#paleontology
1 messages Ā· Page 247 of 1
š¤„
oh I mean idk if even have a full list of the dinosaurs for SE to say
True, there arenāt many in the trailer at least. That sauropod looks good though. And the coelophysid.
Why the edmontosaurs galloping though
Kinda excited to see what the megalodon looks like
There's another Kem Kem composite skull that does have brow bosses, but it's unclear what's real and what isn't.
Wouldn't surprise me if there's a Baryonychine in Kem Kem.```
Just as an FYI
Thinking this is probably guizhouichthyosaurus?
The color took me off guard ngl
Got to see Zuul at the royal Ontario museum today, thought Iād share here since itās pretty cool
Bro look at his face lmao
Oh god why they did that
Tarascosaurus too
tbh it's a bit stupid to say " We don't have any confirmed spinosaurines with brow crests ", when it is sorta of believed that those bones were likely mostly cartilaginous in nature. Which is why we rarely find them in Theropods, despite most theropods already showing lacrimals and postorbitals that would support the presence of such structures. Which Spinosaurs, despite being as derived as they are, don't seem to be exactly too different to not be a possibility ( Not saying this directly to Falcon, just to be clear. )
Or a tyrannosaurus with āāscientifically accurateāā calls (itās just super slowed and reverbed chicken noises)
i wonder why megaraptorans are more used for horror then dromeosaurids
claws.
It's kinda the closest analogue to slashers who use hand-weapons, for example... Despite almost every Theropod having that
i guess that makes sense
is it possible to make animal horror content without demonizing the animal?
More than likely there is definitely ways
I think there was a series called Weird Birds or something I can't remember but alot of the beings done some were puppets too like hand made
Absolutely, it takes some nuance and care but you are able to make a horror story involving big animals without needing to turn them into bloodthirsty, mindless, human-mimicking evil monsters
Funnily some Jurassic Park Analog Horrors Actually don't demonize them^^
Also for Context On Weird Birds this is what it is
I think the puppet even actually has a name
The only thing I think fits the description of bloodthirsty is modern hippos lmao, like they literally will just split a croc in 2 or other herbs for no reason
Ngl I feel like chimps also somewhere fall into that category lmao Sometimes chimps genuinely choose violence for no reason
Hippos definitely
You breathe around a Hippo wrong or look at it wrong it's decided your time is up š
Chimps are just people without filters and or morals, or any impulse control
Exactly, They are
I don't even know because what you said is like spot on
@hallow spear Where the f#ck did Justice even get this long ass femur and tarsal from?
Itās all figured and measured
Where?
One of the papers I sent him, Iāll find it tomorrow
Most likely Galton 1985 if I had to guess though
Is it the one redescribing jurassic taxa from the UK, alongside photos from the collections in that time?
Its prolly in here
Very happy with how it came out justice did an amazing job with it
@queen oar in case you didnāt see it I linked the pdf
You sure that it cites the holotype? Searching in the file, I can't exactly find mention of it, unless the specimen is under a different name there.
It is under a different specimen catalogue I did check and the figures are in there
Yeah, they are. Well, whatever then.
Do you have any other questions?
why are its plates so SPIKEY
Itās based on an isolated plate found close to Loricatos type locality
Not really, surprised that they have put it Lexovisaurus as big similar to how I've reconstructed it, kinda suggesting the material does support the size. Otherwise, I have I don't like posture, but it's a personnal nitpick that generally wouldn't expect many to be convinced of
@hallow spear Also, yeah, what about the plates, exactly? I thought Marsh kinda said that those were likely fin bones from Leedsichthys, unless it's referring to different bones and specimens entirely.
The posture is likely the best posed stegosaur of a skeletal that currently exists, itās based directly on my input
Of course. I have forgotten you are the " Stegosaur Guy ⢠"
As for the plate itās based on Cf. Loricatosaurus priscus [CAMSM J.46874] an isolated plate of unknown placement, and uncertain affinity to Loricatosaurus but since it was found close by, and was iirc reffered to it at one point, itās likely fine for it to be used as a reference, itās not like thatās much better to use. I would say this is the most parsimonious option
closer to stego or dace?
Stegosaurus
Phylogeny of Stegosauria (Based on SƔnchez-Fenollosa et al,. 2025 for taxa included in their Dataset) (Not all unnamed taxa are included)
Kentrosaurus placement is the middle ground for what itās most consistently recovered near or around
Bold move, never would expect speculation from you folks... However, it's a bit unwise, no?
But then again, I did make a composite T. mcraeensis from multiple specimens, so not like I am any better either.
I mean worst case scenario itās not the most parsimonious option, ultimately it isnāt a bad option however since the plate is diagnostic to stegosaurinae
And it is still tenatively reffered to loricatosaurus so itās still reasonable and in this case, best reference for the plates
Tbh, that is kinda playing with fate a bit too risky. Not that I do not admire it, really, that's the fun in Paleo. But, otherwise, given how there is nothing that really gives substance to it belong to Loricatosaurus, it's ultimately unwise to use it. Doesn't mean you can't, just that you would have to be aware of what using it would mean.
Yep we were aware of that, but ultimately we thought it was the best option as the partial plates that Loricato does have best fit a structure of similar build to said isolated plate
Would doubt that, but hey, you do you, stego boy.
I mean the 3D scans I have of the plates agree with that interpretation, it is still speculative but not impossible or too unlikely, which is the point of using it.
Plus itās agreed with in literature well enough for it to be used with some backing even if itās tentative
I mean, but that doesn't make any sense what you said. Like, if it's speculative, you are admitting both to the case that it might be possible or impossible. Like, see, I'm not really trying to argue accuracy or veracity here, just so if it's really a good idea, given how this may stick to the image of the animal and we don't know how this may age in future.
But then again, you did say that Stegosaur remains are hard to find well-preserved, so that may take some hmmmm... 500 years or so. So you may not have to worry.
See, Stego is smart, he is playing the gamble where he will not even see the result of it!!!
Though Iād like to add, even if itās not Loricato thereās only really one other named stegosaur it could be, and thatās Lexovisaurus, and even if itās neither of those 2 it would phylogenetically place inside of Stegosaurinae which makes it reasonably useful to depict Loricato/lexovi from, about as equally as the rest. It canāt be from Dacentrurus since the plate differs enough morphologically to be distinct in literature
Unless a second evil Dacentrurus species rises from the horizon
Probably not unlikely for that to happen but as far as Oxford clay formation goes Iām pretty sure material indicates only one Dacentrurus species throughout it that Iām aware of
I think Stegosaurus however needs to be split into multiple species
but still, even with that second option, it still wouldn't be a good idea. Even if there's alleged support or support we can assert in some way.
I mean itās good enough, not perfect but good enough
@hallow spear You both are gonna have to forgive me, cause I'll draw Loricatosaurus as a Dacentrurinae as I originally intended.
Tsk tsk
Also, i'm dropping that tail downwards.
The tail should be held high as per the Stegosaurus osteology and Kentrosaurus rom study but hey you do you
Yuppers.
Me when I ignore all literature on Stegosaurs for my own Aesthetic basis or something
See? They get it. lmao
Also, I think that for most dinosaurs no one is going to do that, unfortunately.
Literally, the only exception I can think of, is Psittacosaurus, and that's it.
Justice is also the creator of the skeletal(s) lol
And yes you are correct I highly doubt anyone will re asses stegosaurus
Iāll do it!
I wonāt that sounds horrible.
The main issue is that Stenops holotype is entirely inaccessible and still unprepared
Could stegosaurus in general like
Move their plates a lil bit?
Like
Clap for a bit em to make sounds
No clap
Just kinda move em that they could touch eachother to make some lil sounds
Do those plates clap šļøšļø
Idk the word for that
They like
Touch and make plate sounds
Like when The Psittaco mod it has a Dance where it shakes its tail
A similar sound to that?
Clacking I think is the word you're looking for
It absolutely could not swallow a human sized creature whole
Perhaps not in moving the plates themselves but rocking back and forth making the plates hit each other and clack
is that thing even there anymore?
Surprisingly it hasnāt disintegrated yet
and then tomorrow: a boulder falls on top of it
@kind bane did you ever get back onto this?
https://x.com/JusticeDuncan4/status/1281353778743123971?s=20
Chances are lowā¦.but never zero.
Not enough for them to make sounds
Yeeaah that
actually, they play the instrumental of " Camel by Camel ".
Never did
At least, you didn't had to carry the Dilophosaurus' curse.
Zikou
The real monsters were people all along(like what happened to ice age megafauna)
We are still monsters today
Being a Carnosaur and Sauropod enjoyer, is realizing that after you explore every potential of soft tissues on their faces...
You'll never appreciate a conservative reconstruction of them again.
You and me are not so different afterall
Or Dromaeosaurs, which look quite similar to large birds of preys with big cat like hunting strategies, which were human's ancestor main predators
I have yet to see a single actual piece of media with one with it, the dromaeosaurids are still top picks. All I saw is stuffs that are more amateurish works, like not in quality, but about involvement in big studios media
styra is to small in the game
No thatās just how big sty is
I want to see all the ingame dinosaur models compared to a human in-engine
No it isnt. Everything else is just too big
other dinos are too big like wich?
pretty much everything that hasn't gotten a recent tlc
even some of the playables that got a tlc remained oversized, like Achillobator, Sarcosuchus, Concavenator, ect
Could cotylorhynchus survive today?
No, I would ensure it does not survive
what he means
Sauropods for example have been found to have multiple types of scales (Such as in Diplodocus and I think in some titanosaur embryos)
But most of the time they are either given elephant like skin or only one type of scale in media
titan beats t rex
Whomst
Low tier trolling
titan bite is enough for rex
100 assasin bugs beats rex
Bugs Bite, bugs poop in wounds rex dies of infection 2 months later W
whats the most up to date spinosaurus aegyptiacus
Giga glazers are the worst since they make giga hunt things for which they do not eat or are specialized to
elaborate
Its ragebait ai lol
ik, but I wanna see their reasoning lol
titanoboa can squeeze a whole eiffel tower!!
giganotosaurus can solo paraceratherium
well yeah, thats kinda what they're built to do
Small king
Exactly, then some giga glazer will say they can solo ankylosaurus, triceratops, palaeoloxodon namadicus, and even the Cotylorhynchus.
Nothing solos the Cotylorhynchus
Paleoxodon is an issue on itself regarding its size
Elephants aren't the best vs Carnis close their size anyways
Tusks
Anky is a Weird Dude
Giga is Larger by like 3t but then again
Anky is so short Giga is not having an easy time
Then again both would prob be like
"Idk what that is so ima just ignore it"
Only Alierasaurus
Tusks can be useful as long as you know how to usr it effectively
Best they have is prob Paleoxo vs Paleoxo
But Elephants aren't that Great Comparatively vs Theropods of Similar Size
Hell its Main Instict is very likely run away as soon as it sees Giga
Damage Sub vs Armor Sub Moschops
What was that again
Is it true Pycno was bigger than Carno? The largest abelisaurid? Also... It's true Majungasaurus is also of the same family?
Super Cotylorhynchus
Yes, not really, and yes. Pycno isn't really the largest abelisaurid it's just the largest that is officially named and described
there's several specimens from south america and africa that would be larger than pycno but are unnamed due to being single bones, teeth or footprints
Bigger Cotylo
And then there's the massive Majungasaurine skull
Majunga mogs all
Ah
I wish the permian extinct never happened but genuinely.
bunch of doggo potential pets 
Suminia was basically a permian monkey, so theres a solid chance if the extinction never happened people would have evolved from Suminia or a relative of it. Basically "earless" or scaly people
I think the armor plates and body width would really help it not get shredded
tusks arent really doing much against a 10+ ton theropod
I think they could be effective
But I think elephants are at a disadvantage vs giant theropods
Yeah tusks are effective, even on small things like the diictodon or rock hyrax
Not to mention in terms of stamina and agility too
Effective at being really cute
Even if the elephant is heavier it's going to be outlasted and outjuked badly, especially if we are talking about a T.Rex that hunted prey that requires this approach
Yeah totally. They are simply not adapted to handle this type of predator, and I think they'd be pretty vulnerable to the theropods' bites
Who?
I love elephants but that doesn't mean that I'm going to glaze a large one as a rex killer because it's stupid quite frankly
I imagine palaeoloxodon would just stab large theropods to death with its tusks via rearing up
"Titanovenator"
That's not a majungsaurine skull since its based on Abelisaurus itself
Possible but many of them could likely avoid it
If only Palaeoloxodon had more than a 1 ton advantage over Tyrannosaurus it might be fair
I'm not saying the elephant would never win but it seems silly to put them up against a predator of that caliber that's experienced at taking down large prey
Yeah its not exactly a fair setup. You'd need at least an elephant with robust tusks, and at least a 50 - 60% weight advantage over the theropod to hold its own
Yeah, for sure
Unfortunately, there is no elephant large enough for that
Madrehorn /jk
The closest we got is Zygolophodon as the largest Proboscidean, but it's massive, long tusks would be terrible into Tyrannosaurus
Seems non sauropods have a hard size limit on land
Yeah outside of sauropods, the largest is currently
- Shant
2/3/4. Zygolophodon/Paraceratherium/Dzungariotherium in some order (too close in size with too little information) - Edmont
slander campaign against palaeoloxodon was so effective it went from largest land animal that's not a sauropod to barely larger than rex
I mean the evidence is literally a single bone, it could be both
The consequences of your entire identity as the "largest mammalian herbivore" being based on a single unmeasured bone fragment when the rest of your genus is notably smaller (the bone was lost)
maraapuniloxodon
We should all know by now that stuff like this is almost always initially hyped up out of proportion
get edmont outta here bro isnt even top 3 hadrosaurs š„
Oh? Who's the #2 largest hadrosaur then? Even by keystone specimen
Was the bone even described or measured?
Big paul?
It was measured, but there was no such thing as standardized measurements when it was measured so the inches used weren't actually inches, rendering the measurement useless
Sauropod moment
Does it?
wait I forgot X-Rex exists lmao
but if you count indeterminate fragments then the ojo alamo kritosaur is larger
Is X Rex indeterminate?
Maybe.
afaik edmont tails arent diagnostic but its still considered annectens anyway
I henceforth dub this: Larramendiitis
Because giant Palaeoloxodon, Bruhathkayosaurus, and giant Marapuunisaurus are all lost fossils with mass estimates yielded by Larramendi that would be pushing the limit of their respective group
I'd say it's in that category of Maastrichtian Saurolophinis
dreadnoughtus my beloved
Maraapuni wasn't his fault he actually was notably more conservative about it than everyone else
Can't wait for them to find the still living sauropods in the congo river. Mokele Mbembe
hell creek saurolophin ā¤ļøāš©¹ š¹ š
except for the guys who wrote a paper that was 'maybe cope just made a typo'
Lance formation too apparently.
same thing
Me and Doog were looking at a " Trachodon " mandible Marsh allegedly described from there, and it's pretty long.
could you send it here?
Sure, let me kick the pc
Possible
no like
it is E. annectens
YPM 616 is Edmontosaurus annectens
its Ananotitan
Which is Edmontosaurus annectens
your welcome
what
It's a ragebaitasaurus
wait Agnes sent this to me earlier and I somehow didn't notice it was labeled YPM 616 lmao
its labelled as YPM 616 twice and the tag says Anatotitan lmao
I'm blind ok I can't even read chat I just assume what people are saying and am correct
What is Zygolophodon
Mammut/Zygolophodon (genus unclear) borsoni is currently sitting as the proboscidean with the larger properly described material
is the 13t sub adult the largest verifiable P. namadicus?
Fortunately for annectens ypm 616 is a nomen dubium which is probably for the best given it has priority over annectens anyways
Camarasaurus is very legy
Basically, though I believe its a bit over 14?
larramendi has it at 12.5t, idk if thats accurate or not
No clue
is it small or is everything else just really big
i think everything else is just really big idk
I remember how pre tlc spino was Kaiju sized
funfact, alberta and eo are the same size irl
nah.
I mean idk about @balmy oyster's skeletal ( I just assume it's his ), but definetly not? Unless Alberta got bigger and I'm not aware of it.
well, i put the big nose emoji because its suppose to be pinnichio , The nose growth was intended as punishment for his dishonesty because his father didnt want him to lie because he wamnted to raise a honest son and thats why i put that emoji because its nose is long because i lied š
happens.
if eo was renamed to trike, how accurate would it be to trike?
There is some Triceratops specimens that some alleged to " Look like Eotriceratops ", but how much weight that holds, it's pretty subjective. Specially if it's basing on reconstructions that had no thought in mind about how well-preserved the material is.
be honest, which one does PoT eo ( base species ) look like more
ingame eo is probably already closer to Triceratops than actual Eotriceratops so like
More Triceratops. It's also not based on any reconstructions of Eo's skull. Due to how crushed the material is, and how there lacks good photos/figures of the material, Eo's old skulls kinda ultimately gave Eo too much of a longer squamosal, assuming that the material preserved was reflective of how it looked in life.
You could also say, that maybe Alderon asked some of their artists " Hey, make Eo look more like Trike " and that's why it looks the way it does. But ultimately, it is more Trike-like in game
funfact, trike was chosen over eo in a poll but eo was chosen anyways
It looks more like Triceratops to be fair.
kinda expected it, tbh.
-# almost like Eotriceratops sucks and you can't reconstruct an animal's entire postcranial skeleton based on like 12 bones meaning they had to fill the gaps with a close relative
isnt that what happened with hatz and metri?
tbh, the issue is less with the postcranial, and more so with the skull in general.
ig
the skull doesnt look too bad imo
its kinda just the horns and shape of the frill
why does metri and hatz look so distinct while eo looks like trike on a budget?
It's a bit weird to limit Eotrike to only species that are clearly referencing Triceratops specimens, when Eotrike kinda of gets the title around of being the " Triceratopsini ancestor ", so like idk... Maybe put a species referencing Torosaurus or Ojoceratops.
wym
what i mean is what i mean and what i meant is what i meant
ok but like what did you mean
It really isn't. Even the snout if we assume it's one of the thing loyal to Eotrike reconstructions, that area itself from the animal, may have not been preserved decently. Eotrike as a matter of fact, among Ceratopsid reconstructions, tends to have the longest snout, likely cause the process was distorted during preservation in some way or another.
hatz and metri are able to visually look distinct besides barely having any material, if im correct, even less then Eo iirc
Eo just looks like trike, its not visually distinct in anyway from it
Cause it is a trike on a budget.
thats because of a really cool thing called creative liberty where an artist does whatever the hell they want because they never claimed to be 100% accurate
did it run out for eo
Me when I remove any potential of a animal to have it's own identity, and rely on traits from the identity of a more famous animal. Somehow that is " Creative Liberty "
I mean, reconstructions are like that. But also like, on many aspects this is just Triceratops.
Itās just triceratops š
" Eotriceratops xerinsularis? More like... Triceratops xerinsularis "
eo is fine it just needs a deeper jaw and longer frill
I mean, if Alderon intends to keep it closer to old Eo reconstructions, sure. I mean, it's better than just " Definetly-Not-Triceratops "
Eo's skull literally has not changed. The only difference between old and new reconstructions is the size of the skull proportionate to the rest of the body
See, I'm not gonna mention my reconstruction, because then it sounds more like a ego thing, which I do not want it. But trust me when I say this, Eo's skull material, definetly preserves a lot of the skull, but how it's preserved, it's definetly not good, and reconstructions who do not even remotely doubt how well the material is, will not age well. So at the end, I would've definetly preferred if Alderon did a skull reconstruction of their own.
PoT are pro-lumpers
Legit, not even joking. If they did one themselves, it would've been extra points for creativity.
._.
Ok so itās cymbospondylus and dongusuchus. Also just realized that the eyes arenāt actually that big, thereās just yellow rings around them. Still creepy though.
are we really nitpicking pot's eo guys?
that's not nitpicking
It just needs a new skull rec.
Dinosaurs
Today I saw a Nile croc scratching like a dog... Since when do they do that?!
Would a Deinosuchus ever be able to do that?
they try, I think?
I mean
If they are itchy
Also idk if deinosuchus could do that
I imagine dinosaurs/pseudosuchians would use trees or other abrasive things to scratch if they don't have the arms to do it
Yeah thats possible
Birds use their feet a lot to scratch, I've seen bearded dragons do it too. Seems a relatively common behavior for sauropsids in general
Cute, seeing a triceratops or sauropod using a tree to scratch would also be cute
100% real image of camarasaurus taking mudbath
New lancian apato
it made it to the late cretascous???
they are alive?
Yes, lancianās been pumping out a lot of skeletals recently
he's very good
very horizontal.
Where does he post them?
Very, I dislike that itās very much that horizontal personally
Yeah, I tend to prefer to lift the neck a little, I guess.
Oh laaaancian! Stego's disrespecting your work in PoTcord! š¢
he's not even here.
Absolutely!
I told him already, lancian isnāt gonna kill me I donāt think
But like my opinion on whether I agree or not is irrelevant itās up to him
I figured as much lol
Did you know I have a reconstruction of Cetiosauriscus as a Diplodocoidea?
The real sauropod experts have concluded the sauropods didnāt hold their necks up, follow the science!
Erm acktually I asked brick and he thinks a more vertical stance is more agreeable and he is a sauropod expert š¤š¤
Factual
The Real OG was Paleoking ( idk )
I thought brick was the one in discussion agreeing with Lance who am I thinking of
Tommeh, and technically he just said itās variable and there isnāt much to say whatās āmore likelyā
Why did Stego react like that?
Weāll have to kill Lancian and tommeh then!
Paleoking is nima!!!
I see.
I will alert him immediately.
True⦠can we also kill @tough parcel
Some of these requests have been.... arranged already.
@hallow spear you gonna have to kill me first.
ATP itād be a mercy, Iām so tired dude, do NOT wait until the last day to do your final project! Bad idea! 
It looks like it has a tumour on the neck š
True.
Evidence of⦠skill issue?
Did yall decide if spino had lips? I wanna know.
Ask Dilo, not any of us. They are the real expert on that topic ( allegedly, idk really )
Im just curious because I found it interesting. I'm not no paleontologyst
Well, just clutch it, dude.
Trust me the final answer on if spinosaurs had lips is not coming from the path of titans discord
In more secluded servers, he doesnāt share his skeletals around very often
I didn't say I need the legitimate answer I just wanna know what they came up with.
Not to mention there was a lot of factual statements thrown out from them so odds are one of the people here could find a decent answer. Here your more than likely to meet a smart dino enthusiast than you are scrolling Facebook š¤·āāļø
Facebook will show you a ai generated image of a sailed jp tyrannosaurus then claim it was 20 tons
The best answer is that thereās no way to strongly prove absence or presence right now
Still wanna know if they came to agreement or what they stand on
If you mean Dilo, they said something to the same affect, with the additive of lips being a plesiomorphic condition for amniotes in the absence of evidence for the secondary lack of them
Was it cause someone was harassing them?
Not sure
interesting
I am a irl sauropod and can confirm they hold their necks up
Did dinosaurs have a wishbone? Are birds Dinosaurs? Good questions.
Thanks for watching!!!
Please consider subscribing.
ā¬ļøā¬ļøā¬ļøā¬ļøā¬ļøā¬ļøā¬ļøā¬ļø
https://dinosaurpark.org/
If you like dinosaurs, paleontology, T-rex, or fossils in general, check out our other videos!!! Because the Ogden Dinosaur Park is a park full of d...
Anyone know ab a server with only Dinosaurs from a specific period of time like Triassic, Jurassic, or Cretaceous?
Ik the base dinosaurs are from different periods, but is there a server that dosnt allow u to play a (for example) a Triassic Dino in a creataceous server
yuppers.
Can I dm you a server invite?
Could springtrap survive in the late cretaceous period?
The entire Late Cretaceous or one specific point of the Late Cretaceous?
Hmmm hell creek
In my opinion
Even tho spino would be more in water
I think it would have lips
It makes is more natural looking..for me at least
thoughts on the new colossal news?
Money laundering
Hey Fishy
why's that?
what exactly is the goal behind reviving these prehestoric animals, i never got that
Idk,money laundering
Money Laundering disguised as " Doing something useful " ( It isn't. )
Hello folks!
I wanna make a suggestion about Geostenbergia hand orientation, can anyone check if my silly illustration is correct?
Thanks.
@little mauve your field, I guess.
Bluebuck is not prehistoric, it got extinct in ~200 years ago
Sure! Sorry I went to sleep
yes though earlier pterosaurs like rhamphornychus had the latter hand position
Yes, it's correct
Thank you!!
You have my gratitude!!
iirc Pteranodonts onwards had the back angled hands like ye drew
ye
If a pteranodon attacks you can you just grasp its Beak shut
Theyre not exactly the heaviest
i'd be scared of that thing
Weird choice but sure go for it
They founded a de-extinction company, Iām fine with them de-extincting things (if they actually do it instead of being like āwow we injected a gazelle with blue buck hoof genes this is the same as reviving a speciesā)
Look at how thick it's arm bones are
Imagine if it got fussy and wacked you with it's wing like some birds do
@zealous ravine Hey Dilo, the other day you mentioned evidence of small sauropods making herd with juveniles of larger sauropods, could you show that real quick?
I didn't?
.
Oh I meant smaller sauropods make herds and juvenile sauropods make herds, not necessarily together
Idk if it's been published yet but Mother's Day Quarry is a big one. Edit: found it, just waiting for cooldown
I'll ignore the voices.
Oh wait, ok so maybe this is actually true and I was right on accident lmao, cause this paper mentions how some material in the MDQ appears to be true juvenile diplodocids while other material seems to potenitally be mature individuals of some dwarf species. Tho excersize caution cause it hasn't been the subject of a full dedicated study yet. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6181913/#Sec23
Wdym ādiloā they arenāt a dilo š¤
@zealous ravine do you potentially identify yourself as a Sinosaurus?
Bajo de la Carpa was mentioned and i didn't realize, i'm so sad
Also about this. I don't think that's a rule, because in Patagonia we also have Portezuelo from the coniacian and Cerro Fortaleza from (probably) early maastrichtian where the local predators were around the same sizes as the ones in Bajo de la Carpa but some sauropods like Futalognkosaurus, Dreadnoughtus and Puertasaurus still reached quite high levels gigantism
IMO the simplest answer is that there's a size cap (relative to the local predators) sauropods have to reach in order to use it as a deterrent and from there they're free to reach higher sizes depending on other environmental factors such as food availability
Random hypothesis I had: Would Maniraptoran Dinosaurs taste like Gamefowl? (Ik itās probably a bit off topic but my brain wonāt abandon it)
Taste depends on the diet and activity levels of the animal. Herbivorous/omnivorous maniraptorans would be closest but quite tough and gamey as wild animals, carnivores would have a meat closer to modern day raptors, i.e. generally not good to eat
Good to know :3
But theyāre not. And based on past actions & how the government reacted, I donāt think these guys are here for good reasons.
De-extinction itself is a pretty ethically fraught idea. A private startup with who knows who funding it, plus the nods from the Trump regime and others. It's a bad scene, these guys are shady
The issue isnāt blue antelopes or big wolves. Itās whatever the government & other powerful groups & people are wanting to utilize this genetic modification for.
It's not about it hurting ecosystems necessarily, even then ecosystems can and do change as rapidly as within years, decades, or centuries
The primary issue is that it's fluff. Startups generate hype to generate investment to drive up the potential value of their stock. Achieving on stated goals or promises is secondary. Thats the phase Colossal is in right now, and theres good reason to be skeptical of their achievements and goals
Secondly the logistics of what they propose beggar belief. Are they really going to clone a sustainable, genetically diverse breeding population of thousands of individuals? And secure habitat for them?
I doubt it personally
The endgame goal is for their stock to be worth a bajillion dollars when they go public based on some photos of white mutant wolves
I doubt thatās the āendgameā tbh, more so just a bug benefit.
Legal fiduciary duty will necessarily obligate them to that end, no matter what their intentions are
If they ever got big enough, certainly they would become just as shady as those sectors. But their science isn't really impressive, it's not scalable, it serves no real function. This is pure hype
Not to mention, the initiatives from Colossal has damaged ecosystems, by the clear evidence of how willing the current administration in america has been on shutting down every wildlife protection/preservation institution and laws altogether.
I wouldn't be surprised if there was a connection there, certainly. This administration is dumb enough to believe the hype and they want any excuse to cut those regulations
I think they are just trying to speedrun life extending tech
I think I saw the other day the news, right? That they want to kill Cormorants, yeah? Cause in their logic, some stupid birds are somehow responsible for the decline of fish in their waters... Not the... Oh, you know? The companies overfishing?
Did they genuinely say this? How stupid do they think people are?
It was on the news and twitter, last month. They were pretty much trying to find anything that would essentially allow the practice of hunting and killing these birds on sight.
Sea lions too, a rep in Washington is proposing it
The fear of death is a big part, they think if they allow genetic testing and other stuff related to dna, they think they will be able to artificially extend their lives since genes slowly decaying overtime is a hugepart of aging. Since Telemeres(which contain dna) slowly break over time as cells are replaced
*for the wealthy
Just like the Dark Crystal movie fr
Tbh, the worst thing about Colossal is how, even if you argue that they have genuine intentions, it's only performative in nature. What the f#ck does a species extinct for decades or centuries even contribute to modern ecosystems who have established members on the brink of extinction? And mind you, it's totally possible to acquire more samples with those, because it's live specimens, instead of dead or decomposing specimens in a collection or in the wild.
There's that and also what actually are these animals they're creating? How do we define them? At best they're something new and not a recreation of anything. You can't de-extinct just like you can't raise something from the dead, it doesn't work. Mammals are taught their behaviors by their parents and sometimes extended families, who is fulfilling that role in a new creation with no prior generations? I can think of nothing sadder than a "resurrected" mammoth doomed to be an orphan forever, no matter how many more mammoths they clone
Mutts, basically just half baked hybrids or modern animals wearing prehistoric skin
how would you even transform a ressurcted mammoth to the enviorments it suppose to live in? it has 0 to none prior knowledge of it and would only know tropical enviorments for its life
Exactly
You would have a legit easier time building a warp drive to go back in time, and just seeing the prehistoric mammals that way and setting up a prehistoric colony to preserve their genetics then undoing any human environmental damage.
Jurassic Park is literally about the fact that it's sheer arrogance to resurrect an extinct species, assuming things about its ecology, and only unscrupulous carnival barker billionaires would ever even attempt it
Pretty much. It's kinda funny since this is something that they also don't discuss on any matter whatsoever? They don't talk about behaviour or plans to reintroduce or introduce these animals into any ecosystem, giving impression that ultimately... The goal with these is just pure personnal or public entertainment.
It's the stock $ I'm telling ya, but yes basically the same thing. Hype for the stock. There's no substance
Its not even jurassic park, its cenozoic sh3rt
i heard they wanna bring back quagga's, literally what is bringing back quagga's gonna do??? their literally just less flashy zebra's
https://pleistocenepark.org/ pleistocene park is an actual non profit scientific endeavor concerned with ecology and climate change and has never gotten the hype colossal has
I think it's funny, because it's even said that like, other Zebras already established in Africa, likely already replaced Quaggas? Ecologically
I don't think they understand that most species went extinct because of people, not because it was some magical preordained event, resurrecting doesn't just magically undo the problem
Since, we are in the topic of stupid ideas, do you wanna hear MY stupid idea?
Sure go for it
Deal, what if we just turned people into extinct species(preferrably mesozoic reptiles) using some nano machines and made humans go extinct while not killing them at the same time.
So, I was discussing to my friends, how: if I did a Jurassic Park, I would use the technology to help species on the brink of extinction. The only exception being animals such as whales, who cannot be housed in a Zoo/Park in any practical way, and probably would've accounted for multiple offenses of Animal abuse. And one of those ideas it's how, since most Cheetahs are inbred in some form of another, the idea was to experiment with the concept of taking older species from the Acinonyx genus, and try to breed them with modern Cheetahs to see, if introducing more basal traits would help them with their genetic diversity
I think it wouldn't work.
It completely removes human suffering without causing further damage and permanently stopping environmental damage
U see
Dead prehistoric animal,sad ppl
No money:(
"Bring back" animal,happy ppl
Money:D
I wish i could see em
It might work but again you'd still be creating a new artificial species at that point. There's still some merit to it, certainly relative to what colossals stated goals are, but it has some of the same pitfalls
What if they did what [REDACTED] did with the chickens..but
Better
Well so far from what weāve seen theyāve been doing a worse job, which is kinda funny
Das true
Also the moa bird they announce will be just a big emu at the end of th day
Ig when it became clear horner was going to be booted out from the science field sometime soon they went for option B which is Colossal
Yeah bcuz ofc they did
I think all ratites are more close related (and yeah that includes kiwi)
I mean they recently accidently crossbred two different breeds of dogfish that shouldn't have been genetically close enough to produce offspring and made a crossbred dogfish. Scientists are starting to think that crossbreeding isn't ass difficult to do as once thought.
you canot play god
True.
"Chicken aint nothing but a bird"
I can!
See
If i can change the world to the molecular point
I can do anything i want!
(This comment is a satire)
No Im Biologist and Paleontologist
Paleontology people⦠I canāt find refs for sauropod feet. Which one is these are backwards??
The claws face away from the center of the body, and the innermost one is the biggest
Thank you so much, seems my claws are more backwards rather than the foot itself. I think Iāve made a proper fix!
Its like
Tortoise feet
That had tooth back facin claws
I mean some of em have those
Sauropod feet freak me out! Iāve got horrible aphantasia so when looking for references of such unusual features, it can be rather difficult to āmanipulateā those forms in my mind, if that makes sense. Iām grateful for this chat where those who know more than me are able to help š
Also there this refence here i found
Goodness. We have aliens on earth! Thank you!
Yeah i know how u feel
I mean
I mostly draw therapods so their feet are kinda "easy" to draw lmao
Yes theyāre extremely easy, especially when taking birds into account you have always got a reference no matter what. Sauropods on the other hand⦠less easy to find references because theyāre so bizarre and unique. That goes for a lot of non-theropod dinosaurs, though.
Indeed!
Thats why tortoise can be ur best reference for those
Cuz they look fairly similar to sauropod feet in my opinion at least heheh
Certainly! Iāll be sure to reference them more closely next time around
Did those trackways from last year change the exposure of the claws or nah?
At least one species had the claws mostly buried in flesh, yeah
And this was a Titanosaur of some kind?
I don't remember when are the footprints from
Nemegtosaurus apparently
Or opisthocoelicaudia. Some kind of nemegt Titanosaur.
Oh more reasons for saltasaurids to be horrible. Cool
Isnāt Alamosaurus a saltasaurid?
Alamo is a wastebasket made of probably two or more taxa which may not even be close relatives. But yes at least one of them is a saltasaurid
Oh interesting. Are the skeletal proportions similar between them or no?
We only have a forelimb and tail from the saltasaurid, and only a neck described from the lognkosaur form, so who knows
My suspicion is the lognkosaur has a shorter tail and a longer, wider neck
not really. It's just that identifying what is Alamosaurus and what isn't, is extremely difficult, or haven't been put into much consideration in literature.
Additionally, the fact that literature stucked up the idea of " Alamosaurus being the only Titanosaur in Late Cretaceous North America ", also contributed to why many authors were reckless or confident that any material belong to it.
What is the general saltasaur build compared to the lognkosaur build? Oh, and most titanosaurs are lognkosaurs, right?
lognkosauria is just Patagotitan, Futalognkosaurus, Argentinosaurus and friends, saltasaurids are mostly small taxa with very robust limbs. Some have short necks and are grazers/low browsers but most lack neck material
How diferent are both velociraptor species?(mongoliensis and osmolskae)
So like, isisaurus is a saltasaur?
In some phylogenies yes, or close to them
V. osmolskae was described on the basis of some paired maxillae and a left lacrimal. Not a whole lot to go on. It's very similar to V. mongoliensis from what little we can tell
Oh i see
Short movie of Cretaceous Kraken āNanaimoteuthis haggartiā
#paleoart#nanaimoteuthis #3dart #ammonite #noai
Surviving earth wrap party poster showing what we have seen in the trailer, and stuff we have yet to see. Seems like the nanuqās chasing the edmontosaurs are either juveniles, or the poster just shrinks their size.
thoughts on this Criticism for paleo docs? https://x.com/YutyTyrant/status/2050588633770442933
The Baby Eater 3000 bit or the anti genus name bit?
Genus?
Canis
Canis
Goblinus
Canis lupus unfamiliaris
I'm ngl the agenda-following part of me doesn't want Alamosaurus to be resolved because North America having no sauropods past the cenomanian is just very funny
If someone was a real dinosaur-head, theyād know Morgan Freeman had trouble pronouncing the names which was likely the reason they omitted the names
both.
Weren't in the other doc multiple bloopers with Morgan having fun of how weird and almost unpronuntiable some of the names were (to him)? LOL
Yeah
Tbh Morgan Freeman or not they started this trend of "Ah, yes, a herd of unnamed Hadrosaurids you don't care because they didn't appear in any major Paleomedia" started back in PhP, so I kinda agree with that tweet.
Also I don't care of Azdarchids eating babies being repetitive, we had Rex in every documentary ever since forever, so idk why people should get annoyed by any other recurring trope.
Rex appearing isn't a trope
it's a charismatic animal that everyone knows
Azhdarchids being reduced to one thing is an overused trope
I guess the argument of ''ecologically its all they could do'' but like ehh its a bit weird esp since PhP 2 gave em much more to do(for better and worse)
Rex (or anything) appearing in all relevant media because of popularity is a trope though.
How?
I don't think T. rex is a significant or recurrent theme; a motif 
A heavily reused trope is "T. rex is a (good) parent actually"
At risk of going off-topic, a trope is any kind of depiction, idea, or whatever that can occur in media. It is a much more broad thing than just "x doing x".
Fanservice (for lack of a better word rn), like Rex appearing in nearly all paleomedia, is a trope.
Ok then has anyone called Captain America a trope? Optimus Prime?
No, they call the actions of what they do a trope
hence the inclusion of Tyrannosaurus is not one, but what they do with it is such as being a tender caring parent
... Characters in and of themselves are not tropes, nor did I ever suggest that.
But this is decidedly off topic, so I am dropping it.
The T. rex is a charcter, your argument failed already
reading comprehension is dead.
Then tell me why it isn't, curious that you gave up after agreeing with me 
people always become defeatists as soon as the arguement dosent go their way, stand on buisness
The point of all this is that azhdarchids only did something besides "eat baby" in PrePlanet and even then, "eat baby" was 75% of their screentime
A trope people use way too often is all hadrosaurs being amazing parents
Maiasaura and possibly Edmontosaurus regalis being good parents doesnt mean all hadrosaurs are good parents, especially when there's bonebeds that prove otherwise
explain more?
iirc the Amurosaurus bonebed showed that for that species at least, herds were age segregated, meaning babies kinda just had to fend for themselves and couldn't join the adults
oh alright!
Hypacrosaurus shows more precocial young than Maiasaura as well
kinda funny how for 2 sister clades, one of them actually cared about their kids, and the other just used the sauropod method
There's multiple Hadrosaur bonebeds that showcase age segregated herds but interestingly it's inconsistent
E. annectens has the Hanson Ranch bonebed which is just adults but the RMDQ has adults subadults and adolescents
Shantungosaurus has the Kogou quarry bonebed which is just adults but the Zangjiazhuang quarry bonebed has a mix of adults and much younger individuals a fraction their size
This does make me wonder what the concept art for the nanuqsaurus looked likeā¦
tbh, yeah. I think if documentaries reuse animals already shown before, they have to offer something new and refreshing in return. Tyrannosaurus as of recently, hasn't had anything new explored beyond what we've already done in past documentaries. Same thing for Azhdarchids
But we can't explore new things either, because then it ALSO gets negative feedback in some way, cause it's " Too Speculative ".
And yes, Tyrannosaurus re-appearing constantly in documentaries is a trope. Less on the regards of Tyrannosaurus itself, but more so, as said already, often it's inclusion is " Purposeless ", it's not exactly a " New Character " from the world of paleontology that people aren't aware of already, and it's inclusion often comes without any exact payoff
even in PhP, where Parental Care and Display behaviour were shown, this is not exactly something new, and has been explored as far as Walking With Dinosaurs. And ultimately in Season 2, the only thing explored with it was Hunting Behaviour, which we already have seen with some frequency, if anything... It is something that Tyrannosaurs did since their first apperance in the first paleomedias
This is not to say that more unique dinosaurs haven't been as, equally, disappointing in the introduction and conclusion of their narratives. But this feels more like an effect from these documentaries simply not wanting to be bold and creative, to not pass an impression of " Inaccuracy "
I imagine the shant situation could be an example of different subspecies behaving differently?
Also its cool how Edmontosaurus annectens has evidence of age segregation, but ?E. regalis has evidence of being a good parent. Kinda shows how you can't really use phylogenetic bracketing to determine social behaviours.
do you guys think azdarchids will ever escape the trope of them hunting young and will be bodied by the larger therapod to show it as the bigger threat?
Maybe, though I also suspect herding behavior could have varied depending on the time of year as a consequence of changing dietary options. I've seen it suggested that the age segregation was the result of ontogenetic niche partitioning between adult Hadrosaurs and younger individuals but if said niche segregation was only true for part of the year then herd segregation would have only been beneficial for part of the year as well.
T.rex, my favortie nonfiction character
Considering how viscerally people reacted to the Quetzals actually putting up a fight against 1 rex its doubtful
Esp since WWD 2025 had 2 entire sequences of azdarchids getting wrecked by tyrannosaurs
That's an interesting idea, seasonal segregation. Perhaps in the breeding season sexually mature individuals congregated and thats why we see this variation
who made this skeletal?
SIW made the original the, pose was edited by Tableseating
SIW is SpinoInWonderland
I love mammals
Technically they arenāt mammals
Reptile like mammals
Still arenāt true mammals
Which kentrosaurus is more accuarte? : PoT vs the Isle
All hadrosaurs did parenting of the hatchlings
I think PoT mainly because cheekless
it didnt have cheeks?
Real
Looks caked to me idk what they're on about in here
afaik stegosaurids did not have cheeks
Are you sure?
someone summon stego
Wait, really?
How do we know that? š¤ Is it because there are anatomical studies that support that it indeed wouldn't have cheeks?
well they lacked the jaw closer muscles that attached far forward on the jaw, like we see in guys who were probably cheeked
and by "cheeks" i don't necessarily mean exposed muscles, i just mean skin that extends forward of that
Oh dw i understood that
I didn't know aout the lack of closer muscles. That's pretty interesting
it has the jaw closer muscles, but they attached more typically, sort of like theropods or lizards
And that makes sense due to the simpler chewing.
yeah, we have modern hebivorous lizards with a very similar mouth tissue setup. iguanas, etc. iirc the same also applies to pachycephalosaurs. not sure how it applies to miscellaneous ornithischians like thescelosaurids, hypsilophodonts, etc
I thought pachyās did have further extending mouth tissue?
not as far as i know. they also had a simple chewing mechanism
PoT has much better proportions, TI's is way too thin
Yeah but what about attachment stuff.
typical reptilian jaw muscle attachment. if i can find illustrations from the paper i will
Oh please send 'em if you can! It would be delightful to see it
some i had on hand. i believe it was from a second paper by the same authors? got one more hold up
so it didint have cheeks?
@tough parcel what do you want lil buddy
I said cheek discussion on stegosaurs, get workign!
we're discussing two things
Who's more accurate , PoT kentro or The isle Kentro
and if stegosaurids had cheeks or not
from what i posted it looks like stegosaurids and pachycephalosaurids would both have a much more restricted "cheek" region compared to ceratopsids and hadrosaurs
Lips.
š
Hadrosaur cheeks probably extended further than this though right?
they extended at least that far unless you like to imagine big pink sheets of muscle stretching between their jaws. note that the illustrations might not perfectly portray the extent of the muscle attachment
dempsey doesnt think so, so i guess no
Yeah, and on top of this, I believe there are nodosaur skulls with full cheek coverage.
yeah, they had a cheek osteoderm, which pretty directly indicates they'd have cheeks
Birds have the same musculature but also a rictus of skin that can form a cheek of sorts. Possible that ornithiscians had the same
And theropods, cause birds are literally theropods.
i think that the shape of the jaw margin along the tooth row could give us hints as to whether or not there'd be skin "cheeks" too
Scale covered rictus in all dinosaurs is definitely most likely from what I can tell.
Lips on Ornithischians.
this is basically what i picture for most ornithischians. notice how the skin doesn't web directly up to the horn layer of the beak
the skin/rictus appears to terminate roughly where the extent of the muscle terminates. but in stegosaurus and pachycephalosaurus, there is still a lot of mouth length after that point, whereas there's much less with ceratopsids and hadrosaurs
Snapping turtles have a fairly pronounced fleshy rictus as well, terminating at the base of the beak
yes, though i would probably blame this on the turtles having an extremely extensive beak
i have always hated how jurassic park did it, basically a flesh tube right up to the tip of the snout. really ugly and weird, unnatural
We love the stego vacuum cleaner
Very dinosaur renaissance, mammalian cheeks
i sure don't
Hey Gbones, random fact, I thought your profile picture was Doctor Gregory House
wait it's not?
I thought it was Dr doofenzmirtz....
No lol, it's from a comic called The Eternaut
See, the G stands for " Gregory " so he is " Doctor Gregory Bones "
I love mammal dinosaurs
Funny name animal
Camptosaurus?
Nah https://share.google/QCG2t5KipdvTz6MgO dinosaurent
Dinosaurus is an extinct genus of therapsid of controversial affinities. Its type and only species is Dinosaurus murchisonii. It is only known from a partial snout from the Permian of Russia. Its taxonomic history is intertwined with several other poorly-known Russian therapsids, particularly Rhopalodon, Brithopus, and Phthinosuchus.
Dinosaurus ...
Cumnoria
Bri'ish Camptosaurus, I see
How tall would it be close to Churchill?
Sorta, itās actually got some odd traits that differentiate it from Campto quite significantly
I didn't realize it had this much material
I assume the quadropedal stance shown here is outdated, yeah?
Not necessarily
Oh, I thought since it was previously lumped in with Camptosaurus it would have been an obligate biped
It has some traits that make me think it was primarily quadropedal. (And if Iām being honest I think Camptosaurus was spending a good amount of time on all fours as well)
Oh cool
Itās a really interesting topic when you look into it. Uteodon, another species formerly assigned to Campto, might even be an obligate quadruped
I've not heard of any of this, gonna see if I can find some reading on it. Facultative quadrupedality probably makes sense on paper but I wasn't aware that some smaller, jurassic ornithopods may have had specific traits that imply it.
Maidment et al 2012 is a good starting point
At a cursory glance it's perfect, tysm
They also have follow up studies in 2014 and 2017 if you wanna keep reading
I'll add them to the list
I love the morrison formations sauropod diversity
Also Jonkeria, the fact its the first megaherbivore is pretty impressive, it may not be the biggest but it was the first and still is bigger then alot of modern animals. Horses and tapirs for example
oh yeah, I know. But in shape, it's basically a Camptosaurus
Isnāt it omnivorous
Not really. I think the differences will be more obvious once itās finished but the arms are significantly longer, torso shorter, neck longer, and skull bigger
Stegosaurs weren't capable of chewing, just like a lot of lizards and sauropods so I don't see why they'd be cheeked.
Ankylosaurs can chew.
Animals evolving secondary flightlessness didn't wait for the K-Pg extinction to happen. They didn't have time for that!
Check out our merch and support our videos! https://yourdinosaursarewrong.com/
Dimbo font created by Jayvee D. (CC BY SA 3.0)
Sources:
Alvarenga, H., Bonaparte, J. F. (1992).
A new flightless land bird from the Cretaceous ...
Whatever you say " Dilophosaurus sinensis "
Oneās a bobblehead and the otherās a pinhead
Wouldn't say so. But I haven't tested myself.
Beak should probably only expand to the premaxilla and even the maxilla, as seen in birds and turtles.
well thereās skeletals for the two that show this
Give me a sec
Cool, megaomnivores are cool too.
Anteosaurus mogs it
Whatās the size range for parasaurolophus?
Anteosaurus was basically the first "tyrannosaur" lmao
I mean, yeah, definetly. If it wasn't for the fact that most Dilophosaurus skull reconstructions are composite reconstructions including specimens of different sizes, which should definetly be factors to put into consideration. But, also I don't know anything about " Dilophosaurus " sinensis, so I can't comment much on that guy.
I mean itās one of the most well figured & described dinosaurs, and the two good skulls we have of it are both in good condition so I trust reconstructions around dilophosaurus
unironically both dilo and sinosaurus (both species) have some AMAZING skulls
9.2-10.8 meters and 4.5-7 tonnes
Anteosaurus basically had a trex skull shape and the same crushing bite while not being related to tyrannosaurs at all.
Oh no, I'm not saying that the material is bad. But given the size difference between those two specimens, there's concerns if that is reflecting sexual dimorphism or even ontogeny. Which ultimately, would make it doubtful to use the posterior material of the smaller specimen's skull, to reconstruct the posterior side of the larger specimen's skull.
Dang, didnāt realize there could still be 7 tonners
though I be it seems unlikely for the sexual dimorphism part
big tubicen is big
Wait are we talking about sino? Cus diloās head size difference between its two good specimens is likely just ontogeny, but for sino I donāt trust the sino dimorphism argument unless it can be proven with several other specimens studied
No, I was talking about Dilophosaurus wetherilli
Then yeah, even still itās pretty different to S. sinensis
Should probably revisit Dilophosaurus a 4th time, if necessary. I just wouldn't have the collection photos
Iād argue there are other species that could use a revisit more than dilophosaurus honestly
depends. There's a different theropod material from China, similar Jurassic geologic period as these crested theropods, that looks like Dilophosaurus and Sinosaurus, but isn't neither of them and the figures are... Stinky
But what would you like to suggest?
Dumb question but what would be the most dangerous sea or land creature in the permian if you visited it
Of course he did.
It is also a 1:1 match with sinosaurus so Iām inclined to believe him
@elfin pulsar
All dinosaurs lay eggs because none of their living relatives gave birth and there's been no fossil evidence that any of them gave birth to live young.
Utter fool he is then. Cuz that same figure, is based on this skull:
See what I mean that the figures are " Stinky " ? Not really much that can be worked with this.
The skull is really curved sure, but that doesnāt change how some elements are still 1:1 to sino and it can still be restored
Same level of study on something like fragilis or jimmy specimens would be monumental, and would cull researcherās need to justify overlumping them.
it's not 1:1, cuz the same material is heavily distorted from what would it potentially look like in life, so that statement itself is pretty idiotic, since it entirely relies on the condition that the material would look like Sinosaurus, which is not something that can be confirmed manually or practically... Maybe with scans, but I wouldn't have so much hope.
Itās arguably not THAT heavily. It looks like a banana but otherwise it doesnāt look taphonomically shifted as something to bistah or the nano type, and with proper adjustments can be made to a similar (if not the same) length in good restoration
Regardless it would be nice for it to get looked at again though. Would be good to remove the banana condition from it
Looks like Yutyrannus..interesting.
Definetly not, but cuz the snout itself is in different angle, utilizing the lateral view to argue that it looks like sinosaurus, without considering aspects such as the degree the bones are angled, it can only cause a very faulty perspective of how the material looked like in life, not considering those factors, it's how you end up with reconstructions with " Sue Syndrome "
Considering they showcased the fossil like this, it is fair to assume that it is so heavily compressed together, that the bones cannot be extracted without potential damage to the entire fossil, which is why I suggested that maybe it's possible to determine how unique or not it is, via the usage of Scans. But given how there are multiple crushed specimens from China who have not been granted such luxury... I wouldn't be so hopeful.
Oh yeah, that would be cool. But by revisiting Dilophosaurus, I mean myself revisiting and maybe do another skull or two skull reconstructions again ( Would be a downgrade if I didn't include a individual skull reconstruction for UCMP 37302 again )
But yeah, definetly. But we know why that's never gonna happen, if you touch Allosaurus, you gonna have to address Stegosaurus, Triceratops, Tyrannosaurus, etc. And there aren't many researchers available to do that, if there are they would believe that would be too much of a headache for them, or straight up don't wanna do it.
hatchling yutyrannus TRUST
Ok weird question, how do we know for sure that dinosaurs didnāt close their mouths to the point of teeth overlapping the lower jaw, when we have fossils of this being the case? Unless those are just crushed.
Qianzhousaurus also has pathologies on it's palatine bone, seemingly caused by it's own teeth from the lower jaw.
So skulls closing all the way is a fossilization thing that breaks the skull.
@coral forge https://x.com/ttorroo/status/2051238342755586087/photo/1 how accurate is this sizing?
It's a likely interpretation. Realistically, I've never heard or seen those skulls being open to confirm that suspicion. However, a likely reason this was never done, if correct that they are likely caused due to other factors during fossilization, then those mandibles cannot be removed or extracted without further damaging the entire skull.
not great
also ouranosaurus even being on there is inaccurate
i was questioning why edmonto seemed larger then shant
I was about to point that out. Even account for beckyās giant shantungo is still larger.
Itās a funny sizechart because itās almost all lambeosaurs and the two saurolophines arenāt scaled properly and thereās a non-hadrosaurid dinosaur there
ngl even outside of x-rex/becky's giant edmonto is kind of just systematically oversized
every single museum and like science communication thing says it's 12-13 meters even tho that's still well above its average size and there's maybe like 2 specimens that scale to that size
also for some reason regalis gets scaled to 12+ meters even tho that estimate is like 100 years old
it's almost always described as the largest or at least one of the largest hadrosaurs when it's like 1-2 meters longer than most Lambeosaurines
The average annectens specimen is still rather large at about a 6 ton estimate but trying to argue for it regularly being a 14 ton animal when its upper end for a few large specimens is ~9 is sort of silly
Edmontosaurus has insecurities about it's size š
How did bro get Secernosaurus larger than Ouranosaurus
isnt ouranosaurus pretty large?
it depends on the bone bed
average late adult from the RMDQ bonebed is only about 4 tons or so
6 tons could be plausible for late adults from Hanson Ranch if you just assume it's a mix of late and early adults + some subadults but there's not really histological work there so that's uncertain and the overall average is closer to 5 tons
I'm also just like 99% sure x-rex and becky's giant aren't even edmonto at this point so you can't even argue for rare huge specimens
Hanson Ranch specimens are a bit on the big side for Hadrosaurs, but tbh RMDQ material could easily work for most other Hadrosaurs, which is kind of what I'm getting at cuz Edmonto really isn't even that above average, let alone one of the biggest
kinda. It's Larger than a Styracosaurus, funnily enough.
ah
Itās also entirely possible the separate bonebeds could be entirely different species but we canāt justify this because this would imply we have a good holotype descriptionā¦let alone a full on description to begin with.
RMDQ and Hanson overall seem very similar, so the difference in average masses is intriguing. Could definitely be different species, could also maybe represent some resource dependent size plasticity in differing populations
The previous discussion on the bonebeds got me to reading relevant papers and the hypothesis that edmontosaurus was seasonally age segregated seems fairly strong. Adult dominant herds appear to be associated with the winter/low productivity season which is interesting and evidently when these catastrophic incidents tended to occur
Case #9862 @olive imp has been warned.
Reason: Invite link.
What specifically is convincing you x rex is not an edmont? Afaik its never been sugested to be annother taxon in literature.
Observation using the most reliable tool of human history... The Eyeball Mk. 1
Looks like a standard edmont tail to me?
On the size discrepancy thing: saurolophines have exhibited massive ranges in adult sizes. These sizes are from the "maiasaura is a model organism" ontogeny paper https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/296055606740123662/1482668399116161068/image.png?ex=69c5a1cc&is=69c4504c&hm=4628c3de457a460d7ab00f82b72b251745336de9044028a29174823b3ddd9574&
Sexually mature does not quantify as an "adult" though
How many of the edmonts are skeletally mature?
š¤·
WAIT IS THAT THE REAL PALEOP
Alternatively, if we have any data on the teeth, we can compare it to crocodiles to determine the correct age. Since that is an comparable thing between Crocodiles and Hadrosaurs, you can use their teeth to determine how old they are.
Fair point, although i still disagree with calling the average edmont full grown in that case.
No it's the homunculus I made to immitate them
I mean, im pretty sure the averages estimated by table all have an EFS present which was like4-6t
So Fullmetal Alchemist
Fair enough
Asked this earlier, idk if anyone can answer it now, but whatās the general consensus on theropod jaw closure? Iāve seen that itās impossible for them to close their mouths all the way without the skull breaking, but at the same time we have theropod skulls with the upper jaw teeth overlapping the lower jaw.
there are legit some really small skeletally mature maisaura from the bonebed
ie 75cm tibia with 3 Lags in its EFS whereas the largest is about 1m
also that yeah
I am a freakin genius
evidence of something stupid probably
I noticed X-Rex appears to have rather tall neural spines as they approach the sacrum which afaik is inconsistent with most other Edmonto tails
the bigger point is that hadrosaur tails arent super diagnostic to begin with afaik and since becky's giant has been suggested to have potential saurolophin affinities rather than edmontosaurin, it's a deduction on whether the only other giant hadrosaur element belongs to the other hadrosaur that's already a similar size or the one that isnt
Montanolophus doogmensis/Saurolophus longiceps moment.
regalis and annectens did used to have a few postcranial characters distinguishing the two from prieto-marquez's thesis but shockingly they all ended up kinda sucking
Notable that our best evidence for a true multigenerational herd is a trackway and not a catastrophic death assemblage
like a couple of them ended up having both states present in the same annectens bonebed, another two were actually present in both because one of prieto-marquez' "annectens" was reassigned to regalis, another did seem to divide the two but was generally inconsistent within multiple other species, and the only one that wasnt dead on arrival was some random coracoid character
How would the morrison formation play in Path of Titans if the roster was only made out of dinos from the morrison or jurassic sea dinos
whatever. go my 32(?) suddenly dubious hadrosaurs
Close enough, welcome back... Trachodon.
randomthingy vs randomdinos who wins
any big dino lovers know any dinos that look like what i just made lol, i just went with the flow on this sketch XD
trust i win
moschops
@little mauve I have a video for you
umm i dont know bout this lollll
Its a ancestor of mammals making it closer to cows, people, elephants and whales, they lived during the permian and were in a group of synapsids called the Dinocephalians
?
Use code howtown at the link below to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan: https://incogni.com/howtown
Source list: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10N_DdPtKmyCWSXz3KuVkZds9PmGvj0lXxjiDfVBCa1c/edit?usp=sharing
To support independent science journalism and get bonus content ...
JOIN OUR PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/Howtown ...
no i meant i didnt really see the resemblance XD
Headshape
Interesting, thanks
slightly
80% would be sauropods
the hell creek dinosaurs gathering to listen to a dropout soundcloud rapper who has 5 followers and lives in his car:
I mean, You don't have to add all the sauropods you could just add 1 or 2 for each size range, plus it would be fun af seeing the carns have to use their brain. The jurassic is very underrated
" this jurassic is very underrated " why are we lying
The jurassic is NOT underrated
But yea would be fun to see how many sauropods a roster could justify before it implodes
Alot of the morrison/jurassic theropods were basically dedicated bleeders so it would be fair plus theres also alot of non sauropods since funnily enough, iguanodons appeared late jurassic, and stegosaurs/ornithopods, and the tiny ceratopsians also exist.
what isnt a bleeder, everything makes you bleed
Iguanadonts appeared in the early cret, same with ceratopsians
Ankylosauroids were around for a while though
Proceratosaurus was the first tyrannosaur so it would do bonebreak plus, ankys also existed during the jurassic.
Weird justification for crushing but alr
do you ever see artwork that obvious is just hate art of a certain prehestoric creautre but you must keep silent to not get jumped
Some edmontosaurus artwork
Yes jimmy, the prey item will go hunt down and kill its predator for the sake of it.
I swear it was bigger the last time I checked, torvosaurus could also have bonebreak since having megalosaurus and torvosaurus do the same thing would be boring, even if torvosaurus irl isn't a tyrannosaur
I mean you donāt need to be a tyrannosaur to justify a crush ability
I thought it was a tyrannosaur the first time I saw it lol, just a really early one
I mean a basal one sure, but everyone knows tyrannosaurs have small arms
A torvo-like tyrannosaur would be awesome though
And torvosaurus is more related to spinosaurus then anything too lol, tyrannosaurs are closer to birds then allosaurs or carcharodontids
Coelurosaurs took over the world
Could a bird technically be considered a coelurosaur, or is that going too far?
You canāt escape a clade. This is why every vertebrate animal is a fish.
Welp 
I mean, it's that thing, are you a fish phylogenetically or are you a " Literal Fish " ?
Bro I love tyrannosaurs. The "tyrannosaur":. They even have similar teeth
Im kinda sad sauropods somehow didn't survive to the cenozoic, like why must the kto take the greatest of creatures.(last image is lusotitan)
i mean as much as it sucks the largest land animals ever are kind of the last thing id picture surviving a mass extinction
well uhh there was no food to possibly let them survive XD
I hope they invent time machines so we can bring these guys back
Well if anything that was not a bird or crocodile immediately ceased to exist I doubt something 4x the size of an elephant could fare better
yeah lol or smol mamals
Or frogs. Apparently they were barely affected
Ngl I wonder what the cenozoic would look like if the non avian dinosaurs survived, like ice age dinos
what they already are
picture naquasaurus i think i bucherd that spelling btw
A few raptors, some elasmarians, and a stegosaur. Yes. A stegosaur.
nanqusaurus is def not making it
at least we have avian dinos XD
trust with the power of friendship
Nanuqsaurus was probably bald as hell
And no stegosaurs. yes, no stegosaurs
You would be surprisedā¦.
possibly but i wanna believe in my feathered dinos
They are living on fumes by the Coniacian
Ima be so fr nanuqsaurus probably just looked like a daspletosaurus/lythronax grade thing
indeed
Behold
Good thing I love all three
that thing on the bottom left looks like hatz became a horse
or just looks like a random pterosaur that became a flightless pterosaur
the hatz horse and anky sheep look peak
And this is what evolves instead of people
ah so we are now just raptors
Maybe?
what could have been..
Crows today are really smart, even compared to chimps, if mammals never got their chance and probably went extinct since the kto never happened, I imagine a theropod like them or another raptor would evolve intelligence
yeah ik but ur pushing it XD
mammals suck tbh, I wish they went extinct instead of being one right now
bro just dissed the whole human race and every other mamal on the planet
idk we got bears and giant apes big cats and cool pups
are they as amazing as dinos, no but at least we have them XD
cool allo depiction, i dont know who made this but it looks amazing
Its so cute
tiger allo looks adorable lolzz
Erm this is yuty/sino
Though, isnāt Campanian glaciation a thing?
Aināt this a yuty?
nope its a allo depiction i found
This isnāt allo.
Yeah it canāt be allo
Me when ragebait used to be believable.
explain your answer
Well I fell for it. This is what I get for using the internet less.
thats what the original description said, plus the skull and crest add up decently to a allosaur
Folk?
nvm i guess XD the one i saw said allosaur loll mb
I have a lego tiger that I would love to turn into this but I donāt know how I would
Ur good lol
You can tell if its yuty or not by the nasal ridge it has (and if itās fully feathered usually) on its nasal
Well, here's something more entertaining: I believe Folkes responded to someone, that Siats could still be a sister taxa to Neovenator, even though the last paper that remotely discuss phylogenetic placement, finds Siats having more diagnostic similarities to Aerosteon, which the paper discuss it as it somehow meaning that Megaraptors are Neovenatorids, even though that just means Siats is a Megaraptor.
alr lol, im not a huge dino identification pro XD
Ehhh I donāt buy it. Megaraptoran similarities are superficial at best, and if it were to be megaraptoran-adjascent then it would compare with baharia-grade material better (which frankly nobody has tried doing yet)
speaking of allo depictions tho, wow this looks so good
almost like Baharia is definetly not a Megaraptor. HEAVY BERTHASAUR FOR THE WIN!!
i like when the artist take alot of creative liberty in there depictions
never being convinced unfortunately.
Thereās a good blog that talks about the recent baharia identification as a noasaur, and how cau basically just fanficād a random specimen to justify not only noasaur baharia but it being synonymous with delta (technically the opposite, delta becomes baharia I think? Still bizarre) and it ignores most of the material.
It goes over how flawed the noasaur assessment is, and proves that bahariasaurus at the very least is anything BUT a noasaur.
Siats could still be some weird stem-megaraptora but baharia being noasaur is no bueno
what would've happened to paleontology if the great american bonewars never happened?
See Delta I think it's just a Ornithomimosaur, and the GOAT ( Beagliam ) has already showed how possible that interpretation was, actually, I was suspecting that even before he posted his Delta
But Bahariasaurus does not look a Megaraptor, it does not even fit among Coelurosaurs and Carnosaurs, regardless of how doubtful Cau's own words are ( Which are, doubtful, 100% of the time, but a Broken Clock can be right once, I guess )
I've imagined before that it could be a Deinocheirid, but the features are more convergent rather than Ornithimimosaur-in-origin. It looks more close to what we have on Ceratosaurs, effectively meaning it's either a Elaphrosaurinae, but given the time period and convergent features, it's probably a Berthasaurid.
If you would look at the blog, not only does bahariaās vertebrae do look basal megaraptoran like, but it also looks NOTHING like noasaurid vertebrae.
Everyone being wrong and it being a giant ornithomimosaur would be funny and support the near 1m long ornitho ulna from the bayanshiree so I may support this.
This blog goes over everything as to why baharia canāt be a noasaur, it has everything I could ever say about this topic but better. It canāt be a noasaur because that would make no sense.
Nanuqsaurus has nothing to do with it
Nanuqsaurus started it so it could justify cosplying as yutyrannus
I thought the same thing, but it does not mean anything. Baharia's vertebrae look similar to a ton of other theropod groups, making such argument ineffective, since really, to isolate it to one group, you would need to do a lot of cherrypicking, believe me when I say this, I've had interest on Bahariasaurus, and a lot of these arguments are not effective as they seem to be
It has such generalized traits, that it would need to be a basal branch among Theropods, Coelurosaurs and Carnosaurs wouldn't be fitting for it.
I was gonna say something then I realised who cares about Bahariasaurus, because itās not me
3 people out of 8 billion
Neotheropods is not going to work for Bahariasaurus given time period, Ceratosaurs is going to work better.
Doesnāt this blog also have a phylogenetical coding that goes against your claim even more?
Also an animal so generalized it looks nothing like the clade itās been pushed to be in for decades.
If you want to believe it is a giant noasaur then do so, but everything we know about it goes against it being a noasaur. There is even an entire matrix and phylogenetic comparisons proving this, but if you claim to be more knowledgeable than the person whoās done all this then I suggest discussing with them about why theyāre wrong.
As if Megaraptor Bahariasaurus wasn't tried multiple times in history, with similarly doubtful results. But, whatever you say.
- similarly doubtful results
- posts blog proving it works
- ignores it and says āI know betterā
- ???
- argument won
Tell me this, why it works?
The blog explains itā¦literally everything there is explained.
brick wall vs car
I want to hear it from you, as a reader from that blog. Why it works?
About how none of the material aside from a single pubis with superficial similarities is like that of noasaur grade dinosaurs, with good analysis on known material and matrix coding provided.
But you seem to understand the material than this person, so I do wonder what conclusion you came up with to prove itās a noasaur thatās within similar level to what the blogposter has done?
Go read the blog itās pretty well made, if you still disagree then honestly thatās fine. This IS decades old bombed nonexistant material that couldāve even ended up being a sauropod for all we know.
See, if something works or is elaborated in a way that does work for you as a reader. It's expected that at least in some way you are able to pass that information, maybe not word by word, but in a way that knowledge is passed down to more people. If you can't do that, there are multiple alternatives: You didn't read the blog, you forgor, the blog fails on elaborating it or it's just straight up wrong. What alternative interpretation do you think I should take here?
is bahirasaurus really this serious
Apparently, it is.
The presence of sacral pleurocels and caudal pneumatization is one good point the blog makes, both together are only present in megaraptorans. I personally haven't thought much about Bahariasaurus before but the blog is pretty strongly argued. It's an interesting idea at least, these massive basal megaraptorans possibly kicking around.
if i just kiss all of you good night will we be friends
Youāll have to excuse him, itās Z-boomers alt
Mega Baha
Shoutout to all those little guys and gals who stand beside dinosaurs in these images so we can know how big they are, doing a public service
Thatās meā
yeah fr
@restive crag show the snake skeletal.
what is this thing
Palaeophis colossaeus a large extinct marine snake
i gotta study this thing ive never heard of this fella
@restive crag you doing Nanotyrannus?
there is an impostor
Looks fine though. Tsintaosaurus and Shantungosaurus could probably be bigger and Secernosaurus smaller, but that's about it
Iām really upset that brontoraptor is a nomen nudum because itās a pretty sick name ngl
Huh, that was Torvosaurus?
Apparently
I just wish it could actually be used for something instead of being wasted 
Imagine if they named a tyrannosaur brontoraptor
Also unrelated question but how is jimmadseni supposed to be pronounced
Ji maad sen e trust
" Jim Madsen-eye " from what I'm getting.
Weird
Also whoās the GOAT a. jimmadseni or a. fragilis (there is a correct answer)
A. jimmadseni, if I had to guess.
Incorrect (I am not biased at all)
Fair enough. I was gonna say, technically A. jimmadseni material was the one mostly used in most paleomedia appearances of Allosaurus, so A. fragilis would've been weird. But then again, most of those appearances were intending to be A. fragilis
Yeah lots of those were before A. jimmadseni was actually known werenāt they?
Pretty much. I can't recall any doubts towards the classification of those specimens back then, so yeah, it was definetly before A. jimmadseni was considered
Also my definitely nonexistent bias comes from the fact that A. fragilis is the official fossil of my home state
Valid reason.
Like the one example of any state pride present in my psyche lmao
Other than the landscapes I guess because it do be pretty gorgeous here
tbf, the only dinosaurs here, I don't like a whole lot. Not a Pterosaur person either, but Tapejarinis are pretty cool
It comes from the name Jim Madsen, so logically it should be Jim Madseni, but any pronunciation other than Jih-Mud-Senny just sounds wrong
Thatās how I had been pronouncing it until I heard someone else say it and doubted myself so now I feel slightly vindicated lol
Yeah the Morrison kinda hogs a lot of the bangers doesnāt it
For me it's a bit subjective, as none of my favorite animals come from the Morrison, unfortunately
Fair enough, but it is where a lot of the most famous ones come from
Same with Hell Creek formation
Kinda the only taxa that I have some sorta of attachment to, due to reading too much into Bone Wars literature. It's Camarasaurus and Epanterias, and Epanterias has seen " Better days "
with Hell Creek, I do like Torosaurus a lot.
Last I heard torosaurus was a synonym of triceratops, has that been disproven? I havenāt kept up with that situation since the initial debacle
Let's say that, firstly, the author of that hypothesis has been kicked out of all scientific spaces, due to the recent release of some files
Secondly, yeah
Ohā¦
that guy⦠š¬
it was never proven in the first place, we have juveniles of both
It was one of Horner's goofery.
Just like Nanotyrannus.
Hey Arc
Oi, how's?
What do you think of Utahraptor?
Not a fan, I like Achillo more (thanks to BOTM).
Well, then you aren't going to be affected by what I'm doing to it.
Tbh whatever you're going to do to it will definitively be an improvement to the otherwise infinitely boring depictions we had of it, you may even make me like it more.
Are you by any chance a Sibling of mine from another life or some sh#t like that? Lmfao
Idk maybe lmao
Mf has the same opinion on Sauropod and Carnosaur facial soft tissue potential being wasted, and Dromaeosaur depictions being the same flavour
How dare! 
credits to yoofilos for the skull placeholder.
Unenlagiine supremacy
1st, Orcas usually are not solo.
2nd, they don't hunt by biting but by ramming and drowning large marine mammals and sharks so no reasons to think they'd go and bite stuffs
Overall, this comic ignores orca behaviors to favor the mosasaur.
~~tbf there's like 2 formable ecotypes that are hunting sharks actively ~~
Amazing theoretical fight:
Who do you think would come out on top, a large jaguar or an average sized deinonychus?
I know deinon is a bit larger but their weight ranges are pretty similar
Aye, too much drama for something like that
Tbh I agree, I love troodontids, however that won't be much to call it troodontids soon if we keep on going like this.
It depends on who initiates and how. If the jaguar drives its skull into the center of mass, it can muscle the deinonychus off its feet and get the skull bite gg game over. But if the deinon gets even one kick landed into the jaguar's abdomen or flanks, that's a potentially fight ending wound regardless of who "should" win on paper.
You know it's interesting, some paleontologists reconstructed deinonychus legs accurate to their fossils to test how powerful their kicks were and found that they weren't necessarily strong to the extent of disembowling in a single blow. They certainly cut deep, but I do feel that it wouldn't necessarily be game over for the jaguar unless the kick hit a vital point
Honestly I'd say they're evenly matched, the claws of Jaguars are no joke either, and they're specialized for inflicting damage because they're kept sharp, meanwhile only one claw on deinon would likely have similar sharpness while the others would be comparatively more worn down
Even then it's still in the jaguars favor bc cats are terrifyingly quick when they want to be, it's going to get outgrappled and dropped lel
Yeah big cats are absolutely potent predators
Though I will say a deinon would likely be able to outstam a jaguar, givem the latter is built for short bursts of high energy
Even if the deinon pinned a jaguar on its back, the jaguar would still be able to kick out with its legs and claws the hell out of the deinon's stomach
Eh I mean the jaguar's claws aren't really what makes it "scary" they're still lethal yes, but I'd argue their muscle and bite is more lethal, jaguars have insanely developed masseter and temporalis muscles that wrap around a shortened skull anchored by a pronounced sagittal crest their whole architecture is an evolutionary system optimized for entirely biting shtick
Oh yeah, their bite is the most potent weapon, but their claws are their most versatile one
The Persian cat skull hurts my soul 
Yh fs even add more stuff they very much prefer big prey so ye I'm betting on the jaguar
š He's trying his best
Valid, valid 
Honestly while Jaguars would be knocked down the food chain i bet they could survive decently back then just because of how good they are in their niche
Yep if anything jaguars really are one of the most adaptable big cats alive today
Yer
The offshore of north east pacific, the population in south Africa does too, so does the Crozet island killer whales in the Indian ocean as well as the one swimming around the galapagos, the Caribbean and Australia. But as you mention these preys do not make the bulk of their diet and are more like generalists minus for the 2 firsts. Other population close to Brazil coasts also hunt elasmobranchs such as giant Mantas
Them and leopards and mountain lions.
Mountain lions aren't lions and are felids
Do megaraptors could pronate their wrists?
I meant like could it have gotten cold enough for it to benefit from feathering, or was gigantothermy enough?
Whats the difference between achillo and utah that makes you like one so much more than the other
They had much more flexible front limbs than other theropods but iirc true pronation was still out of their range of motion
Oh i see
Theres a nice paper on the RoM of specifically Australovenator, it should be freely accessible!
I might take a look yes
Thx
Tbh this is a more "factionary" preference, as the entire of my favoritism toward Achillo is how Utah is usually portrayed and how Achillo is. For example, BOTM has a vulture-headed Achillobator, which made it stand out and make it interesting.
Aside from that, I tend to also like "asian versions" of dinosaurs.
PoT came after my original interest, and while I think the design is BORING AF, I like how it was meant to be played in concept, not realistic of course but still very amusing.
I like pot achillo except the gross eyes
Mountain lion, cougar, puma, catamount: all the same animal. It's just a familiar name
They could but it was actually quite limited and not like what we or some other mammals are capable of. It is more than what Allosaurus or T.rex was capable of but still similar to what Dilophosaurus and Bambiraptor were capable of.
did shant finally get described???
As the other people said not in the mammalian sense, but they had a wrist/forearm mobility that allowed some (inward) hand adjustment or āsemi-pronationā during flexion more than in most other theropods
Paleontology would prob have developed more slowly in NA, less dinosaur discoveries, and a more methodical (but less explosive) growth of the field overall though it probably would have caught up to a similar state by the mid 20th century
Yeah that was my hypotesis for how their arms could move
This is not really paleontology but does anyone know if the shonisaurus mod is good(strength and health wise) I was ignored on the other chat
I dont play this game, im here for the paleo stuff, however guessing how that is a mod, isnt it better to ask in the modding channel? Maybe someone with knowledge can help you
Okk
purussaurs vs tyrannosaurs rex, fight happens near water with puru lurking the rex, based on pure paleontology and reality (yes, iām aware they didnāt live during the same time period) without bias who is winning this
Theres no real point for rex to go near it and vice versa. If there's a body then they probably try to pull it to their respective side but puru can't walk probablyso it's not gonna try too much
if Purus ambushes rex from the water and manages to grab onto a leg it could kill it, on land it probably isn't going to try it
@thorn grove
I think this is just a new skeletal
Ah
Puru should hypothetically win especially given the scenario
Me when Purussaurus dislocates the Tyrannosaurus' leg.
I love that rex
Me too
rex will have puru in its mouth the moment puru gets a chance to bite its leg
Honestly it seems like it could go both ways but there's going to obviously be a huge bias towards purru near water
real life doesnāt work like films. that bite from puru will probably fracture and cripple the rex immediately. thereās no chance a rex is going to just ābite backā and thatās as if the puru doesnāt do a death roll when that first bite connects
its just a lose situation for a rex regardless
On dry, flat land the tyrannosaurus's height and agility could probably turn the tide though, but that seems more like an instance of catching the purru off guard basking or smth
It was a large hardrosaur. Boom described!
@thorn grove this reminded me of you ā¤ļø
Tyrannosaurus, the moment the fight gets too serious:
Lmao
Also, wouldn't the face be another pretty likely spot for purru to attack in ambush?
why does his neck look like that 
Angry
I mean idk, from what I remember a lot of pathologies on some of the prey items ( that we have evidence ) are mostly from the legs? I am having a feeling that there was evidence of pathologies on the neck of some animal...
Didnāt know we had a Hell creek Purussaurus
I genuinely cant unsee it as them just nuzzling and not fighting now
ava question but in a race instead of a fight
would a Ornithomimus be able to outrun a cheetah?
cheetah starts 300m away and will begin pursuing at 108 km/hr.
the ornithomimus immediately starts running at the maxium speed it has , which i have no clue what that is
is it fast enough to get away?
I was extrapolating its behavior from its relative the hell creek deinosuchus
What is actually the largest crocodile material found in hell creek, or near it?
does the cheetah get a nice meal or does the ornitho live to see another day
can confirm one existed, seen one of the natgeo filmers try to record a rare interaction
cheetahs can only maintain top speed for roughly 400ā500 m (slightly generous) upper estimate before they overheat, so at 108 km/h chasing an ornithomimus running ~65 km/h (example estimate), the distance closing speed is only about 12 m/s. Taking account 300m head start takes the cheetah over 750 meters of sprinting which is well past its stamina limit. Prob will get away
can you break that math down in simpler terms? im confused..
Cheetah: 108 km/h = 30 m/s
108 Ć (1000/3600) = 30
Ornitho
65 Ć (5/18) ā 18.06 m/s
Distance to close in:
30 - 18.06 ā 11.94 m/s ā 12 m/s
Time to close 300 m gap
300 / 12 ā 25 seconds
Cheetah distance sprinted
30 Ć 25 = 750 meters
oooh okay, ty
Are we sure the cheetah would be overheated 
dont cheetahs tire out quite fast? or is that just a misconception
They do, not a misconception
I am sure it was a matter of energy, not that they overheat
Borealosuchus sternbergii is the largest crocodylomorph found in heel creek? im not sure. havent been up to date on this
double checked you're right, seems this is debunked good to know
i wonder, who would be the 3 fastest land animals in PoT?
Yea, I've no clue when it was re-evaluated but I wanna say it was fairly recent
so I'm not surprised it hasn't spread very far
Especially considering stuff surrounding cheetahs isn't as widespread as the late 2000s
struthi's first
but whos 2 and 3? laten and deinon?
Thoracosaurus:
Quite a bit go lmao
oh yeah, forgot about this one, is there any good overview of all the crocodyloforms of hell creek?
like 6 if also counting lance and frenchman
do you have the alt version of this image?
How can we infer those big scales on the tail when they look like imprints of vertebra spines on the inside of the tail print?
Same with those little āscalesā on the underside of the tail
Oh wait theyāre prints from the sides of the tail, not the top and bottom. Sorry, took me a minute to figure that out.
Just had to look at concavenator and juravenator real quick.
Godsaurus newzealand
I donāt usually talk here but how are yall feeling with the prehistoric octopus fossils?
https://youtu.be/Cpz88V7LM9A?si=UoHIH3q4aoDauSMf this is cool
-
Durante el periodo CretÔcico en Australia habitó una gran diversidad de animales, entre ellos el mÔs grande y reconocido es Mutaburrasaurus.
-
Este 9 de Abril del 2026 fue publicado un paper que estudiaba la anatomĆa craneal de Mutaburrasaurus. Tanto el craneo y la mandĆbula estan muy bien preservados, y gracias a los escĆ”neres computar...
What if they are headbutting?
Oh they r fighting?
I though they were just cuddling all this time lmao
There's a big octopus. It's probably not the 19m maximum size estimate though.
Alio is faster than all dromaeosaurs in the game in my experience, right behind struthi (assuming this isnāt referencing paleo stats, my apologies in advance if so)
I think they mean irl
Are irl dromaeosaurs genuinely right behind ornithomimosauria?
nope, dromaeosaurids aren't even super built for speed
Thatās what I thought, it seemed odd to refer to them as fast runners
What family would be behind Struthio then?
hmmm good question. abelisaurids and nanotyrannids would be quite fast. also the smaller, leggy tyrannosaurids. also troodontids and oviraptorosaurs were pretty cursorial