#paleontology
1 messages · Page 244 of 1
U do some pretty art
And sauropods are basically living fortresses with pneumatic bones and suspension, and balancing. That can also outsize most land animals to ever live
meh, the big ones don't spark much interest
Imagine the deep rumbling they made for to comunicate to eachother
Dude I would lay more bricks then new York if I saw a sauropod herd coming any where near.
maybe Paluxysaurus, because I wanna see what the conclusion for that thing will be. But Shunosaurus is my favorite ( despite never drawing it )
I like that one with the spikes
The smaller ones are cool but yeah their biology is just insane.
Legacy Agustinia?
Agustinia
Even it's tail and head act as balancing lol
LMFAO
I wish u were like this
and then you go " NOOOOOOOO- " as it converts into a generic Titanosaur... Or a Rebbachisaur?
Tbh i like nigersaurus too
Macronarians interest me the most tbh, yknow like camarasaurus, brachiosaurus, and sauroposeidon, basically living towers with hook hands. Very verticle creatures
Where did tgey pulled the spikes from?
If i'm not wrong, I think these were like bone processes or spines that they thought were like Osteoderms? But they later found, yeah, it's not osteoderms.
Also ampelosaurus is kinda lame for me
true or false: shunosaurus is the only sauropod with a tail club
Diplodocus is cool af though, or the prosauropods
I think thats true?
Personally, I'm more interested on that one undescribed Sauropod Femur, found by Llewellyn Ivor Price, from Mangabeira, Minas
I like diplo
But not as much as apato
any finale answers?
True!
genny is sadly being executed for being wrong
Argh thank god
I cant take this anymore
Yknow those neck plates or spikes might have served as tusks, for males to fight eachother. I also get theirs no "evidence" for spikes on sauropods but considering how modern lizards have them and how diplodocids have their tail being a weapon, I doubt.
I agree
And i mean
The rule of cool is there
And i like cool things
It's kind of like having a massive head and for a group known to have horns and just not having the horns, you can see where it would fits It's just not there, maybe the spikes were made out of keratin or something that can regrow so they don't permanently lose them?
Kind of like feathers but way sharper and lethal
Hmmmm i see where u goin and i like it
is it completely out of the question that some dinos have neck flaps like green anoles >:P
because i adore drawing dinos with them, 'specially carnivores
id like to think that cerato has em
What’s y’all’s reasons if you think spinosaurus mouth looked like this
This is an old recon it's a rebbachi and doesn't look like this
I personally think spinosaurus looked like that due to it being semi aquatic, just like if you look at crocodiles today they have their teeth exposed because they are constantly in water
The mirabilis paper iirc mentions its teeth being more splayed outwards making lips more ificualt to completely cover tham
this
Personally I think they might have lips
Same as if you look at other animals with lips, they have lips to basically keep their teeth moist. But I'm not a complete expert, just a thought
It is possible but I just think they look a lot like crocodiles
Yes because the skin flap in green anoles are supported by bones. Same for iguanas (if you are interested I can share in PM an iguana dissection) and other Iguanians: they come from the elongation of the second ceratobranchial (hyoid) bone and other ones located in the throat.
Perhaps something similar to how some birds have dewlaps, wattles or caruncles is more likely to have been present in non avian dinosaurs. Even mammals' dewlaps could be likely than anoles' or iguanas'.
Idk, their eating habits are very similar to crocodiles, who do not have lips. I imagine they wouldn’t either
Some cool lizard inspiration that you could get away with when it comes to dinosaur design:
1 - Anolis barbatus
2 - Ctenosaura similis
3 - Pogona vitticeps
4 - Sphenodon punctatus (actually not a lizard).
Still, lizard scales are structurally different from Archosaurian scales iirc so you have to learn by yourself how they differ and how far you can use Lepidosaurs as references.
That's a great comparison
spino is the only known theropod with interlocking, splayed teeth like that which is why it's the only one which has an argument for reduced or absent lips
What about its close relatives like baryonyx and suchomimus? I'd imagine their teeth must be similar
given their niches, being waterborne and heron fishing, i prefer myself half lipped or entirely lipless, with gums allowing to close mouth and sealing it (like crocodiles)
Granted, all lipped, full lipless and semi lipless depictions are correct and there is no more valid depiction than others
they're not actually, they don't splay or interlock
so, its possible they can have the chin flaps, just not the bone and muscles to be able to display/hide it ?
Suchomimus was not as aquatic as Baryonyx or especially Spinosaurus however
they were tied to near water still, as it's head was designed mainly for fishing
i think i found the old version
You can see the teeth difference t rex probably looked more like a Crocodile from his long teeth so no lips
Nah t rex most likely had lips like in this game
Another victim to the bait
noway
guess youve seen one
sonion
t rex could regrow teeth its whole life similar to sharks
its like saying smilodon had lipps crzy
The T. rex is well known to have been the first singer for "Gangnam Style"
are there any proof that colossal or giant squids attack humans?
Yeah
Think like what a lot of mammals have and birds.
Actually I think spinosaurus had lips and some revealing teeth
This is the most outrageous image i've ever seen
Something like this
He looks suspicious
🤔
He looks like he's doin "hmmmmmmmmm"
gulp
U-uh..u won't stop playin
@queen oar put lips on a pterosaur
Encase the beak in flesh like disney's dinosaur
I have a better idea
Gourmet Tupandactylus
I asked randomdinos if this was possible and he said likely not
yeah, likely not. The soft tissues would've been tight to the beak, because of the crests.
Deinosuchus?
Nah. Hate that guy.
i guess bro
And it also doesnt make much sense since the crest on the beak doesnt have the proper suport for the soft tisdue crest
Like how tupan have
yup
I hope that Peters Guy dont do smth like that
We got david peters over here
Cute
It could be they had soft tissue around the bottom like anoles lol
who’s the faster of the two?
giganotosaurus and tyrannosaurus
I believe the smaller adult tyrannosaurus were faster but the very large ones were slower compared to our known giganotosaurus
Rex has longer legs but is also fatter at the same length. Wouldn't really be a big difference since these guys are all walking around
Makes sense
Tyrannosaurus because tyrannosaurids are built for running, whereas carcharodontosaurids are not
I wonder if giganotosaurus could get bigger or around the same weight as trex lol, nothing can go wrong when you are good at hunting sauropods
All animals had bigger and smaller individuals than ones we've found. We have one good specimen of Giga, I honestly expect alot of large theropods to have a similar range size wise
Are we sure its a 3rd specimen even? since its the same site as Holotype, maybe its just more material for it
The 2nd Meraxes is a perfect example yeah, Big Size Difference between individuals of the same species
How big even is meraxes anyways
Hopefully more Torso Material yeah
type specimen is about 11m and 5-6 tonnes, while the new unpublished specimen is allegedly ~13m and 8-9 t
Hello fellow paleo-inthusiasts
ah
Oh sorry, let me do the ritual to summon him...
@thorn grove
Probably ~100 specimens but it’s entirely disarticulated material
Oh yes
Ty
There are 5 localities it’s been found in
The largest bonebed is the Kogou quarry which is in the Zhucheng area in the Wangshi group with a minimum of 55 excavated individuals but in total there should be like 90 at least if not well over 100
The Longgujian quarry has around 10 individuals and is also in Zhucheng
The Zangjiazhuang quarry in Zhucheng has ‘many’ individuals but going by pictures it appears similar or slightly larger than the Longgujian so probably a dozen or so individuals
There’s also an individual found in the Laiyang area of the Wangshi group
Lastly there’s Shantungosaurus sp. material from the Shanyang formation as well
Insecure about their height? So they lump Saurolophini material to look bigger?
The Balloon Molly’s in the petco fish aisle
are balloon mollys the type of genetically modified fish made to look like that or are they naturally just like that
a lot, but its mostly bonebeds so like
obviously that would never happen with a lambeosaurine, with the sole exceptions of Amurosaurus, Arenysaurus, Adynomosaurus, Charonosaurus, and the Basturs lambeosaurine
but theyre goated so it doesnt matter
Inbred
damn
I remember I had two that bred
One turned out looking like a tiny version of a normal molly
Another came out with the most gorgeous fins and coloration ever
The last one looked like the parents (nothing out of the ordinary)
All of them were weirdly small idk why
I what all of them
Interesting!
That Dunk looks cute.
whats the correct trunk length for deinotherium?
https://x.com/ARGAtheropodfan/status/2046671660934439323
https://x.com/euyartoa21/status/2046580462190055750
@warped peak i know your quite interested in prehestoric mammals so im interested in seeing your opinion about it
I like macronarians(big noses)
Would globidens have a slim mosasaurus build, or the big-chested platecarpus build?
It's slim. Tosha did this:
I think they said it's more in line to the anatomy of contemporary relatives to Mosasaurs.
This new take on it almost makes it look more retro
maybe.
In the context of being slightly more like a modern lizard given the build
I mean, they are LIzards not archosaurs
Yes I know, but the shape of this reconstruction makes them look slightly less derived from said lizards
I mean, yeah, but I would say that maybe the vertebrae posture, at least how we reconstruct it might be wrong? I haven't drawn any Mosasaur yet to visualize the idea.
I understand what you are getting at, but regardless the thinner body definitely illustrates more serpentine elements.
oh no no no, definetly.
See, I'm not going to say that i'm very skilled with Mosasaurs. But what I was noticing the other day, that we kinda of depict Mosasaur skeletons with a back hump, right? So, the cervical vertebrae being positioned lower than the Dorsal section, and making a arc on the back line... Which one might say: " Well, it's how in Cetaceans work "
yeah, in Cetaceans. The thing is that, Cetaceans and terrestrial relatives they have, they have that same like vertebrae posture? So it's only implying that Cetaceans have that, because it's like ancestral, it's not something they can afford to change
And in relatives to Mosasaurs, usually they have a " Neck hump " where the cervical section curves above the line of the dorsal
At least, it's my crazy thought. Perhaps there's some study out there that explains better why they are depicted with this kinda of vertebrae posture ( But I didn't find it on the time I was taking a look into it )
afaik it would be shorter, but not as short as is often depicted
@charred hearth
how do you know its about me and not ...idk, john man?
because John Man made a dinosaur book?
maybe im john man
Because Wes responded, I'm gonna just put my input here. For what is known, the idea of short trunk Deinotherium is an idea? There's no exact correlation to where it started, but it seemed to have started along the 2000's, one of the first examples that can come to mind is Markov et al. 2002 - " Reconstruction of the facial morphology of Deinotherium gigantissimum Stefanescu, 1892 based on the material from Ezerovo, South Bulgaria ", now this paper does include a reconstruction of two Deinotherium giganteum specimens, and it does not really clarify why it includes a short trunk into their reconstruction, with only emphasizing a point of " Wrong Ideas " about " Traits we assume are typical to the whole family " ( referring to Proboscidea )
Although there does not clarify much on this choice, there are other papers that tried to use other means to justify this reconstruction: Deinotherium being a Browser, and allegedly there being evidence for different flexible tissue attachments on Deinotherium's skull
What is a bit weird about the browser argument, it's that it only applies short trunks into Deinotherium, and no other browser proboscidean, relatively only making this trait exclusive to Deinotherium reconstructions
On the matter of tissue reconstruction, Deinotherium does not really seem to have different indicatives of flexible tissue attachment compared to other proboscideans, it seems to be mostly an impression due to how unique Deinotherium's skull is in comparison, with only D. bozasi ( the pleistocene species ) where cranial material seems to suggest it following similar trends to other contemporary pleistocene proboscideans, as well a reduction of the lower incisors.
Note: I forgot about this, but D. bozasi does not have a very well complete specimen, it instead is described under multiple specimens, of different sizes, making any reconstruction on it, a composite reconstruction, so there's possibility that: If new material comes out contradicting what I said, I will just look like a clown
But as far as I remember from last time that I touched on it, this thing doesn't have very large lower incisors. As well, this cranium does not look like any of the other species described.
i always struggle to see how it would drink with such a short trunk
the actual argument is just: It's just made-up
would look cool*
made up to look cool*
True
Oh god
I mean it has a long ish neck i supposed
Maybe it just rear down a bit and use the trunk
its a fluffy synapsid called Moschops
I know what it is
behold the cutest creature to ever exist https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iweWds5uejg
Tags: Dinosaur. Walking With Dinosaurs. prehistoric creatures. Screen Time. All scenes. Diictodon.
Yes
I want 4 of them
behold the chunky capybara armadilo the glyptodon (Its even cuter than this)
Last year. 
What on earth prompted you to find a message from 6 years ago
Boredom
True
Behold how little we actually have of a pycno
Yes
But i still want a remodel for the game(pot)
With the bald and higly keratenized head
I know i know
We dont have any skull material
But many paleo arts and interpretations of him make him with those spiky keratin thorns and a boxy shaped head
A famous one bein from Heitoresco
Usually pycno is either given a carnotaurus skull or a llukalken skull
I think we should just model the bones we have
imagine getting attacked by floating vertebrae
Tbh some horn ornament on Pycno seems more likely.
Yeah,but i preffer him without em
Sure
It can have some horn ornaments on his head
But make it diferent from carno
Subspecies moment
Looks clampable
Tbh, that last part will never be a guarantee. Historically, Pycnonemosaurus reconstructions just copy and paste the skulls of other abelisaurs, oftenly because a full own hypothetical original one just demands too many resources.
We also like.... Lack 85% of its skeleton
Yang real
Do u guys think that
This should be possible
Like
These extra flesh on dinosaurs faces
Etc etc
Straight up, I know that there are other animals in the game like that... But Pycno is like the one animal that will be fated to copy the originality of another animal. Unless the Alderon's artists do some absolute fine work.
the third be like:"Long before time had a name-"
Bottom left looks like a Disney dinosaur witchdoctor
Uhum
Subjective.
He's gonna stir the cauldron with his tail while he tells little foot about a time before both of them
Is it outrageous that i never watched land before time ?
No
It's pretty old. And like, dinosaur based kids movies fell off pretty hard for whatever reason.
I think is becuz..uuuhh idk
Ppl got lazy or smth
I actually hated it when I watched it because it depicts carnivores as strictly evil
Yeah i hate when that happens too
Like
Herbivores=good
Carnivores=bad
????
They r just living their lifes why are they bad?
They have kids to feed too
Evil by nature. Hilarious that humans depict carnivores as evil in movies when we ourselves are omnivorous. Also, pachy needs to be an omnivore in game 🧐
Why
Cuz pachy is proposed to be a oportunistic omnivore
Eatin small vetebreds and insects
Not just plants
Oviraptorsaurs still aren't in PoT btw
The skulls that have been found with teeth show it's front teeth to be very reminiscent of carnivorous theropods
Yeah!
And thats cool
It's an interesting creature. One of my faves. Even with its lil brain
Pachycephalosaurs were not omnivorous
Currently fightign 4 my life,
Dogs exist, and they are the epitome of good
Did you ask them? Judging by teeth it was possible. Naturally, we'll never know for sure
Oportunistic Omnivorous
It would eat insects and small reptiles if needed
You've alerted the Horde
Them front pearlies don't look much for plants. What an interesting critter
Tbh
Obligatory herbivory is a myth
U can give a cow meat and it will eat it
Many herbivore eat meat to sustein their diet
Same with carnivores
They will sometime eat plants materials
The carnivorous mammal?
Oh the consequences of the community trying to break stereotypes... How wonderful.
Thats a cammel no?
I will try to spread the truth
Get'em lad! Get'em!!!
If an herbivore eats meat, it's sick, it has a dietary deficiency
I would argue that a camels front teeth are different than serrated pachy teeth. Mind you, camels have those teeth to destroy woody desert plants. According to science (as of now) pachy lived in a humid sub tropical environment with leafy plants, which, serrated teeth would have struggled with
Still
It eats meat for that diet
And again
Horses eat baby chicks
Cows eat rats
See this is where I throw a piano at you from a 5 story building
I wouldn't argue sick. Even deer chew bones for calcium. They just do it. They be knowing
Nothing against you I just need to contain tiktok psuedo science before it keeps spewing into mainstream knowledge consensus
I dont even have tiktok
Why u guys are so mad at me
Most herbivores that consume meat do it opportunistically to supplement their diet. It's been seen and witnessed.
Because this kind of rhetoric is always repeated on these kinds of sites.
No, jimmy, a horse eating a baby chicken does not mean herbivorous animals will go and eat the corpse of its predators.
THERE
THANK YOU
herbivores can consume meat, therefore the pachycephalosaurus is... not a herbivore. curious
Pachycephalosaurus into macropredatory ornithischian pipeline is real
anyway, meat eating pachy hasn't been taken seriously in literature since the 80s, the similarities to troodontid teeth are a strong indicator that troodontids ate plants, not the other way around
Shame the maastrichtian ended so quickly, we could’ve gotten some pretty interesting species
Wild considering troodontids themselves are a controversial genus lol
Im not sayin yhat a fkin pachycephalosaurus is goin to hunt other fkin herbivored
Im sayin that if it seens an insect or small lizard it would eat it to supliment its diet
Im sayin that a animal can still have his herbivore diet
But sometines they need that extra nutrient from somewhere else
Same with carnivores
they're only controversial because the scientists in charge of (re)naming the genus decided to throw darts at the wall as a method of deciding it
Who would've thought RandomDinos would oppose such ideas.
You could make that argument for the entirety of paleontology.
true, if you know very little about paleontology
but troodon/latenivenatrix/stenonychosaurus is a whole different level of mess
You say this but people treat this fact as if plants suddenly no longer have any nutrition in them and carnivorous tendencies are a must instead of an outlier
in some ways it's comparable to what people are doing with spinosaurus aegyptiacus but at least the spinosaur stuff is comprehensible
even trying to read troodon papers gives you a headache
Tbh I would go for a cheeseburger too 😋
Sometimes I feel like paleontologists don't even know what they're talking about tbh. Things are so old and with so little to go off of
Ppl are dumb(most of the time)
I mean, you can't say one is a headache and one is comprehensible
A compregensible headache
Regarding the original point though, pachy has teeth astoundingly similar to carnivores in the front. I highly doubt that they were there for no reason.
Satisfactory.
The nanotyrannus hunter
pachy teeth are very different from carnivore teeth, and very similar to north american troodontids, which aren't carnivores
though where troodontids fall on the omnivory/herbivory spectrum is hard to tell
Opportunistic or otherwise, I would be willing to bet it had some variant of meat in its diet
Yeah!!
Thats my entire point,thank you
Don't we have like troodontid pellets? Pretty sure we do
I think the most important thing here is I’ve only seen like…3 videos be posted of “Omg herbivore eats meat” when, if it were done with any degree of regularity, I’d assume there’d be more than 3!
Fact remains is that humans have messed up the ecosystem real bad so deer are suffering in some areas and captive animals are in a scenario not witnessed by dinosaurs so assuming they’re applicable is erroneous at best
Also this skull is reconstructed with 0 publications on it, there’s no indication of what part is real or fake
" One aggregate consists of two individuals of the multituberculate Filikomys primaevus. This specimen is characterized by brecciated crania, articulated postcrania, and an absence of digestive markings, all suggestive of a non-predatory origin. Two additional aggregates consist of 3 and 11 individuals, respectively, primarily of the marsupialiform Alphadon halleyi. High proportions of crania and indigestible elements (e.g. teeth), extensive disarticulation and breakage, digestive corrosion patterns, and the absence of a phosphatic ground mass are indicative of regurgitalites and align with features of extant prey in diurnal raptor gastric pellets. We interpret these specimens as the oldest known mammal-bearing regurgitalites. The discrepancy in taphonomic features implies behavioural separation between the two mammalian taxa at the locality. Abundant shed teeth and nesting evidence at the locality favours the non-avian theropod Troodon formosus as the predator responsible for the regurgitalites"
Well, Sir Gualicho... You told me such lack/abundance of samples can be atributted, scientifically, as: Preservation Bias.
the troodon pellets would suggest omnivory yeah, although ''these pellets came from troodon because we found troodon teeth at the site'' is a classic case of taphonomic bias
Here's sandy then at the museum.
That could be only 3-4 videos
But u cant say that this could happens in nature
There numerous sightings of these type of creatures engaging in "anormal" behaviors
Such a squirrels goin into birds nest to eat eggs/babies
Again the fkin cows eating rats for exemple
sandy is also known to not preserve the front teeth
https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-abstract/136/7-8/2689/629495/New-biogeochemical-insights-into-Mesozoic isotopic studies of troodontids sampled from the Oldman Formation pinned them as mixed feeders to plant dominant omnivores. So, omnivores. They were a really diverse group with a wide temporal and geographic range though, I'm sure it varied to a degree as well between taxa
Pretty sure there would be sockets in the premaxilla, no? Oh wait, there isn't a premaxilla
yeah, the asian ones are generally acknowledged to be more carnivorous than the north american ones
True, recent discoveries (2024) in hell creek have found premaxillary fangs in pachy skulls however.
Im sayin that
It's possible
And it could happen
Im not sayin that herbivores will try to hunt other animals
But if they had the opportunity to eat something meat related
Like a carcas
Or small animals
They will do if needed
Same with carnivores
Like lions eating grass to sustein their diet
Etc etc
God im tired
lions eat grass to induce vomiting, but sure
My biggest wager that pachy was geared to eat whatever it could within it's region. Making it omnivorous, wether that was a 50/50 split or otherwise I make no claim to.
Guys, what if we settle this on the terms of...
" It is subjective "?
Paleontology moment!
Omg it's agnes tachyon
That too if im not mistaken
Many hyper carnivores do eat grass to vomit
And also for their diet
Sometimes its important to eat some salad(but not toooo much)
Omg it's... Oh... I'm sorry for your loss.
I mostly eat fish myself.
I like gish but i preffer chicken
But that's because I live on an island in the Pacific. It's dirt cheap that way.
Can't beat grouper on a stick
Fish on a stick u say...
What if I ate a Psittacosaurus on a stick?
What if i ate Mawsonia on a stick?
Dryosaurus on a stick?
Im hungry
Yutyrannus wants to know your location
I assume nesting evidence also refers to Troodontid eggs
presumably
Uuuhh what where were talking about..?
Me on my way to eat a roasted Edmontosaurus
Closest you'll get is Coelacanth lol
(It's mid)
So
Are we gonna adress the elephant in the room or nah?
Is it Loxodonta sp. or Elephas sp. ?
If you're referring to me eating a vulnerable fish species, let me clarify, (fishermen unscrupulous they are) catch them as bycatch, and some of the wily individuals will sell fried bits of it regardless of its status in Indonesia.
I don't have a favorite I just think they're neat.
I was not talking 'bout that,
But sure
None?
Like
"Oh my i realy like this allosaurus"
Or "i love this camptosaur"(if u are weird/j)
In game it's sarco and pachy. Otherwise I do like my kaprosuchus
Irl i like spinosaurus becuz duh
Its one of the most coolest dinos out there
We talking about favourite dinosaur?
I think the only one I actually like that's a true dinosaur is pachy 😂 I guess I just like my crocodyliforms
crocs can do anything dinosaurs can - except fly
Goofy ahh shrink-wrapped 1972 gobiosuchus
Spec Evo Moment
Question ia there actually any croc that has the old depiction of kapros build?
Crunch!!
chew chew
I'm worried the day we get the true end all be all of evolution. When crab and croc mix
They’ll be spec evo-ing anything and everything except the most reasonable and likely directions for groups to go
Flying carnivorous cattle
What are you asking? If you're inferring to the idea that kapro was primarily a land predator, they canned that idea
See i'm on android browser, but now I would send that gif of armstrong and raiden shaking hands and hugging
No i meant i am curipus if there are any crocodilfoems that has the look of old kaprosuchus depiction
I'm still not picking up what you're putting down. The closest modern relative would be the Cuban crocodile
Cuban and Nile Crocs I think.
he's asking if there are any crocodylomorphs that are big, quadrupedal, have long legs, and are carnivorous
The nile is closer to sarcosuchus
Sarco? Naaaaaaaah
to which the answer is something like stratiotosuchus is the closest analogy
Bro is just a noodle with legs
Leggies. The nile has them to the sides, the Cuban has them a little more underneath, mind you, they're still pretty distant
Digitigrade Crocodylomorphs were a fantastic thing that happened
Doggo.
Not my fault the maker's allergic to neutral pose
Genuine question does your name just parody Lancian's name or was it like just on accident?
I mean you can just edit it to have one, no?
He jus coolin'
Thanks.
Definitely needs that tooth fixed though
Will never understand why researchers can’t whip out their iphone and take a decent photo of all the material instead of leaving it in the dark for years
Researchers just live in the moment, no cellphone in sight
Which ik is only something people can really do nowadays but something oughta be done
If it was that simple we would've gotten info on a lot of unknown or poorly known stuff tbh
It likely is, because frankly if you have all the material in the lab that isn’t obscured or heavily covered in debre (which it is sometimes and there is always a potential understandable reason why something was left out) then it’s presumably not too hard to get a good multiview photoshoot of the material to put into your supplementary
Idk man maybe I'm too busy studying the specimen instead of taking pictures for the gram
See, but if it was, we would get that so easily, which we don't. I won't say that researchers are lazy, but rather there's like multiple factors that probably don't allow them to do much with the material, where in some situations there were possible. We do know for instance that there is undescribed Purussaurus brasilienses vertebrae
I do wonder when those’ll get looked at.
Give it 200 years. Assuming there won't be any unattended maintenance problems along the way that'll make us loose the fossils forever.
It's like gambling really... " 90% of gamblers quit before winning big!!! "
If deinosuchus was saved from fadeno then purussaurus’s entire body can be rescued from the darkness
Who knows…maybe it could get even larger…?
See, I have something. But I don't have neither photos of the undescribed verts, nor good skeletal references of Caimans ( Besides that paper where the skeleton of a juvenile melanosuchus is described ) so not a priority for me, really.
Actually I may know some contacts for the skeletal references... But the verts are a no go for me.
there was a pseudosuchian with hollow bones, hesperosuchus, there was also fully aquatic crocs that were streamlined, so its not impossible that they might adapt to fly at somepoint
As in they can’t be shared, or you don’t want to do them
Because tbh…I couldddd be willing to assist. 
These ones r silly i wanna pet em
Idk if you know who I am... But let's say that one of the people who had access to the material... Valid reasoning to not like me at al. You want to get in contact with paleontologist Lucy Gomes de Souza, idk if the verts are the subject of a ongoing paper, if they are, this will be useless.
I’m aware of older situations, but it seems you’ve changed considerably since then. Hoping so
It's a frequent fight, really.
Lyviatan’s head was likely extremely asymmetric
Not going to lie, they all look adorable
Wait….. What about Giraffatitan? Did people forget about that in Africa’s Jurassic?
Rage and despondence at the ai slop invading my dino images. So desperate I might have to keyword games for references or paintings or specific papers or something instead because just searching for the animal itself gives me so many ai image results it's disgusting. Chat do you have stego recons and skeletals. I don't want to give any viewership to the algorithm of slop
Same
Welcome to Prehistoric Park with Nigel Marvin
Best show
In regards to the whole "there are no true herbivores!" or "Herbivore eat meat sometimes!" misinformation.
https://www.youtube.com/clip/UgkxX5Pisp7YY0WvQOf5lI7bifoMDO7kr7oy
eating grass to vomit does not make it apart of their diet, the fact it causes them to vomit shoyld be a strong indicator that they infact do not just dislike it, but are physically incapable of consuming it.
Lions are also not just hypercarnivores, they're obligate predators as they need sufficient fresh organ meat as they cannot produce their own vitim A.
The idea hyper herbivores/carnivores stray from vegetation or meat is just not true in alot of the famous examples.
even humans are unable to digest grass as it requires a specialty adapted gut to do so
Thank you so much for this I genuinely was dying when I saw someone talked about Triceratops being a facultative carnivore
I think people imagined this due to its oddly pointy, curved beak
Wait until they hear about parrot beaks 
We can also quite reasonably tell an animal's from tooth isotope testing, enough to see that suchomimus generally was more piscivorous leaning than sarcosuchus which was slightly more balanced between taking terrestrial prey and fish
I know you already explained it but why do you think some people think the "only obligate herbivore" are koalas out of ALL herbivores
I had a whole argument in backer chat about it a while ago, someone hit me with "I have cows, what about you mr skin artist?"
I really hate how a lot of people use those famous clips as smoking guns argument knowing damn well as they so called imply themselves these are very rare or very uncommon occurrences
OH YEAH I forgot to add I feel like dinosaur dietary system like their stomachs would obviously be very different from any ungulate stomach track to allow it to even digest meat or bones like that
In the most respectful way I can possibly say it comes off as a prime example of the dunning kruger effect to me, in that the reality of the carnivore Herbivore spectrum is more complex than just a simple slider.
Not all arguments about this are like that but some are
YES
Never mind the fact you must have the right enzymes to be even able to digest certain foods, or in the cases of termites where they have hyper specialist bacteria break down wood for them.
"nah f that, you saw that one random vid of a horse eating a baby chick, Hadrosaurs might've done it too!
Or the fact say even if alien life is carbon based and basically the same as earth life on broad strokes, it would likepy be extremely toxic to us and visaversa due to the massive amounts of hypothetically possible carbon based protien chains etc there are, even if you mirror a chemical formula of an earth protien it would become a toxin because it wouldn't fit into any of the enzymes we have.
Special thanks to:
Miles Wronkovich: @LetsHaveaBouba
Logan Kearsley: @LoganKearsley, @theoryneutralpodcast, https://gliese1337.blogspot.com/
PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/biblaridion
DISCORD: https://discord.gg/AjvkZBzvka
TIRA DISCORD: https://discord.gg/hZgnWzW
MUSIC: Groove Grove - Kevin MacLeod
SOURCES:
Lars Ruddigkeit, Ruud van ...
Look
Im sorry uf my statments were equivocate to say the least last night
I was drunk
And the fact that i even managed to type was a miracle
But i agree with ur arguments
And also i have to say that i was pretty ignorant
oh don't worry about haha
Anyway
Any new paleo news out there in general?
Im trying to force myself to actualy read more about the papers instead of just lookin at the pictures like a baby
You are what you eat-hatzegopteryx
What
I also get drunk and say dumb stuff lol
You are a sweetheart,Doctor
I sense some sarcasm here...
One new paper about iguanodontians just got published. I posted a link here, a few minutes ago.
Actualy no,i do belive you are very sweetheart coded
Thank you Genny
Thats actualy pretry interesting to see how these creatures spread globaly during their time..also what is "Bayesian"?
hatz irl were known to eat hatchling dinos, or small ones atleast
Are u sayin that i eat babies?/j
not unless you are hatz irl lol
Who said that i aint?
hatz noises
it's not your fault, you have to to survive

RULES OF NATURE
you eat babies
Imagine cowboys and dinosaurs
They would extinct the local edmontosaurus population for food.
@real swan
Did I mess up?
I think I messed up and broke a rule. I’m sorry.
Yeah no file links are sus
I was just trying to link a free PDF to a paper that’s paywalled. I won’t put file links again.
Oh, the original post. I was sharing a new scientific paper. Still, I’m sorry for breaking a rule. Won’t happen again.
Bayesian methods are statistics used to provide a probability that a particular theory is true. In paleo, it’s often used to build phylogenetic trees.
Oh ok ty
i can play this for free?
if you buy it
It's free once you pay €30
Gorgosaurus is such a cool dino my god
Alberto could never
Btw if I vanish into the aether its cus I'm working!
I said, on land it would have maneuvered between quad and bipedal according to terrain. The ouranosaurus or dimetrodon are good examples of how other semi aquatics also were this way.
Torvosaurus was basically the first trex lol
You said Spino where mostly Quadrupedal.
(except dime was a full time quad and ourano was built entirely differently from a larger family known to do so and specialized for it)
Which one of these is torvosaurus.
you have to consider also that these animals were build to resist the pressure of the deep water. which means there front limbs as you said earlier are not infact weak at all. but incredibly dence.
Well ouranosaurus I don't believe is semi-aquatic. There is a case to be made about Dimetrodon, but I don't think I've ever heard of bipedal movement for it and its limbs wouldn't suggest it in the slightest. It decends from quadrupedal animals. Spinosaurus did not.
Also left is torvo
left right is nano
on land, due to their center of gravity
Thats why he got sucha big tail
it could not support itself safely from said gravity on quad seeing it literally was further back
Kinda hard to tell apart from nano lol. They could probably say nano was a megalosaurid or torvosaurus tomorrow and wouldn't be surprised
It should also be stated that the interpretations from 2014 predate the discovery of what its tail really looked like in 2021, and since then its tail has gotten even longer
that cant account for all of it. a tail helps distribute mass, but if it were only for its tail, it would have just fell over in any fight.
ok you probably right Spino Quad make actually sense
That can be said about pretty most bipedal dinosaurs I think! The tail is there in part for counterbalance for bipedal posture and locomotion
it would maybe but Spino wasnt a strong theropod killer either :p
Sauropods also have huge tails for balancing lol
dont sell yourself out to disengage. your better than being facetious. Im being legit. be legit.
worst case scinario one of us is wrong, best one of us learn something. im just not sold on bipedal.
So officially Spino is Quadruped that he would fall when using claw slam
There's no reason to assume Spinosaurus was quadrupedal
ill be back. gotta pick up my daughter from school.
*unless it's made-up to look cool
!!!!
Vally is quadrupedal
What reason could t rex have not beeing Quad?
the Vallyvenator is quadrupedal. It hunted slow herbivores, that's why it lost bipedalism, so it wasn't fast anymore!! ( Source: The Dinosaurs, probably )
Real image of Gualicho
yes i wonder how the Anky did not 1 shot the t rex there is no way
Not to say spinosaurus couldn't have such a novel adaption as it is a pretty novel animal, but no reason to assume.
Especially not when we seemingly do have one of those adaptions to the COM problem. It has big tail. Hanging around water a lot probably helps take the weight off too
tbh, I think the most stupidest thing we ever made up, was that " Theropods can simply flip Ankylosaurs " where there is not like, what? Not a single Ankylosaur specimen ever, that died flipped
Look foxes how they kill hedgehog
I mean we have zero evidence for or against htat
Legit, the most common cause of death for ankylosaurs according to the fossil recod is literally, drowning and old age.
"Hmmmm yes, let me pick up the living rock with a warhammer for a tail gently with my tiny barely useful trex arms"
T rex could just bite its head and kill anky
Anky head plates on his Eyebrows? also how would t rex get on his head when Anky had its huge club
What ankylosaur had an osteology done on it that indicated death via old age 
The club is in the back not the front ;)
T rex would never penetrate an Anky tbf no proof yet 1 BB rex is dead
ummmm, Im pretty sure everything dies of old age at somepoint in this earthly prison
none, really. I just made up that up, because some just straight up lack pathologies and any signs of being dragged by a flood, so, they likely just died from old age, really
Or they were not complete enough to show evidence of predation? 
Work time bye play nice
T rex should take Anky out to dinner first (but I feel confident it could bite hard enough to take it out with a head/neck bite)
which we currently have zero? How many Ankylosaur genera and species we have compared to that?
it doesn't
Silly falcon you know fossils only show the parts of the animal that existed
That means some animals lack body parts of course
no chance rex eating da club
The assumption is that "we have a lot of ankylosaur genera with little evidence of predation so surely they were rarely hunted" and yet the Tarbus isotopes indicate otherwise
nvm, there's that Tarchia and maybe Zuul, but some contest it's pathologies from infraspecific confrontation, so that's just another obstacle.
We also have no proof young sauropods were hunted by theropods and yet... 
Wonder if some dinos ate their male Mates(would be cool if it was me)
Ambush from the front would not be THAT hard. Pretty sure they had bad vision
Can i see that? Out of curiosity
this is because dinosaurs cared about cinematics and would rather have an epic fight to the death with a 50 ton sauropod than just scoop up a baby
No because I'm actually publishing so hard rn...
Just like the papers predicted it ( Jurassic Ornithopods aren't worthy of the spotlight )
Ankylosaurs are likely more susceptible to predation than we think given the isotopic evidence in that one instance.
you say like Anky had no turnspeed :p also it sees infront better then behind
Yeah I do not buy that they were unapproachable
Real.
You don’t really need to flip it. Biting the head would probably do the job just as well while being more practical.
It's a question of whether it could turn fast enough
Truly, one isotopic evidence proves Ankylosaurs were huntable... Not accounting for variables that do in-fact happen in our extant record, where Carnivores would hunt more risky prey. What? What utter nonsense! Glory to the Tyrannosaurs! ( Half-Joking, but that's how it feels really )
Couldn't trex just pick up a really big rock and just drop it on the anky?
A rex could also in theory crush the anky under its own weight but that’s also, yeah.
Anky would smash the rock back with its tail like a baseball
Yeah, that's how it went extinct. Also why every Anky specimen is crushed in some way lol
Lmaooo
Caveman drove every massive animal to ever exist to extinction trust, even the dinosaurs.
it would probably be easier to just pick up the anky or bite it on the head than somehow pick up a rock that can crush with more force than its jaws
See, it's actually the Tyrannosaurus DNA that made the Indominus kill for sport. Because as we know, Tyrannosaurus definetly hunted Ankylosaurus for sport.
Anky would smash t rex skull with his club
I mean we have an ankylosaur skull that shows Tarbosaurus was going for the head and popping it like a balloon though IIRC the animal survived for a little bit after the attack
Why the dinosaurs went extinct
I saw a tiktok comment say that Tyrannosaurus tortured its prey like the cartel so this checks out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmMqFdYkiCM forget trike
The Tyrannosaurus Rex is known as the king of the dinosaurs and ruler of Cretaceous North America. However, there was another king that lived along the Rex, and it was no carnivore, this was the Ankylosaurus
If you want more ExtinctZoo 🦖:
Extra videos on our HeroHero: https://herohero.co/extinctzoo/join
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Ext...
See, that I did make mention of. But, others say it can also just be internal injury partially caused by a blow from another Tarchia club. So, that itself just becomes subjective.
I don’t think Tarchia has teeth on its club
their tails were strong, but not THAT strong
Anky slightly overrated ngl
Pretty sure that skull wasn't found with a teeth, as far as I remember. If it's the animal own teeth, yeah, sure... But a Tarbosaurus teeth pierced on it? Nope, that I don't think I remember.
Post it
*Cries in strange cenozoic/permian animals noises"
they where you talk like rex skull is a car or something haha
T rex's skull is no joke. Insanely solidly put together
generating an impact force between 7,281 and 14,360 Newtons, which is enough to shatter the bones of large predators like Tyrannosaurus rex. The club, acting like a massive sledgehammer, could swing with an immense lateral impact stress of 364–718 Megapascals.
Trex cannot outtank obsidian spears though
well it kinda was the size of a small car but even more durable
It was able to survive bites comparable to being stood on by a large elephant fairly regularly, so an ankylosaur club wouldn't just 1 shot it like that
fact checked by scientists 👍
Extinct Zoo, cringe
Well Spino actually make short process with t rex
I don't doubt that it's strong. Blunt weapons need some room to swing for a strong blow though. Would require a "windup" for good impact force
how accurate is this depiction of livy? i've never seen someone depict it like this before
Anky wouldn't even need to kill the predator
Just need to land a solid blow and make the attacker back off with the least risk possible
congratulations, you have successfully proven that a tail strike from an ankylosaurus was 4x weaker than the bite of a T. rex, which over half of T. rex specimens are known to have survived to the face, meaning it could not infact 1 shot
@tough parcel Wow, there's not a single teeth preserved pierced in that skull. Look at that!!
See, Falcon. No offense, but sometimes I just think that you are ragebaiting me... And I hope you never stop it, because it's the funniest sh#t ever.
it doesnt matter its still shatter the bones an if you see big al you knew how that endet. But this is more lethal
Bulldozes the stupid cavemen and dies later
No single ankylosaurus blow is going to kill a trex. But it doesn’t have to. A splintered leg means it being crippled for the rest of its life at best and a painful death over the course of a few weeks at worst.
except we have proof that it doesn't shatter bones
What…? I never said teeth were embedded in the skull???
Bite marks from teeth????
Tooth marks are separate from blunt force trauma yes.
it can we have also no proof rex ever touched an Anky guess why :)) T rex couldnt even crush a Edmonto head btw..
Fair enough.
The distance between the center of the defect and the gouge mark on the rostral supraorbital is about 5 cm, versus a typical spacing between adult tyrannosaur teeth of 2–6 cm (Smith, 2005; personal observation). Given that some teeth usually are not fully erupted, 5 cm is thus consistent with a tyrannosaur bite.
Me when I'm right
Fair enough. Still wasn't flipped tho.
Never said it was...?
maybe t rex had a big biteforce at max but he would probably never used all of his biteforce.
because bite marks are rare and ankylosaurus has an awful sample size
The flipping thing is kinda dumb. That’s just practically not going to happen.
No, you didn't. But that's how the conservation started.
So we could say rex never could crush bones
except it could because we have proof of it and relatives doing so
Are we still falling for Vally's bait
show me :
Considering we have an ankylosaur skull showing proof of a tyrannosaur aiming for the head and Triceratops skulls with bite marks that indicate a frontal assault, I think tyrannosaurs (theropods in general) were built significantly more different than we make them out to be
not falling for it, just trying to make sure nobody actually believes it and then goes and spreads their misinformation elsewhere
will the world fall apart if somebody thinks different ? i just want you to back it up.
Don't think so. Otherwise, it's a bit inconsistent with what we may find with Hadrosaurs. Tho, the reason could be that Tyrannosaurs are just trying to disable the prey's option to fight back in time, otherwise, not so much.
Statistically if trike was as insanely deadly as made out to be, to where there was a solid chance of death with every attempt, than every rex would be dead by the end of the month.
People have started assuming they were very careful and wouldn't dare attack a risky prey item or launch a suboptimal attack
Perhaps indicative they took a different approach with the defenseless prey than they did with the walking fortresses
Same with buffallos if bufallos where smart there where no lions.
fight 100 leptoceratops sized tyrannosaurus's or fight 10 tyrannosaurus sized leptoceratops
No mistake. Triceratops most certainly was dangerous. But it’s not like the tyrannosaurs don’t know that. Whose to say they didn’t have strategies for handling such things, if still with risk.
There's crushed bone in their poops
no humans or animal use all of his biteforce anyway even if rex could we have no proof... still waiting
Dangerous =/= unapproachable
Also it seems the Tarbosaurus w/ an ankylosaur preference was from an unpublished paper that got leaked YEAAAAAAAAARS ago
So we may never know
rex actually had a symbiotic relationship with ankylosaurs, the anky crushed the bones for them as their bite was too weak to do it
Not really, I think that is just more indicative that the approach is similar, but is trying to disable the defensive capabilities of other respective animals. Hadrosaurs we kinda we see bites aimed at other areas of the body, where severe damage would disable the animal's capability of running, where Triceratopsinis and Ankylosaurs they are avoiding areas where they could hit them back in the process... Although, a Triceratops frill may not be so wise, if it slips and the animal turns on you.
somebody with sense here
Yeah animals very rarely use 100% of their possible muscle force. Applies to anky too. Still plenty strong to crush bones
I mean that's the funniest part, we have a fossil of a Trike skull of that exact scenario (Rex bite marks were on the underside of the frill, impossible to reach unless the Rex was underneath)
anyway i think a Rhino would be super deadly to approach for a rex too so an Trike in a fair frontal fight will win 80%. Trike and Rex where evolved to fight each
Not necessarily, it's just that the bite mark is in a more specific angle, and if we are to assume that 9-10 tons is an average Tyrannosaurus ( Not something that I agree with ), it really can't get under most of those specimens we have... If anything, Triceratopsinis who potentially have evidence of surviving Tyrannosaurus encounters, just indicate that they likely killed their predator or they messed up, allowing a breach for their prey to escape.
There's also the alternative that, the Tyrannosaurus just left wounded... But a stab from either Torosaurus or Triceratops horn, I don't think you have many chances.
I do think it’s likely to assume, in most circumstances, if we have multiple datapoints of a carnivore attacking a herbivore, regardless of the outcome, than it’s likely to be evidence of a predator prey relationship rather than just the exceptional attempts. Cause fossil record evidence rare go brr.
Definetly. I would only add that we are not really looking into the circunstances that would drive for these Tyrannosaurs to pick their prey, but otherwise, a proven possibility is a possibility.
An Adult trike is immortal for a t rex
(This also doesn’t go into the papers suggesting that tyrannosaurus had specific methods of butchering the carcasses of both triceratops and edmontosaurus)
cute rexy.
Rexy solos tho
so like in path, when spino tail slams, I feel like if that were the case, of a spino to use its tale for the sake of combat, it would not be able to just balance on its two rear legs for such an attack, instead it would actually have to ground itself on its frontal limbs, also, in combat, i believe its primary attacks would have been made with its front limbs using its tail as a grounding force to subdue its pray. for example in the event it was fighting another apex like a tyrannosaurus, which i think its highly unlikely anyway.
and that one xD
Although, to be frank here. I feel like we have more evidence of Tyrannosaurus and Torosaurus ( or Triceratops ) predator prey relationship, mostly because for whatever reason North America Maastrichtian, specifically the formations where we find these, don't have a lot of other ornithischians anyways. Which, just asks if those would influence drives for Tyrannosaurus to take more risks when hunting prey items. When in comparison: Campanian North American Formations have a lot more options of Ornithischian contemporary Tyrannosaurs can hunt. Don't know if you agree with this, but I think it's a relevant detail anyways.
Allat just to still be rexs dinner on a random Tuesday ngl
Solos his head on its Spike sure
That is a contributor although I don’t think anyone is saying lack of said evidence would mean it didn’t happen.
Poor triceratops ngl
Spino just has more tools then t rex
I feel like spino would have mainly fought deinosuchos or sarcosuchos and just wrestled the crap out of them.
like, per say, here we are working with 1 predator and 4 available prey items in the ecosystems it's present, so likelyhood to find evidence of predator prey relationship is more likely, simply because the number of ecological members is smaller. If this was a ecosystem that had 2 predators and ( hypothetical, maybe an exaggeration ) 13 available prey items in the ecosystems they are present, you are going to find less evidence of predator prey relationship, not in general, but specifically, and that is not accounting for variables, such as predation of younger prey items or other situations where the opportunity would seem favorable.
Also why Spinosaurus in jp3 hunted rexes on a daily bases when he smelled the urin of it?
Spinosaurus hunted carch
I think hunted is a strong word. Im sure they had confrontations, they shared the same ecosystem.
The star of the 2008 Penn Reading Project and everyone's favorite tetrapod, Tiktaalik now has his own music video!
Music by the Indoorfins:
www.myspace.com/theindoorfins
Penn Reading Project:
www.upenn.edu/nso/prp/
She just kinda says stuff it's funny
we have fossilized evidence
Mhm sure we do
I'm the fossilized evidence btw
@steep atlas what's your favorite plesiosaur?
What’s the largest liopleurodon we have evidence of?
Recently found out I live close to some lignite and clay deposits and found some amber!
Maybe good ole elasmosaurus
@queen oar what's yours?
Microcleidus
What do you like about it
see, I know that likely this is not a exclusive thing about it, but it's probably the first Plesiosaur that I leanerd about that had like binocular vision, and I assume, potentially explore deeper waters?
Hmm maybe so. Did it have especially large eyes?
Very strange creature
probably the most awesome plesiosaur ever really.
The first one no?
Yo thats cool
Did the headshape of this thing come from an old reconstruction, or is there another pliosaur/plesiosaur with a similar head and teeth?
I think it was based out of othe pliosaurs iirc
Cuz i think at the time they didnt have skull material for this one?
My favorite plesiosaur is Aristonectes due to how different it looked to other plesiosaurs
All plesiosaurs kinda look the same to me
Except for the filter feeding ones
whats the earliest example of tarpits we have in the fossil record?
The Buckhorn asphalt lagerstätte, it's marine so different from La brea or terrestrial asphalt seeps but it's got the same great preservation. It's Middle Pennsylvanian
this channel is heaven for a little nerd like me
Case #9634 @plucky rock has been warned.
Reason: Invite link.
this is literally the struthiomimus from prehestoric park...https://x.com/AMAZlNGNATURE/status/2047034355432784196
The ostrich mimic
is that a ostrich? i thought it was a rhea
Struthiomimus means ostrich mimic
ik, but what species is that in the video i sent
It’s an emu
The video doesn't play on mobile
click the link
Twitter acts like a scam link when you try to look at the comments because I don't have Twitter, but that's definitely an emu
The JWE 1 struthio (specifically 1 due to color) comes to mind too
IIRC the largest possible specimen is also the largest Pliosaur tooth period
I wonder if dinosaurs came back today the world would lose a war to them like australia did to the emus
Of liopleurodon??
Emus won the war because maybe using machine guns on fast moving,feather packed, scattering animals wasn’t a good idea
Ankylosaurus/ampelosaurus will be able to deflect bullets trust
If more tactical and specific weaponry was used then maybe the war would’ve gone on for longer but we’d be winning.
Ankylosaurus would get a sniper round to the neck and be downed
Yes
It has proportionally huge teeth tho
All birds are dinosaurs, but not all dinosaurs are birds
"All birds are dinosaurs" but what about, pterosaurs?
All pterosaurs are Archosaurs, but not all Archosaurs are pterosaurs
How huge.
Supposedly about 17 inches
Well how big is the animal likely if it just had huge teeth?
About 9 meters
how accurate is this kentro artwork? https://x.com/Beast_SculptKit/status/2046996736808300673
It's time for some awesome new Beasts of the Mesozoic package art, and we're kicking off our look at the next assortment with Kentrosaurus! Beautiful work here by Heitor de Sa Oliveira.
Preorder the action figure at: https://t.co/qXBGJZtTNV
So gorgeous
https://x.com/Brand0nsm181274/status/2046923787887624677/photo/1 who was your favorite from dinosaur planet?
A. anax
everytime... That name puts a smile on my face...
same
Rip
None
Becuz i never watched it
Spino or x
i dont even wanna know
I honestly thought that was extinct zoo just from the clickbait thumbnail and title alone lmao
i can't believe the mesozoic parasites were parasites of animals of their time and not modern ones!
Could camarasaurus survive the southern part of northern America?
wonder how many red necks it could beat with a single kick
Creepypasta ahh thumbnail lol.
HE KILLED THE KIDS
"HE ATE THEM..." ahh thumbnail 🥀 
I just imagine a camarasaurus in a swamp like those old paleoart pieces
I'd put that in gumbo
Florida moment, tbh you could put a ton of dinos in florida and it wouldn't seem weird
No couillon it's louisiana
Probably one or two before the rest open fire
is this good or bad? https://x.com/DobotRobotics/status/2046834202419909010
It evolves again. 🦖
65 million years after they vanished, something awakens again—this time in a lab.
DOBOT introduces FIRST BREATH Biomimetic Embodied Intelligence 3.0, our latest breakthrough in lifelike robotics. 🤖
#DOBOT #INFFNI #EmbodiedAI #BiomimeticRobotics
https://x.com/Edaphosaurus/status/2047318807165665551 OH MY GOD BRO
EW
It's gonna eat you
Oh hey
I was talkin about this theses days
A synonym of Huanansaurus, but I’m sure many will colloquially call it Corythoraptor regardless
The bigger harm was depicting it in a temperate hardwood forest
😭
Fun fact, carcharodontosaurus and giganotosaurus are more related to allosaurus then any tyrannosaur
I can see it in their heads. Tyrannosaurids look way different in the face
Whats that has to do with the image lmao
Also yeah i know
They ban you for posting memes unrelated to paleo in paleo trust
This is evil
I rather die
I know lmao, it's basically a croc with fur
@steep atlas Did you know that I also have a T. mcraeensis skull diagram?
I did not! Feel free to show me
Hmm interesting, why did you make the lacrimal that tall?
either misinterpretation of what was lacking in the material, or speculative liberty. Won't remember now. It's based on CM 9401, mostly because since T. mcraeensis is a " Older species " of Tyrannosaurus, it would make sense to base it on a old specimen of Tyrannosaurus ( Mostly assuming that traits would be consistent )
Kaijutitan.
WHAT
It makes it look a bit like daspletosaurus lol
It gets better
Why man
Hell nawwh....
Consistent theme with Southwest Tyrannosaurus remains really. They look a bit of a inbetween Tarbosaurus and Daspletosaurus. This is mostly a composite reconstruction. It has the Javeline Tyrannosaur ( TMM 41436-1 ), The Elephant Butte Tyrannosaur ( NMMNH P-3698, who now is the holotype of T. mcraeensis ) and although the previous specimen already had those parts preserve, I did use the North Horn Tyrannosaur ( UMNH 11000 ), and a Daspletosaurus torosus specimen ( TMP 2001.36.1 ) to make an alt with a cornual ossification and a palpebra bone included
Maybe it's going to be like nanotyrannus again.
Looks really cool agnes! Good work
See, I'm trying to interrupt the cursed posting of Geb lol
Nanotyrannus was discovered to be a torvosaurus descendent /jk
Heh much appreciated
I also think it looks more unique from regular trex
Iirc it's quite a bit older than Rex so that would track
Tbh, I just wanna Stygimoloch and Dracorex back, we were robbed and they got replaced by mid.
How do we know dinosaurs didn't have ears
Becuz they were reptiles
And as far as we know
Reptiles dont have ears like how mammals do
I am in the "stygi is pachycephalosaurus spinifer" camp, and dracorex is juvenile spinifer
They did have ears
Yup, we got mid-cephalosaurus spinifer.
Heh, the spikes make it look cooler though
I wonder if there was a woolly stego that lived in the antarctic we just don't have fossils of, kinda like the fluffy iguanodon that was found
Hey doc @steep atlas
Do u think that its possible that t.macreensis is goin to merge into trex sometime?
Im not sayin its goin to happen
But due to how paleontology works most of the time
Its possible
We already know about dinosaurs that were covered in a thick coat of feathers
Hmm I don't know for sure. I think it deserves some further analysis
if we're thinking of the same iguano, that guy wasn't actually fluffy either! not fluffy in the same sense iirc
A lot of people already think thats the case. Whenever theres a new species, especially with as little material as Tmac, some people will always try to lump it into a relatively
okay well now is has to remain valid with a name like Tmac
we can't lose that
T.macdonald's
Tmac is just a shortened version of Tyrannosaurus mcraeensis
I know lol.
I just think my problem is how, this is just like mostly from a misunderstanding of how Pachycephalosaurs work in general, and it's quite literally something that fails to follow that same kinda of topic on other pachycephalosaurs? Oh, idk, we have a domeless Prenocephale, but last conclusion on that specimen, was that it's domeless nature didn't reflect anything ontogenetic, and more so something individual.
The mesozoic if it had a ice age
Was it a Prenocephale or Stegoceras? I forgot already...
idk about that, but I know that Homalocephale was proposed to be a juvie Preno and the flat skull was a characteristic of that, supported by Draco > Stygi > Pachy. But then I think it was recently found that a juvie Preno specimen in fact had the dome skull and threw that idea out
Someone can correct me if I'm understanding it wrong
there is a stegosaur that lived in siberia just outside the arctic circle, but afaik it was probably big enough to not need any kind of fluff
Hmmm, I wonder if it could be one of those elusive examples of sexual dimorphism
I think they have those things that seals have
Like blob
A think coat of fat inside them
terrestrial animals dont have blubber
Yeah no
I know
But that would be funny if they did
at the time. But, more studies on other flat-headed domeless Pachycephalosaur specimens, kinda of concluded that it's more individual, and does not really reflect ontogeny. Per say, in the case of Stegoceras, there are domed individuals on the same size-range as domeless individuals, which is just implying that some individuals already develop domes earlier, some don't
@steep atlas and that's exactly my idea, it's just sexual dimorphism, as we expected. The only issue with the case of Pachycephalosaurus and Stygimoloch, those animals don't have a lot of material besides their ornaments and domes... Dracorex does. So comparing them in a way that excludes any potential doubts, it's not really possible at the moment. Unless, we find more complete specimens... There's also a skull from the Campanian that looks similar to Dracorex.
which studies? the preno ≠ homalo thing was from a few years ago but I don't exactly keep my hand on the pulse of pachycephalosaurids lol
QUETZALCOATLUS
La instalación de la réplica de un Quetzalcoatlus en un museo nos da idea del extraordinario tamaño de este pterosaurio del Cretácico
Oh yeah, that exists
Thats cool
Dyer et al. 2021 " Taking a crack at the dome: histopathology of a pachycephalosaurid (Dinosauria: Ornithischia) frontoparietal dome "
https://doi.org/10.37819/biosis.002.02.0101
thank
It did
Damn
We have
Lambeosaurus glazer
And edmontonian idolatry
lambeosaurine vs saurolophini fight when
lambeosaurines solo obviously
I think both have a chanse to win
it doesn't exactly talk about Homalocephale. But, I think since it involves the nature of domeless Pachycephalosaur specimens, and does make the mention of that specimen of Stegoceras, I think it works for Homalocephale's case too.
the one I was thinking of was from 2018, which is a lot older than I thought lmao. I thought it at least breached 2020
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PPP...494..121E/abstract
Previously, only three pachycephalosaur specimens have been reported from the Nemegt Formation, two of which are holotypes (Homalocephale calathocercos and Prenocephale prenes) and all of which were collected from the classic Nemegt locality. Here, we describe several new cranial specimens from this formation, but which originate from Bügiin Ts...
I like both 🙁 let's ally against the iguanodontids
@runic rover Did you know that I have a Maiasaura drawn?
Show~
...unnecessarily ominous
There was a good reason
Um
Respectfully
Tf is up with that neck
I was interested on some experimentation. So, I did a Extreme Dewlap/Waddle
...I have many questions regarding this... But I don't think I'll indulge in my curiosity
Yknow what I get that, dewlap is cool
I want to slap the dewlaps
You sure? lol
@runic rover now, by any chance, is Megalosaurus also one of your favorites?
Torvo is my fav Jurassic dinosaur together with Miragaia
close enough.
So "kinda"
Yeah, see. I also have evil ideas stored for Megalosaurs. Specially with that lack of a nasal bone
Oh god.
isnt iguanadontid not even a thing anymore?
mono crest?
Whatever takes all of them (excluded Ourano, precious lil baby)
the kraken is REAL https://x.com/HildoBifrons/status/2047386880660914642/photo/1
WELCOME CRETACEOUS KRAKEN
Earliest octopuses were giant top predators in Cretaceous oceans
https://t.co/FsfSYU2wgH
Hallucigenia solos every pre históric animal
nope, never. No Neotheropod crests
I mean yeah
Giant and colossal squids exist today
How big is Saurolophus angustirostris? Is it still 13 meters long, 11 tons?
The evolution of the balls
Watch it get downsized to like 5m in like 3 months
Yeah
Or in 10 years
Like dunkleosteous
It’s like 10ft probably.
actually very cool and definitely a large cephalopod even if it's revised down later, paper is open access too https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aea6285
Why is the size range so large?
Don't think Saurolophus is 13m and 11t
Its like 8-9t iirc
Nvm is like 7.7t
Which makes sense
Huge Guy
@fossil ingot would you eat a Saurolophus leg?
It is already getting viewed with skepticism due to the methods. It's a really big cephalopod, potentially still the new largest, maybe, but 19m? Probably not.
We only have the beaks, and different species of its modern relatives have different sized beaks for their body size.
yeah, a friend is saying best bet is 8-12 meters
Hmmm... I could go for Stegosaur today.
Id be interested to see you draw this specimen
Oh no, I meant as food. But sure, what specimen?
https://youtube.com/shorts/sLzSQygLpxM?si=iq3HbygtoSsp0aic
Huh
Never heard of this guy
@hallow spear what specimen?
Maybe
Prob no
i dont get it
Octopus beak larger than a giant squid beak.
Huge for an octopus, even if it’s probably only 7 meters.
so the scalings are correct?
i dont think people tend to realize how big sucho is compired to spino. sucho is the same size as Spinosaurus mirabilis if you use the largest estimates
it varies depending on meathod used but the bare absolute minimum is 7 meters which would make it 50% longer than modern giant pacific octopus
and the largest?
but what about mass? since thats what determines size in science (i think)
19 meters
i dont feel safe
dont worry thats only 2 LARGE DASPLTOSAURUS?
someone call shoni to come fight this thing
do you guys think it will get the perecetus treatment?
haha we've gone way higher, you can bypass the height limiter on most of them
I mean
There bigger fish
Is there a bigger cephalopod though?
Not for the largest estimates, no
That's a big squid..
if we take the smallest estimate (1.6 m mantle length), then it would probably weigh less than Enchoteuthis, which has a 2 m mantle length. but the average estimate (~3m mantle) certainly has to outweigh Encho, and probably modern giant squid as well
has any skeletals of it been made yet? i wanna do some size comparisons
Octopus
Is yi qi closer in relation to theropod dinosaurs or avians.
Saying squid rolled off better, I know it's an octopus
Fair enough 👌
Therapods iirc
avians are a subgroup of theropod, you cannot be closer to theropods than to avians
but at least according to Hartman et al (2019), Yi is closer to avians than to any other theropod group
Anybody got a afrovenator skeletal
https://x.com/HodariNundu/status/2047455561738809386 this is absolutely horrifying.
Afrovenator..i wonder where he's from..
This can be more horrifying than any large therapod and even mosasaurs
what do we think Nanaimoteuthis was
1 - filter feeder
2 - active predator
3 - opportunist
4 - scavenger
All of them/j
it mostly ate ammonites and other shelled things
so mosasaurus was off the menu?
Considering it seems a more realistic size is 7-8m, most likely
i wonder who will have the larger downsize, Nanaimoteuthis or perecetus?
hm yes, filter feeder
Obviousaly
He used his beak to suck all those microshyt in the ocean!
(This comment is a satire)
I mean it could defens itself agaisnt em
Ig
Ans i think the sheer size of it would already be a good defense
Wait no
I think mosa is bigger nvm
Yeah..huh
Idk maybe it lived in deep water
Do you think it could have eaten shelled things like turtles too?
Depends the mosa it lived with
Possible, if it can catch an ammonite it can catch a turtle
i lowk got distracted hjere
This Stegosaurus cranium was scanned for the Natural History Museum of Utah. Stegosaurus armatus was found in the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, and had up to 17 armor plates on it’s back and 4 tail spikes.
Specimen Number UMNH VP C-44, Courtesy of Natural History Museum of Utah. Use of this and other properties of UMNH is covered under th...
"Lowkey" 
Enchoteuthis with deep water raptor gameplay would be swag as well
Groups-encho
Solo-nanaimo
Gimme the damn ancient cephalopods matt
Rest easy thag simmons
Hodari why can't you read :(
Big quid
it's likely not even the largest Cretaceous cephalopod
Big quid
whats potentially bigger?
Parapuzosia would be heavier than anything but the largest possible estimate
I Wonder, would they have preyed on eachother?
Maybe on smaller ones of eachother species
What timezone is path of titans in? late cretaceous?
I’d argue that might be a tad bit too small. Maybe somthn like 10m, but I think it’s worth trying to scale up with other cephalopods first
time paradox
so multi?
I fear Tyler Greenfield suspects the authors are biased towards gigantic cephalopods and, knowing nothing about them, will listen to the professional
Wasn’t Tyler a little too harsh and dismissive of the data though? The paper did try to prop up kraken sized but it still had research behind it and didn’t use a manatee to fill in for a whale cough and there was nothing confirming it was directly on either side of the scale spectrum
I feel like the safest play is to go with smaller estimates than assuming there's a cephalopod 3x the size of the largest recorded
Should be taken with caution but I don’t think making it as small as possible is the best course of action to do when there can still be better results that fit around the midline
S. armatus has a preserved cranium?
Averaging all the cirrates in the sample gets a 3m mantle length and 12.6 m total length, marginally bigger than a giant squid
Actually slightly shorter than the largest GS but almost definitely heavier
The paper scales it with more derived cirrates but says it likely would’ve been more like basal ones?
it was scaled after long bodied cirrates, which are basal
Let's eat it
Solution to all problems: Turn the problem into food.
Oh, then why such long tentacles with the scaling then? Or did basal species also have rather long tentacles as well
Apparently the latter
Enchoteuthis and stuff are briefly mentioned which have short arms but are not cirrates
Ah, I see
I question if they really average 4.2 times the mantle length, but mantle length is the important measurement for size anyway
Alternatively it was like this thing and it really was 18 meters but had the width of a person height
@hallow spear no scientific literature?
What an abomination.
Just like me, fr.
Every one of them
Apex predator of the Cretaceous some say
Yes. Just yes
Totally True trust
A man can only dream
What kind of dreams do you have???
Real ones
Isn’t Nanaimoteuthis haggarti more like an octopus than a squid? I heard that octopuses are proportionally more robust than squids.
Cirrate octopus, while modern day ones have more rounded bodies earlier species were more elongated
What’s a cirrate octopus?
I dream with scientific papers and scientific discussions ( real thing that happened )
This thing, little documentation of it
Aw. That’s cute
Wait a minute. I get it now. They’re finned octopuses.
That's also how I know Baryonyx is more aquatic than Spinosaurus ( My source is: My Dream )
Unfortunately the specimen is almost entirely undocumented other than it also being reffered to by another name being DNMH 33365 and this specimen number https://www.witmerlab.com/stegosaurus-s-stenops (all of these are the same specimen)
nothing else, like postcranial material?
Nope(maybe, but I couldn’t find anything), just a skull I was thinking perhaps you could draw the skull in sort of a headshot type thing
Is it always labeled as S. armatus, or is it a contested identification?
More recently it’s cf. stenops since armatus is cooked diagnostically
Well, That would be surprising, since it would confirm what I always thought, that Stegosaurus have crushed skulls preserved ( Most of the times ) and it looks more like Hesperosaurus. Kinda what I already did on my Loricatosaurus already
If anything, it's a bit cursed that I got it pretty close.
Hesperosaurus doesn’t have great skulls either, I’ve obtained better photos of Victoria and “moritz” (the latter of which is very well preserved and very stegosaurus like)
Victoria is quite interesting since it isn’t similar at least to me visually to moritz and the holotype of Hespero is a lost cause it’s too scrappy cranially
Speaking of which, a skeletal of loricatosaurus will be releasing at some point (maybe) soon
Technically, I could draw S. stenops. Since, I already drew S. ungulatus in the past
But you know... S. armatus... Very fragmentary... More appealing generally, really.
See, I would be excited, but because it's a British Dinosaur, I am already suspecting it's Folkes.
be who you areeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
It is not
also, I'm stupid, this is Lexovisaurus, fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu-
So what was the purpose of the exaggeration in the art then?
It’s probably intended to depict Loricatosaurus, Lexovisaurus is known from the Ilia and some hindlimb elements unless that’s intentional
no, it's Lexovisaurus, it's just me having the memory issues inherinted from part of my other family. I simply forget what I drawed sometimes
I see, well either way Lexovisaurus will get an edit based on Loricatosaurus anyway given the current consensus is they are close relatives
Really? I thought Loricato seemed more like a Dacentrurinae, but then again, I use very outdated methods of phylogenetics ( a.k.a. Pure Observation )
I'll be damned, I was right that Lexovisaurus is Stegosaurus-like.
While I don’t agree with omega lumped stegosaurus as it currently stands there’s very little it can be seperated into without destroying S. Stenops until an actual revaluation is done
@hallow spear Do you think Stegosaurus needs a visual and/or kit tlc in PoT?
Yes, but right now I couldn’t give any alternate to it since stegosaurus still lacks a skeletal without flaw, the best available is dempseys 2025 body mass supplementary Sophie, and then randoms composite
Alternatively, they can just do what I do. Edit GetAwayTrike's Skeletals to get up to date. lol
Unfortunately GATs skeletal is bad in its own ways too although he did make a new stegosaurus which is better than his old one
I mean, yeah. But you can just edit it, really. And then anything else, you can just pad up when doing the soft tissues.
While yes that’s an option it’s more a case of you cannot fix something that while it is broken, you don’t have the parts to fix it
Why does no one talk about yezoteuthis? its quite large!
Personally, I take the alternative of: We use our own minds to invent those tools as effectively as possible.
Perhaps i'm stubborn, but then again, you also consulted to the designs of some Stegosaurs, that I do know. So, it's not like entirely impossible.
I suppose, but it’s not something I’d do. I prefer my quality of edits to be based in substance rather than vibes . Then again, some things I say could probably be perceived as subjective toward sstegosaurs
less vibes, and more so taking observation from other materials, and elements. To try and come up with a well-rounded guess at the end of the day. Does it make it any different to other guesses? No. But, it's better than glue and tape, really.
what would a smallers stegosaurid defense be? safety in numbers? camoflauge?
Numbers, spikes, larger plates to seem more intimidating, more agile, a lot of things really
Camo is also an option
more agile? idk, i dont see, lets say, gigantospinosaurus being more agile then yangchungasaurus
oh yeah, Stego. @hallow spear which of the bones from Wuerhosaurus belong to a Dacentrurinae now?
well it wouldnt need to be more agile since they didnt live in the same formation 😟
“W, ordosensis” most likely
It’s entirely possible small stegosaurs like Gigantspinosaurus could gallop (not really gallop) to a degree
is there any speed estimates for smaller stegosaurids?
I estimated Huayangosaurus based on a graviportal gait before but since there is no ornithischian speed estimate not really useful to do so
realistically, it seems to be the first alternative Stegosaurs take, really. Idk if a case could be made for Stegosaurs with giant thagomizers being like a " Sloth-Bear analog " where offensives are exaggerated, likely due to the lack of alternatives to avoid predation, but generally most Stegosaurs don't seem to do that anyways.
stego and dace are the only stegosaurids that out weigh all the therapods from their formation, right?
I doubt it, there’s probably more
would you describe stegosaurids as primary / common / main prey-items like how ceratopsians, hadrosaurs and juvie / smaller sauropods are?
No clue
arent you the stegosaurid expert? 😢
Everything you said is physically unprovable or arguable in any logical way. You can argue multiple different angles for multiple different reasons for multiple different clades lol, i don’t particularly like that type of speculation
oh, i apolgoize then.
probably, common really. Stegosaurs and Sauropods seem that they could likely be attributed to the large density of forests at the time, given that they could've ate seeds and cones from the plants, and disperse them. " Probably ", so just a possibility
Oh wait I might have misunderstood you, stegosaurs seemed to be generally pretty common in the environments they were found, b it that could be preservation bias. There seems to be evidence for that @queen oar said about stegosaurs dispersing seeds (Isaberrysaura)
i dont know i always view stegosaurids as rarer then other species, like, when i think of a rarer species i think of like, anky or denver, something you'd seen rarely and alone even though i know thats not the case for stegosaurids
say, do you have that Wuerhosaurus by Gunnar Bivens?
never fear randomdinos is working on a new stego skeletal 😼
What are our thoughts on the new Muttaburrasaurus reconstruction?
I think he looks charming
Triceratops prorsus only
because we once had Agathaumas horridus
Sorry but I don’t trust
Yes!!!!!!
stego was trans
?
the colors
Oooh I see
How do we know what dinosaurs sounded like? https://youtu.be/cM98Vencdwo?si=6ZCrShXW2NOQSFOQ
urutau, passaro de hábitos noturnos aplica técnicas de camuflagem para confundir os predadores e facilitar a caça, este passaro foi encontrado a bordo do navio a caminho da bacia de campos. Não podemos soltá-lo no mar, pois dificilmente sobreviveria a 150km de vôo até terra firme. estamos postando este video na esperança que biólogos no...
Well we know that the modern voicebox birds use didn't evolve until after the KPG Extinction
So for theropods they would have made sounds similar to those that birds without voiceboxes make -think Ostriches, Cassowaries and Emus.
Recently some Ankylosaurs have been found with complex voiceboxes though, so for Ornithiscians it's still vastly unknown what they would have sounded like
Brachiosaurus singing could be real?(from jurassic park)
Probably not since whale vocalizations are very specialized and distinctly mammalian. From animals as big as sauropods I personally wouldn't expect vocalizations as complex as those of birds or even mammals. I think media like Prehistoric Planet portrays what they would have sounded like best. Hisses and grunts, as well as throbbing and deep sounds
If I heard this and saw a sauropod in the middle of the woods at night I would run for my life.
As you should lol. An animal so large would probably kill you by accident
"An animal so large would probably kill you by accident" how tall people feel irl
As a person who's 1.82 meters and still gaining height I can confirm this
we know what some hadrosaurs sound like by 3d modelling their crests and nasal cavities, but there arent any other non avian dinosaurs that we know the sound of
Correct, we can only make educated guesses
Is T.mcraeensis still a valid species or has it been finally been disproven? I’ve been on my wits end about this and I’m still not positively sure if it is a valid species
There is no consensus, some consider it valid while others do not.
Ostriches, emus, and cassowaries still have the avian voicebox, it's just not as fancy as it is in most birds. As for whether or not it's present in dinosaurs, we have no evidence either way.
when did quetz live again?
A quick Wikipedia search will tell you that it is Late Cretaceous
Ooh so I have this and digital circus to look forward to in June, June is really hyping itself up this year
Sooo there may have been a giant prehistoric octopus, like genuinely giant, it was described recently i think
Nanaimoteuthis
That's just a kraken lmfao, plus aren't cephalopods kinda fragile?
Might not be accurate but someone already made art of it
Would be sad if some mosasaur turned it into a huge calamari plate
What animal did they eat? Do we know?
Ammonites and giant clams most likely
The art might be a bit oversized but apparently they may have hunted young mosasaurs
Clams and scallops do taste good irl so I bet ammonites did too
Are we Triassic Kraken posting or is this something with real evidence this time
If so, what is it?
Food
Nanaimoteuthis is known from giant beaks from the late cretaceous
It was not as big as the art, that artist uses rule of cool a lot
Wait I just looked it up this thing is cool as frick
Was it related to dumbo octopuses? I’m seeing a lot of reconstructions of it like those
What if it was just a normal sized squisd with a really big mouth
Tbh it seems more likely it would be a prey animal lol, I have no idea how they would deal with a mosasaur
Looking good so far 
They tested many species of living octopi, the one with the largest mouth relative to body size still resulted in a 7 meter long nanaimo
which is about 50% longer than the modern giant pacific octopus
Imagine if they found a fully aquatic dinosaur(not lizard) like maybe a manatee sauropod
I know a lot of people are gonna see art or headlines that talk about a 19-meter kraken hunting mosasaurs. Just to clarify--19 meters is the UPPER ESTIMATE in a range from 7-19 meters. There's A LOT of wiggle-room there, so don't go assuming that the upper estimate is the most likely thing!
There is a new octopus. It was big. It was eating something hard, but that could be either bones or shells.
most likely shells, since there are no cephalopods today that specialize in eating only the bones of vertebrates, let alone giant ones
Plus ammonites and rudist clams were both extremely common and formed the basis of a distinct food web versus what we see in the oceans today
Erm
I'm gonna ignore this and go with the rule of cool because surely that's how it works
(People are so gonna hype up the 19 meter estimate like it is the definitive one)
Which is why I'm trying to rein it in now XD
Paleo size obsession, some things never change
They already have
There will always be maximumsizeists, but i've seen more people going ''it was not actually 19 meters, there's a range'' than going ''holy crap 19 meter kraken''
Which is a good thing of course, that's how you prevent the ''noo scientists nerfed my favorite animal :('' when it inevitably gets downsized as more data appears
Could dinosaurs understand the concept of death?
?
Walking with dinosaurs soundtrack
Ooooh I see
RIP. Absolute legend of a composer
The roof lizard, Stegosaurus, is coming to Prehistoric Kingdom! Opt into the Public Test Branch to discover 2 new species of Stegosaurus (stenops, ungulatus), overhauled management gameplay and an updated Scrubland biome.
Patch Notes: https://store.steampowered.com/news/app/666150/view/623327006824595680
Buy on Steam: https://store.steampowere...
Awn:(
R.I.P he's in a better place now