#paleontology
1 messages · Page 241 of 1
The new mutaburra looks..so weird
Well it’s not that bad
I mean those r pretty paleoarts
But that 3d model from the paper did him dirty af💀
Ik
Reminder that graphics from papers are often wrong and to trust the fossils foremost
They are made with guidance from the people working on the papers though, right?
Papers are focused on the science, not the exact appearance
This is very often the case, and in almost 100% of situations, an artistic reconstruction specialist will produce better
While I do understand, I also wonder why a paleontologist working on the material wouldn’t be able to reconstruct or guide the reconstruction of the animal they worked on. Isn’t that the whole point of paleontology? We aren’t exactly here because the science of fossilization will help advance society in any meaningful way. We just like living things and trying to get the best look at this planets awesome animals that we’ll never actually get to see.
Yeah dat tracks
Most paleontologists aren't focused on learning the soft tissue end. They're focused on figuring out how the fossils themselves work
Jarvis, bring up the average paper skeletal
Well yes. But does the reconstruction in the paper accurately depict the skull shape?
Not particularly
Well then that would be my point.
I'm crying wher eis that from
Amazng
Thank you Jarvis, sorry gualicho isn’t nice
I would love to see you do an edit of this lowkey
I'm super confused, why's everyone reconstructing the snout slightly differently? The model with the paper made the snout tip VERY small and narrow, but I'm seeing people widen it a lot more in paleoart. Is it becuz people aren't reading the paper? There's a lot of room...f
Something something “paper did it wrong” again
im confused
It's becuz in the paper is ugly and ppl dont like ugly things ig
Obviously there can be problems with how papers do reconstructions but ultimately I do think this whole controversy is over aesthetics and not a lot of scientific substance
To be fair they did it weird in the paper
But hey
Nature dont care if u find things pretty or not
You can very easily get the animal looking normal by adhering to the bones
The paper did it weird and arguably wrong!
I mean things can vary
I think if they research it enough
The apereance can change alot even tho most fossils are very fragmentary and sometimes bones fossilise weird
Like some bones can be all mushed and weird and compressed
There's always going to be variation in how something is reconstructed, especially with hypothetical soft tissue. The knee jerk reaction I saw to the paper was just people talking about how weird and ugly the reconstruction was, nothing to indicate they even read the paper.
Yeah i agree
Also smth that kinda bother me and that they always to the thing with mutaburra post orbital fenestre that they shrinkwrapp it alot some times
Guy who thought new medium sized hadrosaur was shant size for no reason says more things on internet
Did he really said that?
I believe it was edge yeah lol
Also this is kinda wild to me, but edge's comment was in response to Ashley Patch's art of Mutta which is about as close to the paper interpretation while still being normal looking. Unless they were just speaking generally and not referring to that art specifically
it was
I mean..i kinda like the more wide beak in the art
Short answer is for this tho is stuff is up to interpretation by reputable sources if there's room for it
Its kinda funny tho
Triangular shaped head
Also what's up with the arts of muta in water and stuff..does muta is a semi or?
it was actually a dinosaur and not a semitruck
That was a good one i tell u that
In all seriousness there is no evidence mutta was aquatic, there seems to be a hole in its skull that could be space for a salt gland but that doesn't necessarily mean it lived in salt water
Much like the second brain of stegosaurus!
Hmmmm
That could a interesting take on mutta
Like how ouranosaurus was like a moose and it swimmed to eat water plants or smth
That's a new one
ourano trying to rob lurdu
I made a stomatosuchus in spore!
I heard that somewhere idk where
But due to how ourano's beak is like
Its likely that he used it to eat water plants and such
A very interesting speciment
Thank you
I didnt do an edit of it, but I scaled it with latirhinus a few weeks ago
Which of these is more accurate ?
First and last are pretty much equally accurate. Pointy brow bosses are speculative. Middle kinda ignores the brow bosses and does the mouth tissue weirdly
its both overly gummy and doesn't close the mouth fully
.
Thanks :]
They all seem to get the skull shape and musculature correct
Which one, the eofauna one ?
the 2nd one yeah
First and the last one
The second one is weirdly mammal like idk how to explain
The lips look like small jowls you'd see on a dog
Yeah lol, everyone mentions it but online I see a lot of claims of it being the best reconstruction ever so I had to ask here, glad Im not the only one
I believe the reasoning for the large “cheek” area is that when modeling the figure in software, they couldn’t close the mouth all the way without crushing the scales covering the rictus.
2nd one
They also couldn’t make the tail any larger or else the legs would be destroyed. Obviously not a good way to judge the actually biology of the animal since software has limits.
Kinda this, but dinosaurs probably had scales covering the rictus anyways.
https://youtube.com/shorts/qyeAyinTD48?si=A0T8ZhRciqlvoL-W has anyone seein this?
Like Vividsky said the 2nd one here is actually most accurate because it is the only one that gets the cheeck/exoparia correct. The other comments about how it is holding it's mouth and whatnot are purely because it is an articulable figure and not just a 3d model.
2nd also has the most reasonably sized bosses, especially since it is based on Sue specifically. They're difficult to notice in this picture bc of the lighting, but they're there. In most specimens they're smaller than you'd think.
3rd's are far too large for example, even without the pointedness. The Saurian Rex model (1st) image is closer.
This year, technicians and paleontologists from National Geographic's Fin Era Dinos project visited the original excavation site of Carnotaurus sastrei, where they extracted new material. This material, along with a re-evaluation of previously known elements, will eventually be published and will contribute to our understanding, partially changing the interpretive image of the species and elucidating its possible taphonomy.
- Video from the Fin Era Dinos Instagram page
Guysth🤓 how adapted for speed was allosaurus? Ive always heard that coelurosaurs and tyrannosaurs were way more cursorial than similar sized allosauroids but at the same time they say allosaurus ran like 40- 50 kmph which isnt exactly slow for a non cursorial animal that size
The vid is from July 2025, so its possible we see it this year
Oh sick
Yeah I feel like people just didn’t like the mutt reconstruction due to it being fairly derpy. Like, Emily Stepp’s most recent version doesn’t look so derpy.
I know there are a few ways to reconstruct the new beak, but I also understand the people who are upset by the attempt to “fix” what looks ugly.
Wow that was fast-
For their size they are much slower than tyrannosaurs, but that's because they hunted prey that didnt require them to be fast. The largest Allosaurus specimens would be comparable in speed to Tyrannosaurus despite barely being half the size, because hunting stegosaurids and sauropods doesn't require you to be a good runner, whereas hunting hadrosaurs and other cursorial animals does.
Like if youre hunting something whose top speed is like 10km/h if even, then you dont exactly have a reason to be a good runner, but if you're hunting some of the fastest terrestrial animals ever, you're gonna need to be able to run pretty fast
Thanks
40-50???
I dont think thats possible for an animal that size like allosaurus..i mean i could be wrong
And also allo mostly hunted sauropods and stegosaurus
My bad gangie it was 30 - 55 kmph that i saw
I mean
If allo had longer legs i think i would run faster
But still
He didnt had to run fast to hunt what he hunted
Same with giga
Rex
And any large therapod dinosaur
Maybe the fastest one is carnotaurus
But that's still debated cuz we dont have carno lower legs
It kinda reminds me of the outdated giga speed estimates
some people argue that allosaurus couldnt hunt (large) sauropods as its teeth were too short and its Skull too modestly sized in proportion to its body
And that it hunted like ornithopods n stuff
To me Allosaurus was a generalist that dabbled in a bit small prey and larger prey
Fastest carni theropod would probably be the nanos with how absurdly long their legs are.
Yeah i agree
Knowin allosaurus
That boy liked to battle everything he saw
Yeah, and theres an increasing amount of people saying carnotaurus was not a speed demon and that it had a Really developed caudofemoralis to Accelerate and push itself Very hard (for ambushes and Pushing contests???)
Yeah maybe
Its possible tho
Yer WRONG its actually baby rexes!1!1!11
HOLY SH
Well it depends on the specimen
Specimens smaller than like 2t should be fine reaching those kind of speeds, but larger specimens? definitely not
Yeah
Late April fools?
Hell yeah! New material for my favorite Dino, possibly
found this too
The shape of the head reminds me of a plateosaur or smth
did chasmosaursines outlive centrosaurines? like, i cant think of any that survived to the end, i can think of trike and toro for the ones to make it to the end
Explains the choices made for the paper’s reconstruction. Makes enough sense to me.
Good thread
Case #9314 @stable wind has been warned.
Reason: Invite link.
can someone explain to me why the mutta paper is so controversy, like was mutta that serious https://x.com/omegafreelancer/status/2042812037005221907
The Muttaburra discourse has got me vindicated
The "Don't fandomize Paleo" have been on this fuckshit too with trying "fix" the new Mutt for PURELY aesthetic reasons
The call was ALWAYS coming from inside the house, y'all just mad at twitter and made it a "moral" thing
It's Omegafreelancer, it doesn't actually matter that much
oh
people make sht that isn't controversy into controversy becaus 1. they have nothing better to do, or 2. people either the person ( like omega) makes post for ragebait or something don't understand a certain paper and makes into something it isn't and it get reposted by others that aren't caught up
Pictures from my local museum!!
They had an original fossil styra skull on display! It was so cool 
Currently they're working on excavating a whole fossilbed made up mainly of what seems to be a herd of pachyrhinosaurus.
That was one of the fossils found in the River of Death / Pipestone Creek bone bed
I tried to link an article related to it but ig PoT doesn't like when people give sources 💀
There's 100 to 300 bones per square metre, and upwards of 10,000 individuals perserved in this bonebed
It wasn't just a herd, it was a straight-up megaherd that might've been mid-migration before they were all killed by what's hypothesized to be a catastrophic flood that happened well before the extinction event. They think it was either monsoon rains or a hurricane that caused the flood.
Gang that’s an insect
Oh…wow
This’ll be very interesting to see how research progresses
They even have tours of it up here! We're considering going one day if we have the time and money 
@scenic flame can you invite me to the paleo art discord? for modeling, I want to learn
Lots of rain /= monsoon
I'm just quoting the article 
Pipestone is also one of the few dinosaur bonebeds with amber preserved as well, giving a glimpse of the broader ecosystem
Beautiful
Oh that's so cooool 
Ikr? So many of the fossils and fossil replicas were amazing 
Ten thousand?! Ten thousand?!
Ten. Thousand.
Y u p
It's one of the largest bone beds ever discovered
Size of a football field
10K???holy macaroni
What's was he tryin to say here?
I got confused
Nothing important 😭
It's one of those Twitter posts trying to escalate any sort of mild discourse to get engagement
That's just lame af
If u do that on purpose
Go touch some grasses
And maybe pet a dog
Which part of the mutt paper is still up for interpretation? The lack of something bridging the beak to the front of nasal budge?
I think yeah
Cuz we only have like
A lil fragment of the beak
Soooo its up for interpretation rn
I wouldn’t bet on that. I understand where he’s coming from only because I don’t fully understand the content of the paper yet, and what’s still up for interpretation. He’s probably in the same boat.
If you don't understand something, don't talk about it like you do, simple as
Yeah but
Tryin to escalate things like that is kinda lame on his part.
Remmember,try to be open minded about dinosaurs and such(no u u but u get wat i mean)
Why do you think I’m here
I don't think you're on Twitter saying "I knew it all along" because you didn't understand that the paper reconstruction was wonk, just not as bad as people made it out to be
Would u guys have a Pterodactylus as a pet?
Yea
Me too
Its quite small
And i think its easy to manage
Just a lil guy:3
Probs the craziest little creature to have during the summer, anti-mosquito bird
Well what exactly about it is wonk then? From what I read, there was solid reasoning for pretty much everything.
Kinda seems like the life recon only matches the skull when the bones are in the fossilized, and not the life position. At least when I'm using the scaling they provide.
“Tens of thousands”
“But my lord there is no such force”
pans outside to reveal tens of thousands of re animated pachyrhinosaurus skeletons rising from the ground
Seems about right
Ah, hence this fits better.
And then it’s likely something bridged the gap between the beak and the bulge?
This one seems more likely
Rather than what the paper shows..im not sayin that the paper is wrong
But due to how fragmentary and distorted the skull is
Somethings will change in the future
Or i can me completaly wrong!:>
Baby maiasaura army
Ah I see. The bulb is completely closed off, but could extend some bit further?
Oh wait the nostrils aren’t attached to the bulge. So it’s more a question of how big the missing nasal area is.
So wait what did I miss?
New muttaburasaurus reconstruction
Ah here we go
What was the old reconstruction?
so bro was a iggy clone with a bump the whole time?
it looks nothing like iggy 🥀
If anything it looks like Camptosaurus if it was extremely allergic to bees
BRO EWWW
What do you mean ewww? It's just a size comparison
“So guys what if we gave trike the neck of a hadrosaur and changed absolutely nothing else”
“Jeremy your getting a promotion”
look at the broken neck and tiny head
Isn't that how the trike has always looked in Evrima?
yeah
legacy was better
Still is
still a bad design
You're surprised Evrima has a bad design on a dino? 😂
never said that
Congratulations. You have unintentionally described “anchiceratops”
10,000 individuals or 10,000 elements because I see people mix those up sometimes
According to the BBC article, 10,000 individuals
Don't use secondary news sites as a primary source, they often make stuff up for exaggerate things for clickbait. There are 13,000 elements, but only 8,460 identifiable bones accounting for at least 61 edmontosaurus individuals along with a couple of other dinosaurs mixed in
Tbh I think is more so the Posture
Cause yeah Posture is Ugly asf
Head is a little to small atleast seems to be but I think its mainly its posture
It will never not be funny
Isle trike has microcephaly
The Neck is what Kills it tbh
Trike Head Proportions can differ depending the specimen
You have Big John who is basically almost Eo lvls of Proportions and then "Albertensis" who is Massive despite not having a massive head proportionally
Alot is wrong with Evrima's Trike
But man
That Neck
Debatable.
But no you’re right, TI has some interesting design choices usually but they fumbled hard with their triceratops. All it needs is a neck lowering and its fine
Ahh yes Totally gonna Trust some verts that are possibly crushed

Tail seems short aswell I think
My guess is that it was eotrike-proportioned, scaling with eotrike gets close to what you’d think an animal like this would be like
Why scale with Eo tho
Willard while not a Full Skull well basically no skull
He doesn't seem to have a massive head next to its body
To get that good big head to body ratio that large triceratopsins would’ve had
Or else you risk getting a odd looking small headed triceratops…
The humble T. "brevicornus"
This posture… remind me of smthn I saw
-# I looked back and it was an April fools joke smh
What the freakazoid is that skull dude
Lowkey the first time ive seen this
that thing looks like it sinister smiling
Very peculiar looking horns
He needs those chompers to chew
damn but the real life reconstrucion doesnt look close to that
Guys like this usually had something similar to a cheek, so the teeth would not be visible from the side when it opens its mouth
maybe yes, also did you knew most dinosaur wherent extinct like millions years ago we even have dna of triceratops
What
Out of ornithischians, iguanodontians, ceratopsians, and ankylosaurians almost certainly had something resembling cheeks
I mean, dinosaurs are alive today. But nonavian ones died out at the end of the cretaceous period
Bro built like mammoth cube
Birds are not dinosaurs bruhh
They are
They just tasty dinosaurs
Birds are dinosaurs but not all dinosaurs are birds basically
lizards are dinosaurs
"Answers in Genesis" is an anti-science, fundamentalist Christian source. They are not reliable for this
whats anti science
Something that opposes science in favor of an idea with poor evidence
Just deny something because its from christians is weird sounds a bit fruity to me
@unborn bane religion argument insuing in the paleontology chat. could we delete the video posted above
If these Christians were saying correct things, then I wouldn't have a problem
sounds correct kinda spino with libs like what
Lizards and dinosaurs are both in the reptilia clade
But lizards are outside the archosauria clade (which includes birds and crocodilians) which dinosaurs are part of
Is it ok if I dm a few things?
Humans said that yea but Dinosaurs are Dinos and not birbs or me :3
Like I said before, birds are dinosaurs but not all dinosaurs are birds
ok @tulip dove Good we all live in our own reality but some is presented to us is not always the reality!
Idk, it being pretty widely known and thoroughly studied makes it pretty much factual at this point
It'd be kinda like saying that apples aren't fruit (Which they obviously are)
widely known means majority directs kinda
Widely known implies some people just don’t know, not that it isn’t true
For instance, you are one of the people who don’t know and therefore are not part of said majority
Why are y’all still fighting a tungsten wall
ignoring science just because you don't believe it is really funny to me. can we please stop feeding ignorance in this chat, they're not going to change. just block and move on, they don't believe in the moon landing we just did lmfao
Bored
Was about to say that
I can't even argue with that, go wild lol
Anyways, Borealopelta.
That picture is sick
Damn such arrgnce shouldnt you be more inclusive for other opinions? :((
Indeed it is!
Sounds hypocritical of you, since your in denial about what is blatantly real, and all this information your confused about is just a quick internet search away
So everything on the Internet is truth idk that
No but we have decades worth of evidence that dinosaurs existed
i knew they existed i just doubt the time cause we also have blood or dna? but how survived that sucha long time
dna lasts 70.000 years in ideal condition they say
Oh, soft tissue being preserved is extremely rare, like a one in a million chance, psittacosaurus is a fascinating specimen
would be cool if we found a dinosaur in ice but thats probably not gonna happen
That thing is gonna wake up one day
Most of the time we find impressions of the skin, like with one hadrosaur specimen and in the case of borealopelta, its armor plating
found this Once, a dino tail in amber
We can’t just start cloning it because the technology doesn’t exist yet right?
didnt they say jp is fiction lul
Yeah also im pretty sure DNA is not preserved and the tissue is not actually tissue but minerals that Replaced the actual dinosaur tissue like the rest of the fossil
well in jp they extracted dna from mosquitos that fed on dinosaurs and then got trapped in amber. so
yeah, still fiction
so cloning is possible?
That’s what happens to all fossils, they just get replaced by surrounding minerals in a process that literally takes millions of years, but the shape of the original is still retained
Yes
Answers in Genesis isn't bad because it's Christian but because it throws away centuries of research in favor of saying that Bible is absolute fact, something that even Saint Augustin for example did not do.
i'm not rlly jazzed about dino cloning whether or not it's possible. I care more about the amazing find itself
is it true in spin off material, they revived aquatic animals and mammals through frozen leeches and fossilized ticks?
This, and I’m catholic, yet I love dinosaurs and believe they existed
So does AiG but they believe the Earth is 6000 years old and dinosaurs died in the flood
Okay
We do not have preserved dinosaur DNA.
That’s a cool idea
Sorry to disappoint but it’s impossible for dna to survive over that long, it’s like a fruit rotting and dying over time
It is, however you ARE able to find some awesome stuff in amber, just not clone it
Cool lizard skull
Ooo I haven’t seen that before :o
It went famous a few years back because it was misidentified as a bird at first. Hence the name Oculudentavis.
very fun shapes on that lizard
Is nobody gonna mention the entire ant that has been trapped inside since whenever it first got stuck?
this ain't about her
(jk, i like the ant)
Actually how did ants even evolve their colony dynamic anyway? Has any research been done on the evolutionary history of ants?
Ants evolved from wasps which have colonial behavior too
what would y'all say is the more important paper for Ornithopoda, the mutta paper or the haolong paper?
would probably say haolong for it's weird new integument
as much as I love mutta's new funnyface
My fav dinosaur is dimetrodon
Mine is T. rex :D
My favorite is Spinosaurus and Carnotaurus
Valid
the lambeosaur crest paper
what was that
Ofc YOU would say that
paper from like February showing what Lambeosaurus, Coryrhosaurus and I think Hypacrosaurus could make vocalisations with their crest in the same way Parasaurolophus could
didnt everyone think they all could? why would only para be able too
I have no idea what youre talking about, I HATE lambeosaurines
Last February?
lambeo saurus glazer, can you tell me the main differences between Saurolophinae and lambeosaurine?
Parasaurolophus was the only one with proof of it. It was very commonly speculated that other lambeosaurs could do the same, but none of them had their internal crest anatomy thoroughly studied enough to prove it until this year
The main thing that separates lambeosaurines from saurolophines is the fact that they are awesome and not mid
Lmfao
like, if lambeo was a saurolophinae, how different would its anatomy be? if edmonto was a lambeosaurine, what would be different anatomy / visually wise?
Hollow crest
You better be a lambeo main talking like this lol
Idk if he even plays the game I think he just really likes lambeosaurus and lambeosauridae
fair tho, lamb is really cool
They are awesome don't get me wrong, and it's very solid in game too.
Well edmontosaurus already is a saurolophine, but if lambeosaurus was a saurolophine the main difference would be a different skull along with the crest being made of a different bone and stuff
I'm still not all too familiar with the diagnoses for each subfamily though so I can't really give a good answer
i meant if edmonto was a lambeosaurine, sorry
My brother is a lambeo main and is very good with it, even giving theropods his tier in pairs a run for their money
I used to be one of the best lambeo players until I took a break and became rusty
Yeah, it's honestly such a well rounded playable and creature in general.
Lizards r not dinosaurs
aw nah, here we go with the vally ragebait
True dinosaurs means huge terryfing birbs.
Well not always huge and fear is subjective, but yea, birds
Dinosaur literally means Lizards
People didn’t have as much knowledge when the name was made
Remember, when we found mammoth skulls we thought they were cyclops
So what?
Elephant fish isnt a elephant
Having "lizard" in your scientific name doesn't mean that you are a lizard. Hence: Basilosaurus. Literally means "King Lizard" yet it is a whale.
you literally lied to yourself by not Knowing what dinosaur means :p
I understand your confusion, however dinosaurs are classified by a specific hip structure which lizards don’t have, while birds do
What
Good thing is Jurassic Park isnt real life
Yep, that would be awful for the dinosaurs themselves, as our current modern environment wouldn’t be very good for em
i see t rex driving cars
…do they grab the wheel with their mouth, hands, or use their knees
Oh ok i see know
This is stupid
Lizards are what we call Squamata, which are Lepidosaurs. Dinosaurs are Dinosaurians, which are Archosaurs. Both belong to Diapsida as they have 2 temporal openings (literal holes at the back of their head) but that doesn't mean lizards are dinosaurs or vice versa.
I know this is probably ragebait but anyway here is a simple explanative phylogeny if perhaps it is serious (chances: 0.0001%)
Eh it’s fun anyway
Also don't pay attention to the placement of Ichthyosaurs and Sauropterygians, which are probably Archelosaurians (Archosaurs + Turtles) or Archosauromorphans.
I thought the final one was a sperm cell
How did t rex looked before his front legs go small?
…that’s actually a good question, I’m not sure about early tyrannosaur relatives
Look not futher
Yutyrannus(propably)
That what an early tyranosaurid looked like even tho
Yutyranos has like 3 fingers and looks more like an allosaurus
But u get the idea
wee see this at the slowworm maybe rex evolve to a snake would be a possiblity
Daspletosaurus is a tyrannosaur with fairly longish arms compared to other tyrannosaurids
i cant imagine t rex as quadruped ^^
I guess it could be possible over hundreds of millions, maybe billions of years
This reminds me that someone proposed another placement for Ichthyosaurs based on some cranial feature that was interesting (close relatives of the procolophonomorph family Owenettidae, so Parareptiles)
What about his long ahh legs?
I wonder how large a T.rex weenar would have been.
Theres this thing
1 meter
Like elephant
daspletosaurus was a biped
(also heres yutyrannus if you want something even farther back)
slowworm is a lizard too it devolved @true juniper hahaha
Yeah that what i was sayin
looks more like a chararodontid the yuty
nothing "devolves".
6/10 rage bait my eye flinched
i would never
Superficially i guess but its a proceratosaurid (has nothing to do with the actual ceratosaurus it was just a false Classification that aged badly)
Hey u guys think trex had like
Fleshy fleshy thibgs dingling around
Like a turkey
Maaaaaybe as tarbosaurus was reported to have a dewlap
is this the most dangerous critter?
im actually glad you pointed that out. Yutyrannus doesnt actually share much with later tyrannosaurs, instead having features often found in other theropods, such as the longer arms and slimmer jaw. HOWEVER we do see features from later tyrannosaurs popping up, such as the general tooth structure and layout
-# someone correct me if im wrong here
interesting it looks like a small titan from the picture 🙂
personally, it always looked like an allosaurid to me
Early tyrannos are pretty weird
yea we get some real funky stuff out of em...
Another Eo!
I see a quadrupedal dude
feilong i have a question, i remember you once saying amarga should have a psudeo beak or something relating to a beak, is that still true / accurate?
Yeah like
We dont have much soft tissue on rext
Only skin small impressions
I like to think that dinosaurs had these things
after the time, i think the proper term is not pseudo beak, but beak per se
Seems a lot of sauropods got em lately, correct me if wrong
So likely amarga could potentially had it too
Isnt that sauropods in general had those pseudo beak?
does anyone have a image / visual of it? im trying to imagine what it looks like but i cant quite picture it
Like a turtle beak?
Something like this probably
Those r beautifull
Way more cursed, for camara at least
How gassy were sauropods🥀😭
Very gassy
They migh exploded when dead
Like whales do
Incredible Saltasaurus
Yeah that'd pretty much it ig
Months ago i saw a paper on rebbachisaur brains or smth that indicated parental care
do you remember what it said?
I mean
Many animals with 'small brains' do care for their young
Like birds and shi
do birds have small brains?
Yeah comparive speaking
And their brains are like smooth and such
Same with coalas
With their smooth ahh brains
(I may be wrong tho)
Aside from size, what are the anatomical/ morphological differences between achillobator and utahraptor
I don't think T.rex would necessarily have some but perhaps it could.
I also am quite saddened at how the fleshy combs, crests, dewlaps and structures are usually portrayed in paleoart.
Utah is bigger and more bulkier
And i guess utah has more a boxier shaped snout than achillo?
I dont really see it, maybe if we find new material
https://x.com/MarvenNigel/status/2043277554195558555 why didnt nigel marven save the dinosaurs with this power he has?
#Chased_by_Dinosaurs
This is another ending I've never seen before?! Nigel is seen literally tearing through the fabric of time and space with his bare hands, preparing to embark on an adventure from prehistoric Mongolia to Argentina.
Dear @Nigelmarven, is this footage genuine?
Cuz that would cause a paradox
And nigel couldnt save the non avian dinosaurs
Yeah
Cuz we only have what?
Only some maxila and some vértebre and a leg from achilo?
that didnt stop him from putting them in his prehestoric park that had a budget of 3 dollars and maybe 14 cents
3 dollars is alot of money mind u
how good of exhibits / habitats did prehestoric park have for the animals? would you say it was up to standard for the animals?
Hmmmm idk maybe?
i remember terrence and matilda living in a fenced square of dirt and almost nothing else there ToT maybe im misremembering
also why was matilda such a menance in this show
this is real btw
how much danger was martha in when facing off with matilda if it was realistic? this will be under the assumption that matilda has recently turned a young adult and her only experince in hunting was beating on her brother a bunch
At that size the mammoth is screwed, however canonically Matilda is not even 10 years old
what would be a realistic size for her at the time she escaped?
You're mistaken. Absolute brain size doesn't matter as much as relative brain size and relative to their bodies birds have much larger brains than nonavian dinosaurs. Especially sauropods. The rebbachisaur paper found that they could potentially hear at higher frequencies than other sauropods, which might indicate juvenile-adult communication of some kind. Think alligators squeaking to their mothers.
Yeah i thought i was wrong
Ty for the clarification
close enough welcome back anteosaurus
Big head boy
it could have
On top of that, many types of avians may have smaller brains, but their brains are also denser then humans', meaning despite the size there's quite a lot of neurons packed in there as well. When it comes to brains I'm the type that thinks density matters more than size
i'd say the most important thing here is number of neurons vs body size. density and volume will both affect the number of neurons
The relative proportion of the cerebrum seems in some part linked to absolute mass in the non-avian theropods as well, the smaller having the more avian-style endocast
I think they were going on the theory that female rexes were bigger and therefore more aggressive than males
Tbh we don't even know how long since she hatched but under 10 would probably be around Nanotyrannus size or smaller
It absolutely is, the same pattern also occurs in crocodylians through their ontogeny and likely nonavians as well. Avian brain growth is likely a result of paedomorphosis
Not necessarily true. Giraffes have extremely high neuron counts both relatively and in absolute terms and are not particularly cognitively sophisticated. Relative brain size and gross morphology are still our best, limited as they are, predictors for cognition. The reptilian CNS (which birds and other archosaurs inherit) is so different from the mammalian one that comparisons between the two are at best misleading and neuron density in birds specifically reflects their brain structure, which is also pretty different from the ancestral archosaur condition that nonavian dinosaurs had.
what makes a animal semi aquatic?
if they spend alot of time in water and terrestial eviroments, and the most obvious and important one is if they have any adaptions for the water, like webbed feet, or things that help them to swim or allow em to spend alot of time in water
do you consider wadders and such as semi aquatic?
hmm makes sense
https://x.com/rocksolidfossil/status/2042972654068797492/photo/1 does anyone know what the animal in the back is?
Albertosaurus vs. Deinosuchus! https://t.co/p2tAdh6y87 CREDIT: David Christensen #ExtinctCrocodile
It's a Parasaurolophus, but it's T. rex vs Deinosuchus by Sergei Krashovskyi
There's a second version(??) where it's a duo
wait what? then whos david christensen?
Why’s there two versions?
The one with two tyrannosaurs is the original
Maybe David Christensen photoshopped the image and claimed it as his
I've seen the single one for several years so Idk why but I was just like "Yea, he made two versions"
if it was albertosaurus, would it be able to take down a deinosuchus on land? i dont know, i feel like deinosuchus is quite bulky
Albertosaurus would have a hard time doing this because Albertosaurus didn't exist yet
was it gorgo that lived with deino?
gorgo, dasp, and teratophoneus
teratophoneus on its way to replace alberto in the trio:
Hunting deinos would be a dangerous task even for the judith river tyrannosaurin, probably a low rate of success too because the deino can just escape into water before the tyrannosaur causes any meaningful damage
i wonder if anyone is gonna bring up janguars preying on caiman, that only happens because they get the jump on them correct?
like the jaguar, the tyrannosaur would use its gigantic arms to hold the deinosuch in place for a bite to the brain
This is why the only croc hunter we know of is joaquinraptor
if im not mistaken its usually with smaller caimans.
But a bite to the skull from a jaguar is pretty lethal to it.
Its likely a different story if its a max size black caiman
is this the correct maxium size?
im not too sure
between 5-5.5m would be the max size, although basically no individual has reached this size in recent memory
the largest male recorded in the 21st century was alcindo who was 4.5m long with part of the tail tip missing
what happened to the tail tip 😟
eaten by the secret larger caiman
https://x.com/john_bernasol/status/2043323057142665615/photo/1 thoughts on this leed depiction?
allegedly a survey in colombia in 2022 caught a 5.7 meter one, but i can't find any images or official sources about it
its probably could be around that size to be fair
Ahh yeah Alcino
Iirc he was estimated at 5m with Full Tail
Since he was a Captivity lad he was about 500kgs
Wait, what do you mean by "caught"?
Oh, it was not actually caught, so its size was not actually measured
For the Indigenous peoples of Colombia’s lower Caquetá River, the lakes of Puerto Caimán form a huge maloca, a cultural and spiritual hub. This watery habitat is home to the black caiman (Melanosuchus niger), a sacred animal in their culture. According to local elders, “grandfather caiman” was once a man who came down to Earth […]
Could tyrannosaurus have lived in Texas at some point? And are there any kinds of tyrannosaurids that inhabited texas during the late Cretaceous?
is the sauropod alamo?
Titanosauria indet.!
That’s awesome! I live in texas!
could be a lower tooth of a great white or mako if it's recent, if it's extinct then no clue
These are also all from Texas (but Campanian)
Like I literally can’t find a match to anything😭 (so far)
So cool
I would guess a great white lower as well, where was it found?
well i lied a few of those are from mexico but like the formation is continuous across the border so surely they would've lived in texas too
At a beach in South Carolina
NC/SC is known for shark teeth from all eras. I have a megalodon tooth somewhere in my storage from a diving trip off Hatteras
Yeah without the specific site it's hard to pin down, could be oligocene to pleistocene if it's the area around Charleston. The east coast has a lot of shark teeth in general I've found them in NJ and MA as well. The size and triangular shape makes me think some species of Carcharodon but thats just my best guess. There are forums and collectors online that might be more helpful
Its possible ig
Yea I know it was the upper beach area of sc
Does it have serrations or is it smooth?
dinosaur means terrible lizards because dinosaurs are terrible at being lizards lol
Serrations
Fine serrations? And is there a dark band between the enamel and the root? Sorry your pic is a little blurry
Ok that was a good one
Here🍕
Pizza for u
I think it's a Dasp or Albertosaurine, Rex didn't live with Deinosuchus or Parasaurolophus
If there are fine serrations and a bourelette then it could be Otodus actually
I am well-aware! Unfortunately, I cannot find the original + whenever I see it, it's labeled as T. rex
It's a (relatively) old piece so mild anachronistic changes isn't weird + if you're willing, Tyrannosaurine indet.
Yea this is probably the best pic I can get with an iPhone but you can definitely feel serrations but it’s hard to see
Fine serrations would indicate Otodus over Carcharodon certainly, though I can't tell if thats a bourelette there between the enamel and the root
Yeah my guess is Otodus but 3 species are present in the area, I'm not sure which one this is
I identify it as toof
So since muttabuttasaurus had a new reconstruction drop
It looks like a Lego jw figure
Any good Anky/Ankylosaurid paleoart yall have? Can't find any
Can someone tell me the size of random's new "sue"? I wonder what it is, 12.4m or 12.7m, and how much does it weigh.
I'm hearing muttaburrasaurus possibly got larger than we thought?
12.8m and around 11.75t depending on how much soft tissue you give it
is that a penguin skull
11.5-12.1t depending the Soft Tissue Given
Thank you, bro,
11.5t??? Wow, it's huge
Wait till you hear about Cope and Goliath
Cope Maybe
Goliath yeahh....no
Guy Sucks, "Big Femur" that had quedtionable and Doubtful ways of how it was measure nor is actually described
Cope is similar but atleast has more than a femur, issue is that its basically privately owned
cope is pretty much the same size as sue if not smaller, and goliath is unusable because no measurements
those cope and goliath gdis you see on tiktok are oversized
I know that Cope and Goliath are about 12 tons, give or take a few decimal points
cope is probably barely even 11 tons, and goliath can't be scaled
Guys why is my Xbox account not working properly for path of titans
Oh I didn’t see that I just joined the discord
Nothing ever happens
https://x.com/Pinguterra/status/2043392559574356305 how exactly do ornithopods have a " very advanced herbivorous diet " ? like, they can eat any plant matter?
They had a very sophisticated chewing apparatus, grinding front to back and side to side simultaneously thanks to cranial kinesis. At least, hadrosaurs did. Not sure about more basal guys
isnt that what cows do or am i dumb?
Cows do front to back, but not side to side
ah alright, do any animals do side to side only?
i'm pretty sure
In this animation we see a realistic visualization of the classic theory but in a realistic 3D animation environment. For the first time ever, a better glimpse into the chewing mechanisms were made possible. The skull of Edmontosaurus regalis CMN 2289 was scanned and reconstructed in 3D.
This animations shows the basic chewing movements of the j...
I was mistaken, cows do mainly side to side. But they don't have cranial kinesis, just the jaw moving
At the end of the day
Goliath may be just a chonky rex atp
Same with that spino falange part
spino toe bone can be scaled to just a regular sized spino iirc
you have crossplay disabled
Yeah
Does anyone at the dig sight found more material on goliath of just the big femur?
is it true lambeo and Magnapaulia laticaudus were once thought to be the same?
Love Big Paul so much
Magnapaulia was thought to be a 4th species of Lambeosaurus for about 50 years until it was given its own genus in 2012
Its so interesting to see that these dinosaurs have such a felxible skulls
do you love it like you love lambeo?
Kind of a reptile thing. Some guys lost it in favor of skull strength, like tyrannosaurids
I like all lambeosaurines equally except for nipponosaurus
if im correct, lambeo and bars switched size during PoT's development?
I only got the game a week after lambeo tlc, but from what I've been told, the original Lambeosaurus model was based on the assumption that Magnapaulia was a species of Lambeosaurus, hence its size
Ik
Does ceratopsids had that?
Nipplesaurus
Afaik ceratopsids had rigid skulls
I still like it, just less than every other lambeosaurine
Yeah that makes sense
I'm more of a saurolophine enjoyer i'm ngl
can y'all brawl it out
Yes
I like those too
Handrosaurs in general r cool
Even tho i'm more of a spinosaurid guy
what appeared first, lambeosaurines or saurolophine's?
I'm primarily a tyrannosaurid and ceratopsid fan
lambeosaurines are the earliest known hadrosaurids
Lambeosaurines
did saurolophines evolve from lambeosaurines or was it like convergent?
they split off from a common ancestor like 80-90 million years ago
forgot the exact time
I think that they would have technically diverged at the same time if they're sister taxa, which I think they are
Same
does anyone remember 11 - 13 ton para?
they would have, but the earliest known remains that can be assigned to lambeosaurinae are way earlier than the earliest saurolophine remains
like, several million years older
saurolophines first appeared in the lower campanian, but lambeosaurines are known from as far back as the coniacian (mabye even the turonian if that one 1995 paper is to be believed)
Yeah ofc that makes sense. Kind of a similar situation with ceratopsids, centrosaurines being the earliest known ones despite centrosaurinae and chasmosaurinae being sisters
so like, how did they get to the conclusion of 13 ton para? and how did it get disproven?
Idk
Saurophine guys explain it!
para is a lambeosaurine
footprint + fadeno will never be a good combination
Ik
and what was its finale size after all its revisions?
Id have to check. Idk off the top of my head
Less than 13 thats for sure..maybe like
8 or 9
so its the 2nd largest lambeosaurine?
I guess so
Also can the mods low down the time thing?
50 seconds is kinda meh
Make it a 25
maybe like, 6 or 7 tons?
Mayyybe
And that's huge maybe cuz idk much about
Weight things
nope
whats top 3 and their weight?
- Magnapaulia - 10t
- Charonosaurus - 7.2t (might be smaller)
- Ojo alamo lambeosaur indet - 6.4t
charono is just asian parasaurolophus
probably
but its skinnier and therefore better
what are their differences?
oh i have a lambeosaurine question, did they all have extremely thick necks or is just a para thing?
different skull shape, longer but skinnier forelimbs, longer but skinnier ilium
some of them were chunky and some of them weren't
Wdym "better"?lol
Bodyshaming dinosaurs, wow okaaaaay
Also u guys think dinosaurs could go into homosexual relationships?
Like the 15k species modern animals do?
yeah
Definitely
they do
look at swans and penguins
I love penguins
They do that alot
And they also adopt orphan bebies
not body shaming, just the truth
giant, slender parasaurolophin is awesome
i had a paleo question but i think i already answered it. since some birds demonstrate vocal mimicry abilities, some to a rather startling degree (lyrebird) , could raptors do the same thing? for predatory purposes?
Kinda weird how Brachylophosaurus has abnormally long limbs but it's close relative maiasaura doesn't
It depends on the reconstruction. You can make it have long limbs like every other brachylophosaur
Do we have maias arms n legs?
yeah
No, vocal learning, songs, and mimicry are as far as we know unique to psittacopasseres among aves and they have correspondingly unique neurological and anatomical features to do it. Birds are highly derived and since the time of their divergence from theropods have been under a totally different set of evolutionary pressures, taking a modern bird behavior and applying it to a theropod is going to be misleading most of the time
Epanterias sounds like such a cool and menacing Genus name until you find out what it means
"clasping buttressed vertebrae"
ಠ︵ಠ
Well are you going to share with the class
damnit discord now I look stupid why do you scroll like this
May i please share with the class
Do we have a skin impression of a carcharodontosaurus?
MAGNAPAULIA MENTIONED LETS GOOO
Large 🅱️aul
Hes so large
We love him for it
THANK YOU
What’s the most generic theropod out there?
House Sparrows seem pretty generic
birds are anything but generic for dinosaur standards
Megalosaurus
Vocal learning is also present in hummingbirds. But yeah, that about sums it up. Birds are highly derived both neurologically and anatomically, and we don’t have any evidence for similar structures in dinosaurs. It’s unlikely to be ancestral (considering only a small subset of birds is capable of such extreme behavior) and as far as we know, there’s no sign of a convergent appearance in dinosaurs either
The thing is this is also mostly just the referred dilo, the holotype is more normal looking
yea i figured the only way to know would be skeletal remains but it seems we haven’t found any. but the point of birds being derived from theropods for such a long time was one i never thought of. are there theories as to why vocal mimicry evolved in these animals?
ppl can really make you think this is a dinosaur
Not u again with ur stinky ragebait
Solid 0/10
That-s kinda of a hot take but Brontosaurus is kinda of a generic one
Brontosaurus aint no theropod
Oh fuh..i read it dinosaur
My bad chat
I said theropod
My bad i need new glasses
Anyway
Coeleophisis looks fairly generic
It’s pretty small and has a distinct long neck
Hm..meh
What classifes smth as "generic" tho?
What makes smth to a point that it looks generic?
I guess an allosaurus without crests would be a default theropod build
If you put a velociraptor and Utah raptor in the same room, would they kill each other or like do nothing.
Megalosaurus or Marshosaurus imo
That was a my first guess before Coelo boy
The Utah raptor would eat the velociraptor, like a bear eating a coyote
Utahraptor would likely see a velociraptor as prey
Never heard of Marshosaurus before
Thank you
Marshosaurus sounds like a herbivore name than a carnivore
i mean just depends on reaction
animals don't maul each other non stop so good chance of them just existing until either prey drive or they just friend up
Literally just a theropod. Looks extremely generic
I agree
I mean if the utah is hungry
It's more likely that it would kill the velociraptor for food
If not
They would just be in their corners until one aproach eachother
lol he forgot to customize his character
Oh herrerasaurus looks pretty generic too no?
Velociraptor would probably act scared and maybe defensive around utahraptor. Utahraptor would probably be unbothered by this and might investigate the velociraptor
It’s even the perfect size, not too big and not too small
Oh yes!
And velociraptor would do what owls do
Which is that defense position with the wings facin downwards
Or it’d raise its tail up to make itself appear taller
Yeah and like
Raise it's feathers to make if more bulky
Utahraptor might halfheartedly poke or nip at it
"Why u so small"
I imagine it would result in a very scared velociraptor backed into a corner and a Utahraptor going “why am I in a box with this horrid rat bird”
Yeah lol
Honestly the worst thing to come of this immediately would be both of them being scarred because they got randomly dumped into a room 💀
I think the utahraptor might eventually kill the velociraptor out of boredom
I would too ngl
Imagine u just chillin and out of the sudden u r in a white room amother person u dont know
Not only that but it’s a room you’ve never been in before, and the other guy is the size of a chicken and waving his arms around screaming in the corner
They could team up and try to figure a way out the box together, bonding with one another along the way until they fall deeply in love with each other when they share and relate to eachothers trauma and desires
What a lovely love story
Not again
Lay dowm on the fanfics 
This reminded me of a book where a fox frees a wolf from a jail and the wolf comes back later to save the fox from other foxes. I wonder if there are stuff like that but with dinosaurs
That reminds me of sonic origins
The first time taild met sonic
And he was like
Getting bullyed by thede 2 other foxes cuz of his 2 taild
Them sonic beat em up and became best friends with tails
W somic
Puertasaurus reuili by Randomdinos
There’s a lot of speculation on it, but no solid answer as to what caused it. Evolution rarely shows causes in this sense; more so it enables things. Passerines, parrots, and hummingbirds all had features that enabled vocal learning (though in a basic form), such as complex neural systems and vocal organs. Those were tweaked over time to more specialized forms that make more complex vocal learning and mimicry possible.
puerta was such a random animal for the isle to choose as its large sauropod rep
not really since it was one of the largest sauropod even during the time
oh woah ai slop
Atleast uses actual skeletals as reference
Sue and Suecheng Mogs Both
I see we pulling a strawman 
“Reference” and it’s just that size comparison under a AI filter
I do like the background tbh
The Shantungosaurus filled with helium
and 3 kilometres long for some reason
If anyones got a lead on and stl file of lurdusaurus please hit me up. Ive only found 2 so far and neither work for me
I figure this should go under the paleontology tab since im looking for source accurate
I never heard of puertasaurus before the isle im ngl lol
Holy sh
that's almost a quarter the length of the type species of the genus Joe
I cannot recall its species epithet...
Is there a difference between Bronto and Apato? Trying to find images and stuff about them independantly and it seems a lot of the stuff is just the same thing for the both of them. Are they the same animal or are they just that similar?
Used to be the same, but were split a few years back & sit at 3 species
However, some brontosaurus specimens (including the type) were described after plaster was used which may have skewed over its validity.
Afaik it’s excelsus that’s in trouble, but B. parvus and B. yahhnapin may not be as unlucky + parvus has other specimens to compare with
B. parvus & Apato
Look at that neck
Maybe it couldve used it to push trees down or somthing
So dinos could had transparent skin?
No this is a reconstruction made to show its bones
but couldnt it be ?
dinosaurs did not have transparent skin
transculent? like stegos slices?
No purpose plus it would make them more vulnerable to UV for example (alongside other things)
They don’t have skin because they dead
Length 3775m lmao.
See lol
You're such a troll lol
i mean not caring for environmental effects or accurate info isn't exactly a good thing lmao, no reason to use gen ai for that, though i imagine seeing paleo chat it'll eventually get topiced
Can't tell if there's an over-estimation of people who know gen AI details or if blanket statements are being made
or just people prefering the ferret not be let out of the tube seeing its just a worse option outside of said tube
speaking on info, does anyone have remain sites if any majorly exist for european and north american lower permian bits
Please keep all conversations in this channel on topic for discussion of past and present paleontological discoveries, scientific news, and depictions of prehistoric creatures in media in relation to palaeontology.
Please also to remain polite and respectful towards each other and do not provoke or antagonize other users. Refer to our #rules.
Questions and concerns regarding other users within our Discord should be directed to @feral crane.
Sooo what do yall think of spinosaurus fighting others similar to a bear, rearing up and stuff
Do you guys think it was actually possible for a large predator to flip ankylosaurus on its back? Its depicted in many documentaries and films but i never thought it would actually be possible, because moving such a large and heavy creature then flipping it seems impossible even for large theropods like the T.rex
I don’t think it would be logically, as the ankylosaur can shift its weight and going in for a flip as a tyrannosaur means using your head, which adds the risk of it cracking your skull
We have evidence of Tarbosaurus cracking ankylosaur skulls so T. rex doing the same isn't outlandish
The "Flip-N-Eat" technique was probs more useful on smaller individuals but considering the largest Anky sits at like 4...5 tons(?), it's not too mindboggling, but definitely not the first thing for a Rex to do
Yea but that’s not flipping
What I meant is if the tyrannosaur tries to shove, the ankylosaur can very easily hit it in the face, which could be devastating
Judging by its lenght, it doesnt seem like it was really good at swiping its claws to the front, especially because they arent really made to attack anything other than large fish so yeah it kinda makes sense for it to rear up to make space for its claws
If the tyrannosaur tries to shove an ankylosaur over, unless the head is aiming for the rear end, the club would probs strike the torso or leg which is arguably just as bad
for a second I read that as "we have evidence of tarbosaurus cracking ankylosaurs" 🥀
Soo you agree with me, right? Am I a smart bread
Doubt it, considering S. aegyptiacus (using the holotype-neotype) was coming in at ~4t, rearing up probably wasn't gonna do much good when the local Carchadonkadonk sits at 8t
The largest Spinosaurus specimens would probably still be less stable rearing up than a ticked-off Carch so
But as an intimidation display, maybe
Not against carch… against each other
Oh yea then sure why not
Rearing up would make more space to use its claws cause judging by that jaw it doesnt have much biting strenght
I feel like against a carch it would run purely off intimidation, and personally if I was a carch I wouldn’t bother risking getting slashed in the face
If we go strictly by
definition, S. aegyptiacus comes in at literally half Carch's size with S. mirabilis being even smaller, I don't think intimidation would work
It might give a younger Carch some pause but I doubt it'd drive off an attack

Nobody can disprove my head canon that spinosaurus was as docile as a capybara and just lounged around being chill until he decides he wants phish
Heh... this guy doesn't know about the honey badger spinosaurus...
Small animals can intimidate bigger ones happens nowdays aswell
Yea but spoons would look real scary with those teeth and big ole claws
Unfortunately, the honey badger is a poor example as most of the time, they're horribly killed and eaten or run away before lions see them
The ones driven away by their display are young and inexperienced or otherwise decide they don't care enough to actually fight the badger
Never understood why some ppl think the spino would actually fight other theropods, its just a big fish eater
Even if its a poor example he stil gave a good point, and intimidation is very useful when dealing with bigger things
Me personally I imagine it like a gator
If you aren’t food it couldn’t care less
It was a tongue-in-cheek suggestion, not legitimate 🥀
The point is that intimidation only goes so far and cannot be used reliably, the Spinus was stuck in the water
Lol
Well then
Poor guy got hacked
oop-
LOL, TWICE IN A ROW
HOW
It's been happening every couple hours in the isle server now too
That’s a shame, hate to see it
Btw yall know a good video about the daspletosaurus? I tried to see some videos about the dinosaur itself but i couldnt find anything
Not PoT related tho
I was just being sarcastic about it as it's often used to as an example to overhype or make an animal seem more "awesome"
Ceratosaurus for example often gets the whole honey badger treatment which is funny
can anyone else name similar revisionists in paleotology in the same way that ornithopods got " hadrosaurs arent actually fodder and destroy the hunting therapod "
Aight mb then
wym
It's not even just ornithopods, you see that in "herbivorous dinosaur"
Maybe fishing Quetzalcoatlus/azhdarchids
like, moving away or towards it?
Which of these should I try drawing paleo accurate art of
nigersaurus, lurdusaurus, maip, irritator, shantungusaurus, magnapaulia, yutyrannus, sauroposeidon, miragaia, sauropelta, oxalaia, utahraptor, icthyovenator, or allosaurus anax
I'm starting to see a worrying rise in depictions of territorial sauropods ngl
do big big paul rearing up to scare away a tyrannosaur
-# how did I know you would say magnapaulia
Quetzalcoatlus were originally shown as fishers (you can see it in Little Das' Hunt)
Mapusaurus when the territorial argentinosaurus starts moving towards it at 9 km/h (it can outwalk it)
You got it 
the suchomimus in fear seeing the nigersaurus charge at it:
The Mapusaurus uses its high intelligence and canine-like pack behaviours to tame the sauropod and use it as a superweapon against rival clans of Taurovenator and Meraxes
What if it just guides the giant argent into trampling over the smaller sauropods that it cannot hunt.
Kind of a similar thing where predators only ever attack prey way smaller than themselves and are too scared of the risk of attacking larger animals. I especially see it applied to T rex
The Tyrannus can only hunt the juvenile Edmontus
Yeah exactly
If there's any theropod that's built to outright overpower and mangle relatively large prey, it's t rex
Btw, do carcharodontosaurids have any obvious adaptations for hunting large sauropods? What's the origin of the idea they were built to target them?
Think its due to them living with the largest sauropods + very sharp teeth not being built to break bones(which is like, the case for every theropod teeth except tyrannosaurids)
Yeah lol. I suspect it is mainly a case of just being really large with oblong heads and really sharp teeth obviously intended for soft tissue damage
Massive sizes are probably the best indicator
For the first one, there's been a few mentions of carchs having high interial momentum and some things in their foot possibly being an adaptation for better lateral stability, which would help for hunting big animals
Do we have any reason to think they would have targeted adults? The danger of getting crushed seems pretty high. If you look at modern ecosystems, it seems like herbivores are much less frequently targeted by carnivores when they outsize them significantly
Oh that's interesting. Got the paper(s)?
This and the Dr snively paper on low interial momentum in Tyrannosaurs
We also have carchs deliberately avoiding feeding on rebbachisaurid carcasses
Higher inertial momentum wouldn't make carchs more stable, just less agile relative to tyrannosaurs- which might indicate larger prey
That one was just due to them fearing the dangerous abelisaurs
Oh I guess it does make them more stable, I gotta reread that one
Tyrannosaurids seem very well adapted for outright dispatching animals approaching their body size, but I think that would stop them from being as effective against ones that outsize them a lot. Makes sense given what they usually lived with
The authors also predict that abelisaurs would score closer to tyrannosaurs than allosauroids in agility, though this hasn't been tested yet
This is weird. What's the evidence here?
Carchs preferentially eating, if not hunting, giant titanosaurs
Tons of carch teeth are found alongside somphospondylian carcasses, while rebbachisaurs are only ever found with abelisaur teeth
Very interesting. That clears up a lot for me
I'd generally agree but there is more than one way to skin a cat and we do have tyrannosaurs that were hunting sauropods as part of their normal ecosystem. How they did it, if they used an allosauroid type strategy or something else, is a mystery
Always annoyed me when 2 SS are needed
You mean you have the original? Give
(as in tell me which event this is from)
Tarbosaurus and Zhuchengtyrannus lived alongside sauropods barely bigger than themselves, so it's not hard to see the standard tyrannosaur strat working on those
( i mean also avoid and don't predate are 2 different things) and the only really not being predated on animals in inland ecosystems rn
also got a certain primate messing up said areas
that and predators do handle prey vastly larger
just less per species, not entirely rate
It is possible that they simply could not effectively hunt the sauropods with an extreme size difference, like Tyrannosaurus vs Alamosaurus. I don't see how a tyrannosaurid could employ an allosauroid-type strategy with its adaptations, esp with the teeth and jaws
Perhaps they nibbled at its ankles like lumberjacks
Chew through it like a beaver
use the hollywood funding to slowly degrade said sauropods in court
There's a specific art piece that depicts exactly that and I know it existed cause Random saw it as well, unfortunately we can't find it anymore because it was from like 10+ years ago
I think a tyrannosaurid could do it if a limb was narrow enough to clamp around and bite deeply into, or if the neck was low enough to grab
That would probably exclude sauropods that are a lot larger than themselves
would a sauropod ( alamosaurus ) still be able to lift its neck even with a 5+ ton animal latched on to it? https://www.deviantart.com/dontknowwhattodraw94/art/Abort-mission-Abort-494675589
Falcon, please stop employing beavers as lumberjacks just because you don't have to pay them.
image in case you dont want to open the link
I have doubts lol
Mmmmm i love beaver labor
What about the mighty unstoppable Mongolian titan
I figure the adults would have been tyrannosaur-proof unless they break a leg or something
Perhaps the tarbosaur did not hunt adult specimens of that
Kinda like Alamosaurus. Rex just can't handle it. Younger ones with accessible necks would be a meal on wheels though
i mean predation would be doable, better question is how often given they aren't exactly built for mega sauropods
The Nano Tyrant, with its higher speed and agility, would likely be the predator of the Alamo
clearly
You forgot about its pack hunting teeth
So true!!!! Nanotirano the ultimate apex predator
"I'm sure to win because my speed is superior!"
They'd jump onto its back, climb up its neck and crush its skull to take it down
I was there once
aka Opisthocoelicaudia but just barely slightly larger
Tell that to David Attenborough, if you dare
I wouldn't say barely, the smallest estimate is still twice the mass of opistho
But yes sorry sir david that thing is not 70 tons
As for rex and alamo, it is doable as long as you get a small (adult) alamo. BIBE 45854 is ~20m long and probably less than twenty tons
This is the biggest alamo outside of one crappy lost specimen, downsize this by about 15% and it's in danger
Huh, I thought it was bigger
Oh wait my bad this isn't the biggest alamo
But the biggest one is only 7-8% longer than this
Randomdinos when he spreads lies and misinformation
Curious how big the foot would be compared to this
recently, I found that me and @outer tusk draw Ornithopods pretty similar.
Idk what you're smoking
No no no, it's not even an insult. It's pretty similar, I like that.
why did you loose backer and why are you new here
I left the server, got a little stressed from a personnal situation, and let's say I'm prone to extreme reactions, unfortunately ( Don't think I could've offered any other explanation 🤷 )
better to retreat and relax than stay and lash out id say so good on you
Unfortunately it is based on 0 bones so it is a teory and not real
Very true
Listen
We herbivore fans endured decades of carnivores being treated as inherently superior organisms with every super sense, strength, speed, and weapons imaginable, while herbivores were just tough food at best.
Y'all need to get over this "Herbivore glazing is too much"
its tragic how often i forget this is a thing someone said with complete sincerity its so funny
me with durophagous habitual scavenger
gem alert
How heavy are the largest spinosaurus estimates?
we need to stop glazing herbivores, except for lambeosaurines because they're objectively goated and the best
what if we just forget that Lambeosaurus magnicristatus holotype exists and assume that the other specimen has a fully intact crest that could be used like a spear against inferior tyrannosaurs
Oh yeah, I did my take on the most Controversial dinosaur of this year ( Still surprised that title won't go for mirabilis )
Did it have a cool one liner after?
I think bro likes lambeosaurs
-# they are really cool, magnapaulia my favorite herbivore for a reason
Looks lovely! Is the dewlap purely speculative?
If we put this guy and Sir. Oogma to fight in a Arena, only one of them will come out victorious
Yeah, I tend to commonly do it in Ornithischians mostly. Adds up to the vibes
Dewlap ❌
Woah lambeosaurines are so cool with their awesome crests i should try copy them but change it a tiny bit so I dont get caught ✅
Strongest Edmontosaurini fan of back in the day vs Strongest Lambeosaurinae fan of today
Crest but on bottom
all pale in comparison to the median armchair's opinion on parasaurolophus in 2023
and less cool because it just looks like a floppy dih instead of an awesome majestic bone structure
…lambeosaurinae with dewlap.
What if I made the crest of your Lambeosaurines all floppy? I have that power.
impossible
Watch me cook this guy
Would it taste like steak or bird
KFC
Don’t let the colonel learn that sauropods taste like chicken
honestly that looks awesome, like a sheep
looks like it did what ceratopsians tried to do but better
Rooster comb
Nah ceratopsians mog
this your goat?
Ceratopsians got a 20 dollar haircut and thought to themselves " We are so unique "
true
Bigger than an elephant btw
Nah, I just combined the two images. I've checked the Rcapa abstracts upto 2014 and didn't find any. Probably missed it or it was an Evap or somewhere else. Though the format does look pretty Rcapa
They were the same size if not smaller than an average bull elephant. All of those 10+ ton estimates are outdated
Did find this though, its 7 carch teeth instead of 70 so its close enough : https://peapaleontologica.org.ar/index.php/peapa/article/view/568
Also Canale is on alot of papers
Yeah and made it their whole personality like omg im so unique and im so better than everyone bleh bleh bleh
(Oh i forgot to mark)
Lambeosaurines btw
Two opposite ends of the clade (tsintaosaurus - olorotitan) and barely anything changed
Not true. Either way there’s more cooler to these animals than “being big”
It has a slitghly diferent head creast
But other than that
They r very similar in appearence
And some times i got confused who is who most of the time
Or maybe im just stupid
Which it can be the case cuz im not good remmembering names
I wouldn’t blame you
Best way to differentiate the two is that olorotitan has a notch on its crest that other lambeos don’t have
also i feel like tsintaosaurins tend to have shorter torsos than other lambeosaurs
might just be me though
Shame it’s no longer unicorn sack, but at least it’s got a understandable crest now
Yes
And a respectable lookin face
All the lambeosaurs lookin at old tsintao and bullyin him cuz of hia face sayin thibgs like "haha look at him..he has a weenar face"
And they shove him into the locker
Tsintao at least seems a little shorter, in comparison to oloro
Yes
He look "stockier"
See? You think Lambeosaurines are special because of the crests, WE don't think they are special because of the crests
Insert Gus meme here:
" We are not the same "
are these any good? or trash ?
Even considering putting these in the trash label deserves a ban
This is accurate skeletal?
Yes
Which species is it
M. hoffmani
Oh really? Interesting.
overrated
What in the
Yea, that one is...Idk where that one came from
Yes, this is just a edited version of incin's mosa to make it 17 meters (original is 12 meters)
thats a thick man in the middle
where is this from?
Henry Sharpe, posted this morning, approved by Dr. Zietlow p sure
Is there a higher quality version of this? That one is like, 5 pixels oof
What 💔 that looks fine to me lol
It's not as bad it's just that I would think there's a higher qual version of it since I can't see the skull much
- that and discord usually butchers the image quality
this one has been out of date for a while, the thick mosa, meant to reply to that.
TLDR older mosasaur reconstructions all had torsos that were too deep, modern ones have the ribs swept back more such as PoT's tylosaurus
dont we have a real skull
Idk my friend send it to me and said this is new skeletal
So the new skeletal is more accurate than original one?
this is the best one rn.
It's by Hank Sharpe, a paleoartist and student who made the skeletal for an upcoming thesis on Mosasaurus
https://www.artstation.com/paleoartologist
Also Vally is wrong, we have a skull
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/a-MNHN-AC-9648-Mosasaurus-hoffmannii-holotype-specimen-b-Skull-reconstruction-Grey_fig1_303090121
ai slop
time machines are cool
science is never the truth its a mere theory t rex most likely had no lipps like spino.
Source?
tfw AI doesn't know what a T.rex looks like so it just copies the JP T.rex twice but with missing teeth on the ''accurate'' one
I adore these so much
dammit, ill just do it myself...
yo if you're gonna keep coming in here and posting bait at least try to be funny about it
Probably true, they all top out at similar masses
Dinosaurs r cool
Are the ribs believed to have been this underdeveloped in this species?
I understand they didn't really need them anymore but that's fairly interesting and odd to me if true
Ah yes..science is a theory
Not that we ever use science in anything we do
The sternal ribs were cartilage tmk, Sharpe just didn't draw them in because of that
Oh, alright
I mean
Mammals have very dense bones and they lack air sacs like how sauropods do to make em lighter
So if a mammal want to be that big
They need to have those ig
asking because i truly don't know
someone selling for $30
Also does anyone knows if saurpods r plantigrade on their hind limbs or they just look like
$30 FOR ALL OF THEM?? YEA???????? Buy peak.
omg, i did too, nostalgia 😭
is all for $30 ok ?
damn, then i'll contact the guy asap
This is so scary
These are treasure
oh, wow 👌
Yea unironically, the paleo-art books are just rlly nice to flip through and I'm p sure parts of the big green book by Holtz still holds up well
I think people also too much focus on accuracy with these books that they don't focus on peak right in front of em espeically 2000s Raul Martian
T.rex in a forest -like area always goes hard
damn, i just looked them up and all 4 new for $150
i would have to drive a but, but for $30 i can do that 🔥
what art book is this ?
What abelisaurid do we have the most fossils of
Majungosaurus
Castoroides has such a scary skeleton and then on the outside he's just 🦫
Most animals do, how do you think we ended up with 2000s Dinosaurs 
yea, i freakin love that museum 🔥
i mean, even human skeletons are so spooky, and then some people look goofy as f, 😆
Whatttt that’s cool
@foggy crypt I recognize some of those paintings, they’re in my old coloring book
Nice
Does anyone knows if Amphicoelias Fragillimus is still valid genus?
That species got turned into Maraapunisaurus fragillimus with the only valid Amphicoelias species being A. altus
Well, some reconstructions of Maraapunisaurus does give them a relatively long neck, but yeah, definetly not Diplodocidae or Diplodocinae stuff
nvm, they give it a really long neck
Why one is like
Up neck and other low neck
Me dumb
Subjectiveness from the artists, I guess.
Make sense
Basically, I guess there's like idk how many papers on the biomechanics of Sauropod necks, and yeah Diplodocoides tend to be a point of focus, since most Sauropod authors can't really see how they fit with the other sauropods. Note, this is mostly with animals like Apatosaurus and Diplodocus, for example, since you would think that there would be no drive to have long necks like that, when there's also Macronarians in the same formation allegedly doing the browser niche, but most likely all of these sauropods are browsers in their own way
In summary: Diplocoides can have their necks in a vertical or horizontal posture, and people sometimes choose one or the other, or a option in-between ( like a Diagonal Posture )
Tbf im so used to the diagonal one that seein them upright and horizontal feels weird to me
Like those diplodocus' with weird posture in When Dinosaurs Roamed America...or that was walking with dinosaurs?
yeah, both fit with what you describing
There's also the Apatosauruses from The Ballad of Big Al
Yeah
He looks so silly tho:3
@merry jewel this has the mexican govt website linked within with the relevant legal documents. have gd day
Bro thinks he's a Dicraeosaurid
Both are diplodocoids
This channel is for the discussion of past and present paleontological discoveries, scientific news, and depictions of prehistoric creatures in media in relation to palaeontology. Please keep all discussions on topic.
Uhm..ok? Sorry ig
Am I the only person who finds scientifically accurate Trex is adorable
Sorry, I forgot to reply, thanks a lot, I appreciate all the info 
No your just correct
I just think it's cool
And is there any other reconstruction of the T. Rex that could be considered even more accurate than eofauna's
Yeah they made some kind of weird speculative choices and didn't get the brow bosses right
I think everyone does other than awesomebro jurassic park fanboys
I think its the nose what kinda gives me uncanny feelings lmao, I saw that eofauna actually made a 3D model for gojicenter's video which in my opinion looks much better
😭
Ugh. Leave the trunks to the mammals.
Its the stuff nightmares are made of
yeah im very sceptical of anything tbh
Like try to look at it straight for more than 5 seconds
☠️ this ain't the 80s anymore
I can tell lol
What if Eotriceratops is like an old ass Torosaurus?
It kinda doesn't look like torosaurus
Mostly cause of how it is reconstructed, and references they used ( crushed material ), it kinda of has a lot of similarities.
Noted, I'm a bit of a lazy f#ck for not finishing this already, but yeah
Whoa that's really good
I would expect Eotrike and Toro to be similar because they are very closely related. But I'm pretty sure it is well known to be distinct from Torosaurus due to various features of the skull, and being older than Torosaurus outright
that's true, but I'm more wondering if it's like those weird cases where, for instance, my analogy is like Proboscidean genera that has had species from multiple time periods, and sometimes older species from the genera gave rise to younger species associated to the genera. But yeah, you right. Noted, Eotrike does not get included in a lot of the Chasmosaurinae phylogenetic trees, and my suspicion is cause the material is really bad, but most that tend to include it, do put it on a very early position in Triceratopsini, with Torosaurus and Triceratops usually being sister taxa to each other
It would definitely not be a stretch to imagine it was ancestral to the later triceratopsins
animals dont usually shrink as they get older
humans are just weird like that
is the mutta paper fr gonna do more than edmusthosaurus
i hope not but oh boi
is this fr
dizzy rose again
just use the actual skeletal posted
im not up to date with mosasaurus so much
We have no weight of the skeletal so no
Guys is Nanotyrannus actually a thing?
Yea
This says slowly moving… how slow? And does this affect tylosaurus as well?
it is pretty slim.
It looks like when chocolate companies decide to " Reduce Costs " and significantly reduce the chocolate in their products, just keeping the shape, and telling their customers " No guys, it's still the same, see? ", and it's like " No, it definetly isn't. "
They made it up lol
sounds very specific to a company, i guess my mosa boi decided to skip the gym
see, all of them did it in some way, at some point.
yeah fair enough
In the next years, Mosa is looking like this:
ah yes the ability to swim through the prey's brain to hunt it
Keep in mind, Sharpe's recon lacks sternal ribs due to not including cartilage (not wanting to draw it)
This includes the cartilaginous scapula cap
They would've been there in life
yeah, pretty much. Noted, it feels like he/she/they, idk their gender and pronouns, so apologies, but it feels like they just didn't want to draw the postcrania
I mean the reconstruction itself is perfectly fine, they just didn't feel the need to include the cartilaginous elements
Did it also get shorter, or is it still 15 meters?
i though it was nerfed to below 15 meters but i guess thats just the effect of only focusing on goated deinosuchus
mosasaurus hasn't been 15 meters for like 3 years
how accurate is jwe3 archelon?
damn, really?
Like, i'm pretty sure I've heard it's a lot bigger than Tylosaurus proriger
i believe you were lied to then
Not really, I've had a guy who worked on the World Fossil Finder Museum, which is a private museum in South Dakota, they kinda of have this 13 meters long Tylosaurus proriger, and the guy have participated on the dig site where the specimen was found. Pretty sure, they kinda of hinted there are Mosasaurus fossils that could reach lengths larger than that. But then again, he doesn't work there anymore, unfortunately
But the reconstruction is still fine? And would this affect tylosaurus or nah?
This beauty, specifically
Yea, it's fine and we don't know how it affects Tylo
Likely makes it slimmer but yada yada "wait for the paper"