#paleontology
1 messages · Page 237 of 1
Would most theropods have had the same kind of jaw muscle shape and covering? Or would it have been heavily subjected to change depending on hunting style?
Guys what do you think of my allo reconstruction?(Reposted bc there was a bug)
Like, Wwd albertosaurus with a more croc-like jaw structure as opposed to php rex that’s more lizard-like. Just an example.
I like it ! Probably maybe just maybe tail is a bit too thin
Like, what would be considered evidence for any given kind of structure?
THIS IS GOOD
Pretty good actually
What are you surmising as crocodylian like about this Albertosaurus model
I meant like folding into the upper jaw more like a crocodilian. Not the same structure, just similar in outside appearance.
Think you could work a bit on the shoulder. Anything else is fine, by default standard. You get a lizard as a gift.
How do i improve it?
I think it's a bit skinny, not that you have necessarily done anything wrong, as I feel that in general your musculature is being pretty conversative. But I would just say it need a bit more mass and also emphasize that there are conjunctive tissues attaching to the shoulder bone itself ( ignore the blue line, it was just done so I could visualize where the scapula could be )
Personally I would also fill out certain sections of the body and legs a little bit more to account for said emphasis of mass and tissue
It's perfectly fine
Yeah, but I also think that is has to account the artist's approach to tissues here. Realistically, we can't suggest too much, because they want to be pretty conservative on their reconstruction. So ideally it's to suggest criticism in areas that do not interfere too much with the artist's vision.
Lore accurate or something idk
While both are technically possible, evidence of living archosaurs favors the jaw muscles being covered in skin (as in WWD bert) rather than exposed on the outside of the mouth
Fair, and just let me reiterate that there's really nothing wrong with it as is
It's subjective to the artist. Simply.
Alright, what about the structure of it. Wwd Alberto has more of a slope shape, while the php Rex is just a curved wall.
Probably
How accurate is to represent american and asian ankylosaurids with that third row of osteoderms bellow the big ones at the tail? Does that have any validity?
Far right is osteoderm arrangement for A. magniventris according to Arbour & Mallon 2017 https://www.facetsjournal.com/doi/10.1139/facets-2017-0063
why is it so skinny in 2004
I'm talking about these ostederms
Pinacosaurus, Euplocephalus, Dyoplosaurus, Zuul, & Ankylosaurus all preserve caudal osteoderms of some kind, I'd look into each one to find the specific arrangement. My guess is it's still debated for most of them
From Zuul's description, can't really tell with these lateral views unfortunately
Someone ask carpenter about it lol
yearly rex size increase was a lil too much that year
If Ankylosaurs actually looked that that it would be making itself easier to take down
Carpenter is very dino renaissance he was probably basing it off of GSP who likes really really lean ankylosaurs
I cast - Domain Expansion: Revive chat with a bad take (I lowkey think Torvo could beat a 1v1 against a Pentaceratops)
Pentaceratops slams ez
i have trouble imagining a predator adapted for living with and hunting stegosaurs and sauropods would have the necessary information to take on a ceratopsian with much hunting success
was gonna say this
Doubt it
Nah. It wouldn't really know how to take down a Penta, which kinda of leaves space for mistakes that could cause it to leave with a injury or worst.
Mhh,i see and i do agree that the arm is too skinny
Probably would have helped to use a muscleliture diagram
there's bunch of those online. Either done by artists independently or diagrams in some paper.
are orca's ( and humans ) the only animals known to kill for sport?
Dolphins right?
do they? i thought it was speficially orca's
Is this better?@queen oar
Btw how's the quality of the image for you bc for me it's kinda low
it's fine here
Now, this is less of pointing out something wrong, but more so as advice. Sometimes making straight lines like that can often cause the impression that external tissue is too tight around internal tissue. Way to avoid that, it's to find other ways to draw that shape without the need of one singular line, or emphasizing depth in other ways, such as the use of other brush sizes.
thanks for the advice, I'll definitely be using this in the future
is 9 to 10 meters long & 3 to 5 tons a Shunosaurus's most-up-to-date length & weight as of 2026?
if Carnivores ( the game ) was real, would you hunt alien dinosaurs?
answer my question first brochacho 😭 🥀
(but yes, i would hunt them alien dinos)
idk?
He’s really amazing
Prob cause theyre similar in size and penta's frill is fragile
Well it can’t be THAT fragile if it came into fruition solely because of tyrannosaurs
This is most likely the last time I post this allo so that crowd the channel but here's the final version of allo
I mean, it's not thin bone. Solid frame and a soft tissue inside. Would still effectively block attacks
Really cool
It's not really fragile, just not solid like triceratops' frill
My argument is: Torvosaurus was canonically stronger than Mahoraga
unfortunately, Mahoraga has already adapted to the entire existence of Megalosauroides
If I was cheating I could too 
Just release Divine Judge Spinosaurus
Imma eat all of Irritator's 12 fongers
*6
4 on the feet (I shouldve said toes but toes are fingers)
that's uuuuuuuuuh...
14 fingers then
I might be bad at math
yup.
Surprising that he has done this.
maybe the real spinosaurus are the friends we made along the way
The Dinosaurs is inoffensively silly
https://x.com/robokaseki/status/2033857990911267277 thoughts on this robot and the swim study?
スピノサウルスが軽いと想定したロボット。
不安定であまり良く泳がない。
A robot based on the assumption that a Spinosaurus was light.
Unstable and doesn't swim very well.
Evolution isn't about being perfect. It's about being good enough
how accurate is its swimming btw?
Didnt Spino lived in the dessert?
here we go again
Spino is called heron from hell so yes he probably did this
no, it lived in a wetland ( ? )
no. none of the environments spinosaurus lived in would've been classified as a desert
arid wetlands maybe, but riparian and coastal environments are where we have fossils from
Moroccan spino was found at a coastal area and mirblis was found at a river-ish area
Spino hasnt very good bones for beeing Aquatic then t rex but he could have tendons that supported his Aquatic lifestile... his tail is perfect for Swimming
Spino really looks like a big Sandfish but is it impossible for him to swim through sand?
they look nothing alike
..yes. lmao
look the snout minispinosaurus
Spinosaurus has relatively dense bones, so I’d assume it definitely swam around a lot. Just probably not very fast.
yes Spino was later forced to life on Land where he was outcompeted and went exinct
girl
Me when the bait looks succulent
its true th Cenomanian-Turonian event forced Spino to compete with Carch
An Article on the Spino mirabilis Expidition : https://theconversation.com/paleontologists-uncover-a-new-spinosaurus-species-by-following-a-clue-from-a-decades-old-book-into-the-sahara-desert-274182
Do we know the extent of the prey that Spinosaurus would have hunted? Was it limited to fish, and smaller prey, or do we propose it might have targeted larger things also?
It probably ate primarly fish but would Scavage off Corpses if chance Given and Probably Ate Any Small Dinosaur it caught off Guard
Mirabilis Probably like Aegyptiacus but atleast that Lad had SEEMINGLY longer legs
My bet is that Spinosaurus between other spinosaurids is more like a Alligatorid-analogue. Where they have a mostly fish diet, but depending on circunstances of the time, or even during the night, they'll leave the body of water to search for other potential prey items.
i would consider a 2 ton fish and potentially 3 ton hadrosaurs a large target
ofc mostly just snagging aquatic stuff
What fish was 2t again?
I see I see. Also, I’m curious, where’s a good place to start in terms of getting into paleontology? I’ve been interested in dinosaurs n whatnot for most my life, but have kinda stuck to the sidelines when it comes to actually learning about them from a scientific perspective, since it’s so daunting. I want to learn about a wide variety of animals, but I don’t know how y’all manage to remember them all off the top of your heads 😭 Do I just look at the ones I’m interested at first, or would y’all suggest studying more niche things?
maybe smth like megalampris could reach smth like that too
ask yourself what you like from the fossil record, and I guess start researching information about that. You cannot learn a lot without starting small... I think? ( Please someone correct me, if this seems to be a flawed suggestion )
Bet. It’s all just so confusing to me I suppose, that I end up researching nothing, instead of just taking small steps and looking into what actually piques my interest
a fih
All the carch’s died too though
like most predators, opportunistically going after anything it can get its jaws on i imagine. limited to fish isn't really restrictive either, with bawitius, arganodus, mawsonia, onchopristis and concavotectum being some notably large fish to sustain off of on occasion.
i believe the larger mawsonia estimates are from brazilian specimens, but that doesn't really detract from it
ik some are
but p sure these were the african
i'm partially sure
There’s a chance that the African species of Mawsonia is actually Axelrodichthys.
large mawsoniids* then
To be fair all of said dinosaurs in the area, including Carcharadontosaurus and most of its prey are thought to have died out. This would imply that spinosaurus wasn't any more ill adapted than its fully terrestrial counterparts.
carch died later yea
All the pliosaurs and ichthyosaurs went as well. And stegosaurs.
Indicative that the pliosaurs, ichthyosaurs, and stegosaurs were all outcompeted by the carchus
Aka spino doesn't have any right to be called out for dying out when so much else did
Right
We’re gonna get to see all this unfold in Northern Africa too in Surviving Earth episode 4.
Watch soon on NBC channel
I'm looking forward to it because I really don't know much about this particular event or period (Earlier Cretaceous)
The 4th episode takes place entirely in North Africa I believe, so there’s basically a Guaruntee we’ll see carchar as well. Though, I hope they don’t butcher the design, like with Nanuqsaurus…
What's up with it? I've never seen the model
😭
if you laugh you go to hell ( creek )
You laugh you go to Prince creek. And get killed by an actual nanuqsaurus.
Oh, I actually did see that but forgot about it.
They definitely look rather low-quality in comparison to every other animal on the image, which is unfortunately common for dinosaurs
The reality is that Nanuqsaurus was probably a reskin of daspletosaurus, with maybe some light fuzz.
Yeah, but I honestly do like a few things about the model as well, like the beefiness of some areas
Funny, cause daspletosaurus and nanuqsaurus were already 2 of my favorite tyrannosaurs.
Given that some dinosaurs are not usually portrayed with the amount of bulk you'd expect in large animals (I know it's standard in scientific papers and reconstructions but it really pulls them together as real animals)
Also that promo image is pretty old, I imagine the final designs will be a lot more refined
Not happy about the white nanuqsaurus either, but thats gonna be a very hard paleomeme to kill I think
It's probably due to the meaning of its name + the belief that a lot more dinosaurs had full on feathers than they probably actually did.
I'm fine with the latter, reality of preservation means we'll probably never know how much feathers most dinosaurs actually had. I think it's just the polar bear lizard thing 99% of it
Yeah, but it's honestly interesting how quickly feather underrepresentation turned into potential overrepresentation within a couple years, as some people just assume all of them had feathers now.
@little mauve Hey gbones, I'm thinking I did this parietal pretty short, what do you think?
Pendulum swinging for sure. I do think feathers are the plesiomorphic condition for ornithodira, and like I said we have less than a handful of sites with the preservation needed to really confirm or deny feathers. I think overly birdlike behaviors or behaviors just taken directly from living birds is more problematic
I'm really not an anatomy guy at that level sorry, looks good to me lol
which tyrannosaurid do you guys believe is treated the worse / plagued with the same depictions / flaws over and over again the most?
T. rex kind of by default but the problems are more general to the tropes used again and again in dino docs
True, but I also want to mention how the relation to birds has spawned raptor depictions that have them nearly be birds themselves (positioning, exaggerated arm/hand placement)
Would you eat Kentucky Fried Ceratopsids?
is it weird to say nanuq is always depicted the same with little to no variation?
I'm gonna be honest I'd frown upon eating most kinds of megafauna, as we've already seen the problems it brings.
Nanuq has some well established tropes already in how its depicted yeah like the white pelt, pack hunting pachyrhinosaurus, etc
Definitely very closely based on Artic Wolves and Ox
No!
Yeah and people were using that as inspiration for tyrannosaurid/ceratopsid interaction long before nanuq and pachy as well
if you think about it, tarbo gets treated the best out of the tyrannosaurids
Honestly, I can see where you are coming from
A little boring in PhP but thats a problem with PhP in general lol
Would you eat uuuuh... McDeinolds ?
Only if I was a sentient theropod from a parallel universe
Regardless of its other issues, the third season really did a lot more in this regard, and the animals felt bigger and more impressive due to their animation
Would you eat uuuuuuuh... " Brachio's King " ?
Vast quantities of low quality forage at unbeatable prices? Count me in
Not to mention the moas genuinely looked more heavily built than some of the other dinosaurs in PHP, especially in terms of the legs. (Comparatively the rex's legs looked wimpy in some shots)
Would you eat at " Dunkle Donuts " ?
Have not seen the third season yet so I can't really comment
Fair, my bad.
Would you perhaps have a cup of coffee from " Saltabucks " ?
My main point being, we usually see dinosaurs getting the short end of the stick in certain representational aspects.
Yeah I definitely agree, a lot of it becomes tropey and can be actively misleading or misinforming
Most surprising to me is just the emphasis of size being lackluster for some of them, although that can be observed in any media with giant creatures half the time
Scale is really hard to convey without human actors or recognizable everyday objects like cars amd stuff. Just seeing it out in nature next to a tree can give a poor impression of size
Animation and camera work are the key, but yes that can be part of it.
Yeah I think the best approach is making the audience feel like the camera has a real operator, running after the animals and stuff. That really works, they did it a lot in WWD and WWB
Yeah it can really set the stage for comparison and spectacle, and things can feel empty without it.
For me it's the 1:1 mirroring of living animal behavior that then becomes a trope and it just perpetuates forever. Like you said with ceratopsids doing musk ox defensive rings and tyrannosaurs acting as the wolves. Or ceratopsids just acting exactly like bovids in general. I might as well be watching cow footage
Yeah, but to be fair it's pretty hard to portray something that no longer exists with no modern-world baseline (though it's definitely possible and hinted at through fossil evidence for some)
But thats precisely the challenge they're taking on. Don't get lazy and just repeat what others have done before you
All too common these days unfortunately
Yeah it's a big problem, lack of originality. There are corporate reasons as well why things end up the way they are but an independent creator could do something really cool I think remagining these very well known taxa without all the trope baggage
One trope that honestly gets old sometimes to me is Ankylosaur flipping, mainly because they were engineered to make that pretty unlikely (given the stout frame and low center of gravity)
I'm not saying they couldn't, but pulling it off so easily on a flat terrain seems very unlikely
Since the 4th season of Prehistoric Planet is kind of confirmed to be another Pleistocene one, what are we thinking for season 5? Naish talked about pitching ideas for a Jurassic season, and seemed optimistic. However, he did say that the executives didn’t like the idea of Cenozoic stuff outside of the Pleistocene, preferring to stick to ice age tropes.
Smaller ones could likely dig down and protect their underbelly with substrate too https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-83568-4
At the very least the most recent instance of the encounter, it was caught completely off-guard outside of it's defensive stance
I think we'll get Jurassic next
Another possibility is non-Maastrichtian Cretaceous. Spinosaurs, Yixian fauna, etc
He seemed optimistic about more Mesozoic stuff, and considering the success of The Dinosaurs, it’s most likely.
Yeah I think that'll have an impact. They'll want to do their version of the Morrison and stuff
Spinosaurus too though, everybody’s on spinosaurus these days.
Yeah, I'm not saying they were rex killers or anything, but they had a lot going for them in terms of surviving/mitigating attacks
What if he made a Park after Jurassic Season of Prehistoric Planet?
Effectively getting a... Jurassic Park
the dinosaurs has been my favorite recent dinosaur media in terms of watchability
PhP gave all their theropod models enormous iliotibialis muscles
A Prehistoric Park one might say.
Honestly, we need a modern version of Planet Dinosaur. Reboot the show actually.
truly the owner can only call it their... Prehistoric Kingdom
Yeah but that's still just one part of the larger leg
Yeah thats what I'm thinking. If he can squeeze two or three more seasons out of Apple maybe we can get both
Again, the success of The Dinosaurs will really have more studios making dinosaur stuff.
Indeed it will
JW: "nobody cares about dinosaurs anymore"
Reality:
That’s the entire thigh region, in some shots they appear wider than the torso there’s nothing wrong with how theropods legs are reconstructed in s1/s2
If you really dissect Prehistoric Planet, there are a lot of accuracy issues.
tbh, idk about that. I feel like this is majorly more due to what Jurassic World was, rather than the dinosaurs being boring. Like really, if you think about it, going to a park with revived dinosaurs, that are stuck to essentially a style of reconstruction from the 70-80s, I think people would get bored.
All 3 seasons
Not saying they are wrong, but probably could have been a little more fleshed out
If anything they could’ve been less ‘fleshed out’
Also, it's also in a time period where reconstructions were getting a lot more risky with their speculation. So, it would be a understandable sentiment.
I remember a lot of people talking about how much they loved how chunky PhP made a lot of their creatures, when in reality they really shouldn’t have been so chunky.
I'm referring to the legs mainly, I see what you mean with the torso proportions of some, which might contribute to the issue with the leg's comparative size
Making them look blimpy and walking on twig legs
It doesn’t really have much to do with the torso, Tarbosaurus is portrayed much less barrel chested, has prominent leg musculature
it's called Sue syndrome.
As in the popular reconstruction of sue or the specimen itself?
popular reconstruction. I have my conspiracy theories about the specimen, but it's not relevant to the topic currently.
Yeah I definitely know what you mean then
Ignoring the musculature issues, this Tarbosaurus design is just so awesome.
It’s not an issue
Well, no but you know what I mean.
Yeah probably one of my favorite of the theropods along with the raptor
The php nanuqsaurus design is so awesome, but it’s outdated 😭 (kind of)
My question is, would raptors have had hands bent exactly like flying birds as the PHP raptor did?? It seems rather useless.
I would honestly see the arms of the PoT raptors being more reasonable
I love the Rajasaurus design for the series
If dromaeosaurs were secondarily flightless it's possible that in a neutral position they held their arms in a winglike posture but they were still highly functional.
Sullivan et al. 2010 have a paper on carpal asymmetry as it ties to wrist folding
Thanks for the insight, but I'm still curious on what would be most likely other than that kind of folding.
Thank you! Was trying to remember that one. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspb/article-abstract/277/1690/2027/73198/The-asymmetry-of-the-carpal-joint-and-the?redirectedFrom=fulltext @full lagoon
How much evidence exists for the raptors being secondarily flightless?
Beyond clearly saying whether or not they were there’s a seeming trajectory of wrist folding development throughout maniraptora
Flying forms are known from the base of the dromaeosaur family tree already, things like Microraptor. So there were probably both flying and non flying forms giving rise to terrestrial ancestors
How solid is the theory that ornithomimosaurs might have also been secondarily flightless?
I guess that's fair, but there's still a good bit of variation between different types and theories vary. Thanks for the input though.
Same thing, their deep phylogeny is debated, some basal lineages may have been more flighty than others. Pelicanomimus shows some flightish features
That's what I was thinking, as I've heard about pelicanimimus's special features in the past
Oviraptorosaurs too. The Yixian is probably our best glimpse into these clades early lineages, feathered and many featuring flying or gliding adaptations good for densely forested environments
TMK the only person still unironically proposing ornithomimosaurs or other animals were flying in any sort of capacity is a person who you really don't want to be near
Vagueness due to descriptions of their actions will probably get me shot via auto-mod
Paul has been the main proponent for the longest time afaik. If he's canceled I haven't heard about it. It's pretty well established that maniraptorans were experimenting with different modes of flying or gliding early in their diversification
I mean GSP vandalizes phylogeny and species names but afaik hasn’t been a total creep, so likely not him
Oh I meant Carlos
I didn't even know GSP had any hand in early mani evo
Ah
Paul wrote a book about it in 2002 but he's been floating the idea for a bit longer than that
People kill over this stuff for some reason though, the evolution of flight specifically but also paravian phylogeny
Would be interesting implications for the non-Pennaraptoran maniraptors
Pennaceous feathers still may be a thing for ornithomimosaurs, jury is out
Typically they are recovered all the way out in maniraptoromorphs, whether or not it stands I suppose, along with Sullivan and others seeming to say the therizinosaurs show greater wrist folding compared to more basal Coelurosaurs, so maybe the pennaceous wing is older than Oviraptorosaurs
If wrist folding is to protect the plumage like Sullivan proposed in 2011 it would make sense it coevolved with pennaceous feathers and possibly that they had some mechanical function. I'm not all in on secondary flightlessness but its worth exploring imo
Posted this the other day but also relevant to the discussion https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4398413/
https://x.com/MakArts_/status/1991071398945583184
Are we giving enough dinosaurs scaleless skin?
Thought this guy had some interesting takes in his thread about reconstruction stuff.
Would dinosaurs have a gag reflex / throw up?
Take everything im gonna say with a metric ton of salt. I did a lil research(google front page but not its ai since that cant be trusted) and apparently both birds and crocodiles can which probably means none avian dinosaurs could too. Though again take this with a ton of salt because im not a scientist.
breaking news, everyone ⚠️
see, i always said trex had lips 💋
here is the proof
did dinosaurs dream ?
💀
The sad truth that most paleontologists are unwilling to accept is that osteo correlates are in all honestly not much better than reading tea leaves
Without having the soft tissue that left the marks, it's next to impossible to know what the textures mean for sure```
- Regarding osteological correlates from Napoli and Amelia
Damn 😔
THAN READING TEA LEAVES, horrendous slander 😭
What about the scaleless skin parts.
Idk, I mean like there's potential but at the same time, why would we assume it's something completely different than scales
It's like they're looking for an alternative for the popular opinion just to have the alternative
But lemme go check if any studies were done on the scales
I mean, I know there are actual scales found on most kinds of dinosaurs, but the bit about tyrannosaurs coming from potentially fully feathered ancestors is interesting.
Scales turn to feathers, animal loses the need for feathers.
Are there any possible instances of feathers or other kinds of fibers turning back to scales in any animal?
birds
Right, leg scales. But weren’t the legs of bird ancestors always scaled?
Like they vaguely resemble scales, but there is not really anything to suggest we would have a scaleless, scale-looking skin
And just looking at photographs, the rhino skin has a different structure than the scales```
Once again, "we need a mummy"
(We don't really)
Dude, mummified basal Triassic theropod would solve all of our problems. (Not really but it’d be sick)
A mummy wouldn't help at all because we have all the necessary information 🥀
But imagine having facial tissue 
we don't need a mummy
I mean for facial tissue sure but like for this specific topic, we don't
yeah mb but couldn't we also just get this from some very other soft tissue related findings that aren't just mummies
Yeah Ik.
Yes, but imagine having the whole animal. 😏
eh
One can dream ig
No. There is developmental evidence suggesting that bird leg scales evolved from feathers. They can even be turned back into feathers
Add in the fact that a lot of maniraptorans have fully feathered legs, and it’s quite easy to conclude that ancestrally, bird legs were fluffy
This is just legit bad.
When did synapsids start giving live birth?
between monotremes and therians
So true. Let's not take a stance in a certain topic, but rather utilize the fact that most researchers are not willing to compromise to each other's interpretations or find common ground, so absolutely adding nothing to the point, but enough to sound " Smart " or whatever ( This is not directed to Gualicho, just to make it clear )
a " Paleo-Nothing Burger " as per usual.
Did they also develop milk at the time to feed their live babies?
Good answer, Z
Hey there. Do we have any papers or similar studies about the maximum speed of the biggest Carcharodontosaurids (specifically Tyrannotitan and Giganotosaurus)?
There is a study from like 2006 on the maximum speed of Giganotosaurus but it's... really bad
Closest you would get would be Larramendi's 2019 book I think, which puts the maximum speed of Giganotosaurus at 34 km/h
Interesting. Nothing about Tyrannotitan I imagine then, if its more popular relative doesn't have much to deal with. What's the name of Larramendi's book out of curiosity?
This has to be top 2 coldest dinosaur book covers
That's a sick cover, I agree.
I wouldn't normally recommend books for dinosaur size or speed estimates but in this case it's the best we've got. Most scientists agree carcharodontosaurids would be the same speed or slower than equal sized tyrannosaurs due to their shorter lower legs and feet
make the only expectation for Larramendi's because Atuchin and Mazzei carried the artwork 
I might be asking a lot, but since I'm really new to papers and looking up that kind of data, do you have an example or two of papers/studies or even scientists in general that affirm this?
Let me go see if the Holtz paper says it in those words
https://www.nature.com/articles/srep19828/tables/3
This one shows cursoriality scores (predictor of running ability) in various theropods, with tyrannosaurids consistently being higher than allosauroids (table 3)
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5518979/#sec5
Perhaps this too huh?
Meraxes has relatively longer legs though, yes?
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0223698
This one concludes that top speed was about the same in giant tyrannosaurs and giant allosauroids but tyrannosaurs were better at energy saving
Limb length, cursoriality and speed have long been areas of significant interest in theropod paleobiology, since locomotory capacity, especially running ability, is critical in the pursuit of prey and to avoid becoming prey. The impact of allometry on running ability, and the limiting effect of large body size, are aspects that are traditionally...
Damn, thanks a lot! 
Compared to Giganotosaurus sure, nothing special next to Tyrannosaurus though
Sue's metatarsals are like 40% longer than Meraxes's for a 5% difference in femur length
It has longer legs than other large allosaurs, but still shorter than tyrannos. Mainly the feet
How is this possible, the tyrant lizard is fat, whereas the allus is not
This is because the Allus is a primitive and unevolved lifeform whereas the T. rex is complex and evolved.
The mammalian cunning of the tyrant (brain 0.1% larger than that of allosaurus) allowed it to train to run faster
The cunning tyrant was capable of abusing anabolic steroids
That's why it evolved via anagenesis!
tyrannosaurus needed to escape edmuthsthosaurus; allosaurus did not
OMG I NEED TO FIND THE JFC CLIP
Maybe the Tyrant was Fat because it had hoarded food from all of his subjects, while the Benevolent Allus distributed wealth fairly and had no need to fear running away from their people
couldn't find it
Perhaps T rex reached such huge sizes to avoid predation by the cunning pack hunting Edmontosaurus...
Wouldn’t a bigger size mean more food for the edmontosaurus though? Their downward curved beaks would have been perfect for flesh grazing
So 1 rex body serves as food longer for the edmonto packs, giving the other rex herds more time to escape
Ahhh that makes perfect sense, Like a school of fish… if baleen whales feed on schools of fish then i wonder what type of creature could possibly be large enough to strain multiple tyrannosaurus?
What would be an advantage of having shorter legs?
Shorter lower legs theoretically make one more stable, but there is no real advantage it's just how they are ancestrally
Maybe someday we'll find some allosaur that liked chasing after elaphrosaurs more than sauropods
I suppose it really doesn’t take much to keep pace with a Titanosaur.
Edmusthosaurus max size
Yes they did, there’s a specific type of trace fossil regurgitalites and many dinosaur and pterosaur regurgitalites have been found across the world revealing their diet, eating patterns and what their bodies rejected and kept in their system
Just last year there was a pterosaur named from vomit, probably by some spinosaur
Really shows the diversity in some species lifestyles
I’ve heard it might have been a fish instead of a pterosaur.
Something about fish gills being mistaken for pterosaur bristles.
@undone rapids what if we made a fast-food brand around the theme of Pseudosuchians?
"whoops, not gator"
"last year" sounds so damn far away
One could serve sea food with semi aquatic croc names and terrestrial food with terrestrial croc name.
Why not just go full marine croc for the seafood names?
If we have two fossils that show evidence of spinosaurs eating pterosaurs then why was it happening so often?
Pterosaurs ate fish, often diving into water to do so
Much like the Jurassic World mosasaur
imagine being able to fly but you cant escape a 4 ton terrestrial predator that has literally ZERO cover to ambush you from
a skill issue honestly
Spinosaur probably used the tried and true strategy of "stand still and they'll think you're a rock"
They probably had a faster strike and bite than other large theropods too, that would help snatching a pterosaur out of a flock
Just ask gharials the thin snout help with that
they also likely had strong neck muscles associated with ventroflexion
Strong neck muscles, just ask gharials
Natural selection
Yall got anything to say about this 👀
Idk my friend's arguments are really good
He says that birds can have pretty colours cus they can fly and dont have to worry about predators as much, so it's unlikely that alot of dinosaurs would have additional decorative soft tissue and pretty colours
Ok… what’s gonna hunt a full grown tyrannosaurus
Not theoretically wrong but i'm hesitant to agree with someone who calls every speculative paleoartist a "leftist"
I mean, what he says is pretty believable but I don't like how strict he is about speculation in dinosaurs
Another tyrannosaurus
Mosasaurus if the tyrannosaur gets washed out to sea somehow
And that's it, it's an apex predator
They have to worry about camouflage tho cus they're ambush hunters, I see where he comes from
Ooo and peacocks kinda suck at flight, yet still have all that plumage
who would y'all say is the important / influencial paleontologist(s) of the 2000s, 2010s and 2020s so far?
currently joshua knuppe
Most predators a peacock will face are mammals, which don't see in color well
Tigers are bright orange but their prey sees them as green
Hmm I see
the dude thats named gaberiel smth
also why hunters wear orange because deer are trechromats and only see greens or grays or smth
However I can provide the best argument of all
Pretty dino looks better 
You can give herbivores some bright colors, especially the males, because being attractive often outweighs being easier to spot
But for predators being seen means going hungry so they'd be more drab on average
Dont dinosaurs have more eyecones meaning that they see more light than mammals
How big was Nanotyrannus?
Yes, living dinosaurs have excellent color vision and extinct ones probably did also
Doesn’t want to sound like a chud
Proceeds to say chud thing
GUYS 🥹
About 30 big macs tall
N.lancensis was about 6 meters long, N.lethaeus 7-8 meters
and it's mass?
lethaeus is between 900-1500kg
idk about lancensis but you can probably scale down the lethaeus estimate
makes sense
Other tyrannosaurs
Can’t go wrong with that
gang, a LOT of land birds (or birds that generally are bad at flying) have flashy plumage. Just look at ratites and roosters (and other smth fowl I forgot the term but its basically the family chickens, pheasants and others come from)
The flashy plumage of the kiwi
I was thinking smth like a male ostrich and cassowaries which are like, very fluffy and colorful (male ostriches are literally black in a place covered in yellow). Also, Golden Pheasants are very colorful (the males at least) and they arent really the best flyers. I also noticed its always the god darn males tryna be pretty lol
Ostriches are a good example of being flashy without being bright, at most the males can manage a little bit of blue on the neck. But by using black and white they can still show off
This was likely the case for most dinosaurs as well
Galiforms often hide their displays when not using them. They are also smaller than most of the nonavians those types of soft tissue would likely be applied to by paleoartists. The larger an animal is the more energy it has to expend to be colorfull and that can be a limiting factor for how an animal looks.
also, sometimes, being colorful can actually be good. Best I can think of are poison dart frogs and reef fish. One uses color to scare away predators and show off that its dangerous, and the others use it to camouflage and confuse predators in an already flashy environment. But to be honest, I can only see this working on smaller stuff. Big hunters would be unable to ambush and idk about larger herbis
yeah I kinda see it. The best we have nowadays are ostriches, which guess what, arent as flashy as something like a paradise bird, but could still manage some displaying feature. Its hard to speculate on something when we dont really have a basis to speculate from
The same of both species tbh, cuz petey is bigger than jane and dueler is barely smaller
thats also why whales and elephants look so bland and boring. Maybe what they couldve had is something like a song which would be REALLY cool to hear
isn't petey lethaeus?
It was lancensis in the supp iirc.
hmm i doubt that because lancensis's holotype is fully grown at 5 meters while jane is almost 7m and immature
Actually we are both wrong
It’s grey!
Much like the largest animal on earth, the gray whale
So how big might a fully grown one be?
does anyone know how Odobenocetops fed / what it ate?
the authors estimate a fully grown lethaeus at 1200kg
And length?
idk probably 7-7.5m
smth similar to walruses I believe
just imagine a dangerous prey species with dazzling colors like this
You mean emus?
No, somali ostriches also have a blue tint on the neck
SMURF
why you so blue
He's cold give him a shirtz🥺
Somalian ostrich
Yes!
Have you considered antlers? Deer can’t fly.
Crocodiles have been successful apex predators for hundreds of millions of years, but the larger clade they belong to, Pseudosuchia, is far more diverse than the semiaquatic ambush predator niche we’re used to. Crocodiles and their relatives have been terrestrial carnivores, fruit-eaters, armored nodosaur-like herbivores, and bipedal herbivore...
I swear, your friend is like a walking contradiction
I love Deinosuchus
What yall think about the Chilantaisaurus.
Someone tell me what I missed
I like to think that for atleast afew thousand years, some non-avian dinosaurs survived in small vulnerable populations
What was the thing about a giga size decrease or whatever? Is it related to it being reconstructed as a bobblehead or something?
there was no real "size decrease" but use it is from a different reconstruction, am not gonna bother trying to explain the lore of 2 different skeletal reconstruction of same animal, you could just ask Dan Folks yourself as he is also in the server
I’ve had a long history with Giganotosaurus , ever since my first skeletal diagram in 2021/2022. Overall, I’ve revised Giganotosaurus around 6 times (what can I say, I’m a perfectionist), and as I get more data on the holotype specimen, the more I want to update my skeletal diagram to be as close
Oh he is? Neat.
yes
What's everyone think of that Tyrannosaurus Tibia?
I’m intrigued by giga being closer to taurovenator than Meraxes. Is Meraxes more derived compared to other giganotosaurini?
Not all that surprising honestly.
The opposite. Taurovenator is usually meraxes closest relative, but it seems to have more giga like proportions
Still, Meraxes would have been derived away from the tauro/giga proportions, right? Not the other way around?
And where does mapusaurus fit into this?
I think they mean how that one giga dentary isn't thought of to be bigger
Nah I just heard people talking bout some “size nerf”
people will say that but never actually double check or understand what the actual source say
That’s why I asked
Please read
my guy this wasnt an exstensive list of everything by phylogeny and temporal distrubution, this a was a listacle of examples of evolutionary strategies of the group as whole, i thinks you've misunderstood the premise
read? why I never, this is BIG PALEO SCANDAL!!!
Yeah I did
Vividen did also addmit when someone else brought it up on discord he misread the art label of the species, that was a goof
you not getting it is not a reason he needs to change his presentatiom
who's shuvo,necro
and your basis of this opinion is what, have you engaged with any of his audience?
regarding the "awesomebro with sciene" i think you are missing a bit of the point of that statment, its more from the point of view that you're allowed to think dinos are cool and awesome and some of the most metal things to walk the earth but its better to actually use the sciene then just treat them like movie monsters and action figures
also he did reached out to Manusuchus but Manusuchus replied yes after the video was release
No, I'm going to quote tierzoo as a source thankyou very much
if he asked them or used public domain then shouldnt they already know that their art is in or could appear in content
gonna have to eleborate there broski
hey guys do y’all have any plausible ideas or effects of dinosaurs in the walking dead? Species that would survive in modern day america/spain/france? how would we see them?
The only thing Ima really say is you can very easily be knowledgeable about dinosaurs but not care/not know about the catalogue number of specimens especially nicknamed ones
how much truth is behind the " rex has the eyesight of a hawk " claim?
falcon your a hawk 2, uh?
We have no sclerotic rings for Rex so the size of the eyeball is unknown
It's very much possible to be as good or better than a hawk but there's also a chance it's worse, no way to know beyond endocast studies of Rex finding the eyesight wasn't horrible TMK
do we know how good rex's other senses were? like hearing or smell?
Tyrannosaurus () is a genus of large theropod dinosaur. The type species Tyrannosaurus rex (rex meaning 'king' in Latin), often shortened to T. rex or colloquially t-rex, is one of the best represented theropods. It lived throughout what is now western North America, on what was then an island continent known as Laramidia. Tyrannosaurus had a mu...
The study used a Gorgosaurus with a sclerotic ring
I don't know if a study on sclerotic ring growth through ontogeny has been performed on living animals but I would assume it'd be like eyes (since it resides inside the eyeball) where it barely grows through the animal's life
ngl i've heard this in video somewhere before, like verbatim
Not surprised it was a tyrannosaurus Tibia or not surprised it was found in South America? Because still widely accepted they're originated in Asia and this one is super old so it could disprove that.
Where did you get that it was found in South America??
It's a potential tyrannosaurine tibia found in New Mexico
Oop it was New Mexico ty for catching that
southern america
It doesn't change much of anything besides potentially moving the migration date from Asia earlier than currently thought
Even then, we have a tyrannosaurine lacrimal from Deinosuchus hatcheri's holotype site that does the same
It's a tyrannosaurus bro, and may not be to you but pretty cool to me.
okey ppl say eotriceratops have a small body
It's part of the tyrannosaurini lineage
no
looks like alioramus
Eotriceratops is bobbleheaded
Eotyrannus is not
Where did you get the information that Eotriceratops is an immature individual
And Eotriceratops has a proportionately larger head than Triceratops
I think this is Vally problem cause they listed two animals that result in two completely different answers, maybe I should give up and jump off my bed
i didnt even know eotyrannus exist
In a vacuum sure, but there's very usually context clues that will give you what they're talking about
This is the only time there's been confusion and even then, we were right originally. They just managed to guess the name of a real animal and confuse further
I lowkey thought Dakosaurus was a mosasaur
But why scientist assume he was a bobblehead ?
did Tyrannosauroidea and Ceratopsia arrive at america the same time or was one later then the other?
Tyrannosauroids were much earlier
They were widespread across Laurasia and potentially Gondwana by the late Jurassic/earliest Cretaceous
I showed my friend a picture of an allosaurus and his reaction was funny because he expected it to be like T. rex size
would a 13 yr old gymnanist really be able to have the stregnth to kick a deinonychus sized animal out a window?
technically yes but like
it can just
brace itself
lmao
it is just the raptor having skill issue
Is mapusaurus currently closer to Meraxes or Giga?
I mean
Allosaurus do Reach Big Sizes
Just nowhere near Rex in Mass
Sue is like over 2x the Weight of the Largest Allo lol
Taurovenator paper got Mapu closer to Meraxes/Tauro than Giga iirc
But then there was another one later where it was "siblings" with Giga again
Is Meraxes considered the outlier among them in terms of body proportions?
Ehh
Prob?
It has Long Legs
Most Big ones have similar ones
Then theres just Meraxes lol
Tauro prob has the shortest ones? Its between Tauro and Acro ngl
Are there any differences between the skulls that might be noticeable if they still had flesh on them? Or are they really just virtually the same.
They have their differences iirc
To lazy to bull both Recons of Dans tho
I think Mapusaurus deserves a redescription of all the specimens.
Its a Bonebed
So yeah prob needs that
Carcha needs more Material
Been a Partial Skull is...yeah
Post cranial stuff got stripped away.
What the heck is an eotyrannus?
Intermediate tyrannosauroid from the Wessex Formation
when a eotriceratops and tyrannosaurus love eachother very much-
I wish some smol pterasaurus survived
🦕 A new species of baby #dinosaur discovered from South Korea's Aphae Island has been named after one of the most beloved cartoon characters in the country: Dooly.
Check out our latest blog post to learn all about this exciting discovery: https://t.co/XquLlPCPEr
https://x.com/Tessasaurus_rex/status/2034635766521905515 can someone explain each one?
↪️ Replying to @RealQuematrice
@RealQuematrice Yes, haolong is too often shown as being fluffy. Caihong is often reconstructed as being rainbow when we don't know what color it would have been (it was def colorful and iridescent to some degree, just not literally rainbow) and kulindadromeus is just... Everything
small ripoff dryo looking thing
it's not even related to dryosaurus 😭
Explain what?
Dawn Tyrant
still a ripoff
The tyrannos that lived with carchs were pretty cool
That boy looks stiff.
You'll try to make it stand up, and it just always ends up like this:
i am CRYING right now 😭
could allosaurus pull something like this off when it was alive?
Doubt it

Something about how allos neck is is weird
you mean the animal in general or in the screenshot?
In general, to me its neck seems long for a theropod, almost snake like
Snallosaurus
That's me
Is the piscivore ceratosaurus thing confirmed yet?
No
This is the Saurophaganax/Allosaurus Anax mod
They used Random's Allosaurus Anax skeletal for its Proportions iirc
It was better at swimming comparing to other theropods but surely not a semi aquatic predator
Even more we have evidences of well either predation or scavenging both on herbivores and carnivores bones , allo , campto ,( stego ???)
So i don’t really see any reasons why ceratosaurus would be piscivore
Peak 🥹
Btw the ceratosaurus found in portugal was ceratosaurus dentisulcatus right? I couldn't find any site saying what species it was other than one
Ceratosaurus has huge teeth in proportion to its skull
Doesn't it have the biggest teeth-to-body ratio of all dinosaurs?
Yeah that too, wonder what its lifestyle was like.
you mean nasicornis?
It was assigned first , but then argued and revoked , also there was inconsistencies since dentisulcatus believed to be older ( denti and magnicornis) since all specimens assigned to this genus were found in older rock layers alongside with Stego stenops and jimmadseni , while specimen from Portugal was late kimmeridgian , much younger )
And now it is in limbo either it is nasicornis or not even cerato
we only have a tooth from the portuguese ceratosaurus fossil right?
Femur and tibia fragments also
It spent all its money at the dentist.
ha
are these osteoderms looking good? It's tarchia
https://x.com/Dexerto/status/2034945037306298395 why dont they find dinosaurs in korea???
Because half of its off limits could be a small reason
no Triassic or Jurassic sediments and body fossils are relatively rare but Korea has an excellent track and egg record for the Cretaceous
the north even has a rich bird and pterosaur site similar to the Jehol Biota, but it hasn't been described yet
Ah interesting, I honestly had no idea they'd even allow that kind of information to leave from North Korea lol.
well they don't have a problem with China and there are a lot of Chinese paleontologists
partially described now, I missed this study https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195667122001677?via%3Dihub
I've seen that ceratosaurus dentisulcatus is alot bigger than nasicornis, so if it wer a ceratosaurus nasicornis, would that mean that our current ones are adolescent amd adult ceratosaurus are alot bigger?
dentisulcatus is most likely an adult nasicornis
somehow i hadnt noticed until today that c.nasicornis means ''horned lizard horned nose''
Bro the have some beautiful depictions of dinos coming from China to
woah they were really on the NOSE with that one
Is there any maps or anything known about how earth will be in 50-100 million years? What animals do y’all think will be evolving and thriving by then (for a worldbuilding project) I will be making Seriemas for a definite species that evolves back into their ancestral counterparts
whos even truly to say? theres a wide variety of things possible in such a vast expansion of time. minor or major extinction events from a variety of sources could totally factory reset millions of years of evolution. beyond that though im sure theres good sources you could find to see what a general tectonic layout of future earth would be like
what use to live in the north pole in the ice age? who was hanging out with the polar bear over there?
Manny, sid, and diego
this will be a weird question but! what would be built better for speed? a hadrosaurid with a typical jurassic park hadro build or a more accurate lambeosaurine build?
Because of all the bad Korean dinosaur media
Crows and rats will go to war with one another
im just quite curious about this
probably the jp one since it's a lot more leg proportionately and is pretty thin overall
real hadrosaurs werent really built for speed (not that they were especially slow either), they were better for stamina
so while the jp one may be faster, the more realistic one would have better stamina?
Probably the jp hadrosaur since it's leaner and has longer legs
what else would be different due to their build? i imagine they'd require less food due to their much slimmer and smaller build, probably much less durable then actual hadrosaurs ( and seeing how everyone and their grandma eats them in jp )
jp hadrosaur would be more bipedal vs irl hadrosaur which is most likely habitually quadrupedal
Well it looks incapable of going quadrapedal because of how short its arms are, and the neck doesnt look nearly wide enough to allow for any amount of breathing or eating
does jwe help with those issues at all?
definitely
i did not realize how much they changed the hadrosaur body types between jurassic park 3 and jurassic world evolution
On the cursoriality of quadrupedal dinosaurs
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036904
Background The most primitive ornithischian dinosaurs were small bipeds, but quadrupedality evolved three times independently in the clade. The transition to quadrupedality from bipedal ancestors is rare in the history of terrestrial vertebrate evolution, and extant analogues do not exist. Constraints imposed on quadrupedal ornithischians by the...
cutepatootidromeus squishii
what formation would you say is the most diverse to set a saurian like game in?
nemegteg (or whatever is the tarbo and theri formation). Yeah they have like 10 sauropods but thats the standard for every single formation ever. Stuff like Galli, Deinoch, Tarbo and Velo are there
Morrison has a really wide array of species. You could also use multiple formations in the belly river group
i feel like they kinda bit themselves in the foot with hell creek because hell creek and its animals will always be changing / have changes to them
Prob
That's a constant with almost every formation. Hell creek has a lot of cool fauna. A lot of undescribed stuff and a lot of overlap with other formations. Hell creek was a good choice.
I think fossil depauperate formations are better translatable as a game, less work to do
Ichnotaxa game
In the example of saurian, less than half of all the organisms known to be present were slated to be a part of the game, of which many incurred some unnecessary inaccuracies. The depositional environment seems to have been payed very little mind despite the outlined objective of representing the ‘hell creek formation’ which is primarily a record of sediment deposition.
Honestly a ‘southern maastrichtian laramidia’ based Saurian game with the current information we have of it would be awesome
Since you still get giant tyrannosaurs, actual giant saurolophines, giant triceratopsines AND you can include Alamosaurus + the two quetz species with no issue
I'd personally like a grand view style evolution game, simplified ecosystem simulations but with species diversifying over time, geology, extinction events
I think this is even worse idea, southern Maastrichtian Laramidia is so broad and generic to invite many questions, what you consider south/north and what local depo environment you want to represent primarily, because they are not all the same and do not all preserve the same animals
I've always wanted a paleoecology simulator kind of like a zoo builder game except not a zoo, though including longer term interactions as well would be pretty cool
That would be cool, I guess in the most ambitious version of what I'm imagining you could zoom in on individual ecosystems and see stuff interacting too
Well for starters I’m pretty sure anything that’s below the Lance/Denver region (effectively the “Hell Creek” region) is considered more “southern”
Saurian itself was not “specific” and going by its logic leptoceratops couldn’t be added because…? Meanwhile Alamosaurus was perfectly fine despite there being no records of any sauropod in any of the surrounding formations (with the only one being the North Horn where rex & alamo intercept, but even that is considerably more distant to the Lance)
All things considered…they sort of do. Now sure some do have different things and taxa, but like HC related formations it’s all species that are within close relation to one another, and assuming in-game as an overall broad overlap of the regions it can definitely be made to work and especially with saurian’s own logic
Most of this is because many of the formational groups don’t have the greatest fossil record, and all things considered the Hell Creek regional fauna will work better than a broader giant region of related animals.
Morrison formation game where only sauropods are playable
That said I want to play as Adam the torosaurus, and no amount of parsimony or pedantics will get me to disagree.
Your Saurian in the Morrison
help him
Also let’s be fr as long as it’s well balanced and takes good note of the flora and kinds of environments then it’s not going to be “horrible”
what do you mean gang. The apato baby needs to be erradicated from existance as its presence in the universe is a threat to all of it
Accurate gameplay of morrison & asian/european prehistoric ecosystems?
WRONG!! 1247 damage to the tip of your tail and lethal bleed by stegosaurus!!!!!!
The Cleveland-Lloyd Quarry or something
Ohhh Prior Extinction mentioned
No no no, it was a joke, please don't get us shot and killed by the mods
PE is either lawnmower simulator or the most BS hitboxes ever, no in between. Here is 3k damage and broken neck by tyrannosaurus while you were in the middle of frudging nowhere
would PE's least accurate dinosaur be Beipi? Cuz its like, 5 times the size of the real thing and doesnt even have quills
- unprepared adult specimen size
- the isle’s beipi is the most horrifically inaccurate design I’ve seen from them yet
Isle Beipi would be an awesome spec if the animal was actually that size as an adult
Cedar Mountain, Kem Kem, Wessex, Shaximiao
Saurian definitely calls itself a representation of the ‘hell creek’ which is a specific geologic formation that doesn’t by necessity refer to Lance, Scollard, Frenchman, Ferris, or Laramie. Really many issues outline why Saurian is bad at sticking to its own premise. As a region at least the traditional Montana group is in association with the same foreland basin, unlike some of the sevier basins colloquially considered a part of southern biota.
This is why it’s mid, reject hyper realistic constructs and embrace giant torosaurus fighting mcraeensis with an alamo doing nothing in the background
the isle's beipi aint that bad if you consider the body shape of what we currently know of beipi (the smaller specimen): A short, stubby thing with big claws. Otherwise yeah its just made up stuff. Sharp teeth and beak, preened feathers, goofy ass hands, and a weirdly long skull
Well this kind of sums up all TI Evrima designs. Some are pretty good and it works out for them, others…don’t
Video games should be silly and fun I agree
I hate the spino because they couldve genuenily made a cool, accurate looking spino but decided to 2010ify it for some goddamn reason with those basic theropod legs. I know a lot of people like it cuz badass woohoo but god dammit we already have like 4 badass big baddies, give me at least 1 goofy guy that preys on fish and stuff that come to shore
Though I do understand what Saurian was going for. That said, I’ll always have a special distaste for saurian birthing edmusthosaurus and making me physically unable to get tiktok
the isle is a game where teno and magy exist and show the very highs
and very lows
of its design style
hi parrot
anyways does anyone have some late permian formation summaries i could spy into
That's the opposite of what we have 🥀 As of Spino's overhaul, we've only gotten "Fish-eating idiot with short legs"
And uh in terms of paleontology, I think it's ok because it gives us a great view on how depictions have evolved for Spinosaurus
Personally I have no issue with 2010’s spino, I just really dislike how they infused a crocodile into its design because “wooAAAOOhh spinosaurus crocodile mimic!!!!!!!!1!1!1!” (The two are barely alike whatsoever, arguably even in lifestyle and predation)
Honestly, I do like the crocodilian version of Spino's IRL paddle-tail going on because it's a nice combination of what we thought Spino was and what we think it is now but I do wish the skull was more Spinosaurus
I mean, thats what it was. Although PoT made it cool cuz it can use earthbending. TI just made it land theropod but special gimmick number 5
I saw a post that said that it was Rex's head but elongated
Yea that's what it was but-
So I just realized you meant that in terms of the game roster, not in terms of general media depiction
the design is alright, not my favorite but I dont hate it. I hate that they used this design in a game with 4 land apexes and decided that spino would go well on land too
Ok no, I can fully understand your point there, completely real and fair
Tho I will also say that the whole "elongated rex head" might be pattern seeking cause Baardo made it and he's always the goat (I know what post you speak of)
oh cedar would be peak...
herrera??
yes, herrera can dive (and has fish in the diet)
I mean it's about as semi-aquatic as a person is, it's not the best and not the worst
I mean, we do swim pretty well for a primate
anyways I gtg gang, cyall
A general reminder to please keep this channel on-topic with paleontology. Path of Titans game discussion can be had in the #path-of-titans channel. 
I feel like saying "If we use ostrich farms as a basis for large terrestrial bird land requirements and then apply it to an animal the size of Gallimimus" was paleo enough
DOOLYSAURUS
(Dooly is cerato tho lol)
Gallimimus is a chicken mimic, and chickens are not dinosaurs
Doolysaurus being reconstructed as traditionally cute was the greatest move because this is the only ornithischian I've seen reposted beyond the hour of its release
Its prob cause of the name lol
They should have made it look like a baby pelican
i would kill a man for doolysaurus even if he was ugly
which concavenator is more accurate, aexa's or PoT's?
PoT
really? i didnt think it would win
PoT
PoT’s remodels have upped the designs both qualitywise and realismwise
what are the main flaws of aexa's that put it below PoT accuracy wise?
Idk it looks kinda fat
Are you a spokesperson for aexa?
It's FAT
nooo i was just curious
Also maybe it’s cus of how FAT it is but the head looks kind of small
i LIKE aexas more
but its pots due to not being scrunkly
now...which is more accurate , PE or PoT?
PE but that's because their artstyle is "trace the skeletal"
oh, wait what? isnt that what your suppose to do so its accurate?
If you're making sci-comm
If you're making a game, it's like eh, doesn't rlly matter
would you say PoT is able to find a good balance between stylization and realism?
Unfortunately, no dino sim game rlly does that
Every game so far flops between "good stylization", "bad stylization", and "skeletal realism"
Isle is the closest I can think of that strikes a balance with some of its playable designs (Bary, Shant, Herrera) and then I don't rlly need to list the bad
who has the lower lows and higher highs, PoT or isle?
If you want realism, PoT
If you want stylization, Isle
If you want grind, Roblox
This is a final warning that this chat would be dedicated to Paleontology.
Any gameplay related topics are to be taken to #path-of-titans.
its very interesting seeing so many games with so many different accurate takes on the same animal, seeing the differences in paleo-accuracy is quite interesting and gives a amazing view of how different people view paleontology
But, Alderon Parrot! Those games involve Dinosaurs! And Dinosaurs involve Paleontology!
No?
In fact, no. If you may, please check the channel guidelines in it's pinned messages. It better describes what would and what would not be acceptable to be discussed on this channel. Thank you!
I'm trying to find the one section where it speaks about Dinosaurs games, specifically... hmmm...
"Plots, actors, directors, mechanics, gameplay etc. of ANY media or game."
I see, I see.
Wait how are Dino reconstructions done then usually?
.
What is a sci-comm?
I should clarify I don’t mean games, I mean like general recons
Science communication
Most (all?) paleo-art falls under this category
Imo a good game/general media design is "Can I recognize the animal after I put my own twists on it"
Oh I see
Obviously that's not a rule but that's just how it should be seen imo 
what is PE
how accurate is Nova's Argentinosaurus?
@tough parcel great example to what you were saying
I love how it looks but i dont know accurate it is
I’m not a paleo artist, but I know enough about the process to know that it’s a lot more involved that’s just “tracing the skeletal”. Especially if you’re making something 3D, the skeletal just won’t cut it. You probably wanna examine the actual material for the best reconstruction. If you can’t do that, then you just use what’s available (both the skeleton AND photos of the original material). You gotta remember that skeletals are themselves artwork, so they also include inaccuracies or errors from that process.
aexa’s proportions are off
Chickens are Infact theropod dinosaurs
I think aexa is kinda more accurate because the spine of concavenator is actually just infront of the hips and not on it (as far as i know)
?
Ceratosaurus in Portugal? Is that new?
No
That makes one aspect slightly more accurate, PoT’s as a whole is more accurate in terms of the actual shape of the animal
Isn't ceratosaurus dentisulcatus found in Portugal?
nope
what's the material of the specimen
Idk but I found this in the Lourinhã formation's Wikipedia page
Finally a recon of a rynchosaur which depicts the "beak" correctly, not as keratin but just straight up naked bone
I don’t think that this is specimen found in Portugal
That one is I guess
Mb I misread "specimen"
That specific specimen isn't in Portugal but the species ceratosaurus dentisulcatus is
I mean yeah it is aka dentisulcatus
But as I said it can’t be referred to any genus specifically, just ceratosaurus sp , I explained why earlier , also Wikipedia is not the best source
Cutest documentary boi of today vs cutest documentary boi of history
Prehistoric planet still has some of the most appealing designs, despite how inaccurate they might be, and the cgi quality just enhances it even more. I hope the 5th season is a bit better at more informed designs.
To be completely honest, I wouldn’t mind returning to maastrichtian stuff again eventually, so that we can get an updated look at some of the species and many more new ones.
Ain't that just Gigantosaurus from Fallen Kings?
Does Tyrannosaurus Mcraeensis still hold water?
Depends on who you believe.
No, It'd be a Horrible Cup for Holding Water.
?
"I checked all of Stan's teeth one by one against the skull"
I didn't know Stan had CT scans of the tooth-bearing elements showing how deep the root would extend + that he had the original teeth instead of reconstructions 
🤷♂️ idk
Hey Gualicho, I've recently just made the most disgusting interpretation of a Ankylosaur face
The long teeth should stick out a bit like in Dinosaurs. Which we know T.rex was not
Maybe, they could, honestly...
I think they mean "Dinosaur Sanctuary", not dinosaurs 
they forgor 
Translation error maybe
Let’s hope this brilliant mind has effectively measured the alveoli depth for every tooth!
Idk, just found it and was a little curious.
I mean, assuming that Theropods had the Extra Oral Tissue model, and assuming they share a similar condition to other Thecodonts ( Tight Lip Tissue around the jaw bones ), is it a bit far fetched to imagine that the tooth once it began to slip out of the socket it also slipped out of the lip-line?
Huh
First time someone’s used thecodontia since the 19th century
I mean, just saying, technically as the tooth is slipping out, it's not really offering as much of a function as it did originally, and they probably aren't attached as firmly to the mouth as once, so keeping that tooth behind the Extra Oral Tissue, assuming that the Extra Oral Tissue has the function of preserving the teeth by giving them moisture, does not make a lot of sense.
Unless you want that tooth poking at the lower oral tissue which is... Definetly, a annoying sensation, if I had to guess.
Tooth slippage is post mortem
Not entirely sure on that, but even then, you do have to consider that's how they grow new teeth, they just slip out the old ones, and let the new ones replace them.
so what's the point here
yup.
How wide was stegosaurus
Very
So the isle and POTs stego is not accurate?
Stego as a Whole is...
Yeah
Bad Described and Stuff
No idea without a screenshot, but most reconstructions slim them down at least a bit
Not exactly susie is actually pretty close to a complete stego fossil
Best Stego is Probably Prehistoric Kingdom cause Matt Demphys Helped with it
And He knows more Stuff about it
the isles isnt that bad when compared to POTs. path of titans is somehow less paleo accurate than the isle now, save for some of the speculative things in the isle
Sophie is also an Inmature Specimen and Proportions aren't exactly like 1 to 1 with Older Individuals
Doesn't help Sophie might be its own thing and iirc has its Hips Crushed ir smth
Most POT Designs are better than the Isle in Terms of Accuracy
Save Cera who Isle is overall better
And Maybe Stego
But Given Stego's Nature and its Description
And How Old POT Stego is and that is likely based on Sophie
Yeah its rough
But yeah
POT and Isle Stego overall get Mogged by this Guy(advantages of Having Matt Demphys help)
i would say cera, stego, and their carno (pycno having horns STILL ticks me off) and their deino was more accurate than pots sarco before the sarco TLC
Isle Deino Designs is bad even for Old Deino
Its just an Upscale Alligator and doesn't really hold any of Deino's trait even.before its updated Proportions
True, but it has been hypotised that at immature stages stegos were less tall overall and the proportion between the femur and the humerus were less exaggerated
I wanna talk about paleorex cus I think people misinterpret him when he says he uses ai for his animations
I'm against genAI, like I actually want AI companies banned, but paleorex uses a local network that barely pollutes and he uses his own artwork to make the animations, so I don't really see problem??
The colloquial name for Deinocherius should be the quacken
(Sophie)
It was REALLY wide too
the whole point of art is that you put time and effort into it, displaying your OWN artistic ability (hence why if you commission an artwork, it's not YOUR art). animation is a type of art, so animating your paleoart using ai isnt actually your animation and therefore isnt really art. if you use ai to be better at your hobby, it's not a hobby anymore, it's an obsession
Sophie is a decent Specimen
But Stegosaurus descriptiom as a whole Sucks
He said that he's just experimenting and trying new things, so i assume it's temporary
Honestly would've been much bigger of a problem if the AI he was using was public, which pollutes alot
I would take more the Width it has in Prehistoric Kingdom more
Using the Original Width that Demphys uses is based on Sophie which iirc Hips might be Crushed
But sophie wasn't wide at all unlike that video tho
Is the prhistoric kingdom stegosaurus even wider than Dempsey's model?
Width is based on Sophie directly
I mean
That doesn't matter
Demphys was directly Involved on that
And he mentioned before he would change some things from his Previous Ones
he also has a in person Tetcon model of his stegosaurus
What if nothing ever matters
PK Stego is basically an Updated/Current Demphys Stego Model in a Videogame
True
Matt Dempsey is lwk handsome tho right

What? Have you seen the guys face
true
Tyrannosaurus and the Nanotyrannus
This is Raptorex hellcreekensis
He looks like the main character for a Jurassic Park movie
what was the reason for majority of the smaller baleen whales going extinct?
prolly climate change if I had to guess
Most cetaceans starting moving towards poles as megalodon was megalodoning, plus with Great Whites they’d be more formidable to smaller fast moving whales so it became a competition of size
Ocean productivity fundamentally changed during the Pliocene cooling, a major consequence from new wind-driven upwelling was the concentration of krill and zooplankton in dense hotspots of activity rather than a diffuse more even distribution that occurred in warmer oceans. That favored large body sizes and stuff like lunge feeding and migration which were key to the success of larger body plans over smaller ones in baleen whales
oooh that dryptosaurus is VERY rough
I don't even mind the three fingers it's just the arm placement and how short the torso is
I saw the drypto and my first thought was just “aww….i hate him” but somehow in the most well meaning way possible 😭 🙏
wow..
what would you guys say is your biggest paleontology red flag opinion
i'll say calling tyrannosaurus "t. rex" while other long and hard to pronounce names arent like that like carcharodontosaurus not being called "c. saharicus "even though this PROBABLY isnt really related to paleontology at all
i wonder why t.rex became so popular in mainstream media instead of just calling it tyrannosaurus
-# wait "red flag opinion"?? i am just not feeling the reading mood today..
red flag opinion is a opinion that will make people think your a red flag
oh
It's 4 letters vs 13 letters
oh
It’s also why Triceratops became Trike
Well we just call it carchar
ok
Or like saying Giga. Cause we all know who that’d be referring to.
Gigantspinosaurus
gigantoraptor
Exactly 
so is the netflix "The Dinosaurs" the best dino documentary of all times, or what ?
4th place for me actually
It’s ok imo
i thought it was pretty good, top notch graphics, story, and narration
so wich are your best ones ?
- Walking with dinosaurs
- Prehistoric planet
- Planet dinosaur
I miss the format of Planet Dinosaur, that should be brought back.
Woah, that’s a big tooth.
no they do not, and no narrow teeth does not mean they need to wait for prey to bleed out
but yes nice find
how many teeth on average was tyrannosaurus probably loosing a week?
about half
do we know how fast they were able to regernerate teeth?
T. rex had an extremely slow tooth replacement rate for a theropod, Erickson calculated it at close to 800 days
oh my god
It's an old study but the methods hold up afaik, D'Emic has cited it in their more recent papers on sauropod and ceratosaur tooth replacement rates
Carnivores replace their teeth less frequently than herbivores, and T. rex teeth are truly something else compared to other theropods
I’d imagine carch teeth are pretty generalized then, yes?
To be fair this is for the full mouthful I think, not 2 years per tooth
I worded that poorly - it's the time it takes for the same tooth to be shed and fully form again, rather than a tooth falling off every 800 days
Right it's one socket's full cycle. There's no way of knowing how many it would lose per week but based on those estimates probably not many especially compared to other theropods
Enamel in isolated theropod teeth indicate up to a full annual cycle recorded in vivo for a single tooth
Dental microwear and feeding trace surveys also indicate that theropods, even tyrannosaurids, did not utilize bone as a food source to the degree mammalian carnivores do. Which is ironic because the latter don't replace their teeth. Evolutions Greatest Goofs Part III
The mammal… not so cunning?
just a bunch of rats, gnawing away
Pterodactyl, mosasaurus are dinosaurs, spinosaurus is the biggest carnivore
Yea
No proof it couldn’t
would still get absolutely touched by prime 2019 dame
why not? ( I'm curious )
a raptor can be even more skillful in ball if given some gatorade (iykyk)
would stomatosuchus also count as a bobblehead
Yeah
what would've happened if the bone wars / Great Dinosaur Rush never happened?
Hold on, did all groups of dinosaurs have those slightly larger and more rectangular underside scales?
No
Cause as far as I’m aware, ventral scales somewhat like this are present in ceratopsians, some allosauroids, juravenator, some ornithischians, and maybe sauropods?
Anatomically it makes sense. Protected area not needing movement benefits from larger sturdier scales
American Paleontology would've likely had to catch up with everyone else, likely. Although, as a benefit Triceratops ( and Ceratopsia ) wouldn't exist, as a negative Agathaumas wouldn't exist either.
why is trike not existing a benefit ToT
Bone Wars might not have been itself inevitable but the rapid rate of discovery in the American west in the late 1800s probably was. There are lots of bones out there
Would've been described under a new name, and likely would've... Oh you know? Locality and layer where it was found noted, and probably we wouldn't have the mess we currently have in the Lance Formation.
Unfortunate, really. But, you cannot have Triceratops without having Marsh included into that equation.
did the bone wars did more good or bad would you say?
I think it depends on who you ask, really.
And probably how you look at it
well what were the pros and cons of it?
pros:a lot of fossils, a lot of taxon
cons:a lot of synonyms, and Marsh
( In my opinion, and to be simplistic about it )
Here's a huge blanket pro: a lot of energy and interest for paleontology and dinosaurs in particular
A negative: often for the wrong reason, which leads to people doing bad things
Paleontology would not be the same without it, but also like I said it was inevitable to some degree. You take massive exposures of mesozoic fossil bearing beds throughout the west, add the nascent science of paleontology, add the construction of the railroad, etc. Someone was going to find that stuff, marsh and cope were just the preeminent US paleontologists of the time so it makes sense it was them
Could it be ancestral to archosaurs, considering crocs still have them?
I feel like paleo as a whole might be slower around the world if Paleo gets big in the US at a much later time.
Not entirely sure.
someone was saying that stegosaurus went extinct because they couldn't eat the sharp plants that were expanding
that true?
SURVIVING EARTH
Definitely not, don't even know what they mean by "sharp plants expanding"
they said they went extinct because they couldn't eat these sharp hard plants on the rise and thats what ceratopsians became more numerous
don't know what they mean
Yeah that's bogus
@hallow spear
they took that straight from netflix's the dinosaurs
Scicomm!
They seriously say that? Jeeeez
No clue what that person is saying. Completely false too because stegosaurs survived well into the cretaceous in several parts of the world.
Laramidia as a whole is just different from the rest of the world, and large derived ceratopsians are pretty much only existant there, meanwhile the last stegosaurs from the NA continent were millions of years before true ceratopsians (but still existed elsewhere just fine.)
Wait what I said almost sounds like I’m saying that’s the case
Nah. If that was the case then hadrosaurs wouldn’t have been so prevalant.
It's probably the third or fourth silliest claim made in the series tbh
Angiosperms are not "sharper" than earlier lineages of plants, it's that simple to debunk
Oh man, what are the other 2 - 3…
#1 is undisputedly 'the breakup of pangea was a big explosion'
#2 is idk i'm leaving space for something i might have forgotten
#3 is ''spinosaurus was succesful because it was good at exploiting high sea levels''
First one is funny
Second also sounds funny
Third is almost offensive
It’s bogus and also taken from that Netflix thing randoms said
It’s better than PhP they say
It's definitely a big step up from Loop while also being quite entertaining
But there's quite a few inaccuracies in there too
And like said before, some kinda silly claims
maybe #2 could be 'their warm blood gave dinosaurs the advantage over the sluggish pseudosuchians' (which were also warm blooded)
Me when I’m in a incompetent challenge and my opponent is a documentary about dinosaurs
While it ain't that offensive of a claim, they did also go with Spino being the largest theropod claim
Clearly all documentaries are correct and were simply stupid
Return to tradition: 1 minute of animation, 59 minutes of bearded men rambling in the desert
I too propose we banish Jack to a desert
The documentary is just the words "Tyrannosaurus" while Jack Horner sits in a wool sweater in the desert for an hour. 20 episodes long
yeah I got ganged up on about it in a vc 😂
It’s all good lol
This a series ?
clearly the reason carcharodontosaurids went extinct is because they couldn't bite through the tough hides of ceratopsians and ankylosaurids 🧐
Spinosaurus would never abuse exploits, it’s a humble pretty baby 😔
That would honestly be kinda fun tho
do you guys think we'll ever find a ceratopsian outside of asia and NA?
Or better, what about making a Paleontology documentary actually about Paleontology and not just... you know? ...Paleozoology specifically?
europe atleast?
Ajkaceratops was named this year
WHY IS HE BALD
bro baldist
The consequences of pretending to be a rhabdodont
Thoughts on Rexes tlc design?
It is relatively okay: the skull structure still has some flaws but it is much better than what it used to be.
bro is a living nightmare, literally
“living nightmare” and it’s just what if a ceratopsian but not a freak of nature
Peeled ceratopsian.
Awww I like it
he looks like an incested mole rat i hate him
I was going to say something mean ngl-
Be nice he’s doing his best 
his best is terrible
Watching "The Dinosaurs" surely it's just gonna be slop like LOOP
Not nearly as bad
This is important
Is there any possibility of a feathered spinosaurid
ANY possibility
They're all decently big and all from tropical areas, the odds they had feathers as adults is pretty low
Somebody daid they added a feature to their T. Rex drawing cus they were inspired by my ceratosaurus paleoart that is so ucte wtf 🥺
It wouldn't be possible
Hm
Alright
It's not that cut and dry, there's a possibility. Feathers are ancestral to dinosaurs + pterosaurs and preserve poorly apart from exceptional conditions. What's called the conservative view is that several clades independently lost their feathers, which isn't totally conservative in my opinion, and in that case spinosaurids as tetanurans would have been one of the clades to do so. However, Juravenator and Sciurumimus complicate this, they're very immature animals but if they are tetanurans then we can expand the retention of feathers to the base of tetanurae and basically all bets are off, spinosaurs could have feathers, allosaurs could have feathers, etc. the fact that we have scale impressions doesn't preclude feathers either as they can co-develop but only the scale impressions would be preserved
I mainly need to know for an adult oxalaia
Probably not likely
I think some fluff on the back could be possible
But unlikely yes
Ooo I like that idea…
As a gambling enthusiast, slim odds don’t mean impossible
Really? Even a scale impression doesn’t rule out light feathering on that part with the scales?
It does not, scales and feathers can and do co-occur
Bird scales are supressed feathers apperantly
It is 100% possible @spice latch
Is it likely? No. But its possible.
Spinosaurus could be feathered too.
well not necessarily. IF it was based on more derived ( Either Extant or like Extant ) feathers, we kinda of don't have evidence of them being able to share the same follicle. Where fibers/filaments and bristles can share the same follicle, often because those integuments grow from the skin or scales themselves.
True that
I’m not a fan of its back or the way it runs
Looks almost constipated or something
I don't think it's fair to call LOOP slop
it wasn't all bad. Slop is something low quality. Slop is Dinosaur with Stephen Fry
tbh in this era, I think Slop can mostly be defined by AI content. Like " Oh yeah, this one isn't very high quality... But, AT LEAST, it's human-made "
Anky fans...this one is for you.
https://x.com/natscichannel/status/1810536398560403952?s=12
Id say possibly as hatchlings but they likely had little to none as adults
Use code KPASSIONATEFB50 to get 50% OFF your first Factor box plus free breakfast for 1 year at https://bit.ly/4rBMnaW!
A marine biologist reacts to the fossil evidence that the prehistoric Megalodon ate whatever it wanted to eat, including other sharks, predatory whales, and even mastodons. Specifically, the shovel-jawed mastodons.
00:00 - Fa...
Some 90's Paleo art prints by Gerald Mullins.
I need to know
Could a giant theropod like rex potentially roll over at a mature stage, virtually at adult
At bebe stages and such it'd likely be inconsequential or even beneficial for them to be able to quickly swing their weight back up onto their feet if they fell over for any reason
But if they were beeg... how easily could that big thang rebound if it got knocked over or slept weird... would it be bad if they were on their back, similar to how quite a few modern birds and lizards today can actually be very negatively affected by placing them on their back
I am asking for no particular reason.. definitely nawt bcs I drew rex doing silly cat poses.. most of which are on her back..
I'm envisioning something similar to a horse where there'd be like a 5 step verification process to go from some kind of prone position to back up straight on their feet
That para looks like something straight out of avatar, thats awesome. now I see where it might have gotten some of its weird prehistoric-esque alien fauna designs from. I knew something about them felt familiar
Said it before and I'll say it again, very glad Clayton is the one who found it. That means it's likely to get into a museum
Would it be good for them to be on their backs? Probably not, given the massive amount of weight that would be placed on the spine and lungs. But I don't see why they couldn't roll over if they happened to fall on their back
Given most theropods are deeper than they are wide, i doubt that would ever happen, but rex's ribcage is unusually round so maybe it could be stable on its back for a little bit
The ever-reliable log
This is 2 years ago and literally no updates on this
💀
Tbf digs tend to take that long, especially for super complete specimens
It's still kind of funny the tweet's being reposted as if it were made today
Mhm, I fully assumed it was recent cause I've seen a lot of people posting it lol, never checked the date
Are Pachycephalosaurs more likely to have “cheek tissue” or not? Like, tissue covering the mouth up to the beak?
Up to the beak is speculative and up to the artist, although they would have cheeks covering the jaw muscles
So there’s not really anything suggesting that there was coverage past that? Not like with stegosaurs?
We've already had a really long discussion about this here before
Just checking up cause the points made were a little confusing to me.
The same is true of every ornithischian except a few ankylosaurs. No evidence that cheeks extended past the jaw muscle and no evidence that they didn't
I would argue that it's most parsimonious to assume they did but that's just me
Cause in ankylosaurs both the cheeks extend to the beak, and most ornithischians have inset toothrows suggesting something was attached there
Dempsey seems to argue that there is enough evidence to imply stegosaurs did not have extended cheeks, i donth think he outright said it wasi mpossible however
https://x.com/Sketchy_raptor/status/2027877679563776094
@SmashAssemble @Fang83768513 The case of "cheeks" in ornithischians isn't really a one size fits all case.
Many of the features we interpretationally associate with extensive "cheeks" in other ornithischians aren't really a thing in Stegosaurus. The temporal jaw muscles would have been more typical... (1/?)
In marginocephalians and ankylosaurs I would agree
Stegosaurs are a bit of an exception cause they lack the inset toothrows of other species
Default should prolly be extensive cheeks imo
Not necessarily cheeks up to the beak but at least cheeks that cover the chewing teeth would be beneficial to most ornithischians
perhaps they were lost in stegosaurs, perhaps they maintained cheeks despite not having inset toothrows because you can't predict cheek presence based on that
Mhm, cheeks aren't necessarily the type of tissue that would leave correlates to begin with
i mean dempsey doesnt only use lack of heavily inset teeth as a reason
he also uses 'simple chewing' (not a soft tissue correlate, subjective) and more posteriorly placed temporal muscles (maybe a correlate)
Spinosaurus coul dive underwater ✅
They don't show it diving in the doc though, just surface swimming
damn, you are fast at replying 🫡
Sometimes i will reply instantly, sometimes i forget and reply a week later
Or never
This is because he's busy redescribing Giganotosaurus, ping King Minos to learn more
dies
Gramblenotosaurus
I believe there are some enantiornithes that have Bristles seemingly growing with a scale on their feet. Incredibly weird, doesn’t match anything we know with modern birds
Yeah those are the "scutellae scale filaments" or SFFs I believe you're referring to, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-37427-4
Kulindadromeus also has bunches of filaments that extend from a central "plate" which may be a scale
I can relate 🗿🍷
Pinacosaurus when he doesn't enter his name right on the form
How to play ▶ this game
Would chewing style be a better indicator?
Oh and what’s the case with the ankylosaurs you speak of?
Several nodosaurs have plates in their cheeks which would have to have been held in place by some sort of tissue
Spinosaurus is ? atm. We just don’t know
We have plenty of studies concluding that it was or wasn't aquatic, one just isn't enough to conclude either way as these studies are often biased to a particular outcome
Even their schematic feels very different from current Spinosaurus
This kinda looks like Milbourne's "osteologically correct" spino
Evidence of something idk
This seems sort of misinformed and presumes things from surface level knowledge
how much would paleontology and its community have changed / been affected if the jurrasic park franchise never came out?
Also I seriously doubt it was “heron” like idc what spino ends up being can we just stop comparing it to crocodiles and herons because it was like NEITHER.
People wouldn't be as interested I think
so overall less interest in dinosaurs and paleontology as a whole?
What yall fav dinos?😁
Buitreraptor
Ceratosaurus Dentisulcatus
I mean, here's the thing, wouldn't it be better to address that point by simply pointing out flaws in those studies or areas that they seemingly forget to address or intentionally do not address, rather than saying " Well, plenty of studies say it's aquatic or not " ?
Not saying that you are wrong, but it sorta of just doesn't deliver the answers one might be searching about that topic ( Unless, you want them to research after those studies, which is... admirable. )
Nice
oh Falcon did you see that one skeletal of the fake spinosaurus species?
here too because I like this thing
