#paleontology
1 messages · Page 224 of 1
Oh 😭
(I'm too lazy to look it up rn)
i wonder if this man gained brain damage from this
Brain turned into soup
Siphonophores
assuming the animals we are comparing are the SAME size
what would give you more brain damage from a headbutt, a big horn sheep or a headbutt from pachyceph?
Ok, so, responding to the Union Jack reaction
In another discord I'm in I have an ongoing feud with a british person where all they do is spam my messages with Union Jacks and I throw various period-accurate revolutionary insults at them. I had an actual fit when I saw that reaction on this gif because I thought it was the fiendish cur following me into other servers.
Im more worried about the fact your skull would split open or cave in
well, does his skull looked cave in?
Get an egg and hit it with a hammer
arent goats notorious for being really good headbutters?
i know this is AvA, but who do you guys would believe in a headbutting spar?
both animals will be the same size and weight to make it more equal
a bighorn sheep or a pachy? im basically asking, whos built better for absorbing head truama and opposing headbutts?
Man o wars are just drifters Literally
Just an observation, but pachy’s domes are just their skulls. There’s no antlers or horns absorbing the force, they use their craniums head-on pun intended for fighting.
At least with rams & other ungulates, they can absorb a lot of the force with their horns which are usually exaggerated and depending on the species can regrow sufficiently and repair previous damages
Not really sure if pachy would be doing the ram thing like a lot of media presents it, I could see it leaning more towards them kinda hitting each other up close. Not sure what studies have been done on the subject
Pachycephalosaurs are actually pretty bad at absorbing shock, and Pachy even amongst them is no standout
The round domed pachys probably didn't hit like rams as the heads would just glance off eachother. We do have evidence that they used the heads as weapons but probably not full charge frontal headbutt like rams do
Another dinosaur ruined by paleontology 😔
Counterpoint, pachyceph fights were probably a lot deadlier than ram fights. Since the rest of the body doesn't have any protection, if you hit anywhere other than the dome it's going to hurt
Terrible reference
But Estemmenosuchus was about on par with Pachy in terms of shock absorption IIRC
That reminds me of the deer I saw today with a broken leg and now I'm sad
awe 🙁
Tbf I live in delaware, there is literally not a single predator around to take advantage of it
oh
Lowk forgot Delaware
i feel like delaware, maine and maryland are some of the most forgettable states
Well see, you can at least name them unlike the midwestern nobodies
That hurts
Perfectly flat box states like the suburban hellscapes that consume america
Anyway, is there a possibility that pachy also used its dome to attract mates, as in colourful displays?
Permian my beloved
I only remember maine because it’s always associated with lobsters and I like crustaceans
if hatz in the top 10 lighest animals in PoT?
Yes hatz only weighs like 300 kg at most
Pretty sure its 500 but I could be wrong
dosent pachy weigh more then it? ( On a good day )
also idk how much water this holds but wasn't there something going to come out that pachycephalosaurs may have kicked each other by standing on their tails ala kangaroo
yup
Oh hey, its that thing. The thing the mods already deleted once and clearly don't want on this family discord
why are we suprised, he dates and marries his 19 yr old students
oh
Yeah, its bad, but we have to remember there's children on this discord.
Hell there was someone here last night calling us unc for remembering the early 2010s
Working on Bruhathkay scaling finally
hows it going?
They are lovers
They dont have lips to kis eachother noo 🥺
WES, DOWNSIZE BRUHATHKAY TO <50 TONS AND MY LIFE IS YOURS
Cloacal kissing dont count shut up 
Why has everyone decided Maraapunisaurus is not to be talked about while Bruh is still circulating every other day
Why?
Why would you say this?
What would ever possess you to type these words?
Actually yes it does i chabged my mind love islove
whats the material that maraa has? i always wondered
Is it because Bruh has photos so it automatically becomes a “I can fix him” situation? 😭
Maraa and Bruh have no material, all relevant bones turned to dust
Its 4am and i wwas too scared to sleep 🥺
The bruhathkay wiki mentions maraa almost as much as it mentions the sauropod its supposed to be talking about.
Mostly to further the wiki page's agenda to make argentinosaurus not the largest sauropod. It honestly reads like it was written by Raging Triceratops.
you are going to summon him.
it was a partial vertebra
He's already here, he was here the second wes started typing, he's just lying in wait
These animals are literally in the same position in terms of material and yet for some reason, Bruhath keeps getting rescaled 🥀
it almost feels like everyone finally collectively gave up on bothering to give maraa an exact size but maybe im not looking in the right places
Its harder to pronounce, and therefore makes it sound more obscure and thus more useful for the "um actually argentinosaurus isn't the largest
" crowd
I have no clue what to expect here. they are very different proportioned
it looks large ngl
That's what they want you to think
"Its only a juvenile"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruhathkayosaurus
Genuinely the worst wiki article I've read in recent memory
Bruhathkayosaurus (; meaning "huge-bodied lizard") is a genus of sauropod dinosaur found in the Kallamedu Formation of India. The fragmentary remains were originally described as a theropod, but it was later determined to be a titanosaur sauropod. Length estimates by researchers exceed those of the titanosaur Argentinosaurus, as longer than 35 m...
I used to think cloverfield was a mmouse am i crazy cus nobody has made this comparison yet
Its like.
The least rat thing that could ever be compared to a rat.
Do you- do you know what a rat looks like?
it like contradicts itself in multiple places and just doesn't even encompass what wiki articles normally do
I meant mouse 🥺
Tbf I'm pretty selective with what wiki articles I read, let alone which ones I even consider gathering information from.
Reading something that would usually fall outside my narrow searching was an eye opener
wikipedia is not great no, especially for size estimates but size estimates have been so all over the place for so long for so many dinosaurs that it's not really a surprise
Lots of shark stuff on wikipedia is pretty good (its actually more up to date than the Chondrichthyan Tree of Life website)
wikipedia is like B tier ig as a source, like far from perfect but there's so much trash out there that it can be decent
Journalists discover ontogenetic niche partitioning, more at 1:30 where they discuss in even greater detail how, "Dolphins and Whales have crossed the evolutionary point of no return to walk on land again"
Tbf that is kind of weird but sharks also replace teeth like mags so it can be made sensible at one point the replacement teeth change for different prey items
And before a certain Kangaroo or Parrot gets mad at me and angrily taps the paleontology only sign, great whites are from the miocene so hah
Potoos have been around since the beginning of the cenozoic
Sentenced to playing one minute of cry about sarco simulator
Good news, "tibia" bruhath is not big at all
At most 15 tons
The known femur fragment is still more or less Argent sized (smaller by 2 cm), so it is one of the biggest
Just not ''2m tibia'' big
it is however a hot mess
what if it just has long legs? Some Titanosaurs do tend to have that
we don't know the length of the femur, only that it is similar in width to argentinosaurus
It does!
But Isis has a proportionally short neck on behalf of being small so it's probably bigger than depicted
so if it had long legs or not is irrelevant to the size estimate
yeah
@fluid inlet the only person here with heavy investment in Bruhath
This is Bruh using isi proportions?
Yes, an animal from the same locale, time, and bone shape
Do you want an idea?
Don’t ping me while my girlfriend is cursing me out
How heavy is it with this scaling?
I have Jainosaurus scaled to match if you want
we don't have a mass est for Isis to scale up to it i don't think
Little short ass argent
do the Isisaurus proportions for the body, tail the same way, but replaced the cervicals with Alamosaurus cervicals.
That was actually the plan for more proper skeletal end stuff, more or less
can u scale bruhathk to being a Turiasauriam
on second thought these are not compatible at all
make it a Turiasaurian!!!!
These guys went from who cares about the Indian titan sauropod to making hypnotical sizes , I’m flabbergasted
hypnotical sizes
I was tired about everyone defending blue whale sized Kallamedu so I decided to actually be the one to disprove it and as rigorously as possible
two screenies from dino fest(many more else where) look at the size of those heads
I’ll be waiting on the paper, these sizes are as legit as astronauts going to the moon. # didn’t happen
oh hey that's Boris the teratophoneus
I'll scale the weight whenever I get around to modeling it for a mod
oh btw theres a new rex species likely to be published maybe in june but no promises i found this out by the paleo that dug it out at dino fest
New Tyrannosaurus species, revaluation of mcraeensis, or a new species of tyrannosaur?
New new hasn't been described or published yet
Biggest theropod ever found was Rex cousin but bigger !!! Stronger and meaner in 1,2,3
This only answers the middle question
i always forget how small kosmoceratops' fenestrae are
Its a brand new species, i tried getting the name but a las they wouldn't give it, same with the other 8 new ceratopsian species
Ok grandpa time to go to sleep
I didn’t know there was a Pleasedonottouchasarus
smh nah thats a rex, i got see him more in detail later on
please do not the boris
Speaking of hypno
It was funny the first time
Wait in thoery could you hypnotise a tyrannosaurus by drawing a line infront of its face
Because that would make jurassic world far safer
No because a tyrannosaurus is not a chicken. Hope this helps
Just because it wasnt a chicken doesnt meant it wouldnt work
And that doesnt work on any chickens I’ve owned
from what i've seen this experiment requires you to grab the chicken and force its head to the ground
which at that point it's probably doing it because you grabbed it not because there was a line in the ground
also all the sources for it are sites named sht like ''howtodohypnosis.com'' 
So in theory by using robert wadlow we could make a nanotyrannus freeze
I mean there are videos of people doing this, and the moment a line IS drawn in front of it, the chicken immediately chills out until the line is erased in which it goes back to freaking out
No if you press the head down it can trigger a fear response to avoid predators seeing them the freeze like that the line is usually just timed i think via coincidence
Ah. That does make sense, & when the line is erased it could just be sudden movement triggering the chicken’s fight or flight again
Yeah they realise that the freeze response isnt working and they will try to run
If that doesn’t work then they may try to fight
Honestly L take
👍🏽
👍🏽
The whole comment was just “lol people getting mad ahahaha, just look at crocodiles lolz!!!!” Completely ignoring that crocodiles don’t actually do anything 90% of the time + are super specialized animals with effectively no proper dental tissue, and just because a clade is super extensive is a claim that has the same amount of reasoning saying the opposite to what you were arguing
At least they didn’t compare the teeth to elephant tusks. Somehow even worse than the crocodile comparison. 😵💫
👍🏽
is this ragebait
Thumbs up is rage bait? Wtf
Also makes little sense as birds and non avian dinosaurs are closer then non avian dinosaurs are to crocodilians
and even then, birds are their own bizarre specialized animal that diverged all the way from the Jurassic & only started getting into the whole toothless bill thing later on
Yeah heck crocodiliforms once would have had lips
This is scary
any news abt Angaturama?
does the wwd 2013 pachyrhino still hold up today?
it does look cute.
the way the jw sino stole the frill holes 😭
I hate JW sinoceratops
jw sino was supposed to be pachyrhino until the chinese market demands ( and the whole pachy word drama and thats how we got stiggy) and even then its a pug and a half
honestly, you gotta admit, jurassic world did make sino alot more popular
I like his brother
Scowler
Also I love how every pachyrino in the movie has a different frill
The movie is quite good in a lot of ways, especially in such details
Bulldust also looked really cool
The designs were awesome
sadly it gave birth to this abomination :/
Hey
Leave my Boys Angel and Rebel alone
I've only ever watched the voiced version though because that's all I had, I am curious about how different the other version would feel
was there ever a reason on why they had to live in the artic biome?
Because literally nothing else existed there
It feels SO MUCH better without the voices
However it still contains the really stupid scenes like the weird first interaction between Juniper and Patchi with the dumb music
And also the whole rewind scene during
The Gorgo hunt scene especially felt like actual cinema without the voices
Yeah he is
Tho Scowler
Man I love his Head
I like JW Sinoceratops
what species of pachyrhino were they btw?
how does one find this version
Not tmk
Prob has to be how Mantah Corp was testing the resistance of this Dinos
Hence why Spino was on the Desert
I think you spend money?
No idea
Tho given this Gorgosaurus are now meant to be Nanuqsuarus
It gives an Idea
Keep in mind:
There's a WWD:3D cut w/ Benedict Cucumberpatch narrating (I'll try to find it)
When we will get a WWD:3D cut w/ Gualicho narrating it?
You got either the nature documentary with a narrator or the cretaceous cut with no talking at all (which is included in the Blueray version)
The nature documentary version is on youtube iirc
same with disney dinosaur man, why did they feel the need to make them talk??
disney dinosaur is different
I forgot which version was the one that replaces Gorgo with Nanuqsuaurus
On a thrilling ride, we spin back in time to an extraordinary prehistoric world: Alaska in the Cretaceous period, 70 million years ago – the last great flourish of the dinosaur era. BBC Earth invites you to come on a journey through the seasons, and experience a year in the life of dinosaurs fighting, feeding, migrating, playing and hunting.
...
Scanova Fluff Account, what a name
the way the movie is season 0 of prehestoric planet...
Perhaps we should split the Acrocanthus
Well, Disney's Dinosaur was more so aimed at kids, so having them talk would make it easier for children to understand it and such
Tho them giving Iguanodons lips is still a choice
wait
that texturing is lowkey really good
The hole part was due to injury for Patchy
Tbf, Disney's Dinosaur works rlly well with voices because you can tell it was intended to have voices from the start
WWD:3D was because execs thought it would market to kids better w/ voices so they added it in the last few months of production iirc
yeah, a troodon bit it as a baby
Non sense
Not to mention, the weirder visual jokes and humans in the plot
WWD 3d was meant to be a documentary first
Pretty sure Fox just came and decided that none of that and have voices instead
the worst part is they have beaks in the movie, but there are lips on top of the beak...
i still have no clue why they had the baby pachyrhino get shat on 😭
Cause vfx was done last minute
Wait what
It's ok because turtles have this arrangement too
chapstick can save them.
when the iguanodons open their mouths you can see one solid sheet of bone instead of teeth. that's the beak
I thought that was some weird ass tooth arrangement 😭
That's not at all why 😭
The voices were
The visuals were...done throughout the movie's production
Fair, but I think there are some parts that were added in last minute, like Patchy meeting his girl as babies
What happened to that Stellasaurus you talked about weeks ago?
Ceratopsid 💔
@ashen wedge Animation itself takes time so I don't doubt it was a voiceless documentary with a plot but the addition of voices is confirmed to have been last minute
the way this came out before wwd2013 and lowkey had the same premise
Me when Gualicho became a washed paleoartist.
Let me believe that the executives destroyed the movie
i wonder, why does no one speak about march of the dinosaurs? it was like, a okay documentary
Gualicho catching strays
@tough parcel but like, what is the problem? The head?
Tbf there's a ton of dino docs out there that are pretty good but never talked about because not controversial enough or not "good" enough (The comparison is PrePlanet)
Cause the Albertosaurus was jumping to fight the Green Goblin
@tough parcel How washed do you think this Triceratops head is? ( LMFAO )
Whole lotta wrinkles on that boy there
The Canadian side of Life is a pathway to abilities that some consider to be unnatural
Honestly we just need to bring back this sort of writing style in documentaries
Give me the gravitas and dramatics of old docs if you're not gonna change the presenting style
tbh I think that was and still is the only thing that can save a dinosaur documentary
anything but history on the history channel
That's Nat Geo...
Also I agree, dinosaur docs lack the solid foundation of "we can observe (X) animal doing this" so might as well make the speculation fun
like visuals aside, if your documentary fails to make the viewer engaged on following that one Dinosaur individual the episode centers around... You cooked.
Even tho it might not be the greatest when it comes to the overall visuals and such, it's still such a good documentary
One of my favorites out there
oh no, you see, that's Nat Geo as some said, if it was History Channel it would be talking about conspiracy theories around WW2
Honestly fr
MotD is rewatchable because it's entertaining and even without rigorous visuals, it still presents (at the time) up-to-date information
PrePlanet is great visually but after the first or second watch (or episode), you just start getting sleepy
gigantosaurus was actually behind it because it didnt want spino to take 2nd place from it because thats all it has in life because otherwise its just a bum who's popularity comes from people confusing it with mapu
Falcon, draw Megalodon now
Dinosaur Apocalypse with Gregory S. Paul coming soon to Netflix and the History Channel
which one? The Clam? C. megalodon, C. megalodon or O. megalodon?
beautiful creature
Aerial
C. C. and M. are the same
I know. Just different concepts and different ideas.
also, Megalodon is transgender because of that.
!?
The most extraordinary leap of logic
It changed to the genera it found the most comfortable with.
jumping the shark? ❌
jumping the perecetus? ✅
No I think its simply that lamniform taxonomy is a trainwreck
https://fixupx.com/historydefined/status/2017432807291732430
Guys be quiet, new
just dropped
While the infertile tawny owl was away from her nest, caretakers swapped her unviable eggs for orphaned chicks.
Yeah, but that is a boring interpretation.
@ancient crystal You sound sad today.
erm that’s not paleo 🤓
Erm, what if someone animated it as a Velociraptor
Leaving it here for that reference!
on the topic of cuttlefish, whats the most up to date reconstruction of Tusoteuthis?
Probably stuffs like this (?)
These are some fairly good reconstructions of the animal, Tusoteuthis is a specimen of Enchoteuthis making the giant squid analog both inaccurate and invalid.
Here is a close relative: Muensterella
@tough parcel Would you had Fried Chicken? It's paleo-related, it's a Dinosaur.
Yea, it's good food
What about uuuuuuuuh... Fried Ostrich?
its so cute
does anyone know how the cuttlefish and giant squid interpretations spawned?
IIRC the giant squid interpretations started from rumors of a "Triassic Kraken" which turned out to be made up
Yeah it flies in the game
Cuttlefish is just a more stylized interpretation of the Muensterella type body plan IIRC
would it have the ability to make a ink cloud or nah?
Probably?
I mean yeah it’s a cephalopod
March of the Dinosaurs, epic
Could permian animals survive today?
In terms of atmosphere, yes, given some time to acclimate they'd prob be fine
A permian park would be cooler and safer anyways lols
Although gorgonopsids and anteosaurus might be a problem
I mean we found out how to contain tigers & lions so we can definitely find a way to deal with those two
Admittedly Anteosaurus is a lot bigger than any lions
Though Bears are a fair argument
Nah Anteosaurus would easily break out of a bear enclosure thanks to its wide head
Hippo sized trex, if they can contain a hippo they can contain a anteosauurs
And being better at headbutting than Pachycephalosaurus!
apparently hippos irl have reinforced bars to keep them in their enclosures, so it would probably work with anteosaurus which is around hippo sized. A predator around its size would cost a ton to feed however.
Valid concern
Very reinforced
https://youtube.com/shorts/KN73BCLN_88?si=dw8RVPuc4mHQs5IR
Hippo Tries to Escape Zoo
#hippo #wildlife #zoo #viralvideo
A video of a guard protecting a public area from a hippo who is trying to escape is making rounds on the Internet. The video shared by an X (formerly called Twitter) user showed a hippo in a zoo trying to enter a public area, and a guard slapping it, making it return to its place...
Dimetrodon runs for 10 miles to bite kid who threw empty bottle at it
How large is big john? (triceratops)
Something around 5(?) tons
Prob about 7m and 6t of smth
Nah 6t would be getting too large
6-7?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??
This is why discipline works, cause the animal doesn’t want the other side of the hand
- You couldn't learn anything
Is It possible that Miracionyx lived in La Brea? From what i've seen It wasn't found in the tar pits, but is it theorically possible?
Maybe?
A 7m Pachyrino is like 4.5-5t, Iirc on Random's Chart a 7m Trike was about 5t without Horns and Frill
It’s hot potato island
is the average of edmontosaurus weight, 6 tons?
Around that yes
I have mix feelings about this 
WHAT IS THAT THING...
I GOT JUMP SCARED
I was looking at Fabio stuff on Twitter/X and came across this lol
Good Lord he's got curves
We love him
depends on the bonebed but generally 4-5 for overall average, 5-6 for fully grown average
is edmonto one of the few dinosaurs we can create a average for due to its fossil abundance?
yes, in fact because we have multiple bonebeds it's somewhat possible to discuss the extent to which average size may have varied over time/location depending on environmental conditions
the only others i can imagine we'd be able to do that for is psittaco, allo and rex
I.E. there are a decent number of individuals in the Hanson Ranch bonebed whose femora exceed the maximum femoral length recorded in the RMDQ bonebed (123.3 cm max RMDQ vs 131 cm in Hanson Ranch plus a single 142 cm outlier)
Hey someone wanna play with me
i wonder, whats better studied and understood, rex or psittaco?
studied rex
understood might still be psittaco because some specimens are just that good
now...is rex in the top 5 most studied prehestoric animals? maybe top 3?
I have no idea
I was going to say it might be number 1 but tbh I'm sure it's surpassed by hominins
true, this might sound stupid but i feel like it also may have competetion with the woolly mammoth
they are very studied yea
idk why hairy elephants are so interesting to people but mammoths are cool
Its probably the top most studied lol
more then the mentioned hominins?
Oh, wait, just saw that lol
Probably not, but if we're talking pure paleontology untouched by anthropology, its probably rex
oh i've always wondered, how much do antrhopology and paleontology overlap?
maybe not the most perfect comparison but google scholar returns 3,940 results for tyrannosaurus since 2022, and 5,760 for australopithecus since 2022
wow mammoth returns 17,200 :o
t rex gets 31,500 actually but a lot of that seems to just be t or rex being in a result anywhere so i dont think that's very representative
DAMN
Hmmmm, I wonder what could possibly have caused such a colossal surge in mammoth papers
mammoth meatballs?
the mammoth they found alive in agartha
Either no one got my pun or you're all ignoring it and I'll be sad
i got it, i just didnt know what to say
i was subverting audience expectations
always gold according to the GOT producers
If theropods are birds, did they have mating dances, like maybe, a Jiggynotosaurus?
Theropods are not all birds, rather birds are a kind of theropod
All birds are dinosaurs, but not all dinosaurs are birds.
- some random fish
This art still hard
It looks like that rex is blaming me for what happened to it even as a corpse
Yeah
The 2 Classics
@fossil ingot what's the mass estimate for these two?
For acro its around 6.5 - 7 tonnes depending on how one makes the sail or hump. Tarbo is probably similar though no one has estimated it yet
Anyways, I gotta fill the quota and ragebait this channel...
Ahem
Unfortunate this comes from Washeddinos.
It’s apparently now closer to 6t
Waitttt
If all land vertebrates are tetrapods
And you cannot evolve out of a monophyletic group (A clade)
Then all tetrapods are fish because of our common ancestor lobe fin fish meaning trex is technically a fish
Tyrannofish
Oooooor, fish isn't a proper taxonomic term and is just how we lump all non-mammal, non-reptilian, non-amphibian aquatic vertebrates
Or we go by the clade Sarcopterygii and show that lungfish and tetrapods are eachothers closest relatives and then we can have fish as an actual term
Even better
We blame this guy for our issues
No we cannot, because not all fish are Sarcopterygian
Fish as a term is much more useful when applied to poikilothermic, aquatic chordates with appendages (when present) developed as fins, who breathe primarily with gills and are usually scaley
Ok i should have said this better
I meant that we are asmuch of a fish as a lungfish and a coelacanth
And not all chordates are vertebrates
Yes I am aware
I’ve gdied that acro already
I know
Summary
6842.3378148 Litres (Including sail type back)
6682.581033374405 (Without sail)
159.75678143 (Sail GDIed separately)
GDI assuming the entire back is ellipsoid in shape and that it has consistent soft tissue, aka a HUMP/Non sail structure
7679.929485782394 Litres (Probably an unlikely estimate)
a 3D model yields similar results at;
6748.6 Litres (Different dorsal view, not sure as to the degree)
MASS ESTs (0.97 density, same order as above)
6637kg
7449.5kg
6546kg
do not trust the paper recon, it has issues
anyone seen the recent dizzy rose post?
Random mentioned its prob closer to 6t now which makes sense
Just no GDI yet
what is this supposed to be? a paracer or relative? I honestly can't tell.
Ok looking at the skull again it looks like it could be a chopped dinosaur too..?
Lowkey it's sending mixed signals and i'm kind of just bewildered
its supposed to be an ornithischian lol
though i dont trust that skull recon at all. The grey highlights are what they actually have. very weird skull shape to assume
yo what is that
Skull reconstruction so bad people are writing conspiracy theories to try and improve it
Skull so bad that newbies are literally making their own skull pieces
(If you know the reference, you know)
Ended up reconstructing multiple versions based on the OG skull and Olof’s reconfiguration
Awful awful animal
what is this
The paper skull look like a squashed camarasaurus skull
New horrible rhabdodont species Foskeia
that is awful
Perfection
Neither because one is too feathery for PoT and the other is DeviantArt Furry Microraptor (Modified)
A middle-ground would probs be most accurate
i thought it would be the first but your right, As pots feathers ...arent the best
but if it was irl, what would be the most accurate? a mix like you said?
First would be closest to IRL, might just need a shave in terms of feather volume, proper hand anatomy, and longer tail
Maybe also longer legs
@vast dock btw, did you draw this yourself? it looks really good and i'd love to see what inspired the first ones feathering
yeah! prehistoric kingdom's micro inspired me to make the fluffy bastard
This also has a good showcase of potential feather volume
holy hell thats a long tail
i cant believe you're going to shave my son
your son needs it for better flying! think about all the insects it can catch
you know, i never really thought about it, but what was microraptor eating? was it just a carnivore generalist? was it a omnivore? insectivore?
Stomach contents point towards generalist small prey carnivore
One even has a fish
i think recent research suggested it was capable of powered flight but the PoT devs shut down micro having flight in game either way, and when you look at the jagged bundle's silhouette.... I know at the time they didn't even start modeling micro but I hope they aren't going for that peeled chicken of a creature xD
Tbf, it's known that they used placeholder silhouettes from pre-existing media especially on the Kickstarter so I'd assume Micro will look different from either silhouettes
im also sorry for kinda putting you on the spot , i just really liked your art and wanted to share it with the paleontology people lol ❤️
Hatz's and mira's silhouettes seemed pretty on point but their models also both could've been made by then
edit: not during the kickstarter, talking jagged bundle silhouettes xD
i remember pycnos model got leaked 3 months before its release so idk
I have a hyperfixation micro timeline but that's probably a DMs rabbit hole
Perhaps this is evidence speculation based on silhouettes is wonky?
But otherwise, I suspect it'll look like a downsized Deinonychus tweaked to fit Micro's look (not literally)
As long as it doesn't look like a peeled rat or the wings appear too small to even be capable of gliding i'm down for anything
how closely related are microraptor and Archaeopteryx?
I think they're both paraves?
All dromaeosaurs are paraves tmk
ah
nah hatz's was nothing like the the one we got, all of them are just off google etc
hatz's was just this mount, which of course the in game one turned out nothing like, relatively speaking
actually we dont know because all we got is like 3 bones (jk)
We do know because PoT's hatze does not look like the image above, am not talking about IRL hatze
whos the better depiction of hatz, pot or the reconstruction you posted?
PoT probably
does PoT's have like, a off / incorrect posture for azdarchids?
huh, got my words confused there
What's wrong with deviantart furry dinosaurs?😭
alot
dry but neat meat 
G R O K(scutosaurus)
no wonder it went extinct , this build is ridiculous
I think there both in the maniraptora but micros in the dromeosaurs and atchaeopteryx is in the aveale
Several things
There any purrusaurus reconstructions? Like a skeletal
Prob Fabio's
not surpised, some of them look kinda funky
isnt that wwd leed
Tho Puru is kinda sh*** described so...
do you think we'll ever find a large NA theri?
me when I hate and love this creature. ( It`s complicated )
kai legit might be the best render because it kinda looks more like the animal than the lipped nightmare noodle we have
It’s a good thing this skull might not be accurate at all (also bonebed taxon)
is this a correct statement to make
therinosaurids, tyrannosaurids, and ceratopsoids all originated in asia and then migrated over to america
Based*
its so god awful
Tyrannosauroids were probably widespread across Laurasia & Gondwana since the middle Jurassic, the oldest tyrannosaurids we have are north american but that's likely collection bias as fauna was interchanging between Asia and Laramidia since the early Cretaceous and continuously thereafter. Laramidia really wasn't much more than a big peninsula jutting off the back end of Asia and the fauna of both exchanged so much it's not possible in some cases or useful in others to say x originated in y and migrated to z
We have some very basal therizinosaurids and ceratopsoids from Laramidia, it could be that the more isolated or fractured environments there acted as a species pump or it could be that Asia just by being a larger landmass had more diversity and was pumping dinos in the other direction. It probably was a mix of both and in practical effect it was one continent and faunal province
it is kinda weird that ceratopsids are virtually just not present in asia
Sinoceratops:
Not really paleontology, but its about skeletal anatomy so I think it's acceptable here - is it possible to identify the position within the jaw that a shed shark tooth would have had? And can shark teeth grown and shed within the span of a few months still be useful for identifying growth rate of the shark they came from?
Ik but that being the only one is still weird
any chance we know the biteforce of udanoceratops
Ceratopsids might truly be North American with Sinoceratops being an odd migrant or we may just be missing their habitats in Asian beds. Also Sinoceratops is fairly old, there's a lot of time for more exchange afterwards even if they were primarily Laramidian in the Campanian arising somewhere at the base of that age
Turanoceratops is close to ceratopsids and from western Asia, far from the Beringia, so there may be Asian groups from that lineage we just haven't found yet
new asian ceratopsian clade that is neither centrosaurine or chasmosaurine and is something new.
I wouldn't be totally shocked and it would be cool
what would it even look like? because chasmosaurines are characterized by their frills while centrosaurines are characteriszed by their nasal horns
If we're deriving it from something like Turanoceratops it could kind of go either way, though it did have brow horns
i thought tyrannosauroids actually developed in mesozoic asia not north america
the oldest tyrannosauroids are from all over Laurasia: North America, Europe, & Asia. It was all connected at the time, the middle to late Jurassic, so they weren't truly distinct regions like we have today
likewise if Megaraptora are tyrannosauroids they were distributed in Gondwana as well around the same time and we just haven't found them yet
you might be thinking of tyrannosaurids, which is a more derived clade from much later in the Cretaceous. They possibly dispersed from Asia into North America but currently the oldest ones we have are all North American. Again, like in the Jurassic, Asia and the western part of North America called Laramidia were intermittently connected for most of the Cretaceous and were effectively one landmass when it came to fauna. There's not much you find in one that you don't find in the other
👍🏽
i was getting oids and ids wrong huh. i didn’t know the difference between them ngl
like everything else the details of tyrannosaur phylogeny is constantly debated and updated but it's generally accepted that tyrannosauroids are the larger more inclusive group and tyrannosaurids are a clade therein
what’s the theory on why some dinosaurs are fossilised in a backward arching pose?
iirc that's how their bodies would naturally pose postmortem
Thats just how I pose when I am tired. pretty relatable
Postmortem muscle contraction, bloating or something along those lines
The opposite can also happen where it’s the opposite type of arch but that’s usually pretty rare and usually wouldn’t ever happen to bipeds
Omg now all i can think of is a deinocherius slapping the hell out of a tarbosaurus
With how Tall Tarbo is maybe
Is edmontosaurus the only herbivore we have found remains of with healed t-rex bite marks? I thought there was one more but i cant find it on google
Wow i just found it, it was triceratops
I'm sure its just a formality
it is
how?
He is a Thomas Carr superfan
How wouldn't it be a formality?
Tarbosaurus has been proposed to be a species of Tyrannosaurus in the past, and I don't think any paper has actually come out explicitly disproving that theory even if it isn't widely accepted anymore.
Thus "(=Tyrannosaurus?)"
Truly, because otherwise there are a lot of researchers who support that theory, hmmm?
I mean, the only name I can think of is Thomas Carr, but even his reasoning is less due to Tarbosaurus being a species of Tyrannosaurus and some bs idea he has about Sister Taxons. But surely there are other names, right?
Like idk, this kinda of argument is sorta of like " Well, no one has disproved in any available publication that Dilophosaurus didn't had venom, so therefore it's a open possibility! ", but you do you.
Random doesn't have to actually believe Tarbo equals Tyrannosaurus for them to put that little label in their skeletals
I think Tarbosaurus being a possible Tyrannosaurus species has more leverage than any dinosaur especially Dilophosaurus having venom 😭
Random help me, its too early for this 
two animals that are regularly recovered as sister taxa being placed in the same arbitrary taxonomic category? randomdinos please explain
Truly, how?
we have a nearly complete skulls of dilophosaurus with no venom glands 😭
Because one has academic backing and the other is a movie.
So much of paleontology is done informally, from skeletals, to GDIs, to many reconstructions themseleves. Thus, just because not many of us believe Tarbosaurus is Tyrannosaurus, it's both very easy and useful to be like, "hey, there's a possibility, however slim, that this is actually Tyrannosaurus."
This is the one thing I also dislike is how ALOT people will generalize one thing with something that way more speculative and unknown compared to something that's been debuted more frequently and has much more probability
Yeah, this is extraordinarily arbitrary.
Go look up a Dan Folkes Tarbo skeletal, I wouldn't be suprised if it had the same label.
All it amounts to is being as thorough as possible, which is a good thing to do in any scientific field.
Well dammit nevermind, it doesn't look like he's done one. At least not recently
He did Daspletosaurus which he labeled as
Daspletosaurus (=torosus?) wilsoni
Tarbosaurus and Tyrannosaurus are recovered a taxonomic tribe called Tyrannosaurini and share many apomorphies. These are reasons why people might put other fossil species in the same genus
Also, might I point out nanotyrannus didn't have the backing of a lot of researches until late last year?
Who else besides Thomas Carr again?
Yeah, and? Like idk, it's almost like we knew something from private specimens, but then we didn't had confirmation to anything because guess what? Private specimens. And then only changed when we acquired those private specimens to study, and then we had to correct our general stance towards what Nanotyrannus was and/or wasn't. Tarbosaurus? Correct me if I'm wrong, but it has existed since the USSR still existed, and it still is a different genera, despite all of those years, and no collective amount of researchers have pushed for it being a Tyrannosaurus species... Besides a questionable bunch and I guess Thomas Carr with his very bad sister taxon logic.
From my memory at least, unless you want to correct me... If you have anything to correct me.
it is not remotely that deep, nor are genera as a concept in the first place
Doesn't matter. One guy in academia trumps a movie.
You are way too pressed about this
Oh, so you don't know anyone else besides Thomas Carr. Curious.
Especially in the morphology only club that is paleontology
Carr is not the only who did it like quite literally
Truly, because taxonomic tribes who are only composed of two genera should actually be corrected to using only one genera and two species, am I right?
We still fangirling Carr?
No, this is the exact opposite lmao
Nobody is fangirling Carr that isn't even what this is about gng 😭
alright then, who else? Can you actually cite or mention them?
They can be I guess, it doesn’t really matter
#yup.
Look not gonna bother mentioning them but all you need to know it's not only Carr
So, no one else supports Tarbosaurus being a Tyrannosaurus species until i'm made aware of? Wonderful
Imagine not being able to support or defend a theory. It's almost like it only has a very bad basis that is only fated to crumble.
Literally they can just use google scholar
True. What should I search? " Tarbosaurus is Tyrannosaurus species " ?
Ok??
I don't think anyone here is saying tarbosaurus is tyrannosaurus.
Okay which one of these i'm searching for? between the 727 results
Well, you wanted the researchers.
There you go
Omg omg you can't be serious
Well one is Maleev, 1955
fair.
This is the end of polish paleontology
Maleev also had Tyrannosaurus efremovi alongside Rozhdestvensky, 1977
Tyrannosaurus novojilovi again by Maleev but also Glut, 1997
Some others were Dong's ?Tyrannosaurus luanchuanesis in '79 and Zhai's ?Tyrannosaurus "turpaensis" in '78
Like, if I did a megalodon recon, I would put:
Otodus megalodon
(=carcharocles?)
(=carcharodon?)
I know Otodus isn't Carcharodon, and I'm not presently convinced it should be Carcharocles, but given the messy nature of extinct shark taxonomy and the ongoing debate between Otodus and Carcharocles, I would make sure to cover those bases in addition to the placement I believe to be true.
Carcharocles is still okay but Carcharodon is a NO go
Doesn't mean I personally wouldn't put it there.
Honestly I included it here so someone wouldn't be like, "you forgot Carcharodon" or something
Waiter, waiter you forgot the 66 other megalodon synonyms
Something I wouldn't do, for example, is make a great white size diagram and put:
Carcharodon carcharias
(=squalus?)
we need another one
I mean, forget extinct shark taxonomy, this is atrocious
so then the total amount becomes...
zhuchengasaurus is tyrannosaurus in disguise so it can be both the largest and 2nd largest therapod.
(Zhuchengtyrannus)
Here's the thing, genera are completely arbitrary. There's literally no difference scientifically or taxonomically between calling it Tarbosaurus bataar or Tyrannosaurus bataar. I prefer Tarbo because it helps avoid confusion if bataar and rex end up not being sister species, but thats entirely personal preference
"Erm genera are arbitrary
" mfs when I put Allosaurus as distinct from Saurophaganax
Someone doesn't like that Genera are arbitrary.
I mean, you were definitely not of the opinion genera were arbitrary a few hours ago
Fair. But that was only because I thought you said that " Tyrannosaurus bataar " was supported. But I clearly have misread it
You see, i'm sorta of a low-IQ Specimen.
only 2 neurons navigating in this vast ocean that is my hollow cranium.
Genera are arbitrary, species are arbitrary. Hybridization can occur across families as indicated by the Sturddlefish. Animals should instead be given personal names for every individual, like Bill or Javier or Jessica
it's the superior nomenclature system.
unironically the proposal of a paper that came out today (except instead of human names it's essentially barcodes)
Mall Earth
Saw that, hated it.
Taxonomic classifications are arbitrary, but not useless
the developmental barcode idea is really interesting, and it solves nearly every problem with the taxonomic ranks concept
but i agree it's not worth throwing away binomials entirely
it's also (i think) not as incompatible with the idea of a species as the authors say it is. you could define a species as a set of codes that share XYZ character, or just continue using species as an arbitrary category like we do today
pretty much.
the two can definitely be integrated from everything I’ve seen so far, exactly how may get tricky but I see no reason it wouldn’t be possible
link to paper?
What was the first terrestrial Apex predator known
Wouldn't that just be what we do now anyway, just with barcodes?
What if we locked Randomdinos in the Tyrannosaurus enclosure? Do you guys think they survive?
Probably the first terrestrial predator known
@ancient crystal more or less, but the codes allow us to note any number of hybridization events, and can be infinitely specified (down to the individual)
hm i forgot links appear at the end of a message. the below is the paper
thanks!
i find it crazy how alio and campto are faster then struthi, irl, wouldnt struthi smoke both of them?
I would let it kill me just to get a close look at what it looks and moves like.
plus my headstone could say 'first and only human to be killed by Tyrannosaurus'
we're not sure of their exact food webs but the earliest terrestrial predators known are centipedes and trigonotarbid arachnoids
Dinosaur Movie, but the Dinosaurs are never revealed on screen
Wow they're swinging for the fences with this paper, very interesting
can someone summarize the paper in caveman speak for me
1a 1a 1a 1a
i admit the opening page has a rather big wtf moment
2b 1a 2bb 1a
Mfs will be Lex Luthor in the papers now
Lmao
it's complicated, I'm having a hard time following the details myself. From what I understand though is that they're arguing for a much greater emphasis on ontogeny as an evolutionary process. One way is in development, organisms express the most basal ancestral features early in their development (famously down to the fetus) then more derived features later on. This is actually a problem that has confounded a lot of dinosaur taxonomy incidentally, where immature specimens are rated to be more basal based on skeletal features. So they go on to propose an alternative taxonomic system called MOD that replaces genera species with a unique code for an organism that accounts for ontogenic phylogenetic changes. I think
Idk why but this makes me laugh so much, like everyone is equally disappointed that this animal ever existed
👍🏽
Fluffy bastard because it’s just an accurate microraptor
I'm trying to understand, but on the premaxilla are those like pseudo-teeth or just incisor-like extensions like Tethyshadros or whatever the name of that guy
This ontogeny paper is a bit rough, it seems like they have sort of invented a guy to get mad at with respect to how ontogeny is considered in modern biology and phylogenetics. The solution proposed to biological nomenclature is both cumbersome and unnecessary, and depends on the data that is already used for phylogenetic systematics, and it creates only more headaches for dealing with fossil organisms that we cannot observe the development of.
it is almost definitely reconstructed wrong that’s what’s going on lol, the skull elements are really bad and from a bonebed of multiple age groups and possibly multiple taxa
Yeah, I really don't see this methodology being picked up at all. I can't think of a single professor I personally know that would do anything but scoff at the suggestion of dropping binomial nomenclature
or it is just f*cked up and we are not capable of comprehending it's f#cked up-ness
Fossil interpretation weird and/or outright bad
@tough parcel what if I drew Foskeia? hmmmmmmmmmmmm? It would fit nicely in my artstyle
Is this a good set of characters to use if I want to classify the characteristics of a tooth or set of teeth in the jaw of a shark? I can't really think of anything else to add.
Presence of Pathologies?
Pathology description
Root Height
Root Area
Basal Ledge size
Neck height
Neck Area
Neck Size
Crown Height
Crown Area
Distal Edge Length
Mesial Edge Length
The skull is likely reconstructed incorrectly as a few people have pointed out, I don’t know myself but it certainly feels off to me.
So far I found that Struthi was still faster, second is the Alio and the slowest of the 3 is the Campto.
Old Path balance still kinda nailed it until the new stats came
Atm ingame
Alio and Struthi are 1150
i do imagine alio would be quite fast, would it be in top 3 fastest playables in game in real life?
It’s honestly probably just reconstructed poorly
okay, I have heard that, but how has there been no other alternative reconstructions made by anyone else?
There has been like 2 or 3 let me find them. They are just crude edits though, not too much thought other than trying to fix
Randomdinos made a quick skull of one
“Randomdinos” his full government name……. (Also send it I’m lazy thx)
👍🏽
doesn't seem any better.
@queen oar randoms is first Olofs is second(Olof just based on the ct scans re interpreted it as a premax
what would y'all say is better studied
ankylosauria or stegosauria?
hm, no. Doesn't work.
They are both so bad, but stegosauria is probably worse
why are they so bad compared to , lets say, ceratopsians
Ceratopsians are also awful
Even ceratopsians suck lmao.
No? Actually... Nevermind. Forgot Triceratops exists.
you disagree?
Yes
Anything diagnostic is relied only on the skull, which itself is incredibly variable in ceratopsians
Any postcranial material is either ignored or half-baked described and ignored
Objectively, quite a lot of ceratopsians are inadequately studied + the phylogeny and character distribution basically ignoring postcrania… it sucks z 😭
Pachy in game could eat their butts in a 5 minutes pursuit and pray to any gods you won't be dead by that time
I think you confusing here. Skulls are definetly a lot more unique in Ceratopsians, and Postcrania tend to be a lot more variable. Which is why although there is postcrania that might seem a little bit weird, if there's no cranial material, there's nothing to really identify those remains as.
What was this statement meant to add
Not to add. To correct. Pretty different, if you ask me.
not again
The postcranial material absolutely varies and can be diagnostic (as seen with “Adam”) it’s just it was ignored for some reason
Who is Adam?
A new specimen of Torosaurus, found down south much further than other torosaurus specimen. Has nearly the entire postcranial skeleton and is being described atm
do we know adams size yet?
Also, while I do understand the leaning towards interpretating it as being " Ignored ", I think it just forgetting how the field on Ceratopsians is pretty lack on researchers. Don't know if someone will correct me on this, but it has always been the reason why for example, there is not a lot of updated information on Triceratops by example, or any discussions surrounding it.
Because specimens aren’t really properly described…ever
Pretty Complete Torosaurus that is rather getting described this year
Yes, and why do you think that? Because there's not a lot of reseachers expertised on Ceratopsians. Surprisingly, when you are a Taxa that has to share the same formation as the most famous theropod ever, and most researchers leaning to be expertised on specifically theropods of the same group as that animal... You don't get that much attention.
We have some papers on limb anatomy but otherwise it’s just skulls and that’s it
Best figured trike specimen I’ve seen is the “brevicornis” specimen and even then it was years ago and we’re still waiting on Willard (there’s also the dueling dinosaurs trike specimen that’s been tragically forgotten by everyone)
Original Kentrosaurus(wiwaxia
I mean theres an Idea due to the Paper Skeletal of it
But like not really, I doubt the Mount its That good of a reference 100%
I think the mount is decent, but the paper skeletal looks a lot better for it
Ohh yeah Definietly
The Paper Skeletal looks alot better
We do have a histology of Triceratops and a description of its endocranial anatomy, which is more than a lot of genera
If there was one animal that got the short end of the stick, it’s got to be edmontosaurus.
We know so much about it anatomy and soft tissue, yet there’s like no proper osteological description of any specimen
I think the short end of the stick goes to Dakotaraptor, because it clearly hasn't been properly redescribed even though it's a complete easy possibility at the moment.
Adam is about this Complete
And as shown by what we know/seen
Adam's Postcrania been described is very useful
??
We have a thousand of edmontosaurus.
Yeah.
Edmonto's cause Momies, etc and still...
edmonto is real unlike dakota
Dakota is scraps & we have found other specimens + with the information we got we know it’s a composite of all sorts of random animals
Even the claw might just be a nanotyrannus claw lmao
Edmonto is a 100% skeletally complete animal and we have people who still don’t understand its proper size range
I mean yeah, but I still would prefer to get something new on the dromaeosauridae material, rather than to have another Edmontosaurus paper. Or hell, another Tyrannosaurus paper, since really that's the actual tendency.
the thing is, dakota probably wonmt be described, you know what will? the hell creek Unenlagiinae
To no offense to Doogma, because he like E. annectens. But I don't.
Dakota for what it’s worth is a invalid taxon. Edmontosaurus absolutely needs more attention considering how much we know about its anatomy, yet it’s barely talked about in literature
@thorn grove kill
I mean
Not rex fault every year we somehow get another Big guy
Ceratopcians will have their Moment with Adam
But like so will Tyrannosaurs like Zucheng who are getting new Specimens described this year
yeah, I still would prefer something new on the Dromaeosauridae material or Unenlagiinae, whatever... " Dromaeosaur with extra steps " or something.
i feel like the only reason people bring up edmonto is due to its relation of living with rex, no rex conversation? no edmonto
or the classic edmusthosaurus
Most people only like edmonto because of X-rex (also not described anywhere whatsoever) and becky’s giant (might be something not even edmontosaur)
we need to go back in time and stop saurian from being made to prevent that image.
Actually, I would say it is. I'm just biased against T. rex in general. Sorry.
Edmonto is fun due to theur Funny Size Variation
But yeah Edmonto Rises due to Rex
Edmonto has a very stable size variation
edmonto will never be shant no matter how much it tries to grow
Edmonto Wishes it was Shant
Then again
Wouldn't be surprised Shant gets again on the Radar Once Suecheng gets described and ppl start with "Zucheng and Shant the new Gigantic Duo"
do you guys think tarbo will ever have its moment to shine and become bigger or no
Even shant’s 19 ton specimen is a weird outlier, but still it has some sort of average around ~10 - 12t
Like, not to be negative, but Tyrannosaurs probably stained most of the progress on studying any other animals from their respective formations. While I don't know about other countries, pretty sure Thomas Carr commented on a interview or podcast, whatever it was that AKRex did with him, that he mostly chose to study Tyrannosaurs, due to being told that Tyrannosaurs are most likely to be properlly preserved than the alternatives. Which I guess someone could say this doesn't happen everywhere, but it doesn't help when majority of paleontologists are specialized only on Theropods, and sometimes, specifically Tyrannosaurs.
Its already 6.9-7.1t
But hey
Who knows
It technically already became Bigger,
But like When Suecheng gets Described
It will prob wish it had a specimen like that
Technically speaking, it just did
Random made a new tarbo skeletal, and got a gdi estimate of 6.9t
oh tarbo became 7 tons? im proud of it
It is a big moment for tarbosaurus
Still the smallest tyrannosaurine not counting T. vannus though
Beast
I mean
Its Technically Larger than Zucheng Holotype
But that will only last likely until the Suecheng specimen gets described
True
Yup
It entered its prime
This is why giga lost all its weigjt
has tyrannosaurus started hanging out with it again or no
Seeing it to Old Tyrannotitan feels wrong
It won’t with new titan because new titan looks so wrong
Tarbo tried to copy the homework but did slight changes to avoid been caught
Such as even Shorter Arms and Long Tail
And Slightly longer skull proportionally
what's the difference
I want to see it finish already
New Titan looks so wrong yet so Cool lol
I find it weird but I love it
It’s no longer a square and took curvature too literally
Carcharodontosaurines are squares, no?
Yeah
Once Random finishes it you should see
This was towards fishy's comment
No, the square backs was done based on making the back really straight & shaving off the neural spines
All carchas would’ve had some roundness to their backs like every other theropods (some more than others)
@stiff osprey you don't need to finish the new Titan, take a vacation from Carcharodontosaurines for... Hmmmm... 4 years.
weird way of saying giganotosaurinae
Meraxesfication
Giganotosaurini*
don't forget it like Apatoraptor
The one that started the journey…
what was the reason again you didn't finish it cause from what I've seen doesn't seem too special from other caenagnathids
he forgor?
Dacentrurinae son or Nodosauridae daughter
bro has a headphone dent on his back
I saw you post this a few days ago and just because of how large the tarbo was I thought it was an old rex vs giga size comparison
Also first time noticing the actual twigs for arms tarbo has
Yeah they are....
Its funny how Tarbo arms looks in proportion to its body
Thats why Dasp the goat
The one thing the PNSO Tarbosaurus got right
Yeah Tarbo's arms are Comically short even for Tyrannosaur standard
Not even arms at this point, just nubs💀 😂
Even abelisaurs, despite their nubs, still have pretty beefy arms and shoulder girdles
Tarbo got nuthin
who wins the arm wrestle, rex or tarbo
I've yapped about this before, but this chart is weird because it just mashes all 3 quarries that Shant material is in together
A majority of this material is from the Kogou quarry since it's the most dense quarry with at least 55 individuals represented, which indeed averages ~11 tons, but the largest specimen there is 'only' about 16 tons or so
The 19 ton specimen is from the Longgujian quarry which has around 10 specimens or so, from which all material ranges from 13-19 tons, with an average of around 15. Also worth noting that this chart only includes femora, there's a large humerus from that quarry that indicates a specimen of comparable size as the big femur so it may not be much of an outlier there
According the Xing 2014, the Longgujian quarry is 30 meters above the Kogou and represents a later deposition, and Hone 2014 considers both to lack size sorting and to be indicative of the living size distribution, so it appears to me at least that Shantungosaurus authentically increased in average body size
Rex
I like Edmonto but I wish people would stop pretending it and Shant are basically the same thing
no offense to it but it's like the most fodder Hadrosaur of all time, it doesn't even have longer tibiae like Maia to help it run faster
is this why corythosaurus is the goat?
are the hadrosaurs in jurassic park just deaf
That slide to lock in the animation tho 
i'll never get over the scene in the telltale JP game where a parasaurolophus stands peacefully still while a raptor walks up its back and bites it in the neck
wait, i just realized
tarbo and zhu are now larger then rexy, who i believe was stated to be a expectionally large rex ( in universe )
my most musth coded take is that raptors should basically just not be depicted hunting adult hadrosaurs outside of very specific situations
every day i look in this chat i lose faith in humanity 
wait, your telling me this ISNT accurate?
Fret not, I can make it better
thank you falcon I truly needed this
raptors always be doing extra in docs, whether its parkour or hand signals 😭
So there's an actual reason for this in terms of game mechanics.
The carnivores have two combat behaviors, hunting and actual combat.
Hunting, as you see here, guaranteed the prey died in the first game, and still nearly guarantees it in the second and third games though the prey has a chance to escape through the stamina system.
Combat, where the two combatants circle each other and basically take turns attacking can happen whenever and is based on territory and aggression.
This is why carnivores appear so voracious in the JWE series. They do only hunt at a certain threshold, but in between all that hunting they're constantly aggroing or being aggroed by other dinosaurs including the herbivores they are inherently stronger than thanks to star rating determining combat prowess.
Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk schizo rant.
According to that one paper about Gryposaurus skin, hadrosaur skin was actually 0.0003 mm thick, meaning this could happen
Glass bones and paper skin ahh animal
i think you unlocked some deep memory of watching this doc
thank you
i think
Tarbosaurus: The Mightiest Ever : Tsintaosaurus vs the velo pack where it died due to papercuts
tarbosaurus: the mighiest ever son or jurassic fight club daughter
A clothes hanger
jurassic fight club daughter
i mean they were right about nanotyrannus so who knows what else they're hiding
your non binary child™ option is monsters resurrected
Tbf they were also right about compact, leggy Albertosaurus
that doc made me a spino fanboy for like a year when I was 9
i swear, they were doing whatever in 2006 - 2013 dino docs
I think that doc was a major cause for my utter hatred of spinosaurus for like a good 18 years
I was already a spino fanboy when it came out but even I thought one shotting carch with a slap was a bit much
Crit shot!
you know, im actually suprised jfc didnt have a spino vs carch episode
well yea that was goofy
I also didn't understand how it managed to drag its claws along the sarco's body effortlessly even though they didn't have sharpened edges
was about to say that lol it just goes through the osteoderms like butter
It was kinda satisfying to watch tho
In the knife through butter kind of way 
I'm pretty sure it goes through the ribs even with how deep they are
I think a Tyrannosaur could count on one hand the number of genuine dinosaur documentaries made between 2006 and 2022
why were the carchs dying by slaps so much ToT
I thought it was clawing the Sarco's neck
Maybe I should watch the documentary again
I don't know I haven't watched it in like 15 years
also, is the carch and acro model the same just without the sail?
This is inaccurate. Acrocanthosaurus would just have jumped over the tail
It annoys me a little that they used the Dinosaur Revolution Acro as the opening cutscene
And then they used this thing the rest of the doc
We went from this to someone suggesting acro could pounce onto a sauropod
whats another dinosaur documentry thats so trash its good
Unironically the best stan dorsal (except it's edited)
There was a really bad one with quetzalcoatlus, I hardly remember it though.
Oh, I remember one that pretended that Titanoboa lived in the cretaceous and could kill Tyrannosaurus
does anyone remember Valley of the T. rex
No, I think the events of 2 days after it released would sorta wipe anyone's memory clean

why what happened?
THAT CAME OUT ON 9/9?
funfact, a prequel of valley of the trex came out explaining the rex's backstory on why it cant hunt
rex can't hunt because it's stupid and a pathetic excuse for a carnivore of course
no, its because a tarbo THREW it off a cliff
The reason T. rex can't hunt in the documentary hosted by Idiot Paleontologist is perhaps because of Idiot Paleontologist's idiotic ideas
rex can hunt, but only at night, as otherwise the nimble ankylosaurus would easily outrun it (nash, 2018)
i will never listen to john horner after what he did. i dont think any of his research even holds up today
Someone in the PK discord last night tried to say everyone who dislikes Jack Horner or his ideas is dysfunctionally autistic and emotionally unstable
Was it cory
I mention this because its the genuine first time I have EVER seen anyone defend Jack Horner.
Oh sure I've seen people who believe in scavenger rex, but never someone who likes Horner
No, it was that troll-face gamer guy
I thought you were there Random...
planet dinosaur or dinosaur revolution
I left there after realizing 'wow, i have not felt the need to come here to discuss paleo in years'
because the people there are smart and do not need your blessing of knowledge?
👍🏽
I go there because its an actual science chat and not this PRISON where we can only discuss bone shaped rocks
sure let's go with that before the mods kill me for going off topic
what was the more accurate gigantoraptor
planet dinosaur or dinosaur revolution
on the one hand dinosaur revolution has a better model and is skeletally more accurate
on the other hand 30kg of dewlap
The left one, sure its soft tissue is frankly absurd but it doesn't look like it came out the egg too early like the right one does
I am dyslexic
Which is the real Quinn
Shirtz or pantz
I had never thought to actually ask but I'm not surprised that Shirtz is Quinn
He’s a terrible hider
if i had to choose between meeting someone who only wears shirts or only wears pants i'd choose the guy with pants
(Every dinosaur he argued was a part of ontogenetic variation in the Hell Creek ended up becoming valid)
lets keep it on topic and not go off with some off topic conversations with pointless and inaccurate speculation
nu uh, what about trike and toro?
He's saying the opposite of what you think
not everyone can afford the mental cabilities to understand such complex claims , okay?
It is very normal for a already mature animal to immediately go under metamorphosis and grow a frill twice as huge and for your nasal horn to become a boss
It is also very normal for a dinosaur to quickly grow a giant dome head and loose all its knobs in an instant
as well as going through the growth cycle of what is comparable to a fish and not seen in at least any theropod dinosaur (or amniote for that matter)
Maybe Torosaurus were Triceratops who used tools to alter their appearance for ritualistic reasons
Triceratops was the planktonic form of torosaurus
Palaeontology absolutely has improved and still is in rapid succession over these few years and I couldn’t be happier
maybe there was something in the water in hell creek that made all the dinosaurs metamorphose
Torosaurus and triceratops both were apex predators above Tyrannosaurus rex which was 3rd in that ranking
If it isn’t careful it will lose its rank to the great Edmontosaurus.
The amount of times I've seen Triceratops being proposed as a carnivore by merit of its beak is insane
There's a reason I make the herbivores aren't real joke as much as I do.
you know it is actually kind of a shame that Edmusthosaurus is like the only reason Edmonto gets discussed online like 90% of the time now
Really? If anything I see edmontosaurus being more carnivorous
Why are people so obsessed with making edmontosaurus a unstoppable brute that also eats meat?
Because it did
Edmonto is the more counter culture one
People regarding Triceratops as at least putting up a fight against rex has been somewhat normal for decades
No, I've seen multiple times ceratopsids in general be imagined as anything from opportunistic scavengers to straight up predators.
Sure, I could see a triceratops with growing horns nibble a bone or two for the calcium. I can't see, however, their beak being sharp (like all beaks ever) as a justification for carnivory.
Shantungo didn’t because it actually ate the souls of zhuchengtyrannus, which is why its so small and shant is so huge
denver lives in anky's basement to avoid the hell creek controversys the gang gets into
Your mistake, triceratops killed because it ate meat, edmontosaurus killed because it was just that angry
Magnapaulia was better than Shantungosaurus idc if Shantungosaurus is bigger.
In these situations, its less misguided counterculture, and moreso a desire to awesomebro triceratops because even when fans of a herbivore, they can't escape the "herbivores weak and gross" mentality
Edmonto's main cause of death was actually heart attacks
I think shant would’ve had something similar to barsboldia but not as excessive with the hip region
Edmonto has none of this
L
edmonto's only know predator was the most fercious predator, archeraptor.
Edmontosaurus was better , deal with it.
yup
Its the wording mostly
"Ceratopsians perhaps had a larger meat content in their diet than we imagine thanks to their beaks" - fine, genuine opinion, I disagree but I respect
"Ceratopsians were omnivores with FLESH CUTTING raptorial beaks, and they would disembowel their prey" - unserious, aggressive, stems from the violence typical of awesombros, an opinion I don't respect
can't hippos literally die from overeating meat
hippos are omnivores?
Bro
Less that and more so will just maul anything that breathes in their general vacinity
In the sense that they’ve ever been recorded eating meat then yea but definitionally they are herbivores since over 90% of their diet is plant matter
Like…a hawk…t..oo…?
whats a hawk too a real predatory bird, microraptor, which lived 267 mya
A hawk would quiet kill a microraptor I reckon.
depends on the hawk
how valid is bars
I discussed this with @queen oar a while ago I've pulled up the convo and I'll try to summarize what we talked about
ok bro you know it's "acheroraptor" right
I've seen you say archeraptor so many times I just gotta make sure 🥀
no...i didnt
based on this paper: https://ualberta.scholaris.ca/items/7ec4af29-cb46-450e-a57f-b80d48dbb9d9
"Ontogenetic evidence from this site suggests Barsboldia sicinskii, the only other
hadrosaurid from the Nemegt Formation, is a junior synonym of Saurolophus
angustirostris"
They argue that the Barboldia holotype represents a mature individual. When comparing it with the ontogenetic sequence present in the Dragon's Tomb individuals for Saurolophus angustirostris, they find that Saurolophus' neural spines on the sacrum and in the early caudal series (over and just behind the hip) significantly increase in height as they age, suggesting the extreme condition seen in Barsboldia may just be the mature condition for Saurolophus angustirostris. Barsboldia's neural spines in this region measure up to 62 cm and are over 3 times the height of the corresponding centra, those observed in the largest Saurolophus specimens are 45 cm even though they're incomplete, and are around 3.5 times the height of the corresponding centra.
Agnes pointed out that this alone seemed inconclusive and I realized I needed to mention the lack of non-Saurolophus Hadrosaurid material from Nemegt as the paper points out
Their argument is effectively two part:
- Barsboldia's distinguishing characters are in fact explicable as it being a specimen of Saurolophus
- The lack of any other non-Saurolophus Hadrosaurid material in Nemegt gives us no precedent for splitting material from it based on non-definitive characters
Their argument isn't really attempting to present proof that Barsboldia is definitively a Saurolophus specimen, but instead attempting to poke holes in evidence proposing that it definitively isn't. While absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, it's not evidence of presence either, and without more substantial evidence in favor of splitting Barsboldia from Saurolophus they simply argue that there's no reason to do so.
Reappraisal of Saurolophus confirms Saurolophus osborni and Saurolophus angustirostris as distinct species. Synapomorphies of Saurolophus include a spike-like pseudonarial crest formed by the nasals, frontals, and prefrontals; tripartite frontals with anteroventral and posterodorsal extensions that buttress the underside of the nasals; posterodo...
Tbh I'm not really sure if I find this argument 100% convincing but the validity of Barsboldia does seem a bit iffy
thank you
Sounds like Andrewsuchus
egg
No, because birds exist
Hi everyone, I'm doing a bit of research on Dunkleosteus (I'm playing it on PoT and I like to do research about the animals I play). Is the largest Dunk still considered 4.1 m, or did someone contradict Engelman since 2023 ?
Rexy is 8.4t
So not yet
Tbf I wouldn't put too much weight behind the stated weights for characters.
Spino is apparently 4 tons according to JWE
Dunk got goldfished but I know a few people working on a rebuttal to that paper so big dunk might be back soon
I mean
Yeah but thats Cause JWE id Goofy, its more so Official more than anythint
Rexy's Weight been 8.4t atleast is consistant within the Universal Guide and Size Charts
Well i mean given the right pressures
A ratite bird like the emu could become more dromeosaur like
And they never left
The Acheron Thief/plunderer
...you're telling me we would have Saurolophus (one of my favorite hadrosaurs) in PoT instead of Bars if this was discovered a tiny little earlier? 🙁
Probably not, iirc, bars is a comissioned (is that the word?) playable like eotrike and its validity probably wouldn't have made any difference.
10-12 average is still wigidy wack
The 3rd carving.....
JWE doesn’t have the accurate weight Rexy canonically is 8.4 tons in dominion, the spino in jp3 was 8 tons and 10 in CC the Giga I believe was 11 tons
Is any of this stated anywhere at all?
Giga is 9-9.2t
The Animatronic is 11t
Rexy been 8.4t is pretty much stated everywhere
Promotional, internal Guide, etc
In the BTS of JP3 a worker mentions both Bull and Spino are 8t, The Spino Profile since like 2015 mentions Spino been 10t, Lewis Lee a Universal Worker which you can find on X or Jack Ewins discord mentions that at the moment thats kinda just the best size to use for Spino(tho his CC Model isn't far from said size)
Giga on the Guide is 9-9.2 tons
All weights JW mainly uses Metric Tons/Tonnes
JP3 Spino's Size is Arguably just Retcon to be the same as CC due to all Previous Rexes pretty much having their size retcon aswell.
Theres also the Fact the CC Show runners Intended JP3 Spino and CC Spino to be the same individual tho Universal says/thinks Otherwise
Likely to avoid such direct connection or smth
“Largest carnivore the world’s ever seen” except spinosaurus already did that years before in a far better movie
True
Giga is Taller(spikes) and Longer
So I guess it makes up
The True Ruler of Dinosaurus
big boy
what was massive para? was it 13 or 11 tons?
it was claimed to be 12 tons
The footprint...?
the footprint was supposedly 18 tons
12 tons was the maxilla that wasn't actually as big as they said it was
17t for the footprint 
Randomdinos decided not to chime in because their false truths (downsized Parasaurolophus) would be met with facts and logic
what downsized it?
cyrtocristatus vertebrae are consistently around the same size or smaller than walkeri's vertebrae, it just had long legs
which incidentally downsizes the footprint because same foot = less animal
The pursuit predator...?
which granted the downsized version is still like 13m so it's not like the footprint isn't impressive
also there's no evidence it's a cyrtocristatus footprint to begin with tbf
that was going to be my next comment yeah
there's no evidence of it being a parasaurolophin or even a lambeosaurine
i think fadeno just made it cyrtocristatus because its the only hadrosaur from the fruitland formation
ofc this also isnt actually true whatsoever but we cant all be winners
mega parasaurolophus suppressed the niches of other hadrosaurs
Nanoparasaurus
tbh the 12t+ maxillae are still kinda baffling cause both of them are measured and clearly aren't any larger than tubicen at the most
like at least with deinosuchus or something there are a lot of gaps that could beget scaling errors
what was the jump? like, from para's old max size to 12 tons
I forgor was cyrtocristatus was but even tubicens is like ~6 t max
yeah the thing at least doubled
between that and bricks edmontosaurus skeletal convincing half the internet an exemplar edmontosaurus was over 10t 2022 was a very unfortune year for hadrosaurs
6 ton hadrosaur curse ( or blessing..? )
curse because now I'm going to have to spend the rest of my life correcting people about how big Edmontosaurus and Parasaurolophus were
did you know parasaurolophus not only grew to 13 tons but did it in less than a year
Amd getting labeled as an awesomebro because of it
Average youtuber going to go oversize a animal to be le epic💀
you don't think edmonto averaged 15 tons? what are you a rex fanboy?
What do you mean you have a standard of scientific rigor and don't want to blindly believe the largest ever estimate given for a hadrosaur?
You must hate hadrosaurs and think they're weak fodder!
Hadrosaurs are tasty barsburger meals for megatheropods, only defenses are herds, size, and kicks(maybe)
true.
Heh... It needed to grow so fast so it could pummel the local tyrannosaurids to the ground and feast on their corpses...
Why do you think edmontosaurus had front facing eyes?(/jk)
Weird fella
The OG Trio
I like how google AI tries to tell you sandbar sharks have 50 - 60 teeth in one quarter of their mouth like a liar
The GOAT
Truly
who ate bro's face
Another parasaurolophus, clearly.
Nothing else could fell a mighty hadrosaur
The mighty Bisti Beast
I just remember I had an exact portrait like that
A hater of the King
It's kind of funny how a lot of people perceive Parasaurolophus as being roughly cow or horse sized, but even without the ridiculous overestimates it's still as large as modern elephants
Someone should downsize all parasaurolophus species to the size of a miniature pony
corythosaurus deserves the fame para has
unironically a better name
thats why it was in goat dan and para wasnt
but ngl it can't really compete with para's crest
Who would name a goat dan?
literally me
have yall seen lewis larosa dinosaur artwork ? holy moly..... 10/10

no do share
I'm gonna look this up and its going to make David Peters look like DaVinci isn't it?
Lewis LaRosa is a god-tier dinosaur artist
Man sold his soul or smth for that skill
Genuinely wasn't expecting good art just because I'm so used to other side of paleo artistry
like holy shxxtttt
Check it out - Tankers Kickstarter final day! New tiers added! Wraparound cover for Tankers 0, LaRosa art monoprints, and the original art of my Charles Knight T. rex vs Triceratops homage! Thanks for the support everyone! https://t.co/8Zf66c8C6h
I was going to ask if he had more 'normal' paleo art as well
i dont think i ever seen dinosaur art this good , and there is some beast of artist around for dinosaurs
3 days left to back my art book! https://t.co/JLtHf7FqzS Special last minute addition here, working on a piece to add to the tier 4 print set! Will be added to the book as well. RTs hugely appreciated. Thank you for the support guys!
Since we were just talking about para:
i seen enough, guy is the goat
@ancient crystal as a marine biologist, can you explain this to me?
Idk man Corytho is so…. Like bland. I feel like there are way more exciting hadrosaurs, like my boy Olorotitan as an example
im glad php chose olorotitan for an episode, very nice looking hadrosaur
Water resistant feathering, due to certain produced oils
Everyone arguing about whether Para or Cory are better, but they're both inconsequential... the true king is right here
Also potentially the only lambeosaur genus to make it to the very end of the dinosaurs, or at least a very close relative.
worst hadrosaur clade ever resolved award
sobs in old world
Fine, *the only lambeosaur genus that matters
Orange Carnivorous Reptile Zebra
-# this is Acro btw
He's just like me fr
The only mega Predator that no one talks about
Lost
this is crazy looking and i love it
The only one? Wdym there’s a million end Cretaceous Lambeosaurs in Russia and Europe
Welcome to The Dinosaurs – an epic journey into a lost world. From executive producer Steven Spielberg, Amblin Entertainment, and the award‑winning team behind Our Planet, this groundbreaking documentary series follows the rise and fall of the dinosaurs across hundreds of millions of years. Narrated by Academy Award–winner Morgan Freeman. ...
Check this out 
It uses the same models as life on our planet :[
The newcomers are very good looking however
Goober
I hope Brachiosaurus will get a spotlight cameo too
At least they fixed the allo’s proportions. Except the feet, they huge.
this looks awesome
Aquatic ankylosaur, fully lipped spinosaurus
My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined
At least some of the new species inclusions and designs are cool.
Indeed, classics we've never seen
Like Allosaurus, Spinosaurus, Plateosaurus, and Quetzalcoatlus
Sdfu
Nah we got some new faces, and some happily returning ones.
It could very well be it's just crossing along the bottom as well though.
It would drown if it did that. Ankylosaurians are exceptionally great at drowning, it's why we have so many exceptionally well preserved specimens.
Quite an exceptionally exceptional explanation
It's shallow, calm water that it's peeking it's head out of.
idk about you guys but im still gonna enjoy watching it
the only thing they give us is a small species shark that gets eaten by Spino💀
Loop Rex and Trike 💔
I do not see any reason as to why it would wade into water it could barely keep it's head above water in, it can't close it's nostrils so if it stumbled into even just slightly deeper water it would immediately start drowning.
It's like tilting your head back and walking into water with lead armour
the leaps and bounds made for semi aquatic ankylosaurs really are astounding
Ankylosaurs are IRL rock+ground type pokemon, water is super effective against them
ngl am not surprised, is made by reptile fan glazers
Ok
I bet mid-cretaceous south America is going to be slept on like everytime
Animals don't drown as soon as they enter deep water, even if they aren't inherently semi aquatic.
Holding your breath isn't easy when your nostrils are orientated such that gravity doesn't help keep air from just escaping, also the toxicity really isn't nessisary.
Oh boy name calling 
What an affective way to have a conversation
why didnt they just become seals, would've been so much more effective smhhhh stupid creature design L ankylosaurs
It's like the difference between holding a bottle underwater upsidedown and right side up
ok
Mid Cretaceous becomes the most boring time period ever. Is asked to leave the Mesozoic Period Council
It's my understanding that ankylosaurs didn't have the muscles to close their nostrils, or the orientation of said nostrils to just have gravity/buoyancy keep the nostrils from filling with water
That's because the council is run by rex fanboys with Hell Creek-ADHD
Even if water did enter the nasal cavity, it doesn't rush into the lungs if you're not inhaling.
I can't believe this is an argument.
it’s sad because the mid cretaceous is literally so cool in a lot of places
True.² ( To both above )
I mean, how long are you going to be able to hold your breath without being able to empty your nostrils of water
Especially after your center of mass flips you upside down in water
I don't think I implied that, aside from that why are so tilted? Genuinely asking
??? Holding your breath has nothing to do with water being in your orifices, it's literally just about not inhaling.
because we all know breathing is optional
This might seem crazy what I'm about to say but you cannot breathe if water goes into airways
subjective.
You can also just like, push the water out when you resurface
It seems like you directly associated nostrils filling with water to instant drowning.
I don't think animals typically train to control their gag or breathing reflexes
It should also be known ankylosaurs have incredibly complex nasal passages meaning pushing out water isn't as easy as "I snort once"
I'll just mention what I said the other day? But aren't there like a bunch of Ankylosaurs that died by drowning? Just saying, it's like that fact that like " You are most likely to die with what you most commonly interact with, daily "
Sad trumpet noises
You think animals are so incompetent that they can't decide to stop breathing after their head goes underwater? Wow.
Also agnes, that was probably because of flooding and literally being swept away/being in extremely deep water, not just wading.
Yes, as an animal I can testify sometimes we are that silly
Why are you making it so personal 💀 jfc
It's not that they're "incompetent" (what??), they had little to no ability to do so
It's like saying someone is incompetent because they couldn't survive a bullet
I humbly ask that whatever debate is being had remains civil enoughh to not get deleted by the mods
(I'm in class and can't read the argument until after)
But a mistake like that doesn't happen every time you submerge your face.
As an animal that lacks an ossified palate, has a complex nasal passageway, biomechanically designed in a way that it will fill with water very easily, lacking the ability to spray the water back out through their nose
is not going to like swimming
Complex does not necessarily mean complicated. It entirely depends on how much complicated " Complex " entails in this context. Even so, that argument just proves a lot of obstacles to go around, since if you are not able to easily push water out of your nostrils, that means you'll also have difficulty pushing other contents, such as fungi, dust, sand, etc.
Claims to be pro life, dies anyway.
Most of the things you seem to be assuming are default animal traits are unique to mammals and crocodiles
I don't think any animal ever has encountered enough fungi or dust to drown
But I do wonder if the Asian ankylosaurs have a different nasal configuration compared to NA anyklosaurs
Based on that logic they would die in sandstorms
I mean lets be real humans probably have encountered enough
Depends, if your system isn't compromised, no. But otherwise, it's very silly to suggest that a complex nasal system is " Fragile ", when the very complexity of such design, it's entirely intentional to avoid such fragility.
Who said anything about fragile
I've been on slightly windy beaches and felt like I was drowning
I mean... Yeah, they have, that can happen
still ringing true it seems
Hmmmm. Who was it that said that the complex nasal canals of Ankylosaurs couldn't push water because they were complex? Sorry guys, I have memory loss.
Do you expect anything different in this chat
to truely settle this, i'll put an ankylosaurus in deep water in jwe3 and see what happens
/j
We aren't saying they are semi aquatic. Just that they could wade and put their head underwater occasionally without dying instantly.
Are you aware complex is not a synonym of fragile
or even better, prehistoric kingdom
They can't push water out because they just don't have that anatomy, it's not because they're complex, it's bwcause they're strictly terrestrial animals
are you aware that you can imply something without necessarily saying that word literally? Or do I have to explain how saying " It cannot push water " is also implying that it's fragile in some sense?
(Ankylosaurus swims in PK without any issues)
okay, jwe3 it is!
How will you even get it there in game?
my magic powers
how so? It's literally just blowing air out. Like literally the only way that wouldn't work is if your system is compromised, such as having fluids in your lungs, like water or whatever caused by a inner-inflamation. But by that point, it's already a dying animal that we would be talking about. Not a actually healthy one.
that's like saying my ears are fragile because they cannot push water
that's just not what they're supposed to do
What a great analogy. It's not like the ears are an entire different system where it has it's own systems to clean it of whatever substances or small objects that get stuck in it... Except if you ever got the nice experience of a bug entering your ear... Which then, I guess I can only feel sorry if that happened.
That's irrelevant to the point wes was making
