#paleontology
1 messages · Page 221 of 1
~8 meters and ~1.4t
Rex
Spino
Giga
Carcha
Mapu
Duck
Tyranno
Acro
Tauro
Mera
In all honesty, its probably less likely that no dinosaur species possessed a similar dewlap
I feel like giga got knocked down below carch recently, but I could be misremembering something
Carcha is just a giga with a headswap atm. They are basically the same size
Ah, that makes sense.
Though I'd still put it lower just to get on people's nerves
So it would be in the realm of possibility?
in the realm of near certainty
I mean the Rex sub is pretty accurate IMO too
Even amongst just the species known to science, I'd say its a near certainty. Not even counting the thousands upon thousands of dinosaurs yet to be discovered, and those that never fossilized
Thats so neat, thanks
What are some small herbivorous dinosaurs that Velociraptor likely could've hunted if it lived alongside it?
Finches
Finches ?
Wood pigeon
I'm confused, why am I being given birds đ
small herbivorous dinosaurs
You asked for small Dino suggestions. Birds are dinos
They are, but they're not exactly herbivorous
finches are certainly herbivorous; herbivory is defined as consuming 90+% of your diet as plant matter.
and is the main reason "MUH HORSE EAT CHICK WHEN THEY HAVE NO NUTRIENTS" doesn't make them an omnivore
While I know they're dinosaurs, I assumed it would've been obvious I was talking about non-avian dinosaurs otherwise I would've specified birds >.>
Wood pigeons eat mostly veg 99% percent of the time
protoceratops
So basically its a bipedal baboon. Thats cool but also ominous as heck considering baboons are quite scary
My man
How so?
Shri rapax WIP
Zhuchengtyrannar?
Suecheng is undescribed
Once it and big Mera get described the list will change
Ight đ
Yup. It's really scary
who would y'all say is more inaccurate, metri or pachy?
Pachy by virtue of having enough material to confidently assess its accuracy
how accurate was feilongs pachy? ( i think beaked pachy was feilong? )
damn, offical pachy skinny as hell
This is the Skinny Sub tbh
Author here: not so accurate besides having beak 
Proportions are off (is a barrel, thin, long tail, wide chest and tall but thick from the front legs)
Integument is wrong (dome is cornified skin and not scaly, scales are wrong)
Both my version and POT are off and doesn't depict pachy properly, the only difference is just the beak
i thoguht he was bigger damn
A very common sentiment in this community
the bigger they are the bigger they fall ahh
Unless you're one of the chosen ones
Tyrannosaurus, argentinosaurus, the blue whale
I have came to the conclusion that Tyrannosaurus is very similar to a tiger
Both goated
Definitely turkeys
Realistically, yeah but I just wanted to glaze tigers
Its not glaze if its true
So true man
ooh alright, would you say saurian pachy is probably the most accurate pachy model then?
pachy fans, rate it
Tail is too thick. Even back then it was still off.
Would you eat Dinosaur-themed Pastry?
I hate pachy's weird little hands
it doesn't have those preserved, does it?
No as far as I can remember.
ah, but relatives probably have it... So it's not even subjective.
out of the 3, which is best to use a reference / which is the most accurate?
For a game that was so adamant to claim 100% scientific accuracy, there sure are a lot of examples of them not adhering to established science
Well, it's Saurian. ( No further elaboration, I think it's pretty obvious what I mean )
Tragically, its probably the isle's
really? isnt the isle's just jp pachy?
It's so generic that by not filling any quotas, it's probably the best you gonna have.
I mean, I don't remember JP pachy all that well but it certainly doesn't look it. It's not shrink wrapped, doesn't do anything stupid with the face or tail.
It kinda just wins by default
pretty sure JP Pachy and Warpath Stygi are pretty skinny and have a weird posture?
I think a picture of TI pachy in a neutral pose would be a good way to clear this up
im pretty sure these are the pre-remodel pachy
Well pre-remodel doesn't represent the current model. And yeah, that's an ugly model
Saurian's
only flaw is the tail
Me when
found it
PARTE 1 - Modelos elder prontos!
.
SIGA @centraltheislebrasil
.
#theisle #theislegame #dinosaur
189
oh, is the tail too bulky? but besides that its almost completely accurate, including the hands?
Alright, it's got a bit of a twig neck, but again, it's just a generic pachy that doesn't try to be quirky or different. I think that makes it the best
Saurian got it the closest i'd say, this is current pachy depiction based on multiple specimens (homalo, sandy and zavacephale)
Also, look at its eye lmao, it looks almost as dead inside as the average Isle player
Shin Gojira eyes
Pre-Evrima Pachy is gorgeous
Evrima Pachy is beautiful but stylized
me when tailn't
oh my god.
rat tail
Pachycephalosaurs are domed rats!!!
that is basically pachy proportions
The ever-humble Glavenus:
why is it so fat and wide expect the tail
herbivore
they are ducks with dome and tail
That's like me picking up a dead rat off the streets of New York and calling it gorgeous
whats pachy's speed estimates? if we have any at all
Rats. We gotta name one " Jermacephale " or " Jermaceratus " if it has the funny horns
Hey man, Legacy Pachy is just the model equivalent of a left-lateral skeletal so
Probably about the speed of one pachy
would pachy even make top 10 fastest playables in PoT? ( in real life speed )
i know struthi would probably be first, but behind it? no clue

Btw, talking about feathered critters, Heterodontosaurs being Marginocephalians is still up in the air or just naaaaaah?
well, if we count like, areial diving speed and swimming speed, would struthi still be first ? or would hatz, rhamp or thal snatch that from it?
I think they are the "fathers" atm for em
heteros originating ceratopsia and pachycephalosauria
tho with Zalmoxes and stuff being basal ceratopsia now, that may change
Pachys? No, they are in the same clade
Likely originating from the same branch
But I mean given that those, Zalmoxes and pals, were iguanodontids in the past, unsure if may change anything regarding heterodontosaurids
Zalmoxes is a bit in the air. Some of its specimens were ceratopsians and were given a new name iirc
no the Rhabdodons ( Forgot their name )
Yeah, Zalmoxes and pals,
Those are basal ceratopsia now
The real question is, would you eat a small Ceratopsian roasted on a stick?
Given that it would be all heavy metals, I'm likely dying next lol
i wonder, do pachycelpholosaurids get invited to the ceratopsian party as cousins or are they just left out in the cold to watch
whats sandy?
the squirrel
itâs not all rhabodontids just a couple from europe including some elements of zalmoxes
parts of zalmoxes and the rest of the rhabodonts are still iguanodontians
thats inaccurate bud
tragically ? whats so tragic about it , unless u have bias towards path of titans.
? the paper itself says that
Yes, it's literally on the message lol
That's why I said Zalmoxes & pals and not Rhabdodontids as a whole
come to think of it I donât remember if the holotype for zalmoxes got reclassified or not, the paper itself says its not all of them but the the posts on social media were just misleading for some reason
i saw something saying that said Zalmoxes robustus is fine but shqiperorum got the ceratops beam
I have an extraordinary bias towards path of titans.
I have a really annoying friend that keeps on insisting that spinosaurus had an M-shaped sail instead of a semi-oval and no matter how much I tell him it's just personal preference, he keeps saying that there's proof of it being shaped like that, can anyone debunk what he says?
I swear this was brought up before and someone said that the neural spines' placement isn't really up for interpretation anymore
Could be very wrong about that though
Whys the pachy hitting the luigi
Btw BoBâs is super inaccurate isnt it
Tell him he'll get a L-Shaped Sail soon lmao
The new one is fine, old one disgusting
Oh there is a new one?
Ok. I was wrong, it is not at all known what shape spino's sail took or even if there was a single characteristic sail shape across individuals of the same species
Hes a goo chee eng simp btw, he believes everything that guy says
there's a new one?
From what I was able to see from both this and another paleo channel, the M shape is potentially known from one specimen but without well preserved sails in other individuals, it is impossible to say that the M shape is more "correct" than any other sail type
@ionic crescent @elfin pulsar https://imgur.com/USRDRbT
Oh ty
mobile nostrils đ„
What? Are we looking at the same animal? đ
look at it when looks around, it "flexes" nostrils
Both are fine, there is no Concrete answer
Tmk Holotype might have had a M Shape
But like
Look at this smh
The m shaped was from holotype yeah, so its now dust
Yeah, that's what I was referring to. Holotype (rest in pieces) had the M shape, but to claim that every spinosaurus had that same sail structure is pretty much impossible lacking more well preserved specimens
What he said was "when u pull apart slime it dips into a more stable structure right?Sags in the middle, because spino is so long the sail would probably need to be that shape otherwise the neural spines would have more stress put onto them" ig it makes sense but it also kinda doesnt
would "dakotaraptor" be the primary predator of pachy or would it be a mix of both "dakota" and nano
Yeah, the presence of bones in the spine kills that arguement
Ima be so real but the second you encounter someone who unironically believes Mr. Hallucinations, just give up
I like it
Is It possible that paraceratherium could use It's neck to fight like a giraffe? Or maybe for self defense
Dakota, nano, smaller Tyrannosaurus, and any other yet to be discovered mesopredator in Hell Creek, because there sure as hell weren't only two of em
how about archeraptor?
REALLL
Acheroraptor isn't large enough to really scare an adult Pachy
arche got the saurian drop attack
Another paleo hack to add to my collection
The vicious Acheroraptor when its spine gets dusted by a well-placed headbutt
He hates my spinosaurus paleoart đ„č
Idk If i am allowed to send GIFs here so Just imagine my comment as that Lego Batman one
hell creek is truly a enviorment
The True Place...
Thankaks
Welcome to Hell Creek, we have: all the largest animals on the continent shoved into one place and next to nothing else
their only missing alamo from the largest animals of the continent
Tbf Alamo wandered onto the continent after the fact
The Fact Hell Creek had Trike and Toro together is crazy
Family Stays Close
and edmonto has no family, it killed all of them đ
Tho Multiple Similar sized Ceratopsians species together isn't THAT rare as seen on the Judith River Formation and iirc Alberto Lived with Eo, Pachyrino and more lol
trike has toro
anky has denver
rex has nano
dakota has arche
who does edmonto have...?
Hell Creek superficially encouraging and supporting the habit of paleontologists to throw any basic understanding of ecology out the window all while being the best understood and well studied mesozoic formation is really something.
Oplosaurus restored as a turiasaur? Interesting
Anatosaurus 
Edmonto has Crazy Size Variation
Edmonto has Parasaurolophus hellcreekensis
X-Rex is totally another species trust
It ain't called Hell Creek for nothing
"Tyrannosaurus filled every niche in its environment, but grew too large and heavy as an adult so they became obligate scavengers whilst the young actively took down prey. Yes, I took terrestrial ecology in college, I had to audit it twice and got a C, why do you ask?"
So it's a overweight theropod? Lmao
Can't wait to become the biggest primate species irl, just gotta eat more and bite more.
do you think we'll ever discover a lambeosaurine from hell creek?
I think T. Rex being green is actually fairly accurate considering the fact they're ambush hunters actively living in rainforests
Very likely many dinosaurs had classic green coloration since they wouldnât have the skill issue mammals had where they could only produce various shades of blacks, greys, browns, and reds.
by that logic tigers should be green. But they're only green in the eyes of the prey they hunt. Though reptiles have more complex color vision so idk how it'd work
The Morrison >>>
i remember the entirety of dryo and campto's friends died, rip nano , drinker and etc
drinker is still alive
there's one driving towards my house right n
You could say Drinker has to... Cope
someone needs to edit wikipedia and get rid of those stupid "X-Rex is totally a good representative specimen for Edmontosaurus you guys" size comparisons
I would do it but im lazy
Fruitadens is still valid and drinker isn't down for the count. Enigmacursor got described a few months later as well, but it is sad seeing nano go.
Wdym Nano was revalidated by Zanno and Napoli! 
Wdym
Its totally fine...
why tf is avisaurus a bird
I came so close to making this joke
which way would a ceratopsian wear pants?
2nd
3rd, they wouldnt cuz theyre dead
whats the more accurate theri?
both of them are pretty iffy but Id say TI because its bulkier
better look at both as i thought both images were too low quality
what makes them both iffy though? they seem like standard theri designs to me.
Stupid question but do you think edmontosaurus could swim and do you think it could stick its tounge out
I think both have too many feathers
swim yes
idk if there's research on hadrosaur tongues specifically but iirc a lot of non-avian dinosaurs had pretty inflexible tongues more like crocodiles
it kinda makes sense they would, most dinosaurs couldn't chew but they could so maybe their tongues moving might have helped
ankylosaurs at least seem to have had flexible tongues but that doesnât have much bearing on hadrosaurs
I'd have to see if there's research on their hyoid bones I just don't know of any off the top of my head
the Ankylosaur thing I sorta remembered forgot to mention it, ig it at least demonstrates the presence of those in Ornithischia
as for chewing... I can see how a more flexible tongue could help but Hadrosaur chewing worked quite a bit differently from mammalian chewing
would theris and ducks feathering be more sparse like a elephants hair?
but i do see where alot of feathering come from, because couldnt negment get cold enough to snow / blizzard?
thereâs a lot of uncertainty around feathering in theropods like that, especially nemegt ones given the possibility for cooler temperatures
Is yutyrannus still the largest feathered therapod?
How flexible were dromeosaur tails? Specifically Achillobator? Cuz it sticks its tail up real weird in it's aggro call and im wondering if that's physically possible
flexible at the base but the rest of it was pretty stiff iirc
Thanks!
Largest confirmed one, yes
TO
I believe Deinocheirus is the largest theropod with potential evidence of feathers? Pygostyle and whatever happens there. But that's not direct or conclusive by any means
I have the option to be really pedantic and say the largest theropod with evidence of feathers is T.rex because le phylogeny but I shall not because I know someone will erm me to death
likelyhood of some dinosaurs sleeping standing up?
I lwk like therizinosaurus with no feathers, or a really small amount of feathers
that doesnât confirm anything
Good you didnât because it doesnât work like that
The largest feathered animal was argentinosaurus as sauropods are closer to theropods like birds (which were feathered) than crocodiles.
The day we find sauropod feathering imprints is the day paleontology as a profession implodes upon itself and society collapses
it will be a international crisis for many
There's a sauropod from the Hanson formation, which got pretty cold, is there a possibility of some kind of feather like structures on them or is their size enough in terms of insulation
like this
Itâs extremely unlikely that sauropods had feathers let alone a full shaggy coat like this, sauropod skin is well documented and is fully scaly as far as scientists have found.
I mean similar to what elephants have but feathers instead of hair
Recent papers on the integument of animals like Diplodocus show us only scales, in colder climates sauropods likely kept themselves warm by bulk alone. Gigantothermy is the term i think.
Gigantothermy is a hell of a thing
Feathered sauropods are more of a thing of fantasy
cows, specifically the usual kind with very thin coats can be fairly comfortable at 0 degrees C, the larger an animal the greater it's cold tolerance is
Therizinosaurus probably had less feathers than Tarbosaurus
I highly doubt that
Sad, maybe smaller ones but thats really the only kind I could think of.(amargasaurus, europasseaus sized)
sauropods feel like they wouldn't need them at all
I honestly doubt it, I am more likely to state carcharodontosaurs had feathers than sauropods
No fluffy giants, truly a cursed time the mesozoic was
If sauropodomorphs had any kind of filament they likely lost them completely in the Triassic if they ever had them at all.
speaking of the triassic how bad would it be if you ported all the pseudosuchians to the cenozoic? Probably in florida.
I mean it would be awful because itâs a large invasive animal
FEATHERLESS THERIZINOSAURUS đ„č
It was similar in size to Tarbosaurus and probably didn't need feathers since processing plants generates more heat, i forgor but there's a name for that process iirc.
Though tbh, we don't really know at what size and environment gigantothermy would result in animals losing feathers. 1-2 tonne yuty was probably fine. Would 4 or 5 tonnes be where it'd matter?
In which case would a sub adult tarbosaurus/tyrannosaurus be as feathered as a yuty assuming the temperature of there environments wasn't too different
A big problem is how rare rocks that preserve feathers are, so our direct evidence sample is always going to be small
all pseudosuchians? yeah cenozoic is cooked
it has floridians though so very equal/jk
Okay, now there's a chance
It probably wouldn't have gotten as cold as the image shows even then
Given that it's the Jurassic period it probably would have been more temperate, cooler than the rest of the world but not usually frozen.
I mean the temperature is different itâs just colder.
Possible quills I think
Ben one of the peps on jFC talked about them not being quills
Completely feathered wings, bald/scaly body
You'd probably start a fight with the people who wrote the current page.
I will where did they get 15.9 tons from you can't just add that to Wikipedia without a source wth
it would be like someone adding that T. rex could've gotten to over 13 tons because they saw it in vividen's video
except vividen's videos are probably a more credible source than wherever this came from
It should also be known Wikipedia editors only accept published sizes otherwise they will be removed
A whole new section of the page could be added addressing Edmontosaurus' size variation and the scewed "averages" that circulate in popular media
Well, none of the length, height, or mass measurements seem to have cited sources
Oh
Then I guess that must only be for the megatheropod pages đ
oh nvm I looked through the page history, there was a source but someone must've accidentally removed it
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950117225000160#sec3
"large specimens from North America referred to Edmontosaurus annectens (Mor-1142 and 1609 and NHM R3656), with â15 m (Horner and Woodward Ballard, 2011; Prieto-MĂĄrquez, 2014), which, sensu Seebacher (2001), would be around 15,873 kg."
This is just using Seebacher 2001's mass estimate formula that just goes by total length which is not very good at accounting for variations in proportions but whatever
Perhaps they had the source removed so no one would be able to point that out
No no, Mega Edmonto is real because the T. rex was actually incapable of hunting adults because only mammals can hunt prey their size or larger!
You know I think Seebacher 2001 estimates a 17 meter Shant (very real) at 22.5 tons so why isn't that added to the shant page then
The mega-Edmonto thing is so weird because people simultaneously pretend T. rex was this wimpy pathetic predator to do it and also bulldoze their way past plenty of other Hadrosaurs that actually were huge (I.E. Shant, Magnapaulia, etc.)
It's almost like people do it out of spite for T. rex and not because they actually care about Edmonto
Do they really?
Also happy b-day, I apologize but it's been a busy few days
yea it's like the go to source for wikipedia size estimates
Heh... T rex wouldn't dare to hunt the bull Edmontosaurus in musth and would instead go for the local Triceratops with over meter long horns on their faces...
tbf I think people who partake in such chicanery would also argue Trike and Anky being immune at full size
Basically T. rex was a dedicated juvie hunter
It's a shame GSP is the only person who has put effort into making dorsal views because they are definitely not good
The small game hunter
Making Nanotyrannus the true apex predator of Hell Creek
Hey man, I already made this joke...
If y'all were a Tyrannosaurus, what would you go for
A: An agile elephant sized herbivore with a pair of meter long brow horners and a shield on its head
B: A short, low to the ground armored ball with a club that can shatter ankles
C: A big, meaty burger that feels slightly grumpy and has no real comparable weaponry compared to the previous options
Pachycephalosaurus because it's the only thing such a pathetic loser like Tyrannosaurus could take
Ankylosaurs literally doesn't seem worth the effort
That's what I meant by agile, not fast when it comes to running but positioning itself to face the threat effectively
Shorter and smaller but egregiously difficult to take down when there are far more filling options
Tbf considering Tarbosaurus was taking out ankylosaurs, I doubt Anky's an impenetrable fortress
Size difference was about the same, I believe
Is there evidence for tarbo actually eating them? (Also I never said they were impenetrable)
No, but you see, Tyrannosaurus was totally inept because I don't like it and said so, therefore anky was unkillable
Think there's a skull of a Tarchia that was at least bitten by a Tarbosaurus
Didn't kill it but an infection got it iirc
there's a Tarchia specimen with a crushed skull that's been interpreted as the result of a Tarbosaurus bite
There was a dietary study on Tarbo done that found ankylosaurs weren't off the menu
I think there was mention of an individual with a preference for ankylosaurs
link? if you have
Even still as a slow and relatively uncommon herbivores in their region the defense would have had to have done something for them or else they wouldn't have survived
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031018218310538
I'll try to track down the ankylosaur individual because I don't think it was mentioned in the paper, but as an aside
yea ofc
ig the general point is that while their defenses were probably pretty effective, animals don't evolve defenses unless they're under predation pressure
not to mention there was also a tarchia speicmen with tarbosaurus
Mentioned here but I wasn't sure if we had one or two skulls w/ bitemarks
You the Tarchia with marks on its skull?
True, but I definitely still see them as less common targets
yea that's fair
It's a shame ankylosaur fossils were all vaporized...
true, i guess
I remember the other day seeing someone ask very simply, if others thought Torosaurus or Triceratops would be more effective at detering a Tyrannosaurus, and someone unironically tried to correct them by saying that they wouldn't deter a Tyrannosaurus but instead they'd usually kill it
W Ceratopsian Agenda
Nah
Yah
Trex has just become the overrated dinosaur at the point since its everywhere, they just do it out of spite
Even as a joke, I think "agendas" like these are always a bad thing.
I like the fact that it's overrated, bite me
Hadrosaur size scaling has to be one of the most blighted paleo topics rn
at least people bother to fact check when it comes to theropods
It's a good thing it's praised the way it is, it deserves its title
I have a theory
what theory
The thick ahh animal theory
They only bother to try and enforce fact checking theropods because they themselves don't do it for hadrosaurs, and in the us vs them mentality these folks usually have, that's some sort of advantage.
yea that's the thing is the Hadrosaur fanboys try to make it out like every Hadrosaur was gigantic and that ends up ruining people's perception of the group
It's not fair to hate an animal due to how others view it imo
Awesomebros never left paleocircles, and though I won't pretend that there aren't those still convinced T. rex was an unstoppable bloodthirsty movie monster, it seems plenty of others have realized they can either treat herbivores the same way or do so as some sort of counterculture
I mean yeah, but at the same time, I think Tyrannosaurus deserves some humiliation.
Nah
See, you just proved my point 
Exactly. Because I am not perfect.
Game has a larp epidemic at this point
people will be upset when you use Randomdinos updated Sue that's based on actual 3D scans and only increases mass by like 700 kg but if you use Fadeno's Parasaurolophus that's 3x bigger than any credible estimate based on footprints no one has ever assigned to Para people act like it's totally fine
I love T. Rex and the praise it gets tbh (also it has a really satisfying face
)
hmmmm...
Objection:|| It doesn't look like Doctor Gregory House||
Fun fact potoos have been around since the beginning of the cenozoic
Literally anurognathus
I don't want to gatekeep paleontology and all the cool things that come from it to just pure science, and I usually think its a great thing when people who might not have a scientific interest in otherwise scientific subjects attempt to engage with those fields.
But I don't think powerscaling, agendas, awesomebro who-kills-who, this animal deserves my eternal wrath and ire because its 500kg too large bs should be encouraged or even allowed when possible
THANK YOU
Animal powerscaling sucks
You should look up the user Mr. Triceratops in this channel, the last arguement they had here was something else
In all honesty the size/strength of dinosaurs between one another isn't even my main reason of interest by a long shot
I mean tbh, I think it's not addressing the issue, that is like... I think I said it to Doogma the other day?
" Selective Realism "
that is simply referring to how our image of Dinosaurs will always be updated to some matter, and it won't happen that we will get a 100% precise/accurate representation of a Dinosaur. But usually what that also refers to is how people will usually be pretty selective about depicting certain elements to certain dinosaurs. Quite simply, putting your finger on the scale until your side benefits enough from it.
Being honest here, terms like " Awesomebros " or whatever the f#$k people make up this day to call somebody, feel more like a distraction than anything. Because it only creates a stereotype and essentially makes you believe " The problem is only associated with these people! Who think Jurassic Park is accurate! ", when in general it's a issue that can be found anywhere in the community and, personally, I think many would prefer if it was addressed from the root rather than by individual groups.
Which is sort of what sparked this whole thing.
Wikipedia apparently requiring sources for megetheropod sizes under threat of punishment, but not doing so with the large hadrosaurus that have usually more dubious size estimates and averages
Tbf I realized there was initially a source for the Edmonto mass estimate but theyâre evidently still much less vigilant on the Hadrosaur pages considering itâs sat without a source for months
Hadrosaurs have the problem of being big enough to not be small but not being the biggest so people always want the "sauropod destroying hadrosaur" to be a thing
but Wikipedia has always had some form of Selective Realism. It's not to say that Wikipedia is " Oh Wikipedia is A.K.A. source of misinformation! ", but it's mostly to say that Wikipedia always had an issue, not just on the Dinosaur sector of the site, but also on other sectors, due to how some communities will always have someone who wants to fulfill a " Agenda " of some sort. Like, this is going to sound unrelated, but the only example I can think outside of dinosaurs that wouldn't make me sound bias, is that the A-10 wikipedia page still cited Pierre Sprey as it's designer, because many of the books oftenly curated or written by Pierre Sprey claimed that was his design, his creation, and the page would go for years without giving proper mention to Alexander Kartveli
Kinda like how permian and cenozoic animals are overestimated sometimes
That's why I included the end bit, because sources are evidently not enforced for edmontosaurus when according to Gualicho, they are for megatheropods.
That isn't to say I don't want sources to not be enforced, but its something that should happen for all groups, not just carnivores because muh counterculture herbivore bias
Ok, lets not pretend Longrich is the pinnacle of paleontological rigor, or that his paper did a thing to revalidate nanotyrannus
That's just dishonest tbh. I think it was said in this chat, and I'll simply repeat what people have said here, while it's true that some of the opposition to Nanotyrannus often used some form of verbal aggression to shut down any doubts or discussion about it. You also have to acknowledge that at the time Nanotyrannus didn't had any real evidence. Bloody Mary from the Dueling Montana Dinosaurs was still a private specimen and even when it was acquired it took a good time to be described.
Kinda weird how many people doubted nanotyrannus tbh, tons of animals have dwarf/small variants, potoos, hippos, foxes, and even some primates
And it makes a lot of sense given that there were no real mid-sized predators to our understanding before that point
Itâs more that where theropod fans factionalize into their personal favorite theropod, hadrosaur fans wanted them to be megatheropod killers as a group (muh herbivore counterculture as venator lunae mentioned) so they seemed to care more about getting a large number of hadrosaurs to huge sized than they did about parsing out the details of which ones really were huge or not
In hindsight, the pre-nano vision for hell creek and tyrannosaurus ecology was absurd. I made fun of it the other day.
However, as dumb as pretending that mesopredators weren't found in hell creek was, that same logic couldn't have been used to argue nano's validity either.
pretty much, yeah.
Sir William
Doesn't even make sense lol, hadrosaurs are primarily herd creatures, who use numbers and speed, the only hadrosaur I can think of with a obvious defense is iguanodon
Also, I would like to mention there are some really unpleasant people who act like nano being valid gives them a justification to be shitty' to others.
Both this channel, and PK's paleochat had them right after the paper dropped.
Also hah I win, discord censorship
They aren't exactly hadrosaurs either
What's not hadrosaurs???
Iguanadontids, they are a different type of ornithscian
Ornithopod.
Hadrosaur fans when you point out their favorite carnivore slayer was an R selected prey species: 
Yeah that's what I meant, my bad (it still counts but is too generalized for what I was saying)
More of a sauropod fan or pterosaur fan, diplodocus is definitely a peak dino and anurognathus is peak
Also, I just now realize that saying "hadrosaur fans" in a mocking matter implies that I am somehow not a fan of hadrosaurs.
I'm not a "fan" of any dinosaur, I like them all equally. I think hadrosaurs are really cool, I just don't find any joy in purposefully misunderstanding and misrepresenting their ecology, nor does my enjoyment of paleontology necessitate that this warped version of the animals be accepted by others.
I find this narrative really. Really stupid.
I like all types of dinosaurs, but I have a particular interest in ornithomimosaurs
Abelisaurs were the greatest Multicelular organisms to grace this Planet
I hate Deinonychus.
Most of the people that claim such a thing are very much bad actors in the field for a variety of reasons, using the situation to either promote poor practices or were using private fossils to justify their idea. Napoli and coâs paper on Nanotyrannus was significant because such a controversial idea was backed up with actually good and robust science, not because it was the first to break the status quo.
Why?
Live anurognathus reaction
Similar to Tyrannosaurus, I don't like the culture around it, and I often find hard to disassociate the animal with that culture.
I too agree that we should beat GSP with hammers
They Are Peak
I can understand that, but it doesn't really matter what others think about it if you are willing to understand them as real animals.
Yeah it just feels like listening to the wrong crowd.
Okay, but do you imagine when you want to find any content about your favorite dinosaur and it's all pretty much just agenda content meant to make that dinosaur look better than anything else? Like personally, I would be pretty bored or sad.
True..
You just have to realize people coming into paleontology from a fandom headspace are not engaging with the scientific aspect of the wider subject, or if they are then they are doing so poorly (see above critiques of hadrosaur size "glazing")
I don't really take glaze on any side seriously though, especially if it's just by random people
None of that holds any bearing whatsoever in an actual understanding of the animal
Nobody is forced to like or dislike any animal but honestly a massive issue in paleo spaces i find as a casual enjoyer is that too many people don't give a hoot about the truth. They don't see these animals as animals, and if evidence points to something that isn't what they like they get upset, as if science isn't the point.
I love heterodontosaurs!!! Give me the little fuzzy tusked guys!
The other two I get but what is wrong with carno? One of the largest abelisaurs known from good remains and a unique appearance.
how the hell is any of those 3 theropods overrated đ
Overrated based on what? It's an animal. it is what it is
"Paleontology ruined spinosaurus and I personally hate Paul Sereno"
Its also like, one of the only large carnivores that probably used its horns for more than Display
The thing is, there's always going to be things that are more appealing to different people
No. But at the same time, you gonna like an animal that is mostly associated with people trying to " Gotcha " other people online. Than at that point, I would prefer to invest my time on discussing or learning about other animals, and then have my own reasons to like it. Rather than if I said " I like Tyrannosaurus ", people would usually go " Woah dude! Did you know it had 20 tons?!!! And it had the bite force of god?!!! "
Like, personally, it's just a thing that would make anyone exhausted, and understandably make them want to avoid the animal to avoid that sorta of culture.
Real ones know spinosaurus wasnât ruined and instead is currently a victim (to the mess of science that is North African paleontology)
It's entirely fair to want to avoid it or not want to engage with it. Just that I think, some extrapolation that i see is really excessive. Having more/less appeal? ok. X animal is BAD and SUCKS and LOW TIER
ok?
Skorpiovenator is also, extremely cool. Like look at that Skull
Achillobator hasn't even been showcased much at all in paleo mediums
And personally, it's deeply rooted with a lot of insecurities people have. And that can only go one way.
Yeah his claim sounds more like Utahraptor
Abelisaurs in general have a really awesome hunting style that just isnât talked about much.
I do partially agree, it'd be nice to see some other abelisaurids take the spotlight sometimes.
How it feels to like pseudosuchians in 2026
They wrestled prey down. They were grapplers, but with their face.
You know, I've never once encountered that mindset with Tyrannosaurus.
Its mostly the opposite, nowadays. People are so obsessed with pushing back on certain dated tropes in paleo circles (shrinkwrapping, fodder herbivores, awesomebro tyrannosaurus) that they don't realize those tropes are already all but extinct
I once convinced people that this was a Tyrannosaur skull
Incredible
There was a paper that other day that noted their morphological similarities to tyrannosaurs, just with the jaws being less crushing and more holding.
I've always seen them as the true bruisers of the dinosaurs, and this definitely supports both their body shape and my assumptions.
There's a paper on Carnotaurus neck being worked on, that might shed some light on that hopefully soon
There's also a bunch of undescribed abelis that are pretty exciting for various reasons(other than the big one)
You didn't encounter or did not notice it? Because like, what I mean, is that if you are mostly present in Paleo-chats or something like that you've likely seen that, but thought it was common/normal. And that's just normal, if a behaviour is so common in a community you frequent then yeah, you not gonna think much of it
Also, I understand why you would want to make that point, and it is to some way also tell me " Hey man, that is not as big of a deal as you think ", but I also think it just sorta of misses the point of accounting for other's experiences in spaces from the community and how that sorta of affected their overall perspective about cultures around certain dinosaurs or about the community to some extent.
Iirc correctly there's a lot of cool mounts of things like desmatosuchus at my local museum, possibly also a postosuchus but I don't fully remember
I understand what youâre saying but I really donât see how this isnt like any other hobby/subject. Thereâs always something analogous to toxicity to work around.
Plus they also have solid bones and some like fasolasuchus hunted early sauropods
No. Genuinely, most conversations surrounding Tyrannosaurus that I have witnessed over the last 6 or so years being active in paleochats on discord do not see that attitude. It is almost always the oppositeâdisliking Tyrannosaurus for whatever arbitrary reason that treats the animal more like a character
Then it also applies to that case too.
What do you mean by solid bones? Comparatively vs dinosaurs?
All archosaurs can have hollow bones thatâs not exactly something unique to dinosaurs.
I think it might be because everyone glorifies Tyrannosaurus and doesnt actually look at other genus, like yeah Tyrannosaurus beats em all so theyre not interesting or sum shi like that
I wasn't questioning that, and I'm aware that it varies a lot between different types, but I've never heard of "solid" bones
Don't pseudosuchians have heavier bones?
But how can you say that? Like yeah, yes. But you also cannot tell me that is something that can be worked around, when if you search about anything Tyrannosaurus, here's what is going to be the results: Tyrannosaurus mass estimates, Tyrannosaurus superiority over other large theropods, " Guys did Tyrannosaurus had feathers or not? ", Jurassic Park Tyrannosaurus, etc.
Like, my point is simply being that, liking a dinosaur that you will simply never get the satisfaction of any actual entertaining content online... It's just depressing man
And It can apply to any animal
Like you seriously would be calm enough to enjoy something, that only you can share your specific reason for enjoying it? Like, no one else having that reason, because everyone wants to focus on the most insignificant, irrelevant, childish debates ever?
Ts allat to read đ„ đ
Another cool one, Llukalkan
Isnt this the guy had lived with Carno
I wouldn't be surprised if they were less hollow than some dinosaurs, but the term "solid" bones was kind of confusing to me.
I meanâŠ..yeah? Life is too short to care about any nonsense like this. Itâs the internet. People will be stupid. Stupid people shouldnât dictate what you do or donât like.
No, that was Koleken. This one from Bajo de le carpa foration, with viavenator
I think that used to be the case, but paleocircles tend to be slow to change course, and a trend that was common 10 years ago only just starts to see pushback now.
I think, if you were to somehow survey all the various conversations on Tyrannosaurus in the last 5 years across the internet, the majority of them would be negative, and the majority of those would be supposedly in response to everyone else "glazing it."
Almost.
Does Guamesia have a skull or is it just some fragmentary bones? Ik its a fairly small guy
Like itâs not the taxa or the mediumâs fault. Iâm not going to dislike or indirectly blame anything for having stupid followers when thatâs out of anyoneâs control.
Not what I meant. Here's simply a analogy: Do you imagine liking something for a genuine and well-researched knowledge on that topic, and most of the internet just repeats the same stereotypes again and again? Like yeah, you do you, I believe. But at the same time, it's just exhausting.
Just a Braincase
Found only one: Hesperosuchus
đ„
I fail to see a difference. I donât dislike honey badgers because of the stereotypes and misinformation that plague them constantly.
fair.
Itâs the internet. People are stupid. Enjoy what you enjoy and simply move around the dumb areas.
"Honey badgers don't care and are brave" No bro, they literally cannot outrun their problems
So true, like a League of Legends lobby.
If anything, I'd find researching and parsing correct and good knowledge about a stereotyped and misunderstood animal potentially more rewarding
Honey badgers are like any other animals, but because they live with lions they look tuff or smth. We have videos of rats attacking cats because they got cornered or were panicked and its the same stuff, just downgraded
The same can be said towards anything, including like fictional characters and franchises
I mean Iâd say standing up for yourself despite being utterly terrified is a very good definition of what bravery and courage is. A lot of stereotypes are way more awesome with nuance.
If you got cornered by someone that wants to eat you at least you wanna go down throwing hands
Hell theres videos of rats launching themselves at people swatting at them with a broom.
But no one's going to praise a flea-bitten diseased rat they found on the streets of NY. Justice for the rat.
We are all flea bitten diseased rats online
Master Splinter
Shout out to Megaloceros btw. People know it for the antlers but thatâs, like, not even close to the most insane part about it.
It kicks?
Without the antlers its stil as tall as a moose (I think)
The antlers just amplify its size but like its still humongous
Moose can rival their size but still it's a humongous animal yeah
I wonder if Megaloceros could glide using its antlers
Moose can kick in a 360 angle, no one is safe.
Gang, I think most hooved animals can do that
Megaloceros fits the textbook definition of âathleticismâ. Like the reason the males have such big antlers is because it correlates with fitness, and they were built for an amount of efficiency and athleticism that is SEVERELY understate. Like, this thing is the size of a moose but very cursorial, like it would match the fastest deer in speed and be able run for hours at a time without stopping.
The amount of energy they had to expend for that kind of strength was a huge pressure towards the species
Megaloceros were just ripped.
Another animal I would like to mention for its feats is Camels, they have a built in leather hard pad in their mouth for cacti and have cells that can expand and shrink more for water. And for its feet they have specially adapted pads for the sandy environment which shifts
Iirc the changing environment + the amount of energy invested into their displays of fitness is claimed to have eventually led to their extinction
Sexual selection that became so extreme it had a large cost to the animals
Could pterosaurs survive today? I'm not sure why they wouldn't and walking with dinosaurs seems to think not
Probably competition with birds but idk why they wouldnt
What types of pterosaurs, in general?
Azhdarchids, the semiaquatic pterosaurs or anurognathids
The smaller jurassic ones I can totally see going along with seagulls and cormorants. Idk about the larger, cretaceous ones
Pterosaurs would have a place purely on sheer size. Rhamphorhynchus is already rivaling the largest flying birds. Pterosaurs have size classes birds mostly donât that they would have to themselves.
At the same time, that could be a disadvantage, such as in the extreme sizes of the azdarchids
I can totally see rhamphy and seagulls teaming up to be nuisances to everyone
Seeing a seagulls getting eaten by rhamps and pterodactyls would be funny, although azhdarchids might be a problem due to their size and ability to fly.
I would imagine either ramphorynchus would prey on seagulls, or would get swarmed
Itâs about the size of an albatross mind you. They arenât small.
Regardless mobbing is extremely effective
I think pterosaurs that could have a definitive niche are Tapejarids (eating nuts and other plant matter, probably rivaling with macaws and parrots but that wouldnt really be a problem in how huge the rainforest is) and maybe smaller Azdachids basically being reptilians storks
Other types might struggle due to drastically differing environments and food supplies
And something seagulls are very good at
And maybe Pterodaustro too?
It's important to note that there's a lot less biological activity today, which is going to be an issue for animals that are used to relative abundance
Most filter feeding pterosaurs would probably thrive well, due to their food supply not changing much (small shrimp and other small organisms) and being available in quite abundance
That's the main reason I think dinosaurs and pterosaurs would struggle, alongside competition from certain well established modern species, mainly us.
Tbh a domesticated pterosaur or raptor would be pretty cool.
Most theropods would fill the niche of apex predators
Seems like a weird parrot lol
Commanding my Jeholopterus to pester my neighbour sounds like a cool idea
Tbh I see pterosaurs basically just filling the pigeon role, we have no idea of how smart they actually were and tons of them are around pet size. Carrier pigeons
Our Tapejarids arenât really from rainforest depositional settings
Ik theyre for more arid areas but idk where theyd fit that has actual plant matter instead of cacti everywhere
Perhaps certain species would be well adapted for living in cities given they likely nested on rocky shores and cliffs
Many environments exist in the spectrum between âdesertâ and ârainforestâ
yeah, it is commented that they probably helped on forestation like some bats.
Usually, sexually selected traits are correlated with an individual's fitness, which is defined by its capacity to spread across a population (either by reproducing or surviving, but the individuals with better chances at surviving are the ones to reproduce) so no surprise.
I think some sort of savannah, maybe somewhere in the northern region of Brazil or somewhere in South Africa
Or maybe that region from Congo thats called Green Stripe or smth like that, that is a large region of rainforest. Maybe somewhere on the border of that region too
Kinda what I meant by pet sized, big enough to petted but not a huge cost/threat. Kinda why nobody keeps a house horse or why people are anxious about big dogs
Hmmmm... Cooked Rhamphy... đ€€
a delicacy.
Yk how they have the Turducken? We have the Quetzteranorhynchus
A rhamph inside of a ptera inside of a quetz, truly a troglodytian delicacy
Picture of the biggest Dinosaur
Plus rhamps aren't apex predators like the largest pterosaurs. Which is a good pet quality since wolves are also not solo apex predators
We actually have some recent studies on the evolution of pterosaur brains and while not as well developed as modern avians they were generally more developed than most dinosaurs or reptiles, close in relative size and shape to non-avian paravians like troodontids or archaeopteryx
It's so peakđȘ
is stomping land theri the most iconic / well known theri design in media?
it and CBD are
I hate it, its skinny fat and it reminds me of myself
!?
jurassic world dominion clears either of them by a pretty far margin i'd say in terms of popularity
i have never seen this in my life
well it didn't say good theri designs in media!
how feathered do you guys like your theri designs?
Anteater theri is peak
Completely scaley, because it upsets people
seasonally dependant! which is something almost completely unexplored in feather reconstructions as a whole for some reason
do you have any irl examples of that? i'd love to see it!
Completely bald with 2 breast displays because we all love some speculative design choices
You know, I just said that I liked scaley theri because it upsets people but now I find myself on the receiving end of such an atrocity
Live anurognathus
If yall dont know what I am talking about there is a paleoart of a naked theri with "nipples", which are mating displays. I just dont kbow why the heck did the guy choose to make colorful nipples instead of ANYTHING ELSE
It haunts me to this day
Ssssurrre
This thing
Its from Gabriel Ugueto. And I just wanna ask, why
Also I just noticed it has some fuzz but still
Wait till you see the sage grouse
It's a nice piece of speculation and some animals tend to have really weird mating displays
Might look odd but that's something animals don't care about
As long as the opposite gender is impressed, it works
I think itâs very creative. It isnât very fair to apply mammalian standards to dinos
The thing is that this guy is very fluffy and those are air sacs. On the theri its just there
They are airsacs though
Which one ur talking about
I understand why youâre weirded out, but to be fair the greater sea grouseâs display looks a lot more like breasts than the Theri
Also, about this, I totally get when they make some dinos have extravagant displays but on that specific art they just look like nipples that dont do anything. Its not like they inflate to a degree that they look like a large balloon or something, looks more like a display of a mandril with the red butt
Alsp dawg who made the cooldown 45 seconds long đ
Again, applying mammalian standards to a dinosaur is unfair. This rendition makes sense, and you can tell that the artist didnât intend for it to be inherently similar to a breast⊠Itâs a herbivore about the size of its predator, Tarbosaurus. It makes sense that its display is smaller than birds and yet flashy enough to garner attention from possible mates. I imagine that it could be easily hidden. I think you should probably consider that youâre the only one seeing it this way.
ok ig
Idk what's going on but I can just tell you're fuming
no hate
idk how to really respond to this tbh
You can respond by sending me a little kitty cat emoji
And a thal too
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/605788102975291414/1464173321892401162/image0.gif
Why do my gifs NEVER WORK
What's going on here
guy didnt like me not liking nipple theri
fun if that's allowed
no fun allowed because it aint paleo related because paleontologists never have fun
because u smell
I once had someone tell me marine biology isn't a real job because whenever they see marine biologists work they seem to be happy
Trueđ
The enormous clawed hands were too subtle
Source ?
The Onion
Will need a more credible source then that. Paper please.
Pufferfish freak me out.
Dawg what the hell
A general reminder to please keep this channel on-topic with paleontology, as well as being kind & respectful to other server members. Please review the pinned message for the channel guidelines, as well as the server #rules.

Is this true
didnt it have the same bite force as a type of fruit bat
Well, relative is the important word here, and when talking about pterosaurs that means prey that weighs more than 10kg
So a child
Ah, so no thal bonebreak update? real shame
No, no, thal will be able to combine with four other thals to create a mega pterazord
pyroraptor will be able to breath fire when it gets added.
I got cooked by an ai dinosaur yt channel 
I wrote a grumpy comment because I didn't even know anyone ran the account and they turned into shkespeare :P
Of all the things that should not be in the same sentence its definitely ai and dinosaur
I dont think they know ai is harmful to the environment so Ill kindly tell them to not use it
they know, they just don't care.
You havenât gotten cooked, the dude probably just used AI for that too
Just say âhad to use AI again skill issueâ gg
BEHOLD
SIN
For the record I wrote "holy misinformation" cus they were comparing T. Rex with a crocodile in a fight
It doesnât even look good
I know, it's truly awful
I wrote an apology and explained what they got wrong
Yes. Thalassodromeus was likely a terrestrial predator
Heres the whole thing đ
Now that I look at it those replies were probably chatgpt too
the response looks ai as well dawg
Lmao, thats the most, "erm, ChatGPT write an insult for this absolute meany that insulted my sick YT video" response I have ever seen
what is the video even about may i ask beyond the croco and rex bit
That was kinda the whole short
wow
Doesnt even say who wins just hypes up the crocodile and ends the video with "who do you think would win"
"I am sure to win because my water speed is superior" ~1t croc facing 10t croc-jawed predator
Take comfort in the knowledge that YT is pulling the plug on the AI generated shorts, their owners are reporting massive drop offs in their analytics
Not to praise YT though, as they're also phasing out the custom subtitles feature in favor of forced AI generated subtitles...
Real
what was the coldest formation that we have from the Mesozoic?
Perhaps the meteor should have missed
FFOOOOOooooOOOOoooOOOOOlll
oh that was SO written by AI đ„
I'll slime them out with you
You should see if they also send you an AI comment
oh wow did he remove the comment?
Dang you searched it up?
Wait, you should write the exact same comment
You a real one i respect you i like you marry me
I already wrote this but I guess I could change it lol
I changed it lmao
And when they delete that one, someone else should write that same comment
The chestâs colors would be in direct line of sight when observing the claws, plus it would be a good signal of dietary health since nutrients would be the cause of the bright blue. Also consider that its hands were more likely used to manipulate branches while feeding. Itâs speculative biology, plus this really has nothing to do with what we were discussing
Like an action movie franchise
Woah
We slowly drive their AI using selves mad with our copy-paste unoriginality.
I thought about daring them to write a reply by themselves lol
Oh my god you changed the comment to be the same thing as me đ
But the key is waiting for each previous comment to be deleted so it doesn't just look like random people copying another user
To me my comment still shows up
I could say the cryptyrannus solos both. (favorite dinosaur â€ïž)
Might be because you wrote it, but if it doesn't appear to other users assumedly the creator has done something whether that be reported it or removed it
Oh I remember this
I just love that thing
Shame how such a cool animal gets overshadowed by other discoveries in the formation 
fr- one of the coolest portrayals in a documentary too
Wait thats a real dinosaur?
I thought he made a fictional species lol đ
Living old paleoart.
i always wondered, how did theri defend itself from tarbo?
It waddled swiftly away
Just because the claws werenât the best doesnât mean they still canât be used
then it waddled away, waddle waddle
so the theri slap is still good?
No
From what Iâve seen, something like a closed handed stab would be more stable for the claws than randomly wailing them around
âïž
A closed handed stab you say? I wonder how that would look exactly..
Well, squeeze your fingers together while they're straightened out and then jab
That seems.. very odd to employ as a defense mechanism.
Well, its either that or the giant (likely not that fast) walking bowling pin has to try and run away from a tyrannosaur
they actually have long claws to draw runes in the ground to more effectively to cast spells/jk
I'm confused as to how a forward jab, which goes against the claw curvature, would be more effective than just raking their presumably sharp claws across something's body (Not necessarily a slap)
They could potentially target more sensitive areas to make something like that more effective as well
It does but the whole animal itself is very odd. If your fingernail swords arenât good at slashing might as well stab.
How does that work when the claws curve inwards?
Youâre not thinking it jabbed like a boxer or robot right?
A study found that the slash & drag method would have put a lot of stress into the bone, and while I donât recall it taking keratin into account it would still likely not be that great for such movement
A âfistâ in a stab-like motion would lessen the stress put on the bone and still be effective for defense, even if theriâs claws arenât the greatest for said defense in the first place
They way you described it made it somewhat confusing to know what you meant exacty
Think of like, a right hook with a wolverine hand where the blades are slightly curved
Yeah I get it now
Sweet
But yeah weird animal, maybe it couldnât even do that and it was just good at only looking scary lol
I highly doubt that would be enough
br nt shkrpr (slow + reverb + quiet)
Getting attacked by something like that wouldnât be fun and could incentivize a predator to try going for something less murder-y looking
Fair, but lots of the prey carnivorous dinosaurs took on were both tough and intimidating
While there's no refuting the stress study, I'd think theres a bit more to it's claws in defense, whether it be the effects of soft tissue/keratin or some other sort of strategy (such as well targeted strikes.) I find it difficult to believe just "fear factor" would suffice.
Tbf, bluffing can be an extraordinarily effective defense.
Little known fact about geese, but they're massive pushovers to anything that actually stands their ground, but that happens so little they get away with harassing and deterring just about anything that isn't dead set on attacking them.
Fair, but who knows how it would play out with something like a tarbosaurus?
Well, a tarbosaurus isn't taller than a theri, so think about it like a giant (seemingly) heavily armed goose approaching you making whatever hellish noise they were likely to have made alongside a threat display.
Save for a starving, desparate tarbo, that might deter a less committed predator
I get goose is just an analog but I just think a goose is pretty mundane to described therizinosaurus
Well, I'd say something like rabid swan, but swans are NOT bluffing and do intend to and are capable of harming whatever it is that's earned their ire
rabid swan? sure
Considering I'm pretty sure the last anything said about giga in this channel was it being downsized, I'd say just by the title alone it is pretty accurate
I can't we still believe that a 300kg+ dip is a downsize
Well, when you look in the search bar that seems to have been how everyone was treating it
yeah because people LOVE to overexaggerate so many thing that aren't worth getting worked up over
I made art of a hypothetical polar spinosaur, and I'm curious, if the same forces that created polar bears were applied to a spinosaur, would it successfully evolve or go extinct?
Oh and like this guy said, don't go crazy over it, just a modest yes or no and an explanation
there will never be a "yes or no" all the time with these either, given GDI or just 3D modeling can always vary between person to person and unless we get more publish material to make more discussions
cool spec evo spinosaur, uh what is it suppose to be really "where is it from", "which subfamily is it in", "what is it doing in the polar"
unless there were seals (one of the most calorie dense animals you could find) it would probably go extinct
Oh no I'm not modding or model, I just made art and wonder what if it was real
I know? I was just saying in general not for you only lol
I'm still imagining it lol, got the idea from another server. And @native kindle-oh ok
well again where is it suppose to be in
Maybe some very northern yet mid sized spino, like Baryonyx or Ichtyovenator
Maybe have it evolved so its size will be on par with carno or maip.
Again I'm still imagining this guy lol
so which one is it gonan be a Baryonychinae or a spinosaurinae?
Whoa slow down man, I'll choose, I'm only thinking this up just cause I can hehe
if you're trying to make it work in the current day artics it'd just die. for the mesozoic poles, depending on the time period those are just normal environments
there is a way for it to survive.
Just a thought I'd like to do, plus places like Alaska and Southern Australia were cold in the cretaceous
cold, not complete sheets of ice spanning an entire continent with the only large prey being walrus. pretty major difference
the only way it can survive is by turning into the scrapped giant spinosaurus from jw:rebirth and eat whales for breakfest lunch and dessert
Brilliant!
it wouldn't really be a "polar bear" in that case then it'd just be a cold climate oceanic predator, which is certainly awesome
i still cant believe they considered a kaiju spinosaurus for the film
You have a point, my version would be like a penguin, occasionally entering the sea to snatch anything it wanted to eat. It would also occasionally hunt prey on land as it's a bit more bulkier than spinos before it.
how big exactly would it be?
Maybe it should be a Baryonyx, it's the more northern spinosaur I know, plus I don't want it too have a to ridged back
"like a penguin" and "occasionally hunts prey on land" is an oxymoronic statement
Similar to carno or maip
so 2 tonnes
is that the largest terrestrial animal in the artic or is the musk ox bigger?
musk ox are tiny
Ok, Kui and Rose makes some good points, forget the swimming portion. It's still semi aquatic, but it uses the hippo method, walking on the bottom of seas and large bodies of water, searching for crustaceans, mollusk, corpses of long dead marine animals, and any poor fish that notice it too late, come winter, it hunts purely on land as the water is too cold and getting it's feathers too soaked will increase the risk of hypothermia.
really? i always viewed as like, well, bison size
they weigh 200-400 kg
which is a fairly impressive weight when you remember they are not bovines at all, but goats
so how old is this spinosaur, like Cenomanian or older
THEIR GOATS?
likely their large size mainly come from how the camera is shot in alot of those videos making them appear larger than actually
I love misnomers like that
Whoever figured that out probably was like 
goat wanted to be cow
why am i watching a man in a polar bear outfit scare them
Younger, maastrichtian, like 70 or less
Footage by Sergey Abarok
NEW YORK (June 1, 2016) The Wrangel Island Federal Reserve, a remote island some 300 miles north of the Arctic Circle in Russia, was recently the site of an expedition to understand the impacts of climate change and polar bear predation on muskoxenâa Pleistocene relic that survived the woolly mammoths ...
Poor ox
so you should def reference animals like Ichthyovenator, Spinosaurus, Irritator, and prob Camarillasaurus
I'ma turn in for today, night guys! Nice talking about something that never existed. XD
ts cant be fr. I swear they dwarved wolves. In here it just looks like a single wolf can maul one apart with ease đ
they look so stubby too, why must they ruin animals like this
who's they? ToT
Big paleo who are coming for the musk ox
musk ox
okay but knowing they lived with mammoths makes them so much cooler
Also makes the mammoth look like a kaiju because muskox inherently look big
Yeah, I thought they were bison sized
I think the musk oxes are upsized in this too
mammoths hang out with musk oxs so they can flex their size and appear much bigger
unless the girl in ts is like 2 meters tall
anyone wanna do a visual of a mammoth and musk oxs size difference?
considering the girl's size, she would almost hit the base of the tusks, which is insane
She does look kinda tall ngl
either that girl is huge or muskox are tiny, and I am convinced she is a giant trying to fool us all
She seems pretty tall
Related to mountain goats by any chance?
mountain goats are antelopes iirc
Yeah I'm wondering if they are something similar and not true goats
Anteoples aren't goats but they are bovid
so musk ox's arent boviod but are goats
but mountain goats arent goats but are bovids?
my life is like , a lie..
They are both on the same subfamily that includes goats according to Wikipedia
I'm a marine biologist who only learned that bottle nose whales exist today, so I know how you feel
why does it look like that đ
they look like a dolphin and a sperm whale's newborn child
their a type of beaked whale right?
Caprine animals are bovids technically
Yes
im getting confused
Bovidae includes goats
And I would have been blessed with the knowledge of their existence a lot sooner if my university spent more time on megafauna and less time on MICROSCOPIC NOBODIES
hey, hop off of water bears
we discovered a new microorganism, nanomegasuperhyperdangerousdonotunfreezedisease kawaii frozen under a thick sheet of ice, and we are hoping we can melt the ice and ressucitate it!
Includes antelope btw too
No, I have been subject to three and a half miserable years of marine microbiology because my university employs a grand total of two vertebrate biologists and one macro invertebrate biologist
all hooved animals are related technically
True..
mountain goats and musk oxen are both caprines, caprinae is the subfamily that includes goats
oh alright, thank you
the idea that it isnât a goat probably comes from it not being a âtrue goatâ which is anything in the genus Capra
but as far as Iâm concerned the whole subfamily are goats because itâs easier that way
You've heard of the no true scotsman fallacy, now get ready for the no true musk ox fallacy
edmontosaurus, hadrosaurs
yes, hadrosaurs and horse are related. Everyone knows that
Through the mighty Tiktaalik, we vertebrates all are united
Throught the power of the ancient TikTaalik ways, I shall ascend to sauropodomorpha.đȘ
imagine naming an animal after sperm in your language
Cool new paper comparing the teeth of Ceratosaurus to machairodont cats https://www.researchgate.net/publication/400054043_A_MORRISON_SABER-TOOTH_-COMPARISON_OF_CERATOSAURUS_DENTITION_TO_OTHER_THEROPODS_AND_MACHAIRODONTINAE_AND_ITS_IMPLICATIONS_FOR_CERATOSAURUS_PREDATORY_ECOLOGY
pretty epic
fhgfhghfghfughihghwHGWihfwhfHWhbh
tbh, this would be epic if it existed
lol
@hallow spear your time has come
New giant stegosaurus specimen apparently
how big is it?
Says in the paper
this is a different specimen than the big tibia too, right?
so 7 tons? wasnt apex 8 tons?
not sure how it got that huge, but its more around ~5t or less tmk
Ay bro yâall remember that one scene in chaos theory where the atrociraptor gives an assist to his boy
So back to the Large Rajasaurus.
while its true lametasaurus has a wide tibia (35.5cm circumference vs 36.7cm in pycnonemosaurus) this is somewhat contextualized by the fact it is a) only 15% wider in distal width than the 6-7m rajasaurus holotype, and b) being 30cm shorter in total length than pycnonemosaurus's tibia
Not really, at the shaft both Lametasaurus and Pycnonemosaurus have a width of 10 cm
they're similar yeah but that seems to be moreso because rajasaurus has a proportionally wide tibia
ie as a more concrete example rajasaurus' holotype has a 193mm tibia distal width vs 183 in ekrixinatosaurus despite the latter having larger vertebrae
Amphicoelias my beloved đ„Čđ©
Yes but Lametasaurus tibia has a minimum circumference of 35.5 cm, which would mean the tibia would be hecka stocky.
9200 kg lametasaurus, amazing
Ah yes, the Pacu fish ate what humans eat cause their teeth are similar (even tho everything else is different)
BOTTLENOSE BEAKED WHALE MENTIONNED
What do you mean you don't love to learn everything there is to know about biofilms, phytoplankton, holobiontes and larvae?
It isnât stegosaurus but itâs pretty big. It does seem to have a proportionally big humerus relative to the lower leg
Could it be that Megalanias actually didn't predate their offspring like Komodos do ?
I mean, once you've learned about it once, you've learned about it a thousand times
Ik there is a funny story behinf butt but I forgot
every class hammering phylogeny into my skull:
How big were real Didelphodons ?
what
I couldn't really find trustworthy sources about the size of Didelphodon Vorax, like the actual animal not the game one
Like the size of the largest house cats, but shorter legged
(Why is the cat breed name censored?)
Dayum, that big ? Thanks
Yet it is like the biggest part of researches in marine bio
Up to 6kg to be precise
What if it was Stegosaurus but cooler?
Like there's Stegosaurus and then there's " Cool Stegosaurus "
okay, GSP
I would not be surprised in D. vorax could be heavier than even slightly more recent estimates, semi-aquatic mammals are quite dense
Sure it is, and I appreciate how vital they are to marine ecosystems.
But that doesn't make me care about them anymore than I do. Charismatic megafauna are cool actually, and no amount of, "oh, but the world of plankton is like a whole 'nother universe đ„č đ„č " is going to get me to change my mind.
Pacu don't have canines or incisors and humans use their molars to crush seeds so there is convergence there. Don't really see your reasoning, are you saying teeth aren't useful for comparative anatomy?
Hell, what if there is another Stegosaurus, and it's like " Radical Stegosaurus " ?
I'm sure if you looked close enough you could see evidence that no one else found to support this idea
Hell, what if there is a Stegosaurus who's just called " Larry " ?
Perhaps a few micron wide scrapes in the rock shall completely upend all the established science and you'll be hailed as a hero
I mean that only morphological wise are comparable, but the functionality is completely different on both cases
Sabertooth canines were kinda fragile while Ceratosaurus' teeth weren't
what would you think if someone in this chat found a new species of Stegosaurus and convinced any of the researchers in charge of describing it to name the species in your honor?
they would have to make one hella of a convince if they're letting someone get the honor to new the species instead of the person/people actually describing it
in this hypothetical, the person has super-powers where their super-power is that they can make a really REALLY convincing argument.
@outer tusk You know what is disappointing?
You didn't draw " Larry, the Stegosaurus "
Pacu mainly eat fruits, seeds and nuts, notorious for being major parts of the hominid diet
And sabertooth teeth are as resistant as theropod teeth, if not more so. Theropods simply replace their teeth when they break
Beat me to it
Hm, I swore sabertooth sabers were once said to be extremely fragile, therefore only used for final blows when prey was pinned
My b I guess
They were somewhat prone to breakage but I don't see what bearing that has on the discussion
They're relatively weak to side to side forces because of how long and thin they are, but the same applies to theropod teeth, the only difference is if a sabertooth breaks its teeth it dies
Ceratosaurus also has particularly compressed teeth as well
Did you know that there are Three Ceratosauruses?
Mammals sure do love going the "oh all my teeth are worn down, guess I'll starve" route
They are called, " Sausage ", " Pepperoni " and " Hot Dog ".
Cause if they weren't as resistant as, making such comparison is kinda pointless imo
Cause like, you'll be comparing something on a niche based on the looks alone and not the whole pack
But if sabertooth sabers had a similar endurance and stats, then it's my b
It's apples and oranges when factor in that theropods continuously replaced teeth
Yes but remember what I said before, I was under the assumption that sabers were way more fragile (and more niche scenario) than theropod teeth
That's why lol
Now it's only Pepperoni and Hot Dog.
Got it, no problem, it's an interesting paper i recommend reading it. I think a stronger difference is forelimb utilization, machairodonts were pinning and grappling stuff whereas ceratosaurus probably wasnt using its hands for much of anything
And I read it, it's why I was confused about the usage in the comparison graphics of the sabers lol
But hey, mistakes were made (I mean myself)
hey Venator, what if we found a Jurassic Dromaeosauridae, and named it " Jurassicoraptor " ?
that would be the stupidest name yet for a dinosaur am gonna honest
That spot is already taken, I believe.
Hey Venator, what if we found teeth of unknown affinities from the Middle Jurassic and decided to name that " Mesozoicodon " ?
Hey Venator, what if a North American paleontologist found another medium-sized Theropod and named it " Thanathovenator " ?
Hey guys, what do y'all think of this green dinosaur? It's paleontology-related because it's a Dinosaur and then someone will follow with a question like " Could Dinosaurs be green in the Mesozoic? "
https://fxtwitter.com/hatrichan/status/2014680584854110546?s=20
How about my green T. Rex lol
I think the best names for dinosaurs are either the carcharodontosaurids like
Meraxis gigas or tyrannotitan
Or a raptor called archeroraptor (Acheron plunderer)
" What IF it was purple! "
Wait you gave an idea
Also if we doing palaeontology then donât forget Bangiomorpha pubescens
The answer to protoceratops vs velociraptor
Shifting sand dune stomps
Would you like to see any other battles?
its probably closewd to dacentrurus
Would you ever scale it to Dacent though?
10 argentinosaurus vs 1 compsognathus
wdym
the femur
it doesnt preserve a femur, so no & the estimated femur length is basedo n Hesperosaurus & Stegosaurus + some indet specimens
does alcovasaurus have a femur?
What game is this again? I swear I used to have it
I can't tell
Why not?
I wont be special
Dm me it then
yes, it doesnt preserve any overlap with the 1095 specimen tho
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DT8C9fuiYv7/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==
Peak Rex moement
World Premiere of the skull of Valerie!
Meet Valerie, a Late Cretaceous sub-adult Tyrannosaurus from South Dakota, laden with pathologies. Twas found by Anthony Maltese of Triebold Paleontology in 2022, thus the specimen number 22-014. The name Valerie honors Anthonyâs wife.
I love how this cast shows off the original elements. Too often one...
142
Spiky noodles are peak
so its a new stegosaurid that rivals dace in size?
How is it not stegosaurus
Isnât consistent with stegosaurus morphology, plus itâs never been reffered to stegosaurus prior to this study
is that apato or bronto btw?
Something like that yeah
ARBS
Why is he acting like only he knows it i used to see videos of that game all the time in 2024
i come to you boys to find out , were a lot of theropod tails strictly balance purpose or could have and did they use their tails for defending themselves.
I think having a huge mouth full of teeth and with the power of an hydraulic press would resolve most of their problems
Unless its for like shooing away much smaller animals, yeah exposing your relatively weaker backside to another large animal isn't a good idea. The base of the tail is also where big leg muscles are, so if that gets bitten its in a very very bad position.
I do wonder if any smaller theropods used their tail as a defensive mechanism similar to a whip, kinda like how monitor lizards and iguanas do it
just wondering
like torvosaurus wouldnt of used its tail at all to give something a good smack?
like check the tail on this guy
that's pretty average for a theropod tail give they need it for counter balance
To put things into perspective, a theropod probably wouldnât choose to use its tail over its mouth and claws but it probably could use its tail to give a good smack if something crept up on it.
exactly my thoughts , anything coming up behind it
Feel like it'd usually just be an unintentional little smack while its turning around to face the thingie that snuck up on it.
possible or could be a very swift , strong smack while turning as well , who knows.
Theropod tails tend to be rather important. The base especially contains a lot of muscles that power the legs. Not exactly something they want to risk getting bitten.
Wtf no way it was that big
mines bigger
This one is missing some leg cartilage so it would be 10cm taller give or take
WHAT
well not if hes missing his legs duh ?
Whats scarier is that T. Rex is somehow like 10x larger than this
10x larger ? no but def really robust.
the legendary 40-50 ton t.rex
Ohhh Bertha!
itâs ten times larger but just in height
when you mess up in spore creature editor
Giga taller
Whatever helps u sleep at night Timothy jr
Does anybody have more details on what we think the neck of the Amargasaurus looks like now?
Pretty sure amargasaurus had sails
Hell yeah
Dude what is this even supposed to mean?
Smooth skin
Omg you just gave me the best idea ever kratos T. Rex I have to draw that asap
What if it was really skinny membrane sails like basilisk-lizards
Yeah that seems about right, plus the spikes lacked keratin, and were not that thick
I've heard some sources claim it was even more hump-like?
Yayyy

Seems about right
see the similarities?
Its a Thick Neck
Yo tf that's just a tiny amargasaurus
It has sails, and they were thick structures. The spines existed to support the ligaments that control the neck.
Similar to Dacreo
How about with spinosaurus? Mark Witton draws spinosaurus with a membrane sail and tail its weird, i really like his art tho
Here a Good Representation of Amarga
Spino is Spino
Idk why people portray amargasaurus with those tiny spikes as weapons, its like if dimtrodon just had a ton of pianokey sized spikes it used to play music as a attack
@polar rain Hello! Let's please be respectful of others when participating in this Discord, as per our #rules.
Someone give Giga long legs
Actually Nvm, I don't want Giga with Meraxes Proportions...
This ALWAYS happens to me 
I want to read the drama as much as I want to talk about the funny giant lizards
yall ever be studying paleontology and well... heh, you know the rest
Djde I didnt even say anyrhing disrespectful đđ
a beautiful animal.
Fine Ill be nicer about my really rude friend 
So in other words, I have a friend who has really biased opinions about spinosaurus, for example, he hates spinosaurid lips, a sail shaped like a semi-oval instead of an M, etc. And I was wondering if there's anything wrong with drawing spinosaurus with membrane-like sails because mark witton does it
Uhhh is that nice enough
improved it
No way is that he-man 
Thanks for this!
How much yall wanna bet I can make a more accurate amargasaurusđ€
I hate the movieification of the velociraptor itâs genuinely so annoying when I talk about a velociraptor and people are like oh you mean the 6 foot scaly reptile.
Lwk just start saying velociraptor mongoliensis and raptor
30 years in the public conscious will do that
Yea the movie version of the velociraptor is closer to a utahraptor. But the scaly reptile part would still be hilariously incorrect
Isn't it more like, in between a Utahraptor and Deinonychus? I think Utahraptor is actually larger.
Yea true
What I hate even more is how much Jurassic Park ruined how absolutely terrifying the Dilophosaurus actually was in the Jurassic period
Utahraptor is larger than a freakin polar bear dude
Jurassic Park the movie did that
But yeah, unfortunately the real velociraptor has never really had much interest among people, even in the past
I mean
Better than Giving it Meraxes Leg proportions
Yes but the book still had the venom spitting part
Ok, lets also not pretend creative liberty is a bad thing. It was a horror book, liberties were going to be taken.
To be fair (most) of the dinosaurs in that franchise canonically deviate from their real life variants genetically
Doesnt matter book dilophosaurus was still terrifying af they made it accurate to irl dilophosaurus regardless of venom or not
I mean
Taller yes, but its not as Heavy
Prob about the weight as an Average Polar Bear tho
True ig but the Dilophosaurus was already terrifying in the Jurassic period as is there really was no reason to change it.
This was the excuse until Dominion said their absolutely absurd looking dinosaurs were genetically pure
Jurassic World beat it over our head with a several minute long dialogue between Wu and Masrani, but people still both expect Jurassic franchise designs to keep up with the current science or go into the films thinking the dinosaurs are accurate
Yeah, and I personally enjoyed that part of the movie a lot
It wasn't an excuse, it was a plot point from the very beginning. Dominion screwed up a whole lot, including that
Fair, excuse is a strong word
I love the Jurassic movies but they really are inaccurate but the one positive is that they showed that spinosaurus could swim a couple years before that was scientifically accepted
It's honestly really insane watching the franchise fall off with the last two. They completely just disregarded even half-decent writing.
It isn't really a but anything.
The jurassic movies can be loved even as they're innacurate. Their scientific inaccuracy takes away absolutely nothing from their merit as films
The crappy writing is what does that
I don't understand how these people have no ideas about how to make an interesting dinosaur flick
i would've loved the scrapped kaiju spinosaurus that was sadly cute from jurassic world rebirth
Wouldn't have made the film any better though by itself
Me personally, I really like Tyrannosaurus, and I also like the Tyrannosaurus design in JP regardless of accuracy.
As far as JP goes, accuracy literally doesn't matter (to an extent of course)
Im pretty sure utahraptor wasnt that small
are you sure thats the correct size?
I agree Iâm just pointing out how inaccurate they are considering as a kid I thought it was the most realistic stuff ever lol. Also I would say the crappy writing started with fallen kingdom
Personally I'm glad they switched it to mosa. JWR mosa is peak.
The problem with spino is that JP spino fans are a cancer and giving them this would not do anyone any good.
No, I know its taller than a polar bear tho
Utah isn't THAT long
Its about 5.2m Along the Centra
Also what I shared thats Scaled to the Largest Utah
The mosasaur was probably my favorite thing visually and audially, regardless of the overall film
Oh yeah, that whole part of the film was pretty good. It was when they got on the actual island that the movie started to fall apart
Here a Drawing of the Skeletal I showed(which is just Hartmans Utah)
With the Updated Museum Skull
Oh ok, i remember finding a photo of a guy next to a life-size utahraptor skull and it appeared absolutely huge, I thinkit was just perspective
Utah IS Taller than a Polar Bear
But Utah is like 450-500kgs with its Largest Specimen
Which is about that of an Average Polar Bear
I love the soft tissue and arm posture on this
Funny story time when I was younger I had amber that I got from a museum. One night when I was like 5 or so I decided to smash the amber to ârevive the dinosaursâ I proceeded to wake up the following morning when my mom was yelling at me for destroying her table. My method of recreating the Dinoâs was I kid you not smashing amber to bits with a rock on an antique table.
@tough parcel the Goat made this
Having the same weight as a polar bear is still scary af tbh
thoughts on it being shoni instead?
The lack of excessive modern bird bias is what makes it great I think
i do wish we got to see other marine reptiles instead of just mosa in jurassic world films
no...
True
This species would probably better explain why it didn't just kill everyone though
I to this day am still distraught by the fact that I destroyed such good quality amberđ
#justiceforshoni
I saw the drawing on twitter before you showed it and really liked it I didnt expect the guy to actually be in this server đ
It just doesn't work in an antagonistic role ngl
true, i feel like you'd be seeing it more in a graceful and docile way like a whale
At the same time though it would explain why the thing was less enthusiastic to just eat everyone on the boat instead of swimming off (The movie tried to explain it as intimidation instead of pure predation)
Actually, just give the shoni brain worms, problem solved
Why is this guy followed by so many other paleoartists I follow đ
RJ PALMER TOO?!!
how many original dinosaurs even appeared in jwr?
i can think of the 2 hybrids, aquilops and titanosaur
I'd call the spino and mosa half original, as they're complete design revamps given a different role than previous films
Not a dinosaur but anurognathus and some kind of amphibian appeared
did anurognathus do anything or was it kinda just a cameo? or a background dinosaur like cory
Cameo
Background, same with the amphibian
It was on screen for like 10 seconds
they designed it like this with ill intent.
Hey look its that damned lizard that steals 600 dollars from me monthly
The amphibian in that one scene by itself was nice because it made it seem like it was almost a separate film
Save 15% or more on car insurance my ass
what could this possiblely have been
Awsomebroamphibius
Level 40 Ichthyostega from JW: The Game