#paleontology
1 messages Ā· Page 220 of 1
(by the way it is fancy seeing you here Stego, are you out of PE?)
pardon?
From what I see in the show they are always in a very odd, modern bird pose
I've seen far worse rexes in media, but the wwd 2025 one seems off. The arms are anchored on the side of the body when they should be closer to the inside of the chest with the belly bulging out behind them. Both the belly and legs look too thin from the front. There seems to be a weird overhand with the lips and i assume they just overclosed the jaws? (also no way in heck that rex weighs only 8 tons)
bey guys do you think some hadrosaurus did this https://youtube.com/shorts/sPKhREIxa94?si=r7KXF0HhlaSgDKag
Pls be mindful this is the only time i could this so it the only video i found
#shorts #trendingshorts #viral
GAMESTOP | https://shopstyle.it/l/bYxCG
AMAZON FAVES | www.amazon.com/shop/superhive
MERCH | https://super-hive.creator-spring.com/
TWITTER | https://twitter.com/SuperHiveDC?s=09
INSTAGRAM | https://www.instagram.com/brooks_hive
AUTUMN SNYDER AFSP FUND | https://afsp.donordrive.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=donorD...
Kinda of the purpose, I believe.
Even in that image they seem have an odd bias to folding back and upwards, which seems very unlike a non avian dinosaur
It's questionable that they would look like that as animals that couldn't fly and had the potential to actually use their arms
seems pretty fine to me unless otherwise stated
Yeah I'm not sure if there's any confirmation on its positioning in life, but it just seems odd, especially compared to other dinosaurs.
well the thing is dromaeosaurs are much closer to avians then other non-avians dinosaurs well actually because they are paraves so it's fine
Still wouldn't dictate that their arm positioning would be nearly identical, but I get why people reconstruct it like that.
so in Pennaraptora, which is before Paraves, which Paraves itself includes Dromaeosauridae... Pennaraptora includes Oviraptorosauria, and Oviraptorosauria has many taxa who have either independently evolved, or commonly share by default, conjunctive tissue anatomy already, maybe almost, identical to the same anatomy that allows Birds to flap their wings, which tends to be associated with the capabilities of flight and the same posture of the arms being discussed. To say the least, if they have it, it's not unwise to suggest that Dromaeosaurids also have it. Although, I don't know if there's anything about them in literature
Who gonna tell them š
No buddy , it canāt.
Lol T. rex for Tyrannosaurus rex makes sense š
I did not originate in pe no!
The lip thing will be explained someday.. hopefully this year. As for the arms, yeah I guess; havenāt seen many rex designs get the arm thing right.
I thought it was explained in what... 2024? What do you mean it's going to be explained again?
Liplodon
there's apparently a new "paper" coming about the specfics on the lips used for theropods like the tyrannosaurs in WWD 2025 which am gonna be an ass about, I don't think it's gonna be special at all
truly necessary.
Perucetus doesnāt waste its opinion with those below it. Meh.
The Perucetus does not concern itself with endless dinosaur discussions.
Yeah the lip thing had something to do with the blood vessels on the skull resembling turtles more than squamates or crocodiles?? Lemme find the blog post about it.
Meilyn Quarry Cf. Hesperosaurus mjosi
oh no, not Cau again.
I get that musculature would be really similar, but it seems counterintuitive to develop large claws on your hands if they aren't in the proper position to do anything but flap. (I'm not arguing against the science, I'm just suggesting that there might be more to uncover in this regard)
This animal however, is truly eye candy to the naked eye. A beautiful animal in every sense of the imagination. https://preview.redd.it/the-ancient-colossal-pervuvian-whale-perucetus-colossus-art-v0-81gtooer7rgb1.jpg?auto=webp&s=ce91ca798ca4dcdaed96a5d3f06591919414c536
Even in size reduction , we marvel at this beautiful creation life has brought to us.
oh! whens the beautiful creature gonna appear?
It's so funny that with every single colossal monster we found out there living in worlds where the extreme were normal... And still the blue whale is constantly the biggest. I can't even understand how, how did nothing get beyond that size?!
Because it's simply not practical
if you assume that by having that kinda of arm posture, it means that you cannot use your claws. You're probably mistaken, as Ostriches do in-fact use the claws on their wings. But assuming you are referring to actions such as holding, and by extension, piercing their claws on prey items, although the flexibility of a Dromaeosaur has been tested before ( Deinonychus ), that was only so in the realms of potential, and not so much exploring if such flexibility could be used in practice or in consideration to how the conjunctive tissues of the arms would be reconstructed. That kinda has been discussed before in this channel
Hereās the blog, it is by Cau.
https://theropoda.blogspot.com/2023/07/all-hail-to-terrifying-face-of-turtle.html?m=1
translate the page with the widget.
Well there is the fragmentary ichthyosaur , so I wouldnāt be certain for sure nothing reached that size.
Remember lack of material doesnāt mean it didnāt happen.
In terms of overall mass it most likely would have been much lighter regardless
remember that tyrannosaurus, the blue whale and argentinasaurus run a secret hitman buisness to make sure nothing surpasses them in size in their respective catagories
Well the Indian titan sauropod is very likely bigger than argentinosaurus. And there is a lot of fragmentary carcharodontosaurids that can be in that size range.
Size estimates are like hot potatoes always changing in paleontology, I donāt hold anything with certainty.
For the blue what you might be right , you might not be.
Sometimes I wonder what Cau is having before he writes a blogpost
Blue whale is just ridiculous massive anyways , at peak weight. Really doesnāt make sense for most things to even get that big.
It's only sustainable in very particular circumstances, and it's definitely showing today as they are struggling to find enough food.
No, its actually an eldritch cult. Theres a reason why paleontologists go mad so often, the bones of their rivals throughout all space and time are cursed from birth to be small and frail, and interacting with these accursed remains causes the GSPs and David Peters of the world
Gotta imagine how much human intervention has to do with that tho. We are parasites to the planet.
It's mainly us, yeah (if not completely.)
I can't imagine how fortunate we are to be alive with the largest animal in recorded history
Fortunate for us but the most unfortunate thing for them
For sure
Tyrannosaurus at this point has a secret propaganda department somewhere
I doubt the study will say anything about lips overhanging. I would assume there would be quite a lot of room for variation in results as with most things paleo.
Why?
dead chat.
I know there is one, I just can't prove it.
that indian titanosaur has no remains and we donāt know what its even related to, it isnāt āvery likelyā bigger we can say basically nothing about it beyond āitās really bigā
Yes, but at the same time tho, people call aptosaurus ābrontosaurusā still
where/what is the best place(s) to read all the latest paleo news?
(No, it is not very likely, its more likely smaller)
Whatever helps you sleep at night jr
Why would an animal that is less robust than Argent be heavier
Physiologically that wouldn't work by any standard, especially not at the breaking point of biological limits
like, bone robustness or body robustness?
The kid is just chatting stuff the material is quite phenomenal. Or what once was.
"Bruh" has leg bones notably thinner than is seen in Argentino
Even if its longer, it couldn't support as much weight, and therefore wouldn't be ABLE to be bigger
that kinda of doesn't mean anything?
the raging in raging triceratops stands for rage bait
Heās an emotional one. I wouldnāt get too invested.
How does the bone being not able to support as much weight not mean anything when the only material of the animal is said leg bone
and before you say, even in Mammals, bone robustness does not exactly correlate to weight. Or else, Palaeoloxodon antiquus would be heavier than Palaeoloxodon namadicus in weight, because guess who has more robust bones?
the bone doesnāt even exist anymore you quite literally canāt say anything about it
You quiet can , I mean big paleontology does a lot of videos about the animal.
You're not going to believe this but the largest Antiquus specimens are likely larger than the largest Namadicus specimens
yeah, I believe that. But that is talking about it being larger, and not heavier lol.
I'm talking about it being heavier.
in biology larger basically always refers to mass not dimensions
And Proboscideans aren't nearly as extreme. An 80 ton animal is pushing the limits of physiology. Argent's bones would already be under extreme constraints. A sauropod larger than it could not physically have less robust leg bones
Paleosaniwa vs a just born T rex, who do u think would win ?
a lot of those really big estimates for it also restore it as something looking like argentinosaurus, the sauropods living in india at the time would have looked different
What lmao
Only graphic I have on hand at the moment but theres more I can dig up if you want
Bone width, in every family, is more reliably than bone length. For almost every single bone.
Send me the paper my good pal.
Its not a paper because theres no proper material to right a paper on.
Write * also Tameryraptor got a paper quite literally.
genuine question, this was set by who exactly? and when? Because I learned that bigger refers to mass, and not larger. So I would at least like to know who and when this has been a thing.
Tameryraptor had well documented material
bigger and larger meaning different things is not a thing, saying an animal is bigger or larger will both generally refer to mass
Okay, but it was set by who and when?
So thereās no paper this information is basically I should take your word for it pal?
Better than anything GSP has to say
Greg Gilmorelarsontyrannus Paul
itās just how itās done in science to keep a consistent measure, nobody necessarily set it thatās just how it is lol
I think Iāll refer to guys like Darius Nau over someone on discord pal.
I don't care who said it, I just wanna know if there is a actual source to that. Or else I'll simply take it as " You can do it as subjectively as you want ".
ā ļø as if Darius Nau doesn't have a discord
What do I know, I'm just a Paleobiology student frequently doing fieldwork and organizing large scale papers
argentinosaurus is a lognkosaur, a predominantly south american clade, india has other titanosaur groups but no lognkosaurs so restoring it like argentinosaurus doesnāt make much sense
Everyone has a discord Tim.
But can you tell who did it first and set that standard?
So why the "over someone on discord"
weird question but do you guys believe Xiphactinus would go after humans or would we too big of a target?
Because it fits his agenda to pretend I'm not an educated member of the field
Talenkauen is the best elasmarian, no debate
Iām saying Iām not taking a take my word for it as a proven source on discord. No papers on it just trust me big bro.
i dont know if i'd feel safe swimming with this thing
how is there supposed to be a paper for fossils that dissolved in a monsoon and have nothing but bad quality pictures š
@queen oar what you think is that fair ? š¤Ø
- Quoting a paper by one of the most infamously bad paleontologists out there who repeatedly commits taxonomic vandalism on the basis of wanting to name things first and garner as much attention as possible
Gregory S Paul is actively a detriment to the field.
Majority of discussions regarding anything Paleo might not even be discuss in papers but can still be useful regardless if they are noted in a paper or not
Here 
No its not. Run. Run far away. This channel will be your tomb.
Xiphactinus are known to have killed themselves eating things too big for them. They absolutely would try to eat us probably.
no I canāt, but talk to any biologist or paleontologist and theyāll agree that itās the standard way of doing things
Proof, Xiphactinus were the first gamblers
The common fish folly of, "if too big, why mouth sized?"
Iām willing to bet at least one would succeed too
i'd feel safer swimming with meg then i would ever feel swimming with xip or tylo
Itās pretty undignified but I digress , Iām going to get my daily raspberry lemonade Iced tea. Enjoy the day fellas the day is young.
That sounds ass
Not my fault you drink faucet water, have a good day.
Oh, so is there any Biologist or Paleontologist here who I can consult here, and that can give me the source of that? Because otherwise, what is the point of your correction, if you can't even cite a source to what you claim to be something so consistent in biology, that apparently it doesn't even have any origins in scientific literature?
I mean, if it was to fail at basic scicomm, then congratulations.
All we have of "Bruh" is a fragment of a leg bone
- This is an incomplete bone
- This bone is thinner than the same bone on Argentinosaurus
The only way it gets larger is if
- a) This bone that is thinner is somehow adapted to support more weight than the bone of the largest sauropod known from the heaviest built Titanosaur family out there, which thrived from a different continent entirely
- b) The bone is reconstructed as longer than the same bone in Argentinosaurus, which would also likely correlate with the animal being notably more cursorial
if you want a scientist so bad youāre looking at one, Iām a wildlife biologist and thatās how I do things and itās how every wildlife biologist I know does things
Okay then, can you tell me a source? Where the term " Large " and any variations is used purely to refer to weight? Like can you do that?
Honestly how it became standard to measure size by weight is an interesting question
perhaps it depends on context and we can use context clues to read the room
Because, i'm totally willing to apologize to any way that i'm being rude to you, because I'd admit, i'm being an a**. But, you can't simply correct someone, and then just slap them with a " Trust me, bro "
I can tell you why itās done not necessarily how it originated, we do it that way to keep measurements consistent. standardizing larger or bigger to one measurement means that you donāt have to get confused over the possibility of not every measurement exceeding a different animal
Nothing rude with asking for credible sources šš½
what does raspberry lemonade iced tea even taste like?
Its important to remember that papers aren't always credible sources, and the credibility of the source is determined on the origin and the people involved with it
A explosion of feelings
āļø
Raspberries 
Raspberries have many health benefits I might add.
so like if I have 5 species of snake trapped and some are definitely longer than others but not heavier, saying which is the biggest might get complicated unless we standardize it to just mass (and mass is what we always use)
So, you are saying that is simply collective consensus?
there almost definitely is something out there actually cementing it too but itās definitely a collective consensus
So cool.
what even caused this
Bruhathkayosaurus, apparently.
Is this the larger shouldn't just refer to mass arguement?
Shout-out to Borealopelta's holotype breaking and falling
Not-Ceratosaurus
Yadagiri, P. and Ayyasami, K. (1987) A Carnosaurian Dinosaur from the Kallamedu Formation (Maestrichtian Horizon), Tamil Nadu. Geological Survey of India Special Publications, 1, 523-528.
not my goat
Can I do a suggestion?
A interesting animal, the big beautiful sauropod from India. Currently getting my raspberry tea tho.
please
I'll get a rough skeletal for it together soon based off of proportions and Indian titanosaurs
Genyodectes, just the skull. Let people suffer with the rest of the skeleton
Send me the photo again of it next to argentinosaurus however.
make it a scaled up isisaurus it would be really funny
Another animal I find quite more interesting than Argentinosaurus.
zamtrios
Oh come on mods, that was funny!
but it is just a few teeth
that's why it's funny.
Me doing the thumbs down emote even though I didnāt see it
I was (rightfully) poking fun at the absurdity of this current arguement
Iām also not caught up on that either LOL
No straight up, most of the options are similar
Missed Isisaurus one second
Rapetosaurus ?
@outer tusk Would you turn into a Gorgosaurus and be subjected to T.M. Opera O's song?
Welcome to the forms of Titanosaurs other than Argentinosaurus
Argent has short proportional legs, as opposed to both known Titanosaurs from India and Bruhathkayosaurus, which has cursorial adapted legbones
Is that my beloved Atlasaurus?
Isisaurus but similar! Although unrelated somehow.
actually Wes I think you do have atlasaurus there lol
yeah, it's Atlasaurus
Yeah my bad lmfao
All these leggy sauropods blend together. Here we go.
I actually like this, definitely unique.
itās cursed that the two can even be confused with each other at all let alone so easily
@warped peak you should be funny and do Bruh as like a undefined Macronarian.
I'm just saying, it would be funny
If it was possible it'd be funny. But the fact that Bruhath has more in common not just anatomically but geographically with Isisaurus type animals is hilarious
a big example of the short necked saltasaur group would be interesting
Would also explain a lot about it honestly.
Size being used as a coding feature for phylogeny and comparing relatives is dangerous as a precedent and stupid. And has repeatedly yielded stupid results for every animal it has been used for
I mean, yeah. But Bruh is kinda like those " Potential Dinosaurs "
" Give me mass estimates, "
" Give me size estimates, "
" Or I turn into dust! "
So it's not surprising that most people tend to emphasize only on it's dimensions and mass.
Paul and Larramendi are exceptionally bad for this in the field too
Larramendi also did this with lost bones with unverified measurements to get giant Palaeoloxodon
would you guys say nano was the most significant finding of 2025?
yah.
I think its mostly just that people want there to be a larger animal than the current largest, regardless of the science.
People want the giant ichthyosaurs to be larger than the blue whale, they want giga to be larger than rex, and bruhtha larger than argent.
would you guys say nano is currently the most significant finding of the 2020's?
Nah, it was paulodon, obviously
Saying that name makes me gag
I donāt know in terms of significance but it is very much a historical moment imo
Not to me
I feel like it'd either be Stegouros or nano
I mean, realistically speaking, this is only a product of the kinda of culture cultivated in the community and outside the community. Where dimensions and mass are seem as significant achievements, that takes priority over anything.
This is not nano
because it was through Stegouros that Parankylosauria was established right?
Yes that's my point.
People don't care about the science, or how bad or good an estimate is, if it's potentially larger no matter the methods then for all intents and purposes it is larger in a lot of people's eyes.
So, the current standard is never " Enough ", it's kinda like... People treat prehistoric animals, as if they were like uuuuh... Speedruns, right? Where essentially, they are just waiting for the new big guy to beat the record.
Spicomellus or Temno are what I'd personally raise as most important but Nanotyrannus is by far the most culturally impactful
Nanotyrannus is not really significant because itās back. More so that for it being so insanely controversial, with the current precedent being hard against nanoās validity, the fact that the evidence and science was so sound that EVERYONE basically universally agreed with it is unheard of prior. Iāve never seen anything like it.
It has to be Temno for me by a big gap.
I mean its cool but its not redefining a family history like Spicomellus is
Stegouros son or Spicomellus daughter
Oh itās quin
Nanotyrannus IS significant tbh. Like it or not, the fact that it's " Back ", it's kinda what allowed for people to discuss about serious behaviour in the community, either outside or inside the field. I think the most relevant of these examples have been the author behind Jurassic Fight Club talking in a facebook post about the harassment they received on the time, JUST because of the Nanotyrannus episode.
who's that
It's culturally impactful, because it's only now that aspects about the culture around Nanotyrannus are finally being addressed to some extent... Even if so minimally, mind you.
Not something you can get with Tyrannosaurus tho.
In terms of community, Nanotyrannus is the winner by far
In terms of scientific impact, probably Spicomellus
Is my opinion
Was the perma frost saber tooth cat last year? Time be flying I canāt even keep up.
You old.
the temnodontosaurus thing is really cool but I wouldnāt call it more significant than the plesiosaur or diplodocus skin papers, thereās been a lot of really good skin stuff in the 2020s
My father told me to never get old, I should of listened to him
arent you balding at 26?
lol what no
@warped peak Would you be a Palaeoloxodon?
tldr on what makes spicomellus so special?
Nah I'm a Pseudocyon
potential early thyreophoran diversity?
Entire anatomy changed for one of the only basal Thyreophorans
We have almost no record of basal thyreophorans, especially Ankylosaurs, and the armor of Spicomellus affects a lot on our understanding of their evolution. Including huge support for the idea that the armor was originally an adaptation for display that slowly got adapted into defense
the glow up was truly insane for this thing
Would you be a Spicomellus?
would you like to be a Xiphactinus
Yeah
Would you be a Coelophysis?
i've heard Xiphactinus speed estimates that put it to be like, barracuda, is this false or true?
Iām terrible at dinosaur feet idk why
feet are very intricate
Spicomelus is just āoh some basal members were porcupines. Cool.ā
Nanoās existence has disproven decades of tyrannosaurus ontogeny research, and proves how ecosystems are vastly more diverse than how much we have been trying to make them not.
Decades of ontogeny on a single animal, vs redefining the ancestry of a family
Fooor Nanotyrannus
Nanotyrannus being valid rewrites a lot of what we thought we knew, and may begin a new arc of looking back in previous ecosystems and formations to restudy them
Again what does spicomelus prove? That some jurassic species were spiky? The variation is dope do not get me wrong, but itās not exactly āgroundbreakingā and flips everything on its head
itās like if it turned out sauroph was a carcharodontosaurid theropod this whole time, pretty cool but we knew they had been around that time & the morrison is quite vast
Spico is intruiging, but nano was some pretty damn big news and you canāt undermine it.
It demonstrates the origin and ancestral form of Ankylosaur armor, alongside proving its ancestral purpose and corroborating the growing belief that Ankylosaurs engaged in significant intraspecific combat
It is also the oldest known Ankylosaur period, which means they developed this complex display armor incredibly early in their evolution and changes their overall ancestry as a whole
In terms of Ankylosaurs, it very much does flip almost everything on its head
Back up fish this is my fight
The raging triceratops disrespects the ankylosaur grandpa
I mean maybe? even things like scuto and scelido seemed more on the defensive side than for display, and frankly spico could just be a one-off thing that went to go do something different unlike other ankylosaurs.
Like how some birds tried to evolve wing membranes unlike the specialized scaled ones, but it lead to nowhere and āregular birdsā continued on.
I feel like both sides need to recognize that for their groups, the animals are incredibly important
But in the grand scheme of things, paleontology isn't important because there's no oil
The true paleontology was the oil we made along the way
Abelisaurs are the only important ones
I would argue that, on a blank slate, Nanotyrannus is less important than Spicomellus
However, so much of paleontology as an idea and concept are based on Tyrannosaurus that any change on it is disproportionately impactful
Itās time we found a unicorn pachycephalosaur to complete the trio of winged birds and porcupine ankys
We should find a winged sauropod
Paleontology doesn't matter because it's not contributing to the economy!
Spoken like a true politician
Paleontology is bad because its taking away from important resources, like the 4 trillion dollar military budget
Paleo jobs wonāt be taken by ai, cause whoās gonna pay to have an ai do everything.
We can defeat it by asking for seahorse emoji
This is where we show blackrock jurassic world so it convinces them to be interested in dinosaurs so we can both get more funding and research while they bring back dinosaurs for military conflict
Unless... Dinosaur Crypto!!!
Military being paleontology's biggest opp (destroyed kem kem)
And I'd do it again
Why invest into war and death when we can invest into exploding the ground and finding cool bone-shaped rocks
Invest into mecha dinosaurs
Clankerdromeus
Thatās a derogatory word.
Clankerceratops
whats a paleontology opinion that will have you like this?
no
what would you say it is?
I agree with what Scan was saying
Its absolutely a historical moment and has huge ramifications for the field. But the discovery ITSELF isn't something earth shattering. Its the impact it causes that is huge
That I find frilled Dilophosaurus cool and wouldn't mind if it was true probably...
you mean possibly?
yeah, chat jump him
what is the function of the frill on the frilled lizard?
Intimidation and display
.
boost
No, frilled dilophosaurus is actually really cool and a great example of accuracy not being the ultimate factor in design.
JP Dilophosaurus suffers from being undersized and having a frog face
i find it so funny the scrapped retcon name for jp dilo is Chlamydosaurus sputori
Give big boy a frill and you have the JP dilo as it should have been
Spicomellus/Thyreosaurus
thoughts?
maybe monsters ressurected spinosaurus was actually accurately sized....
Would you be a Frilled Dilophosaurus, Kuitaran?
That wouldāve been actually hilarious
no
why not?
I don't like being animal that has a weird triat that's never gonna be used
becuase who'd wanna be called Chlamydosaurus
Skill Issue, tbh.
Incorrect, the trait is very useful for aura farming. An essential part of their lifecycle.
Man gonna say " I wouldn't be a Dragon, because Dragons don't exist!! "
yes it was def not be used in some overdone 2010s paleoart like some All Yesterday's spinoff
@outer tusk But would you make a appearance in All Yesterdays? If you could
yeah sure
Kuitaran is Heatmor your favorite pokƩmon or something?
heatmor? zu
durant, ruBL
so true, yet so sad.
Its actually Durant
It's Heatran.
Ok, if you look up Durant or any similar query like "Steel Ant Pokemon" google first comes up with multiple images of Kevin Durant
@outer tusk Would you be a Heatmor and eat Durants?
Ds mosasaur remodel is really accurate, but the bag was fumbled, and prognathodon is way too fat.
it's not
the head looks off to me
Really?
uh yeah? it's not very too fat like what are you cooking
It looks adorably chunky to me.
Are these not the most up-to-date body shapes for mosasaurs?
these are terrifyingly skinny to me.
you know you could've just posted Diocles' prognathodon since we're talking about Prognathodon, right?
Well, they did.
Maybe I have no idea what Iām talking about. Care to explain it better?
No, I mean 'probably' as 'i'd probably get jumped for it'
I know it's impossible
you look real jumpable rn
Also Tylosaurus proriger was described by Cope? Pog.
simply put DS prognathodon is fine accuracy wise and even if it's not the differences are so SO SO damn minor that you would just be nitpicking at that point since the there's no real goal to make these models the "most accurate" just an improvement or their original models
The thickness is very much different though, is it not? Thatās all Iām pointing out.
I mean, I would ask to blame for any reasons behind his decisions. But, he lost his discord account since 2025, so yeeeeeah...
Reef made the models, so heād be the one to ask.
problem is the model isn't made model by Blame
They are deeply upsetting to look at
(No hate to the artist, rather hate to the animals for looking that way)
Oh, yeah I don't know that one. My bad, I made the error of assuming DS only has one modeler ( Which they do, most of the time )
Reef modeled them, blame animated them.
Sarq maybe just ask Reef before trying to make these questions or asusmpution because it looks very bad and defeats the original intent. personally I just don't like it when this happens also Blame didn't animted prognathodon Seviper did
Seviper? Like the PokƩmon? Damn
They don't even have arms
" You telling me a Snake animated this model? "
this is not funny just fyi
I know.
I would just like to say I'm very confused
do we have any estimated speeds for xiph?
Does amargasaurus really Just has a tall and fat neck instead of two spiky "sails"
Seems like it yes
Loved it
Was the meg from the ice age era?
as in last 1 million years
yeah
went extinct about.....40k years ago iirc
don't remember it emerged though
This thing's land anim in the game is hilarious
Do you mean the lack there of an animation ? š
The newer ones actually have anims for once
it's not the lack of one just how funny it is when you go on land
Dang didnāt know that, havenāt played mods in ages just last time I was on mosa there was just nothing for land
The hipheight makes it even more useless tho
yk actually thinking the hipheight woukd make more sense like that since OBIVOUSLY see animsl were fully aqautic so being on land for even a sec would feel like so much pain
So I totally didn't pull this out of my ass, but I decided that I want this thing to be a pseudo-aqautic
the REAL indominus Rex
the thing that is RIDICULOUS is that an entire dinosaur is suddenly created by a single footprint, a piece of a tiny bone, or even a fossilized feather, lmao
like, come on, bruv 
i have a dumb question
but lets same theres a daspletosaurini and carchadontasaurusid thats the same size
do to how both are built, is it safe to assume the daspletosaurini will always be faster?
depends on many factors
I mean
Dasp comes from a Family that is decently Fast, Most Carchs are not designed to be that Fast
daspletosaurini is more cursorial
always faster might be a leap though depending what you mean by always
i mean like, just by the standard build alone, i feel like their more built for speed then your standard carchadontasaurid build.
admitly we don't have many carcharodontosaurids in a similar size range to "daspletosaurini" but for most part they seem to be roughly the same in terms of speed
You try to tell this to the average paleofan and I think they'd have a seizure
tameryraptor might be the closest we have to a daspletosaurini-sized carch]
ig
it was like, more like a hypothetical, if two animals of the same size but different builds ( in this case, the build of a memeber from daspletosaurini and carchadontasarus ) raced, who'd be faster
Maybe Meraxes
wtf those are real tracks?
yes
How fast could Guan generally run?
...did leeds get downsized to like, 12m recently?
Yes
is it still 40 tons?
dang so its smaller than tylo now
Shorter doesnāt mean smaller, itās still a fat fish
its still a looot smaller though, not nearly as impressive
tylo is at most 9 tons
I know itās dubious but Veterupristisaurus. milneri is often sighted at 8-9 metres, weighing about 2 tons in weight so that seems maybe slightly more comparable, considering dasp is like 7.5m and a bit heftier? But again not a safe bet at all due to the sheer lack of remains under the genus
These are 2 very real clades
You know the rules, anything that isn't Rex or Megalodon has to become a tadpole.
Leeds?
About 17.5t atm, maybe changes once Dan shares its dorsal
Hi I need your opinion on this lokiceratops
So far looks pretty good to me
Did you base the scaling off of the scalebars or measurements
for the head I used the edit by table because the one from the paper is to big, and the rest of the material for the measurements of the paper
Then awesome!
Tylo is 9-11 m depending on species
Honestly being 12 m is better for PoT lol
Why is it blue, 0/10 restart
I like this 
If you want some extra nitpicks, the cloaca goes just after the ischium (it's more separated than it should imo), I would add more keratin "bump" on the rough surface at the snout and extend the rictus (the cheeks) a tad more forward for the upper side at least
i think you made it a bit small, he is the biges of the
Albertaceratopsini
Guan ?
Would Torvosaurus beat allosaurus anax if we use their sizes
Both are like
Basically the same size
Who lands a bite first wins(they would just ignore eachother)
I think it's big enough, 6-7 m
Makes sense
Sounds about right
Random scaled it to 6.1m, 7m is already Drumheller Pachtrino territory
Oop Old version
Here the updated one
Trex wins
I would say, probably depends on why they are fighting, and most likely it wonāt be to the death, unless extremely desperate
These are neat, any more of them besides hell creek and dinosaur park here? Also whatās with the tyrannosaurus sp?
just ask Randomdinos he has alot also Tyrannosaurus sp. is a large Tyrannosaurini lacrimal that's comparable to possibly a "Stan"-sized Tyrannosaurus
Neat
T. Sp is this humble material
A complete morphological description of Dakosaurus maximus (Crocodyliformes: Thalattosuchia) with further insights into their palaeoecology
https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2026/5775-dakosaurus-maximus-morphology-and-palaeoecology
Sick
Yo new surviving earth clips dropped
I read that the scale bar of the paper skeletal doesn't have sense and doesn't fit with the actual measurements, so it is small compared to that
yep
2 clips
BABY PLACODERMS
Torvosaurus and allosaurus Anax wouldnāt fight each other at all because they werenāt around together
how early is mcreenis compared to rex?
As in, Guanlong
Ohhh
Not by much, can't look too far into it rn because work but apparently the initial estimates were older than what is currently believed?
oh, becuase i heard of a tyrannosaur that was in the dinosaur park formation ( ? ) , it was in one of the formations that i b elieve was like, 73 - 72 mya?
was it mcreenis?
mcraeensis was from the Mcrae group, the possible campanian one is from a isolated lacrimal in the judith river/two medicine region
alr ty
what are the main differences between mcraeenis and rex besides timing and location?
Iirc the like only difference due to its fragmentary nature is like the skull shape and size? Although it is basically just some bits of the skull
If itās real which idk
Thicker postorbital, Dentary is more slender & has curving features not too far off from zhucheng
North American Zhuchengtyrannus (PLEASE)
Did we ever get new Carnotoraurus fossils?
Doesnāt seem like it
Damā¦..
Itās always possible, weāre still finding new species & material from its formation
Fair
Carnotaurus the peak of peak
Would you draw a Carnotaurus?
I have in the past
But would you do it again?
yeah
Bump
how many feet / legs does arthropleura have?
the real question is how fast can @tough parcel run?
the real question is how many questions @queen oar can ask random people
depends on how creative I am, and how random the question will feel.
Soā¦. How tall was it? We donāt know its legs, do we?
For example, would you choose infinite bacon but no games, or infinite games but no games?
2.5meters
How do we know the leg length? Just curious, and plus what happens if it turns out to be taller like how spinosaurus turned out to be a short king
relatives
I think you forgot the bacons in the second one
I would advised reading the top part
wdym?
didnt really expect to see cerato pop up here, is it related to carnotaurus? im uninformed
or is it just because they both have like...horns
distantly related as both are ceratosaurs since abelisaurids are within ceratosauria
it being used only because both have "horns" is pretty stupid in logistics sense, since any theropod that most people think has "horns" like cryolophosaurus, even dilo to an extent or even tyrannosaurs would be just as useful
Are chickens really descendants of Tyrannosaurus rex
Not even remotely
I need an explanation on how it isnāt a Trex, all I know is that chickens have similar cells to Trex from what I heard
From what I know, all birds are descended from smaller, feathered theropods which connects them to all dinosaurs, including Tyrannosaurus
So it's more of a broader relation than direct
It's an oversimplification basically. Birds in general are dinosaurs like t. rex or triceratops. The chicken isn't particularly more related to t. rex than any other bird.
I think this image sums it up nicely
The two didnāt share a common ancestor in hundreds of millions of years, matter of fact birds were a thing long before rex was
Ah I see now, thanks for explaining
Thanks
is asia , europe and north america the only places we found tyrannosaurids?
actually, i dont even know if they were found in europe, im pretty sure olorititan lived with one?
or do they have the same range as ceratopsoids being only found in asia and NA?
Donāt recall any from Europe, think it was just NA & Asia for now
i wonder why none ever made it too europe atleast
also, i find it interesting how we have multiple asian tyrannosaurids and only one asian ceratopsoid, ie, sinoceratops
Meanwhile nodosaurs and ankylosaurus kinda just did whatever
Late Cretaceous Europe has a very odd faunal distribution. It's kind of a mix of Asian and African migrants plus endemics.
i wonder why sino is the only asian ceratopsoid we have, is it just preservation bias not helping them out?
We don't really know.
Maybe, but from the looks of it they didnāt seem to care to going into asia
sino is just so interesting to me as its the only one of its kind and being massive for its time amongst other ceratopsoids, wasnt it semi early amongst its kind?
It was the same time when centrosaurs were still going strong before everything died and got replaced with tricerstops and torosaurus
damn.
the hell creek gang really just out here killing and replacing everyone
We have the thigh bone of carno and close relatives that have complete legs. It probably wasn't like Majungasaurus/Spinosaurus
reconstructing carno's legs based on majungasaurus (which isn't closely related to it) still only gets like 10cm shorter legs than my skeletal anyway
So did anybody see that new thing about Torvo?
Hii, I finished my lokiceratops, and also edited a version for albertaceratops
how accurate is Inspector's Rex
yeah its being worked on, hopefully it'll be published sometime soon
Here's a good look at its material from the people that collected it iirc : https://youtu.be/3Oh3Y5VOne0
A first look at some of the new material from the newly discovered Torvosaurus "Elvis" Some good size comparisons between the bones of Torvosaurus and the other dominant predator in the Morrison Formation, Allosaurus. Read about "Elvis" the most complete Torvosaurus yet found and the largest complete predator from the Jurassic at https://www.f...
It was sold to a Museum and is now being described
Won't you extend the rictus? Just asking 
Isnāt Elvisās skull just warped? I heard thatās why it looks so different.
I don't think elvis has that much of the skull, so idk how much is distorted
It does look very distorted if I have to be honest
How accurate is this about Megs ?
it's awesome.
This ones more accurate, correct ?
I feel like the pot meg is a bit big
almost everything in PoT is too big
Magnapaulia laticaudus spotted
Magnapaulia
honestly most of the 2-slot ones are good, except for Alio and meg
thal is nearly 4 meters tall
i forgot thal,achilo
Imagine being 4 meters tall
I don't have to
Achi⦠Thal⦠2 of the most oversized ones in pot š Ceras also like double as wide as it should be
magnapaulia, whats your opinion on your biggest size rivals, shant and edmonto?
meg is also like 4 meters tall when reared up
conc and pachy were like 2 meters at the hip pre tlc, idk about now
Conc didnāt get a model change I canāt member if pachy did
Who let edmontofraudus in here š„
My smallest specimen is almost as big as their average get bro out of here
Oh that was longgggg ago before itās recent move tlc
Conca is good, just a bit of texture or a few touches and it's fine
this is 3 years ago
you know not to speak ill of shant
someone send the itchyovenator x concavenator gif
gets folded by zhuchengtyrannus
-# (ignore the El Gallo tyrannosaur that is at minimum the same size as Magna holotype, we dont talk about that)
true
is it true your secretly lambeosaurus going under a new name due to the law being after you?
The law would never go after lambeosaurus, he's too perfect
jealousy or self admiration? you decide
ngl idk why they changed the head for TLC concave
Any comment on their problematic comments from March 13, 2025?
I plead the fifth
Ooh I see
is concave the closet relative to tyrannotitan in game?
I would have to believe so if we're talking about vanilla dinos but I have no clue
Allo maybe idk
Official playables only yes
Use Random's Conc smh
Not much difference but I prefer this one
Now a drawing based on the skeletal and in a Threatened(or however its written) posture
Random's should be better than Justice's but justine works for weight
Basically Random's for lateral and justice for dorsal(its just an edited Bates Acro to match Conc)
Isnt that his old one
Yes Stonks used the old one
Tmk the old one is the one Stonks usef(it seems older quality wise)
And this one is the one JFD Uses for their Conc(the one I used)
And tmk Random does work for JFD to some extent for skeletals
Justice and Random are fine as Justice is making a new one
Peak Incoming
Anyways have 2 Triceratops
damn that artstyle on the second one is awesome.
This reconstruction for the meg tlc woukd be so peak
Yk Lowki. I forgot it wasnāt randoms most recent
I feel like theyre gonna stick with basing it off komodo dragons, which is kinda sad imo
I dont think a single popular megalania portrayal is based on perenties even though they look way cooler and make for a much more unique look
Sadly you're probably right. The komodo look is what people seem to be drawn to cause its more familiar.
Im still little miffed the hatz model didn't get tweaked tbh.
@tough parcel keep cooking.
also why you playing Minecraft for the last 41 hours?
Glitched
I'm not, I swear
hmmmm, I don't know, buddy.
it's so funny how you can be play for a good minute and sometimes even when you leave the game, it'll still have your game tag on
I was on Marvel Rivals for like 45 hours cause of it
Dumb question, but could cenozoic megamammals survive the triassic or jurassic if they layed eggs?
eggs werent the problem, the problem were the dinosaurs and other big stuff around the mammals that couldnt allow them to develop and take higher niches in the food chain. Looks what happens right after the dinosaur were wiped out
also, earth was much hotter back then so maybe theyd overheat. But not considering that, probably yeah. Nothing would really hunt them, but theyd need to feed on something else
I just dont know how much it would be extended :c
How would laying eggs help them at all?
Megamammals laying eggs so radically changes their reproductive and developmental strategies you might as well be inventing a whole new group of animals altogether
i need a crocodilan morph from north america and a serpent like animal from asia
Brachychampsa and vasuki
or Deinosuchus if ur boring
calling the goat boring has to be slander
Calling any animal boring is slander (other than Paranthropus but heās boring in like the good gramma way where he just aināt doing much but you love him for it)
Paranthropus is cool cuz he chews really really good
just a lot of chewing very epic
deinosuchus is boring because its the common pick, brachychampsa was somehow what came first into my mind
As a great philosopher once said
āTo say an animal is boring, merely because it is commonly picked, is to be boring yourselfā
ā a wise old man I made up just now
that must be an old a wise man
I view Paranthropus like a grandmotherly monke that just likes to sit in her rocking chair with her kitten and eat salad while watching her funny hairless grandnephews stab the trunked creature until she can later get a few scraps of its hair for her quilting (itās a bit new fangled but sheās accepting of her grandnephews new ways)
that is what paranthropus is like it's true
''to worship the famous is to refuse to recognize the valuable'' - Some guy probably
If an Acro and a Carno were to engage in a fight, realistically, what kind of damage could be done to either of them?
isnt carno like, 2 tons compared to acros 5?
Yeah, but I'd like to know what kinda injuries they could sustain if they were to fight
Acro could sustain quite substantial damage
And carno would probably sustain the death kind of damage 
Rip 
I can't help but imagine that as a PokƩmon battle
? Both are apex predators and one is at best double the size of the other. Carno can't do much and the acro is going to pin down the carno and tear it to shreds. It's 1-sided to insane levels.
One at worst gets scratches and the other is lucky if it walks away alive.
My take on this situation
Totally scientifically accurate and it did look like this actually
I love that so much oml
Thank you XD
the carno could hurt it but the size ratio is literally male lion to hyena amounts
that and acro is built like a brick vs carno being very
twiggy
with a nk
so yeah acro mogs
A last headswap to medusa

Is the AMNH abelisaurid skull specimen of Rajasaurus? The premaxilla of AMNH 1955 matches well with this cast of Rajasaurus and there are more AMNH Indian abelisaurid skull fragments.
This is so silly ane cute
How strong was Tyrannotitan's bite ?
Probably about 20KN (Iām assuming based off carchas being about 24KN)
Thanks ! I was quite curious because a lot of sites usualky describes it as "weak" kinda the same as Spino
It would be around 2900psi right ?
no like a modern or prehistoric aisa serpent
Would be more than 4000 psi at 20KN
Ohh, thanks for the correction, here we dont use psi that much so its always kinda diifcult to convert
By much by the way ? Or closer to 4000 than to 5000 for example
Iām unsure either as I donāt know the exact conversion but it seems maybe closer to 5 but someone else who knows the conversion would have to answer
I ll see if someone knows, thanks again š
larger femur width
proportionally, yes.
it's not thinner actually. it's wider slighty.
No
That would be a awesome game
3.6 million years ago
We have a second footprint with the same size and morphology from the same area. It's a theropod, not a sauropod. This is also what paleontologists who saw that footprint believe too, iirc.
ultra archipelago
I quite love how these guys are, I assume, visually longer?
Ngl never heard of this specimen, interesting
It has barely any skull material lmao
likely comparable to Carcha however based on phylogenetic bracketing
The specimen is figured in Chatterjee 1978 but he referred it to Indosuchus but a 2011 study contradicts his statement.
Abelisauridae indet. it is
Idk, I mailed Paul Sereno about this and he did said that the skull material indeed belongs to Rajasaurus.
What do u mean here ? Like we have so little material that we cant affirm whether it was strong or weak ?
So, not much skull ?
very clearly
They were referring to megalania I'm pretty sure based on other responses
Oh
It was funny cause I was actually confused, the could mean that we ourselves lack much of its skull or if the dino itself's skull wasn't very big, u know ?
What
I mean idk what this convo is about but I think it's easy to tell if a skull lacks material or if it's just small XD
I know lmfaoo, is not what I mean but I think I just cant explain it in english
I ll try to reword it, obviously the pic shows it just lacks material, but what I meant is not easy to explain, gimme a sec
itās pretty easy to tell what kind of of animal a skull bone belongs to, and from there you can cross reference the details for size and shape of the rest of the skull
Why did it get deleted? Idk what kalia is so was it just a normal croc or an extinct one?
dead crocodile i deleted it cause it was unrelated to paleo( even tho i cant even find anyone to ask about mordern animals now)
Ooooh i see
Yeah tbh it would benefit if Paleontology was renamed to Paleobiology to have more leeway
This is kinda where I was going initially, my confusion stemmed mostly from not knowing whether the first message meant that Tyrannotitan didn't have enough "capacity," so to speak, in its skull to provide strong bites, or whether it meant that those who claimed it had a weak bite were wrong because we don't have enough fossils to say for sure whether its bite was weak or not. I couldn't find a better word than "size," but I think capacity, mass, or space would be more accurate.
@outer tusk I think the message above explains better what I meant, sorry for the confussion :]
Compared to T. rex, the bite was weak
Compared to the flesh of an animal, it doesn't matter
All other theropods have "weak" bites if they are compared to Tyrannosaurids, just like how all cats are "slow" because cheetahs are faster.
In general most theropods are pretty similar bite wise with differences just being mainly on size.
Some are pretty thin like Suchomimus and probably other spinosaurids since they were mainly for piscivorous prey, while others are clearly focused on breaking hard stuff(Tyrannosaurids). Rest of theropods like allosauroids, abelis, megalos, non-tyrannosaurid Tyrannosaurs, etc are basically in the middle since that was enough.
Basically every other theropod external to Tyrannosaurus is built for some form of either snatchy snatchy, or massive gaping flesh wound
Thanks for all the info guys, I'm also curious about Titan specifically because in some places, I ve read that from all the Carchas, it was probably the strongest bite and even able to break bones, obviously not like a Rex, but being able to crush some, how true is that ?
Unlikely, considering how little of the skull we have of Tyrannotitan
Idk how they even got that, most Carchs are either smaller or don't have any skull, TTT included yea
I mean any 300kg+ predator is wholly capable of breaking bones
It all depends on the bone you're asking it to break 
The femur
Of
A chicken
Prehistoric chicken which instantly makes it 30x larger for no reason
I honestly wish we had more of Titans, they're kinda my fav Carcha
I think a lot people look at animal traits almost like a video game, that is to say, in a very black and white lense.
Tyrannosaurus is adapted for breaking bones, so surely its bites wouldn't cause an animal to bleed much.
Giganotosaurus had teeth adapted for slashing, so surely it could not break bones.
Reminder that humans bites can break bone. Bone is super subjective
Tbh any bite would cause bleed if it pierces through the skin. One more than the others tho
Erm, according to science, the Tyrannus NEEDED to niche partition with the Nanus otherwise one of them would die
There's also the whole "Big arms = big bleeding" when they're mostly for handling prey
if theres not much fossil bite from deinosuchus like dinosaurs could it mean deinosuchus would have eaten them whole( not directly consuming it instantly)
As far as I know, Carchas basically had teeth that was like a knife cutting butter
So what you're saying is that little arms = big bleeding 
Not physically capable unless its a tiny dino
Yes, the tiny arms of abelisaurs tickled prey so much they vomited blood and died
Its like you trying to swallow a medium-sized dog whole
Alvarezsaurids had the ability to shoot their claws like missiles, piercing their enemies and infusing them with deadly hemorrhagic toxin, making them bleed to death
no no like crocodylus anthropophagus since i heard they eat their prey untill there was nothing left
Gng, most crocodiles do that
damn even to the water buffalos?
Manipulonyx actually Beat other dinosaurs to death using the osteoderms on its hands
Crocodiles arent active hunters so they have to eat as much as they can handle. They can stay up to an year without eating. They could leave stuff behind but still, crocodiles arent really targetting buffalos since theyre much more dangerous and big that smth like a zebra or wilderbeest
thanks for answering,(i should have said what crocodile it was)
Any theropod can have strong bites with irl skull models made of metals. And I guess questionable estimates.
Titanium Spinosaurus vs Glass Tyrannosaurus
Yup. How surprising when you don't have to consider multiple factors that contributes to the overall force a animal may apply with it's bite-force irl, it is incredibly simple to get Carnivorous Theropods with strengths you never would imagine.
Coughing baby tyrannosaurus vs hydrogen bomb spinosaurus
Technically the baby tyranno always wins since it'll always live for a few microseconds longer than the bomb which explodes
whats the size of quinkana
Confidently ~3 meters tmk. Any bigger is unknown due to extremely fragmented remains.
Path of titans moment, but yeah, most things can break bones with enough effort, depends on which bones.
Too lazy to measure along centra but here's the size of the dude
Didnāt know this guy had more channels
He was hired as the Narrator I think, They have a whole team for the website which is very nice
Interesting
btw @undone rapids would you be a Simosuchus?
Indeed
Varanus Priscus victim
Yes. Yes it is.
Also, why do people still use the term Megalania? It is like how we call the Mammuthus genus Mammoths? Did it just become a commom name lol
Yes, megalania is essentially the common name
From now on the common name for Tyrannosaurus Rex will be Fat-Bellied Chunky boi
Its quite a nice site : https://www.facts.app/comparison
This Accurate Comparison Tools Lets You Compare Dinosaurs Against Each Other, From Height To Speed & Much More.
Yeah I looked at it
@undone rapids if you had to choose a taxon to be your most hated, which would it be?
Don't really hate any, though I guess I've never really liked Ceratosaurus. Dunno why, just don't like it.
The Allosaurus Shadow Government smiles
more like Torvosaurus Republic grins
YOUš«µš½š«µš½š«µš½
š«µš½ šļøšļøšļøšļøšļøšļø
quick counter-attack with jerboadiver
"Yes, Tyrannotitan, like its famous cousin T. rex, likely had an immense bite force capable of shattering prey bones, using powerful jaws and bone-crushing teeth to deliver significant pressure, evidenced by bone fragments in fossilized dung and bite marks on prey fossils, indicating they could easily break bones for nutrients and to subdue prey, though Tyrannotitan itself was an earlier, slightly different large carnivore from South America. " HUH, COUSIN ? š
I was googling some stuff about Tt and this popped out lmao
What are some recommended paleoartists to reference from for realism?
this is probably the AI summary
Pretty sure, but the "cousin" caught me completely off guard
same AI that said that Spinosaurus's living descendant was the snail
I need to see that, this is probably the best thing I heard, ah yes the most known Spino family member, šÆš½š ššš¶š¾š
its a video iirc
The wonders of AI, am I right ?
Imma find it rq hold up
spinosaurus
They are in the avetheropoda clade, so, itās not that far off.
I mean
Art
cant find the video but there is a reaction to the video in a channel called HarrisTsandYT 2 iirc
0 worries, thanks btw, this made my night lmao
do you have a image of late cretascous europe perhaps?
couldnt find the video but the channel is full of crappy paleontology video reviews
I am afraid to send a example and end up killing a paleo enjoyer
very good low budget channel btw, its funny hearing him crash out over stuff 
Ill check it out it ll be cinema
Dumb question, any more animals that look like they could fit in the cenozoic despite being permian?
it has other stuff but to find the paleo videos just search ''worst paleontology video''. Theres a whole playlist from him
''there is an impostor among us'' ahh
Gotchu 
Because that one Permian guy is a synapsid
Why do they always call other theropods a cousin to trex...it kills meš
I want to participate, since the jurassic world FK boom and dominion, the nasutoceratops and sinoceratops were everywhere, and with a awful designs, so I hate them
Terrible that a crappy movie ruined a real group of extinct animals for you.
Life was big during the times of the dinosaurs, for both predator and prey. In this episode of Pre-History, we explore some of the most well known Cretaceous giants ever, the Tyrannosaurus and Edmontosaurus, in their natural game for survival.
Want to learn how to animate with Blender? Try TOAnimate Blender Animation course: https://toanimate.t...
What do you think i like it i love edmontosaurus
I know
Edmontosaurus my beloved
Idk
All I know Deino is Cool
Like
Look at that Big ah Head
He looks Goofy
I love it more now
Is this the newer proportioned head?
uh yeah
Well it isnāt that different I guess
literallymiguel is just random's deinosuchus there's nothing different about it besides it's a life reconstruction
Yeah
Its just this guy
Head in the reconstruction definitely looks bigger is all Iām saying
yeah it's a bobblehead
It looks bigger but I did compare them side by side. The big thing is posture, and how the back of the skull merges with the neck undefinably
Just looks like that
That makes more sense
not rlly paleontology at all but dear god idom is oversized, goliath btw
john pixel
John Antipixel bruh
This Indom is just oversized. That's like 18 meters.
saw another one of rexy absoluty dwarfing an accurate rex made by the same guy
Indom is like 16.9m
And JW tmk doesn't measure along the Centra anyways so
We talking āofficial metricsā or actual cgi models?
Cause yeah the cgi models are always huge, but the indominus wasnāt supposed to be over 50ft in-universe.
wdym
She is stated multiple times to be 16.9m
Stated to be bigger than Expected
The Exhibit was made for an 50ft yet was worked to get bigger due to her size
And Overall Is consistantly even by Universal to be said size
50ft is rather old and what she was meant to be at first, but she simply grew largern
I mean
Is not the worst
Doesnāt look goofy at all the big head is menacing
Someone with some reliable sources is Sauroposedion still the tallest known sauropod?
Look at those stompers
Is it possible to know what time of day prehistoric animals were active at? More specifically dinosaurs
Like diurnal, nocturnal, ect
-# excluding modern day birds before anybody says
Do we have evidence of Leaellynasaurus being fluffy (fur, feathers, whatever) or is that a speculative thing?
Which Leaellynasaura?
I wasn't aware there were more, but I'm referencing Leaellynasaura Amicagraphica from Australia
No it's because there is Leaellynasaura the pretty generic ornithopod and then there's " Leaellynasaura " which is that specimen with the pretty long tail
Unless anything changed about those two.
From what I'm seeing they might be the same dinosaur?
Damn... I'm old.
Itās funny that the irl Rex weighs more than rexy š„ jw dinosaurs be made of air
Heh... Titanosaurus...
Pretty sure the tail did recently turn out to be actually Lea
Are there any illustrations comparing Megalania and Komodos size by size, being accurate ?
i know majority of creatures are omnivorous to a extent, but what defines, i guess like, a true omnivore?? is that even a term
Hawaii 
Herbivore is +90% Vegetation
Hypercarnivore is +90% Meat
Mesocarnivore is about 50 - 90% Meat
Theres not a proper term for herbivores that eat that much meat AFAIK but Mesoherbivore probably applies in the same vein
would any animal in pot be a mesocarnivore / mesoherbivore?
probably only struthi?
kto yang, tsg desmato, pt giga, gigantoraptor, tc citipati, tsg bonapart? not many officials tho outside of cheirus
isnt cheirus debated on its omnivory? i heard ppl say the fish jkust died inside the corspe or ontop/beneath
like that semi aquatic anky or whatever
IRL or in-game?
Why giga and yang?
giga and specifically yang have the ability to eat insects, roots, fruit
i meant, like, in real life
i wouldnt ignore desmato, giganraptor, citipati and bona, because i feel like they'd be omnivores irl
i thought you meant in the game
in that case ignore everything i said
the fish remains are disarticulated backbones and scales and found in situ with thousands of gasroliths, so it's a different situation than Liaoningosaurus
so i got lied too about deinocherius by those people? damn
Ah I thought it was irl
it's all in the 2014 paper on the new specimens, check primary sources
there isnt a term because there isnt an example of such iirc
bears, latenivenatrix, maned wolves
They definitely exist
Bears are simplied omnivores though along with maned wolves, im talking about the term for a mesoherbivore, it doesnt physically exist
Yeah the term doesn't exist, but it's weird that it doesn't when there's multiple examples
Maned wolves and most bears predominantly eat vegetation. Ancestrally, most Hominina also falls into this dietary condition too
This is purely for fun and curiosity, do u people think that if Megalania lived with non avian dinosaurs, could have survived ? Of course in a hypothetic zone where Megs could live
what do these definitions come from? Haven't seen them before
Honestly I couldn't give a source on this. Kinda just learned from research into Carnivora and the different ecological roles they have
oh i thought it was like, an actual established categorization
so its not formal, but like ur personal take?
I got mixed up lol
No it is defined, but I couldn't quote where I know it from
oh ok
cause i was looking for it and saw a LOT of diff % numbers
i guess its one of those things thats defined circumstantially by field, and not a universal constant that can be applied across disciplines with strict numbres
Yeaah probably
Mesocarnivore I've seen everything from 90 - 70 to 90 - 40, but the most consistent defined usage I've seen is 90 - 60%
I published on it in my new paper in Nature calle
Every herbivore is actually omnivorous cus i saw a cow chewing on a dead snake and an edmontosaurus eating a tyrannosaurus alive from the inside out on tiktok with creepy music in the background
Top 10 Dangerous Prehistoric Animals You WOULDN'T Want to Meet...
thank you gamer you are my HERO
if an animal ever eats meat it is bloodthirsty killavore
you do NOT want to meet this animal...
honse 
Number 10: SEA cucumber
And this is why it's 90% plant matter
Daisy Bell slowed in the background We're glad they went extinct... Ahh vids
" Why the Cretaceous Was a Lot More Terrifying Than You Think "
Number 10: Pegomastax
That thing deserves to be drawn and quartered
for the hype about it being terrifying or just in general
look at him go
For stealing my stuff in ARK
Icthyornis deserves the same, probably worse because at least I can run down a Pego
Anteosaurus, trex dimetrodon
Or, quetz, hatz or jaekelopterus
ichthyornis is a menace to society and should not be allowed near it
ehhhh could be better
Microraptor is SCARIER than Giganotosaurus
What is mircoraptor gonna do
do NOT ask Microraptor what he did in july 10th 1961
And donāt ask Giganotosaurus what he did on August 14th 1994
Reminds me of a time I watched some Top 10 most BLOODTHIRSY sharks! bs on shark week, and they had the great white in the number 2 spot.
10 year old me was dumbfounded because what could possibly be more bloodthirsty than a great white? The number 1 spot: the whale shark.
ofc, Whale sharks kill millions of small fry and plankton every year. Truly a genocidal beast
That was more or less their reasoning
then why tf arent basking sharks in second
If I remember right the way they presented it was this scene of two whale sharks eating the sperm and eggs of spawning fish. And it had this sinister music and sort of serial killer vibe.
Very strange because literally the scene before had a great white punting a seal pup 20 feet in the air with heavy metal playing in the background.
spawn killer
irl, who among the roster of playables would count as a omnivore?
The Eotriceratops...
microstruthiovenatriceratorhynchonychus
microraptor
struthio
laten
cerato?
rhamp?
I just said random stuff
Hypotheyically, from all the Path of Titans roster, whay do yall think a Megalania could realistically take down ?
but struth is the most likely of being an omnivore. Others who could be are Laten, Deinoch, and maybe Pachy and Thal but the last 2 are probably more herbi/carni who eventually suplement
the pegomastax fandom is dying, repost if you love pegging
Such a horrid creature
rhamp, laten, deinon, struthi and thal
Isotopic analysis indicate that deinonychus was a carnivore
that says deinocherius
Oh whoops lol I haven't played pot in a while so I mix up the nicknames
any 1 slot if we are taking account about what we know. But if we take account Komodo Dragons, and the possibility that Megalania mightve had some sort of venom, then it could probably bring down an Alberta and even a Mira. As for carnivores it could brawl like a Conca but everything else would be too risky and not worth it. Theyd probably hiss and roar and just leave
mira is wayyyy to big
I mean you can also look at the sharp teeth to confirm it was a predatory animal
Yeah it seemed like a strange claim before I was corrected
New ichthyosaur soft tissue?
They finally found meš„¹
tbh its similar to the ratio between komodos and cape buffalos
ooooh i was thinking about dace in size not mira, sorry
do we know how affective megs venom would be?
Prolly like a Komodo dragon
would it be though? maybe someone lied to me but i heard komodo dragons werent their closest living relatives
Someone said the same to me about mosasaurs, yet here we areā¦
and mosasaurs are barely venomous
why the hell would Mosa even need venom when its like 12 meters long and could crush stuff with one chop. Megalania lived alongside a 3 ton wombat
exactly, like, it had it, and it would barely be effective for what its hunt. which i believe is other large marine reptiles?
other marine reptiles, fish (including sharks) and ammonites probably
Mosasaurs ate everything, up to and including large marine reptiles. If it had venom it was likely an anticoagulant and also not the deciding factor in the lethality of its bite
^ this is the case for most lizards, including komodos
it would probably be used as smth like oh my bite scraped on its fin, but itll bleed to death because its anticoagulant
komodos use the venom when hunting water buffalo, which aren't native to their territory, but everything else they go after is dead before the venom does anything
Yeah it's the ziphodont teeth and targeted bites doing the majority of the damage
Megalania's venom would be much more useful considering the available prey, like Diprotodon and Procoptodon. One is a huge humunculus and the other is overall faster, although I dont think it would escape the first bite
I think even with megalania the damage inflicted by its slashing bites would be the deciding factor
I actually think venom would be less useful for meg than for komodos, if the venom was proportionally the same strength. Komodos live in tiny islands so the prey can't ever really get out of tracking range, megalanias have an entire continent-sized island to search
Megalania would have an even more powerful and damaging bite than a komodo as well
it helps secure the kill tbh, even if the initial hunt is failed cuz the prey escaped the grip
Both would prefer to take down prey quickly like any other predator and not rely on envenomation and long chases
so its venom would be more potent then a komado or am i misinterpreting?
No evidence either way. We're speculating
having potent venom would help it hunt diprotodonts, but it would still do just fine without any venom
tbh there are a lot of predators that use of time and slowly ripping their prey apart to eventually kill it, but I get what ur saying
Absolutely but even komodos target vulnerable areas and will try to kill or totally subdue their prey as quickly as they can
yeah as a predator Id rather take down my prey quickly than wait hours for it to fall, but Id also rather have a guaranteed kill even if they escape my grip than lose my prey because I fumbled the bag
The insurance is useful for sure and like random dinos mentioned well suited to enclosed island environments but predators especially ectothermic ones are going to be highly aware of energy conservation and optimize towards that. If you can really make the first few strikes count and wait 5-10 minutes for the deer to bleed out from the throat you're going to do that versus a multi hour or multi day trek. The latter is reserved for water buffalo which can end up feeding multiple oras
They have remarkably similar teeth to most theropods and there's no reason to think the latter were depending on venom in any fashion
not saying they were depending, just saying its better to have something than to have nothing. Diprotodons (which would be one of the few targets where the venom would be useful) weight about 3 tons so that would feed a LOT of stuff, not only the Megs
shrews are also venomous and theyre out here hunting worms
Presumably basal trait of all toxicoferans as I understand it
The nature of the venom may have been as such that it was more digestive enzyme than predation tool, we simply don't know. We know megalania was a large and heavily armed predator regardless of venom, which we can't say what the effect would be anyway other than to possibly still the prey animal but to modify a quote from researcher Kurt Schwenk "I guarantee that if you had a 10-foot [15-20 foot megalania] lizard jump out of the bushes and rip your guts out, youād be somewhat still and quiet for a bit.ā
Ora tooth, megalania would be similar just larger, perfectly designed for cutting flesh to ribbons
So thoughts on Big Bertha and new T-Rex news?
significant but not really surprising
What are these specimens?
You mean the new age paper?
how closely related are horses and zebra's? because im just now hearing that horses are scared of zebra's?
close, but not as close as you think. I think it might just be the fact that zebras can be crackheads
Yes
It is very cool
I didn't take Mira as a possibility, these things were amazing, I pretty much think the same, for carnis I think dinos like Alios, Raptors, Metris even, Concas and for others maybe Pachys too, pretty much a lizard that could fight a polar bear
Zebras are closer to donkeys than to horses, whichā¦can explain a few things
the problem with carnivores is that they usually dont have the flight response most herbivores have so it would be kinda hard to land a free bite
meg would probably win against all 2 slots, but then it gets ragdolled by all 3 slots
Yeah, I mean if their skin was as hard as Komodo's maybe it could palliate that, but it would be intense
I have to look at all 2 slots lol, this is so interesting, I forgot which is the list of all 3s and 2s
the one which I am not sure about is Kentro, cuz its Kentro
what was the biggest thing megalania would've realistically preyed on?
Slots needed : Kentro
in its enviormenmt, not pot
Diprotodons maybe ? Im not sure if there was anything bigger there
would adults be apart of its regular diet?
Could be yeah, pretty similar to how Komodos hunt much bigger preys than them
would it be in the same manner? the hunting style?
Very possible, as they also probably stalked packs of them before striking too
this isn't really based on anything when talking about the ecology of megalania though. we can't say "probably" for something with no evidence towards that fact for an animal three times the size of its closest relative
a komodos prey is also on average a lot faster than the average megafauna of prehistoric australia
Not to mention isnāt it rather incomplete? We know it was big and what it was related to but it doesnāt get much descriptive after that
We know or might be very sure because of ecological interferance too, but its very especulative
that's like. the most basic statement you can make about a prehistoric animal
Well I'm not a paleonthologist, I'm still learning a lot ?
The most basic for u might be really new for me
As far as I know and if I remember correctly, there are some fossils with remains of the largest things Megs lived with, I think here it's developed further https://australian.museum/learn/australia-over-time/extinct-animals/megalania-prisca/
(Some info is outdated tho)
Take it with a grain of salt
Grain of salt? More like an entire salt lamp why is it obese
Yeah, the art is really uhh, I love it tho even if is not accurate, kinda reminds me of the 50s dino movies
Im pretty sure there were remains of Megalanias with Diprotodon fossils found at the Naracoorte caves in World Heritage Area in South Aust, but a lot of the articles and stuff are rather old so the info is very very scattered
would megalania be living primarily in the open plains of australia? well, shrubland?
what are these animals? https://x.com/alwansyaah/status/2013678579221999996
Brittle stars.
and the thing eatin g them?
Nudibranch (sea slug)
wow.
how accurate is Noi's Rex 
Thatās a rex?
eyup
Itās a pretty accurate depiction of t rex from Carnivores Box art
Sooo...apparently there's a study on Mosasaur's Venom ? What's your thoughts on that ?
Nah.
It's hypothetical but still interesting
If this is true, then that will make the Mosasaur 200 times more scarier
not sure how consequential it would be
most things that mosa hunted could prob be killed in like 2 bites
Yah
That would be hype af
The front half of a now dead turtle falling to the sea floor: alas, I have been envenomated
venom is ancestral to toxicoferans, so if mosa was venomous (i donāt doubt it) it would likely be more or less inconsequential, like in many monitor lizards
for them to not have it, wouldnt they have to actively evolve to get rid of it?
pretty sure
āIt was estimated that the common ancestral species that first developed venom in the venom clade lived on the order of 200 million years ago.[2]ā
Did baryonyx have a taller and slightly shorter snout than suchomimus?
I mean, the "venomous mosa" thing isn't on Mosasaurus itself, but on Gnathomortis. I'd have to check its size
same idea applies
I think so? Not sure. @violet elm can you confirm?
Can every dinosaur get a discord account so we can just ping them when we have questions
š
Buddy looks a bit hungy
And has a lot on his mind
alot of people aren't fully reading the tweet, nothing new wwas found tmk, it's just a hypothetical idea of what the soft tissue would look like
whats a dinosaurs name everyone mispronounces?
Giganotosaurus
Nigersaurus(G is a J)
how are you suppose to pronounce it?
Jiganotosaurus
I think there's a video floating around somewhere of Dr. Coria talking about it and he had a soft G
so its not giga-nato-saurus?
No, it'd be smth like Jija-noto-saurus (I'm forgetting if the second G was soft but I assume it would be)
If its from "Gigantic" or some similar word then maybe it'd be Jiganotosaurus, though I still prefer Giganotosaurus
Fortunately, Jurassic World: Dominion has included it so the official pronunciation is Giganotosaurus!
If we were to follow how the Argentinians say it then it'd be Heeganotosaurus
one that looks it'd be 1 way but has been confirmed by the namer to be the other
....yeah
Is there any information regarding parental caring from Megalanias ? Maybe not at all, like Komodos ?
No because the difference is caused by the fact Argentinians do not speak western English as their first language
Technically, we would need to follow how the Argentinians say it (Heeganotosaurus) due to it being found and named by Argentinian scientists and thus they would know how they intended it to be pronounced (which is why I mentioned Dr. Coria because he's one of the original describers)
But unfortunately, we don't have many Argentinian people willing to narrate a documentary/movie with Giganotosaurus
I feel like most people just called it giga anyways. Cause you wouldnāt say ājigaā. š
Well you would if you were the people describing and naming Giganotosaurus...
Itās just so trippy
Like, I would always say Sucho āmimisā instead of Sucho āmime-usā for the longest time.
Evidence pronunciation isn't all that important as long as you aren't 400 miles off base and making no sense
I say the full name with ājigā and shorten it to giga with the hard g because nobody can stop me
Yeah idc itās āGIFā not āJifā
I don't think gif originated in Argentina so
Evidence that Argentina has a false narrative
how are you suppose to pronounce concavenator? because the tlc video suprised me with how thjey pronounced it
evidence argentinosaurus is a hoax?
Heeganotosaurio
Heeganotosauro
Don't forget the spanishization

Tho I believe second one also works for the portuguese way as well
L

unless you're Jay Z
Ć
Bold of you to assume i can't type that Ć 
Power of mobile
do you guys call it pahree as well
Nah for us its jiganotosauro (portuguese)
Indeed, but how you pronounce the phonetic ji in English
Hee
Cause ji is more like "yi" in English
Its probably because "giga" has a similar pronounciation to "gigante" which means giant
Yes but what I mean is that our ji, in English is pronounced hee
Just say jyeganotosaurus š„ š„ š„
Ćpico
conc-aye-ven-ator is how i pronounce it
nah
what human(? ) species are around at that time that these could belong too
We only have cave art from H. sapiens, we might from Neanderthals and Denisovans but it's controversial
kon-ka-VEN-at-or
Con-ca-vƩ-na-tor
con-cay-vuh-nay-tor
Scaly Stomper Spell
I use another word
High Wall!
Hey folks, even though this is a slightly more speculative (we can't say for sure they used tools like us and AFAIK it's not fully confirmed they were fully bipedal) paleoart of em, I just wanted to share this piece of paleoart I found of Paradolichopithecus because it goes absolutely hard for me.
I also wanted to know if there has been previous discussion of it before, and whatcha folks think about this and the possibility of greater bipedalism on the species.
(Oh btw, if any of you know the artist that made this please tell! I love this)
what the...
Oh btw here's the article I was reading about 'em: https://extinct-and-extant.blogspot.com/2021/06/the-peculiar-case-of.html?m=1
Yeah that illustration's something else, ain't it?
Here's one a tad more grounded, for a better reference on how this creature may have looked like (walking on two legs)
Ms. Obama get down-
Anyone have like a good top 10 largest theropods list or whatever that's like up to date?
How accurate are pt's models, are they accurate enough where i can use them as reference / base for a design or drawing?
Im sure newer models are good
Are you pantz cousin?
who? huh? what? huh?
Oh. My fault silly me pantz is dead what about Quinn are you related to him
whos the top 3 most accurate playables in PoT?
This is the correct way, not even the person who discovered it could convince me otherwise
my top 3 are
tylosaurus
tyrannotitan
styracosaurus
Thalassodromeus, kaiwhekea, and pachycephalosaurus
1 million percent true
whos more inaccurate
metri or pachy
I hope they don't get rid of metris dewlap, I love it so much
don't forget stego
god those things rival me on bodily not function
Would it have been possible for some dinosaur to have a dewlap similar to metris ingame one? Or maybe something like the green anoles?