#paleontology
1 messages · Page 216 of 1
Thoughtful of them honestly
Anyone else kinda hesitant to get mark wittons and david hones book on spino that came out this year. (Both two of my favorite paleontologists) But buying a book on spino in 2025 seems. 
torosaurus found dead after messing up cobblestone generator
@bright veldt Scanova, I have a question for you
Find actual Tyrannosaurus juveniles
OR
Be sent back in time, and get stuck in the Pleistocene,
Which would you choose?
One means death
You're right, you should do the Pleistocene one
It's a simple question
has anyone been killed for a paleontological discovery or to prevent one from happening or not yet?
I mean, depends on what you are counting, there's that one Miner that got crushed by a Hadrosaur footprint
the hadrosaur : " last stomp, let it haunt "
get sent back in time and be surrounded by Tyrannosaurus juveniles
It's open to interpretation đ ( Didn't say they have to alive or dead, did I? )
I win
I could easily beat like 8 juvenile Tyrannosaurus. Just give me an RPG and a 12 gauge
and maybe like 3 frag grenades
It's a simple question, Doc
Would you rather, be at a table, with Coca Cola, Steak, Baked Potatoes, Salad and Cake
Or
Be completely limbless, surrounded by the most dangerous Carnivores of the earth, with no disadvantages whatsoever, while Poisonous frogs fall from the sky, and Fire Tornadoes are being formed out of the nowhere
Which would you choose?
both
If they stop the study on teen Rex I'll be sure one happens
Give me a large stick and a $20 bill
sue
To defeat a Tyrannosaur, you must present them with their singular unifying weakness: an effigy of GSP, the sight of which shall cause the animal to be torn to shreds as GSP has attempted to do to their taxonomy
or just make them invalid, turning them into Megalosaurus Rex
In one you hang out with fluffy rhinos, in the other you get assassinated by big paleo
Wow this is such a dope Giga artwork
What da felis doin
The cat hired more than just a merc he hired Adam smasher or Morgan black hand from cyberpunk (or v depending on your tastes lol)
âlook behind youâ ah moment
Actually the haolonggood does the whole sauropod âbeakâ thing pretty well on their Argentinosaurus.
Also Merry Christmas chat 
picked up xilin the wuerhosaurus and fredrick the lokicerstops from PSNO or whatever their called, xilin is my spirit animal
Their argent is awesome. Kind of a shame that itâs almost $300 though.
Well itâs pretty big and heavy
It is massive, so I guess it makes sense.
I have one on the shelf behind me rn, worth it
i have a question, how much beak do they mean when they talk about the sauropod beak theory?
the texture around the mouth shows that it was covered in some kind of hornlike tissue. it wouldn't make a sharp point like a true beak though
would it be like stegosaurus's psuedo beak?
stego just has a regular beak
Could have just been denser lip tissue as well, right?
Could be sort of like what crocs have around the face
Im not even approaching trike's scissor jaws man
i always imagined ceratopsians had a decent biteforce
I think I heard trike's biteforce was like 3 tons but idk
Their jaws were like scissors and def used for defense
Stegosaurus could probably break your skin and maybe fingers
Triceratops could outright kill you
This is gonna be a stupid question but what would be the differences in diet / plant matter they would be consuming? im gonna assume ceratopsians ate much tougher plants while stegosaurids ate softer plants?
Many a mammals with a large dental battery have robust mastication musculature
Yes
Fun fact: Zebra's were notorious for biting those who tried to ride them
Itâs also a difference in what parts of the plants they would be eating. Stegosaurus would many eat softer leaves and potentially twigs, Triceratops could have cut up the stronger stems of the plants.
Probably
Thin snout usually suggests picky eater in herbis I think
Ceratopsian jaws were like scissors while stegosaurs could strip leaves at best
(Idk if they were capable of chewing)
@hallow spear i apologize for the ping but do we have any stomach contents from any stegosaurid?
Ion think so
as sauropod beak hater #1 I should try to draw the croc approach
That's a Taurovenator no? Pretty sure it's like a Dino OC from someone, where it's based on a setting where there are extinct dinosaurs alive in the modern world, and this is like a Taurovenator where they eat from the trash and developed a friendship with the stray cats. Until eventually becoming essentially a pet to the neighborhood grandma
nevermind, the one I described it's a Meraxes, and the one in the art is a Giga. I'm pretty dumb.
A triceratops could bite you in half
i wonder how often its mouth / beak was used in combat , interspecies or self defense
Me when I hate the Sauropod beak idea.
well, why?
Make yourself a question, if Sauropods had pseudo-beaks or straight-up beaks, isn't it weird that there is no... Not a single species that has derived that trait further? Like becoming like a completely beaked species, and loosing all of their teeth.
thats a question for someone smarter then i, like falcon here
Tyrannosaur arms
Abelisaur arms
It happens a lot in Theropods, it happens partially in Ornithischians. In sauropods? Never.
Are you sure?
I meant the beak, but sure lol
Perhaps this is because it worked?
We know they were shedding teeth wholesale due to their constant feeding so it's probably easier to grow front teeth in a group that already constantly replaces teeth than dealing with a broken beak damaged via constant usage
But isn't it weird that there is not a single species that derived that trait? If it was present. It's not like they always had to eat the same kinds of plants, or vegetal material. So, there would definitely be some room for specialization. I just find it weird... That it does not happen, not even once.
I mean if you can find more sauropod soft tissue and/or skulls, be my guest LOL
That's the main problem here too!
This is why Tapuisaurus is TOP sauropod
my gripe with a true beak is that it would still need gums anyway because to has to be pliable enough for replacement teeth to go in, and the surface fossils don't indicate a true beak necessarily just some robust covering that may or may not have extended to the surface
I mean, sure... But it's also like, even for Titanosaur skulls for example, they are just going back to trends already done in Jurassic Sauropods. It's not really like, there's much going on. Sauropods just seem to repeat adaptations related to how they eat. Not bad, because it might just mean that they don't really need to do anything different... Or they are just pretty flexible.
or they're just animals doing what animals do when evolution calls for 
Nah. Sauropods are above that... They are the GOATs
Also, I swear if after this conversation we find a purely beaked sauropod... I don't really know what i'm gonna do, but I'll definetly do something.
You know what, this is my new headcannon for this Sauropod just cause I find it too funny
Might be beaks, might not be. It could just be a different kind of lip tissue.
What if it was just Lips with thick scales?
Again, haolonggood Argentinosaurus is a good example of what it might look like in the flesh. And yes, thick scaled lips is a good possibility.
Ew.
Doesnât look horrendous. Less like a beak and more like the jaws of an excavator or something.
It reminds me of very bad Sauropod reconstructions i've seen from someone once... Won't remember their name.
your doing too much
Again, might not have been that exagerated. All we know is that there was something very.. dense I guess?.. attached to the lip areas of sauropod. Could have been anything from beak-like structures to just dense lips.
I'm assuming you are likely referring to that stuff we found around the teeth of Camarasaurus, but realistically, wouldn't any soft tissues kinda of become dense after being preserved in the rock for such a long time?
Idk
<@&1118094543787663381> I need to find out who is using my email on a game NOW!
Like, I'm pretty sure that this happens, but most soft tissues preserved in fossil kinda of become either too densely compacted or harden due to how they reach a stage of decomposition where conjunctive tissues loose any flexibility they originally had.
it's also based on bone textures in diplodocids and camarasaurus, not necessarily the lips entirely either but possibly just the gums underneath
Me when the hypothesis is about Bone texture in fossils. Bruh
So just dense gums.
I came up with the concept of this game 20 years ago tech wasn't ready I see it on tictok and I can't log in because somehow a game I've not played "path of titans" says my email is in use!!!!!
You know whatâd be awesome. One young mummified perfectly preserved specimen of each major group of dinosaur.
possibly but it does seem pretty extensive, so whatever it is it's weird but not necessarily a beak
đââïž
Yeah, that sounds nice. 
Another edmontosaurus mummy, take it or leave it
Are the diplodocus scales pretty similar to other sauropod scales that may have been found, or are they completely different? Canât imagine sauropods, or any dinosaur in a specific group, would need to change their scale shape so drastically overtime.
Nah gimme another hadrosaur. I wanna see if they all got the weird upper back thing going on.
we have a lot less from other sauropods but titanosaurs seem to be at least a little different
Ok well Iâd expect a little different. Wondering if they had those sick lower back spike-looking scales that diplodocus seems to have.
we don't know for all sauropods, but there's embryos without those that have a row of bigger flat midline scales
Velociraptor mummy that reveals they were featherless and shrinkwrapped, or pachyrhinosaurus mummy that reveals they had shaggy mammoth-esque coats
Pick your poison
Well Iâd have to pick the pachy, cause the veli would imply Iâd have to imagine Utahraptor like that too.
The former
I would take an articulated Shantungosaurus at this point
Would dromaeosaurs taste like chicken or turkey? Or something else? If this has an answer LOL
I would like to know for next Christmas
probably neither considering those are grain feeding birds with huge fat deposits, they probably taste like whatever a hawk would taste like
i wish i could taste hawk too A. very pleasent meal i think it would be
how flexible would a stegosaurids plates be? like, this will sound stupid but would they jiggle / sway when walking?
Hello there,
Please feel free to contact our friendly support team: https://alderon.games/support
They will be able to take a look at your concern and assist further
Bro what could I possibly be saying thatâs getting me flagged
and would they be loose / flexible enough to even theoretically touch?
It's just a circle of advertising no person to contact
So if I had two of them would that equal to the taste of a hawk or two? Ahh...hard to tell
i did it first and i did it better
is ano the slowest playable in game? ( if it was like, yknow real life )
technically tylo, eurhino and kai are slower than ano on land
how big of a difference would ano and stego be? im gonna assume their close to the same speed
stego would be a good bit faster iirc due to having much longer legs
is it the 2nd slowest land creature or is there someone slower then stego but faster then ano?
Bone texture is shockingly informative, you'd be very surprised lol
That's how we reconstruct muscles, muscle attachments leave distinctive marks in the bone texture
Well probably Pachy cause we know velo at least had wings
if a dinosaur did have a shaggy mammoth-esque coat, would it really count as fur? or would it be something different?
i know feathers are highly modified scales, then what is hair and stuff like what?
hair is a type of modified scale too
oh.
a dinosaur with a shaggy coat would have a fur like coat, but it wouldn't be fur as that's unique to mammals
would it be considered feathers then?
It also depends on the structure of the âscaledâ too because hairlike feathers still do resemble certain types of more basal kinds of feathering when looked at up close
how big is Crocodylus thorbjarnarsoni
Around 7.6m I think
Random got it around that yeah
Whoâs the new big croc (yes I know itâs not technically a crocodile, but yâall get what I mean)
Astorgosuchus? I donât think itâs new, and I believe it is an actual crocodile.
Oh didnât know it, as I havenât heard it ever being mentioned before
mix between Astorgosuchus, and Rhamposuchus
Puru would be the biggest 1. Heâs sitting at 6.6t
Yeah me neither
How did mosasaurus and tylosaurus skulls compare to each other? I know tylosaurus had a longer head, and the rostrum thing, but was its head also thinner than mosaâs?
tylosaurus has the longer skull
Is it widely accepted that Tylosaurus and kin evolved to be secondarily marine aquatic separately from Mosasaurus and kin? Because if so thatâs crazy
Itâs a type of Mosasaur and within that family
Yeah Iâm aware. I mean did the Tylosaurinae and the Mosasaurinae evolve to be secondarily aquatic separately. In other words was the common ancestor of both aquatic or terrestrial
Mosa-family was already aquatic when Tylosaurus came around
I was watching the Skeleton crew on YouTube and Amelia Zietlow, who is a mosasaur researcher, said the opposite. So im curious if thatâs widely accepted or not
If Zietlow said it, I fear there's not much to be said
Thatâs crazy though, thatâd be like if whales evolved twice
Me when I just really really really really really like swimming
Being a swimmy lizard was so in vogue 90 million years ago
Dang deino just looks like a normal gator size in that
yeah it's only about 2 meters long and several 100 kilogarm heavier
If birds are reptiles is hatz a bird?
Also was it a chunky fella or still slim like other azdarchids
Azhdarchids are like if you took a giraffe and emaciated it to the point that it could fly
No it doesn't work like that, all birds are reptiles but not all reptiles are birds.
And hatz, though assumedly more robust than other azdarchids would have still been pretty slim.
no because they're not aves
I see
One day this will be found and my life will be complete
Yeah
Proportions need to be updated but 0rob about same size
https://tenor.com/view/dead-pigeon-awakened-play-dead-gif-12561300
Azdarchids when an average midsized theropod enters their domain
Bruh he was so cozy 
This is the worst thing ever
I like it
Itâs funny lookin
Yes, but are they broad to the same degree, or is tylos skull also thinner?
yeah ig so
Tylo's Body was slimmer than Mosa (what been a speed demon does to you)
Skull might either be the same or slightly thinner
Apparently they were around the same level of thickness
I was just wondering cause the php mosas head is fairly broad. Although I just noticed that itâs thinner in season 2 actually..
likely just a model edit change to fit more accurately simialr to Hatz
Actually yeah idk if the second one is just perspective, but it seems much thinner; but is it to an accurate degree?
(I believe they did the same for season 2 tyrannosaurus)
Should be fine
It definitely looks like a model change
Seems like itâs only for the one shot though. The mosasaurus model in the hunting scene is too fat.
Could be a camera thing then?
no it's actually the Jurassic World Crococetus
Trippy. Imma have to get used to this.
Someone pinged me
It is, they did not change the model for their Mosasaurus
I yearn for the day we get a documentary or game thatâs based on 100% design accuracy. Preferably a game, since depictions can be changed with time.
If we do itâs gonna suck balls ima be so fr
Chances are yeah, but we need some more accuracy around.
Sorry, âscientifically informed stuffâ.
That makes it sound worse somehow
I read this comment SO out of context
lmao
game that never gets finished/documentary that becomes heavily out of date in 10 years you mean? because that's what you get when you try to exclusively build off of strict realism
Yeah, that sounds about right.
Its doable if the scale is small, but no every indie dino game must be multiplayer survival with gazillion features
Well, for a documentary yes. Sauria was ONE TIME though. I believe it can certainly be done right. Again, Ecos La Brea is a good example. Sure itâs on Roblox, but itâs pretty neat and fun to play. The game is simple, so much of the focus can be on accuracy.
Chat am doing a tyrannosaurus head and I need to know which speicmen should I do (Sue) or (Scotty
anything else actually
Give us dinosaurs that can move faster than a dying snail đ„ đ„
Just go generic. Sue and Scotty are all beaten up.
Actually, what does a not-warped tyrannosaurus skull look like?
The holotype and AMNH 5027 are one
Thatâs what Saurian tried to do, which was an enormous mistake imo
Well, it was pretty ambitious, but again Ecos La Brea is doing kind of the same thing, and much more smoothly.
Yeah true
Ecos is pretty good but it doesn't really stand out in actual gameplay substance, at least for now
Well, for that reason they can focus on accuracy. Itâs still fun to play as well.
I think only sue is, scottyâs is just incomplete
It suffers the same issues as many animal survival games, and can become boring quickly without constant fighting.
Isaberrysaura, though it isnt a Stegosaurid, it is inside of Stegosauria though
Itâs the best so far on Roblox, everything has unique mechanics, movement is good, and for the first time aside from military-dino RP games doesnât force you to go through a tedious poorly done growth process
True, but there are unfortunately few good ways to fix that.
No hate towards the game at all btw, it's impressive
i wonder what you're refering to!!

Yeah itâs pretty cool. Got some leaked images of upcoming creatures and they look pretty good.
Wait then why havenât WE DONE AN OSTEOLOGY YET
its postcrania was supposed to be described but it hasnt been so idk
Whatâs in stegosauria thatâs not a stegosaurid?
What does isaberrysaura look like?
Huayangosaurs
@full lagoon we dk, it only has the skull described
We do have all the material shown (and it was NOT something like dryo i forgot the name lol; originally thought to be one)
Stego my brain blanked what are stuff like nanosaurus and dryosaurus
Such is the dilemma of finding bones misplaced from the rest of the body đ
Basal Neo ornithischian
Yes those ones
Interestingly, that inferred leg shape almost makes it look like a lanky theropod, I wonder how likely that is.
this was a recon based on neo ornithischians
Probably not very, dunno how accurate this is but the ilium looks rather small
It must be that I'm not used to seeing specimens with legs quite that long.
The recon isnt accurate at all its all assumed, not based on actual material
the material is probably still unprepped
Yeah that's what I was assuming based on other well known neornithscia
yeah, it maybe resides inside of Huayangosauridae
I mean, saurian tried that so we know how that turns out
anyone got with pterosaurs? am still kind of stump whether the neck detail I gave this guy is enough or not
make the neck thicker imo
Yeah I agree, it looks a bit thin
Make it thinner, it won't be accurate until it looks like it would choke on a pencil lead
Make more room in the context of the esophagus and throat I'd say
like this?
They were so busy making T.rex's nostril pores correct that they forgor to make the gameplay fun
Looks a lot better to me, bro didn't have room for a throat before
No, it'd be fine
if only we actually had a sense of what a pterosaur thorat looked like
Azdarchids have no use for a throat, for they feed on the fears of orphans
I like the horn that you put on the snout, I'm assuming this is a speculative pterosaur?
If we look at birds like storks, the esophagus and various airways can easily fit into the space
Probably like a throat 
I mean what he originally had barely traced the vertebra
Yea, I know lol
Would you call this a horn?
No
As much as ceratosaurus' I suppose, not a true horn. (You get what I mean)
def
I can't find an x-ray of a heron that isn't bunched up but they're freaks
Weird
Freaks is such a kind word for what ever the hell this is
However I still question if an azdarchid would be exactly like that due to their larger size and build
true would love to see some actual soft tissue in sometime in the future that gets assigned to these animals
For sure. Unfortunately it may never come to be given the nature of fossilization. đ
The earth is vast, and our efforts so narrow, I'm sure one day it will be uncovered
That's definitely a fair statement too
Who says it canât be attempted again?
The general wisdom of not repeating someone else's mistakes
Well that game went under cause scummy people. If the right people work on a project, itâll be fine.
So the throat just does whatever
The problem with saurian is that if you have to keep up with the modern times you'll end up making 5 times the game over and over because of new discoveries
Imagine throwing the entire mechanic of Dakotaraptor, a playable in the trash bin because it suddenly isn't a thing anymore.
I mean, not really. If you really do your research and set up an accurate environment with accurate creatures, only minor tweaks will need to be made.
Imagine Saurian did get off the ground, with the devs maintaining their dedication to accuracy.
The latest nano paper would have been absolutely devastating to the game
To be fair we do still have large dromeosaur elements, so it would just have to unnamed to work
Nanoâs validity in itself was devastating to decades of tyrannosaurus research, saurian woulda been fried
Hey fishy, I saw you writing of acro yesterday
Could you tell me more of it? I want to know about the huge spine
Acro's spines are broken, it's just a natural curve connecting the first spines and the sacrals
We do have one described vert somewhere that shows the sheer height (anterior caudal), forgot if it was the paratype or smu specimen
SIX SEVENNNN
ikr
Great meme reset (those who knoe)
The Goat
fah now I gonna redo my spec evo inostran
Lol
wait nah I think it's close but I do gonna straighten the back leg and swopped the tail
Now I see the change in proportions better
idk why but his 3D one remidns me alot of his 2022 one
@balmy oyster @full lagoon @runic heart Forgot to send this
So we donât have a smooth transitional between stegosaurids and whatever came before that was plateless?
Oh and which was larger, Miragaia or dacentrurus?
Im not sure what you mean for the first thing, the phylogeny is heavily reduced taxa wise idrk why its missing quite a bit and Dacent is larger
did stegosaurus co-exist with any other stegosaurid?
i know other stegosaurids lived in the same formation but i believe they lived earlier then it
Alcovasaurus
stego and its mini me
hesperosaurus is there too but I donât remember if they overlap
the almighty power of AI will bring the Dinosaurs back to life đ
who let bro cook
now you know sea dragon ragebaits with ai because everyone just gives keep giving him a reaction to keep going
dacentrurus is the second largest stegosaur iirc, so Dacen clears. Mira is about 6 meters ish
So apparently Ino's model is about 1.2-1.3t LOL
PRIMEVIL INO SIZE WAS ACCURATE?
Diplocaulus got redesigned. I am appalled
Nibelsnarf be like:
(Monster hunter fans rise up)
Also this is funny
Is it possible to speculate Stegosaurus having tiny spikes on his back? Like, is there any evidence against or in favour of this possibility?
Dan Downsized it lol
it's the same volume
I really think he is wrong on that ngl
Perfect size snack
đ§ââïž
Heess beautiful
I love paleontology
Hello paleo friends. I got a replica velociraptor skull for Christmas and am going to need to paint it myself unless i keep it ivory white.
Any insights into what color bests fits a velociraptor fossil based on the most common layers /strata they come from? Ik i could just look into it but there might be some nuance you smart people might know I wouldn't realize.
Spinos biggest skull to its holotypes.
The holotype size should be right based off my scaling
Dinosaur
Yes a dinosaur
Yes indeed a dinosaur
Its just the numbers given to me by the program
I'll reiterate that it was the graphic that had an incorrect scale bar - the model in blender was always the correct size, and that's where the volume of the model is from
Obviously it may not be "correct", but it's not my priority to estimate the size anyways. Its the skeletal anatomy that counts
gold ofc, everyone knows velociraptor lived in absolute luxury and many were fossilized in their Scrooge McDuck style money pits
Poorly described af
I mean ancestors of Mosasaurus and Tylosaurus already had aquatic adaptations
Itâs more accurate that they became entirely aquatic separately. Pretty sure the early mosasauroids were still semi-aquatic at the very least.
Fair enough
Yes, quite a few
Ironic how the Stego replies to a question about himself
Assuming maximum splitting, S, Stenops, Diracodon, Hesperosaurus (SEPERATE) S. ungulatus, armatus, sulcatus, stenops and Alcovasaurus would have co-existed. with Hypsirophus being probably the only one not contemporary with any pre-existing labled stegosaur genus
This ofc is probably nto entirely correct since morrison stratigraphical dating is kinda eh
(I will also check this specifically asap)
maybe this idea came from the prehistoric shark ? đ€·ââïž
In 1982 a complete shark fossil was discovered in Bearsden
After skimming, that is not what happened at all
Especially because the first prototype entered flight testing in the 60s
âïž I know Sea Dragon is ragebaiting but like come on gng this isn't even good ragebait
Semi related but I wanted to point out a potential use of that strange structure on the animal's fin. What if it was like that of a horn shark, making ingestion by larger predators more difficult?
Instead of literally being deleted when swallowed, what If it lodged itself inside of the mouth of its attacker with this and was spit out?
That's actually very possible, as being taller than the mouth gape of potential predators is a very common predator defense in fishes.
Yeah and imagine that spiky cheese grater fin scraping across the roof of your mouth. It would definitely be uncomfortable.
Sand-Blasting Breath Holder vs. Armored Shark: Nature's Amazing Defenses #shortstory #wildlifeonearth #documentary
.
.
.
.
đ Ever wonder how ocean creatures stay one step ahead of danger? This benthic hunter camouflages with sand blown through spiracles, while baby horn sharks rock nature's sharpest armor. Survival isn't about being biggest...
3087
na, i think it was more like some sort of underwater radar, like the AWACS
@outer tusk ain't that right, bro ? 
@full lagoon
Speed of a demon
similar to the sperm whale's, but this one was 360°
i can swim faster than that
Yeah crocs be hiding their true potential
i hide my true potential too
most alpha predators do
Cakes are the alpha predators
na, i am talking about the likes of a trex, spinosaurus, megalodon, tiger, etc... đ
Yeah its funny when they do that
Specially Black Caimans
so stego lived with a bunch of other stegosauyrids from what im gathering?
i wonder what allo's favourite was too eat
stego tried to split so hard he noted s.stenops twice
what does maxium splitting even mean?
most of those species are considered invalid by researchers he just used the maximum possible number
bro just died, damn
What were lambeosaurus front feet like?
Yeah the clip is quite absurd when you think about it. The animal literally just disappeared in a cloud of blood. One of the main reasons I noted out how the build of stethacanthus probably wouldn't have made it too easy to swallow.
the Hyneria is just like that
He's built different đł
Random but I keep hearing about T. rex being an ambush predator but how would an animal that is over 9 thousand pounds sneak up on anythingđ
silent foot steps
elephants sneak up on people all the time and they aren't even trying to be stealthy. you just need dense foliage or some big rocks
Yea that makes sense itâs just trippy to me how an animal that large could move like that
ignoring the footpad bit for theropods, which does help
i mean its not built for chasing, better to get lower and outright bone shattering are better for ambushing
tbf with rex it might have run for longer distances than other animals of its size. i'm sure it would prefer to hunt in areas with lots of cover though, unless it was nocturnal
I heard from a podcast with dave hone that it would kinda like try to sneak up and get the first bit of distance before its prey could notice (basically a definition of ambushing so yea lol)
I don't blame them, elepahnts are very sneaky animals
I wonder if we could have survived the same asteroid that sent the dinosaurs to the shadow realm
I was playing POT the other day and a friend of mine unironically hid like this from some apexes, it worked
đ lmao
I would believe it, especially compared to creatures outside saurischia
https://x.com/GogoMrdodo/status/2005050161731682449/photo/1 i loveee speculative behavior like this, even when not defending their kids, they still form a circle around them just incase, do any animals do this in nature?
yes
sperm whales i presume?
As one always says
When a large creature gets in a protective circle a even worser creature is coming
well
Or they are protecting the vulnerable
That too but its usually when predators are coming
wdym there's nothing in that pic
IKR, bro i've been stuck trying to find it 
âThey arenât dinosaurs, but theropods like most of the dinosaurs like Trex or raptorsâ
âwhales arenât animals theyâre mammalsâ
"Humans aren't animals they're mammals" (genuinely heard this before)
i've heard fish aren't animals, insects aren't animals, reptiles aren't animals, birds aren't animals, but i have never heard mammals aren't animals before
you forgot the best one: humans aren't animals
Muskox I think
oh no that one i've heard before. every other mammal is an animal but not us because we're smart
thisjust made my day
no no mind you any 4 legged mammal is an animal, but whales arenât because theyâre mammals
I genuinely had that argument with a teacher
four legs good, two legs or less... not a mammal
what if you have 3 legs
What did scales look like for most plesiosaurs and pliosaurs? And I guess ichthyosaurs as well. And would any species of marine reptile in particular have been lacking lip scales for some reason?
Plesiosaurs and Ichthyosaurs mostly don't have scales at all. They have naked skin like dolphins. Scales are only really found in the front edge of the fins, which is likely for hydrodynamic-related reasons.
I thought they did have scales but just super tiny
No. Mosasaurs were like that though.
I love how the first ones are coloured like leopard seals (I think so anyways)
How would the skin have transitioned to scales? What would that look like?
are pliosaurs the same or are they scaley like mosasaurids?
I mean we don't have skin preservation from them at all tmk. But there's no reason to suspect they'd be different from typical plesis.
I mean the scales afaik are very small and smooth. They weren't really too visible.
Pliosaurs are a type of Plesiosaur so it's probably the same as the other Plesiosaurs
From the hit novel, Not An Animal Farm
choose your large african megafuana that is the most compareable to ceratopsians locomotion wise
Well you see, animal and mammal rhyme, so they're the same but none of those other things 
the answer would be hippos right?
is the size of the eyes good?
Looks alright to me!
Is the biggest kronosaurus still estimated at 11m?
did yall know carcha had organs for reproduction like us
I was gonna say I noticed similarities
neither
Nuh uh you gotta choose one smarty pants
the "closest" is maybe elepahnt
Tmm yeah
Hasn't changed
11.5m Beast
well you dont chose it, the answer is non of them, but the "closest" is elephants probably
Peak timing since Krono skull just dropped 2 hrs ago
did he post this on his Insta cause I can't find it on his DA?
wait how did you get the images though, you ss'd them?
You can get them from inspect element
Pliosaurs and plesiosaurs probably had lip scales right? I mean idk why they wouldnât, besides some crazy snaggleteeth in later elasmosaurs.
It's been suggested that large Ceratopsids might have been as athletic as rhinos:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352216336_The_evolutionary_biomechanics_of_locomotor_function_in_giant_land_animals
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/paleobiology/article/abs/forelimb-posture-in-neoceratopsian-dinosaurs-implications-for-gait-and-locomotion/D68C8C8D7CEAE836F5B5BE65A78ABD93
so can i use this to tell matt to buff eos sprint speed lol?
Personally, I doubt that Sauropterygians as a whole had lips.
Krilling myself over this.
Eo charge is already faster than a real life rhino
eo charge travels at 57.6 KM/H
i ment eos normal sprint speed
fastest playable in the game is eurhino, traveling at 180 KM/H during breach. hatzeg nosedive at 144? KM/H should be second
144 km/h for hatz dive is actually not bad. 180 km/h ichthyosaur would die instantly tho
would rip the skin of his bones lmao
How fast would hatz go if it wants to unalive(POT doesn't allow the other word đ) itself and nosedives from the sky
idk what the terminal velocity of a hatzegopteryx is, probably like 300-400km/h?
Oneshots argentinosaurus 
I swear i saw a blog somewhere that calculated terminal velocity of a gallimimus but i can't find it
What- I didn't know it was THAT fast.
Its average flight speed is like 80 km/h, nosedive being double that seems reasonable
Why do people still think birds are not dinosaurs and are instead just close to dinosaurs
because schools still teach that birds and reptiles are separate classes
and I kinda get it because trying to get 10 year olds to understand cladistics and the seven billion unranked clades everything is in is a nightmare
My 60 year old dad got in a shouting match with me over birds being reptiles
The logic of birds not being reptile would be the same as saying that we are not mammals because we don't have extensive fur.
It's mostly an historical relic more than anything. It's only been something recently considered (since the 80-90's) iirc.
How accurate are these estimates
Well what did the basal members look like?
Saurosphargids and Placodonts.
Though this guy might be their closest relative.
indosuchus and indosaurus seem fine enough but raja is a bit off
Indosuchus and Indosaurus are said to be 2.7 metres tall and 7 metres long đ
i mean like, the closest in locomotion to it , not the exact same
yeah no these are ass, mainly because the original artist that the sizes used isn't known for the based scaling
Yea, though these from a book which will be published next year
I feel like this book is gonan be bad
Atleast the information is somewhat accurate.
Hmmmmm... I want it.
File is too big to send over discord but it is findable online
Just dmed you the link
Early Flowers and Angiosperm Evolution by Friis, Crane, & Pedersen is another really good book on mesozoic paleobotany
^I also am interested for the link
Dmed
I wish allosaurus's mating dance was it just break dancing
Expecially because mesozoic plants are so much different! I really want it so muchh
plants were huge back then, produced more oxygen
Is the colossal "dire Wolf"'s white fur actually accurate or not?
It's doubtful since they sourced material from La Brea, which is not a snowy environment, and would select against white predators.
It's more likely they were just paler than modern wolves afaik
Thank you
Speaking of plants in mesozoic... How realistic is Twisted forest and/or the giant tree?
the biggest mesozoic trees we know are like 400ft tall, surely there could have been larger ones but not the size of big tree overlook
The biophysical limit of tree height has been calculated to be around 130 meters, redwoods probably got that high within recent prehistory, @stiff osprey where is the record of 400 footers in the Mesozoic from?
Larramendi et al (2020)'s sauropod book mentions it, I don't think it was exactly 400 ft but more like 113-115 meters
Not exactly true. Primary productivity was probably higher during periods of higher CO2, the plants weren't bigger they were just more plentiful and/or energetically productive
The tallest living Sequoia is about that tall, so thats reasonable
Me trying to read about paleozoic (or triassic) plants only to find out most of the papers are behind a paywall⊠there is so little about paleobotany anyway
Huh
Oh i was right the first time
143 meters is pretty funne
I mean possibly. Itâs also a possibility that the gray wolf dna they used just ended up expressing white fur.
One of the press posts said the lighter fur was a dire wolf feature, though tbf who knows when they're telling the truth or not
Again, there isnât much dire wolf in them. The skeleton and build is very much akin to gray wolves.
Dires are much more robust in the snout area, and are a bit bulkier than actual canids.
Hard to compare a living animal to a skeleton, especially if it's a juvenile. They do seem to have particularly wide snouts but so far are not much different from grays postcranially
Again, I donât know as much about mammal stuff. Iâm much more knowledgeable as a dinosaur/reptile enthusiast. The guys over in the Ecos server know much more on the subject.
tbh the ecos dire wolf looks very gracile to me, it's probably due to the short fur though
Yeah they probably werenât extremely furry. Itâs still California, so it wasnât that cold.
definitive proof that Spinosaurus could dive
A Preview From Spinosaurus Adventure Part 2
Don't do it, don't take the bait...
Thereâs been unpublished stuff which suggests pale coloration but almost certainly not white. Snow White is essentially unheard of in large carnivorans unless itâs under specific circumstances. It was lowkey made up for the Game of Thrones appeal.
Wasn't the white chosen for due to genetic complications with genes for a "lighter" coat?
Havenât exactly heard of that. I only heard that they had to do a more complicated workaround method to get the white color because the genes were tied to some physical issues.
That's what I'm remembering
I was under the impression that they did try to do "lighter" but couldn't, though yours also makes sense
Wewn't dire wolves more jackal-like than actual wolves?
Thatâs a misnomer. Dire Wolves are kind of their own lineage not super closely related to anything else.
You could say our knowledge of dire wolves is in pretty dire straits
Idk why I remembering someone saying that Direwolf used to be a very large jackal (or like an ancestor to it) I wouldn't know myself since I never interested myself in prehistoric mammals, just wanted to add my own experience to it
Itâs a misunderstanding of how to look at phylogeny. I fell for that too at the time. Lemme grab the image.
While itâs tempting to say because of this, theyâre closest to jackals because theyâre next to it in the tree, thatâs not how it works. Theyâre related to all the other canines here equally. Theyâre sister to that entire lineage. Not the next split after that lineage forms.
Jackals are closer related to the painted dogs, dholes, and wolves than they are to aenocyon.
Wasnât their material sourced explicitly not from La Brea
Ngl but I learned to distrust these more than Thomas Carr in a Nanotyrannus convention, expecially after trying to read megaraptorans on wikipedia.
One of their localities is from southern latitudes, the other i don't remember
It wasnât. It was from somewhere around Ohio iirc. In the east.
Ohio is pretty northern, but was it within the arctic circle at the time? I imagine not
It was about the same as now yes. I looked it up. The DNA was from two fossils in two different sites. One in Ohio and one in Idaho.
Both are northern
Evidence I do not know where US states are
Might I also add that even if it was super northern, it would say basically nothing. Arctic Wolves are an isolated population with limited genetics (they arenât even born white) and polar bears are bears that are also extremely specialized marine mammals.
whats y'alls hopes, thoughts and predictions for paleontology in 2026?
There is no serious correlation with northern latitudes and lighter colors in such animals.
Arctic circle is just the beginning of the region which has at least one 24hour day and one 24hour night
Cold climates are decoupled from this.
Itâs why we can pretty confidently say homotherium probably wasnât white like that one segment in PhP Ice Age too.
What's the region that has sea ice called
The ocean
Dire wolves did not live in the ocean, so I was correct that they were not white
Impressive deductive work
This also suggests that pilot whales live in fire since they are black, the opposite of white
Boiling water (water with fire)
We had done some digging and the vegetation at the time in Idaho and Ohio are quite cold but nothing like Canadian Arctic Archipelago where the whitest of the modern wolves reside.
đ lmao
NHM-PV R.2981(a) and NHM-PV R.2129(b) actual good material. As well as something about Sauroniops.
Happy cause we are getting More Zucheng Stuff specially with Suecheng
Happy Adam is Finally likely getting described and have actual Good Ceratopcian Postcrania Description
Hopefully the Schimitar Spino gets Described
Hopefully we get more Carch Stuff, either Carch itself or a new lad
The Ohio material should be of a similar age
It's ironic since the only specimen I've seen hyped up for the last 3 years that actually got described was the Yellowstone hyperpredator
what was it?
A big meg someone hyped up as a new thing
Think the paper is said to be almost 50 pages or close to that
Don't remember
Adam Postcrania is damn good
https://x.com/Capi974/status/2004966858450219485 how big would this cleaner fish theroretically be?
I would say maybe about the size of a northern pike
ty pike man
Also this could be a cleaner wrasse
I think it would be sort of a symbiosis between fish and shark like today except with a bus sized shark and a quite large cleaner fish
on a scale of 1 pike to 10 pikes, howâs your day going
Also to all my other paleo nerds here, how likely do you think is it for an undiscovered sauropod or some other herbivorous dinosaur to have a trunk? Considering how highly complex and specialized they are I feel like itâd be incredibly unlikely, and proboscideans kinda got lucky with them long noses
That's a very interesting question.
It would likely be very unneccecary unless it was something as display or to variate calls, like a pronghorn or tapir. (Elephants too to an extent as well minus physical functionality) Not for function because, well, neck should help with reaching stuff around and whatnot
We do already have evidence somewhat of expanding/fleshy nasal features on certain dinosaurs, so maybe not impossible.
Whatâs the status on the new Brontosaurus specimens? As I know it was changed partially recently from being a bit different from Aptasaurus
I was trying to reference mutaburrasaurus, but I understand thatâs a different case.
Plus I think most hadrosaurs have inflatable nasal areas.
Kid named saurolophines
Obviously no trunk but there was very clearly skull support for some sort of fleshy nasal structure
how accurate is everyone? https://x.com/Cindy_Joli/status/2005072592341008777/photo/1
~World's Largest Fully Aquatic Toothed Predators~
If there are any other known fully aquatic toothed predators worth mentioning, drop in the comments and I'll add later.
See full resolution on my deviant art page here:) https://t.co/G9ov5280WL
#marine #ocean #predatorx #whale
Not great tbf
Iâll just note what I see: mosasaurs are too thick, livyatan is too long, Prionosuchus is too stubby.
dang, i would've never noticed
i know your a specialist in marine mammals , why would you say some of inaccuracies is?
Helicoprion and Megalodon are pretty bad
Helicoprion is fine, but meg and livy do definitely have issues
Mosa and tyloâs size should be fine i believe since both can get pretty large
whats the issue with meg?
Some article I read said that helicoprion spun i
ts bottom jaw like a saw
I like how they included the Tuna
Like what are you doing here little fella? Go back to your can.
I mean, I know they're big, but when I think "largest toothed aquatic animals" Tuna is not on said list
tuna are the size of great whites??
Well, would you look at that lmao
I still stand by it being strange they're here. In fact I'd say the same for the great white.
It seems they're going off of some mix between time period and general grouping of animal.
Like I would've just put the sperm whale and maybe orca for extant species
A trunk on any reptile is extremely unlikely. The mammalian trunk is made of our complex facial musculature which reptiles lack. And that musculature is associated with differences in the pathway of the trigeminal nerve that are probably associated with developmental novelties unique to mammals.
Yea thatâs what I was thinking, itâs the whole reason human facial expressions can be so diverse
helcoprion snout is too long
to be fair we don't have that part preserved, so its possible it could've been a little more conicle and elongated unless we have a close relative that would probably disprove that
we do
Which ones
give me like a good hour or so it takes time
times ticking
Prionosuchus there is almost entirely wrong
The whole art looks great at a glance, but more direct looking shows almost too many issues to lost
This makes me wanna commit oceanic war crimes
You canât give plesiosaurs lips. Thatâs not even a statement of paleontological fact. Just a straight up moral statement. đ
can i ask exactly whats wrong with prino? im curious
legs r way too long, body too fat probably more
May I ask what exactly suggests that they didnât have lip scales? Or actual lips in this case..?
To my understanding the teeth are just too big, along with them being in a lipless group in general (could be wrong)
Nah youâre right thereâs nothing to suggest lips
Somehow i missed this completely
The species name isn't even correct. It's Funkei, not Funkie
Typo đ
Legs too long, body is too thick, head too large, tail is the entirely wrong shape, external gills
Could utahraptor have a neck this chunky
i mean
are peguins really the best allegory for a dromeosauird?
I always compare dromeosaurids with chicken
They are like one of the closest relatives of dinosaurs
duh, any bird IS a dinosaur
Correct statement, I only use chickens because I see a lot of people always use chickens to compare with dinosaurs
Admire pijon
I personally use flightless birds or birds of prey
yes pijon, very bird indeed
I personally use domesticated pigeon breeds or de-feathered taxidermies, but go figure
oh god i forgot about the second image
Maybe the pliosaurus liked to dance to the 80's music?
I would maybe say either a roadrunner or Seriema
Seriemaâs use a sickle claw to dispatch prey like dromies, and watching roadrunners they always just feel like how a dromie would move
Yes cause a lot of birds can look fat because of feathers
Technically speaking, Paleognathanae (ostriches, moas, emus) are the closest living relatives to non-avian dinosaurs
Kiwi
Not really, all birds are the closest relatives of non-avian dinosaurs and all birds are equally close
fair
No
Yes
Friend shaped
ew
What dinosaur would u give neck scratches and belly rubs
Well why would their ancestors have lost them?
dryosaurus
Obviously by the time pliosaurs became a thing, they wouldnât be lip scales cause they just didnât have scales at that point.
Not really? Birds have a smooth silhouette due to being flying animals and thus needing a streamlined shape to reduce flight drag
A Utahraptor would not be flying
Like any other lipless aquatic animal, they probably lost it to catch fish but this is a theory
Also their teeth, besides being too big, splay out too far (especially in the front), it's the same reasoning for Spinosaurus but more exaggerated
And because they had skin on most of them rather than scales, would it look more like a river dolphin face? And how far back should the line be drawn? Like, would it be the same case for ichthyosaurs because of a basal ancestor, or is it derived in just plesiosaurs?
Bluefin tunas are among the largest toothed bony fish
Sturgeons aren't exactly toothed so they are to exclude. Same for ocean sunfish, which are the largest extant bony fish. Oarfish have no teeth as well. Add to the toothless category giant Mekong catfish, which is a freshwater animal btw and I think the creator only includes marine species. Wels catfish teeth are not visible too. Marlins do have teeth but these are quite small. Alligator gars are dwarfed by yellowfin tunas: they are just long, not heavy. Arapaimas also are lightweights next to bluefins. Largest goliath groupers are about a third of the largest bluefin tunas' size.
I think they only selected animals with visible teeth and wanted to compare extant and extinct taxa. However, the disposition is not the best.
Yeah, I was not aware just how large they got. But I think it's odd to include either the tuna or great white, even if they're among the largest toothed bony and non bony fish.
They didn't do the same with the extinct taxa so it seems very redundant.
These properly proportioned? Yk, with the swept ribs and everything.
All of them
Me too
Actually everything seems correct here, tail flukes, skull shapes, even the fins.
uh yeah that's from my guy, Diocles
İ feel like the first ones belly is a little bit off
nah it's good
Heâs got some really good reconstructions
What about the necks? PoT tylo looks like its neck is raise up a bit, unless it just looks that way cause of the large throat sack thing.
Throat sack it is
It was very likely the nasal structure thing went up across the whole crest btw, if weâre following what goes on with maiasaura and prosaurolophus
S. angustirostris shows sulci on the distal tip of the crest that suggests keratinization there according to Sharpe et al 2025
It only looks keratinized at the tip. The entire rest of the nasal structure is grooved.
âïž
Another skull that shows the same thing. The visual âbumpinessâ seems to extend all the way down the nasal but i doubt this is all keratinization
Thats what "distal tip" is referring to, yes
Was also commenting for John as well.
Gotcha, good diagram that image shows it off well
Sharing the paper as well in case anyone missed it, https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.70098
Should also be known osteological correlates aren't 100% reliable (which is why I sorta sigh at diagrams that give us what Rex's face "really looks like)
what did their rex looked lke?
Like a Rex
What a terrible comparison
awh man đ
It was very unlikely to be likeâŠthis.
I do not think a giant predatory dromeosaurid would have had the same feathering as a sparrow.
when your basing a marine reptiles behavior and stuff like that, what modern day animal do you guys recommend looking at? i know mammals arent that good of a analog for reptiles , but the only other marine reptiles i can think of are marine iguana's and saltwater crocodiles
it would actually look like this, trust 
Not to mention the arm pose rendering them absolutely useless
You know whatâs funny is the feathering on the ânakedâ Achillo might not be that far off for a dromeosaur of that size.
marine reptiles were incredibly diverse and likewise probably had incredibly diverse behaviors but we can make some inferences based on fossil evidence, what niches they were occupying, and modern relatives. For instance, we have fossil evidence of live birth being widespread in marine reptiles and the babies they're having are larger than we'd expect for reptiles of their size (they're very much not like dinosaurs or most other reptiles in this respect) so it's very likely they were investing in more parental care than other reptiles. So in that respect they're behaving like marine mammals to some extent based on the limitations of being fully marine. There's also good evidence for social behavior being widespread in marine reptiles so again they're converging on some sharks and most marine mammals in that regard. There are similarities to their relatives too, mosasaurs probably had a forked tongue and possibly some kind of venom or toxic saliva
I still think this utah is one of the best utah artworks there is
Fred has/will NEVER miss
Hey can I use the the body of fragilis with a head swap for jimmadseni? or are there better options for jimmadseni
One of my favorites as well
Hm, is it more plausible that Utahraptor had relatively sparse feathers like this?
We donât know, but it surely isnât big sparrow
Aside from obviously albertosaurus, which creatures in the new Walking with dinosaurs are the most scientifically informed?
Honestly I'd say it's not out of the question, especially given its less derived features and inferred climate.
Chocobo Theme Death Metal Cover
and there's Matt's skeletal of SMA
Bro why this PoT thumbnail so detailed. Can you really make the graphics look this good? Really makes you appreciate all the lizard scaling on this thing. Cant wait to see the quality and accuracy of future models go up.
I feel like most of the changes needed for current models are all texture related. Also, I heard the pachy in game is the most inaccurate; why is that?
probably AI, look at the campto
It's basically a theropod with a dome more than having any actual pachycephalosaur anatomy. I don't know if it's the most inaccurate thing, cause kaiwhekea exists. But pachy ain't great either.
kai and metri exist but pachy is p bad ja
Metri def top over the innaccuraies of pachy and kai
Huh? Care to explain what's wrong with Pachy?
It's honestly hard to explain with words. I've just seen accurate pachy and it's a night and day difference (ontop of the obvious lack of beak thing).
So seems like quite a few creatures need complete remodeling to compete with the newer ones, and most if not all of the roster needs new textures.
Ok I checked the fossil, damn I really liked the rhino-iguana kind of face they gave it...
Allosaurus tlc has a chance to give it some really nice textures.
I just hope they make Jimmandesi still with a long face, it's what I like a lot about the Jimmandesi sub.
The poor Metri left the RDA laboratory
How do yall feel about the look of eurhinosaurus? Seems kinda bland to me, but idk what could be added or changed.
Also idk why Jimmandesi was the thin one and Europaeus was the chonky one, it should have kind of been the opposite since the two "big Al"s were confirmed Jimmandesi.
Same problem with Titan, don't get me wrong, Carolinii sub looks stunning and it's my own personal fave but I'm baffled as of why would they put it as the less huge subs given how it would be meant to represent the atm crown-holder of Carcharodontosaurids.
bro depends on the speicmens used
Aside from the fact that PoT Allo is anax-sized, Jimmandesi average is bulkier and larger than Europaeus average, that's just a fact.
Larger Yes, Bulkier we don't have an exact number
POT Allo is like 11.3m or smth
So its like
Smaller in Length than Big Anax and Fragilis but is Stocky Build lile old Sauro so makes up
that campto looks AI
the better question would be "what did they get right with pachy?" and the answer is not much besides it having a dome head!
Metri and Pachy are rather bad accuracy wise overall
Tylo Mogs All
Titan is....complicated
How is Titan complicated? I thought it was second to tylo.
What's with Titan? Last time I checked it's one of the best depictions of Carcharodontosauridae in games
Random is Changing his Titan
And well
It has quite the changes
You will prob see whenever he finishes it
Was yes, and will be till Random publishes his new one
Where it will prob still be good except for few things(blame it on Titan's Bones)
I need a little more context with this, who's random and what is going on with changing titan? Is official remodeling it?
Nah they POT Won't Change Titan
No need for it
And for Random
You know him as Randomdinos aka the maker of this lad and much more skeletals
Oh ok, I panicked a little, don't see quite any differences tho...
That is his Current Titan, but he is updating it
And there are some differences with the new one
who's randomdinos, never heard of him
New one is not done yet but with what its done you can already tell he evolved like a certain relative in certain part
@thorn grove randomdinos is totally the friends we made along the way...
So this is a job or hobby of his?
can the magical randomdinos make a lingwulong skeletal
Ehhh
Actually idk
Maybe Job to an Extent??
No idea
If you Comission it Prob
Ppl already have Comission him stuff like his Para and Acro
Lingwulong is peak tho
I mean, did he or is he studying paleontology?
I think he is studying
I forgot
I feel like you have to be pretty good to be making skeletals of an animal based on any level of fragmentary material.
He is studying, however I am working with Big Paleo to make sure he never gets a job because he does not upsize T. rex!
how can we be certain random isnât already in the pocket of big paleo?
Imagine a paleo database with all up-to-date info and reconstructions and whatnot. Quite the project, but itâd be really neat.
Now where is the paper describing BHI 6248 in detail...
Wasnât more giga material found at the holotype site? I guess thatâs got a paper coming out eventually.
Atp just use Sue and Leave Spino cause otherwise it gets Dwarfed
would titanaboa be able to go on land or would it be too massive?
Prob too heavy
so a titanaboa could theroretically beach itself like a whale?
yes
Donât yet, lingwulong needs an actual description to save its life also its a bonebed
by the way, the existence of all life, including dinosaurs, is a near impossibility
The origin of life on Earth via the spontaneous emergence of a protocell prior to Darwinian evolution remains a fundamental open question in physics and chemistry. Here, we develop a conceptual framework based on information theory and algorithmic complexity. Using estimates grounded in modern computational models, we evaluate the difficulty of ...
does any prehestoric hog / pig species match the size of Mamoswin?
2.5 m
291.0 kg
no creature matches the proportions of pokemon, most pokemon are blimps
is mamoswine suppose to a hog, mastadon or mammoth?
all
the pokemon that most closely resembles its actual weight is probably mudsdale
and yet still a certainty!
truly a ice age package
but not naturally... as it has been taught
something is quite not right, everyone knows that...
I'm sure they do
?
(I assume they're trying to imply God exists instead of just "a deity")
Right, good luck with that lol
See to turn this into a real experiment you'd need to compare a control universe with universes that contained godlike deities and see if one was more likely to develop life than the other. Unfortunately we only have our universe to compare ourselves to, in which both dinosaurs and humans evolved. Putting their likelihood of evolution both at 100% irrespective of a deity
why is it on fire and then also getting carried away by a flood, what happens in march of the dinosaurs
Pyroclastic flow I imagine
Flaming branch landed on it -> fluff caught fire -> volcanic explosion melted the snow on top of the mountain -> ash + melted snow = ash flood -> it was standing in a shallow valley that acted as a funnel for the flood
We need to bring back this style of writing for documentaries
PrePlanet was cool and all but cmon, we need that flair
agreed, PhP is too cozycore
"He who strikes the king must strike to kill...or pay the price." đŁïž đŁïž đ„ đ„ đ„
surviving earth seems like it'll have that old school edge possibly
Pleading, sobbing, crying that it does
Honestly PP was a better outlet for that old-school dramaticism to come out simply because it's majority "made up" stories but Ig SE might also be that 
I think the producers have a better idea about storytelling, given what they did with WWD and the inherent drama of mass extinction
I feel like anti-awesomebro went too far, dinosaurs are friggin awesome in the most literal sense, I don't want to see them sleeping
Iâm fine with seeing them in more lowkey situations like php but itâs nice to have both ways in moderation, not entirely one or the other
I think the criticism with PhP lacking violence was overblown until Ice Age.
still haven't seen Ice Age cause I'm broke after Christmas and not as into mammals but I've heard similar things
Tbh I think S1 is passable
S2 is where you start to see the criticism really take foot
Ice Age is just...yea wow 
Take all of the arguably nitpicks in the first two seasons and make them actual issues. That's Ice Age.
pretty much
Interesting, I did see Naish's point about showing the different lifestyles of mammals versus dinosaurs. Life being cheap in the Mesozoic, but also I'm kind of sick of that dogma too.
I will agree however I will never forgive S2 for hyping up Tarbosaurus as the apex predator and known sauropod hunter
And then having the sauropod die via tripping
Yeah no there's not to say that it isn't valid in a few cases. That and the troodontid hunting birds are the most glaring examples.
THANK YOU
I understand an aversion to gore, understandable, but cmon đ„
That scene was the biggest blueball I've had
That's why we need good indie creators unafraid of portraying the carnage of brontophagy
they went for that but it felt like they really didnât showcase any unique lifestyles or behaviors at all, like no descriptions of how their adaptations work or why they do things just a âfamily survivalâ over and over
all that said, I liked the giganto segment a lot even if they oversized it
That's the big thing. Prehistoric Planet was noted for showing off a lot of things that people didn't think of with dinosaurs before. Ice Age was very by-the-numbers to the point of being very repetitive. There's too many "following a child and it nearly evades death" scenarios.
The amount of "Wow, they actually did this/looked like this?" I had from the first two seasons dropped like a rock with Ice Age
It then turned into "Wow, there's a lot of mating in the ice age
"
gotta stay warm
obligatory comment about how wwb had multiple scenes of full frontal
I think we're running around the obvious fact that dinosaurs are cooler and more interesting than mammals, who pretty much just mate and raise their babies all day
Perhaps this is commentary that Ice Age was so by-the-books that the only scenes that stood out was the mating...
the ice age (and cenozoic as a whole) has so many cool animals there just has to be actual focus on unique behaviors and ecosystems
The biggest problem with php ice age is lack of name dropping tho
I think the sequences were mainly alright besides the one with homotherium and mammoths and the plot armor babies
Take a shot every time Loki says "ice age"
even without the no name dropping thereâs basically no information or background given on the animals, makes it feel a lot more like eye candy
Perhaps it would've been better if it was a Crocodile Hunter-Prehistoric Park hybrid show where Nigel teaches us...
yes
I feel like that undoubtly concerning in my opinion but I guess someone would say otherwise
Btw I heard some people say php ice age megalania's tail is too short
Is this correct?
This is called "vibes-based guessing" because I don't think we ever see the tail in a shot that would indicate such
can i be honest? i think when dinosaurs roamed america deserves more praise
do we have any notable feathered dinosaurs from Campanian
we don't have many, if any, Campanian rocks with the right preservation for feathers but there were plenty of lineages present in the Campanian presumed or extremely likely to be feathered
There are Ornithomimus specimens from the Upper Cretaceous of Alberta, not sure if Campanian or Maastrichtian, with arm feathers preserved
Hi
The specimen from Dinosaur Park is the most well-described one
thank you, that I'd say is the most notable feathered dino with direct evidence in the Campanian
The correct answer is that the Ice Age has boring mammals compared to most of the Cenozoic
All of the unique things that were beautiful and alien to us are already gone by now for the most part
I mean, havenât there been recent studies that show heavy Campanian glaciation?
yes, the Barrika glaciation 82.8â80.96 Ma. You don't need a glaciation to have feathered dinosaurs though, plenty of birds live in tropical climates today with full feathers
Well yes but itâs just another reason why some animals would have retained feather for longer I guess.
idk
I believe there was a paper recently that brought up the possibility that Campanian glaciations were more extreme than Pleistocene ones.
"but he who strikes the king must strike to kill" đŁïž đ„đ„đŻ
jfc I'm an idiot I didn't realize you made this joke already
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825225003125#s0110 the authors say it's comparable to records of Cenozoic glaciation
Hi guys I'm new here in this discord how do I sign in from path of Titans
Surviving earth đ
I put my email and password but game shows that incorry password or email
Stellar sea cow đ
Honestly have high hopes since they actually updated their dimetrodon with scales after that paper released, and its concept art already didnât have them.
Stellar's sea cow comes from giant tusked manatees
Speaking of tusks
Odobenocetops!! Needs more people to see it existed
If yall were to just be able to see and know what 1 prehistoric animal really looked like in its entirety, what would it be.
Rex or Gorgo
Iâd want to say those two, or some kind of basal carnosaur.
Iâm leaning more towards basal carnosaur or Triassic theropod though since we already have a sick look at Alberto/gorgo.
maybe therizinosaurus, or bahariasaurus logically
but my heart says allosaurus, stegosaurus, t rex, triceratops, just a really popular one
Hrmmmđ€
You know what they say about never meeting your heroes?
And knowing what a basal member of any group looks like would really help understand the rest of them.
amarga or baja
This made me chuckle
Argentavis was probably glorious just getting by on concept alone
Maybe the real game plan should be some glupdumbo that I dislike...this way my favorites are untouched and the opps are ruined...
I vote Bahariasaurus for this reason
Keeping in mind that these were all real animals who don't owe us anything as fans, I suppose any response is equally valid.
Chilantaisaurus.
We already have great previews from the fossil record of Sinosauropteryx, so I'm pretty confident that I'd like the look of the living Panda Chicken
Imagine picking edmontosaurus to be funny, and itâs actually just blue. Like the Wwd one.
Maraapunisaurus.
By all means, gimme. (One of the largest and weirdest megafaunal dinosaurs)
Piveteausaurus
tbh just knowing exactly what t rex looked like would be a huge cultural thing
As cool as it would be to see Dinosaurs irl, I feel like the fact that you can kind of pick and choose what you imagine they looked like is half the fun with them in a broader cultural sense
Paleontology rewind
Help us protect and save animals by going to https://www.farmkind.giving/animalogic and using our code ANIMALOGIC for a 50% boost.
2025 was an amazing year for pelaeontology. Follow Danielle as she tells you about the newest dinos and the newest discoveries you might have missed.
Get your copy of "Strange Creatures" now! Itâs filled with a...
Yooooooooo everyone
I have been studying maastrictian prehistoric life for a while now and I think I got an accuracy review on Prehistoric Planet 1!
The accuracy review lands at 4.6/5
There are a few outdated bits, some nitpicks and a singular narration error
If anyone wants to know the issues, tell me
Also why does pot still have laten named laten despite it now being considered a junior synonym of Stenonychosaurus Inequalis?
Sure I get that people are more used to this name more than stenon but still
I regard pot as a pretty solid game when it comes to scientific accuracy on fauna, so I am kinda sad about the whole laten stenon thing
Can't the same be said for miragaia or whatever? Anyways idk but at the end of the day it's up to the devs on what they wanna add/remove
Funny thing, Mira was made undeniably valid a few days ago
Sum about 22+ distinct features that Dacentrurus doesn't have
The laten stenon thing isn't really cared about as much because at the end of the day it's just another troodontid with naming issues
Really? That's neat
does make you wonder what else is in the same situation as miragaia but is still in need of a paper like this
if I had a nickel for every time a smaller genus was confused with a bigger genus and had controversies for over a decade, but was solved in the final quarter of 2025, i'd have two nickels, which isn't a lot but it's weird it happened twice
POT has a very large fanbase, so changing it can easily cause issues. If Laten was removed or changed to Stenon, all you'd hear from players would be "Where did Laten go?" If it were me, I wouldn't want to change a playable that I had worked hard on. Even if its invalid, it can still remain somewhat accurate and fun to play with so I personally don't see a problem with it
to be fair Laten was kind of an odd choice to add in the first place, in the same paper it was described in it's validity was questioned not two sentences later
Elaborate on this
Spino
Megalodon
Ngl I didn't know what laten was until POT đ It feels a bit obscure to me
It was a known thing in the paleontology community because it was one of the big three Troodontids that killed Troodon's validity
As a taxa it lasted like 4 years.
Troodon found dead
Rip Troodon >.>
Good riddance! The guy who named it is actually awful so sinking it into Stenonychosaurus is great
I sure do hope American troodontids keep stable!
At least pectinodon will last I think
lol
Cambridge is tryna establish a neotype tho so one can hope that Latenivenatrix and Stenonychosaurus die in a fire
The neotype of Troodon, famously without controversy and issueâŠ
The paper's really funny though. Like they acknowledge the buttload of problems with doing that but are just like "Can this happen anyway? Pretty please?".
shhhhh
Its kronosaurus eiectus situation all over again
isn't the neotype kind of...not adequate for being a neotype though?
Every time I eat a ray finned fish I pray to Spinosaurus aegyptiacus for Troodon to become valid
Eh this situation is actually a bit complicated. Eiectus was funny because everyone just went "That's dumb" and moved on.
Spino too huh?
it would be so much better to create a neotype that was found preferably from the same formation, maybe even locality.
perhaps
lads i'm sure if I confirmation bias this hard enough it will become true, like Nanotyrannus did
Yeah kinda funny how the paper came out and everyone were like nah
gsp is reaching a point where other people in the science field are also going to eiectus his work and the problem is solved by doing nothing
Unfortunately his isn't even funny because of how it disrespects a lot of people.
hence why I propose Eiectusing him.
he doesn't respect everyone putting in genuine work and is trying to slime in his own name in literature? keep going, don't bat an eye
Honestly, even gsp's skeletals and mass estimates arent good nowadays
He's entering the david peters arc kinda
(now obviously this can't just, happen, but I do feel more and more people will start opting to fully ignoring his work as it effectively does not matter with what he writes)
poorly traces over fossils and uses both his & illustrations in general for descriptions and osteological examination instead of...the actual material. which he clearly is capable of accessing and looking over.
What bird do u think might have been therezinosaurus
Dont forget the human perception based analysis he did on tyrannosaurus specimans lol
emu
In terms of looks, or niche?
Looks
the "these lacrimal tips look similar enough compared to other lacrimal tips" paper.
Prob less hairy version of ratites
Btw What even is this acro lol
Why did someone come up with the idea that the pubis bone is what differentiates ornischian and saurischian dinosaurs? Why use that 1 bone as a reference point
This may sound stupid but since penguins live in the arctic does that technically mean that penguins use to be a dinosaur that lived in the snow like yutyrannus
my brain
randoms acro if it didn't eat anything for 6 months
I mean there was a paper that suggested an alternate way to classify dino clades that puts ornithoschians and theropods in one group and sauropods in the other
Theoretically speaking, are there any actual rules on names for genera? I thought that you had to use Latin or Greek but now people are taking names from other languages more recently
So i guess what Iâm saying is can I just name a genus of hadrosaur âGeorge Bingusâ and it be accepted
Shrink wrap
isn't it the entire pubic region, illium ischium and pubis n all? but also because it's the best way to tell apart entire clades since limbs, skull bones, vertebrae, anything else really can make it more iffy and confusion
Thats exactly what chinese r doing rn
So you can prob get away with it as long as that name isnt already taken
Latin and greek is just the standard. In theory you can name a genus/species anything so long as it hasn't been used before. It's just not scientific to name your new species "Bobs burgers"
Knowing paleontology and cool names George Bingus is already ascribed to a bug 
I mean we already have "big paul", "weird wings", and a freaking gremlin
Why not name a new species like that
Those first two are just the meanings. That's a bit different.
Yi qi is just weird wings in chinese tho
So to a chinese its pretty much like that lol
My goofy ah going to get a PHD so I can name a new genus of Saurolophine Peter Griffin
i yearn for the day something like "gremlin" does somehow get an entire skeleton to its name and it now holds the mantle as best preserved neoceratopsian thing other than psittaco, forever called "gremlin"
Shoutout to the sabertooth genus named "Yoshi". idk I just think it's really cute cause it's named after the guy's cat.
Would I get muted if I mention the genus name of a certain plesiosaur btw
erm it wasn't a mammal either!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That is very cute
A cat is a complete and utter waste of the genus name Yoshi though đ this is dinosaurus levels of a name being used for the wrong thing
Sauropods + ornithischians and theropods would make more sense intuitively but ik there were omnivores/herbivores among the theropods
I think its just the hip-bone thing
you'd think, but early neotheropods and early neo prosauropods honestly look quite alike
Btw someone named a synapsid varanosaurus
Tf
Thats what im wondering though, just because that thing is a synapsid like us it is closer related to us than to dinos, but why is 1 hole vs 2 holes in the skull (sauropsids/diapsids) the reason? Why is that the relevant factor
dinosaurus.
Yes the earliest sauropods were carnis i think
Varnosaurus is worse since its literally monitor lizard in latin
cus thats how it is 
both skull types can be seen from across all related descendants and ties back to these 2 skull types. pattern recognition and evolutionary patterns will get you far
Eoraptor which is a basal saurosuchian closer to sauropodmorphs was omnivorous I think
In a phylogeny that puts theropods and ornithischians together, where do Silesaurs go
Yes but it has the sail in common with spinosaurinae/-ids/-ia (idk which latin suffix would be relevant here) + probably has also a lot more in common with them, so idk
wrong reply?
Sir sail is not a basal trait
However smth like holes in the skull originate much further down in the family tree
oh he's talking about dimetridon specifically..
saying "both have sail so both closely related?" is a disastrous take, regardless on your knowledge of phylogeny. convergent evolution is a thing that exists & also the two are separated by entirely separated eras.
Im more closely related to theri than a trex is to a theri cause we both stand upright ahh argument 
But Rex is a mostly featherless biped, therefore it is mostly a man And more related to you
humans have canines and some synapsids have specified canines
therefore my sister species is inostrancevia
I dont have scales and kronosaurus also doesnt have scales
Thus Im its closest relative
What about teeth, skin/scales etc.? If they're closer to dinosaurs/crocs etc. In that regard, why does an extra hole in the skull override that? Because that step in the evolution happened earlier?
Yes its a trait that happened way down there which split up those clades to begin with
Also dimetrodon has hetrodont teeth unlike majority of diapsids
teeth are super variable, we mistake them frequently. skin impressions don't preserve 99.9% of the time.
as silly as it sounds, holes in the skull (or any minute differences in skeletal anatomy really) can be extremely telling for where something fits in evolution.
the anapsid part didn't age well
true
Speaking of anapsids, where to turtles fit rn
Also, are pareiasaurs still considered as their relatives?
Mhm ok
And yes i guess i was talking hypothetically, if dimetrodon had more things in common with them than with us why would it make sense to point to the skull detail, that was basically my point
was just looking around, it seems turtles are considered diapsids but lost one pair of the holes some time down the line
I didnt know anapsids were a thing
tbf that's because they aren't anymore
I meant like r they closer to squamates or archosaurs?
Well still cool to know
turtles are now considered diapsids, closer to archosaurs than lizards
oh, by archosaurs currently
archosauromorphs reign supreme
Palaeo youtubers should make videos on phylogeny/taxonomy itself (what's even the difference), like what we talked about or what makes a genus/species etc.
I mean squamates are still bad ass
fortunately they do, clint's reptiles makes videos about all sorts of clades and they seem to be pretty accurate and informative
I'd reccomend Clint's Reptiles. He has an entire series relating to phylogeny.
Yeah his videos are good
The reason i started to get interested in this is exactly because of his videos, but i mean a more general video (without it being about a SPECIFIC clade/species etc.). Know what i mean? Like in order to be considered a genus, what does it take? What points are needed to be considered a species?
those are good questions, unfortunately I don't know any from the top of my head but if I find one I'll lyk
Yeah that'd be nice, videos are much better than reading stuff because this is kinda abstract for me xd
Im sure genus and species are pretty much arbitrary atm
Since theres no set standard for splitting
Thats why there are "splitters" and "lumpers" in paleontology
I only know of dimetrodon being a mammal because of clint i think haha
I wouldve thought its a dino for sure
Dimetrodon is not exactly a mammal
Its a synapsid but its not a true mammal
Oh i see, that makes it a bit easier. Like the word reptile or mummy (just got done watching his latest videos on mummy dinos)
Its closer relation to mammals than to dinosaurs then
Kinda funny how about 50% of mummy dinos are edmontos
They are amazing like the psittaco but the borealopelta has to be the best one
and yet ITS STILL ONE OF THE MOST POORLY DESCRIBED DINOSAURS WHAT ARE WE DOING PALEONTOLOGY
âStem-mammalâ is the best term really. It gets the mammal relation vs reptile point across without conflating it.
Yeah isn't the other few we know of large hadrosaurs too? I know there's one for Hypacrosaurus as well, and Corythosaurus I believe too.
I take "X is a young Y" less seriously than a JW movie, it was a clown practice started by Horner of all people and it was proven wrong more times than right... Hell I think it was never even proven right to begin with!
Horner looking at everything he tried to synonymize together based on ontogeny in the hell creek crumble and become their own thing anyways
We all know he did to laugh at Bakker
so much for that
Thats kinda weird now that I think about it
At least he was right about dracorex
I believe that Bakker did say that he has access to some material not released to the public on the matter, so itâs possible that this could be wrong, although I doubt it
Again, is it? Because to me it sounds again like Nanotyrannus.
If Im not wrong, dracorex being a young pachy is a general consensus while stygi is a bit controversial
Pretty sure that the general consensus as of now is that it either was a sub adult stage of Pachycephalosaurus Wy. Or was another species known as Pachycephalosaurus Spifiner
The latter is more supported as the spikes popping out from the dome-like structure of Pachycephalosaurus couldn't really re absorb it's self back at all
Though this is still scientifically debated
Hope this helped!
Thx
General consensus has the same value of fried air unless there is a good evidence of it, only serves to get in the way with unnecessary bias imho
I meant in for the scientific community, in which some support P. Spinifer while others support the sub adult thing
You are correct in that sense though
My other message literally has the question if anyone wants to know the problems with that show
Read it
They're not Archosauromorphs though, they're more basal
Outside of dinosauria however a phylogeny with Ornithoscelida is wrong
Archosauromorph relatives and no
Buriolestes, the basalmost sauropodomorph, was a carnivore
It was the difference that was used for these clade's names
Yeah, but that paper was wrong.
Baryonyx doesn't have a sail but I severely doubt Dimetrodon is more similar to Spinosaurus than Bary
Dimetrodon being similar to Spinosaurus,I want to die gng đ
To make things worse, apparently Dimetrodon was closer to mammals and by extension HUMANS rather than dinosaurs!
YDRWA already said this like 12 years ago gng
I mean technically it is similar just not related, right?
Oh no feilongs typing a lot Iâm scared ;-;
@granite thicket Dracorex is the juvenile form of both, sitting as Pachycephalosaurus sp. Cause has extra epiocipital (spikes) displaying some variance like chasmosaurines do
Meanwhile Stygimoloch (Pachycephalosaurus spinifer) sits as some separated species from P. wyomingensis, due to the geological time in between each other (just like Triceratops prorsus and horridus)
Oh thank god it wasnât towards my statement
nerds puru would handle a rex on land like a baby
Both are correct xd
Cause Stygimoloch fossil is not adult, is subadult
But it would be a subadult of the P. spinifer species, which means the spikes likely grew bigger/longer
Thanks for the info, also cool pfp
Thanks
Omg guys we finally figured out who dess is in deltarune
Shes a TORVOSAURUS
deino
Nice selfie very demure very mindful
nah this isnt actually a selfie tho
youâre right. How could you take a selfie when youâve been dead for 70 million years.
exactly man
some funny figure took it
who would win on land a 6 ton puru or a 10 ton rex
rex
Puru easy wins
how
Purus skin can withstand bites off other purus which have a 200k newton bite whilst a trex has 60k newtons, also the tail of a crocodile is very strong as they use it to swim and can leap out of water with it. They can use that tail to slap the trex as it has a very high gravity knocking the rex over and killing it from the drop
I wouldn't be so sure
when was a study that said puru had 200k newton bite
how accurate is the types of tylos attack? ie its ramming and stuff
Likely pretty accurate
Larger mosasaurs have thick, robust skulls like a tyrannosaur and likely rammed into larger prey to stun them before crunching (at least to my knowledge)
disclaimer that ofc it doesnât apply to all and we donât for definitive proof
So are Stygimoloch and Dracorex valid?
WellâŠyes but no.
juvi stygimoloch harhar
Background Crocodilians have dominated predatory niches at the water-land interface for over 85 million years. Like their ancestors, living species show substantial variation in their jaw proportions, dental form and body size. These differences are often assumed to reflect anatomical specialization related to feeding and niche occupation, but q...
thats so much text
oh its made in 2012 thats why it says 200k newton
The date of the paper has no effect on its reliability, a friend of mine knows some of the co authors of this paper personally as well.
are you this is up to date tho
On land I'd think the Tyrannosaurus could simply pin it down and have its way with the purru
they kind of do