#paleontology
1 messages · Page 207 of 1
does that mean its 30 ft or something is still debatable?
Maybe.
Also better quality here
Sarco based on Termino is 9.1m
Which is like 30ft so...
Thats kinda the best you can scale Sarco
Until its Post Crania gets Actually a Proper Description
Otherwise we end with Deinosuchus Upsized Moment
Purussaurus has good post cranial material, right? Unlikely that it will be downsized?
whats a crania?
Post crania = everything of the skeleton behind the head
Puru is Lucky P.Mirandai Exists(the Smallest guy here)
Its Description isn't the Best but Given Puru is a Caiman, Scaling through its Jaw/skull Width and some of Mirandai gets Consistantly an Animal that is +10m for the Big Guys
So yeah
oohhhhhh
what year was this size realible
@tough parcel If you had to choose, would you choose:
Infinite bacon, but no fossils
or
Infinite fossils, but no fossils?
Here Deinosuchus for Example
Big Ah Head
2000s Sarco my hated.
it looks like other deinosuchus cannibalized it
what would have been funny is if they dropped the scan in 2023
Its 3D Scans of the Material of an Specimen
Is what Finally Denostrated Deinosuchus was indeed Bobbleheaded and Fadeno Deinosuchus is just Scale Bars Moment
Choose
I don't rlly eat bacon but how do you have infinite fossils if there are no fossils
it's a lose-lose situation!
what specimen is it exactly?
technically, I didn't specify the fossils, so there's the mystery
TMM 43632-1 for the 3D Scans
The monkey paw curls...
First one I guess
kk
my god 13.5 meters to 9.6 meters
trailer for ww2 in deinosuchus guys!!!
What Trusting Scale Bars does to a Mf....
also I like how unbelievably detailed the fadeino is https://www.reddit.com/r/Paleontology/comments/og8jim/reconstruction_of_deinosuchus_hatcheri_by_fadeno/
is that the new Fadeno one?
holy christ
Technically
From 13.5m to 9.2m
Since Fadeno's 13.5m is CM 963 which was downscaled to 9.2m
Fadeno's TMM 43632-1 is like 14m which is like 9.2m lol
@queen oar yes
well, the quality doesn't save it ( 144p )
A downsize to surpase dunkelosteus
Puru literally survived cause
Its an Actual True Crocodilian and its a Caiman
And that P.Mirandai for some parts
So is not that hard to get a consistant size with it
the downfall of dunk turning into a great white shark victimizer
I wonder if the megadunk is actually this big
So, is this actually inaccurate? That megalania has vertical pupils? Do some varinids have them?
No varanid has slit pupils, it's an inaccuracy during production, it cannot be changed
we all would still start screaming tho fr
It was said it was a mistake by Darren Naish. I don't blame them tbh
darren naish did the dunk?
Oh I forgot to respond to the message wait
He didn't notice and it slipped by?
Idk lol, there was never elaboration beyond "Yea, we know it's a mistake but we can't fix it now"
I was talking about PhP Megalania sorry
oh
Oh ok. Happens, even though I think it's a very obvious detail.
Most mentally stable paleontologist:
I think the funny thing here is Longrich is far from mentally stable 🥀
Guillotine goldfish
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-22983-3 a new filter feeding pterosaur (and fish) identified in preserved, possible, spinosaur vomit
Yutyrannus slams allosaurus in a fight
As usual, Brazil keeps winning in the pterosaur fossil field
Just wish we had a giant Azdarchid tho 
Thats what i call crocodilian bias
white shark 🗿
puffy fish cya
do you guys think we'll ever find a plesiosaur with a armored back?
Nope
no shells, maybe big barrel shaped ribs like cotylorhynchus but no further than that
No ostroderms or anything
nope, most marine reptiles would have smooth, blubbery skin iirc
I don’t see why it would need that
sea turtle is offended
Was it said
I mean lapras gotta be based offa something so prolly yea
Plesiosaurs have nearly naked skin so I wouldn't bet on it
Yeah, its based on the imagination of a Japanese game developer

one in the shape of lapras's would be not very hydrodynamic
Don't think so
Yuh
Are orcas bigger than the bigger species of elephant seals
I say nah because of the fangs and googly compound eyes (which I dont think centipedes and millipedes have) and cuz arthro was a detritivore and I dont think it would need fangs. Otherwise its like every other arthro depiction
Hello! 
Good Arthropleura, not a particularly standout design
Interestingly I've heard speculation that the Arthropluera may have had a kind of stalk eye like crabs
I believe that was right
Isn’t its body shape different as well, or has that changed again?
I can't remember. This one wasn't adult? But it doesn't change a ton either
It was not adult, but yeah probably didn’t change its body shape into adulthood.
Yeah this was it reconstructed as an adult from other known specimens, we just have a good grasp of the animal's growth now
So it didn’t get thinner towards the back half?
So apparently the stalked eyes were lost in adulthood, and it also gained more segments as it molted. Juveniles probably also had a preference for water.
Doesn’t that seem like separate species material? Or even separate genus?
Not saying any of the changes are unusual for an arthropod, they aren’t. It’s just how do we know for sure they aren’t similar but different species?
Differentiating species and genus are incredibly difficult in paleontology, and individual variation can be nuts
Yeah cus muh variation!!!!!
thoughts on the prey of nano?
Looking now I think they look so drastically different cause they're mabey different subspecies of rexs like
Asian lions and African lions for example that's my theory tho
is there any possibility of finding a sauropod that may have lived in or near the hell creek formation?
there is rumors of Titanosaur material in hc
though its not published and what material it entails is very ????
espically since finding any information on it is so hard
so its possible
but when and how we dont know at the moment
only the largest outlier herbivores such as Edmusthosaurus or max size Ankylosaurus
Conclusions have been jumped to
huh?
that's literally true though
Sent you a secret
Also @craggy trench last I heard, they were either mislabeled (aka probably hadrosaurs)/not in the actual area of the Hell Creek
interesting
They can join the secret lambeo material
what would be the most accurate depiction of a featherless dinosaur, lets say a..velo or oviraptor
Any depiction, since dinosaurs don't have hair
Is feathers considered an advance form of hair?
i meant featherless 🙁
@ashen wedge also, arent feathers a advanced form of scales?
Yes, but didn’t proto-mammals also at have scales?
No
I know, I'm just messing with you lol
I would like to say that it would, especially for the ones you mentioned, be closest to the third image
while, lets say yutyrannus would be more like 1?
idk, because would it be loose?? or no? would it be closer to how a reptiles skin is?
Every skin impression we have of various non-avian dinosaur species point to them being more akin to reptilians
would dinosaurs even be able to have large amounts of loose skin?
Unknown but from what we know, unlikely
but cowsboldia...
⁉️
Would it taste like steak tho? I’m being serious
no
slap that thing and it would ripple like the sea
And also make you ripple as well
why would me slapping it make me ripple
no one said he gets a turn
oh i have a question actually, why do bovines have such loose and plentiful skin that hangs everywhere
Selective breeding
Only really one species of wild bovine has some form of loose skin dewlap
so the goldfish and dog treatment?
a miracle that thing ain't bedridden
Who said he was gonna slap back?
do we know what different type of marine reptile skin would be like? would it feel like whales? marine iguana's?
evidenced by the fact I will also be rippling in this interaction
if i pet a plesiosaur, would the texture be samiliar to a whales? perhaps a marine iguana? maybe dolphin ?
From him stomping on ya
No because reptiles aren’t mammals and they have scales. Hope this helps
don't be a bars girl bro
i knew marine iguana's were mammals...
... wtf is a bars girl
do I even want to know
it wouldnt need to stomp when a fart from the thing could kill a whole medieval village with the forth coming of thy plague
(Horse girl)
tbf though iirc plesiosaurs only had scales on their flippers. Though I don't know how far back this trait went in the lineage
you innocent soul
( what fishy said)
Couldn’t that be from preservation bias? Or do we have preserved skin impressions from the body as well that show no scaled patterning?
iirc it's from this thing
ahh I remember that specimen
explain in caveman terms
BROTHER
MAY I HAVE SOME CORNIFERS
plesiosaurs seemed to have had scales on their flippers and smooth skin everywhere else
also I think it may suggest that plesiosaurs didn't shrink at the base of their necks?
thank you unga bunga
I present to y'all the bridge between the metalwork and Paleontology community
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQRcCg5kVmX/?igsh=MWNvaHhzeWc2Y3Bhdw==
The construction process of the Australovenator! A prehistoric dinosaur that use to roam the great Australian outback. Measuring 6.3m long and equipped with 7 inch stainless steel claws! Constructed from retired tools, machine parts and farm scrap.
88521
Yeah plesiosaurs and ichthyosaurs were scaleless on almost the entirety of their bodies. This is very uncanny to me personally. They're reptiles but would've had the texture of cetaceans.
What about mosasaurs?
From my personal cross referencing of meat tastes over my personal experience I think if a mix of pork, venison for a sweet gamey taste, and beef because it’s herbivorous
Some reptiles taste like pork like iguana for example from what I’ve heard but no lie I’m curious too 🍴
The taste if non-avian dinosaurs and even pterosaurs is probably the same, if not extremely similar. Considering chicken and alligator apparently tastes the same, I’d assume it’s likely that most archosaurs had a similar taste.
Ok nvm apparently only alligator tail tastes like chicken.
flavor is mostly based off the diet and muscle of the animal, it’s why we tend to only eat fatty grazers
Prime African bull elephant slams a Giganotosaurus
This is true because an african elephant hurt goku once which means elephants are at least earth level
The reason they went extinct is because the elephants came and beat them up
Guys I needa help
who have the original 1952 paper of Sacroprion?
Nielsen, Egil (30 August 1952). "On new or little known Edestidae from the Permian and Triassic of East Greenland". Meddelelser om Grønland
Skin, scales, hair, and feathers basically all come from the same stuff- it makes perfect sense. Skin in general is like really small smoothed down scales anyways.
It's all just keratin expressed in different ways.
Not skin, skin is an organ
Only scales, feathers, and hair are made of keratin
Also hair and feathers are technically just derived forms of scales
The surface level of skin is majorly composed of keratin..
This is common knowledge.
It's honestly shocking to see someone unaware of that in this channel.
What is this logic bro 🤨
Paleontology is so dope
Being an organ doesn't mean it can't be made up of something, and the structures you mentioned are just a more specific subclass of integument.
what itchyosaur is this?
That's terrifying, reminds me of the meg
Fr
I'm not sure if this is allowed to be asked here but what's jwe3's most accurate dinosaur/pterosaur/reptile whatever?
Possibly a temnodontosaurus, a larger predatory species.
The psittacosaurus, protoceratops, and caiuajara are pretty realistic too.
Oh yee
Cool, thanks!
Is the Utahraptor any good?
Best Utahraptor representation you’re going to get is unironically the new Wwd one.
Bruh that one is terrible if I'm being honest. It literally has copy pasted bird wings and it's skull doesn't even look like a Utahraptor.
is riograndensis and hatcheri the same
I guess the nose area could be higher but it’s pretty good.
It just doesn't look right to me.
What specifically though?
Is it the bird-like cheek area? Cause that’s something all dromaeosaurs could have had, being more related to birds.
The arms and face still just look wrong compared to the fossils we have. Not to mention that it was one of the more basal dromaeosaurs.
I suppose that is a fair point. Do you have a representation that you think might be better?
I thought there were some problems with the skull shape
Or was that PK's psittaco?
I wouldn't know for sure, I don't really scrutinize it that closely. Regardless it's pretty stunning for a JW game. (If I had to guess I'd assume PK has the more realistic one)
Probably any of them with a slightly boxier skull and a more traditional theropod arm position (there's no reason it would be positioned exactly like a modern bird.)
I couldn't find any full photos of the wwd utahraptor, what does it look like?
It has very small arms that are essentially just bird wings. The anatomy seems skewed in a few other places as well.
Sadge it folds up when it walks cuz of cringe ceratopsian walk animation
As well as it's front legs look unnatural when it walks
Animation updates would definitely be nice, especially in terms of combat.
Just self-plugging again because it's the only recon I know that uses the Gaston BYU mount but
This looks way more realistic to me
It actually has its distinctive skeletal features and positioning instead of having modern birds fused with its physiology in unrealistic (and impractical) ways.
shamelessly self plugging yet again
I don't know for sure where the trope of augmenting their skeletal anatomy to fit true birds is from but it's not helpful in understanding them as the distinct class of dinosaur they were.
difference between riograndensis and hatcheri?
Nothing, in fact I think they’re the same thing now 
I don’t remember this, from my childhood, what’s going on?
bro missed the memo
i have 2 Spinosaurus teeth but i dont know if they came from adults or not is there a way to identify asking cuz im curious
you can't identify age based on teeth, but if they are bigger than 6-7 cm or so, they probably come from an adult
okk thx
my first tooth is 7cm and my second one is 7,5 cm so that means they're maybe from adults right
whats worse for scaling, footprint scaling or tooth scaling
if that's the length without the root yea
Mosasaurs have scales.
Yes its without the root thanks for the info 👍
no problem!
Do you have a lateral pic of the BYU Mount?
Not anymore!
I had a (near) perfect skull lateral but I've misplaced it
Damn, did you lost the Jerboadiver emote too?
I would never
You should draw a Dinosaur as a Helldiver, me thinks
Would it be repetitive to put Dromornis in php ice age? Considering we are getting moa AND aepyornis? Idk I just like Dromornis.
as long as it isn't Titanis
it would hammer home the point that there was a lot of giant birds up until very recently, I think we forget that a lot
I want titanis still.
Best I have (I used the skull only)
Btw, how long exactly was php ice age in production for? Right after season one or two? Just trying to get an idea of when we can expect another season.
If it was up for you, would you prefer to wait for any new information from the Utahraptor block, or do you think the Skeletal made by hartman still would properly reflect the animal?
How complete is this Utah block anyways? Ik it’s probably not any sort of lancensis grade preservation but I’d imagine it would have to be pretty solid if it means Scott’s skeletal as a whole needs to be re-done
Considering the block is being excavated at a glacial pace, I'd just use Hartman
I think i'll wait
I'm not aware of Hartman's skeletal needing to be completely redone, TMK he used bits that were available from the block(?) to fill in some gaps, though I could be misremembering on that
is nano the most complete therapod skeletal we have?
The humble Psittacosaurus:
There's a few Asian + North American taxa that are on the same level and don't forget European ones like Scipionyx or Compsognathus
The stupid bird that I hate
Why do you hate titanis though?
do you guys think we'll ever know what the lambeosaurine of hell creek was or will i forever be a mystery?
Cause it bores me.
Right now, the "lambeosaurine" is just misidentified Edmontosaurus bones
Obviously some abstracts propose we're missing some diversity in Edmontosaurus remains but there's no smoking gun evidence (publicly) that says a lambeosaurine resides in HC
Personally, you are a Paleo-Artist that prefers potential or accuracy?
Wdym 
Cause a good paleo-artist does both
Why big eye
Not really interested on arguing the difference between those two specifics. More so, interested on where you stand or view yourself
No I was just curious as to what you meant by "potential"
Do you mean speculative reconstructions like the Dinosaur Revolution Gigantoraptor? Or do you mean the potential interactions like invading Tyrannosaurus and native albertosaurines
Try to think of it as, Hypothesis that have no actual confirmation, but are really well-thought and make partial sense
Like Triceratops having quill-like structures on its back?
I mean, I don't see a reason as to not draw such
Problem is most hypotheses that I see are directly contradicted by evidence despite being labeled as "Well, we don't know!"
Exactly like Triceratops having quills on its back. The current evidence directly contradicts any such structure but people say it's one of those "great unknowables"
I wouldn't say it's really impossible, if I do be frank. But, it involves more personal perspective of how we think of these topics
But, where do you think you stand on these, as a Paleo-Artist?
That goes so hard
i have a question, whats the difference between riograndensis and hatcheri
bro got told earlier and got mad
i did?
They're synonymized, there are no differences
kk
@green helm
i didnt get the ping thats why
I mean as I said, if there's no evidence against it, I don't see the harm in its portrayal but stuff like the Triceratops quills does have evidence against it so it's more beneficial to follow the idea that it had none over it did have quills (for @neat notch too)
What If it did have them only temporarily?
Technically, there you wouldn't need to prioritize neither of the two depictions
Well no, that'd only validate spines and the reconstruction on the left but even then, there's no reason to assume they'd be temporary since I cannot think of a reason as to why they'd be temporary nor any animal today that sheds its scales into new "forms"
Bristles is still out of the question
Yeah, I'm thinking you prefer accuracy
I will once again reiterate that if there's no evidence against something, I'm fine with it but if there's direct contradiction, then you cannot support your idea
What's your opinion on Karl Popper, Sir Gualicho?
Never heard of them, why?
Well, that answers. Thank you
According to Popper, a theory in the empirical sciences can never be proven, but it can be falsified, meaning that it can (and should) be scrutinised with decisive experiments.
Oh this guy, yea I don't know how this is applicable considering we can prove that filaments don't grow directly from scales and that if the 3D shape of the base was preserved, there's no reason to assume the 3D shape of the quill would not have been preserved
hello! 
Hello! Fellow Paleonerds

You know I can search and find this was from a Wikipedia article, right?
I think even with your last point, I think it should be noted that realistically the shape of a quill wouldn't be preserved, like a Follicle per example, because the kinda of Quills seem in Ornithischians, or even Ceratopsians like Psittacosaurus, tend to normally extend out of already established scales on the body. It's to remember that the lack of follicles, has often been used to discredit the ideas of pycnofibers and filaments in Archosaurs ( Mostly in Pterosaurs ), and has repeatedly gained responses explaining that: " Yes, it's not meant to have follicles "
this is a stupid debate, it doesnt have a quill or any form of filament
It doesn't. But it's possible, that's the difference.
I don't think that's how that works
its literally not, the structure is in direct contrary to any plausibility of it being possible. you are simply just wrong, sorry
@kindred night has worked directly with the Psittacosaurus specimen/collaborated with the people who studied it so perhaps they can shed some light on this idea that the filaments "tend to normally extend out of already established scales on the body." or otherwise give some insight on the Triceratops quill debacle
in THEORY its possible for it to have a quill structure, but not on the feature scales nor any of the skin we have of triceratops, so it would have to be from an area we have no skin from & ontop of that Tacos "quills" are not even quills, they are bristles which require different insertion to be present
Triceratops clearly had bristles on its horns like a pipe cleaner
Also I'm aware it's from a Wikipedia article, I copy-pasted it so everyone reading was up to date and aware of what you were talking about
We also have skin from Pachyrhinosaurus that shows no traces of filaments or quills but in fact showed a condition like Triceratops (small raised bumps)
we have the same from Chasmosaurus i think
clearly the real answer is all the larger ceratopsians had male pattern baldness
It was either Chasmosaurus or Pachyrhinosaurus, probably both tbh
we have bits of it from centrosaurus as well
Quill haters (me) eating good rn
Imagine when Allo TLC come out the aloe kind of looks the same as the Isle aloe that's in horde test
Why tho
They're ugly
U know what's ugly
||Weevils||
I mean the utah's wing feathers do look a little strange but that is more or less accurate afaik
I mean I am of the opinion that all dinosaurs must've had at least one tiny feather left over on their body, but as Falcon said the quills of psittacosaurus being spread across ceratopsians is kind of a meme
(I guess if you must... they could be present in other more comparatively basal animals like protoceratops or leptoceratopsids. Protoceratops has a suspiciously raised tail which seems like the perfect base for quills. At the same time we could be digging too deep)
I will not tolerate weevil slander
Ewwwww
Proto had that as means to spin really fast like a rudder as it swims in water
what goobers
Realistically, I do not disagree with that part, I'm less defending the meme itself, or trying to suggest the idea behind like " Phylogenetics, and Psittacosaurus is a Ceratopsian, blah blah blah ", I'm more saying it's partially possible, maybe temporarily present, maybe partially present, it doesn't matter the context. It sorta of was related to the point of me asking Gualicho if they are: " ...a Paleo-Artist who prefers potential or accuracy? "
I hold the personal belief that we cannot discard possibilities or other perspectives of how certain elements might be depicted, even if it is due to very selective ways some have decided to contextualize that evidence, if anything it brings complications to discuss about the respective extinct animals, because we are creating limitations to ourselves about how to actually see them
I'd say that I'm more surprised that some have insisted on evidence that proves the contrary, without being able to elaborate how it debunks the possibility discussed, which to me sounds: a lot of the people here do believe in the possibility, they just don't agree... For whatever reason ( This is entailing that, I do not know what reason it is... But it's definitely not a good one )
what
Don’t want to seem illiterate but why do you ALWAYS type in multiple paragraphs over something somewhat simple 😭
I'm a Yapper...
Sorry, can't help it
Many things are possible, but they might not be preferred for depictions if they are not likely to some degree, which varies depending on the artist.
Agree, but I also think sometimes you need to incentivize a little discussion... Even If it might get a little too out of hand sometimes
These two statements are both technically true
3 legs*
Tyranosaurus rex could be older than Tyranosaurus mecraensis🧐
Tyrannosaurus Mcraeensis more like non existant
Was velociraptor a bird🧐
No bap
I got a young earth creationism PTSD flashback from this sentence
What if @balmy oyster was a Paleo-Artist?
That would mean I have to do something except procrastinate and do nothing
But what kinda of Paleo-Art do you think you would produce?
I feel this
Are they dangerous?
is it true the most common cause of hadrosaur injurey was by mating?
no
You certain to someone that is terrified of bugs?
They aren't venomous, nor sting or whatever. They mostly are pollinators afaik.
No!!!! Pollinators!!!! Sadly for me I am allergic to pollen so they are technically my enemy….
Is it true tho?
thats what im asking
I don't know if it's the most common pathology but it's fairly common and it is mating related
Or it could be bad fossilization? Just throwing that idea out as a possibility, is it a low chance, yes
Would they have really needed to step on them like this? Id assume that the sex organs would be optimized for these large animals mating.
Then again I'm realizing they had those massive tails that would make mounting from behind impossible...
The injuries are proximal to the cloacal opening, thats part of the authors' reasoning
remove the we from weevil and we have something bad
weevils without communism = evil
Looks kinda like platyptergius https://www.deviantart.com/paleonerd01/art/Mighty-Platypterygius-991289838
Define bird
I mean the entire pushing force of evolution is to copulate, even if it injured the male or female. If they make the next generation it worked. That's why we get harmful animal sex that may hurt the receiver and/or giver yet the animals are successful
TL:DR Edmontosaurus sex is rough but it worked so well no new adaptations were necessarily needed to make said sex nicer
Have you guys seen the meta natural art's nano model yet?
It's based on Jane I think. The hands look a little too small but still pretty neat
Neat
whats the sneak? and why is it prehestoric planet?
I think I get the joke but it's kinda dumb because it was just talking about paleomedia and not dinosaur media, preplanet ice age absolutely counts (by this logic PK wouldn't count either since mammals are prominently featured)
or the joke is just that WWD 2025 is bad... yeah, that's probably it nvm-
thats wwd 2014...
2013...
( its not)
the wwd movie took place solely in na
it is wwd 2013, i see the pachyrhino and troodon
dawg
i love to be wrong and double down instead of admitting my wrongess!
i cant wait to get rid you of pantz, one day you will dissapear and i can be free.
Prime African Bull Elephant slams a Giga
Lucifer Bee
Hell, no 👹
Allosaurus is just bigger
So how high would Palaeoloxodon scale if Bush elephant is planetary?
Design reviews: Ark's Dunkleosteus
Good or nah?
Nah, because it beats Megalodon
Yutyrannus is acc bigger
Allo is a lot bigger. Especially using allos biggest specimens
straight ass
we love chunky dunky
Fragilis adult could perfectly reach 11 - 12 meters. And that's just insane lol
Yutyrannus could generally reach 29.6ft in length while allosaurus reached 28ft with yutyrannus also being slightly taller, just allo is a bit heavier
Size is determined by mass. Yuty topped out at about 1.7t. Meanwhile there’s allos at 4.8t
is about the same besides ofc some speicmens of Allosaurus "fragiilis" that get over ~4 tonnes
I don't get it
what do you not get 99% of ark design either are ass or are not accurate to the animal they are meant to be 😭
ignoring the arkifying part, arks dunkle is also based on the outdated l o n g props
So yutys biggest was about the size of mid sized allos we have
An allosaurus that big is an allosaurus anax which is literally being questioned and disputed from how much of an outlier it is
The average yutyrannus would still win against an allosaurus
This is better, thank you
Fax the designs are so ass
There’s a fragilis specimen up there aswell as others. Not just Anax got that big
Then a lot of them in the ~3t range. Which is then almost double yutys size
No fragilis got up to 4.8 tons
Yuty also doesn’t have an “average” not enough specimens to get a reliable one. If u want u can use the smaller yuty, there’s one at 1.2t
Gamma jack victim
always:)
AMNH 5767 (first on the list I sent) is assigned to fragilis atm
When I say "reviews" I don't mean accuracy wise btw, especially when Ark is hard sci fi. I want to know if people think it represents an animal well
I just went to check this and it’s literally just a few fossils that is being disputed to being a totally new theropod all my with an allo so erm ye
I mean yea it’s disputed yea but allo atm is a mess in itself. There’s still 3t fragilis’s which are again pretty much double yutys size
Allosaurus smokes Yutyrannus, idk what some of yall are on about.
Nuh uh yuty drop kicks allo
Looks cool, but I don't think it's accurate😭
again if we wanna use a much larger speicmen 😭\
Well, that’s what I meant.
then it would make more to mention those instead of in general
planetary level
Here’s another one, Albertosaurus slams ceratosaurus
okay
Yeah
Y do u just like these 1 sided fights 🥀
2 baits and a truth
the average fragilis was several hundred kg larger than the largest yuty
thats hes thing
AMNH should be +5t
Anax is +4.8t iirc
This guy is iirc can be lumped to Fragilid and should be about 4.2t
I mean
A Decently Big Allo is 2.7-3t vs the 1.7t Yuty lol
Who is the largest Yuty
Yea 4.8t. Last I’ve seen from what random said
ZCDM V5000
Could an Iguanadon be 11,000 pounds?
yes, it could be more than that
Pretty good for a stylized retro Dunk
Horrible by accuracy standards these days
It could be close to double that.
albertosaurus slamming into nothing and breaking its head because ceratosaurus is long dead:
what are the hardest extinct animals to imagine alive for you guys?
Any super super large sauropod for me
pterosaurs in general but especially the large ones for me because how do you even fathom such a creature that appears that huge, but can ALSO fly. It can already be hard to comprehend a giraffe in person
Tbf they weren't that big either
right. I wanted to use a better image but couldn't find one I liked
they're seemingly about the same size either way though the model has a shorter neck and bigger head
The kiwi-postured moa hypothesis is honestly stupid. We have rock paintings of them standing erect.
tbf even if they stood like kiwis it doesn't mean they'd do it all the time as kiwis occasionally rear their heads up. This and I feel the neck up may have just been more appealing to draw
But what’s the reasoning for the kiwi posture?
wdym? Like why kiwis stand like that or why it's thought moas did?
I don’t see why things such as moas need to be positioned like kiwi’s when we have all sorts of giant flightless birds that have no issue being reconstructed upright
resting and feeding posture can also be way different, diplodocids are a perfect example (feed low, rest high)
thoughts?
Like they said
Clearly that’s not a trex nor anything close to trex 
Also, why would an evolved T.rex look like....JWD Giga ?
Its Chilantaisaurus!!
Since when is yuty 1.7 tons?
is this what tyrannosauriods actually looked like?
No, it's a surface level "Tyrannosauroid = long arms"
Thats not comparable to JWD giga at all, it's just grey
It's still a half-assed excuse tho
this is basically allosaurus if it had some shrinkwrapping in the face and was depicted with huge chonk like bigger theropods
speaking of allo, is it true it had snake like scales?
Correct but they're extremely teeny tiny and barely noticeable unless you're kissing the animal
Why we thought moas did
I believe it refers to ventral scales. We have record of them in quite a few groups of theropods, but they are very small and hard to notice. Why they had them, idk.
4.8t is from Anax tmk
While AMNH does reach 5t
Yeah
1.7t Yuty
Cool lad
I’m confused as to how this conclusion was reached. The only metrics I’ve seen have it at around 1.2.
gained 500 more kgs from stress eating
yutyrannus looking at how many liaoningotitan it needs to eat to gain weight
in its defense it did exist ~70 million years before the creation of smart phones
talk dumb get the thumb
iguanadon best be glad it didn't exist in the last 10 million years of the Mesozoic
... idk tbh, just remembered moas aren't even the ones thought to have been related to kiwis iirc, that'd be elephant birds
Damn, they really crossed oceans.
Also I did NOT realize how much heavier aepyornis was than dinornis.
they all are iirc, since kiwis are ratites, and both moas and elephant birds are also ratites
ofc, I mean within ratites
yep apterygiformes (kiwi) are right next to aepyornithiformes (elephant birds) while moas are more related to tinamous
I thought they could explain what gravity is
Is this true and accurate?
She's gonna get folded by the giga a second time
also, if you wanna see the first paleopark anime to be made, make sure to vote for dinosaur park to see accurate dinosaurs and prehestoric animals in anime! https://x.com/DinosanOfficial/status/1988655965970063751
To achieve anime adaptation, vote for Dinosaur Sanctuary!!
VOTE🗳️🦖
https://t.co/VjuIcruONa
At the same time there have been cool unexpected confrontations in the show
allosaurus when it gets folded by another ceratopsian for the third time:
Pyroraptor in the show had twenty times more aura than it did in Dominion so i'm hoping giga gets the same treatment
didnt majunga also have mad aura in cc?
That show basically sold Pyroraptor to me because they portrayed it so much better. Intelligent, opportunistic, and oddly enough even had some form of common sense against the Atrocioraptors.
Even gallimimus had aura though too, that one in Africa was peak and even fended off a raptor.
has rexy won any fight against a animal her size
Tarbosaurus
Does triceratops count because I'm sure that had to have happened
it fought lady margret to a draw
It's implied Lady Margaret got TKOed or at least got away with more injury than Rexy
I trusted you Pantz...
Is that canon or from that one game
i trusted me too.
The game is soft canon but otherwise yea
Sometimes I like the show better than some movies because of this and other more nuanced things
rexy
- beat tarbo
- fought lady margaret to a draw or came out with less injurey
- had to have 3 animals jump the indom
- didnt fight the scorpio rex for somereason?
- ran from giga
- was getting beat up by the giga until everyone also jumped giga
give her screentime give her fodder give her mid tiers or she retires.
Realistically she would have to start using her brain to win fights instead of being so overly aggressive and reckless
how old is 34 years if you translate it from trex years to human years
not counting the 2 raptors she destroyed and the carno she farmed aura on
she snuck 1 raptor and came in after the sinoceratops beat up Toro
also she beat the almost invincible pooping lawyer
this is her strongest feat....
For her age her combat experience is not good
rexy is kinda fodded tbf, biggest feat of her was probably a random medium theropod or raptor (alone)
Sue and Trix are both about 30 and are the oldest T. rex we know of
old ladie
@rancid glade Cave bear fact for you
They were predominantly herbivores, with some populations taking it extreme
what's the coolest dinosaur clade with this body type
dinornithidae, struthionidae, ornithomimidae
I find it kinda funny how in media depictions of dinosaurs the herbivores always get lame toned down animal sounds/mixes and carnivores get crocodile sounds
Make Triceratops sounds like a crocodile and make Rex sound like a moose 🗣️
A recent study actually aged Scotty and found it to be the new current oldest tyrannosaurus known.
I knew that some cave bears did eat vegetation sometimes, didn't know that some populations had such an unusual body plan
oh how old?
https://youtu.be/zp8cx5-c0Sw?si=vmNp1qaT-8-XLCjn Scotty was 32-35.
This was the eighth talk at the APS Paleo 2025 Symposium held March 15 - 16, 2025 at Mount Royal University in Calgary, Alberta.
The Alberta Palaeontological Society is a non-profit volunteer organization dedicated to bringing together amateur and professional palaeontologists in Alberta, Canada. Most of our events are free and open to the publ...
is it possible for us to translate tyrannosaurid years into human years or nah?
The wikipedia page for this thing probably needs some work. Most of it is basic info about generic "cave bears" (I assume U. spelaeus) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ursus_rossicus
If we can do it for whatever nowadays I don’t see why not
Right so that's relevant moreso to the dwarf species
But basically yes I was aware cave bears did have a more vegetation focused diet. Although I do think they'd probably scavenge something maybe sometimes if the opportunity presented itself.
Scotty should at least theoretically be a good bit younger than sue given there is a Tyrannosaurus specimen with a skeletally mature fibula but not femur (ergo fibula reaches skeletal maturity before the femur), and Scotty has fewer LAGS in its fibular EFS than Sue's femoral EFS
not sure how relevant it is but wasn't there a thesis on Tarbosaurus a bit ago finding that Tyrannosaurid ages were being underestimated
iirc it found that the larger specimens' with remodelled early growth records were having their ages underestimated relative to being fitted to a curve alongside younger specimens
though that wouldnt have any bearing on comparing relative age like with scotty/sue
here we are
i like the one curve on the far right that makes tarbosaurus take 200+ years to mature
Just like the tortoise...
Which looks better (talking about good ol Iguanodon)
So Scotty may be 30-35 but Sue is still older?
I see the claim in here but is there published material to go along with it? Curious how they came to that revision, especially with the differences to Sue @sullen cairn mentioned. Now I'm confused lol
just like the mighty 250 year old supersaurus
seems very reliable to me 
AFAIK there’s never been an attempt to retrocalculate Scotty’s chronological age so best bet would probably be to work backwards from Sue (which iirc is estimated at ~35 on average with zanno and napoli’s retrocalculations
Gotcha, thank you
if a rex was in captivity, how old do you guys think they could get ?
scotty has 2-5 LAGs in its fibular EFS (the exact counts hard to discern due to remodelling) whereas sue has 8 LAGs in its femoral EFS to the assumption would be Scotty's at least 3-6 years younger
do you guys think hesperornis ever went after small young marine reptiles
what are some legit (online) shops to buy fossils from?
Not a direct answer, but definitely read up on ethical sourcing- many countries and regions have issues with fossil smuggling and forgery, and even child labor, so it's a good idea to (on top of choosing a legitimate shop) pick something that is also ethically sourced 👍
that's really good to know! thanks 👍
plausible
like maybe a really young mosasaur that got lost
I haven’t bought any myself but I received one from fossilera and have heard generally good reviews
There’s a fossil forum you could check out to get more info too
Young turtles definitely
Yes
Ankylosaurus is the best herbivore against carnivores like trex and giga
Its a 5t Flat Guy that is low to the Ground
Its Tail Cub while not the strongest, its enough to hurt enough and be annoying to hunt
The precursor of the "DAAAAAAAMN!!!" meme
I read (skimmed) a paper that analyzed the hitting power Ankylosaurus' tail club, finding it could break bone in an abstract sense, but it simply suggest that for deciding whether it could break the bones of large Theropods specifically that finite element analysis would have to be done
Has that been done since then? Do we have info on that
The newborn Polycotylid here is too small (they were like about 33% to 50% their mother's size at birth) so probably not. Maybe Mosasaurs.
marine reptiles in general have large newborns, even mosasaurs, a newborn clidastes was about 30 cm long and the head of a newborn tylosaur was also about 30 cm
it's of unktaheela which is already small but yeah I guess proportionally speaking, idk?
I've always found the sturdy plate like hip and sternum of plesiosaurs really cool. I wonder if it had some other type of functionality.
It reminds me of the plastron of turtles, so maybe it could help with supporting their bodies when beached?
Or it could just be a large muscle attachment for your main form of propulsion
Like I'm 99.9% sure any sort of terrestrial ability for marine reptiles has been ruled out since the 90s/early 2000s
I think nothosaurs were ruled out more recently
Not even nothosaurs?
I wasn't trying to imply that they would have actually gone out of their way to do that btw
They wouldn't have done it at all unless they liked dying
Like I said I wasn't saying it was something they actually would have done, it was just an observation contrasting them with other marine animals.
However I'm still curious about why we are so certain that they couldn't move on land whatsoever
I know they didn't have a need to because they gave live birth but even still they look like they'd be a lot more capable in that regard versus cetaceans
Tmk they lack the limb flexibility and musculature to actually hold their necks on land. They look like they have legs but they don’t really have legs basically.
Hey Gualicho
Draw a Dinosaur as a Helldiver
Even for something like a nothosaurs? I kind of find that difficult to believe.
There’s nothing published asking this question (everyone just kind of assumes leg=walk) but there are various traits nothosaurs have that are against them being able to move on land.
Same goes for Ambulocetus and Desmostylians
What if we made a giant prosthetic that made them walk again?
this guy posted elite ball knowledge
wait what
now we think those things couldn't walk at all??
I knew desmostylians couldn’t walk, but ambulocetus?
Yes
Why might that be the case? How exactly do we know?
Their ribs couldn't support the load required to walk
I thought desmostylians could at least flop around in a seal like way
So what’s the earliest whale relative that could walk?
Might be possible for Desmostylus itself IIRC but the entire rest of the family is more heavily adapted for marine life. The shoulders are almost floating, and they are huge animals bigger than any seal barring Elephant seals
didn't realize they were that big
even warlus?
Ngl I'd be down for fried anomalocaris.
ichthyosaur is not something I want in my mouth
Why? Do most reptiles taste awful?
no- quite the contrary to my knowledge actually. Alligator tastes like chicken I believe. Tortoise fat was used to make dodo birds more appetizing for hungry sailors back in the day- turtle soup exists, etc.
but most animals in the niche of ichthyosaurs (like.. a medium-small dolphin or shark) do not taste very good afaik
Oh, alright. Yeah, I thought that reptiles would taste at least ok, since birds are also reptiles. Don't know how I forgot it.
From a lot of hystorical accounts and diaries, dodo tasted like absolute garbage tho. Only their eggs were delicious, which is kinda true for most birds I believe. Or eggs in general.
I know spinosaurus' teeth were falling out very frequently, that's why there are so many of them. Rex probably had something similar.
Tooth replacement rate is an important contributor to feeding ecology for polyphyodont animals. Dinosaurs exhibit a wide range of tooth replacement rates, mirroring their diverse craniofacial specializations, but little is known about broad-scale allometric or evolutionary patterns within the group. In the current broad but sparse dinosaurian sa...
Design reviews: Ark's Mosasaurus
Good or nah?
Irrelevant. Much better here.
I can think of so many other better mosasaur designs
Can I have some sources regarding the fact certain prehistoric aquatic animals like mentioned above couldn't even support their weight apparently
explanation on nothoaurs is here, there are actual studies with ambuleocetus and desmostylians although I personally don't know where they are right now
I wanna know your reasoning
One actually looks like a mosasaur and the other doesn't
ark's mosa doesn't even look like a mosasaur
does it even have the forked tongue? You'd think people making mosasaurs monster like would jump to include that detail but apparently not lol (see JW)
I see your game
Because of that Ark Aquatica trailer i'm willing to say it's AI
And if it isn't... i'll say it anyways out of pure slander
it's not. That trailer wasn't made by actual ASE artists lmao
besides the dossier is way way older than when AI could make anything half decent
It came out in 2015 dude. It also has way more merit even if bad
Shhh Ark was entirely funded and programmed on ChatGPT
This is my truth now
It really doesn't have merit at all. It's a sludge monster being paraded as a mosasaur.
@balmy oyster
It's human made, with a possible reasoning behind it
Is this embargoed or no?
what does embargoed mean
I do think outdated though scientifically informed (at the time) mosasaurs have a lot of value still though
Ofcourse
Yeah it's kind of a caricature of a retro mosa, I dig it in that way
no
g-guys how accurate is monsters ressurected spino?
ADAMMMM RHAAHAGFHFHHG
No I think it was publicly shared unlike the schimitar spino stuff
The new torosaurus spine reveals a VERY hunched back. Probably more muscle and had something to do with its giant head.
Its just a more accurate Jurassic park three spinosaurus except with head spines such
Gotcha
is it really more accurate then jp3 spino
It's really not. JP3 for the time had easily the most accurate spinosaurus, and for 2011 it still wouldn't be bad at all.
Yeah except it can’t crush bone and snap necks I still prefer the most up to date reconstruction of it being a mix of bipedal and walking on it’s knuckles to keep its claws sharp and undamaged
About as accurate as the Ark mosa to a mosasaurus haha (not really, that one is probably worse)
could an elephant bird theoretically be ridden without a massive strain on its body?
I know this is possibly with ostriches but unfortunately it hurts them badly
Yeah the size is over exaggerated
I can’t imagine getting kicked and on top of that gutted by its clawed feet and for the saddle maybe? In quotation
Think elephant birds were angry like cassowaries?
Probably
Imagine: 10ft tall basically emu with the attitude of a cassowary.
It is the largest bird. It wouldn't be much of an issue. The biggest ones are like 800 kg.
Cassowaries aren't angry. They're shy reactive birds. The aggressive reputation is grossly exaggerated. Ostriches have killed more people than them.
if dakotaraptor was real, which do you guys find most likely?
Knowing what’s been going on recently with unenlagids, it’s probably that.
the saurian devs would cry themselves to sleep if it was a unenlagid
Just about as bad as it could be
Adam ||totally didn't had this before||
Most up to date for spino is strictly bipedal it’s just got stubby legs
a bird being almost a ton like this is hilarious
hard to say whether I prefer them or moas
Is this a new skeletal
Yes, based on a spine that was found recently.
new torosaurus (possibly new species?)
Its Adam
Its adam
Lad is more than an Spine
Its rather complete and has been known for like 1 year or so?
Byt sadly no description yet
HOWEVER
it seems we are getting Closer to it
Adam seems to not be T.Latus
Might be Utahensis
But at the same time
Might even be something new
Now if only Tiny was described aswell...
that pose is so silly
also I didn't think their tails were that long-
Please do not post this, the authors do not want it shared publically and the photo was taken/shared without permission
i'd say Dromaeosaurinae, close to Deinonychus
why is platecarpus and its relatives always portrayed as so thicc?? Do we have evidence of that?
Hydrodynamics
Eh the knuckle walking part sounded cool though
No & usually I see mosasaurs being reconstructed as lean, so idk where the fat ones are coming from probably deviantart
I feel like they'd be more hydrodynamic if they didn't look like tom and jerry eating a balloon
then again I think there is more evidence in plioplatecarpines for possibly deep diving and some chunk would help with that
discord didn't load the image and i got real scared real fast from that
but yeah
So that’s what concavenator’s spine bump was used for
No
they complete each other
Wdym looks like it’s a public setting lol
It's a private conference
"Do not photograph or video tape a talk or poster without the authors’ express permission. Never post any images or video without the authors’ permission.
While the default assumption is to allow open discussion of SVP presentations on social media, please respect any request by an author to not disseminate the contents of their talk. "
Actually it was at my house, we had cookies 
Why do you think that?
Ah yes, Convexvenator
Do you have any left over 
Consexvenator
If that was in the photo I didn’t even realize it, was too memorized by the new Toro skeletal.
Man, the 2000s-early 2010s biggest theropod glazing was insane. Doctor Doom fans wish they could glaze this hard.
It all makes sense now.
spinosaurus maximus specimen!!!
Iirc the Polycotylid are like considered as the most pelagic Plesiosaurs known, or at least could be given their locomotry performance. They also give live birth so I don't see why would their sternum and hip being large would be correlated with terrestrial performance when it actually is correlated with their attachement on the body, mouvement capacity and thickness (not wideness), so weight bearing.
Pay your respects to the goat https://x.com/wrycritic/status/1988852554969604534?s=46
Don't let Pyrocynical know that.
Aerodynamically speaking, droplet-like shapes are the most aerodynamical form possible.
Not sure if this extends to high fluidity environments thought.
Also, I won't tolerate phatt lizard slander on this channel 
Unrealistic body standarts are hurting the paleo community.
That's suberb. Elegant, powerful and gets the service done
Lol, shrink wrapping, for instance
Babushka wants no skinny dinosaur unfed she wants them fat for winter
I want my dinosaurs packed with muscle and looking like fatten cattle
My grandma just stuffs me with food. It's painful, but it's worth it.
No joke tho, being overwheight is not good, you need to work out.
Yeah what I mention the first part was a joke but I do see what you’re saying but in actuality a shrink wrapped dinosaur doesn’t look right
I know that was a joke, but for dinosaurs it's completely different. Rex may look chubby and fat, but it's all muscle.
Facts
"IN WATER, CHIMPS WILL DROWN"
Hippos are the definition of when you're so bad at one thing that actually makes you an ace
Them water horses are so densely packed with muscles and have so little fat that they have to really try staying at the water column. Instead, they simply run on the bottom, and fast
That's also why hippos can't cross deep water for much long
Do hippos actually have any natural predators? Obviously the babies would more vulnerable, but are they actually? How often do crocs even dare to attack them?
Or lions, maybe.
Scar King, the GOAT
may he rest in peace 🫡
too op nerf pls ahh water pig
Hippos do get prey on actually
Baby hippos (normally with their mother supervision) use to nibble on crocs tails to ease toothing pain, but sometimes they do it even when alone, and even then the water geckos be shook and well behaved, cuz them know what happens if they don't
Adults?
"Crocodile gets subtracted from the census, colorized"
The trex is the natural predator of the hippo when they are adults(jk but the only cases I know of are people with guns or exceptionally large crocodiles)
This "proves" 2 things:
- Hippos don't fear God
- Crocs don't like to get turned into flip flops
Literal land whale💀
"THE KASAI REX IS REAAAAAAAL"
Must have been the wind
Dog keep it paleontological at least 🥺
Hippos would probably lose their mind if spinosaurus suddenly lived alongside them.
Prime African Bull elephant slams a giga like high diff
Just watch the Spino get mobbed by them:
I get it but hippos are basically walking tanks so a Tyrannosaur would be the best bet.
I've seen some clips of lions struggling to take down even a baby elefant, they are doing absolutely nothing to an adult hippo.
So, basically only very large crocs and humans are a threat.
A bison would slam a ceratosaurus btw
Again, Scar King
T.rex victim.
Yeah different lion prides in different areas because specialists in taking down whatever is in their area
Scar king? As in Godzilla?
As in the baddest lion that ever lived
I guess lions can get really desperate.
Fasolasuchus vs hippo?
Scarface, sorry
Or really good it depends on how many lions are in the pride too
The males hunt as well just they spend their time guarding the pride from other threats
Well, I mean, 20 lions can definitely kill a hippo, but I don't remember if they actually hunt in such large groups.
I’ve seen them on National Geographic, animal planet, and whatever current nature shows on stream tv etc
They do, some lions or a certain lion group that went extinct I cant remember the name of, became extremely large and specialized to kill water buffalo, which were the only avaliable food source
But do modern lions do that as well?
Yes
Imagine glazing a animal so hard you forget it's actual name 💀
What every lion wants to be only a few can achieve it
Nice. But yeah, I assume they would hunt elephants in very dire circumstances. But the payoff is huge, an elephant can feed the entire pride.
Nah Kasai rex solos
They get preyed on by hyenas and lions if they're caught far from water
A rhino slams a carnotaurus
Ah a man of culture I see you like cryptids too?
Mokele mbemba is peak too
Is spino sitting on a big fish?
bro sat on onchopristis 
Nope long neck dinosaur or sauropod if you’re specific
well thats not the spino
Mokele mbemba is a sauropod that lives in the Amazon River, and is semi aquatic
It was the one dinosaur that’s being sat on I think bounzy bones was asking about
perusaurus
Are you /j or /srs
Yes
Tylosaurus has entered the chat
I was asking what spinosaurus is sitting on. Giga is obviously sitting on a sauropod, but I don't get what spinosaurus is sitting on. Probably looks like a rock.
I think, just for any listeners out there who aren't aware, it should be known that the natives of the area started leaning more heavily into the "sauropod" look after explorers started showing them sauropods lol
deinosuchus stealing the deathroll
I still think this is not too accurate cause the death roll might have existed prior
My bad I didn’t realize that
Yes, the Spinosaurus is sitting on the head of Onchopristis which is...a feat, I think
oh no..... dont tell me...
Hmmmm
Honestly reasonable reaction to that seat
Wait does that mean that the barbs nose is in…..
NOT THE HEAD OF IT NO!
Lmfao
Lucky
dayum dinosaurs getting freaky
It goes deep probably.
why you reminding us

I mean, I'm just fascinated by such a peculiar entertainment for spinosaurus. Can't wait for the paper.
He's going to convert you💀
You can tell this comic was drawn by a carch fanboy, not from the fact that Spinosaurus has a saw up its ass, but by the fact Carcharodontosaurus is portrayed as smart
carch bias
That is not carch, that is giga, head too tall and thin
It's Carch lol
it is absolutely carch
IF IT'S GREEN AND CARCH SHAPED IT'S GIGA
I wouldn’t say Carch is smart, but like all dinosaurs, they are smart as they need to be to remain alive and reach adulthood to pass their genes down to a generation or two
Sorry Random, you didn't examine the material yourself! Please come back when you do! Otherwise I'll have to report you to Big GDI
Giga is peak, and pack hunters
This can be deduced by the many Giganotosaurus specimens we have
Could a sauropod survive in the Amazon or congo?
but falcon giga killed rex in Dominion intro and thats paleo accurate so its cleary the best dino ever 
real guys
I am fish
Jurassic Park 3 moment.
this is sooooo accurate guys fr fr
This is probably taking into account Dinosaur King's Spinosaurus
A fat one
My favorite part about this is I've seen this image labeled Sarcosuchus, deinosuchus, and purussaurus
oh nooooo
yes because of the colors
Humble Gustav
Only true paleontologists know that those 3 are identical to each other except for the colors
Sarcosuchus is the walugi of crocodiles, same with quetzalcoatlus of pterosaurs
holy peak tho
If this was the size, I will ask, what was the prey?
uhhh sauropods
Nah cotylorhynchus
it looks so cursed
Tbf that's extremely disproportionate
it looks like someone putted a young skeleton and a adult head to it
It seems like giga is not always green.
Its head was still massive, but the body is also very large
Wait nvm, it has greenish spots. I am still correct.
Interesting, tell me more
NEVER take this phrase out of context I beg of you 😭
Quetzalcoatlus is taller but not as heavy as hatzegopteryx, kind of like the mane wolf
Guys who wins, 6.10²³ of Spinosaurus glazers or Molag Bal
I love molag bal
What do we think of the JWA Erythosuchus design
Both are bad
If you had to compare JWA Erytosuchus to any animal what would you say it's the closest to if not Erytosuchus
Some sort of butchered gorgonopsid or synapsid in general, Ig 😭
something between a carnivorous moschops and that new poposauroid that was just described
Add...more...
That's called "we are too lazy and greedy to commit to a scientifically accurate model, so instead we'll just slap an Inostrancevia one to this bag bisch"
Like Fukuiraptor having t-rex animations while being a megaraptoran
Found it
Molag bal is just a hybrid of moloch and baal in skyrim, If you know you know
Fukuiraptor has the dromaeosaurid rig animation not the large theropod rig
which is just as bad
Basically a softcore Slaneesh with Khorne-y instances
Mb, don't play that trash every since that happened 🙏
Neither, just like, the worst, more like malice
2 out of the few fossils i own
Real Elasmosaurus tooth and Mosasaurus tail vertebrae
Free food
Was the acquisition legit? Asking for my fish
Don't know enough about 40k to know for certain
Would anyone be able to give me a visual image of the height difference between an average stego & deinocheirus comparison side by side?
I don’t trust myself to get the heights accurate to each other. If anyone’s kind enough to do that please give me an @ ^^
"huh"
Would've loved to see these two things irl

gosh these are so cursed
Never send those again im scared
rocket now feels threaten and violated by it....
Yes it's outside my house right now I think
hide somewhere!
Cotylorynchus is blessed
is it true megapirannha was mainly herbivorous?
do we know why erythrosuchus' head was so big?
well i dont know
@thorn grove @green helm It was not that large proportionately
oh so that one piece of artwork is just exaggerated
Significantly
that is unfortunate
well thats much better atleast
did you know that crocodiles can eat fruits?
Alligators are repeatedly recorded raiding watermelon farms, yes
never seen alligators do that but damn
Me when I'm a little thief
he wants a little treat
let him
hes been a good swamp puppy
The alligator gets a little watermelon
As a treat
now i demand to see a deinosuchus with a watermelon.
Was it smart enough to play doom?
Yea
what a happy boi
Anything more about this new mammal?
This is so interesting! I never would have thought they'd eat fruit.
Though it does make sense because it's one of the more fleshy and easily digestible types of plants.
Looks like a groundhog plus a horn
From The Biology and Evolution of Crocodylians by Grigg & Kirshner
It reminds me of that one lystrosaurus art that is very clearly a hippo photoshopped into the shape of a lystrosaurus
I'd say it's pretty old, there's a dinosaur in the back
Design reviews: Ark's Quetzalcoatlus
Good or nah?
I sent that before : ' )
I don't remember what was said tho
It sucks
In what respect are we supposed to be rating the design because it definitely sucks in terms of being realistic
How well it represents the animal, how creative it is, something like that
Isn't it humongous in the game?
Yes
It has severe proportion issues: torso is too big, limbs too skinny, hand wrongly oriented, it is represented digitigrade and not plantigrade, wing proportion is completely off, tail is too long, head is too small, neck is perhaps too thick, skull is completely off
the ingame model or the dos model
ingame has normal kaiju sizing
but weirdly hunched over and iirc some arm issues on thickness and bend
It could be better if it wasn't hunched over like a bat ingame
Here are accurate Quetzalcoatlus reconstructions.
Aren't the ark species different from historical ones canonically
Yeah, ARK dinosaurs and creatures aren't meant to be accurate.
More recent creatures have been better tho
nah
speaking of "Quetz" what was the pterosaur in WWD3D really suppose to be since the formation likely does houses referred quetz material?
I mean it looks like one?
yeah but also could be something else clearly given we almsot never have complete material of large pterosaur skulls
Didn't the show just call them pterosaurs? My best guess is that it's an indeterminate one based on quetzalcoatlus
I refuse to call anything 100% accurate when they are only a bunch of fragementary bones
I mean it's hard to not make a good comp with relatives that are known from better materials
Yes. That is how this paleontology thing works.
TBF nothing mesozoic is 100% accurate
At least from the remains we have now, even something like sue is subject to a lot of different reconstructions
100% accurate to our current knowledge
would it be smarter to use reptillian behavior or bird behavior for therapods? sometimes their protrayed more like reptile while other times their protrayed more like birds, what is your prefrenance?
I think it depends on how close it is to birds
It would have probably been it's own unique behavior tbh
I wouldn't doubt homosexuality in dinosaurs though, it's already pretty common in nature today
iirc the braincase of allosaurus is shaped a lot more like crocodiles than birds
A mix. There's some things consistent with both but 1-1 comparisons aren't really fair.
so a more derived therapod would probably be more birdlike?
There's no way to know for sure but possibly
Probably a trait in species that have a leave a lot of unattended offspring, right? Benefits to take care of the orphans in a species.
Well...no 
An added benefit that might occasionally happen I suppose
i dont think thats the case for peguins
any takers?
devianart autism figured it out
that isn't an excuse to say we know nothing though, or that Ark's quetz is fine accuracy wise
its relatives:
So we have giant Alaskan pterosaurs?
I think the Ark Quetz is sh-%#
Reminds me of those photos of Featherless Ostriches
friend
inside
us
me
Yes the most derived paravian brains are most similar to the most basal avian brains
The elongate crocodylian brain is most similar to non-maniraptoran theropods
Is there an Alaskan therizinosaur?
Yes
What’s it called? If named.
Ichnotaxon, unnamed
it's a footprint lol
couldnt this just be Cryodrakon
Could anyone fact check this for me?
I’m not trying to argue the point ankylosaurus is unable to defend itself, or that rex would win ever encounter (I doubt it would win even 10% of them) I just simply need to know if the osteoderm section of my blurb is correct
I don’t think it was the holotype, but the “Dynamosaurus” specimen, which is why that specimen in particular used to be reconstructed with osteoderms when it was found
Though I only saw this from a conversation & idk how true it is, but I could ask around elsewhere if it’s not confirmed here
Ah hold on I may have mixed up my words there you’re right. It was the 1900 specimen so if that aligns then you’re certainly correct.
Asking around would be nice. I referenced the Canadian encyclopedia & a few paleo conversation threads as I couldn’t find a paper for the life of me
It was probably scavenging, since if a rex had just killed an anky, it would have plenty of meat and would have no reason to eat osteoderms made of pure bone
If it really was swallowing osteoderms that suggests it had absolutely nothing else to eat
I’m under the impression it could also very likely have been a younger specimen, or an injured one, which could also push it into eating the bone. (Again I couldn’t find any papers to date and age the fossils) I dont see why it wouldn’t since the osteoderms grow In the skin rather in the skeleton itself…which could mean it ate it way through neck to belly and ate osteoderms on the way?
But not to disregard your point, I don’t disagree with that, I’m just trying to gauge as many viewpoints on this as I can
I think both were adults, "Dynamosaurus" has a dentary and cervical verts similar in size to Sue's, and the anky osteoderms are average sized iirc
Yeah, the Osteoderms were big. I believe they were the posterior lateral ones, hip or tail region
Okay perfect thank you! That’s what I was looking for. Answered both my questions in one.
If either of you have any notable papers to share on the topic I’d appreciate them being sent to me, if you’d be so kind!!
rate it
Ummm. @marsh tapir
General reminder to please keep this chat to paleo topics only, feel free to see our pinned message in this channel for more information,
Additionally please make sure to keep any and all forms of communication to NSFW free and server appropriate. You can see our #rules for further explanation.
No blood allowed?
you posted a woman who was mauled
tf??
ok I did NOT realize canadaga was that big wth??
News post about someone who was mauled by a gang of river otters. I suppose I understand.
Dizzy posted the new toro skeletal on their YouTube
Hunchback of laramidia
What if besides scavenging, eating the osteoderms were more like gastrolith usage? 
Incredibly liberal soft tissue and it couldn’t make this posture in-life but this is also a pretty good sense of scale
And that’s with a neck that’s fairly tucked in imagine how weird it would look with an outstretched neck
We'd probably find more examples if it was the case, plus even in giant dinosaurs gastroliths aren't more than a few cm across
I mean that amount of soft tissue seems totally plausible
especially considering it may have lived in colder waters
(and like... maybe it could hold that pose for a second right??)
Scavenging you say?
hes like the drake of paleontology.
Siats?
random big carch that apparently looks like a neovenator; apparently reaches 5-6 tons at largest (completion is not good tho)
so new carcha , nice.
how long do you guys think large itchyosaurs were living for seeing how whales can live up to 200?
kinda wish we did a histology on ichthyotitan material
whats that?
Well gay is not the word because it relates to human society norms and construction but same sex mating and raising pairs are a thing both observed in birds and crocodilians so I don't see why would dinosaurs have never gone through that.
how do we fix suchiominus and give it webbed feet and claws?
its also really weird that suchio doesnt use its arms to paddle while swimming
I’d imagine you’re talking about PoT sucho but I got confused for a second 
I think baryonychines, especially suchomimus, were less aquatic than other spinosaurs
even so, suchio doenst have webbed feet or hands in game, even though multiple fossiled tracks show that they infact did.
afaik only tracks of more derived spinosaurines show the webbed feet, but yeah idk
(also it's suchomimus not suchiomimus-)
they also posted 11.7m sue
people in the comments are crying about how "anky got nerfed", "dizzy shrunk anky to make it easy rex food" and "even though its that small it could still 1 shot rex" 🥀
birb
sounds like its a thicc trex incoming get down!
honestly would make it probably more easier for it to hit it because of how big it is and the downsize making anky more agile and fast
it isnt a downsize though
they oversized sue by 9.4% which makes anky look tiny by comparison
oh thats sue in the picture?
yeah but they oversized it by an insane amount
they are insanely biased towards predators and always try to make them look like unstoppable monsters
trex fanboys be like
Sue could be oversized but not by much
it has a 1500mm femur in the picture which is 9.4% oversized
I mean Sue itself is 12.7m lol
But that won't change its Height
You need to edit the Tail to be Slighgly longer cause Randomdino's Sue(the sue you are using) has an Undersized Tail by Default and its 12.4m
I mean
Regular Sue already makes Anky look small
And Sue its like 2x the Biggest Anky in weight
is there a website where you can see the heights of dinosaurs?
Here's a nice one : https://www.facts.app/comparison
Just know that everything size related will vary based on who is reconstructing which specimen and how.
This Accurate Comparison Tools Lets You Compare Dinosaurs Against Each Other, From Height To Speed & Much More.
afaik no, but some skeletal artists like randomdinos and franoys will often put the height and length of the animal in their diagram.
If there's no measurements given you can use the scalebar to see how tall it is
Over 2x, isn't anky like only 4.8 tonnes? And Sue is 11.1 tonnes now.
why did this message only appear after I sent my message despite being sent 5 minutes earlier 🥀
Randoms Sue is 3.9m tall at the Hip and 12.4m Long
However Tail is undersized and should be 12.7m
@astral spindle Biggest Anky is about 5.1t
And Sue is 10.9-11t with Random's updated Sue
Ye with the thicker thighs
biggest anky is like 5t but smaller ones are around 3-4 so even average rex would be more than double the size of most ankies
Main reason of Weight Change is tail been undersized and that more soft tissue was added on overall all the body
Being that much shorter honestly seems like it could be advantageous at the same time
It'd honestly be awkward for a trex to reach one while standing up
Its an Advantage
Thats why the family is built like that
But is not impossible either
Staying close to/beneath the predator so they can't get proper bites would be incredibly effective and annoying to deal with
Until the T.rex pulls out the extendo-arms…
thank you
Didnt some of them also have counter shading for camouflage or am I thinking of something else
Ankylosaurus when the Tricerankylostegogigatherispinosaurus mamenchiensis pulls up
Every anky post i see on reddit says CMN 8880 is 8t
How dense would that even be lol
Is not even dense
They are using Fadeno's CMN 8880, Which as you can see
Its 9t
ngl its a shame so many of fadeno's skeletals are oversized
they look so cool
His Old Style was cool yeah
However 12-18t Para...
70t baro
16t deino
His Deino was 14t with TMM( Which now is 4.7t)
But his newest CM 963 has better proportions than the old one
But the size....
But hey
Its an Upgrade
Well, I wished any of them upgraded the skulls.
Lake Placid ah
It’s not cuz of Fadeno it’s because Wikipedia uses Arbor and Mallon 2018 and both the paper and the article are written in a weird way that kind of obfuscates that that’s an upper estimate for a fragmentary specimen
I mean
Random's has the best skull of the 3
Thats what having 3D Scans help
Plus redditors are often just far more willing to take upper estimates for herbivores as if it’s an average size I.E. the whole Edmusthosaurus saga

