#paleontology
1 messages · Page 206 of 1
Carnotaurus has the largest caudofemoralis muscle, which is at least in the region of what you'd call bum in humans
It’s not the answer but the funny thing is there is no evidence suggests that any extinct or modern animal surpassed the relative size of the human gluteal muscles, which means the animal with the biggest bum relative to body size is actually humans 
Fun fact: pinecones taste like wood
Thank you upright walking, very cool
You need to eat the center
That also takes like wood
How do we know what prehistoric sharks look like? Isn't it only the teeth (and jaws? Maybe?) that fossilize?
Most of the time
Usually, but we do have a reasonable amount of fossilized cartilage
Teeth still yield enough info, especially on more modern sharks. More primitive members further from modern genera are harder to tell info on relies on bridging gaps with the occasional fossilized cartilage
What if I get musth
I didnt know cartilage was able to fossilize, good to know thanks! : D
It's uncommon, but so is fossilizing of bones in all truth
Here's an example, a young fossilized Ptychodus
I was thinking of those strange sharks with the spikes on their fins, dunno their names exactly but I'm pretty sure they were from the permian-triassic?
Wooaah that's awesome, looks well preserved aswell
Like these?
Pretty sure you mean xenacanthiformes?
Yeah i think so
Thats about accurate
My fav one is Hybodontiformes
Or more of the hybodont group
I prefer Acanthodians myself
Wait, these guys were conodonts?
No, Acanthodians and Conodonts are very different
Oh I looked up the wrong thing that’s why
Which genus are these guys here?
Machaeracanthus, 2 different interpretations based off close relatives
Means "Makhaira (a type of greek blade) Thorn"
Yeah I looked up acanthodus for some reason, cause I thought it was a kind of acanthodian.
Holy anime eyes
Thankfully (at least for more recent extinctions) we have a plethora of extant relatives to draw inferences from.
But there's also fossilized cartilage (megalodon has a sizeable fossilized spine) and if you go far enough back, you start seeing a lot more fossilized impressions of fish in the fossil record
Neat, you learn something new everyday
Would spinosaur be able to pick up a sarcosuchis in real life?
Probably not
No. They didn’t live together. 
And if they did? I mean like it seems like spinos jaw is huge
Sarco has larger jaws than Spino does, as well as more heavily built
If Spino were to pick up a 3 ton animal whatever body part it used to pick it up would just snap
Thanks, so only baby sarcos would be in actual danger(if they did live together alright thank you )
Somewhat, they'd be able to swim away pretty easily
This is a big releif to me for in game purposes, like sarco vs spino i dont wanna play sarco if i was cheating on spinos cause it cant pick me up type stuff
Always bet on the croc downsize
Holey, do we have 1 of the spino too
Trying to pick up a croc of decent size in general isn't a good idea if you value your limbs
Just with deino, Big spino is fragmentary ofcourse
Oh thats a deino, so sarco is fair with 02 bite, i was wrong 😅(deinos where huge and modded one shows that)
Is it possible for medium to large dromeasaurs to have hunted in packs? I keep hearing mixed things🧍♂️
Sure, possible for basically every theropod. Though we'll never really know stuff like which dinos hunted in how large packs and the dynamics of said packs and stuff
reminder that we have more evidence for pack hunting in tyrannosaurids then we do dromeasaurs
excuse the goofy figure, but could styraco have its nose horn curved like that?
Considering how variable styra specimens already are
I don’t see why not
Wait what am I talking about we already have fossil evidence of this
stellasaurus?
We have equally little evidence for packhunting in both groups. We have bonebeds and some track ways that might indicate group travel. We also have evidence in both of the young specializing in different prey than the adults, which isn't how packhunters work
Design review: Ark's Tusoteuthis
Good or nah?
outdated as sin even ignoring it being a kraken
It’s not even outdated it’s just outright wrong
But it’s ark so idk what was expected
Good yes , accurate no
Why the hell does Sarco look like that 💀
New updated skeletal.
this isnt even true
We have many bonebeds of multiple tyrannosaurids together. Albertosaurus, Daspletosaurus, Teratophoneus, Dynamoterror, group trackways, yutyrannus if you wanna extent it to tyrannosauroids.
Meanwhile for dromaeosaurs you have a single trackway from China, the deinonychus bonebed that can easily be mobbing/cannibalism, and the potential utahraptor congregation.
Isn't the Utah congregation explained by the fact that Raptors got stuck in quicksand/mud ? Or is that misinformation from WWD 2025 (I watched it yesterday ^^')
Is dynamoterror actually its own thing?
yes there is another specimen
why do hyena's live in such big families and yet not pack hunt together
I'm convinced nanotyrannus pack hunted to some degree until proven otherwise
if 3 or 4 hyenas can take down almost anything, adding 10 more hyenas will not help anything, it just lowers the amount of meat available to each one
Most hyenas hunt alone or with a buddy as well.
It’s not for hunting reasons. It’s so a family can back each other up when holding resources. Territory is valuable, so being able to defend it as a group from other hyenas and defend food from other predators ontop of that is beneficial.
How so?
was about to say yeah^
also don't lone hyenas get up to 52% ish zone more food per meal seeing less contesting
How so X2
guess
Tusoteuthis ain’t even a legit taxa anymore and enchoteuthis doesn’t look like a generic squid but huge.
squid body, genuinely kaiju sized, larger tents among others
the ark version is basically just a kraken
I kinda knew, just curious
Don’t ever look at the Ark for accurate designs , the design themselves are good but just inaccurate.
I know. They could have use a cameroceras or something actually...
scratch spino drawing
rough draft (25 minutes, continue next week)
stay tuned...
one of my favorites is the giga size compared to other dinos 😂
Based on its closest relative and basically headswap
You can add it a bit more soft tissue and prob wider leg bones but thats it
The Little Cousing in question
Why is the image called "Sarcosussy" ? XD
No idea lol
some are accurate tbf like the moschops
and then you have the nightmare fuel of areneo yeah
Question: Is Dakotaraptor valid?
As per scientific consensus, yes
Technically yes, but it’s not really big.
So Utah still largest raptor?
Uhm actually Dakotaraptor has actually been confirmed dubious and now represents juve rex!
Always has been.
You know, the whole nanotyrannus thing is making me rethink oxalaia…..
I thought that Dakotaraptor challenged it
Isn’t there material that’s not published of potential dromeosaurids bigger than Utahraptor
I don’t believe so…. Cause Utah was bulky
Idk there is a like a bunch of big cats similar in weights in history for example, it’s not far fetched at all.
Closest to Utah is Achillo
3rd place would be Austro, yes?
hell nah
Possibly
Araneo is not supposed to be real tbf
is edmontosaurus the dinosaur we know most about?
yeah. They are pretty diverse
thats true but it is just not very spider like at all beyond...some basics
I love them, they are the sole reason I've regrown my Achillobator, though I hesitated between Achillo and Utah
They have very big hands !
Who loves allosaurus 🖐️
I do! I do!
"They don't suggest it was a giant lenon shark"
Crazy how they use that Model and Dorsal to give it a Size Estimate
" ...only that the lemon shark was the closest match in head to tail to body proportion "
Crazy that some fully capable people can't read.
You are assuming I didn't read that?
Lmao
I have seen that Tweet like 3 times already lol
Yeah, because it seems that you didn't read it at all.
And does that Bother you?
No, good
Drc
Damn, got some attitude there? Level that up please.
I did read it, I just didn't address that Part
I read what Evo said and also what was said Deeper on the Other Comments, is not hard to read like 5 comments.
@queen oar I mean, should I?
No, Then just don't go assuming things
Which is smth you always do
No, I don't think you did.
And, also that was it? Please, young man, if you want to play that game, I can wait until you can actually sound all mean and tough... Maybe, wait 5 years, but it'll probably be worth it.
And you are supposed to be???
Not really. I like being goofy.
What are you expecting from me??
To find you worth my time for that Convo or what?
I said what I wanted to say
Nothing more
Neither too deep either
Sounds like you are spending a lot of your effort into this. What kinda of tree would you personally be?
I would be a Sequoia
Like
What is your Goal

I mean
I am typing is not really an effort when Playing POT.
There's quite literally no goal here. I just thought on correcting what you said about the tweet, maybe a little sarcastic? Perhaps, but nothing that really would harm anyone, mind you...
What kinda of tree would you be?
both of you are the vines tryna strangle each other on the side of a tree rn
You are correcting based on the fact you THOUGHT I didn't read the Whole Thing???
While implying I can't Read
Idk man, atp sounds like you are talking based on your assumptions lmao
~ Chinese proverb or something Idk
sun achoo- the art of garden war
So, let's read what you said, shall we?
"They don't suggest it was a giant lenon shark"
Crazy how they use that Model and Dorsal to give it a Size Estimate
What do you think this would imply about what you understood about the tweet? Also, what kind of tree?
https://x.com/twitigalli/status/1918073848269820091?s=46 whatever came of this lmao
I mean
Why don't you ask you know
In a more normal way
"Did you read everything evo replied"
Rather than just saying "Crazy how ppl can't read"
Sounds different
Doesn't it.
Also what I said isn't even that bad, they did use the Body Shape to make a Dorsal Model and Size Estimate
They just didn't put definitive Fins.
Also Idk anything about Trees so None
psittacosaurus
See, you didn't want to reply now. But, somehow I'm making too much assumptions
Go wonder, if not even the original author of the message wants to explain their part.
really hope there is a paper for this & it's well written and not another gsp "based on vibes" paper.
I mean what should I replat about a Tree
I legit nothing about trees lol
How does that even mean anything?
I'll simply put it, I did assume you didn't read it, because the way you put that message, really feels like you did not read the last part of that tweet... Or you simply ignored it. I don't care which it is, I just thought you were being ignorant about it.
are you two only capable of arguing oml I always see you both bickering about something stupid
someone come in and scientifically explain well why anatotitan is distinct and my life is yours
and we could use #BackInHell for it again
I don't even care about my plants outside my own house
What am I gonna care for a Tree Histology
Now, that's a Paleo-take.
Hey look distraction
long face and sasquatch will be good additions to this formation
Bro has Long ah Legs
what would even be the difference between anatosaurus and anatotitan
assuming these 2, there's a lot of skull differences
fr I'm lowkey questioning it myself
anatotitan came first as a name, right?
Does anyone know how Edmontosaurus is defined?
Many is a stretch, you've named all of them apart from the Sue bonebed. I'm not aware of the Dynamoterror bonebed but I'll take your word for it. We likewise only have one group trackway for tyrannosaurs. So I think you're slightly overstating things. Either way bonebeds can be caused by a lot of things, some are better than others at indicating mass casualty events rather than postmortem accretions but not all of them. I'd say between all of that you have soft evidence of gregariousness. Even then, solitary animals congregate for various reasons at various times, it's very soft evidence. However, there is still no evidence for packhunting.
I never suggested any of that. Sociality comes in many forms. I highly doubt that that a whole bunch of large territorial animals would end up caught up in the same freak flood event or something similar. It's STILL true that we have more evidence for it in tyrannosaurs than any other carnivorous theropod group.
Predators overcome territoriality all the time when theres a large free food source, i think at the daspletosaurus site there are also half a dozen edmontosaurs mixed in too. Or water sources during droughts, toxic algae is cited as a possible killer at the teratophonus site. At any rate, my original statement was that there's equally little evidence for packhunting in dromaeosaurs and tyrannosaurs. Not sociality, not bonebeds.
i still think theres more evidence for tyrannosaurids then dromeosaurs
Y’all ever think about how many dinosaur genera would actually be considered synonymous if they were alive today
I’d argue we’d have…triple if they were all alive today.
who do you guys think lived in bigger herds, ceratopsians, sauropods or hadrosaurs?
probably hadrosaurs
although I'm sure it varied a lot
primarily skull characters I think
We have very large hadrosaur and ceratopsian bonebeds, not so with sauropods
yes we do?
With thousands of elements? I don't think so
Bettt gives me hope for a campto size buff lmao
saltasaurus, ampleosaurus, isisaurusu, camarasaurus
we have bonebeds and nesting colonies but none on the same magnitude of actual bodies like we have in hadrosaurs and ceratopsians, all of those have bonebeds (amp is actually multiple species seemingly) but not literally hundreds of individuals
ooh alright,
we still know sauropods were moving in herds and probably pretty big ones for some species, but we don’t have the same level of mass mortality
Actually in Paleontology theres more of a tendency to lump stuff together that wouldn’t be lumped today
It could also be that natural geological conditions could have affected it, some bonebeds of multiple same-species tyrannosaurids are located in what used to be river basins or lakes, it’s not impossible to assume a flood could have occurred and all of the bones were washed out together. But it is a very vague assumption despite being very plausible
Is Campto oversized or undersized in this game or or is it perfect
There are irl specimens bigger than it. So its size is pretty gd. U asked this question already…
I wanted more opinions so I keep yap to my campto nerd friend..
I wouldn’t really say this is a topic which needs many opinions
POT campto is like, 4.5 meters? An average Camptosaurus is 5ish meters, biggest one is 7.5m
Well I wanted more
Is Barinasuchus 6,2m or was it downsized?
how can you downsize something that already doesn't have postcarnia material
Which is the more accurate depiction of Alamosaurus, Deadsound or PhP
Alamosaurus from Dead Sound
Really? Mind explaining further?
Posture?
Osteoderms?
Head shape?
Neck position?
Tail length?
The fact it has legs instead of looking like a corgi is a great start
So the php one is too chunky
Not necessarily. I don't think there is a very objective way of judging these two.
php sauropods in general tend to overcompensate in the soft tissue
The posture is very different. There is probably a more straight forward answer to that.
The dreadnoughtus isn’t nearly as bad. Neither is isisaurus really.
I wouldn't say it's as noticeable. I think this impression is being given by the amount of soft tissues rather than actual differences in the posture of the skeleton
Additionally, one has Osteoderms, which the other lacks.
I suppose you’re right. The neck is different, but idk if there’s any way to tell exactly how they held their necks.
And about the osteoderms, which arrangement is correct? The large waist spikes, or the smaller pebbles all over the back?
I might be incorrect, but Titanosaur osteoderms are pretty variable and subjective to their current phylogenetic placement, if that doesn't change any soon, as Titanosaur osteoderms are pretty variable. I think some have told me in the past, but the spikes here are based on osteoderms from animals like Neuquensaurus, where it's potentially a big misinterpretation?
They tend to often be reconstructed from these protrusions on the Osteoderms, but given the difference on texture from both ventral view ( A ) and Dorsal ( B ), it's safe to say these protrusions are actually points where Conjunctive tissue attached to the osteoderm in order to maintain it sticking to the body, where the dorsal view is where it would actually be externally visible by soft tissues covering it
To say the least, most Titanosaurs seem to be of the " Pebble-Variation ".
Are there any others that also have the spikes?
Not that I'm aware of, at least...
Maybe other people in this chat know something?
would all titanosaurforms have these osteoderms
for example
euhelopusauridae
euhelopodids may not even be titanosauriformes but it’s such an enormous group I wouldn’t generalize it across all of them
Yeah, the word here is: Subjective
Technically, this also extends to Titanosaurs too, because we don't know if there are Titanosaurs that would be " Osteoderm-less ", mind you the record of Titanosaur osteoderms is pretty limited, and even some families do not have anything. This also means it's difficult to know how old these Osteoderms are... In Titanosauriformes, for example
Saltasauridae is I believe the only group that has them
Includes stuff like Saltasaurus, Alamosaurus, ampelosaurus etc.
Not exactly, because I think Mendozasaurus has it too? And I don't remember where it's placed now, but it seems to still be Lognkosauria?
From what I’m reading, there’s no actual evidence for waist spikes in titanosaurs. So then where the hell did the trend come from?
and Ampelosaurus is a Lithostrotian now?
Ampelosaurus and maybe some others have somewhat conical osteoderms
Right but I see a bunch of Titanosaur designs with waist spikes osteoderms, which apparently has no basis at all.
It looks cool, but I’m wondering where the trend came from.
Are you referring to the parallel dorsal osteoderm rows?
Uh, I guess so yeah.
More recently there was a riconsaurian that preserved its osteoderms in articulation, they had this general scheme with the caudal osteoderms positioned laterally on the tail. So a little different that what’s shown here
But this design was made in 2022. Is there anything that would have prompted a creative decision like that?
Idr
Pot argent mod has them too.
OOOHHHHHH vascular canals. That’s why.
But that doesn’t explain the height of the osteoderms. No clue where that comes from.
Hartman's Alamosaurus skeletal included them, likely because they were associated with a specimen in Alamosaurus or some other titanosaur
So about the Prehistoric Planet's Alamosaurus:
So it is like a scaled up Saltasaurus.
saltasauroid, not saltasaurus itself
Yeah but it looks more like a Saltasaurus than any other giant titanosaur.
It doesn’t look particularly more like Saltasaurus at all
I kinda don't remember, but I think what Hartman means by Saltasauroid, it's probably by standards of what Saltasauroides were back in the 2010's before the 2020's? Which did include a lot of sauropods, Opisthocoelicaudia, Lirainosaurus, Ampelosaurus, etc.
it still clades as a saltasauroid often, that’s what he means
Design reviews: Ark's Tyrannosaurus (original right, left TLC)
Good or nah?
||I hate the TLC one with a passion||
The TLC is a far better design while still being recognizably Tyrannosaurus, even if stylized, and being fairly iconic
Just how
How can you not think it looks better
What in any way does the old model do to look pleasant
You're talking about the one on the left right? Then Im 100% sure it's worse cause it doesn't even have a proper Rex skull
Neither does the right.
Left is less shrinkwrapped, has teeth that better resemble an actual rex, and the snout is less bulbous
Yes and you can barely see the dent between where the neck muscles start between the edge of the chest I think
Do it with the other
There's specimens matching both. Just not based on the same individual tyrannosaurus
There you go
And considering they are both based on Tyrannosaurus specimens, the TLC one having FAR better textures means it is better
Tyrannosaurus comes in many shapes
Should look better from the outside then. But the texture thing is valid
And it does, it looks SO much better
No no no, I had a brain fart. Doesn't count lol
I mean actually here, one second
textures have a massive impact on the appearance
Not talking about textures tho. And even if it matches a specimen, it looks weird and short from the outside. The old one is more superficially similar to a more typical shape, was my point
Custer's skull with the bulbous snout is an outlier among Tyrannosaurus specimens to be clear, so taking it as more "average" is just wrong
Almost every single skull is closer to Trisan, with the relatively straight line nasal bridge with a curved but not round snout
Im not saying it's the true average, Im saying if you ignore the bulbous nose it resembles one (though it isn't)
So if you ignore the most prominent and obvious feature of the skull it looks like an average Tyrannosaurus? Sure
But the TLC one looks like an average Tyrannosaurus already
second species?!? Hheueheuhe
I think there's ways to make a design based on more typical skulls and not make it look stupid
Points at Paleo Ark
Everyone is entitled to their opinion of the models
And no one is going to win this discussion either
So I suggest agree to disagree
Sorry I had to start agenda posting lol
Now, good or nah? For both of then
Exactly
Some of the skulls here are still distorted tho
I imagine Custer is among them
Realistically, Ark's models are more meant to reflect the concept of the respective dinosaurs with the same names, and aren't exactly meant to really reflect the animal itself from head to tail.
It's more to say...
Ark designs will be stupid, one way or another
It's kinda of their thing at this point
how vunerable was the stomach of a sauropod?
vulnerable? lol
they could have swallowed you up 
Idk. They could crunch you, I think.
i mean, besides the neck, wouldnt you want to attack the stomach?
I mean, it's not as simple when there's like 4 legs on all angles of the stomach, is it?
limayasaurus when it has to attempt to kick giga:
Giga when Limaysaurus uses it's body as a weapon
is giga not heavier then limaya
Don't care. Even if you are heavier, you are not sustaining any impact from a multi-ton animal.
the doubt i have is there
I mean, I'm sorry, you could weight 3 tons, but if I violently threw a 1 ton anvil at you, you are not leaving unharmed ( Perhaps the tone of this analogy wasn't necessary )
now let me tell you why your incorrect
yah?
amd that is my explanation on why your incorrect.
facts
does anyone wanna settle this arguement
Paleo ARK and Kyoryu knowing how to properly make fantastical dinosaurs not garbage.
I'd say not too vulnerable tbh, it would be more wiser to go for the legs/tailbase region since you risk getting hurt by the legs or overall weight of the animal if you go for the stomach
would it be the same for smaller and larger sauropods?
likely
I remember there being a disccusion about how the bodyplan of rebbachisaurs would've made it so a direct bite to the side of the body would have been pretty difficult due to the narrow and really tall torso
even most other notable sauropods like diplo & brachi are rather thin
Sounds cool, need that in a mod where sauropods can eat dinos whole
Maybe it worked...
Are rebbachisaurs similar in body plan to apatosaurus?
Oh, and what’s the general consensus now about diplodocoid posture?
this is probably just yall messing around but i just wanted to step in and say for every 1 ton theres like 2000lbs give or take (2000 for this case), so for example a 2000lb animal is probably going to be hurt by a 6000lb animal falling on it because thats literally three times (?) its weight- that makes a big difference in my eyes, and makes sense in the real world (imagine being a 100 lb person and a 300 lb person falls on you 😬 )
Yeah, even if you're heavier being slammed by a 7 ton animal is still gonna hurt.
what happens if the 100lb jumps into/bodychecks the 300 lb person?
it would still hurt, but probably not as much as the other way around, that isn't to say that a 100lb person couldn't potentially knock over and harm a 300lb person but it would probably take alot more force to be exerted than what the 300lb person would need to exert against the 100lb person
not quit & diplo with most sauropods would've held their necks upwards
Okay, but like, it's not like if you become heavier you become more resilient to damage, this is more related to density of the specific components found within that mass, and how that density will absorb damage... Organic Material? Besides Latex? Aren't that good at absorbing impacts, and animals who often develop to take those, like horned and domed animals, have to resort extremely specific adaptations
Example: Utilizing layers of tissue in their heads, to make it more difficult for the energy of the impact itself travel to the center of their head, these tissues include: Soft Tissues ( Like Keratin ), Bone Tissue and both conjunctive tissue from the interior or exterior of the head
For the body itself, that is not something you can often achieve, because it often involves becoming highly incapable of multiple flexible mechanisms of your body. Of course, there are exceptions, but those exceptions just found Other ways to go around those issues, they aren't the rule
There's also something about, for example, the latex, how the atoms and protons of those specific components attach to each other, and how difficult it would be to break those apart. But, I don't know much about it to talk about it in Animals, the point is:
If you become heavier... That's it. Your mass doesn't suddenly turn into armor
how bs is this that megaraptorans could stop themselves from falling by putting their hands out
People want indoraptor to be real too much
NO DEADASS
Now... If you suddenly wanted to develop integuments purposefully so that you just become more difficult to actually be taken down instantly... Oh, I don't know? From a Prey and Predator interaction?
Now, that's something worth discussing
am not saying megaraptor indo doesn't work but saying it's the BEST analog for a "real" indor is pushing it
the humble knuckle walking:
found it
One can only dream of one day...
( ||Credit to Molten_Barry ||)
How accurate is this Tarbo ontogeny
I was looking for Tarbo stuff to see what rex growth was probably like now that his children have been shoved into another genus 💀
Fine, I'll find the skull chart later™
- So what exactly would maarapunisaurus have looked like given it was a giant rebbachisaur?
- This is good for diplodocus?
If I can ask, because you asked to fish, but can I answer the first question?
- We don’t know since we have no good basal rebbachisaurs to base it off of. Best thing people use is lavocatisaurus but even then it’s a stretch
- No, proportions are way off
Sure
I meant in terms of posture for the diplodocus. The leaned slightly upward thing.
then yeah I'd say so
Mm ok. So pretty much all sauropods had an upward leaning stance, with a heavy exaggeration in brachiosaur relatives?
well, kinda? dicraeosaurs and rebbachisaurs don't really have that
Isn’t there something that came up saying that rebbachisaurs may have been more similar to apatosaurs?
Hence uh…. This.
Okay so...
The issue with reconstructing very fragmentary diplodocomorphs or diplocoides, it's that depictions often tend depend on derived feats in any family, and because of this, this often creates a very difficult concept to visualize how these animals function, other than the function of the relatives we have primarily and dependantly used to reconstruct them
This is not to say that there weren't Diplodocomorphs with short or long necks in the jurassic, this is pretty true verifiable evidence, but often because of how old some of these animals are, it's pretty unlikely for them to share any of those derived proportions
So, how do you do Maarapunisaurus as a Rebbachisaur? So, here's an advice... You may use Rebbachisaur proportions for the tail, body, and limbs... But use Apatosaurines for the neck. Due to them being a in-between them, their neck is neither too long nor too short. This means for, that not only due to their placement, but they are pretty good examples to use for reconstructing the neck length of very old animals like Maarapunisaurus.
@queen oar what about the body ^
I'd say you can use it. Tail length doesn't tend to vary much in terms of proportions ( Maybe they do in Diplodocines??? ) but yeah, just think of making a very generic Diplodocoidea, with maybe high spines ( Since that's what Maarapunisaurus has )
I had a feeling...
diplodocoid phylogeny is in need of re-evaluations, especially apatosaurinae
So what’s with the big-ass baro specimens? Anything still hold up to this day?
I think all of those actually got identified as Supersaurus ( I still can't get over this stupid animal lmfao )
Not many, largest of the giant baro’s is the second specimen on top, everything else is supersaurus (maybe first specimen could still be baro but I know second one is)
“BYU 20805”
afaik both genera have giant 40 meter-ish dudes, but I could be wrong
When will Raptor Rex get valid?
never in a million years
So supersaurus was the really big one then?
baro can still be pretty big but yes
I'd bargain it's possible within this or next decade, due to nano's confirmation & complete re-evaluation of tyrannosaur phylogeny we're bound to get further tyrannosaur research down the line
Do the specimens being assigned to supersaurus make the animal smaller? How does supersaurus’s build compare to baros?
Alright
no
brontomerus
also Sauria from Dead Sound
New creatures. New era. Experience the Ice Age like never before. Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age premieres November 26 on Apple TV https://apple.co/_PrehistoricPlanet
“Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age” is a sweeping new installment of the award-winning natural history series from executive producers Jon Favreau and Mike Gunton, produced by BBC Stud...
Oh yeah, and Miragaia is back.
Paleontology is like politics, just one big pendulum swinging from lumping everything together and everything being distinct
Manfred
New creatures. New era. Experience the Ice Age like never before. Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age premieres November 26 on Apple TV https://apple.co/_PrehistoricPlanet
“Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age” is a sweeping new installment of the award-winning natural history series from executive producers Jon Favreau and Mike Gunton, produced by BBC Stud...
Late. I got it first.
Terror Bird AND Megalania ? YESSS
We’re on the side that’s splitting everything rn
Let them be
I don’t understand why people tried so hard to defend them even after all their controversy and confirming that they can’t really be trusted
Megalaniaaa
Could we guess the Terror Bird species ?
OMG it's beautiful
Its cuuute ! I still hope we see Titanis
New modded playable the psilopterus, it can solo rex and titan packs
Some of those prehistoric planet mammals look so ugly
I think you're alone on that statement
yes they do, just to a lesser extent and its taxa dependant
baseless, Apatosaurs also can have an erect neck
I'm in love with this Megalania, it's so beautiful and looks so real, I can almost touch it
Was Miragaia ever gone?
Not in our hearts
People are already complaining about it T_T
No, seriously, what happened there?
People wanted to merge miragaia with dacent
They complain about Megalania's pupils and gregarious behaviour in rhinos seen in the trailer
Manfred
Many don't know this but you can critique media while also appreciating it
The slit pupil on the Megalania when a majority (all?) monitor lizards have round pupils is weird
Gregarious rhinos isn't as outlandish because I believe such congregations happen in African rhinos/Javans?
rhinos also have such low populations that their behavior has probably shifted a bit, but we do have social behavior in rhinos
Yea I was going to mention that I suspect the tendency to not herd together is a side effect of being hunted to (near) extinction
Well
Yeah I know, I just don't find this a BIG deal
It's a noticeable detail that is questionable
I mean why they did this? It's strange
Either they'll say why in the doc, or they just depicted it like every other reptiles in general media, with slit pupils. Tho the examples I have in mind are Stylised reptiles
I like both tbh, I'm just glad we'll have a relatively good depiction of it
isn't it possible they're just dilated to that shape in this moment
Nah, in the trailer it seems to have slit pupils too
Or maybe it's a design thing to make it "more menacing" or something
god please no preplanet would never
There may be a link between vertical pupils and ambush predation that they're basing it off of, or reconstructing it as most active at dusk and dawn which they're also helpful for. Doesn't look great though, should probably have just based it on other monitors.
Ooooor it could be a trailer thing, like the tyrannosaurus having a more traditional jp-esque roar in the trailer but not the actual doc
Either way, Megalania will be very cool to see. I still hope for a big terror bird
I’m willing to bet all the species in the show were just revealed today.
I think so too
We went from having nothing to having maybe all the species shown aha (I'm not complaining tho)
A Tupandactylus at dusk searching for food.
-# Art of Mark Witton :3
man i need to watch prehistoric planet
i only watched either the first season or part of the first season because of the Apple TV+ free trial i think
Wonder what they would sound like
Me too, and also wondering what their flight would be like, it would be almost like seeing a human being flying, more or less the same size.
They straight up just look like fantasy creatures
After watching the trailer more closely, I find the animation to be much less goofy.
hasnt it been back
Wait which day was spinosaurus formerly described I gotta make sure I celebrate their 110th birthday right
also, why is everyone ignoring that a cave lion? apparently jumped and leaped at a mammoths face
I love this horrid bald creature
Homotherium
that stupid bird that I hate
8
Is it that big of a stretch ?
It’s psilopterus. Why the hate?
Thought it was Titanis, my hatred was aimed poorly 😔
i get to pet a big bird, a squirrel and a baby mammoth for 8 hours
the best seat
I still want titanis to appear. But why the hate?
I just don't like it.
I’m picking 4. Looks like a guy I’d go fishing with.
thats fair but might just get pulled back by a big cat is the risk
Imagine 3. You’d have to be ducking the whole flight.
kinda
and not much room to start with seeing a big bear hogging the front
It’s a cave lion? Thought it was another variant of homotherium.
nope
i really dont see how , no matter what it is, somehow jump onto a adult mammoths face
It's Homotherium. It doesn't have conical canines, and it has smaller lower canines
I think just because something is implausible, or you think will get an animal killed, doesn't automatically mean it wouldn't ever happen
i just dont how it would be able to jump that high..
(That's seriously terrifying)
Big problem, Machairodontines usually tend to be more front-heavy, and tend to have stronger forelimbs than hindlimbs. And I can't find any studies testing if they would be able to jump, although considering those differences, they would likely perform poorly.
is that elephant okay
I would be more concerned about that guy
Probably traumatized, not sure about the guy on the elephant.
Yeah, well, I hope he didn't get mauled
I doubt Homotherium would be able to jump like that, though.
Playing Alio in honor of Nanotyrannus my beloved coming back
Similarly, I doubt quetzalcoatlus could hover in the air and peck at a tyrannosaurus until it fled a carcass
PhP takes some liberties to tell a story
Would be cool if they made that more clear, perhaps
It's not a cave lion
i mean woolly mammoths are about 13 feet tall
not unreasonable in the slightly for homother to get to 10
Like realistically, I understand your point, and I don't think there is a documentary that cannot take liberties. Documentaries are a form of art, in some ways, perhaps more than others...
It doesn't help when it constantly tries to promote a objective and factual depictions of what these animals did and what could do
What if they're attacking a mammoth stuck in tar?
HE DID IT
Yes, but it's like asking: Could they jump?
He did it…
HE IS A MANIAC, HE ACTUALLY DID IT
ENHYDRIODON FIGHTING A SABERTOOTH
its getting jumped
Talking about Prehistoric Planet, what cat do you think is this? This is not smilodon, right?
Homotherium
what kind of question is that what
Ah, thanks.
No that's a canid
David we know this is your alt
very beautiful model
Quetzalcoatlus couldn't harass Tyrannosaurus because Quetzalcoatlus couldn't fly!!
I would kill to see a Miocene Prehistoric Planet after this to focus on the peakest mammals
All of the cool guys were around in the Miocene
But a Paleozoic season would be awesome too. Early Permian my beloved
I just recently started rewatching Prehistoric Planet on Apple TV ||(whoever thought that not adding a quality selector for a video is a normal idea should be burned alive, downloading is useless fr)||, and when the connection is great, my god it looks actually real. Like, me touching and feeling it through the screen real.
They have an oceans episode that's suspiciously white shark heavy because they didn't have to use cgi
do we think meg will appear in this season or nah?
Megalodon went extinct before the Ice Age if I remember correctly.
Probably not unless they take some larger than usual liberties with animals not from the time period the doc is focusing on
No, it did in the pliocene
The turtle (literally Archelon) from the first episode:
So before the last glacial maximum (which is probably what killed it) but it was still an ice age
Ah, I see. I thought it was extinct already. Can't remember any period names after Mesozoic, it's confusing for me.
Because I saw that pots youtube channel posted an announcement but I can't find anywhere on a solid date Spinosaurus was formerly described
Don't know your time zone, but it seems like today.
Oh man I don't have enough time
i want cretoxyrhina rn
ngl We only had marine reptiles and one shark like Otodus obliquus, I want to see Tylosaur, Prognathodon xiphactinus, and Cretoxyrhina
well its kinda late for that
Maybe seasons after that will focus on different period, like Jurassic? I know, it's basically impossible to find locations that look like that, and you would have to render it all, but it's the price to pay. If BBC and Apple TV actually need to invest into anything, it's this series.
prehestoric planet: chased by seamonsters
But I guess Apple doesn't have enough money, the poor international multibillion corporation.
how would you rank the 7 oceans featured in chased by seamonsters from least to most deadly? Ordovician, Triassic, Devonian, Eocene, Pliocene, Jurassic, and Cretaceous
do we count the lack of oxygen in danger level for the ordovician?
every era must be dangerous
ones alot more dangerous then the others
wiche ones ?
the great cretoxyrhina
the devonian ocean is alot less dangerous then the pliocene
And the Pliocene ocean is a lot less dangerous than the Miocend
exactly
Lower oxygen level:
(The Oxygen level was not related, life was just relatively underdeveloped)
The water remains toxic(for human)
why would it be toxic?
H₂S+water wich was also rich in dissolved metals and minerals, like made it harsh on human skin and lungs
so, how would you rate them from the least to most dangerous?
I meant lower oxygen would make it more dangerous for you.
Of course with Miocene in first
Would kill you quicker than any animals there.
i feel like , eocene, plio and mio would be the most dangerous for humans spefically because majority of predators would be curious to taste this new mammal they find in the water
The majority of time periods on earth's history would kill humans if they just tried to live because the oxygen content or atmospheric composition has varied dramatically over 500 million years
Western interior seaway:
they preyed majority on reptiles so a large ( not really ) mammal would be alot more foreign to them
I would definitely rank Eocene below Cretaceous and Jurassic though. Potentially even Triassic
You also forgot Carboniferous
I’d think Xiphactinus would be a persons biggest problem. Or anything’s biggest problem.
i got the list from the chased by sea monsters wiki 🙁
Ordovician → Devonian → Carboniferous → Triassic → Jurassic → Cretaceous → Eocene → Oligocene → Miocene → Pliocene
tbh safest of these is carboniferous. Biggest threat is probably the air (largest predator is a 1 meter long shrimp)
(The largest predator is a 45 foot long Parahelicoprion)
With a large variety of 5 - 8m long Eugeneodont "sharks"
saivodus👀
I might be confusing it with cambrian 💀
Saivodus is a lot smaller than Parahelicoprion
Also the Eocene has no reason to be ranked so high, its not THAT bad.
Does he exist?(pretty bad draw ik)
cretaceous has everything bad in it. Big squids, big fish, big sharks, big marine reptiles from various shapes, its basically an 100 ways to die by Goji center
It does seem like cheating to include both the Upper and Lower Cretaceous when they're basically entirely different marine biomes, but both really are still more dangerous than the Eocene
i feel like the triassic should be higher due to the evil ass itchyosaurs
I may or may not but most definitely may need answers
What is the consensus on piatnitzkysauridae?
I've seen they're either megalosauroids, allosauroids but also apparently in the Yuanmouraptor description they're sister to avetheropoda?
Is this a skeleton of a megalosaurus?
There is no consensus, they've been allosauroids recently, but they'll probably continue to jump around a bit as we better understand them
Yup
You can find most of dan folkes skeletals on thecodontia website
Gorgeous and iconic
save the classic: ark kaijufying stuff
its very good
ARK has done an excellent job of making a niche obscure animal into an almost commonplace prehistoric creature name
So guys...do we think we've seen all the species that are going to appear in Prehistoric Planet S3 ? Seems weird to have Moas and Elephant Birds but no Haasr Eagle
Nah
They got the giant fossa in prehistoric planet ice age! Madagascar fans anyone?
We're probably getting a whole Madagascar episode
I don’t think it’ll be an entire madagascar episode based on what we know so far, but I could see an australia/madagascar split episode
Fair
or throwing new zealand in there too, make it an islands episode
There was moa wasn't there? Or only elephant birds
both I think, moa for sure because there’s a male and female
Imagine dying and people think the dwarf that slimed tf outta your kids is your kid (Nanotyrannus/Rex reference)
Well how could we ride it otherwise?
its very much so rideable irl end
just not a very tall mount
under 3 foot king to run about
Nanuqsaurus is just Tyrannosaurid Oxalaia
It's a fragmentary animal where 99% of it's reconstructions are just another animal but with a weird twist so it's different
Speaking of oxalaia, how do we know if it had a sail (i think it's depicted with that) if we only have a part of the snout? I know it was probably compared to other spinosaurids related to it but is there a way we would know for sure?
Please ignore if this question doesn't make sense or is dumb LOL
Now I'm curious if daspleto, NMC 8506, has a jaw force of 14,360N how much would Pete iii have? Also bite force
the true Oxalaia recon
are Cuckoos's the only parasitic birds?
I have to mention here that Nanuqsaurus actually have a more complete skull
Nah there's many parasitic birds
oh really, how so?
But it's portrayed as nothing but a fluffy Dasp, it differs very little if not at all
Pete III is around 3.75t
And NMC 8506 was the Torosus Holotype wasn't it, which is like 3.4t
So idk?
Maybe 16kn
like nest parasites? there’s a ton of them
cowbirds are another good example, some ducks are pseudo nest parasites and lay eggs in the nests of multiple other females
oh..what makes the cuckoo the most famous of them then?
Correct it was the holotype
Also doesn't help there is this on Pete iii that I saw
Iirc wasn't the holotype estimated to be 3.6t?
I forgot what was daspletosaurus bite force in psi
Oh yeah
Wasn't this before the newer Pete III Stuff came?
Pete III isn't much bigger than the Holotype
Given how Goofy PSI can sometimes be
I would expect alot
Interesting, yeah all I know about dasp rn is the jaw force not the psi
20,000PSI trust
I believe you cited the jaw force of a Tyrannosaur earlier, right? Did the authors say what methods they used? Because we could try to use it on Daspleto ( If possible )
Yes I indeed did but I didn't exactly see the method they used if it was mentioned
Wait nvm I just found it, the formula they used to get the jaw force
It states these are estimations based if respective muscle's anatomical cross-sectional area has the same contribution to total subtemporal fenestra area
Is it possible to execute it manually? Or do we need other tools?
Not quite sure on that part I'm currently reading it
If you want to check it out for yourself, here you go
https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.25326
Yes, this thing bothered me. In describing dinosaurs, it seems, there is a separate scale when naming small, medium, large compared to mammals. We should compare everything to a single scale.
"Dinosaurised scale" and the correct scale below. Figure from:
https://t.co/fqv7XteMvC
I don't see why you couldn't do it manually provided you have the necessary information
I mean, it's important to ask anyways. But, I think even so, it would involve us actually having to manually reconstruct the respective jaw conjunctive tissues
that's true although depending on how exactly accurate you want it to be you could scale some of those from other Tyrannosaurs
regardless, the authors already estimated Daspletosaurus' bite force in the study, at 14,360 N
Yeah, but the person wants a different Daspletosaurus specimen, it seems
I have a controversial question.
Are we SURE all dromaeosaurids had feathers? Because it came to me that we found evidence of some of them being feathered, and it just came to me that we may be looking yet again at a "Yutyrannus is feathered therefore Rex must be too" with raptors.
I'm not "glazing Jurassic park" or something, I am just genuinely wondering if that is even a chance.
Me trying to figure out the difference between a carcharodontosaurus and a giganotosaurus
Wait till you see mammals
I’m toasted
Tyrannosaurids are currently an exception in coelurosaurs. Literally every other time we’ve found direct evidence in integument in coelurosaurs it’s almost always full fluff.
Dromaeosaurs in particular have up to a dozen species with integument preserved and they all essentially show full feathers akin to a bird right down to the complex feather structure and wings.
We don’t really question it right now in the same way we don’t question finding a bird skeleton without integument. We’re not going to assume or speculate that the bird doesn’t have feathers.
So does Giga have those spines on its back?? I keep seeing pics of Giga with and without those spines
Those are speculation, The only differences between Giga and Carch are in the skull. Since that's all Carcha has
Here's Carch and Giga
How much bigger even is dentarys skull to holotype. Like % wise
We don't know, the dentary it self is around 6% larger, but these can vary alot even on the same animal. Where the left Dentary of an animal is some % larger than the right dentary, so there's no real way to estimate the total size of the dentary skull reliably.
Best we can say it was probably of similar size
Guessing 10t+ dentary giga comes from just scaling up the holotype entire skull by 6%?
It comes from scaling up the entire holotype by 6%
Giga overall skull is a bit taller with a taller lacrimal front and carchar is a bit longer and much more smooth and "rounded"
It's so joever
Wait for the thread.
No!!! You were supposed to know more than them, not wait for them to release the thread!
You really loved this Jerboadiver emote huh?
Why do I sometimee see carcharodontosaurus reconstructions with higher spines
I see...well, we're all humans, we all make mistakes
No thats a paleo meme. People keep reconstructing or designing carcgarodontosaurs with back spines but there's 0 evidence of it.
General Question do you guys think alioramus could have been bigger? since only juvie fossils was found
All animals, would have bigger individuals than the ones we've found bones of. The an adult Alio would be bigger, Qianzhousaurus is probably what it'd be like
So, they'll fix it? 
Nope. Shows already done.
It's not too late
It probably is.
We will see
Can we talk about how little bones yet so much knowledge we have of the Quetzalcoatlus😭
Well, we have little bones of the big one. Quetzalcoatlus lawsoni has like a thousand bones
whats faster and why, alio ( or qianzho ) or nano?
Nano, cuz longest legs/feet bones
so alio lost its place as the fastest tyrannosaurid?
Don't think it was ever really there considering its a juvi and stuff like Juvi Gorgosaurs were prob faster
oh..
They really just edited Carch to make their Giga
so, i have a question, who would be faster, juvi rex or nano?
We don't really have any good described juvi rexes, but nano prob
nano really robbed juvi rex of everything..
Here's nano(jane) with Qianzhousaurus, they're similar in height, but Nano has longer Feet bones and longer lower legs overall, so it covers more ground with each step + its lighter with a smaller head
Hello Sir, can I get my hands on that Qianzhousaurus skeletal?
I would just use Hartman's Jane tbh
Alioramines seem to be (in general) less adapted for speed
Jumpscare
true.
Erm hey buddy...he already did an N. lethaeus skeletal!
@tough parcel Thats why I said Jane
Me when the tyrannus
Just gonna use Dueler now
LEG
(Replying to this since you didn't get an answer) This is likely a human cultural thing rather than any inherent biological trait, but it's possibly due in part to the common cuckoo (which is a brood parasite-- not all cuckoos are!) living across the entirety of Europe and Asia and being very visually obvious (thereby drawing more attention and interest) as a brood parasite since they usually look nothing like their host and are significantly larger
I'm going cuckoo for coco puffs is a good start too
ooh alright
was it possible any dinosaur species could have "culture" ?
How much do we even have of big quetzal?
culture in animals is a little complicated, but depending on how you define it, it's reasonably possible, though most research on animal culture is from researching haplorrhine primates (my primatology professor actually talked about ape cultures with us a whole bunch, it's cool stuff)
if you want to browse around https://datadiversitylab.github.io/ACDB, it's a little database of cultural behavior research!
im trying to think about other animals with culture excluding mammals, all i can think about is orca's, elephants and apes...
why is there an elf there
She was there when they were alive
I think that's a bit too straight.
Although, I tend to posture my theropods differently, so maybe it's only my impression
So, how do we know about its beak, neck etc ? Is Quetz mainly reconstructed based on other azhdarchids ?
I think, they just reconstruct it after the other species, no?
lawsoni
Ooooh okay
Most Pterosaur are not very complete, the smaller species of Quetz is very complete which is used to complete the bigger species. but a recent paper found that they are not each other's closest relatives, but still pretty clsoe and probably still the best for completeing quetz. Here's the material of hatz btw
Such a funky beak
How do we Hatz’s beak shape?
We don't
Yeah Pterosaur bones are particularly fragile
Then why do we give Hatz a much thicker beak than Quetz?
The bones of Hatz and its close relatives are more robust that those of Quetz, so probably that
I suppose that makes sense
What probably glaive said & I think a more basal position in its phylogeny?
That's actually the quetz, the long necked crested thing on the right is friren
Design reviews: Ark's Megalodon
Good or nah?
Nah for me
horrenduous
What material do we have of Purussaurus in total?
ew
Kinda good ngl
Yeah that’s not too bad at all.
How much is the big specimen subjected to change in size tho being only known from what looks like to be jaw bones
Uhm, Azhdarchid sp. you mean!
One of the worst original ark designs in everyway
Well no, even if it isn’t as close to quetz as we thought it’s probably not getting a name change anytime soon & lawsoni is easier and more understandable to say
Could you guys elaborate pls?
It's probably getting a name change because it isn't Q.northropi closest relative anymore and falls in a polytomy with other fossil taxa.
Well for one the note art doesn't resemble the in game model, which itself is pretty unappealing to look at
Biggest issue for me is size, I mean ark upsizes all these animals to absurd degrees but then decides to take megalodon of all animals and make it a realtively tiny early game tame.
Keeping on the actual game mechanics, the only thing meg has going for it is it gets a pack bonus, which is also stupid because it should reasonably be able to suffice alone
All in all its just really poorly designed visually and mechanically next to its island peers.
Fair enough
Because it makes them giant white sharks ( Which I think it's the intention ), it has bad oral configuration, and the eyes are fuc-&%$# horrible. Credits to Evoincarnate, as always.
Was talking more so about the design tho
The design is "SharK" and that's all
I further don't like the fin rays along the spine and how small the gills are
Again, its just pretty lame for what ark usually tries to do
But until then…
Lawsoni!!!
We should independently name it " Lawsonpterus "
I guess they wanted the mosa to be the sea monster for some reason
(The only thing remotely great white about the ark meg is the one drawing in the note)
Oh yeah
meg in ark is one of the few that they couldve made huge but shrunk it to no bigger than a cretoxyrhina
It was done super dirty
omega chopped
You could say that for most herbivores also
@stiff osprey is he right or wrong
squali if upsize it
Yeah, but ark being the game that it is can kinda justify that with needing something to be easy to tame in the early game and herbivores would be an obvious choice on top of being easier to feed
Meg has no similar excuse
I want my murder trike tho 
In general, I think the art of Ark is that it just uses stereotypes associated to the concept of the specific animals... Example: Giganotosaurus was the " Biggest Theropod " back in the day, so what they did? They made a Colossal Theropod
It's bad? Yeah, but there's some charm to it.
And herbivores are usually really good utility tames
Meg just sucks across the board for everything and anything because it was made at a time where mosasaurus vs megalodon was a serious debate on the internet
I don't think it's bad, it's not a docu and the game is science fiction
I mean, yeah... But, at the same time, you would expect for example: A Lion to look like a Lion
Realistically, yes. Ark is not realistic... But it doesn't mean that there aren't some people that wished for some good representation of their favorite extinct taxa
Well, they failed miserably for megalodon.
It's whole thing is being the big shark, and it is literally one of the smaller water tames.
true
And with all the shark stereotypes that fit into the awesomebro ark style, it should have been a slam dunk
If I do honest, I really feel like the department responsible for designing the water creatures lacked any creativity.
yes we have a nearly complete Purussaurus skeleton, would be nice if we had real measurements
So size is subjected to change right , for being bigger or being smaller. He’s acting like there is no way it can be smaller.
ark love so much glazing xipha and heli rn
Most creatures look like the part?
I can't think of any that don't look the part, even megalodon for all its failures as a design remains a big shark
(Until you venture out into the ocean)
it's not going to get the Deinosuchus treatment if that's what you're asking, we do have a general idea of how big it is. Could be about a meter smaller or a meter larger than the current 10m estimates
I don't think thats true, they at least give an idea of what they're supposed to be (did I understand it correctly?)
I would have liked him to make a Cretoxyrhina if they want an average shark
I mean yes, because that's what Ark does it just enhances the stereotype associated to those animals... Beyond that, I kinda of don't think so, really. Realistically, if none of the them had those names, you would had to guess what respective animals they are. The only exceptions I can think where that wouldn't be the case, are animals who have very iconic features: Carnotaurus, Spinosaurus, Kaprosuchus, etc.
Otherwise... It would be just a guess game, if the Tyrannosaurus in the game was just called " Tyrannosaur "
If you say so 🤷
I mean if it’s a giant tyrannosaur in a mainstream game you have a safe bet it’s tyrannosaurus
You could, but it's also not that big compared to other things on the game... So it would just be confusing trying to make sense around it.
Tbf it was pretty big until giga got added, and then its all downhill from there
Pretty much... I'm just more saying... If you made a Stylized Design for a Dinosaur
If you don't add any context, like it's real name or iconic feats... Nobody would really know what it is.
OMG IS THAT MY KING "SUPER"
whats the current fastest therapod
jobaria
Could someone tell me what materials do w ehave for the "Dracula" Pterosaur specimen ?
Apparently it was an error. Probably miscommunication with the cgi guys. I understand, but the guy working on Megalania should at least know what a monitor lizard looks like.
Its a single detail on a single animal
There was quite a few much bigger issues with PP lol
And there will still likely be many issues with this season. Of course less speculative though since we know a lot more about Pleistocene stuff.
Even with the speculative stuff though, seasons one and two had their fair share of screwups through miscommunications. Prime example being the shamosuchus/paraligator.
why does the thick meg has such a bulldog skull
Human sweat system or avian respiratory system
Same speed, who can travel longer before collapsing
This is pretty testable
Are we including limb adaptations as well?
lol wtf is this
For something like an ostrich, which can probably travel further than a human at high or low speeds, a lot of that efficiency comes from the gait and how the limbs store and release energy and not necessarily the respiration system. I dont know if the latter has been properly tested but it's an interesting question
How many et al are we using bruh 😭
What is this analog horror ah spinosaurus
Idk how they even got this size like what
It’s funny cuz the dizzy person posted it on their YouTube
3t deinosuchus and 12t spinosaurus
both:)
What’s the current status on Bruhathkayosaurus? Is it the name of an abelisaur, with the sauropod material going unnamed, or did I hallucinate that?
An abomination
A mod for Ark Survival Ascended
Idk. Probably just a Titanosaur with proportionally large legs.
It also is not of the same name I believe.
You wanna see something more bizarre that I found?
Gyatt
SAURONIOPS WILL NEVER BE REAL
the inconspicuous decently preserved frontal region:
Lmfao. Me omw to give an animal the weirdest proportions ever to make it as big as physically possible
Makes for a cool monster design
🥀
disgusting
ofcourse dizzy rose would believe it..
is nanotyrannus lancensis the coyote latheus the wolf, and t rex the bear?
The holotype is a theropod illium.
The sauropod material isn't Bruhathkayosaurus
and for the prey edmontosaurus are moose/elk trikes are bisons
Gotcha, and the current unofficial name for it is Fangorn, yes?
and is dakotaraptor valid?
Don't think so
I wanna know if "laeviatanus is real"
What's that
It's the nickname they gave to the colossal "Carch" vertebra found in Brazil
Well that's real but the name is unofficial and wasn't actually given to it
Wait... This thing was found in late cretaceous?!
It's kem kem like carch
That's Sauroniops, which is a single skull bone from the Kem Kem formation (same as Spino and Carcharodontosaurus) and probably isn't that big
I didn't know that but thank God, Laeviatanus seems like the thing a 13years old gave to his DA original dinosaur (do not steal)
Laeviatanus was a name given by the paleontologist Cau in 2008 for a hypothetical largest theropod
So, when therizinasaurus was first found it was just the arms...and the first thing they thought was a giant tutrtle??? I would've 100% thought they belonged to a giant therapod carnavore
I was expecting this channel to be even more of a fistfight than the official PoT channel, but I have to admit this gotta be the best Paleo channel I have seen in a long time btw
Nuh uh, we'll fix that
Nobody just screams at you for liking something or mock you for asking a valid but controversial question (like Yesterday when I asked about what are the odds that there could be unfeathered dromaeosaurids given how we never found actual feathers on things like Velociraptor & Deinonychus), everyone just explained politely to me the reason of why, I'm more used at people going full chimp and throwing dung at you for even entertaining the idea that Nano could exist before 1 week ago.
People keep saying "Oh I was hit with slings and arrows for suggesting Nano was valid but only a month ago" but I've never seen that happen 💔
I have a hunch that php ice age will gloss over the fact that we killed off all the megafauna. We love denying responsibility and blame it all on climate change.
Only Nano fans who actively said it got to experience that.
Persecution of the masses...
Did we really kill them off like that? Like is it possible that a bunch of people with pointy sticks risking their life hunting any of these large megafauna that extensively could pull that?
it was probably a cascade effect, the climate did start to change and we destabilized things enough that it made that worse and then we mopped up what was left
Okok that makes more sense to me, as in I'd expect that kind of carnage in modern times where survival is a concept so far away and we actively hunt stuffs for trophies while risking very little with the modern firepower, but in that period I find it hard
Speaking of. I wonder if we'll hear the theory that Komodo dragons are insular dwarfism Megalania, I found it very amusing.
Thanks!
cool fantasy dinosaur
I love homotherium
Nanotyrannus was the final nail in the coffin
(It wasn't because there's still large maniraptoran material)
We can’t formally make Dakota invalid cause we can’t look at his material asdf
So he gets to be valid as a treat until then
Schrödinger's Dromaeosaurid go brrr
Does anyone know what plants grow in Bayanshiree Formation?
Why would you think that tbf
Because they already know what a theropod carnivore looks like, people back then didn't have as complete of a view and the most similar thing to Theri's claws at the time was a turtle
Therizinosaurus claws compared to Alligator snapping turtle claws
Disappointing that it was overlooked, ngl.
Shin Godzilla my beloved
I truly hate how scary along the theri’s claws are
I couldn’t imagine getting swatted by those claws full force too
No
Design reviews: Ark's Purlovia
Good or nah?
Is that a real animal
Yes but it’s not a very well known animal
This is what we have of the skull it seems
There are abundant fruits at Bor Guvé and Khara Kuutal so angiosperms of some kind seem to have been common, IDing them is impossible at this point. I'd look to roughly contemporaneous northern hemisphere sites with better plant records for inspiration
This is the only other art of it in existence so its decent by default of being the only one basically
Outside of being a carnivore
we have Araucarian cones from the Sheeregeen Gashoon locality, Nyssoidea mongolica type is from here, though it’s been said to have not actually been related to nyssaceae, my guess would be a Cercidiphyllaceae identity for the fruit.
Thanks @little mauve and @light osprey
Seems like the comparisons to the Nemegt are pretty apt
Wdym no it's just true
Yes
Yes 
Nanotyrannus is so visually appealing
I didn’t know what homotherium was until a few months ago. I already love it.
SAME BEAST 🗣️🗣️ RAHHH 🔥✍️
The purlovia is huge (the animal is only about a meter long most likely irl) and overly mammalified. Therocephalians don't have fur and don't give birth to live young.
Tbf, almost every animal in ark is huge (aside from megalodon)
most ironic thing ever
meg is the largest fish, right?
Most non-sauropod herbivores in Ark aren't that huge
That ark purlovia looks like someone’s character rather than a therocephalian animal and as always plantigrade is made digitigrade
This is because digitigrade is ugly
on average, who would be larger, leed or a whale sharl?
To an extent, I’m actually trying to find some better literature on the description of Araucarian wood from the Nemegt, given so far I haven’t found Palynology samples with them, so I’m suspecting a Cheirolepidiaceous identity
A bigger meg probably
Largest fish that we know of I think
Ye
@split forge sorry, it got deleted before I got a proper chance to read it but, I like Anurognathus and eohippus if that helps at all 😅
oh my god a horse with toes
Right? It's very cute lol
Wasn't there like a wolf with hooves too, or something? One of those weird 'missing link' animals
The "hell pig" maybe?
no not that one. It was a beachgoer I think.
Mesonychids?
"Andrewsarchus"
apparently that's it, I just knew it by another name
All good haha
These ancient mammals are a trip. And not in the same way dinosaurs, synapsids and fish are. More in the "I refuse to believe this thing was real" way.
Understandable haha
There's a ton of strange ones
This thread might have some useful sources https://x.com/Jaizinosaurus/status/1954611644668969181?s=20
would a orca have any way of drowning a stellar sea cow?
I mean, bite tail arteries so it can’t swim. That’s what some sharks do to whales today.
No because they never really figured out how to 😭
i think its too fat to sink
Yeah they were buoyant
I suppose so, yeah.
keep in mind andrewsarchus is no longer considered a mesonychid
We don't really have knowledge of how orcas would've hunted sea cows. Although there's a few things about them that probably didn't make for ideal prey.
- They inhabit kelp forests, which orcas generally avoid.
- The sea cows literally float, so drowning it is very difficult.
- Last I checked based on hunting accounts, sea cows will actively defend each other when under attack instead of fleeing.
leed
ik its against wooden boats but wasnt it noted that their headbutting really didnt do alot?
where can i find a list of the marine life that lived alongside tylosaurus
Probably by precise attacks? I mean, I could be wrong, but isn't there this factoid that Orcas will actively target Shark Livers? Maybe depending on how experienced they are with Sea Cows, they may also know the most effective location to apply some form of injury?
Paleo nerds, hear my plea. What was the biggest Psudeosuchian? Size, name, yadda yadda. I'm so horrible at researching stuff🙏
joemamasuchus
It’s between silosuchus giant vert, prestosuchus giant vert, fasolasuchus
wouldn't it be purussaurus since modern crocodilians are within pseudosuchia
Oh yeah you’re right lol
question, i was doing some resharch n discovered the Cenomanian-Turonian faunal turnover event. given that this was caused by a rapid rise in global co2 n asidification in the oceans
is it safe to say that the ongoing tectonic activity caused this?
nvm, it did
Question, so atm what's the heaviest nodosaur to ankylosaur comparison???
Purussaurus
^
Purussaurus was between 10-11 meters long and lived in northern South America 16-5 million years ago
@green helm
yes
search up dizzy rose on this channel and you will find it
Acrocanthosaurus mauls deinosuchus
(Gamma Jack victims)
why are we doing it here theres a timer here
Where do I go then
to the debate channel we were before its called debate room for a reason no?
Oh
I wonder if The Smallest Puru Species lived today would change anything
Will it be able to sustain itself?
neivensis would prob be fine prior to human overexploitation of resources, after that it would either go extinct or shrink
Rip
The ultimate fate of a lot of wildlife nowadays
Majungasaurus slams ceratosaurus
Question: Would an Allosaurus (any of the species) survive in Hell Creek along side a T-Rex?
Small ones should would do better maybe, get bullied by subadults and adult rexes ofc and have to compete with Nanos, but if there's enough edmontos to go around, sure why not.
Albertosaurus > Allosaurus
That seems fair
depends if their target prey is there
allosaurus could go after their own prey while tyrannosaurus goes after theirs but if one does not have its target prey it may interfere with the tyrannosauruses food causing a new target prey for the allosaurus and tyrannosaurus
Hot take
Yutyrannus beats an allosaurus in a fight
Depends on the Allosaurus species
Which species of Allosaurus
Allosaurus fragilis
Fragilis Dwarf Yuty at Max size
So ima guess you are using a Small Fragilis
Spinosaurus was the strongest and more intelligent and fearsome dinosaur!
and that is a fact ✅
also, it could swim underwater ✅
my honest reaction
Extremely overweight yet somehow malnourished bald columbian mammoth with that sack head the Wwd lusotitan has.
You cannot be for real. We went over this thing 2 times already!
It’s bait, don’t do it
Why do you think no-one’s responded on a weekend 😭
because they have lives?
in a dinosaur discord?💔
Guys, I'm a scale of 1 to 10, how likely u ppl think lightning strikes were of a threat to big sauropods (Argentinosaurus, Patagotitan, etc)?
About 3. They usually lived near trees which are much taller than they are, so it would only be a threat if they were standing by the exact tree that got hit
Would dinosaurs bask like reptiles today
Prolly not, theyre warm blooded
Woah
gets hunted down
i don't know mega to full but iirc the ONLY thing thats genuinely off is being abit skinny and the normal arking bits( just not nightmarishly so)
rest are reasonable spec and being meganuera
unrelated but i find hilarious nobody made a big brain meme out of this columbi depiction
I think it might depends on how you reconstruct your Mosasaurs. Afaik, they were hella skinny and Mosasaurus itself would have weighted about 4 metric tons: at 12.3 meters, Tosha's reconstruction is at 6.4 tons. However, Incinerox's Mosa, with a deeper dearticulated torso, goes up to 10 tons. Steller's sea cow possibly reached up to 9-10 metric tons, but most estimates seem to gravitate around 4 tons as well.
Stellar's Sea Cow covers a large size range. The largest recorded skeletons indicate around 9m and 12 - 14 tons
We have a quite good grasp on the size of Stellar from documentation of life specimens combined with an extensive record
what would eggnog taste like if it was made from sauropod eggs(I love eggnog)
I just remembered estemmenosuchus existed and is WICKED AF
More effective at headbutting than Pachycephelasaurus!
if a pachy did this too you, would you survive?
Oh he was chubby?
Maybe. Idk if shrink wrapping extends to this guys face. Maybe someone here could answer???
I think some shrinkwrapping is acceptable for some prehistoric creatures faces
Yeah but like, I’m wondering if it’s this kinda situation.
Whoa, what a facelift
This isn't correct afaik.
They still would've been visible.
yeah they're kinda too big to have not been visible lol
Daily reminder that mammals have weird anatomy and applying it, even to moderately distant related mammals, yields drastically different results
IE Hippos compared to Horses compared to Platypus compared to Cats
Let alone animals that aren't mammals
lisowicia my beloved
2nd daily reminder: one animal will not say the same thing for another animal
The humble horseshoe crab...
But how am I supposed to criticize paleo reconstructions if I can't equate extinct animals to my very poor understanding of mammal biology
is this true?? https://x.com/zackdfilms1/status/1987618890545836409
what stops paleontologists fron getting dieases when they lick fossils?
Well
It’s a rock
So virtually nothing
waitt....so i can safely lick rocks?
i will do this tomorrow.
but wont licking the fossil damage it?
👅
i never considered you could be a woman, maybe im a bad person.
also what fossil are you even licking
No because human saliva is not battery acid nor are you licking it repeatedly (hopefully)
i hope i can lick a fossil one day
Yummy fossils
who here has licked a fossil? im curious
Do they taste good though? How many can you eat?
I haven’t yet but I can lick some Edmonto fingers when I get home
tell us how that goes
it tastes like rock
EAT IT
no I like having it
Someone tried to get me to lick a megalodon tooth but one of the grad students I work for was standing over my shoulder very much expecting that I don't lick the fossil
Ah yes, the technique lmao
I have. Also to explain why folks do it, the porous texture of fossils means they stick to your tongue, which normal rocks don't, so it can be a way to ID fossils in the field
Me running around licking the floor in Wyoming looking for tyrannosaurus specimens
This is how they found a second labocania species btw
Is everything okay in this chat I'm concerned
Speak for yourself you salamander slimer
is this even robust morph
Robust morph is the bone that’s being licked
I’d press charges..
The Fossil Lickers of the Cenozoic, we can only wonder about the reasons behind the adaptations of their respective evolution
-Some Alien Goofy Ass
What we thinking?
Got lips finally. Might buy this one actually, it’s really cool.
Homotherium is probably seen as a bunch of different species, likely in every episode since it was everywhere. Idc about the lions, enhydriodon is awesome, and megalania’s eyes were a mistake.
Slit pupils. No monitor lizard has them, nor is there any reason for them to be portrayed like that. According to Naish though, it was a production mistake.
Prehistoric planet still makes many mistakes. Regardless, this season is going to be much less speculative than the previous two, since we know a lot more from the Pleistocene.
Me when horned Tameryraptor 😔
Because every scaly raptor ever has slit pupils and it looks like a scaly raptor
It’s not about hate, it’s about accuracy
Hope prehistoric planet are gonna fix that issue
Why is No one talking abt Elasmotherium?
What's wrong with it
It had a big dome, blood vessels below it and one specimen has a puncture wound on the shoulder.
Yet it's horn gets done dirty🥀
Because it could be sexually dimorphic
thus indicating...?
Also Naish said they're too far past the point of no return to fix it under that tweet
Yeah, the episodes are already like done, so they can't really fix it. Maybe if they plan to sell it in the future??? But I don't know?
They are but it depends where, can you imagine a cow with these eyes 
Giant versions of today’s species are only unusual by our standards because we killed them all.
And they were tasty
Horn was too small to be visible when covered in skin right?
Damn. Well aside from that, it looks awesome. So sad it couldn’t be perfect… 😭
Less due to that. The bony structure itself is big, but the " Horn Texture " on the nasal is something already known from other Carcharodontosaurines, this is due to there potentially being a extensive keratin sheath in life, where contact to the bone made it " Stretch ". In Tameryraptor, it's just the more noticeable one... Probably because it's a individual with a extreme condition
So this pnso model here could represent one individual.
Certainly.
Alright that makes it a little better. What if it’s sexual dimorphism? That’d be really cool.
It could also be a broken nasal ridge because tmk, the actual bump isn't that large 
I'm leaning more to it's something that happened during development, probably being too stimulated and then idk, potentially it had a very big keratin soft tissue structure over the face. Because this is already visible in Meraxes, for example. There's also Giga, Mapu and Carcha ( at least so far for these with preserved Nasals )
They are just more on the average expected size, instead of the extreme size seen in Tameryraptor
But what are the chances we found one individual with the abnormal growth? Certainly not 0 I guess.
What is this, Meraxes?
I mean, considering we already got lucky with finding extreme individuals of other genera and species. It was expected that some point we would've found a extreme individual of a Carcharodontosaur genera
Not 0 but the chances are near impossible
So assuming it's a species-wide trait is smarter
So it’s probably a common phenomenon in this genus anyways.
Well yea
Wouldn't lean into that alternative, but sure
the solution is to study the material hands on
wait-
It could also just not be as present as most draw it to be
Stromer makes it very small in his description of the material
You wouldn't lean into the most plausible scenario 🥀 ?
ye there are many valid interpretations at this current time
and though some people use bad science or make things up and choose to go down that route cant very well stop them 
thus is the world of paleo
in summary tammy is very cool
In summary, this figure is awesome and I’ll be getting it.
mhm mhm
It's not wrong but it's not the only interpretation, yea
I just wouldn't say it's plausible. Simple as
It's a extremely larger structure already seen in other close relatives, and it also doesn't seem like the animal has any unique reasons or adaptations to have suddenly changed that, or charged it to the maximum... So, it's just a Indiviudal with a extreme condition for me.
I mean I literally posted the material right here showing the horn is not that big
Right, but the chances we found the condition as being rare is low. Because we found it, it’s probably not uncommon in the genus.
Fossilization is already an incredibly rare event in the first place
So what you're saying is this incredibly rare individual happened to survive the incredibly rare fossilization process instead of the countless other individuals without this trait
it'd be like me falling into a bog
Same reason that we have more extinct genus’s than species.
Boy, do I love to use Illustrations subjective to potential partial misinterpretation of the material. Sure, it's not as big here either... But, it's also not that small as compared to the others.
why is the emote called arifrier asdf
The illustration is literally all we have for a lateral view 🥀
The photo you showed is larger but it also seems other traits of the nasal are larger (you can see the bumps behind it are larger in the photo than the illustration from Stromer)
So I partially wonder if other larger bumps were broken off during preservation because the front of the nasal looks incredibly smooth compared to the back half
wait what crocodilian caused sarcosuchus to get nerfed?
Tbh, compared to Tyrannosaur nasals, Carcharodontosaurinae nasals aren't that rugose, they are mostly smooth, with the exception of the " Hornlets " that appear here and there. ( C. saharicus )
None??
Sarco description is just horrible
So we based its closest relative, Terminonaris
oh yeah this guy
The Goat yeah
