#paleontology
1 messages · Page 205 of 1
yeah, I don’t think we should be estimating anything down to the centimeter, but at least with theropods (sauropods and others are probably trickier), if the track is well-preserved (or they just not completely screwed up, and I haven't seen many like that) you can clearly see where the digits start and end, and that lets you figure out the length of the acropodium. That already gives you a decent basis for roughly estimating the animal’s size
🙋♂️ 👀 📖 👇 🗨️
didn't concavenator show it at least had more extensive padding than most people tend to give them?
it doesn't change anything in this context
It changes a bit if observed animal tracks have been known to increase in size as erosion and other deformation processes take their toll
So now you have increased padding from what we're used to using + deformation increasing the size
thoughts on dromeosaurs Mainstream media ability of mimicing voices?
Yup.
i swear theres other examples of dromeosaurids mimicing voices
It's not an unpopular idea but never within "mainstream" media
a track can show the actual anatomy of the foot very well and still be subject to size deformation, I see it all the time in the field
y u p .
choose your dromeosaurid ability
1 - pack hunting
2 - hyper intelligence
3 - voice mimicing
4 - hand signals
Shrikes do something similar but moreso that it's a siren call instead of mimickry, it's quite cool
But still, my point is about a rough estimate, and the fact that the toes were a bit more fleshy doesn’t change anything. And again, “erosion and deformation processes” are things you evaluate based on the specific tracks, not just in theory.
What I mean is that a slightly thicker toes in Concavenator won’t change the fact that if a track shows a 90 cm long acropodium, it definitely wasn’t made by a 5m animal. You don’t need to argue whether it was 11.78 or 12.47 meters long, but I don’t see anything controversial about saying that such a track clearly belonged to a huge animal, thats it
I dislike all of these options. I despise all of them
even packing hunting?
I think you should take a look at what Cuttlefish is saying, very informative stuff from someone actually in modern wildlife fields
idk maybe you should read what I wrote again
a track can show the actual anatomy of the foot very well and still be subject to size deformation, I see it all the time in the field
This is directly contradictory to the idea that it's going to help you in any basic form
Generally, I hate all of these because they've become pretty generic and almost stereotypical with Dromaeosaurs. It's almost like people don't know what else they can use to make Dromaeosaurs sound efficiently scary in the role of a Horror Monster.
I do enjoy that Cuttlefish has experience with this occurring in real life
Maybe you should talk with them more @mellow prism or with people in the field who have experience with how trackways are warped instead of relying on paleontology
Late reply but I think so.
LMAOOOO, what a great response from Paleo
Also @arctic crane we have a caudal and a metatarsal (potentially)
The claw is likely to be a NanoT
Should probably tell a Mod to access the Server's history
hm, how about
dromeosaurid dropping from a tree onto prey like a jaguar/lepoard?
i can also confirm on even fresh tracks warping potential yeah, its not too rare either
can someone inform me about the difference between a jaguar and a lepoard
If it was Deinonychus, yeah sure, why not?
would utah have the anatomy to climb tree's effectively?
If being the size of a Polar Bear and being the most heavy dromaeosaur should indicate...
Probably not
of course, footprints can be larger than a real foot, and there are deformations, etc., but I haven't questioned that anywhere. You simply don't understand that you can't jump from these facts to conclusion that for each footprint you have a range of the potential size of the author from 30 cm to 30 meters. It doesn't work that way
That's not very much. Maybe nano really did kill off Dakotas chance. How sure are we that the caudal is a dromaeosaur could there be any doubts?
Let us please remain polite and respectful while interacting on this server. Do not provoke or antagonize other users.
Refer to our #rules.
Cook 🧑🏽🍳
Using them for size estimations at all is very unwise as now two people have corroborated that trackways can inflate notably due to deformation
Obviously a Velociraptor-sized animal won't turn into a T. rex-sized footprint but a mid-sized megaraptorid turning into a large megaraptorid? Probably more possible
I mean it's definitely not a tyrannosaur
I don't have any images on me but from my recollection, it's pretty dromaeosaur in shape
how did this whole arguement start?
you're a bit like a wall, but talking
Pretty sure it was due to basically a " Breviparopus 2.0 "
Anyways regardless those footprints are impressive and without a doubt are from a very impressive sauropod.
So there is still a chance of a large one there ok. Guess we'll just have to wait and see.
Are there any smaller ones in hell creek?
as a reference I was working in a wetland earlier this fall and I wear a size 13 boot in the field, in that same wetland 2 weeks later my boot print was still perfect (super dry fall here) but it looks like an 8 foot tall clown was running around out there
@marsh tapir
I've noticed, I've reported them already luckily
yes you can tell the footprint came from a large animal, but trying to say anything beyond that is just not wise
@marsh tapir please is it possible to access the server's history and see messages that PaleoFreak deleted? I think it could be found they've committed two offenses.
Oh my God, that's actually a hilarious story 😭 also really interesting that it upsized to such a degree 
He did say it’s silly to try to make accurate measurements off footprints . So I’m unsure what’s actually the debate ?
The debate is they're trying to get a measurement period
This is a final warning to, please, follow the server #rules.
Failing to comply will generate a mute in this server.
If we're unable to remain polite and respectful while discussing this topic, we'd recommend moving to a different one altogether.
the argument is about exactly how far off it can be, I’m not super invested just throwing my hat in the ring in terms of why we don’t estimate that way in my field
how good are footprints at speed scaling?
I think a recent paper on modern birds showed they're actually not very reliable
I'd have to ask around for it though because I can't remember any key terms that would help find it
Tell em bro
I just know for sure it’s a big boy that’s the safe bet , exact numbers would be silly without any material and just circumstances too.
it’s a whole can of worms honestly
Cuttlefish is the expert on track deformation, as I've said
I would suggest reading their arguments and properly understanding their anecdote rather than focusing on me
I have no clue, but I'm gonna take my leave because it's movie night with my girlfriends so adios, take care
Nothing about this was wrong btw
Huh, I swear I've heard the wind...
Anyways, @tough parcel a suggestion: what do you think of putting quills or filaments on the arms of your Gallimimus? I think they could be neat
I think it's now a bit smaller then the largest argen and bruh
Which is huge regardless even if the case!
I actually did consider it but I wanted to try out different ideas of integument than usual
I'm not aware of Galli containing quill knobs so I thought it was a good subject to try it out on
Pretty sure Ornithomimus has it, so... Not impossible to extrapolate Gallimimus had it, right?
Hence why my Ornithomimus has wings
It's not unreasonable to apply it to Gallimimus but on the flip side, it also means that naked arms is very possible too
Idk. There are some winged birds who do not necessarily have visible quill knobs on their ulna... But, it's fair.
Well, all Birds are winged... So what I said is stupid.
Nah I getcha, that's why I'm not saying it's conclusive proof
Just that I have wiggle room 
All quill knobs have quills
But not all quills have quill knobs
Or smth
And then there's Concavenator
Concavenator is rlly weird because soft tissue impressions but no indications of feathering
But then again, I'd assume scaly skin is a bit harder to decompose than feathers or quills
I think it had feathers or something close to them in shape. Simply because Concavenator is a Aerodynamic Freak
what the heck happened up there
Someone being rude to Falcon. Simply.
I really like the idea that Concavenator was just dedicated to the dance
Like Spinosaurus but better at functioning
It's interesting that we do have two carcharodontids with weird talk spines
Who had the better sail game, carchs or spinosaurids
I made a nanotyrannus jack-o-lantern
Spinosaurus for the size
Carchs and the other spinosaurs for still being able to function
Nah. For me Conca is like the true theropod Cheetah, I tend to think it had wings or wing-like structures to change it's aerodynamic profile on the run, so never loosing too much energy, and being able to keep up with prey items like Garudumimus
To be fair, when attempting to lean into speed, theropods tended to just...lose their arms (see: noasaurs and abelisaurs)
Or they were freaks like ornithomimisaurs and didn't care
i dont wanna sound dumb but how do arms and speed relate? like, aerodynamic?
Not really, that is pretty short term speed, and those clades didn't seem to be able to develop wings. There's a study on the musculature of the hindlimbs of Skorpiovenator, which seems to show they didn't had as much the same configurations of conjunctive tissues as birds, which we see in Tetanureans a lot, but more configurations akin to Crocodiles. For Abelisaurs, this seems to imply they are more ambush and burst predators in general rather than long term sprinting.
For Noasaurs... I really don't know, but i also don't know of their current phylogenetics.
did they do any updated nanotyrannus skeletals for the paper ?
Hol' up let me grab the paper...
Noasaurs are within Abelisauria
As for the musculature, that's not exactly what I'm leading into
It's obviously not a rule of thumb but assumedly arm reduction is weight reduction and/or aerodynamics
It is. Not disagreeing with that, but that might be more indicative that the animals weren't able to find other alternatives to change their aerodynamic profile.
I cited the musculature, because it's relevant, usually the configuration of there being mostly tendons in Bird's feet, in Tetanureans allows for many theropods to afford sprinting long distances or being able to conserve energy efficiently by the long term ( by stalking, for example ). If Abelisaurs differ in that matter, that tends to indicate that they must be doing something different.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1B4WnxQJJdOz5lO_ZEMneDbfUxdtxLmF4/view?usp=drivesdk
If only we had more abelisaurs with feet!!! If only they weren't bad at preserving their lower legs!!!!!!!! 
Skorpiovenator descends from the heavens
I lost the plot sorry
As I said, I'm watching The Nun w/ my gfs so I'm very focus-divided 😭
Uhh I agree that abelisaurs weren't exactly sprinting after prey for a decent amount of time, I prefer the idea they were more like pitbulls where they'd burst out of the brush with insane speed, grab a prey item, and shake it to death like a ragdoll
For me the analogy is more Bipedal Land Croc/Shark, but I agree on the same idea
We have any studies on the myology of Ceratosaurus?
Any studies on Ceratosaurus period 💔
Tmk no
LMFAO
what would be considered the best non adult specimen of tyrannosaurus rex now ?
see I would agree but a leopard is so so much more flexible than a dromaeosaur would've been
Thank you A. Parrot ❤️
Also @fluid inlet most likely Bucky or Cupcake, though I can't recall where either of them are held
@sharp jackal This is a final warning to not provoke or antagonize other users in this server. We appreciate your cooperation and understanding on this one.
Is there any reconstructions of them I just want to see a good an example for a drawing I’m doing
These work?
adolescent is better than nothing i guess , thanks
Yeaa unfortunately, there's no more small small rex specimens 🥀
This artwork is great but T. rex Adol and nano look so alike , the really clear difference is the little crest bumps and the skin colors obviously
I like that nano bullying baby rexes is just what they do. Jurassic fight club really set the standard lol
Common username? Sorry for any confusion
https://tetzoo.com/blog/2025/10/29/the-amazing-giant-black-fossa btw this kinda got buried by all the nano stuff but uhhh the giant fossa may still be alive
"Oh, it's alive today? Boring. Let's just take it for granted like everything else alive today." My personal opinion on how we would treat extinct creatures if they weren't extinct.
idk about you but if I woke up and read that I might go nuts
It kinda makes sense for them to look alike
Alternatively, young Tyrannosaurus could had the lacrimals too, depending if you do it more based on Raptorex or Tarbosaurus
Welcome back to Pine Ridge.
NIGHTFALL is now streaming on YouTube!
WATCH NOW: https://t.co/yDaKlxXWwC
Yeah I’m having a hard time lol
Don’t worry, I believe in you
DAYUM
I found this image of a theropod dinosaur sleeping, is this a nanuqsaurus??
the lion dosen’t concern himself with the validity of nanotyrannus
Hi guys, I read somewhere that the Humboldt Squid has a bite force of 6.000 PSI, is that true ?
What pet dinosaur would you have
Buitreraptor
Mononykus
Let him eat bugs
Ubirajara
My favourite dinosaur is rhamphoryncus
Spinosaurus easily defeats Trex, Mosa and every kaiju in monster verse
This is funny to me
I always thought sucho is the size of majunga
Nope
it's a very big animal
And Majunga won against it in Chaos Theory
I would have a pet Parasaurolophus so that way it can eat the evil pollen producing plants around my house and save me from spring pollen allergies
Joke btw
Source: BBC
https://search.app/P33xM
No!!! What happened to the Para?!
Nature has always a "filter" that keeps apex predators in check. makes sense. it's already very unstoppable the way it was.
Cause Majunga in the series is bigger than this while CT Sucho is smaller than this Sucho
how much does stegosaurus weight at max
I assumed so I was just goofin around lol
Already have two
can i ask however HOW ON EARTH did something that isn't a Tyrannosauridae be for so long gaslighted into being a juvenile tyrannosaurus?
Yarp
peak avatar btw
We love to see it
Alamotyrannus
They didn’t, it was Nanotyrannus
juvenile derived tyrannosaurs look similar to basal tyrannosaurs + there were no juvenile rexes to compare them to
Mhm
I mean, yeah, those are factors, but it also doesn't help when some are coming out and stating that for the longest time, some people were really too serious against Nanotyrannus
https://fxtwitter.com/MiloGaillard3/status/1984597460564787290?t=NZIF-_Z2JTvK-c_lAu-nnA&s=19
there was also the fact that most of the nanotyrannus proponents were fossil salesmen, so even if they turned out to be correct, not many people trust them
Yeah but the way it looks now seems like neither Carr nor Busatte even took a look at any Nano skeletons and went all "yeah sure makes sense we will make sure every try to make Nano real results in ridiculisation", like how on earth do you miss the longer arms thing?
I remember when someone would say "Nano" they would be made fun of. How does one ever stand up and decides they can fix this is beyond my understanding.
the arms being bigger can easily be explained as the arms on Tyrannosaurus are nearly vestigial structures - you wouldn't classify a whale as a new species because it has a bigger pelvis than another, and the documentation of rex arms was very poor in the first place
idk who came up with the idea that the arms "had to shrink" from nano to rex. We have ONE Nano arm, some individuals can just be born with bigger arms than others
And yes, I know nano is valid for other reasons besides the arms
All the good nano and juvi rex specimens being private means there's not much evidence to use
What if the Nanotyrannus evolved to beat T. rex in an arm wrestle?
Squirrels have a bite of 20 000 PSI so probably
PSI is a measurement of pressure, not force
how accurate is the isles camarasaurus?
Imagine looking over at your fellow juvi in a hunt, and not knowing it’s a 30 year old man that just ate your buddy.
I've been reading Carpenters original paper on theropod forelimb biomechanics and this bit near the end interested me and I would like to know more about it because of what it says about the movement of Deinonychus' forelimbs, particularly its unique capability to pronate which seems to go against everything we say about Dromaeosaur hand articulation today despite most citing this paper as the original source against it.
"Deinonychus also shows one adaptation not seen in the
other theropods, the capacity of pronating the manus. However,
it does so, not by rotating the radius, but by movements
between the radiale and semilunate, and between the radius
and
radiale (text-fig. 14 C-F). This movement is a precursor to
the avian wrist movements described by VAZQUEZ (1992)."
So whats up with that?
is this facts
Imagine how many other species we have grouped together incorrectly.
I’m trying to help yall but the quests should give you the coins to get Dino’s and other stuff so like people can have a better gaming experience with the game -BEEFY
Wrong chat bro
Oh lol mb
Here's the Lameta formation in India.
(some of these might end up being the same animal, but we'll care about that when it happens)
I wouldn't doubt that certain dinosaurs actually had some form of dexterity in their hands, even if it is different from ours. To me this seems like more evidence against making raptor arms look like copy pasted bird wings.
Even though making them like that wasn't justified or realistic to begin with.
I don't know if it's accurate
The figure seems realistic besides the lack of some facial soft tissue like lips and exoparia
It’s all sauropods and abelisaurs 💀
Not 100% sure based on the angle but the face might be a bit too slim on the end? the fossil's snout seems slightly more boxy to me.
The first one with the face dates from 2022, and the following year Dan Flokes published Sinraptor Hepigensis for 2023, so there have been quite a few changes
So there is potential for all the reconstructions of Dromaeosaurs (or at least Deinonychus) showing avian style hand folding being inaccurate? Isn't that kinda huge 💀
Avian style hand folding was always implausible to my knowledge because of how Dromaeosaur wrists work
oh no it's right, i think the Premaxilla wasn't preserved in this Sinraptor species? ( So, that cast is like, really really bad )
Can you show me a new reference in 2025?
The arm structures while similar, are still a lot different than birds, it seems that most people just overlooked that in reconstructions
I'm not the most well versed on that species tbh, I was mainly looking at the material provided
Also I can't understand how did Carr's opinion get more relevant and accepted than legendary paleontologist Bakker on the matter?
wait what
Sure they could fold their wings, just not like a bird because that'd break their arm anatomy.
By the way, celebrating Nano by buying a Nano figure, Safari ltd or PNSO?
PNSO models are really neat
tbh, i think everything on the figure is done very horribly. There's like... Way more efficient ways to get that sorta of look
then how could they do it-
Yeah, same opinion as the guy above, PNSO for the win
They could still move their hands and arms, just not fold them so tightly and high against the body like birds do
Carr's paper iirc had Alligators losing teeth as they grow and the differences of a Daspletosaurus juvi from a daspleto adult as examples of extreme changes in Tyrannosaur growth and tooth loss during to ontogeny + the skull's weirder differences being due to deformation and such.
Dr. Napoli's paper from last year found gators didn't loose teeth as they grew and the daspletosaurus juvinile was recently found to be a gorgosaurus juvi, so that made the Nano=Rex argument weaker.
yes but what other default arm position would they take? I can't visualize this
Finding out that Deinonychus couldn't fold its arms tightly and could (maybe?) pronate is news to me too. See my post above, I'm desperate for more info on this because nobody seems to be talking about this.
Raptor arms are too often passed off as modern bird wings with fingers it seems
I thought they basically were tbf
You telling me the guy who confused Gorgosaurus with Albertosaurus couldn't tell a Gorgo juvi apart from a Daspleto juvi???
Shocking
( Yes, I'm gonna do this joke to death )
These two arms are not the same and are positioned so differently on the body
Basically what tyrant is saying is that they probably wouldn't be too much different than other theropod dinosaurs
Nono I mean, how did Carr 's theory took traction and nobody for a second went "wait a minute, Bakker isn't exactly a glomp shitto, he must know his own stuffs"
Non-Avian Theropods had pretty flexible arms, no?
Nano was still seen as a Juvi by most people, also no adult Nanotyrannus and no decent material juvi rex was also a big thing. If there's no Juvinile of the most populas predator in hell creek, this must be it
They couldn't pronate well if at all, but they definitely could swipe and slash
Possibly even grab things to a degree
Give me a sec
At most more like this than tightly tucked against the body.
Otherwise probably held out to a degree like other dinosaurs
https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836905006989
https://doi.org/10.26879/900
https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/24278/1/20240801 Allosaurus_MS.pdf
Pretty sure, the hands of Deinonychus reminds me a bit of Carnosaur hands, but I could be wrong ( Maybe only I have that impression )
Yes, their hands were still more similar to that of other theropods than avian dinosaurs
Oh yeah, I couldn't forget... Australovenator
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137709
The hypertrophied manual claws and modified manus of megaraptoran theropods represent an unusual morphological adaptation among carnivorous dinosaurs. The skeleton of Australovenator wintonensis from the Cenomanian of Australia is among the most complete of any megaraptorid. It presents the opportunity to examine the range of motion of its forea...
Basically what I've been trying to get across
I know that Megaraptorids have more flexible wrists and could semi-pronate, I wonder if their wrists have any similarities with Deinonychus'.
Another important thing this article mentions is that just testing the limitations of the bare bones themselves is not completely reliable
That is True. However, it's better than nothing and just trying to guess by theory only
For sure, but my point is that it's probably not best to put a solid limitation on something we don't have the whole picture of
I don't think it's putting a limitation and more exploring how extensive the limitation could be. Realistically, it would be better if these studies didn't just experimented how much they could possibly articulate the forelimbs, but also supported by some theory of how the muscles could look, maybe create a personal model of their own, and run some tests with that.
Our studies of animal remains often underplay some aspects of their functionality, though, and that was more of my point
Hell, here's a suggestion: Given how there is some advancements on the technology of prosthetics... What about we try to make a Prosthetic of a Non-Avian Theropod? What do you guys think of that idea?
Basically, it could be moved by command, and would be designed in a way to still give function to that Theropod, based on our best guess of how their forelimbs worked.
That would be pretty interesting but also a bit extreme
Yes, but what i'm saying it's more trying to find some way to put in-practice our knowledge, essentially
I'm honestly curious about how the arms of ornithomimosaurs might have been distinct from other dinosaurs
They seem to have the most potential for object manipulation and grasping from what I know about them.
did they do this irl?
We may never know.
Probably outside of the realm of their terrestrial capabilities
yall so im watching videos on condors and i find out theyre so big that they to fall from high places or need heavy wind to fly
now im wondering how something like a hatzegopteryx can fly can someone explain
Because Hatzeg's wings are it's legs, so it can use them to propel itself
Condors can't use their wings to run
Take notice of the body structure of both animals, they fly and walk in different ways.
Hatze has four limbs on the ground to plant itself, and a very awkward but efficient body build that's good at driving it forwards.
I want all my apologies for bullying me for saying nanotyrannus is valid last year
You would agree that the strongest muscles in a birds body are its pectorals right? Now imagine if birds could use those muscles to jump. That's what all Pterosaurs do.
Not all flyers are built the same
is this true?
Hearsay
I thought the lambeosaur material wasn't true, and I've never heard of any therizinosaur material
I believe this is referring to another ( Alleged ) Lambeosaurinae material, that like only got cited once? I won't remember from where.
infinite jump glitch
I don't know if anyone has posted this yet
https://youtu.be/IfKTibGkJCc?si=7Jv8rUkHqZEp6O5b
Scientists at the NC Museum of Natural Sciences have found that what was believed to be a juvenile T.rex skeleton is instead a distant relative, the first of its kind to be found in a full skeleton. Their work has also raised new questions about what is know about that popular predator.
(Credit: WRAL)
Subscribe to WRAL:
https://youtube.com/c/w...
There's a few specimens of Ornithomimus that seem to show winglike feathers developing through ontogeny, that's pretty interesting imo
I was under the impression that there is no evidence of pronation in non-avian Dinosaurs, so this is news to me.
Which study is this?
do you think we'll ever find a early paleogene non avian dinosaur?
Wouldn’t bet on it
Yeah me neither, everywhere we have a record of the K/T boundary shows a sudden and total extinction
Ammonites survived another 500k years though
nanotyrannus
your average farmer probably isn’t keeping up with the maintenance on an elephant sized animal, horses would probably be fine
it'll be hard to manage unless you can mantain something like styra to gore everything
isn't tarbo the best one to base EXTREMELY young mega tyrannos now
Jack Horner watching as all the dinosaurs he made as just juvie stages being identified as unique species (Hell Creek isn't just rex, trike, pachy, anky, and edmonto) [No slander to Jack though, great paleontologist, just the whole "most of hell creek are the same 5 species" thing ws kinda stupid]
"individual variation" fans when genuine anatomical differences with multiple specimens or skeletal features to defend being split
so was all of jack horners theorys wrong
Could dinosaurs vomit?
birds and crocs can regurgitate with no issue, so I don't see why they couldn't
https://youtu.be/0VpPY0qGbdA?si=JYQpI8YWq_3x9lwo
Super interesting video
It’s beginning to look like our success on land, and that of all tetrapods, from frogs to dogs to dinosaurs, was just a lucky side-effect of fish trying to stay fish.
PBS Member Stations rely on viewers like you. To support your local station, go to https://to.pbs.org/PBSSupportEons
Eons is a production of Complexly for PBS Digit...
I could've been a lizard
I mean jack horner is STILL pushing the "rex was a coward lol" narrative + has meddled with rex specimens before, so I don't think he's really that great of a paleontologist.
Ehh, yeah ur probably right
would Rex, if one happened to accidentally met us, ignore us or eat us?
are we even worth as their snack?
Yeah we're worth it. An 80kg human would be a whole meal for a rex
Issue is whether they would instinctually attack humans, or avoid us because we are so weird to them
What do you guys think would be the biggest thing that makes Nanotyrannus invalid again
the real effect of never seen a primate in their entire life
also i think this was like candies, do u take things for free even if they're small?
ig Rex sees us as candies then
I mean, Rex would see us as tiny bipedal things that run instead of fight and stay in groups. They'd probably think we were odd looking Ornithomimosaurs
would you be more scared of a nanotyrannus or rex
Nanotyrannus because it could catch you faster but not kill you quicker
even if you consider our bones and organs to be inedible (which is doubtful) rex would only need to eat ~4 humans to fill its daily food requirements, and just 1 or 2 if it ate the whole person
but yes nanotyrannus, nano is probably the most terrifying dinosaur
so like, do we know its speed? would it be anywhere compareable to a struthi?
Also if we go into a tiny area, a Nano can follow us into it
nanotyrannus core?
Obviously not a crawlspace, but things like heavy coverings of trees, caves, etc we can be followed
it can also fit through a door
i have been evolved from Nano denier to Nano believer
Even the bigger species considering those weirdos can crouch
now, who would you fear more, a utah or a nano
bro bloody mary is an adult 💔 it's here to stay
you can argue about lethaeus if you want a little but the genus is definitively back
But deep down you were always a follower of the sciences
Hence why your opinion changed so wuickl
for once, media franchises was right to depict them always chasing us with unrelenting savagery until we are torn to shreds between the Rex's tooth-filled jaws
Chat how do we know the big Rexes aren't the babies
30 year old skeletally mature baby
You should meet my old boss and you'll know those exist
after 30 they just kept growing more soft tissue until they were godzilla sized slime balls
also lol
where would archeraptor, hell creek dromeosaur, nano and tyrannosaurus fall onto this?
2-3rd level consumers
if we start running for a while likely no, but if we sit there and do nothing then yeah
rex was basically eating exclusively large herbivores so ironically it would be a lower trophic level than like acheroraptor
wait whta?
That same rex with practically silent footsteps and the best eyesight of any terrestrial animal:
but isnt the highest level the apex??
trophic level is how many steps between you and the bottom of the food chain
"silent footsteps" are a myth, it's more like it makes the direction where the rex is coming from harder to figure out which I think's a little cooler
this is really sad to see/hear
rex eats a trike -> trike eats plants
achero eats a lizard -> lizard eats bug -> bug eats plants
in this scenario rex is a secondary consumer and achero a tertiary consumer
why was everyone so against nano again? people can be so stupidly stubborn for no good reason whatsoever.
talking abt Rex, is 11.6-12.4 meters & 7-10.4 tons is an accurate size for Rex?
Rex can outpace a human, and they can walk at like, 10 mph right?
We'd be cooked if a Rex knew how healthy we were for it's diet
mb gang, my brain just defaults to rex having silent footsteps
honestly same lol
this is very sad to read
Send me the thread I gotta read ts
who even is George Blasing dawg
NPC ass we don't even know who you are, get out from here
I kinda just roll my eyes at this. Obviously I'm not going to defend actual vitriole, that's unacceptable regardless, but Blasing has his own history of harassing people who disagree with him, ontop of it really just being another case of someone going "I was right all along" when the success of nano today was the science rather than personal opinion.
I swear to God, this convo just happened already
Did time go backwards or smth
he wrote peak fiction hop off
oh hell nah he's more pathetic than i ever imagined 💀
Scanova replied to the george message but it was posted again immediately after so he deleted it and posted it again, thus causing a time paradox
I like how every community has a toxic group. For Paleontology it was SOME of the anti Nano fanboys
That's really a minor footnote compared to actual problematic people tbh.
this is really sad but i am so hungry rn
are you so hungry you could eat an Argentinosaurus?
pre nerf perecetus
bro could go for the pando tree colony
why do they hate nano so much that they must harass someone over it?
their evolution to Nano believer is malfunctioned
DAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMMMMNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!
baby nanotyrannus:
VALIDIFICATIONN!!!
damn.
DIVERSIFICATION!!!!
NANOTYRANNUS!!!
nobody:
Mapusaurus vs Argentinosaurus:
The Titan, of immeasurable power and ferocity. He strode upon the plain and faced the Earth Lizard and a mighty battle was fought on the desolate plains. The Titan fought with the fury of the countless that had fallen at the Earth Lizard's hand, but there fell the Titan, and in his defeat the dinosaur horde were routed.
holy bars
Pretty decent range yeah
If you go for known fully-grown adults they'd be 9-10+ tonnes, but we do have individuals of unknown ages that are in the 7-tonne range
@frigid delta what dinosaur trophies do you currently have?
Damn, it's full too. You even have the enigmatic Agathaumas.
What Carnivores mod would you recommend?
Legacy
Fallen Kings
Round Up
Dangergrounds
and many more i can't named all but worth the shots
What do you think if there was a Carnivores game where the animals are based on Gregory S. Paul's reconstructions?
Ornithischians like pachycephalosaurus don't have anavian respiratory systems right? So theoretically they could run for as long as a theropod
I'm thinking about how an animal like nanotyrannus hunts. Its long legs and gracile build implies it could sprint pretty fast for an animal of its size, and being a theropod its respiratory system would give it a lot of stamina. So I imagine it would change its tactics depending on what it's hunting and how much it wants it. Ambushing prey an/or pursuit predation aren't really mutually exclusive.
But how would an animal like pachy deal with this? Could it out run a nano or could it out turn one? Would they have the stamina to outlast a hunting attempt? As for fighting back I could see it but in the modern day herbivores that have ram like weapons as opposed to sharp horns or antlers have a harder time fighting off predators and using rely on speed and agility or bulk in the case of must ox.
REINCARNATION!!!!!
do you have a nanotyrannus skeletal? i could help you with your issue
What do you mean?
just trust me, give me a skeletal
Like this? It's Jane so it should work
this is probably wrong since im using a different program
Thanks. Definitely dangerous prey then. If nano even targeted stuff that large peachy might have the bulk to defend itself even if its headbutt isn't as effective. Though the mechanics of pachys headbutt has to be weird too. We only have quadrupeds with weapons like that today so maybe pachys could swing around more effectively than a ram or musk ox could
again, this size is probably not accurate
those arms are prob too small
It's not my diagram. I know Jane is supposed to be the larger of the two nano species so I tried to find one that was of that. I didn't have one at hand
I could see a nano hunting some like that especially the young, sick or weak. I imagine if a nano was desperate enough to try its luck against an adult that large it would prefer to ambush it rather than try chasing one down and risking injury
what is this audio
Eh keep in mind pachy is 50% smaller to half the nano's size and the dome isn't exactly a great defense. I don't see it being a good time for it either way.
yeah this doesn't look right lol
Do you have a more accurate size comparison?
No because Pachycephalosaurus sucks in terms of having anything described
And also having anything to describe
I mean I think the size comparison is fine it's just eyeballing it vs taking the actual weight into account.
Am I right about ornithischians not having an avian respiratory system. I've heard that was the case but it feels wrong
when was that thing about pachycephalosaurs fighting on their tails like kangaroos coming out? Whatever happened with that?
Hartman has just redone his Jane skeletal
Right that one of the things I was saying. Looking at the animals of hellcreek that I am guessing are in nano's size range (admittedly I am guessing) I could see how a lot of them avoid predation like some of the ornithomimids for example. But pachy confuses me. Couldn't it out run a nano? Out last one? Out fight one? That's what I'm trying to imagine
That's right, we're not exactly sure what kind of system ornithiscians used but it may have been a "pelvic bellows" system similar to the hepatic piston in crocodylians
Maybe I'm missing something. Animals usually run, fight, and/or hide from predators. So many pachy actually just had crazy camouflage like the carnos in the second JP book lol
A theropod like nanotyrannus would have had a much more efficient and powerful respiratory system
It’s arms look so short but every nano depiction I’ve seen is giving them big boi arms, am I just a smol brain boi
Now that is interesting I'll have to read and look into this later. Thank you
Theropods respiratory system allowing the to utilize crazy stamina, is one of the reasons why I have the theory that so many? Ornithischians went so hard into the defenseve weapons and bulk. And gracile builds and speed seem to be how small theropods escaped predation. There are obviously exceptions to that
I could see one putting up a fight tbh, at least in certain occasions. We also have to take account of the size and potential other internal differences that could have atleast made it a bit more fair
But yeah I think the stamina aspect of theropods is heavily overlooked. Especially in terms of theoretical matchups against large mammals
Respiration is definitely a big part of dinosaur diversification. Then you have sauropods using pneumatization to massively increase their bulk beyond any ornithiscian
It's probably one of the only reasons they could even exist at those sizes to begin with
Oh yeah it absolutely is
Sauropods feel like a force onto themselves. They are so weird and interesting
How smaller less armed ornithischians avoid predation is some I think about often. I wonder what they did to survive their predators both theropods and others
early detection and fleeing is a safe bet
there’s a lot of habitat considerations that go into predator avoidance in modern animals that we tend to ignore in paleo for some reason
I work in a specific environment where eastern cottontail are pretty common and a lot of how they avoid predators is by having briar patches that they specifically use to run into and escape, we actually call it escape cover lol
Yeah i could see a lot of small ornithiscians using cover, generally being elusive like most small animals are
Camouflage too. And being faster than your predator goes along way. A therapod might be able to run forever but it doesn't matter if you quickly Sprint away and disappear into the undergrowth
oh for sure
Burrowing may have been common too
it certainly is in modern animals
Also general agility too
The cavernous Edmontosaurus burrow
Yep out juking you predator is a useful skill
Secret of their success
It's not like they would have been incompetent at all, especially given their supposed massive success worldwide
And obviously small theropods would use many of these same tactics. Smaller predators have predators of their own
Yes with their avian or protoavian respiration leading to the evolution of hypercursorial theropods in multiple lineages
Perhaps rapid growth rates as well
I get how smaller dino avoid predation and how the big and well weaponized one did it. Edmont is just so big that the very act of trying to kill it could hurt its predator let alone it kick or biting back
And they still probably weren't horrible at maintaining speed either
They also moved in herds of potentially tens of thousands of individuals. Just penetrating that to pick out a target is difficult
This is a very cool conversation. But I'm still trying to think of what tactics a pachy would use to avoid predation from a nano
Even taking in all the collection and preservation biases of the formation I think there's good reason to believe pachycephalosaurs were rare elements of the fauna. Which may mean numerically rare and likewise not a common prey item or they were somehow ecologically segregated from where we get good preservation in those rocks. They may have lived out of reach from many predators in uplands or arid basins where large predators are more rare
Also, isn't it pretty much proven that they could indeed use their heads for offense?
Fascinating how isotopic analysis could tell us a lot about this, like a great many things which it has yet been applied to
I know right they should be doing that stuff to everything
Do we have a reason to believe that nanotyrannus wasn't living in the rest of laramidia.or was at least rare?
Just like today Laramidia would have been a mosaic of habitats and just like any animal nanotyrannus is not going to be evenly distributed across all habitats
Yes, but at least in modern animals, the ones that have bashing and bludgeoning weapons have a harder time using them to defend themselves from predators in ones with stabbing or grappling weapons
Generally our westward sedimentary basins have been less productive
And thats where a lot of the higher altitude and more arid conditions would have been preserved, no?
True, but they are at a nice height to target the legs I'd think
Higher altitude only confidently in Sheep pass, however that is mostly breccia/conglomerate so fat chance any bones could survive there if they were present. Willow Creek fm is certainly more arid but preserves nothing particularly wacky/interesting, and Hall Lake is its own thing but still has worse quality fossils
That's true. There are a lot of animals in the modern day that are very widespread throughout entire continents or even multiple
One thing that pachy has over a ram or musk ox is that it's bipedal and that could allow it to swing its head laterally providing enough force for its bludgeoning weapon to be effective. Modern animals with weapons like that have to be at speed for them to do anything.
I just don't know if there are any studies that show that packy swing its head horizontally or diagonally like a warhammer
And we know that they could definitely take absurd forces too, I could definitely see one injuring a predator
Yeah I'm just picturing the foothills of the young Rockies and the kind of stuff that may have been up there
I love when my passion for historical martial arts and paleontology overlap lol
Although I think numerically rare is not off the table, I think it’s possible the groups present in HCF may have still preferred the depositional environment rather than somewhere off into the west
Thats basically where I'm at with it, the faunas to the west could have been pretty different in composition depending on the environment
Do we have a wider view of laramidia's habitats during the latest cretaceous? I know hell creek was swampy and forested, And I think I read that the western coastline is vaguely similar to modern-day Californians don't know how true that is though.
There’s not much to indicate aridity on the southern western coast. Much like today, the intermontane basins of Maastrichtian NA were vaguely similar to their modern basin and range counterparts. Though I’m not confident we’ve found radically different faunal composition further inland thus far.
I suppose a range map of animals that live to 66 million years ago is way too much to ask for lol
In most paleontological contexts it’s just infeasible
Yeah ask again in a few millenia
Prince creek is mostly maastrichtian, yes? (Your description)
It’s been redated as late Campanian, about 1mya before the Campanian/maastrichtian boundary
Does that not mean it probably had the same fauna into the maastrichtian?
do we think nano would ever go after a fully grown trike/toro/edmonto?
While I do like the idea of Tyrannosaurus having multiple species, I also like the idea of it being so perfect that it wouldn't need to adapt enough to be considered a different species
The bigger species at fully grown probably would if the situation was right
Fully grown? I doubt it. Even a desperate one probably wouldn't. That would be like a leopard attacking a fully grown healthy elephant
We have no idea
I could see a nano attacking one of the babies though if the situation was right
this is really sad https://x.com/domdyer70/status/1983462981229826217
It won't get any better at this rate either
How’s that paleo related
soon they will be paleotology
So will we lol
Pessimism is cringe and bad for you, stop being cringe and bad 
Chat is it pessimism to think we won't live forever
Define live
true
Chat longs to be part of the fossil record
the children yearn for fossilization
Yeah.
How tho, we have yet to discover any person that can live forever
other than like walt disney's frozen head or something
Random, no offense
But, I think I would be more sad if I used AI for any of my projects, rather than the fact that my life has a limit
I mean, the second one, that's something you just can get used to... The first one? Don't know if that's something you can overcome.
what does an alligator have to do with human mortality or AI usage
like you are aware the stokes alligator is a real animal right
I deadass wanna be fossilized, all the bits of me
At the very least I want future paleontologists to find my healed broken arm and conclude that it took metal implants to heal (despite said metal implants not being present anymore)
Life is limited, therefore you should seek to do what you want, regardless of how small or big it is, regardless of how easy or difficult it is...
Wanting to take a shortcut... Kinda of goes against that basic idea
Also, I think you would like to reconsider your statement, as yes, the Animal is pretty clearly real... But, it's pretty obvious that you took the 4.8 meters one from Gemini AI.
the stokes alligator was a unit
There should be a fossilization program that lets you get buried in a random area in a good fossilization slurry and just buried without being disturbed
I’m not sure where you’re getting random taking that from Gemini, the stokes alligator measurements are independently verifiable
a very funny accusation given that i made the chart in 2020 and gemini AI came out in 2023
i in fact took it from a 2017 news report that listed the length of the gator as 15 feet 9 inches (4.801 m)
what’s crazier to me is that alligators probably used to get to sizes like that more routinely (and there’s ones of that size that are just smart enough to avoid people) we must murked all the big ones
we as wildlife managers put size limits on fish for that exact reason (fish don’t technically count as wildlife but we’re gonna ignore that for a minute)
Oh yes, your Croc chart has existed way before Gemini AI. However, I think it's pretty simple to understand that I'm more referring to the current version of it. Even, If you didn't. You decided to not search for any verifiable scientific sources and depend on a News report??? And to also, not update it?
there are other reports of 15+ foot gators but i figured this one was more reliable since it was recent, guess I was wrong
but no, you do not get to call me out on failing to fact check when you accused me of using an AI that came out three years later based on your own inability to find other sources for the measurement
So, correct me If i'm wrong, but Metasuchus was working on a Toyotamaphimeia skeletal in what year?
2023-24 i think
there is verified 15+ foot gators some of which are alive (like 19 feet is the longest I think somehow) but the stokes alligator has the largest verified mass
nevermind it was 2021 when armin made his
Interesting. And fair, I guess. Clearly, I've been misinformed by someone, and I would like to apologize for my mistake... Would you like something as compensation for my trouble?
oh wait armin and meta are different people i've no idea when Meta made his
and sure
What would you particularly wish?
Black caimans also got that treatment
oh nvm i thought you had like a new thing you were going to reveal
I mean i was still wrong about the size so i'm not mad about it
No no no no! I made a very serious accusation, specially in a space where Artistic Skill is highly valued, so I believe it's only fair if I gave you something in return for my error.
I'm struggling to think of anything i need that's discord related, maybe like send me pictures of monitor lizards or something i'm never opposed to that
excellent
there are living ones?
I mean i guess at this point it's not paleo related but if there was a living 19ft gator i thought i'd have heard of it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wakinyantanka
Nanotyrannus?
Wakinyantanka (from Lakota Wakíŋyaŋ Tȟáŋka, "great thunderbird") is an ichnogenus of footprint produced by a large theropod dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous Hell Creek Formation of South Dakota. Wakinyantanka tracks are large with three long, slender toes with occasional impressions of a short hallux and narrow metatarsals. Wakinyantanka...
I really hope jane gets a good description in the future, so that we can compare with both lancensis & lethaeus
Carr is working on that iirc
yay
Scientists at the NC Museum of Natural Sciences have found that what was believed to be a juvenile T.rex skeleton is instead a distant relative, the first of its kind to be found in a full skeleton. Their work has also raised new questions about what is know about that popular predator.
(Credit: WRAL)
Subscribe to WRAL:
https://youtube.com/c/w...
19ft is dead but on record, there’s live 16 footers out there but it’s rare
Latheuas and lancensus would be cool for Alio TLC
wouldn't make any sense tho, there's 2 irl alio species and their close relative Qianzhousaurus
Yeah that what I was thinking, although a nanotyrannus reference like that I think would be cool. They won’t do it anyway
When will we get Troodon back as a valid species?
Are there any theories or papers on the grooming behavior of pterosaurs?
I don't think we can really know but I've always imagined them just picking at themselves with their beaks
Hence why I specified theories
I guess pecking will be an option
why are nodasaurids / ankylosaurids usually potrayed as non social?
Could be that they are more solitary than other dinosaurs, or at least will be like other dinosaurs when it comes to mating pairs and raising kids/family
Stem-fleas show up in the fossil record in the Middle Jurassic of China so it's possible their evolution corresponds with the increased diversity of feathered dinosaurs, pterosaurs, and mammals. Even by the Early Cretaceous they are still quite a bit different than today's fleas, mostly being larger and less specialized. But pterosaurs still probably dealt with them the same way modern birds do: preening and dust baths
okay but where does this interpretation come from?
Maybe vary it depending on the type of Pterosaur?
Pterosaur with teeth have more thick coats, so it's practical to use their jaws for brushing
Pterosaurs without teeth have more thin and tight coats, so it's more practical to use the tip of their beaks
Maybe make them use their claws or their bodies ( like scratching themselves against some object ) for areas they can't exactly reach with their jaws/beaks.
Although, considering how Birds kinda of have very variable methods, you could perhaps say the same happens for Pterosaurs? Idk
interestingly enough allopreening is absent in paleognathae and likely was in dinosaurs and pterosaurs https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10442270/
I’m just going off of speculation of behavior as seen in modern day birds and reptiles
I would say that could be related to other factors. Not likely a good idea to generalize it to Dinosaurs and Pterosaurs. As relatives to Palaeognathes seem to have a preference for dry methods of cleaning, like Dust baths ( At least, from what I'm finding so far ).
It also has to be put into consideration, that the integument configurations in Palaeognathes, as the same it's not reflective of all configurations in Birds, it might also not be reflecting of all configurations in Dinosaurs and Pterosaurs ( Which, in many clear instances, like preserved integument or impressions of said integument, it clearly doesn't ).
can someone edit nano into this image?
Effort
i cant do it myself because ibis paint x has me ip banned for hacking into it so i dont have to pay for premium
TIL Ibis does that
read the paper, it's about cognition not integument
Thank you
Can't wait for next the paper to describe that the dueling dinos actually just washed up like that after a hurricane or something and didn't actually fight to a draw
That's diabolical 😭
My guess is that it was something like both of those events, given the fact they fossilized anyways.
hey guys how many hadrosaur where a herd after breeding and mating season if you had to guess

I don’t even know what to say here.
I
What
No
Dont do this to me
What do we think, chat?
The first two are peak
Hi, Marine Biologist here...
No.
Just no.
I mean...the first two are possible, no ?
That last one is not at all plausible, yes?
Correct, especially the tail. Symmetrical tails like that are a relatively recent adaptation in fish, showing up in more advanced teleosts. There is no reason to think dunkleosteus - a placoderm - had something like that
And the head?
Also, being able to see the bony armor isn't the same as shrinkwrapping unless you reconstruct the plates as external really. Lots of armored fish have their armor at least partially visible.
As for the lips, they're pretty silly. There is no benefit to having them especially as fleshy as they are
It strikes me as another example of people going to far to try and separate themselves from shrinkwrapping and other old paleotropes
Actually this makes me think, did lips evolve in fish before they went onto land, or after?
Cause I see tiktaalik portrayed with lips often.
Probably before, but I guess it depends on what you consider lips
Just coverings over teeth. My first question is, why would they have developed “lips” in the first place, and my second is why would an animal like a crocodile or a river dolphin loose their lips or have exposed teeth?
I mean, most fish have it, no?
Noted, you don't need to do it like that, and you can do it more efficiently for Dunkleosteus:
https://x.com/mcdom787751/status/1830746776791589189
https://x.com/Evoincarnate/status/1869459300273586215
https://x.com/Evoincarnate/status/1921723552442523854
The first teeth developed weren’t exposed, so yeah…..
They were a bit, but they also weren't per say... " Shrinkwrapped ", there still would be some oral tissue. Even if minimal...
So the question isn’t why does an animal have covered teeth, it’s why doesn’t an animal have covered teeth.
Well animals like crocodiles and river dolphins don't need lips because they have their own way to keep their teeth from drying out by virtue of their habitat. Lips have been gained and lost many times in vertebrate evolution across different groups.
As for coverings over teeth, lots of fish don't have those anyway and just have teeth sticking straight out of their jaws. Placoderms didn't have teeth so much as they had pieces of their skull modified for the same function as teeth, and early toothed fishes like sharks again just have them sticking straight out of their face and I wouldn't consider what little flesh they have around their jaws to really be lips.
I’m just talking about anything that covers teeth when the mouth is closed. And how can we tell which extinct animals did and didn’t have something like that.
I’d imagine phytosaurs even had lip scales.
It can be a bit subjective. Realistically, a lot of people tend to assume Lips or " Extra Oral Tissues " have to necessarily cover both jaws, but in the extant record, we have observed that might not entirely be the case, sometimes it's exclusive purely to the upper jaw of some animals, and it seems to be mostly correlated to the feeding mechanisms of those animals
In a extreme and totally hypothetical case, a animal could not have covered teeth IF it's necessary for their feeding to function
It's consistent to what we see with reptiles, how their oral configurations are shaped alongside the bones of their jaws, and it's consistent to how Mammals have lips potentially due to function of sucking in offsprings... Because, you know? They are " Mammals ", they have Mammary glands
For a lot of extinct animals though... This is where it becomes subjective to what we may find or test on them, respectively.
is this shrink wrapped
That's hard to do but thankfully we have a lot of ancient fish lineages still in the oceans today to make inferences off of.
I'd wager a guess and say at least not all of dunkleosteus's gnathal plates (plating?) were covered by flesh and its probably better to look at sharks which have true teeth to look at how those structures evolved.
i didnt get to see 🙁
They can't keep getting away with this
Is the portrayal of a single lobed tail just out of the question or something
Not to my knowledge, but also unlikely for dunkle's theorized niche
It's diabolical a modern fish tail is there instead of that though
The symmetrical (homocercal) tail is out of the question though
So, the Bot didn't like something I said
But I responded to this before, it's very fitting with what we imagine the tissues of a Mammuthus columbi would look like around the skeleton. It might be giving the impression the tissues are too tight around the head, because of the " Big Forehead " ( avoiding to use the term, because I think the bot didn't like it ) but it's speculative feat included in this model used for Primeval, inspired or based on those that Wooly Mammoths would have
And some Mammoth species can be hairless during summers.
Kinda wish they would bring back paleoloxodon namadicus
This niche being a more quickly moving predator? Vaugely like a shark or giant piranha id assume
Something of that nature. Single lobbed tails are usually not something an animal with dunk's body shape develop unless they aren't moving fast very often or at all
Understandable given the modern examples that exist today
Lol
About Dunkleosteus, I would like to point out, that I'm not particularly informed on them. Fish simply aren't my main thing
However, a lot of feats included in modern Dunkleosteus reconstructions have been done so because it follows general trends to what we see in the extant and extinct record to some matter
I would like to advice you, that if you have any particular questions about it, you can ask this person:
https://x.com/Evoincarnate/status/1869459311082258793
They are more involved in Paleo-Circles surrounding extinct fishes, and they have more proper knowledge on the topic.
We don't need any extinct animals when modern ones are already struggling to eat or have enough space to sustain themselves
this isn't true, we absolutely do not have enough fossils of pterosaurs with feather impressions to say that.
Well, I wasn't saying it was, I was more saying on the lines of it being hypothetical...
I think the usage of " Maybe " ,made that clear
https://tenor.com/view/lilo-and-stitch-disney-lilo-stitch-hiss-gif-3562813
Me every time nanotyrannus is resurrected:
I don’t think it’s going anywhere this time
Whaat is that
read
This paleoart is my favorite because it shows that realistically, a Pachy's head would explode under pressure
I suspect many things would explode under sudden, substantial pressure
very festive pfp
Its not even thanksgiving you monster
the voices are getting thankful
The Nanotyrannus would never wear a pilgrim hat
Anyone else think anurognathus might have looked like the potoo irl
Dinosaur
Nature - Nanotyrannus and Tyrannosaurus coexisted at the close of the Cretaceous
ew sharing token what the hell is that
now it wont pet me see
ok wow it needs the sharing token to be able to see without paying
Nature - Nanotyrannus and Tyrannosaurus coexisted at the close of the Cretaceous
Was this ever a question?
whats the largest playable in PoT gondwa could actually support a large and stable population of?
eotriceratops, or if you count modded but still real animals apatosaurus and lisowicia
isnt PoT's map like, smaller then hateg
it’s 8km by 8km IIRC
including the ocean
that is really really small for real life
whats it compareable too irl?
Still, they both have high survivability, yeah overtime they might get smaller but they generally have the best chances, both because yknow, they have really good defenses like whiptails/herds, giant tusks/horns, and size. They also don't have to hunt for food constantly. or amarg. which already is small for a sauropod
hateg is 80,000 km², this map is... less than 40km²
Map is also abundunt with edible plants and has no toxic vegetation, only thing that is toxic is the deathcaps and they literally exist in one area.
and whats stopping it from all being eaten in a month or so by a stable large herbi population
apato or eotrike would starve to death within a year
now cumberland island is 150km² and apparently has a small horse population, so maybe campto or struth would survive
would the main predator be ..hatz?
wait how do we know how big hateg was
idk it was said to be similar to hokkaido
by a benton et al 2011
hatz or some form of theropod like yuty or maip, dimetrodon milleris would be everyone since they are small enough to not require much food, same with some that are not mods yet, like diictodon or the rock hyrax.
i think yuty or maip would be wayyyyyyyyyy to big
if the herbivores would be maxing out at <1 ton I imagine the vast majority of pot playable carnis would be too large
the ones i think would live there are , laten, deinon, rhamp, thal , hatz and potentially concave, and spino as a visitor once and a while
vagrant spinosaurus pulling up to gondwa after 5 million years
what makes something count as marine?
saltwater
like, lets say spino ocasionally visited the ocean, would that make it a marine dinosaur or no? like, do you gotta live in it full time??
spino is definitely not a marine dinosaur because its desired habitat was freshwater
hesperornis I would consider a marine dinosaur
i know , but the other question, what defines being a marine? living in saltwater full time?
I mean pinnipeds can go onto land but I wouldn't call them not marine
is this true?
Do we know if the "dromeosaur" remains are even from hell creek and not just taken and faked from some other place by depalma knowing the guy?
You know
it would be really cool, if Dakotaraptor got the Nanotyrannus treatment...
like, right now
Nah
i have no clue
I love the possibility of spinosaurus crossing the sea between Africa and South America, because that implies it ran into….. Monquirasaurus….. 
Hope not.
Which is the better up to date skeletal for yuty?
just some pics of my Dino’s from a community server, not sure where else in here to post them haha
Living predominantly within, and relying on marine environments in order to survive is how I would define it
so while hippos may venture out into the alantic ocean, because they dont rely on it, theyh wouldnt count?
Yes
What's the difference between Nanotyrannus and T. Rex? In wake of a publication formally recognizing Nanotyrannus as a new species of dinosaur -- for the first time ever -- Tyrannosaur expert Peter Larson (recently featured in Washington Post's coverage of the historic discovery) explains it all.
In this TBM Podcast Clip, Pete breaks down the ...
Personally, use GetAwayTrike for the body
https://www.deviantart.com/getawaytrike/art/Beautiful-feathered-tyrants-639050619
And only if you want, you can use Blame's skulls
https://x.com/SirBlameson/status/1876223119880593767?t=rkIFlz46C6xV8II2JSc3wQ&s=19
Appreciate it
wonder why theropods never evolved to become fully aquatic like mammals, or any dinosaur for that matter.
I mean they've come fairly close
They've gotten about as aquatic as the most aquatic carnivoran mammals, that counts for something
deviantart died again lol
why aren't their any like, yknow, whale theropods or seal theropods, did they just use too much oxygen?
there are totally "seal theropods"
GET OU-
wdym they literally are lol
those are seal food theropods not seal theropofs
Goes hard
Where we sitting at?
Dsungaripterid table
Anurognathidae my beloved
Tapejaridae since iirc there's a lotta material
Would the broken jaw Allosaurus specimen promote the idea of Allosaurus group living since the jaw showed signs of healing over time?
Probably because marine reptiles got there first
Marine theropods or whatever would be a really interesting idea
ctenochasmatids are goated
More likely it's evidence of a croc style healing. The injury wasn't as devastating as depicted in the doc, it still had some functional teeth in the lower jaw
Tapejaridae
Top middle
Istiodactylidae?
Pteranodontida Table for me
Would sauropod blood taste good irl

I wanna know
I...what's the criteria for "taste good"
Full of energy
I mean I don't think the blood is particularly special if that tells you anything
Call me basic but Azhdarkidae
Larger creatures have more nutrients in their blood or something according to a spec evo I watched, kinda why vampire bat populations exploded when they brought relatively massive farm animals
I doubt that would make it taste much better, and I doubt humans which are not sanguivores would be able to actually get much from sauropod blood
Darn, guess I will have to evolve.
I mean
I also have to wonder if it's less the amount of nutrients in the blood but that there's more blood to go around in an animal 300x larger than a penguin (which iirc is the main "natural" food source for them)
ngl dinosaur black pudding would be fire
Nyctosauridae or Pteranodontidae. If it is already taken, Tapejaridae or Ctenochasmatidae.
how heavy are teen and juviline argentinasaurus?
They forgot Thalassodromidae 
No idea
We only have 1 argent
anything about how fast giganotosaurus speed is?
Same as most other Giant Theropods that could just walk fast, within the 20-35 kph range depending on size probably
How big exactly might beipi be?
How much argent material do we have?
Not that much. Recent studies show it’s probably not as big as we thought. Idk how true this is, but Patagotitan is more likely to be larger.
Is it still the biggest known dinosaur or has some passed it? It sucks that these massive sauropods refused to fossilize well
Its probably still the biggest
Jim Kirkland has said that he’s seen an adult in the 6 meter long range
I believe more estimates have it as smaller than we thought, which would make Patagotitan the largest based on reasonable material.
Oh cool. Do they loose any feathers as they grow?
we have no clue, all of the adult specimens are undescribed or private
Wait we know some of the colors of edmontosaurus now that's so cool. Where did they find the blue pigment on the crest?
Sucks. There’s got to be something done about private collections. People do have the right to a private collection imo, but there at least needs to be something that requires all private specimens to be publicly known or studied if requested.
afaik nothings been done on pigmentation in edmontosaurus since melanin was detected in Dakota in 2015. The blue crest is just a meme
Damn lead ashtray again. Thanks though
No problem, if this happens a lot always make sure to ask people for their sources
What? 💔 That's not happened at all lmao
@arctic crane it's still ~80t putting it at the largest known terrestrial animal
Where’s Patagotitan at? Oh, and is maarapunisaurus still among the largest, even with one nonexistent vertebra?
I wanted to ask, the dinosaur that acts like a weeping angel in tempus triad, what would it be? Ppl speculate it most likely is a herbivore, but its claws dont make sense to me as a defence mechanism
Also I hate that becoming an acheoligisy, and palaeontologist you need to have the degree level of essentially a doctor, top marks, finish yr 12, bc wym i have to be great in school to be able to dig up dinos :(
Looks like a therizino to me
Yeah, im not sure how they say it is a herbivore though, those claws dont make sense as a defensive mechanism
Well, it is slow moving, doesn't have any horns or spikes, has a small head and a gracile neck, it's basically defenseless except for the claws (and size)
Oh wow okay, thats super cool
Some paleontologists say the claws are too weak to be used for defense, but idk i'd rather get my claws broken than have a tyrannosaur eat my face
I just never thought that a herbivore would have claws like a carni, i thought it would more have defensive spikes, id think itd be a take it not a 'i slap back'
Therizino evolved from carnivorous ancestors so it makes sense it'd keep some degree of "Slap back"
Oh wow thats really fascinating, i wonder why they evolved to be herbivores instead of staying carnis
Don't need to chase a leaf down 
And probably less competition
Evolution is the definition of "Take the easy way out"
That is true ngl, but id rather hunt for food then be in constant fear of being mauled, but then again both herbs and carnis are just surviving haha, also, thoughts on the old ahh walking with dinosaurs movies? I watched them religiously as a kid whose special interest was dinos
The one where the dinosaurs talked?
Beautiful designs and cinematography
Horrible decision to make them talk
Thankfully, there’s a version where the dinosaurs DON’T talk and, get this
It’s narrated by Benedict cumberbatch
Nono, the old docco ones, they were amazing
Yea it's on YouTube
Unfortunately the IMAX editors didn't cut out the weird slow-mo scenes so it's kinda awkward at times
There’s also I think yet another version where there isn’t even a narrator, but versions exist where the dinosaurs do not speak a single word and the movie is 100x better.
these are the childhood of every dinosaur fan under 40, if you talk badly about them in any paleo community they instantly maul you
Luckily they are objectively really good
Despite being pretty outdated now, still one of the best dino docs out there
They were my entire childhood, plus they went off actual facts at the time not just aesthetics of the dinos
Falcon wtf is that reaction
Not entirely
Most of the time yea but there are some segments that, at the time, wasn't the best
It's a Jerboadiver
Yes that is true, but also not alot of information was available back them, so they had to imagine some things hahaha
Jerboadiver, please do not insult them as they are trying their best 
Strongest Allies of Super-Earth
Can't recall everything off the top of my head but one that stands out is that the Liopleurodon was too large even for then
Iirc their advisor insisted a sauropod vert was a Liopleurodon despite everyone else saying otherwise tho someone can Def correct me
I have no clue honestly, but i def have to rewatch them haha, but i wanna get into dinos again
Nah that's valid, just wanted to mention it lol
Not tryna say you should never watch it 
Speaking of, while not dinosaurs directly, Prehistoric Planet is releasing an Ice Age season on Nov. 26th if you are interested
This is probably moa, yes? Titanis walks more on its toes I believe.
Nono I understand hahaha, im always wanting to learn more about them in media!
It's a moa because no sickle claw and Aegyptornis/however you say it was leaked lol
No Sicle claw either
Titanis and moa walk the same way
I still hope for Titanis and/or Megalania do appear
Still hope we get titanis. But so far we’ve got both elephant bird and moa confirmed.
Unless that info page got it wrong and it’s just moa.
Me when the stupid bird that I hate ( not the Moa )
thoughts?
Probably some of the best tyrannosaur phylogenies yet
Personally I find the right one more likely. It seems to mesh better with biogeography and stratigraphy
Very interesting that bistahieversor is now albertosaurine
Nanotyrannidae is a bad name, it should be dryptosauridae or nanotyrannosauridae
Bro there are crocodile fans really claiming a purussaurs at 6 tons can take out a 10 ton trike on LAND
aegyptornis is elephant bird not moa
Same thing!
isnt moa dinornis (Giant Moa, idk about the others)
They aren’t. Elephant birds lived in Madagascar, moa lived in New Zealand.
SAme thing because I said so
yeah bro and I can manhandle a bull
From what I recall it’s alligators that have good stamina
Crocs tend to build up lactic acid very quickly
Although Purussaurus was in Alligatoridae
Is thoracosaurus the largest hell creek croc still? 9 meters for the absolute largest specimen?
A Small Trike like a 5t Horridus
Possibly with an Ambush
But a Trike is a Trike
Saurian's mega-Thoraco is based on ??? because it's unreplicable if you actually reconstructed the animal
Well does hell creek have any decently large sized crocs?
Thoraco’s the only one
Borealo & the other one are sorta small
https://fxtwitter.com/jwescreenshots1/status/1985374584078504317?s=46&t=9Fi-DYYXsUFRZrPHX1qLKA
Such an icon in the franchise.
I was thinking if they ever portray it in a more scientifically accurate way they could had use quill feathers instead of a frill that raises up like a crest for communication and intimidation. And instead of venom they spit out bile like Fulmar birds do today
What you guys think of it speculative speaking?
Pretty sure it's based on some big Thoracosaurus remains from Europe. But, from what i've tried to see... That's their only " support " to the size, as for remains in the actual Hell Creek:
Pretty much a load of nothing
The remains assigned to Thoraco in HC turn out an approximately 15 foot animal
Not small, but not 9 meters 😭
Yup. Me when I'm the allegedly most scientifically-accurate dinosaur game ever ( A.K.A. I'm actually biased, like to cherry-pick and tend to lie a lot, because i'm bored )
Can we just comment that, If any other game tries to replicate the ecosystem and fauna of any mesozoic formation, no one is going to trust them because of Saurian?
There are big maastrichtian thoracosaurs.... from NJ
9 meters big, though?
I doubt it but I'm not sure, never seen a good estimate but I know it has gotten mistaken for deinosuchus in the past. They're digging a lot right now at the Edelman Fossil Park in Mantua NJ so I expect there to be some new published material soon
They do have good stamina , but against a Trike on Land they are not out stamina it and are getting out DPS
Crocodiles do not have good stamina, especially on land at large sizes.
Alligators have significantly better stamina than Crocodiles since they handle lactic acid buildup much better iirc
none compared to Homo.sapiens however
Isn't there literally videos or cases where Alligators have been found pretty far from any body of water?
That isn’t the topic ?
The topic is purussaurs being able to take a triceratops on land and the latter claimed purussaurs had great stamina, which I’m not sure about if or not but I’m pretty certain it would not have better stamina in combat on land vs a trike.
It’s a silly discussion either way tho.
Who said that? Like, who made the claim first.
being an Alligatorid it's plausible it would have good stamina but idk enough about the phylogeny and whatever else to say
it beating a Triceratops is unrealistic, however
would emotional support arthopleura's be allowed in stores?
i would hope so
Yeah, no. Purussaurus beating a Triceratops is delusional.
Echoes of extinction discord
Tell them they are delusional.
I mean
Beating a 5t Horridus with Ambush isn't THAT impossible
Nope, that is quite delusional. Plus, it's a scenario on land being implied, never that is going to happen
I'd recommend avoiding the community there tbh, Islander isn't renowned for putting a lot of care into his stuff
It’s just general chat , not the paleontology chat so I wouldn’t put no blame on islander.
Those guys were huge crocodilian fans , which I am too but I’m not delusional about my favorites.
No I mean EOE in general
I wouldb't say Ambushing a 5t Trike is delussional
Just very unlikely lol
its not delu at all to say in an ambush puru could snag one, just not constant
on land is uh
another story
what is it genuinely gonna do there
Correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the entire point of Purussaurus brasiliensis is that it feeds on smaller genera and species of like Ground Sloths and maybe Proboscideans? Like, bro, that thing is not built to eat absurdly gigantic animals, regardless of what you might think.
Yep, land was the debate which is indeed delusional.
How is it going to ambush Trike on land lol
the mighty souls roll to cull the trike clearly
Oh no, it's delusional, from the person who might think it, and the crocodile itself expecting any results Lol
Like, it's literally just this:
https://fxtwitter.com/silver_gold4/status/1953500670637519024
Clearly it waits for sleep
Nah
Game looks Cool and has Designs
Unless you mean another Echoes of Extinction
Which you prob do LOL
Rare W srumis
puru isn't 4x smaller than a 5 ton trike is the thing lmao
( that and puru is alr decently built)
Given Saltie there is not even the same Size as the Elephant
While The Puru I am using to Ambush a 5t is the 6.6t Big one
💀
Dang, is it that bad?
I found the community and staff quite great tbh. Maybe it’s different from when you was first there but I got no complaints about either.
Also
Pretty sure Niles or Salties are Recorded on Mortally Wonding Elephants lol
So is NOT impossible
Just again
Unlikely
there is a joke in there somewhere
unlike the brain matter after that
What would be the height and length of a 5 Ton Triceratops, approximately?
it's possible in the water but the scenario was a land battle in which case taking down a Triceratops (especially a large one) is less realistic
The devs are really engaging and like furious is a 10/10 dev.
Ehh
About the Size of Eo
So prob about 7m
That is not happening
It isn’t
Obv
Max Prorsus and Horridus(taxing in Maximus)
Are Smaller Bigger than Puru
Tbf. Nearly 7 ton. 10m+ Purru
I mean
It Mortally Wounding the Trike is not off the question
Crocs have Mortally Wounded Elephants who are much bigger than said Croc
If the Ambush is well
Is not leaving off without injury, Trike is overall somewhat Safe thx to its Frill and Horns
But a Almost 7t Massive Caiman is no joke
On a Proper Land Battle Trikes wins tho yeah obviously
The big thing is honestly the sheer size. If it wasn't a massive size discrepancy theres no chance
But there's like a 30% gap on a specialized ambush macropredator adapted to crush armored prey
How much size reduction do we expect Puru to get anyways like is it staying 6.2 tons or whatever it is right now?
This is basically the only animal outside of maybe Megalodon or Livy that has a chance to break a Triceratops skull
Keep in mind that if you want to get onto max sizes then trikes can get to 10+ tons, and crocodilians tend to fare poorly overall with land animals larger than themselves.
Oh absolutely but I know 5 ton Trike was specified in all of this
If the Trike is even the same size theres no chance
Even then...eh. It can depend.
Its size basically got bigger
From 6.4t to 6.6t
Without osteoderms
No chance for the trike or for the Alligatorid ?
This Pictures are so funny
Crocodile Flying goes brrr
A trike similar in size to itself is still alot, albeit it should also be said that ceratopsids probably didn't fare well in deep water. Their head orientation made it hard to stay above the water line if floating/submerged.
I thought the argument was for on land
It is
Oh on land then it's a complete joke yeah.
on the topic on crocodillians, would alamo still be able to raise its head / neck if a crocodilian was clamped onto it?
backstory given for the image
"A large Deinosuchus hatcheri is laying down on the bottom of a Late Cretaceous river 75 million years ago when he suddenly notices the sounds of an animal drinking. Haven't had anything to eat the past few days he decides to take the bait: without anything visible of him above the surface, the giant croc swims cautiously over the bottom of the river towards the source of sound. When he gets closer he sees the mouth of a not that large head breaking through the surface, probably that of a large hadrosaurid: perfect prey.
The Deinosuchus gets into position, prepares himself and then shoots towards his target, launching in the air and grabs it with the neck. To his own surprise the Deinosuchus doesn't return to the water but keeps gaining altitude...
To the the not that large head isn't a hadrosaurid attached but a giant Alamosaurus sanjuanensis. The sauropod scares and starts to raise his head with the predator still holding on to his neck. Time is now urging for the Deinosuchus to let go before the Alamosaurus goes into defense. A group of Gryposaurus notabilis in the shallow part of the river stare at the amazing spectacle but better pay some attention too for incoming danger."
A Caiman with a Skull that is wide and about 145cm is no Joke.
Obv Trike wouldn't be prefer Fair.
On Land Trike Humbles bad yeah
I was Talking more so in an Ambush lol
So, a reminder that, in both cases that we see Tyrannosaurus and Nanotyrannus interacting with Triceratops, both animals preferred to execute multiple bites on those animals before being able to take them down. This is generally implying that, these two carnivores having lived with Triceratops, and therefore having coexisted with the Triceratopsini enough to where these two species do know how to take it down effectively... Which seems to by exhausting it first, and likely feeding on animal while it was alive, or in the case of Tyrannosaurus, literally removing the head of the animal ( Although, how that seems to always happen after death, there's no way to know if Tyrannosaurus only did this to carcasses beginning their process of decomposition, and therefore there being less strain of the conjunctive tissues of the animal, making it easier to rip off the head, or if it did it right after the animal died )
This is not something a Caiman or Alligator ( only being mentioned as an example ) apply in the same fashion, and even if per say, Purussaurus had the advantage over the particular Triceratops individual... It probably would take more than one bite to actually kill it effectively, which after the first one... It probably won't even achieve a second
Maybe on the water, which I'm more towards agreeing, but on land... It's ridiculous
The puru bites the trike.....then what? It can't drag it to water. It's not tearing/crushing something that big.
Holy paragraphs back to back lmao
I mean
If its a 5t Trike
Is not Impossible to Mortally Wound it or maybe even Drag it a bit
Also, Doing Mortally Bite is def doing.
A Good Bite and some Thrasing will hurt alot
The issue is the Purussaurus is going to take significant damage trying to accomplish that.
We don't even know how Rex and Nano Fighted Trike
Ambush was Included Obviously
But saying "They exhausted trike first"
Is like
Based on Nothing LOL
Depends on the size of the croc. I IMAGINE sauropods had strong necks
5 tons like big Deinosuchus is probably a bit much though. Maybe a 1 - 2 ton croc?
i know their not compareable but if a elephant can lift its trunk fully with a croc attatched, why not a large sauropod and its neck?
When it's that big no. It will hurt but like. 5 tons for a puru even that size is too much to properly manipulate. The second the trike gets away the puru is basically at its mercy. It can just walk away or decide to just get to its rear and start swinging. Again, crocodilians that big on land were probably pathetic in terms of any land athleticism.
I am talking ambush wise
Puru isn't Ambush Forward Straight to its Horns Lol
Elephant trunks are basically pure muscle, and their head is like a fifth of their body weight and already extremely awkward to maneuver. They also routinely haul and toss large things with their trunk and tusks, this is just a weird shaped log in practice
Sauropods presumably didn't
I never said a Land Fight
Hell, I even said is not Fair on Land
Puru may have evolved to support is weight
But is not agile enough to fight a Trike on Land LOL
IF The Ambush was effective enough and the Trike gets injured alot( a 5t Trike)
It will likely just try get away rather than Continue to Engage and risk off more Injury
So, we have Kelsey, and the Montana Dueling Dinosaurs with multiple theropod bites distributed on the body... And we don't know?
I mean, maybe if you can't imagine how that would occur in the context of a interaction between prey and predator, or you can't imagine it in the context of a " Fight "
I'm sorry, but as far as i know, the act itself of predating on something, implies in some matter trying to avoid potential injury to yourself, while at the same time assuring that injuries are being applied to your prey subject. In some cases, yes, it's more fast, but in Tyrannosaurs, it's definetly slow
I just don’t see how it’s going to ambush it, even if triceratops is drinking water and puru tried to ambush it ain’t it going to triceratops strong points the horns
In all seriousness, "how big a crocodile could Alamo lift" is genuinely an interesting question and would be a fun biomechanics paper
That the Trike and Nanuq landed Fights doesn't mean
"I am going to Exhaust you"
Atleast not the way you are implying
I think it really depends from a water ambush. On one hand, a triceratops getting bit on the head isn't that signficiant, but at the same time a puru is biting the snout not the horns. The trike is probably still too big to be dragged but at the same time if it does get dragged a little or stumble into said water it might be in trouble for previously said reasons.
Why are we talking about nanuq and tyrannosaurs wasn’t this a discussion if trike could kick a puru’s ahh on land
It reminds me of a video I saw of a large crocodile biting the head of an african buffalo, about its size, managed to drag it into the water, but after a struggle it let go and the buffalo survived, albeit injured and exhausted.
Triceratops is not necessarily that close to the ground but I reckon its center of gravity is even more in trike favor as well ?
Clearly Triceratops was hunting the Alamosaurus, because yknow, herbivores aren't afraid of a little meat 🫦
All trike has to do is point its horn at puru and it’s gonna be fine
When Alamosaurus is in musk and triceratops gets too close 💔
The Tyrannogator Slams all obv
Insert Hodari art here
Puru when A Big Trike drags it to Land: 
I feel like I never see artworks of sauropods and ceratopsians in confrontation
And that’s unfortunate
The word musth now triggers Hodari PTSD
Cope Jumpscare
Is that the guy that recently did the mammoth thing?… lol
Puru when a Sloth Big Spawns: 
I wonder if Puru would had gotten Bigger had Massive Sloths like this live with it
Puru Already dwarfs its Ecosystem anyways
A Sloth the size of it would had been cool
Puru when the 10 ton Eremo freak decides its pond is its new bathroom (we have evidence of a local extinction event caused by ground sloths defecating in a watering hole until it was polluted)

ik that dw
unlike the poor tickle chickens
My Fav 10t Eremo freak
sorry on ping but do show me this( like paper and such) because that is
what
Check out Animal IQ: https://youtu.be/Ft9nFhEjGiE
At Tanque Loma, at least 22 giant ground sloths in the genus Eremotherium met their end. Of the five hypotheses that researchers proposed for what killed the sloths, the best supported one right now is that they died surrounded by their own poop.
Thanks to Dr. Emily Lindsey for providing a num...
a pbs eons i missed???
shame on me zamn
also thanks
Lol
Weird way to go
So they died like Bruce Lee
What the hell happened to Bruce Lee
Death by poop
That's new
Don't worry, my Zygolophodon will play similar to this!
LMAO
...what species?
- Swamp Rot: While Wet, increases the Hunger and Thirst of unallied creatures nearby by 150%. Debuff is halved for creatures in combat.
Zygolophodon borsoni, the probable largest Proboscidean
… holy hell….
So, Borson's Mastodon. The Mystery Loot Box Mammutidae
The Fatty..
how many terrestersial mammals made it past
10 tons
15 tons
20 tons
The 17-18 ton Unit
wtf is this
Zygolophodon borsoni
Those tusk are ridiculous.
They are! They weigh several hundred kilograms.
how many birds could sit on them?
atleast 4.37
20 tons, none
15 Tons - Palaeoloxodon, Paraceratherium, Zygolophodon, Dzungariotherium
Mammut is not a good reference for the body
Parecer representing
What do you mean mammut isnt a good reference for the body
The animal is very possibly Mammut directly. And if not is the direct ancestor to Mammut. The issue is the Genera are so similar we struggle to tell them apart
Hi, I'm new.
Hi new
Hi new I'm Wes DAMNIT
hi, im new too!
Does anyone speak Portuguese? Brazil
Obrigado , as far as I’m going.
No idea
I only speak Spanish or english
why does this look familiar 👀
?
Mmm Yes why
Totally didn't stole it....
Yeah no, impossible....

So, the particular reason I said " Borson's Mastodon ", it's because it's not diagnostic with Zygolophodon, Mammut is exclusive to North America, not only because of fossil evidence, but because we know that genetically, they are exclusive to North America, since the only specimens who share similar genetic materail are only present there.
Borson's Mastodon can't be assigned to Mammut, because as far as it's known there's no genetic evidence found on it, like Mitochondrial DNA, and given how Mammut is exclusive to North America, that doesn't seem to be happening at any time. Mammut americanum and Mammut pacificum have pretty specific body anatomy, which is not good for. Borson's Mastodon also has longer forelimbs than Mammut americanum itself.
For ease of moderation please keep this chat to English only, feel free to use #português #español
Luckily, the reconstruction here is based off of Zygolophodon and Mastodon in tandem, which are incredibly well understood taxa still, and as such the overall anatomy of Borsoni isn't exactly a huge mystery beyond exact Phylogenetic placement
The musculature side view is built off Borsoni directly.
Doesn't address anything. And I think my point still stands, it's not diagnostic with each with the two, it should at least look a bit unique, or reflect what we have found. Short forelimbs? Not it, chief.
If you plan to actually reflect it's appearance, consider this:
Dr. Chris Widga is the Head Curator at the Gray Fossil Site and Museum at East Tennessee State University.
https://www.etmnh.org/about/directory/chris-widga
Chris will share a short (25 min) presentation about “North American Mastodons: Evolution, Ecology, and Extinction” and be available for a few minutes for questions and discussion.
NO...
Different specimen, not Borson's Mastodon, it's also from North America... But at least it's closer than M. americanum and Zygolophodon.
which is exactly what the reference I presented did.
I've discussed this rigorously with experts, and I'm not the one who made these references.
Fair enough, I thought it was shorter because of my impression purely. So, I believe it's only fair to give you my apologies.
I respect that and I accept your apology.
Only the best for Borsoni
mastodon get way too slept on
Yesss it does 😭😭
It’s very unfortunate it’s such a cool prehistoric mammal
what would be the closest to 20?
Paracer, followed by probably Zygo than Palaeolox, then Dzungario
oh btw, whatever happened to 20 ton paleo?
It was lost a long time ago and measured in a defunct system that has no verifiable integrity
Like using "palms" basically
How big is namadicus now then? I know there's other individuals besides the potential big one.
isnt it like, 16 - 18 tons?
P. antiquus is heavier than P. namadicus, right?
Around 17 tons
y do all 3 biggest mammals max at that number
its a sign
Because none of them have a lot of available info on their largest specimens really
Dzungariotherium potentially also is 17 - 18 tons but has pretty little info
*land mammals
how many remains we have of that guy?
Not entirely sure
The estimate is unreliable moreso because it also dramatically reduces other Paraceratheres. IIRC the paper was like 14 Tons for Big Paracer but 21 tons for Dzungario?
Weird, they wouldn't have essentially the same body plan?
They would. One maybe being a bit heavier built, but there's been no other work on any of it since so shrug
wdym? There's something?
Why does pots kaiwhekea have lips? Did it have that in life? I see people saying it's innacurate
Depends on who you ask. But Plesiosaurs seem to be ancestrally lipless
I wouldn't think so, myself.
I see, thanks!
Because its relatives all have huge interlocking teeth, imagine trying to pucker a mouth like this.
is it??
There's no reason to suspect it. Plesiosaurs primarily feed through lateral strikes and often have very interlocked teeth, both traits that would actively hinder lips. Kaiwhekea is less dramatic in these regards, but aristonectines only appeared in the last ~10 million years of the Mesozoic and there's no reason to suspect they got super derived with reevolved lips super quickly or anything.
lips would also probably be an active detriment to the way aristonectines sift fed
Realistically, a lot of ocean animals don't seem to be lipless, and seems to be something that occurs mostly on in-land water environments ( Like rivers, lakes, ponds, etc ). Even by these arguments, it's like, not really a lot of unique things, or would imply that Plesiosaurs were different in a few ways than most animals, rather than lipless. Which it isn't unusual either
I'd suspect that, given how a lot of marine animals have it, it might be related to how they design their hydrodynamic profile, having a lot of exposed teeth poking out at the front, doesn't tend to help with that a lot.
in plesiosaurs it’s by and large because they literally couldn’t fit their teeth inside of lips lol
That just means they have different oral configurations, not...
Lipless Oral Configurations
Perhaps
Perhaps not 
??? nothosaurus and plesiosaurs have a history of having gigantic interlocking teeth that make lips impractical ONTOP of a lateral striking-style feeding strategy, which lips would be actively detrimental in. This is likely why crocodilians are lipless for example.
So, just so I can understand you, do you think that Kaiwhekea with it's really small teeth ( Probably the minimal size of them in Plesiosaurs ) would be lipless because of the argument you made?
no
Pretty hard to sift sand when lips are in the way
Hmmm... If only there was a Extant animal with lips who showcases similar behaviour... hmmm...
Not to mention, as of said before, even if there is no advantage I don't think there'd be a reason to suddenly evolve it back given Aristonectines were a recent and late evolution, ontop of kaiwhekea being a basal member of the clade anyway.
Are you referring to gray whales?
So, are you advocating that marine animals, extinct or extant, with interlocking teeth from minimal ( miniscule ) to maximum ( gigantic ) proportions should be lipless?
Because, I can see a very bad way of using that sorta of argument. Not that I'm really interested on changing your current perspective
I have no idea what you're going on about because you are really generalizing things here.
This thing is not having lips.
They're so interlocked and facing very laterally.
Any benefits of lips in that scenario are not worth
Ouchie my gums
(Well not gums but yanno, meant for funny more than anything)
I'm not suggesting just interlocking means liplessness because that's not true.
Kinda of the point really. Because I want to see how further you can go with the idea, without any context from anything else. Anyways, how would you reconstruct this animal?
Genuine curiosity, not in any way trying to imply anything, I think it's important to discuss it's potential life-appearance afterall...
There's a reason why I specified lateral feeding, because most cetaceans don't do that.
Some do that, which is probably why you see the extremely toothy south asian river dolphins, but it's not common.
I mean, Sperm Whales do? And their mandible teeth, since really that's the only teeth they have now, aren't exactly all different from our Acrophyseter friend... Also to Zygophyseter... Livyatan...
But not the point, am I right? How would you reconstruct them?
carefully
Sperm whales don't laterally strike at prey. They're suction feeders. They don't use their teeth in feeding at all.
isnt it mostly for grip on their prey?
I mean it probably helps if the prey is large but their teeth aren't used in feeding otherwise. Its most likely purpose is when raking other individuals, especially males.
I was sure there was something about Sperm Whales eating Sharks somewhere, but it seems that I cannot find access to the original source of those claims, which means I have no argument...
I admit defeat
||( Even if I'm not convinced )||
do we have any remaining juvie trex specimens?
We do
Most are unpublished though iirc
I mean sperm whales eat a lot of things including sharks. But that's not a common part of their diet. They're squid specialists. Even with the macropredatory varieties they're hunting large prey, not laterally striking at fish.
one may specalize in kung-fu but also may participate in street fighting style, boxing and wrestling but does not detract or deminish the specality in said specialist
What I'm finding hard to believe in your statement, primarily focusing on the aspect of lateral strikes, and your analogy to Crocodilians... Even if this was a necessity for a lot of mechanisms associated to the animal's jaws to function, it kinda of doesn't mean much for their in-life appearance. I think even being insistent on the Crocodile analogy, it's being a bit selective
This is not to say that your statement isn't true. But rather, what I'm referring to it's to what I've previously said: Most marine animals have some form of extra-oral tissue
Crocodilians and Plesiosaurs wouldn't share similar kinda of water environments. Ocean Environments are more variable, due to where that specific part of the ocean is located, what kinda of temperatures it reaches, the specific amount of contents found in the water, and other factors. This is true to Crocodilians too, but not only their water habitats are more limited in size, because simply: The Ocean is too big
But it's less likely they would had to face the same amount of variability, and if they did, by quantity that is, it would probably be very different from what Plesiosaurs would had to commonly face. This is more to say that I think how their Hydrodynamic profile is shaped wouldn't be reflective of what Plesiosaurs would have... And being lipless certainly also has a effect onto that.
Has anyone’s known that Tyrannosaurus Rex 70% Bigger yes I’m not joking some suggest that most Trex Fossils were Adolecent and if this is true then Adults would be humongous
i think someone lied to you
Why do you keep bringing the environment up? This is nothing to do with anything. There's not many tetrapods that have the feeding style I'm refering to, hence why I'm bringing it up as likely significant because it's a trend we see in such lipless animals. No duh most marine animals have extra-oral tissue, most animals in general have extra-oral tissue.
most rexes that you would encounter if you go 66 mil years wouldnt be near the size of the current fossils
why do i feel like none of this is right
It's because of study that basically asked "Ok, hypothetically, how big would a rex get biomechanically?". It has no actual merits in how big trex actually got.
“If this is true” I do not also know
Because it's still relevant? And I don't think you really gave a answer to what I said, no offense, of course.
d'arc you need to get this w because you've lost every debate today
They could be smaller or bigger, but I am leaning into the smaller side since that size you brought would need an insane input of energy
There's no shame on taking Ls. If you engage with other people on the expectation of winning... You already lost
I just don't understand. It's not relevant because you're kinda just brute-forcing correlation. No duh most marine animals have extraoral tissue because most animals in general do. Liplessness is more specific and turns out, hey, most of the examples of lipless animals are aquatic species that laterally strike at fast slippery prey like fish.
to loose is too win but winning is too loose
shaskepere shakes in his historically accurate maryjanes when he hears my poetry and philosophy
So, let me try to put it simply... Why do you think that most marine animals have lips? Answer that, because I also don't know... I'm quite the Low IQ specimen
beause most animals do? It's the default condition?
But why?
This is mostly in relation to tetrapods cause with fish their skull structures are weird and varied.
its a defualt you actively have to evolve not to have
But if it became common in most animals... It would had to be developed at some place first... So, why?
are you asking why lips evolved??
He is and I don't know the answer to that.
I mean, i was originally just asking why most Marine Mammals have it? Which then he said, most animals have it, so I had to ask why.
When it comes to marine animals having lips it mostly serve essential functions related to feeding, sensation, and communication or like sound production
Reasonable
But It is not entirely accurate to say that most marine animals have lips in the way humans or land mammals do though
I mean, I was thinking it may have to do with their hydrodynamic profile? Since most of marine animals, even those without lips, kinda of try to achive sorta of a " Smooth Body shape ", without extreme or sudden differences in shape on their body... But, that is not entirely true, when I think about it... Unfortunately for me.
The presence and form of lips vary widely depending on the species and their evolutionary adaptations, so like I said it depends.
Undescribed, so treat any estimate with a truckload of salt. It’s probably not that big
Oh thanks
the person who measured this "9.4 ton meraxes" also oversized it as well
the larger specimen would've been smaller
What's scary is that there is a 10 ton eremotherium, which probably means that by chance there was probably a eremotherium larger then any land animal alive right now 💔
Why is a sloth of all things bigger then every living land animal now 😔
Most animals have legs therefore snakes have legs
Mosasaurs almost definitely had lips because most if not all squamates have lips and mosasaurs wouldn't have had enough of a reason to get rid of them
Plesiosaurs wouldn't really have a use for lips considering theyre mainly used for hydrating teeth and to help with chewing, which is useless when you are surrounded by water from the moment you are conceived to the moment you die and don't chew along with the fact that the tooth and jaw structure of many plesiosaurs simply dont support lips
Idk about ichthyosaurs tho
You just immediately contradicted your own line of logic with the next message
well it was a dumb line of logic so that's good
Is Campto oversized in this game
No it gets bigger in real life
how?
Alright really really important question..
Which extinct animal (regardless of era or time period) had the biggest bum relative to body size?
Doesn't necessarily have to take soft tissue into account, either.
The question of all times, truly