#paleontology
1 messages · Page 203 of 1
I like thinking about how Utahraptor was probably killed off by the invasive Siats.
the ill-meaning atroxicarius:
Do we tell dizzy rose to think twice before trusting it since he’s starting to believe everything he sees
I mean
That was the size we had of it earlier today
However3t sarco was revived
Ngl the skeletal could likely use some more soft tissue to it knowing crocs, but the skeletal itself should be good
This is all Termino's Fault...
Damn you terminos!
Puru however basically got slightly heavier
Cause that is just how chad it is
Wasnt it 10,7 meters last time I saw it?
You make it range from 10.3-10.5m
MAYBE 10.7m
Who is making these and why are they so bad at putting the correct mass
Ironically I did already do that but I didn’t give it as much as Puru was given (I actually reduced the Puru soft tissue)
The skull is from lambo & the body from Miguel but neither of the two made this, uh, edit?
They prob used when Sarco was 8.5m
Neither of those people made it lol, they just scaled the stuff, rose made that, they put the wrong mass
Alright
Srumis is posting the correct stuff
Anything about this?
Looks like a croc
Thats just Astorgo in Randomdinos Chart
"Slightly larger than the largest salties"
The Largest Saltie ever is very likelt Edgar, who is 6.7m and 1.5t
The Most except for a Few are noticiably smaller so yeah
Astorgo also has a Wide Skull
I keep forgetting this is Averge estimates most of the time
Still a cool crocodilians tho Thats for sure
Oh yeah
Def
i don't think there's anyway to make it more bigger anyways, and even trends among giant crocs seem to be inconsistent too... So, no way to actually narrow down potential traits
ew it's thin
Naw it’s bulky
nah.
If Thats thin then sarco is a stick
yeah, i already said it before too lol
Man sarco is being bullied😔 💔
but I meant more the dorsal view of Purus, rather than the lateral view... Also what are those gaps?
The gaps looks like fat that chubby people usually has tbh
I would't say so? But i can't find the pic of the Broad Snout Caiman resting on it's belly from a dorsal angle
The dorsal is deinosuchus dorsal scales to Puru
Oh hell naw
Chonker boys
Sarco robust
"Thin"
Mf this Guy is 6.6t
How is that Thin😭
Me when i'm not referring to the weight, but the silhouette, but somehow someone still confuses it
No calling people mfs
I mean
You are calling the Dorsal Thin
Which is not
Puru and Deino here
Broad Snouted Caiman main Issue is proportionally how Small its Head can be compared to the Rest of their body
Puru's Wdith is Scaled based off its Skull Which
Melanosuchus is Technically Closer to Puru than Broadies are
But using Melanosuchus isn't the best for Width
Given how Proportionally Skinny they are
So, I might as well take the risk, the point of a lot of Caimans, is that their heads are proportionally smaller to their overall body, and tend to not have a lot of significant differences between each other... With the exception of Melanosuchus having potentially higher spines? But I don't know
As for Purussaurus itself, as for what we know, it's not particularly different either. If anything, the Author was " Generous " by giving it a big head, because if it looked like a Kingpin... Well, it would be funny
The Bigger Head an Animal usually has
The Proportionally more Booblehead they are
Using Puru's Skull Width ad well as the Poorly Measurements we have for P.Mirandai(which is from where Postcrania is from)
We get an overall 10m or bit more animal
Not the point. But, sure. I guess somehow, a group of crocs that are so similar to each other, that we require to find extremely specific osteological feats to identify them... Purussaurus is somehow the only exception
Go wonder
Puru been 10m is not new, it been proportionally less wide than Deino should be normal too
Puru isn't the only Excpetion eithee
Are the new Edmontosaurus specimens E. Annectens or E. Regalis?
Doesn't Help that P.Mirandai even with its Aweful description showa Puru having a Proportionally Bigger Head than most Caimans
Specially Broadies
Broadies are Peak Animals anyways
Their Proportions with Puru aren't just
What you would want unless you want 12m Puru all over again
Yeah, you didn't get the point.
I'm gonna be honest I can't really figure out what your point is
I mean
The Question I mainly have is
Why you think its Thin?
Cause Proportionally its Still wide asf
Neither me
He first says its "thin"
Stego mentions we are using Deinos Dorsal adjusted to Puru's Skull Width
And Deino Itself already uses an American Alligator Dorsal scaled to its Skull Width.
Then he was explained why the Dorsal is not thin and now brings the Argument of its Head to Body Ratio like that affects its width lol
Then was also explained why none of its Material indicate Puru having a Head to Body Ratio like that of C.Latirostris
(When Puru is likely Proportionally heavier than said Caiman either way)
Anyways
its not becasue their south american, its because their titanosaurs
No it’s very clearly because they are South American. I would like to see North American ones do that. 😤
I don’t see a flaw in that logic
So, in terms of body, Crocs do not change in a lot in terms of proportions, even more so among their subfamilies. The point is less trying to objectify an estimate, because estimates themselves are... What they are
They are an attempt at predicting a number, usually with rules with whether or not that number falls into what is expected ( reasonable ) or falls into what is unexpected ( unreasonable )
But the point itself that is being made, that I find it a bit ridiculous, that the excuse for what is essentially non-reflective proportions of a Caiman, that this is based on a estimate. There is no problem with that, but at the same time... I would expect that there would be some effort to fit the animal in it's, assumingly, correct proportions
Maybe Purussaurus is somehow different than other Caimans, but even so... I think that is a very poor attempt at explaining a bad rec ( I'm trying my best to avoid the use of any particularly mean words )
I'll try to even be generous and compare it to the figure of P. mirandai ( assuming that is properlly scaled ), and what I assume is a Caiman latirostris, upscaling them to have a similar ( but not identical, because I'm not perfect ) mandible. But even there, it's a bit ridiculous.
LiterallyMiguel is mentioned in one of the comments from Srumis, and the thing is that: Back in April He did make a Purussaurus reconstruction with the consultation of someone who is into the fields of Caimans, and even that reconstruction does attempt to keep in similar proportions to other Caimans. I think my point is very clear
https://x.com/LiterallyMiguel/status/1913970240871899324
I mean
Miguel kinda like
Didn't mind Puru been 10.3m
He is on the Server this was made LMAO
I believe, i've not emphasized that Miguel minds Purussaurus being 10.3m
I'm more saying... Miguel did a Purussaurus with Caiman Proportions in April... Because he had someone who understood Caimans helping him
Again
He never said the Proportions on Fabio's was Wrong eithee
P.Mirandai scaled Properly
Leaves an Animal with Proportions very similar to that of Fabio's
Not the point, not what I've emphasized. And I think you are being intentionally oblivious
Have done my argument, this is where I leave and await for a more interesting topic.
lol okay
My Guy
Your Arguments kinda Lacks
Specially when Miguel has said he will have to Redo his Puru but can't exactly say why
Using only C.Latirostris as a Copy Paste isn't any Good Either
You are quite Literally Ignoring the Material Puru has by
"You see its a Caimaninae therefore it will have same Proportions as this only caiman despite its skull width, its material and other caiman material indicating otherwise"
I like how the main talk in this chat is just crocodilians, ragebait, and the occasional new news (with a healthy sprinkle of Hell Creek shenanigans)
if I wanted to go through that I would just skim through twitter.
Real, either there or Reddit
so glad I stopped using reddit, best decision ever
The Classic
"Why was Deinosuchus nerf" of Reddit is still funny
if you study the anatomy of purussaurus you will find that it is not similar to any living caiman in head:body ratio (and this is corroborated by recent papers studying the relationship between head width and body length in caimaninae)
a general rule of restoring extinct animals is that ignoring the preserved material in favor of using the proportions of living relatives (or vastly smaller relatives) will almost always lead to a massive overestimation of the animal's size
tis how we got 12m sarcosuchus, 12m deinosuchus, and 12m purussaurus
That's my favorite dinosaur!
one of the dinosaurs ever for sure
Really bud mines is Ichthyotitan
Best Dino of all time bud
"Dinosaur"?
I like how both of these aren't true dinosaurs
That implies the existence of false dinosaurs
the humble poposaurus
baseless funny speculative idea I had: Baby t rex were born with colors that mimicked those of nanotyrannus, similar to baby cheetahs mimicking honey badgers
I feel like the entire debate above would have been easily solved if someone just pinged random himself so he could explain it sooner
i think it would have gone similarly as it went with srumis
The guy is like that.
Something similar happened with the Elvis Mount Skull situation
I do imagine that speaking for someone is more difficult to get your point across than iof you were to say it yourself
What abt mimicking dromeasaurs, like Dakotaraptor and Deinonychus
Op strategy, pls nerf
dakotaraptor isn't real and they didn't live with deinonychus
said nano because a juvie rex would most easily pass as a nanotyrannus and I could see larger adult rexes not wanting to mess with a nano (not that they couldn't kill it, but it'd just be really annoying like a honey badger or call all its friends)
They should just mimic an adult Triceratops and be done with it already
That's why it got extinct
Couldn't fool anything but itself
I LOVE DIICTODON, CLEARLY THE BEST STEM MAMMAL
all reptiles are dinosaurs if u dont know this , pick up a book bud.
this is true except in the case of dinosaurus which is in fact a bird
I mean you’re kind of right, I respect your opinion but isn’t like lizards and crocodiles a reptile? They are not dinosaurs
It feels like you’re rage baiting I just can’t prove it
Am I the only allosaurus fan here
See now that is rage baiting
Would you want a pet mononykus
Pteranodon
My fav dinosaur is mosasaurus😂✌️
spinosaurus bullying alligators for no reason
I assumed I missed alot?
Its my birthday today and I got ammonite fossils : D
found this and its so beautiful
happy birthday
Thank youuuu 
Anurognathus
No!!! My para!!!
Happy Birthday
New documentary?
It's not new
Those nanuqs look not good tbh
Here they are if anyone wants to see them
Paleofans will see an artwork of a predator discombobulate the intestines of baby dinos and day "nature is so beautiful 😭🙏"
Be sure to bury them alongside you in your funeral to confuse the hell out of future paleontologists
I'll do it with the one I have
LOL I will
I'll ask to be buried in the middle of the desert or ocean aswell just to throw in a little more confusion
hell yeah!
Been in the works since 2022
jezz what is lemongates TYPING
If you think about it, humans could leave behind some weird ass fossils behind, like prosthetic members, body augmentations, scar surgeries, etc.
If full head transplants could ever be successful in the future, it'll be even better, like "why's there a male cranium and maxila with a female skeleton?"
dawg i was expecting a whole essay
🙏
I write slowly 
.......dayum
Mobile users have no peace istg
Ooo interesting
we could also leave nothing at all, as there are multiple timespans of millions of years during earth's history that simply haven't left us any sedimentary rocks today
We won't leave anything, I will make sure of it
We also like to conceal our dead in boxes or incinerate them, so even less fossils to leave behind
We’ve murdered millions of each other across the planet, I doubt we won’t leave anything whatsoever anywhere
won't matter if 100-200 thousand years of holocene rocks simply don't preserve
true
Man if it's new he immediately believes it.
Mexican fishing bat and rhamphorhynchus
exactly
Oh yeah, i forgot to share this:
https://x.com/AnatRecord/status/1982764669992398860?t=xH5-OWqrsMC2Nv5RHcG7_g&s=19
New insights into early therizinosaur evolution! Newly described cranial bones of Falcarius utahensis—the oldest known therizinosaur—reveal key transitions in skull form and feeding anatomy.
Freimuth & Zanno: https://t.co/hYl3yE9CDI
Prehistoric Planet Ice Age spoilers
Can someone post that Meraxes again so I get the chance to respond with " Ew " ?
was asiatyrannus actually less mature than first thought?
Stop posting this bruh, it’s already been confirmed fake.
oh it's real lol https://ymiclassroom.com/lesson-plans/prehistoricplanet/
When Naish said it was fake he even went back and said that he didn't actually read what was being shown
The five-episode documentary event–Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age–brings you to a new era millions of years after the dinosaurs are long gone, when a third of the world is covered in ice, and the world’s coolest animals inherited the earth. These activities challenge students in grades 3-5 to determine measurements of awe-inspiring Ice Age an...
Dunno, one paper said its less mature than the original authors say. We'll have to see what the future holds. There are some big Tyranno teeth in that formation so maybe they belong to its adult form
I just have to wonder how big the grown animal was
It's not fake 
would sauropods have the same level of cancer resistance as whales have?
Oh damn
So then these are real, which means we are only getting one season of Pleistocene ice age. Honestly, good. As cool as this will be, I want to see early-mid Cretaceous, Jurassic, and Triassic. Paleozoic if we’re REALLY lucky.
is episode 3 about australia?
Seems like it
Is the second critter here not a thylacoleo?
"yeah I like Nanuqsaurus over any other Tyrannosaur"
It’s definitely up there.
mfs will like Nanuq and then go bash Oxalaia enjoyers
99% of Nanuqsaurus reconstructions are just Dasp with feathers
True paleontology fans do not speak ill of fragmentary taxa nº 650 fans
There’s more material for nanuqsaurus. Brief paper on it in, basically just dasp with MAYBE some feathers.
the more material being a rib
Not maybe. WITH some feathers
Prince creek wasn’t actually that cold.
No direct evidence of feathers in Nanuqsaurus or really anything within Tyrannosauria
If anything all of Tyrannosauria was featherless
Still, you do need to regulate temperature somehow
The prince creek wasn't cold enough to need feathers, plus it's nearly double the size of a polar bear if not more than
Only feathered dinosaurs seem to be basal coelurasauria and like, one basal ornithopod?
Was there a new paper on that and i wasn't informed about? Thought that it was pretty standard knowledge that Prince Creek was cold, maybe during Winters, but still cold
most feathered dinosaurs are pretty small unless they live in cold enviornments
Why would you want to be rude?
the average was only around 40-50F, still plenty warm enough to not need feathering
Yixian formation was fairly warm too, yes?
large animals as a rule arrive at that somehow so probably
My brother that is... 4-10º celsius??? Hold on let just check this, no way you just said that
It is
When you get to a certain size while also being warm blooded, you don't need feathering or fur as much because by just being that big you're making enough heat
Plus with Nanuqsaurus being a Tyrannosaurid (which are confirmed to be scaley) it's unlikely evolution would end up needing to favor feathers over not having feathers
dont we have rex's with cancer though?
No. Also, it's 4-9º Celsius what are you on about? How heavy is Nanuqsaurus? Someone real quick get some estimate of weight for me
Yeah 4 - 10 is not nearly enough for a 2 ton theropod to require feathering lol
It was similar in temperature but the difference here is that Yutyrannus didn't lose and then re-evolve feathering, plus feathering can work on a large animal because feathers aren't as simple as something like hair is
It's unlikely that Nanuq would face the pressure to re-evolve feathers, whereas Yutyrannus already had em
From Brinkman et. al. 2025, referring to the Prince Creek formation climate
Palaeobotanical proxies of Late Cretaceous Arctic palaeoclimate suggest a mean annual temperature of 6.3 ± 2.2°C, a warm month mean of 14.5 ± 3.1°C and a cold month mean of −2.0 ± 3.9°C (Spicer & Herman 2010; Herman et al. 2016). The biological implications of these physical parameters indicate that plants and animals endured freezing temperatures and up to 4 months of polar darkness during the Arctic winter (Spicer & Herman 2010; Herman et al. 2016).
hi Canadian here
The vast majority of animals on this planet can take that temperature completely fine
I suppose. Which groups of theropods are most likely to have kept feathers then? Megalosaurs? Dilophosaurus and relatives?
Coelurosaurs, Carcharodonts are the only ones with record of feathering
2 ton is being generous. Real quick, I used Franoy's old GDI estimate of weight, can someone grab any new GDI Estimate if there is any? Because if Nanuqsaurus is like Daspletosaurus, and by average it's 6 meters long, while Daspletosaurus is 9 meters long, a 0.3 difference in size btw, it would had 900 kgs
(the 6m specimen isn't adult)
do you live here
Assuming it's not, but okay, let's say we use the 7 meters one, or what estimte an adult would had?
Proposed adult scale is 8m IIRC
Juravenator and Sciurumimus might be tetanurans
Nanuq is 9 meters.
Even then though, Alligators and Crocs manage fine without integument in cold months
And they're cold blooded and a fraction of the size
This conversation is genius.
They don't manage fine though, they brumate the majority of the winter or they'll die
falls off truck what’s the topic? Nanuq fuzzy?
Indeed. And these are animals specialized for hot climate and ambush hunting, the worst possible combo to survive a cold winter
If they can manage, so can a large Tyrannosaur. Hell even the Permian dwellers managed to survive ice ages before integument was even a thing
Nanuq feathering and also how it's basically just a valid Tyrannosaur version of Oxalaia
nanuq fuzzy cause he could have display instead of keeping warm
the largest prince creek material is pretty comparable in size to large daspletosaurus stuff and the ontogenetic status of smaller stuff like the nanuq type is equivocal
It's a Coelurosaur, it probably did have at least some feathering. But it's not like that's any different to Dasp or relatives. It's just the ancestral condition
I mean, nothing wrong with fragmentary specimens at face value. They’re a scientific mystery to be explored and that’s cool
Also Wes I know what you mean but I’m imagining some skinless Permian lads begging for the sweet release
well nanuq isnt mostly destoyed and he does have more stuff in the wings waiting to be published
so hes better than oxi is at least
The second part of that was mostly ragebait that led into the first part
huh
nanuq is the same as the two labocania species, it's just that labocania got more attention than nanuq
What if the real nanuq is the friends we made along the way
tbf to the nanuq haters the thing describing the new prince creek material also thinks nanuq itself is dubious
I think people like Nanuq too much for a fragmentary species, and then I said how it's basically just a Dasp with feathers in most reconstructions, which led to the conversation of Nanuq feathering
ah
well people can like what they like
I mean there’s nothing wrong with liking or disliking an animal. It’s an animal
But to get on other people for liking it is an interesting choice imho
Majority of peeps that like Oxalaia are just told they like Spino but wanna be different
Same story for Nanuq imo
I mean you can like it, but people shouldn't treat artistic representation as end-all-be-all cus the material is honestly...bad
he could be worse
could be a single tooth
So how exactly do we know that Nanuq isn't just a Dasp or something?
So, reminder that the particular adaptation of birds having mostly tendons as the most present conjunctive tissue on their feet, it's present in most Tetanureans, and tends to be characteristic that animals who have it, who are mostly adapted to walk on ground for most of their lives, tend to be adapted for preserving energy during long distances, this also includes Tyrannosaurs.
That’s kinda yucky either way
Imagine getting onto someone for liking an animal.
I don’t like things to be different, I like it cause I like it
I imagine others are similar tbh
tbf can't alligators literally freeze themselves alive and come out unscathed? They have crazy body control when it comes to that stuff. I doubt the same for an active dinsaur
could be something closer to lythronax
normalize not using crocs to compare to dinosaurs because the 2 are so vastly different
even using birds can be kind of a stretch sometimes but it's so much better than crocs.
can't wait for 15 years in the future when the undescribed Nanuq specimen gets destroyed, lost, or just started being studied only to be halted
there's supposed to be some subtle cranial characters it has not present in tyrannosaurids as derived as daspletosaurs or tyrannosaurins
Honestly finding anything vaguely tyrannosaur shaped that far north is really cool imo
If it’s dubious, and it gets reassigned, then the ppl who like it will like the new thing
Either way a win
Don't let them know that Oxalaia lacks 1 pair of teeth that Spinosaurus still visibly has...
we have hibernation in endotherms and brumation in archosaurs, both can take many forms but generally involve a seasonal lowering of the metabolic rate. I have little doubt dinosaurs in polar conditions did some variation thereof this as they overwintered in the dark cold months
Ironically it wasn't because croc v dinosaur, it's just crocs being the best example of a large animal lacking fur/feathers that tolerate cold when not expected
plus probably some other little things i wouldnt know off my head that arent necesarrily unique to nanuq but also arent present in daspletosaurus
Teratophoni Nanuq....
fair, but they're still so vastly different even compared to earlier relatives
Name me a 1 ton featherless bird for comparison lol
If it gets assigned as Dubious it's gonna be a Brontosaurus situation (minus becoming valid again) all over again with the annoying mfs saying "well aktshooully"
tbh what if Nanuqsaurus was like a Eurasian Tyrannosaurinae? like Tarbosaurus and Zhuchengtyrannus?
worse things have happened tho. If you refer to it by nanuq when it’s no longer valid ppl know what you mean.
not a single bird has even reached a ton, let alone any going anything notably over 500kg (other than that really fat one which got ~800kg but it's probably oversized)
"hibernation" in dinosaurs would probably be more similar to that seen in mammals and some birds rather than ectotherms like gators right?
(Still so cool and funny that they can do this)
its not nearly derived enough to be aligned with proper the asian tyrannosaurins even if it were related to some unknown primitive asian forms
my uncle after too many beers
the humble edmontosaurus going into a body of water and turning into a block of ice
But it would be funny
I mean, don't we have potential evidence of Asian taxa migrating to the Prince Creek? ( Not migrating but i don't remember the term )
current Tyrannosauridae tree for reference if anyone needs it
dont think so irrc
not true, alioramines are sister to tyrannosaurini!!!
Therizinosaur footprints, something like, from my memory
In Alaska right?
thats not in prince creek thats Cantwell
They're sister to the Albertosaurinae as of the new paper that followed Khankhuuluu
Yeah probably not freezing themselves but something intermediate between reptiles and mammals is possible, especially for smaller taxa like thescelosaurids and leptoceratopsids
I'm stupid
why are people acting like nothronychus doesn't exist
No, you’re mistaken. There’s a difference 👍 everyone make mistakes
There is no Nothronychus in ba sing se
the prince creek nothronychus
cause its like 20 million years before cantwell
What about southronychus
Me when Maastricthian Nothronychus
what about equatorronychus
westonychus
its always impressive how despite ucmp toe being a 15t rex already being a really stupid take there was a somehow an even stupider counterclaim of what if it was actually a therizinosaur for no discernable reason
Finally the REAL questions I crave
Well, they are fat. Obese. Overweight, duh
I could see this being accurate after all yeah
Now
What dinosaur would be the best at soccer
Assume fifa regulations
did yall know T.rex had a cloeca wide enough for you to stick an iphone in sideways?
Thank WWD 2025 for the information
galli and friends
We have burrows from Cretaceous polar Australia now so yeah basically (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019566710900072X)
This is like watching gore
i'm so glad documentaries are using language that today's youth understands
Mm true
Tbh I think plateosaurus would be good at it tho
no they said 6-7 inches, I just said it in a way we can all visualize
noodle their quadrupedal thoughhhhh 
Like idk if ornithomimosaurs would make good goalies
That’s ok then their front feet count as legs too
That certainly was necessary information
the humble sauropod blocking the entire goal
quadrupedal Ornithomimosaur
Gigantoraptor would prolly be good but they might break the ball so idk
Like what’s the critical mass where a dinosaur is no longer good at soccer
something something raccoons capable of fitting into really small holes & overlap with something that can stretch.......use your imagination
thinking about that is sickening lol
" Normal Day " for Paleo
Ok let’s try this…
If you could eat one extinct animal what and why
not very educational pnoodle5
i would eat a edmontosaurus!
yeah
i want to eat a pliosaur though
I would like to eat a dire wolf
In fact, I think it’s a highly educational question. You can consider the potential similarities between them and extant animals, the body composition, and most of all its fun
You'll probably have a very short lifespan after that... Don't know why, but that's my impression
not the puppy 
edmonto ribeye 🤤
Dire wolf prolly wouldn’t be much good unless it was a stew
Dog is not the yummiest meat in general
I would love to try a pterosaur
The wings would be so big
Theverycutefishy is rex posting
he now needs to rex grind
an extra juicy gryposaurus or relative in a similar niche end
I think oviraptor drumstick would also be good. But a young one
This is so educational
the humble cassowary
Oviraptor drumstick battered in Oviraptor egg
taste testing all 20+ different kritosaurines
I agree
Btw, if you ever get to ask this to RickRaptor, hope he doesn't answer Ammonite
What would be the difference in flavor profile across them? Like, what would the major differences in body composition and fat distribution be, I wonder
just a nibble
juicy strung cooked out fattier end gryposaurus thigh meat with some garlic siding and breads🤤
I feel like asparagus would go well with a hadrosaur
Idk why it just. Feels right
ew asparagus
the why is
well mid sized mega fauna herbivore in colder region with slightly birdier and gamier meat gotta be good n juicy
Saw some fossils of our very own Eurhinosaurus at the London Natural History Museum today!
I'm going to make the most horrific smelly turducken fathomable with anzu but what do I fill it with
Where did you get lancian’s anzu-
is this true?
Heavy metals due to bioaccumulation, perhaps? Raw reptile flesh generally isn't very safe either (assuming it's eaten raw)
whats everyones opinions on anti predator vegans?
What if humans can create new dinosaur species? (Not bring back dinosaurs, create archosaur)
This is wrong because all hadrosaurs had two claws
I'm curious but what about the evidence in Dakota the Edmontosaurus?
Dakota the Edmontosaurus has two claws, the foot was not perfect
No, I mean this
That's so cool
According to Wikipedia, Edmontosaurs are classified as Edmontosaurines, not Lamb
True.
The digits were still broken
Digit 1 showed a nail too but it's broken off partially
thoughts?
We’re good at walking, but in comparison with something like African Wild Dogs we fall short
I can’t remember where I found this but it displays what falcon is talking about
I wonder what Falcon would think of this
I think it shows a visible hoove
am I an idiot and falcon made that
Didn't know the nails worked like that, noice
I think Edmontosaurus did not have a different finger count from the usual hadrosaur, Cuttlefish found the diagram I was looking for
No, it was made by Rizky
ohhh that makes sense, I have that stowed away for this exact conversation I just forgot where it came from lol
Neither saying that
Then there's no proof the hand varied from any other hadrosaur and thus the tweet is wrong
we're still above alot of stuff endurance wise
just not the literal highest ends
Didn't defend the Tweet tho?
Ok 💔
your just trying to argue now
be kind
MOR 981
what ceratopsian has the biggest frill, i guess frill to body ratio?
Likely torosaurus
Nah
you're*
They don’t have the first digit anymore
Evidence that Random lied?
Digit 2 is probably what he was referring to
Nuh uh
Tangential but Tom Parker made this and it seems to be the most sensible recon I’ve seen
Evidence that I lied?
Evidence we should just give up on sci-comm?
@queen oar
How long can hooves be dated back too ? Surely Dino’s weren’t the first right ?
Did para ever live in or near the hell creek formation
Para was Campanian so it was dead by then
Para wasn’t invited to that era
HOLY PIXEL
nope
really? not penta or titano?
no
toro had the largest skull of any land animal
Going to just throw this here, but hadrosaur hands and especially back feet are very similar to tapirs
i meant like, frill size in relation to body size
why have you done this to me
Titano’s frill proportions aren’t known too well, but even then toro had some exaggerated parietals that would make something like penta weep
Make sense, they likely had similar lifestyles
what do we know about baby ankylosaurids and parenting?
would parenting lean towards large sauropod or hadrosaur?
because I've had to live with this knowledge since dakota's hand was first shown and bear with people calling the hand a horse hoof when it is nothing like one
tbh, do we have any studies on the conjunctive tissues that would be present on those hands and feet?
mainly refering tro the underlying skeletal structure and back nails
I know, i'm just more curious if the analogy could be expanded further or not.
Thought this was a Nodosaur at first glance
it's in the same condition as one lol
thought that the horn was a shoulder spike and the upper jaw was the head and that it was all viewed from the top
big ass eye on that nodosaur
Eye of Rah
does anyone have a good procompsognathus skeletal?
Oh yeah I see it
farewell aquatic anky,,,
finally it comes to an end
what you just quote doesn't disprove semi-aquatic Liao, it just shows they were babies which is super cool
We bout to get a new puru skeletal….
we all preapered to see purus downfall and im not gonna defend it
The thing about puru is, we have a relatively good body AND skull of a juvenile, so it’s not a bobble head.
pretty sure it lacks much more fossils then deinosuchus has
Fossils from the body?
yes
Mm…
either way lets see what will be the fate of purussarus
I was at the museum and saw this
We are? 🧍♂️
Deino and Sarco both got nerfed, puru is next.
It's not the official name but I call it the last duel
Unlikely. Puru is consistently above 10m and the backing for it is pretty gd
the new estimates of it: tonights the night
That's a biiig head. Btw, with the new estimates, can we still say that Deino could prey on Dinos ?
the bite marks of hardosaurus isnt gone so yes
Forgot about those. I only remembered the bite marks on turtle shells
nom nom
Haven't some people argued it could just be a scavenger situation ? A carcass finding itself in a body of water and a croc munching on it ?
well why would a corpse be in water is another question then since it could just be another deinosuchus ambushed it and left just for another deinosuchus to eat it
Ehh not really
P.Mirandai Carries, and using skull width even when based on Caimanae gets Puru to be 10m~
So Puru is consistantly that size
Puru's main issue is its description
But from its material and some variation, it been 10m~ its quite solid
either way lets see what new estimates says about that
I mean
Most newer stuff has it at 10m~
Wether its with P.Mirandai or its material (it only gets to like 12m if you for some reason Copy Paste Broad Snoured caimans proportions into it)
How do scientists try to figure out the rest of a dinosaurs body by one fossil
well you can use mordern animals that has something similar with prehistoric one
It’s still pretty much the biggest predator in its ecosystem
Puru technically got heavier
Went from 6.4t to 6.6t
Which is funny but works
Puru been the only True Crocodilian between those 2 prob helps
use more complete relatives to fill gaps
Small enough ones yeah. Not like fully grow para or anything.
Deino didn’t live with para. But regardless, deino is of a similar size to para
That’s why meraxes was such a huge deal, cause we had very little from other carcharodontosaurids to go off of.
Deino was the largest predator in its Formation
Sure when THAT Big it just belly dragged itself on land
But water ambushes exists
Plus we know mf liked Turtles
Wouldn’t tyrannosaurus sp be bigger than it
So Dinosaurs relative to the individual size and turtles for sure then
Actually
Yeah
Forgot that thing existrd
2nd Biggest works anyways
That depends on if Tyrannosaurus sp even is in that formation, its pretty unclear atm
Genuinely the comparison random did was the first I’ve even heard of tyrannosaurus sp lmao
What size was the dino with Deino's bite marks on it ?
Then again
Deino's formation is more fairs than Part of Puru's one lol
Mf had to eat about 5 of anything there for a full meal 🥀
I mean
The Stupen there is 1t
And we know Puru liked said Turtle
Sarco seems so small now x) I know it wasn't, it's just funny on the skeletal image
and what about P. cyrtocristatus, P. tubicen, and P. walkeri,
Pholidosauridae moment
Still 3t
Sarco just suffers the issue that its Post Crania description is kinda
None existant
So we gotta use Termino
They are about the same size, about the 5t~ range
yeah and also just gonna show what i found
puru had animals smaller then it huh
Peak animal btw
Thx to it 12m Sarco doesn't exist anymore
ohh you mean when it was 40ft yeah i remember that estimate
Not hard to be smaller than a Caiman that reaches about 6.6t at max, the average Puru is prob larger than all those anyways
Oh so he’s the reason for sarcos new size and look
i remember now that caimans today are way bigger then any other animals in amazon
He is Sarco's Closest relative with actual Post Crania
So yeah
What have we even got of Sarco?
I mean
Mainly Melanosuchus, C.Yacare is on the smaller end, Melanosuchus However is Big for been a Close relative of Caimans but is still proporrtionally light compared to other crocodilians if the same length
We actually have a Decent Bit
We just have Sereno Moment, Bad if not basically none existant description of its Post Crania, a Drawing that doesn't match and gives like 11m Sarco Trusting of Scale Bars, etc
Basically a Mess Lol
you know that i mean puru being bigger then others tho right
Which is why using Terminonaris which is Sarco'd Closest relative is just better to fill its Head to Body Ratio
I mean.
Puru is a very special case
Its the only True Crocodilian that is consistantly the size it is and remain on the top
And is a Caiman of all things lol
you mean the true crocodilian is what supports that its 10 meters
Paras can get really freaking big.
No?
I mean is the only True Crocodilian that consistantly mantain its size been so large
Cause Deino is a Stem Croc and Sarco a Pholidosauridae
Which is funny how Puru is the only True Crocodilian now between those 3
What Supports Puru been 10m is its Material
kk
Ah. So pretty standard for croc stuff it seems lmao
They get up to about 6t. So abit bigger than deino. If ur thinking bigger than ur talking about fadenos massively oversized ones
ah yes thinking about a bigger deino must be you thinking about fadeno deino

kaiju deino
Bigger than Shant paras
Rex sized anky
🥀
its just crocodilian bias trust trust
pretty sure at that time tho shant was still bigger then fadenos deino
I’m pretty sure fadeno had para at about 20t
yeah either way fadeno was just a artist a good one at that
Do we have paleoarts with Deino's or Sarco's new size estimates/new moprhology ?
nope but deinos art gonna look goofy prob
With its big head ? yeah x)
id still prefer this art tho
It's beautiful ! Gonna check this artists art
it really is i love it
Omg I found their Erythrosuchus art
show me!
oh dayum a bobblehead trex
We still having prehistoric suchian discussion?
who you talking to
Everyone in this room
what will be in this discussion
I just said it
Prehistoric suchians
ill assume weights then
i found this
"This has to be satire" I said dumbfoundedly
Littles did I know...it wasn't...
The monke himself finally appears
I'm hoping for Megalania in the Australia centered episode
what is Sizes for allosaurus anax and torvosaurus?
Around 4-5 tonnes.
theres more!!!
squalicorax
clidastes
deino
I just want titanis man
12-18t yeah
Love it
https://bsky.app/profile/tetzoo.bsky.social/post/3m4axxpccsk2w
3 When the Lamb opened the second seal, I heard the second Obamadon saying, “Come!” 4 Then another Edmontosaurus came out, fiery red. The Nanotyrannus riding on it was permitted to take peace from the earth, so that people would slaughter one another. He was given a great controversy.
Looks like a pretty interesting paper is out this week, if you like Cretaceous dinosaurs. Oh boy.
oviraptor and parasaurolophus, my favourite nemegt formation dinosaurs
The humble Charonosaurus
there arent even any lambeosaurines in nemegt 💔
if they wanted a hadrosaur for nemegt they could have just done edmont because at least thats actually a saurolophine
Umm hello?
I love how whoever this is just...steals the skeletal and puts it in their own chart, no other effort 💔
Oh, other than adding a cheesy nickname
is there even a new meraxes specimen or is it literally just "oh hey new skeletal of my favourite dinosaur I'm gonna make some stuff up so it becomes the biggest and scariest"
Is that image real?
wait if Dan Folkes is the source wouldn't that make them wrong by their own source because Dan has an 11.1t giga
I have not been able to verify the image...
Thats why im asking in here
This is the original
As for the body text, I don't think that's...factual at all
Sweet thx
they also oversized the skeletal by 20%
tsk tsk tsk tsk
For sci-comm!!!
There was a larger individual discovered, but it might be dubious rn idk.
15% larger I believe.
Ew
it just looks wrong for some reason
the base of the neck looks thin and the legs are proportionally very long
yeah
the torso looks a bit too dorito shaped too
Me when peak Meraxes already exists:
https://x.com/Beagliam/status/1888644347286991128
"This skeletal is wrong because I don't like how it looks" Ok 💔 💔
Someone throw at this guy the Shantungosaurus skeletal made by Greg. S. Paul ( with the comically large chin )
thats a very cool skeletal wym
Many don't know this but Dan Folkes is reliable...
yeah, but also the chin doesn't help when you are trying to take it seriously
honestly I dont really like the posture in some of them but I'll still use them because theyre really good
This is when we say "It's a living animal that can move"
comparing Dan Folkes to GSP is insane work
tbh, he is somewhat... But everytime i see his work i see that meme of the " Potential Man "
What does that even mean 💔 💔 💔
Can you provide examples of his work being erroneous or otherwise unreliable
Just think his work has a lot of potential. But at the end that's kinda of it, I don't think it ever gets expanded
Not even the 15% for the larger specimen, straight up oversized even the probable oversized second specimen estimate. 💔
What do you mean!!! He's already published in several papers and has a blog, what other potential 😭 😭
What are you talking about, his skeletals are some of the best in the skeletal making world? His giga especially is notable for him going to measure and look at it himself.
I just don't think like that. But then again, I like being a contrarian for no reason
His was commissioned for Taurovenator
we can tell.
Don't think you did. Because I caught a fish
LMFAO
Himself? Wasn't it warpath who measured the stuff?
“People are disagreeing with me? I must be ragebaiting then!”
"you cant summarise the Internet in 10 words"
Theveryhumblefishy:
Regardless he still got some of the best measurements of Giga he could get & he still did go to the material itself, so I was under the impression some of the material was measured there when he could
I think someone working on the material provided the measurements for him. But, honestly i can't remember the tweet where he said it
I normally despise ragebaiters but i have to say i think i caught a fish made me laugh
also yes Warpath measured the bones in person and sent them to Dan
Studies have been shown that fish can recognize what may likely be bait on a fishing hook if they’ve been caught previously in that area and will choose to avoid anything suspicious in the area
I am not one of those fish
" You see, i'm not like you guys! I'm built different! "
Studies have shown that the Spinosaurus is a fisher
🐟 
no it was actually a terrestrial pursuit predator
I saw a documentary about it in 2001
It was a land shark, swam through the sand
Either spinosaurus was the Michael Phelps of the semi aquatic world, or it was a slow stupid heron that moved around like a cartoon character wearing a scuba suit
Not Heron. Baby Legs
who would win aquatic pursuit predator that cant swim or terrestrial heron wader that cant walk
Jurassic park if it was realistic
aquatic because it can still walk but the heron can't
Hey guys, i know the true answer to the Spinosaurus debate...
It was Semi-Aquatic
So its either walking on the sea floor or crawling on the ground to hunt....
technically semiaquatic is a correct term but it also encompasses anything from a heron to a seal
was about to start making a chart only to find that the formation has 12 birds
mabye I'll do a different formation 🥀
Literally me with hell creek
I think it just means: This organism functions on both land and in water, without any specifications of how much time it spends on either
Actually Lancian would have outcompeted you if you did, please stay in your niche next time!
Fool, I niche partitioned with him by asking him first
You wanna know what neither of you did yet?
Neither has made a Avisaurus skeletal
Say what you want about lancian but his dedication for the entirety of the hell creek is very admirable
Now someone pester him to make Becky’s giant into a hell creek saurolophine!
every formation i wanted to do either has
- too many sauropods
- too many birds
- too many indeterminate taxons
I was gonna do udurchukan yesterday but then I saw 14 indeterminate taxons with no sources and 4 described ones and immediately noped out
my kayenta formation chart is still missing 2 animals because I can't find anything about them anywhere
Morrison is never gonna be good enough cus there’ll always be 7 more sauropods a year that get remade phylogenetically or are new to science
or a carnivore becomes a sauropod
too many sauropods is only an issue if they are like Titanosauria indet.
what do you mean it can be anything from Saltasaurus to Argentinosaurus 💀
Why would you want to torture the poor person? ( I don't know their pronouns )
Like idk, make them draw a skeletal of the " Edmontosaurus sasquatch " something species
this guy:
its an issue for me because I do my charts on mobile so it lags a lot if the resolution is too high and if I make the resolution too low then any small animals are like 4 pixels long
that is valid i once made a chart featuring a 30 meter sauropod and a 3 centimeter frog
the worst ive had was dilo and a ~7cm coelophysid
how is a coelophysid so small
Infant child
its 20cm nvm idk where i got 7 from
also its probably a juvenile
its an 11.1mm sacrum scaled off syntarsus
Oh yeah, that'll probably be a big one
Chinasaurus
Japanosuchus

is this real cuh
Its not published yet, so we'll have to see.
i really wanna see that skull now
||no||
tbh, why not the name Nipponosuchus?
Wikipedia pmo
like wym youre telling me you have a source but you arent letting me see the source
whats even the point in listing it then
it isnt?
look at the authors
Also google translate the name, just don't post it here. Lambeosaurus learned the hard way
i found this from another discord server image so i cant find it
twice
so this is more of a joke then
"I wanna make a lance formation chart" I said with glee
little did I know there would be 25 birds, 9 of which are indeterminate and/or unnamed
Wikipedia moment
Either there are dedicated people that want to educate others, or there are " I'm a walking contradiction! "
yeah read the author list and it becomes pretty clear lol
You can also check the PMID or DOI of abstracts to see if they're real or not
the sauropoda Wikipedia page last year placed macronaria outside of sauropoda
lets hope it dosent spread and make people believe it
I've heard somewhere that tapejara is considered to be a herbivorous pterosaur. Can someone pls tell me the study that mentions this or is it some other pterosaur? I would like to know how they arrived at that conclusion.
Is the material we have in grey, or white……?
naw mate its fake its all jokes
you just got exicted baited
I mean, it’s extremely exagerated, but I would honestly expect something like it. There aren’t really any big predators discovered from that time period in Japan.
Thanks a lot.
its fake dw
Imma prank some people
Yeah, I figured. Professional, quality shitpost.
we have tyrannosaur material from Japan
yo lemme see the reactions on dms when you get reactions
Japan was an ocean. Which is all the more reason to find a giant saltwater croc there but whatever.
There are terrestrial deposits, it was likely just an eastern region of the mainland during the late K
no problem, there's also the new Sinopterus material with stomach contents https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095927325006759
👍
Which one is more accurate? Did torvo get downsized recently?
Or is the one on the left just a smaller specimen?
Right is better, the left one probably isn't using the edmarka rex specimen yeah
Technically both
Ok.
I thought another "dunkleosteus situation has hit the paleo community".
dunk be dunked
I'm gonna sue you for breach of privacy where tf did you get that photo of me
bro 💔
Did you guys know there's a Vtuber who's obsessed with Pseudosuchians and basically all of their content is drawing soft tissue reconstructions or skeletal reconstructions of them?
How long is Sarco? 8,9m?
I’ve seen some of them
They’re…not the greatest but still sweet
It’s Purussaurus daddy
no its deinosuchus maximus
Where are we getting 9+ tonnes from?
the goverment?
they took dans newest skeletal and upsized it by 20% for no reason
@randomdinos this legit?
@stiff osprey
no
The skeletal is from dan, but the size and text and stuff is from someone else
Person doing these upsizes & scalings shouldn’t be trusted, they’ve made too many like this
Is it mmch-pv-65 or the big one?
Its the big one, except we don't really know the big one's size since its unpublished so its just meraxes made bigger based on vibes
How big was the actual one that Dan made then?
Should be close to 11 meters or so
This is the Holotype right?
Yup
Looks more normal when made like this
1000 people are now going to comment that the neck can't make an S shape without actually looking at how the cervicals are articulated
Two guys who didn't skip Leg day
That's ai
biologists for 10,000 years: porcupines CAN NOT shoot their quills!!!
AI in 2025: lol but what if i made people think they did
Wouldn't it be funny if we made meraxes speed based on molina-perez's theropod speed study
Just look at bro's hand
Death lock spotted
I'm everywhere
They gonna try to turn all the big crocodillians into dwarfs
What’s with this whole “carcha’s can’t bend their necks!!” thing anyways
it's based on the taurovenator cervical interlock thing but people are ignoring that taurovenator only preserves the anterior half of the neck, the base of it could still move
just look at that porcupine lol, it looks like a ball. More like a spikier hedgehog than a porcupine
That's something Warpath or Dan said can't remember
but "based on Taurovenator it shouldn't be possible"
notice how there is only evidence of interlock in the first five cervicals, while the bend in the neck of the meraxes edit happens in the posterior ones
Is warpath the guy that was crazy about Saurophaganax in vividen server , no it wasn’t forget the little lad name.
that was 7shots
no that's not the one
for warpath, you may be right random, it's just that warpath being behind the scene in Argentina, I often take what he is saying as granted while I should remain a bit more critical
if you think S 'eck meraces can be real I'll take it
Yea 7shots it’s all coming back now , how is the fella these days
well he's definitely right about the preserved cervicals of taurovenator having interlock that prevents upwards movement
i'm just saying we can't apply this to cervicals that aren't preserved (and that according to the paper, the posterior ones would not interlock anyway)
what would be the best animal i could get to help protect my flock of dryosaurs from dromeosaurids that keep sneaking into my ranch?
the dreaded guard camarasaur
Diplodocus
Could snipe them from 30 feet away
that would take way too much time to grow and train and would probably step on them...for the both of them
i was thinking of a gallimimus / struthiomimus, as they'd easily be able to stomp them out, besides the ocasional utahraptor, which i will snipe with my riftle because #thisisamerica
Was baryonx actually found in Africa or was it just mistaken and it was suchomimus
suchomimus
It’s a plot by big paleo to draw attention away from large fragmentary ichthyosaurs they don’t want us to know about
are we the reason rats are becoming ambush predators
I have no idea what this is referring to but my gut is telling me yes
one of the best sentences to come out of this discord ever
y
thoughts?
That puppers needs to be on a diet
how accurate are these edmonto depictions? https://x.com/ElReptileano/status/1982878968094347599
Hard to say at this time as that paper just dropped and hasn’t had much chance to be talked about and critiqued in the scientific spaces
So it’s not bad but just ?? At the moment
Especially with the mummy being annectens and they put it on regalis
Can’t say yay or nay to it quite yet
It’s very clear that the annectens specimens lack a comb
https://www.tumblr.com/elementalspirits/797496192616529920?source=share how plausible is this?
It's thylacoleo! I had a LOT of thoughts reconstructing this thing, but the main ones were 1) I had no idea koalas were the closest relative and 2) I must be doing something wrong because very few reconstructions look like this.
Koala ears were just for fun.
-# #thylacoleo #sketch #art #paleoart #artists on tumblr
I mean
that tracks
what material do we have for thylacoleo?
What are the chances that Edmontosaurus' crest was actually misidentified desiccated skin that slid off the animals carcass?
Did one of the mummies preserve the top of the skull?
A few living relatives, koalas and wombats. Both herbivorous….
What’s this supposed to be?
Its a pretty cool Fossil
T. rex fighting something?
Its a tyrannosaur fossil that was found with a small Ceratopsian, it was found in like early 2010s I think, now its finally in a Museum
Both are extremely complete
Oh damn
Any scales impressions on either or nah?
I don't think I've every heard of something like that, but its not been studied in detail yet, since its not been long since it got to a museum.
The tyrannosaur has tarsal scutes at the very least
I have a question, are Sinraptor dongi and Hepigensis is the same species?
maybe hepi can very well be a full adult
Nope, Hepi even gets placed as a Yangchuanosaurus species sometimes
I think hepi might even end up as its own genus someday, but if its recovered next to dongi most of the time it'll probably stay as a different species of Sinraptor
I see, thank you for information
Guys how old was the 3.1 tonne Spinosaurus holotype?
17-19 years old roughly and closer to 4 tonnes
So it's an adolescent one? Or a sub adult maybe?
It depends on your definition of Sub adult, adult, etc. But it wasn't growing very fast iirc so it probably wasn't too far from being fully grown. So i'd call it a Young Adult
Hearing the Dueling Dinosaurs brought up
No, we don’t mention JFC here, only KFC
The first Russian documentary series about prehistoric animals!
https://youtu.be/gpkeAcMKNgk?si=sURvWG5T04dcMGOO
600 миллионов лет истории. Тысячи километров дорог и путешествие за следами исчезнувших времен. Туда, где окаменелые панцири морских чудовищ, хрупкие кости динозавров, красные скелеты зверо...
First Volgadraco bogolubovi in media and maybe first Pliosaurus rossicus in media
Oxalaia is 7 tons right?
more like 3-4 tons
the snout is 77% the linear dimensions of a Spinosaurus snout, which with isometric scaling, means it weighs 45% as much as Spino
did spinosaurus get downsized?
No
Wb length wise? nvm found ur comparison with it in
whats its weight
8.5t for its biggest
alright thank you
It never even got to 5 tons
Random right
the most recent mummy, the one with the supposed "sail" is what people are reffering to that preserves a comb but it actually doesnt
why?
Imagine they declare the triceratops specimen a different species and nano stays invalid
I mean, i could be wrong here, but couldn't it just have similar size variation as Spinosaurus?
Wouldn’t be surprised if the scimitar spino and oxalaia are all just species of spinosaurus.
Wouldn't happen, unfortunately. They tried this game before, it never works.
Scimitar Spino was mentioned as a species of spino yeah, though we'll have to see if it ends up like that or not
Yes, these are living animals but throwing out hypothetical weights because "Well, it could get larger so why not" doesn't help anyone
Stick to the specimens we have and ignore the specimens we don't have
I think this is a field that sorta of always worked with hypotheticals. And also, wouldn't that just apply to Spinosaurus too? If anything, large weight estimates are based on a partial maxilla and premaxilla. Yes, you can probably estimate the size of these with other Spinosaurus specimens, but that still would be something we technically have incomplete no?
But hey, i don't make the rules, so what do i know?
I don't understand your point here
There is one (1) Oxalaia specimen whereas there is a dozen Spinosaurus specimens, at least two of which reach the same size (~8t)
There's also that one huge Neutral spine Ibrahim showed off on Social media, probably another big spino specimen
Tbf we don't know how variable the spines are, where the spine would be placed in the sequence, or how the spines grow throughout ontogeny so it could just be a normal adult 🥀
I think it's a pretty bad take to talk about " What we don't have " in a field where that tends to be the standard for most of the time.
So when I say "what we don't have", I literally mean that
You're making up specimens that do not exist of Oxalaia to get an animal above 3-4 tons
Spinosaurus has concrete evidence it got bigger than the neotype-holotype
Oh no, sure thing
we don't have any proof of oxa being the same as spleen on raw variance and getting higher so why suggest it in the first place
outside of just normal animal variance
which goes for everything, where is my 200 pound musk ox next to a 1.3 ton one
So, if I asked: In appearance wise, do you think Oxalaia is like Spinosaurus?
Do you think it is or not?
Appearance wise Oxalaia is closer to charcoal than Spinosaurus
But do you think it would be?
So based on that it should look more like Egyptian Spinosaurus than Morocan Spinosaurus
So, like Spinosaurus aegyptiacus?
I mean, there was an attempt to make a different species name for the Moroccan one, I think? But, that one doesn't seem to be going anywhere...
So, you think it's like Spinosaurus aegyptiacus?
Until they find any major difference between Egyptian and Morocan spino(Which won't happen until we find another Egyptian Spino), they'll probably be considered the same thing. Oxa was also lumped into Spino for a similar reason iirc, though that probably will not be the case for long(or maybe it will cuz paper work takes time )
But do you think it is?
wdym?
Oxalaia is not Spinosaurus aegyptiacus but it probably looked very similar to Spinosaurs aegyptiacus
Spinosaurus brasilus
Good, we think in similar ways.
Most likely the sail and head crest would have a different shape... and that's about it
Maybe it'll end up closer to Cama
I hope not he looks stupid
damn, when did Camarilla get that material?
Like, a few months ago. They went back to the site where the original material was found and dug out more stuff
Truly the pinnacle of Paleontology gambling
Same thing happened with Giga recently, 30 years after the orginal find they went back and found some more material
Yeah, but we don't care about Giga. Now, fragmentary taxa number 220? That's true gambling
Cus it was never that big
The mummy with the sail had the top part of the head destroyed, the images going around is a reconstruction iirc
I was just about to send that lol
I really hope Annectens is combless tho, I like that Regalis has something for us to be like "Oh yeah that's my smol northern boi"
AMNH 5060 Has impressions on the back of the skull of scales
puts comb onto your E. annectens for no reason
That’s because it is the female morph
People are saying nanotyrannus is back. All crap, or nah?
Lets just wait and see
I remember when people came into paleo chat and their ragebait used to be believable
now its more sad and delusional than anything else
(not talking about the nano stuff above btw, just stuff ive noticed as of late)
but anyways those people will never recognize it even if people tell it to there face
but moving on
cant wait for new dino
like Athenar bermani
oh it's back alright https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBFGY2aE_Cw
At long last, the Dueling Dinosaurs are coming to an international scientific journal near you, and they promise to end the greatest debate in the history of paleontology.
well its not
no paper is published
so going around saying it is is wrong
and even then
that isnt the paper saying nano is real anyways
Oh wow that's a interesting lacrimal crest
??? obviously it's about nano wdym...
Oh boy, I can’t wait for the new info about protoceratops and velociraptor! 
There's multiple nano related papers, we don't know which one is being published
on nano
maybe
but its more than likely not gonna be the paper to say nano is valid
Probably will tbh.
This is a paper on a specimen that may or may not be identified as nanotyrannus, T. rex, or the funny outcome- something else
Aw shoot they did show Stygivenator
I mean it's quoted as being "decisive" and it seems to be a huge deal in general so idk
It certainly is a big deal, it’s just schrodingers paper at the moment /gen
Yeah, tbh, it's probably not going to be " Nanotyrannus " because the genus name was already used, but mostly just likely the concept of Nanotyrannus itself
yeah saying anything about it right now will just lead to confusion
best to wait for it to drop
No, let's make our bets and then loose a ton of money!
I’m fairly certain they can use that name but don’t quote me there
Regardless the funny outcome is that the specimen gives credence to compsognathids being baby tyrannosauroids in some cases
That would be so funny PLEASE
(This is me shitposting and not an actual thing about the fossil don’t sue me)
I don't see why the name itself couldn't be used??
afaik the holotype is suspected to be mature now
👨🏻⚖️ fork over the big ones
because it's associated with that guy... I forgot the name of the skull, you know the guy?
A guy with a skull… hmm
if it matches the nano holotype(Cleaveland skull), then it'll just be another specimen of that genus
Hope not, because then it would be funny
Imagine the chaos
It is also extremely difficult to yeet a name just because of a personal association. A. hitleri is still going strong so anything else doesn’t have much of a shot
There will be chaos, but in a different way
It needs to be a pretty long chaos
I mean regardless we have an influx of more evidence supporting the thing as being something else than Trex, any paper officially describing it as its own species is definitely needed but we still have a lot of knowledge to defend it
Stand ready for me arrival worm
Wondering if the table will really turn or nah with the dueling dinosaur specimen.
I mean it’s a nearly 100% complete specimen that’s in pretty ideal condition, so there is anything that allows it to defend its name then it’ll be pretty concrete
if the paper does bring back nano then it’s gonna be pretty decisive yeah, if not we kind of just stay where we are until the other nano associated specimens get looked at
would pachy/struthi be the main prey of nano?
Keep in mind pachy is like 500 kg and doesn't exactly have the best weapon for fending off larger predators. Even if the hypothetical nano is 1/10th rex's size it's still much bigger than pachy.
You're alive ?
Here n there
why would he be dead I saw him post like 3 days ago
I like turning up here when I'm bored.
Lol. Lmao
I think nano would've been struthi and pachys' main threat
tbf it's easy to forget that nanotyrannus is actually a really large animal because we only see it in the context of being a baby of the largest land carnivore of all time
i heard an alioramus might of been around the size of tarbosaurus? is that true at all
the current PoT adult alio size is apparently a juvie accurate alio size
What did I miss?
They're lying to you 💔
The Alioramus specimens were nearly full grown, they were just "juvenile" which is a term used for literally any animal that isn't an adult
Whar 💔 I haven't heard that either
Both of you are potentially wrong
Isn't the Alio Specimen like barely 4-9 years or smth lol
About the Alioramus specimens being nearly full grown or that juvenile doesn't mean anything that is younger than an adult?
Nearly fully grown
The smaller of the two (the 5m A. altai) was like 9 years old.
The altai specimen was around 9, which is nearly full grown
And your evidence is...?
That's like half typical tyrannosaur maturity.
Not suggesting that Alioramus actually got big but it's certainly not almost mature regardless of being paedomorphic or not. Qian is likely a good basis for mature alioramine anatomy and size.
hmm
Are you using the largest Tyrannosaurid's aging time in comparison for the smallest Tyrannosaurid we know of?
No? Other tyrannosaurids seemed to follow this. Tarbosaurus is the one exception I know of and that's only because we got really old individuals rather than them seemingly maturing slower, but I could be wrong.
Chat last time I checked, smaller animals grew faster
I don't think it took an Alioramus 20 years to reach sexual maturity
So there's no evidence of them being near adulthood besides "It doesn't feel right"?
This is also just not a rule. The 1 ton ceratosaurus took like 2 years to mature while the 20 kg guanlong takes like 5.
Google is telling me it was at the latter stages of it's growth and that's just leading me to Wikipedia
This is pretty much true in the history of animals.
well just seeing the first thing google pops up is not the best, you need an actual trusted website for that stuff
I'm literally reading Wiki and nowhere do I see the specimens are near adulthood
So at what growth stage was the Alioramus?
Juvenile 
Yeah this is what I was talking about with some consistency across tyrannosauridae. Albertosaurines are like half the size but still took about the same time to mature, even if growth rate isn't as drastic.
Why are we using growth charts for large apex predator tyrannosaurs in comparison for a small game hunting Tyrannosaur
If you look down, you'll see several other tyrannosaurs included
Speaks in absolutes but the second you find it contradicting your idea you say it's an exception for x reason.
Alioramines could have been doing something weird i guess but this is the closest we can compare currently
All of which are apex predators of their environments, Alioramus was not
"why are we using growth charts for the tyrannosaurs we have multiple specimens of instead of the tyrannosaurs known from 1 single specimen"
Histological analyses performed on the holotype of A. altai (IGM 100/1844) by Brusatte and colleagues in 2009 determined that this individual had an internal bone structure corresponding to a nine year-old and actively growing Tyrannosaurus.
Perhaps you should have read Wikipedia instead of Google AI Response?
what type of tyrannosaurid was nano? daspletosaurini? whatever the clade for alio is?
The 1 ton Ceratosaurus took around 2 years to mature.
The 20 kg guanlong took about 5 years to mature.
The 1 ton Majungasaurus took about 20 years to mature.
The 8-10 ton tyrannosaurus took about 20 years to mature.
Age is absolutely, totally, based on size with no exceptions.
When I clicked the little link thingy on the ai response it sent me to Wikipedia where I didn't find anything. Don't know why it would link me to Wikipedia
I literally took that excerpt from Wikipedia 💔
anyway i can't wait for the tyrannosaurus growth curve to get nuked soon
True
the google AI response is quite possibly the WORST thing to use since itll use ANY source of information from ANYWHERE without checking if its even right lol
it once told me stegosaurus is still alive and walking around....
(im not even joking its that bad)
Mood
I know dude, I'm saying I don't know why Google ai likes to link stuff that has nothing to do with what it's arguing
So were the Alioramus only half grown? Is there a good size estimate for an adult out there?
No and no
Closest you get is Qianzhousaurus but that's a sub-adult but tbh it's close enough
I can't wait for T. rex mesopredator niche suppression to die too
is this about dueling dinosaurs or is it getting nuked for a mysterious other reason
I did already say that Qian is probably good basis for what adult alioramines look like and are sized if we are to select an analogue.
Wasn't the original q about it being as large as tarbosaurus? Well it's not, it's a much less robust animal even at identical body lengths it would be smaller
Hyperendocrine Alioramus...?
all i know is i heard a full grown alioramus (idk if it was altai or remotus alio) could of almost been the size of tarbosaurus, which is why ive asked here if its true lol im guessing you also heard that somewhere too
It's not true as previously stated
oh mb i didnt see that part
I mean that sort of stuff was before we knew alioramines were weird. Without that knowledge it's kind of just assuming on the basic of them looking like and some what being lil baby men.
even if it is proven or not proven for them to of been like 4x larger than theyre currently said to be i hope alderon keeps them the same size for the alio TLC. i love running around as the skinny little guy
They made alioramus a speculative adult size and that aged quite well.
No, they used the unpublished/poorly photographed/reconstructed skull on display (now reclaimed and in a museum) then tried to scale it to a supposed "adult Alioramus" tooth if it's the same chart as the one I remember a few years ago
more than half the things in this game arent accurately sized anyway so it wouldnt matter if alderon keeps alio the current size they have it as
true or false
Yeah as others have mentioned Qianzhousaurus is our closest guess at what a close-to-adult sized alioramine would look like. I believe there is some private material that is larger but I don't know if it's been legitimately looked at by anyone or ever will
oh rip
Oh is that what that thing was
This is just not true. Almost every TLC has corrected size inaccuracies and now there's far more things accurately sized than not.
Very few things are exactly accurate sized, but most TLCs are within 10 - 20% size range, which is important to note difference depictions yield different sizes so its a range to be accurate anyways
It's more about scaling with each other than literal correct sizing. There's no point of reference ingame to compare that anyway.
Accurate sizing is pointless IMO
Just make it the size that works best for intended gameplay. I am strongly of the opinion that Achillo's upscale was necessary
the only 2 creatures with horrible sizes are campto and thal
I just did the numbers. Only 5 out of 36 are somewhat miscaled (Thal, Sarco, Achillo, Anodonto, and dein vs laten is weird).
(And Hatzeg)
Sarco got shrunk a bunch in the TLC too (and then it got shrunk IRL, AGAIN)
Camptosaurus is on the lower end but still reasonable in my opinion. It's bigger than it was originally. It absolutely does not deserve to still be a 1-slot though.
Hatzeg is about a 15m wingspan
Yeah that's fair. Sarco was downsized but is still too big, probably just for practicality reasons.
bars and eotrike are also very oversized i think? and rex a bit, titan, barely spino, uhhhh
i thought bars got fixed
rex and titan have always been fine, eotrike and bars were shrunk in their TLCs which personally surprised me, good on Alderon
I hope hatzeg keeps the big wings even after its tlc, I understand azdarchids had relatively stubby wings compared to their size but I think the giant wings are a good stylization choice
Sarco ingame Model is still 12m
It didn't change
titan is very oversized in this game
bars and eo would be like the size of a 4 slot if accurate. same with titan
Are you going off of exact numbers which don't actually matter in gameplay or how it is scaled with other playables. There is a difference.
how it is scaled with other playables
rex would dwarf titan
It does kinda do that tbf
Both irl are about 12 meters long I have no idea what you're on about.
If we wanna base Rex on some Fragmentary Speciemens
Rex is possibly the least Oversized Apex
Like this looks perfectly reasonable to me.
Sarco and Hatzeg are what I'd consider gameplay anomalies
At IRL size, their niches wouldn't work
8.5m Sarco grabbing an 8m Megalania?
Max Rex "dwarfs" Max Titan even when using Max Titan next to Sue
This goes into specifics that don't actually matter I'll be real.
Sue is pretty big and nothing about this is dwarfing maybe overweighting lol
Max Titan is 11.7m, Random's Sue is 12.4m (technically will be 12.7m
@bright veldt idk man, you say "both are about 12m"
When Titan doesn't touch 12m and Rex can almost touch 13m
No megalania is 8 meters long btw. 8.5 meter sarco also just isn't correct. The skeletal was updated and sarco is baasically the same size still (~9ish m).
Really they made it seem like it got much smaller ?
Ingame Titan is like 13m lol
Its Oversized a Decent bit, but thats fine otherwise is to small
You're dealing in decimals with giant animals dude, and might I remind you that most adult rexes aren't Sue or Scotty.
Megalania is about 8m in-game
8.5 - 9.5m has been pretty confident for a while, with Miguel's Terminonaris skeletal yielding 8.5m Sarco (potentially smaller)
It's also really fresh to use "Max tyrannotitan" when tyrannotitan is only known from 2 specimens lmao
I mean
The Paratype Titan is Bigger than the Holotype
Same can easisly be said for Titan and say "not all adult Titans are the Paratype"
Was upsized to 9.1m based on what Random's said about Miguel
.
Is not really Decimals
Even the Average Rex is larger than Titan Paratypes using AMNH 5027
Let alone the Holotype of Titan
Titan is quite Tall tho
Tbf the biggest thing for PoT is length, height, and outwards facing limbs
Its close enough. Titan is tall and long
You're trying to tell me a 12.0 m rex and a 12.5 m rex makes a world of difference in perspective during gameplay.
I mean
That Logic is used on Everything
Thats why Max Sucho is the Holotype despite Sucho not been more than a few specimens
Like I really don't care here. It's just making a criticism being made when it doesn't exist. God forbid a theropod is 0.5m bigger.
I mean
Its Taller, Wider and May actually look closer to a 5 slot than a 4 slot Visually
Also a 12.5m Rex would be funny
💀💀💀
My Guy
I am not the one claiming out "both are about 12m"
When one doesn't show evidence of been 12m
me when 11.7 rounds up to 12
Jesus you’re invested bud
A 0.3m difference matters in perspective during gameplay? No it does not. You're losing the plot.
I mean
Titan is oversized by about 1.3m
Which kinda shows how even 1m can matter alot lol
I'd say an error range of 7.5% is enough to say "about"
there was a plot?
When do we think we will get a paper for that new Giga materiel ?
Achillobator is as big as metri but a megatheropod being like 0.5m longer than it should be is the problem.
"Losing the plot"
The Plot that never existed:
Like I'm sorry it is just absurd to say this is an issue.
Never knew it was an issue tbh until I read paleo today.
I'll also say that megalania being 8 m is really pushing it. Megalania estimates these days don't really get bigger than 6.
I mean
Achillo is more than just .5m longer
Could had used any other Example but Achillo tbh
Also Ppl did Complain about Achillo's Size
Which in a Gameplay perspective is size is Fine
Same for Titan
I never said for Gameplay perspective its an issue
For its Gameplay and Purporse its size is fine
Doesn't doesn't mean is not oversized
Are you just getting annoyed for me pointing out the obvious or???
Damn, we talking about sizes again
(Again, referring to in-game Megalania)
Actually when did I say Titan been oversized is an issue
All I did was show how an Max Titan looks to the 2nd-3largest Rex and Next to the Largest Spino
Kinda to show why Titan needed an Upsize
Otherwise we have a basically Sucho sized mf
I mean fair but even for PoT that's a big jump.
IIRC in-game Megalania is around 8.5m or so? I remember it being bigger than Priono was prior to upscaling it
POT's Biggest Jump is Prob Bars
Irl Bars is basically 11m (10.93m) While Ingame Bars is still around 13-15m
Actually, Thala still exists
I think it's about 14 yea but I never checked specifics
Don’t expect anymore bar size changes I’d reckon
Barsboldia
Lizard Jumpscare
Is this based on Varanus salvadorii?
Honestly idk what Random based it off
Idk if he even remembers @stiff osprey do you remember what is your Meg based off?
Hatzeg is 15m ingame
I mean i say it because that's the closest relative by genetic evidence, i believe? ( i don't remember )
wingspan? TBH they really stretched its wings. If they were more like quetz´s it would be closer to the irl one
2 years to mature for ceratosaurus?? wtf??
well, 2 years is the minimum, it was likely closer to 6 years. which is still incredibly fast for a dinosaur let alone a predatory one
yeah still that's wild
why cant we do this too dinosaurs? https://x.com/Breaking911/status/1983526931652833316
do what? he was born like that
yeah, the feats here are mostly Komodo Dragon
would sarco realistically be able to grab a megalania?
the impatient sarcosuchus tries to grab a creature that doesn't exist yet
could a 8.5m animal really fully grab a 8m animal?
no because neither of those animals is that size
but a 9 meter croc can probably grab a 6 m lizard
oh sorry, i was using this as a refrence
perchance, i should've looked at what it was replying too first
Go to sleep
Maybe
How does Metri size in this game to it's size in real life
Is Metri oversized or undersized or perfect
Slightly oversized iirc
It is based on Sinraptor, because Metri does not exist
I think its size is fine except if he decides to make it a little bigger
morever allo is really oversized
Its probably fine, Big Allos were around
It’s smaller than the biggest allos we have. Pot allo is 11.4m the biggest we have is 11.8m
Its not as long nor tall as Irl Allo
But is prob proportionally bulky so makes up for it
Metri does exist
Just Fragmentary and is basically smaller sinraptor
Metri isn't that small either
What's the point of relying on fragments if you don't have the complete skeleton? pot should rebuild a Sinraptor
Metri looks like a sub-adult, it's a bit strange🤔
if it becomes fast, they will nerf its size surely especially the fragilis one
Metri is not a sub adult and wouldn't be a species of metricanthosaurus
i dunno why pot didnt just give us sinraptor but basically made a sinraptor then name it metri
they actually used the Dan 2019 sin pic to make the ingame metri instead of its own bone remains
that makes sense now.....
Metri tlc, just rename it sinraptor.
btw a metri reapprial paper is coming this year, on SVP next month more exactly, along with a "largest total group analysis of Allosauroidea to date"
and "C. iguidensis" is gotta move out, finally
