#paleontology
1 messages · Page 201 of 1
(impossible)
it’s not so much that, we have sauropods coexisting with ornithopods for a long time, more so that almost every other sauropod group just disappears from most of the world
I'm not saying they were directly driven extinct by competition with Ornithopods, it was more of a general observation
I wonder what caused the shift and decline of those groups tbh
Rise of ornithischians in North America and Asia made it harder for even titanosaurs to get their footing
The southern hemisphere was largely unaffected though, you got sauropods trying to cosplay as brachiosaurs and dicraeosaurs & carcha-like abelisaurs running around
anoxic event in the ocean, probably caused a cascade and big climate shift
come to think of it, we only really ever find abelisaurs and abundance of sauropods in the southern hemisphere, while the northern was mainly ornithischian and tyrannosaur….
Interesting
shant after being asked if its gonna let its local sauropod be bigger then it:
Didn’t it also squander out ichthyosaurs and Pliosaurs? Pretty notable extinction event
yeah it probably took them out in a more direct way, then terrestrial ecosystems started to feel it
tbh everything in Wangshi has ended up bigger than I thought so at this point I'm just half expecting a random 50+ t Zhuchengtitan upsize
Barsboldia and saurolophus tried this but the mystery Mongolian footprint showed them who’s the largest
good old fashioned cascade (we’re about to get real familiar with that)
how plesiosaurids felt when all their opps died just to see monitor lizards starting to take diving courses off of ebay:
(Oh boy!
)
whats bars/sauro's size compared to their local sauropods?
Pliosaurs and plesiosaurs tried something interesting
Mosasaurs did nothing except break their tail and evolve flippers and called it a day
that plot idea was always so stupid bro
dawg we still like elephants and zoos and big explosions
why would humanity magically get tired of dinosaurs
pug worthy dinosaurs sure seeing jw but dinosaurs still
wait...what evolved into itchyosaurs? we dont know what went into the water and became them??
Didn't Plesiosaurs specifically survive that event? I thought they made it to the end of the Cretaceous.
There's some basal itchyosaurs, actually
Interestingly, I heard the ancestor to all of them…came around the end of the Permian. I need to check again, but if this is true it means ichthyosaurs (or at least their ancestors) were one of the only things to come out of the Permian into the Triassic
what were the others? synapsids?
off topic but i forget your pfp is a fish sometimes and it just looks like a dude with a beard
also, how accurate is this apperance list
1 - itchyosaurs appeared first
2 - plesiosaurs appeared
3 - pliosaurs appeared shortly after
4 - moasaurids arrived very late to the party
I have been referred to Michael Jordan before.
His pfp looks like a Puerto Rican guy in some really awful low budget animated show I watched one time
and just like jordan i hope you're worth 4 billion dollars
yay ty
Theverycutefishy irl
Sorry I meant Phillipines I got my P countries mixed up
Cartorynchus is one adorable example of this
philidephlia is a state.....
that just gave me whiplash I forgot about that game
I have war flashbacks…the great divide…
anyways on a genuine note does anyone have some papers outside of wikipedias sourcing for 15-80k ya north and central america ecosystem wise
besides living stuff duh
the great divide was a pretty mid atla episode
No but I think I know a server where I can ask
do lemme know the results, just tryna think and better to have more source variance yknow
thank you regardless
Call of duty has been releasing poopy games for the last couple years and millions still buy it
what would happen to a hadrosaur that is being thrashed around by a tyrannosaur? Would it just die outright or would it take a bit longer
Heavily depends on what part of the body is being attacked
Deeeep.io mentioned ❤️🩹
If Philadelphia was a state I'd leave this country and never look back
I’m pretty sure it ain’t a state
forgot to specify the throat mb
Depends on the tyrannosaur too, if it was a large adult with bone crushing teeth it might be quite a quick bite to the head or spine. An adolescent or a smaller genus with more ziphodont dentition might go for more slashing bites to the throat which takes a bit longer but is still fast. It's also possible that the killing bite happens after the prey is disabled from attacks to the thigh or caudofemoralis
Any 2+ ton tyrannosaurid with their contemporary hadrosaurs
like lythro and brachy
Bista and para
Dasp and grypo
ect
like would it be
- grab neck
- thrash
- dead hadrosaur
or
- grab neck
- thrash to disable
- bite the head
My point is that outside of alioramin all tyrannosaurine teeth become more incrassate through ontogeny, suggesting a change in prey and/or prey acquisition strategy. Considering the majority of a given population would not be full sized adults I think it's worth mentioning. Like I said full sized adults with thickened teeth and robust skulls would probably disable the animal with a crippling bite to the locomotor system, or possibly the spine, then finish it off with a bite to the head or neck. Puncture-and-pull is probably our best model for big tyrannosaur feeding, wherein the thrashing is to actually remove large chunks of flesh from the prey animal rather than thrashing to snap the neck like a dog or something
So like immoblilse via bite to the leg or back then finish off with headshot for large adults like dasp and rex?
What about smaller ones like alioramins and young tyrannosaurines
https://youtube.com/shorts/eRou63Z2IQM?si=3x0nF6EcS6kvXP3W would this be an example of puncture pull feeding just replace the nigersaurus with a hadrosaur
Albertosaurus Hunts Nigersaurus!! in Jurassic World Evolution 2 #shorts
#jurassicworldevolution2
#dinosaurs
#jurassicworld
For very large prey I'd say that would be most likely yeah
Alr
what about like a juve rex hunting an ornithomimus or an alioramus hunting a gallimimus
Just grab the neck while chasing or do the same as with hadrosaurs
Puncture and pull is much more brutal than this. The bite occurs, the teeth go in, crush and grab flesh, then the head is whipped back with the chunk of flesh being severed in that motion causing massive wounds
https://youtube.com/shorts/wq8BgDkKD8A?si=ngJcVl_penGXaJ65 like this? Jwe animations scale with size iirc so its more brutal with the larger carnivores
Young tyrannosaurs or alioramins, stuff with more laterally compressed teeth, have weaker skulls but much faster bites. They would be more like a conventional theropod or komodo dragon with fast, slashing bites when taking on large prey. Smaller stuff could be snapped very quickly, like in a pursuit, then they'd probably go for the neck
Is it literally just
- Grab the thigh/base of the tail
- Pull back with so much force the leg is dislocated/the tail is severed
- Finish with bite to the head
Brutal, jeez
This implies it works exactly like that each and every time
Also I'm pretty sure "puncture-pull feeding" is only used during feeding, not hunting
I wouldn't be that specific honestly, there's a lot of room for variation
I'd say it's more like (in a very general sense)
- "grabbing bite"
- "crippling bite"
- "killing bite"
which may all be the same bite in some cases
The humble pitbull
I know it wouldn't be exactly like that every single time but that's the ideal way of doing it right?
the main difference being that pitbulls bite and hold, big tyrannosaurs would be using those serrations to cut flesh as they tear it away (hence puncture and pull)
I mean as I said, puncture and pull is a feeding method and not a hunting method
You don't need a quirky killing method when biting is gonna cause massive damage
It's a method of flesh dismemberment, which applies equally to living or dead flesh, that's what is causing the massive damage of the bites. Overall this is a pretty simple hunting method
How accurate is arks Quetzalcoatlus? Not much I'm guessing?
If it actually had that pose in game it would already be better than what it currently is
dinosaur full lips on both jaw and valid Nanotyrannus, which one is more pending or controversial in yall opinion?
(I'm asking this bcz i saw some people waiting for pnso to launch a full lipped trex. lol that isnt likely coming soon and they just dont know the attitude of pnso or the whole chinese paleo community on the lip thing)
Lipped dinosaurs isn't controversial in the slightest
dinosaur lips isn’t actually controversial to anyone who isn’t a kook or misinformed at this point
Aren’t archosaur lips already a widely accepted theory with proper reasoning backing it up over years now
do we
have a directly preserved lip or a print fossil on a dinosaur
Tbf we don’t necessarily need any sort of preservation to provide reasoning for why some sort of skin covering for the mouth to aid protection from outside elements and keep some sort of moisture would be a good idea
Sure crocs & gators don’t have any lips (or soft tissue on their skulls as a whole) but some species are capable of being inactive for months as they hide away in burrows outside of the water (most are within environments that are usually always water-filled anyways)
Makes me wonder what you think about nanotyrannus tbh, since it’s still in need of further research and more specimens need to be studied
Its unfortunate that all extanct archosaurs are the ones without lips, even though historically that was likely not the norm
majestic dinosaur/giant bird!
Everything nowadays is a bunch of freaks with toothless keratinized mouths or ultra shrinkwrapped skulls
ok but thats the problem, no direct fossil is found
I had to say the chinese paleo community didnt learned about the lip thing quite later than international community
yet, the whole community still remain a very cautious attitude on lips though years have passed by
(doesnt mean they hate lips, they just do not prefer a restoration with lip than a teeth exposed one so yall know the whole chinese market have no additional interest on lipped figures before a lip fossil is actually found)
as for PNSO, or Zhao Chuang himself as the artist, he simply hates lips
maybe yall guys know pnso once made a experimental trex head with full lip
they gave that up very soon after its shown publically since its just too ugly, "looks like a hippo"
i personally guess the problem wont be solved before a preserved lip or a print is actually found
Nanotyrannus exists in some sort of liminal space between validated and invalidated and its only by further examination can you say for certain which it is.
In other words, Schrödinger's Tyrannosaur
From my understanding, this just seems like a whole issue within a community revolves around model making & some guy’s personal bias because Chinese people didn’t like a fat faced Rex model that PNSO did
no
just lips thing
the whole community just doesnt like lips
the pnso tyrannosaurs actually have quite a good reputation except tarbo
also thats not just model making thing
once the whole community was laughing and criticizing a art of a full lipped trex on twitter for several days
wait a minute I had to found the art on X
maybe yall guys have seen that piece of art
the sneezing trex
Why are they like this?
simply bcz no lip skin fossil or print is actually found so the whole community decided to be very cautious on this thing
the community is quite conservative, they dont like something with no directly fossil evidence sppported but only theory
and I reckon they will likely continue to behave in this style of cautious and conservative in the foreseeable future
if u are asking about pnso then its just the main artist and the boss zhao chuang hates full lip on both jaw like quite a bloody lot members in this community
(check pnso arts they posted on ins and yall can directly see that)
how did the art look like?
a sneezing trex with full lip
im still trynna finding it
being conservative with lips is such a bizarre take, restoring a terrestrial animal without them is so much more of a leap
damn... Just that made them all laugh??? Weird sense of humor, if you ask me
and a bulldog rex one iirc
bcz the community just classifies all rex restoration with thick full lip on both jaw as "hippo rex"
another example is the eofauna 2024 rex model
that I can get behind lmao
I’ve seen that model, I can understand why people wouldn’t like it but everyone immediately hating on the idea of it being lipped is kinda funny
only the ones with very thick lips would got strongly opposed tbh
some normal lipped ones like the newest yang or anax still sold very well
but the eofauna one was too impactive for them
they are not against lip itself
they just don't care it
like they dont consider a full lipped one as more realistic
then the community is wrong - or at least, heavily biased. Calling fully lipped tyrannosaurus ‘hippo rex’ shows a very clear bias towards toothy dinosaurs. Wear patterns on teeth are a big factor here since they would be exposed to the elements, but we don’t really see that in the fossils. It’s not a lack of evidence for lips, it’s a lack of evidence for exposed teeth
what if it was more lizard-based? Like, the thick lips, would they still laugh at it?
like this:
well they once had a argue on twitter for that iirc
Probably not as thick tbh, archosaurs were pretty conservative with soft tissue from what we know & unlike monitor lizards have pretty large teeth that likely grew and were replaced fast
would marine reptiles have blubber ( or i guess the reptile equivelant? )
I think Michael Deak ( I think it's his name? ) had showcased a comparison between Ceratosaurus nasicornis and Varanus salvadorii ( Crocodile Monitor ), and he didn't found Theropod teeth to be too large. And more so, in-line with the proportions seem in Monitor Lizards
can we send twitter link in this channel
i want to share a link of one of their paleo argument so yall can better understand what they are thinking about lip
You should be able to
@arvalis T-rex is different from lizards. The lower jaw teeth of T-rex can be completely nested into the upper jaw (the fossilized upper jaw has grooves for lower jaw teeth), in which case the excessively long upper jaw teeth may pierce the lips of the lower jaw
I'll also take the opportunity to show the tweet in question...
I agree, they have a good point
It is remarkably stupid
a trilobite sacrificed itself to be someones paint
yeah, it's idiotic
you could use any other rock for this, using a fossil doesn't make you quirky
foolish to assume they think they look quirky
imagine dying, fossilizing, becoming part of the earth itself and the history of our planet, be unearthed and becoming fricking paint for some john doe
I think that’s less saying that the tooth size is that different from monitors and instead that Cerato isn’t that unusual compared to other theropods
fair
Worth noting thick lips varanids have won't allow dinosaurs to shed teeth as fast as they actually shed, something more basal like tuatara and iguanian like is way better
Not sure. I've heard different arguments surrounding the matter...
If I'm not incorrect I believe a close friend has shared a blogpost from Theropoda, where it discusses the potential evidence of more extensive tissues surrounding the teeth of Theropods
Would you mind if I try to find that real quick?
whats general consesus on mosasaurids and venom?
You are free to
But considering thick lips is a very very very derivative trait in lepidosaur family, so extrapolating it to whole archosaur family is from the beginning an incorrect take, you'd need to go the closest relative with or if not most basal ones from the other relatives, which in this case would be tuatara, then followed by iguanians
Here. It is this one. Good Sir/Ma'am/Gentleperson
https://theropoda.blogspot.com/2025/10/il-piu-giovane-allosaurus-porta-nuove.html?m=1
This one talks about gums mainly, and worth noting this correlates with crocodile relatives (reminder the "gnarly" look is basically their gums transformed)
Not lips per se
I think it’s worth noting when Feilong says “thick lips”, he means where the gums encase the teeth
When anyone else says “thick lips”, I have no clue what they mean but I assume not that considering the associated image does not picture that
I love my Big Gorgo
Looks good
Might as well be called
Tyrannosaur Formation
Why do we keep talking about thick lips and people actually refers thick gums (the teeth coverer) ☠️
Is way too confusing
If the later, yes, is doable cause crocodiles, their closest relatives do
But worth noting crocodile and monitor one is pretty different, since monitor one makes shedding harder
Monitor covers almost the whole teeth, while crocodiles the base and then some
I haven't had enough sleep yet, but in case it was a misunderstanding, we were talking about big drooly lips (lips, not gums)
You can have crocodile like gums and then normal tuatara like lips, which is basically the proper depiction until a mommified mouth is found
How he so big
protobrachy has some long legs
Who?
Alot of guys there are Big
Gorgo
Most likely a Femur based Guy
That's normal, Albertosaurines are just built like that
its always them
Yeah they tall
Alberto is very tall despite been only like
7.8m lol
Yeah, Its almost the same height, while being a good bit shorter in body length
Alberto the Freak
thoughts on this transition species between ceratosauria and abelisaurids? https://x.com/heitoresco/status/1980308992162517486
Pretty cool
welcome back, eoabelisaurus
indominus canonically has the dna of like 5 different abelisaurs so it really should look like that
It has so much different DNA...
Genetic modification isn't usually an even blend of traits anyways
More of choosing how traits would be expressed as well, just because for example, it has many abelisaurs in its genome, that doesn't mean abelisaur is the base or most prominent in it's body plan.
Hybridization (in terms of possessing a lot of genetic science and innovations like the Jurassic franchise) is often viewed as throwing animals into a blender and seeing what comes out, but realistically it'd be a lot more intricate and purposeful in design. The indom is actually a good example of that surprisingly.
To be entirely fair, that's already how people use genetic modification, but it's predominantly for developing food.
But that's an entirely different topic.
How in tarnation does China have so many feathered fossils
Like fr half feather-having fossils in the world came from there?? Where the conditions on that place this good???
Or it was just bc of the sheer amount of fauna with this characteristics that dominated the region
Halp me
Also, they never even ONCE utilized megaraptorian dna. If they did, Indom solos the mosa no diff
What a waste
Someone give me a dinosaur skeletal to draw , I will use no reference of reconstruction
They're practically all from one place, Liaoning, with exceptional preservation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jehol_Biota
"The Yixian and Jiufotang Formations are considered Lagerstätte, meaning that they have exceptionally good conditions for fossil preservation. The fossils are numerous, but also very well preserved – often including articulated skeletons, soft tissues, colour patterns, stomach contents, and twigs with leaves and flowers still attached. Zhonghe Zhou et al.. (2003) deduced two things from this. The first is that the land animals and plants were washed into the lakes very gently, or were already in the lakes when they died. They do not show the damage seen in fossils formed by large floods. Secondly, volcanic ash is commonly inter-bedded with lake sediments, and ashfalls seem to have quickly buried the fossilized organisms, creating anoxic conditions around them and preventing scavenging."
The Jehol Biota includes all the living organisms – the ecosystem – of northeastern China between 133 and 120 million years ago. This is the Lower Cretaceous ecosystem which left fossils in the Yixian Formation and Jiufotang Formation. These deposits are composed of layers of tephra and sediment. It is also believed to have left fossils in t...
not a dino, but it's the only image I have downloaded in my phone @fluid inlet
Just pretend there's no flesh lol
Ya this too easy because I already seen the body scales and everything lol
ik you can ride ostriches but that harms the animal, if you road a gallimimus would that harm the animal?
Depends how big it is and how much you weigh, if you are a child, it won’t hurt nearly as much as a full grown adult
WOOOHOOOO I love when irreplaceable pieces of science and history are written off as useless!!!
As a paleontologist once said
Still very unnecessary though ofc.```
what would've been the longest sauropods tail? like, i guess body to tail raito?
im gonna assume its either a diplodocid, dicreosaurus or rebbiachasaurus
I guess that is fair but, it's not like any more are just spawning in. Being reduced to paint just feels wrong but idk
I mean they're not literally "spawning in," but the number of fossils that we have access to naturally increases over time as land erodes and any fossils that aren't collected fairly quickly after exposure will be destroyed by natural processes anyway. I'd prefer they not be used for paint but it's not the most egregious thing of all time.
Big paleo is making Copium Rex and Bruhathkayosaurus into paint to hide them from the public
it also has t.rex (literally the base genome), deinosuchus, cuttlefish and pit viper DNA
10 of the animals used for it have small or no arms but only 3 animals (theri, velociraptor, tree frog) have large arms
technically, which would've taken priority?
yeah the base genome should take priority, and then the 6 abelisaurs, 1 stem crocodilian, 1 snake and 1 fish should be more than enough to give it tiny arms
I was going to try and see what kinda of argument could've been made, but I guess, the only thing you could say it's that technically all of them would share something in common to Neotheropods? And then, Indominus has Neotheropoda arms instead of any of the derived arms. Since, none of them would've taken priority over the other, or wouldn't really be possible to combine.
I'm just guessing, just to clarify...
I think the only real explanation is: It's a fictional animal that isn't supposed to be realistic and thats ok because its awesome
that too... But it's also fun to speculate, no?
is Cardiodon valid?
For people interested into how do genes establish body plans, here is a cool video about it : https://youtu.be/5GghnmAGNZU?si=P9ABwzZSzWMLECOw
Why do humans, flies, and even jellyfish share the same genes—but look completely different?
In this episode, we’ll explore how evolution uses the same genetic toolkit to create endless forms most beautiful. Learn how Hox genes and developmental biology shaped every animal body plan—from sponges and jellyfish to mammals and us.
Discover ...
Saw this nonsense on Facebook. Now I'll never get the idea out of my head.
This has to be the most normal Hodari spec Evo idea
Thats the dumbest thing I seen what's even the point just use healthy bone at that point
@river plinth
Nah ( ||It's not Hypnovenator|| )
What a distinguished gentleman, he even lifts his tail to sit
I actually quite like that idea, nature has done this quite a bit and even if its nonsense its still pretty cool
How come everyone assumes Therizinosaurus couldn't use it's claws for digging, foraging, and self defense just because they were brittle? For comparison Smilodon is known for its notoriously brittle sabre teeth yet it still found way to use them to take down large prey.
Didn't Smilodon's teeth work well in every way except side-to-side movement which makes sense considering pulling a blade side-to-side after stabbing something isn't how it's supposed to work
yeah, they are only brittle if pulled sideways
In vertical motions they are strong enough to pierce the skulls of other smilodon
Which is contrary to the Therizinus which just exploded when doing anything
That's why the specimen we found has intact claws, it lived its entire life in a sealed vaccuum chamber
Innovation saved the species...
Theri was a Pacifist? It used Dialogue and Negotiation to Survive...
tbh, I think this is sorta of underestimating how soft tissues can contribute to absorb certain stresses. Majority of these studies are more so analyzing the specific structures/organs just by what we have preserved... Which is not a lot, because it's just bone.
hmm
does anyone have a good alligator side view for a chart i cant find one for the life of me
Because some people take stuff at face value and assume because a paper said theri’s claws weren’t made of solid steel they shattered on impact to a butterfly
Or these were the parameters tested in the paper...how curious
Obviously the giant animal with giant claws would be able to stab things (and likely still be able to even if the claws break because a broken sword can still be dangerous if the breakage isn’t blunt)
Were it's claws conical in shape or blade-like
And they're telling us that shi ain't useful as weapons??
Paleontologists need to touch more grass and less rocks
Theri’s claws really were useful, sure they exploded upon impact but explosions still hurt and would still be effective to a degree
This is why they used computer-generated models and not vibes-based reasoning
Unguals are scaled to the same surface area and illustrated in lateral view. This phylogeny is based on studies by Qin et al.7 and Zanno et al.
Nerrrrrrrrrd
it's a jk don't smite me pls
LMFAO
Maybe even going to a farm to see a geese in person, not in manuscripts and tablets
tbh, we should search for a different methodology and make our own paper on the usage of Therizinosaurus' claw in-life?
It was just a 50 meter megaraptorian fr, they are dragons
tbh tho, it's kinda of a bit stupid, when... I'm gonna bet alright? Literally " Let's go gambling " meme here... But if they used the same methods as that paper on... Ground Sloth claws they would also conclude something stupid like " Ground Sloths can't use their claws, because they are brittle ,you see ? ", and then somehow we would've to pretend that these giant herbivores who took idk how many years to develop their claws at that point, just evolved that for... No use.
"But dragons don't exist, silly" not anymore, little Timmy. Don't forget to thank it later at bedtime
Actually the same paper did test ground sloths 😭
As previously hypothesised from functional simulation and track evidence12,44, the early-branching therizinosaurians with non-specialised unguals could be analogues of the giant ground sloths such as Megatherium. Our analyses support this hypothesis and further reveal a highly analogical function to unguals of the giant ground sloth Eremotherium. Also, like giant ground sloths, therizinosaurians were most likely herbivores, as their body forms do not support carnivorous ecology10, and their body size is far beyond the limits of insectivorous ecology13.
tbf i think its a pretty reasonable assumption therizinosaurus was doing something relatively different to other theropods with its hands given the much worse ungual performance compared to like every other theropod
whether thats cause of some allometric thing that would've been negated with also overgrown keratin (which doesn't seem necessary for any taxon with smaller not super thin unguals) or they just generally did in fact have poor mechanical use idk
On a more serious tone, they even have those little valleys that swords generally have to weight less while maintaining structural integrity
I mean so does every other animal
but like i think the fact ground sloths exist (with pretty distinct ungual morphology from therizinosaurus) is kinda missing the point
New word of power learned: Ungual
Like idk, sometimes... You don't really need tests
Like, I was trying to search for this conversation, but I can't find the clip. But does anyone remember like... In " *The Truth about Killer Dinosaurs *", this one scene where they test if a Triceratops could charge, right? And they basically put a replica of a skull, and throw it against a Metal Wall, and when the skull obviously break they go " WOW! Triceratops couldn't charge! "
Like, it's the stupid thing similar to like... If you threw a Human Skeleton against a Car going 50 km/h and then when it blows into smitherings, you go " WOW! a Human can't survive from the impact of a Car! "
is that really that similar to FEA though
not really. It's a different method afterall, but it's kinda like... Similar levels of sillyness?
Would a "crazy-proof" hospice room be effectively Trike-proof as well?
Probably, who knows at this point?
like the therizinosaurus thing was comparing relative mechanical performance relative to a bunch of other therizinosaurs/theropods thats not really the same was applying a set force/pressure like being chucked into a wall
I bet it would love it. I mean, a bouncy floor? Zoomies inbound
Bro is modifying their house to be Triceratops-friendly
with the main point being that therizinosaurus unguals performed much worse relatively
I need a industrial complex asap
not to say FEA isn't without flaws but that's kinda unrelated to failing a single mechanical test with no point of comparison
wait were the claws scaled to the same surface area for the test or just for the figures
Gotta baby-proof their horns tho, it's a hazard by and for itself
the tests were all to the same surface area
oh then you could probably mitigate some of the weakness of theri's claws by the fact that they are larger in absolute terms
and also relative to the rest of the arm
granted there'd presumably also be more force applied to the claws for the same reason
but from what very little I know about FEA i think models being scaled to the same surface area is whats supposed to be done for general comparison
evidence that the therizinosaur moved in slow motion?
I mean, I don't entirely disagree, but at the same time, it's kinda of those things that I feel it's only so experimenting that in theory. Not to say in practice takes priority, more so that... Sometimes, these are not considering additionals details or things that could've made the results particularly different... Not that it's bad, because that's the purpose of some of these tests. They are experimenting with whatever particular standards those respective authors have settled.
isnt the triceratops thrown into the wall like the exact opposite in that case
one of the main issues with FEA is you can't perfectly model the bone density and strength in different sections of the fossil as it would have been in life which understandably affects stress tests
but a physical model made of like plastic or steel or cow bones wouldn't be accurate either so in practice you just have the same problem
this is why they should've used an actual triceratops fossil to smash into the wall
NO-
more so to say, both don't take priority over each other. Their results tell a partial truth, but it's also a matter of " What results would've been acquired if the conditions have been different? "
If per say, the Triceratops skull thrown in the wall, wasn't just a skull, but a Skull replica attached to the entire vertebrae of Triceratops, alongside reconstruction of the face and postcrania... Would've the results been different?
I'm just offering a hypothetical here because... Well, that's the only thing I can offer... Sorry.
sure but for the sake of the therizinosaurus study it'd be like if every ceratopsid skull didnt explode on contact with the wall but the triceratops and then discussing why only triceratops exploded
like yeah sure maybe if they were actual fossils or had keratin it might not have exploded but i think there's still meaningful discussion to be had on the relative performance there
I agree. Any discussion is useful.
Don't forget soft tissues as well, bisons and rams make precious use of the muscles, cartilage, joints and fat to absorb the impact on their heads and spine
It's what I meant with " Reconstruction of the face and postcrania... " I should've specified it more, so that's my bad! Sorry!
Also, fossilized bones have VERY different density and tension from when it was live, actual bone
Omfg that discussion again
The world is a Flat Therizinosaurus
Don't be, just trying to add smt to the discussion 
Heres a list of different animals from the Kayenta formation I’m drawing for a project!
Please correct any mistakes I may have so I can draw everything accurately! And please give me any animals I may have missed, (excluding crustaceans, shells, and fauna!)
- Dilophosaurus Wetherilli
- Coelophysis kayentakatoe
- Eopneumatosuchus colberti
- Kayentavenator elyside
- Calsoyasuchus valliceps
- Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis
- Kayentasuchus Walkeri
- Scelidosaurus harrisonii
- Kayentachelys aprix
- Ceratodus stewarti
- Scutellosaurus lawleri
- Lophionotus kanabensis
- Potamoceratodus guentheri
- Prosalirus bitis
- Eocaecilia micropodia
- Rhamphinion jenkinsi
- Morganucodon oehleri
- Navajosphenodon
- Dinnebitodon amarali
- Dinnetherium nezorum
- Kayentatherium wellesi
- Oligokyphus triserialis
- Eopneumatosuchus colberti
Dinosaurs:
- Dilophosaurus
- Coelophysis
- Kayentavenator
- Scutellosaurus
- Sarahsaurus
- Scelidosaurus
Crocodiles:
- Kayentasuchus
- Eopneumatosuchus
- Calsoyasuchus
Pterosaurs:
- Rhamphinion
Turtles:
- Kayentachelys
Amphibians:
1: Prosalirus (Frog)
2. Eocaecilia (Gymnophionan)
** Sphenodontid:**
- Navajosphenodon
Fish:
- Potamoceratodus
- Lophionotus
- Ceratodus
Mammals:
- Morganucodon
- Dinnetherium
- Dinnebitodon
- Kayentatherium
- Oligokyphus
is this true?
tmk yes
yah, pretty much traces over photos and renders of other people's works
That’s unfortunate :/
Not really, 1 less AI Artist the community doesn't have to keep around
That’s true! Fortunate we found out so we no longer have to support him, but unfortunate we lost someone who we thought had some real talent
Thoughts
Thinking
Here are my thoughts of the environment in the Kayenta formation back in the Jurassic. Please share any thoughts.
I pretty much thought out the Kayenta to be dry for quite a bit, with hoodoos and rocky terrain, and throughout the year get gradually wetter and wetter into a sort of ..rocky wetland?
The soil gets less dense and accepts the water so little bits of greenery grow and the plants all come back, which is when all the amphibians, turtles and non 100% terrestrial crocs would come back into their heyday
I feel like there’d be a migration part of it for the larger herbivores. I also am curious to know what the largest herbivore in the area is (Sarahsaurus definitely wasn’t it) because the ecosystem 100% wouldn’t be functional if Dilophosaurus was the largest animal there
Usually an ecosystem does better if there’s larger herbivores, but Sarahsaurus definitely isn’t that. Some estimates bring it close to Dilophosaurus height while others keep it tiny tiny
So, I was going to say there were footprints of potential large Prosauropods... But, I was confusing Kayenta with Elliot Formation
It would be pretty cool to find something a little larger. I know it’s out there but they haven’t found it yet
I know there are more track marks found of more prosauropods & theropods but they’re believed to also just be Dilophosaurus & sarahsaurus (which I’m speculative of, of course)
Kayenta's dynamic is pretty much kinda like... I don't know any specific example i could cite here... But you know? Those ecosystems mainly composed of small animals and then there's like Birds of prey larger than them.
Yeah, I understand what you mean, it’s just so hard to believe that Dilophosaurus is really the dominant animal of the area. I just feel like it wouldn’t work given how large it is compared to literally everything!
It’s like taking the hippo away from the lion, nothing to keep it in line.
I legit read that as the Kanye formation
lol
Well, the size it's kinda debatable. Not so, the veracity of *Dilophosaurus' * size, but more so " Why did Dilophosaurus get big? ", because for example in the perspective of a carnivore, where you have a lot of small prey items, that mean you would had to deal with the struggle of sustaining yourself by likely acquiring more prey than necessary... But maybe you could make the argument that Kayenta had such a large population of animals available to Dilophosaurus, things like: They are able to produce large number of individuals, have a shorter time requirement to grow, etc. Where Dilophosaurus having a higher demand to sustain itself wouldn't affect the population of those respective animals
The other alternative would be that " Dilophosaurus got big because of something else ", and while it may sound likely... The issue is: What would it be? Technically, this alternative is a lot more speculative than the first one, because even speculating the identity of a potential larger carnivore requires one to make a lot of shortcuts to even manage explaining it's potential ( and potential only! ) existence, and even then the trend of Carnivores pressured by larger carnivores ( or other carnivores in general ), it's usually getting smaller because it means they don't have to waste so much energy and have a smaller demand to sustain themselves. To include it, there's also the potential of a large herbivore but I think that also has similar issues, since you would've to imagine how such animal would interact with that particular environment...
Dilophosaurus could... Be a generalist carnivore, it's not highly-specialized on any specific prey items and probably just got big... Because it could.
Most Kayenta beds were deposited by ephemeral lakes and rivers that would dry up periodically, it was the edge of a massive desert. So not enough persistent vegetation for large herbivores, however these lakes and rivers supported a relative abundance of fish- a likely food source for theropods
I believe you’re likely right in both aspects here. It’s just such an odd concept for me to wrap my head around that it was just the biggest — it could very well be a coincidence we haven’t found any herbivore bigger, or very well there was nothing bigger. I do like the “it got bigger because it could” point you made, which in all honesty does sound plausible given the prey items. And I do definitely believe it was a generalist and not highly specialized, given its skull notch/rosette, and its powerful legs. I can see it both fishing, eating turtles, and chasing after fast prey, while occasionally hunting sarahsaurus (which there is fossil evidence of, I believe.)
I also like the idea you stated that there was just such a high population of smaller animals that it got bigger off of sustainability! I was thinking of an herbivore larger than it simply because of my personal migration theory (I want to preface I know nothing about geological realism other than the few basics I have read up on. Little to no specialty on this topic and I only have amateur hypothesis on this, of course. I am but a humble paleoarist). I believe it could have been possible that if there were a larger herbivore, it would’ve had to migrate when the rivers dried up and plants in the area were no longer sustainable. I’m not sure where, of if that could’ve been plausible, but it would be interesting to hear more if it had been. Of course when thinking of this I’m thinking of birds, and savanna wildlife.
@little mauve thank you for this! I didn’t know that! What a great picture to imagine. Do you think hoodoos would be plausible?
As I said in my paragraph above, I do believe it could’ve been a super small possibility that if there were (while unlikely, I suppose) a larger herbivore, they could’ve migrated out of the area. As I said before, then again, I’m not sure what greener climates were around close enough for them to do that if they could do that. Thank you for informing me about the lakes — it’ll definitely be something I can draw up at a later date. I had been confused of dilophosaurus’s notch/rosette until now. (I was aware there was abundant water in kayenta, just want 100% in what pattern until now).
If there was a possibility of a larger herbivore, what would either of you think it could be realistically?
Personally, because mostly due to " Visual Performance points", I think a Thyreophoran, " Why ? ", because I think the image of a Dilophosaurus hunting a prototype of Stegosaur and Ankylosaur sounds fire as hell!
But being realistic, the only reasoning I could do is that, based on the kind of herbivores you see in Kayenta, you see more Thyreophorans ( or Ornithischians, if you want to see it that way ) than Prosauropods, which is implying that whatever vegetation or niches available, Thyreophorans were doing it better than Sarahsaurus, or at least, there was more niches available for animals like Scelidosaurus & Scutellosaurus, but animals like Sarahsaurus don't tend to really fit on those niches, and so they stay in a very special corner of their own. But being real? I think that itself is maybe a little too speculative? There wouldn't be any ways to narrow the potential appearance of the animal, and even then it's kinda like... Maybe a bit too fantastical?
So, it probably would've another Prosauropod... Maybe call it Prosauropod number 56
I think what you said is true
Wait did yiu say... fantastic?
This all sounds viable to me! And a larger Thyreophoran would be so cool to imagine. I could see it working out… but as you and gbones stated, the lack of constant vegetation might just be an issue if migration wasn’t plausible. Another prosauropod sounds about right too.
When I say big desert I mean a reeaally big desert, migration likely wasn't an option. The distances are too vast. Hoodoos are reasonable imo
Thank you! That rules out a lot of my potential theories then
I'm sure they were atleast a bit stronger than given credit for tbh, especially as we have been way off about similar things before.
Now the Eubrontes trackmaker in Connecticut, if it is indeed a species of Dilophosaurus or a close relative, did overlap with some big prosauropods. Probably a much more lush environment with consistent relatively tall vegetation suitable for a browser
Oh wow, a genuine discussion in this channel. Incredible.
This is also something to think about. I hope in the future it’s determined what species it may be (?) and for now I may infer it to be Dilophosaurus for paleoart reasons, until it is 100% ruled out, or not, — speculation could be had!
hasn’t paleorex been using ai for a while now or is this something new?
they’ve been making the moving edits for a while but made a post saying it isn’t ai iirc (I could be wrong and they said their regular art isn’t ai)
Body fossils are incredibly rare in the Connecticut Valley but it's still possible we'll get a better ID someday. Dilophosaur grade neotheropods were basically doing their thing throughout Pangea at the time
That’s such a beautiful thing to know. Thank you
No head feathers terror bird > head feathered terror bird
From what I understand its a river oasis in a desert basically, but I haven't looked into it in a while
Does he not photoshop(?) the images then use his own ai he built to make them move?
If what the image says is true that would really suck cuz I loved his stuff : (
Is there any basis on why Concavenator is a semi-aquatic in the game ? I thought I heard something about that somewhere
Shark fin = aquatic + needs unique kit
Ok but vultures
How many times does the concavenator question get asked per month do you think?
No real basis
There are no evidences for such lifestyle
Just a regular land theropod
I see, thanks for the answer !
so why do we have that??
erm, path of titans, its seems you're not following the concept that concavenator is a terrestrial animal 🤓
^
imagine phorusrhacids with bald heads as an adaptation for plunging into corpses like vultures
That would be cool
Hey paleonerds what are the most reliable differences between troodontids and dromeosaurids?
Troodontids seem to be generally slimmer with larger eyes and smaller sickle claws but there's also dromeosaurids like buitreraptor that I'd assume were troodontids.
what makes him dromaeosauridae??
Isn’t buitreraptor unenlagiine
Troodontids have quite unique teeth with large denticles. Pretty reliable way to distinguish them
which is part of dromaeosauridae is it not?
Troodontids also have proportionally longer metatarsals and the metatarsals have a shape known as the "arctometatarsus" which I think dromaeosaurids lack. Troodontids have larger more forward facing eyes and some have asymmetrical ears like owls.
Recently they were placed as their own family within Avialae, so a bit closer to birds than to Dromaeosaurids or Troodontids
ohhh okay ty
Oh nvm it's outside of Avialae but a few steps closer to Avialae than the other guys
Wait, did I miss something on Troodontids?
The dodo’s return from extinction just got a lot closer. We have gene-edited birds!
In this mind-blowing update, we unpack the science shaking up the world of genetics. Colossal’s team shares the latest breakthroughs pushing dodo de-extinction from theory to reality, revealing how new discoveries continue to rewrite the story of extinction....
Really cool that they can make a chicken give birth to a pigeon
Nope, unenlagiids
I find all these bringing back extinct species or whatever things sorta weird, especially the 'dire wolf' one cuz like..that's not really bringing back the dire wolf is it?😭 You're just modifying the genes or whatever of a normal wolf right??
Anyways that video looks super cool
Yea it’s just basically a tinkered with modern day animal that now looks different
( also doesn't look much like direwolves beyond maybe 1 pop but thats a whole ordeal)
Still waiting patiently for my Ubiraja and Anurognathus tho

The humble pug-ified pootoo
They are know as Urutau in my region
Bro holding em like a mic
Dodomimus
Anurognathus found on camera>
Awh : ( his stuff was really cool this is upsetting to find out
That explains why they sometimes look weirder than even more speculative modern paleoart
Though this isn't art
So, beyond the detail some have already added like: The Teeth. Troodontids haven't been found in South America, at least... For now ( Maybe at some point in the future... )
But another difference is that we have a little idea of Buitreraptor's skull shape, so usually Dromaeosaurs have wide craniums and then the proportions transitions into a more thinner width onto the snout. Which seems to happen with Buitreraptor, since we have remains of the frontal and nasal bones to reconstruct that. Troodontids are similar, but not really, a similar transition of width occurs, but it's not that noticeable, if anything... They have broader snouts than Dromaeosaurs
Maybe something to do with the fact they can swallow prey items whole? Maybe a more generalist diet in general? I'm not that good with them... But, usually this difference means Troodontids tend to usually have shorter snouts than Dromaeosaurs... For most times.
I guess, if you want some examples?
I believe Buitreraptor had a slim shaped skull, allowing it to prey on quick game, like fish and small mammals/lizards
yeah, seems about right
There's a whole paper on unenlagiine ecology due to foot and skull build
Someone else find it cause I'm a teensy bit busy but it's not hard to find
Austroraptor is a very close relative of it, and I recall they had those same characteristics
Hmm, listen to an idea...
Coastal Unenlagiine
Seems good to me
We must draw it like a Penguin
I'll do it once I'm back home, trust
Not if I do it first
I'll do it better
Bet
Nah, I'm moneyless
LMFAO
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7163733/ I believe this is what you're referring to
From the intro:
"The first analysis drew the unenlagiines close to taxa with long tibiae, as well as long and slender metatarsi. Instead, eudromaeosaurs are closer to taxa with shorter tibiae, and shorter and wider metatarsi. The second analysis showed that eudromaeosaurs and unenlagiines have similar phalangeal proportions, including the elongation of distal phalanges. However, the shorter second phalanx of the pedal digit II of eudromaeosaurs could have increased the force generated by this digit, which was the main predatory tool of the autopodium. This, together with a shorter and wider metatarsus, and a marked hinge‐like morphology of the articular surfaces of metatarsals and phalanges, possibly allowed eudromaeosaurs to exert a great gripping strength and hunt large prey. Conversely, the longer and slender subarctometatarsus, and less well‐marked hinge joints of unenlagiines possibly gave them greater cursorial capacities. Additionally, the longer second phalanx of digit II allowed unenlagiines fast movements of this digit to hunt smaller and elusive prey. Thus, the distinctive morphological evolutionary pathways of these two dromaeosaurid clades seem to have been influenced by the particular locomotor and predatory specializations that characterized each of these lineages."
Coincidentally I’m back on researching pedal morphology in Dromaeosaurs in regards to Imperobator
boy why you so legs
That boy ain't right
Evoincarnate
Interesting, find anything good?
I didn't think basilo and tylo were that big, and I thought monquirosaurus was bigger
(c'mon fossil record... there's gotta be a giant pliosaur. Please.)
Foolish to believe the Fossil Record would ever give you that sorta of hint
Only the obvious I suppose, proportional robustness in the pedal elements is associated with the Laurasian Dromaeosaurs, and to the extreme degree in Balaur, which maybe Imperobator falls into the degree of, at least compared to Unenlagiinae
Perhaps to add to the idea of weight bearing, which is still pretty vague in terms of an ecological paradigm, the (imo) likely 2nd ungual has not only the previously recorded reduced hypertrophied condition but also apparently a rounded ventral edge?
Whales were just built different to marine reptiles (literally in this case)
So based on that do you doubt its placement in Unenlagiinae?
No, but I suspect it’s doing something very different than the rest of them
Very cool, I've been thinking about the Nothofagidites province in the Maastrichtian, i.e. Antarctica & Australia, and what potentially typified the ecology there
With a marine deposition only known thus far there’s only so much to procure in terms of the constraining environmental factors at least in Imperobator’s case
Aside from at least by the Maastrichtian, the codified shift towards subpolar temperature and a likely accentuated humidity
Absolutely, it's kind of amazing we even have that site. Going to be a long time before we get a better picture of it
I feel the intuition to say that imperobator’s distinctiveness must be motivated by temperature and its influence on the environment in some way, but to what end it’s hard to say
I still refuse to believe that
mysticetes sure, but the only reason we've found no marine reptiles besides ichthyosaurs getting to a 30-60 ton range like large physeteroids is because mosasaurs barely existed for any time and... I swear there's still a giant pliosaur in the fossil record we just haven't found yet
You could say that Ichthyosaurs had more resources to afford getting bigger, and had more opportunities to fit into other niches... Given the diversity we have preserved
but did the triassic ocean really have more resources than the ocean throughout all the time that short necked pliosaurs existed
tbh it's the only explanation I can think of. Maybe the other way you could think around it, it's that Mosasaurs and Pliosaurs couldn't get as big or else it would affect their mobility or hydrodynamics... Which, probably was the reason? idk
surely not right? Four flippers all propelling the animal would be very efficient in pliosaurs' case, I doubt it'd be easy to get too big for that to work
maybe we will discover a life accurate WWD liopleurodon one day
ohh that's super informative actually, tysm!
People believe T Rex was slow, but in reality he ran faster than almost everyone here lol
people who believe rex was slow are the same who think they can outrun a hippo
Lol, nailed
what had the faster locomotion, dolphins or itchyosaurs?
Me
depends, but my bet is on dolphins cuz they are much more hydrodynamic. Icthyosaurs mostly look like an oval with a beak and a fish tail
I have 5 flippers
I think the flippers added more on agility and maneuvering
true, so icthyosaurs would probably be more like weird sharks, that can go fast but its not their main perk
Perky rascals
imagine stealing playstyles smh
I mean, the thing is more that getting big and then having 4 big flippers, means that would be causing too much drag underwater? Which is why for example, Baleen Whales are more hydrodynamic efficient by their lateral sides? Could be wrong. But something related to how their flippers would cause their hydrodynamic profile to be larger by the sides, which is why they tend to preferably develop smaller dorsal fins or " humps ", and the thing is that getting big like that does not fit either Pliosaurs or Mosasaurs... I'm not good with them so i'm just guessing... But, from what I understand, some of them are likely very generalists, some of them can be more specialized, uhh... Taking the opportunity! To any other Globidens fan in the chat! HELL YEAH BROTHE-
But from what I understand their deal is to be more hydrodynamic efficient anteriorly and posteriorly... Like, from what some friends told me... Some researchers even discuss about how more derived Mosasaurs were changing how they moved underwater, and even evidence of potential dorsal fins? For Pliosaurs... I'll be honest chief, i'm stupid with them, I don't know anything!
"He may be out of line, but he's right" ahh moment
that is fair but tbh I'm not totally sold on the "evidence" for derived mosasaurs having dorsal fins
Could some herbivorous dinosaurs have been omnivores, and are we misreading their diets based on tooth shape alone?
also an oval with fins (ichthyosaurs actually have a really hydrodynamic build)
It is difficult to believe it. But, I think it has more to do with how the idea of the potential itself is sold to people... Realistically, Sharks have it, majority of the Odontocetis have it... Uh... Maybe other predatory fishes? I'm sorry for the fish people but I don't know a lot about them... Babelichthys is my favorite though
But for example, just make this question: What they have in common with Mosasaurs?
All of their respective evolutions focused on getting more efficient hydrodynamic profiles from the anterior & posterior angle.So it makes sense that... Either sooner ( or later ), they would've begun to share the same convergent traits.
There really is zero evidence for a dorsal fin in any mosasaur, the oddly shaped vertebrae that allegedly indicate a fin in Megapterygius are also found in finless porpoises
Plesiosaurs also didn't have any aside from the small tain fin, and they were doing fine hydrodynamically, so the relatively larger vertical tail fins of mosasaurs were probably good enough to stabilize them
Probably ( Psst! I would put dorsal fins anyways! )
This will sound cliche for this chat but herbivory is a spectrum, we can be sure that herbivorous dinosaurs ate primarily plants, but we can't dismiss that they ate some meat here and there
They were not likely to be active predators, though
that oval isnt shaped like a barrel tho, that is a flat oval
tuna are pretty round from the front similar to a lot of the not giant ichthyosaurs, there’s an entire paper on locomotion that compares the two but it’s paywalled ;-;
Depends on the specie you're looking at but if I had to guess both fastest swimmer in both respective clades probably achieved similar speeds (being in the +50kmh).
u can kinda see here it is chonk
If you want I can try to get access to it. If so, share the DOI
(though I should educate myself a lot of those animals because gosh they are so cool and are my favs)
icthyosaurs are dead, dolphins arent, so the ladder is clearly superior
Truth nuke
im gonna assume large itchyosaurs outspeed large baleen whales?
yeah
blue and fin whales are incredibly fast i don't think an ichthyosaur would be faster than that
Modern large baleen whales are built so they're probably quite faster but large ichthyosaurs were also probably fast and efficient swimmers (Guatarra et al. 2019)
Misinterpreted my bad
just a side note small ichthyosaurs like Stenopterygius may have been faster sprinters. just like smaller dolphins like the spinner dolphin (1.5–2 m) are extremely agile and fast.larger ones like Shonisaurus were likely slower but built for long-distance cruising.just like larger species like the orca (up to 9 m) are slower to accelerate but can cruise efficiently at high speeds.
Do you guys want an interesting, but fitting, but totally speculative topic?
Ichthyosaur hybrids
I know it's a meme but I'm still not convinced pachycephalosaurs were strict herbivores in a cow or horse sense. Their teeth were confused with those of north american troodontids which while herbivorous leaning were definitely still omnivores
that doesn't mean pachycephalosaurs were dropping off of cliffs like kratos to bash giant prey in the head to kill them and let them feed though, is what people gotta understand
I mean, there are literature treating such topics so you can always read some on the occasion.
I think pachycephalosaurs being opportunistic scavengers or eating the occasional small vertebrate or bug is fine
As long as they're not chasing down other dinosaurs to eat them it's not implausible
this
Tbh, what if the premaxillary teeth are an alternative to defense? In case the animal doesn't want to risk damage to it's dome?
" How? ", I mean... Technically it's easier to imagine Pachycephalosaurs dealing with any reasonable threat with it's dome ( probably not the 6-9 ton Theropods, the only alternative there is RUNNING ), but what if it misses the aggressor and hits something else? That can offer a certain risk to the dome, and depending on what it hits disable the efficiency of the individual from headbutting
Not to say the teeth can't imply something about it's diet... Just trying to see it from a different angle
some say t rex could not run but only walk at about 10 mph
it apparently walked down its prey until it was tired and then killed them
10mph is a misreading, 17 would be more accurate
which is fast enough to catch an edmontosaurus or triceratops
what would be some positives of bringing dinosaurs back to life
None. Because every negative would outweight any possible positive...
You would essentially create the impression that species can be brought back regardless of human action, and then be responsible for the abolishment of any conservation effort/program, as well the extinction of any species associated.
Thats what i was thinking and also the fact that if they escape 💀
Colossal biosciences are and have plans of bringing back all these creatures but its impossible to bring dinosaurs back right
They'd probably just be killed realistically, especially since they wouldn't have a high population to start with, but it depends on how inconspicuous they'd be/if they were a species that was small and reproduced quickly.
It's truthfully impossible to bring back any extinct species, any result would just be some sort of approximation.
Once a species goes extinct there's really no getting them back as they were.
Me when:
Colossal says Dire wolves
Looks inside
Game Of Thrones Wolves
They didn't really even try to make an approximation, they are just modified wolves with a fancy title to bring in funding.
I mean, yeah, it's kinda why i said Game of Thrones wolves, since they want it to appeal to the general public, so what they do? Of course they are going to modify wolves to look like the Game of Thrones one
Quite frankly... I've seen people defend this in many ways, and usually focusing around the matter of " Funding ", but honestly, more people should question the ethics of Colossal, because that's some evil shi- @#$
If we're not excluding avian dinosaurs (birds) that went extinct due to human activity, quite a lot- but they'd need their habitat to be restored to survive or fill an ecological role.
I'm pretty sure that's not what you meant, though.
if im correct, rex outsped all of its prey in hell creek right?
Not enough people consider restoring habitat first to try and rewild or re create lost ecosystems/repair existing ones with artificial species, such as what colossal has been apparently trying to do.
It's always the big names that get focus, when in reality nothing would be accomplished without ensuring a stable base, which would be by far the biggest challenge if not impossible.
I could see that. Overall robustness but lacking the killing claw is an intriguing combo no doubt. Adaptations towards herbivory? 🤷♂️
The reason they don't do, it's because people are likely settled into those lost habitats, and if you propose it, they are going to burst into rage " HOW DARE YOU! YOU ARE TELLING ME TO ABANDON MY HOUSE?!! "
Finally someone else calls out the “funding” argument! I feel like you would have better chances of public appeal and “funding” if you tried to make the things at least resemble basal species like jackals. Now people are skeptical of you because it just seems like you’re doing a Jurassic world instead.
That and the fact many people don't actually care or understand anything about ecological stability, yeah.
Funding? They're a private company, it's literally revenue. It's not like they're a university lab or non profit. The dire wolves and everything else, the dodos, are marketing for a private business
I used the term "funding" because that's how other people have described it to me, I entirely agree with your perspective.
like idk I could totally see a pachycephalosaur going after an unguarded nest. Joschua Knuppe has a good portrayal of small marginocephalians that I like (I imagine leptoceratopsids being kinda similar but idk) They're herbivores but if you put a little meat in front of them they'll go for it
"The way I see it is that. Its a company, is never gonna be flawless, such things dont exist. They are doing actual research for sure. That the marketing of it is weird and disingenuous? Yes. That people over react sometimes about it? Yes. That there are people on both sides of the ring benefiting from misinformation? Most definitely. I do keep an eye on their projects out of curiosity, but as with any research, always wait for proper results to better judge its outcome. Too often people see science as a flawless monolith, which has and will never be the case. Any piece of research should always be taken with a pinch of salt, unless its got extremely undeniable hard proof of its intent. Many are the people who go hype recent discoveries without properly reading said research to just be debunked in a couple of months."
Cause I feel like this Colossal issue is being seen in too much black and white
Nothing is ever just black and white, but that doesn't change how some people will think of it regardless.
I mean…that’s what I said
It's another discussion entirely not worth having here but the ongoing trend of privatization of science and conservation is fraught to say the least. I understand people's criticisms mostly on those grounds. But not really paleo related so I'll drop it
I'd say eat the rich
Unrelated tangent to everything going on, but just a mini side tangent I wanted to go on briefly. I dont talk about paleontology much but thats really only because im a very casual enthusiast and dont really have much to contribute to a convo 80% of the time other than "i like this thing about this animal"
just something ive been noticing in general is that people can have pretty extensive discussions about long dead remains and im just like "idk man i think this animal looks cool"
Certainly a more stable and efficient locomotory setup, with the arctometatarsal conditions still present as well.
I'd say it depends on how passionate one is about the topic. If you feel like passionate about it, you are likely to spend a lot of time onto it, and be informed onto it... But realistically anyone can contribute to a conversation, regardless of how much informed they are.
Wikipedia mentions teeth and some cranial elements but I can't access the source, you find anything there?
Considering they've actively tried to censor scientists refuting their claims and talked down to actual conservation efforts, they deserve no leeway.
Undescribed unfortunately, the existence of the material is all that’s known as of late
Thanks!
where have they done this? not refuting you just haven’t seen it personally so I want to know
I'll DM the attacking scientists bit. For the talking down to conservation stuff, the CEO of Colossal outright stated that their red wolves are "more pure red wolf" than the literal Red Wolf Recovery Program.
I think of the opposite, bigger species recurring to egg/crustaceans eating or carrion chewing, cause small ones would likely be able to feed easily on things due to smaller sizes (not saying they wouldn't, more like bigger ones would require more of certain nutrients which small ones could already supply with their main diets)
This is ironically some trait to be observed in most aves, specially fowls (waterfowls and screamers), the bigger they are, the easier it is for em to feed on other things on the menu
Obv this is just my opinion
But in general I think of whole marginocephalians as a good big boars, if it exists, it's food lol
I think they are neat.
Does anyone have in their bookmarks/folder/or whatever you guys use to save publications you've read, a paper in-depth, or that at least, discusses about the appearance and placement of the feathers on Dromeosaurs' tails?
oh then that's fair
but idk it's more the general body shape of pachycephalosaurs that lends itself more to very very light carnivory
whats the 3 oldest playables in PoT
i know rhamp is first, but whos second and third?
after rhamph it’s the morrison group kent and mira
we really need either middle jurassic or triassic playables...
oh wait I forgot metri, that would be next
so it goes
rhamp
metri
Morrison gang + mira?
I forgot kent too, I’m discovering I don’t actually know the roster as well as I thought
damn, how early was kent compared to the morrison gang?
the 3 youngest would be
1 - meglania
2 - pachy
3 - tyrannosaurus
tyrannosaurus has been found in as early of beds as like, 73 mya right?
Eurhino is first tmk
i deadass forgot eurhino existed
brachi is way to big for the base roster
no, zby blast.
turisaurus topysytervy
Yes, its big, thats why it needs to be in the roster.
A new study from researchers at University of Wisconsin-La Crosse and Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences found that Tyrannosaurus rex — and other tyrannosaurs like it — could turn twice as fast as other carnivorous dinosaurs their size.
We are all doomed
C. lentus would probably be the perfect large Sauropod for the base roster
I know the perfect sauropods, amphicoelias, diplodocus, and shunosaurus
as cool as Amphicoelias/Maraapunisaurus is, I really don't think it would work well in game at all, especially as it trends more towards a pvp focus
Diplo and Shuni would be fine though
nah we need argentinosaurus and amphicoelias too, maybe brachiosaurus too
maraapuni playable would either be nerfed beyond belief or just be an instant server wipe whenever someone becomes it
we need the 6000 combat weight maraapuni
nah we need a 12k or 9k combat weight sauropod, trexes stinky
argentinosaurus would be cool too to have in base game.
Big sauropods are good though
I feel like the problem is that in any game that has large Hadrosaurs (I.E. Bars) capable of fighting apex Theropods, it's kind of impossible to introduce a massive Sauropod like that without it either being insanely overpowered or just feeling artificially nerfed for no reason
edmontosaurus too
Argentinosaurus oneshots lame trex duo with stomps and physics.
Yea, I was referring to how Hadrosaurs and Sauropods both rely on simply throwing their weight around to inflict damage (ergo a massive Sauropod should be vastly more powerful than something like Barsboldia)
tbf, I do feel a Hadrosaur not being graviportal does make it a bit better at throwing its weight around, but that's still a relatively marginal advantage compared with nearly an order of magnitude weight differential
diplodocids, or whip tailed sauropods like apatosaurus or diplodocus, or barosaurus, use their whiptails to inflict severe damage and bleeding.
I mean that's kind of still throwing the weight of their tail around but I don't want to waste time on semantics
Imagine most hadrosaurs would just step on theropods till they died in herds, kind of what they do.
depends on the size ratio but in most cases Hadrosaurs probably just ran away
Megapacks will be the death of this game.
Sculpting a Vacuum into a Nigersaurus
#JLC3DP 3D printing starts at $0.3, sign up to get $70 new user coupons: https://jlc3dp.com/?from=kayakasaurus
Join my Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/c/Kayakasaurus
My Etsy shop! https://kayakasaurus.etsy.com
Tools and materials I used in this video: https://www.amazon.com/shop/kayakasaurus/list/3P3LQ...
Love it when people make paleo-accurate electrodomestic devices
A way to circumvent this issue is making megasauropods op, like they were irl, but also making more sauropod-hunting megatheropods like Mapusaurus and Giganotosaurus
Well, giga is a modded dino, the pt one is my favorite, and carch pretty much is like mapusaurus
Also why people think Nigersaurus is controversial just because of the funni letter? Niger (the country) and the shall-not-be-spoken word are very phonetically different
I was talking abt a theoretical game environment, but sure
Sorry for the skull react but I just laugh every time I hear its name because of all the dumb memes
I'm working on a game of mine that works with that concept
Colossal sauropods should only get 5 seconds worth of growth per quest if they're added
I plan to add ALL fauna and flora of the Cretaceous period, diversifying between ai and playables
Ye, a considerable size of the fauna list will be composed of smol sauros, no way it would be just beeg beefy column lizards
~by Thalos, you type quick, huh?~
Sauropods are pretty hard to add to games and work
Small sauropods are pretty defenseless against popular theropods that are put in most games, and mega sauropods are unkillable without mega packs and starvation
I think it would be easier to tackle if it was just north America because most dinosaur species discovered are Cretaceous age so you'd have to add hundreds of genera
North America still has some pretty good sauropods of all sizes all over the Cretaceous
A healthy amount of speculative adaptations will be included to fight off big predators
So it has the same issue as big sauropods, if the sauropods in general are just hard to kill the game would just be a ton of sauropods with starving carnivores
I am aware of the hustle, still I'll not deviate from the path proposed by myself
And it'll be more like fair and balanced, rather than pushing the scales to a side from other
Amarga is one of the only small sauropods that works in the game because they made it a porcupine AoE/knockback brawler
Any other run of the mill sauropod of its size would suffer
I'm not saying small sauropods in general are defenseless persay, I'm just saying that a small sauropod put up again a megatheropod would be cooked
And that's why being in a group is so important
Anyways if you wanna add a mechanic a small sauropod could use as a defense: The sunfish method. It's so inedible it's not worth eating
That's a good idea, imma steal
But would people wanna play the small defenseless sauropod to get in groups big enough?
Also it's a trend with basically all dinosaur games that they end up turning into pvp games so why would they play a weak playable that can't fight back on it's own? It would probably turn into the equal of the isle's Dryo or PoT's Campto
Ngl I think big, multi formation rosters are self destructive
A hell creek based game would work because you can center your roster easier around evading a few threats
Multi formation rosters are basically just Florida
Multiple species that cannot co exist with each other and eventually one just comes out on top and destroys everything
I think the only case a multi formation roster would work if it's something like Hell Creek + some other late Cretaceous Canadian formations
^^^
Ok guys I cannot follow the conversation in a fluid manner, y'all text too fast for me lol
Triassic Game would be peak
Cool, let me know when it's done so I can do it better
the rex model looked weird but this was peak
Don’t remember them from the series, but this is impressive for the late 90s
I WISH we had this level of detail back in the 90s
those are from the 2025 walking with
is the order of the numbers weird I cant tell
Jokes on you spitting on people in the isle is so fun+ embarrassingly juking out Carnos and junk
23 and mabye 15 feel a little hard to read
Wait there was one in 2025? Was it good as original or is it crap?
oh it was crap, wwd in name only
am I the only one who knew it would be crap just from the first teaser
I think a lot of people had the idea at that point we just held out hope
Dam….. it should have been named something else and probably would have gotten some better views….. not saying it doesn’t deserve criticism, as I believe everything deserves some form of criticism, but when you compare yourself to something beloved, it does make your show/movie seem worse in comparison to the original beloved material, and probably would have stand on its own two feet if it had a different name and would have been criticized less harshly
I still think it would’ve gotten pretty harsh treatment honestly, it was pretty lackluster even compared to older non wwd documentaries
Oh…. It was that bad? This is worse than imagined, I’ll check out the trailer
Just saw the trailer

I will give it this, it does have good models of the dinosaurs but the CGI budget looks like that of the original but instead of using it sparingly and no practical effects (since I believe the best outcome for visual effects is a mixture of practical and visual effects in post, and not just one way or the other), but the dinosaur CGI looks like a crap show
Wait…. There is a human focus in Walking With Dinosaurs (2025)?! What did universe did I walk into?
what? Ik the animals are anthropomorphised but I didnt know there were humans
Yeah, not to do anything against the paleontologists in it, but the film makers really made them look amateurish for paleontologists…..
The dodo’s return from extinction just got a lot closer. We have gene-edited birds!
In this mind-blowing update, we unpack the science shaking up the world of genetics. Colossal’s team shares the latest breakthroughs pushing dodo de-extinction from theory to reality, revealing how new discoveries continue to rewrite the story of extinction....
AI 
Why try to "resurrect" prehistoric animals, when you can use that to save current ones ?
(They are saving extant animals)
I say we bring back a penguin and recolor it, and call it a dodo since that’s what they basically did with the direwolves
Bighead turkey
Felt
Colossal has never ever done anything good ever, they're only evil AI scammers...
Erm, why aren’t they devoting literally all their time and resources to literally only doing this though instead of what they’re passionate about and have been working towards for years?! Boom! Colossal evil and bad 
@tough parcel hi
Hi
WHY ARE YOU TALKING TO ME STOP IT
I'm deleting my Toujiangosaurus size chart
Mauritius is in ecological collapse so a dodo or dodo analogue does actually have benefits in this case
hi
If they are able to one day, they should bring back every therapsid from the permian, for one permian animals are smaller then modern ones and not overly large or dissimilar from modern ones
Was camptosaurus bipedal?
yup
Ok
I suspect the weird stiff theropod lips were inspired by this blog post by Andrea Cau in 2023 who says the foramina on Tyrannosaurus didn't resemble lizards or crocodiles but instead turtles the most. Therefore he speculates Tyrannosaurus would've had a sharp beak like structures to protect the teeth...I'm not convinced at all but it's a interesting read.
https://theropoda.blogspot.com/2023/07/all-hail-to-terrifying-face-of-turtle.html
I believe it has to do with unreleased research
You know what we say about unreleased research?
Who cares!
I do. I care. All I can do is wait though.
(Norther White Rhino)
Why are we resurrecting bird which behaves like a Capybara which lays a single egg and just leaves it?
But why, you don't have access to it nor should you
It's the same level as going "Trust me bro" except there might be a sliver of truth to it but no-one can corroborate it so it loops back to "Just trust me frfr"
The thing is gonna die itself........ . ... and some countries ahum ahum *China, will probably excessively breed them.
It’s less of a “trust me bro” and more of a “yeah it might be out there, but we’ll have to wait a bit”.
We are so back
So it's a trust me bro because you shouldn't be sharing it nor should you be proving it 
It's simply assuming that whatever this person is saying is actually in the works
It’ll be exciting discussing it when my grandchildren have their own children!
NOOOO
Wait, so is this about spreading unreleased research, or about believing there is unreleased research?
And I’m confused by why you’re so upset about this. We both enjoy prehistory, so why can’t we enjoy talking about it.
Both, they're not exclusive and cannot be made exclusive from each other. If you're spreading embargoed information, you're perpetuating unreleased information with 0 backing
As to why I'm on your case, it's because professionals have standards. Imagine you're working on publishing something you've worked on for months, maybe years, and some kid on the Internet leaks 90% of it for the clout
https://www.instagram.com/paulserenoofficial/live/?broadcast_id=18393541597193677
Paul Sereno livestream of his lab, might have something new
I suppose this does make sense. I’m just very eager to know more. I’m one of those guys who believes more paleo art and reconstructions should be based more on direct info and less speculative.
I heard about this, and I’ll definitely be checking it out.
Very cool !
Sick
guys do you think bird cleaning deinosuchus teeth is accurate
edmonto getting weird with it again is a pleasant surprise
Not unlikely
Birds don't clean crocodile teeth
I used to believe it from Wonder Pets, I wish it was true...
i wish it was a thing
Don’t they pick at dead skin & flesh bits from previous prey? Or is even that also a lie 
Some greek philosopher said they did 2000 years ago and people just took that as fact. Even the images you see of it are photoshopped
now i can see it
here is the same croc but with 2 more birds randomly photoshopped in
eh whatever atleast deinosuchus would carry its children to the water with its mouth
assuming it can even walk around in the first place
It would carry everything in its mouth, not like it had an option
it has legs mate
regardless of the high walk it would still crawl around on land
Whales have legs….
yeah for saving up energy
oh cmon deinosuchus legs was not that SMALL
tsk tsk tsk
So what do they actually do inside crocs mouths.
nothing, they don't go there. they're called crocodile birds because they make nests near croc nests
A study posted like today or yesterday has looked to the morphoanatomy of american alligator and Deinosuchus legs and concluded that Deinosuchus couldn't sustain high walking after a certain body size. You already see such limits affecting modern crocodile species such as salties, gharials and even black caimans (though black caimans and gharials have very puny legs).
gharial:D
good dad
So what could this mean for Sarco and puru? That they had larger legs, or they weren’t as big as we thought?
like it did to lolong?
cause then it dosent really feel like a debunk of it
Tbh if you added the triassic animals into a modern day ecosystem, not much would change, only problem would be fasolosuchus but alot of the creatures are around the same size of modern ones
Puru has robust legs and 3 sacral vertebrae, which helped it to high walk even at large sizes.
For Sarcosuchus idk the post cranial isn't studied. A shame that our Sarco specimen here (MNHN) just sits at the gallery lmao.
thinking about that deinosuchus would be the only weird one then if it couldnt high walk
So max size for puru could still be 33ft, while deino was bumped down to 26?
I ain't doing a SEP master (Systematic, Evolution and Paleontology) so hell nah
does this mean deinosuchus is the only large crocodilian that cant high walk meaning its a fodder among the other ones
I'll let that to someone else or suggest some friends interested in croc paleo to do a thesis about the locomotry capacities of Pholidosaurs. I think someone at the MNHN is indeed interested in crocs (they worked on Dyrosaurs and Thalattosuchians).
What evolving a bobblehead does to someone
i find it weird why it turned out that way tho i dont think any other crocodilian was like that
Deino is the only big croc in that study, so idk
do you think its debatable if it still could high walk
Considering very big crocs alive don't, yeah deino was probably similar with what the study says
50/50 eh?
I mean that it probably wasn't walking around. When it made the transition from walking to crawling idk
can i possible think it still would be able to high walk (assuming other crocodilians didnt have any unpossiblty of not being able to high walk for now)
aside from going to a beach or anything where the sun is at
Doesn't seem like it.
either way im sticking with the deinosuchus being able to high walk for short time
well we got riograndensis (dont know if it just another hatcheri tho) and rugosus
the paper suggests younger individuals or smaller species might be able to high walk
someone said that black caimans start crawling at adulthood age right
Well, the only sexual dimorphism between male and female crocodylians (which Deino is not but it isn't important here) that I know of is that males are larger than females.
we don't know but it is highly likely female deinosuchus were smaller than the males (the 9+ meter 4+ tonners are probably males)
females would also be the ones with the greater need to move on land, since. yknow. egg
could i say my opinion about the weight of this?
Random updated his skeletal.
what is it now?
5.4 tonnes for the largest specimen (which is dubious), 4.7 tonnes for the one shown in this image
do you think the cm is teen to subadult possibly
no, they are like 50 years old
Was about to say "isn't it like 45 years old ?"
it could grow a little bit more if it lived to say, 100, but probably not more than 2-3 feet
because of the osteoderms?
seems so yes
here's the paper
https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1038/18343
i have trust issues on links but okey
Art channel. Better safe than sorry
Art channel, unless it’s art being used to describe a scientific concept of sorts. I suppose that’s fine.
is deino just the pseudosuchian eotriceratops now in that we used to think it was the largest of its kind but it turned out to just be a bobblehead but people will still believe that its over 10 tons until the end of time
i haven't actually seen much pushback to it being bobbleheaded after the scans came out
but maybe that's just because fadeno hasn't released his newest 15t version yet
Huh 
well he updated his deino just 2 months ago
Was it really 2 months ago?
I thought it was more...
maybe it was more than that i don't understand the concept of time. but it was less than 6 months
Which species (assuming notabilis)
I like the new Torvosaurus look , never knew Torvosaurus previous reconstruction was just based off nothing really lol
Is there a new reconstruction? Haven’t seen anything about that
Not really that new https://x.com/tm9380/status/1980651532166341107?s=46 I more mean current look
chat who's the most well versed with carnosaurs?
not me
I mean, I like carnosaurs. 
it's about neovenatoridae but I need someone who's good at it
Pretty sure neovenatoridae doesn’t exist anymore
I mean, neovenatoridae included stuff like neovenator, deltadromeus, and chilantaisaurus. Neovenator is a basal carch, deltadromeus is a probable noasaurid, and chilantaisaurus is uh…. Yeah.
It was a thing when megaraptors were allos along with things like siats and chlantai yeah
Siats is probably a carch, not much else it could be given where it lived. Chilantaisaurus…. I wonder if it’s a spinosaurid. Is that even a possibility?
Doubt it, Probably some type of allosaur
Isn’t that just called a wastebasket taxon?
Yeah. Troodon is a wastebasket taxon as well.
Sone Decently Big Crocs like American Gators ans Niles can still High Walk decently even when Adult
And Puru has Adaptations for it to Possibly High Walk despite its size
So a carch then.
Could be some basal surving allosaur lineage
That claw kinda does. Plus, we do already spinosaurids lived in Asia.
That would be awesome, but I’m not going to get my hopes up. Probably a carch if anything.
What if.... metris survived?
That thought crossed my mind too…
I love Diictodon
Cretaceous asia is pretty weird tbh. In early cret we see yutyrannus and sinotyrannus living with some type of small carnosaur. Then some time later chilantai shows up... hope we find more from these eras
Cuz theres a chance that there were ecosystems where long armed large tyrannosauroids and allosaurs living together.... That'd be really cool. Esp if spinos were around as well.
Is allosauridae even a thing, or is it always just allosaurus?
didnt mean to reply to you, sorry
including flight and swim speed, who would be the top 3 fastest creatures In POT? ( including critters )
So apparently Edmontosaurus has a sail now
Its just allosaurus and used to be saurophaganax. Sometimes asfaltrovenator shows up there but usually its just allo
lol what
Yeah, maybe 4 if europus
Holy peak
That’d be neat.
Allosaurus anax now. It really was all allosaurus. There’s also whatever Epanterias is, probably another allosaurus.
I do believe in larger species of allosaurus, like Anax. Epanterias though probably just falls into that Anax category.
Now, if all allosaurids are just allosaurus, I wonder if we could classify it as a basal carch..
wtf is this stance
The show off as much of the animal as possible in as dynamic of a pose as possible stance
couldve made it a side view? That just looks like ed is flashing the dead guy in the background
So then allosaurus is literally just…. Allosaurus. There is no higher classification other than whatever came before it.
The dead guy is a different edmontosaurus mummy
Allosaurus and Acrocanthosaurus have similar looking skulls if you ask me, any case to be made there?
There are jurrassic carchs other than veteru
Lusovenator is an example, idk much about veter, but I'd imagine its fragmentary features are closer to those of luso and other carchs than allo itself
There will be no Edmontosaurus hate bud
Anyone who hating on Edmontosaurus getting dropped
I’m like 95% sure veterupristisaurus being united with carchs has nothing to do with neural spine height
From the wiki : It is diagnosed by a spinoprezygapophyseal lamina in the middle caudal vertebrae extending anteriorly to the midwidth of the base of the prezygapophysis and being flanked laterally by a short, parallel lamina extending from the lateral margin of the prezygapophysis posteriorly. Thus, Rauhut considered a sister-group relationship between Veterupristisaurus and Acrocanthosaurus within the Carcharodontosauridae.[1] In 2025, the study that described Tameryraptor, which had Rauhut as a co-author, noted its only diagnostic character was shared with Lusovenator, making the validity of Veterupristisaurus questionable.[
Isn’t the whole point the Jurassic carcharodontosaurs are more similar to Cretaceous carcharodontosaurus than allosaurus that’s like the whole point of comparative morphology
So asfaltovenator isn’t allosauridae. It’s a basal allosauroid.
So its something very close to lusovenator, which is a carch
Tmk the Jurassic carchs consistently clade with the Cretaceous ones
Allosaurus could just be a stand alone thing.
And as non-carcharodontosaurid carcharodontosaurians they are still absolutely united with carcharodontosaurids to the exclusion of allosaurids
They made a group chat without allo cuz its annoying.
Allosaurus is the schizo loner making bank off its many species.
How much did the smallest adult allo specimen weigh again? (in metric)
Just found out my spirit animal is the African sable so what do you think is the dinosaur counerpart of the African sable os based off diet,niche in the ecosystem,lifestyle,looks if you can find something similar in appearance in one way
A little bit
Well I think it’s more than marketing, I do think that the people at colossal have a genuine passion for reviving extinct species, the company was founded to do that after all.
I understand how corporate and unethical they are, but if they can make something that at least looks like a dodo, would that not be kinda neat?
Don’t release them onto Mauritius though obviously.
I still don’t really see any evidence of wrongdoing from them other than exaggerating what the wolves really were by using a different species definition, which isn’t the best thing to do but it’s technically valid under the ecological species concept so I’m not gonna beat them over the head for it
I think people tend to just be naturally suspicious of 'playing god' or whatever, and them sort of lying about that just further increased people's suspicions
Doubling down on that too was sort of weird
Not enough Edmontosaurus talk after this magnificent paper and material from Paul Serrano
I can't believe we had so much good Hadrosaur material for so long and we still let them look as ugly as they did for decades on end
They basically lied about bringing back Dire Wolves (Yes, lied, they did about multiple things multiple times during their various PR stunts about the whole thing), and have essentially slandered genuine conservation efforts, while constantly fishing for media attention over things that is essentially just white noise (Shoutout to saying they'll bring back dodos and moa soon when cloning birds right now is literally impossible).
Deextinction, while not inherently a bad thing, is problematic for the very reasons that Colossal is doing it. They claim it is to help with conservation, but it is fishing resources away from said conservation efforts (which they again have actively talked down to before), such efforts they have shown have been non-productive in said effort (Dire Wolves have no conservation value even if they were legitimate), and the first thing American politicians saw in response to said "de-extinction" was to suggest redacting threatened species from the endangered species list because, in their eyes, if threatened with extinction they can just be ressurected.
beautiful boys
Also, again, shoutout to them trying to slander and ruin the reputations of scientists that justifiably disagree with them.
Amplexus is (at least currently) lumpable into Fragilis, not anax
The vast majority didn’t know that, hell I didn’t know that and I’m pretty interested in any material.
So it was just described then , I never heard anyone in here mention prior to this paper.
A lot of people are also disillusioned as to what actual passion in relation to animals is. Saying they love animals and want to save them in the most passionate way possible is all well and good but means nothing if their actions actively contradict that. But people tend to just see the former and not the latter. It's a problem with media in general not just Colossal.
Welcome back bud
Cheers
Your pfp reminds me of egg yolks and makes me kinda hungry…
Yay, I’m such a big fan of discord just arbitrarily not letting me see pings because my personal fbi agent has a vendetta against me or something 💀
I have learned I was wrong and silly, and apologize for making
Uninformed claims 
All good. I'm not going to act like Colossal is all bad, they have done some good things, but that doesn't suddenly excuse the majority of what they do which is bad, and I can understand how folks don't know because people just generally don't hear about it.
Half the people in this chat give me a ping when they respond to me, the other half don’t
I still have no idea how it chooses
A lot of the time I don’t ping people because some people have really strong feelings about being pinged and it’s safer to hier on not doing it just in case lol
Obligatory dinosaur so the mods don’t discipline us with bricks and heavy objects
How accurate is this camptosaurus I did for a thingy?
Camptosaurus was generally a lot more bulky and with shorter legs.
As far as I know compared to their neighbors like dryosaurus they weren't very fast.
He’s shaped like horizontal big chungus
No that’s ceratosaurus
wait no I think that would be vertical
ceratosaurus is shaped like plywood
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adw3282 Naashoibito Member dated to the very latest Cretaceous (~66.4 to 66.0 million years)
New one?
Could Rauisuchians survive today?
It probably would get smaller and get hunted down by humans
What about. Rauisuchian steeds?
Steeds?
Saurosuchus steed would go hard
Da hell is steeds
Like horse
"Steed" is an archaic or poetic term for a horse, particularly a fine or spirited one used for riding
The spirit saurosuchus
Does that mean sarcosuchus powerscaling
Speed
So allosaurus could fill pretty much any niche then with its many species and sizes.
Ouranosaurus is peak
Can't wait to get DB one in game
hey whats the difference between trex jaws or tarbosaurus jaws because if theyre haws lock woulnd yhat make tarbo stronger
Two new Edmontosaurus skeletons with preserved skin just got published by Paul Sereno and collegues. They had a fleshy scaly crest over their back and hoofed feet!
I was lucky enough to see the specimens last summer. The publication is open access:
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adw3536 https://t.co/JY2yWJLSId
Does e. annectens have a crest and mini sail now?
"We tentatively add the fleshy midline comb over the occiput preserved in close relative E. regalis"
So no direct evidence
what about the crest
Probably more of a hump than a sail. Like Acro.
this is lovely
kind of annoying how they keep saying edmont has hoofed front feet
It’s just fleshy padding.
i still havent seen the new 15 ton deino from fadeno
i was being hyperbolic but i assume he will come up with a new massive one sooner or later
lets see if he will bring anything to the table then shall we
I love how Edmont started as a boring stereotype of a hadrosaur and has gradually become a shining example of how the most boring looking creatures can actually have some of the coolest unfossilized structures
yk what the biggest prehistoric dog is?
Epicyon haydeni iirc
would it be bigger then the prehistoric cats?
No, it's like half the size of Smilodon
ohh so how much does it weight
like this size eh?
Epicyon’s shoulder height is around 90cm, not far from today’s wolf, 85cm
isnt it funyn how we both have extremely large indivuals of the first 2 dinosaurs? ( i think its 8 ton megalo?? and 10 ton iggy )
pardon me for not being very well informed on those specimens but wasn't it the case that a lot of dinosaur material was just haphazardly lumped in with those two taxa
heres 10 ton iggy
Is 8 tonne Megalo from a Footprint?
Neo is small ?
Obviously
What is a weak grass eater gonna do against the swift and cunning carnivore...
ask @undone rapids as i believe he made it
Maybe there are bigger specimens we have, but I just used this
also its next to a giant 10 ton iguanadon
thats the lamb and magnapaulia thing all over again
may i ask how?
We actually do have a bigger specimen
Yeah I'm checking what material they have
so neovenator got that?
Yes trust
Its not much, but yeah its a bigger Theropod referred to Neo. Two incomplete Neck Bones and a Toe Bone
So hot
if im correct, spinosaurids were usually the largest therapod in their enviorment, right?
It varies, In North Africa(Egypt and Morrocoo mainly) Carchs are bigger. Sucho is the biggest in its formation though.
bro got his backer taken away
what happened to you
Ah yes
Isle of Wright Iggy
My Fab Lad
why write many word when few word do trick
its an iguanadon like femur, not at actual iguanadon
The yapper
he got his backer back
We just need more specimens to see
whats para's range
tbf the giant Edmonto and Para stuff is questionable as actually belonging to either taxon
I think there's some suggestion of developmental plasticity being widespread in dinosauria but to what degree I'm not sure
I think the next best explanation is speciation and/or sexual dimorphism but I suspect it's a combination of all three that explains these variable sizes. We need much bigger samples of basically every genus to determine one way or another
para's development plasticity amounts to some maxillae/jugals that are actually the same length as all the other maxillae/jugals and footprints that people think are parasaurolophus for no discernable reason
para's massive size variability is just fadeno pulling another fadeno
Yeah the evidence is stronger in Saurischia
with edmontosaurus there is indeed a lot of unresolved morphological variation in its purpoted hypodigm but with parasaurolophus its just like lying about the things size
granted there is some rtmp postcrania sometimes tentatively referred to walkeri that appears to be a good bit larger than the holotype but even that isnt nearly as dramatic as some of the size charts online would have you believe
"MOR 1609 was originally regarded as a gigantic specimen of Edmontosaurus annectens, but analysis of its morphology highlights several peculiarities... The maxilla and jugal morphologies observed in MOR 1609 are more similar to those observed in the saurolophin hadrosaurid Saurolophus. Incorporation of MOR 1609 into a phylogenetic analysis resulted in a polytomy for the strict consensus tree; the 50% majority rule tree places MOR 1609 outside of Edmontosaurini and within Saurolophini. Given the large size of the specimen, it is possible that the cranial features noted here represent late-stage ontogenetic changes within Edmontosaurus."
https://share.google/uAou5zGmdR9uz79Qv page 160
Given we have an extremely limited amount of Hadrosaur material in the size range of MOR 1609 it's hard to say anything definitively atm but it is questionable that those individuals are indeed Edmontosaurus
i generally agree with this but i dont think remarkable variation in size is a concern for most of anything but edmontosaurus
ofc i just meant in regard to the initial premise thats there drastic size variation in several hadrosaur taxa
granted i suppose there's an argument to be made for magnapaulia not actually having any diagnostic humerus characters
maybe they can also touch upon the purpoted hell creek lambeosaur crania nobody's bothered mentioning since like 20 years ago
giant Hell Creek Saurolophini would be cool
as of 20 years ago it was in the university of wyoming
there's images of its ribs thats about it
granted there was an abstract like 20 years ago about how they're diagnostically lambeosaur ribs which also has never been mentioned again so take that as you will
Posted last night too but the Naashoibito has been constrained to the latest Maastrichtian, pretty cool for latest-K diversity in NA https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adw3282
its so surprising the previous provisional magnetostratigraphic and radiometric analysis were correct and not the dinosaur biostratigraphy in the half of the continent with like five diagnostic taxa
thank you gsp please never try doing strat again 🤗
Lol
there's also an abstract from like 20 years ago about how it got half a rib torn out by a tyrannosaur and lived which again crickets
the first one is interesting cuz that's the author of the abstract I quoted from and the tweet was posted slightly before the abstract was published on at all
why are we ignoring the most interesting thing in hell creek then what
how long is supersaurus lourinhanensis
cause its a bunch of 20yo abstracts with no current followup
also wegweiser calls it a hadrosaurine in a 2006 abstract (which seems to be the last new word on the thing along with 2006 paper saying the crania has putative lambeosaur affinities)
unfortunately neither giant HC Hadrosaurid specimen has a femur, or any other limb material for that matter
there's also some crucial information we must keep in mind when discussing lancian dinosaur diversity
and on a 100% completely unrelated note would it be simpler to do a chart of every rebbachisaur and a chart of every flagelligaudate separately or do all of diplodocoidea in one chart
all 52 (20 rebacchisaurs, 30 flagellicaudates and haplocanthosaurus)
is this reddit et al.
there would be no better source
Evidence Torosaurus and Denversaurus are just Juvi Triceratops and Ankylosaurus?
if i split it into 2 I would probably have to do only diplodocimorpha considering Haplocanthosaurus is the only basal diplodocoid so I would be excluding 1 singular genus
S. osborni
Has anyone seen the new dinosauria animation? It's terrifying but so well made
go for it I like the idea of a 15 meter Saurolophus
Gigantosaurolophus
go go gadget augustynolophus fortlakepeckensis
anyone know how long supersaurus lourinhanensis is
Edmusthosaurus
or maybe Mustholophus to represent it being in a different clade
generally larger animals tend to be more robust but without limb or torso material that's just an inference
Heptakósiahebdomēkontaennéasaurolophus
meaning 779 dactylos (ancient greek measurement unit equalling about 14.996 meters) saurolophus
I still think Mustholophus is funnier but you're making the drawing
probably not too much no
Davidini schowdereni
Wb Goblindromaeus clashensis
if we discovered a fossil of a animal on another planet, would that still fall under paleontology?
Paleontology 2.0
it would probably be referred to as astro-paleontology or exo-paleontology
paleoastronomy or smth
Yeah it would be
We actually kinda did that probably on mars so that’s cool
(if we count microbes as animals)
are we team biped or quad ourano
ostensibly it was capable of both like other Hadrosauriformes but off the top of my head I don't know enough about its material to say anything beyond that
yea I don't think it's named or anything but there's one from Cedar mountain apparently
Seriously why did like nobody talk about this 💀 https://youtu.be/iWuFBZw9Olk?si=v7Zu9Rl5cNmbSfMK
also mods, this is paleontology
👍
The paper does not have a particularly exciting name https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09413-0 "Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars" but I am going to explain to you why it could go down in history as a pretty important moment.
Subscribe to our newsletter! https://werehere.beehiiv.com/subscribe
Le...
It's probably not the kind of thing people in this chat are used to being autistic over but it is a genuinely very exciting discovery
We playing Ourano in eoe bud
This is a case of microbial fossils inside a rock so idk how that could come from contamination
UChicago paleontologists have unveiled an extraordinary discovery: perfectly preserved "dinosaur mummies" that reveal, for the first time, the complete external appearance of Edmontosaurus annectens, a duck-billed dinosaur from 66 million years ago.
Through a rare preservation process called "clay templating," a paper-thin clay mask captured ev...
Best thing I saw this whole month
Oh no they already did that. They waited to share the news until they exhausted all other possibilities. Tbh idk how you missed it people were talking all about it a few weeks ago.
@ionic crescent thanks for making no cheeks look weird for me😭
EEWWWW!!!!
The face bro. Hadrosaurs need cheeks, you can’t change my mind.
education is important guys
Miragaia is the only invalid dino in pot rn
Not actually, laten is
Yeah nvm your right
Hasn't it been valid for some time?
Not since...2023(?)
Interesting, what was discovered in 2023?
Laten’s complicated because the 2025 troodon neotype proposal is unironically one of the most articulate arguments for its validity since its description
Wait Troodon is coming back?
Hopefully not but some workers are trying to regardless
I don’t see an issue with the name of Troodon
Can we just abolish all 3 of the big Troodontids into a new genus
Neomorphodon idk
To me it really depends on if the neotype gets approved or not. I still think it's super flawed but given carchar was also sketchy and people are letting it slide, I can't argue if they say it's legit.
tbf carchs neotype was never subject to an iczn petition so its acceptance is only really reliant on peer concensus rather than a strict ruling
I'm just talking logic-wise.
what happens if a neotype doesn't get an iczn petition
do we just act like it's a neotype until eventually people forget it's not
Is that not what spino is doing?
but my concern with troodon is moreso they make like zero coherent morphological argument any historically relevant troodon material is actually the same taxon as their neotype (and if anything lend more support to the contrary)
which would lead to the revised neotype-concept of troodon being entirely separate from "troodon" prior to the 21st century in both anatomy and relevant specimens
it doesn't seem to be working given the increasing opinion that FSAC isn't aegyptiacus
spinosaurus and carch both wont ever get an iczn petition because iczn petitions are only for non-lost/exploded holotypes anyways
so if a holotype is lost the first person to claim neotype just. gets it?
if everyone agrees it meets the iczn criteria yeah
which the iczn itself doesnt rule on so its kinda just based on vibes from workers
only when the holotype still exists is there an actual iczn petition and ruling
Edmont buff?
UChicago paleontologists have unveiled an extraordinary discovery: perfectly preserved "dinosaur mummies" that reveal, for the first time, the complete external appearance of Edmontosaurus annectens, a duck-billed dinosaur from 66 million years ago.
Through a rare preservation process called "clay templating," a paper-thin clay mask captured ev...
whats its buff?
anyone know what this could be? its an inventum mod a future inventum mod
its not a large sauropod, they said therizinosaurus is the largest mod they plan on ever making
jobaria
think it was confirmed cetiosaurus
they didnt say anything besides "its sillhoheted (ik i spelled it wrong) for a reason, you can try to guess tho"
thats bigger then theri
jobaria is pretty big, definitely bigger than theri
mini-jobaria
So THIS is why the Wwd torvo looks the way it does!!! New material gave us a new skull shape.
Don’t know why because this looks crushed to me
Elvis Mount isn't really
New Material tbf
And Looks Somewhat Crushed
WWD Skull is also thickers than in Elvis Mount and doesn't seem Crushed
as someone who has no experience in skeletals at all and has no clue what would look right or wrong, yeah that looks damaged
This two don't look the same(the Skeletal is Based on the Mount)
It definitely is warped in some capacity, although I'm failing to see how people are seeing a difference here. Torvo's kind of always looked like this. The more boxy skull has always been the minority.
This is just Mount Moment
Mounts are the reason ppl think Rex is a Fat ah and why Demphy's Acro is what it is
Nothing is wrong with Dempsey acro bud
It’s not the boxiness that’s the issue, it’s this whole part that looks comparable to deformation you’d see in specimens like due or wait is that what you said
Ahh Yes
Its an Acro thats Based on a Mount with some Unknown Stuff, Same Reason the Patato is based on a Mount and suddently gained a Massive Weight Boost
Same for Apato suddenly gained almost 20t out of the blue for been based on a Mount.
So Bud, I wouldn't Tfust Mounts 100%
Either way the skull here is definitely crushed
Oh you silly bud you.
"Silly bud"
Doesn't Prove why I am silly.
Totally average Paleo Response
No he’s got a point.
Museum mounts are notorious for proportional mishaps
Museum Mounts tend to have quite the margin of error and alot of other mistakes
This is not new at all
The Sue with a Torso thats Deeper than someone trying to look for my empathy(its almost none existant)
The lad is a silly one, but Dempsey papers are heavily researched, he’s probably has the best access just in terms of acro.
As for Torvo I could see it being crushed but how crushed is the question i don’t think it’s too far off this reconstruction , which i absolutely love.
My Guy
Demphy's himself said his Acro is Based on a Museum Mount😭
He also gave Pictures of said mounts
me when
It is though, ik theropod skulls can be sorta curvy sometimes but this looks like a lite version of Sue 😭
What are you suggesting
If you wanna reconstruct Elvis of the Mount Skull it will look like that.
Otherwise its more Megalosaurid Looking
That the skull is crushed and needs editing
Sue Skull ia funny
Skull looks fine on the reconstruction imo
honestly it looks perfectly fine, it really just depends on reconstruction, and it’s in a museum too so how it is shown here must be accurate to what the animal was like irl
Average Sue Moment
Stop this is no where near the same LMAO and you know it
I mean
The Point is to show that the Skull shows signs of been demorfed
Not the same Extent but still has issues
Gurneyi has a maxilia that from what I know was in better preservation that can be used for edmarka/elvis
Which I quote said it doesn’t look far off bud.
Wiehen is just
Bulky Megalo
He Peaks
I caught a whiff of the ragebait, nice try
The whole skull seems sort of crushed, which also accounts for the maxilia
Raging is just like that
You get use to it
Megalo can atleast defend itself
you can also see that the top of the naris is distorted
what would rex rely on the most?
a - its sight
b - its hearing
c - its smell
We don’t know much about dinosaur hearing capabilities, but I’d recon smell & sight would be the big 2
seeing its prey items, i feel like sight would probably be the best
Rex has Great Smell and Sight
It prob used that more than hearing
Tho its hearing waa likely good too
Its Rex ffs lol
Yeah
Totally Why when making WWD the Skull doesn't represent the Mounts Skull
Must be a low bar then because this is showing definitive signs of taphonomic distortion
It’s crazy that I’m being accused of rage baiting but overall the reconstruction looks fine , def better than the skull of Sue fish posted and said it’s a normal reconstruction lol
would all megatherapods rely mainly on sight due to their prey?
Straight up. It's not the worst but it is present. Although again I don't get why people are acting like torvo's head has been boxier until recently. It hasn't.
Basically all theropods had good vision so sure I guess
It looks Good for a Mount
But doesn't change that its Skull is the main issue
Ppl have compliment Sue's Mount despite its Gastralia error
Compliments≠best
Elvis description is also kinda
None exists or barely any good
Which doesn't help the mount
You can Reconstruct Elvis Skull without been crushed just fine lol
Why doesn’t it work? I don’t see how fixing up the obvious dent in the middle of the skull and tweaking the heights of various skull bones (like how people do with Sue’s skull, especially by using other Rex skulls) will make it inaccurate when it’ll match up more with what we know of megalosauridae in general?
This is legit just fine
like torvo's kinda always been like this, you just see the boxier head on a few mounts I don't get it
which dinosaur species has the most indivuality throughout its specimens?
Allosaurus, likely Rex, and triceratops
Its Fine
If you wanna base it off the Mount sure
Same way Demphy's is Fine if you wanna base it on a Museum Mount lol
It can look fine, doesn't meab uts Objectively fine tho
I can say the Sue Mount with a Gastralia to low looks fine despite objectively speaking is not
yeah those three pretty much, they have sheer volume of specimens contributing to that
really? trike? i thought it'd be either edmonto or styraco ( so unique it got turned into multiple animals )
Yeah I think the award would go to ceratopsids in general. Them having horn consistency between specimens is optional for a lot of them.
Ooo yes styra is definitely a good one
Edmonto maybe, but a lot of skulls that we thought were different species just represented different age groups
styracosaurus has very unique specimens just not as many of them with skulls as something like trike
Styra is prob a Good Candidate yeah
@hallow spear starting to think the best way to get apex stuff is through dempsey
also, whats the earliest tyrannosaurus? 73 mya?
Allo also multiplied by 10x and basically decided to be everywhere smh