#paleontology
1 messages · Page 192 of 1
Give the human a dagger and the odds switch
That is one big Ankylosaur
is this the one that's based on tooth scaling
Think so yes, tho iirc Random was able to downsize it?
I gave a try on scaling it and managed to get something WAY smaller
I’ll send it eventually trust
Only reason why behemoth priconodon existed was because it was probably scaled with sauropelta which has small centrums and can get something terrifyingly huge
Did it get like downsized or something
Can’t borealopelta survive getting rammed into by a car 😭. I feel like I remember a test with it
Hardly
primeval/weird birds ahh scenario
(I think the knight might win though)

even smaller.
gotta love people using outdated documentaries as a source for things that arent even relevant to the documentary
Sailfish speed have been re evaluated to much lower than that. Previous estimates were based on fishermen sayings about how fast their lines were rolling lmao.

anyone know if noahsaurus had its big claw on its toe, or hand, ive seen renditions with both and ive seen a couple of studies which point both ways so any thoughts?
It took a while, but here it is. The short film about Pycnonemosaurus!
Inspired by the magnificent illustration by @heitoresco_ , it shows a territorial clash between two specimens of Pycnobemosaurus, the largest genus of abelisaurid found in Brazil.
Pycno is a very fragmented specimen, but thanks to the numerous finds of its cousins, we can...
Noasaurus?
The large and curved unguals come from the hand, though for a moment it was thought they were paravian-like sickle claws
"Brazilian T. Rex"
so why is troodon considered a potentially dubious genus? and what woud those dinosaurs be assigned to if not troodon? (if possible answer in laymans terms, im not a biologist😅)
For the numbskull in the picture, it's allo europaeus
a sub adult a. europaeus with a broken jaw and no fighting experience vs an oversized depiction of the largest Torvosaurus species that didnt live in America
Real
Personally, I believe A. anax will win against a Torvosaurus, though with great difficulty
They're a lot closer in size than people think idk why everyone says torvo clears especially when A. Fragilis was by far the most dominant carnivore in the morrison
it makes up 72% of the morrison theropod fossil content for a reason
why did they use 2 seperate allo skeletals?..
also Fragilis isnt the largest specimen
wym
wdym
wym 2 separate allo skeletals and that fragilis doesn't have a large specimen
first,ly the first one is self explanitory, there are 2 different allo skeletals visible in use for Anax and fragilis
because they're 2 different species
why is the 'average torvosaurus' scaled to the smallest specimen
if that's the case 'average allosaurus' should be the neotype
it was the only one in existence I could find that had a scale bar and wasnt edmarka
and? you use fragilis for both skeletals because anax barely differs, ontop of that the 1st skeletal isnt even anax im pretty sure its just franoys sauropha/allo different species does not mean you use a random other skeletal
and the fragilis depicted is not the largest allosaurus fragilis specimen, is what i meant by "fragilsi isnt the largest"
oh wait yeah that one is sauro mb
but why should you use fragilis when showcasing anax when they're 2 different species? genuine question
they are the same genus and anax is fragmentory, using a different skeletal is just stupid
megalania and pygmy monitors are the same genus too and megalania is fragmentary so should a pygmy monitor skeletal be used to showcase megalania?
is Allosaurus anax and Fragilis a Megalania or Pygmy monitor? No. You would use Fragilis skeletal scaled to anax to depict Anax because anax is not complete or visually distinct enough to warrant a random skeletal being used purely because you feel like it
ok but you said that if theyre both in the same genus and one is fragmentary you should just use a skeletal from a different species in the genus so how come that only applies to allosaurus and not varanus?
Because i know nothing about Varanus so i cannot argue it. I do however know about allosaurus
You are using something to prove your point with allosaurus but you're ignoring the actual specimen from anax
varanus is the single worst animal you could use to argue this, its a complete mess and its taxonomy isn't really anything like other genera
I know, I'm just using anything other than allosaurus to show why im confused why a different species should always be used to represent a fragmentary member of the same genus.
Anaxs reconstruction is pretty much the same as fragilis atm so using a skeletal which is something completely different is kinda odd.
2nd one is anax
I misread it and thought it was an anax skeletal which is why I used it
so whats a good average for fragilis then
or is there not one
I think around 8.5m is an average for it
now torvo feels tiny
I feel like something went wrong with it because I scaled it the same as allo but it turned out smaller than it should have...
Its supposed to be 11.4m but it turned out as 10.7
Paleoconspiracy Theory Time: What if Allosaurus Anax is just Allosaurus Fragillis?
you are scaling allosaurus very wrong lmao, and torvo too
what if deinocheirus is just a really big tarbosaurus
so you are explaining things very wrong because i did it how you said it should be done
this is what it looks like when it is scaled correctly @brave nova @coral forge
#backer- chat
No, you just didnt scale it correctly. I Never said how to scale anything. You did it wrong through your own means
Pretty sure thats just because of the posture making the allos in the one i did look taller
(also youre proving me right because I scaled them using the one you just sent)
Each one of these squares is supposed to be 1m, the Allosaurs in this scale at over 12m in a straight line which they are not
they are 11.8 and 11.7 which are identical to the 2 largest in the one you just sent
No, they are 11.8 & 11.7m in a straight line which is not the same measurement as the image sent
wrong pic
11.8 and 11.7m respectively are their Centra lengths , not straight line measurements
is that not 11.8? You're phrasing this in a very confusing way. Could you try to be informative rather than rude and condescending please?
i am explaining it but this cooldown sucks & i dont think im being rude or condescending at all
you've called me stupid and instead of explaining how to correctly do it all you said was "you are scaling allosaurus very wrong lmao"
calling someone stupid and laughing at them for knowing less than you is pretty rude
I did not call you stupid, i said using a random skeletal of a random species to represent a different species is stupid there is a difference
This line is 1124 pixels long, which when divided by the 1m scalebar whcih is 144 pixels yields a straight line length of 7.8m, which is in contrast to the centra length of 8.3m
(I forgot the image one sec)
still calling my actions stupid which means you're calling me stupid
mabye try just not referring to anything that anyone does as stupid unless it very truly is?
Here is the image
so the 11.8m doesn't refer to the distance from the tip of the snout to the tip of the tail?
Correct, it refers to the vertabrae if it was stretched out on the skeletal, so for example it measures the vertabral centra from the tail to the head i will do an example in this message, this is lazily done but image it went to the end of the tail, this measurement then represents the meters estimate of 8.3m if completed, since it disregards posture in its estimate and is why like 99% of the skeletals you see will use this same measurement method
if you did want to scale in future you would need to match up the 1m bars
thats what I did but it somehow ended up smaller than it should be
That seems the right size
so even though the skeletal says 11.4m its actually 10.7 if you draw a straight line from the nose to the tail?
They are in the game right now, download the mod.
The skeletal says its 11.4 meters along the centra, which is measured by drawing a line through the centra of all the verts and it different from straight line length
Yo guys I need help
Which raptor sized dinosaur is like a duck
Halszkaraptor
Thank you
yeah so like the red line is 11.4 but the blue is 10.7?
Yes
Pretty sure that's an image i edited before for explaining once this before lol
so is there a way to tell how to size it correctly on a chart if there isn't a meter bar to go off?
If there are any measurements of the specimen like say a femur length, you can use that to get the femur length in pixels then figure out how long 1 meter would be in that images pixels
Like say the femur in that torvosaurus is 300 pixels long. That'd mean 300 px ~= 1.1 meters. So 1 meter = (300/1.1) pixels
So how do you tell how many pixels long it is?
Sorry if these are dumb questions I'm just curious
TBH I just use the image measurement tool + 1m scalebar https://imagemeasurement.online/image/select
Image Measurement is the service for measurement of your objects.
Paste the image into something like paint, there should be a line making tool that you can use to measure it. It'll say the length of the line on the bottom left
These aren't dumb questions at all btw, pretty normal when learning something.
Yes
does this mean pt torvo is oversized?@hallow spear
what is torvo's weight? someone said the edmarka rex thing is 6 tons
pt usually uses the largest possible sizes they can find
their para is based off a 12 ton estimate which is crazy
I dunno
I mean when Para was made, it was within reason
when they do it with para and torvo but no Goliath rex💔
12.5t para was valid 2 years ago?
Yea based on Fadeno's skeletals
damn
When PT made the t rex, goliath wasn't discovered
I wonder what specimen they based rex on since its listed as smaller than sue
Yes
PT Torvo was Specifically made 12m cause Allo is around 11.4m ingamr
5.2t. 6t is the pt torvo
No, They Used Sue
Their Rex is 12.4m
Its only difference is that is Based on Sue without Cartilage.
PT Rex and PT Torvo next to eachother in the first two pics
PT Torvo Lateral on the 3rd Pic
Randomdinos Torvo With and Without Cartilage, Scaled to PT Torvo(who is meant to have Cartilage while been 12m) and Cartilage Sue
Wym cartilage
Cartilage in theropods dramatically affects height
They used this Sue tmk
sue isn't 12.4m tall though
Sue is 12.8m long IIRC?
12.4 but close
You can tell I focus on mamms and fish
why do people get such different measurements for Sue
surely something that's like 90% complete shouldn't have 40cm differences depending on which source you use
Both PT Rex and Randomdinos Sue are 12.4m
40cm differences aren't much for a 1200cm animal
Funny Animals
its 3% the total length which is quite a lot of variation for something that's almost entirely complete
the difference between 12.4 and 12.8m on a t.rex is the same as 6ft and 6'2 on a human
But yesh
Sue and PT Rex are both 12.4m
is that the slim sub on the left
I honestly have never seen a 12.8m anywhere, Cope Scaling off Sue is like 12.7m lol
And This is how they both look next to eachotjer
I saw one earlier today that was 12.77 lemme find it
Thats...Torvo
Base PT Torvo Sub
Crazy.
Random's is 12.4m and Even Hartmans iirc is 12.3m
oh
megalosaurines really do look like mini tyrannosaurs huh
yeah I misread franoys' 12.57 as 12.77
I mean.
Edmarka is Wide, surprisingly.
Elvis is poorly described but tmk is thinnier
Apparently
I know, what im saying is people were asking if they were gonna upsize it and they said no
did you ever send it
so what were people able to get priconodon down too?
@stiff osprey
falcon is trying to cancel priconodon...
its gonna be a shame whenever the priconodon stuff gets published and we'll have to abandon the several separate attempted ring scalings of the thing floating around
this also makes suecheng far less annoying the priconodon on account of being actually measured
whats suecheng
I will point out all of the downsized priconodons are still obscene and giant for a nodosaur, just not small sauropod sized
How old is this multview and who all contribute to the making of it?
the giant zhucheng I'm pretty sure
larger then anky? or similar size?
Wasn't the bird just covered in antifreeze or something?
Its an old image
oh was the bird okay?
smaller
Was posted on 2024, tho its possibly a Bit Older
We do have this one which uses a Shorter Torso based on Elvis iirc
reminds me of that time they found a seagull covered in curry
current range is 7-10 meters and like 4-8 tonnes
which may sound like a wide range but consider that priconodon is known from 3 scraps of barely identifiable bone
what size tyrannosaurid fits Tyrantrum the best? ( tyrantrum is 8'02"/2.5 m and 595.2 lbs./270.0 kg)
Moros Intrepidus maybe
oh....
theres no tyrannosaurid of that weight that even gets past 1.5 meters tall but by weight I'd say bagaraatan or asiatyrannus but by height I'd say dasp horneri and length mabye alio
2.5m tall 4m long and only 270kg would require you to be insanely skinny
i'd expect it to be atleast tarbo size ToT
in the animated series its 4.3m tall making it significantly taller than any theropod but according to the pokedex its pretty tiny
most pokemon are tiny according to the pokedex
wailord in the games can be as large as a ship but barely weights a ton
thats why it can fly
pokemon has a weird weight system (tbh its so stuff like snorlax which would probably weight like 3 or 4 tons dont become stupidly OP with bodyslam which is based off of weight)
cosmoem weighs 999kg and is like 1ft wide
then again it is like a black hole or smth so even that is too light
I think its an entire galaxy inside it, and lillian can carry it in her purse like its nothing lol
pokedex entries are weird tbh
they say one thing but stats say another
theres one pokemon that can move lightning fast according to the pokedex but its speed stat is like 80
hmm yes hmm the ground shattering reptile that provokes earthquakes and willingly splits water so it can walk on ground is as heavy as a muddy horse, hmm yes
it moves lightning fast only when no one is watching, like a weeping angel
vikavolt 🥀 nintendo trying not to make fun of bug types challenge: impossible
Want to learn how to animate with Blender? Try TOAnimate Blender Animation course: https://toanimate.teachable.com/a/aff_f5ccv22b/external?affcode=1192974_ua3_0zok
The courtship behavior of modern birds are extremely diverse and unique. One bird in particular called the Bowerbird would build structures out of branches and decorate them with col...
also rayquaza the giant space dragon that resembles a meteor when flying has a speed stat of 95
slower than obese cat (purrugly)
what if their speed is just based off of reaction speed?
it can dodge light speed attacks at point blank so that makes even less sense
iirc rhyhorn has a really hefty speed stat and its said they constantly run into stuff and cant stop running
25 speed 💔
nevermind
Actually modern calculations place it as lightning fast...
big beefy chungus plesiosuchus
Pokemon are in a strange size range where they are bigger than the smaller real world animals but nowhere near the largest animals documented
if it was just the height, who would tyrantrum be most compareable too?
I'm honestly not sure
dasp horneri
Erm...Nanotyrannus...
lythronax
actually it might be more comparable to an alio with an unnaturally long and beefy neck
obese alioramus
Lythronax is best with the fat skull
alioramus if it was a tyrannosaurini
if you use the one from the show mabye, but bista or tarbo would probably fit better no?
Are we using that one or this previous one because the one you just posted is gigantic
the official size 2.5m tall which is what I used in the dasp comparison but the one in the lythronax pic is the size shown in the anime which is 4.3m
Don't they have a "skeleton" of one of those at a pokemon museum?
Maybe that could be useful to reference instead
Fun fact: The initial brake up of Gondwana in the early Jurassic was started by the Karoo-ferrar lip(large igneous province) which was a Gondwana wide flood basalt event. It also helped cause the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic event which killed 23% of marine and in the Cleveland basin 87% of benthic species went extinct.
I’m just realizing how a smaller Rex in between the sizes of Thomas (LACM 150167) and Stan (BHI 3033) would’ve potentially been so much more deadly than a giant Rex like Goliath sue or Scotty
(Yes I know Thomas and Stan were huge but weight wise they were actually on the lower end of the large rexes) I feel like they would have all the size advantages (bite force sheer weight etc) with the agility advantages as well
Deadlier to who? That just depends what animal groups you’re talking about.
To us
koolasuchus better
Well a Rex that size probably wouldn’t be hunting the largest of herbivores maybe ceratopsians ankylosauridae maybe younger hadrosaur species (edmontosaur etc)
Also this palaeontologist studying stuff hard man😭
pretty sure the Lyth is alittle off, Hartman is okay here
Chilantaisaurus
my goat!
Thanks
We don't rlly know how tall Bista was is the thing
The postcrania is still being prepared but is supposedly super complete
what sauropod is auorus most compareable too? (8'10/"2.7 m and 496.0 lbs./225.0 kg)
height is comparable to amargasaurus, weight is comparable to nothing because no sauropod is that small
even europasaurus is still like the size of a moose
why must pokemon be so light
apparently because they have weight based moves so an accurate sized sauropod would just obliterate the other pokemon
if they didnt have to take weight into balance, it would weigh like 4 tons?
not really because it isn't built like amargasaurus at all
so...lighter or heavier?
pokemon height is measured to the top of the head so it's probably closer to 1t
and tyrantrum if it had a accurate weight?
which is funny because there are 2 1 tonne pokemon
one is a black hole goblin and the other is a horse
Many such cases
Someone should GDI Aurora
there's probably some pokemon fan out there who has ripped the 3d models of every pokemon from one of the latest games and can do it in 3 seconds
i can do it rn, what do i do?
you'd need a side and top view of the model that are in the same pose as eachother without perspective
sir yes sir
now what
are you in blender? the program has an automatic volume calc thing but i don't know how to use it
i could gdi it for you but if you learn how you should be able to do it faster in blender anyway
i have no clue how, so please do gdi do it for me, im very slow
this is so peak
@hallow spear blender volume calc. teach this man
i just did it in spyder, total volume is ~925 liters so assuming the same density as regular amargasaurus it weighs 900 kg
my 1 t guess was close
this however is very much not paleontology so i will stop talking
i mean, its kinda paleontology
anyone got any idea on how to make scales and make them look realistic
Drawing them
sherlock holmes
It is the fossil Pokémon so technically yea
in a realistic scenario, would the deinocherius have a higher chance then 50% to survive its encounter with the sarco?
Assuming they're right next to each other and perspective isn't the cause for Sarco's gigantic size
Probably not
Considering Deinocheirus is what? Double Sarco's size?
3.5 tons vs like 7
At the scale in the image Duck is dead for sure
if we assume the duck is farther back would it be more fair?
POT Sarco is about 12m
God knows how Oversized Deinoc is
But if we go throw the scale in the art, Deinoc has it Complicated
i thought majority of the apexes got changed to around their irl sizes?
alright, in a realistic scenario, what would probably happen in the context with whats happening in this image
either the dasp would be able to try to score the neck (if it can do so while getting around the frill) or the dasp would die from an impale wound
I mean
Deinoc got no Model TLC nor Size Decrease.
Rex got a Better Model and slightly Smaller(its about 13.2m)
Titan is quite Oversized at 13m while the Paratype is 11.6m
Spino Seems to be About 15-15.5m?, Which isn't Completely Aweful given NHMUK is 14.7m along the Centra
Eo is still Gigantic for what Eo is meant to be, Is like 9m or more? While Eo is 7m, however the downsize it got WAS needed cause lord
Bars is like 15-16m when the Animal is like 10.93m
I sent someone into insanity with this ball knowledge
Guys guess what
https://youtu.be/tSUPOJjYCWw?si=k5UHHF_RK5yzSO4p is this accurate
Sígueme para más contenido/Follow me for more content.
📢Contacto.
Contáctame por si deseas tener más información o los estudios al respecto en mis redes sociales.
Contact me if you'd like more information or to read more about the studies on my social media.
⚈Discord: https://discord.gg/ejd7qEKFaP
⚈WhatsApp: https://chat.whatsapp.c...
anyone know how heavy theropod saurophaganax was
5.7-7.2t tarbo feels a bit big
same with 5.6t megalo, 8.4t titan and acro, 8.6t mcraeensis and 9.6t mapu
technically you could make this skeletal even thinner because the soft tissue isn't really aligned with the skeletal
I'm so sad desmostylians didn't make it they would've been like herbivorous pliosaurs by now
so true lol
Does anyone have measurements of how tall Apatosaurus may have been standing only on its hind legs
what is that dinosaur?
A dinosaur 
Oh I pinged wrong picture
what is that dinosaur? chilantai?
Yup, here's another reconstruction of it(we just have legs and some arm material of it sadly)
Hi, I have a question, do Kryptops and Carno have the same size?
No, Krytops is a much smaller abelisaur iirc
kryptops' description like many other abelisaurs was super poop, its in reality a very small abelisaur
There's more material than I thought
Ok, nvm. I forgor this guy was apart of the eocarch chimeric stuff
I haven't watched it. But Darknix is quite thorough with their research, having often seen the process
@coral forge
5.7 - 7.2t Tarbo if quoted like that isn't out of the realm of possibility, especially considering the private skull specimen
IIRC we have some giant fragments of Megalosaurus and giant footprints from it too
The Carchs sound a bit heavy tho
i have a question, in a realistic scenario, would the pachy be able to escape from the pycno?
In a realistic scenario, we don't have a lot of Pycno to say
If its built like a 10m long Carno it might have a chance of catching it? But Pachy is pretty heavily built for speed so I wouldn't bet on it
fr? ive never heard anything about a giant torvo or megalo
Assuming pycno was doing the same thing as other South Murican abelisaurs, bob and weaving through trees might work as long as it survives the initial ambush
in a realistic scenario neither of these groups have evidence of coexisting
well if they did
Fastest non avian dinosaur with research?
"It has front facing eyes like us, so if a T.rex was looking at you, it was looking AT YOU"
(I hate this TikTok audio so much because all animals with front facing eyes look in front of themselves)
Microraptor in a hurricane
Patagotitan entering the Earth’s atmosphere
I was thinking where’d they get those megalo estimates?
Prob this Guy, the Parker Coll Femjr
9.6t Mapu is based on a Specimen Material Worse than even Dentary Giga
Bruh
one of the large ornithomimids probably
You mean our goat
His carno got that big? It’s crazy how big it is compared to other Abelisaurs
What’s it based on lol
https://www.ameghiniana.org.ar/index.php/ameghiniana/libraryFiles/downloadPublic/141
possible campanian-maastrichtian spinosaur 
(its croc teeth)
carno isn't too big, kryptops is just tiny
I think its the Pubis or a MidCaudal
Either way its bad
Ok fastest carnivorous dinosaur?
Carno is pretty big for an abelisaur, not many that get bigger
Way to be a Debbie downer /j
peregrine falcon
for non avian dinosaurs its juvenile gorgosaurus iirc
probably stuff like khankhuluu and alectrosaurus
Forget to add non avian
small tyrannosaurs
pretty sure juve gorgo was the fastest but I could be wrong
Majunga is quite Big
Just Short Legged
thats the biggest majunga ive ever seen
That's based on a fragmentary skull roof iirc, most majungs are much smaller
Its like
8.1m, Random's Carno is 7.8m
Its Hartman's Majunga just on a Neutral Posture
Like Most Animals
Sucho's Holotype is the Big one, the Refered Material and Other Specimen are Smaller
Carno is only the Holotype However
Kinda hope it ends up being another abelisaur, would be cool to see what else was living with majung
We do have Sub Adults Majunga's Seemingly anyways (UA 8678)
Megaraptor Chilantai on top
Yup, most majungs are around this size
just let me hope
they even give reasoning why they think it's not a croc
Sub Adults are usually Smaller well yeah.
Doesn't mean when Adults they usually get Big
Google says the fastest dinosaur was compsagnathus interesting
Livyatan best girl
I think it'd be either gali or alio/qianzhousaurus whichever is bigger
Alio isn't even an Adult so maybe
Guys this person's last name copied Livyatan melvillei
What are some ambush predator dinosaurs?
Probably all of them, most predators rely on ambush
most carnivores with proportionally short legs and lots of bulk are ambush predators
All predators utilize Ambushing to some degree.
Since there's no real downside to ambushing your prey
true but I'd consider an "ambush hunter" as anything that cant hunt without an ambush
like cheetahs will ambush their prey but theyre pursuit hunters because they chase their prey, but tyrannosaurus on the other hand cannot chase and if the ambush is not pulled off it will most likely fail the hunt
ambush hunter - will most likely fail a hunt if unable to ambush. Examples: t.rex, crocodilians
pursuit hunter - chases their prey. Examples: abelisaurids, cheetahs
endurance hunter - will fight indirectly for extended periods until prey dies from hunger, exhaustion etc. Examples: carcharodontosaurids, wolves
Cheetahs rely on ambush, they can only run for at most 30 seconds. It can't exactly just run up on prey
The fastest land predators alive today need ambush
yes but a failed ambush doesnt guarantee the hunt to be failed
a cheetah can still chase its prey, a tyrannosaurus cannot chase its prey
Dunno why it can't, most of tyrannosaurus' large prey are slower than it
the only thing faster then rex was edmonto ( that it was normally hunting )
there were 4 multi ton herbivores in its ecosystem and it would be unable to hunt 3 of them without an ambush
uhm
edmonto
toro
trike
mosasaurus thats washed up on the beach?
Edmonto, Denver, Anky, Toro, Trike H and Trike P. There are more than four
oh yeah I forgot about toro
alamo
trike (ambush required)
toro (ambush required)
anky (probably unhuntable regardless unless caught upside down somehow)
edmont (ambush required)
how did you get 4 if you forgot toro
i only thought of alamo trike anky and edmont
Baby or laying down dying Alamo*
i mean like, if rex is hunting alamo thats probably because its young, sick/old or has a disability
cheetah's too only chase prey after getting close enough to prey from ambushing, nothing a rex wouldn't do
yeah, an ambush would still probably be required on a laying down alamo
Alot of Ambush is needed even for Current Animals
Cause Ambushing and Catching by Surprise is the Main issue way to win the fight
Also why are we not including Denver on this list vro it's a multi ton herbivore 🥀
denver is being a bum in ankys basement and refuses to go outside and interact with the world
tyrannosaurus can definitely chase down any of the large herbivores in its environment, easily too for most of them
it mostly 'needs' to ambush because most of them are capable of defending themselves, but by the mentioned standards of ''it can/can't chase'', tyrannosaurus is a pursuit predator
isn't denver below 2t
Jaguars are pretty noticiable ambush predators when it comes to killing Caimans.
Ambush Predators are kinda just
Alot of Predators
could you say baleen whales also count as ambush predators?
It's 3 tons
Everything ambushes, if your prey sees you before you get close. The hunt has already failed
That too
I'm not saying nothing ambushes im saying things that are obligate ambush hunters and are not built for chasing for extended periods are far more likely to fail a hunt if they fail an ambush
The only obligate ambush hunters that NEED ambush to the extent you're talking about is crocodillians
what are we arguing for and against? im really confused
Rex mostly Ambushes cause most things its Area can fight it Back or in Edmonto's Case mostly run away
But Rex is pretty much Faster than Toro and Trike
Rex can pretty much Chase all its Prey Items but maybe a Not that Big Edmonto
Apparently what an ambush predator is and isn't
thats.... what im saying
You said that if Rex Failed an Ambush it can't Pursuit Prey unlike Cheetah(Despite Cheetah arguably needing Ambush more than Rex)
Isn't that true for basically every carnivore that lives out of water ever?
Then its mainly just endurance hunters like wolves and other canines which can run for long distance and ambushers like tigers and other cats. For dinos, I'd imagine ones like albertos and otehr long legged ones would be good at endurance or atleast longer distance hunting than other theropods. Most other theropods might just stop after a shorter chase liek cats
No, I said that it cant pursue for extended periods making it rely on ambushing more than most other predators
Everything ambushes, it's stupid not to but some animals simply rely on it more than others
Saying Rex 100% needs an Ambush vs Toro and Trike just sounds dumh.
Sure, am Ambush is Obviously the Better and Much Safer Option
But saying that Without an Ambush it just not ablento is just
Lol
i thought rex could
The first sentence is literally just cheetahs
Basically all cats
you are completely misinterpreting what im saying
not once have i said a failed ambush is a guaranteed failed hunt
Rex is a Pretty decent Pursuit Predator for its Size.
Is Speed and Agility are overall superior to most of its Prey.
Cheetah Relies on the Ambush, moment Cheetah Ruins it and misses, once it runs out of Gas it can no Longer pursuit
I feel that using Cheetah as a Comparison was just
Not Great
panthers are predominantly ambush hunters but you could argue for lions bordering on endurance hunters because they will occasionally spend days on a single hunt
Yeah
Cheetah Arguably Relies on Ambushing more than Others
Cause while Fast, its Enduramce is kinda Cheeks
And if they don't catch up to their prey in those few secs
Yeah
Basically same as Rex.
I wouldn't say a Carch is a Pursuit Predator only cause its Bleed when Rex is Probably as good for that lol
Where are you getting they spend days on a single hunt?
Also if that statement is true, it would make sense considering they can have members rest while the others remain hunting. A solo lion wouldn't be an endurance hunter
Its about the same amount as most other cats, Tigers chase very little too after the initial burst, Jaguars and leopards I don't think chase for long either
They mostly chase very little cause Prey is usually kill on the Spot Yeah.
And for Jaguars vs Caimans mainly to Inmobilize the Caiman Quickly
I was referring to failed hunt situations. Cheetah's iirc have much higher succesful hunting % compared to other cats
Thats why i said occasionally and bordering on.
There have been a few recorded cases of groups of lions hunting weak/injured hippos over multiple days meaning they will employ endurance hunting tactics sometimes but definitely not all times
So can you link or tell me where to find said recorded cases? I'm not denying if it's true I was literally just asking where you got that information
I mean
Cheetah Prey are Gazelles most times
A Sucesful Ambush much times will result in Food
But its possible
Why do felids have such low endurance and canids have high endurance? What's going on for them to be so different?
Yeah, I live at the same time as this, this is epic (can't say the same for my grandchildren though)
Proboscis dinosaur
You have re-awoken a rage inside of me that has been dormant for years
Why
A proboscis is not reasonable on a reptile and they look weird
Differing strategies result in differing morphologies and vice versa. One example is the forelimbs, canids can be more cursorial with both fore and hind limbs and paws because they aren't used for grappling prey
A proboscis requires a ton of face muscles which reptiles don't possess
He’s tuff don’t lie
Reptile face muscles (Archosaurian and Lepidosaurian)
https://www.kenyawildparks.com/do-lions-hunt-hippos/ this is the main one that I found because it is insanely rare but it talks about how when hippos are hunted the lions wait until its exhausted which is more or less endurance hunting
Do lions hunt hippos? The answer is yes—but only under specific and often desperate conditions. Lions generally prefer to go after easier, less dangerous prey. However, in the right (or wrong) circumstances—a vulnerable calf, an isolated adult, a drought-stricken savannah, or a bold young lion—hippos can become targets.
If you're talking about an extended nose then yeah that's possible but if you're talking about elephants or tapir level stuff than absolutely not
What about stuff like muttaburra
isn't that just a giant nose like what bars has ingame
That's just a giant nasal region, basically just an extended nose
Could a carnivore have that
I don't see why not
Do we have any evidence of it
I don't know
I looked up barsboldia skeletal and just got this. What the flipperoni 💔
barboldia Laticaudus
I miss Lambeosaurine Barsboldia
At least we got this mf
I miss 25t lambeosaurus magna
Magnapaulia best hadrosaur
For the first time in 150 million years, a stegosaur is giving up its secrets; thanks to a skull so complete it’s rewriting their history.
Found in Spain, it’s the most complete stegosaur skull ever uncovered in Europe. The fossil belongs to Dacentrurus armatus and is so well-preserved that scientists have re-drawn the family tree of stegos...
1923
@hallow spear
least oversized prehistoric wildlife chart
Well wasn’t that when ekrix was like scaled to some sort of abelisaur that made it gigantic?
I'd be surprised if it was scaled to something other than an abelisaur considering it is an abelisaur
Its just an older estimate for ekrixinatosaurus, since it had a larger skull than carnotaurus(we know now better than to trust skull length for abelisaur scalling)
The urge to scale an abelisaurid to its skull despite them having proportionally big skulls
though the legs are still way too long
I love the murder sausages ❤️🩹❤️🩹
But yeah its got a big and wide skull, basically wider than rex if scalled to the same skull length
Nah but that’s just crazy how big ekrixinatos skull was lol
is a ceratopsians center of gravity / balance the same as like, a sheep or cows?
can we trust cotylorynchus skull length for erythrosuchus scaling?
or what if tarbo had the same arm length as duck
Good question
Godzilla..
Seems extremely overly dramatic lol
Which one would dromaeosaurids be
It's really just a difference in their builds and lifestyles. Felids usually opt for short bursts of power rather than exhausting prey via endurance like canids do. this is why big cats can only reach their insane top speeds for a few seconds.
Well what’s it about?
Very likely more front heavy
There are some feliforms that have that more endurance focused build like hyenas and homotherium iirc
Yeah for sure, but generally speaking they simply employ different strategies, not that they are just somehow less capable of becoming that way.
If you count a hummingbird's odd, butterfly convergent beak, then you are not wrong
Niche partioning and extinction
The low endurance ambush Canids got outcompeted by cats which were better at the niche, largely due to retractable claws and shorter skulls better for powerful biting
For example, Hyenas are feliforms with high endurance, with a couple extinct species almost resembling cheetahs. Bone cracking dogs were more robust and better suited for tackling large prey in ambushes. The whole Homotherium lineage was far more cursorial than modern cats as well, despite being sabertoothed. Amphicyonids only went extinct relatively recently, but were largely built like members of Panthera
Even Bears have some more cursorial giant relatives that went extinct.
Basically, almost every lineage tried both ambush and pursuit hunting methods. Cats are extremely proficient predators, and their lineage of pursuit hunting Basically just died out between humans and the ice age, while the ambush dogs got outcompeted by big cats, and the last more "robust" and ambush favoring dogs went extinct in the ice age
Liekly about the Miragai / Dacent lump
Ofc lol
How possible is this
This is extremely possible
They're based on a mix of salamanders and hippos
salamanders?
Hes right, they do kinda look like Salamanders.
A salamander is a lizard-like amphibian
i know what a salamander is
Got the pnso carcha model from 2021, it’s pretty accurate for 2021 the only thing I wish it had was lips
I put it behind my real carcha tooth
How do you know?
Did you buy it or dig it up from the Kem Kem yourself?
So? How do you know what a salamander is
I ant going to Morocco for a Dino tooth, I bought it
inform me on how i wouldnt knwo what a salamander is
Y'know
Ragebait
Wouldn't requires a would, tell me how you would know what a salamander is
y'know
I know people don't care for anything concerning Colossal, but I've always had this nagging question about their "dire wolves."
Yes, they are not true dire wolves.
Yes, they are "just" GMO grey wolves.
But, beyond that, what Colossal ended up doing was achieve the end result of generations of selective breeding in one generation.
Dogs are a subspecies of wolf, or at least some people say as much, others simply consider them Canis lupus.
So how genetically dissimilar does something have to be to be considered a subspecies? At what point, genetically, do Colossal's animals become something other than just GMO grey wolves?
Ngl we should make up a term for genetically edited animals that are meant to be morphologically different
Kinda how breed is a made up but not scientific word.
I think it’s called a mutant
Do you think its even necessary to add another Crocodilian? If so, what would be a good and separated option from Sarco?
Probably a more land based one
Isn’t T. Rex just all three of these
I believe Breed is still the same idea
GMO is used like that
Yeah but a more common name would be nice considering animals like these are most likely gonna get more and more common
“GMO” has filled that gap already as a common buzzword for genetically engineered animals though
the people who talk about GMO wheat giving their dog autism aren’t the same ones who engineer the wheat
Its important to note that even natural breeding is considered GMO
autistic dogs were not in my 2025 bingo card
GMOs are safe to consume, 90% of the pushback is due to people either A. fearmongering for a certain agenda or B. not understanding what they are in the first place. The same people who get twitchy about GMOs are usually the same people who want vaccines banned because they think it causes autism, it’s pseudoscientific nonsense.
There actually shellfish but id go as far as calling them terrestrial sea slugs
they are otters, guys, they are otters
Furless otters, nice one
I'm sure they got inspiration from em but there's no way there isn't some salamander and hippo there
how?
the pokedex lists it as "the hermit crab pokemon" and hermit crabs are shellfish
I just heard of plaussible Maastrichthian Spinosauridae in South America 🙏😭
watch tiktok call it fake and everyone who likes it is a poser because its fragmentary and therefore just a spino or smth
What was bro doing living same time as Tyrannosaurus
correction what was tyrannosaurus doing living at the same time as bro
did bro just find out about montanaspinus
oh wait no this is a different thing
Its just tooth fragment, not plausible to assigned a species or genus, but they know is a Spinosauridae
oh yeah tiktok is gonna have a field day with that
turns out the teeth aren't spinosaur they're some sort of random croc teeth, but both clades do apparently have superficial similarities (probably due to similar niches & prey items)
https://x.com/TomHoltzPaleo/status/1964444300110156119?t=WFu8lofMQOd7SypVp1lwNw&s=19
Here funny paper
G.J. Olmedo-Romaña et al. (2025)
Theropod and sauropod dinosaurs from the Campanian–Maastrichtian Bagua Basin of Perú, including the first possible report of Spinosauridae in western South America.
Ameghiniana
doi: 10.5710/AMGH.13.02.2025.3627
https://t.co/msd8Bx6FRe
it's not spinosaur
Shhh, It is, Maastrichthian Spinosaurids are real, trust me
technically all reptiles are spinosaurs
is it a reptile? does it have a spine? its a spined reptile
Reptiles should be renamed "Spinosaurus"
guy who thinks “shellfish” refers to any animal with a shell:
did we use all 100% of our brain for this one
no
like 24% max

Cause there pokedex literally calls them the the shellfish pokemon with the fact they look like hermit crabs with 4 legs
which size is better for pycno? I assume the second one but I just wanna be sure
theyre around the same length but 2 is considerably taller
Nothing about them looks like hermit crabs other than the shell
"nothing about them looks like hermit crabs other than the main defining feature of hermit crabs"
both are probably fine, not like we know who pycno's closest relative is
I'll just go with the second one then because I dont like pycno being shorter than carno
Pycno probably was shorter than Carno in height cuz Carno has an absurdly long femur for its size
nuh uh
behold, a hermit crab
Snails are born with their shells and their shells aren't the same as hermit crabs
hermit crabs wear snail shells
not always
you cant just call a snail a hermit crab because they both have shells and hermit crabs sometimes wear snail shells
behold, a hermit crab
does that species of octopus live in the shell or is that just a random octopus sitting in a shell
Veined octopus
ok so you could say that it is an octopus that resembles a hermit crab, perhaps even being named after them if someone else named them
Behold, a hermit crab
that's an orange
Hermit crab (actually a crab)
What did I miss?
What if spinosaurus was the one who hunted sauropods and not carcharodontosaurus because how can carcharodontosaurus reach the sauropods if they live in the water 24/7 because of their weight
I'm gonna remove your spine and ability to produce internal heat and then we'll see what you're called (in Minecraft)
Hermit crab shells aren't even their own shells how can that be their defining feature?
Hermit crab semantics
Because the shells they have are what most people recognise them by even if they aren't part of their body
If we went off of what most people mostly called something then south american foxes would be true foxes
We got taxonomy for a reason brotato chip
??
what do you think im trying to say
We go off of what they actually are not what most people say they are or recognize them for
yeah, except slowbro resembles a hermit crab and was thus named after them
It's a pink hippo salamander otter with a shell on the tip of it's tail how is that resembling a hermit crab
If I slap a snail shell onto your finger are you resembling a hermit crab?
People 100% recognize hermit crabs by their behavior and face, if we went off of shells it would be illogical
Oh, I guess that ain’t too bad

I did a coastal population survey the other day at a local beach and my god the hermit crabs were a pain to count because they were all wearing mud snail shells
I dont think you can say hippos are omnivores.if there are a good amount of plant and stuff to eat they will very rarely or not eat meat
This opens spec evo for predatory Ceratopsians if they didn't go extinct
Oh I know, I'm just posting this because I think its ridiculous that people hear that example of a deer eating a baby bird and suddenly think they're omnivores
I used to be a profile writer for a realism server (don't recommend) and everyone wanted us to let eo hunt things like rexes
Aren't those cases during times of need where an animal would be super low on protein and calcium?
Exactly, its dietary supplementation
Letting Eotrikes hunt Rexes is wild work, at the biggest they'd eat a Compy or a Rhamph
oh hey I remember that lmao
the reason its called the hermit crab pokemon, is not because its a hermit crab, its because its like a hermit crab in the way it "found" a shell to protect itself, ie, Shellder
The Hermit Crab Pokemon implies the existence of Hermit Crabs that aren't Pokemon within the Pokeverse.
Lots of pokemon names are like that
does anyone know what prehestoric life they refrence?
You can distinguish hermit crabs from other Anomourans even when they don't have shells. They got a soft coiled abdomen coiled to the side. Their 4th and 5th pair of limbs are also modified to hold on said shell and eggs.
I recently learnt the origin of "hermit crab" in French, which we call "Bernard l'Ermite" : it was a wastebasket term referring to a lot of marine invertebrates.
oh damn, really?
Crinoids
can criniods do this "It ensnares prey with its eight tentacles. It then melts the prey with a strong acid before feeding."
IVE BEEN SAYING THIS FOR YEARS!!! The beak and the slicing teeth could eat small game and scavenge no problem. They had horns that required Calcium and Keratin to grow, they needed protein and Calcium to make that happen. Large animals today who are less equipped to eat meat than Ceratopsians hunt small critters and scavenge bones for the minerals and nutrients to supplement their diet. I think a trike would not hesitate at all to eat a hatchling, turtle, small dead or dying animal, or grubs/bugs if the opportunity came up. They have the jaws to do so and food is food. Even "plant eating" reptiles today eat bugs and the occasional vertebrate, and beaked birds like the Hornbill hunt bats and lizards despite being fruit and nut specialists.
If you scale that up, anything smaller than a ceratopstians head would be viable food, meat or not. If one was going off of percentage of plant vs meat in modern day animals, grizzly bears in some areas eat 87% plant life, supplementing with fish, grubs, and whale meat. Others hunt small game daily, even large game if the opportunity arises or the season provides it. Which begs the question... did some ceratopdians engage in similar behavior?
I, uh, think you missed the point. I'm posting this, especially with this emote
, to express my doubt about it
damn.
No crinoids are filter feeders
Ceratopsians have specialized teeth for grinding hard matter like bark, not slicing.
Ceratopsiana certainly have no reason to be thought of as anything but herbivorous
Dietary supplementation does not change their overall feeding strategy
Ceratopsian beaks are more similar to a parrot than a bird of prey well
In terms of function, not in terms of structure. Parrot skulls are cursed.
If we're being serious, Stegosaurs and Ankylosaurs also have significantly higher amounts of Chitin and bone display than Ceratopsians do
And feathered herbivores like Therizinosaurs also have huge keratin displays that would require constant maintenance due to shedding!
is there any way to tell whats a obligatory herbivore/carnivore in prehestoric species?
Oh I see. My point still stands. Domestic and wild hooved have less biting power than ceratopsians, and are less equipped to eat flesh. Yet there is multiple accounts and videos showing them doing the opposite, eating chick's, mice, I saw a cow eat a snake in a video and in person. And there are parrots that eat meat as well as fruit, like the Kia bird. I highly doubt an animal that needed to put on mass as fast as larger Ceratopsians like Triceratops and Styracosaurus wouldn't venture into eating meat or seeking out bones or forms of protein that were not plantbased as they went through growspurts into adults. It happens with a lot if different species, mammal, bird, and reptile, today
By the same logic then it becomes entirely not worth mentioning because its a universal herbivore behavior, not a "ceratopsian" thing. Hadrosaurs would need far more nutrients as would sauropods!
I love the pfp bro
I will point out there was an isotopic study done on Dinosaur Park Formation animals and ankylosaurs were eating as much meat as ceratopsids
As in none
Wdym, clearly ankylosaurus was a bloodthirsty killer that ate the shattered remains of dinosaur ankles
That's what dakotaraptor's chimera is, it was a pile of the vicious ankylosaur's kills
Its definitely worth talking about and speculating imo. I have a hunch (not every species but the larger and mid sized ones that lived more solo life styles) were more omnviorus based on the season and plant avaliablity. And I'd also like to point out fossil bias being a thing. The isotopic testing may have applied to those individuals, but I doubt those ones stand for the millions we will never had. Like I said, I speculate they ate small game from time to time, and only the ones who had to struggle more for food. No dino was a blood thirsty killer, but I think the strong jaws of the frill heads were Def able to eat meat if pushed to it.
This doesn't mention hadrosaurs however...
And this is because the local hadrosaurs were the ones keeping the herbivore population in check
The theropods were just scavenging the leftovers...
the only times that genuine herbivores eat meat in the modern day is when they're genuinely malnourished, why are we speculating when herbivorous dinosaurs became malnourished just to push meat eating propaganda lol
The problem is you're assuming they had abnormally strong jaws
If we look at a camel and crocodile skull then apply the same logic, the camel bites harder than the croc + sharp teeth thus it's omnivorous
but the more important thing is that this was already studied and doesn't really have any backing!
would you rather get bit by archelon or udanoceratops
I have a theory
"would you rather get your arm cleaved off or get your arm cleaved off" fixed the question for ya
Also worth noting that Triceratops at least had poorly developed olfactory bulbs, a poor sense of smell isn't the best tool for an omnivore-scavenger
Actually, its olfactory bulbs were in its horns
Ah yes, and the frill was a radar dish to hone in on prey
Would you rather get bit by camarasaurus or edmontosaurus
I envy camels and any other mammal omnivorous, why they have good developed teeth, for each diet, and we have so bad teeths, and we are omnivorous.

Because human skulls have been shrinking a while
The skull hasn’t, from my research the jaw has
Camels eat meat to supplement their diet! And I don't assume for the strong bite, but it simply supports the claim. And they were not abnormally strong, but they were strong. The reason I believe they engaged in supplementation through meat and bone and other organic sources is this: their horn and frill growth! The plants alone most likely wouldn't support that 100%, much like modern day animals big and small who grow display structures and horns for interspecies combat.
Im also not sure the point you are making here: camels eat meat, they eat carrion and small vertebrates/ insects, and have a strong bite (no where near the bite of a crocodile, thats an absured thing to insuate) , and are, in general, still considered herbivores. But like I said, not all, but some ceratopsians in my mind would be capable of the same omnviory that a wild boar or a black bear goes through. I'd argue that it could have even depended on the individual and varied between them within the same species. I also think the term "Herbivore" might need some redefining, or the acknowledgement that diet in wildlife is way more fluid than most people think.
I want to clarify, dietary stuff is well defined
Under 10% Meat: Herbivore
Under 90% Meat: Mesocarnivore/Omnivore
Over 90% Meat: Hypercarnivore
Crinoids have 10 arms
Also yeah, they are microvores filter feeders as said previously.
Got a source on that camel thing?
I do know I've seen it on Wikipedia but again that just boils down to herbivore behavior. Dietary supplement is common in nature
Its why herbivore and Hypercarnivore aren't 100% Meat or Plant
https://wildswhisper.com/what-do-camels-eat/
"Also, camels are herbivores that feed mainly on grasses. However, it has been discovered that they also feed on carrion and chew bones to enhance their diet."
https://a-z-animals.com/blog/camels-the-deserts-ships-with-unique-adaptations-and-lifespan/
And here's one about them eating things from bones to metal to sticks when food is scarce as well, but they are domestic and thus do not have access to meat.
What Do Camels Eat their unique diet a blend of hardy plants, specialized nutrients, and surprising delicacies that enable them to thrive....
Camels can survive without water for over 150 days. Discover more amazing facts about camels in this post.
It seems plausible that Ceratopsids supplemented their diet with meat but that likely goes for any large herbivore. As pointed out before isotopic analysis hasn't found any indication of meat being a significant component of their diet so it seems unlikely that they were making substantial efforts to try and acquire meat, which is how I would interpret "redefining herbivory" or the original post a little bit back calling them omnivores.
Camels are subjected to a wide variety of nutritional deficiencies as they are largely dependent upon grazing desert plants.
Oh ok so what I'm seeing is it's not the best comparison because they're desert animals and are thus subjected to severe "nutritional deficiencies" aka the reason any herbivore consumes animal matter
I wouldn't say it isnt the "best" comparison, more of that for this study in particular they were looking into Pica in domestic food camels. And I'd reason that rapid growth/ growing horns and frill would leave an animal in a similar state of nutrient deficiency in terms of needing to seek out alternative sources via animal protein
And yet the dietary study on DPF animals shows they weren't consuming meat to an extent that would show up in an isotopic breakdown
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031018208002253
(Preservation of primary stable isotope signals in dinosaur remains, and environmental gradients of the Late Cretaceous of Montana and Alberta)
https://hal.science/hal-03821761/document
(The stability of dinosaur communities before the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary: A perspective from southern Alberta using calcium isotopes as a dietary proxy)
besides sizing, does sarco need anjy visual changes?
Because leaves from high vegetation tend to be more 44Ca-enriched than lower-growing plant materials (Schmitt, 2016; Moynier and Fujii, 2017;Martin et al., 2018), the 44Ca-enriched composition of hadrosaurid enamel supports the hypothesis that hadrosaurids foraged preferentially on tall plants, whereas the other megaherbivores fed on plants closer to the ground (Weishampel and Norman, 1989; see also Mallon et al., 2013). The aforementioned foraging flexibility of hadrosaurids could explain the isotopic signature overlaps occasionally observed among this clade and other megaherbivores.
This was neat
Hoping that Sarco's proportions are fixed 🙏
can you inform me what about sarcos proportions need to be fixed besides how massively oversized it is?
The head is like 1/4th of its body when in crocodylomorphs it is 1/7th
This isn’t an absolute rule among pseudosuchia, Sarco’s closest (well preserved) relatives have larger heads for their size iirc.
Terminonaris for example.
Already looks better
The head looks much nicer, PoT’s sarco always had weird snout proportions but it looks fixed here
Even Scaling to Sarco Closest Relatives like here.
Its Head to Body Ratio isn't ad Bad to how POT Sarco is
So did denio or Sarco have the bigger set of jaws?
Head to body or head to TL?
Because the HL-TL ratio is like 1:5.5 in that image
Sarco’s skull is longer, deino’s is overall larger though.
Ahh ok gotcha
Sarco Skull is not longer than Deino
Not compared to the Biggest Deino like CM 963 atleast
is it not? Excluding the deinos that have super bad preservation I’m fairly sure sarcosuchus’ total head length is greater.
Could easily be wrong, I can’t remember deino measurements off the top of my head
This more in for Sarco.
Let em Check for Random's Deino
Skull is still about 1/6th, which is quite far off of what old Sarco had.
Deino seems larger yeah.
Sarvo is possibly Longer than Puru
I would had to Dounle Check the Skull Length of DGM 527-R
wdym?
Sarcosuchus’ DCL is 5cm longer I think lel
Terminonaris skull length is about 1 meters (98cm) while the entire animal is estimated at about 6 meters.
Skull is supposed to be 1/6th of the animal's body length
That puts the TL of the 170cm skull specimen at like 10.2 meters which is perfectly reasonable given that it’s around 8.9+ meters TL
Scale Bar for Big Sarco is 20cm
I Can't seem to find for Puru DGM 527-R
That being said, head width is a better predictor of TL in extant crocs iirc, which is where estimates like 9.5m come from
Regardless, that’s less than a meter of difference, I feel like it’s safe to say it was in the ~8.5 to ~10m range
Right, I read the paper. But what the paper stated is that:
1.) The sample size of teeth does not cover every individual that has existence and never will, just the location of the Park formation they pulled from.
2.) Does not state the ages, condition, or complexity of the health/life style of each individual to show what it lived like outside of niche partitioning within other animals of a primarily Herbivorus diet.
I simply state that its entirely possible they ate meat and bone to aid in growth of head ornamentation and dietary supplementation. Perhaps most individuals in the area for the study you referenced didn't engage in that sort of behavior, at least in their final years of life before becoming fossils. But, I will still say it's entirely possible for creatures outside of that formation that were in similar or different niches to the herbivores in the Dinosaur Park Formation. I highly doubt, given that so many modern animals show signs of animal consumption to supplement a diet of plants when they need to, that not a single Ceratopsian out of their lineage that spreads millions of years, didn't engage in the same behavior. Its just not realistic to say it was always plants all the time. Saurapods, the early ones, had members who at meat and others who where omnivourus. The fact is, no species that exists today didn't have a descendent that ate something different then they did. Thats just evolution, adaptations to fit its environment and the needed caloric intake that depends on the availability of food. I'd also like to point out that supplementing ones diet in the earlier years of its life occasionally wouldn't show up clearly on isotopic analysis.
Mmmm
Average stomatosuchus build
10m just seems to Big for Sarco, Given the Old 10.3m estimate was later downsized after other proportions were given for it.
8.9m is mostly the Length Given Nowdays for the Biggest Specimen
At least for specimens we have, I heard word of a supposed specimen that would be absolutely colossal but I’m not inclined to believe in it until it’s like actually described + given any kind of evidence that wasn’t a twitter screenshot lmao
Calling it now, people will hate it
Can you send the screenshot?
Dumb reason but yeah
There wasn’t ever a 10.3m estimate, it was 12m in sereno’s 2001 paper
~10m is just from 1:7 HL-TL which isn’t exactly the best estimate but unfortunately sarco has no well described postcrania sadly
@opaque kayak I don’t have it lmao, I saw it over a year ago.
First rule of fanbases, the fans hate the game
I wouldn't even believe this tbh
This has been said so many times for alot of Animals only for them to become lost Media
The 12m is even Older than 10.3m and shouldn't even be taken Seriously,
The 10.3m comes from Lambor Skeletal
It's not the first time someone has alleged a huge unbelievable specimen online and didn't follow up with it
From what I remember it said the femur was something absurd like 96cm long, I really don’t believe that💀
8.9m.Sarco comes from this
no
Without the screenshot I wouldn't even mention it tbh
yeah it’s just funny because of how absurd that is
That’s bigger than the allo’s femur here, there’s no way any pseudosuchian had a femur that large unless it was a freakishly large terrestrial one💀
How do you know
how do you know
Cause none of Sarco Proportions suggest that tbf
Sarcosuchus needed long legs to hunt terrestrial prey, water was dangerous for the suchomimus lived there ofc
I wish the voice message feature was allowed because I really wanna repeat this to you in an annoying voice
We don’t even have described femurs for it besides juveniles iirc
I wish the voice message feature was allowed because I really wanna repeat this to you in annoying voice
Rampho and Grypo are cooler than Sarco anyways
Your first point does not matter in the grand scheme of the discussion because you do not classify individuals as "herbivores" or "carnivores", you classify the species/genus
Your second one is only partially applicable because of the possibility of age influencing diet however considering herbivores cannot eat meat to a high degree without falling sick, I suspect this second point does not apply either
I just wish Rhampho had more material then random jaw bone 💔
We can base it off Close Relatives for that.
abysmal take, please send this guy to the hadal zone
If you can send me the screenshot, I can try and scale it.
Until then, it prob doesn't exist
Say what you will, I am not taking it personally, but it appears you are close minded on this subject and have chosen what you wish to believe, which I respect. Regardless, I still believe in the possibility of what I have stated. I hope you have a wonderful day, and I respect your input.
Society will tell you science is faith-based apparently
im looking for it
actually wait how long is the femur in fadeno's deino skeletal just for reference of an oversized croc
Faith based? Idk what you mean by that. All I am saying is I agree to disagree about what I said to start was speculation.
There's pretty solid evidence they aren't eating meat to a high degree
And you're choosing to "believe in the possibility of what I have stated"
Accusing someone of being "closed minded" for not agreeing with you (especially when they have provided substantial evidence for why) is incredibly patronizing and frankly just rude
facts
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295362923_FEMORAL_DIMENSIONS_AND_BODY_SIZE_OF_ALLIGATOR_MISSISSIPPIENSIS_ESTIMATING_THE_SIZE_OF_FOSSIL_CROCODYLIANS_AND_THEIR_KIN interestingly, this paper gives a length of 7.2-9.1m for an individual that was supposedly like 25% shorter than the larger sarcosuchus specimens. That's quite the range and i imagine the more recent reconstructions are a good bit more reliable
Camels also have the advantage of quite harsh stomach acid IIRC to assist in digestion
I never said it was to a high degree, I said, at least 10 times at this point, that they supplemented their diets. I apologize for calling you close minded. And yes, I speculate its possible, expessially given the study you showcased feasbly cannot be every Ceratopsian to exist, because that not possible. Which for me, means there is still a chance as no one can ever say with 100% certainty that they never did that. Modern day herbivores supplement, which to me, means its possible for bigger and more robust animals of the past to do the same. Thats all I am saying and all that I meant.
-
modern herbivores eating meat is a very over exaggerated phenomenon, the vast majority of cases you may think of such as deers eating birds chicks etc is done purely for acquiring calcium etc to aid in antler growth etc, osteophagy is not a thing that make herbivores carnivorous as it is a purely mineral driven behaviour.
-
cases where normally strict herbivores eat meat does not make them omnivorous has it is caused by malnutrition etc, causing them to desperately seek out any form of sustanence regardless of whether or not they're actually adapted to it.
-
If you feed a cow/deer/horse nothing but plant based foods it's entire life it will have no deficiencies, because they are infact strict herbivores
Humans aren't detritivores just because when extremely starving we might consider eating manure
(which is exactly the kind of comparison being made)
there's nothing more to be said on the topic, there's no need to try and emphasize that maybe sometimes herbivores had 0.05% of their diet as meat. it makes no difference in how they lived
Same thing for a lot of Herbivores too, surprisingly enough. Elephants sometimes seek out their own dung when growing to get healthy gut bacteria for digesting the same material as their peers.
That's completely unrelated to the point I made
but that's not eating dung as a dietary staple into adulthood
i.e. fungus, certain invertebrates, etc
Whats the point being made? I am a bit confused. What you stated is all that I agree with and all that I am saying is that ceratopsians could and would do the same in times of horn growth and low nutrition.
Love your work btw
horn growth would mainly just require calcium, nawing on bones etc or osteophagy does not make an animal omnivorous, you were tmk stating that it did.
My point about manure was that you don't say humans have poop as apart of the their diet just because a severely starved person might try to eat it out of desperation, the same way you wouldn't call a cow omnivorous because it ate a bird because it was starving to death.
I see, I admit I may have used my terminology incorrectly. I will say though, I think its odd how Hadrosaurs ate shell fish a few different times throughout their lives, intentionally. The leading theory on this appears to be preparation with Egg laying, as they would need the calcium and proteins for the eggs. Does that make them omnivourus depending on season? Or is this just Herbivorus animals supplementing diet?
TMK if it's done purely for mineral content then it wouldn't, if it was for energetic needs etc then it would be
Interesting. The true odd ball of this has to be Limusaurus though. When its young it's a voracious carnivore, but as it grew, its teeth were replaced with a beak and they transitioned into herbivores. It makes me wonder: what other dinosaurs, if any, where like that? A lot of baby dinosaurs were not fossilized, because fossil preservation bias. Which sucks. I hate fossil bias.
I see

what visual changes have the tlc made to sarco so far?
like, how much better or different is this compared to the original?
Head is more Croc Like
Doesn't look as Big headed as before
you think it'll get downsized?
Both eocarchia?
thoughts on the cambrian period?
Btw Rugops deserves way more recognition
do polar bears count as marine mammals?
What do you define a marine mammal as
Where can I find these fish’s
the ocean
uhm...mammals that primarily live in the ocean?
Diet certainly shifted with ontogeny in all dinosaurs. I agree with the heart of your point that sauropsids in general and archosaurs in particular are perhaps more highly flexible in their diet and dietary needs than mammals. Like so many things I think mammals are a poor comparison to dinosaurs in this respect. A young growing dinosaur, or one with display structures that really heighten at sexual maturity, or a pregnant female like you mentioned all might have a higher protein, calcium, etc need than an equivalent sized mammal. However, that doesn't make said dinosaur an omnivore, it just means they are a particular type of herbivore. Likewise for a multitude of reasons bears and boars are poor proxies for ceratopsians. I can see your point on a lot of it though. Isotopes don't tell the whole story but they give us categories in which to place things and ceratopsians were categorically low browsing herbivores
The new paleomeme should be mid sized theropods eating the rotting flesh scented fruit of early angiosperms
I need one for my aquarium
facts
Maybe
Prob not much
how oversized even is it?
iirc POT sarco is 12 meters so ~25%
Only a small maxilia
That new really spiky ankylosaur reminds of when a bird has a keratin growth disorder and their nails and beak get really long and weird, not saying that ankylosaur had one, but would be interesting to see a dinosaur with one
☠️
Eocarcharia is a spinosaur by name now, although there are Carcharodont elements, they are not what is known as Eocarcharia anymore
I think it's a dinosaur
Still the goat or maybe i just like African dinosaurs
Don't be rude. It has a whole 5 bones
See its the goat
Wait really? I really did think it was only a maxilia, where did the rest come from
The ground

you are wrong, it came from the sky fr
kryptops is the partial maxilla one
30 foot long killing machine
oh
is that a camel skull on the right? 💀
- i didn't know they had huge sharp canines
i have one better
Triceratops was a carnivore!
Any extinct animals we know have a proboscis
Mammoth
Lot of non vertebrates have a proboscis, even among extinct taxa
Invertebrates ☝️🤓
desmatosuchus potentially
Uhm, invertebrates is not a clade so I prefer to refer them non vertebrates!
why not simply list every single clade that lack vertebrae and posses members with proboscis?
They're both clades, one is paraphyletic and the other is monophyletic
What is our current understanding of sarcos looks? Chonk or slim?
Slim
Bro's living in the 1920s
Thank you <3
2030s*
Well ya see it isn't called the shark tooth lizard for nothing, it will detach it's teeth the teeth will swim like tiny sharks to kill the Sauropod and drag it out of the water
how accurate is fadeno's 90 ton 52 meter barosaurus?
they get chased out by the territorial onchopristis who doesn't tolerate other sharks
The YPM one or the BYU one
YPM
Ignore it, there is no reason that should even be regarded as Barosaurus
alr
I was looking for anything about 41 on here and stumbled across it
a diplodocid being almost as tall as brachiosaurus felt off
is it just a giant maara or smth
Which
the giant baro
I'll highlight it 1 sec
Praphyly is stinky
It’s just outdated most likely
Also no, a clade IS a monophyletic group by definition.
so how heavy is Baro's actual weight?
genuine
is it still a sauropod just not barosaurus or does it straight up just not exist anymore
I could be wrong but last I remember hearing the giant "barosaurus" remains are probably supersaurus?
tmk the biggest ones are Supersaurus now but there are still some very big Baro specimens
i wonder if some dinosaurs had like.. the things chickens and ducks and turkeys have sometimes
like the red thing
Almost definitely, there's plenty of birds with extraneous tissue like that. And our sample size is purely just the modern day birds we live with, compared to the hundreds of millions of years non-avian dinosaurs were around for. But good luck knowing what exactly, because that's not something likely to preserve outside of exceptional circumstances
Are we forgetting Edmontosaurus Regalis here?
TRUE but that's a little idiot nubbin compared to the freaky stuff muscovies have going on
Or the stuff you have going on.
Yeah i know you have waddles, you can't hide them anymore Serpenatarius, if that even is your real name.
I always forget it was just a soft tissue structure in E. regalis
ironically enough my namesake DOES have a noteworthy fleshy bit on the face. Just not that extreme and probably not what they're known for quite as much
Mulch in your pool.
There is now Mulch in your pool, you're welcome.
CARNIVORES TROPHY ROOM? WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE?
of all hadrosaurs that ever walked on earth, E. Regalis is actually my least favorite hadros cuz idk its crest makes it looks weird
i love Edmontosaurus, but only Annectens. Regalis is just a big no no for me, srry
a large amount of archosaurs have caruncle in some form or another, even without being big and fleshy
God, how dare a simple hadrosaur want some fashion in their lives, oh the humanity.
im just saying go big or go home. Saurolophus looks silly for much the same reason
a duck and an egg stealer...
Parasaurolophus and lambeosaurus? Now there's some hadrosaurs that understood the assignment thankyou very much.
crocs and tortoises have it around their nostrils iirc, a lot of extant birds have it around their eyes as well. caruncle is really just any fleshy bits, doesn't have to be full on tumor necks
Ugh god I hate it on the ibis here so much, it looks like inflamed scales on the back of their heads
why can't they keep the cute black feathers they have as juveniles
Because then they wouldn't be as good at eating refuse
Are we just going to ignore the Herald of Death itself in the top left?
bin juice 🤤
2013 was so goat'd
Those spines 
love how the first one is based on hartman's 2012 skeletal, but isn't actually the skeletal
Yeah it's a slightly edited version of it
What in the name of all what is possibly holy is that?
Grandma's lawn decoration escaped everyone, and it is PISSED.
I hate when my Jurassic World Funko Pop comes to life.
How accurate is Sarco's new model ?
Man, why don't I get pinged for updates anymore?
I don’t think the full model is out yet is it? we just saw the top of the head
TLC is out
I stand corrected I didn’t get a ping either
People are already complaining
They are, apparently it's ugly and goofy
big ahh nose
it’s honestly not even that bad. The way people are complaining i thought it was worse xD
Reason why I genuinely don’t like this community
Guys, you can make a size comparison between old sarco and the new one
Am I the only one a bit annoyed they referred to it as dinosaur tlc when talking about the sarco ?
Yes, like in most games like this, dinosaur is just a general term used for all their playables
Could literally just say creature tlc if they don’t want to be specific lol
I was worried about the snout textures
Sarco had big nose
SARCO'S imperator sub is literally 90>% accurate 🥀 🥀 🥀 these mfs looking at the gharial-inspired swim sub and complaining that it doesn't look like a sarco... that's because swim sub LOOKS LIKE A GHARIAL
anyone know where I can find a good camarasaurus lentus and dyslocosaurus skeletal
is new sarco legs became up right posture?
You are not alone.
Why does he look 🥀
Caiman stylised subspecies
First sub is the best one
Sarco body posture giving me caiman vibes
For those complaining about the new model, it actually holds up better to the real thing.
Again, they don't care. They want to hate it
Yeah no anatomically the new Sarco is really really good.
Again don't make me tap the sign,
"Just because a reconstruction doesn't look like your favorite piece of Paleoart doesn't mean it's a more or less correct interpretation of the material preserved"
Yeah I'm sure but I'd like to share regardless. Maybe one person will learn something.
Its impossible to do something that everyone will like. The people who are complaining about sarco are the same people who complained about spino and think jp rex looks better than real rex.
People just hate for the sake of hating, thats just human nature
It looks tuff
I really like the new Sarco model! I’m not sure how I feel about the swim sprint animation, the back legs flailing doesn’t feel very efficient to me but maybe there’s some merit to that I don’t know. the tail movement is nicer though
Real, I got no time for people who play this game and moan whilst also having no paleo knowledge and just wanting unrealistic stuff
yes he have big ahh nose
At this point the devs have got to start putting actual reconstructions alongside their TLC announcements. I think people were expecting deinosuchus for the sarco TLC
If you saw this & thought it was DeinoS, alongside how every single thing in these teasers up to now has been a tlc
That’s on you
I think most of the hate is on them anyway tbh, they clearly haven't been paying attention to the art direction the game has been taking and get upset when every TLC remains consistent with that art direction.
of the problems I have with this game, the models are not one
this TLC looks good
regardless of what ppl said abt the tlc, Sarco is still my fav crocodile since my childhood
sarco’s one of my favorite extinct animals too and I like that the TLC model is very nice for it. that thin snout and big nose bump is what makes Sarco’s silhouette stick out so I’ve never gotten why people want it to just kind of be a big crocodile
Ok so could sarcs death roll? I know a study said they couldn't because of their snouts, but both modern gharial species can and they have proportionately thinner snouts
tmk it couldn't, but it was more or less half and half between fish and terrestrial dinosaur prey based off of tooth isotopes
I think it’s suggested that it probably wouldn’t be doing it to live prey because of stress to the skull - the study you’re referencing found it wasn’t built for it and suggested it probably only used it for feeding iirc. I’m not sure whether we can really guess that based only on that stress test, though (but it’s still valuable information)
I suppose that's one of those we'll never truly know things. I'll just assume it could at least for feeding if not dispatching prey since I've seen malayan gharials don't with my own eyes
you’ve seen that in person?? that sounds like a really cool experience
My local zoo has one and I was lucky enough to be there when they fed it a chicken. A plucked chicken might not be a particularly sturdy meal but bro was spinning
that’s very interesting
I always find it weird that people who choose to play a game known for having accurate models then get mad because they don't like the accurate features on a model. Like, curate your experience better then?
Of the two gharial species malayans get less attention than indian ones. Kinda a shame honestly they are really cool. After seeing one in person I did a lot of research on them. Apparently they've been known to go after larger prey than previously thought possible by a crocodilian with as thin a snout as they have the largest I know of is a water buffalo being taken by a large adult Malayan gharial
I know sarcosuchus and modern gharials aren't very closely related so probably not a great comparison but they do look very similar at least at a glance
Today I learned the Quagga is still alive, in the sense that the Plains Zebra had its binomial name changed to E. quagga
did sarco get any resizing?
no
Looking at the new sarco model it looks less like the old bug eyed Indian gharial inspired design and more like a West African slender-snouted crocodile
At least on s. imperator. The swim stam sub still looks very gharial-esk
I do think sarcos head posture does look a bit unnatural or forced since it was such a large animal. Looks a lot better crouched.
Large animal with a particularly large head.
I agree. I wish the belly walk was default and the high walk was toggle
But hey at least it's front teeth don't clip through it bottom jaw when it opens its mouth now
hi
Seems closer to 11m than its Old 12m
The Base Sub looks Very Sarco like to me
good thing?
Ya, it looks pretty accurate. I'm talking about the flesh parts though. The eyes and ears look more like that of a slender snouted crocodile than a gharial with the bugged out eyes it used to have. Its standing and sitting posture looks kinda like a caiman though
Tbf Sarco's Skull resembled more that of some Crocs than that of a Gharial

It seems it was a downsize but not by too much. Still oversized but it's less obvious now. Might have to do with mechanical stuff relating to its role n' all that.
I'm mixed on the TLC personally. The model looks much better now, but I thought it was already pretty decent before, and I'm really not a fan of the new posture and movement. I don't know why they refuse to make the reptiles actually move like reptiles unless it's under specific circumstances.
I love African dinosaurs man
who ghost ping
It moves a lot more like a crocodile than it did before. Cuban crocodiles are pretty upright when the sit and move afaik. If I had to guess a lot of why the animals don't feel that reptile like is just due to how active they are. They wouldn't fit as well with the rest of the roster if they weren't sped up
Why does it need to high walk is the thing. It doesn't move like its a high walk. It moves like a dinosaur or early triassic reptile.
It was less obvious before but it's so awkward seeing a crocodile run like that.
Sarco moves more reptilian than meg. It's not bad though it's posture is very caiman like which looks weird on such a large animal
A crocodile's high walk is like this, the legs still walk out to the side as it goes, and there's some side-to-side movement of its body. Not whatever the sarco ingame is doing.
I love spinos
I like what devs are doing with the new TLCs aka adding new genus to the subspecies of a creature (Einio and Stella for Styrac, Grypo and what I think is supposed to resemble a Purussaurus to Sarco) but damn, realism servers gonna have a tough time with these
(thick sub Sarco is actually a species of Sarco)
which is?
argentina sarco
hartti?
What no? The swim speed sub is hartii
It's labeled hartii
Wasn't swim stamina sub gharial
its gharial but the sub's name is hartti. Honestly idk why they didnt just change the order by making palustribus the gharial and hartti the thicko
wait why is there a subspeices name gharial
I'm confused as to what the difference is. S. imperator and S. hartti are actual sarcosuchus species.
@sudden wind
Ajaxs that much bigger then louisae?
This Spinosaurus Design feels familiar idk how tho 😭
Wait is sarco oversized?
By the looks of it yes, since the irl one is supposed to be at most 9m (but apparently still above 10+ meters ingame)
can i have that Randomdinos Deinos skeletal pls?
yea sarco does seem to be shrunk a bit (sorry for the rushed 2nd photo)
-# left = tlc
-# right = before tlc
forgot to reply to the message
“Running “ walking with confidence
Now let's see a croc run
Scanova has returned, rejoice
I think the ajax in the original chart is a bit oversized
Am I crazy or does old sarco look like sarcosuchus and new sarco doesn’t look like sarcosuchus? 💀
Am I tripping because this looks weird lol
Idk what it is, maybe it’s just vibes, but something just feels fundamentally not sarcosuchus about this design
It's possible the standing posture. It looks off for something that big to just stand like that effortlessly. It has a very caiman like posture for an animal that probably weighed a few tons. Other than that though the model is really good
is that ai or do crocs really run like that
It saddens me that that has to be a legitimate question. But yes it's really not all Crocs can run like that but some do
damn! i mean ive been watching nature documentaries my entire life and this is the first time i see it
The Crocs that can do that don't get as much attention as saltwaters and Niles. Cuban Crocs and Johnstone's crocs are the ones I know for sure can
it would probably be worse for the sarco since its jaw was built for fishing and not really hunting land prey, while deino has a more robust jaw, the kind that could probably snap a bone when it got its hold on something
This isn’t a true statement, sarco’s jaws were just as good for handling large prey, even if slimmer than something like puru & deinoS.
not sure, some even argue that sarcos jaws wouldn't be capable of handling deathrolls without damage to the animal itself
It most likely could’ve had a more piscivorous diet but the thickness of its jaws still show it would’ve been able to hunt down larger terrestrial prey pretty decently
To be fair none of the mega crocs would’ve been able to deathroll due to sheer size, so this could apply to the rest as well
Modern crocs start to struggle when reaching certain larger sizes, so now imagine the same thing but 3 - 5x larger
guess you dont need a deathroll to maul the suchomimus juvenile to death
That's not ai
i think sarcpsuchus hartii is an actual genus no?
species?
species yeah mb lol
Does anyone know the average weight estimate of an Euthecodon?
My favorite part is this doesn't address the 90% of the animal that lies behind the head
ive only seen people complaining about the skull so like
People REALLY need to be reminded of what gharial skulls actually look like for how common of an opinion this is.
I saw someone say it wasn't about the width of sarco's snout, but how thin it's jaws are
Which made me realize some people will not let go of the notion sarco is a giant gharial
You see, Sarco had a pot and it's in PoT so it's a gharial
Apparently the test for that was dud they tried that test on a croc that could death roll and it said they couldn't
Didn't sarco fill the same niche as nile crocodiles meaning its jaw was built for a mix of both
Also false gharials do death rolls they have slender jaws
False gharials jaws
They also hunt things like deer
Isotopic studies show that sarcosuchus wasn't really that different in diet from any other large macropredatory crocodile like a nile or saltie.
Depends on the species of deino
It would get 1 shot by hatcheri and probably lose to riograndensis and thus would probably avoid them where possible but I could see it fighting rugosus and schwimmeri
And what size of animals are tomistoma documented rolling
They eat deer and livestock
Thats not what I asked. What size of animals are they documented rolling
Large prey like deer and each other
Any particular type of deer?
Sambar deer for one
D. hatcheri and D. riograndensis are synonyms for all intents and purposes, and D. schwimmeri has replaced D. rugosus.
Hey, apparently spino got new weight estimates that put it around 11 metric tons, huh?
Where’s the weight estimate in there? 11 tons is a hard sell
That's the paper that a news video talking about it listed as fonts
I'm posting it here to see if yall got any other sources tbh
But ya, I'm also kinda skeptical about it
11 tonne Spino is probably possible if you apply methods like Matt Dempsey paper, which generally would probably make alot of animals heavier since more soft tissue is given there. Though that paper isn't really about weight estimates iirc
This is funny though
Yeah it’s more about soft tissue distribution for different dinosaurs. It is useful for weight estimates though, just that we can’t really replicate their methods at home
You can, if you have a scanned 3D skeleton. Its not too hard, but yeah harder than stuff like GDIs. I tried it with a sculpted carnotaurus skeleton model, it was fun.
Wasn't the main takeaway from Dempsey's paper that we shouldn't be so rigorous in our size estimates because techniques and soft tissue application varies? Not that dinosaurs are all bigger now
11 tonne Spino is not related to Dempsey's methods, it's based on a single incomplete toe bone that Cau estimates to be 45% larger than the neotype when complete
Which like. Toe bone scaling is already one of the worst forms of scaling. Incomplete toe bone scaling is even worse
But what's the worst form of scaling possible?
with the exception of Footprints and stuff.
Probably tooth scaling for theropods, or like carpal bone scaling
At some point in the cretaceous a spinosaurus stubbed its toe and now people are saying spino is 11 tons
Honestly I’d argue toe bone scaling is worse, since yes teeth are variable but truthfully you nearly never get any superbehemoths from just teeth if you know what you’re doing
Meanwhile we’ve gotten several gigantic theropods before based on toebones before people started applying logic
This paper is also kind of bad too. Only good part about it is eocarcharia & yutyrannus discussion. (And if I’m not thinking about another paper, acro as well)
You can usually avoid monsters with tooth scaling by assuming that the tooth is the biggest one the animal had. Which is done by convenience but technically there's no reason to believe that
Omw to scale with the tiniest tooth
27 ton theropod
Toes actually have a more or less defined position so you can't just assume it was the biggest phalanx
they just suck because toe size can vary by 20% or more between same sized individuals
The biggest Tomistoma registred have 8 meters length.
But usually the average is 6-5 meters
So what's the large greyed out skull closest to Steve?
What? No. No crocodilian averages 6 meters. Only 1 living individual in the entirety of crocodylia has been confirmed to reach 6 meters at all (Lolong) and while there are skulls that might suggest bigger they are justifiably kept as speculation.
thoughts on these two statements?
The new sarco is more accurate and science doesn't care about those opinions. Reminds me of when spinosaurus was first added to the game.
"Super croc" 
The name "supercroc" is stupid and objectively hurts the vision of the animal
Old sarco had huge head
why people are saying old is better
did browser discord get a new font or something
hence why sarcosmoocher is the objectively better title
I do wish the standing posture was different, I wonder why they designed it that way?
Maybe some issue with the rig?
Because it looks bigger and more intimidating
using a gharial as a refrence when reconstructing sarco is incorrect, right?
Sarco players just have delusions of grandeur and think they should be able to drag a dasp under water, so basically no matter what the devs did, they wouldn't have been happy
I'm not sure why everyone acts like the posture is so weird
I saw someone on a community server asking to let sarco grab iguanodon because its "fun and realistic"
sarco isnt even grabbing lurdusaurus
Realism is Iggy is double Sarco's size lmao
well yeah lurd was the biggest thing in its ecosystem
Meanwhile iggy was 2t bigger than sarco 😔
Sharing this again for a comparison. People really love comparing it to a gharial without even knowing what a gharial skull looks like.
7t iggy is back?
The absolute last person you should ever take seriously about any matter on this game is a realism player
I speak from years of unfortunate experience
They also said deinosuchus should realistically be able to drag a rex
i too sadly know the horrors
realism servers when actual realism comes in( its not a 18 step rule to allow a rex to leave the woods only at 4
-5 pm)
Crocodiles struggle to drag prey that isn't smaller than they are. Only the biggest nile crocodiles take zebras and wildebeest let alone anything else larger.
Deinosuchus fans hate being told Tyrannosaurus is twice its size so just do that
real
No!!!!
was that para or charnosaurus, i lowkey forgot what happens in that episode
Para
realism servers realising nocturnal animals dont exclusively hunt at night and actually do stuff during the day other than sleep and vice versa
Para
That ep takes place in north america, hence the deinosuchus
And as a parasaurolophus lover, I hate seeing it being attacked, but get it was prey
i have a question, how much danger was martha in here ?
A lot
matilda was just a menance in that show
is Martha the rex or the mammoth
matilda was beating her brothers ass any chance she got
not a lot then considering the rex has broken arms and is severely malnourished and thus probably can't fight properly
martha would've gotten hard combo'd and carried into down aired off stage if the elephant horde didn't arrive ong
I always thought their T rex model looked more like albertosaurus or something
the elephant horde didnt even arrive, matilda just though nigel was worth it more
ngl elephants are cooked against anything in their general size range
im not even gonna lie, im pretty sure the model was one, just retexture / changed slightly
They don’t have that much going for them besides tusks. Better off than hadrosaurs at least
combat isnt everything
oh wait was that another segment then
zamn
which tbf nigel got that zang
You know, I somehow struggle to see how broken arms would do much to impede a tyrannosaurus
i love you prehestoric park https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWw3w7ncBJk
Copyright goes to ITV or Animal Planet
Depends on what the arms where used for exactly
the deinosuchus scene is still one of the most cinamatic shots of all times in paleo media
i'm mature
i'm mature
uh to stop chin itches ofc
Well you see crocodiles do indeed have jaws
did any marine crocodile even get larger then bruce ( the shark from jaws )
my counterargument for the matilda vs martha fight is that matilda is canonically only like 5 years old and thus should have been too small to threaten a mammoth
what size would she have been at 5?
