#paleontology
1 messages · Page 187 of 1
and is the jw saga good
depends, to me yes, to most no
GNG WHAT THE HELL DID I JUST READ WITH MY OWN MOUTH
the thing that bugged me the most about the books may be that the scientist character knew the names of every dinosaur
(it’s not it was the giraffatitan scene)
what was the giraffatitan scene?
"what is that, comrade"
"a utahraptor..."
"the hell's a utahraptor"
"i don't know they aren't going to name it for another 30 years"
oh there's like a whole genre of these
Paleo chat, this is my tribute to Utahraptor, I hope it's good enough
an adult giraffatitan basically just stands there and gets eaten by a carch, after that same carch gets demolished by a pachyrhinosaurus earlier in the book
this isn't one of those dinosaur romance books, i am literally screenshoting the primitive war book
like, it just stood there and did nothing??
This is because much like the woolly mammoth, the woolly Pachyrhinosaurus was in musth
essentially yes
!?!
Offtopic just thought this would be funny for some reason
Context is JWR quetz
that same carch who killed the giraffatitan later gets unceremoniously torn apart by the utahraptors
the second book is not good
My honest reaction:
That is also in the primitive war novel, it's not edited
I keep seeing this image and idk if this an actually good front view of Utah or just a weird reptilian humanoid
it looks like a ape
Also for some reason that image just pmo SO MUCH
Probably because it looks like they widened the snout/removed the eyebrows to make it appear more human-like
why is there only plesiosaur cryptids, why no pliosaurs?
Cus they all died long before the Cretaceous extinction
then why is there no rex crpytid
atleast those troodontid / dromeosaurid cryptids
technically there are if you count those unoffical Kasai rex ones
there are offical cryptids?
yes gng
the partridge creek beast also could be a tyrannosaur although think it's a more primitive one
partridge creek i usually see as a ceratosaur
OH THIS GUY
yea it just depends if the nasal horns a horn or some elaborate nasal structure
Which figure is better ig
can i theroretically make my own cryptid?
theoretically yes but the internet will learn its fake, Kasai rex was a internet hoax
Ah yes, Kasai Rex, the famous Internet hoax from 1932
what was shoni's main prey?
I suspect Pantz would make smth more convincing than this anyways
@charred hearth Likely any large prey in the area
im just saying it wouldnt be forever
vhs horror series of oceanic life and boats being attacked by a unknown predator that make noises like a foghorn...
I'm mainly pointing out that your information of it being an Internet hoax is incredibly wrong
But also I've seen people pass off the Weird Birds photo as a cryptid sighting so
If Partridge Creek was any tyrannosaurs based on it being from Canada I would suspect it would be closest to a Subadult Tyrannosaurus rex, Albertosaurus, Daspletosaurus or Thanatotheristes ( imagine Dan Folkes Daspletosaurus is Thanatho )
theres uh..whats the kaiju movie with a monster that makes foghorn noises
I like this one
Also lmfao the guy who "sighted" Kasai Rex was named John Johnson
pt apato's calls inspired
john johnson, themost fake name
Do you have any idea how little that narrows it down? The most famous example are the tripods from War of the Worlds
its korean i think and is like within 10 years old, like the monsters whole design is around sounding like a foghorn
kaiju that sounds like a fog horn
not mentioning The Fog Horn (1951)
Howl from beyond the Fog thats it
This is because before 1954, kaiju did not exist!
could y'all see the idea behind shoni making pt apato calls?
Actually heartbreaking story from the monster's point of view btw
i thinnnk Howl from beyind the fog may be a modern version of the foghorn
Just read the synopsis and wow, that is heartbreaking 
Custer
is custer one of these oddball rex heads
Nah, he's the most NORMAL one
Tristan, Custer, Mcareensis, Holotype ( Scotty and Sue soon ) | all by SirBlameson
calling any rex normal..
All rexes are normal, the problem is fossilization does not take kindly to organic material
☝️
ok but arent some skulls just wonky shaped individually like tristian otto
how useful are therapod tails for balance?
Fossilization does not take kindly to organic material and some people are bad at reconstruction
@charred hearth Vital, they die without it
I almost forgot Franoys did a Tristan skull, actuall beauty
ok but im just saying..it is..funky from the side compared to other rex skulls
Because real goats aren't like the others!
could a large ceratopsian live without its tail?
Some skulls get completely pulverized apart so reconstructing them will always get varied results
if Wyrex lived a decent while missing 75% of its tail, i think a ceratopsians fine
Did it live a "decent" while
The problem is there's no guarantee the tail loss was pre- or post-mortem because (TMK) the Black Hills Institute won't release it but most paleontologists seem to support the tail being lost after death
@charred hearth Probably, it might have trouble walking depending on the amount lost because all non-avian dinosaurs have crucial locomotor muscles in their tails but otherwise, probably not bad
i thought the general agreement it was during life but was a massive contribution to death
That's what I thought too tbh.
i aint saying it lived years maybe a year max in the best case scenario, but i was under the impression the tails ripped off, and now it succumbs to malnutrition, horrific infection, or being outcompeted
WAIT WAIT I lied
We do have evidence it healed so it was lost during life but it definitely wasn't long
p
Ok so why did I see utahraptor erotic writing a few scrolls up
This is Path Of Titans, this is pretty normal if you ask me
The bone growth doesn't seem as extensive as other injuries that show marked improvement so
@ancient crystal it's an excerpt from Primitive War
Unfortunately you're right
Its almost as if its technically possible to survive losing your tail but it has massive fatal complications
I can post the study itself, but this seems to be the only times Wyrex is mentioned
rex probably died less from blood loss and more from from just starvation
And no maidens
Yep. Thats the big thing, water and food when you're basically wheelchair bound
Now am thinking of a cripple tyrannosaurus rex lmao
i mean sue
I don't think there would've been noticable signs of healing if they died from blood loss.
I think we should point out the fact a T. rex ripped the tail off of a similarly-sized individual
Yeah that part sounds insane but does fit average Tyrannosaurus moment
how long do we think it took it took to even bite through the muscle or did it just bite the outer skin and just heave and rip
The amount of force required to RIP that off would be almost immeasurable so I'm gonna say biting
Tyrannosaurs had insanely well developed neck muscles so I'd say it was a mix of both.
Random is here to agree with me full-heartedly and not mention that caudal trauma seems to be common in theropods to some extent and we need a more in-depth study of Wyrex specifically to say confidently if it was lost due to amputation, surely!
rex is a precison surgeon in amputation
Random just stay "stinky" and leave
which fossils usually have more injuries, rex's or allo's?
Andrea Cau pointed out that while there are signs of healing on the bone, the study does not actually provide any proof that the tail was fully ripped off, just that it suffered intense trauma
Maybe it lived for a while with a broken but not removed tail and then it was lost after death
@warped peak stinky
I could take down a rex, to bad they arent around anymore for me to prove it
ok but its Cau so i find his stuff questionable ever since that compy= carch paper
You can take down a modern Rex still. Bones aren't good at fighting
I mean he is objectively correct, the paper does not provide proof
It's a one off sentence
So weird question, but how does naming a dinosaur happen?
Like coverting whatever you want to name it into latin, or greek, or whatever. Like everyone knows tri, or titan, or saurus, but Saurophagnax for example. Do you just put Lord of the Lizard Eaters into google translate, do you go to someone who knows the language, do you yourself learn it?
Most predators that utilize a high powered bite usually pair it with other forceful movements of the head and neck to make an attack all the more devastating.
At least, when they're aiming to do real damage.
Also tbh, a rex breaking through all the muscle at the base of the tail, and then damaging the bone so badly that it eventually falls off with minimal effort is just as impressive as straight up tearing it off
Does fire count as being alive
No
in the words of a wise man..88 million newtons of bite force
Given google translate didn't exist during the discovery of Saurophaganax, it would've been named into Latin or Greek from predominantly dictionaries or someone else providing said info
so...was puru the only prehestoric croc that we have that could preform a death roll?
no? im pretty sure the death roll predates pseudosuchia as a whole
I was just using it as an example
There were plenty of extinct crocodilians that could probably do something similar to a death roll depending on their anatomy.
i mean like, sarco and deino cant do a death rol
what says those two cant? ones literally a Alligatoroid
Also that's not at all what he says
He proposes compsognathids are a polyphyletic group with the members being spread out between Carnosauria (including megalosaurs) and Coelurosauria
Scipionyx being a carch is totally reasonable imo
Bro is like a week old and already 50cm long
thats like the only one id waver being plausible
Compsognathus itself being a megalosaurid has gotta be one of his more insane takes tho
isnt half his stuff off the wall, or something like that
he has a lot of normal takes, it's just he's an [censored by bot]hole about it so people automatically dislike him
snout thickness or whatever
I know JP isn't very paleo but thinking of the scene from TLW were one guy gets jumped by a group of comps but it's just baby megalos is just a wild thought
granted i just remeber more then half of people jusr denounced the compy paper, it was either cause it was him, cause of what it was, or cause it was saying comps were valid
that guy genuinely could have killed the compies by just rolling over the fact that he died to them is astonishing
which dude? hammond or the other dude?
was this before compy venom was canon in the movies?
dieter
Hammond only dies to compies in the books after he already has a broken leg and is basically dying anyway
then they napalmed his corpse
There’s more than 3 prehistoric crocodylomorphs
My personal least favorite take from him has to be tyrannosaur shaochilong and spinosaur eocarcharia just because am bias
okay but nobody really cares abt the others besides stomasuchus
Tyrannosaur Shaochilong?
dude stomatas like only mentioned in as this funky prehistoric croc
people arguing Eocarch might be a spinosaur just cause its some skull bones and tyrannosaur Schaochilong? pure dilusions
It's not argument lol, the bones ASSIGNED the title of Eocarcharia are Spinosaur
Not convinced after all these years
It’s still a single portion of the skull so I’m not gonna act as if this is diehard evidence it’s a spinosaur

Well thank god your intuition on a singular isolated bone is enough to override papers
(Spinosaur and Carch skulls are also not even remotely similar in shape or structure)
can your intuition make amargasaurus 5 tons
No im just dubious on single isolated bones being relabeled
I mean surely their postorbitals are similar otherwise Sereno would not have mistaken one for the other
wasnt tyrannosauroid shaochilong from alpkarakush's description
I think it's popped up a few times?
Wasn’t that where famously Monolopho was a spinosaur
Mono's been a spinosaur a lot of times actually
Despite having no spinosaur adaptations
its basal
in any case as of bahariadromeus paper cau's still been getting shaochilong s a carch
ill fight for Bahariasaurus to be valid
Baharia is definitely valid at this point, the debate is where it sits
nvm that was just in a polytomy with the rest of coelurosauria
tameryraptors description is the one that articulates a tyrannosauroid identity
didnt Tamery only leave like 3 bones for Carch
carch is most of a skull still
shaochilong is a turonian carcharodontosaur
actually shaochilong is a carcharodontosaur from a normal epoch
actually shaochilong is neither turonian nor a carch
tragedy
so what is it
The Big Paleo refuses to let the average carcharodontosaurid size go down
Shaochilongs what Siamotyrannus wish it was
how many leptoceratops would it take to kill a rex
man Siamo just vanished off the face of the earth when people figued it wasnt a tyrannosaur
Are they riding Udanoceratops or on foot?
foot
thats like asking would you ride the horse which 95% will murder you or walk
A large headed bipedal reptile
7 leptoceratops because rex has 6 toes
Each of them bites off one toe and the rex goes down, then the 7th one finishes it off
this is true
About one if it hits the right place at insane velocity (considering you're using the dino as a high powered projectile and augmenting it to be efficient at doing so)
Are the Leptoceratops called to the bench after biting off a toe? Why are they out of action upon performing their duty
Seriously question
How big of a bear do you think would be on equal footing with Ceratosaurus (weight wise)
polar bear
After they bite off a toe the rex screams comically and then kicks them into space
agustitherium if its dentisculatus for safety
are there only 3 valid ceratopsians in hell creek?
Is anyone here a pot dev?
4 if you count the two species of trike
They just misspelled nugget, trust
Oh
Let's see if they're as fast as shutting down an "offtopic" discussion 
does anzu have the potential to be the 2nd largest oviraptorid or nah?
Who?
Can anyone help give some advice, my Achillo is glitched and all its cooldowns are one sec
agustatherium, largest bear and Ceratosaurus detisculatus, largest species of ceratosaurus
K
in terms of named taxa i think it already is? Can't think of any oviraptorosaur that is over 3.5m besides gigantor
There is no Agustatherium, the largest bear is Arctotherium if thats what you meant
is the new hell creek one with anzu a tad smaller?
i kinda forget oviraptorids are so plentiful in america, i always associate them with asia
because in NA they are Caengnathids, unless whatever those giant eggs are
Tbh I think a bear a whopping 20% larger than Cerato is pretty overkill
I'd say around a 900kg Polar would be more than enough IMO
ceratosaurus is actually 3t see reddit comment et all for more
are the 3 tons things from like africa or whatever
ceratosaurus is going to be so confused when the small-headed white mammal slaps it with the force of a thousand suns
no its so much worse this is like all time funniest reddit posts
"What a weird rat" bear stands up to 11 feet tall "OhmayGahd"
ceratosaurus dentisulcatus has been agreed to be a subadult since the 2000s (literally said by no one ever)
who was the true winner in the end, ceratosaurus or allosaurus?
durophagous habitual scavenger
....so..my eyes hurt now, but is three tons impossible? not average but hypothetically possible?
So is 17 ton Tyrannosaurus hypothetically
3 ton ceratosaurus is as likely as 22 ton spinosaurus or 30 ton rex
see carnegi only has that juvie cerato so i got no clue of a adult cerato size
1100kg is the biggest specimen
i have a question, what would be the differecne in niche between black bears, brown bears and bigfoot? as bigfoot is most commonly found in the ranges of those two bears
we have several skeletally mature specimens the guy in the reddit comment was just like lying
see i just am aware Cerato was beefier then people assume
Assumedly (in a hypothetical that Bigfoot is 100% real), it doesn't hibernate
Well that'd be weird when we have several specimens demonstrating it is not beefy
so its be around through the whole year unlike bears?
is bigfoot a herbivore or what i'm not familiar
well, i'd assume it have a diet similar to gorilla's
bigfoot eats the very common chupacabra
Omnivore but whether it leans towards herbivory or carnivory isn't known due to obvious reasons
But it has been allegedly spotted hunting boar, deer, and alligator
Alligator? Damn
If we're being serious, the most likely candidate for an IRL version of Bigfoot would be a giant Paranthropus. Being Durophagous grazers, it would be entirely reasonable to assume they'd munch on foliage in the summer while putting on pounds and (possibly PHYSICALLY, like a squirrel) storing food for winter, as it'd be difficult for a Hominid to graze in deep mountain frost, as hominids are still quite clever and keep food in manners like that
Iirc the account says it was a young alligator that was basking on a sandbank but it's still a gator
Perhaps the bigfoot has taken over the niche of the North American jaguar...
would the yeti also be a giant nothern species of paranthropus?
isnt it like PNW sasquatch are more peacful grazers, northeast is a voracous deer hunter, the south is just whatever it can grab
oh i thought that was a deliberate ogre pun
You do realize nasicornis is the only valid species right?
There is 0 evidence to back this due to A) Sasquatch isn't a species we can observe
B) We don't know what accounts are hoaxes, true, and/or misidentifications
It'd be reasonable to assume Yeti and Sasquatch come from the same common ancestor, being more of regional variations and adaptations, similar to Grizzly and Polar bears
no nasicornisn dentisulcatus are valid and magnacornis may be nasicornis, also yes im aware bigfoots fake, just based off patterns i seen
arent the "original " yetis from philophines completely different from pop culture yetis?
yetis are from nepal
I have no clue man I study bear dogs
are they close....😅
No they're not, the "original" account of the Yeti was from the Himalayas
the phillipines are islands in the indian ocean and nepals in the center of the himilayan mounts
i thought nepal was in the philiphines 😔
as one does
Rude...
We're always forgotten
your Neapolitan?
I'd make fun of you for that but i couldn't point out the phillipines in a map if i tried
no thats napoleon
i cant tell at this point if this is a bit to mess with falcon or not
either way i'm in favor of it
no, napoleon was french
man i dont know whats happening i forgot the plot at talking about bigfoot
i always assumed falcon was from like New Jersey
i used to think he was canadian
i thought he was flordian
Almost all my Geographic knowledge is from Paleontology and geology
I'm glad I'm ambiguous enough that I can never be doxxed even by my friends
i aced geography from paleontolgy
anyways, back to paleontology
do we have any scottish plesiosaurs??
the best you have is anything from the jurassic coast, scotland kinda sucks for marine stuff
im trying to track the ancestor of the loch ness monster
it aint a reptile
aw hell we got a seal nessie believer
i didnt say its a mammal
doxxing falcon
I will accept either big eel or some unknown horror
is that brazil
TO THE MOUNTAINS
if we look at the old depictions of the loch ness monsters before the popular plesiosaur one, what would be the most likely? eel?
the hypothetical adult eel even
the mythical conger conger
the freshwater conger conger
conger bonger island 
I know you’re literally everywhere but seeing you here is like a jump scare
are there even seals in loch ness???
yes they swim up the loch
i like to surface here specifically to post the most bonkers stuff and then recede to the sea
This is because Noodle jumps and scares you
She still has my wallet 
Noodle stole my dog
their like sh-tposting godzilla
They would never. Noodle is too pure to do such horrible acts...they would steal your cat...
would lochness even be big enough to have a stable plesiosaur population??
no the cat left with them
his dog IS really cool
anyway to stay on topic north america 5mya is very cool and i want to visit there pls
as a mammal hater what was in NA 5 million years ago?
why hate mammal? they are animal trying to live their life
whoever answers this will be recive a reward btw
Dino W
Mammal boring 
reptile superior, mammal inferior
it seems unlikely to me but idk if we could know for sure
rhinoceros...
oh wait Daeodon? hes cool..certified awsome, Carnegies mount is still labeled Dinohyus
daeodon is about 10 mya off but he got the spirit
i have a question about hell creek
bold to assume im a reliable source for that, but shoot
im reliable enough
what are the size estimates for anzu next to a human?
better
was the only change removing the weird bug creature in the sky
little bug creature is now an actual bulding facade yes
ive never seen an anzu and a human in the same room... suspicious
google is ur friend
ive actively tried to not think about anzu in the past 2 years but it isnt working
i can prolly dig up a reference if you want tho
how/why does one actively try not to think about anzu
i thought about him way too much. now i gotta balance it out. mhm
i thought you were modding hell creek dinosaurs into the game 😔
to be fair that doesnt mean that i have any paleontological knowledge of the animal. your best bet would be reliable, consistent ppl who scale well and cite their specimens
i did this during the dakotanzu craze of 2021 because people saying dakotas claw was a giant anzu annoyed me
im cursed cause i named my lizard anzu
REAL
a dark time
it's a traumatizing experience so some people try to block it out
I had to attend therapy
Dakota is actually a cetacean fossil 
is the hell creek spinosaurid montanaspinus on your roster btw?
That’s not even a real animal
It’s a meme
it’s a well known fact that the easiest way to get random to do something is irritate him
your not real and YOUR a meme

the entire reason i made a torvosaurus skeletal is this one guy i knew kept telling me it was 9 meters long max
Silly Pantz, Montanaspinus is synonymous with Edmontosaurus
is guyneri bigger then Tanneri?
would hell creek be a good environment for a spinosaurid?
both torvos are in the same size range
Where's the hell creek rodent btw.
but for real dont trust random people. i could say this is anzu scale, doesnt make it true /gen
Poor random
His stuff isn’t trustworthy
give the goose a homura wig
neck length is questionable as idk which metric the verts were measured in, but here's various anzu specimens with 50cm scalebars
i didnt even know hartman had a new one 
he just said not to trust random people, trusting random dinos should be ok, after all he was there
I know it was a joke
Based on their wording and the person named random
really all he did vs the old one was like make it slightly meatier
would gigantoraptor count as the apex of its formation? im unsure if it would've been a active predator
was gigantoraptor a carnivore?
probably not
i say it ate whatever it wanted, meat, plant..anything
i figure you're referring to didelphodon and kin, but fun fact! those aren't actually rodents, they're metatherians. relatives of the living marsupials
fun fact 2- you can see the connection in the genus name of the living virginia opossum- Didelphis
stay tuned for more useless facts
Just came across this gorgeous specimen from Portugal. Belongs to Lusovenator
for free!?
Lusovenator the goat
Not a huge fan of that skel but Luso is based asf
If it’s cause of the dip, that can easily be filled in
It feels a little long to me but I have to actually scale the material myself to be sure, I plan on using Lajasvenator to fill in gaps
Try also using neovenator and concavenator to fill in the gap since that's what Sassy did
you mean this photo?
no because there's no neovenator here
Idk if I’ll use neo but Conc for sure. Neo is a weirdo
what dont we do this for aquatic reptiles like plesiosaurs? https://x.com/therotundtable/status/1956354364777398582
dead
I wonder what the crazy paleontologists like David Peters think of nanotyrannus
Great question
I bet he thinks its a turtle or something
Wonder what he thinks of the three Rex proposal GSP did
He could probably "find" evidence of eight more Tyrannosaurus species in the specimens sampled
Ironically he would do a better job because at least he puts effort
Gsp just went “trust me bro” for it
wouldnt it be 3 tyrannosaurus?
That’s what I said
He has like 3 different species of nano as well iirc
I remember making that peak, but it seems you don't have the gif I also made
Oh yeah, I know this! I was just saying something silly is all, lmao.
does anyone remember if Troodon is still a waste-basket taxon? i know there's T. formosus but last i heard its the only real Troodon species and everything else was waste-basket basically
^ this was around the time the Troodon/Nanuq Dinosauria episode came out that I heard this, and I wanted to double check it was still a true statement to this day or if something changed since then that i hadnt heard about
It's got hope for being real, some peeps at cambridge are trying to establish a neotype
"the original name of 1856 has come to encompass a robust and specific species"
look inside
neotype autapomorphies cannot be evaluated in any other north american troodontine taxon except for single character that isnt present in Latenivenatrix
"there is no convincing evidence for a second skeletal taxon from these geologic units of Alberta and Montana"
????
Troodontidae moment
how well would a small - medium sized spinosaurid do today in south america?
It’ll get bullied by the hippos
actually, isnt the smallest spinosaurid ( irratator ) the size of a hippo? ( or atleast from my size, while not weight, their still taller and longer then hippos )
Yeah irritator is bigger than a hippo
But it would still probably get bullied considering hippos live in pods
i mean, yeah,
Speaking of that, would the hippos just inbreed themselves to death after a bit? They're starting from a population of 4 and are currently at around 170
i mean....they got too 170, so im sure their fine
But after a while of inbreeding there's gotta be something wrong with em by now
afaik cheetahs are also pretty inbred and overall they’re doing fine (they do get some human help but a lot of African fauna does regardless)
They've survived like 2 bottle necks without humans and would be doing even better if we weren't around
I hope the program in India continues going well, it'd be great to see them recover. The Grey wolf too
Not as inbred from a population of 4 though, I'm pretty sure cheetahs were at 7 at their lowest bottleneck
Not saying it's too much better but it's better than 4
I do hope for the sake of the Colombian ecosystem something goes wrong in the genetics of those hippos and they become infertile or something
I know you probably weren’t serious but the hippos are so few and South America is so big that they wouldn’t really an issue
If it fits, we have found the missing piece
Do the papers saying spinosaurus was too buoyant to dive underwater take into consideration how the animals own active propulsion could assist it in breaking underneath the surface?
Take marine iguanas for example, marine iguanas are actually buoyant and naturally float if they aren’t trying to swim underwater. I know there is a massive size difference between the animals but just saying…comparing the two spinosaurus seems more specialized for an aquatic lifestyle than the marine iguana. Spinosaurus didn't necessarily need to be a good swimmer to be a successful aquatic predator, it just needed to be a good enough swimmer.
that was tuff
True
Convergence with Stegosaurus
Does Apex have a weight yet?
How does one get the weight of a dinosaur in life based on just the bones?
My latest 3D print Allosaurus arm printed and up on my office wall 🙂
There are essentially two methods: limb circumference allometry, which is easier but less accurate, where you compare the circumference of the femur and/or humerus to various other animals and find a relationship between femur circumference and body mass
And the other is volumetric reconstruction, where you construct the skeleton in multiple views, add the amount of soft tissue you think is appropriate based on muscle studies etc., and then just. Measure the volume of your model
Is it me or are the feet too big for Velociraptor in prehistoric planet
i remember someone telling me apex predator is a incorrect term to use, is this true? if so, what do you use instead of it?
It's the correct term
i thought it was like , tettiary predator or something
Tertiary predator and apex predator mean the same thing. The problem is people conflating the technical term apex predator with its pop culture usage, like so many other things
what would you define as a apex predator?
Well tertiary or quaternary, since on rare occasions, ecosystems can support a 4th trophic level
Very true, I believe some marine mesozoic ecosystem was recently reconstructed with a 4th trophic level. It's intriguing that it may have been more common in the Mesozoic, both marine and terrestrial, with the extra plant productivity and biomass
Is it just me, but why is it that when theropod groups become bigger and bigger and reach the mega theropod weight class, they usually shrink the size of their arms and increase the size of their heads
whats the 4th?
Something like an orca pod that hunts large sharks would be considered on a 4th trophic level.
Its rare in today's ecosystems where plant productivity (as mentioned) isn't as high. But they're usually found in aquatic environments in the first place since a higher percentage of animals are secondary and up consumers.
https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(22)00860-0?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0960982222008600%3Fshowall%3Dtrue here's a paper that discusses that trend. Probably a correlation between the increased usage of the head and feet in prey capture and reduced usage of the hands
to be a apex, must you be a activate hunter?
The idea behind trophic levels is energy transfer. Which is only 10% efficient, so when you go up a level, you lose 90% of the energy the previous one sequestered, and usually by the third trophic level, a 4th cannot be sustained.
But in high productivity aquatic environments such as coral reefs, where there is an abundance of energy, you can get a fourth trophic level.
skulls as a whole can support better stress, and are a bit less risky to use compared to arms as you can't really grapple sauropods lmao
To be an apex predator you need to be the highest level consumer in your environment. All consumers at or above a secondary level are predators by their very nature.
The layman's version of an apex predator might be constrained to "active predator." But that's not necessarily a requirement.
It is usually how it goes though, because inactive predators such as filter feeders usually occupy the first or second trophic levels because filter feeding only works because there is still so much available energy for the consumer.
It also gets really strange in aquatic environments because of how producers work.
There is very little macro plant life in the oceans. The vast majority of photosynthesis happens in the upper 20 feet of water and by microorganisms, which then get eaten by zoo plankton, which gets eaten by larger zoo plankton, which gets eaten by the smallest fish, which goes up and up until you reach something like a Great White or an Orca, and at that point if you're super granular about it you have like 7 trophic levels so usually the entire micro environment of the oceans which not only produces the base energy for the ecosystem but has its own trophic levels that transfer that energy up into the macroorganisms just gets rolled into one trophic level
i think my brain just shut off trying to comprehend that
Trying to classify anything in ecology with neat and tidy lines and definitions is a fool's errand and we usually constrain ourselves to 3, at the very most 4, broad trophic levels
For example, take humans. We consider ourselves apex predators, masters of the world, yadda yadda yadda.
If you take apex predator to mean occupying the third trophic level, we are not an apex predator, because we mostly eat producers and primary consumers as a species, putting us in the second trophic level.
But humans are, ecologically, an apex predator; very few animals hunt us, we have the capability to eat the majority of the available biomass in an area.
So what definition do you use? The strict, trophic level based definition which we do not fit. Or a larger definition that takes into account more than just our diet?
I think apex predator = occupying the third trophic level is a silly definition. The same individual animal can be part of different trophic levels depending on what it eats
If a shark-eating orca is at the seventh trophic level would that make the orca an apexapexapexapexpredator?
Exactly, so the better definition is just highest trophic consumer. Which can, in all fairness, also fluctuate but at some point you have to draw a line and say "this animal usually does this, that animal usually does that."
he boot too big for he feet
Hey random, what’s the maximum length and weight estimate for Goliath atm? And then with cope aswell?
How much sucho weigh im in a debate rn
Like 5.3t
off the top of my head both are like..13ish tons?
a quick look seems to put goliath at..13.05 meters, dont quote me
Last stuff I saw was max weight for cope was 11.7t and then for Goliath 13-14t but it’s y I wanna check as it was ages ago and I’m not sure if they were hyper estimates or not
and i found a chart that puts Cope at 12.33 meters
same chart puts cope in the 11 ton range
Do we know how strong suchomimus's arms are
all i know is their huge

Suchomimus's prey?
lurdusaurus
There is some truth in what you say as it didn't need to excel in water to be good enough at swimming but what I don't agree with it that "Spinosaurus seems more specialized to an aquatic lifestyle". It is undeniable that Spinosaurus consumed subaquaeous prey items and foraged in wet habitats but this doesn't necessarily make it an aquatic dinosaur. It could just like it could not be based on physics, but Spino mayhaps gave a middle finger to that and still swam.
the thing has a paddle tail and more then liklely webbed feet
See, there are buoyant animals with webbed feet that don't necessarily dive to catch preys (they still swim). "Paddle" tail is kinda debatable when it is more similar in structure to Dimetrodon sail than a marin iguana's or water monitor lizard.
How would we have known about the shape of latenivenatrix's tail
cant disprove punting, Latens a troodontid so just look at tother troodonts
It does not indeed
We don't and cannot really predict it but one Troodontid as feather impression on its tail and it's Jianianhualong
what adaptations would a hypothetical microbe need to survive on the surface of mars
I guess what you define as a microbe is a microorganism. Well first it would need water to just survive at first and idk the condition of Mars so I don't know what adaptations it would need. Iirc Mars is more severely hit by solar storms so I guess that more UV's go through Mars atmosphere and so your cells would need ways to protect themselves, deal with DNA breakages and mutations. So, it's possible that they'd have better enzymes to repair their DNA, which could be used in order to find a cure against cancer.
That sounds like a great premise for a book icl
Given that mars is very cold, their membrane would be much richer in saturated fat like cholesterol too so the molecules can still move.
Also they would produce a lot of antifreezing proteins.
They would also have proteins throughout their membrane that could help with detecting changes in temperatures, which then would influence how much other proteins are produced to protect said cells.
could the oxidised soil be processed to get oxygen?
Also coming back on DNA they'd also have enzymes more effectives at detecting breakages and mutations, not just repairing them.
If they can reduce said soil they could get some oxygen. But not all life needs oxygen to survive though so they could also very well not depend on it.
Though iirc oxydation just means that you're loosing electrons, which doesn't necessarily implies the use of oxygen.
Deinococcus radiodurans is a current bacteria that can survive on mars though I think it may be through a form of stasis so probably doesn’t count
Oh that can also work. Bacterias have lot of ways to deal with that with sporulation for example.
it’s dna is packed into a Torus-like shapes to help with radiation resistance
Are there any known extinct subspecies of H. sapiens? I know there are subspecies of H. er*ctus (H. e. soloensis, H. e. pekiensis and others)
isnt Neanderthals debatably a subspecies, i know nothing of human evolution
Neanderthals are a different species of the same genus
So not a subspecies, but a very close relative
i know that, i just didnt know if there were debated to be a saphiens subspecies at any point
A subspecies can't be a different species entirely
It has to be in the same genus AND species but have slight differences that distinguish it
do y'all think spinos had a pouch like pelicans?
that'd be kinda cool and useful.
probably
Well it may have had a throat pouch like a crop, but I think we would see a skeletal distinction in the jaws if it could actually separate and expand it's jaws like a pelican
indeed.
I wouldn't doubt it if several species of dinosaur had something in their bodies to store extra food like a crop, but as far as I know nothing like that has been found
The crop appears to have arose within Aves according to https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pala.12453 but I suppose a convergent structure might be possible
there is a camp that considers them a subspecies of H. sapiens yes
there’s a lot of back and forth on it but there’s people in both camps, even with genetic information paleoanthropology is pretty volatile
It was suggested when people thought they landed on a definition of what a species is that goes past morphology
Imo species are just morphology and genetics, has nothing to do with being able to produce viable offspring, because if that were true these two would be the same species
No it also has to do with that, but its not the overarching rule to speciation, at least not anymore.
Genetics, morphology, and biology are all aspects of defining a species. In order of importance they rank:
- Genetics
- Biology
- Morphology
The morphological species concept is next to useless for defining extant species.
Lets try that again, thanks a lot discord censors.
In the case of Neanderthals, since they're extinct and I'm not sure if we have any knowledge of their genetic history (so correct me if this is wrong) then biology and morphology are what defines them as or as not a species.
Since they could in-breed with H. sapien then that is very good evidence of them being the same species. Their morphology, which is beyond the normal variation in populations of humans, is what defines them as a subspecies if you subscribe to that idea, which I do.
Alright here's a question
Would you call ever breed of dog a different subspecies?
No cause breeds are a different thing than subspecies
They all share the same genetic history with wolves, and can all interbreed.
Their morphology is different, but its easier to (especially as they are a human creation) define them all as the same subspecies or even not give them a subspecies at all.
Canis lupus familiaris iirc
I will call it a dog
And even then, the rules are fast and loose ones, as everything in the life sciences is.
Brown bears are a great example of this. Morphologically polar bears and brown bears are different species, but both biologically and through their genetic history they are more similar than they are different. So there is at some level a debate as to what to call polar bears.
Brown bears already have a really messy classification history, with hundreds of invalid subspecies. You could call them a subspecies of brown bear, but its really just easier to keep them as Ursus maritimus and because they are so ecologically unique that's perfectly fine if you ask me.
Didn't Neanderthals evolve from H. heidelbergensis whereas Sapiens evolved from H. er*ctus?
From what I've been looking up we don't share the same common ancestor in H. er°ctus
Unless I'm missing something and we also share H. heidelbergensis
Btw do any subspecies of other animals have this extent of skull differences as Sapiens and Neanderthals do?
Going back to the polar bear debate, you've got this going on
As for defined undebated subspecies (that aren't dogs) I don't know of any off the top of my head
Btw I take back my part on the different common ancestor being different, apparently heidelbergensis is our ancestor but every science communicator just left that part out and just said it was er*ctus
Confused here, are you saying they should be different species because they have differing skull morphology?
No, I'm just giving you an example of another proposed subspecies with decent skull variation.
I'm of the opinion that even if polar bears fit into the general rules to define a subspecies, it is better to keep them separate.
But for Neanderthals I could really go either way.
So why do you think they (polar and brown bears) should remain separate despite you saying that polars should be a subspecies? I don't think it being too controversial should be an excuse if that's the case
Also you said previously you subscribed to the idea of Neanderthals being H. sapiens neanderthalensis but now it can go either way, what changed?
Mammal phylogeny mid
Dinosaur phylogeny peak
I think that they could be defined as a subspecies same as Grizzly and Kodiak bears, but not necessarily that they should.
What I think keeps it distinct is their morphology and ecology not any controversy. Polar bears are a marine animal, not terrestrial as their continental relatives are, and they are heavily adapted to the arctic. Couple that with the proposed population of brown bears they are derived from being extinct, and their isolation from other populations they are well on their way to speciation.
I subscribe currently to the idea of Neanderthals being a subspecies, but not so strongly that I couldn't be convinced otherwise given proper evidence.
Makes sense, hopefully they can get on with full speciation before they recombine with brown bears due to current climate issues
Btw the last part is just science acceptance, that's how it should be. Ur goated for that
if ceratopsians were alive today, would they be hunted for their horns?
I know that, my current understanding of Neanderthals lacks much of any knowledge of their genetic history. I am unaware if that information has been studied, or discovered. Which is why I follow the mindset I do concerning their relation to humans.
I imagine in the future when brown bears take over they'll have a similar argument on whether or not polar bears are just a subspecies of brown bear or if they're their own species
Pretty similar event to what happened with Neanderthals funnily (or unfunnily) enough
nuh uh im wright
Release the Swedish beardog scientists
I know there's a term for it but google is holding it from me
what chasmosaurine does bastidon resemble the most?
Good question
What;s the status on kaprosuchus? Last I heard it was considered not really that savvy on land and would've just stuck to shores as a typical croc would?
Cuban crocodile
iz me fr fr
Dam, and I thought that I had a thick skull
so real
whats the most accurate spino skeletal we have
every single one ive seen from 2023-2025 looks insanely different
lokiceratops perhaps
randomdinos is one of the best ones atm
Kind of a mix of Spiclypeus and Kosmoceratops
was loki discovered when diamond and pearl came out?
Would a master's be enough to get a job in paleontology or would a PhD be absolutely necessary?
Just learned the Moab Giants stego model has feathers and I low key love that
(Found the image on their insta, no idea who lil bro is so I blurred him lol)
Loki was named in 2024
Feathered stegosaurus…….
Feathered….bipedal stegosaurus….
Seen some sh
do you guys believe shoni, if alive today, would attack boats?
like, how sharks confused surfers for seals
Chasmosaurus
Ask shoni
Rex vs shant?
rex
Why
(I stopped being a herbivore glazer now btw)
cool bro
I actually dont understand the logic of making it a tank
because its the biggest carni in game
can we talk about the sauropod family like wow there amazing
very few kits are logical, but its a pvp game so theyre gonna sacrifice realism for fun and uniqueness
for example there isn't much logic behind every single hadrosaur being a high damage low mobility brawler but its very fun so who cares
Super huge too, there’s a bajillion species ranging potentially from all the way back in the Triassic
cough, rex, cough cough
cw
Cow War?
weight combat
Wait, Combat?
Nanotyrannus is real
@balmy nacelle maip, i believe the biggiest megaraptor. No sickle claw on back limbs but huge claws on front limbs
@mellow prism elite ball knowledge, show this man the truth
Danger dolan
surface level knowledge
Nah its the Truth, the rest are noasaurs
Campanian - maastrichtian giant noasaurs? 
Ofcourse, they couldn't let their abeli brethren be the only ones to get big.
allosaurus vs daspletosaurus,what is the chance of one winning over the other and vice versa?
Sounds like a #path-of-titans question if you mean ingame, irl it'd just depend on how big the Allo is since most Adult Daspletos are basically the same size :
i mean real life
If they're similar is size, then probably whoever gets the first good bite(or whoever the writer wants).
depends on the allo species
Anax and Fragilis are the largest and both are similarly size at max sizes anyways
Yeah P-26083 is probably fragilis since it comes from the same quarry where all allos are fragillis and it doesn't have anything making it unique from fragillis other than being big, its basically the same size as the big anaxes.
They are all the same weight tho plus ...
last i remember the POT allo is based roughly off Saurophagan size
for its time yes
probably cause they couldnt do a sauro sub when allo has 3 species already so comprimise and make allo sauro size
pretty sure every daspletosaurus is larger than this, but again it doesn't really matter it's just who gets the first well placed bite
this is how every animal vs. animal debate goes. its not a video game, they'll just die
huh
Lourinha was the "Everyone is here" formation for theropods, Torvos? Yup, Allos? Yup, Ceratos? Yup, Abelis? Yup, Carchs? Yup. Also had cool stegos and sauropods
Hold on carchs and abelis?
Lusovenator is a Carch, Possible Lourinhasaurus itself too but its hard to say. Abelis are sadly just teeth found there, but we do find Abelis all over Europe in the Cretaceous, so it wouldn't be too suprising to find em in Jurassic Europe too.
anax was considerably larger wasnt it
doesnt fragilis only get up to 3t
There's a good few bigger than that and basically within the anax size range. AMNH 5767 and CPS 99 are big too
I've never heard of a 4+ ton fragilis before
probably doesnt mean its impossible
true but it probably means it didnt average that size so anax is still quite a bit larger
ill keep my opinions on that thing to myself
Yeah probably. Though Anax in general isn't very complete iirc
He ain’t dumb
anax is very complete idk what you're talking about
This is the Allosaurus anax Holotype(The Chosen One)
yea i dont even call it that name
Beautiful
when im in a fragmentary holotype competition and my opponent is a carnosaurian
Dumb can also mean cute
But it always means Dumb
Hey folks 👋 wanted to ask about what things do we know about the kaprosuchus? It's an ancient animal i really liked since i was a child but there was a time since i researched about it.
Was it adapted for a more land-based environment while remaining capable in water? Do you have any papers/studies that talk about it?
technically dumb means unable to speak so all non avian dinosaurs were probably very dumb
Kapro more then likely was equivalent to modern day Cuban crocs in life but not 100% sure due to the whole we have a single skull
think of it like a Cuban croc
mostly aquatic but not uncomfortable on land
I have this on Kapro, dunno much more(by CurrentlyMiguel)
Are there any theories as to why the "boar tusks"?
i mean its a croc with big teeth so its definitely hunting with them
because theyre awesome and who wouldn't want them
That's a good answer
I remain in love with this extinct creature
ark and realism servers ruined kapro for me
ok but Arks kapro is cool on the basis its a alien
I would like kapro more if it was still a horse croc
Few of em are. (I saw few and there’s like 1)
Brachiosuchus is kinda one
I understand Ark (those things are like chainsaw missiles darting from the waters to bleed you out) but why realism servers?
every single encounter ive ever had with a kapro on a realism/semi realism server has resulted in 1 or more rulebreaks by the kapro
also you cant hit them as a big theropod
and even if you do land a hit they take reduced damage for some reason
I see
also their speed demons who tail ride, with a op turn
Aren't the legs too long here based on Mahajangasuchus ?
They're fine, I think?
Kinda sad this guys scene got cut in PHP S2
Oh wow I didn't remember its legs being that long my bad
No Problem, These skeletals are pretty new. Miguel has been on a spree of skeletals ever since he discovered the other skeletal made the legs too short
Same, such an interesting croc
Is that why WOTG Kapro was updated with longer legs ?
Dunno
They can speak, although not in human languages
I hope we get a large terrestrial pseudosuchian in that new series
ICE AGE BARINASUCHUS(no it won't happen, but it'd be funny)
the definition of speaking is "to say" and the definition of say is "to utter words" so you cannot speak if there are no words to speak
new discovery gets made tomorrow that shows fasolasuchus lived until the end of the triassic so it gets included
BARINASUCHUS MY BELOVED
wasn't Barina like 12 million years or something stupid
Pride of my country
archosaurs in general are just awesome
-# except corytbosaurus i hope that unholy abomination becomes invalid³
cause i think i saw somewhere the entirety of Barinas time on earth ws it just progessively getting bigger
alligatoroids be like
Also there's this thing from Jurassic Madagascar, not much there but its cool.
I think quinkana is the only pseudosuchian we might get, especially considering it had one of the most tragic extinctions.
Existed for 25 million years only to go extinct to humans. Perfect representation of the holocene extinction.
But what defines a word?
a single distinct meaningful element of speech or writing, used with others (or sometimes alone) to form a sentence and typically shown with a space on either side when written or printed.
yes
So for that, they did speak as they didn’t write since they can communicate with members of the same species just like how humans can
they didn't speak because language didnt exist
Language exists for animals, how else are they communicating with one another
Language: "watch out there's a crocodile"
Basic Communication: distressed unga bunga
one contains words, one does not
also language is defined as human communication meaning if there are no humans there is no language
To play devil’s advocate, some species have been shown to have different distress calls for different species of predator, if I remember correctly prairie dogs have a very complex system of calls to point out threats and details about them. If they have a specific noise that means a specific thing, could it be considered a word?
Yeah if Distressed unga bunga has a meaning, its basically a language
What is a cuss word if not the modern distressed unga bunga?
Cats only Meow at their parents when young and at humans, they hiss for warning, etc
Yeah there are animals that have that. I'm pretty sure there are primates in africa that have different screams for different words. Like one scream means "eagle" and they all run to the trees, but another means "snake" and they all start searching, but that isn't language by definition because those primates aren't humans
"Epanterias" was also Classified as Fragilis
Epanterias is actually the Biggest in that Chart
AMNH 5767
Truly....
what is Shamosaurus' most up-to-date length & weight?
Are there any dinosaur documentaries like bbc earth or dinosaur movies like jw or jp?
Wait wasn't it 11.8 meters long?
no, this is the holotype
Oh
How heavy is the 11.8 m one? 6.5 tons or 4.9 tons?
The 11.8m isn't Anax
Its Fragilis
Anax is the 11.7m, which should be like 4.8-5.2t tmk
11.7m is like 4.8t or so, the 5t+ one is 11.8-12m
The mighty AI
It's about the same size as Palaeosaniwa
I don't think an aussie croc is out of the picture but you'd want something better than Quinkana. Like Baru or Paludirex
I can confirm why, I got send back in the day few reference, Scott Hartman's among em, but it seems Scott ones were posed in a weird way when drawn, leading to the legs to be shorter than needed
Nowadays, even with long leg stuff, kapro remains as tall as Scott Hartman's reference
So in shorts, it was kinda one of the reasons it got some traits tweaked
This one has legs longer than it should (scaled using vertebrae with phone, so apologies if it seems a tad displaced)
Are we doing this discussion again
I mean, it's the paleontology channel
no, hartman posed them in their sprawled position im pretty sure this exact convo has happened before iirc
That's what I mainly meant (apologies if there was some misunderstanding on my own)
Should've worded it better
wyes but you said "leading to the legs to be shorter than needed" which isnt true, them being spraled is intentional and not shorter than needed its just perspective of the bone articulation
I meant to the model we had
Since placed the model and made the legs as big as the reference, so the legs were shorter than what it should've been
I call this kaprogrughus, rhymes with Grug
I see, thanks for the clarification !
can we go back to making saltasaurids looking like stellar sea cows on land
No, we'll go further, we'll make them look like pre-randomdinos perucetus on land
well
@winter marsh
That looks clean as hell. But why does it have weird symbols on its back
I think Moto Moto likes you
Oh lawd he comin
@winter marsh, I used the bottom image’s weird back shapes as inspiration.
I like the one that Looks like the “Goosebumps” G right above the R shaped pattern.
what made people depict saltasaurids hella fat?
Probably the general bubble wrapping craze where people mistook morbidly obese, dying animals as a healthy size
whats the worse bubble wrapping, hadrosaurs street fightering combo's on therapods or obese dinosaurs
Obese dinosaurs is bubble wrapping.
The worse of which I'd say is people treating triceratops' jugal bone as a massive muscle attachment site
oops, i thought the bubble wrapping term was when you from one extreme to another, oopsies
People thinking edmontosaurus was doing mortal combat finishers on Rex
But yes, edmusthosaurus is probably the worst thing to happen to paleontology in recent memory
a lot of people saw x-rex and assume every edmontosaurus was a 10+ ton monster that could 1 shot t. rex
I had a debate with like 4 people on tiktok about whether or not edmontosaurus was bigger than and could easily kill a t. rex
nah, tiktok finding out about oxalaia
Even prey that can "easily" kill their predators, and not that edmontosaurus could, usually try to run away first.
The only animal that needs to actively engage the other in a predator - prey interaction is the predator. The prey usually chooses to first wholly avoid injury.
Oxalaia is just fragmentary species no. 257, in the grand scheme of things it hasn’t done much
you haven't seen a comment section of any video on spinosaurids have you
Was edmonto the only prey item that rex usually hunted that was faster then it?
I don’t need to, edmonto glaze is significantly worse
well I doubt Triceratops was much faster and I don't see a rex hunting anything else
torosaurus, denversaurus, ankylosaurus all found....alive? in a ditch
ive seen people get threats for having oxalaia in their top 10 spinosaurids because "its only 2 bones meaning it isn't even valid + youre actually just a spino fan who wants to be different"
did they lie
This is common in megatheropod arguments, it never goes anywhere other than empty threats because…lo and behold the really big animal with really big teeth that hunts really big animals is really big and awesome. What a shocker
we have no evidence for rex hunting anky, I doubt it would go for denver and toro definitely wasnt faster
are you for or against rex hunting toro
Rex probably hunted everything let’s be real here
I don't see why it wouldn't
its just a slightly bigger trike after all
is toro bigger? i thought trike was , or their the same size
It’s about the same size, prorsus is larger though
whats the difference between prorsus and horridus again? size? horn shape?
Pretty minimal, but “major” differences are usually with the brow/nasal horns and uhhh there was another thing regarding the back of skull?
was nedo prorsus or horridus?
horridus
I don't know about EVERYTHING
and tatankaceratops?
This is significantly more favorable compared to other theropod-sauropod relationships
Alamosaurus as far as we know hardly overlapped with Tyrannosaurus, and honestly? If that's all the size difference, I can see a particularly dedicated large tyrannosaurus taking that down
i dont know, i kinda can see two rex's actually attempting to take down one, maybe not a fully healthy one, but even a slightly sick, young or old indivual
That one is pretty doable actually, though bigger alamos, yeah
The neck is right in the range of the most devastating bite of the mesozoic
Though that puts the rex in kicking range
Ambush from behind, bite leg/tail base and its got a pretty good shot
I’m certain most of the time tyrannosaurs wouldn’t bother alamosaurs and go after something else, but as Venator said Rex could absolutely handle one down if needed to
Not to mention the Rex here isn’t even on the larger side either, just imagine one that’s pushing ~9 - 10 tons lol
ig, but for something that's used to 1 shotting things smaller than it it would be tough
idk what you're talking about
why is it so low quality
This…kind of confirms my point
but also rebbachisaurus hehahuehae
idk it was the only good pic for paralititan I could find
giga's formation was giga's dream
200 rebbachisaurs
Carchs loved rabbechis so much that when they went extinct carchs followed
what abt tarbo and its sauropods?
It hunted them and everything else in its formation, Cuz big Predator
Considerably more favorable than even Rex and Alamo
the weight difference was nearly half of rex and alamo iirc
the best theropod sauropod matchup is probably sucho and nigersaurus or smth
Are You Sure?
No nigersaurus was too precious for any animal to actually kill, that's how they survived don't ya know
Part 2 and 2.5
oh i didnt realise giga lived with so many dwarf sauropods lol
sucho vs nigersaurus is still a good runner up though
Those are normal sized sauropods, Giga is just Huge(same with the bigger sauropods)
Nigersaurus used Jurassic World logic and used its many teeth to automatically defeat suchomimus in battle
I still cant get over the nigersaurus kill animations in jwe2
Theropods living with similar sized sauropods was pretty common
everyone says ceratopsians and hadrosaurs were fodder...but the real fodder was sauropods
The real fodder was the friends we made along the way
ceratosaurus was fodder to allo because jurassic fight club said it was
Barosaurus slept with an Eye open, it always feared the tinies would ambush it in its sleep
fr
people think the only natural predator of barosaurus was allosaurus when in reality it was ornitholestes, the true apex of the morrison formation
the diplodocus never learned to fear them and look what happened
Painful to read this honestly.
Tbf it seems sarcastic
Being large wasn't all they had going for them. They had incredibly unique and distinct well-optimized anatomy and most likely had other behavioral adaptations that contributed to survival.- even if we don't exactly know the.
Also you're probably right Oogma, but I wanted to state that regardless.
“Sauropods aren’t fodder” people when I put the 3 year old sauropodlet against the local apex predator
Babies of any species are vulnerable.
Okay, then let's put a baby charcharadontosaur against a fully grown sauropod (it's fodder)
That's like calling a human fodder because our offspring are utterly defenseless alone.
Unfortunately, young carcharodontosaurs and humans do not comprise a majority of the ecosystem for either
Irrelevant to our point entirely but okay?
You don't don't become one of the most dominant herbivore groups during the late cretaceous by being "fodder"
The humble hadrosaur:
and it isn’t @last adder because the point of my half-joke was that young sauropods were very much the norm you’d encounter considering they laid eggs by the hundreds (if not thousands)
Obviously the adults would be easier to find but I kind of doubt they’d have the same density as younger individuals
I see his point kind of
Baby Sauropods being far more common than baby Carcharodontosaurs would make them more conventially "fodder" since they would be getting picked off in massive numbers
The local apex predator ends up being a Azdarchid which dies due to being too stupid and trying to eat a baby larger than its Throat and Stomach
the humble hippopotamus
I don't understand why we consider prey animals "fodder" when everything we glaze wouldn't exist without them (for more reasons than just as food as well)
Putting it like that makes sense, but having a high mortality rate at any life stage does not make a species unsuccessful or unfit.
That baby sauropod tears its way out of the azdarchid, eats leaves and grows big and strong, it once accidentally eats a Liazard and earns the name of "Lord of the Lizard Eaters"
It's stupid to rank animals like we are power scaling them, and I'm honestly tired of it
Yea I dislike the term fodder in general since I don't really think it means much but in turn brings an unnecessarily negative connotation into the discussion, but if someone was going to call an animal "fodder" then heavily R-selected animals that encompass a major portion of the predator's diet does fit that bill more than any other
Those animals literally carry their ecosystems though, and most wouldn't survive without them. It's not a matter of linear strength and predation.
“ I like dinosaurs, but for more nuanced reasons than you”
Is the way young sauropods behaved/were raised, ect known about at all? I know that they had large clutches of very small offspring- but are there any other indicators?
The so called S-Tier dinosaurs when the "fodder" no longer exists (they are cooked)
That is how the extinction went down tbf
I mean fodder doesn't necessarily mean bad, the most basic definition of fodder is literally just "food"
That's why it's stupid to talk about them like that imo. All of them are important.
I’m pretty sure we have evidence for age-specific herding
Still carries a pretty strong negative connotation for most
That would certainly make sense! And isn't too dissimilar to the strategies other dinosaurs used such as specific hadrosaurs.
Especially in the context of how most people use the word (Power scaling)
I understand, that's why I said before I dislike the term in general, rather just clarifying that using the term to simply mean "animal that gets eaten a lot" isn't necessarily wrong even if it comes across as a needlessly harsh descriptor
Large theropods are fodder the day they're born (Whenever they inevitably die they get eaten by scavengers and microorganisms)
What annoys me most about the term is the implication that said organism is inferior. Some organisms are better at certain things than others but this by no means means one is inherently "better"
Your argument is invalid
Says the fodder (you'll also die one day and get decomposed in one way or another.)
I agree
everything is inferior to tartigrades
Tradigrades are awesome but they aren't invincible, they commonly get eaten by snails
They can only become "invulnerable" in a period of stasis, and can't actually move and eat in this state. It's mainly to wait out unfavorable conditions for as long as possible.
So the Immortal snail is just a snail who got too much fed up on tardigrades?
Being eaten is just normal, regardless of how or when it happens. It doesn't determine success whatsoever if you're still adapted to your circumstances and reproducing.
This is too peak
People will look at this and say "not fat enough"
Some may also think it's not slim enough.
Haven't actually seen that take yet. People are obsessed with the idea dinosaurs were overly obese
I feel like it's either extreme for some reason
From what I've seen there's been a lot of paleoart- even modern- that gives them way too little soft tissue in some areas. Could just be me though
It's generally been getting less common though I think?
For whatever reason there's not too much of a middle ground in this regard, and we either have skinny or obese dinosaurs mainly
The only shrinkwrapping I've seen for ages now (outside of the jurassic franchise keeping brand consistency) is in skeletals and there's a reason for it being present there
I mean in skeletals it makes sense as you are just tracing the bones essentially
It really depends on which Jurassic dinosaur and what part of the body. Lots of them are considerably beefy in the limbs, and I actually don't think that's too unrealistic at all.
Why are you using Sue? The legs seem proportionally correct, it's just the fact that Sue is huge compared to the average Rex
Hank is on the same level as sue and I will not hear otherwise
Me when PHP rex uses sues:
Where is that stated?
just fyi this is the lastest one
tbf it looks to be scaled to the same length as sue here
Does Hank use Sue's skeletal as a reference or is Hank literally a giant Rex in PHP?
Which specimen I should use for this comparison?
AMNH 5027, pretty sure that one's the average size for a Rex
Also scale Hank up or down to show it better when overlapping with the specimen
Regardless of the argument of the leg height, the PHP rex was a very good interpretation
So is Hank a 1:1 of Sue or do they just use her skeletal?
The other skeletal honestly looks more excessively tall rather than him being short
I'm not an expert but I'm pretty sure that's wrong 
he's not a 1:1 but he's just a fatter overlay of scott's sue
TBH hank don't look like sue unless they articulated her ribs like that mount so her torso would be huge
Legs seem the same
Also it kinda just looks like Hank is more set in and his weight is on him rather than his legs being short
Looking at this Hank looks kinda proportionate to the mount
This one?
Also, it's not only "hank", all 6 rexes from PhP had short legs.
I thought all Rexes in PhP were Hank since it's all the same design (give or take size variation)
so in the mating scene was Hank mating with himself?
💀
Not what i'm tryna say, I'm tryna say that I thought Hank was the name for the Rex model, not that it's a reoccuring animal
Hank is specifically the one in the first episode I think, the father
Hank is not an offical name given to nor a real rex speicmen or the PHP rex
Hank is the name for the father dinosaur that was shown early in the series, yeah.
That's really boring, thought it was just a nickname for every Rex in the series
It's just a fan given name anyways

Why does a Rex swimming and flipping a turtle get a name but not the two Rexes who risked their lives fighting an Edmontosaurus
Or that one that killed a Trike off screen and instantly laid some pipe 2 minutes after
The whole deal was that Hank had a big daddy vibe to him, and that's why fans named it that.
Fixed*
Did they really risk their lives? Seemed like a pretty clean encounter to me
He barely did anything parental 💀
And the others did nothing parental
He led his children across water to an island with food?
I don't think that you need to be a "good" dad to be label such a name
Well he was the first introduced one as well, and set the image for tyrannosaurus further along the series
You can still go into an encounter that can risk your life without anything actually happening to you
@last adder he woulda done that without kids either way, the kids just followed him
I just can't understand how they made such a mistake
Also, the main trailer for PhP refers to how he's being a dad rather than being the most powerful predator on the planet for the day
What mistake?
I suppose that's true? But he did show genuine concern when one of the babies got snatched by the mosasaur and acknowledged it.
Titanoboa and T rex
Legs are too short
I remember seeing a "documentary" that tried to convince its audience titanoboa could kill a tyrannosaurus
I wouldn't say that necessarily, it's just that they made him very bulky
The Rex just seems very set into his weight and he has bulk, not that his legs are short
This image is sue as well, your post isn't an end-all response
Is my discord bugging or is this the exact same messages that were sent 5 minutes ago?
those skeletals are standing straight up and don't look affected by their own weight
They are t posed essentially.
I know it's sue, but it has a incorrect rib articulation in that mount, so it wouldn't be looking like sue if it looked like that mount.
Literally a shrink-wrapped t-posed dinosaur isn't equal to one in a natural position
Handsome hank scares me
Can I please have a source for that, I believe you, I mean just look at it, it looks ridiculous. But anytime I mention that I've been told that the ribs are incorrect I'm asked for a source and I. Can't. Find. One.
Isn't the ceiling also too low originally so they set up the Sue mount to be lower than she would be in life? I remember being told that in this chat a few months back
The new most accurate Tyrannosaurus rex ever reconstructed? The Eofauna T. rex is a faithful reconstruction of the individual Tyrannosaurus known as Sue. A great deal of research went into creating this model, giving us the closest look yet at what the face of this iconic animal may have been like.
Check out the Eofauna Sue the T. rex here: ht...
Basically almost other archosaur has a bent back ribs(https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.20989), and rex is like that as well. The field museum mount has the gastralia too low, and the ribs bending foward instead of backwards
This honestly looks very strange and unsteady with those elongated legs. How they are in the show makes him seem much better planted.
I’m pretty sure there’s an official overlay for the pp Rex
I JUST DID IT
Not sure what this image is supposed to be proving but the legs look perfect to me.
So much more well defined than a good bit of depictions.
Those are official sizes of PhP's dinos
Oh, awesome!
Someone should make comparison between these two, mine isn't good 
Hey friends! Today Ben clicks on the wrong type of ad, we learn all about scaley lips and dive into the hot topic of dinosaur temperatures.
More about how we know the colour of dinosaurs:
https://youtu.be/c0PYvIP0Tmw
•••••
Your host: Ben the Quasi-Ecologist
•••••
Looking to support the channel? Take a look at our support...
The musculoskeletal drawing really do seem kinda overly tall ngl. This is coming from someone who has been around multiple Tyrannosaurus mounts in person.
Thats because mounts are usually outdated and in an active pose
Neutral pose is always taller
How outdated are the mounts from the HMNS? I certainly could be wrong.
What is the sauropod behind the giraffe
Alamosaurus
Alamo was larger than dread? I didn't know that
For some reason museum mounts make dinosaur dorsal vertebrae very straight and usually give them real deep torsos
Php rex still isn't anywhere near this deep, I think some angles and scenes might make it seem that way though. It still looks super realistic to me.
remember kids, animals are usually closer to starvation than they are obesity
please stop making everything fat this isn't a zoo
But they shouldn’t be shrink wrapped
where in my message does it say to start shrink wrapping things?
There's a difference between a bulky animal and a fat animal, Rex is bulky but people just call it fat
Is trex vs spinosaurus a on going debate
because php rex is fat and improperly proportioned
so now people have continued making it more and more fat
animal versus animal debates don't exist in a paleontological setting, especially for two animals who are completely ecologically different
its like going "dude this hyena gets wrecked by a tiger, bad animal"
Chances are if the two did live together, they wouldn’t fight frequently as both occupy completely different niches (albeit environment and fauna richness also matters too)
In an AVA context, no lol
Big Rex is almost twice the size of the largest Spino that isn't a singular toe
An "acquaintance" of mine thinks spino>trex simply because of idek(I tried my best to help him but got angry and said some wild things)
Its like the ugly duckling, somewhere in the cretaceous a spinosaurus was bullied by its peers for having a freakishly large toe but now children on the internet thinks it means 20 ton spino is still a thing
Spinosaurus was faster though not in terms of agility
Spinosaurus weighed less i just assumed so
Maybe spino got big feet when it becomes old
maybe it's like a tiger😎
You guys like it
(I know it sucks)
Is spinosaurus even an apex? I see carchardontosaurus as the superior CARNIVORE
Wdym?
Carchardontosaurus should be definitively be seen as the apex of north africa
Well they fill different niches
spinosaurus was really just chilling by the pound you know existing
So?
Carchardontosaurus has really been proven to be the more superior species
spinosaurus in hell creek having to fight the mosaurus for the 3 piece baby trex meal:
Wdym by that spino was good at the niche it filled
me when 2 mega fauna who are the highest of their respective niches don't have the same exact niche
therefor both
apex carnivore is a dumb form of terminology
spinosaurus still occupied the highest trophic level in its environment, it was doing just fine
Kinda redundant too since an herbivore by their very definition cannot be an apex, so you don't need to specify if the apex is carnivorous
the best apex term is clearly: the big things
depending how you view it, spino might occupy a higher trophic level than carcharodontosaurus too
gotta love the fish eaters
The virgin 2nd trophic level carcharodontosaurus vs the chad 3rd trophic level spinosaurus
how accurate is Will's Udanoceratops?
Various spinosaurus images for the person from general chat
I guess its not taller at the hip but I was referring to head height
Regardless I appreciate you finding the pictures
I'm pretty sure the old spino model was larger however
Oh that is definitely true
Not even
No cheeks-
Can anyone hand me a good acrocanthosaurus skeletal please?
Well considering they "supposedly" ate nothing but fish i would have to agree spino (bc of its diet) would probably not be an apex granted I had much more advantages (similar to how lions are "kings" of the jungle its aditude alone from what we think happened in its life time
Ye I gotchu
Lions are the apex because its species is the "strongest"(even though they have the most butt booty cheeked up hunt success rate of all time)
What was the average height of a trex 15 feet yes?
Measurements for prehistoric animals use the metric system ☝️ 🤓
4.572 meters yes?
Why is it so specific 🥀
also second thing: length is preferred more, since height is VASTLY variable
That's how you get 15 feet
If you use the feet - meter conversion Google provides yea
If thats the case then what stops a 1v1 of a elephant vs a lion ? The lion is smart enough to know it cant take a elephant down 1v1 same with anything else smaller then t rex or spino if they weren't seen a threat they most likely aren't worth the risk(which is how lions hunt)
In theory this is what makes it an apex btw if the threat is higher then reward its not worth to fight which is seen in quite a few ways of nature and can be tracked throughout the entire world by almost all hunting behaviors of creatures
Granted there the rare case of seeing 1v1 in nature unless prey os overcome by predators 10x over which i would imagine is how spino would of hunted if we knew for sure it was more then a fish eater
Ngl bro you might gotta slow down i just got back on this topic😭 so my brain is refreshed
Not a single comma located
ye it was a little confusing
Oh im sorry!!! Just very excited to talk about spino ans thw way it could of been and how modern animals can relate to past creatures
That is very cool👍
And? Im not righting a letter to nasa or anything like that im jist sharing my thoughts and ideas to see if anyone else has insights on it and their thoughts of how they would of been
it doesn't have to be a letter written by nasa if you're writing something of such length then it could be confusing to others
ngl I might go back to just doing calculus or something dinosaur to complex for me
yo update me on the fight/debate I wanna pick sides
It’s just your messages are a little confusing, I don’t see why you can’t incorporate a comma here and there to prevent long run-off sentences 😭
Oh well im ngl I don't focus on punctuation when it comes to specific things so nvm about it
someone tell me the beef, yall are getting heated from what i'm reading
Nothing is happening atm 
Gl ig to u guys hope ur debate goes well
guess I gotta read back and suffer the puncuation horrors
In the Kem Kem there are two apex predators there, Spinosaurus and Carcha. One isn't considered better than the other on which is the apex carnivore in the formation
Carcha is the apex predator, but Spinosaurus is the apex piscivore in the formation
carcha is apex spinosaurus is not get mogged
( ^ This message alone should tell you everything about the previous “debate”.)
Main reason I don't take the arguments of peeps with the new person badge seriously until they prove they aren't joking
No I've been in this server for more than a year
mhm...
have fun you two
@sand gyro this me
Apex refers to what is at the top of the food chain, nothing to do with strength (though that is a factor)
Oh you're the guy who kept doing animal vs animal talks
I still ain't taking you seriously
The video is still playing it turned into a ghost
thank you emu
@wispy knot Hello! Please keep posts on-topic and appropriate while in this Discord server. Refer to our #rules and pinned guidelines in every channel you intend to use.
I WANT T. REX DOING A LOAF SIT
I WANT THEIR LOAF SIT
speedrawn loaf rex
if I knew patience i'd put effort into art that isn't speed drawing and probably pump out some peak
Why is there so much spinosaurus and ankylosaurus love on social media
they're cool
Cus they’re cool
1# is conversation starter and 2# is anky armour op
should I draw a baby Rex doing the loaf?
(Nah I'm joking they are both cool
)
Yeah i'm horrible at drawing baby Rexes
that's why I stick to the FATTIES when drawing dinos
two finger carcharodontosaur
Hey guys, What’s your favorite Dinosaur?

Tyrannosaurus, Spinosaurus, & Giganotosaurus
the big three
Oh okay, mine would be the Allosaurus.
Pycnonemosaurus,carnotaurus,kryptops,rajasaurus…..I know,very hard to guess my favourite theropod genus….
based on the baby Rex from PhP, i'm just bad with heads for some reason
Loll, isn’t Kryptops a Carnivorous Therapod?
Yeah,it’s an abelisaurid,my fav genus
clade
Oh srry,forgot Clade was the word lol
Nice, well nothin’ special about my old Boi Allosaurus, coming from the Allosauridae 🥱
Well nice chat, Ima head to bed.
Loll, okay okay fine. But yeah Goodnight.
TTT more basal than acro…
What’s everyone’s top 5 favourite Clades? Mine goes
- Abelisaurids
- Ceratopsids
- Tyranosauroids or however you call it
- Charcaradontosaurids
5.Megaraptora
Huh?
Kk,I kinda just pulled the chart out of my ass,I didn’t take time to check if it was accurate lol
please keep intimate details to yourself, i was eating
Out of my ass means finding the image from a source that doesn’t give any proof of being accurate
too late, the thought won't go away now 😭
Sorry 😭
- Dinocerata
- Amphicyonidae
- Archegosauridae
- Arthropoda as a whole
- Coelurosauria
Carcharodontosaurus, Shantungosaurus, Stegosaurus/Utahraptor
Irritator and uh Supersaurus. They kinda cool
I like sauroniops to
Wish we had more to it, probably would’ve been a very cool looking animal
Did epanterias turn into allosaurus amplexus or was the species morphed into one of the other allo species
50/50 between weird fragilis & “A. amplexus”
- Tyrannosaurus
- Allosaurus
- Ostrich
- Kelenken
- Sparrows
Looks cursed but is completely accurate
the best dinosaurs are the ones I can see
oh mb lemme just
- Mosasaurus
- Pterodactyl
- Mammoth
- Smilodon
- T.rex
uh
chat
we seem to have some Zhuchengtyrannus news again
oh?
They’re all dead and lived before my great great grandpa so all are dinosaurs
Huh?
