#paleontology
1 messages · Page 183 of 1
I think there's a pretty confident take right now that it is a baby but is still valid, so the adult would be near the size of tarbosaurus
Isn’t there also an upcoming second tyrannosaur species from the nemegt?
is there??
You mean Jenghizkhan (which is lumped into Tarbosaurus but might be resurrected)?
I think it’s known from an abstract, same ones that the sauroph paper & schimitar spino were in
I think you are referring Svp 2024
Yea
New Leeds skeletal surprisingly didn’t catch too much attention
Yeah a Tarbo Species that's found more Western parts I think
Don't think that's necessary that it'd be the size of adult tarbo, its a juvinile Tyrannosaur, estimating adult size from that is pretty hard. Alio is also know just from a Juvenile specimen and it's adult could be anywhere from Tarbo to maybe just Qianzhou sized(probably Qian sized)
roast him over an open fire
I predicted the future
Fun game of which is which
I also forgot that Alioramus was immature
Will it be an AI or playable?
Its legs seem proportionally longer.... NANOTYRANNUS BATAAR
Nanotyrannus kriegsteini
big canned fish
would be cool if we find an adult
If only the +60 specimens of Tarbosaurus were DESCRIBED AND NOT JUST A HANDFUL
They'll all be described in 60 lines, 1 for each
Seems like Mongolia is focused on the bayanshiree right now, we’ll eventually get to the nemegt trust
Most of the specimen are in Russian institutes iirc
Oh
ZPAL is a Polish Museum, so maybe they're stored there.
There's still alot of tarbo stuff being worked on, new species, the Ontogeny paper and a paper on Tarbo's Skull(probably wider than how we reconstruct it currently)
how large was Styracosaurus? is its in-game model correctly sized?
It’s pretty accurately sized
thank you
it is after its tlc, mostly accurately sized yeah
How long are certain populations of non-avian dinosaur thought to have survived into the cenozoic? Considering not all species could've possibly been wiped out at the extinction event
we have no idea but idk if any of them really survived into the cenozoic unless you consider the start of it to be the moment the meteor hit
Yeah that's what I mean
I saw a video that was talking about how most scientists think at most, non-avian holdouts lasted a few years, but some fringe theories suggest some surviving as late as 33,000 years after the impact
Considering how we have 0 fossil record of non avian dinosaurs at the start of the Cenozoic right after the extinction & we know that decently sized animals like birds and crocs managed to survive with no issue, I’m inclined to believe maybe at most a few ten thousand years?
Since even if they survived the initial impact and aftermath, they’ll be in even more direct competition with other animals
how accurate is Nova's Rex?
https://x.com/Berlography/status/1950686202568556831
great explanation, bro 🫡
Ty
"theropods in general gain 2 extra tons"
okay, but is this statement missing something, by any chance? 🤔
like, what is the point trying to be made
.
just a little confused 😅
.
and also, what "creator" and "community" are talking about?
@crystal dock
Idk
ArgentinosaurudLad is referring to humpacked theropods like Sucho and Arco yet none of them yelid animal over 5 tonnes outside of Matt's paper and even then that's a likely "maximum"
what are you talking about, that trike image is 🔥
Trike + Universe = peak aura ✨️
plus, trike > monkey, anyday 😆
That's not a monkey on SirSpicy pfp
I don't see trikes making tools
Also trikes didn't turn into latinas so I win
triceratops was the largest terror bird
bro actually cooked him💀
I love rhinoceros.
that's because trikes were the dino world's tool of doom 🔥
and slavic better 😅
not even close 🤏 😁
apes are monkeys
we got any other nanotyrannus truthers here!?
2 tons from some fat?
how does this affect the Acrocanthosaurus jumping theory
With a minor cameo from Arcovenator
Arcovenator doesn't even have a sailback so I assume somebody attempted to drunk type Acrocanthosaurus but had abelisaurids on the brain
how accurate was this fix by my friend on Discord?
ngl i like this pose more than PK's vanilla tail dragging
it should've be like this tbh
(i am a tail dragging Spino despiser so if y'all disagree with me, feel free to change my mind)
Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age
The tail dragging ain't exactly innacurate, Spino was VERY lopsided
WE ARE SOOOOOOO BACK! 1!!1!!!11
i didn't know that
but still liked that posture more
These two are just reincarnated versions of the Triceratops mother and her baby, you cannot convince me otherwise
Rhinos are basically trike... Like, the weird neck literally resembles the collar-shield.
Btw, are there any prominent prehistoric reptiles in Ice Age? I only remember megalania.
They tried to be pachyrhinosaurus, but then became styracosaurus
The humble Terror birds
RIGHT.
as for cold blooded bois, I think Megalania is the biggest reptile from that era that isn't alive today that is popular
Forgot that my boy gastornis existed.
huh
I love Coelodonta
yap alert
creatures that i hope appeared in PP Ice Age:
- Megacerops
- Entelodonts like Daeodon
- Aenocyon
- Gastornis
- Megaloceros
- Paraceratherium
- Doedicurus
- Smilodon
- Wooly Mammuthus
- Titanis
- Hyaenodon
- Andrewsarchus
- Arctodus
- Gigantopithecus
upside is that Megaloceros and Wooly Mammoths live in the same formation as Coelodonta, so there is a decent chance
Also Doedicurus is this thing, I think
i want to boop its nose even if it has a chance to bonk me with its clubtail
I love Armadillos
I love em so much I don't want one as a pet even though I know it would love me dearly
I would 100% make an ant farm for vro
It's either Glyptherium or Doedicurus
I still love them both
Prolly one of the only good scenes in LOOP if we're being honest
#lifeonourplanet #paleontology #smilodon #doedicurus
If I've used something on my video that you don't want me to use, PLEASE EMAIL ME first before flagging a video, I'm very reasonable and will take the video down to replace whatever image, Soundtrack or video belongs to you.
Email: paleontologyresearchstation@gmail.com
----------------------...
the ice age =/= the entire cenozoic
there will be no gastornis, terror birds, hyaenodon, andrewsarchus, brontotheres, or entelodonts bro
this is glyptotherium actually. They said so iirc + doedicurus has a more humped back and ofc a long tail
extinct animals from times that recent are not found in typical geologic formations
(also worth mentioning while modern armadillos are omnivores, glyptodonts were pure herbivores)
Is it true the Fruitland formation has a hadrosaur track larger then Shant?
It’s confirmed Glyptotherium via apple’s website
it's sad but true
The western landmass of Laramidia was a hotbed of dinosaur diversity during the Late Cretaceous, with spectacular forms of horned, duckbilled, and tyrannosaur dinosaurs. DMNS teams have been hunting for these lost ecosystems across the American West, from Utah and New Mexico, to right here in Colorado. New dino discoveries have begun to challeng...
really hope its not just the ice age lol
I hope it’s not i want winter Dino’s like nanuq😂✌️
that is what it's called
uh
It’s just like minor cameos not much. I just wanna see more fuzzy dinosaurs lol
bro
what killed the dinosaurs??
--- --- ---
missed the joke
I won’t say it
THA ICE AAGEEE ⌚ ⌚
Mira stilll valid right?
Terror birds lived until pretty recently, we probably won't see any of the biggest of the biggest like Kel but I'd definitely love to see Titanis since it lived in the Pleistocene
titanis lived in the early pleistocene. Not the ice age
your best bet is psilopterus, but that one is small, and even then it's contentious
Isn't the ice age the whole Pleistocene? Or is it middle-late?
We really need more documentaries about the Cenozoic, this should be common knowledge in my opinion
THE ice age occurred in the late pleistocene
ofc the cenozoic had been getting cooler since the eocene but I think it was only really the last glacial maximum in the late pleistocene
she freeze on my poles till my ocean levels drop
The current definition of ice age just refers to period of time when continental and alpine glaciers are present, should include most of the cenozoic, and even the middle-late eocene.
Yall
cool but i would have liked to see more dinos
do you guys believe we'll get a Prehestoric planet season focusing around the paleozoic?
thoughts on the male utahraptor from jwe3?
Sorry pal but the last 2 seasons + every paleodoc ever has been about dinosaurs. You’ve had your time in the sun
Objection your honor
Pleistocene animals are low key really lame compared to non avian dinosaurs
Objection, all prehistoric animals are cool in their own right, it’s that prehistoric animals that aren’t within the mammal boom after the KPG, are more interesting since we don’t have a modern version of them
nostalgia bias
informations are so rare for metricanthosauridae
We dont know how wide their bodies are, are they rather bulky or slender, or why they had those very deep snout
Why is he so based?
Metri skulls are pretty nice
Really like hepi's skull
On the one side you have rhino but big
On the other you have giant pseudo avian creatures never seen by any human
Like don’t get me wrong, Pleistocene animals are sick….but man a Triassic documentary is waaaay more needed 💀
Docs focusiing on older eras are probably harder and more expensive since its harder to use current locations for filiming like PHP does, No grass, flowers, etc
True,
however it’d definitely be worth it to give me coelophysis my beloved
🙏
You’ve been given coelophysis in wwd
ngl I thought this was a stego for a second
a stego would be like 70 times as wide
I just meant it kinda looked like a stegosaurid
Sorry I was joking
New Stegosaurus? Would this be the Saurophaganax specimen?
Yes
WWD is old, I’d like new Triassic media in good quality at some point 
Indeed
Cause why they so. Big
Carcha prototype
.
most animals, if you look at them closely, are true biological marvels, bro (even the ones that look mundane at first glance) 
different from each other, but amazing in their own ways
Someone help me, what kind of tree is this? I would of showed this image on the main pot page but I can’t send images
I can’t find it anywhere online
Pretty sure the tree was edited into this photo, it's a Lepidodendron.
Which is extinct*
why is there a shadow demon
I think this drawing/portrayal of one exactly.
Perhaps a reference to this meme?
I agree entirely
I just happen to think dinosaurs are leagues cooler than anything that has ever existed
Not to say other things aren’t extremely cool, heck, if they cloned a mammoth and I got to see it I’d probably cry
Knowing colossal, they’ll just…make a hairy(er) Indian elephant and call it a day.
damn, great catch bro 👌
lmao, well, the upcoming "moa" will likely be a big ostrich 😭
I think the next Colossal project will make or break their credibility
Whatever that may be
I wish they'd just focus on supporting other conversation groups solely instead of doing all this other crap.
Wdym by other crap
The "reviving extinct animals" gig, which they only really seem to be doing for investors.
It's not like they are or ever could be what they're advertised as- and even if so- modern ecosystems either aren't robust enough or suitable enough to support them.
Honestly though, nothing I want more than to see the animals of the past in the flesh
Literally 🥀
Their credibility was already in the dumpster when they lied about their dire wolves in the first place. Even tried cherry picking to make it seem like they were justified in making game of thrones wolves.
I'd love that too, but I don't think it's possible to get to see the real deal genuinely. Nothing created by people would be the same as the animals that existed long ago.
Once species go extinct, they really are gone forever, and no approximation could replace them.
Honestly don’t really don’t think they purposely made them to look like GOT, the coloration seems to be attested to by outside sources on genetics as well apparently
Actually I'm pretty sute they did- because investors wanted them to look like that.
I might be wrong but I believe they did go specifically for certain traits when making the “dire” wolves, considering that I think the author of game of thrones was a part of this project.
Only one out of six wolves in GOT is even white 💀 the others are all normal wolf colors
nice pfp, bro 🍻
The funniest thing about the situation to me is that dire wolves weren't actually true wolves.
I guess they thought the general public would be stupid enough to eat this up, but unfortunately when you try doing “cus I said so” with paleontology you’ll get beat up
Something something “all canids are genetically similar to one another”
That's basically like pulling out a bonobo and saying it's a human just because they're quite closely related.
I think there was more to it than just the two being related though, It was explained by colossal a few times
I don't really follow them that closely, so you're probably right.
dire wolves are equally related to all modern canines, so picking the biggest most robust one as a base made the most sense
(the claim that direwolves are actually jackals is just outright false)
Yeah
Wasn’t the consensus their closest relative was the jackal, rather than dire wolves being true jackals?
Something like that? But yeah they weren't straight up a type of jackal like Random stated.
I'm not exactly sure at this point actually, I've been getting a lot of conflicting information.
no, people were misreading the tree that showed direwolves being one step more basal than jackals
Ohhh
there's an alternative universe where canini trees switch the vertical order of the grades and we avoided this problem altogether
So in that case aren't they like- essentially a type of wolf that diverged earlier than modern varieties of wolf?
And that would still place them as being most closely related to modern wolves- right?
I'm not as well educated about canids to be honest.
I hate the colossal situation. It’s such a giant wasteful money sink
Also not to mention it spreads harmful ideas and misinformation..
I'm getting the sense neither of you have looked into any of their conservation work
I'm saying aside from the conservative work they've been doing.)
they don't just do de-extinction (it's a sad reality but it brings in more funding), they do a lot with endangered species basically everywhere and fund other projects, doing the mammoth stuff is how they managed to get good enough with elephant mrna to make a vaccine for eehv
They aren't inherently bad, but claiming certain things (that aren't true) and spreading the idea that you can just resurrect extinct animals could definitely have consequences.
I am aware of that and their red wolf conservation project. Money towards the ‘de-extinction’ projects should go into this conservation and public education in the first place. It is objectively harmful for the public view on animals and extinction
If you can prove the money people donate towards the de-extinction projects would have gone towards "conservation and public education", please provide evidence
Otherwise the whole spiel about how it's taking money away from conservation feels rocky at best
it is weird that they advertised the fake dire wolf thing so heavily to the point of lying about it publicly, but didn't advertise fixing one of the biggest issues with captive elephant populations
no. THE ice age does not refer to that, it's the lgm
alright call it chat ragebait or mental illness??
there is no such thing as ''THE ice age''
Or perhaps a difference of opinion between individuals?
of course I can’t prove that, because it wouldn’t have. Rich investors donate FOR the ‘dire wolf’. It’s not taking money away from conservation, it’s money that never would have gone to valuable science. I know that, but it’s not how science should be conducted and, in my opinion, it’s unethical to fool the public into thinking we can bring back extinct animals.
the last ice age is what people usually refer to as just "the ice age" ofc there have been ice ages before and will be after, but the late pleistocene ice age is the one it's talking about
the popular definition of ''ice age fauna'' encompasses like, the entire late pleistocene
Pretty much sums up the point I was trying to make as well.
that's what I'm talking about because it's the peak of the recent most ice age
apparently the late pleistocene is much shorter than i thought
but anyway, the ''purely 66 mya'' prehistoric planet s1 and 2 had campanian animals, so it's highly unlikely they they will stick to just the late pleistocene for every segment
Yeah, I honestly agree with that point.
that doesn't mean the segment took place in the campanian
when preplanet was made they thought that prince creek was maastrichtian. And aside from that the campanian animals that show up are just speculation (or in the case of velociraptor, only named after an animal) and doesn't mean the segment actually took place in the campanian
Smilodon (or homotherium) with lips covering the fangs my beloved
I want to say they specified scimitar cat for that one, so probably homotherium
Is it likely that smilodon had lips completely covering their fangs? I can understand homotherium, but I know the fangs of smilodon were quite large.
so you can have campanian animals in segments set 66 mya, but you can't have early-mid pleistocene animals in the late pleistocene?
would megalodon have lived to see the time period where prehestoric planet 3 takes place?
megalodon lived into the pleistocene, yes
just not into the late pleistocene
well, do we know if the show if focused on the entire pleistocene or just the late pleistocence?
people are arguing that it is exclusively late pleistocene because the marketing says ''ice age''
except the marketing for season 1-2 said ''66 million years ago'', which was clearly not true of the animals depicted
its probably for marketing as the time frame is most famously known as trhe ice age, i dont see why it couldnt be the whole pleistocence
wait I'm wrong, megalodon is not in the pleistocene
if the paleontology community put in as much time into the gym that we spend talking about random dino stuff we'd all be ripped 💔🥀
youngest meg records are early pliocene, 3.6 mya
apparently the pleistocene records exist but are unreliable
instead of reviewing several papers on tyrannosaurus rex poop how bout you go review some papers on gaining mass and getting ripped lil bro🙏
jorge calvo and david peters:
is it true sauropods are most commonly found in arid enviorments? is it due to preservation bias or just living there more often?
I think they just preserved better and they would've likely just been moving in a lot of areas, wetlands and wet jungles are like the worst places to preserve fossils
So you're telling me there's a chance
this one is homotherium. Smilodon's teeth would stick out a bit when its mouth was closed
yes unironically yes (late campanian, anyway)
no shot titanis lived into the late pleistocene, as much as I wish
also wth since when did megalodon live into the pleistocene?? thought it died in the pliocene
yeah what
That's what I was thinking, yeah.
I just want spy hopping megalodon I don't care if it has to time travel for it to happen
bad sentiment
Sharks spyhop? (Sorry if this is a dumb question, I've just never really heard that mentioned before)
Great Whites are observed doing it relatively often.
Other sharks do so as well, but they're the ones known for it
Awesome! Love learning something new.
Awwe
It makes sense, especially for great whites as the majority of their adult diet consists of pinnipeds
Yeah! As soon as you mentioned great whites being known for it, I instantly realized why.
But even for other kinds, it always makes sense to try and evaluate your surroundings or simply be curious.
When your senses are almost entirely limited to the water, its good to be able to look at what's going on above
a lot less cute when this guy does it lmao
Idk man I still think he's cute.
You've just got his bad side
imagine a plesiosaur doing it
Not sure what's going on with that eye though?
This definitely seems likely! Could also work as a display behavior too.
It was absolutely a possibility for an animal like megalodon to spyhop, maybe not as an adult as I don't know how that sort of motion scales to a 90 ton animal but definitely as younger sharks
Considering even large whales will spyhop, I wouldn't doubt a mature megalodon could as well.
they gotta feature some crocodylian in this new season tho, its crazy how deino or purru havent got the spotlight in a new doc
stomasuchus save us
*Blue Whales can and will spyhop, it's jusy not observed often likely do to population and other factors)
you mean stomatosuchus? GIVE US PURRU
That's quite interesting, but given differences in skeletal structure and how the two propel themselves through the water, I imagine it could still be possible a mature meg wouldn't be able to spyhop even though the much larger blue whale can
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing after typing that message. They have very different anatomy and locomotive methods.
Unless proven otherwise I like to think it's still theoretically possible, though.
Omg wait, my dad wants to watch prehistoric planet with me
That's awesome honestly, having parents that share similar interests. Hope yall enjoy!
guys why is concas mouth blue?
how are we suppose to know?
because he ate a blue lollipop
I'm assuming they made its mouth blue to make it unique, and it seems to based on how some animals (especially birds and reptiles) can have colorful mouths.
name every pterasour in this image https://x.com/Parasau53355133/status/1951003474361266577/photo/1
thank you for a proper answer and not "because he ate a blue lollipop"
but what if it did...
fossilized blue lollipop found inside stomach of Concavenator specimen
Much like the predatory Avians of today, the Hatzegopteryx had incredible night vision. Far superior to that of the human eye
I definitely wouldn't doubt that!
Also, a common example of a reptile with a colorful mouth- the Blue Tounged Skink!
Their entire mouth isn't blue, but I'm assuming the reasoning behind including it in the dinosaur portrayal is vaguely similar.
Yeah there are stuffs down to 2.6 mya apparently
Another (less widely known) but even better example- The Double Crested Cormorant!
this birds are so cool 😎
i think that at one point, their entire beak turns blue (can't remember exactly if its due to mating season)
i wonder what dino would storks be the most related to 🤔
- just captured this at the zoo right now
quetzal? pterodactyl? none? 🤷♂️
Pterosaurs are very closely related to Dinosaurs, but they're more like a sister group. And since birds are literally a type of theropod, that means a storks closest non-avian dino relatives are simply- well, the latest non avian dinos closest related to true avians.
and wich one you think is the latest non-avian related dino?
do you know, bro, or is there not enough fossil material discovered yet?
I don't think the latest non-avian dinos that were most closely related to true birds have any like- known representatives yet sadly.
i see 😔
The most bird like dinosaurs that weren't true birds around at the time were enantiornithes- which were essentially "alternative birds" that diverged from the same ancestors of true birds.
However, there were actual birds around during the Mesozoic, all of them are known from the Cretaceous period iirc.
Pretty sure several modern day bird species diverged around the Cretaceous and survived past the extinction event
Maybe not the exactly the same species, but I get what you mean. The ancestors of modern types of bird
Vegavis was a true bird that lived right near the end of the Cretaceous, and is thought to represent an ancestor of modern waterfowl like ducks and geese.
It is an anseriform but it didn’t look quite like this
There's a wide range of reconstructions and not exactly that much fossil material, so I just chose the drawing I thought looked best. Could you provide some insight on how they more likely could've looked?
While not having the most material assigned to it, there was also a ratite-like flightless bird known from the early Maastrichtian- Gargantuavis.
I always think of Confuciusornis first when it comes to early true birds
Somehow I almost forgot that Confuciusornis was a true bird.
Hesperornis and Ichthyornis are also great examples.
I blame dinosaur train for this
Hey gaymars wgo wins a shan or a rex?
shantungasaurus?
Yes
Either could, but I'm not sure if a rex would try attacking something so large. If so it'd probably be an ambush attack, and the rex behind it would likely be experienced and confident in it's abilities. (However take into account these dinosaurs did not coexist and this is a theoretical situation.)
Hypothetically if they both fought eachother which would win?
Trying to determine fight outcomes is really difficult, because in real life fights can go either way and no victor is preemptively confirmed- there's also tons of variables at play.
Which one would have a higher chance of winning?
Both have experience with animals similar to one another in their native habitats- and kind of represent larger versions of what they're used to. (For Shant that would be Tarbo, and to Rex that'd be Edmonto)
the largest Shantungosaurus we know of was a decent bit bigger than Edmontosaurus, but I think T. rex would have been cautious around larger Edmontosaurus already. these hadrosaurs would do severe damage if they got any chance to fight back. The simplest answer is that nature isn’t a power scaling thunderdome, and animals don’t behave like that.
in a literal cage match where they can see one another, though, I might give the edge to the Shantungosaurus. it’s just so huge that it’s a bit like a large bear fighting a moose. if they both really traded blows in a full-on brawl for some strange reason (dino rabies, perhaps), both animals would likely sustain severe injuries and die.
Thank you sirs
really, nobody wins lol
Most apex predators are able to kill prey 2-3 times their size without much trouble, if the shant is alerted to its presence early it would be quite dangerous but rex would probably win
Overall, yeah, I agree. But that's not to say the Shant could still have a chance of injuring, driving off, or even potentially killing the Rex. I'd imagine rex to win more though to be quite honest, at least in a natural setting.
thoughts? ( talking abt why prehestoric planet may not do the paleozoic )
I've been saying something similar here for a while now.
I’m not sure that’s right? Lions have taken down water buffalo solo, for example, but the reverse is also true, with lone water buffalo landing their hits and killing adult male lions. 2-3 times their size alone without trouble isn’t very common.
I don't think Random said "without trouble" at all
In fact, they seem to indicate it would be "quite dangerous"
They might do it as long as they have enough funding, though the scale and stuff might not be the same if they have to do more of the environment digitally
I assure you that the lion comes out victorious more often than not. But not just lions, solo wolves have also been recorded hunting bison, solo mustelids take down rabbits several times their size, leopards take down eland, a lone spotted hyena once took out a rhino(!), etc.
does anyone have any pictures of a good and accurate paleozoic landscape?
Tigers and Lions take down big buffs more often yeah
And these are things with a much greater size difference than Rex and Shant
Tigers hunt Gaurs more often than people think, heck even go after rhinos sometimes
A really big factor though is the amount of experience either individual has dealing with predators/tough prey.
For the sake of argument, let's say they're equally matched in that area
is this rage bait? actually genuine. they said that exact quote in the message I replied to
forgot to reply, in the message gualicho sent ^^
??? I haven't read anything here that sounds remotely like rage bait.
rex is american, shant isnt, meaning rex has a gun and shant dosent
sorry, it was this message
Predators in a confrontation usually are capable of killing what they have caught. The failed hunts mostly comes from failing to get their grip on said preys or if they were spotted beforehand and that the preys ran away.
If you mean where I quote Random's message, no
It was meant to illustrate that your response of " 2-3 times their size alone without trouble isn’t very common." was incorrect and was highly misrepresenting the argument put forward previously
^yeah, actual cases of prey killing a predator are extremely rare (and in the case of cape buffalo are often due to their herd defense behavior, not a lone buffalo killing a lion)
if only you said zhutyrannus instead of rex, it would've been a more interesting conversation
Most predator deaths, in large amniotes, are usually related to starvation, competitors, infections/injuries, parasites and other diseases... outside of human interactions (poaching, environment fragmentation, traffic, pollution etc)
it’s not misrepresenting the argument at all. random literally said “Most apex predators are able to kill prey 2-3 times their size without much trouble”. Prey 2-3 times the weight of a predator give them trouble regularly, at least often leading to injury and infection. I will concede that T. rex would likely be able to kill Shantungosaurus in a cage match - the argument put forth makes more sense there.
Who knew the predatory animal that has adapted to hunting its particular prey won’t cause it to die directly from said prey a majority of the time
Eventually the damage sustained from hunting and competing renders them weakened, making them more likely to get sick or infected, or simply unable to sustain themselves as well.
Why are we doing a “cage match” I didn’t know Rex joined the WWA
Must be a pretty big Cage
because that was the conversation starter, even though it’s not exactly realistic lol
Jurassic world evolution 2
That's why I dislike AvA so much because it ignores ecology.
I think the original starter was just asking if Rex or shant would win, nothing about being paired up in a cage somewhere or in any advanced AvA terms
I've never really liked imaginary fight scenarios but it can be interesting sometimes.
wolves, hyenas, lions, tigers, leopards, crocodiles, pretty much every large predator that can hunt solo has been recorded taking down prey 2-3 times its size without injury, while the reverse is exceptionally rare or nonexistant
@balmy oyster to be fair, in a realistic scenario rex would either retreat or easily take down Shant with a succesful ambush, neither makes for a good fight
The Ecology edition of AvA would just end with "Did the ambush Succeed? Yes? Predator wins. No? Prey runs away or herd stands together or something"
Literally.
i think the only case where this dosent happened would be like, nodasaurids / ankylosaurids
It’s why AvA only works on paper and in shitposts, no predatory animal would go out of its way to continue fighting and trying to kill another animal if it has lost the advantage and has the opportunity to retreat and possibly try again later or avoid alltogether
i mean it also worked pretty well in the colosseum 
how so? they'd still wanna herd up if a predator is close
true, i need to get the misconception of nodasaurids / ankylosaurids being loners out of my head
Really cool paper about hunting success in cheetahs, so it shows that hunting success accounts for a lot of metrics and not just size: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347212002886
(if anyone has free access to it feel free)
“When in Rome” or something 
all roads lead to rome
Yeah. Hunting success is usually determined by strategy rather than size.
…Except ones in the Americas. For those you’d need a boat or plane.
you’re right here, I shouldn’t have brought it to AvA. It kind of kills discussion of actual ecology and realism.
That's really cool, Cheetah's not hunting near rivers if prey are in plains to avoid lions and catching as many fawns as possible cuz they're so easy for em is great
Nanotyrannus
Has there been a consensus reached about that dino, or still no?
Nope, but there's alot of work being done on specimens related to it
I know this doesn't matter or mean anything towards real paleontology, but what do you guys think about it?
as someone on a dino game discord (ie not a paleontologist), I am skeptical of it. we’ll see what happens
what would nano even be? a tyrannosaurid or a alioramid?
I like to believe that it's a distinct genus, but obviously there's not enough known yet to say.
is this real chat
I think it'll end up as a new genus
The Iconic Trio
Any reasons for thinking so? Perhaps you know more about it than I do-?
get Dasp outta here bruh, I know they're all Canadian but Dasp is the bully to those other two (assuming all 3 hunted in packs)
well, it could be both since alioramini is in tyrannosaurinae! but I guess it would possibly be an alioramine or maybe in its own subgroup. there was also some discussion on it being a more basal tyrannosaurid a while ago, I think?
how much would nanotyrannus change if it was in alioramini?
I heard a bit ago they placed it near to the Albertosaurinae
right! that was the other placement
There's a paper being worked on that measures the age of the Nanotyrannus holotype skull and finds it to be an adult. Its just an abstract atm but if true then it'd be pretty clear. Also the dueling dinos tyrannosaur has some weird arms iirc
Sometimes I forget about how tall Alberta is- they're also pretty short in terms of body length.
hopefully dueling dinos will settle it. very excited for that
Double present of both really complete tyrannosaurine & a really complete ceratopsian together in one
Also the Nanotyrannus skull has like more teeth than any adult rex which is weird
istg if somebody brings up Gorgosaurus...
I got papers that support that Tyrannosaurids didn't lose tooth positionings as they age if anyone wants to use that as an argument
https://psdinosaurs.blogspot.com/2022/05/tyrannosauroids-did-not-lose-teeth.html
These Nanotyrannus arguments drive me absolutely insane but I love them every time
i have a question, would therapods have been able to replace teeth like modern day sharks or would they loose them permantly like mammals?
They replaced them
No, but they would replace them like similar to crocodiles
Sharks shed teeth a lot, sometimes without struggles, but crocodiles hold onto them until they fall out from struggles
Majung replaced them like every 56ish days, fastest of any carni dino they measured in that paper
Dinosaurs are known for replacing their teeth, some of them, especially certain herbivores, did so quite rapidly.
I wish we had a bird with teeth (beaks excluded if you wanna go with the theory that beaks are just big egg teeth)
I didn't know that! Interesting!
How did they determine this?
They collected alot of teeth and looked at the growth rings in slices like in trees iirc. Something like that. Prob better to check the paper itself
Why are mammals just "worse" at everything? Dinos got reproduction, teeth, growth, and age so much better than mammals
I have no clue how mammals took over the world as the dominant land vertebrates
Dinosaur teeth aren't as hard as mammal teeth iirc
Yeah but they are easily replaceable
Mammalian jaws and teeth can also develop to become much more effective in precise piercing bites.
If you bite into a bone too hard on accident as a mammal, congratulations you're out of a tooth your entire life
They're similar to crocs and break more easily that's why they need to regrow them. Its just different adaptation for different reasons probably
it just seems more efficient to keep regrowing teeth instead of just having one main set that you rely on
To be fair, larger mammals haven't been around as long nor have they had as much time to refine as archosaurs and reptiles in general.
yeah but dinos kinda had it off the bat when they were smaller, the air sacs in their bones made em peak
We're basically internally designed to be den dwellers whereas they're just friggin made for getting huge, just right off the bat
Yeah- it's really just coincidence thanks to their ancestors.
Mammals are other here struggling, the second you get over a ton you gotta move slow, and then there's the dinosaurs
I don't think there will be any organisms in the future that evolve to be more efficient a huge sizes on land than dinosaurs tbh.
Thousands of different plant lineages (trees):
Should've specified animals lmao- I literally walked into that one.
And non-sedentary animals at that, because it's theoretically possible for giant sedentary types of animal to exist on land at some point.
Tbf genus are arbitrary so eh, it would be a distinct specie but if it falls within Tyrannosaurini everything could be Tyrannosaurus tbf (time to lump Zucheng and Tarbo (which itself has like 4 taxon lumped in) into Tyrannosaurus (genera are arbitrary)!!)
Hello paleo chat
It’s been a year since I haven’t visited this channel

I can make this so much worse
spicyy and jango must brainrot together, to make a superior whole
I- don't really understand what you're trying to say.
You do realize that titles such as "Nanotyrannus" and "Tyrannosaurus* refer to the genus, right? And that "Rex" would be an example of a species name.
I'm sorry if I'm misunderstanding or accidentally being rude, I'm just really confused.
I blame myself for starting to make this joke “adult-like”
you should
What have I done
I…don’t think it really works like that
They mean that as if two animals are very closely related, its upto the author if they wanna make them different genera or same genus different species
define genus
Alright saying it like that makes sense.
Tyrannosaurus mcrensis was gonna be its own genus, but the publisher wanted it to be a tyrannosaurus species so that's what it ended up as
define species
Okay that concludes my visit to this channel
I’ll visit paleo chat in another year
Its a thingie
define thingie
I get what they were trying to say now. I just got confused so badly by that message.
Basically a group of animals that have similar traits
good, I can't find a way to twist that to mean anything else
define a
define this
Define this btw
Canis Lupus Familiaris
Yeah but we need to go more specific
I don't think that's correct
Canis lupus familiaris, Dachshund breed
Yeah but we need to go more specific
Was jakapil a thyreophoran or an ornithopod?
Canis lupus familiaris, domestic variety, dachshund breed
The only way to be more specific is to go into bro's genes and then it's just sub form
Lucky
Smh he's a miniature dachshund.
Mb on the forma and subforma, that stuff is used in botany and mycology
Erm it was Zhuchengtyranus not Tarbo 🤓
I dont know as much about that area in specific, so thanks for the correction.
Basal thyreophoran
Don’t they only hunt like old, sick, or young individuals of animals that are bigger than them? Wolves lions etc
Not always, but it's preferable if they are.
Pixerma
No, they try to if they can but if unable to find any they’ll resort to healthier individuals
depends on the predator and situation too, a lot of predators rotate prey species depending on availability and risk
Yeah.
how accurate is facts.app Anky?
https://www.facts.app/dinosaur/ankylosaurus
Discover Interesting Facts About The Ankylosaurus Dinosaur & See Accurate 360 Images. Learn About It's Height, Speed, & Much More.
not amazing, high end length and weight estimates are based on CMN 8880 which aside from just being a single skull probably isn't even as big as the estimates put there
the model itself is fine but the torso looks kind of fat
what abt their Pinaco?
https://www.facts.app/dinosaur/pinacosaurus
Discover Interesting Facts About The Pinacosaurus Dinosaur & See Accurate 360 Images. Learn About It's Height, Speed, & Much More.
seems fine afaik
Were their heads really that big relative to body size?
I don't think it's that big it's just weird the way it's holding it
Ah alright. The proportions just seem funny to me.
Welcome back Fadeno's Anky in terms of weight and size
Anky still peak
4.8-5.1 tons
it doesn’t have the weird cheek osteoderm but it’s good
many theropods such as pinosaurus replaced their teeth continuously
that is why you find spino teeth fossils for sale online and dino fossil shops so easily
you don't mean a fossil, right bro? 😅
why ? 🤔
You mean the now lizard? It wasn't a dinosaur, it was a lizard. It was misidentified upon discovery
Yeah, I was just about to mention that.
oh, I think i read something like that but somehow forgot, lol 😅
also when I mean birds with teeth I mean extant, we got tons of extinct birds with teeth, even on their beaks
Wasn't it a second species in the same genus described that helped confirm that?
that is what i thought, but wanted to show that one in particular just in case 😅
and for whoever might take a look at this channel that doesn't know because i think it was nice how that fossil head was preserved in amber 🔥
probably, all I know is it's just some tiny lizard
i read the paper but i totally forgot most of what was said 😭
so much crap that i read that i think my hard drive needs more space 😅
The one you sent? That's an article not a research paper 😭
yes i know
i read the actual scientific paper at one point
ah nice
They were so small lmao.
Weird lil lizards
makes ya wonder if they did something similar with a snoot like that
Could be possible
https://www.instagram.com/p/DMuxwxoo1OU/?igsh=MXh1dzB1azdzdDVscA==
well looks like I have to do redo my zhuchengtitan model
A collection of titanosaur footprints uncovered in southern Mongolia has been studied, revealing some previously unseen features of the soft tissues of these dinosaurs’ hands and feet.
The natural casts reveal that these titanosaurs' hands and feet were covered in large, protruding scales on their undersides. The hand tracks also possess pecu...
1247
It’s just foot tracks do you have to change the feet?
Why is nobody talking about this?
https://www.sciencealert.com/ancient-voice-box-finally-reveals-how-dinosaurs-may-have-sounded
2nd dinosaur we found with a Larynx right?
3rd dinosaur but 2nd genera
I think they've found 2 Pinacosaurus with their Larynx
Tyrannosaurus rex is indeed a specie of Tyrannosaurus, just like Tarbosaurus bataar is a specie of Tarbosaurus. But both could very well fall within Tyrannosaurus, one being T.rex and the other T.bataar and it would literally not matter.
My point is that there are no rules when it comes to naming a genus like there are for species.
Genus are arbitrary: they englobe several species sharing similar characteristics/synapomorphies.
In dinosaur palaeontology, lot of workers prefer to design new genera because they are biased toward monospefic genera. Morphological differences don't really matter because what define species are their autapomorphies, but based on their shared autapomorphies, which would then be synapomorphies, you can very well put several species within the same genus depending on how, and mostly if, the genus is defined.
remind me how did we get a leptoceratopsid named "Gremlin"?
again, something like this is very confusing to me even after you explained it multiple time
of all name we could choose
we decided to named it "Gremlin"
funniest naming i've ever seen in my entire life
Humans are human, they see a gremlin they say gremlin
too bad i am Carnivores Trophy Room
I guess that some people really wanted an indet Leptoceratopsid to be named gremlin cause that's the vibe they give (it's just a skull fragment)
typically whoever discovers it gets to name it
because its a gremlin
how accurate is Nova's Rex? (part 2)
https://x.com/Berlography/status/1951264423202509202
Yes, I was just confused due to your original message. Someone else already helped me understand what you meant earlier, but thank you for trying to clarify yourself!
To me the legs look really thin? From a head on perspective, side to side rather than front to back. The feet also look really flat/strangely shaped.
microraptor vs rhamp
Byzantium would still be around if Constantinople was hit with all those earthquakes and plagues during Justinian I's rein!!!
-# /j
if only there was anime that could educate me on the lore of rome
Just read wikipedia
what are the differents visually between dasp and albertasaurus
is the irritator jaw or throat pouch or whatever it is the new standard for spinosaurids?
mild spoilers for JWR
could an azdarch actually climb like this?
No, only irritator has the weird jaws, rest of spinosaurids including spinosaurus’s jaws wouldn’t be able to do that
I mean there's also the possibility that it's not even the new standard for Irritator
That too
AHEM
what
my.
question.
I would answer it but you’re being weirdly rude. Maybe someone else will answer it for you.
I WAS GONNA SAY PLEASE BUT THE STUPID SLOWMODE
im gonna repeat it but in a nicer way..
can you ansew my qweston pwety pweseee????
😒
your doing too much rn
thenn uuhhhh
which is the largest pterosaur that can climb like that
None of the above
kowabummer 😔
Anurognathus maybe
THATS HOW BIG IT GETS?!?!?!
Climbing on a vertical flat surface isn’t something larger sized animals are really good at
ye but, speculative behavior 🥺
how is it speculative behavior...
idfk
right
Why does it look like in such a random place
but what about a speculative species (same genus) that did evolve to do so? (ik species arent that different from the genus but like look at humans for example, same species, very different adaptations varying on the individual)
Over the years, people have suggested several ideas and theories for the purpose of the Parasaurolophus’s crest. Some of them are plausible theories, but others are just downright weird, with the weirdest one going to the fire-breathing Parasaurolophus theory.
Want more content like this? Check out my pr...
Private specimen probably
that's not a private speicmen if it's in an airport 😭
A little late to the party but using human as an example for different species PERSONALLY doesn't seem like the best comp when it comes to other animals like pterosaurs; additionally what purpose would climbing vertical even serve for a large flying anima like quetz
I wonder how many dinosaurs were venomous
Hunting people duh, didn't you see the movie 🙄
Anyways @plucky basin the only pterosaurs that might have some sort of ability for that sort of climbing are the small pterosaurs because having small claws combined with small hands/feet does not make for a good climber
Small ones get away with it because they weigh about as much as a paperclip
i hate my life
To be fair all pterosaurs are pretty light, most of the larger ones are around the size of a black bear & those can pretty easily scale trees
Though black bears have the needed things to allow them to be such good climbers, for a pterosaur it’s need its own specialty to be able to do something similar
It would probably lose the ability to fly at that point
Definitely
do you think there was ever a flightless pterosaur ?
No because then they would have no way to escape their main predator (hadrosaur looking for protein supplement)
💀
the kiwi who shoots its very large eggs at predators to kill them:
There might have been a flightless pterosaur in some messed up island ecosystem that lasted 2000 years and then went extinct
But i don't think there were ever mainland ones
always a island ecosystem..
Birds can evolve flightlessness very quickly but it helps that their locomotion isn't hindered when they do so, they're moving bipedally on the ground with or without functioning wings. It's definitely possible for pterosaurs to have evolved to be flightless but it does feel like vestigial wings in pterosaurs would be more detrimental to ground locomotion than birds losing functional wings would be
do u guys think the young bird is angry or is it awaiting food from the angry bird?
Awaiting food, that’s the begging pose
" angry bird " HIS NAME IS RED.
chuck better
Maybe if they keratinized their wing finger…
name every pterosaur in this image https://x.com/Parasau53355133/status/1951003474361266577/photo/1
here is MY try
rhamp
dimetredons
tapejera
idk
idk its name
trope
a azdarchid
dimphorodn again
nyctasaurus
thal
I think the blue birds are anurognathus (or something related)
Yea it’s
- Rhamphorhynchus
- Anurognathus
- Tapejara
- Pteranodon
- Pterodaustro
- Tropeognathus
- Hatzegopteryx
- Dimorphodon
- Nyctosaurus
- Thalassodromeus
I was correct
except who uses Alanqa in this day and age
i love alanqa..
ALANQA FROM JURASSIC WORLD THE GAME!
Is OPH2813 spino specimen is a thing?
yes but it's a toe
Raptor is Latin for grabber and thief but it is also Latin for seducer, so it is technically correct to call Gigantoraptor the "giant seducer"
Oh my
i mean, i bet those dances it did to attract mates were hot asf
I DIDNT MEAN IT LIKE THAT
So is Rhamphorhynchus Longicaudus still a thing? Desperately trying to find fossil material images for it but everything is Muensteri and the wiki doesn't even list Longicaudus as a species
big pterosaur swallows children as part of good diet
if i was a big pterosaur i would too
thoughts on primitive wars dreadnoughts skull?
jurassic world apatosaurus
I just realized the eyes are human-like…
its JW apa unless the rest of the body is shown
I think we can believe this guy did his own work 
Also I think the wider river shot shows the body (but it looks very very similar to the JP Brachi so who knows, maybe it’s a new sauropod)
huh, interresting. Anyways, I wish it wasnt the boring gray of the apa or else it wouldve been way more believable to be something else cuz yk
I mean the head is very clearly JW Apa (inspired, if we want to give this guy some space) but the coloration seems much more interesting
is jw apato's head even accurate for itself?
how accurate were the scrapped jwd theri head?
Not very
really? not even the second one?
Second one looks like it saw something shocking
Personally I would’ve preferred the second
This image is so cool
name every ceratopsian in that image
styra, einio, pachyrhino, achelou, centro, nasuto, diablo, kosmo, alberta, chasmo and the 2 on the top corner idk
brian curtice the well known progenitor of all ceratopsids
penta, probably trike and the one next to trike I have no idea
sierraceratops?
Centrosaurines:
- diabloceratops
- Nasutoceratops (?)
- Centrosaurus
- styracosaurus
- Einosaurus
- pachyrhinosaurus (canadensis + lakustai)
Chasmosaurines:
- Pentaceratops
- Kosmoceratops
- Bisti/Bravoceratops (?)
- Anchiceratops
- Triceratops
really? i thought one was achelo
On second thought, I think you’re right
If it really is achelou then idk why it’s put as a pachyrhinosaur, let alone more derived than canadensis
it might be a pachyrhino
I’ve usually seen it either clade with eino or right outside of pachyrhino’s
whats the difference between pachyrhinosaurini and pachyrostra
They're not Deinocheirus Mirificus.
He’s got a point…
one of them has einiosaurus in it and the other doesn't
well why?
that's just how modern cladistics are
willing to bet that the definition of pachyrostra is something like "all ceratopsids more closely related to pachyrhinosaurus lakustai than to einiosaurus procurvicornis"
kachow
Cope
Can I seethe too? I’ve always wanted to do both
i'm working on mald myself
Its so weird seeing you with a new pic lol
it always hurts to see people change
I used to get a new one every month but then the horrors
How accurate is that majority of the dinosaurs in jw are now dead due to moving to the main land?
if they had said in the beginning of the franchise that the dinosaurs couldn't survive outside of the five deaths, it would make sense
but the way they introduced it in rebirth was stupider than the north american giganotosaurus in dominion
I like north american Giga.
Same with Nasuto living same time as Rex
my favorite part is they were all living in the paleocene
i guess in JW canon the dinosaurs went extinct in the ice age or something
Like, how did majority of them die? Due to climate? Hunting? Lack or resources?
it said they died due to diseases and the climate
(which they were completely immune to in the previous 2 movies)
Likely Climate.
On Dominion the whole point was them living just fine.
Rebirth said "fk that"
I think it’s dumb. I doubt oxygen would be an issue unless there’s too much for some of them, and weather would be an issue but they’re endotherms so a lot could probably deal with some chill temperatures (nothing too cold)
I think the ones in south America and Africa survived, would majority really die to the climate of north america??
no lol they just wanted to put the dinosaurs in a faraway exotic place for the 1000th time
''faraway exotic place'' he says, while living in south america
The whole Point of Dominion and Chaos Theory(which they worked with ppl from Dominion to make it work fine)
Was to show Dinos Surviving and Adapting fine.
Rebirth kinda just.
Ignored that
Do you think they'll retcon it?
All to argue them going to Site C?.
Sure Site C gaves us the best Rex Design but like.
Cmon bro the Plot..
Anyways back on Topic,
@steady rock if Gareth is in charge of another one, no
Mf kinda made this one Purpose
waiter! more half baked excuses for children to end up on isolated dinosaur islands please!
the kids in rebirth were funny but still
what defines a theropod?
2 legs I am guessing
Am I a therapod? 😍
best way to tell i think is the presence of a premaxillary fenestra
Pachy:
or a maxillary fenestra
i think both are unique to theropods but the maxillary's easier to see
Would eurptyrids ( sea scorpions) hear the same way modern scorpions do?
oh i see, thank you
but spino doesnt have it? Or am i blind
it does, everything is just shoved to the back
all the bones are there just different proportions
that's the problem with defining a clade based on anatomy. any anatomical feature can be lost or shrink to the point where it looks like it's lost
in reality there's no single trait that is visible in every theropod and no other animals (as far as i know)
but the maxillary fenestra's good 99% of the time
you're not going to confuse spino with an ornithischian anyway 
true lol
i dont see the maxillary fenestra on the picture tho?
the maxilla would overlap it
im sorry i dont understand, wdym overlap?
that bone is in the middle of the skull
but isnt it an opening
i checked the Irritator osteology, it really doesn't have one
the description of spino's snout also doesn't mention it so i assume it is lost in spinosaurines
actually kind of insane that my favorite theropod lacks a defining theropod feature and i never noticed
would that ridge be what's left of it?
what remains of the antorbital fossa i think
which is there, just tiny
oh that triangle is one of the palate bones
@stiff osprey wouldn't that new spino find be used to depict the appearance of spino instead of irritator from now on?
? I was asking what that was
<@&538079608914968587>
as far as I know the "new spino" is known from the crest and a maxilla, both bones we already knew from spinosaurus
it doesn't change how it's reconstructed
I was told it was a lot more by people on reddit but I guess it isnt credible as that paper hasn't been published yet💔
crazy how small spinos skull is compared to trex's skull. Didnt expect that much of a difference tbh lol
I was making note of how similar the comparison between the spino and T rex skulls look to the infamous internet funny
oh, my bad man
negative aura on my side💔
speaking of spino, POT PLEASE PALEOACCURATE SPINO PLEASE
well this one might be outdated now but it looks so good
Just put it's tail into a sandwich press and presto, modern reconstruction of spinosaurus aegypticus.
I think it’s PE spino
It’s nowhere NEAR the word “accurate”.
how accurate is Tormer's Dunk?
https://www.moddb.com/games/carnivores-2/addons/dunkleosteus
How accurate is tina rex's design in the new gumball reboot
(Her wrist aren't usually pronated)
not
Still not accurate
But the head definitely looks different and more modernized
Anyone know if T. mcraeensis is still valid or not? haven't seen anything of it since the paper of it's description, so I assume it's still valid? But I have no clue to be honest.
Its considered valid by some, though some workers(like in the recent Khankhuluu paper) consider it a rex since its features are seen in various other rex specimens. So really just a wait and see where it ends up
Grimace Egg.
Will there ever be a day I get to play a game as my special little guys 🥺😞 such unique beasts
Look at them, so diverse
They really are such interesting and peculiar creatures! And you're right- they- and a lot of other unique Cenozoic animals- definitely don't get enough portrayal in media.
Horse have been quiet when they saw this
I can tell more than 50 Prehistoric animals that is not talked by the media
I'm sure of it- there's so many who deserve just as much love as the big names.
More than 100 even if i write them
It really was the time for things to just be funky and have fur. Lots of having fur
Idk why people talk about the mammoth when palaeoloxodon exist
Guys have you a PFP for me i have no idea my favorite group of dino is allosaurid and carcharodontosauridae
Idk why i choose a gojo PFP😭
Drawing your own can be pretty neat! (If you're remotely confident in your abilities) but if not, you could probably find one online!
Ok i will
Put him up against basil
Looks like the Chalicotherium is evolving into a hadrosaur
@tough parcel the way the skin is
is spot on for what a large animal would have
Didnt even noticed him ngl
how fat is this rex
Is it just me or did they just reshape a rexy model. Those look like her raptor scars no?
can a rex physically be this fat?
Keep going, I’m sure youll get there. Itll take work though, took a while for me to even get to cope level
murica
Wuh
Wrinkles
Bunch 'ol Crinoid fossils I found (Appalachia)
rhamp, changyuraptor, hals and micro
Rhamphy be getting beaten by something half its size because it doesnt do damage lol
who says micro will do dmg?
prionosuchus is a cool creature
16 layers of pot belly dads type fat wrapped in elephant seal blubber and uder developed saltwater crocodile lard on the outside with enough cholesterol and hide that would make eating Macdonalds look healthy
Yes any animal can get fat its just nothing many get the chance to be so or no human has made them yet its like YOU CAN put a gorilla in hyper training and see what a physically fit and bodybuilding elephants or gorilla looks like but nobody has tried it yet
do you ever get so so happy when you see paleoart that includes the Exoparia
i enjoy how it looks
Is that the C-rex on a realism server?
i find that extremely offensive 😔
Awesome! These ones are so teeny and adorable- Its nice to see someone else mention Crinoids here :>
Its a nice addition that really helps them feel fleshed out! Really throws together the facial for herbivores and carnivores alike.
Is there any consensus on how it'd look specifically on certain dinos?
They range from the size of my hand to the size of a pebble ^-^
Wow! Thats so cool! Crinoids used to be really diverse- would've loved to see all these unfamiliar types in life.
8 to 10 tons fat
Have you seen kiabugboy’s recent shorts on youtube? He has made some crinoid anims, i think those are from paleozoic
A "proper" ecosystem has multiple predators of the same size, there's like no overcompetition
Most Current Ecosystems have been affected alot by humans, Almost every continent had the diversity of Africa or even more before Humans
No, no this about the dumbest take I've seen talking about ecology
@light oxide would it be alright if you explain to me your thought behind this? /gen /nm
Was spino still considered a theropod when it was thought to walk on all 4?
why wouldnt it be?
Yes because walking on anyhting other than two legs does not instantly disqualify you from theropod status
Its certaily strange. But its more like what platypus laying eggs is to mammals than not having hair or producing milk would be.
whart 🥀
I'll be honest... I think that was just a smooth brain moment on my end.
I was moreso talking ingame style, not really in real life (AKA, what ecosystem would benefit as a comparison for an ecosystem for Path of Titan). I just worded it horridly.

_ _
-# That said, to say that it's perfect isn't really correct anyways, as you can thank your favorite hairless primate for that (poaching and human-made climate/habitat changes in some regions). Which is true for a lot of places, sadly.
Lex Luthor...
why didnt superman just kiss lex luthor to stop him from being evil?
i love small sauropods living with giant carnivores
They definitely didn't just need size to be successful.
Clearly this is evidence that Giga was too slow and stupid to hunt even small sauropods and was thus a scavenger
this is because ekirk was the trust apex of its formation
oh ok
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8kmB4DS/
I think the carnivores lose this one
Which itself was a victim of the Limusthaurus
Almost certain your comment is a joke but I'm gonna say this anyway to play along) Maybe it means that relatively smaller animals actual have ways to survive and reproduce and aren't just unviable because nature isn't about combat and power scaling.
what is spino gonna be doing
aura farm
Small sauropods probably live like sea turtles
Give birth to 200 million kids and a select few survive and continue living
out of 300 baby sauropods, how many would y'all say reach adulthood?
2 and a half
I feel like it would make sense if smaller sauropods that lived alongside giant predators either formed large herds at adulthood or did their best to stay our of open areas/live where there was a lot of foilated/geological cover so they could escape easier while still having access to food.
Perhaps they opted to be smaller for the latter lifestyle I mentioned specifically- requiring less food and travel at the cost of size.
5-10 I'd say
6 or 7
That'd be around 2-3% survival rate
would young sauropods be a year round food soucre?
If the adults reproduced annually, most likely
it makes you wonder, would any predator be speficially a young sauropod hunter?
Probably plenty of them
Most definitely
Probably the Carcharodontosaurs
Sauropods were basically (sea) turtles when it comes to eggs/raising young
There probably wasn't an easier meal on the planet than a hatchling sauropod for any large predator
Aside from carrion, of course
what do you think was on tarbos menu more often, sauropod or hadrosaur?
Does anyone remember the original Walking with Dinosaurs episode about diplodocus? The poor babies...
This makes me question how dunkleosteus really looked like
Probably mapusaurus
This is my least favorite meme on the internet
arent these memes kinda inaccurate as they push a false narrative ?
im not familiar with these memes but i came across it on the internet and it made me question dunkleosteus
This would only be accurate in referring to 19-1800s prior, nowadays, we have the knowledge and technology to know otherwise 🙂
We question its body structure & size/length rather than its skull
i mean im more curious about how the head of the animal looked like
Look up a pic of modern armored fish for some ideas (in a way)
Sad that it isn’t really depicted in media
I remember it being on 'Walking with Monsters'
Whether the armor was visible or not on its face can go both ways pretty much equally and unless I'm mistaken there really isn't a way to know for sure
Good times….
I believe it was 'in the middle' with some creases from the skulls armor being visible.
It most likely didn’t look anything too bizarre considering it was an oceanic predatory pelagic fish, plus we have relatives to which we can use in comparison for the reconstruction of the body
Would it be possible that it didn’t lips due to it technically still having scale-esque bones for teeth?
Microraptor lore drop.
Background Microraptor is an essential animal for understanding the evolution of flight in birds and their closest relatives. Recent studies have uncovered evidence of its powered flight potential and details of its diet and ecology. However, we are still missing a thorough description of the anatomy of Microraptor connecting feathers, soft tiss...
oh cool, Microraptor can fly
https://fxtwitter.com/BMC_series/status/1951191169171333339
A study in #BMCEcolEvol reveals Microraptor wasn’t just gliding—it was built for speed. Using 14 fossils, @GrosmouginPaleo & @PalaeoPittman show this “four-winged” dinosaur had flight abilities comparable to modern falcons and shorebirds. #FossilFriday go.sn.pub/6wxiu0
we knew micro could fly, but we didn't know it could fly fast
they buff micro every update🧡
Micro fans eating well
Now watch it be a slow glider in Path
the microraptor pick for path is a bit rough because I’m not sure how they’ll solve it. they said it would have tree climbing and gliding but it just doesn’t make sense and will look stupid. and if it’s just a flyer it won’t be different from rhamph
hopefully it’s got a good model, though
maybe it deals toxin, paralysis and poison from eating bugs like a pitohui fr fr
Idk, path usually does a good job, I can think of some ways they could do it and make it fun. Like parkour hopping between trees and stuff. I'm hoping its a mix between limited bursts of powered flight with gliding as well. And climbing... That would be a lot for them to pull off but I have high hopes. They have already don a TON of different locomotion types.
The only problem I see is I dont think people really understand how small micro raptor is compared to the other dinosaurs.
Doubt it
oh im dumb, i thought it said it was as fast as a falcon, oops
no because we have intercontinental ballistic hatz
and doubt it would be faster than a plane sized flyer that could glide across islands with ease
Wasn't the large azdarchids whole work around to being relatively terrible at flying just being really fast?
I feel like I heard that somewhere
maneuverability would’ve been pretty terrible yeah, but anything that big is gonna be hauling some serious booty once it’s in the air
do you guys think any large azdarchids got harassed in the air by smaller pterosaurs?
maybe yes maybe no cuz the thing is azdarchids werent really on the same niche as other pterosaurs to be in a situtaion like frigates and seagulls
Don’t need to be, smaller bird species always harass predatory birds if given the chance, even crows will square up with hawks and owls cus they don’t like them
wait whaaat thats crazy. It can actually fly???
the thing is they wouldnt even find each other unless its a cenario like PP where for example, quetz would go to a beach for scavenging or hatz would go to find a mate. Cuz I dont think there are any pterosaurs that lived inland that were also small
im curious for anchiornis now. Wonder if it could fly as well
I think anchiornis was from a more developed family so probably better than micro itself
I would assume so, it also has really developed wings. It looks pheasant shaped but without the keel.
"In the related dinosaurs Microraptor and Archaeopteryx, the longest wing feathers were closest to the tip of the wing, making the wings appear relatively long and pointed. However, in Anchiornis, the longest wing feathers were those nearest the wrist, making the wing broadest in the middle and tapering near the tip for a more rounded, less flight-adapted profile."
Preservation bias, I see no reason why smaller pterosaur species couldn’t interact with azdharchids.
PhP is also pretty speculative when it comes to pterosaur behavior
The show is very speculative. Par for the course when your documentary is about things what are dead.
Except me of course.
True…
pecky eyes
If a paleo-doc stuck to only verifiable facts, it would be unpublishable.
They need to be speculative in order to flesh out animals that otherwise are literally only piles of bones.
do you guys think we'll ever a paleozoic documentry seeing how little irl enviorments are useable?
Wait did acro get "buffed" irl? I'm seeing this thing about hull scaling or whatever it's called ??
First time hearing about “hull scaling”
how accurate/inaccurate is the current, default Concavenator in PoT (+5% Bleed Damage)? if there's any inaccuracies, what specifically?
conc actually only got +4% bleed irl
There was a new paper that tried to estimate how much soft tissue we should be putting on dinosaurs based off of birds and other reptiles, they found that we should be putting a good bit more soft tissue on most dinosaurs, instead of just a small layer over the bones using convex hulls.
Alot of Dinos got a good bit heavier in that study including the rex and acro specimen used in that study. Acro had two different reconstructions based off of making the tall spines a fat hump or a thinner sail.
The exact numbers in kg don't matter as much as the general range they got for dino weights based on their reconstruction(they used a mounted acro which is reconstructed a bit differently from teh franoys skeletal)
Its not just a rex or acro "buff", but a more general "Yeah we should be giving dinos a bit more muscle instead of a thin layer over the bones", though there are some exceptions like sauropod necks and such which should still be kept with less soft tissue based on birds. They also focused on posture differences the different Center of Masses would have. So Theropods with COG over the conter of hip like acro would stand completely straight while ones like Sinraptor or Dilo would have a much more flexed posture since they have a heavier front body and lighter tail
There’s several reasons as to why dempsey’s reasoning isn’t the most sound but I think there’s other people who are more informed that could cover why
Its too late fishy, we're putting more Soft Tissue on Carchs.... Enough to make them all Flat Backed
I think one of the main issues was that it proposes stuff already really known about musculature and soft tissue in general, but at the same time idk if the paper accounted for dinosaurian archosaurs having differentiating soft tissue amounts compared to modern day archosaurs & mammals
Also his acro reconstruction uses a mount for the base and while mount based skeletals can work iirc the one he used might’ve had some issues with proportions
Dinosaurian archosaurs are birds, which were preferred in for some parts of the body for soft tissue iirc
They’re really derived ones that need to have lighter builds in order for flight and even the ones that are grounded also have extremely minimal soft tissue
Also opposite of the spectrum, we shouldn’t be assuming dinosaurs had more extensive soft tissue than what has already been depicted in recent times
Dempsey’s paper basically just says what everyone has been thinking this whole time while morphing around some dinosaurs, hence the 8 ton acro & 40 ton apato
yeah, though the size increase from his previous estimate for acro isn't too different from the % size increase of the rex used, around 9-12% iirc. Though yeah you'd need a skeleton to apply it correctly
I don’t disbelieve acro would still be able to reach about ~7t using dempsey’s logic but only reason why his gets so big is because the torso was deepened because of the pubis
Things like gdi’s also benefit from using minimal soft tissue since if more is used it skews up results and may not represent the animal with what we know
I do hope we get a consistent idea of acro's proportions
its Sad the the most complete one was in such a bad condition
It’s only really tricky because all referred specimens don’t overlap the best so it’s possible to get varying results
there’s also the idea that our largest acro specimen may not even be “acro” itself which only lowers what we can use. There’s also another specimen that is currently believed to be acro as well but…I have my doubts.
I mean, even if they aren't acro.... we'd still use them to fill blanks cuz what else is there? Siats? lol
True lol
Ohh okay, so what's acros weight estimates then? 5.5-6.5? Or is it increased bc of that hull study, and would that mean rex average (I assume 8-9) is now also increased to maybe 9-10 from that hull study?
Depends on what reconstruction you use for acro, the franoys Skeletal estimates are from GDIs and get a 5-6 tonne range, the paper uses the mount scan version of acro which has pretty different proportions like fishy mentioned(deeper pubis, lower shoulder, taller spines, etc), you'd get the range the study provides around 7-8 depending how how you muscle up the spines. The rex in that study was AMNH 5027 and got around 8 tonnes, so bigger ones would probably be bigger though hard estimate bigger specimens with this method since you need the whole skeleton of the animal in 3D to apply it. Can't really just beef em up by some % since alot of the animals in that study got a similar weight estimate to the GDI estimates like Sucho(around 5-5.5). No real way to know the average of stuff since the method was just applied to one specimen of each species
A study in #BMCEcolEvol reveals Microraptor wasn’t just gliding—it was built for speed. Using 14 fossils, @GrosmouginPaleo & @PalaeoPittman show this “four-winged” dinosaur had flight abilities comparable to modern falcons and shorebirds. #FossilFriday go.sn.pub/6wxiu0
remember to actually read the paper for nuance and details, folks
QRT: BMC_series
A study in #BMCEcolEvol reveals Microraptor wasn’t just gliding—it was built for speed. Using 14 fossils, @GrosmouginPaleo & @PalaeoPittman show this “four-winged” dinosaur had flight abilities comparable to modern falcons and shorebirds. #FossilFriday https://go.sn.pub/6wxiu0
Has a young Zhuchengtyrannus ever been discovered?
Don't think so.
entirely( not ) random but uh
@stiff osprey your 2017 allo chart is still reliable yes? or is it missing any reliable adult allo specimens
use his new one
may i get a link for it seeing for whatever reason google is being a pain for allosaurus sizes beyond: uh its this, for some reason
google will never give you stuff that are usually never posted publicly for stuff like this unless some outsider does post it publicly
i know on some of it being not pushed
just allo in general is being
goofy
also thank you
Talking about Allosaurus;
REGARDING THE NON STOP DEBATE OF ALLO TRUE SIZE. SAVE THIS NEXT MESSAGE (RECOMMENDED) Because, I'm so, so, so tired of lies and low acknowledge. Not angry, just tired:
First of all, that isn't a chart of adult specimens, is a chart of some famous or notable specimens. Most specimens are subadults, many other juveniles. The holotype of fragilis was probably less than 10 years and a juvenile, since another specimen from the same quarry, bigger than the holotype and around 7,9m long was only 9 years old, late juvenile or early subadult. Many specimens around 8,5m are subadults between 12 and 16 years. We know that the life expectancy of allo was around 30 years, Big Joe is near 30 years old, reached somatic maturity (and jimmadseni). The smallest adult specimens of fragilis are those of Cleveland Lloyd Quarry, one (3689) at 9m was 18-19 years old, young adult or even late subadult, died long before reaching skeletal maturity. The other adult at CLDQ 6345 is around 9,5 or 9,6m long, and it has an incipient EFS, but there isn't an exact age reported. AMNH 680 is 9,7m long and was a young adult at 22 years old, still growing and plenty of margin to grow.
If that specimen lived long entered into its 20s, closer to 30s, it could probably have attained a size similar to that of overlord or even the New Mexico specimen. No other confirmed fragilis have been sampled in a histology study and showed to be an adult, much less a somatic mature individual. The only one could be the anax specimen it that species turns out to be fragilis too, as some details imply. There are individuals that has EFS at smaller body size but most of them are jimmadseni from the Big Horn Mountains. Only a couple are indeterminate, that could be jimmadseni, fragilis or another thing, like that of Nail Quarry "Wyomingraptor" or Reeds allosaurus, that has some intermediate morphology, but probably jimmadseni. Many of the gigantic individuals haven't been sampled, but all them have a greater bone fusion, it is expected those reached somatic maturity.
It is interesting that most of these gigantic individuals come from the eastern front of the formation, there could be different populations of fragilis.
As a final note, to take arbitrarily some individuals from a chart without taking into account ontogeny and taxonomy is nonsense. Someone could take a sample of 10 adult T. rex, one of them being nano holotype, another Black beauty, and while all the others being 11 to 12m, the average would be screwed by outliers.
Delete this message. Did you even read mine? The hell
That's super wrong
Alright sorry, excuse me then
i'm reading it
i just posted a updated one using the updated randoms scaling
@severe field you also want to read this, you truly need it. I promise, if you debate me, and prove me wrong. I will give you my bank account.
the bank account is mine
so, in essence, the average adult fragilis may be bigger than an average of famous specimens implies because many of them aren’t mature adults?
There are multiple Allosaurus specimens smaller than 9 meters with an EFS, MHNG GEPI V2567b, SCMG 0727, SCMG 0177, UW20511, as well as Tate v3587 which is about 9-9.5 m. And they do not grow into their 30s, MHNG GEPI V2567b stopped growing at ~22 years of age.
There is also no evidence that the neotype (not holotype) was a 10 year old juvenile, we already know that Allosaurus has highly variable growth, meaning that ''another specimen is larger and is 9 years old'' does not mean anything
this part is correct, most Allosaurus specimens are not fully grown, the same is also true of Tyrannosaurus and most dinosaurs
sorry was laying in bed abit so late response
isn't the smallest adult specimen a europeas at like 7.smth meters(?)
using the averages of that is 9.5 vs the full listing
i don't wanna sound like i'm just copy n pasting from randoms( great) response
but most archosaurs have the technically not grown thing whether it just be the way they are and preservation bias in slight
that and don't we have alot more smaller "adult" specimens, like the updated list prior than just those
also hi random
i don't think we have a histology on europaeus specimens, although SCMG 0727 is fully grown and is smaller than europaeus, I would be generous and assume that 0727 is an outlier because it's not even 5 meters
my guess is that it either has some kind of developmental disorder or belongs to a new species not named yet
just like me fr
Nanollosaurus...
if we ignore SCMG 0727, the smallest mature Allosaurus is SCMG 0177, which is around the same size as the neotype (7.4-7.9 m). I think the neotype was also said to be fully grown in some paper but i cannot find it
the adult size range of Allosaurus is ~7.5-12 meters, like it always has been, but both the ~7m and ~12m specimens are quite rare (the upper end is even more common than the lower end)
Bro thinks he is edmonto with that size variation
i was trying to say more, but the bot keeps censoring my messages even though i am not using any insults, so i'll stop
but yes i agree that saying 8.5 m or 8.2 m or any specific measurement is the average Allosaurus size is inaccurate
what would be the average in your knowledge then, because 11 m does not sound average to me, unless you just mean the whole: allo has really big size variations thing
I have a paleo conspiracy theory
Paleo Conspiracy Theory Time: What if all of the Allosaurus species are just the same members that had extreme individual variation
I could buy 11m being the average for "saurophaganax", but obviously it isn't average for the whole genus. for example there are no jimmadseni specimens larger than 9.7m and most cluster at 8-9
i'm not even gonna try to claim an average for fragilis since jimmadseni and anax are diagnosed purely on cranial characters and most allo specimens lack skulls
Real
OH you just mean because of constant specimen flucts, got it
the list that Glaive sent IS of adult specimens aside from the hatchling at the end
it says 2017 chart, so it is not referring to the one above, it's referring to the 8 year old version
unfortunately reading is bad, therefore i try not to where possible!
i changed to the updated one by glaive sending it luckily seeing its age
Id like to addon to this by prefacing that there is also a non adult specimen still in heavy active growth phase that is larger than 9m (Another TATE specimen, that i forgot the sp number of)
presumably there were several otherwise it'd be impossible for 11-12m specimens to exist
what if they never existed..
Interestingly isnt AMNH 680 also not an adult?
yes jesus already said that
ngl though i find it kind of pointless to discuss average adult size when we already know that it was almost impossible for an Allosaurus to live to adulthood lmao
On a random note
CMP 279 has a pretty skull that is also fully measured with detailed figures https://answersresearchjournal.org/fossils/allosaurus-fragilis-skull/
CMP
i wonder how much creationist propadanda is in this paper
Propadanda
Propadanda
propadanda
propadanda
Poor CMP, they didn’t choose to be in the Creationist museum
I can see the tail vertebrae of my boy Ebenezer
I was reading this paper and a couple things stuck out to me, such as obviously no geographic time being given for the Morrison formation at all
but this made me confused because I’m not sure what is notable about bringing in the other genera of Jurassic theropods here. any thoughts?
I mean it is a creationist paper
yeah, that’s what I mean. I just read it over for fun but it’s not very substantive outside of basic measurements
I HAVE A PHOTO OF THIS EXACT SPECIMEN
what does it mean to be a creationist?
Belief that the Earth was created in 7 days
..
Yeah, as it’s the extreme religious belief that the religion (primarily Christianity) that the stuff in the Bible is the accurate account of Earth’s history
if u count subadult as young
duhh it was
nah it was 9, gotta remember weekend breaks
I long for the day that this poor boi is liberated from AIG and placed in a real museum
Young earth creationism is the bane of my existence 
Technically “creationist” just means anyone who believes that the earth was created by God, however the type in question here is Young Earth creationism. YEC posits that the earth was created more or less in its current state 6000 years ago and the geologic column was almost entirely if not entirely laid down by the deluge of Noah’s flood.
Other forms of creationism include Old earth creationism, and Theistic evolution
Let's not discuss religious topics in the server please, as asked in #rules! The topic can make people uncomfortable or provoke arguments, so please move it to DMs or another server thank you! 
Also, this ain’t a religious discussion my moderator friends, just a clarification of terms
My message was two seconds late lol
Thats not what creationism means
I understand, though it would be preferred if it could be moved to DMs, to avoid any potential upset, thank you!
Based on the evidence of Tanystropheus being mostly terrestrial, I really hope they give them more of a land-spawn rate than in-water. I'd love to see these goobers around along the shore doing some chill fishing behaviors and such
But wait….. does this mean Nigel encountered one on its daily swim?
Another note, there's no evidence Tany could have dropped it's tail like that scene, So he pretty much just tore off a piece of it permanently 👀
If you were to add one prehistory creature to the game what would it be? 👀
My top three choices are already in! if top-5, I'd want to see either Arthropleura, and Titanoboa
Good picks
I forgot the name of the really fat athropod boi but that one
The centipede one?
oh right, hibbertopterus the fat boi
It’s in a mod I believe.
Maybe Diprotodon as a big meaty critter, low damage output, but lots of health and food value. Mild challenge for medium and small creatures to bring down just by patience and landing more hits than they take, but would run from 3-slots or above
I figured that much, but at least we now know that Nigel was the Apex Predator
Ok what do you think should be in the game?
Atopodentatus as a herbivore aquatic, Pterodaustro as a filter-feeder herbivore flyer
as playables or critters?
Playables!
Like who’s actually stronger. Megatherium or Iguanadon. I’m thinking Iguana since megatherium are big and slow compared to the more agile Iguanadon even tho there the same size
me on a friday
I have question
What would sound better, hadrosaurus crest calls or modern music? I am genuinely asking this
if you're asking with an ounce of legitimacy, megatherium without question
A study in #BMCEcolEvol reveals Microraptor wasn’t just gliding—it was built for speed. Using 14 fossils, @GrosmouginPaleo & @PalaeoPittman show this “four-winged” dinosaur had flight abilities comparable to modern falcons and shorebirds. #FossilFriday https://t.co/DwHkTg9JEt
Hey devs check this out
Megatherium really?
one of them is from a group of animals that digs giant burrows constantly, with some of the largest claws built for the task
and the other is iguanodon
werent large ground sloths creating giant cave systems?
thats what i said
what i said is what i said meaning what i said is what i said so just for you to know, what i said is what i said so whjat i said is what said and you need to accept what i said
Megatherium was also the largest of the burrowers in the family
Giant ground sloth appreciation :]
Now if you want a more serious interaction
Lestodon vs Deinocheirus: Arm Wrestling
Meaty armored tank vs Giant hunched fisher
when did iguanadontidae get like, i guess disbanded? because i heard now giuanadon and ourano are now apart of hadrosauriformes
did you know that los dinosaurs didn't lived in Centroamerica, why Centroamerica It was formed less than 20 million years ago and non-avian dinosaurs became extinct 66 million years ago
I’m pretty sure we have dinosaur fossils from Central America…
But of course “Central America” wasn’t a thing back then, it was either the land connecting laramidia and the lower continent, or just the edge of laramidia.
It was the land with Potential of... Tyrannosaurids and Abelis living together(I can hope)
I only recognise it as the area where more basal centrosaurines didn’t feel like going extinct when every other centrosaur did
do anyone here know a great book about megafauna or the pleistocene that has many illustrations and visuals ?
- there seem to be so many about dinosaurs but almost none about this time
I haven't read them but Mauricio Anton supposedly has some nice books
ruled the oceans
"Most badass fossil in existence"
They clearly haven't see the small Tyrannosaur vs a Trike 2-3 times it's size
Rex or Nanotyrannus, time will tell because the fossil is being studied
i hope that analysis finish then
It would be funny if it was the Triceratops itself that was the aggressor towards the smaller Tyrannosaurus (since prey animals are usually much more trigger happy due to, well, being prey items), only for them to get hit with a mudslide that killed them and preserved them as they are. 
"the edmusthosaurus mauls the feeble rex" type message.
most likely the juvi rex (potentially nano?) tried to hunt the subadult trike but both died of their injuries
Idk if they'd die to their injuries that close to each other and fossilize in the same spot without getting buried.
We just don't know.
Could be what also happened with the Protoceratops and Velociraptor, especially since the raptor obviously was getting bit hard on the wrist while trying to kick (seemingly defensively while on its back) at the larger animal away to escape.
judging by how you describe predator-prey relationships you seem to be a big fan of edmontosaurus annectens.
I'm moreso a fan of hadrosaurs in general, but they are still prey items at the end of the day, and they're more likely to flee than attack back.
It's just that we should try to consider all possibilities.
it could also be possible they were attacking each other near a stream or some body of water then fell in and got preserved by the mad
I don't think herbivores being the initial aggressor would be common enough to fossilize?
Though its possible.
not to mention it's already really uncommon in modern day and only happens either out of defense or if the animal knows it has protection via size (against a much smaller individual attacker) or a herd/pack nearby
On a side note though, is it just on that slate, or does it have 3 dimensions to it like the Velociraptor and Protoceratops?
I believe it is mostly slate but there is some dimension to it

Interesting.
proper 3d scans should let us know
regardless I cannot wait for these two, it's one of the best paleo discoveries we've had ever
Indeed.
I'm almost certain the image you're looking at rn shows a replica though.
Real fossil is a bit different.
-# It's also possible that they might've not been attacking at all, just at a standoff until a mudslide occurred nearby that trapped them as they were probably too slow in reacting to it, leading to their death and preservation. Only really saying this as they do seem to be running in opposite directions, meaning that they were about to flee from whatever killed them.
I totally agree with this possibility.
What if edmusthosaurus came and used firebending to incinerate all of them before earthbending and immediately turning them into fossils
I still think the fighting dinosaurs fossil is more badass than both the megalodon one and and the one we were just talking about.
It's an actual unmistakable conflict that just so happened to get preserved this well against absurd odds.
Isn't copium only a piece of a femer?
Cope is like 10% of a skeleton
what creature in PoT has the least material?
Goliath is the femur
Confidently referred? Hatzeg
Frieren look out, the Phantom Hatzegopteryx Thambema, is right on top of you.

