#paleontology
1 messages · Page 169 of 1
I need to see it next to a 1.8m tall silhouette
I would do that if i were home
Tried my best to measure this out for you.
Any inaccuracies are my fault
All skeletal credits go to Dan Folkes of course
i got overslept and forgot to post their size info
Very nice
Is Mimicry among cats, like Tigers mimicking bovids and House Cats mimicking birds to name a few an ancestral trait or independently evolved?
If it's ancestral, is there a possibility that Saber-toothed felids could mimic prey as well? I know there wouldn't be proof for it directly but seeing as modern felids can do it wouldn't it stand to reason that now ancient felids could too?
new animal lore unlocked
If you can prove these are done with the intent of mimicry and then if you can prove more than two cats do this with predatory intent, then you might have something maybe
But afaik (and I've only heard of domestic cat clicking), it isn't exactly useful in hunting (if used at all...?)
Why did WWD say 11 meters long?
Domestic cats clicking usually tries to imitate the octave of bird calls, which will draw them closer regardless of how the cat actually sounds, as well as cat clicking being able to mimic squirrels better than how they mimic birds.
I don't know how often it's used but I do know that tigers mimic cows and deer and then proceed to have a successful hunt.
I think it needs more research but felid mimicry is successful at times and it's just a matter of if the felid learned it from its parents (as I read somewhere cats without parents that mimic don't end up mimicking)
maybe Sobek is based on the holotype (?)
Oh
I think the main thing halting research on domestic cats actually having successful hunts using mimicry is that they are kinda invasive everywhere so you can't just let a cat loose, and mimicry only happens in some cats
Also the fact that nobody has a real motive to research that kinda thing because I think the most we got from it is "my cat clicks when it's near squirrels and birds and goes into a hunting mood"
WWD is based on the neotype (which is like 2-3% larger than the holotype so)
I mean do you have solid numbers to say that mimicking is successful or is this vibes-based
i'm kinda dissapointed that they didn't use like msnm or nhmuk but whatever, they do they
pffftt
I can't find exact numbers, but the best I can find is that animals the tiger is mimicking tend to come closer
Damn I wish there was more research on this subject it's so interesting
Considering the series is based around current finds and the neotype is still being excavated, this makes sense to use the neotype
@hardy sentinel evidence you too can write a research paper?
I believe in you. You don't need a PhD to write one...
I just found the most terrifying thing I’ve ever laid eyes upon
Looks like the "dinosaurs didn't have lips" crowd doesn't discriminate
Unfortunately 
I feel like the "dinosaurs didn't have lips" crowd is mostly a bunch of people still hung up on Jurassic park because most of the people I argue with about it seem to act like depictions of Dromeosaurids, Troodontids, and Sauropods with lips aren't an issue to their ideas
Dropping this here then running away
it's because the dromaeosaurids and sauropods that were in jp DID have lips
as far as mimicry goes margay are the most prominent examples of it but it isn’t a widespread strategy
Good for them 🤗 glad they came out in time for Pride Month!
falcon so help me god
is heterodontosaurus’s dentition more comparable to boar or fanged deer
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
most inaccurate sauroposeidon ever
Dinosaurs with lips>without, looks sm better having lips than none 🥱🥱🥱🥱
Woah there buddy calm down with the hot takes
bro I thought that was an old art piece
I hâte spino fans that thinks the spino is stronger than t rex just by the fact spino wins in JP3
That’s mainly only the jp fans
Most times
Yeah
Is been 24 years let it go
besides spino wins in the aggressive air game with how much range and air speed it has w slight floatiness
Spino neutral air has no opening or end lag and too many options out of neutral
Spino isn't good as t rex in battle because spinosaurus aegyptiacus fished and don't hunt contrarly the t rex hunt big prey like edmontosaurus triceratops and others
you forgot spinos neutral ranged moves dealing stun
TBF in JP lore fan terms it's a lot more justified
T rex was a lowly scavenger while spinosaurus hunted sauropods
Dofus it's fake t rex was scavenger when they old and WTF spinosaurus didn't hunted sauropods where you find that information
will spino tlc give it a quadruped stance?
hell nah
This is so real
We all know this juys
Is Allosaurus bigger or smaller than Daspletosaurus?
depends
most allosaurus are smaller than most daspletosaurus with the specimens we have
some allos get larger than the largest dasps, but its like 3-4? of them out of the dozens we have
Was about to say that : most Allos are smaller, within the 1-2 tons range, while most Dasp are in the high 2 tons and some above 4 iirc ? Yet if you consider A.anax, the specimen is thought to be above 5 or 6 tons. Some A.fragilis specimen are thought to be like 4 tons or so.
i think its just one thats close to 4? but in comparison with the maybe 2-3 for allo they're basically just the same size with allo on average smaller
Yeah
Spinosaurus changed a bit
I will name him Cletus.
No Dasp is above 4t Atm.
The Only Dasp thats veey Close to it is Pete III at 3.7-3.9t
Guys what do you think about the fact that the mononycus face looks like a owl and he have a long tongue in Prehistoric planet
Fragilis gets a lot larger if you included the amplexus specimens which is also plausible
The NMMNH specimen itself is like 4.2-4.6t, which is regarded as fragilis
okay speculation
Was Tapejara a frugivore?
Yes
My biggest flex is that my father knew the guy that they named T. Mcraeensis after
Hi I'm back
No it’s true Rex couldn’t properly hunt because of the ferocious musth induced edmontosaurus with a completely truthful average size of 16 tons
imagine if ts was a real thing wtf looks like my dog
And trex used its bone crushing bite to crush and eat the bones of the carcass so it gets full and doesnt hunt
ngl spinofaarus mod when
edmusthosaurus hunted t rex
t res dint hunt bcus it was fat edmont ate plant so it hunt rex
edmont aeveage size 25 tons
You forgot a 0 at the end
2 zeros
2 zeros is the lower estimates. Average is 3 zeros
humming bird vs Shantungosaurus
since we know handrosaurs are fodder from jurassic park (since we know JP is Scientific and up to date) humming bird low dif
Isnt jurassic park literal footages from the dinosaur period
yeah my grandpa used to tell me about recording them
I swear spinos down B is broken
Yeah seems real enough
You know its funny when in there mobile game jurassic world alive the hadrosaurs are nearly UNKILLABLE and with heal stall you out the match💀
Dino's frontal Views are funny
Trex is pretty wide from the front too
scotty spotted
Fell for the rage bait
Looks normal to me
this is kinda unrelated but which of these animals would win in a fight a male siberian tiger or a male African lion(i want to start smthing)
Siberian tiger
Siberian tiger for sure
why? @fluid inlet @manic grail
Because its bigger and more powerful. Much stronger bite force and stronger claws (stronger swipes)
https://youtu.be/MSoImbo8Yr8?si=11k660S-8i1TLqxU they should of paid this guy to make walking with dinosaurs 2
We follow a dinosaur in his last moments, in which he, in an inhospitable world, succumbs to the effects of fatigue and his injuries. With his last breath, his world of thought unfolds, and his last impressions merge with his memories to a very personal end.
Subscribe to the channel: https://bit.ly/31vOHH3
Director: Andreas Feix
Producer: Fran...
Siberian tiger
I knew you would say that lol well to stop you from having misinformation lingering in your mind the studys saying siberian tigers weight is over 500 pounds are taken by overweight siberian tigers in captivity the average siberian tiger is 200-389 pounds (males) the weight of a African male lion is 400-500 pounds on average
sorry 380-500 for males(lions)
Even if you don't take size into account, Tigers on average hunt large prey solo that a hunting party of lions need a group for whereas male Lions don't hunt unless they are prideless. A Siberian Tiger has more battle experience than even the most experienced male lions
Lions do hunt prey alone that is a VERY VERY common misconception there have been recorded cases of male lions hunting adult cape buffalo(2000 ibs) and adult giraffes (2600 ibs) alone this is rare but so as a tiger hunting a guar
Also I must remind you of cylde beatty the trainer who lost 50 tigers to one lion
Were all 50 tigers siberian tigers? There are more subspecies of tiger that are much smaller than lions
Im not saying siberian tigers aren't stronger they just dont weigh more and dont have the capacity for long battles 1 min fights
They don’t need to win a long battle , they need to get the kill.
With the stats you gave us they are evenly matched size wise. Then apply a ton of swiping muscle and bite force to one of them and see who comes out on top
And they cant get that while fighting something 200 ibs there weight that is basically a better version of themselves
Siberian Tigers have gotten smaller over the Years, they are smaller than African Lions overall now.
Bengal Tigers are a better fit
They USED to weight more than Lions BTW.
They just have gotten smaller on the Wild over the Years to the point of now been smaller
thats only because people use a study from a obese tiger in captivity and give it the same agility and power it has in the wild African lions have always been bigger
Source for that?
Not really?
They used to get Larger than they do rn, they have just gotten smaller.
Bengal Tigers ARE still Larger than African Lions so not that it matters tbh
Recent scientific research
What is that from? Text on a screen isn't a source without a link to the study
This was sad
Wtf lol
@sand gyro btw you do know that said Paper also downsized Lions right??
Cause they Call Bengals the Largest Big Cat(which they are And Paper never mentions Siberian Tiger)
So like, It Contradicts Your Statement as a Whole lol.
Cause said Paper never Mentions Siberian Tigers, and Calls Bengal Tigers the Biggest
Why did siberians tiger get smaller?
Why else you think
If you kill a big tiger people see as a threat you get respect. Do that for hundreds of years and suddenly the big tigers are weeded out
um how does that downsize lions? Possibly the stupidest take respectfully ive ever seen
Paper Specifically Calls Bengal Tiger the Largest of the Living cats, which you know Includes Lions, they also seem to imply at the end what I said Before.
Of Bengal Tigers been Larger than Siberian and Amur Tigers
Siberian tigers and Amur tigers are the same thing, just different names for each other
that doesnt downsize lions in size AT ALL
You can't say "Lions are Larger"
When the Paper you use to "downsize Tigers"
Specifically Mentions Said Tiger been Larger than Lions lmao
@fluid inlet real
I’m bigger than a lion tbh , their size is not impressive.
we are comparing the weight of THE siberian tiger and THE African lions weight actually i think we are confused lol
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780815515708000025
Paper but it seems to be paid access
Gotta love it when science can't be accessed because of some greedy b words
You need to Find a good Source for Both, Cause the one that you are using, Directly Calls it the Larger of the Fam.
@sand gyro The Part you shared NEVER mentioned Siberian Tigers Weight exactly.(atleast that I recognize)
The 200-260kgs are from Average Male Bengal Tigers
Tho Siberian Tiger is prob one of those smaller Tiger sizes.
You prob confuse me cause you are using LBS/Pounds lol
Yall the tiny weight differences might not matter in this situation, the sizes seem to be very close and tigers (especially the big ones) can slap and bite like a mf compared to what a lion can do
Having new information about a species behind a paywall is ridiculous.
I sent the wrong thing 💀the tiger names confused me the actual weight is 389-400 tho
And i replied to no one bro @fossil ingot
Locking scientific information behind a paywall is ridiculous regardless. I don't know how scientific institutions find it ethical to do such (spoiler alert, it ain't)
200 ibs isn't a tiny weight difference imo
african lions arent as athletic because they're bigger so anyone who makes that argument has no idea what they are talking about
I know it’s Google but it’s the best I can find
@sand gyro Where are you getting your info for lion sizes? All I'm seeing in your source is Tiger sizes
Lions are big, especially when compared to a prematurely born human infant
Paper Places Bengals at 440-570lbs
Which is about right tbf.
Afterall THEY ARE the Largest Cat rn.
For Siberian Tiger we need a better ref tho
I cant send the links for some reason im being fr but this is lion size 186-200 kg https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1980.tb01433.x. there we go
siberian tiger cant win agaisnt a lion just accept that fact lions hunt stronger and bigger prey (alone or in prides) lions are bigger and actually have similar or even stronger bite forces they are more durable are more built for mid to long term fights
Can you atleast slide the Proof of the Siberian Tiger Size???
Also I wouldn't necesarrily call the Prey that Solo Lion Hunts more Lethal than a Solo Tiger, both are lethal in their own ways.
Tiger likely beats on pfp.
Then again
Bengal>Lion>Siberian
igh hold on
Amur tiger facts; the Amur tiger, Panthera tigris altaica is the largest big cat in the world. Today fewer than 500 live in the Russian Far East with...
sand cat no diffs both
I would argue that a African lion could beat a bengal tiger in a fight how do you feel about this
So I'm confused here universe. Are you tryna have a gotcha moment where you try to tell us in a belittling way that a subspecies of tiger (that used to be the biggest) which has decreased in size significantly in the past few years enough to where commonly cited sources can't keep up cannot beat a lion or are you tryna say that the biggest current subspecies of tiger cannot beat a male lion?
Giraffe kicks decapitate lions btw(just so yk)
maybe both
Everyone has their own opinions so.
Maybe as in maybe both or maybe as in yes I'm trying to do both?
True but if we are going off the average individual in which the fights have the average weight,strength,and ovr abilities of their species then i think a lion factually wins but it depends on the specimen eitherway
Mmm seems about right.
This guys have gotten Smaller over the years so makes sense
both💔(they need to change the cooldown)
You never put the average vs the average u make the best fight the best
On average both overlap each other in size, it just depends which random cat you pick off the savannah or forest respectively. But if you're going best of the best it's Tiger all day
It’s like ufc fighters they want the best fighters not average fighters.
What's the 2nd largest big cat probably the O delta lions
Even if we're going average, are we talking about the buffalo hunting lions or the zebra hunting lions, or are we talking about the seal hunting lions? It depends which population you wanna pick from
Give me TikTok lions
Tigers are literally fattys in captivity
So we're using captive animals for this fight? Dude they'll probably not even fight and if they do they'll probably both die
maybe the hippo hunting lions(joke only happens with weak individual adult hippos) maybe the giraffe hunting SOLO lions vs the guar hunting tigers
they won't fight at all realistically male tigers and male lions aren't competitive unless there is a female(lion or tiger)
Or over a kill
I mean in captivity they feed them both equally pretty sure
Na I’m not talking about captivity the largest tiger ever found in the wild much bigger than the largest lion ever found in the wild
The largest tiger ever recorded in the wild was a Bengal tiger found in Uttar Pradesh, India, in 1967. It measured 10 feet 7 inches long and weighed approximately 857 pounds.
Wait so in this situation we're using captive animals? That's never good for a 1v1 scenario as most captive animals either
a) are born there
b) got issues
That’s nearly 200 lbs weight advantage for the Tiger
animals in captivity usually have a droopy look (they are more relaxed)
Wait I’m tripping lol
Also even if we are using captive fat tigers here, fat does help when fighting
If we are using wild biggest of the biggest the tigers got the advantage
If we are using the average, tigers swipe harder
you all fell for his trick
thats a lion?
When they say tiger they are referring to their message before
I somehow messed up big time , the tiger is bigger but by 25 lbs
largest tiger specimen was 840 lbs still bigger than the lion but not 200 lbs bigger lions have manes tigers usually go for the shoulders in fights and not actually the facial regions and lions take down bigger and stronger prey also since this is a captive tiger its odd for you to pit it up agaisnt a adult male lion from the wild thats 820 lbs
This guy solos both
She weighs 9,000 pounds of pure muscle and eats elephants and whales on the daily
Taking down bigger pray has nothing to do with a 1 on 1 fight against another predator.
well funfact if ligers were let out in captivity and given a population we think they could be the first REAL natural predators for elephants
Megistotherium 🥀
They are natural predators for indian elephants, african elephants don't have natural predators when fully grown and healthy (aside from humans)
So chat who wins kodiak bear or polar bear
Who wins Spinosaurus or T. Rex
it does lions have a stronger skeletal structure and it shows there strength and overall stamina against prey the siberian tiger would be destroyed agaisnt they are built for fast speed and agility not powerful blows and strength like the tiger
arctodus simus GRAAHHHHH
I dont know how this is a battle but it's obviously t rex and @manic grail to answer your question it's the kodiak bear they are bigger than polar bears by a large margin and since they are related to grizzly bears they have slower twitch muscles which make them built for stamina
Tmk.
When I talked to a Friend and he slidded me skeletals.
Tigers are Proportionally more Robust then Tigers.
I prob have said Skeletals sm
Tho its easier to just ask him tbh lol
Who wins, the Spinosaurus holotype or a german bombing run
Wait kodiak bear is bigger? I always thought polar bear is the biggest bear. Because i always hear on the internet that the polar bear is the largest land predator
Largest Polar Bear was over 1 Ton, they are the Largest Carnivourus Bear
Where did you get lions have a stronger skeletal from ?
We already know
Tigers have slender skeletons and bodies(siberian tiger specifically) you can search up the anatomy between the African lion and siberian tiger to
So if i understand correctly kodiak bears are bigger on average?
I was talking about Bengal Tigers in Specific but I will prob ask my Friend to Slide me the 3D Musculate he has showed me before
I reckon the only thing a Lion has going for it is that mane, specifically made for fighting others of it's species (though it would work against a tiger too)
Yeah the mane is definitely a benefit
Looks great too
I don't see a Lion beating a Tiger Pfp imo.
Atleast a Bengal One
Well the only person that is convinced of the opposite is universe who came in with a motive anyways lol
if we are using obese captive tiger weights and acting as if they have the same agility and physical abilities as a wild one I might as well use a barbary lion specimen and just yk both can duke it out
Im doing the biggest tiger specimen compare to biggest lion specimen in the wild that says otherwise
I don't think agility matters in a close range thrashing honestly, a fat man beats a boxer in a wrestling match 8/10 times
Now give the fat man a meaner left hook than the boxer can give and see who wins
that isn't entirley true but yeah a lion would win because it has stronger capabilities i dont know why people use the tigers agility as an advantage
Ok lion fan boy
Who's truly the ultimate bear in the wild: the Grizzly Bear or the Kodiak Bear? 🐻 Discover the unique power, survival tactics, and deadly skills of each bear in this face-off of strength and strategy! For fans of epic animal battles and those curious about nature's fiercest predators.
#shorts #grizzlybear #KodiakBear #wildlife #animalshowdow...
afaik it's fine, zhucheng is either like tarbo, rex or something inbetween, iirc Tarbo-like zhuecheng is the most favoured
The Fearsome Zucheng
Silly goofball question
How does an animal evolve a beak from a fleshy snout?
I actually saw something about that recently
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/a9YVHrwGQ88?feature=share
Ever notice how many groups of dinosaurs (and other archosauromorphs) evolved beaks? Well, there's some evidence from chicken embryos that hatching from eggs predisposed them towards it. Egg teeth are the hard bit on the snouts of hatchlings that they'll use to break the membrane and shell of their eggs when their ready to hatch. Lizards, snake...
the screenshots i just sent says the femur was 89 cm long
bro please tell me its a young adult
zhuchengtyrannus size nerf would kill me
Zhucheng’s been tiny for years wdym
iirc there's a 107 cm femur but any post cranial material can't be confidently assigned to Zhuchengtyrannus because there's another cranially diagnosed Tyrannosauridae indet. there (that might just be tarbo afaik)
I thought it was a couple 500kg smaller than tarbo 💔
source?
personally I wouldn't use the femur for anything serious, an excuse to upsize for PoT? sure.
tbf the tibia is more indicative of an upsize anyway
I'm more so speaking on the fact it has no overlap with the zhuecheng holotype I assume
additionally idk if there's any reason to believe any respective material at the site belongs to the same individual of the holotype given its a disarticulated bonebed
yea ik
yea post cranial material can't be assigned to zhucheng because of disarticulation and reasons i said above
I knew it had something to do with teeth...
@fossil ingot @sullen cairn sent dms
guys please don't downsize zhuchengtyrannus again, its gonna be dasp 2.0😭
Gonna get even more confusing considering it's the biggest thing in the ecosystem that coulda hunted Shantungosaurus
THATS WHAT IM SAYING
💔💔💔💔
so real
thats probably super old, zhuchengtyrannus was a tyrannosaurus species
can they hurry up and publish all the wangshi tyrannosaur stuff
Tyrannosaurus Rex so terrifying it caused Hadrosaurs more than double it's size a continent over to herd together in fear💔💔💔🥀🥀🥀
@white matrix I know, but Tyrannosaurus Rex? At least call it Tyrannosaurus zhuchengensis
tbf if the other thing there really is tarbo there's also that as a potential predator, albeit that's not too much of a size boost
also i forgor that some tyrannosaurid teeth in Zhucheng where assigned to Tyrannosaurus itself, but it still wasn't T. rex
should I just turn my zhuchengtyrannus into a large tarbo ?
zhuchengtyrannus being 8-10 meters is just sad
the holotype material, which is the only definitive material, supports a roughly 10 meter length iirc
I feel bad for Zhuchengtyrannus, bro is big enough to be a threat but tiny enough to be forgotten
sent a dm
bro getting put into the same class as dasp and gorgo😔💔
being 3rd biggest ends up that way i feel like, not in the spotlight but not even in the shadow either
We got the Tyrant lizard king, the alarming lizard hero, and then there's Zhucheng tyrant, Zhucheng isn't a scary thing, just the name of a place.
I guess people gotta pay taxes in Zhucheng so that's scary I guess
it's in Shandong which is scary cuz of dong
I mean if you look deeper into the name Zhucheng it means "to cast in metal". Cast in Metal Tyrant could be pretty.... Metal
how big is in game dasp?
10 meters?
I'd have an accurate answer if the mod with the human model worked
actually metal cast tyrant is unironically fire
Well, Zhu Cheng means cast in metal, Zhucheng is just the name of a city
oh well we'll assume it's the same thing cuz that would be cool i think
It should be illegal to give Tyrannosaurs mid names
Like Yutyrannus huali means "beautiful feathered tyrant"
super epic awesome dino tyrant
guanlong means "crowned dragon"
"oh boy I can't wait to see how big Embasaurus is!"
The first image on google:
"take a guess" ahhh
Gomez would never be that small not even at birth
Giganotosaurus ahh (I think Spinosaurus is bigger than it)
isn't giga bigger tho
ig spino is at least 1st for length and it looks weird so that gives it more popularity
Meh all 3 have been noted to been the biggest at 1 spot so it’s hard to forget any of them especially with Jurassic park/ world featuring all of them
I mean rex is unquestionably the most popular but i take your point yea
Zhu Cheng literally just means "many cities" or "the cities"
I dunno how u come up with "to cast in metal"
Zhu means many, a series of something and Cheng is just city or castle
also
Yutyrannus huali
yu - feather
huali - beautiful
Guanlong paradoxus
guan - crown, crested
long - dragon
also for Zhuchengtyrannus
the holotype is without doubt tiny if u compare it with the biggest tarbo
it's just a mid-large tarbo
but theres a slightly larger specimen got its description in 2022, which could reach 10 metres in length or larger
K
"Tyrannosaurus zhuchengensis" has been put into Z.magnus in 2022
but there's still 2 local Tyrannosauridae indet, Chinkangkousaurus fragilis and a very slender thing
it's 诸城 not 筑城
google messed it up totally
also do u guys need the 2022 paper which described the new specimen of Zhuchengtyrannus?
I'll take your word for it, the tiny third guy deserves to be left in the boring dust for that mid name
That how I felt after they kept nerfing my poor perucetus
Tyrant Lizard King and Alarming Hero Lizard are peak names and then there's a tyrant of a city
u'll soon get a even more boring fourth one
recently a huge and rather complete tyrannosaur which found in Guifeng biota(the same biota of Qianzhousaurus and Asiatyrannus, previously considered to be Nanshiung Fr. but no longer now) was showed in an exposition in Nanjing.
And it's name(which is informal now)…
was
uh
more boring than your worst imagine
Oh sure yeah! I didn’t know it was described!
dm
please!
can you send me more information on this?
dm
warning: all in Chinese except the abstract and contents
thats okay
give pls
please no 8-10 meter zhuchengtyrannus, please 😭
informal name "Ganzhoutyrannus jiangxiensis"
ganzhou is city and jiangxi is province
sobs
the introduction at the expo mentioned that dorsal vertebrae, pelvic girdle and tail vertebrae were found together, along with some rib and limb
not sure if theres skull material, some guy told me there is
the length was "around 10 metres"
and thats all
and a VERY BAD mount
some part was likely made up
Sorry to ask again but could you send me that paper
ok wait a minute
Holy moly that big tyrannosaur tooth FINALLY getting some postcrania associated to to
dm me plz
Agility is one of the most important attributes to consider in a fight between a Tiger and a Lion. A Tiger in the Terai Region of North India and South Nepal averages 518 lbs, i.e 235 Kgs, while a Lion in Kruger National Park averages around 490 lbs, so a Tiger is slightly bigger, Tigers have stronger muscles while Lions have denser bones.
Yes pls
dm
Why dm just post it lol
many important article are thesis that dont publish and u have to wait for years if not decades to get access to it
such as the further description of Yutyrannus and Sinotytannus
these two paper exists yet never get published, u could only read the abstract
Please do not share external links that we can't verify are safe to download. If you wish to share this file you can do so through direct messages.
got that
sobs
how accurate are these
awesomesupergorekillerfivenightsatOhiosaurus: 💀 💀 💀 💀 💀
anyways I think that’s a dumb toddler take because I’d rather a name tell me about the animal rather than just being vaguely “cool”
nobody is saying it has to be something overly edgy, though edgy names can work (maip)
not necessarily "deadly killer of killers" but like "emperor of the saurian citadel"
Around 9.6m
thats very similar with the biggest dasp irl
where can I check the actual size of the official creatures in game
Theres no real Size Chart, best we have is Comparing the models with the Unreal Engine Human Model, thats kinda how we know POT Sarco is 12m when the real Animal is 8.9m
here
excuse me
what is Velafrons most up-to-date length & weight?
may I have a look of the results of all the official creatures?
i put the new forgis on the jeep
Did Parasaurolophus start life on two legs, and move to four, or was it the other way around? Computer modeling has given us an idea of the advantages of both stances for foraging and high speed movement. And the discovery of a juvenile with a very scrawny arm has given us a possible clue as to how they grew and transitioned.
Check out our mer...
funny how in game bars has its standard endurance running on 4 legs but its faster dash is on 2 then lol
I FRIGGIN LOVE YDAW 🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥
Do y'all pronounce it Parasaurolophus or Para Sauro Lophus
the former
Parasaur
the animation doesn't give para full stride length on the top runcycle
the back leg does not go very far back
tbf weren't hadrosaur stride lengths restricted because of the muscle arrangements on their hind legs
maybe?
but would they restrict the leg from going backwards?
also the abstract from the study he was referencing
hopping lmao
Also here's what I was thinking of:
The fourth trochanter was much closer to the hip on Tyrannosaurs. This would allow greater leg movement with less muscle movement, thus enabling longer strides and therefore a higher max speed; a hypothesis supported by comparing the trackways of Hadrosaurs and Tyrannosaurs. The Hadrosaur's musculature allows its muscles far more leverage while moving its legs, however; and this allows them to sustain movement for longer without suffering from fatigue https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292885678_Duckbills_on_the_run_The_cursorial_abilities_of_hadrosaurs_and_implications_for_tyrannosaur-avoidance_strategies
that seems more like it would restrict forward movement rather than backwards
which would be a point against the animation.
possibly yea
I can only assume it's because the animation is animating the paper's findings so they might've used the range proposed by the paper (But I don't have the paper on-hand so this is a game theory)
Perhaps why they also illustrate the 4+ ton Parasaurolophus with air time in the "galloping" animation
i really wish there were still gifs of the hopping edmont
it was hillarious
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255643436_Virtual_palaeontology_Gait_reconstruction_of_extinct_vertebrates_using_high_performance_computing
I think the Dakota Edmonto documentary might have it
But also ty, it seems like they might have? 
hmmm
that weight estimate is clearly too high
@sand gyro you said rex wins. Spino is over 3 times the weight as shown here
That's way too small for Spino
As we know it weighed 500 billion tons
If there is one thing WWD 2025 got right it was the dinosaur noises. They sound plausible
I hope we can find Spinosaurus's front limbs.
Spino one shotting carcha and sarco with its claws in that one documentary and we havent even found its front limbs yet
Can ichthyosaur pupil dilate like gecko does ?
None that I’m aware of
a lot of them were probably casual pollinators but those are really hard to identify
As a kid i believed all of this lol. I thought it was a scientific documentary
Was acro upsized to 12m or is still 11,5-11,7m?
This is peak cinema.
Also, new render for Rebirth spinosaurus, and surprisingly it looks better here and not ultra fugly.
we did have a prehistoric bird that ended up being a weird lizrd that could be a pollinator but yeah not really
i feel like tiny marginocephalians would do that as like a self-earned treat
keep in mind hummingbirds are very very specialized for what they do, I don't think we see evidence for that kind of stuff in non avian dinosaurs
Look, I don’t wanna make judgments before the movie, but it just looks peak
It’s not too hard to become a pollinator tbf, we even got wolves of all things managing to be pollinators
||me when WWD 2025 tells me about the circumference of a Tyrannosaurus's bum hole instead of actually interesting information that also relates to the episode||
casual pollination is very easy it'd be shocking if there weren't dinosaurs that did it
Shuvuuia has a preserved hyoid showing pretty developed tongues for insectivory, I dont see why not non avian dinos could reach that level of specialization even if its not fossilized
Yea the least you would have to do is eat fruits
This show really is a big letdown huh
Fr, I bet if I cut out all the parts where people are digging, the episode would be at most 10 minutes long
flowers only really appeared in the cretaceous I believe so anything before that is out of question
part of what I was disappointed by was the lack of variety in animals, we see at most like 4 per episode and edmontosaurus shows up in 3 of them
I legit didn’t finished stop watching after 3 episodes and cancelled my vpn lol
At least the Spinosaurus episode was good. I skipped all the parts with the Paleontologists in it though
Gnetophytes and Cycads aren’t wind pollinated
ngl yeah, it would've been better recieved had they not called it WWD
They need other animals to spread their pollen, like most angiosperms
Does anyone else just keep beautiful paleoart in their phones
Mostly memes I think that have paleoart
I'm separated from my computer and I wanna watch Prehistoric Planet (totally not pirated). The Rex is so visually appealing
Like I came across an edit and now I miss it
shuvuuia also lived in an arid desert. I'm not saying non avian dinosaurs couldn't pollinate, they definitely did, just not to the specialized extent of hummingbirds
Which is biggger cerato or dilo?
Dilo had been buffed for weight.
Cera
Jwfk baryonyx with sail
Gigachad jawline
Isn’t zhucheng heavier then tarbo?
What 😭
Kenyan Giants Twin Bro
Kenyan giant smaller
No, not with the Holotype atleast
only one isolated vertebra scales to be larger and it can't confidently be assigned to zhucheng cuz it comes from a disarticulated bonebed in which one other tyrannosaurid taxon (which may be tarbo) is present and so could also be the owner of the vert
An accurate Mosasaurus would have been so much scarier in Rebirth
Bigger things take longer to turn, so now downsize it to its normal size and then you get an Orca sized animal that can still do tons of damage to a boat that can propel itself high out of the water like a shark, but it's smarter and can aim itself better
Regardless I am still hyped for the film because a predatory blue whale sized Mosasaur and 3 Spinosaurus vs a boat of people is gonna be epic to watch for the first time. I hope a main character dies and plot armor exists very little in this film
Does the prehistoric planet Rex still hold up in terms of accuracy?
Kinda? Other than having a rather bit much soft tissue, the overall anatomy & movement should be accurate
A new specimen of the early branching crocodyliform Platyognathus hsui from the Early Jurassic extends the record of gobiosuchids back 67 million years
Yes, a GHOST LINEAGE BIGGER THAN THE CENOZOIC
https://t.co/t9v5rdPkIo
If it turns out to be a pycnonemosaurus that's a w
It’s plausible but we first need good skull material of pycno in order to make that comparison
True, not wrong there, but if it turns out if it is a pycnonemosaurus when we find more material it'll probably stay on top or second place as the largest abelisaurid found
better Mosa pic by Fabio but ur points still stand
100 tons Mosa 
Yes, well aside from teh i think legs which are too short
Well at least rebirth mosa still smaller than fallen kingdom/dominons
Rhamp?
Harpactognathus
Ohhhhh i don't knoa what that is
Don’t blame you, it’s not the most well known & I think pretty fragmentary
I would use Tosha's Updated Mosa
He Cool
That is the most devious mosasaurid i've ever laid eyes upon.
What is he plotting?
Mosasaurs have changed quite a bit I see
NGL I still can't get over this aesthetic, not that it's not accurate
is this on their twitter?
can i have their links?
Oh god really? Thats a massive Abelisaurid
They lool funny for me
Torpedo
Alright
This is on Diocles Twitter.
Art is based on Tosha's Mosa recon that I shared above
Yeah, it's waaaay better than earlier concept art and promotional imagery.
These 2 just look so uninspired compared to the final one.
I kinda like the new Spinosaurus, I do hope the ones we don't fully see have unique designs
The other 2 Spinosaurus are hidden and definitely have different sails and features we just see one yellow one more often
Idk, but I think they all look like this, just with slightly different patterns.
It looks like this one has a more M shaped sail and what looks like a tiny crest
Probably just some perspective thing but I hope JW goes the route of 3 different Spino designs
I think this is the exact same one I just posted above. And it does have this little crest, as you see.
The sail pattern is identical.
Ah, didn't see the crest. It's tiny af, the one in the picture I sent looks like it has more of a crest
Yeah I'm prolly tweaking, I'm just setting out hope that JW rebirth is gonna have 3 different designs and not some copy/paste
Very unlikely tho, so far in the entire franchise all dinosaurs of the same species have the same proportions and look alike, except the patterns.
Raptor squad or baryonyx squad from Camp Cretaceous, for example.
The Rexes did seem to change a bit throughout their appearances, just slight differences like bulk and size though, wish all the Spinosaurus were unique at least color wise
Not saying the Spino hasn't changed ofc, just saying I wish they didn't make one model and call it good
My only complaint about this Rebirth spino design is that crest is soooooooo tiny. Even the spino from JP3 and Camp Cretaceous has those very prominent 2 horns on it's snout.
I thought rebirth was coming out on the 2 of june
July 2nd
Man, time does fly. I remember when we didn't know how the movie is going to be called, and very popular theory was that it's going to be about an expedition to South American jungle to find out why dinosaur populations are decreasing.
Oh boy I sure do wonder why animals who need a lot of food are starving and by proxy the animals who eat those animals are starving too
Yuh
Me when Dominion of dinosaurs around the world didn't last (never saw it coming):
Dinosaurs wouldn't last a day here, poachers would kill em quicker than the meteor
We need to be careful in this Jurassic World...they might have a Fallen Kingdom but it's still their Dominion...
We just have to make sure our world doesn't become lost. This is surely not going to be a walk in a park, but we'll try.
This park is very Jurassic..... 3
its surely like a camp, gotta be old, almost cretaceous old
Makes you wonder if there is some sort of chaos theory at play here.
It’s more so Kenyan giant isn’t as large as people think it is
What’s the size difference between pycno and carno ?
I mean it’s very large, it’s around like 4.5t and 10-11m
Oh ok
Now show off the supposed adult pycno size estimate
So he’s a bigger abelisauridae
Pycno is yes. But the one I sent there is hypothetical adult. Use the one I sent above it for the current Pycno size which is still bigger than carno
Okay ,thanks thragg ^^
I love the hypothetical adult size of an animal that belongs to a clade where we have 0 information on how they would grow!
It’s very reliable 
I. galvensis is real?
And I. anglicus was supposed to be its type species instead of I. bernissartensis
Definitely, but it’s not the 8t+ majunga relative people used to make it out to be lol
Whoops wrong reply, meant to respond to @hallow spear
This world in the jurassic, it seems to be changing via evolution
Well considering this is thought to be related to pycno https://x.com/sxur17/status/1929524481891963206?s=46
Try not to find very fragmentary large abelisaurids mission impossible, considering the pycno has solid material
smh my head , have you forgotten Ceratosaurus grows to adult in 2 years. That means the pycno we have was only 1 year old!!!
Top 5 formations
- Morrison (Allo, Steg, Apato)
- Nemegt (Theri, Tarbo, Duck)
- Hell Creek (Rex, Trike, Pachy)
- Prince Creek (Pachyrhino, Nanuq, "Laten")
- Horseshoe Canyon (Eo, Albertasaurus, Ano)
Fight me on it
Bajo de la Carpa, Huincul, Allen
What are from those formations?
Want to say Anacleto but no one knows what age is it
Notosuchus is the only one I recognized from the first photo
there's been new renders shown with a crest
you dont know alvarezsaurus?
its literally the namesake of an entire family and you DARE NOT KNOW ABOUT IT??
I know like two Alvarezsaurids, literally just learned their name
That Pycno is to Big and atm just the other Pycno
And when I mean that Pycno is to Big, is cause Iirc Random said his Pycno was 2.7t scaled off Carno
Ngl these muscle diagrams are so lovely
The pycno I sent is randoms pycno so idk tbh
Yeah, iirc Random mentioned his Pycno was 2.7t scaling off Carno, and he wondered how they got 3.2t.
Which idk if it ever Got Answered LOL.
Idk how Heavy is the Pycno I sended above tho
The 2 Funny Friends
I thought pycno was like 2-2.2 tons?
No.
Thats almost Carno's Weight(1.8-2t)
Oh really?
Ya really
They’re correct. Pycno is estimated to be much heavier than Carno. Around 3-3.6t. It’s the largest known Abelisaurid. No horns like Carno either
3.6 tons is way wrong...
“At first, it was thought to be a medium-sized abelisaurus with a body length of about 6 to 7 meters and a weight of about 1.2 tons, but after re-estimation, it was estimated to be about 9 meters in length and a weight of 3.6 tons.”
This is still debated in the community. They’ve only discovered the tailbone and part of a leg bone, so no estimate that is given is going to be 100% correct. And the specimen they found seems to be sub-adult.
That’s surprising. Are there any Abelisaurs in between them since a 1 ton difference is insane
3-3.6t seems to much given the Material we have.
Also been a Sub Adult doesn't mean it was gonna grown much more and depends what you wanna consider Sub Adult
3tons doesn’t sound unrealistic at all to me
Most were between 5-9m and between 1-2 tons. For example Rajasaurus and Majungasaurus
Like I said, it’s still up for debate. But the largest Pycno’s were almost certainly larger than Carnotaurus
3.6t sure does.
2.7t Sounds Pretty Tame for its Size rn.
@atomic cave Pycno's Holotype is already Larger than Carno's Holotype by like 900-700kgs
Never said it wasn't tbf
Ik that
By tupandaclyus on Instagram
I can't believe a pterosaur drew that.
Actually crazy how smart reptiles were back then
Not a surprise to me
wait so why isn't anky over 8 meters again
because there's no ankylosaurus over 8 meters
yea i know but did something change with the scaling or what happened
I was looking at Lancian's reconstruction and scaling it up to match CMN 8880 seems to put it over 8 meters unless the scaling factor got updated
I am not a thyrephoran expert at all so idrk anything
It got better
also we have like 2 decent ankylosaurus speicmen
Huh, let me see, hol up
I was using 26% increase but that might be outdated
the larger 2 speicmen shouldn't be over 7 meters
26% increase is via skull width
the difference in skull length is smaller
which is more reliable, and could i have a reference for that if possible
thank you all
but now I'm just curious if a study or something came out suggesting skull length was the more reliable scale factor
iirc arbour and mallon 2018 use a something like ~15% estimated discrepancy in body length between 5895 and 8880 which if i'm remembering right corresponds fairly well to some average between skull width and length
but i dont think that was ever explicitly stated as the methodology used
no i've been reading that study and it's pretty vague about a lot of stuff
side note but said paper also intriguingly describes zuul's skull as being 4m wide
This is because Zuul is the wide
there's multiple errors since its length range estimate is seemingly based on CMN 8880 having a 26% wider skull than AMNH 5214 even though that's the scale factor compared to AMNH 5895's skull
this reminds of how like a year ago this guy in the pk server entirely unprompted started crashing out over someone saying that CMN 8880 could be below 8t and subsequently had no idea how arbour and mallon even achieved their estimates
which led to a remarkably engaging conversation that never really expanded beyond "The 8 metre 8 tonne for CMN 8880 estimate was made by the worlds leading ankylosaurus experts"
The based 12 ton Ibrahim Spino:
Also wow this server died
🙁
afaik there isnt really any literature looking at allometry in ankylosaur skulls (or ankylosaur elements in general)
ok thanks anyway
any rendered version of that Anky like this for example?
i also wish arbour and mallon stated how they're defining basal skull length because they seem to treat it differently from premax-occipital condoyle length (which is bizzare because their amnh 5214 basal skull is identical to carpenter 2004's premax-occipital length for the same specimen, but the 5214 premax-occipital skull length from arbour and mallon is shorter than either)
and they actually cite carpenter for the 55.5cm basal skull length which would really seem to imply their basal skull length is premax-occipital (despite the premax-occipital length being later stated as 54.2cm)
idk that study kind of seems like a mess
Do we know in which position dinosaurs slept? My personal theory is they kinda slept like birds do. Do we have an actual fossil record of this tho?
what makes Attenborosaurus a pliosaur despite having them long necks like plesiosaur do???
these type of classification sometimes confuses me
wait…
Apparently basal pliosaurs had longer necks and were a lot similar to what people consider plesiosaurs
Here’s two other close relatives also pretty basal to pliosauridae
Pliosaurs are a type of Plesiosaur, and Attenborosaurus is more basal compared to their more stumpy necked cousins. The long neck and proportionally large head point it out as being a basal Pliosauroid
paleo, do we have any idea what allosaurus looked like as babies? i know we have otogeny from rex and triceratops but what about allo?
And Cera torvo yang sauro
@fleet creek We have a juvenile Allosaurus that if you give me a bit, I can find a few skeletals for it. From what I remember, it’s a lanky baby. Not to the degree of tyrannosaurs, but it’s not a shrunken adult
@placid stump The only possible ontogenetic series is from Cerato and I don’t think the juveniles are described
Facebook scares me, I wanna engage and call their misinformation but I'm afraid of being ganged up on and having my brain exploded
The real question is why are you there?
we have a good amount of young allo specimens, though this is the only I can find that has been skeletized

@placid stump @fleet creek https://archosaurmusings.wordpress.com/2013/08/17/interview-with-scott-hartman/ (Source for the Scott Hartman one)
Was changing my pfp cuz I just got glasses (my mother suggested it) and apparently my dino tism feed from Instagram translates to my Facebook
dinotism real
Still somehow better then twitter
y'all haven't seen tiktok
yall think some dinos were gay
Not gonna question that but any new stuff I miss, new discoveries for example
I’ve heard crocodiles can be so probably
Wait until you see birds
😭
who was going to tell me spino was sooo small compared to sucho. for clarity im using the estimate from the morocco holotype of spinosaurus and the current size estimates for suchomimus
that must be wrong
This doesn’t look to be allat right. This is with liams holotype spino and dans Sucho
you just proven my point
yeahhh sucho's like 5.3 tons lmao
Isn’t the spino holotype a young individual? If I remember correctly the adult size is really debated at this point
I’m not saying Sucho isn’t bigger but it’s not that big. Sucho is made out to be a lot bigger
sucho stands at 3.6 meters and spino stand at 2.6 meters
Are u talking about the big spino there. Cause its hip height is 2.5m and then ~5m with sail
i go based on the hip height since thats a constant
Spino holotype and neotype aren't big next to sucho.
That isn't the holotype nor neotype. This is based on a referred specimen.
Ik. I’ve already sent the pics of it compared to holo. I’m now sending it compared to the big one
This is NOT the version I have seen
Holotype & “neotype” specimens are considerably smaller than sucho, it’s interesting
yeah i noticed that but based on who does the skeletal it changes considerable
The only true “spinosaurus aegyptiacus” is the holotype that got bombed, all the others we’ve found in the Kem Kem group are different
yup those are spinosaurus moroccous if im not mistaken
spinosaurus marocannus is sigilmassasaurus + also invalid, so if neotype is a new species it’s sm else
then the spinosaurus we know today isnt spinosaurus either since we havent found another example of the holotype
someone should make an updated zhuchengtyrannus skeletal on these
Tbf Dan's Sucho is not as tall as the Edit Random's made of Sereno's
Tbf for the Holo just
Downsize Random's to the Holotype Size lol
Spino's Holotype is basically the size that Oxalaia is here, maybe even a bit shorter
Someone give me the paper on Deinosuchus that says it ain't a true Crocodillian anymore
Seeing Sigil reconstructed without a sail is weird
Second species of spinosaurus
It’s because of “spinosaurus b” but that’s most likely its own entirely different thing as well. Sigil most likely had a sail.
wha
Is this one iirc
Yeah its not anymore
Sigil without robust morph sails hurt me
Random did also say there is a correlation between sigil & robust morph verts so it’s still on the menu
I'm going to copy paste the olof quote since my peanut brain cannot comprehend for the robust morph spines "I know for a fact that there are anterior and posterior dorsal centra in Kem Kem that do not fit the holotype. These centra have a ventral keel as well as a triangular rugose plateau. The feature that was described as something that Sigilmassasaurus possesses in it's cervicals."
Apparently, the slender morph spines do not have that "keel" (I have no idea what that means or a triangular rugose plateau), so they are less likely to be sigil
You're telling me that the spinosaurus is a spy?!
People theorize this a lot that the "neotype" isn't spinosaurus aegyptiacus, but some other species, since it was found across a sea.
from my understanding its what we been using for the current look for spino
TBH even if the neotype isn't spinosaurus aegyptiacus proper, it's the closest related to the holotype, so even if it is a seperate species it would be the thing we are using to fill in the missing gaps of the holotype, and spino itself's recon wouldn't change either
Yes because even if we assume the neotype isn't Spinosaurus proper, it's still the closest relative we would use to reconstruct the holotype
So purist Spinosaurus people are merely annoying
Who would win megalania or titanoboa I was wondering because at first glance it seems easy for titanoboa but then there’s the fact megalania might have venom if it’s not already confirmed he did
megalania/slatemate
Guys I was thinking of therizinosaurus and it's claws and remembered that they were Fragile and not meant for slashing and stuff and I remember that brown bears also had long claws
And that those long claws are fragile too but serve as grappling tools not only to fish but also grapple so I thought that maybe theri was a grappler and that they would most likely make the aggressor fall then stomp it or claw at it or even peck it
So I was wondering if that could be true
I didnt know brown bears had fragile claws
They don't
They're also nowhere near the length of Therizinosaurus claws so the comparison dies as fast as it was born 💔
Look up brown bear claw attacks and you’ll see how fragile they are
If brown bear claws are “fragile” then theri can still make tarbo shishkebabs
Yeah I find it hard to believe Therizinosaurus claws wouldn’t demand some type of respect
Arent elephant tusks considered fragile too?
Yeah I was thinking Meg because the venom seems to be a big help on its part
Well main issue for titanoboa it's predominantly a fish eater incapable of constriction
No they handle stress very well, theriz claws on the other hand seem to not
Huh wdym? Titanoboa didn't constrict things?
Way too big for it
Ok
It seems Titanoboa’s skull was not properly built to swallow large things as well as the dentition indicating it was more of a fish eater than a large prey eater
Last part might’ve been created from the anthers of my mind but it sounds right so 
Is there any actual dinosaurs we know have neck flaps ( not like jw dilo )
Like iguana neck flaps?
Yea
Luckily Titanoboa's skull being like half a meter long means it is easily able to eat people anyway
Is the dewlap tarbo thing just pure speculation or actually have soem evidence/merit curious
Like from prehistoric kingdom
Ye n some paleoart i sometime see tarbo n rex with big dewlaps
I think that’s speculative but I love that prehistoric kingdom design lol
Thanks, i'l read it later when i have time
Wait your serious that’s actually so cool lol. I literally was looking up dinosaur dewlaps and I think I found the same thing lol
No it doesn’t exist, that’s the point of the blog haha
It’s breaking down the possible origins but it’s otherwise here-say afaik
I thought it was real but lost
There’s still a really small chance he wasn’t lying. And I’m taking that chance since it’s cool in my opinion
I have a question that I need answers for...
I want to make a shelter 2 inspired Blender animation of a pterosaur species. Im not well versed enough to find what species I may want to use so, my questions;
What small pterosaur species fits an arboreal hunter akin to like a goshawk ?
Id dig but I was drained from how would I draw Tropeognathus hands yesterday lol
Hadrosaur supremacy
New hadrosaur. Betttt
Also where do you guys get these articles fun?
I usually scroll in science daily, research gate, and google news(it gives you articles based on your interests)
Taleta Taleta? ❌
Tralalelo Tralala ✅
Ajnabia has a friend now
Scaled this guy and he rlly is tiny
Lil critter
Those who know 💀💀💀💀
no, that assumption is wrong
any bear claws are not just for decoration, they are actually very strong (not fragile at all), and are very lethal
a single swipe has been known to slash animals (including humans) to death due to hemorrhage
i know this, trust me
likewise, i can bet that, regardless of what any random person might say about Therizinosaur supposedly "fragile" claws, they were sure to also be used and lethal in combat
lol
elephant tusks are able to deeply penetrate and kill full grown male rhinoceros (the sound is horrible)
so not fragile at all
How likely would it be for spinosaurids to have throat pouches? I always depict mine with some sort of large throat pouch under the jaw.
This is the PoT spino I’ve drawn here but I added on the pouch I always do. Just pretend it’s an accurate spino with a pouch
There's no evidence for or against such a thing, but 99.9% of people give dinosaurs some degree of pouch because it looks so aesthetic 💅
I pretty much add it on all my Dino’s to some extent, but the spinosaurids get a fairly large one.
What is the most scientifically accurate picture of spino that we can imagine?
?
Considering irri jaw stuff, I don't see farfetched seeing spinosaurines having duck/goose or pelican like-pouches
(The Irritator expanding jaw stuff might be questionable)
Also @worldly thistle do you mean a skeletal?
By fragile I meant that they are more likely to break off than a other bear claws due to their shape same applies for theri
I'd also like to point out that while yes if you get or anyone gets swiped by a bear claw it's probably gonna tear through you but these class are not really meant for bears generally don't use them that way when they fight it other bears or large animal they usually grapple them and put them in submission then look for a way to bite without getting hit they might through a swipe here and there but it's more for the blunt force than actual slashing it's claws are just bad at it especially when against another bears thick skin fat and fur layers unlike polar bears who have much shorter class which are actually made to tear flesh easily
They are more of a tool to brown bears to help with their foraging as well as their grappling
We should also not compare mammals' with other animals
Also in general, popular belief says smilodon canines were powerful weapons, yet they were extremely fragile and were only used for the fatal blow
Just cause other animal has X strong part doesn't mean Y animal can
Awesome, pretty much what I thought, thank you!
I mean, we have a Pachyrhinosaurus with half its face off and still lived
Really? Can you send me to the paper to that.
Unsure if it has official paper, but here it is
Not as bad as I thought but still based
I was just wondering since theri claws are slightly similar to brown bear claws that maybe they also grappled a lot too
@fluid inlet where did he get that ibuprofen from?
Being similar doesn't make em in any way as tough as the others
Once again, smilodon canines are in no way similar to other "sabertoothed" animals
Studies recently stated theri claws being fragile, if anything theri could've used em as some elaborated display to threaten and intimidate predators, but considering it's animal size, that would've been enough to scare off most predators
From what I saw the study is more comparing it to other closely related species it was not actually fragile just not as sturdy as others theyre quite sturdy actually especially when thrusting
Aka not usable for combat
Claws are not nails, once broken they don't regenerate. And if those animals used those scythe for eating and/or displays (either mating or intimidating displays) losing em could make difference between live and pass your genes or just die
How come that's the conclusion you thought of it's just slightly less sturdy not paper fragile they can also regenerate as they are mostly likely covered in keratin the study debunked that their was a digger like ground sloths and showed that their claws were made for hooking and pulling things (presumably food which I find hard to believe do to their necks size maybe they were talking about food on the ground )so that why I made the comparaison with brown bears which they too have slightly less sturdy claws than other bears who also have pulling and hooking claws for fishing and grappling
You regenerate the keratin shed, not the bone
Well yeah if the bone gets removed your nail is done for
My condundrum with this is.. why would this animal evolve a part of its body to be nigh useless for anything that requires some elbow grease? Therizinosaurids whole thing was big arms and sharp claws, why would it relegate such a valuable tool to something it can flap around to look scary or attractive?
And the whole "Pulling down branches" thing never made sense to me considering that, if it did have a similar build to other known therizinosaurids, it would've had a long neck that extended far past it's claw range.
I just find it hard to believe that a therizinosaurus couldn't slap something, or use its claws for digging into bark, soil and such. I share this sentiment with the Skeleton Crew, (Go watch them if you don't already, hearing actual paleontologists talk about things is quiote refreshing) in that i strongly believe that therizinosaurus' claws were not as practically useless as some believe.
I'm not a paleontologist though, and my thoughts mean nothing to cold hard research done by the wonderful workers.
that was not "half its face off", lol, that was more like, maybe, 4% of its face off
sometimes exaggerating can lead other people to think wrong theories 
but cool to show it, bro
Considering that the affected place is one vital zone (is not like losing a bite of frill), is kinda respectable to have lived such wound/infection
Considering it's like this big, I'd say it's approximately half its face
again, that certainly does not look like "half its face"
lets not sugar coat it when its not needed
don't forget the other side of the face is not even showing
Perhaps you also count the hair on your head as part of your face...
Love this art and definitely feel like sauropods rightfully bullied nearby azhdarchids.
why is the frill counted as the face 😭
Research by University of Alberta student Henry Sharpe shows dinosaurs may have had chubby cheek muscles. CTV News Edmonton's Jeremy Thompson has the details.
Subscribe to CTV News to watch more videos: https://www.youtube.com/ctvnews
Connect with CTV News:
For live updates and latest headlines visit: http://www.ctvnews.ca/
For breaking news,...
oml
next theyre gonna give rex eyelashes and plump lips
guys has there been any news about my glorious king the amazing goat tarbosaur
Wat
has there been any news about my glorious king tarbosaurus
Oh idk. Idk if it’s common knowledge by now but there is a super duper small chance they had a neck flap
Wattle
Bumping this since I never got a clear answer
I tried to look up a bit for ya, no dino has been found to have them how they are shown in game and movie culture, some do have frills but they are bony not fleshy
I mean like iguana flaps
Ohhhhh my bad lol
Little fun game for people who like phylogenetic trees
Find a random tree in person that branches out, draw it, and then try to replicate a phylogenetic tree you know. I did non human great apes
Draw the tree before you get an idea of what family to make from it, it's a fun game I play on bus rides
Ignore me originally misspelling Orangutan
Was spinos sail a weakpoint?
Against a foe of similar size, absolutely, vertebrae are pretty fragile and filled with nessecary stuff to make sure you can actually move
I see. If it broke would it immobilize the animal?
Depending on which one, it would immobilize it or make movement difficult and painful
I feel like with this information, sauropods should have a body slam move or have trample back because even if its a small Petrustitan, that is still a lot of weight to throw around. At least 10 tons right?
Makes sense they would have cheeks. Many of them would’ve had to have chewed their food, even if they had mixed diets. It’s like when feathers were introduced and people thought it was ridiculous until the fossils made it undeniable. Herbivores especially would need a from soft tissue “cheeks” to keep plant matter from falling out while chewing. Animals with complex chewing motions (like ornithopods) needed that kind of structure.
I want my Barsboldia to have horse-sized chubby cheeks
I wonder if that would extend to a creature like plesiosaurs since they had robust diets and chewed. What would that even look like?
I what world did Plesiosaurs chew
@manic grail @hardy sentinel No because the breaking point would be higher than where any vital portions of the vertebra are (assuming the spines aren't forcibly and violently ripped out, but even then it might apply)
@stable stream @white matrix @drifting arch They're not actually "chubby cheeks", it's an extra muscle not observed in any other group besides non-avian dinosaurs (afaik). They would be in the same area as you already see the pink muscle in current dinosaur reconstructions as well so it isn't a drastic change
Unlikely, or at the very least not in the same way. They had elongated skulls with interlocking teeth designed for catching slippery prey, not really chewing.
Plesiosaurs would not have the exoparia as they are not non-avian dinosaurs
Well yeah, “chubby cheeks” headline is a media-friendly oversimplification. Just a lot easier to say cheeks. To be more specific I could say ‘reptilian cheeks’.
I know but I've seen people take it seriously so bases covered
Gotcha, been reading this article on plesiosaurs from Australia so I was curious
They’re not even dinosaurs at all as far as I was aware… are they a type of Archosaur?
They're a reptile but not a dinosaur from what I remember
First of all, if you chew you must have teeth adapted for grinding your food, which plesiosaurs lack. You may consider Plesiosaurs heterodont in some groups like Elasmosaurs, specifically Styxosaurines as they developed extremely prolonged teeth that I'd call fangs, they completely lack blunt teeth to crush and grind something.
Second of all, you also need some uncommon jaw mobility in order to chew your food, which I don't think Plesiosaurs had ?
To my knowledge, plesiosaurs had conical, pointed teeth to pierce / hold prey in place. Styxosaurus got those "fangs" to snatch slippery prey like fish and cephalopods and had no `blunt' surfaces to crush with. Elasmosaurids had slow tooth formation cycles, meaning that tooth wear due to grinding had to be infrequent or even nonexistent. So, plesiosaur jaws worked by simple vertical shearing. And lateral / palinal movement ability is characterized by jaws of chewing dinosaurs and mammals. Right? (I remember too many words from Zoology in HS lol)
it was a picture of a tyrannosaur...
Yes, I realize this. But there’s evidence in the Exopaia discovery explaining convergent evolution in jaw-stabilizing soft tissues (“cheeks”) in theropods. They would maintain T. rex's teeth protection, prey control, and jaw stabilization. These are things quite necessary for an apex predator that uses forceful bites as opposed to regular mastication.
would you have a face without a forehead? lol
didn't think so either
Wait what….? The forehead is right in front of the eyes not above the eyes extending beyond the occipital structure of the skull
but that's not the animal's face 😭
yes a human skul and a pachyrhino skull is such a fair comparison
The frill is made from the parietal and squamosal. Those are at the rear of the skull, not the forehead. Forehead is made up of the frontal bone.
(Sorry about all the edits, I’m ‘OCD’ about the way my sentences look)
the forehead, also known as the frontal region (frontal bone), is the superior part of the face, extending from the hairline to the eyebrows
i have coupons for an online course in human anatomy if anyone needs it 🍻
I did a quick look through Google, evidently it’s a common misconception, but the ceratopsian frill is definitely not part of the forehead.
Also, I am very completely aware of what a skull looks like I took multiple biology classes, forensics, and zoology with a lesson in this.
I am a biology minor undergrad. What you need to be looking at is a side angle of a skull not a front angle. The front from what you can see on the image you sent is considered the facial orientation. anything beyond that point is no longer the face.
Also yes. The area around the frontal bone is considered the frontal portion / facial orientation of the skull, which creates the true forehead and face. But, ceratopsian frills do not extend from the frontal bone. They extend from the parietal (& squamosal). So it means the frill projects from the rear part of the skull, not from the forehead or facial region. (I didn’t like my prior explanation lol)
yes, we all know that ceratopsians frills (the bony structures that extended backwards from the rear of the skull forming a neck shield), and that this frill was formed from the parietal and squamosal bones
and although wasn't specifically located on the forehead, per say, the frill is certainly still part of the head structure
But you directly implied that the frill is a part of the face which it is not. It is definitely a head structure and I never implied that It wasn’t. In paleontology and osteology region-specific terms matter….
I understand that but they wouldn't have been "chubby cheeks"
i meant to say part of the skull, because i saw someone exaggerating something 😅
I don’t think they would’ve been either. They would have been quite meaty with that head but 100% not ‘chubby’ or real pronounced. Like I said prior; “chubby cheeks” headlines are a media-friendly oversimplification.
No with tissue and skin
No, you're still wrong because unless you have more than one right side of your face...it's half the face
Also @worldly thistle wdym
Not skeletal,its full appearance
that is still not half the face, that skull shows only a portion missing
half is 50 %, math 101
thats equivalent to a human getting a chunk of their cheekbone bitten off
Ah then I can't think of...many that would have incorporated @stiff osprey recent skeletal but maybe they've saved some
And @white matrix this is a lot more than their cheekbone lol
okay cheek bone and part of my eyebrow ridge
They keep nerfing my boy spino how will it be able to rival rexy
Spino is so strong that rex isnt considered a rival but prey if they meet
Are we talking about a scientifically accurate one?
how you think I feel about them making zhuchengtyrannus 8-10 meters while buffing tarbosaurus to 12...
exactly 💯
so you can have a better idea with this illustration that shows muscles and skin, that looks more like part of the cheek and a bit more
but certainly not "half its face"
That damage extends into the zygomatic (cheek), jugal, and part of the maxilla regions, which is a significant facial injury, not just “a little off the side”… that’s like 1/4th of the face imo. Still pretty f-ed up tho, like imagine if a fourth of your face was clean ripped off
yes, nobody is disputing that it was a significant facial injury
what its being disputed is the "half its face" claim, which is obviously an exaggeration
Almost Half its face it is
I mean, yeah it’s an exaggeration. True…. I feel like it’s partially warranted for a tremendous injury like that. That is almost half of the face…. It feels like you are trying to minimize the facial trauma evident in the pathology specimen tho.
Tbf I think the current belief by the people studying it was some sort of infection might have triggered bone reabsorption/been the cause
But there's the chance a bite was the original infection reason
Still a real nasty wound
no, like i said, the trauma was likely f... up
i mean, damn, how that individual survived after that? lol
but i have seen other animals survive even worse injuries so i would not be surprised 😬
Tbf I've seen videos of an alligator with an exposed lung chilling like nothing happened
White tail deer existing
Some nasty injuries on all sorts of birds
bro, i know of humans who got their entire face mauled by bears (no exaggeration here) and yet somehow survived
This was a major facial trauma, not a surface scratch like eeeeeeeesh— that’s like when my uncle got into a motorcycle accident. The affected areas are core parts of the facial skeleton, losing that much would severely alter ability to function. In terms of facial area I will still say ¼ to ⅓ of the face being damaged is not a wild estimate when considering muscle mass, eye socket position, and feeding mechanics.
If your aim was to clarify exaggerated language, fair. But minimizing the trauma as “just a bit of cheek” after calling the frill the face is… a little bit ironic…. /lh
fair, alright, lets go get a drink and move on 🍻
So, what about all these Iguanodons? (I just recently studied them)
Turned into coal 🔥
Noooooooo!
Luckily animals don't need to be able to fight against other animals that live in different continents and 20 million years apart, all Spino had to do was be good at eating fishe
Blue Lias size chart
amazingly fleshed out ecosystem
the large carnivore ate the medium carnivore which ate the small carnivore which spontaneously emerged from the earth
Much like the fly...wait...both fly and are the humble scavenger...
Spino looks pretty damn good right now , I don’t know what nerfs we talking about.
Huge enough to make anything on land think twice about attacking , big sss sail , unique lifestyle , unique build.
Why bro got a piece of steak above his beak
so guys i have a question, in carcharodontosaurids, what purpose did the elongated spine serve compared to other theropods?
Muscle attachment
can you elaborate how that made things better compared to theropods without such a elongated spine
I mean considering other theropods didn't develop it, I doubt it was in some way "better"
Just more room for muscles to anchor so carchs didn't need to worry about being flung halfway to the moon by a ticked-off sauropod
@zealous ravine can you make a zhuchengtyrannus skeletal using these?
so in other words, helped with maintaining further balance, compared to theropods that didnt develop that sorta spine?
No, carcharodontosaurids were usually gunning for sauropods which are usually much larger when compared to other megatheropods and their prey so having a strong neck and a larger head (though they did have to sacrifice some neck movement) than "average" is the result
The paper I attached goes over the second specimen for Taurovenator and a possible explanation for the raised spines
Basically larger dorsal muscles are helpful for lifting and carrying a gigantic head
they were also probably helpful in pulling back said giant head to tear equally large chunks of meat from prey
Nah I don’t do full body stuff
Camarasaurus skull.
Trust
You can tell by the robust teeth and characteristic nose
Yes
Nah you be mistaken since it’s clearly a Brachiosaurus Skull
🤔 it might be. It's difficult to guess because it has no skin
Nah, after doing another look, you are right it’s a Camarasaurus Skull
Just look at the teeth. The molars seems to be designed to eat tall grass just like camarasurus, and also, you can see he has 4 cavities in the skull, possibly implying he had 4 eyes, 2 in each side. To see better through the tall trees
Trust me, I'm an expert. I've been studying lizard bodies since 1979, I met important people
You right, it be having 4k eye vision to see the trees
Lizard bodies 😂😭
In all seriousness, I’m 98% sure that the skull is a Tyrannosaurus Rex, or 1% Daspletosaurus, or 1% Tarbosaurus
It's Rex skull😊
I was pretty certain that it was
Now give us the name, model, place of discovery, and place of current residence
I think that's Thomas, a T Rex in a museum from Los Angeles
Yeah that looks like one of the LACM juvies in the bg nvm I'm blind that thing has 5 fingers but it still looks like the LACM
Yes😊
the biggest skull here is harley
the other three are down the hall and to the left
is anyone here crazy enough to own the paleo accurate 44 inch long PNSO blue whale that runs at around $600 usd ?
now i kind of want it to go with my animal and dino figure collection, but damn...
$600 is crazy
i know, right? 😂
its crazy that not just the $ but in this case the space it takes, lmao
Chat try to guess which skull this is
Dog.
Bro that’s a snake duh
Liver & Kidney ahh 💀
Skinny charcarodontosauridae💀
Sucho
It’s irritator
My Grandfather.
My mom?
Yes
It seems like irritator irritated you
The one u sent has a split jaw. Sucho doesn’t have a split jaw
I got it from here
https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/suchomimus-skull-wip-66b314c247764aeeac0bee750def184f
Dunno y they decided to give it a split jaw
Oh i see. W correction
Archosaur dentaries aren't fused and are connected by cartilage. So they have some sort of "split" jaws which wouldn't be split when the animal was alive.
Here on Tyrannosaurus rex, Allosaurus fragilis, Gorgosaurus libratus and Crocodylus for example.
So every archosaur has a split jaw?
pretty sure they just said that
I see but then y doesnt the Sucho Skeletals show it?
Like on all Rex, allo, giga Skeletals etc they do actually show it now that I look but for Sucho no
I asked because there are some archosaur traits with exceptions. Like crocodiles not having an antorbital fenestra
I thought it was something specific to irritator hence the idea irritator could open its jaws up and have a more pelican like jaw
Irritator jaw mobility does not come from the gap between the dentaries : it comes from how the jaw joints articulate, causing the bones to bend laterally.
Question: what’s the most largest Megaraptor?
has there any news abt Nedoceratops' validity?
Maip is a genus of large megaraptorid theropod dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Chorrillo Formation of Santa Cruz, Argentina. The genus contains a single species, M. macrothorax, known from an incomplete, disarticulated skeleton. Maip may represent the largest megaraptorid known from South America, and possibly the world.
Thank you
yw
what about the fabled megaraptoran bahariasaurus
Conjecture and I will make sure it stays WRONG with the help of the humble bull elephants in musth
can i have sm answer abt this pls?
Noooo!!!!!
?
No
From what I've heard, it's most likely a Noasaur now
Except only the ischium is noasaur is morphology. The rest does not match up.
Im still confused, do they break their jaw everytime to open its mouth??
No.
Guys what's your favorite dino mine saurophaganax
Explain to me (im a visual learner btw)
I have bad news for you…
not every though
I know i know...
it CAN return one day…we can only hope.
I thought that was delta? But they probably the same thing anyway
They aren't
The key feature that Cau (assuming you're speaking about the recent paper by him) used to diagnose them as synonymous was plaster, not the actual fossil
Ah ok
allegedly plaster is the only thing splitting bronto and apato
I doubt that considering there are multiple species assigned to each
Looks like a rex
Oh my god
I doubt it, considering we have at least two pretty complete specimens for brontosaurus Parvus that we can compare to louisae + the other two bronto species
this is just what brian curtice randomly says on facebook, could be just one bronto specimen but he does not like the genus
Might just be bias
he’s also a well known lumper
Fishy shows us pictures of two specimens of the same species to prove that they are different genera
Ok guys, these are beautiful (JWE3 creatures!!!)
That proceratosaurid is unironically really good, I thought it was a PK update
It’s guanlong, and yeah it’s beautiful
I LOVE MODERN DAY DINOSAUR DIVERSITY 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥🥶🥶🥶🥶🦅🦅
THEY HAVE LIPS
Deffo gonna buy this game
where is this come from?
They dropped after the trailer
Yay
Today i learned about the existence of the blue penguins
Wow what a gorgeous dinosaur, I never seen such a beautiful beast!
haven't mammals been around for technically longer if you think about it
I’m certain that both were around, but I believe mammals were first prior to the dinosaurs
True but if we getting technical then reptiles been around longer , I was just dumbfounded by the A.I lol
mammals appear at the end of the triassic by the earliest, dinosaurs are older
Are Dinosaurs not a late Triassic thing as well
yes, but the earliest mammaliaforms are norian, while the earliest dinosaurs are ladinian (or earliest carnian)
presumably mammals appeared some time after mammaliforms did
Do we have any crown group Mammalia from the Triassic
Not that i know of, i think it's molecular clocks that put them in the triassic
Ain’t there some early Triassic theropod footprints
no, prob made by pseudosuchians or some dinosauromorph type thing
''late triassic'' is a misleading term because the late triassic actually takes up 2/3 of the entire triassic period and early/mid triassic are tiny squeezes of time
these are norian-rhaetian, late triassic
But if they are that big how long did it take them to evolve into that point from whatever dinosaur they came from 🤨
Not very long
herrerasaurus is only about 5-7 million years after the first known dinosaurs and it already weighs half a ton
also keep in mind the diagram is oversized, the footprint maker was not built like allosaurus
Chad Norian single handedly being half the triassic 
oh crap if we use the ladinian age for gamatavus and the other guy then middle triassic dinosaurs are real
silesaurs are dinosaurs now? that's new
Apparently they are according to this nightmare of a phylogeny
I don't know anything about phylogenies but this looks clapped
there's a slightly better one from 2023
check the classification section
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silesauridae
Silesauridae is an extinct family of Triassic dinosauriforms. It is most commonly considered to be a clade of non-dinosaur dinosauriforms, and the sister group of dinosaurs. Some studies have instead suggested that most or all silesaurids comprised an early diverging clade or a paraphyletic grade within ornithischian dinosaurs. Silesaurids have ...
It's my birthday 😃
that's a weird looking...pliosaur?
but also yes archelon so peak
Does anyone know a good dinosaur API with pictures?
That's AI
Alr archelon looked weird 
I love how the Ichthyosaurs, Plesiosaurs, and Turtles are all a family (or so I've been told). You can really see it when you look past the hell that turtles are basically just short necked Plesiosaurs with beaks
That's an old idea which may not old up anyway (first the Plsio + turtle group and now the whole Archosaurian marine clade).
what would the largest macropredatoral snake be?
Vasuki , duh.
did you ever fight socks yet
so so far what we have for zhuchengtyrannus that's definitive
- complete leg
- shoulder/scapula
- maxilla
- lower jaw
- part of the temporal fenestra
Can’t fight the scared
clock it
afaik the only definitive part are the maxilla and jower jaw, everything else doesn't have overlap so can't be confidently assigned to zhue
Yeah I know
can i dm the source? its not the same stuff that they cant decide if its tarbo or zhucheng, its something else
i will say its very small, 89 cm femur....
there is no source, simply put if the new specimens containing:
- complete leg
- shoulder/scapula
- part of the temporal fenestra
don't have overlap with the holotype, you cannot be certain it's the same species/genus
How paleo accurate
then why would it include the maxilla and jaw as part of it? it isn't new either
wdym? the maxilla and jaw are the holotype, tmk the rest are other specimens attributed to zhuecheng even though there's no overlap
sent a dm

Nah the original gangsta was that one cell that decided to split into more cells, the cell was lonely so it made more
There’s a new specimen assigned as of 2022, the study said it had a maxilla with similar features to the holotype, albeit of a smaller length
ah ok, that makes more sense then
I would link it but last time some one tried to the auto mod deleted it
I could dm it tho
sure i can send it
@thorn grove hey so rex had a longer femur than tibia right?
this zhuchengtyrannus had a 89 cm femur and 95 cm tibia
rn im scaling the new maxilla to the old one
if its bigger than that means zhuchengtyrannus size nerf...
okay it says both maxilla are the same size
BUT that when referencing tyrannosaurus, tarbo and the qianzo whatever that it doesn't look to be fully developed
meaning so far when scaling using its femurs, we got a 8 meter zhuchengtyrannus but with the potential to be a lot larger
Basically same boat as alamosaurus
lets hope that unclassified tyrannosaur is just a fully mature zhuchengtyrannus 🙏
lets pray for 12 meter zhuchengtyrannus
in the new walking with dinosaurs spinosaurus aegyptiacus has slit pupils and i suspect this is because they wanted to give it a more crocodilian appearance and the inference on semi-aquatic ability, but does evidence suggest round pupils instead?
Better depth perception and vision at night, mainly for predatory animals that need to rely on ambushing to catch their prey
While it’s plausible I feel as if spinosaurs would’ve benefited more from rounder pupils considering it shares its habitat with a lot of other giant predatory and rounded pupils would be overall better for all-rounded vision
Both current models
Left is the oversized model
Right is Thal correct size (sub)
Carcharodontosaurus is going to be in primitive war ?
i thought the new one was smaller, did i misread
also yes T. rex has a longer femur than tibia
So Primitive War is a novel series first and foremost
The caption even reads "second novel" instead of "movie" or whatever else
The movie is based on the first novel which is during the Vietnam War!
"equivalent in size to the massive zhuchengtyrannus"
idk if google translate just sucks but that's what it said
Carcharodontosaurus in the movie would be peak
mine says something else
The study claims the new one is 460 mm, while iirc the holotype is 63 cm long, considerably bigger, so this translation makes more sense
what did you use to translate? i got something way different
"Well first off the easy stuff – we can measure the bones we do have and that gives us a 64 cm maxilla and a 78 cm dentary, though the latter would probably have been a bit longer in life."
https://archosaurmusings.wordpress.com/2011/04/03/so-just-how-big-was-zhuchengtyrannus/
I used image translate instead of copying the text, that may give different results
But yea the new specimen seems to be quite a bit smaller than the old one going by the numbers, I was actually remembering the holotype slightly smaller than it actually is
so old one is 10 meters, new is 8 ?
technically if the new one is 8 m then the old one scales to be 11 but I think Tyrannosaurid maxillae get proportionately larger as they age (don't quote me on that) so 10 seems more reasonable and is roughly what people got from scaling it to Tarbosaurus maxillae
bro Google translate is buns
"the lower would have been 40 meters"
it was talking about a tooth btw...
Livyatan is smoked
Out of the top 10 largest carnivorous dinosaurs where do carchadontosaurus and acrocanthosaurus place if even up there
Based off current estimates they are 4/5
Isn’t like the ranking 1. tyranosaurus 2. Giga 3. Spino 4. Carcharodontosaurus = 5. TyranoTitan 6. Mapusaurus 7. Acrocanthosaurus 8. Taurovenator ( might be bigger then acro? ) 9. and 10 are like zhucheng, tarbo, tameryraptor, Kenyan Giant, meraxes, Allo Anax, and like a few other carcharadontosaurs
The ranking was
Rex
Giga
Spino
Carcha
Mapu
meraeensis
Tyranno
Tauro
Acro
Mera
But the new Acro reconstructions based off the museum mount has it as big/bigger than carcha
I didn’t put macreensis since I just went for the biggest tyranosaurus ( both species included ). And I thought those acro constructions were oversized? Or are they new
I haven’t heard much more about them since it was being talked about. Tmk its weight range is still 5.9t-8.5t
I also saw a video saying Kelmayisaurus was bigger than Meraxes and Tameryraptor? Idk if it was length or actual size idk
I haven’t even heard of kelmayisaurus before tbf. But looking at its skeletal I doubt it. It’s pretty skinny. But it doesn’t look to have good remains
I’ll show the video https://youtu.be/BliwP9Wd8PY?si=ai4H989TwfdeHFj3
Carcharodontosaurus, Giganotosaurus, Tyrannotitan, and Acrocanthosaurus, are remarkable as being titan killers, as their morphology suggests macro-predation, they likely regularly hunted and killed giant sauropods for food. And they're all grouped in a family called the Carcharodontosauridae, showcasing the family's potency as some of the most p...
The weights in the video seem abit off based on the current estimates tbh
Like
Mera is 5.7t
Tauro is 6.3t
Tyranno is 6.7t
Mapu is 7t
Carcha is 7.6t or 8.4t depending on who u wanna scale it off
Giga is 8.6t but then if u wanna use dentary it’s 10.7t
Then with Acro the scaling for it before using the museum mount had it at 6.1t
Giga's dentary is 10.7t since when?
I also learnt that it could just be about the same size as holotype giga too since apparently the size difference isn’t really that great…
Maybe we’ll find out better when the third specimen comes out in a decade lol
we also wont know zhucheng's true size for another decade
bet there's a well articulated skeleton out there being kept secret
Wangshi is unfortunately dumb
like you're telling me you found all these shantungosaurus but only one single bone for zhuchengtitan??
@lofty creek you got anything on zhuchengtitan?
kelmayi was small
like a averange allo size
8 metres around
the 10-to-12-metre-kelmayi was a mistake
like 7-metre-Beishanlong holotype
its dumber than your craziest image
the local goverment made it into a dumbass dino theme small park filled with bad mounts and they use Trex for zhuchengtyrannus
they even keep that name "Huaxiasaurus gigantus" which is a quite old name for shant
I feel like my eyes get seriously damaged when I went there
yes, named from one single bone
and with hundreds(if not thousands) of Shant indivaduals in the same group
also shant is everywhere
there's even shant found in west China
(wangshi group is in the east)
wait what i've never heard of a west china shant do you have a source for that
i've seen images from that theme park i didnt realize it was that bad tho
was thinking theres more
@thorn grove @white matrix also have u guys check that large scapula(KG-151)?
a 89 cm scapula is fairly good
in shan'nxi province
give me a minute
what's that ?
i saw but im less familiar with scapula scaling
I was just searching for the origin and suddenly recalled that wikipedia mentioned that
it had a 1.4 metre femur iirc
the origin was a report
how big is it compared to a rex's?
im curious if that'll stick but increasing shant's range from basically one city to like all of china is wild
i mean its numbers in wangshi were insane.... would make sense for it to be dominant in most of china
I believe there's some trex that have a scapular around 90 cm so compare it with them
but also this zhuchengtyrannus also has a near complete leg
so why not use its leg or femur to make a better estimation
its basically complete, only missing a few toe bones
there were many lambeosaur in masstrichtian China
while they had dead up in North America
shant had to compete with them
on the one hand yea
on the other hand given how abnormal its size is compared to other hadrosaurs i figured wangshi just had unusual environmental conditions allowing for that size
although 1.4 meters is smaller than most shant femora so maybe this is a smaller species than giganteus
cause its smaller than the first zrex if you compare maxillas, and that femur scales to 8 meters, it also isnt fully grown
so the scapular was
not very normal for it…
unusually large I think
could be a different zrex's
i was about to say couldnt they just be different individuals given bonebed
^ yeah 89 cm scapula would be way too big for that zhucheng
89 cm femur and 94 cm tibia with thin bone walls suggest it was still growing
plus when comparing maxillas it was way smaller
so we actually get a 8-meter subadult or just immature and a way larger adult with it…
goddamned single scapular estimate time
id say its a sub, too bulky for a juvi
when does the femur get longer than the tibia in rex?
12 meter zhucheng is real.... i feel it in my nuggets
for that scapular I'd like to suggest it at ~11 metres?
though single bone estimate never reliable
id say more like 10
i am too lazy to measure from skeletals but am having a frustratingly hard time finding t rex scapula measurements
Ok
likely to be slightly larger than holotype then
i dont think theres any complete ones? but you could ask these guys for their sources
bro even try to do that 😭
its crazy to dig exact size from a single scapular
Eyeball it like a pro
those scale to either 9.5 or 11 meters but I rarely see Zhucheng restored with actual T. rex-like proportions, I usually see it look more like Tarbo if anything but idk how well founded that is given how little material there is for now
do you have anything sub adult rex legs?
idk rex specimen ages off the top of my head but MOR 009 has a tibia ever so slightly longer than its femur and is pretty small by rex standards
Table 1: https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.24118
well if you compare their scapulas its closer to tarbo than it is to dasp or rex @thorn grove
Big acro energy
i sense zhucheng being bigger than tarbo on the way...
it is a big scapula but idk tarbo scapula numbers lol
also info on that Shanyang Shant according to some random archived email that google came up with
Shantungosaurus cf. giganteus
material- (NWUV 1114) two teeth, caudal centrum, humerus (900 mm),
incomplete ulna, partial radius, manual phalanx, partial pubis(?), femur
(1.536 m), distal metatarsal(?), unidentified flat bone (scapula?)
Shanyang Formation or Hongtuling Formation, Shaanxi, China
Maastrichtian, LC
Description- This is mentioned as being similar to the type species, but a
bit smaller. It is actually always referred to in the article as
"Shandongosaurus cf. giganteus Hu 1974", but looks hadrosaurian and
Shantungosaurus was described by Hu in 1973, so I'm betting it's a
misspelling. https://dml.reptilis.net/2000Sep/msg00139.html
yes
same thing
the spell system was different
now that's spelled as shandong but shantung was older
yea the transliterations have changed a few times
the measurements alone make it seem like it's shant though, that's a massive humerus
it just seems ridiculous for it to be limited to a small part of eastern china in campanian rocks and then randomly turn up in maastrichtian rocks in western china but who knows ig
might be a different species at least
edmonton also survived a long time so thats possible
also Wangshi is a biota, not a formation anymore
it's longer and bigger than u may think
Do you mean Wangshi is a geologic group
