#paleontology
1 messages · Page 167 of 1
how come scotty is wider in this skeletal, isn't sue bigger?
that makes more sense
They're similar sized, Scotty is usually estimated like a bit bigger, but its not a big diff
BTW bro this is why this spino model looks so akward (bro hips are sweating to make bro center of mass at the hips 😭 🙏 )
yall reckon if Spino didn't go extinct it would have kept getting higher and higher tail spines until it was eventually just a ruffles chip with legs and a crocodile head?
There's a point where mate selection stops overriding survival
They are practically identical
Scotty is allegedly a few hundred kilograms heavier but
It’s a less complete specimen so you aren’t wrong to claim Sue is the biggest because Sue is 94% complete (or something along those percentages) while Scotty is a 35-45% partial specimen
Sue is also
Considerably more proportionally robust
Scotty has a bobble head and longer legs but the bulk seems less
That might be Spino's neutral pose tbh
Bro would have became Bill Cipher with a paddle tail and duck head
Sentient Dorito looking aahhh theropod
WWD prob has alot more work that's not published yet. so could be one of the things
TBF Randomdino's updated spino did one COM model with the thicker tail + extra caudals, and bro was in a normal position
Tbf that still
Looks more stable tilted imo
The dynamic pose makes it more stable for horizontal, but it’s also keeping the neck in a rather uncomfortable angle, the jaw is open and it’s obviously standing like a crane
I would say it would probably look more comfortable standing with a 10-20 degrees slope which is what most people reconstruct it standing on two legs and more extended / relaxed neck
I love the Gourmand from "The New Dinosaurs" as a Rex ancestor. Basically just gets more armored and loses the arms. Peak Tyrannosaur evolution
My favorite theropod (carcharodontosaurus) and third favorite (Spinosaurus), what a luck they existed together for these fans
depends on what normal position is, if the COM was a bit more forward then it'd need to flex its femur a bit like we saw with sinraptor and rex. But if it has a more upright pose, maybe it wouldn't need to flex its femur as much. Prob wrong but just a thought I had
How big is that Carcha supposed to be
That looks so small
Skeletals are by Dan Folkes (most recent version) and Randomdino's Carch. It prob just looks that way since they are being comped sideways
But how long is that Carcha was my question
looks like the 12 meter one, based on tamery I think?
I'm fairly sure it is this one
Ah that one
TBF Carch is only a single skull, and so any headswap gets you pretty big size diffs
Yeah I just wanted to know
So it’s the hypothetical max of Spino vs
A more conservative and average sized Carcha (average as in not by specimens but yielded size using a more averagely proportioned relative)
Makes sense for the drastic difference
TBH it's closer to the sizes for the largest specimen for both, since neither estimate is surprising or exceptional
Most estimates are within 12-13 meters iirc, With Meraxes getting the biggest cuz smol head with Big body
maybe they should make one with acro....
The 15-16 meters spinosaurus is exceptionally big and based on a single rostrum as well as being contested as not being Spinosaurus aegyptiacus or not even Spinosaurus
The other 3-4 specimens belonging to Spino are like 11-14 meters
This is year of spino , not carcha , next question.
It's also the same size of a dentary of another specimen, and frankly carch is a partial upper skull as well. And the contested of being carch is also applied to carch as well
BTW I actually have scaled Carch from purely meraxes (lol) and got this
Who hurt him
Dude might be called Batman because Bane snapped his spine
Is the dentary accepted being S. aegyptiacus?
I assume it’s the bottom one
I know the rostrum has questionable origins and consensus
It's Spinosaurus cf. aegyptiacus, since we aren't sure if it is spinosaurus aegyptiacus specifically (still spino tho). The same applies for Carch, since carch's syntype is a random lost tooth, and in that case if the syntype is favored over the neotype, it would make the giant skull a new species.
Its my #1 animal of all time
Spino gang🔥
🔥
I just want to know which catalog number we are debating so I will look it up in my free time and see what I can find in its verifiability
Because people throw around 15 meters 8 tons Spino way too Willy-Nilly because of the bias surrounding this animal and people always trying to make it bigger than it is
So I am taking these kind of things with a grain of salt and want to double check the literature around it

Bro looking like Jar Jar Binks in that picture lmao
That is a weird crest
So that is what happened with the Old Tsintao crest
The current estimates for 8 ton, 14-15 meter spino comes from skeletal artists and gdi makers, and the same applies for current estimates of giga, scotty, cope, goliath, carch, etc, etc. Dan Folkes, Randomdinos and Battlechampions do get basically the same size, though, so that number is as solid as you can get for most extinct animals. (aka, 20 percent size variance technically possible, bigger or smaller, like with basically any other extinct animal). If you want a official size, Sereno made a rough size around 7.4 tons (with the insane density, so realistically 9 tons) for it
BTW, if anyone wants to see more explanation abt this confusing saga of Carch & Tameryraptor and naming issues, check out this deviantart post explanation. https://www.deviantart.com/paleonerd01/art/Tameryraptor-and-Carcharodontosaurus-skeletal-1154808928
Maybe we should wait a little while longer for the extra material from the neotype to come out
Where the new material on Giga
Prob new specimen pls come out 
This is Giganotosaurus, btw. He just wants to say hi
Yeah the biggest verifiable Spino estimates that don’t use the absolute max but use multiple specimens were Sereno’s 7.4 and I think it was Scott Hartman who used 7.8 tons for his (might have been someone else I will need to double check)
My problem with 8+ tons is the fact it’s often compared to holotype Giga or Carcha based on the smaller estimates
If you compare it to Sue / Scotty / Cope and Dentary Giga sure
It’s also
I have the same argument when people take Scotty/Sue/Cope as “average Rex” when we have
Actually an actual dozens of adults for Rex ranging from 8.5-9.7 tons
Giga is iffy but the best we have to average is the holotype, since all we have is a bigger specimen in the form of dentary
Well
Unless the new specimen gets published
Scotty is like
150kgs heavier than sue
Hiii Giganotosaurus 👋
I like prehistoric planets baby trike more Ngl
Let’s see who is under the mask
Gasp
RETRO TSINTAO!!!
Tbf
We have more Adult Rexed that are 7-8t which is why Considered the average
The 7.4 tons uses a insane density, which the study assumes is for every theropod, and therefore, if we take that study as being accurate, it means Giga and Rex are 2 tons lighter as well. The study's model actually makes spino 9+ tons if you apply proper density btw
7.8 tons comes from Dan folkes (I don't believe scott ever made a weight estimate iirc, maybe I forgor), but dan's + random's should be taken as being reasonable as it gets, since it's how Giga is above 8 tons as well. BTW, the only def Spinosaurus aegyptiacus is from the baharia holotype, so you could even argue the biggest aegyptiacus is 3 tons. (Although Spinosaurus would be still much heavier)
It’s a pretty good trike as well
True, although I wish more trike babies in media would be like melon colored
Ps, a avg for Spino is impossible, since we have like 2 possible specimens which we can reasonable estimate size
Right, it was Dan, I wasn’t sure
Thanks for the refresher, I appreciate that
Thats why Sucho and Sigilmasa are the goats
It’s me
Sigil-MESA
(Shameless 2 seconds iPhone edit)
Absolutely Goated Family
Peak (longest dinosaur family on avg) 
Smh poor Camarilla being forgotten
Bro no Irritator either
Blasphemy
You can count Angaturama as Irritator tbf
https://www.instagram.com/p/DJ46B8Ftdo1/?img_index=1&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA== is the muscle mass on this spino realistic? pot's spino kinda changed my view of it
ehh not really
how are the proportions on saurian's rex? idk if its just the t pose but the head looks so huge on it
That’s quite outdated
Compared to the newer model
That’s a lot of feathers
the proportions still look the same
maybe its just the hips being at a neutral position, way too used to seeing rex in tpose
It’s probably too bulky, albeit not impossible
It’s a
Probably Possible but unlikely based on what we know
Reptiles don’t have a terribly lot of extra bulk on their skeletal unless it is specifically migratory / winter climate songbirds / waterfowl and snakes which
I don’t think I need to explain how far snakes are from literally everything else on the reptile family tree other than monitors and mosasaurs and even then it’s quite a lot
Edit: the skull is kinda too tight probably tho and I still think at least half lips is probably more realistic than zero lips
idk if this is a dumb question but do reptiles increase their muscle mass from training like we do?
for example if a rex lived in a mountainous/hilly environment compared to something like a flat plains rex would it be more muscular from having to move up inclined terrain, idk if reptiles develop muscle mass the same way we do
Sort of yes but fundamentally no
As someone who did taxidermy
You actually can tell if a snake that died in captivity was fed live prey or not and
Hilarious example but
Chicken meat you buy in the store you can tell how much it was allowed to move
It’s a bit different mechanically compared to humans because we mostly just
Well any mammals
The muscle fibres themselves get bigger, stronger and more “swollen” unless it’s traumatic muscle building (extreme bodybuilding) where muscles split and become two, but more vulnerable and brittle (hence you see extreme injury videos like someone’s arm just popping open in Mr Muscle America style bodybuilding)
Reptiles meanwhile grow more actual muscle tissues
It’s the same kind of thing where
Reptiles can regenerate lost liver / neuron tissue while humans with neuron or liver damage get their remaining cells and tissue swell up and take the job of the lost apparatus
So yes ripped Rex would be a thing in your example or
A Rex eating Trike or Anky consistently instead of easy prey like hadrosaurs or juvenile prey
Which
Btw happened in Tarbosaurus
We have an absolute jock of a Tarbo which with isotope analysis was revealed to have a favourite meal of Ankykosaurs like Tarchia
While the average Tarbosaurus ate hadrosaurs, sauropods, Deinocheirus and other ornithopods and theri in that particular order
I made several edits because I kept remembering things
you will survive this.
who would yopu rather be bit by, a large hadrosaur or camarasaurus
Considering Camarasaurus had the strongest bite of sauropods and literally ate whole cycads with the bloody trunk
Which is like
Basically the equivalent of eating the trunk of a small tree / shrub making the thing an elephant to mega mammoth sized beaver son of a gun (depending on the exact species of the four we have)
Bro would grind me up like a woodchipper in one bite
I am going with the hadrosaur, at least I would have a chalk outline to be featured on the next episode of NCIS
2 chalk lines are better than 80
althoguht Camarasaurus bite force was like 400kg
I remember higher from a paper that discussed the whole
Camara being specialised to eat Cycads
But regardless
I am going with
Mega swan mouth
vs
Resident evil reject
(I went with Edmonto cause that’s the quintessential big hadrosaur and Para seems almost harmless with no front teeth or serration)
Shantungosaurus looks even more unremarkable as I thought
That’s like
Such an easy Choice
The worst I can see this doing is breaking an arm bone or two
Vs
Mega woodchipper pitbull named princess
Edmonto bite would still be gnarly because of the serration tho
whats the difference between mastadons and mammoths?
alright
archelon or udanoceratops
This Ceratosaurus looks dope
Life is pain
what is that
A dinosaur
something you are old man
who made this????
@rancid dove
you do commission?
Not me i found it in Twitter i research ceratosaurus
But Is pretty draw yea
I hope the official cera will be like this
most likely not
at least for a couple years
Xiongguanlong mentioned 
https://x.com/Paleoartologist/status/1924858116903936228 how correct is this?
Tyrannosaur movement would seem unfamiliar to us. They were using similar systems of balance and sense to birds, but had to contend with potentially-lethal gravity. The lumbering walks of tyrannosaurs in Jurassic World, while more “real looking”, are unlikely.
Honestly I'm curious how Hank came to the conclusion on the limited tail movement on Tyrannosaurs as it's completely at odds with a recent paper done on tail movement in Tyrannosaurus showing a less subtle up and down
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.201441
go put this in sauropodomorphs
i wish i could be with sauropodomorphs :(
Please don't make me do this
I’m too lazy to do it myself therefore you have to, the discussion there was like verbatim
He says in the tweet that he just didn’t bother to animate em lol
Unfortunately, WWD2's animation is still jank
I didn't see the amendment that he didn't bother until recently
The thing that sucks about this is basically all the seams between bones are completely obscured so it’s just a guessing game
thankfully we can at least refer from relatives
Nope sadly
So the paper saying that troodon is a synonim of stenonychosaurus and troodon being the senior name means that it will be renamed to troodon was cut short?
the paper was published without issue but the neotype actually being accepted could take quite some time
it took allosaurus 13 years for its neotype to be approved by the iczn and that was much more intuitive than troodon's
13 years table spoons damn
iirc Edmonto's beak wasn't serrated, the protrusions from the bone core of the beak were probably for the keratin to anchor better.
I've never seen any reconstructions of edmonto with beak serrations, and given we have preserved keratin sheaths of it's beak I assume that's because it didn't have them.
was gonna say that
Is it true that dinosaur chew differently from mammals?
Like they cant move their lower jaw side ways like mammals
they didn't need to
https://youtu.be/u8ffPhdTk14?t=612
This can differ alot from clade to clade though, thyreophorans didn't chew at all iirc
https://www.patreon.com/YDAW -- Iguanodon's been with us for nearly as long as paleontology itself. Consequently, the way we reconstruct this animal has changed over and over, right down to the present day.
Opening skit music by Jamal Green: https://soundcloud.com/jamalgreenmusic
(used with permission)
Check out our merch on Etsy: https://yda...
Ive seen a video about how hadrosaur can actually move their upper teeth side ways when they open their jaw which is amazing!
Animation I created for part of my Master's thesis. I had each of the 23 disarticulated bones of the skull individually laser surface scanned, and then virtually reassembled the skull and animated it to test/visualize this theory of how different bones in the skull moved while the dinosaur was chewing.
Learned something new everyday
I always thought stegosaur have teeth for chewing
King of the ceratopsians
i lost Dan Folkes' Taurovenator
can someone resend it to me?
anyone else think that the main character’s goals and motivation in the movie new jp is too noble
@stiff osprey should nmmnh p 26083 be classified as cf fragilis also ping me when you respond
maybe
You had one job random 🤣
Replacement ping
You know, that is fair
I think I made the assumption because of Tethyshadros and overlooked that
First of all, thank you
Also the bottom version of Spino is possible, my only critique is that I think the belly and the neck has too much loose tissue
But then again, it’s possible for iguanas, Komodos and stuff, so it’s not really wrong per say either
But there's a reason why Iguanas, Komodos have that and not dinosaurs like Spinosaurus
That’s the other problem, it’s closest relatives are extremely poorly figured and it’s relatives that are figured are noticeably different
Anyways made some progress
Hes in my local museum
Really? Got any pictures ?
hello?
I think it has been here since april 2025 and i havent been in the museum yet since then but when i go i will take pictures and send them here
Damn I’m jealous , we got lane the triceratops over here in Houston which is great but damn seeing Willard must be an experience
Undescribed ah Animal
Willard and Adam have one thing in Common.
Been undescribed
Bertha and Goliath moment
Real
Does anyone here know if it's possible to go on from an undergraduate degree in Geology with Palaeontology/straight Palaeontology to a career that's more focused on entomology?
Or does it entirely depend on the course content?
Didn't really know where else to ask but here.
Doesn't entomology require biology knowledge?
Most Palaeontology/Geology with Palaeontology courses are made up primarily of biology focused modules so I don't think a lack of biology knowledge would be an issue really.
And that content usually pertains to both vertebrates and invertebrates.
At least in Spain you can't go Geology → Biology without subjects being validated, and then you have cases where the stuff you're taught in the geology module is half the knowledge you'd get in the biology module, so you'd basically need to take it again (talking about how it works here)
probably?
Oh I understand! That's what I expected for the most part.
I'm probably going to try to contact some of the universities I've applied to asking about graduate prospects as and see if I can piece things together from then on. Thank though!
Which Taurovenator estimate is more up to date 10,6m or 11,8m?
Ayee I saw lane when I was in Texas a few months ago
that spino is so bad, neck too thick and just looks wrong 
In my opinion i like it
but it won't matter if the JP franchise decides to destroy its main Trex protagonist by making it look weaker than other alpha carnivorous dinosaurs
in JP3 it fought the Spino and lost, in JP4 lost against that dumb and unreal Indominous crap, and in JP5 lost against the Giganotosaurus
when in reality, all those fights would have been much more even where maybe the Trex could have won
for some reason the head reminds me of the King Kong Skull Island creature, lol
Yh it kinda does
The render by itself is also kinda bad.
I wonder if this has a png for it like old spino
Wait, was acro really 8 tons? I thought it was much smaller.
Which is pretty much the point
@astral spindle is carcharodontosaurus 8.2t or it doesn’t matter as long it’s at least 7t
Uhh bro varies a lot bc it's a partial upper skull, and people scale it's body differently 😔
Also random wasn’t specific on what species nmmnh p 26083 is for allosaurus
whats the difference between mastadon, mammoths and probably another elephant species/clade?
I think the main distinction is the lower jaw, since mastodons have features that are akin to more basal proboscideans with the weird lower jaw tusks going on (of which mastodon's and close relatives have recessed) while mammoths are morphologically more similar to current day proboscideans
there's also considering the overall build of the body, with mammoths & current day elephants being more long-limbed and shorter torso's, while mastodons were real robust
why is it so FAT
idk 
Idk grazing mammals just look like that
it was a grazer?
Aren’t modern elephants? I know it’s not the exact same but I’m pretty sure they mostly eat grass
pretty sure modern elephant don't do that
okay turns out they do mb, but it's not their main part of diet
dunno why its seaworld of all things
Ok who is bigger Tylosaurus proriger or Mosasaurus hoffmanni
if you use mostly complete skulls, Tylosaurus is longer (13-14 meters vs 12-13), but the mass is similar between both. If you take fragments into account Mosasaurus is larger
any pliosaurs or plesiosaurs bigger then both or nah?
longer? no. heavier? absolutely
sachicasaurus, kronosaurus, pliosaurus funkei, the abingdon pliosaur etc are all larger than the largest mosasaurs
Who's the second biggest megaraptoran?
I thinm maip os the biggest but who is the second biggest? Aeroesteon? Or megaraptor itself, or perhaps orkoraptor
largest prehestoric animal that would've lived mainly in freshwater?
If that nee mega amphibian is legit that large bro is prob no.1 surpassing rhizodus. ( semi aqua stuff liek crocs not counted)
i do wonder, did deinosuchus reside more in freshwater or the west inteior sea?
BTW, dan folke's old and new spino vibe change is so real
what dino is that supposed to be from?
microraptor
mosasaurus
It ranges from 7.6-8.2 or 8.4 tons
The different numbers are from scaling it with different Carcharodontosaurids, such as 7.6 tons was with Giganotosaurus skull
I think I’ve reached the point where I have to just say it’s done so I don’t spend a whole week tweaking every little thing lol. Now for teeth, jaw, and details
How long was Meraxes holotype?
I am not sure. I ran into a tour gude and he said it was from a theropod meat-eater that had a hip height of maybe 1.7 meters or so
Hmm I searched online and Allosaurus I think
What's interesting is Australia was near Antarctica at the time so they were polar dinosaurs
And 8.2 with tyrannotitan but do those size estimates matter they don’t match so it doesn’t matter which one you use
What about the second specimen? is 15% longer or just 15% larger overall bcuz the numbers can vary from 11,8m and ~6t to well over 12,5m and 7t
It’s meant to be like 15% larger but it’s undescribed so who knows. I’ve been told that it would weigh 8.7t
Heared the same thing
yea, i did notice a theropod shape
very neat 👌
and also, there was no ice back then
Antartica temperature was much warmer during those times
i always wonder about all the inpecable dino fossil that are still under the current ice over there
many may be crushed but i am sure others are intact
No ice? Even for our extreme greenhouse periods it’s ambiguous. Depending on when it’s from, there were periods of frigid permafrost development in the Hauterivian and Barremian in southern Australia, fluctuating to subarctic Taiga in the intermediate periods.
my bad, i meant much less ice 😅
I wish I could relive the wonder of discovering what Megaraptors were
How small (mass) ìs the smallest A.fragilis specimen
@dire frost Barsboldia is known from a few back vertebrae and is NOT size accurate
Barsboldia is basically Edmontosaurus with back issues
I said more size accurate And there's a pretty good Chance at least 1 bars was of that size
This argument could be made for literally everything
The lack of evidence is not evidence for something else
Not for thal or ano
But based on what we do have of bars and what bars general size estimate is as of now pot bar being smaller can be seen as more accurate to a degree
Also it's pretty harmless for bars since it was irl probably pretty much a smaller edmo with back issues same goes for titan like yeah it's basically a giga but so was titan irl (and the name sounds better)
Except by virtue of them downsizing Bars from being a Shant sized monstrosity to a slightly larger than Rex hadrosaur, they did make its size more accurate to the actual remains of the animal. Another key detail is that much of Bars visual size comes from its height (predominantly due to its neural spines) and when it rears up
Afaik Bars is now like, very slightly upsized from what we "know" of the animal. And if look at the majority of hadrosaurs(and archosaurs as a whole tbh), their size varies both down and up quite a lot
IRL bar is like 11m pot bar is like 13.5m
I’m planning on making a PoT themed PC inside of a T. rex skull. It’s gonna involve some manufacturing and learning new things for me, it’s about the knowledge and the journey.
My question is this: does anyone know of a good sized and decent quality rex replica skull I can buy online? I sorta need that to measure everything else out 
and in the grand scheme of things, going from high sub-apex to standard apex isn't a very big change
It's entirely possible bars got that big anyhow
Pot amarg is slightly oversized but there’s more likely that there’s a pot sized amarg out there
I’m starting on this fella, a juvenile tyrannosaurid from Iren Dabasu, and for the maxilla I can’t decide if I should use Timurlengia or Suskityrannus
Like pot does have an issue making some dinosaurs basically be their more commonly known cousins but I see it like this eo is already similar to trike irl so it's fine l, same with titan to giga (plus it makes more sense for them to use titan it's path of titans lol), pycno looks like carno but doesn't really play like carno does in most games, thal is inexcusable same with kia, achillo is oversized but honestly that's fine it's fun and works for its niche, and bars is slightly oversized but could really be that big and is now not really a shant clone (and yeah it's similar to edmo but why does that matter they where similar irl and would you rather have the more popular one?)
Be dead serious who would want a slightly stronger Albert on pot
Why wouldn't anyone want Alberta to be buffed
Spino big
I really love the 2020s reconstruction for Spinosaurus as it feels more proportionate and natural considering its expected lifestyle. Beautiful paleontology concept art for it as well!
"Barsboldia was a large hadrosaur, previously estimated at 10 metres (33 ft) in length and 5 metric tons (5.5 short tons) in body mass. In 2011, the tibial length was measured at 1.4 m (4.6 ft), rivaling that of Shantungosaurus at 1.47 m (4.8 ft) and that of Magnapaulia at 1.36 m (4.5 ft); this indicates that Barsboldia could have possibly reached within the range of 12–14 metres (39–46 ft) in total body length." -Wikipedia, and then https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20511.pdf giving a much more detailed measurement on the Barsboldia fossil pieces discovered. How would you say Barsboldia scales in accuracy in Path of Titans? Too big or too small?
Bar is estimated to be ~11m 7-8t
It’s still too big in pot. Its like X-Rex edmont size
A lot of people when they play Path of Titans have this sense that everything is scaled down, feels smaller then it should be, and I believe part of that is because of the scaled sizing of all the ambience and AI that throws people off.
It went from like 3rd biggest Shant size to around biggest Ed size
Does Path of Titans have a size comparison chart that they allow the community to view by chance?
They don’t have one. There’s a video that shows a lot of them to a human but it’s very old
there is a chart pinned in this channel granted it's outdated
Ah I see, so someone would need to make an updated video with a size chart comparing Path of Titan roster measurements to their actual paleo measurements
Should note that Barsboldia is found as a Saurolophine in recent phylogenetic analysis but its exact placement within the group is unclear. It's equally related to both Edmontosaurini and Kritosaurini and therefore pretty much all the available subspecies are equally likely with no skull material from Barsboldia.
Most things are oversized for the most part
Oh that's fascinating, I guess its not as closely related to the Lambeosaurinae line anymore? I remember there being placements for Barsboldia in that line before in a couple of articles.
It would be nice to have an updated visual guide for future conversations in here. I thought someone in this channel was working on a new chart a while ago?
Hasn't been a Lambeosaurine since Maryańska & Osmólska, 1981.
You're going to have to forgive me, I haven't read up on paleontology notes until recently in 2024, before that, I hadn't dabbled into paleontology as passionate since I was 7 years old going to museums and reading books so I'm going to be behind on updated research >.<
It's the trees and other foliage that make everything feel small, why is there 12 foot tall grass in some area (assuming Hatz is accurate sized, which it isn't). The map just needs to get changed and updated because I do tend to feel bigger when walking through GP as an apex whereas in other areas I don't
That is fair, I think with adjustments to the map and just a little bit more polishing on the size ratios of the ambience would dramatically help player perception of size scaling. It doesn't help that we have fantastical interpretations of prehistoric sizes from sources like Ark: Survival Evolved so a lot of people just have this expectation that all life was like....godzilla big.
gonna be honest
I don't get this obsession with wanting the dinosaurs to look large. The trees should realistically dwarph them.
depends honestly
Friendly reminder that the Birches in Birchwoods only reach 3/4's the size they can get to irl and this is only for a few of the biggest ones in the biome
This is true, I do believe the trees, considering what we know of the oxygen levels of older time periods and how it affected vegetation, should dwarf majority of prehistoric life, and vegetation should in general be of a considerable size.
my main issue is the grasses. non avian dinos and pterosaurs did not get to experience tall grasses that reach up to about 8 feet high
I think ultimately that perception in the game is tricky, because its hard to masterfully scale everything so that people feel correct when going through the different biomes, but I do still agree that some polishing of the map would greatly help.
I'm talking about modern trees. Most of the trees people have been aquanted with are regrowth.
consider this is actually relatively small for a tree in modern day
and it's massively taller than the tallest dinosaurs
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/384543747284926466/1339027263848448100/image.png?ex=68306711&is=682f1591&hm=70a3339c8b1056b2ae457cfee92d105a1928bbcb81d378210b7682dbd67ad7f1&
You know that would honestly be so breathtaking incredible if Path of Titans could scale the trees to that height in the game, but I imagine that would put a lot of strain on the engine they use.
I assume the redwoods in game are already that height
for another comparison have the nooksack giant which is a douglass fir at 465ft that was sadly logged
Oh so are you saying that the foliage is already mostly correct and that its just the creatures that need to be scaled down? I must've missed that somewhere, sorry.
in my opinion the main foliage has no issues, doesn't make people feel bigger or smaller. It's the grasses and reeds that are half the height of a giraffe
the creatures in game are larger then their life counterparts. the trees could be taller
I can't emphasize enough how cool it would be if the world was scaled so that the trees were of that scale and us the players were appropriately sized to view the world as such.
Yeah that's fair, there some really big ahhh reeds in the game XD. I imagine the burrows would have to be scaled down as well to give a perception that the world is larger.
to be fair there are some really large reeds and grasses
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/384543747284926466/1339032510457446520/image.png?ex=68306bf4&is=682f1a74&hm=f09ff06e51ab12983e42b5197c7b1e1a315a6d0fea69d7698263a646d3d22f38&
https://www.wnyprism.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/ARUDON-Scale-Chuck-Bargeron-University-of-Georgia-Bugwood.org_..webp
Picea Mariana is usually found in continental type climates as well lol
thing is the grasses didn't even get that big until MEGALANIA'S time, which was very recent
As for reeds, I got no clue
I just hate when people say giga or spino is bigger then Rex, we only have a jaw bone of the biggest giga so we can’t correctly estimate the size, and spino was very thin and not as heavy, but the biggest Rex specimen is a femur so we can estimate it much easier. And Rex is definitely the biggest, for now.
HOLY--ok I stand corrected. Wow.
By what metric are you constraining the evolution of grass height? One of our earliest grasses to appear in the macrofloral record is Phragmites
There wasn’t much reeds or grasses in the Mesozoic the ones that were there were small and separated
We don't have evidence grass got to extreme heights like that considering the fact they weren't dominant enough to spread out into fields until maybe the late cretaceous. If you can show me evidence of the contrary that would be amazing but my point stands that tall, towering grass is pretty recent
When it comes to sizing, that is a difficult complicated argument I'd much rather have our professional paleontologists debate over and then give us the feedback on. If it makes sense, then I roll with it, but if it sounds really far-fetched inconclusive then I just wait till more information is available before I make any strong conclusions of my own.
Not to be a smart ahh, but this brings a whole new meaning to "go touch grass" for me lol
Even if we look at the current fossils that have been professionally sized Rex is still bigger
For the entire fossil record, grass only appears in the fossil record in the form of phytoliths and leaves, neither of which can tell you about the height of these plants. The genus Phragmites appears at least in the Maastrichtian, with possible listed occurrences in the Campanian. The extant species P. australis ranges from 2-4m in most of its range.
I’m not a Rex fan boy personally I prefer carcharodontosaurids and spinosaurids but Rex is just the biggest out there right now.
The biggest issue with Giganotosaurus for me is a couple of things: 1) There are too many fossils missing to make any strong conclusions of it's preferred prey and size, 2) we don't even know if the fossils found are just parts from another carcharodontosauridae member, and 3) we don't know if the fossils found belong to a full adult. Dinosaurs grew to some pretty incredible heights back in the Cretaceous Period, and its a known fact that Gigantism as well as Dwarfism was experienced depending on environments and forced adaptations.
I’m talking about current evidence that we have right now, until we have evidence otherwise Rex is bigger
While using living species in the genus is a good idea to put out sizes, sizes do vary within genera and vary even more when we put it on a 66+ million year history, and in a time where gymnosperms were still relatively common I don't see a reason why angiosperms like Phragmites would be as tall or taller during an era of such intense competition
Keep in mind I am by no means an expert on plant evolution, I am more knowledged on animal evolution so tell me if I got anything here wrong
Angiosperms are plenty diverse during the Cretaceous, a bit of a non sequitur really, seeing as they are the dominant canopy trees in places like Antarctica or low-mid latitude forests in the northern hemisphere. Heck, they are the dominant understory vegetation as well.
Gymnosperm diversity and dominance has not radically changed since the latest Cretaceous. Some now extinct clades were present then, some genera that exist now were not present then.
but would it be reasonable to assume that a genus of grass would keep the same height over a 66+ million year time gap? I feel like it is kind of reaching since genera often don't tend to stay the same size as they evolve (whether from selection pressures or not)
couldn't it convergently evolve in a different genre?
I mean plants are plants, they're always expanding and evolving at a faster rate then wildlife.
You cannot know the exact height of an extinct grass species from any point in time. We don’t know how tall each specific gramminoid taxon was in the Cretaceous, Paleogene, or Neogene. All you do is observe, in this specific example, the observed heights (all modern Phragmites species quite easily reach these heights) and make the inference.
I agree with all your points but do wanna add that there is debate on whether the different Phragmites species are actually just one species or multiple considering how similar they are (I went down a Phragmites rabbit hole)
As of now WCSP lists 4 species
If it were only one species, that would be greater evidence of a morphologically conserved plant, not that the earliest appearances of the plants should be presumed to drastically differ in stature.
idk why but talking about plants hurts my brain more than talking about animals. I don't expect them to be the same or even be studied the same considering the common ancestor of plants diverged from everything else's common ancestor a long ahh time ago
Basically I don't know if evolution and taxonomy works in the same or different way than animals and fungi
As someone who was originally going into FFA back in highschool because of my unnatural obsession with crops development and the chemistry of plantlife....plants are just...complicated in the sense they are complex and simple at the same time. That's why I originally stated "plants are plants, they're always expanding and evolving at a faster rate then wildlife" because essentially there are too many unknown variables on prehistoric time periods to really have anything concrete on grass, but we can go off of what we know a bit in modern times, and that is grass can and will be invasive as a growth depending on the environments and has a fast ratio of adaption given the elements of those environments. Example A: Crab Grass. Ever tried getting rid of that in your lawn? Crab Grass is noted to originally having been small with coarse leafage, but developed a root system over time that was elongated and strengthened like a Strangler Vine.
tell me how to get rid of the damn crab grass 😭
i have tried everything
.
all the other weeds have been murderer in my lawn, all of them, except a few crab grass
With your permission, I could dm the solution to you, I just wouldn't be able to do so on this Discord as the response doesn't pertain to Path of Titans XD
rate my fossil collection
yes 🙏
Peak, peak, and more peak. I love teeth.
Ngl I need more fossils, but those are a spino tooth a carch tooth a crytoxyrhina tooth a otodus obliques tooth a trilobite a Meg tooth some mosasaur jaw bone and some rocks
Headlines are silly, would rather read the article if you have a link to it
Thanks
Isn't that bone from Suski just the maxilla?
Suski has the whole front of the snout and jaw whereas Timur just has the maxilla
The premax preserved is extremely small in Suski and at the very most anterior part of the piece. So there I don't get why you connected the lacrimal to the maxilla with this red line.
Oh fair, it was a super rough outline just to get an idea of how they would connect if I used it
Okok.
I don't know if you used this figure or not but here is how the bones are connected to one another : in your skull reconstruction, you unfortunately forgot to give your Tyrannosaur nares 😅
I'm aware lol, like I said I was just sketching the outline of the maxilla
Anyways I went with Timur, still unsure on the premax and nasal
Super rough sketch
New Walking With Dinosaurus (2025) Spinosaurus clip
Please help me out by liking/commenting/subscribing! It would mean the (Jurassic) World to me!
SUBSCRIBE for tips, tricks, inspiration, and entertainment: https://tinyurl.com/y4shhkrk
I've written my own R-rated Jurassic World sequel. Check out my AUDIOBOOK right here:
https://youtu.be/4ttIe...
sorry but the animation where he picked up the baby and how he picked it up are bad
Silhouette feels about right
Its not that bad in my opinion
its too stiff and how aggresively he picks it up is weird imo
I wouldn't say it's aggressive, it does it fairly slowly compared to how spino is usually depicted to move
Xionnguanlong?
This one's actually an unnamed juvenile tyrannosaur from the Iren Dabasu fm
Here's the WIP outline with the preserved bones highlighted (minus some pterygoid parts that won't be visible in the final piece and a couple of teeth)
what would deinosuchus have hunted more in, the west inteior sea way or freshwater?
I would image fresh water mostly or exclusively
what makes you say exclusively?
No idea
We just know he liked Turtle.
Plus iirc Deino lived in a Time with a Big Mosasaurid.
I think Tylo?
I forgot lol
it did live with me boi tylo but idk what species 
That's so Megalosaur like lol
Very guy
We know that it was an estuarine specie iirc capable of tolerating saltwater.
It also had salt glands :
https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-025-07653-4
They didn’t bring back dire wolfs they genetically Fd a gray wolf to make it look like a dire wolf
You know I'm not an expert but hasn't pycno been reclassified to be closer to carno since it's release to the game?
Wrong chat bud
Uh oh wrong chat
you really went from actual art to ai art
could pseudosuchians have filamentous integument
“Woodland” and it has a fully aquatic marine reptile
random question, but did anybody else think that allosaurus was the ancestor of carcharodontosaurids?
You and the entirety of the paleontological community for a while
Technically, genetic and phylogenetic evidence has it as possible. But we also have no evidence actually in favor of it either
Just that based off of traits in crocodiles, we cannot entirely write off the possibility
Does anyone think megalosaurus were the ancestor of spinosaurids or just me 🤨
Megalosaurs being ancestral to Spinosaurs is an accepted phylogenetic placement
alr, im not the only delusional one here
Is there no mass estimate?
Quick question were is pycno in relation to the rest of the abelisaur's?
Pretty undecided, but probably not a Majungasaurine
Yeah I kept hearing people saying carno was it's closest relative but that couldn't be right cause of the limited info we have on it ty
It's currently in the same Tribe as Carno, but there's not a ton of evidence either
250kg
Isn't the only specimen we have just a few vertibre and a femur
how accurate is the shoni mod?
Thanks kuitaran
Looks pretty spot on to me
holy peepers
those eyes are way too big
fins too long, eyes too big, headshape is a bit square, bottom jaw should be bigger
interesting ahh animal
are we playing spot the difference
maybe they thought the sclerotic rings were the outline of the pupil?
looks like it tbh
I'm actually not sure how legit the rib recon here is
why is your pfp AI
I can help you find triceratops paleoart that is good pfp material dude
because him and another dude find it funny sadly
I will say that I greatly appreciate that most path dinos are relatively size accurate (with the exception of achillo and thal)
dang shoni is one chonky ichythosaur XD
Nearly blue whale sized if I remember right
jeez!!! that’s insane
Not even close, ichthyotitan is the giant whale sized one
i think the media is who first claimed that, because anyone who read the original paper would know it was just modified gray wolfs, lol
almost always the media (average person) have no f clue what they are talking about 
Hmm shasta
Mb got them mixed up then
0/10
Ah yes the sea blimp a butiful creature
Why is Edmontosaurus in the past referred to as Anatosaurus? What's the history on that or is it just as simple as not being seen as the same genus as Edmontosaurus regalis until relatively recently?
edmontosaurus taxonomic history is such a mess, anatosaurus is just the tip of the ice berg
It has the same eyes as your pfp
Aren't they sister to Megalosauridae? Otherwise Megalosauridae wouldn't be an actual family and be a sort of grading group.
So, Megalosaurs in the strict term wouldn't be the ancestors of Spinosaurs, but Spinosaur ancestors would have been quite Megalosaur like as they are each other's closest relatives.
Rude mango, my fossil collection is amazing ur jealous.
Any1 know if melons were around by the late cretaceous? I keep seeing them in paleo art
Iirc they’re sister to megalosaurids, so not an ancestral relationship really
Mhm, though it’s not impossible that changes (see lagerpetids), I doubt it will
Im curious at what point do pseudosuchians loose feathers.
Nobody:
Absolutely nobody:
JWR Spinosaurus:
The dg
Still unpacking my stuff from my move im about 30% done unfortunately the shart vert on the bottom right didn't make it
Paleo equivalent of flexing a Rolex + Lambo
excuse me
anybody still fw Alpkarakush?
No idea what that is
i beg u pardon?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpkarakush
Thought that was a youtubers name for their chanell LOL
I'll read up on it and get back to you. I do have some material from Kyrgyzstan.
I guess the mods got jealous lol. Yo @bitter oasis let me gift you nitro
@manic grail Please keep on the topic of the channel, thank you! this would be better discussed in direct messages 
Alright my bad. I'll dm you
Didnt work either so i guess thats a rejection
People dont even accept my gifts, no wonder all my job applications get rejected
I feel bad i would accept otherwise
Is anyone else excited for the new Walking with Dinosaurs in 2 days, Im looking forwards to their spinosaurus depiction
I’m always open for nitro 
Lets gooo. But just to make sure, discord says it wont work if you have subscribed to nitro in the last 12 months
I dont know discord too well so i dont know if the effects in your profile picture are from nitro or not
Safe some for the rest of us lol
https://www.reddit.com/r/pathoftitans/s/2uFjjtaXC3
Obviously claims of 90mph Carcharodontosaurus are wrong, but where would they even come from?
I don't think any paper has ever gotten anywhere near close to that, even in Km/h
Afaik all phylogenetic analysis keep them monophyletic, same for lagerpetids which are sister to Pterosaurs except in Garcia and Müller et al. 2025, which I unfortunately didn't read
could someone show me which parts of the anomalocaris are good to eat (dont ask any questions)
Probably the meat
thats kinda what im asking, which part is the meat
the soft tissue under the carapace
what about the lateral flaps?
You should know better than to argue with “experts” on reddit
Oh I know, I am just genuinely curious if there's ever been a paper to propose a fraction of that
There is not. Fastest speed estimate ever given to a carch was 31 mph for Giganotosaurus
Even then it would be breaking its own legs, and if it were to fall at that speed it would probably shatter every bone in its body
And yet Barry Allen is perfectly fine...
Evidence the Speed Force existed in Mesozoic?
Barry Allen is not a Giganotosaurus, duh
Wasn't there a Comic that had DC heros turn into Dinosaurs(nvm it was Marvel)
90 mph 
My name is Baryonyx...and I'm the fastest theropod alive...
If Carcharodontosaurids could reach 90 mph...
What does this mean for the stuff like Jane and the ornithomimosaurids...

that they were inferior to the glorious uberdino carcharodontosaurids
Realistic
200 mph elaphrosaur
Do yall guys agree that Hatz need a muuuuch thicker neck for its TLC?
Thicker neck sure, to that degree? absolutely not. Neither of those animals could fly lol
(although the one on the left looks like it's a giant throat pouch rather than muscle, which is better)
its not getting one, im pretty sure
Why do people feel like the recon on the left is what Hatz is "suppose" to look like when we have almsot jack CRAP of the original animal ,yet soft tissue could yelid some kind of thicker neck but not to the extent of that image
Because it was an island hunter which had to swallow animals whole or eat from them one bite at time. A big neck and gullet is much more plausible than a skinny one, my issue is that it's not shown on other azhdarchids which most likely did the same
A thick neck is pointless when the stomach is smaller than a human torso and cannot expand like a snake's, any large prey swallowed would get stuck in the chest and choke the hatz. Azhdarchids ate prey whole because they ate small prey (less than 20kg on average)
^
Not to mention AGAIN it's known from pretty crappy remains not to mention as stated by Randomdinos these guys could've swallowed small prey but where globbing down prey similar in fashion to a pelican or Cormorant
hatz so washed it cant even open up a magy corspe on its own
Isn’t this like basically all we have of hatz?
"honey, wake up! new elasmosaurid just dropped!!"
Yes like the actual material
Yeah, Funny animal
I did a thing
i forget alectrosaurus exists tbh, great job btw!
which one is it
You can see the names below
But Hatz is the 3rd Tallest there
is it true we have a european quetz or nah?
thats why i asked you, i cant read
In game hatz is fineeee it just the land posture and locomotion that are bad
Sploinky neck
Is this kind of posture actually more plausible for giant azhdarchid? I thought they held their body much upright like the php quetz
noodle foodle
say what?
you would be surprised what nature can do, bro
I don’t think azhdarchids could open their jaws like that
i would not be surprised because i know that unlike azhdarchids, fish eating birds have stomachs larger than their mouths 
if you scale a bird and a pterosaur to the same body size, the pterosaur's head will be twice as big or more. that doesn't mean the pterosaur ate prey twice as big as the bird does, because they have the same stomach size
this is why birds are better
Pretty easy question
when did amargas galloping get debunked btw?
for some reason i didnt read the stegosaurus has neck armor one and was like wow why did quinnz post all fake statements
which fake one would you say is most beliveable?
given my current knowledge kaiwhekea being australian is the most believable because i did not remember where it was from and new zealand is basically australia anyway
did you know the only reason they picked kai is because they thought it was australian?
Hot take but Appalachian tyrannosaurs are underrated (Ignore the fact that it’s two species known from super fragmentary remains lmao)
how much protection would the stegosaurus neck armor really provide?
small city block level
imo it probably was more useful in helping it push through spiky leaves and branches than as an antipredator defense
it's not like giant sloths which are mostly facing predators 1/10th their size
any predator big enough to chance attacking a stego could bite through that chainmail pretty easily
if we were talking about a cat or such that would make sense but somehow i doubt allosaurus was sliding underneath a stego to grab its throat
wouldnt its jaws very easily be able to grab its neck? the armor not letting the lower jaw get a good grip?
the tips of the teeth would pierce the space between osteoderms (which are individually very small) and be able to grip anyways
the neck plates would actually be a better defense against a neck grip since they are placed at the angle a predator would attack from
sure, a bite to the neck will probably break the plates fairly easily, but that's better than being bitten directly in the throat and dying
I like to imagine stego always tuck their neck between their legs when faced with predator
would that even be anatomy possible?
not tucking between the legs exactly but stego's neck has a lot of downward mobility
even something like this which is well under the maximum would still be helpful in protecting the neck
ooh okay
every day i ask god why doesnt stego keep sophie proportions until adulthood
long necked long tailed plate dragon looks so much cooler than Cube
Being cube is the evolutionary peak of defense mechanism
i mean, we dont exactly know adult proportions since all the "adult" specimens have 4 different pairs of estimates all likely being the result of how its measured
roadkill is definitely cube though so either the animal has insane ind.variation or the adult is Even More Cube
i think thats to do with scaling from sophie
since its just stretching it vertically, although thats not all i think is wrong with roadkill
I think it'd be far better if roadkill was just, adequately figured it has what, one anteriormost dorsal in a good enough view to use?
we know the vertebrae aren't crushed lengthwise due to the pose in which they preserved
roadkill just genuinely has 50% taller verts proportionally
best you can do is make the spine more horizontal which only makes it about 2% less cube
I think roadkill can be fixed with rearticuklation of the spine & using limb proportions that use the "best fit" formula (and by that i mean use the measurement pairs that fit that)
i might try and edit dempseys sophie scan into roadkill proportions, since its quite good quality
do it!
ill probably use the same scaling you used, n see how it looks with that since its like genuinely rlly good quality
n since the anterior cervicals and likely the first 2 anterior dorsals judging from the description, ill probably pose the neck like dempseys skeletal since it looks cool & seems more plausible for a natural pose
it is a shame that Sophies hind limb elements are crushed/flattened though
that neck is NOT in neutral pose 😭
according to dempsey it is
also i was talking about his skeletal depiction not the image above, that is supposedly a neutral pose for the paper
neutral in this context means as straight as possible, not the animal's life pose
you can tell because animals don't hold their knees and elbows at a 180 degree angle
no i know that thats why the neck i was reffering to is like this https://x.com/Sketchy_raptor/status/1410735263085588481
oh that one is fine
albeit he didnt fix the crushing of the anterior cervicals or dorsal
the scan of the cervicals i got really shows how f-ed up they are 😭
Has anyone done a skeletal on apex
not possible, yet
i have a low quality scan and measured some bones, but its not possible still yet
No because it’s not released
Stego, is my Stegosaurus missing anything to be a proper Stegosaurus?
its butt is too flat
Legs too short, especially front ones
Jesus
Just gonna say this here also before I get dunked for not mentioning it lol:
I don't got it on me, but like I said it's still contended as there's another paper that came after for arguing their separation
If you can find it (google scholar helps but be sure to type in the species name after Miragaia) please tell me. I am currently reading a paper on Miragaia so I will return shortly to inform
I would just look up dacen and mira papers from the past couple years that say something like "new specimen of dacentrurus" whatever what have you. I can't be bothered to look for em right now.
I'm sure someone here knows the papers I'm referring to and can provide eventually
can anyone identify the species/formation in the first image?
There's stegouros
I see what looks like a Stegouros, some unenlagiine, and a megaraptoran.
Dorotea Formation since Stegouros
how can you tell its stegouros spefically? arent Parankylosauria mostly identified from their tails or am i just confused?
Chorillo formation considering megaraptoran
Way it looks. But if it's not stegouros then its restored off of it
Because I found the paper that says it's Stegouros in the drawing
https://www.jsg.utexas.edu/news/2023/01/fossils-reveal-dinosaurs-of-prehistoric-patagonia/
oh alright
Pleases me we all recognized the stegouros
its a lil baby
Here's one of em
https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlae074/7696911
For anyone that might have been confused for the past few months if Miragaia longicollum is a valid species of stegosaur or not, you can find out all you need about that in our 15min. video-talk from this year's Palaeontological Virtual Congress (https://www.palaeovc.org/)
TL:DR for anyone still in doubt, Miragaia never went away, because the ...
There's the other thing probably
3 daya ago jeesh. I thought there was something else about it from a month ago or so
gotta sign up to actually look at the paper, darn these companies. Gimme a sec
I think that was the pre-print/abstract release
Yooo they found a third smaller Miragaia specimen
The minigaia
Ope nevermind, gotta purchase the article, looking at the abstract ain't good enough for me
Gotta love it when companies gatekeep knowledge behind a subscription. Can't even do basic research for free unless i'm a research institution
Have you tried SciHub
ain't got the document for free
Their world is about to open
Sometimes I just try a different site for the same paper, and it will just be public lol. I think it was Thyreosaurus's description I ran into that
Scihub is useless for anything after 2023 💔
Get to work Random! Use your connections in Big Paleo to help us...
Someone should lowkey break into oxford and upload the Dacentrurus 2025 taxonomy paper for free
I'd certainly go to jail for free knowledge since my education system is failing me (United States moment) and so I gotta go looking elsewhere
Whenever a new paper comes out and I don't download it while I can, I kick myself in the head later
Because then I have to ask people for it. People are GROSS
I should lowkey get hella rich, buy all gatekept dinosaur papers then start an archive of all current dinosaur genera, then upload it to the internet for free
And THEN i'd move onto Pterosaurs right after shaving off 20 years of my life on the previous project
If my life's work is helping Avemetarsalia research become free then so kill me i'll do it, 2088 extinct genera (and expanding) will all be successfully logged on all papers I can possibly find (ts is gonna take me 80 years, possibly 6 generations, and millions of dollars)
Do I start from Megalosaurus and go in order of discovery or do I start at "Aardonyx" and go in alphabetical order
Oooh that's a tough one
a proper stegosaurus would be bipedal 
I hope you aren't serious
Make the plates more diamond shaped and less triangular. Then make the plates in a pattern like this, with one set of plates on one side and one on the other with all plates being able to be seen from the side
The plates are the only issue here (which is seen in other paleo artist's interpretations of Stego) but otherwise it's really up to date, especially the neck scales
if needed to get the top leaves to eat 🍃
Good thing Stego wasn't a high tree browser like a certain someone
If miragaia was still synonymous with dacent, would dacent be
megagaia?
1 more day until wwd 2 comes out
Peak Father
Im most excited for spino
Triceratops for me
How much did Pamelaria weigh?
thank you
Is this Thalassodromeus accurate ?
Has anyone tried to measure tyrannotitan using the new acro weight method?
yeah
how heavy is Velafrons?
Pretty much yeah, the wings fold correctly, it has an appropriate amount of pycnofibers and the skull shape generally looks good
It's the term used for pterosaur plumage.
I personally just call them feathers, as they likely are derived from the common ancestor pterosaurs and dinosaurs come from, alongside them generally being near identical.
Pycnofibers are the fuzz that pterosaurs would have been covered by. It's debated if pycnofibers are actually feathers or something else entirely
Ooooh thanks for the information ! If you want to talk about pterosaurs sometimes I’m in
I think devs should copy this model but with a sharp beak
That looks good too. The posture that it has while flying may be outdated though, as pterosaurs like Thalassodromeus may have had their legs more straight, and the wing membrane would have attached to the ankle
I had the same opinion about the wings membrane
I would say however I feel they could help with non-optimal bites, kicks or claw scratches.
Specifically in regards to how a fight could end up pretty messy especially if the predator in question in inexperienced.
like more of a scratch guard
Ramph having a 6 foot wingspan
oh my man doesn't know about BIG RHAMPH
https://peerj.com/articles/18587/
Rhamphorhynchus is one of the best-known pterosaurs, with well over 100 specimens being held in public collections. Most of these represent juvenile animals, and the adults known are typically around 1 m in wingspan. Here we describe a near complete skeleton, preserved partially in 3D, of an animal with a wingspan of around 1.8 m, that is consid...
I think it's SUPPOSED to be the 5 Allo species but yeah Ramph gets way bigger than 6 feet
They said false, not true
The 12 foot ramph:
What 💔
Your Honor, relevance?
Is this cap
the biggest referred brachi specimen scales to 67t yeah
you mean camarasaurus specimen
Quick question what are some good paleontological dig sites to volunteer at?
you be quiet we don’t speak about that
depends, im gonna give you a list of formations rq..
Morrison Formation
Hell Creek Formation
Ischigualasto Formation
Solnhofen Limestone
Wealden Group
Yixian Formation
Kem Kem Beds
Winton Formation
I feel like going to kem kem in the middle of the Sahara to volunteer might get half of our discord population killed,....
why did you think i put that one in the list
Hush
would these dino figures from Schleich be paleo accurate enough for a 3 year old, or should I get all PNSO
- Schleich cost about half of PNSO
None of those, if you want a (kinda) cheap accurate trex you could get the haolonggood one
PNSO is worth it though
Too bad no lips
Although it is quite expensive for a 1/35 scale rex
bro, the thing is i went to a Barnes and Noble bookstore and saw some Schleich brand animals that looked very good for about $10 usd a piece for my son
i only wanted like 5 but ended up getting one figure of each animal there (like 30), then went to Amazon and got like 25 more, and then got like another 30 on their website
so the $ ended up being much more than originally planned for like 85 figures, lol
so now, i kind of want to get him dino figures but i honestly think that for $25 a piece the Schleich are not very paleo accurate
but now the problem is that the PNSO for like $50 a piece would be a ton of $ on figures for a 3 year old i think
i mean, PNSO look very nice but would they be able to handle toddler abuse?
.
i saw the Halongood and they look good too, but they seem to cost about the same as the PNSO 🤔
I should probably specify I live in the Midwest of the United States
if so, then here..
Mazon Creek Formation
Decorah Shale
Platteville Formation
Galena Formation
St. Peter Sandstone
Niobrara Formation
Dakota Formation
Pleistocene Deposits
do you think this Schleich Carcharodontosaurus paleo accurate?
kind of.. its missing some lips and a LOT of fat but other than that, everything is good
doesn't it look a little skiny on the head, lol?
ok, thanks bro
HLG is much cheaper than pnso, $12-$20 on average compared to $35+ for pnso, by far the best cheap models
There are a couple of online stores with Hallonggood figures on sale rn. I have a list of current coupon codes and sales for dinosaur model stuff that can help stretch the budget: https://dinotoyblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=11975.msg397068;topicseen#new
Online Store Coupon Code and Sale Thread
okay, i'll find a cheaper website for it then
thanks bro
whoever answers RIGHT gets a prize btw
oh, okay, thanks 
1 is my answer what’s my prize
nothing because you were wrong
amargasaurus is actually a dicraeosaurid not a diplodocid, both are diplodocoids but they’re two separate families
Oh wait 4 I forgot what laurasia was lmao
thats why i said larger family, like how dicreosaurid is in diplodocid?
Diplodocid and Diplodocoid are different things tho
those are the same word...
o
yeah diplodocoidea and diplodocidae look very similar but diplodocoids are the broader group
Same as tyrannosauridae and tyrannosauroidae
a o changes everything....
@sudden wind Proportions should be fixed now
bir ❤️
1 - false
2 - true
3 - false
4 - Divide by 0
Hey does anyone here have any art references? I would love some.
1 and 3 are true
1 is only true for Diplodocus itself, it could very easily vary in others, 3 it was hit in the pubic bone and tmk generally not the area the testes are kept in avians etc
oops
3rd one is being nit picking though tbf
@scenic flame Is this skull good?
is 5 ton centro becoming real
wrong image i meant this one @scenic flame
yes, though iirc the bigger one in the back is dubious
idk why but too me i keep thinking its sino for some reason
cuz sino's built different
this is also because both those images are sinoceratops
oh..
centrosaurus is 2-3 tonnes max
why did the 5 ton centro become dubious?
wait do we have that much of sino then i thought it was just two partial skulls
GAT restored it with fairly complete postcrania but i haven't actually seen those described anywhere
also there has never been a 5 ton centrosaurus
there hasnt been??
has there any asian ceratopsians besides Sinoceratops?
ceratopsians yes
ceratopsids not afaik
This is absolutely diabolical 😭 🙏
where is that?
let me guess, Alberta, lol
Oh I have no idea, but yeah probably Alberta
The article is right, this is pretty terrifying
those who have kidney stones: 💀💀💀💀💀
Proportions seem good now
Watching walking with dinosaurs and one thing I notice is these dinosaurs be deaf 🤣
huh?
e
Oops 🤣
Ts xemes have me dyeing
ITS HERE
So far in the first two episodes I find it very formative, decent in terms of story and decent in terms of music and decent in terms of quality of dinosaur models and the way they move.
as good as the original?
IDK why but they kinda look like the characters in a cartoon about dinosaur friends going on a adventure
might be some influence from that one movie
I’m trying to get over how bad spinosaurus looks when it walks on land but I can’t avoid it , straight up robot like 😅
show probably doesnt have crazy budget, nostalgia for WWD has died off for a lot of people
My thing is for every episode I seen so far like 20% of it isn’t even the dinosaurs , surely that helps with the cost.
yeah
if the story is good i dont mind
I dont like any of their models tbh, they all have really wide thighs
wwd arent exactly known for amazing models anyway
Yeah...
This doesn’t compare to WWD 1
ofc it doesnt
I’m watching other dinosaur stuff that has came out the last couple of years and the fights look so much better than wwd2 , I’m not trying to rag on it but that’s just my observation.
I think this what I was just watching to try to compare it and the dinosaurs are much more fluid on here
This dinosaur is more stiff than an animal that just died 2 days ago…
The animation quality fell off💔
oh well
at least the story might be good
bro😭
Wwd 1 is really good, but might I say without getting assassinated, that even for the time the accuracy was a mixed bag?
I feel like wwd2 will be the same.
Not very happy with the new WWD
Where can you watch it??
Modelled in blockbench?, n pretty good, thoigh could use bulking up on the neck a little imo
Nothing will beat the original. Just seems like a wwd the movie made into a documentary more than the original documentary.
I keep seeing these posts where people keep saying “stop comparing it to prehistoric planet!” When I haven’t seen anyone actually doing that, all I’ve seen is people disliking the VFX and other people assuming it’s because of prehistoric planet and not because the animation is janky 💀
This is my favourite wwd
the budget was probably insufficient
oh damn, it does lack better movement for sure 
I think Dinosaur Revolution was better visually
it definitely had better animation
These are quite literally the only ones I’ve seen 💀
im totally okay with the quality, its just that ive seen some animations in the dinosaurs get pretty repetitive
There are a lot and didn't you just say that you never seen these comments
I don't think this really matters in this context, since they don't speak for everyone
is it on tubi
omg 🥰
Hmm yes, Cowboys vs. Dinosaurs. My favorite paleo-documentary
Same. Probably the most accurate documentary out there
CGI downgrade fr
Meanwhile transformers in 2007:
The old WWD looks nicer icl (At least anim wise)
are these spikes/scutes (or whatever they're called) accurate for a ceratosaurian?
Is it more plausible for spinosaurus to have had smoother scales or more larger scales like that of a crocodile.
☝️ 🤓 Ackschually carnotaurus is an abelisaur and not related to ceratosaurus.
ceratosaurians are primitive cousins of abelisaurs iirc
Berberosaurus is a primitive abelisaur and it resembles Ceratosaurus a bit
But regarding this question as well.
smoother because it isnt a crocodilian
Ceratosaurs are members of the clade Ceratosauria, a group of dinosaurs defined as all theropods sharing a more recent common ancestor with Ceratosaurus than with birds. The oldest known ceratosaur, Saltriovenator, dates to the earliest part of the Jurassic, around 199 million years ago. Ceratosauria includes three major clades: Ceratosauridae, ...
get outnerded, nerd
now answer my question
@wary heath
I just watched the first ep of walking with dinosaurs and without any spoilers i can say im disappointed
No because Ceratosaurus is the only one known with honest-to-goodness osteoderms along the midline of the back (and maybe the flank, but it was just one free-floating osteoderm that "didn't look like the other midline scales" so take that as you will)
Carnotaurus just had feature scales that were predominantly flatter than that
alr thanks
Were you disappointed with the accuracy of the dinosaurs?
Don't forget the stock sound effects
^
I read a paper on the arm rotation of Dilophosaurus, which showed a diagram of how far they could reach. It stated that Dilophosaurus could easily grasp things between its arms (as in young, food, nesting materials, etc etc…) how do you all feel about this? Do you feel it would be a preferred method of scavenging to rip a piece of flesh and run with it? Or more so just to carry young+ nest materials. I personally think it’s plausible, but I’ve heard some debate on it
It would use this to suplex lesser theropods
I don't think the claws would be very good at actual carcass processing, carrying things for sure, but the claws are meat hooks, not blades
I didn’t even get to this episode I stopped after 2 episodes I suffered enough
Fair enough, I definitely agree with you here. When imagining it, I imagined it ripping meat off with its face, dropping it to pick it up and then grabbing more meat with its face. Like if like dual transportation for it and it’s young, or it and it’s mate
Lol
Prehistoric Planet really set the standard when it comes to dino documentaries.
that’s just, wow
a gold standard
probably too high
but like dawg
it has the same amount of stock noises as my own animations
from a mega doc
bruh
I mean even if we ignore prehistoric planet being a thing, dinosaur revolution and dinosaur planet have the same storytelling style as wwd 2025 and both did a much better job, visually the models in both of those series are obviously not as good, but the animation itself is a lot better in those 2, the stories are much more cohesive, and the paleontologist segments actually help the viewer understand what is happening on screen better
It doesn’t even have to be prehistoric planet tbh look at how much better the dinosaurs moved here and don’t tell me whatever this company is has more money than bbc lol
This was in 2013 as well.
Also for some reason diplocaulus is in the spinosaurus episode? 150 million years time travel
I think the community has collectively forgotten every documentary before Prehistoric Planet because there are a few documentaries that are the same quality or better (visually) 🥀
Visually I don't think there's any in terms of quality
Yeah prehistoric planet is the best but there is a lot of different companies that have done way better with a lot less than bbc
@Don_Elladio @ddinodan you are wrong and are punching down on good paleomedia projects Expect more bad movies like jurassic world thanks to you.
The more I learn about dinosaurs the more I dislike the jurassic world franchise. Jurassic park gets a pass since we didn't know that much about dinosaurs back then.
My glorious kings...
Jurassic world ruined the giga and purposely made it look more evil and then killed it for no good reason.
“The reason was in the lore bro!!”
I haven’t seen anyone mention it yet but they only released it in the uk, so if reviews from the uk are bad they’re probably going to lower the amount of average people viewing it everywhere else
I mean...people have been watching it through very legal means so...
Everything tbh
VPN has already been cancelled 6 days before free trial ends
This is one of my favourite Dino movies that has ever been released I will die on this hill
The guardian already released a review of it https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2025/may/25/walking-with-dinosaurs-review-bbc-revival
that sounds like a pig being slaughtered, lmao 😂
talk about low budget, lol
Damn they came in swinging 🤣
Oh hey. This guy has been in my comment section twice before telling me that my velociraptor I drew is actually a pyroraptor because it’s red and Jurassic world confirmed it to be red (he then deleted this comment) then he saw the same drawing In another video and said it was a skinny Utahraptor lol. I really wonder, where do these people get this information from?
I pointed out the difference in skulls, arms, and general anatomy of the two dinosaurs and he did not believe me for a second
JP is just bad
they need to hire actual paleontologist, fr
Velocipastor is peak Paleo-Accurate
Not necessarily because Jurassic park isn’t suppose to be paleo accurate
do anyone here needs a job, sure you can do better than the JW pros, lol
well the original was making an effort to be if you want to split hairs, up until jw they actually tried after that they didn’t
i crave for just a dino movie franchise with the jurassic park budget but the actual story realism of something like, lets say, game of thrones 🔥
Nah it cannot have a big budget, it’s just gonna be another poorly made documentary.
ddinodan is officially bigger than the BBC
One came out in 2000 one came out in 2025….
The only good thing WWD25 does better than PhP is storytelling, but because PhP has no story :u
The CGI feels like someone with a green screen doing some quick YouTube animation for a B series film
Out of the current roster, spino has the best textures, because the rest of em (I like trike frill and overall shape, but the jugal horn kills me) are kinda meh
Even then, in both Spanish and English, the script is quite bland
I think we all wanted wwd2 to be great but we can all agree this is anything but great
i animate better then that
What dinosaur is this
freddy fazbearsaurus
You overestimate your skills I think
udanoceratops is a underrated paleontology topic
Hello there. As per this channel's guidelines.
You may NOT discuss or post:
- Memes,
This is an educational channel and not the place for trolling or memes as this may be disruptive or misleading.,- Plots, actors, directors, mechanics, gameplay etc. of ANY media or game.,
Such as how you feel a movie’s, etc. plot should be changed instead of, for example, how the dinosaurs didn’t coexist,- Future dinosaur related media and your hopes or aspirations for said media, rather than dinosaur accuracy etc.,
- Fictional creatures such as Kong, Godzilla or anything that is not a dinosaur or prehistoric creature.
Please refer to the channel guidelines in it's pinned messages.
what would udanoceratops bite be compareable to irl?
CaseOh
i think a hyena's
really?
hey I'm almost through episode 3 and so far I think ep 1 is just really really bad lol
Episode 2 had a better story but all the issues are vibrant in it.
So it's a Nothing Burger then? well and truly?
What a shame.
I just finished ep 3 and ngl it was a little cartoony awesomebro
It’s okay I know what will deliver , surviving earth!
fr
I still hate that they're using prince creek of all formations for the K-Pg episode (PC wasn't even maastrichtian) though
Where do you guys watch the new WWD? It says its only available in UK
Isn’t prince creek campanian
apparently not
And forgotten bloodlines
I really wish they just gave it a different name...
If it didn't have the WWD IP on its shoulders it would have performed fine
In isolation I think its fine, but they just had to give it that name
thats coming out this year?
Yup
trex actually averaged 20+ tons and they all had a phd in psychology so they could kill their prey with facts
Please, we all know they had a PHD in earth sciencies
name something BETTER then this https://x.com/VanZe85/status/1748200319341756597
Oh this reminds me of an idea I had.
Igaunadons thumbs as venomous spurs like a platypus
How would y’all say this Rex is with accuracy?
I'll put it this way. I can tell it's a tyrannosaur, but I wouldn't immediately guess it's a rex
Is it the horns? I make them big lol
That's part of it. I'll draw
Ones with the blue dot, they don't get big at all. It didn't really have lacrimal crests the same way as other tyrannosaurids where they are upraised. Ones with the red dot bosses/horns, excessively huge. But you make them big and it's stylized so that's whatever. No biggy. The ones with the yellow dot, those don't exist. Has more horns than it should
Aletopelta is bizzarre, like would you believe me if I told you this is from the Campanian? (Ignore the feet I made them too small lmao)
Using the skull of Dan's scotty skelly to show what I mean further, with corresponding dots. You see the lacrimal doesn't really get large or stand up prominently like you see in others like the albertosaurines. Just kinda lays its way into the post-orbital boss. On that note, you have the post orbital right above the eye, which it should kind of be more behind it in a way. But also in the art, it's huge anyway so idk how much of a difference that would make
may i ask why its so weird? /gen
The yellow ones aren’t as much horns as they are a keratinous ridge that accidentally turned into horns at some point when I was drawing lol, think of those three as more of a connected ridge that has keratin horns that don’t really have any bone core associated with them
Yeah Tyrannosaurus doesn't really have that lol. No tyrannosaur would I don't think
Eye rings maybe, but the art doesn't look like what it would be like
It’s a Campanian ankylosaur whose closest relatives are all from the Early Cretaceous
thats a ankylosaur? wheres the club??
That’s from the campanian?
Yep
Exactly, that's how basal it is lmao, like just above Gastonia
English or Spanish ahh blud💀💀💀💀💀
@fluid inlet Def picking this up ASAP, it's only $22, cheaper than Saurolophus lmao
How much?
$22
What’s the price?
Wow, for a sauropod??
Yep, and not a small one either
Not bad
That’s pretty solid , 22$ wow.
What's the price?
I yearn for hell creek paleoart that includes the small fauna
Read bro.
accuracy on the scales/keratin/horns of this rex?
Seems good, although I don't think we think rex had a jugal horn anymore because of the Exoparia.
So the way that the flesh on the exoparia would've been formed wouldn't have allowed for a keratinous horn?
@zealous ravine
bro, can you dm me the actual link of whatever the hell you are seeing that offer? 🙏
Hey! Does anyone know what the term 'Oxbridge' means when describing a university that isn't Oxford or Cambridge?
I was told by someone that the University of Bristol is a good choice of university for an undergraduate course in Palaeontology on the grounds that it looks 'semi-oxbridge' and I have no idea what that means.
Wouldn’t that just mean it looks professional and high regarded despite not being as prestigious as Oxford and Cambridge
How would the mouth look closed?
I couldn't find an image, but I assume the mouth line wouldn't extend beyond the eye
how accurate is Saurian Target's Rex?
https://youtu.be/forQjq4n060?si=dyII3KAo_NgYBIBE
Walking with Dinosaurs style guide: https://dinomikemak.weebly.com/paleo-publications.html
Realistic T.rex mod featured in this video: https://www.moddb.com/games/carnivores-2/addons/realistic-tyrannosaurus-mod
Old Videos Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLP43EDCE-r7uV7_MKGRJVGnRSP3uUxD9k
Tweet me on Twitter!: https://twitter.c...
can't believe im coming in here and asking this, but is that 2005 paper regarding giga only being able to hunt juveniles any sort of correct?
oxbridge is the name for oxford and cambridge
they are the most reputed unis in the UK
bristol is in the Russel group, which is also seen as the most prestigious group of UK unis, which is probably why he said that
its also quite high in the rankings, and is probably one of the top unis for paleontology in the uk
Would any dromeosaurs have crest on their head
I don’t think so
Not really no, a Carcharodontosaurid could very feasibly hunt a sauropod twice its size or even a little more, imo. A lot of extant predators hunt things much bigger than them including Komodo dragons which have similar dentition (as well as proportionally smaller skulls and much weaker bites than carcharodontosaurids).
The 20-ton Andesaurus would not be safe from an adult Giganotosaurus even as an adult.
Juveniles only would apply to things like whatever the undescribed argentinosaurus sized titanosaur from candeleros is. At least for a solo hunt, because obviously no terrestrial predator is taking on a 60+ ton colossus and winning unless it’s like 1/1,000,000 and the stars align or smth.
Damn I was free drawing and ending up drawing what looks to be a dromeosaur but with a crest, oh well I’m going to keep it
I think “crests” made out of feathers could work
Like pt utah brow feathers
Can you show me an example
That wouldn’t be bad actually
Af
it is not, gigas most likely hunted big pray but of course could eat small snacks here and there
they also used to say that trex was only a scavenger, but now trex are known to have been great hunters
The whole Tyrannosaurus was a scavenger bit barely had any actual scientific backing. All it was really good for was ragebait articles on how "T.rex actually sucked, your childhood is a lie!!!!", and wasting a bunch of Paleontologists time with refuting this bogus claim.
Not to mention how Big Jack Horner eventually claimed that it was a "Social Study" on how people in paleontology grasp onto new things too easily.
If that was the case, he wouldn't have been pushing it as hard as he did and even devote entire talks about it.
Legit reason or not, he wasted a bunch of poor workers time on disputing a claim that was pretty obviously false and nonsensical.
My favorite bit is when the paper from a year or two ago proposed that all theropods except T. rex were scavengers
With T. rex being the only active hunter
because the optimal form of a obligate scavenging animal is a 5 ton+ animal with adaptations perfectly suited for hunting prey.
Or like the paper that tried to propose that allosaurus was an exclusive sauropod scavenger, as if the Late Jurassic was just the Rotten vail from Monster Hunter...
Good lord.
Jack Horner(56) when you tell him marrying his 19 yr old student is bad:
POV: You are a uni student and meet Jack Horner (age gap is 65 mya)
I refuse
is this true? https://x.com/Peak4651/status/1926964475942363610
Yeah, like this new sauropod phylogeny has odd things in it, but, imo, its taxon sampling in that region of the tree is still quite poor. This critter looks to me a bit more basal if you were to sample most non-neosauropods, but we'll see. For now, its nice to have a pretty nice new sauropod
oh idc no more i thought it was cetiosaurus not cetiosauriscus
What? You asked for accuracy 😭
I know but the scales themselves are good right?
Yeah, I quite like the larger facial scales, and the general shape of them look naturalistic.
it's pretty cool
Yep
Jack Horner likes his wife like how he likes his dracorex 
In a world ruled by giants, even the fiercest predators find their match. Watch as a T.rex and fully-grown Triceratops face off in a brutal standoff that shakes the earth.
Subscribe: http://bit.ly/BBCEarthSub
#WalkingWithDinosaurs #TRex #Triceratops
Watch more:
Best of BBC Earth 🌍 https://bit.ly/BestOfBBCEarth
Best Animal Fights 🥊 ht...
okay perhaps I judged WWD 2025 too harshly
https://youtu.be/m7zgC5gEfXQ?si=MY20ZolhP_od0zK4
The Spinosaurus and the animation doesn't look the worst
Disturbing a Spinosaurus' sleep is a dangerous move – unless you're his family. Even the fiercest giants show a softer side when it comes to their young.
Subscribe: http://bit.ly/BBCEarthSub
#Spinosaurus #WalkingWithDinosaurs #Dinosaurs
Watch more:
Best of BBC Earth 🌍 https://bit.ly/BestOfBBCEarth
Best Animal Fights 🥊 https://bit.l...
You’re joking right
path of titans gameplay footage:
Giganto started
fr, also wasn't the blood flushed frill hypothesis abandoned?
Saw this and it really does make me feel how some ceratopsians can be seen as like a prehistoric bison.
"nechies"
Do u spaek anglaish
wi may never know
Do you know the best websites or YouTube channels about dinosaurs and paleontology? I've tried looking everywhere and can't find a good one.
0:00 Acrocanthosaurus
0:04 Albertosaurus
0:11 Allosaurus
0:18 Ankylosaurus
0:23 Brachiosaurus
0:40 Camarasaurus
0:50 Carcharodontosaurus
1:02 Ceratosaurus
1:12 Corythosaurus
1:17 Dilophosaurus
1:23 Dryosaurus
1:25 Edmontosaurus
1:31 Gallimimus
1:35 Homalochepale
1:38 Kentrosaurus
1:44 Ouranosaurus
1:49 Pachycephalosaurus
1:56 Parasaurolophus
2:...
It really is as bad as people say
where do i watch it
VPN
I HAVE A VPN WHAT WEBSITE
Go to google and put bbc iplayer
how powerful would iguanodons thumb jabs have been?
as powerful as being stabbed with a 30cm traffic spike
I eat that
what about against similarly sized opponents?
ngl it looks cool
The Spinosaurus is so far the best looking one. I do have hope for the Utahraptor too
o w ??
What are your thoughts @hardy sentinel considering I think you enjoy ceratopsians
They are cool
I can 100% see the Bison simularities here, but a better Bison-like ceratopsian would be Pachyrhinosaurus simply because of behavior
Oh yes, and Pachyrhinosaurus is my favorite ceratopsian species!
Which species of Pachyrhinosaurus? I like Lakustai the most
Ok so after watching the video, I really do believe Tyrannosaurids, including Rex, avoided big ceratopsians like Triceratops at all costs due to the severe threat they impose on predators. The only time I can see a Tyrannosaurus Rex going after a Triceratops is if there are two Rexes or the Triceratops is vulnerable by either age or an injury.
a Rex would probably just avoid a Triceratops face on, but ambushes are pretty likely to be successful. It was either down to a giant Hadrosaur which could pound a Rex's throat in, a walking sword and shield with a temper, or a tank.
I’m the same actually; P. Lakustai is a first favorite followed up with P. Canadensis.
could a peak human beat the yellow cerato? (pretty sure this is AvA but im still risking it)
I imagine ambushes still carried risks though and had more secured successes without serious injury if there were Rex pairs.
If no weapons or armour then i'd say no
well if the human has a decent weapon like a shotgun, p sure they'll win
Rexes would NEED to hunt in pairs for basically all of hell creek fauna by that logic, you underestimate how powerful a car crushing bite is
what about like a guy with a doomslayer build AND mentality?
not even an Argentinosaurus would survive that
The peak human whenever the tiny Cerato jumps forward, rips his arm off and swallows it in front of him
Wait you are the blue gorilla guy
alright, i got my answer
Anyways, Rexes could most likely take down an adult Triceratops one on one but fights were 50/50
Rexes shouldn't be underestimated, and by your logic everything in the hell creek bigger than a Denversaurus, Dakotaraptor, or Pachy would need two Rexes to kill
(also keep in mind that T. rex lived with Triceratops prorsus, not horridus so fights would be easier than what you would expect from the bigger species)
Not in the slightest
no i'm Carnivores Trophy Room
But wasnt your old profile picture that blue gorilla
what would that Edmonto COULD do? 😭
bro think he's on the team
I just finished the last ep of WWD
honestly I already had low expectations but what a letdown man. Ep 4 was decent but the entire rest of it (especially 1 and 6) are so numbingly boring, and ep 3 is weirdly awesomebro at times
This is true. If i recall correctly, the critically acclaimed Prehistoric Planet implies two T. rexes would be required to hunt an adult edmontosaurus.
I’m not saying TRex wasn’t impressive as a predator as they definitely were, but I think how they fought is similar to how modern apex predators try to overcome challenges today. Lions for example are very impressive powerful predators known to taking on African elephants if needing to, but there’s always a lot of risk involved with any of their primary prey; zebras can break a bone with a kick, Cape buffalo can gore/break bones/or crush by impact, and there’s always instances of lions getting serious injuries or losing a member while hunting big herbivores because of how violent the process is. So when there’s discussion involved with Tyrannosaurus Rex vs big herbivores I think in the same perceptions that those apex carnivores still had to deal with a lot of risk even if an ambush took off well just because of how powerful and aggressive herbivores can get in a fight or flight situation.
I agree, but I 100% think that a Triceratops p could be taken on 1v1 against a Rex
clearly, as prehistoric planet is the scientific accuracy gospel
lest we forget the edmontosaurus is as big as t. rex - and twice as fast
Yeah, but the difference between modern lions and tyrannosaurus is that tyrannosaurus was bigger than most of it's prey. It would be like a Grizzly Bear vs an Elk instead of a Lion vs a Zebra
Ankylosaurus and Edmontosaurus would 100% whoop a lone Rex though
also ||rose's BF dies from a very light edmontosaurus trampling
||
As a result, all titanosaurs from then on MUST have a display feature on the neck / head
i think a teenage albertosaurus getting fatally steamrolled by an edmontosaurus isnt necessarily that stupid but with how its animated it doesnt really give off the impression of instant death
also there is an inexplicable diplocaulus in ep 2????
Lucky, yall Europeans got WWD a month earlier than us Americans. I gotta wait until someone pirates it now
I think it releases sometime in July for us
oh I ain't European
also yeah that's what I'm saying. ||The edmont gives a very light fall over the Albert and he's just dead like that||
how did you get it early then??
While that’s true, Tyrannosaurus was generally taller then it’s preferred prey, I still have to keep in mind that Triceratops had two very pronounced goring horns and even a good hit in a non-lethal area on a Tyrannosaurus Rex is still a devastating blow that would pose some hesitation from a predator. These are just my thoughts though.
DMs
Hence why most bites we find on Triceratops are from behind, indicating ambushes. We also find a lot of them healed.
I ain't saying Triceratops was weak, I'm saying it didn't take two adult Tyrannosaurus to kill an adult Triceratops, just one adult who was probably decently skilled
Bro pirating
Sorry to ask but can u tell me too?
I wasn't waiting another month. The show isn't even good anyways
by the sixth episode I was waiting for it to be over
Shows not good? Has to be blasphemy
the only decent episode is 4 about albertosaurus, but even it is stupid at times
How come?
How was the utah episode?
What I find funny is that WWD 2 got less funding than Prehistoric Planet despite
-
being a pre-existing show that did good
-
Having a pre-existing fanbase who will watch it for nastolgia
check your dms real quick
funnily enough, most of the show is boring but utah episode dips its toes into awesomebro territory
who knew a giant bird lizard who hunts with stealth and speed would be awesome
no I mean ||the pack coordinates an attack to topple and kill, starts eating a gastonia, and the leader literally immediately starts closing in on the protagonist gastonia anyways||
but but you see there is a video of a leopard catching a duckling and going for another and letting both go because it wanted to be a awesomebro therefor valid!!!!
bruh
I SAID WWD2 would be bad and nobody believed me until the last few days before release when we got clips
probably the oldies who grew up with peak for it's time now gotta deal with ahh for their time
it's so sad, I love prehistoric planet, but for more narrative docus in the style of the original WWD there are no good modern ones 
also ep 6 is genuinely baffling. ||There are only TWO living animals in the entire episode, + an anonymous pliosaur carcass and... jurassic azhdarchids
because the show is just that lazy||
gang 💔
they acknowledged this as intentional even before release. They decided to reference what was previously probably the worst thing in the franchise, rather than the original
but I would genuinely say I enjoy WWD the movie more than WWD2 🥀, tbf though I enjoy WWD the movie more than most
WWD the movie is only enjoyable on mute or in the documentary version
that is a statement of nightmarish implications
especially if its true on quality
hearing that about ep 6 genuinely guts me
||I hope this stupid infant trike dies considering her fossil is literally found at the start of the episode||
it's especially sad considering it's the ONLY jurassic episode
I was so hyped to see like allosaurus or dacentrurus or something
||and no, funnily enough, the baby trike is one of the few dinosaurs who don't die at the end of their episode. All of them are found at the start of their episodes.||
I hope WWD locks in and releases a remake of Ballad of Big Al
So a DEAD BABY is found at the start and DOESN'T DIE?
they'd probably make it bad, ugly, poorly animated, boring, and there would be half as many animals that appear on screen. And there would be a random quetzalcoatlus in the background 💀
and no, some of the episodes just end with everybody wondering like "huhh well it must've died eventually but who knows"
shoulda hit her with the
another oversight I noticed is like, not only do barely any animals appear on screen in most episodes, there are like next to no small animals outside of some dragonflies and diplocaulus(????) in ep 2
I hate how the documentary is switching between the dinos and the fossil, like at least for the episode i'm on the paleontologists are adding NOTHING
that is truly the biggest blunder of them all to me. Originally I was hoping for something kind of like dinosaur planet but istg in WWD2 each segment doesn't go for more than like 4 minutes at a time at most. Sometimes nothing even happens in the dinosaur segment.
Bro
also gorgosaurus appear in ep 5 and they are literally completely unedited from the albertosaurus. I kid you not they look exactly the same
That is literally the most WWD thing to do
Prehistoric Planet had random unnamed Troodontids and gave them unique models
Walking With Dinosaurs shoulda gotten MORE funding considering it's an already reliable form of income for BBC considering it absolutely popped off in the late 90s and early 2000s and so they already have a viewbase with kids, that's automatically more money for them
pretty much
though at least in the original they tried to make them a little different
alright what nono word did you use
They couldn’t have changed the gorgo model?
Idk what it looks like so ima take your word
apparently it was just a last minute script change, the people working on the episode had been calling it alberto but they changed the name to gorgo at the last minute, so they had no time to make them look different
This footstep makes me mad it's too loud, like did the WWD team even do research on dinosaurs? Dinosaur information is more accurate on dinosaur tiktok bruh
Ngl the WWD 3d movie had better cgi
What was the most accurate thing of wwd2?
I honestly think this is fair given it seems to be planting it foot in more than just a basic walking step. What IS stupid about this scene is how the rex sneaks up on a supposedly attentive mother infernodrakon across several feet of open land
They even mention it's feet made very little noise WHILE IT MAKES LOUD NOISE
A wild animal would pick up on that loud of noise easily, and would listen better considering it lives in the second most dangerous formation in north america EVER (Morrison first obviously)
in the rest of the scene it's waaaay too quiet, like, black panther levels 
Erm black panthers aren’t exactly real they are just names for melanistic specimens of the panthera genus
technically ffarter's statement is not wrong, since most Pantherans hunt at night, a melanistic pantheran is still stealthy
eerrrrm I meant the superhero because that's how bad it is
Yeah but I didn’t say they weren’t
Black Panthers do exist, but it is just a wider scope than most people think
I some unironic musth posting earlier, I am afraid.
A decent amount of what the actual paleontologists are saying (based off of just 15 minutes into the first episode) is the most accurate
Judging by the random highly complete fossils they are finding above ground though does 100% make me think that all these fossils are planted just for the episode, like a nearly complete Triceratops brow horn just sitting on some gravel
a lot of the models are very good even if the cgi can look very bad at times
the albertosaurus is probably the best one I've ever seen but the edmontosaurus is... so bad
I reckon the T. rex model is a bit too skinny, but we might just be looking at the "gracile" morph
wdym it looks fine to me
i'll get a screenshot when it shows more than just the head
Is it just me or does the new WWD trex kind of have "different" lips?
WWD Rex seems skinny, Hank is a nice bulky boi tho
I would accept the idea that the WWD Rex is the skinnier morph though, if that hypothesis still does hold up
that's not a very good shot. Been looking for some online myself but no wonder people aren't sharing screenshots of this show
it's definitely within the range of acceptable soft tissue
anyways why is an 8+ ton predator focusing on a dog sized baby trike?? I feel like the carnivores are acting more like villans than animals here
I mean it'd be easier than an adult
Yeah but it would be like you running a marathon and eating only a chicken nugget. Wasted energy an animal could not afford to lose
yeah tbh it chases clover a good bit
the amount it chases Clover could make you assume that it didn't eat since that Pterosaur, so it's basically slowly starving to death and going after prey it never catches
This Rex is the definition of insane
pretty much
I think people are just coping by saying this show is good
what ep are you on?
the first still, pausing it every time I see something stupid
oh nvm then I thought you had gotten to like ep 4 or 5 or something. In this case I'm excited to hear the rest of your thoughts
WHY DOES IT HAVE A CREST?
It's not even a fleshly waddle, that is straight up a skin covered SOLID crest, on ANNECTENS
animals do weird things. if thing look chaseable, it chase
I mean it is still possible annectens had a crest iirc
and I don't think the crest on regalis is completely analogous to a chicken's. So this may be how it would look, but I'm not entirely sure
the crest on regalis is more similar to a chicken's comb than to a lambeosaurine crest/sagittal crest. They straight up gave this mf a sagittal crest
not for an animal as expensively living and slow as t rex I'd assume
nature is no stranger to doing things detrimental. play is also energy exerting and animals do it
Polars Bears don't chase things for the sake of chasing, they save their energy. You don't see a Polar Bear chasing down an Arctic fox when it could be waiting at a breath hole for a seal
Because that’s what animals do, they target the young and sick. it’s also more than enough nutrition