#paleontology
1 messages · Page 166 of 1
alr thanks
The specimens below don’t represent the largest
Yes, I just wanted to be sure of this species xD
@wind prairie if you look at the blue circle you can see the individual digits, the red circle is the damaged foot where the large single nail myth came from
We do not care about microraptor lil bro https://x.com/tm9380/status/1922674798536036772?s=46
Chicago?!
housed in chicago, not found in chicago
Makes WAY more sense lol
What should I change about this tyrannosaurus head?
Isn't that term kinda a very mammalian one?
maybe make the nasal ridges a bit taller
Okay thank you
where is the raised claw in that art
Proportions/size are off by a bit (peak drawing tho)
WHY ARE ARCHELONS FINS SO BIG
Also his last version megalodon was hilarious
Wait why do we discuss livyatan vs megalodon if theres such a big size difference
megalodon when the pod of livys pull up:
Livyatan used to live in pods?
Where is the skeletal for megalodon 🤓
Paraheli just standing there without skel 
dont almost all toothed whales live in pods?
Replacing heli with creto is better, because right now it is so difficult that I cannot see this chainsaw fraud.
Doesn’t mean that extinct species of toothed whales did
a couple beaked whales might be solitary but most of them do yeah
why would livy be any different? is there a chance it was solitary? yeah but you can make a pretty good assumption that yeah, it did live in pods
Difficult to say given that we don’t have a pure picture of the environment.
It isn’t a safe assumption. Why do most Candiae have wildly different hunting and social patterns? Same thing with Large cats for example.
??? how isnt it a safe assumption? the reason most candiae have wildly different hunting and social pattern is because...uhm i dont know, im a sauropod person
nah meg is fine,just huge teeth are enough for us and it is very difficult to find a complete skeleton, and moreover on cetaceans we have found traces of meg🤓
So plump
500 tons
The point about Candiae is that even within the same family you will have wildly different evolutionary behaviors. And if you have that variation at the genus level. You can not simply assume that it’s “it’s a tooth whale so it’ll act like other toothed whales”
I think that says 50 tons
No skeletal only teeth 🦷 it must be British megalodon
Giant bite marks on whale bones and fossilized teeth found near cetacean carcasses support these hypotheses. Megalodon had an estimated bite force of over 18-20 tons, capable of crushing massive bones.
besides ( potentially ) beaked whales, why would livy be any different?
Name every sauropod
amargasaurus
brachiosaurus
Diplodocus
zby
magaryosaurus
miragaia
trex
susie
Do you guys think sauropods could swing their necks like giraffes do?
No, their skulls would be damaged
light amounts for most sure( but that goes for any necky boi)
doubt many would've went as hard as giraffes do seeing they got gear literally built for it like ossicles
Giraffe necks are specialized for such kind of movement, don’t think any sauropod has similar
no way
Its crazy to think that water buffalo has longer horns than triceratops
I've grown to love the air sacs of that Dreadnoughtus
Is there any evidence for it or is it pure speculation?
No
And also no to the air sacs, pure pure evil speculation
why evil?
the "air sacs" sauropods had were most likely internal only
FRANOYS GALEMOPUS
Ok thanks
Rhymes with grug
His head gets fried
Its brain is at the center of the lightning strike, it's dead
What about humans? Or have lighting strikes not hit the head?
I can only assume it's because we're so low to the ground meaning the lightning has less time to travel through your body and nuke your internal organs
Oh ok 👍
We should strike elephants with lightning to test this hypothesis
What about giraffes since their the closest thing to sauropods kinda
Im taller
EOCARCHANIA GOT TURNED INTO A SPINOSAURID? https://x.com/TwitiGalli/status/1922583033443496255
single eyebrow ( ? ) bone can literally be anything
Wait one of my teachers put this picture in OneNote lol
That's why it's SOFUNNY
"Those circles could be anything, boss!"
"to hell with it!!! make it a spinosaurid to annoy the spinosaurus guys!"
- quill
is there any reaosn why they chose spinosaurid spefically?
Yea because they are the best dinosaurs
But air isnt black
Damn Echoes of extinction is cooked they just dropped this today with their new eocharcha model
what5s echoes of extinction...
Another quirky "Isle of Titans Bermuda Survival Simulator 9000"
okay but this one has CAVEMAN
And cool Dino models!!!
If they actually care, just call it Shaochilong
First depiction in media ever and definitely a carcharodontosaurid
nah they don't like making changes in that community
Impossible...who could've guessed...
Isn’t laten invalid and path of titans did nothing with that lol
how deadly is a sauropods fart
Cau’s new paper suggested that the holotype Eocarch frontal was a spinosaur while the referred maxilla was a carch, but who knows if that’s gonna hold up
Difference between "invalid" and "completely different family of dinosaurs"
But as Dilo said, we're waiting to see if further analysis agrees
The change just happen so why are you assuming they just going to stick with it. Need for them to respond first. 🤣
is it true troodon came back or nah?
So this is still perfectly valid for now, a proposal by a single paper doesnt automatically become the truth (damn you beat me to it, I hate this slowmode)
It’s a bad gameplan to make dinosaurs for your game off such little material anyways. I was unfamiliar with it and didn’t realize that there was hardly anything to it.
Perhaps the Yutyrannus should be showcased instead
I feel sorry for anyone who models a dino for a game and decides to try and keep it accurate, unless that dino is something like rex where we aren't likely to ever really change what it looks like
nano for sure
david peters is my FAVORITE totally legitimate paleo artist
Do we have eny skin impressions of tyrannosaurus rex face or lips?
Honestly irl Dilo is way cooler than JP Dilo, from little scavenger with a frill to one of the largest theropods of its time, apex predator of its environment
Look at this badass
Also had some of the most flexible wrists of any theropods, possibly to withstand the forces of holding struggling prey.
lol
tbh while I do agree, when people say this it feels like copium
because if we knew IRL dilo had a frill and poison it'd easily be one of the most unique dinosaurs
Do we have any direct evidence of Ceratopsians raising their young? Like ik we found Pachyrhinosaurus herds but did those herds only contain adult/near adult specimens or specimens of all ages?
Honestly irl dilo is way cooler, and since it’s a real animal it’s cooler in my book at least lol
Morrison Titan of USA. Fascinating Icon.
I'm down with ignoring Maraapunisaurus
It’s relevant to say that 40t is way too low for that specimen iirc, it’s more like 49t I think
Yup. I think it's 49.8T, 50T if we round it off. Some individual might reach higher
That’s the only bone that supports 22 tons but there’s plenty of other material
Granted the bone is amphicoelias'd (destroyed + last seen 19th century plz return to owner) so bro's not very sturdy
May i ask what material and how big
Put that amarature in front
why's this doesn't surprised me lol
Not at all plausible
Now, this is some cool speculation, and its plausibility is uncertain.
There is modern birds with long tongues like this, sort of like woodpeckers, and if you do keep the tongue I suggest you base it off of that
Why would you base it on a woodpecker
That's what speculation is for, I was adding an example.
Not at all what speculation is for
As well as the fact large tongues leave osteological evidence (afaik the most common one being an enlarged hyoid)
Ok that's true, we'd need evidence, but it's still cool to see in my eyes.
Perhaps Stego wishes to elaborate on this 
Stego infact, did not elaborate on it
I've seen portrayals of thyreophorans with long tongues, does that hold any water?
-
Woodpecker skulls are made to specifically have their tongue wrap around their heads
-
Even without complete skulls, therizinosaurs heads lack any treats that require this
So wouldn't it make sense that it only happened once in the 4 billion years a habitable earth has been around and never since? Maybe there are factors we cannot recreate as the earth has been around that long and has significantly changed since the first life assembled itself
If it's so astronomically unlikely to have even happened then it makes sense that it has happened once in the billions of years earth had been habitable
Interestingly it’s thought that viruses could have played an important role in early evolution, they have been known to inadvertently transfer dna from one organism to another and this could have helped with rapid diversification in the early days of life
but it is a HUGE factor. Time needed when the assembly of such is unlikely to happen in the first place
From there you can evolve into countless forms, given enough time
And do you know just how complex DNA is?
honestly just, to me, animals look like each other and I find it hard to believe they were just created independently. Then also why do whales, and other secondarily aquatic tetrapods, still have fingers in their flippers? Also considering the flawed functions in the bodies of many animals, idk man.
I mean look at an elk and a moose, and you think they had nothing to do with each other?
It’s really simple at its core, just a couple proteins fused together, and RNA, which is thought to come first, is even simpler. Given 2+ billion years of constant chemical reactions I think it’s more than likely it could arise by chance at least once.
and there's the rabbit hole of transitional forms, there is literally a flounder with an eye on top of its forehead. If that's not proof idk what is
With newer interpretations of creationism they see stuff as coming from a common ancestor of a "kind", with an original one being made and then diversifying after the ark landed
So like there would be a horse kind, deer kind, cat kind, etc but not a common ancestor between them
It makes little sense to me because at that point they are just using evolution but ignoring the part where they ALL had a common ancestor
I am aware
they can't even define what a "kind" is as it constantly changes to them. They basically just want to explain evolution into a way that makes sense with that belief. They'd say like, zebras didn't exist originally, but diversified from an original equus base
Yeah creationism had its place before science was really a thing but nowadays every single piece of evidence says that it’s wrong. The only reason it’s still alive is charlatans like Ken Hamm using it to manipulate people into giving them money sadly.
As we are in a scientific chat, please use an actual rebuttal and not just denying claims straight up, makes you seem unreliable as someone to debate with (seeing as this is both a scientific debate and scientific conversation chat)
what would have the stronger bite
archelon or udanoceratops?
also if extinct things from the fossil record coexisted with humans, wouldn't we find evidence for that?
(idk, paintings of dinosaurs, saddles, etc.)
Well given the gases used almost certainly weren’t the same ones present in early earth’s atmosphere then I don’t think that much matters.
The truth is that life arose abiotically, we know that, and I’m sorry you seem to be so caught up in misinformation that you can’t see it but nothing you say will change the fact that this is the truth
That’s literally what nature does, like to a T, nature creates more nature. Animals create more animals, plants create more plants, don’t tell me you’re gonna deny reproduction next.
??
First time sm not dinosaur convo in POT lol
why dosent the big ism eat the smaller ism
Perhaps the wonder of the natural world will never cease to amaze us
A channel reminder:
Please view pinned messages for appropriate paleo-chat topics.
This channel is for educational purposes. All conversations in this channel must be associated with paleontological discoveries, scientific news, and depictions of prehistoric creatures in media in relation to paleontology.
As per #rules 11, this is not the place to discuss politics or religion. We recommend all off-topic conversations be directed to DM's or another server entirely.
May I ask why we don't have a general science chat? Yes, PoT is a game based in extinct animals, but there is clearly a desire by the people who use this channel to talk about other disciplines and subjects beyond paleontology.
But in this case we were talking about scientific news that happened to include religion, why have rules that contradict each other? Using this chat to educate is a thing we are doing. While some messages have gone more into the religious side we were debunking misinformation that the poster of the message was sending.
Where is the line exactly drawn between someone sending misinformation which includes a religious base that we have to debunk and someone talking about religion?
If you have any questions or concerns regarding our moderation or server rules please DM @feral crane or contact our support team directly here: https://alderon.games/support
Who wins 2 Velociraptor Mongoliensis or a healthy Protoceratops
Would the protoceratops be a female or male?
Doesn't matter, we don't know if they even had size dimorphism between genders
I I think a protoceratops could win if it was cautious enough of both of the raptors.
I reckon the raptors would win if they know where to strike, which we know they did with the famous fighting dinosaurs fossil
I would give it to protoceratops honestly, though it would obviously depend on a lot of factors, I don’t think people realize quite how big a size difference between the two there is.
May I see the size difference? I always thought they were more or less the same ngl
They are similar in height, but a Protoceratops outweighs a Velociraptor by a lot
Adasaurus would have a better chance but it’s Nemegt, not Djadochta
Kinda like a turkey/goose with a long tail, teeth, and claws fighting a wild boar
That fossil always looked to me like the raptor just happened to strike there because that’s where it could reach, and it could only reach that cause the Proto had its arm in its mouth lol
Shoulda used Adasaurus in prehistoric planet instead of Velociraptor which went extinct 5+ million years before PP took place
Well the timing of Nemegt and Djadochta is kinda uncertain, it’s been suggested they actually could have taken place at the same time, in which case PhP would be decently accurate
Adasaurus would still be more entertaining, bigger raptor and then we could see an actual raptor hunt that aren't just opportunistic or failures
hi,What size do orcas make in the game?
Most likely based size wise on the Antarctic Orca ecotype
so small species is 7 m and orca ecotype is 9 meters..alr thanks🫡
I think one velociraptor could do it, you underestimate it
Fossil evidence claims that it was a draw in a 1v1
Is it just me or is that orca's head just ever so slightly too small
In fact, there are several species of orcas that are robust, slender, with most different attributes and patterne
They like me fr fr?
Who wins Tyrannosaurus Rex or Tyrannosaurus Rex with a 9mm
with gun
How would he aim and pull the trigger?
🤣
not fair, its a boosted mirror match, give the other rex a spear
evil
Whos win this scenario
100 men vs a Tyrannosaurus Rex
The men have one week to kill it and a forest the size of a small town that they can use to make weapons
Men
They all have crazy differences, especially in terms of their heads.
3 15 ton Deinosuchus would just cannibalism
love how deino and sauro are oversized
Fadeno's legacy is strong
does the head look fine? ignoring the tongue
freaky ass bird
why is horridus, deinoS and sauroposeidon all oversized
Because this is about 2 years outdated + the maker probably forgor horridus size
Is the one in the top right also a spino? Looks different
it's the angle
Is the new bars smaller than the old one ? and those it make it more accurate to the real thing ?
can i say pachyrhino is the second most popular ceratopsian?
i remember when you people JUMPED me because i said halkzaraptor raptor lived on hateg island because i thought it was hategraptor
people get jumped for being wrong here it happens to everyone
why did i have beef with ariana grande
maybe she likes beef
lowkey why was i so mean back then
wouldn't you have been like 13
I feel so old 😣
yup, either 13 or 14
yea idk middle schoolers are meanies
alright grandpa, back to the retirement home you go
noooooo :(
im not that old... yet
your miocence right now
you're*
he's gonna wake up with some neck pain
im not one on physics but wouldnt the meteor cause the body to fall foward with it or no?
maybe but I think the neck would need to lose all of its slack first which probably doesnt fully happen during the gif
the body kinda looks like it starts getting pulled forward right near the end
i wonder, would a sauropods biggest cause of death ( if it made it to adult hood ) be disease or weather?
ok I looked it up in elephants and the leading natural cause according to one article i found was loss of teeth which i doubt sauropods would suffer from being reptiles
my guess would probably be disease but idrk
Dis a W spino?
It's not the most accurate
huh?
My drawing
Probably should go in the Art channel then
Crazy but this isnt spino
Tail?
Glad to see Huaxiagnathus orientalis getting more recognition
I dont know why but i respect this animal so much

yes
incredible
it seems that almost all the axial skeleton has been preserved pretty well
Stop Cauing
How big were sue, scotty, ed cope and Goliath?
largest Yangchuano spesies?
Yangchuanosaurus shangyouensis CV 00216, sometimes exists as "Y.maximus"
10-10.5m in length, no reliable weight since there's no good mount, either too stocky or too narrow
it would still be a bulk guy but lighter than Torvosaurus and Allosaurus at similar length
is 3-3.5 tons safe to assume?
There was a gdi for yang which puts it at 4t at 10.5m
oh ok
not safe at all
it's likely at 4-5 tons
imagine a megalodon burger
Dont sharks taste like pee pee
Accurate?
Austro and Utah are too high
What did you do with tylosaurus' tail 😭
I know the recon you used
Why is the tylosaurus being compared to Homelander...?
Because he's a true AMERICAN!!!
AMERICA RAAAAH 🦅 🦅🦅
What the hell , tylo and Leeds that close in size biggest to biggest ?
Apparently
Who would win 2 tyrannosaurus rexs or 2 titans (I forgot how to spell their full name)
irl
2 rexs going off body and niche
titan is like 6.3-7.smth tons vs rex at a comfy 8, both being mega mega fauna predators
how big was Isano?
what’s that
Isanosaurus?
Now make a comp with pliosaurus funkei 
Give the skeletal and I shall
Isanosaurus
In length yeah
This is an Old Tylo Recon, tho so it should be longer than that since this is the Holotype
However, Leed should still be heavier
May I have the most up to date skeletal?
12.5 meters huh
I made one btw
I like the new look tbh
Walking with dinosaurs irl
It no longer looks like a tumor riddled sardine
that is not a tyrannosaurus..
Factor Trace, your my goat for releasing the carchar vid, but im pretty sure that isnt a tyrannosaurus
it is, it's Sue by the looks of it
it is??
no, it seems more like a daspletosaurus skull
Vivid, Sue doesn't have extremely pronounced lacrimal crests 💔
I was goin off the snout shape
Perhaps one should go off the entire skull 
On the topic of skulls I need to change my PFP
I could be wrong
Anyone know if Miragaia is actually valid or not still kinda unsure on that debate
I think it is. It's been renamed to Dacentrurus
i dont think both are in the same topic..
https://fixupx.com/TheDarknix/status/1901443361979941246
it's a back and forth rn tmk
DINO News!!!
︀︀So Miragaia & Dacentrurus are different after all!?!
︀︀An infographic created by the P.V.C indicates that these two genera are actually separate, meaning the synonymy isn't as accurate as previously proposed.
︀︀ #dinosaur #Portugal #stegosaurus #JurassicWorldRebirth
Alright thank you both
So this means miragaia isn't invalid after all? interesting
Mira has been in debate about it being a different species for ages, the 2024 paper kinda confused people, Mira was defended thankfully
AKA "it's a back and forth rn tmk"

"Estimates range from a length of 12 to 13.2 meters and a weight of 4 to a whopping 13.8 metric tons. Nowadays Giganotosaurus is mostly considered roughly equal in size or marginally smaller than the largest known Tyrannosaurus, although several workers have noted that the femoral proportions of Giganotosaurus might indicate a larger body mass than Tyrannosaurus. And as there is only one good Giganotosaurus specimen known, it is possible that larger individuals existed that haven't yet been discovered."
is this factual fellas? did JWD tell the truth??
dang..
The Fact JWD Giga is 15.5m yet only 8.95t speaks it all
13.2t Giga is crazy tho
Up to date?
Previously we only had roughly the back half of Dacentrurus and the front half of Miragaia. The 2024 paper described a new specimen of Dacentrurus which had elements of the front and back, a much more complete specimen overall.
When analysed it was found that the Miragaia holotype had no identifiable differences from the new Dacentrurus specimen, because Dacentrurus was named first it's name took priority, thus Miragaia was made a junior synonym of Dacentrurus, making it invalid.
https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-abstract/203/3/zlae074/7696911?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false
The twitter post further up I posted tmk eferring to an upcoming paper, is making an argument that there are differences, and enough to be a seperate genus again.
thats what i said, but still, that line in JWD goes hard (sad that the rest of the movie is ass)
13.8t no, but larger undiscovered individuals is a given since we only have 1-2 giga specimens, where rex has like 50
They are. And it' actually paleo related, as it's from a skeletal I've yet to share
oooo, mb then
Its likely distinct
this is not peak https://www.youtube.com/shorts/KQR2qclOUlc
Forget Megalodon — meet Liopleurodon, the true nightmare of the Jurassic oceans. 🦈🌊 Stretching over 20 feet long with a bone-crushing bite, this marine reptile was built for domination. Its massive jaws could shatter anything that dared to cross its path, making it one of the deadliest predators of its time. 💥🐊
While sharks ruled ...
Kai is 6-7 meters,1 ton-2 max
i know but i need a skeletal or atleast a scaling to that for something i wanna make
Watching factor traces new vid and I have a question:
If taurovenator, meraxes and mapusaurus were alive today, would we even see them as different species within the same genus?
My dumb self accidentally posted this in meme chat 💀
how accurate is this still?
gonna need some updating
i would say completely redone as thbe weight and how their being weighed is all over the place
Isn't pycno a tad too big ?
based on projected adult size
is the chart based off of max size or average?
i like how bars there is given as being the same weight as deinocheirus even though the silhouette is visually no bigger than iguanodon
I think average
it's based on vibes
but i dont believe stego and rex's averages are 8 tons or 10 tons
rex is around 7 - 8
maybe this size chart is just representing the sizes the dinosaurs are ingame?
Also, what did i miss here recently ?
but bars...
bars was always awkward, glad it got a design tlc
Can any1 answer?
yes, there are some notable differences in proportion
also having them all be alive at the same time is kind of removing one of the big factors we use for distinguishing dinosaur species/genera, being that two animals being separated by a long time is indicative that speciation has likely happened in between, we don't assume we have the full picture just because two animals have similar looking bones
yea bars really needed that tlc, glad it got a bit downsized too I didn't really like that it was just discount shant
Thank you
oh god i love this
Sorry to kind of be slow here to some but what's the largest Spinosaurus weight estimate again?
8300-8500kgs
Chatting here always makes me feel like im so unknowledgeable im unworthy of saying i love dinosaurs
nah you can love dinos no matter how much you know
everyone is always learning anyway it's just about where you are on that journey
Ik but like i always feel like im so far behind everyone
you probably know a lot more than the average person, no need to beat yourself up over not knowing as much as a bunch of nerds
You know what? That is true actually, thank you once more
yeah, all that matters is the info is correct, not on how much you know, because a good part of life is learning, especially in a area where a dromeosaur became a turtle and 5 other animals
And why people should allow other people to look at fossil finds 
So back to paleo stuff, how trustable is that paper that reanalysed the sizes of 52 dinosaurs and upscaled them quite a bit?
Wait are links banned?
Pretty good paper, its not just upsizing some dinos. It was basically arguing for more soft tissue on reconstructions of dinos based on extant reptiles and how that would affect things like leg posture based on their center of mass. Basically to not make dinosaurs too shrinkwrapped
Isn’t that the thicc Acro paper
Yessss my boy just got upped to rex size
8 ton acro my beloved
WHAT IN THE EVERLOVING EARLY CRETACEOUS HAPPENED?! Bro is built now 😭 🙏
I mean thats a biig exaggeration now that i think abt it, more like slightly smaller than what we thought rex was, paper rex reached like 11 tons
It still got a ~50% increase in size compared to 9% for Tyrannosaurus
Are dacenturus and hesperosaurus really sister taxa?
@hallow spear have fun
not really paleo-related but does anybody know where i can get this image but higher quality?
What’s the consensus on how Parasaurolophus likely sounded? Does the trumpeting reconstruction from way back still hold up?
partially, but they didn't account for soft tissue shifting it even if slightly
Dude I hate that, I’m certain there’s a workaround tho, maybe smthn like obs
obs?
Troodon might be back
No it isn’t Timmy
The guys who posted this are paleontology guys , so that should answer your question.
Feather extent is debatable but the anatomy itself is probably good
What’s going on with it’s face
Keratin extensions...
I heard a new one on insta but idk if it’s legit or another one of those “slowed down chicken noises for Trex!!!”
Dastardly
Basically
It’s possible given stegosaur phylogeny is awful and nothing is ever stable
Carunkles, prolly based on moscovy ducks or smthn similar
Livy and Shoni here are wayyyy too thick
Here's the chart comped with actual skeletals
https://youtu.be/uKYrRtT-arI?si=S9WBTRWk5FV9CFNV for people who can’t read papers
Dinosaurs were even bigger than we thought. A cutting-edge study shows that our traditional understanding of dinosaur size may be underselling the ancient reptiles. It’s no secret that one of the biggest draws to dinosaurs, and paleontology in general, in terms of the public view is how big prehistoric animals were capable of getting. Obviousl...
Lord have mercy
How heavy would Argentino be with these new estimations methods
i dont wanna say anything too definitive but I wouldn't be shocked if 100+ tons is back on the menu
how big was Cardiodon?
Anyone got some book recommendations for dinosaurs? Specifically dromaeosaurids? Asking for my friend, @subtle pike
Fortnite
Did the mod team become chill? Bro didn’t get smited for this
Also to keep on topic, Pelecanimimus. What’s up with him. Why he got scales. Where are the scales. And why is bro like that fr.
So you mean we could have had bigger camptos to?....
I don't think there is a book specifically for Dromies out there
Alright, what did I miss?
Guys is it really amarga is nerfed alr?
guys what do you think spino would look like if the skeleton didint get bombed
*what would our current understanding be
Not that different. The skeleton was well described + we have casts of it, so really nothing outside of maybe a histology would change much
intresting 💖
Guys, Is troodon valid again ?
Imagine spino arm turned out to be the smallest among other spinosaur
Are eocarcharia and shaochilong carchs after all?
Wouldn't be surprise
No
So what do we think of the fact that 2 of Laten's subspecies are just Troodon now (formosus and inequalis) and since Laten might be a junior synonym of Stenonychosaurus, Laten will be the first dino with one valid subspecies (at least that aren't made up)
This is of course under the assumption that Cambridge is right about Stenonychosaurus being a junior synonym of Troodon if they can establish a neotype
The first mistake is assuming we have the ability to assume anything in paleontology is capable of having “subspecies” 
subspecies as in path of titans subspecies, thats the term I was referring to as thats what they are called in PoT despite being indepentent species
Can we stop doing this in the paleontology channel?
I'm asking a simple question here dawg, it's mostly about the validity of Laten and if it would have only one valid subspecies in game or two. Also fym "can we stop doing this" because this is the first time anyone asked anything similar to this to my knowledge
it's also sorta a question of have any other playables had similar issues Laten/Stenony/Troodon is having validity wise in the past or present
If you’re talking about path of titans just say you are talking about path of titans.
I'm asking about the path of titans dinosaurs in real life if they had similar taxonomic/validity issues as Laten and it's family is too
If you need me to simplify it more since you're jumping to conclusions,
Do dino have same issue as laten that me can play as
That's just patronising
“You get confused by my question because I’m treating this like #path-of-titans so ur stupid duhrrr do get question uhrrrr????”
Well seeing as he has been acting like such and misinterpreting all my questions, thought i'd dumb it down
Your "dumbing it down" makes it harder to understand though.... which to me makes no sense since then why dumb it down?
Because he got butthurt over me being reasonably confused and annoyed whether he was talking about the game or irl. This isn’t the first time someone was talking about the game like it was irl.
oh my god it's not even that hard to understand
Latenivenatrix and most of the other Troodontids have a confusing history and are weirdly going in and out of validity pretty often, are any other dinosaurs which happen to be playables in path of titans have the same issues or had the same issues
yup
I was more so referring to the dumbed down version, the original question makes perfect sense to me but the grammar in the dumbed down one throws me off
The artistry of getting butthurt and randomly starting arguments over a simple statement
Latenivenatrix formosus (or inequalis) cannot be a valid species because that combination is impossible. It's either L.mcmasterae or T.formosus. You can't have a valid species of an invalid genus
that's not what i'm asking. I was refering to inequalis and formosus as in stenonychosaurus and troodon, but since I was reading em off a screen I forgot to include the genus
Only steno would be “valid” the other two are either dubious or need more material
So not only were you calling a species a 'subspecies', you were calling an entire genus a subspecies... yet you're butthurt fishy misinterpreted you
i wonder what dinosaurs might have had blue colors 🔥 like the double crested Cormorant 🤔
During breeding season, the inside of a Double-crested Cormorant’s mouth turns bright blue. It also grows tufts of feathers on each side of its head, giving it the name “double-crested”. Males and females look alike, with males being slightly larger.
On a recent walk at La Jolla Cove, in Southern California, I found this Double-crested Co...
But Steno is thought to be dubious because of the new cambridge paper
@stiff osprey I was referring to them as subspecies because I was half talking game talk and half talking paleontology talk since they are referred to subspecies in the game and I was saying something similar to "Would Laten only have one valid subspecies in game" not "Would Laten only have one valid subspecies in real life"
Randomdinos the destroyer of dreams 😆
And all I was trying to say was making a clear distinction between reality and the game, because the game has a different logic with its “subspecies” than irl paleontology (and by that I mean there’s functionally no “subspecies” in reality regarding a massive majority of prehistory)
ingame Laten would not have a valid subspecies because Laten isn't valid. If it was valid it wouldn't be a member of Laten. The question doesn't make sense
Um Random...you might need to "dumb it down" for the rest of the chat!
Ima just rephrase the question entirely
Since Latenivenatrix has three subspecies in game (which would be species in real life) and two of the species are controversial on the thought of being invalid (Stenonychosaurus and Latenivenatrix) , would that make "Laten" the first dino in path of titans who would only have one valid subspecies (species) that is not made up to fill a 3 subspecies (species) quota
The reason I am asking this here is because it is a paleontology question
Also, I do not think Laten has ever been formally placed as invalid, just proposed
How long has laten been invalid for? I only found out about troodon being invalid last year since I haven't really been following paleo that much
I think 2021 was when it was first made synonymous w/ Stenon
😪 only last year
which spinosaurus ( spinosaurus got le nerfed again 💀) subspecies is the best? and how did spinosaurus fight against T rex and eotriceratops irl like it does ingame? I wish the bars subspecies were stronger like irl
bro, valid, invalid, then valid againnto just be invalid later...
just chill and enjoy your day, bro 😎
Wheres the paper on that? Everyone else has been quoting the 2017 paper which proposed Latenivenatrix might be invalid and synonymous with Stenonychosaurus
It's the one by Currie and if it's 2017, I'm gonna freak out 🤗 because I keep getting the date wrong 🤗
no, because the valid 'subspecies' is not in the genus Latenivenatrix, it's in the genus Troodon (or Stenonychosaurus, whatever)
if we ignore that the game calls it Laten and pretend that it's Troodon, then you could argue that both mcmasterae and formosus are valid, but I'm fairly sure Laten was proposed to be synonymous with S. inequalis, not a separate species within Stenon
Don't freak out
Troodontids are known from Asia and North America, with the most complete specimens from the Jurassic of China and the Cretaceous of Mongolia. North
So have any other dinos in the game had a similar history or is Laten/Troodon just uniquely messed up
I’m pretty sure there’s an allosaurus maximus ingame
most ingame animals are too recent to have had much renaming done
except rex but i forget what the alts are
and a.maximus I guess but that's an invalid species of a valid genus
Rex has Bataar (Tarbo) and some made up one the devs made (even tho Mcraeensis is right there)
Mcraeensis was named after Rex was added so
why don’t the silly path of titans devs use precognition
yeah but not after the TLC was done, also could just used imperator or regina (even though now invalid) but they chose to make one up
I don't think they ever changed the names even after TLCs so I dunno why you think Rex would have been special 🥀
Like Laten got a TLC a year or so ago
They've changed subspecies names before even without TLCs i'm pretty sure, so I honestly expected it to change
When
I can only remember...Allo maybe?
kinda hard to check it, I basically gotta go through old videos but i'm 90% sure it was a carnivore and a theropod
can i say on average dromeosaurids got bigger then troodontids?
those Chinese troodontid footprints were pretty big
always a footprint never a fossil
Maybe but this could be due to preservation bias, we do have some decently big troodontids
latenivenatrix aka sinornithosaurus aka troodon aka wtf is going on is pretty big
Imagine time traveling to the Miocene and you see this Amphicyonids are hella terrifying
Wanna hug it
Until your face is ripped off lol
True but it'll be ok. Three women got famous off an otter attack, I'll be on every wilderness podcast
My beautiful baby boy
Although the forehead will need to be reduced down the road, Hodari made it huge
Which reminds me, I should send Qigao the updated skeletal in case it helps him with anything
He really that big though. I have censored the skull out of respect of authors as to not spoil the surprise of their paper
I would go try to give it a sandwich and get mauled in two
The surprise is that it’s a late-surviving prestosuchid…
It's skull feels like one.
It's like the second most robust mammal skull I have ever seen, only barely being beaten by Dinocrocuta
This is basically just a 700kg Dinocrocuta with the arms of a bear
nah ceratogaulus solos
puppy 🐶
you mean🍖 for pseudocyon
no
Legit question that may sound a bit dumb. Whats the main differences between Shonisaurus and Shastasaurus??? They seem so similar to me xD
Ones a blimp and ones a tube
Is nmmnh p 26083 fragilis anyone?
Guess the Dino’s
Carnivorous theropods
Torvo and Alberto
I was googling why bears lost their tail (since Amphicyonids represent more basal ancestors) and I swear I am going to go to google HQ and shove a metal pipe in their AI's main computer
Like gang tell me the evolutionary benefit to losing their tails 🙏😭
I didn't even say "according to folklore" I literally asked straight up in a way that COULD NOT BE CONFUSED
So anyways why did bears lose their tails
PoT micro
I think he might have confused length with height
But its just a theory, a paleo theory
same vibes
how accurate is my size comparison of micro and rhamp?
pretty good, but rhamph seems a bit too big
idk i didnt scale up the original rhamp skeletal/image so it should be as it was originally
the rhamp is actually accurate i nsize, rhamp is FREAKING huge
dang..
espeically since Sassy's is GREAT with pterosaurs
better then david peter?
thats like saying most people do better health wise than a corpse
The only reason people feather deinocheirus was because there is potential evidence of a tail fan
Yeah but just because there is a bone of it doesn't mean there may have even been feathers attached to it
What?..
So, Deinocheirus likely possessed a pygostyle (tail fan bone) but that doesn't necessarily mean there may have even been feathers on it, and coulda just been a "leftover"
Leftover of what
I mean there's more evidence for feathering than against it
evolutionary leftover like our tailbone. It's self explanitory when we're talking about ancient life
@tough parcel the evidence being a supposed pygostyle (which doesn't increase the odds it even had feathers) and the fact it was an Ornithomimosaur. It was also heavier than an elephant so I don't see feathers lasting
Feathering looks cool
Ergo, I am right
A) Having a pygostyle can still mean it had some sort of feathers there
B) Feathers aren't as cut-and-dry as fur is with a paper in 20(???) found they could also help in cooling better than fur
Left over of meat loaf , stay on topic
I do agree that feathers can be on big dinos, but to the extend that path of titans, prehistoric planet, and the amazing dinoworld having I don't see it as likely. I see it more as the prehistoric kingdom deinocheirus with some small feathering sprinkled in there
what abt nanuq?
What about it? Most likely retained a decent amount of feathering via neoteny. Not too far out of the idea but we got the same amount of evidence for feathers on it as Theri, very little but it's basically up to who you ask
Closest evidence we got for Theri is from Beipiaosaurus which isn't exactly a close relative and is MUCH smaller
how close is nanuq to yutyrannus ? not that close?
Not that close, you're more related to a rabbit than Yuty is to Nanuq, but feathers are ancestral to basically all dinosaurs and pterosaurs so it's just the right set of issues your species has to have to gain back feathers.
You haven't answered A or B
whats a and b? i wanna try to asnwer them
guh @steady rock
Neoteny? I don’t think we have any evidence that tyrannosaurids lost plumage as they aged
It is theorized that young Tyrannosaurs retained feathers that more basal ancestors had, but we know for a fact large adults had scales (Tyrannosaurus, Daspletosaurus, and Albertasaurus)
baseless speculation would be a more apt description
You delivered a total of none of those in the form of a question, hence why I didn't answer them. It just seemed like you were providing facts
Because they're evidence against you, not questions
Let me use "responding" instead of "answering", in case my perfectly clear question wasn't clear enough
"clear questioning" where is the question mark on your "clear questioning"
Also my response is that some feathers make sense, but not full plumage most interpretations show, as for B, I believe you and I also wanna take a look at the paper because it sounds interesting
"Clear questioning" looks more like you are debunking my points which I am fine with, but don't call it clear questioning when it is not delivered in the form of a question
Intentional semantics ragebait or genuine semantics....
I'm so confused here, but do you have the 20(???) paper or know what it was called at least?
hi
did he ever find the 20(???) paper
Google is free
I would say that Hatchling Duck is probably better than this in terms of Feathering on Adults
That’s the naked skin
God.
I LOVE this design
Telling someone to find a source you are pulling from is wild
Like gang, they claim it as their source, have your stuff ready when someone asks for said source
google is free
So am I supposed to scroll through hundreds to thousands of papers about birds and feathers from the last 25 years? Gualicho knows more about the paper than I do
yes
9/10 ragebait had me for a second
Ain't no way bro felt for the bait for even a second 
But fr @tough parcel what's the paper called
the real reason deinocheirus had feathers is to build up that stink aura and kill everything in a 30 meter radius
why does paleontology always get people so heated?
what doesn't?
hyperthermia
it had the feathers to build up algae and sequester poison and then that would be eaten by the mononykus subspecies “shuvuuia”
i meant topics of discussion but i suppose you got me
wait lmfao no you didn't hyperthermia is when your body gets too hot
hypothermia* wait no I’m dumb
no its not??
oh it is...
hypothermia is too cold, hyperthermia is too hot
what do you think the main cause of deaths to adult sauropods were? natural diasters? starvation? diease?
probably dying
"subspecies" 💔💔🥀🥀🥀
wowwww not even acknowledging the David peters reference am I that weak
wut the hell is this "the hatchling" ?
is it some kind of mobile dino park or something? lol
the deino is preety cool, though 😎
Introducing ‘THE HATCHLING,’’ an original short film that transports you to a world where dinosaurs and man coexist. Nestled within the picturesque outskirts of Pine Ridge, a tight-knit group is thrust into a thrilling adventure to help reunite a baby Deinocheirus with its family in the sun-soaked wilds. Alongside evading the wrath of preh...
oh damn, nice, i'll check it out
why is nanuq lumped in with animals 4 or 5 times it's size
idk ask @hardy sentinel
did falcon ever find that paper or no
arguing for very reduced feathering is reasonable but especially when dealing wit Ceolurosaurs you'd imo really want some strong evidence for no feathers, I cannot imagine an argument for Deinocheirus having a pygostyle but no tail fan of some sort other than is just lost it randomly somewhere on it's evolutionary lineage
these large words are confusing, would it be alright if you told me what a ceolurosaurus and pygostyle are?
Hey everyone! Question for you y'all! I'm a bit new to doing paleontology research as a genuine hobby! Does anyone know any good places to go to look for proper research information?
Because the evidence for Nanuq having feathers is basic as solid as Theri and Deinocheirus having feathers due to most of it being educated guesses and up to whoever decides to illustrate them
coelurosaurs are dinosaurs more closely related to birds than they are to carnosaurs
ooh alright, thank you
Honestly I’d say to argue for a complete and total loss of feathers in any dinosaur is an impossible task since they could just be present as hair like structures that don’t fossilize
Which is why I’ll always give ankylosaurs scruffy little beards
New leeds skeletal dropped
just spend time reading the posts on this channel and you'll see people posting all kinds of research links (some are very good) from time to time
other than that, google can be a good friend 
@drowsy raft
Sweet! Thank you so much! That's so helpful to know! 🙂 I would love to use Google, but I don't always know how to tell if what I am reading is from an accredited source of information. If anyone knows how to tell, please let me know. 🥲 I'm honestly really wanting to go to college to study paleontology, so catching up on how to spot trustworthy sorces would be awesome. 🙂
That doesn't seem too problematic(us) to remember, I hope PoT sees it the same and adds something similar
@drowsy raft
the thing is that there are many and i would not want to overwhelm you... 😅
- museums of natural history such as:
- paleontology websites from universities that end in .edu or government .gov, such as:
https://library.si.edu/research/paleontology
- and well known scientific articles from places like Nature are only some but good to start:
https://www.nature.com/search?q=paleontology+dinosaurs&order=relevance
other online libraries are accessible to only paleontology professionals but here you can sometimes read the articles that some people post and you can get a better idea 
Smithsonian Resources Dinosaurs Paleontology The Smithsonian Libraries and Archives' Paleontology Research Guide is a select list of resources for students, teachers, and researchers to learn
You're literally so great for this! Thanks so much for helping! And don't worry about overwhelming me! I like to take any good articles I can and group them in a Google Doc to refer to later. 😅 lol, it's like a dragon hoard of information and links. But thank you!! Feel free to share more if you'd like or have any. >:D
Pog fish
🐟
sure, anytime 😉
can someone please tell me some cool and unique prehistoric fauna (preferably invertebrates, mammals, and plants)
Deinocheirus Mirificus
no way
the only solid argument for them to lose them is thermoregulation, dense coats in hot or hottish climates being detrimental, Nanuq lived in a temperate to cold envirnment and tmk is like 1-2 tons in mass so I do not see why it'd totally lose feathers
any good Pinaco paleoart?
Pretty sure feathered Nanuqsaurus is a thing because folks are taking the environment into account
they may be confusing feathered nanuq and full white nanuq in regards to which is a meme
Perhaps we should make Deinocheirus fully white instead
polar bear nanuq vs tiger yutyrannus
Edible
David peters spinosaurus jump scare and random one
that is clearly not a David peters reconstruction. It is really a wonder that you trolls can’t see the proof that he preaches
look at him go 🥹
What
David peters is a modern day edward drinker cope ( minus the eugenics )
david peters is the best croods creature designer
BREAKING: david Peters invests 15 dollars in subscription to Ai image generator for totally normal non fraud reasons
What do you guys think this is? (Late Pleistocene-early Holocene from Kansas)
I'm currently thinking it is probably some kind of bison
how heavy would the blue deinocheirus be?
I'd say more than 1kg but thats just me
Smaller than the yellow one
Assuming the yellow one weighs ~7 tonnes, blue one weighs about 3
Lies, you're not taking in account the 82782 tonnes of feathers
True, all of Deinocheirus's feathers fell off when it reached 9 meters long
another request, does anybody have this but abelisaurid instead of carcharodontosaurid?
Random, would you happen to recall where the "feathers are better at general thermoregulation than fur" paper is/what it's called 
epic
Will falcon ever find the paper? We may never know
Have you considered looking at you own feathers and testing them against mammalian Fur?
Heavier actually.
Yeah the blue one hit the gym like an addict, who knew
What paleo hot takes or wild ideas do you guys have
Sauropods could live a very long time
Some of dinosaurs fossils could probably be either sexual dimorphism (irl example: male muscovy tends to have a more wide skeleton than females) or specimen variation (some crocodiles, depending on the nutrition to adulthood, may or may not develop some traits)

edmonto is only famous because it lived with rex
ceratopsians are more fodder then hadrosaurs
These are all somewhat accurate weights for all playables in PoT and one non playable
Achillobator: 550-770 lbs
Acrocanthosaurus: 8,818.49-13,227.7 lbs
Albertaceratops: 7,700 lbs
Alioramus: 1,100-1,550 lbs
Allosaurus: 3,747.8-5,952.4 lbs
Amargasaurus: 5,732-8,818.4 lbs
Ampelosaurus: 21,825.8 lbs
Anodontosaurus: 4,409.2 lbs
Apatosaurus: 39,683.2-91,050.9 lbs
Argentinosaurus: 154,324-220,462 lbs
Barsboldia: 11,023.1 lbs
Camptosaurus: 1,102.3-5,511.5 lbs
Carcharodontosaurus: 13,227.7-15,432.4 lbs
Carnotaurus: 2,866-4,629.7 lbs
Ceratosaurus: 2,204.6-4,409.2
Compsognathus: 8 lbs
Concavenator: 710-880 lbs
Daspletosaurus: 4,409.2-6,613.8 lbs
Deinocheirus: 14,330-16,093.7 lbs
Deinonychus: 150-220 lbs
Deinosuchus: 5,511.5-11,023.1
Dilophosaurus: 440.9-881.8 lbs
Dimetrodon: 60-550 lbs
Dunkleosteus: 2,090-2,650 lbs
Edmontosaurus: 7,716.1-11,023.1 lbs
Eotriceratops: 19,841.6-24,250.8 lbs
Eurhinosaurus: 1,000-2,000 lbs
Giganotosaurus: 13,227.7-17,637 lbs
Hatzegopteryx: 440-550 lbs
Iguanodon: 8,818,4-11,023.1 lbs
Kaiwhekea: 2,000 lbs
Kentrosaurus: 2,200 lbs
Kryptops: 3,306.9 lbs
Lambeosaurus: 5,732-7,495.7 lbs
Latenivenatrix: 353 lbs
Megalania: 1,268-4,280 lbs
Metriacanthosaurus: 2,204.6 lbs
Miragaia: 4,409.2 lbs
Ocepechelon: unkown
Pachycephalosaurus: 815.7-992 lbs
Parasaurolophus: depending on species can be 5,511.5, 7,936.6, 14,550.5, and even 27,778.2 lbs so wide range
Platyhystrix: 5-550 lbs
Pycnonemosaurus: 7,054.7-7,946.6 lbs
Quetzalcoatlus: 200-500 lbs
Rhamphorhynchus: 1.5 lbs
Sachicasaurus: 26,455.5 lbs
Sarcosuchus: 7,495.7-9,479.8 lbs
Smilodon: 350-620 lbs
Spinosaurus: 13,227.7-17,637 lbs
Squalicorax: 500-1,000 lbs
Stegosaurus: 11,023.1-15,432.4 lbs
Struthiomimus: 330 lbs
Styracosaurus: 5,952.4 lbs
Suchomimus: 5,511.56-8,377.5 lbs
Therizinosaurus: 11,023.1 lbs
Triceratops: 11,023.1-19,841.6 lbs maybe 13,227.7-22,046.2 lbs
Tylosaurus: 19,841.6-44,092.5 lbs
Tyrannosaurus: 17,637-22,046.2 lbs
Tyrannotitan: 13,227.7-16,314.2 lbs
Utahraptor: 551.1-771.6 lbs or on heavier range 1,543.2 lbs
Yunnanosaurus: 551-5,732 lbs
Yutyrannus: 3,117 lbs
Zhuchengtyrannus: 11,023.1-13,227.7 lbs
If anything is wrong or I missed some stuff lemme know but this took way too long 
translate this to pounds and tons
it is in pounds
Kg
people making me suffer over here 
you can do it, you can do it
convert it to tons actually
uhm yeah, i think?
this is all practically useless because dinosaur weights are used in kgs/tons
okay maybe "useless" too harsh, but people will need to have to translate all of this individual by individual
btw where did you get these
exactly
As if they can't be conversed to kg and tons
Why do american love complicating thing just use metric smh
okay go have fun converting each and every one into kgs and tons!
im canadian I just wanted to use pounds for lighter stuff then decided why not make it all nice and do all in pounds
i kind of vibe with using pounds for lighter animals but once you get into the thousands it's like what does that even mean
can we start measuring dinosaur size by volume 
measure dinosaurs by cheeseburgers per bald eagle
These definitely need a run over gonna be honest
A lot are very wrong, like Kryptops
Hell yeah:🦅🦅🦅🇺🇸🇺🇸
i checked acro and its honestly solid, though on the lighter side
grams exist 😭
Kryptops, Zhucheng, Kai, Smilodon, Yuty off the too do my head are way off
Anyone got good up to date stego and iggy skeletal?
bro, i saw a rayban ad and they said that this was a deinonychus
For smaller animals the humble gram and kilogram come into play
iguanadon should be solid but stego will probably get some changes in the future, though as of rn these are the most 'up-to-date'
TLW stego is 12 meters tho
when did you become a backer?
sometime last week
This is clearly deinonychus as it rhymes with grug
dang, you're right, my bad
ooooooo
@stiff osprey is nmmnh p 26083 fragilis?
maybe
For yangchuanosaurus, are the 2 recognized species magnus and shangyouensis?
Because I heard that shangyouensis is actually just a younger magnus.
*magnus is an older shangyouensis, shang was named first and thus magnus becomes invalid
Iirc there’s another species from the lower Shax that may or may not be Yang
i have a question, how can you tell if something is a different species of the same dinosaur, the same dinosaur or a whole new creature?
That’s the million dollar question isn’t it lol
is it a dumb question? :(
each dinosaur is distinguished from other species by a set of traits defined by the authors. if those traits appear in a different species, or are somehow shown to be variable through age, disease etc., then they cannot be used to distinguish a species anymore, and one gets lumped into another
no just hard to answer
may you use allo as a example on why it can have 3 species?
Nope, it’s a question we’re still trying to figure out lol, it’s the reason there’s so much debate around lumping and splitting and whatnot. That said, like random said, there are some things like morphology and phylogeny we can generally use to varying extents. There’s also some research in the works to hopefully clarify things a bit on the species level through comparison to extant species.
the combination of traits shown in jimmadseni and anax is more similar to allosaurus fragilis than to any other animal not named allosaurus
they could have named them as new genera if they wanted to, but they decided to put them in the genus Allosaurus because it's closer to Allosaurus than to anything else
genera are arbitrary, you could put every tyrannosaurid into the genus Tyrannosaurus if you wanted to. but it wouldn't be accepted by the wider community because it makes things way more confusing than having them separated into gorgo, alberto, das, tarbo, tyranno etc
''how big is tyrannosaurus''
''between 1 and 12 tonnes depending on species''
isnt it 13 tonnes?
it's a distorted incomplete and undescribed femur i wouldn't make super specific estimates
goliath has been kinda annoying everyone just takes 12.9 tons at face value and conveniently ignores that we don't have taphonomic info and that that's the upper estimate anyway
what does taphonomic mean?
tbf it is the largest theropod specimen known minus brazilocaudus giganteus it's just not worth arguing if it rounds up or down to 11 or 12 or 13 t without more info
yea it's just frustrating when people take a certain estimate as gospel when even the source of the estimate acknowledged it being unreliable
Question: how accurate is pot metricanthosaurus's model?
not
even w us not having too much on metri, we have a good bit on relatives
big arms be one of the main problems
relating to how fossils form and if they undergo any changes between deposition and now
has there ever been scalings of a 10 ton stego?
The humble mammal tooth taxon:
what mammal tooth taxon varies 12fold in size i am not a boobologist
All of them
Megistotherium
The Hyaenodon
Yes based on allometry
whats allometry
It’s allometry
what he's referring to is using allometric scaling equations to arrive at weight estimates typically based on limb bone dimensions
there's a 10 ton stego??!?!
For those who don't know
Does he know
Does he know
I didn't know
lol
Those who know💀
What does the tinier skull belong to? it looks familiar but I can't put my finger on it
Centrosaurus?
Whats everyone's opinion on the bars remodel? Does it accurate enough? (From what we know)
Not enough quills or display features
From what we know (which isn’t much) yeah, imo it’s also one of the best looking models in the game very aesthetically pleasing and well made
The sub you sent is based on ourano tho so not the best for bars necessarily
For base bars pretty positive it’s great. Especially since this is bars material and it matches the dip https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/605788102975291414/1371945705995899021/image0.png?ex=682b9301&is=682a4181&hm=e0ddfc2f7ae774b303b2d1ed9747a20477ba74697391c54b2884aab5006efbab&
The stance i thought was pretty good for its bipedal stance. Seems well balanced.
Cretoxyrhina
oh my god it IS based on ourano you're right, dunno why that never clicked for me. maybe thats why I'm drawn to that sub specifically so much
There's a reason I always put it with a range of +- 1500 kg
But of course people take that out of context and only use the higher estimates (although tbf it's probably higher than 13 tonnes now with Dempsey's soft tissue levels)
Both true although I was referring to the before time
You might think a dinosaur as big as a T.rex wouldn't be able to sneak up on anything. But these iconic giants might be sneakier than we once thought.
Subscribe: http://bit.ly/BBCEarthSub
#WalkingWithDinosaurs #TRex #Tyrannosaurus
Watch more:
Best of BBC Earth 🌍 https://bit.ly/BestOfBBCEarth
Best Animal Fights 🥊 https://bit.ly/BestAn...
why does it step so loudly 😭
why do gorrillas have such big teeth when they eat mostly plants
They’re good for eating vegetation, and apparently males use them as a display thing
just in case they gotta fight 100 humans
Their bite is incredibly strong too. Much much stronger than lions
y though like is eating plant that tough or something
carnivore ancestors and there is no reason to loose them as they are good for fighting off predators and fighting other gorillas
You have no idea how hard it is to chew plants, meat is easy to chew
This mostly there’s a reason we cook most veggies to hell before eating them.
What’s their bite force ?
1300psi about 300 more than a lion
my biteforce
PSI is not a good measurement of bite force
I know I just don't know where to find the newton for gorillas I believe someone said in here 4500 for lion or something like that tho
Do you have anything I didn't find any trusty thing yet
What is the current consensus about cheeked herbivores?
Pretty likely
Do people forget newtons exist 😭
Newton? That guy who got hit by an apple? What does he have to do with this?
The Apple had a Biteforce bigger than Rex
1 newton = the force of 1 apple falling from a tree
No it's the force of 1 apple hitting your head after falling from a tree
gastonia looks stoned as hell
Interestingly Jaguars have a much stronger bite force than any other big cat
Go outside and try eating a stick! A lot of the vegetation in their diet is very fibrous and requires a lot of chewing and strong jaws. This is part of the reason for their very prominent sagittal crest which gives them their incredible jaw strength! That crest is why they have such a large “forehead”. Silverbacks have larger ones for, as
President Karson said, protection of their troop and to compete with rival males who threaten their harem. Though males are not overly domineering in other cases.
Gorillas are so cool :3
i eat paper meaning i have already bested the stick.
Modern vegetables have also been selectively bred to be much more nutritious and easier to eat. The rise in farming also saw the jaw size in humans decrease as such intense chewing became less and less necessary. Coincidentally, it’s theorized that modern farming practices are why we tend to need our wisdom teeth removed!
Smaller jaw means less room for teeth and those teeth, once necessary for the vigorous wear from fibrous plants, are no longer as necessary. : ) Though of course, like most biology, there is variance. And some folks can accommodate their wisdom teeth.
also some vegetation is just hard to digest and extract nutrience from, or has toxins
....
Yeah! TW Potentially Gross Science Fact: ||That’s why some animals, including Gorillas, engage in coprophagy, consumption of feces to absorb nutrients that weren’t caught the first time!||
💀 what are we talking about
Primatology!
Sloane's hobbies
That's an absolute lie and it's never been recorded that high.
On average a male adult lowland gorilla has About 800psi recorded bite force.
🍴
You'll find that nowhere is it actually recorded on a paper or anything above 800.
The 1300 cones from a grossly overestimated sum in the early 90s that is still perpetuated even on the Internet.
We've since then actually recorded results with the animals and while impressive a gorilla is not a monster
you will survive
what would hurt more
getting bit by a camarasaurus or a large hadrosaurid?
Megalodon had an estimated bite force of 40,000 PSI ☝️ 
Um...my alpha male podcast said the silverback gorilla could tear a tiger in half with its teeth...
My sigma male podcast said a trex could crush a Honda odyssey in one bite
Gorillas are not natural predators their teeth are built for grinding vegetation, not for ripping apart prey. So while a silverback is undeniably strong, the idea of it tearing a tiger in half with its teeth is more fantasy than fact. I think
Mfs think the average gorilla is King Kong
Hey man, we just want justice for harambe
Also depending on your definition of crush? Probably true. Could at least tear the roof off
A short clip from BBC's documentary The Truth About Killer Dinosaurs.
You know, fair, should have been more specific. Also I remember when that came out originally…
im getting old sigh
I dont do this i think
dont gorriles eat the leaf of the stick and not the stick it self
Bamboo shoots and stems! Not literally sticks, but I was being a hyperbolic for fun : )
@proud prawn is right, I personally felt that prehistoric planet set the bar way too high and now everything else has to try to match it. IMO.
for me so far from the trailers and clips it's the immersion that I really take issue with, it just doesn't feel the same as the first
could change but I'm still worried about it
This is just demonstrably false
It has the same quality of early 2000s CGI while things like Dinosaur Revolution show that it isn't just "Prehistoric Planet raising the bar". The bar has been high for quite some time
Display
why does ankylosaurids and nodosaurs in general are small?
sure, they still weighs a ton
but nowadays Anky's max size is 5.5t iirc which i would consider it to be medium sized
any reason?
What the hell is this 💀
Lower to the ground = Harder to flip = Juicy soft underside is hard to bite = survive and spread on more genes to be lower to the ground
baby rex sigularity
Dinosaur Revolution 
The Definitely Legal Version I grabbed it from didn't age well cause it was uploaded like...10 years ago maybe?
the less weight the more protected?
No, the more area you are spread out the more protected. If you are lower to the ground and have a hide back it is harder to get to the parts of your body which can sustain heavier damage
The predators the "smaller" Nodosaurids lived with still couldn't flip them because Nodosaurids tend to have sharp spikes on their sides. and Ankylosaurids weigh a lot more.
Also Ankylosaurus weighs around 4 tons, which is still very hard to flip by Tyrannosaurus standards
I also said nothing about weight in the statement you responded to
4 tons is hella small but thx for the explanation
-# rip 7-8 tons Anky you will (not?) be missed
4 tons is not small, it's the weight of an African elephant. Try to flip a pancake of dense material half your weight using just your mouth and you'll find it is indeed, not hella small
even ignoring model quality the animation is pretty lackluster here
The Infernodrakon locks up completely when being carried away
Like a GMod model being frozen
what if i use my feet 😏
wouldn't be easier, but also be bent over your feet rather than them being right under you while you do it, while that pancake of dense material rams a sledgehammer into your leg
Ankylosaurs were not small and were not to be messed with
so no Anky skateboard?
regardless of our Anky discussion, what would happened to this guy irl if the weight & length stays on?
This was my exact thought. The Rex foot moves so stiffly
I was already a bit pessimistic about the new WWD due to the real life segments, but the cgi is just kinda lackluster, wasn’t expecting a prehistoric planet by any means but this just ain’t it for me
are terror birds like kelenken considered theropods ?
All birds are
That is interesting
i mean i guess so they are all bipedal dinosaurs but kelenken was there man . large theropod dinosaurs almost made a comeback
it doesn’t help that they put it right out in the open with no vegetation to hide it a bit
is WWD 2025 out?
They’re not considered Theropods because of their bipedalism, they’re considered Theropods because they are bracketed in the clade Theropoda as a result of evolving from Theropods
You mean to tell me the spec evo quadrapedal bird I just decided exists would still be a therapod? Because I think that'd be funny
Halloween mask 
either that, or those dinos sniffing some illegal stuff, lol
ts so ahh 🥀 🥀 💔
Also whatever pterosaur that was literally just uses Prehistoric Planet's Quetzal sounds
my Honda Odyssey said only in its dreams 
The rex's or the honda's?
Literally just Prehistoric planet Quetzalcoatlus noises. This is so lazy
If you can beat them join them 💀
usually to join someone you gotta get to their level 💀
Could always try bringing them to yours
That's not the same sound
Not saying it was, but it's eerily similar and I'm not about to go through every clip in PP with an Azdharkid yelling just to say the fact that WWD copied off of prehistoric planet's paper and changed the punctuation here
Also weird that it made a loud honk AFTER getting its neck completed crushed while locked in the T. rex jaws
carcharodontosaurs are so peak 🔥
worst part is it can't even be interpreted as air gushing out quickly like an animal would wake when it gets it's throat crushed, because we see it get it's neck crushed and then make the noise
Admittedly if I made anything like this I’d probably do the same lol, the honks are just perfect for azhdarchids in a weird way
Yeah but at least use different honks, you'd think it was copy/paste
If they really wanted to get creative they could’ve done one of those bird hisses, haven’t really heard a pterosaur do that
I’m all for all dinosaur stuff in 2025 but I can’t help but feel this looks underwhelming ( WWD2)
I ain't saying the honks aren't creative, it's that they used the same bird at the same pitch and same length as all the Quetz calls in Prehistoric Planet
He wouldn’t be crushing any sucho skull considering they weren’t in the same era
Both are very thin from the front but suchos is much much thinner
the nefarious wormhole creating carcharodontosaurus individual:
No way. Thanks for the clarification
Obviously I know lool
i cry my spy why dinosaur no right before die
Isn't that same sound pack?
Prehistoric Planet is so lazyy it reused Planet Dinosaur sound 🥱
It's same soundpack, it's not laziness
Also this, they used Jurassic Park's sound as main sound for their tyrannosaurus, that sound is realistic but it's weird, they could make their own main sound 
(also yeah, WWD2 used that rex sound effect on the trailer)
I can bet People would Go Fund Me for a Remake of the OG WWD series with updated models and species fixes in the fauna. A masterpiece improved.
Only if it would have the same visual quality as prehistoric planet
NGL WWD cooked with this one
It's not that easy, they got a lot of budget for making PhP
Believe it or not folks but trying to reconstruct a crushed skull ain’t easy
Most definitely
And it turns out it might not even be as crushed as I thought it was, which is insane
Which Dino?
Xiongguanlong
Yeah that’s a a very slender skull my guy
Part of the reason I did this recon is cause I wasn’t super convinced with other recons but I’m beginning to think they may be right lol
Dinosaur king cgi
so how many years will it take you?
If you got the chance to name any dinosaur, what would you name it?
Me personally, if i got to name a dinosaur, specifically a Megaraptoran, I think I'd name it something like Lunavenator. How about you?
Probably name a tyrannosaur paracarcharodontosaurus
Lol everyone hating on WWD cos it doesnt have PP level cgi smh
@swift sand
Fr bro
Maybe
Well thats your opinion i dont mind the cgi
some people don’t have high standards
Soo
Is troodon back or not?
Im sorry but what is this dorsal?
Where did you get this dorsal? I know stego did his gdi with one which was different
Also, what is wrong with it?
To be entirely fair it's not like giganotosaurus has any reliable and good dorsal view
Any word on what the new material of the new Giga specimen is
Hartman's might be based on the mounts, most others are based on Bates' acrocanthosaurus
We have ribs from cf. Taurovenator but they're not figured or measured, giga supposedly have some ribs as well but their completeness is unknown
Exactly my point
You can use this one if you need
Simon.
Gladly
How long was carch?
Depends, atm carch is only a pretty complete skull (minus the lower jaw).
Based on its position in different phylogenies here's what you get:
- Based on Tyrannotitan, ~12.4m
- Based on Tameryraptor ~12m
- Based on cf.Taurovenator/Meraxes ~12.9-13m
To be safe saying 12-13m is good
12-13m is always good, if anyone ever hassles you for specifics tell em they don't matter lol
is this accurate (dont ask why makima is in there i have no idea either)
The worst of the worst dinosaurs were left here. Watch the final trailer for Jurassic World Rebirth and get tickets now.
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@jurassicworld
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/jurassicworld
X: https://twitter.com/jurassicworld
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jurassicworld
Official Site: https://www.jurassicwo...
Yes
If dinoshark with a real animal what would it look like the msot
Dinoshark
she trying to manipulate the fossils as while she be doing it to every one
I’m pretty sure you can get it larger using tamery, I think random used something else to downsize it
That's what most recon using Tamery gets, like Folkes' or Franoys'
SIW got it slightly larger so it's possible
Still think that 12-13m is a safe range
My favourite is Taurovenator since it gets extremely close results to Tyrannotitan, And I feel like 2 animals getting very similar results is usually favourable
It gets decently larger results, PaleoNerd's is way larger than his giga despite the latter having a bigger skull (his giga is already ~8,5t). Using Dan's taurovenator is even worse
I’ve measured it, it’s very close to randoms tyranntoitan
It should be about 12.6-12.8m
I don't understand how it's possible due to the body/skull size ratio being so different between titan and tauro
I don’t know either but size wise they are extremely similar, this also includes length. Proportionally they do differ however
also, its not that much larger than you say it is, they are only .09cm difference in standing length, assuming the posture is similar enough
if i recall correctly someone measured PNs centre length at like 12.5m?
Ok so carcha :
159-160cm skull
Taurovenator (Dan's):
Femur = 118cm
Skull = 135cm
Length = 11.8m
Tyrannotitan paratype (Random's):
Femur = 133cm
Skull = 151cm
Length= 11.6m
Using Dan tauro carcha is 13.9m, using PaleoNerd Tauro carcha is 13.1m
Using Random's Tyrannotitan carcha is 12.3m
12.4m for randoms scaling, and using PNs Taurovenator scaling it is most cerainly not 13.1m
it doesnt just gain 1.1m from posture, especially not in the posture PN gave it
I just did the math, 1 6/1.51 * 11.6 = 12.29
Measured PaleoNerd Tauro and got 11.15m which rounded to 11.2 gets you 13.1m
that isnt the scaling PN used then, because this isnt 13.1m
Means he didn't use his Tauro then
We're debating over centimeters, for an only skull something so trivial as 50cm of overall length is nothing
It’s peak 
he did use tauro thats what im interested in, since its not 13.1m, and the holotype giga is about the same size as his carch, if using the dentary, it would be larger
since his giga is scaled to the holotype
Heartbreaking: Most repetitive franchise you know just made a good film 💔
Wait where did you get 11.6m from? since PNs tauro is 10.6m standing length, and probably 11m centre length
PN doesnt know how to measure centre length so non of his skeletals have it listed
I can try to re-measure his Tauro, can't right now but if it was closer to ~11m it would explain the difference
However still very different to Dan's estimate using Tauro, no disrespect to Paleonerd but I would prefer to use the paper's skeletal especially when we get such a good one.
Still it's strange to find carcharodontosaurus being bigger than the giganotosaurus holotype despite having a smaller skull
GIga seems to be proportionally bigger headed so its not that weird, especially sicne carch clades more basal which seems to have smaller heads
or well. My bad we dont actually know if it confidently clades more basal
PaleoNerd is 11.15m from what I've mesured
Random Titan is 11.6, Dan Tauro is 11.8
Also, it's actually not true if Meraxes and Taurovenator are the derived ones...
Yup, I’m really interested in what happens if you include both the reffered tauro material and the tamery material since both of their respective papers have phylogeny’s that lack a key carch included, if meraxes and carch are basal, then carch being larger has a much more likely outcome
I'll be honest and say that this is debating about very much nothing...
Current carch phylogenetic trees are lackluster like you said, carcharodontosaurus is only a skull, using a range of 12.-13m is already a very good interval for such remains
agreed
i was mainly debating about the scaling not seeming to match up with the skeletal, not about its size necessarily. albeit at the start i was
It doesn’t even have that absolutely lovely (horrendous disgusting) blue filter over everything that we all clearly love!
This is still an unresolved thing which im quite disappointed no one has tried to do a matrix which includes all the relevant carch characters from the Cf Tauro & Tamery paper
I truly think that there are BIG carcharodontosaurs in North Africa, Sauroniops and the partial femur described in Cau's paper are a good example. Similarly to carch they are HUGE, but how huge can't properly be estimated with such lackluster remains and unstable/incomplete phylogenies
MY DISCORD HAS CRASHED 3 TIMES HELP
🔥
🔥
It looks so wrong lol, what’d they do to him
He’s too small now too
He would look so good with a longer neck
In my opinion i love the new design
Honestly I think the design has a lot of charm
its just not spino atp
Well its not supposed to be a "good" spino
Its a failed attempt at cloning one, which I think the design communicates very well
What is innacurate about PoT Allosaurus? It mostly matches but something doesn't seem right to me
It's arms are too beefy IIRC
The Rex looks awesome
Spino doesn't Look that Ugly here
This is just majestic (the quality sucks but still)
Also I think the fins might be sexually dimorphic which is fun
Oh, Wise and almighty @stiff osprey , what is the new true size of Acrocanthosaurus?
the largest one ranges from 11.2-11.8 meters and 5.8-8.3 tonnes. I'd need a better idea of Fran's material to be more specific
Acro is totally the largest land carnivore ever(it’s not)
Anybody know what this is,
Hi guys! Discord now has a quest for a DILOPHOSAURUS PROFILE ICON you can get through a quest! Its sadly only available on PC, but if you're interested you can go to Gift Inventory -> Quests and watch the Jurassic World Rebirth trailer to get it! Its sadly not paleo-accurate, but its cool enough to me!
Rex has aura now idk why he's means business
Love the rex look now he looks mean and more bulky I love it
How epic would it be if the spinos killed the rex. It would be JW saying "unlike back in jp3, accurate spino would lose, but 3 spinos do the job". Rex fans couldnt have any arguments because its just true
Accurate rex still beats both you also cant lie but I have a feeling this rex might kill the spinos and leave one to live
Accurate rex aint beating 3 spinos
Ahem no but the 3 spino would get hurn one snap on their thin necks dead instantly or rip arm of can go either way but but I do agree yes just that people think rex can't handle 3 things I'm not glazing bur rex is bulky spino isn't and rex has good hips to turn spino isn't that I'm not saying no just saying rex is not what you think
Like, it’s not accurate obviously but for some reason this just feels like what the name “T.rex” invokes
three 7 ton armed animals would absolutely beat one 8 ton crunch animal lmao
The spinos arent just gonna present their necks to the rex. "Rex is not what you think" i never said rex is weak or something like that. If anything then spino is not what you think if you think rex can take on 3 of them
anyways paleo chat am i right, how is that new soft tissue reshape paper going on reception and reasonability
I'm not saying it can beat every single one but I'm gonna say this animals in real life can win a whole pack example a someone dog chased down 10 or 8 coyotes and and won its a real story but I'm still learning stuff of course but I also know it depends on the environment the battle takes place animals can win a 1 v many it's just not seen often but ya your argument stand but I'm just saying
Dempsey et al 2025?
believe so
It doesnt really change anything, its mainly trying to put into debate a more objective means of estimating animals without relying on the minimum of convex hulls themselves
Remember
If you think your paleo design is bad
Remember some moron put a whale throat as a Mosa belly and thought it’s a passable design
right, know most of the bit itself isn't going crazy on shifts, weren't the only major weight shifts some sauropods and acro pushing from it, and a smaller hump vs sail bit(?)
By far the most accurate Rex in the Jurassic Park verse
Tbh I liked the outright monster looking mosa in jw series
It also was unironically more accurate
The jaws, the scales, the inner jaws
The flipper
The only inaccuracies were the scutes and the tail flipper not being big enough (it was also designed a year before the flipper tail was discovered)
The new mosa is just bad
Are we really arguing about who would win in a fight between 3Spinos vs 1T.rex isn't obvious🙏💀
@mortal fossil why do you disagree with me that the Rex is the most accurate in the JP universe? Is there a more accurate one I don't know about?
It looks like an upscaled Albertosaurus and not a Tyrannosaurus
The chin is too thin, the dog brows look bad and the chest is way too square shaped
The belly is more skinny somehow
Dominion Rexy and The Lost World Buck looked better even with their skull shape inaccuracies
It doesn't look like an Albertosaurus
Yeah, but Rexy and Buck lack noticable keratinous eyebrow crests and also have pronated wrists, while this one is also bulkier. It is objectively more accurate
Also from what I can see this new Rex is less upright as Dominion Rexy and Buck
You can't be serious dawg. I see your reasonings haven't changed one bit. Still as incoherent as ever
New one is a downgrade
Btw I have actually made this scene of Spino and Mosa from the trailer and replaced JWR spino with the old but more accurate spino and mosa with Aust Colossus, and they look similar af
So you'd prefer the still starved, paino player with no eyebrows to peak?
I don’t see how it is “peak” when it’s just as skinny but having a worse skull and the wrong eyebrow shape
I like the new one more
hmmm
New Rex has
Keratinous eyebrows (which I will admit look a bit Albertosaurine)
Pronated Wrists
A correct posture
And bulk.
This makes new Rex more accurate, the lack of such makes the old Rexes less accurate
I like the green Spino it reminds me of the lost world kenner toy Spino
@mortal fossil what parts do you disagree with? The thumbs down do not contribute to the conversation nor does it prove your point
Bonkers
Buck literally have keratinous eyebrows as well as the nasal ridge
I literally explained already why the skull is wrong, if you all read my message instead of dogpiling me then we would have a discussion
Also you see the ribs of this Rex so it’s not any bulkier
BTW, nowadays Spino's vibe lowkey changed since the torso's not as thick, but the tail is thicker + longer (extra caudals), but old Spino with the thick body does kinda look like jwr spino
True
Just asking are the skinny legs accurate?
I mean sure that’s inaccurate but I still quite like the design, this movie has honestly been really good with designs so far at least imo
That's still a lot more shrink wrapped than new Rex. As well as new Rex having more belly whereas older Rexes are much thinner
Just because they didn't go all the way doesn't mean the older ones are more accurate
Yeah, spino legs have been like that since 2014
Hmmm, I scaled the JWR spino to lore size (12 meters), and it unironically KINDA looks similar. Big diff of having thick legs is true for every theropod in JW as well anyways.
Just realized. I usually look at the skeletals so seeing it without bones made it look kind of different for a moment there
Dominion Rexes look a lot more like Rex even if they didn’t go for the robust look
They look like the Stan skeletal and other skinnier Rexes
They also unpronated them
I would agree with if it was just JW (1) Rexy which
Sure I am not arguing against that one at all
But it has as many inaccuracies as the Lost World Rexes and have more than Dominion
JWR Rebirth is Legit Stated Bulkier than Rexy
Saying its more Skinny or Skin wrapped than her is Crazy
Lol bro built like this 💀
“Show, don’t tell”
I don’t believe what the directors ask let alone what they say after they unironically called Giga a “joker” and the other dumb things they stated
Ye lol when u just look at the bones you dont realize how skinny they really are. But i still love spino no matter how skinny or fat
And don't Down thumb Be when its Literally said in the Empire Magazine
They Still made the Animal, That you don't want to believe what the actual creators of the animal said
Thats on You
GOSH every time I look at this man I get a dopamine rush, such a beautiful design
I dunno if you're adding onto my point are refuting it so ima just respond with my point if you're refuting it
I didn't say new rex is more skin wrapped, I was saying it's less shrink wrapped than the older Rexes
I am not going against you.
I am going against the Person denying what the actual creators said
Only thing that would make him more beautiful is some luscious, scaley lips
@fossil ingot my bad lol, just wanted to make sure
Also
Comparing Buck and JWR Rex Using Buck's ANIMATRONIC rather than CGI Version is even Worse in your Part
btw do we know JP Rex sexual dimorphism? Like Buck seems to have a dewlap but Bull doesn't. Do we know if new Rex is a male or a female?
since i saw that allosaurus could survive hits from a stegosaur's thagomizer, that got me thinking. could an allosaurus survive a hit from a triceratops's horn?
Rexy is Proportionally Skinnier even when Using her JWD CGI model who is equally as Bulky as the CGI Rexy of JP1 yet not as Bulky as the Animatronics.
@hardy sentinel Males Rexes have the Dewlap, different skull and in theory shorter tails than Females
Bull is Stated a Male Younger than Buck but still an Adult
And we don't know if its Male or Female, Hopefully Male cause I am tired of Females XD
Also remember Spicy, Bull uses Buck's Animatronic, the CGI Model is different tho
I hope someone does some photo edits of this, that’d look absolutely gorgeous
ngl we need lipped Rex in the JW movie after rebirth (if they keep doing movies). Because it's almost like the lipped dinosaurs tend to turn out the scariest because they aren't outwardly trying to be scary
Spino is such a cool animal it Will be always my #1 favorite tho its sad some poeple dont see that and only see a "Weak fish eater" "Fooder" and all other types of insult tho Spino is still the Biggest and Strongest fish eating Dinosaur truly a remarkable animal
So called weak fisher
those arent ribs those are stripes
cough, cough, carcharodontosaurus
Hmm yes indeed pathetic
at that point, Charcharodontosaurus wishes it evolved stronger neck muscles
Ah yes
Arm motions it literally physically couldn’t do
JWR Spinosaurus = 🟤 , Spinosaurus irl (without caudals) = 🟢
What are the Most recent size estimations for my boy Spino
you dont know how to count its 21
my eyes aren't working cuz my glasses broke and my smart self decided to have my text small
14-15 meters and 8-8.5 tons
is it actually i lied just to annoy you damn im smart as hell
Thx
You aren’t making the point you think you are making when the size comparison highlights how skinny it is compared to just an elephant
It just shows how even an elephant would just bowl it over
why dosent the wspinosaurus just drown the elephbant with all of its papers?
I tried my best lol
I doubt that it would be able to simply bowl it over, unless it stays absolutely still and gets hit on the side, and the Spino outweighs the elephant here by 2-3 tons. Spino's legs are quite short, so it's probable that it is slower, but to expect it to stay still and get pushed on the side is not going to happen realistically
the parrot is here.
Okay this is top comment material
Spinosaurus just fires all of its papers that go back and forth about its ability to swim or not lmao
The weight crushes Dumbo
This is a final warning to remain polite and respectful while interacting on this server. If unable to remain civil on this topic, we'd ask you to please move on to a different one. Refer to our #rules
It definitely could swim, and I'm not quite sure on where that rumor even spread. The closest paper that actually argued that was Sereno's paper, which said on the matter Spinosaurus was a land-based predator by using a bird-level density (yes, pigeon level of density + air pockets) to argue it would be a animal more adapted to being on land. Even that paper believes spino could absoluetly swim, and only had some problems in being fully/semi-aquatic, so I'm not sure why that would even be
is spinosaurus to thin to walk on the bottom like a hippo?
This is cursed
There were actually scientific papers about it using (albeit questionable) methods of biomechanic models
why was knuckle walking spino ever a thing...
I don’t remember which paper it was but
This image will never be not funny
Peter griffin death pose in water
Yes, this is Sereno's paper. (bird level density lol)
Because some guy wanted a quadrupedal theropod and didn't look at the facts that the center of mass is near the pelvis like the majority of theropods
It was Ibrahim's belief (probably proposed in the 2014 paper where he described it) based on the legs being ridiculously small, smaller than any theropod proportionately
it would be funny if we discovered a quadrupedal theropod though, I bet it would be misclassified for years and still not accepted
Scott Hartman also had a paper? Article? His blog?
He ADAMANTLY argued for Spino being terrestrial and not aquatic
Which included his infamous skeletal many people criticised for using the actual fossil tail instead of an anatomically corrected one
I don’t remember all the papers, but there was a few arguing against aquatic Spino
Mostly to spite / debunk Ibrahim
But we are overanalysing a meme
It was funny
huh, never realized, but with super long tail in 2020 or whatever its legs got proportionally shorter
TBF they did argue for a very good reasoning since at the time extra caudals weren't discovered, so the tail was 1 meter + shorter, and the tail wasn't made with anywhere close of a soft tissue. That's why the old one looks more chonky, and the argument was that bro would tip over and faceplant bc the center of mass was so front-focused (probably not anymore tho)