#paleontology
1 messages Ā· Page 121 of 1
Discovered in the 1800s with massive media hype around it, it was the T.rex before T.rex. Plus it's known from dozens of specimens, exhibited in like every museum in the northern hemisphere, and simply looks cool
hey Randomdinos uh I know your sigilmassa is just an edit but would you considered it to be more usable compared to other sigilmassa skeletal before it? like lanican's
lancian's is fine and every other sigil skeletal is garbage so i'd say it's top 2
š wild
Kinda disappointing it's not pushed into media alot
It was for a while, stopped being pushed once good specimens of T.rex were found
if that's the case then Elemental model is pretty gas cause look how peak this is š
lipped spinosaurine, instantly awful
Dietpinosaurs
for legal reasons, that's a joke
you SUCK
Time to unlip
random is a horrible person cancel him (unless he gets un-busy and lets me pay him to make Stegouros) š„ŗ
No he must smooch
I can't suck, because i am lipless
ONFG THIS IS WHY TABLE IS THE TRUE GOAT!!!!
you broke my brain wtf
this was a major issue as a baby mammal that needs to suck in order to live but i managed
Proof that random is perhaps...a dinosauroid...?
Honestly like it when it's mouth is like a crocodile or gator
Bro.
How does Lanican's sigil looks like?
It looks like Spino...but at the same time no
ok so how would theropod like spinos sleep would they sleep like crocs or birds witch one
Iād say both
that dossnt make it clearer ap what would that look like
I can't say I've ever read a paper on how dinosaurs sleep
I'm glad I did buy that saurophaganax model from PNSO, it's just so peak (as Allosaurus now)
can i ask a question
What's the largest size estimates for Deinonychus? By length and weight.
Also how does it compare to the on in game to size
3.5 meters is the largest specimen. Based on what I've seen of mass estimates one of that size would be about 100 kg.
thx
iāll never not read it as macaroni
this does go hard
awesome bros would argue that a human could kill a deinonychus cause we weigh more on average, have more height, more intelligence, and more battle iq
(it would maul us)
Mammalian cunning...
do if dinosaurs where in our time our main predators would be small to mid size carnivores an large to any type of pterosaurs like that would u win a fight with a ostrich no it could kick ur gut out the best thing u can do is try to make ur self look bigger if that doesnt work try to choke it out but u probably lose ur nose
theropods over 1 ton likely wouldnt hunt us frequently if they ended up in environments with lots of large game.
In places like europe they definately would tho.
our biggest worry would be theropods between 50 and 1000kg.
I'm sorry lol
That's metal
were all the mapusaurus in the huincul bone bed all of varying ages
also, is flesh grazing a reasonable behavior for carcharodontosaurids
probably not
Their teeth are somewhat similar of monitor lizards, so they probably were tearing off their preys muscles and ligaments, which would result in immobilization and blood loss, though they'd probably die by the hatchet before bleeding out.
Only animals that I know off that are flesh-grazers are marine species so I doubt a terrestrial animal with high metabolic demand would do that over straight up killing a prey a large and feeding until satiation. It'd be even more riskier to go in and out for some meat sticks than just "fck it we ball in" and get your whole meal.
yeah, killing an adult argent and having food for weeks, while risking death makes more sense than taking a chunk of an argent, risking death, and only recieving a small amount of food
I don't think they'd necessarily kill fully grown giant Titanosaurs regularly. It probably was more of an occasional instance but younger, smaller individuals that are within the 10-20 tons? Sure.
yeah
if we gave one a good enough reason to come after us maybe.
it might take a few chunks out of us if it did kill us, but it wouldnt actively seek out human sized prey
yes
Who should I get first
That Loki looks siiiiiiiiick
i bought it
spino!
Ok so how did spino sleep like if it sleep like a bird it probably couldnt due to it fin on it back but sleeping liek a croc would be unbalanced an i ferl if we knew jow they slept we could figure out how there there bodys would contect an how they moved swimmed but in general im very curious
Heartwrenching
Where does the theory that āthe dinosaurs were so big due to the higher oxygen levelsā come from?
As far as Iām aware the Cretaceous had less than today, and thatās when dinosaurs peaked in size
Last time I heard that was in Jurassic Fight Club
dinosaurs got big because their anatomy allowed them to be big.
the herbivorous dinosaurs got big first during the triassic, and once the pseudosuchians that hunted those went extinct the theropods became larger to hunt those sauropods. Over time herbivorous dinosaurs got bigger due to a lot of other factors, and so theropods became larger to hunt those herbivores, not only that but because ecosystems were very productive during the cretaceous being big was advantageous in a lot of scenarios, so dinosaurs just kept getting bigger
It's more than just oxygen like there's so many factors
Basically the entire ecosystem was built to sustain large animals
thats why most of the largest predators in their clades emerged when ecosystems were very productive
(barinasuchus, deinosuchus, titanoboa, trex, megalodon, etc)
Morrison formation has to be the most unique example of productive but harsh ecosystem
Iām pretty sure oxygen didnāt contribute to their size whatsoever
Also
Is he chattin or actually right
how social where theropods an also what is trikes what gene are they
Is this really real?
Maybe
Crossing my fingers
Calculating atmospheric oxygen concentration is heavily reliant on modelling with often little to no direct geologic proxies. Both suggestions of meaningfully high or low oxygen levels during the Mesozoic are problematic in some way, maybe even more so due to the fact the the Mesozoic contain drastically variable climatic conditions within that period of time and theres no feasible way that a generalisation would be accurate.
Oxygen levels also have nothing to do with dinosaur size, pneumatic bones are just more conducive to supporting larger sizes more often.
no its a joke
it was actually a permian early bovine š
Well, sort of. It was a bunch if animals together, so Saurophaganax may have been a big Allosauroid...but it also had sauropod stuff in there
No it was actually real its scaled right to the chevrons & axis
So that means "Saurophaganax" name is a sauropod's name, but there is still a big allosaurus?
No but yes, ther abstract that is out clarifies that its very possible that the Holotype material (that carries the name Saurophaganax maximus) is from a sauropod, along with other material aka the Chevrons, axis etc from other specimens
I hope we'll get more news about it soon
Should wait until the paper is out to say anything
Yeah
guys i think we should call marin reptiles either ydroviasavra or naftiliasavra i took marin an aqutic an put the greek word for lizard or reptiles at the back like dinosaurs donu think this could work
no because marine reptiles arenāt a group theyāre several groups in a trench coat
mosasaurs are squamates, ichthyolosaurs come from somewhere indeterminate, and plesiosaurs are closeish to turtles
so are squamatea an ichthyolosaurs an indeterminate an pleaiosaurs not reptile or lizards if so then the name cant work
I just had a stroke reading that ;-;
are all the dino he list reptiles or lizard or not
it doesnāt work because they arenāt a unified group, all of those groups are still reptiles but they arenāt a single group beyond that
y
because theropod cerotopisan an saurpod hadrosaurs arent the smas but there all considered dinosuars an pterodactyl an quetz an rhamps arent the same but they are pterosaurs can u pls help me understand really confused now
they all share a common ancestor so it becomes a group, the different groups of marine reptiles do not share a common ancestor close enough to make it a valid grouping
what answter does an giant argent have in common with a taco
if you want to classify mosasaurs in that group then you also have to make lizards and snakes marine reptiles, and tortoises if you want to make plesiosaurs marine reptiles, it just doesnāt work beyond a common name for those things
snake marin reptiles isnt that still related to a land snake an if they tranfered to the ocean then that make sense for kost marin reptiles but if most stayed near the ocean or where born like that then i would think they be closly related
is it dwarf in comparison to other apes, or dwarf in comparison to gigantopithecus
Dwarf to gigantopithecus, new early species basically
So, marine reptiles do not form a clade, or a monophyletic group (it's more so of a polyphyletic fictive group as they do not share the same morphological adaptations and do not have an aquatic common ancestor).
Among marine reptiles, we have :
- Mosasaurs, a group of giant aquatic lizards, therefore squamates (Lepidosauria), that invaded the seas approximately 95 MA.
- Thalattosuchians, a group of Crocodylomorph, therefor their closest modern relatives are crocodiles but their aquatic adaptations were evolved independently (Thalattosuchia is a group dating back from the Early Jurassic while modern crocs are somewhere in the EarlyCretaceous).
- Thalattosaurs, a group of aquatic reptiles which the relationships isn't completely clear. These guys are from the middle to late Triassic.
- Ichthyopterygianss, probably the most successful group of marine tetrapod ever with some of the most outstanding adaptations to their aquatic lifestyle : the Ichthyosaurs. Among Ichthyopterygians you can also count Huphesuchians which are odd little guys, which some were filter feeders. They appeared in the early triassic and may even have a Permian origin (but this is not based on fossil evidences).
- Sauropterygians, probably the group which had the highest diversity during the Triassic. They include stuffs like Saurosphargids, Placodonts, Nothosaurs and Plesiosaurs.
- Mesosaurs, the oldest land vertebrates to go back to the sea during the Early Permian.
- Marine turtles, they still are around to this date. However, some groups have gone extinct since then such as Protostegids (which is famous for Archelon).
Most of these animals do not share an aquatic common ancestor among diapsids. The ones that may do are Ichthyosaurs, Sauropterygians and Mesosaurs. All other groups have evolved their own ways to go back in the seas when given the occasion.
Other groups have also achieved to live in saltwater among reptiles, that being the case of some Crocodylians and marine iguanas, but also, during the Jurassic, the Rhynchocephalians with Pleurosaurus.
Yet, when it comes to the group with most marine reptiles, I do wonder if their last common ancestor was aquatic or just had features which helped its descendance to become aquatic. The second hypothesis may explain all the different forms that existed. So they may all have possibly became aquatic independently.
yeah that
Confuzzled
Could Stegosaurs walk bipedally?
same because so far all of them are reptiles but not reptiles it very conuseing but this is way i got theyre not the same reptiles but all are reptiles but then y are all dinosaurs like theropod an cerotopisn hadrosaurs saurpods all called dinosaurs they arent all the same adoption but are still the same clade but marin reptiles arent in the same clade so wouldnt still make sense to jsut call them marin reptiles as a way to say all of them liek u do pterosaurs an dinosaurs
i am very confused still
because y are hadrosaurs an saurpod theropod an cerotopiasn all form dinosaurs they dont look to ahev the snae adoption
They all evolved from the same creature
what was that
And this chart show them coming from the same creature or related to it some how so does it not a clade like dinosurs
some small maybe fuzzy bipedal dinosaur
I don't know dinosaurs I'm only here because of my gf š
ok if bipedal then y dont saurpod an cerotopiasm walk on bipedal
they evolved to be quadrupedal to support their mass better
they all come from the same ancestor but that ancestor is so far back that other things also come from it that arenāt aquatic
yea dinosaurs an marin reptiles arent the same as it but that chart nessco should us it look like a lot of marin reptiles came from the same thing
They liked going up and down stairs quadrupedally, is that a crime :(
yes
you're missing the point, those marine reptiles share a common ancestor if you go far back enough but they still aren't closely related, mosasaurs and plesiosaurs are distantly related sure but mosasaurs are more closely related to snakes and lizards, you can't make an official "marine reptile" grouping that includes both without including things like lizards and snakes
ok but a other question then y are pterosaurs tranlate to winging lizard hut dotn have a relative to a lizars
because in Latin ālizardā was used for most reptiles, not just squamates Iām pretty sure
This is an instance where I would just throw a wikipedia link and say "have at it"
they say not to trust wikipedia becaus poeple change it alot an often then knew it
It's usually fine for surface level knowledge which, no offense, but that's the level you seem to be at
ur not wrong
and if mosasaurs are closer to lizard an anake then wat are the rest closer to
squamates are the group that contain lizards and snakes, mosasaurs are also squamates
Then check the sources
Totally agree with most things said here, just thought I'd mention thalattosuchians evolved marine adaptations independently but not aquatic adaptations as a whole, the transition from being a largely terrestrial clade to shifting towards being mostly semi-aquatic had already begun by the time thalattosuchians diverge and they inherit a lot of characters that are shared by other crocodylomorphs - tethysuchians, for example. There are also more marine crocodylomorph lineages than just thalattosuchians, a lot of tethysuchian taxa are predominantly marine (particularly dyrosaurids, although there are a few non-marine taxa in that group too) and then there are gavialoids and a few other assorted lineages too.
i read everything here but only processed 20% of it
so what i got out of it was terrestrial clade land thing grow to be semi aquetic an inherited feature of a aquatic things right am i missing anything
tanystropheus.
what the hell is this thing and why is its neck so damn long and why do it sit like that
wait did spino evolve from theropod but it may ahve inherited trait from crocs
They all are "reptiles" (or diapsids, which is a clade) but their hypothetical common ancestor was not aquatic and the same almost every diapsid there is today.
Just, marine reptile is a term describing a lifestyle and not a clade.
No, crocodiles have their own traits that Spinosaurus lacks. Spinosaurus is indeed a theropod and so a dinosaur, not a pseudosuchian.
ok then did they evolove theyāre facial structure to hunt more aquaticly base on the life stills
The skull morphology of Spinosaurs evolved due to their dieter preferences, yes. Their skull has a very different construction from that of crocodiles, which shows it was not inherited from a common ancestor, so they are analogous.
are acro an giga related
Yes, they are closely related as both taxon/genera are within Carcharodontosauridae,. This is evidenced by homologous structures, which define the clade Carcharodontosauridae and so these features are synapomorphies and help us to classify animals and say who's related to who.
(gonna try my best to explain taxonomy because this is a subject I love)
an also wat the reaaon stegorid grow plates is protection but also mating because the are very thin an were like cookie but it it just had a open back that would be a. Constant threat to it so witch one was it
There are possibly several evolutionary drivers for stegosaur plates and "thagomizers". AFAIK, there isn't necessarily one argument stronger than the other so it could be caused by sociosexual behaviors or/and by predation. Iirc it is rather unlikely to be in response to thermoregulation but I'm sure @hallow spear can elaborate further on this subject than I can.
It'd be overall caused by natural selection anyway.
(it's anyway the only recognizable evolution force observable in the mesozoic fossil record)
tthe underdog of the jurassic
Beta animal
why did everyone agree that cera had to be portrayed as a crackhead in games
because large head and small body
its buit for killing bigger stuff then itself
So does it have horn or it skull is just de formed
a lot of theropods were built for killing bigger stuff than itself
i mean in the game
guys how big is allosaurus (biggest species with biggest specimen)
yeah, but even in game, most theropods can kill larger prey, it hink its just that everyone assumes that it would've been fodder in the morrison unless it was like a beserker, even tho they just niche partitioned
Cera in game is made for killing bigger stuff then itself it has all the tools innit
fighting against allos is it for cera mains like me
i mean yeah, but WHY was it made like that
in every game cera is an over the top beserker
..........
Ask game devs haha
Wasn't responding to you home slice
i really want to knew how intelligent most apex theropods where where they like ravens or like pigeon
There aināt exactly a direct consensus, but itās very clear display/intimidation was a big driver in plates, defence may just an added bonus.. but of course something can be driven by multiple factors so itās entirely plausible that it is also a thermoregulatory device ontop of this. like you mentioned itās all caused by atrial selection and some cases intraspecific selective breeding
There really isnāt anything else to say on the subject because all literature on plates just agrees that itās not for certain what the main function was for it
Impossible to determine for most if not all extinct dinos like Rex, Trike etc
Is oculudentavis naga like an anole? Iām reading they had a crest similar to the neck flap displays lizards today have? I thought it was a birdā¦
It was a lizard, the authors knew it was, but they published it claiming it was a bird because that would give it more media attention
oh paleontology
Bro says that like it's unique to paleontology (it isn't in the slightest)
yup it had a horn. We have found multiple individuals all with similar horns
is it possible that marine reptiles were more colourful than modern marine mammals? especially in reef environments
I mean aren't there extremely few marine reptiles currently
quite a few marine mammals tho
the smaller marine reptiles were probably more colorful than marine mammals, but not the giant ones
Would this count as colorful
Wobbegong plesiosaur is my new favorite thing
this is a paleontology channel,
oh astrophysics doesnt hit the same
What
That still doesn't make it correct š„
gualicho is such a hater š
it doesš³āāļø š¦ š„
I am š„ š„ just say that popularity contests are
he plays monster hunter wild, he only can be a hater
is it true that depending on thr inside of the skull you could possibly see how a dinosaurs brain may have developed an what it was good at or how it acted like having great sense of smell or being a bit more intelligent or being able to see 3d or it hearing an can lizard even hear
Jon Jones is the best p4p fighter to have ever existed on this planet
Is there any basis to the tend of Theropods having big ol spikey necks?
the basis that it looks cool
All my homies love lying 
Imagine Jon Jones getting hit by George Foreman
Hey guys, there has been a long time since I came here, but I just had to tell you this crazy thing:
I had a very bizarre dream where a flock from an unknown species of a rhamphorhynchoidean pterosaur had somehow managed to survive inside a sealed cave-like ecosystem which somehow had sunlight? And were accidentally released into the world, becoming an invasive species specifically in parts of South America where they were outcompeting the local American Black Vultures for a niche.
These little pterosaurs had black skin and some kind of pseudofeathers covering their bodies, their beaks were wide, and non-pointy, and they had a very short tail like those of pterodactyls.
I know this doesn't reeeaaally fit real-life paleontology, but this dream was so vivid and I saw these beautiful ancient animals in front of my eyes, as my child (and adult) self always wished, that I had to tell someone else about this.
tbf
thats really cool
Now that I was thinking about it, it actually kinda looked pretty much like a Tropeognatus
With that protrusion in it's mouth. But crow sized and with colors of black and grey.
A.R.G in the making
Or YouTube vhs series
A very far-off branched descendants of Tropeognatus, living alone in a sealed environment for millenia?
Yeah that's sick. Not so much the part where they become invasive but it could be indeed an interesting concept
unrelated but i'm gonna miss falcon's ghost pfp š
Opinions on Incisivosaurus?
man, I never have cool dreams like this anymore. Only nice ones that build up to something cool and then cutoff or are ruined just before I wake up
looks like the average PoT player
i forget my dreams 2.6 seconds after i wake up lmfao
Is big Joe the biggest most complete allosaurus
no it's Joe Swanson
jk idk either :v
dino dex Tyrannosaurus Rex screen time part 1
Oh hey they changed the Rex again, looks sick ngl, the Dino Dan franchise has had weirdly great designs lately
I like it although am not a huge fan of the feathers
maybe a hot take but until the general populous is informed of and accepting of birds being dinosaurs, and them having feathers, iād rather depictions of theropods have too much feathering than none
It causes issues like the whole "Rex had wings" situation
It's a hot take because scientifically, you should aim for the most likely/most conservative reconstruction
If you wanna draw Yutyrannus looking like a mighty eagle, go ahead, but do not claim it as scientific
Too late. This is Yutyrannus. Scientifically accurate.

of course but for me at least iād rather see a raptor looking like a pom-pom instead of naked lmao
No one answered my question , big Joe the biggest allosaurus specimen with near complete material
What's your definition of "naked" because the issue is birds are rotund and perfect because they fly. The feathers form a shell to streamline their flight
Non-avian dinosaurs did not fly and as such, likely had that shaggy, short feather covering
I've heard it described as looking like that shag carpet from the 70s
@stiff osprey
Guys i have a problem im dinoist i just hate torvo witha. Passion for no reason there just stinky an i just hate torvo for no reason
no other dino make as mad as a torvo does expect hatz but other than that i just hate torvo with a passion they wte atinky to me
iām aware, iāve been studying this stuff for a long time. assisted in teaching lectures and all. by naked i mean naked. no feathers
Then I dunno about you, but no-one does naked raptors (or related animals) much anymore
sure, but a lot of people still think they are. thatās my point
I think that's a consequence of JW franchise and should not be compensated for by overcorrecting in the other direction
youāre reading too much into this. my point was simply that iād personally rather see theropods with too much feathering, than none at all
of course optimally youād want it to be accurate. but if i had to choose one or the other, iād rather the former
And my point is that since we don't need to choose one or the other, don't overcorrect
Otherwise we'll go back into the 2014s of "EVERY dinosaur gets feathers RAHHH!!!!"
Perhaps their integument was more akin to the Mammalia or ratite?
in terms of mainstream media? we kinda do. regardless itās just how i feel
no need to argue over it, we vibe
It is more complete than other specimens that are larger, it is larger than other fairly complete specimens, but it could potentially be the most complete of the large ones because the site is not exhausted and they may continue with more excavations.
What was the name of the new tyrannosaurid discovered
Labocania?
That's the one
longreach 
@fossil ingot
Puppy
Ohh its written Amurosaurus
The guy wrote Amurasaurus
No wonder I didn't find it
I love when Wikipedia states obvious biases in information with no evidence
how accurate are these types of videos?
not accurate
wth is going on abt sue being 13 tons
maybe if you listened to what stego said you would get it
what did he say...
idk scroll up to his messages
Complete speculation and nothing more
i feel like the only accurate one you can really get is livy
well actually, wouldnt you be able to get pinacosaurus's? i remember someone mentioning a voice box being found of it
you could get the range of sounds, but never the exact patterns they used in life
Guys, sorry for interrupting but I have a question
Were all Saurischian Dinosaurs bipedal? It's just that with my limited knowledge, I can't remember if there were any saurischians which were quadrupeds
Saurischians consist of theropods and sauropods the former being completely bipedal but the latter have some early members that were bipedal
So inaccurate that it never ceases to bug me that they're called studies. Click bait, nothing more. It's just poorly edited extant animal sounds
Um blub...dinosaurs are animals too so clearly they'd make the same noises as modern animals........
Omg....
Oh wait.
So sauropods are saurischians? I always thought they were ornisthichians!
But wait, there were bipedal sauropod?
In the beginning, yes
Prosauropods
I mean... Afaik, they're purely speculative but based on certain scientific notions (the good ones, at least).
I personally find them really cool though
(They're really just slowed-down, reverbed goose calls or smth)
That's epic!
I still need to get a good hold of taxonomy because I struggle with it
Spinosaurus's sounds in one of the vids are loon calls pitched down and reverbed
I understand. I still find the speculation cool
would the mammals be more accurate?
I mean it's hard to be accurate when you literally can't even see the target.
We have especulated based on bone morphology, but without having any actual proof of the structures used by them to make sound, it's extremely hard to know how they sounded like exactly
That channel's most recent content is stuff from video games. I feel that one should be able to judge if their vocalization vids are accurate at all
basically when it comes to sounds, certain animals have enough material and the like to reconstruct a very, very rough idea of their vocals (though even thatās a stretch), but overall the most we know is that they didnāt walk around screaming like jp lol
Oh! I see. Question: other than bone structure, what other things have we found that could tell us a little bit more about how they could sound?
First off, I understand your opinion about Torvo. Second off, Hatzegopteryx isn't a dinosaur. It's an Azdarchid or to be very broad, a pterosaur.
the hyoid bone is a big one, allowing plausible reconstructions of the tongue. we also have an ankylosaur with evidence of a syrinx, which is the āvoice boxā that birds have (we have a larynx), so we know at some point down the line, they started developing that over a larynx and the vocalizations may have been more like a birdās. and, correct me if iām wrong somebody, i believe theyāve managed to plausibly reconstruct tyrannosaurusās throat?
If I remember correctly, it was Pinacosaurus
ye i think so
Here's an image of the new spinosaurus everyone's been talking about (This image has been taken with permission from the author so don't worry) https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/864787072739704832/1302015831907110922/IMG_2815.jpg?ex=6726943c&is=672542bc&hm=ffacbdf6da4c626205ed22e09764a1682e81554b24b2fa914096511e38922fa9&
unicorn spino
Jeez, that crest looks so much bigger now
Damn thats weird
Oh hey, the two-clawed therizinosaur I heard about like 10 years ago finally showed itself
Damn this be cooking
dang how much dinosaur news we gonna find this week holy moly
the hand of the claw on the right reminds me of the indominus rex
Astorgosuchus irl
also ik you said allosaurus amplexous or fragilis or whatever th epanterias is is 4 tons but is it just 4 tons or its 4.5 tons,4.7 tons (ex)
Dawg I have no doubt it's just fine if you go for 4 tonnes flat, like you don't need an extra point to add on to it
gimme the length
Nah
Just find it yourself
atleast gimme the source š dont you dare refuse
Bro you have it right in front, it's not like you don't know you just can't seem to keep track of it when you "need" to
Also don't you force me to do anything or am telling mods to kick you out
Its not a syrinx I thought, but a larynx. Syrinxes are known only of birds, separate from the larynx which they also have.
Ornithischians and Saurischians are seperate yes, Theropods and Sauropodomorphas are closer related than they are to Ornithischia
You sure this was permitted? EJR posted it on Twitter but he blocked out the part with the actual skull reconstructions
The photo's by Archelosaurian, who stated he had permission to take the image and post it.
thx telling me that
what abt this
That one is up there for sure! but The angle and the dramatic scene of Torvo squaring up with ceratosaurus >>>
found a better image
changes ur mind?
Nope but I also love this one
sometimes i wish i had nitro so i can make that my banner
Nitro is for losers 
which it was in a right angle and was in a natural envorment
No scientific backing, but I do really love some of the sounds they make
Every dinosaur gets feathers raaaah isnāt always a bad thing if you do it right
(#giveeverythingprehistoricplanetrexfeathers)
little guy
Evidence of ontogeny...?
Bro used my skeletal for scimitarspinus but not for the actual animal it represents
Is that its name?
The urge to say yes rn is palpable
i think he used dans oh nm i saw it
guys is there a torvo species in germany
Two.. clawed?..
life is mysterious
Wait, a crest? That's so bizarre, and cool
only two fingers on the hand
was too lazy to scale it to the holotype
@bright veldt lets shrink spinosaurus to like 4 tons and make carno 7.
Evidence: i felt like it
Evidence: vibes
Should I chnage anything about my torvosaurus?
New spinosaurus ?!
Woah who made it?
yes
uses these images for the head ig
rudolf hima
Nice Im a fan of his work as well
w
Elden ring bossfight
Kronos, Morrison's Hunger.
guys wat can we find out about dinosaur skull mainly the inside because what if they were like smart to understand to grive or complex thing
can't find out all that much
Btw it's from documentary "Dinosaur Empire"
His latest work https://x.com/himarudolf/status/1851039251548553698?s=46
When they said they crest was shaped like a scimitar, they weren't lying . . . .
Also, I assume the skeletal of the didactyl Therizinosaur is by GAT?
A spinosaurid that has a unicorn horn? yeah that's not too surprising, would've thought that one with wings would be found first
I would be suprised if they didn't grieve with how many animals do it today, including birds
Those are outdated skeletals and skulls, they look prior to Elvis, they are much different now.
there are Torvo named 'Elvis' or what???
Yes iirc itās the holotype I think
Thym āoutdatedā
Well technically Randomdinos is ( the one the right )
The one the left is just an edit of his without even lips and the head is from other artist
Random did do an Elvis, with Paleojoe also doing one
who this Torvo supposed to be???
the Elvis Presley of the Jurassic???
It is not the holotype
Elvis is CMC VP15575, is not the holotype, it was found in Colorado near dinosaur national monument. It is the biggest most complete torvosaurus, the size of edmarka, and is currently being studied, a paper is on the works.
also do you want me to send the left torvo skeletal edit?
called used is from carcharsauce
correct if am wrong, and I do apologize but from this angle doesn't the 'now' skull look crushed?
That's is the accurate Torvo, those reconstructions are outdated based on allosauroid proportions
really?
It is not, Elvis has the best and most complete preserved maxilla, the dry mesa maxilla was broken and reconstructed like allosaur maxilla.
oh, well damn
The ascending process of the maxilla was very low, parallel to the ventral margin
so may I ask skeletal wise paleojoe's ( the one on the right ) would be more accurate?
Let me share a pic of it
They are both outdated, with allosauroid and tyranno proportions
so at the moment there is no accurate torvosaurus skeletal?
This is a replica of Elvis skeletal mount made by the same paleontologist that prepared the real specimen
So in short when referencing from torvosaurus we should use this Elvis mount?
that's really impressive
You can see that is very low and narrow
Oh really, btw I was asking earlier about my torvosaurus heads and I was hoping you saw it
gurneyi maxilla (top) showing similarities with Elvis maxilla. Dry Mesa original specimen (bottom), red lines pointing to the cracks of the ascending process and how they reconstructed more vertical oriented like in Allosaurus, but now we know that's incorrect.
I'll check it
Sorry cant find them
^
Btw Elvis is 10,5m long and ~2,5m tall at ilium blade. Some bones are same size of those of Edmarka, ribs are similar to louisae quarry Edmarka and pubis and vertebra are same size even bigger (caudal) than Nail quarry Edmarka.
also would Dan Folkes be also outdated too?
dinosaurs arent lizard but arent bird but closer related to birds
yup
They look quite correct with the lacrimal to jugal dorsoventral height being narrower than premaxilla and maxilla height
rectangle head built dinosaur
Dry Mesa for sure, French and gurneyi look more accurate but still too tall compared to Elvis. But they are different species so can't assure about those at 100%
wat was para an arco in trhe same time period an place
Also gurneyi holotype is bigger (maxilla body) than Dry mesa as you can see in the previous pic I shared.
This one
ok is they are dinosaurs or are closely related to dinosaurs
what
are dinosuars bird or related to birds
birds are dinosaurs
oh so i got that confused with lizards because i though dinosaurs where closely related to bird also a thing on google said bird are technically lizards
No birds are dinosaurs
Because the other specimens are fabricated, Elvis is the most complete Torvo, the only Torvo with associated semiarticulated cervical and dorsal series, and the only Torvo with the femur preserved.
I knew but that wat it said
Parasaurolophus and acrocanthosaurus literally lived multiple million years apart from each other
btw would you say Hartman's would be more accurate at least showcasing the skull being more narrow and less boxier?
so this isnt true right
All birds are dinosaurs but all dinosaurs arenāt birds
Itās like saying, āall cats are mammals but not all mammals are catsā
Yes Scott Hartman's is way more accurate, but that one you posted is Scotts one modified, incorrectly, the tibia is enlarged, torvos leg are shorter than usual for an average theropod.
Blame table ong!!! he did it!!! ( btw what about this edit by my friend 'Le_Gustta' )
Looks better
Torvosaurus is so gas
But still the legs look too long? Scott's one is this
Nvm the one of your friend looks longer due to the gap between the femur and tibia so it seems accurate
okay
probably they added more cartilage
btw would you say that the postcranial skeleton of Hartman's skeletal is also more accurate then other skeletals?
Yes, looks like it's partly based on Dry mesa "small" or mid invididual plus some parts of "brontoraptor", and he updated the skull based on Elvis
The MNI for Dry mesa is 3 individuals, 2 of almost same size and the 3rd one smaller. There are 2 right tibiae of similar size, 72cm, so those must be from the 2 big individuals. That they should be around 9-9,4m. A 72cm tibia for that long animal is proportionally shorter than other theropods around that size. For example the +9,5m Allosaurus 680 has a tibia of 85cm. Metatarsals of Dry mesa are also shorter, with the big ones being 35cm and the one of the smaller individual 33cm. For comparison an Allo around 8,5m (DINO 2560, amnh 6125) have 37 and 36 cm metatarsals respectively.
But the elements are very robust.
okay thanks
Brontorapto does kind go hard as a name
that one isn't randoms that is alpha 8's edit of it
the skull may look different if you want to use else as the base but for the most part random's torvo isn't outdated
random's torvo funny enough uses this as a base ( for the most part and they aren't really that different )
I dont know which one is Randoms or which one is Randoms but edited, but they have clear differences in the limb-head proportions and torso-head proportions, also as reconstructed, the sacral neural spines shouldn't be visible from the side, in the replica and mount are visible because the left ilium is crushed, but the right ilium is not and it covers almost all the neural spines.
The size of some elements doesn't fit with reported measurements, also Elvis is almost reaching 35ft, but still not 35ft, and that is with 55 caudal vertebra. The skeletals have 50 cuadals, so they should be even shorter. (In my opinion derived megalosaurids should have 50, 55 seems too many, in that regard they reconstructed it better)
We can literally just do @stiff osprey and ask what happened with your TOrvo
^
uhm if you still wanna know this is random torvo ( unedited )
The limbs are different because I used 'Brontoraptor' as the primary reference; its pelvis and limbs are known from one associated individual, while the Dry Mesa bonebed is at least 3, probably 4 or more individuals
The maxilla is based on T.gurneyi; as the image states, obviously there was no allosaurid or tyrannosauroid material used in the skull reconstruction.
can I still call Torvosaurus ( Brontoraptor ) for the funnies
oh yeah I guess I can ask this now but Random did you see my torvo?
I'll have a look at the Elvis material when that paper comes out, then I'll see what needs to be changed
damn so what MorrisonFPaleo said is right but we would have to wait for the paper right?
He is assuming most of the Dry Mesa material belongs to equal sized individuals, which is possible and would indeed make an animal like Hartman's. But I don't work with taking bonebeds for granted that way. We'll see if Elvis gets a good osteology
damn, uh can I still use Hartman's though?
yes, especially since there are those who still believe Dry Mesa and the Brontoraptor quarry are different species. The pelvis notably is pretty different between the two
uh could your skeletal still be used?
Sometimes you have to make that judgement for yourself
DAMNNNNN that's a hard ass quote
Chances are both will turn out to have errors in the postcrania if Elvis is described
other funny para news big maxilla #2's toothrow is actually shorter than the toothrow measurement for walkeri in Wyenberg-Henzler 2022
the mind continues to be baffled
People need to understand that before Elvis there were hardly any articulated remains of taneri, there were associated remains but it is not even clear whether these belonged to the same individual or to several. I consider 3 to be more parsimonious in for Dry mesa. it was suggested a long time ago that perhaps some of the cranial remains were from a larger individual than the axial or appendicular skeleton, but with the discovery of elvis i think it is now clear that big cranial remains comes with proportionally short axial and appendicular remains. It's hard to make accurate skeletals from obscure species, there are famous species that are particularly difficult, much more than what people expect for them being well known names.
Just to clarify I wasn't implying you used allosaurid and tyrannosaurid remains, I was speaking about Britts 91 reconstruction and the original Torvo looks
iirc when it was put over the mount they didn't too many differences but that could change with the elvis description, given how some mounts aren't the best
Oh yeah, no worries
The main differences between the Elvis mount and my skeletal were the length of the lower limb (tibia + mt3) and tail. But Elvis's tibia is only known from a fragment and only 2 caudals were known when they made the mount
man I love brontoraptor
Btw I made something for my concept game and was wondering if something like this okay
-# Viavenator mentioned
yes
Anyone know of any good pachycephalosaurus skeletals?
guys wat is a archosaur
Archosauria (lit.ā'ruling reptiles') or archosaurs () is a clade of diapsid sauropsid tetrapods, with birds and crocodilians being the only extant representatives. Although broadly classified as reptiles, which traditionally exclude birds, the cladistic sense of the term includes all living and extinct relatives of birds and crocodilians such as...
It's a clade including pterosaurs, psuedosuchians, dinosaurs, only alive members today are birds and crocodiles to explain it shortly
but yeah what blub sent
Immature skulls of the theropod dinosaur Coelophysis bauri from Ghost Ranch, New Mexico
https://app.pan.pl/article/item/app010852023.html
A brief review of non-avian dinosaur biogeography: state-of-the-art and prospectus https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2024.0429
Is it just me or does prehistoric planets archelon look a bit oversized
Itās probably perspective. Itās not Archelon either.
^
Is there any more concrete info on the oxalaia?
W pic?
No
there's one
it's a burned dust now
The armor of this dinosaur was so durable that it could absorb the impact of a car driving nearly fifty kilometers an hour--but itās far from the only crazy armored critter lurking in prehistory. This video explores the most extreme armored animals in prehistoric times, including the mummified nodosaur Borealopelta, the killer sharp-jawed placod...
Yeah maybe if you hit it with one of those toy cars
People forget how powerful cars are
Also tbh wouldn't a sauropod have much better odds?
wouldnjt anything like, elephant sized and have better odds? i never seen a elephant get hit by a car but i feel like it would take it better then a nodsaurid
Armor is nice but a fast enough car is still Liquifying you through it
Your car donāt count
lol
actually, i feel like they can flip cars maybe if hit, i've heard of wombats flipping cars when hit
The car itself also gets liquified, cows and moose do plenty of damage to cars while being much smaller and unarmored
they are each other's natural enemies you see
Because the metal would melt when destroyed, we never found any fossils of the cretaceous car
Unless... the car car odontosaur?
This!
the ghost lineage was right in front of our eyes....how could we not have seen it
Oh that wasn't even in the question. Car is totaled instantly.
anyone know any good, ACCURATE dinosaur model kits? Looking for a quality assemblable and/or paintable models, preferably around 8-12inches (Moderate desk or self decoration size)
people forget how much damage a 3000lbs+ hunk of metal traveling faster than anything on land was meant to go can do
not kits, but PNSO is pretty much the best accurate dino model company out there, with HLG also rising up there
Iāve also seen bears survive car crashes in multiple videos. Obviously the greater the speed the less likely an animal will survive but now you switch the bear out for an ancient tank I like its chances a lot more.
Ankylosaurs actually disappeared from the fossil record once the Flintstones cars were invented
ight mr deino let's get u back to ur swamp now
Depends on various other factors, regardless this vividen hate just seems dumb to me tbh, not a fan either but its just a youtube title to attract viewers?
YOU CAN'T MAKE ME GO BACK THERE!
Proceeds to quickly shuffle away into the woods in a panicked mess
angy gorilla noises
whose mapu should i use again?
lambor or random?
cap
look at all their tyrannosaurs
Gorilla Vs The Large Fowl
Yeah they look terrible , Iām holding on buying any until the lip theropods start coming out. Their yang looks real good tho.
other than being lipless theyāre literally fine lol. their updated rex is gorgeous. just display them with the mouth open, and the liplessness isnāt noticeable. i own almost every model
besides, they are doing lips now, their sauro-allo looks incredible
.
This has been tested though. An abstract mentioned doing biomechanical tests on a digitalized Borealopelta armor and they got these results.
Though I'm pretty sure the animal, borealopelta, will die later on from internal injuries. Just physically the armor let's it tank a car.
oh it would absolutely die later from internal injuries. impacts are brutal
would defo experience some kind of head injury, like concussion or worse
Is it true that a complete spinosaurus skull has been found? Or have I been tricked?
you have been decieved
Not complete
Correct me if i'm wrong, but: isn't the mass of a cow enough to damage and even derail a single vehicle?
Yerah that's what i meant! Of course, the animal would either instantly die or eventually die due to injuries, but i think a nodosaurid could cause heavy damage to a car and its driver
if deer can cause car crashes a cow defo can
Ye but if itās a high speed car the cow also gets completely eviscerated, thatās the point
Of course
is this still an indet
Its wild that there is a theory suggesting saurophaganax as a sauropod
is that a yes or a no
not a theory but ok
?
Saurophaganax's type specimen is possibly chimeric with sauropod remains. As for Allosauroidea indet. it is still an indet last I remember
No, it's Allosaurus sp.
By the way, quick question. On the image shared by Scanova on the Scimitar-Crested "Spinosaurus", it says "New Spinosaurine". Is it not a Spinosaurus ? Or is it a "Wait and see" question ?
It's a wait and see atm
Okay, thanks !
i wanted it to be fragilis š
Tenatively.. it may still be an Allosaurid, Saurophaganax maximus
Well you know what is going on with that genus, and you can't attribute 26083 to maximus unless you are lumping all maximus in fragilis. Because 26083 has the characters that differentiate fragilis from maximus.
26083 is currently being histologically studied along with other fragilis specimens.
The paper is still some years from being published.
I need good comparison images between pterosaur, scansoryopterygid, bird and bat wing anatomy. Would appreciate it
thym
its not sauro š š
bro it's not that serious
yes lil bro
my brother in christ aren't you the one that begged for rnadomdinos to make you a skeletal because you're birthday is coming up?
ye and?
and werent you the one that theatened to kick me for something that wasnt deep lets go to the dms its a bit offtopic...
you don't see what wrong with that? literally asking someone who is a skeletal maker to do you a favor without considering paying them cause working on a skeletal isn't easy or yk considering they might be busy with other things
if that's the case idk why you mention that
alr i was only asking him out of curiousity
dawg there was already no chance he was gonna do a skeletal based on your request like he said
it was only "epnatieras" sure ik its fragmentary but whats wrong with it
because it would literally just be his saurophaganax skeletal or an upscaled ver of his allosaurus
not proving ur point cuz he could just change a few things of it
you literally wouldn't need to change anything about it, the only thin you would change epseically for the latter would be the size and that's it everything else would literally be the same
nah
well he could just replace his sauro thing and rewrite it as epanterias
then it wouldn't change anything like I said ( all you did was chnage the name )
but lets be real here he wouldnt care unless ill pay him
Well no sht if you don't pay him he's not gonna give a damn
š§āāļø
im reffering to the neural arch only, which is a single bone
This is fake btw, brick created it as a joke
Nu uh.
Saurpod Sauro real(trust)
It was never real oooooooo š»
Perfect Halloween twist
The cake was a lie
So there was iguanodon sized allosaurus?
Spinosaurus sp.
Well then if you only refer to the holotype you still could not refer 26083 to Saurophaganax (1123) because they do not overlap at all.
Uhuh but I was never talking about 26083
Yes
YOOOO POT GOT IT RIGHT THIS WHOLE TIME I'd ping Matt and tell him they're doing good research ahead of there time but I can't 
Oh OK, my initial reply was only about 26083
Yo anyone got some info in the Megalosaurus?
found dead in a ditch
Oh im ngl i thought you responded to something else (I went and checked the original thing)
You're right its either fragilis or Allosaurus sp., id probably lean to A. fragilis given its been reffered to such in other literature including Loewan 2020 and 2009
Its only partially a joke(if not a joke at all), its scaled correctly to how big "Sauropha" would be as a sauropod based on the Chevrons and the Axis + it being a Diplodocid (with said material) is the most likely attribution
Yes definitely is more fragilis than jimmadseni.
yes
may I ask if 26083 is closer to either allosaurus fragilis or allosaurus sp. it would still be a 3-4 ton animal right?
elephant
How old would we say a saurpod theropod hadrosaur an ceratopsian would get
4t yeah
Probably closer to 4-5, Limb bone allometry gets 4.5t give or take
4.2t is what you get directly scaling from 2560 and also accounting distortion of the caudals (length)
Yeah I noticed even with the limits remains we still have a pretty massive theropod
Which means 4-5t is still a consistent result
What would you guys say is a mistake people make when trying to etc make very accurate paleoart, but end up going so far it's inaccurate?
I know feathered dinosaurs get this treatment but what else
Ik its just another method
Soft tissue? Doesnt happen often though tmk
I don't like people becoming fans of feathers and pushing them on scaly dinos like adult tyrannosaurus (or any other species that was found with skin impressions) š
Gives me the same cringe as scaly raptors every time
Were you talking about this? Not sure
Nah, feathered rex is peak, If we use the saurian version.
i never realized/knew how fragmentary torv is
Truth be told tyrannosaurs were probably feathered still, just not to an exaggerated extent that we saw in the past
Frankly youāre being too generalised with ātyrannosaursā should be specific to a group or genera
I'm referring to tyrannosauridae specifically
Then i definitely disagree given thereās no evidence for any of the larger ones especially to be feathered, maybe you can argue size for Alioramus and co, but I would not see any reason for the rest of them, plus there are scale impressions
It could be feathered but vestigial on larger ones
going back to 2015, vulture feathering was the only valid option for a feathered tyrannosaurus rex
Itās quite a silly and arbitrary model of integument distribution as well.
I just find it hard to believe they'd be completely devoid. That's not present in any other coelurosaur family. Even if just a little.
What about very sparse feathers similar to hair on an elephant?
A case by case perhaps. Most derived tyrannosaurs evolve during a period of very equitable global climates, I think thereās also nothing discounting shedding of integument during the waning coolhouse climate of the Maastrichtian. The African elephant is pretty much hairless in its adult life as well.
Complete loss of filamentous integument is basically unheard of in animals, but yeah it would probably be so sparse that it would be invisible from a distance
Would an African elephantās hair show up in a skin impressions though?
yea because I said it, my source??? turst me bro
Probably like the same lifespan of a elephant or a good bit older
https://tenor.com/view/anjanath-mhw-monster-hunter-world-monster-rawr-gif-17086904
Another franchise accidentally making discoverys
@vast sedge also
wth
@vast sedge from here and up look
You got shammed smekeldwarfed even
scientists make up their mind challenge
Lmao
Bubble wrapping, basically the opposite of shrink wrapping (which is still the larger mistake imo, but everyone knows about that one) where the artist goes so far in the other direction that their depiction ends up looking like the animal had some catastrophic endocrine disorder
How old would a argent get in it jole life span
did concavenator have feathers or like protofeathers? because i have seen some renditions with them and some without them
Conc has quill knobs on its arms iirc but that's the only evidence we have of feathers
Ok I was wondering because Iām making a 3d models and I am deciding whether or not / how much feathers to give them
Are you talking about on the arm or full body? bc the only concrete evidence we have is just quills/feathers on the arms. It's your model though so do whatever you feel like
i may do some over all feathers but ill try to stay accurate, i wasnt sure how much it had before so i gave it like a feathery down
I will add some more quill like stuff around the arms now
For accuracy
In terms of accuracy, it is really up to you in terms of feather density and coverage. All we have suggests Concavenator could have had a feather "wing" on its arms (not a literal quills). We have no idea of how the rest of its body looked like in terms of integument, so you have the freedom to be creative.
āDinosaurs did not have a Monarchyā might be the most zero fun statement Iāve ever read
All of these options can be equally valid. You just need to keep in mind that some parts of the body would have more sparser coverage than others.
Concavenator's thing is very wierd. People talk about it either being quill knobs or muscle scars, but it would be very wierd either way.
would this be more accurate
Anybody know the accuracy of this scaling regarding Hippopotamus gorgops?
We had a talk in here about this before. This is accurate afaik.
Okay just wanted to double check lol
Yea neither is conclusive iirc.
This goes hard
I'm referring to t rex specifically, it's been found with scales on almost every body part
Not smaller tyrannosaurids, that's another topic
and to be more precise, I was talking about full feathers mode as in dromeosaurids, not sparse quills
Hey is there any reason why most paleoart gives dinosaurs very small eyeballs?
Mostly because the bigger you are the smaller your eyeballs look, despite them being rather large in your head. Skin and muscle cover most of your actual eyeball
I see I see ty
I love how dinosaurs have survived 3 confirmed mass extinctions (Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous if you are smart and count birds) and are on their way to survive a fourth (The one humans are currently doing). The dinosaur liniage is a fire one
Simple more primitive designs just work
The end of the Jurassic wasnāt a mass extinction
what are all the cladds like therepods an saurpods
just use Wikipedia dude
Use wiki its decent for this like this
aren't eras ended with mass extinctions?
Well if you class it as a mass extinction then dinosaurs must be unkillable given like 99% of groups survived the Jurassic to Cretaceous transition
so it was more of a "peaceful" transition? What really defined it as a new era then?
Thing like theropod are subbroaders
what
The only qualifying factor is some sort of major global ātransitionā or āeventā
what transition/event changed the jurassic into the cretaceous?
A major global marine regression. It caused some groups to go extinct but it was in no way a mass extinction
iirc that also happened in the Cenomanian -> Turonian
That was an anoxic event, dissolved oxygen was released from the oceans, creating toxic waters
oops
"they poisoned the water supply"
Imagine dying because you're an idiot and then becoming nearly perfectly preserved so people can look at your idiotness (He swallowed a fish too big for him)
Don't be mean, he can't help it
"this thing can barely fit in my mouth, lets eat it" -Dumb fish
I know the paper is not out yet, but how likely is it that the new Spinosaurus sp. represent a male Spinosaurus ? The idea of male Spinosaurus being way smaller..I don't know why I like the idea x) I mean if specialists think it is a new species then who am I to say otherwise x)
How exactly do you tell the gender? Is there something unique about it? What if it is just a younger indevidual?
I believe that to determine if a specimen is young or not, you look at the rings in the bones, kinda like a tree iirc
Most of the time with gender, it's a guessing game, but there are exceptions
I don't think they would chop open fossils to find out, most fossils are really fragile and would probably shatter the whole thing
Depends on the animal the fossil came from
My idea for it being a male Spinosaurus only comes from the scimitar crest, which could be for display, but that's not enough evidence. It's just a "headcanon" of mine until the paper drops
What is the name of the specimen? I wanna take a look
No name, the paper didn't drop. We only have a snippet kindly shared by Scanova. I can find it if you want
Yeah probably, its unlikely they mated like birds considering they have massive tails in the way
Most likely having reproductive organs similar in appearances to modern reptilians
that would be a WILD size difference
Might just be a new species tbh, are we sure it was found in a similar time formation to Spinosaurus AG?
Lemme see if I can find the answer, if not, we'll have to wait for the paper
Even if it was in the same time formation, it could still be a new species. With it eating smaller fish and S. Aegypticus going for bigger fish (I'm so creative I know)
Yes but why THAT similar?
Similar attraction methods š¤·
Keep in mind, Spinosaurus is a genus, not a species, and within genuses thing can be VERY different (Just look at snow leopards and tigers)
What i'm tryna say is it's not entirely out of the question for this new thing to be a new species of Spoon, and just being smaller and for a different niche
Apparently it was discovered in Niger
Moving the tails out of the way isnt difficult
Yes, but that niche would have been heavily occupied by Smaller Spinosaurs, Crocs, and POSSIBLY large predatory fish, just don't see how an animal that big could survive with that much compeition while being THAT much similar in apperance
Much more difficult if we assumed they mated like birds
It was probably autocorrect from "sails"
so uhh minor issue, wouldn't this new Spinosaur fall prey to the already present and similar sized Suchomimus (Which lived in Niger at the same time)
Tiger V leopard comparison you made would come handy right now
Maybe, or maybe there was niche partitioning between the two, maybe Spinosaurus sp. hunted different, smaller fish than the bigger Suchomimus ?
Only the paper could answer that, we have to wait, I don't know how long
That doesn't make sense in this scenario, was more or less saying how different things in the same genus could be. Not niche partitioning between two very different genuses with animals of similar sizes (if you include the sail ofc)
I mean you do have a fair point that a Suchomimus could probably make this New Spinosaur prey, but then again this new fully grown Spinosaur would probably make a similar sized Suchomimus its prey as well, it could certainly hold its own for sure
This one has Spinosaurus Sp in it as #3 btw (called Siggilmassasaurus)
Is the Spino AG too small or is that Sucho just that large
I think it's normal sized, they are just using a woman here, so it might be a 5 foot something instead of 6 foot comparison. Don't quote me on that tho
Here are sizes added on the post so you can check em out
also I found a wiki page on Siggil/Spoon Sp
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigilmassasaurus#History_of_research
Sigilmassasaurus ( see-jil-MAH-sÉ-SOR-És; "Sijilmassa lizard") is a controversial genus of spinosaurid dinosaur that lived approximately 100 to 94 million years ago during the Late Cretaceous Period in what is now northern Africa. Named in 1996 by Canadian paleontologist Dale Russell, it contains a single species, Sigilmassasaurus brevicollis. T...
no just teeth
They didn't live at the same time, Suchomimus lived ~112 million years ago while this new spinosaur lived between 105-97 mya
ah thanks
i tried to find this but all i got was this Domain, Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, and Species so what would. Sauropod theropod cerotopaians fall under
Thanks for nothing I guess
clade
ie
to put it extremely simply, clades are groupings within the ranks of biological classification
Anyone know what theropod this is?
and if ANYONE can recall an individual called Dinosauria 101, please let me know
Allosaurus
same person as chocolatecake123 and triceratopshorridus DA
allosaurus
really?
Chat Iām drawing Gigantoraptor for Dinovember day 4
What level of fluff do you guys think
medulary bone for reptiles is the best way, as it is formed by females to provide calcium for eggs
I say go full stylized exotic
thx
Too bad most dinosaurs barely preserve it, or just don't
ok so wat bigger argent or patagotitan because every time i look it. Up it never get a consistent answer
indeed
its even worse for reptiles when we dont have it, cause the cloaca does the same thing for both genders ;(
well the medullary bone only forms when āpregnantā, which adds even more rarity to the incredibly rare instance of fossilization, not to mention the bone is designed to essentially disintegrate
it was found on a rex specimen right
And look at this too, B Rex confirmed to be female, doesn't show any variation in Tyrannosaurs to make other separate guesses on dinosaur sexes 

most sexual dimorphism in birds is external, like displays and stuff. and even if we do get those preserved, we donāt know if itās for males. literally the only way to know is the medullary bone, but itās absence could mean male or non-pregnant female
And we don't even know which was larger than the other
hell if a non-pregnant female Tyrannosaurus and a Male were equal in mass and proportions you wouldn't be able to tell
MASSIVE IF but if we assume that it's the typical dimorphism like many animals (With many males being larger than their female counterparts) AND disregard skull variation having any possible effect on Sexes, AND disregard the possibility of other species of Tyrannosaurus (While LOW, still possible) having sexes interchangeable in size (Species A bigger male smaller female/ Species B smaller male Bigger Female) WE MIGHT be able to assume a Tyrannosaurs sex
i see what u did with that last line
What do you mean?š³
No seriously what do you mean, I have no clue what you are talking about. Should I have said Tyrannosaur's sex or Tyrannosaurs' sex
nevermind
It's about an SVP abstract that did in fact compare the energy absorption ability of Borealopelta's armor to the values generated by "high-speed automobile collisions".
You can really tell that most people commenting about the title/concept clearly did not watch the video haha
yeah fr
it could take a car crash, but surely it would die from internal damage afterwards
I'm sure it would
Depends on the car
smart car gets folded in half
In America, everything is bigger š
I calculated in the video the mass/speed that would correspond to Habib & Brown's energy values of 125,000 Joules. The equivalent of a 2020 Toyota Corolla going about 30 mph/48 kmph would match up with Borealopelta's limit of energy absorption
Ngl legs might be a bit to short
This New Spino is said to had Taller/Longer Legs then reg Spino
But in all honesty considering how the predators it lived with weren't heavily built enough to get through its armor I'm fairly sure it was more then enough
Anything bigger, or the same size but faster, would be too much for it to handle
ankylosaurs would be the number on dinosaur getting into car accidents if they were around today
it would PROBABLY die but considering how much mass it has it would be a great issue getting rid of the carcass
Just look at how much of an issue white-tailed deer are in the US today in terms of vehicle damages and accidents. A 1300 kilogram nodosaur with spiked armor would be an order of magnitude more difficult to deal with
It forms in response to severe trauma as well as it is a calcium reserve to avoid overtaxing the animal
Has anyone considered a costal bear theory for the variation in US as well as Candian Tyrannosaurus size?
If you can provide enough T. rex specimens for such an analysis, maybe
But as it stands so far, we do not have such resources
Unfortunately, but I would love to know the differences in predation of prey for a Tyrannosaurus located in Canda vs one located in the lower south
lots of mountains in laramidia, i wonder how that impacted tyrannosaurs
guys how is komodo dragon the worlds largest lizards but crocodile are considered lizards
Crocodiles aren't considered lizards
but when i looked it up it said croc where comsidered reptiles
Yes, they're reptiles but not lizards. Turtles are also reptiles, but they're not lizards
is this wrong
No it's not. Crocodiles are in a group of reptiles called the archosaurs. Birds are also in this group
ok so there reptiles is like a clade or category for all birds lizard reptiles an crocs right but not lizards that somethign completely different right
What
croc are reptiles but not lizards
if this helps
ok so croc arenāt lizard but there reptiles right
Yes
ok other question what bigger argent or patagotitan
Should be argent
"Lizards" isn't even a clade btw : it just describes a morphology within Lepidosauria.
i dont knew how true this is
I never questioned the armor would survive. But saying it could "Tank a car crash" when it would almost certainly die afterwards to internal injury, just because the armor was not shattered, is definitely a bit misleading.
In a car crash, both parties lose. I did not watch the video nor do I intend to, I was merely commenting on the nature of the title.
Although I agree with the estimates of 4.2-4.5t for 26083, how did you scale from the weight of DINO 2560 if no reconstruction has ever been made of that individual? (except for Scott Hartman and it's just a side view), all other 2560 reconstructions are based on Madsens composite that actually doesn't have a single 2560 bone, all are from CLDQ, so all those reconstructions are undersized or not accurate at all. Unless if you are using 2560 femur circumference.
And even Scott's one isn't 100% accurate
Made a rough size chart of the largest extinct Chondrichthys, + the largest extant member
My Dinovember calendar: ones in bold I have not chosen yet!! Please help me pick some! I will have full scientific name out once the day actually comes but if yall have any suggestions for genus of certain dinos lmk. Fridays are specifically Pterosaurs and Wednesdays are for any non dinosaurs or dinosaurs not in the other clades
I added a less small Megalodon and it makes me cry lol
Sent this here bc I feel like you guys would have opinions on the genus of the dinos I havenāt picked a genus for yet
https://x.com/fossilcrates/status/1853505831632818683?s=46&t=Im902yodl7_eUDwKAn4w0Q
me when i maliciously spread this everywhere
Aka, the holotype is still a Allosaur, given all the context clues and implication
So Sauro is???
Alive?
allosaurus maximus

Rough edit of Big Arctotherium built off of a skeletal of moderate sized Arctotherium
(Original Source: https://www.deviantart.com/blazze92/art/Arctotherium-angustidens-440223159)
downsize P. ludvigseni to 5.8-6m, and ptychodus to 9.6m finally for paraheli downsize it to 10 meters
OOp I ued wrong species for Proteo my bad. Working off a diagram not assuming complete allometry from a modern frilled shark, though realistically it should be around 8m instead of 9. Ptychodus is about accurate though, based on the soft tissue found this year for the species matched to Ontogeny in sharks
Paraheli I'm not 100% sure on
Dragonthunder aka Fabio accurately sacled Paraheli at 10 meters so you should use it
Will do so after, appreciated. It's a funny fish
What's the current idea on the biomechanical purposes on the Helico-type tooth whirls? Last I checked it was slurping ammonite out of shells IIRC
sent already nerd!
yeah
damn
@warped peak use this for whale shark
Randomdinos
There has been plenty of recons 2560 is an archetypal Allo
And also no Im using a volumetric estimate
Randomdinos is based on Madsens composite, is quite different from 2560 in proportions and some morphology and a little smaller, the skull is in fact 2560 tho
Be careful, Wait for the paper, definitely not going to announce the conclusions on a twitt
you're too petty about things sometimes, it fits the DINO 2560 measurements that are available, random revised and edited to fit what the Loewen thesis states, its just not publsihed yet
? I didn't want to be mean, where did I said something bad against the reconstruction?
it doesnt matter
At least the last time I saw it (years ago by now) it was clearly based on Madsen monograph, that's petty? I even have it downloaded because I liked how it was made
He correctly used 9+14 for the vertebrae, contrary to many other reconstructions
Props to him, also I like the scapulacoracoid position, more vertival
Hes edited it to fit the measurements from Loewen 2009 i think it was, which changed the sacrum among some other things, also added 2 caudals as it was missing them.. probbaly more but icba to go check, regardless he has changed it
Nice then, do you know where can I find it?
Still my coments were more regarding the appearance of the dorsals and the size of them. At least in the old version they were the ones of the plates. Don't know the new version.
"the two strange lizards met, as it was written"
https://x.com/SalmonArtist/status/1853382775396868604?t=EwRiUsGCho4oXJ7Brt3tjQ&s=19
For context this is what I was talking about, scaled to same skull and femur length.
OMG IT'S FLOATING SKELETAL!!!
I assume this one, which was actually posted a year ago. Happy birthday
https://www.deviantart.com/randomdinos/art/Allosaurus-fragilis-skeletal-reconstruction-2-0-992237249
that mount is at an angle tho.. ive seen different angles of it, the skull and neck are not at the same angle as the body
it was actually yesterday
Still has the exact same vertebral count
Yeah its a matter of angle
And also the neck is contracted in Randoms
I'm talking about the dorsals
Its funny you say that, bc I also thought it said nov 3rd, but when I looked back at it again it said 4th and it confused tf outta me
Dont most specimens have generally shorter neural spines than that
They are clearly undersized and do not match the morphology at all, the anterior dorsal spines of 2560 are much more rectangular and bigger than CLDQ. AFAIK Randoms dorsals are scaled to the plates. Also note that in the mount the scapulacoracoid is a little further back at mid length of 10th presacral, so in the position of Randoms (correctly at the very beginning of the 10th presacral) the difference in the dorsal series would be even more noticeable.
I'm not saying is bad, it is clearly accurate to the famous monograph, is just not 100% 2560, and still one of the best skeletals out there.
Well obviously, since its missing an entire tail also
ā ļø someone bit it's tail off
man I ain't talking bout when it was posted in private paleo server #30
It's not private though? Also ngl idk what it being even private have to do with anything since it's still a source where it can be founded
you flexing with being in a private paleo server
Either way the neural spine will probably not affect the mass that much
If that's T2.0 that one's private homie, can't just freely make an invite lol. Most people aren't in it, including MorrisonFPaleo here the person askin'
Vs deviant art which anyone can just go and look at
Apparently thr new version is the same one that I have and used in the comparison
well it's also in theropoda 1.0 so yeah
@stiff osprey Your Allosaurus is being fought over again
Yes, I just asked if there was any one apart from hartmans, but the dorsal series size and the position of the scapulacoracoid and ribs can make a lot of difference in the weight.
Which you'd apparently be surprised to know most people don't even know exists
so?
Idk why I'm getting a "so" here I was just saying it was its birthday today and was met with an "um actually" bc it was also posted in discord servers most people don't know exist, probably earlier than the third too if we really wanted to split that hair
I mean he probably is going to confirm he used Madsens plates, scaled to them as there wasn't available info about 2560 at the time, so not a fight at all, just talking about the facts, it's not wrong nor bad it is the classic composite instead of a 100% 2560
Ik, it's a joke, don't worry lol
BTW his USNM 4734 is the best reconstruction of that particular individual ever IMHO
that cool
wait have your seen uh big_boi reco nof the head if so I have an edit of it with that of random USNM 4734
I'm not at home atm, and the updated version still needs redrawing of the gastralia and pelvis, so I can't post it
But I edited it to the DINO 2560 measurements in Loewen's thesis, while the drawings of individual bones are still based on Madsen, as it is the only online source for images of 2560's postcrania
skidibi sigma ohio rizz level 10 kai cent duke dennis random dinos! 
Never say that again
sorry big boi
Same thing I was saying, also keep in mind Madsens plates are not based on 2560, those are CLDQ individuals scaled to a size type.

^ anyone?
Throw ma boi Carnotaurus in there somewhere for a Theropod thursday
oh yes sir how could I forget! š«”
I'd also say either slip Llukalkan, Eoabelisaurus, Inawentu or Chilesaurus in there
Regaliceratops
Tyrannotitan Thursday
Deinocheirus Mirificus Century
Guys do you have any recommendation on online pages/vlogs that publish news about up-to-date paleontological discoveries?
Stenonychosaurus inequalis is the 'replacement' for the invalid Latenivenatrix mcmasterae. Correct?
Yes
Alright. So Stenonychosaurus inequalis's size range must be large, corect?
give or take yeah
Also, I am confused about the new 'Latenivenatrix TLC'. Does that mean that anyone who already has Latenivenatrix can access it, or only the ones who purchase the game itself? And while I am here, can anyone explain to me what 'TLC' means?
TLC is "Tender, Love, & Care" it just means giving it an update it deserves. It's not anything content-related. It's just an update.
So, my Latenivenatrix also has all the new things, right?
ye
Alright. Thank you so much Scanova the Carnotaurus. You have been big help. One more question though, are those additional abilities, or are they the 'new' abilities?
It's half and half. Typically a TLC update both improves/changes old things and adds new things. It's a case-by-case basis.
Thank you so much.
š
Is noxovenator a fantasy dino? The one absentia is making? Is there any skeletal for this or for what it used to be
it's entirely fictional
Hullo PaleoChat, I'm curious-
I've been seeing irritator compared to pelicans with the discovery of its jaw type, so im wondering if Spinosaurudae as a collective might have carried themselves in that sort of posture
Head sort of resting on the neck as they walk. I haven't seen paleoart of this. Is it possible?
But I still imagine a more, elegant?, posture. Thoughts?
Both are wrong, pelicans are far more extreme than what irriator and potentially other spinosaurus have going on, they also don't have nearly enough flexibility in their necks to do that
Alright, thanks much
I think Olof compared it to a Cormorant
Ye
yep
what is the largest sauropod hadrosaur theropod cerotopsain an anything that pf a clade like what the largest thing in each clade
Bro please don't tell me Ben G Thomas got the case of Tyrannosaur glaze š¤¦āāļø https://youtu.be/W87JG8aclTo
What was the deadliest dinosaur that ever lived? Steve Backshall decides!
Steve Backshall Ocean Live Tour: https://www.stevebackshall.com/liveshows
Become a Channel Member or support us on Patreon for behind-the-scenes, bloopers, extra adventures and more!
Become a Member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDSzwZqgtJEnUzacq3ddoOQ/join
Join our ...
T. rex is my goat
He was such a good paleo youtuber, UNTIL he made this list
Cry all you want, T. rex will always be #1 š
its NOT that. It's just that too much Tyrannosaurus talk becomes a bit repetitive
guy what the largest cerotopsain
Look it up
i did an it said giga was the largest theropod
Argentinosaurus, Shantungosaurus, Tyrannosaurus, Triceratops, Stegosaurus, Ankylosaurus
the goat covering the goat, the glaze is needed
are this all the clades for dinosaurs Theropoda
Sauropoda
Hadrosauridae
Ceratopsia
Stegosauria
Ankylosauria
Pachycephalosauria
Iguanodontia
Protoceratopsidae
Diplodocoidea
Titanosauria
no you're defintely missing a lot
Perhaps the nanotyrant can usurp the tyrant lizard?

no theres a lot more, the ones i listed are just the main ones, Sauropoda, Ornithopoda, Theropoda, Marginocephalia, Stegosauria, Ankylosauria
Wow, the largest, peak theropod evolution turns out to be actually strong and a formidable opponent therefore earning top tiew, what a big surprise!
Of any prehistoric creature was alive what would cause human the most problems
thats too subjective but id say for livestock or farms id say Raptor type things, Utah, Deinony etc.. for Infrastructure id say Sauropods, Large ornithischians, large Theropods
no like what would eb a good guess mine is giant pterosaurs like hatz or quetz an small to mid sized theropods like raptor or carnos things liek that
Biggest problem is a mid sized carnosaur/tyrannosaur of any kind
because they mostl likely hunted human sized things
They would die if they hunted humans
Only in small, underdeveloped places do you see predators ever hunting humans on the regular
Medium size theropod didn't hunt human size things if anything they much of similar size prey again humans might not be hunted but would be considered killed if things does goes very wrong
if a random human just out an about was an carnosaur was hungry would they most like run if the carno just started going for them the chance fo survival are like 25/75 who knew it could lose interest
Carno isn't a carnosaurš, is it?
It it name shorten
I said any theropod in the Carnosaur group, look it up
What is a carnosaur?
Carnosaurs. The very name evokes danger ā Greek for "meat-eating lizards." These theropod dinosaurs must have terrorized their dinosaurian prey during their peak in the Jurassic period.
https://ucmp.berkeley.edu āŗ diapsids
The Carnosauria - University of California Museum of Paleontology
Carnosauria is an extinct group of carnivorous theropod dinosaurs that lived during the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods.
While Carnosauria was historically considered largely synonymous with Allosauroidea, some recent studies have revived Carnosauria as clade including both Allosauroidea and Megalosauroidea (which is sometimes recovered as parap...
Idk what's wrong with this, rex is simply the deadliest
Itās the largest predatory theropod that is actually known from decent remains and is widely available to study. Itās not rex glazing it is just being well known thatās literally the reason it is talked about more is because we have more things to talk about when it comes to it because weāve known about it longer and have more info to go off of.
I thought carnosaurs was the was the small version pcynosaur
Are large Madtsoiids like Vasuki thought to have constricted prey? I know it's believed for the smaller members
Thats Carnotaurus an abelisaurid
Carnosaur ā carnotaurus
yeah probably, but at the same time they may have used their jaws more often, considering they have no venom, and especially vasuki being the largest predator in its environment
Especially considering they were less adapted for constricting, makes sense
that is interesting, I would really like to see a matsoiid snake hunting decently large prey. I wonder how it went about doing it. too bad wonambi died out 40k years ago
Clades are literally every group, from Saurolophini to Dinosauria, so no, thatās not even close to all of them lmao
And also, for the record, Pycnosaurus is a large Carnotaurus lmao. (And it probably looked less like Carnotaurus than path portrayed it seeing as those horns seem to be more or less exclusive to Carno)
Comparing the two is wild when Carnotaurus is known from a nearly complete specimen, just missing the tail and lower legs, that even preserves skin impressions. Meanwhile Pycno is known from a few fragments of leg and tail
Was corythoraptor a omnivore? and which was its primary food intake?
accidentally poops this
https://x.com/Fossilcrates/status/1853505831632818683?t=E-JI7LGVPeaverUc-AKoUA&s=19
All oviraptorosaurs were primarily herbivores of tougher vegetation.
what abt Ovi the Egg Stealer?
Oviraptorosaurs in general. Oviraptor never stole any eggs. Those were its own.
fr?
Then was the young raptor mandible(?) found within the nest false or...?
remains washed into the site from above
Oh how quirky
But Dinosaurs couldnāt yea ok
Pog
This is literally a 7 ton theropod
I don't...quite understand the point being made here
They said it was impossible blub
Who
And what dinosaurs? I assume sauropods cus that's usually what rearing like that typically pertains to
What I understood as the clade the less likely possible to rear up id Brachiosauridae because of their cog/com close to their fore limbs.
What point are you trying to make
Dinosaurs and rearing up.
Society when the compact elephant can rear up better than the elongated sauropod
would ceratopsians be able to rear up like a comapct elephant
Yeah probably.
no
Ceratopsians are one of the things that probably just couldnt rear up
Ceratopsians have gigantic blocks of bone for heads, elephants less so
Isn't ceratopsid COM close to the center of their body?
its not just aobut the COM
Surely the ceratopsid centre of mass is more anterior than not though right?
yea its further forward than that
Any studies suggesting that? Cause this one does say that Ceratopsid COM is more forward than that of other ornithischians (with Ankylosaurs having the most backward ones due to their dermal armor) and does compare with skull ornementation vs without.
c-d seems fairly okay as the reconstruction is not based on GSP and seem to be more in line with other Chasmosaurines, so it really does not look too far off to me.
i have a model of trike
Though I will agree than COM isn't the only factor about an animal capacity to rear up.
Im basing what im saying on trike & the other large ceratopsians by extension
That model sure is something
Musculature is also to account, but I wouldn't exclude entirely ceratopsids to rear up (unless you wanna make them rear up like monitor lizards or elephant or like keep the position for long times).
I dont think a short rear is impossible like a short "jump", but one like the elephant is depicted doing i just dont think so
Yeah then we both agree on that.
i could potentially do some tests to see what the most optimal position would be
Something I'd see being possible would be sort of like a crocodile imo.
As we always say, fck around and find out!
But it'd be something very occasional and probably uncomfortable, not high + not possible to keep for very long.
Elephants have HELLA long limbs, which Ceratopsids are like chubby and short.
Does anyone happen to havr this one hatchling Trike picture that's just standing up like a man lmao?
anyone know any good paleo artists? I really want to follow some on instea
Ceratopsids are large and heavy, and half of that is head
Andrey Atuchin is goated
Other highlights would be Fried Wierum, Douglas Henderson (I doubt he has an insta though) and Sergey Krasovskiy
Randomsdinos have you ever made paleoart?
Heh...
Wait, you do dragon scaling? The more you know
Mostly skeletal reconstructions now, but I used to post drawings of live scenes as well
Issue is I only ever draw when I'm bored doing something else
According to the skeleton model in GOT season 5, dragons are theropods, so this counts as random dinos
Guh, chat is this real?
It actually might be
Avian or non avian
Gabriel Ugueto
Firdassoy( pretty sure he still uses insta)
Ville Sinkkonen
Me /jk
Otherwise, yeah Audrey Atuchinznd Ville Sinkkonen are my personal favorites, but then Cristian Bacchetta, ddinodan, Caetano Soares, Simone Zoccante, Rudolf Hima, Lautaro Rodriguez Blanco, paleoiii, Speed Thief and many more.
Dang drogon is small compared to the books
How plausible was it that fukuiraptor was omnivorous?
It's not a omnivore
today i learnt that the carnotaurus and ceratosaurus are apparently related
Yep and they're also related to Deltadromeus
really trashy image sry but it turns out the things were related to everything
Well yes, related animals will always share a common ancestor
so could something like a stegosaur or ankylosaur do it
stegosaurs were definitely capable of rearing, I donāt think ankylosaurs would be able to at all
Yeah not really. Too hefty.
the legs of the larger ones were probably too small proportionally to even push themselves up vertically anyway
guys what where horn on ceratosaura y does it have horns does it head butt thing or just use it for display or did it us it to protect its nest in dens
Prob used for display afaik, they're not made for combat
And they're not really horns as they don't function as such
^ likely display
is the whole keratin sheath thing not accepted anymore
Wait what