#paleontology
1 messages · Page 120 of 1
I forgot we had two specimens
"stood no higher than a chicken" -google
considering they might have also been in the group that had feathers, they could have looked a bit like chickens as well 
Source
knowing that many dinosaurs like the tyrannosaurus had feathers, i assumed that there is a possibility they could have as well, i dont have a source as it was only a theory
theres like no evidence of tyrannosaurus actually having feathers
feathers are ancestral going way back afaik, to the point some of the first "crocs" could've had feathers
Honestly, I'm curious about what the Apex predator of the early Cretaceous was for the northern hemisphere. In the south, there was the Carcharodontosaurs, but what was their equivalent in the other half of the world?
so unless we have skin impressions(which to be fair, we do in tyrannosaurus) feathered in some capacity is the default for a lot of theropods it seems
In the northern hemisphere it was also carcharodontosaurs for the most part
still carcharodontosaurs!! and sometimes spinosaurs
Carcharodontosaurs were simply built different
Based on what I can find online, the only instance of a larger Carcharodontosaur from the Northern Hemisphere I can find is Acrocanthesaurus, and even then, he was from fairly early on.
I remember asking which theropod do people think was starting to take over or would take over had the meteor not hit and most people said either megaraptors or abelisaurids
fortunately 90% of early cretaceous north american fauna is just cloverly with sprinkles
There's Acrocanthosaurus in North America, Neovenator in England, Concavenator in Spain, Alti/Becklespinax in France (?). Not much is known from Asia at this time but there's Chilantaisaurus, which is debated to be a carcharodontosaur or megaraptoran
they really be calling turonian early cretaceous now
I don't know. Herbivores were changing close to the end of the Cretaceous, putting a greater emphasis on the ability to effectively fight back against predators, see Triceratops and Ankylosaurus.
well shaochilong apparently has been redated to aptian-albian so i assumed chilantai was redated as well
or do they not coexist anymore
i thought shaochilong got deported from ulanhsuhi to whatever john new oviraptorosaurs from
i dunno if chilantaisaurus got thrown out too
no more tiny carch being bullied by giant megaraptoran
this is a terrible day
I meant taking over in terms of being the next kingpin of theropods
woah why do franoys's and SIW's shaochilong match up to less than 3cm of total length apart
so i can pretend that shaochilong has concrete size estimates to throw rocks at that big caudal
i love scaling 5m animals to inexplicable 13m relatives!!
~man who just reconstructed bahariasaurus
shaochilong is (was) a baby chilantaisaurus (bahariasaurid) so that tracks
Yes, and to do so, said theropods would have to be able to adapt to their prey becoming increasingly capable of fighting back. The Tyrannosaurs were already adapting to this, as seen with Tyrannosaurus.
now can we downsize the glup shitto ornithopod vertebrae as well or are those doomed to be shant sized
sister taxon to hippodraco gianttailensis and iguanodon 1.4m+femorafromthe19thcenturyensis
although on that note did anyone ever figure out how to make this normal-size
well i'm pretty sure the only reason it was ginormous is fadeno scaled a picture of the caudals using a scalebar that was 2m further from the camera
That's interesting
if i had a nickel for every time fadeno scaled something several tonnes larger than you'd reasonably expect it to be i could probably buy a candy bar
That’s certainly a few nickels
so you're tellin me they have done this about 40 times lol
table how long was the brazilocarch caudal exactly i forgot
23.3632156
Man, ddinodan has been on a role with things
so brazilophaganax would be 13.9 m long based on shaochilong
and that's ignoring the likely proportionally larger skull
and given some of thats the bigass tail lets just say its roughly dentary giga size
we did it patrick, we saved brazil!
skinwalker
wait
since shaochilong is a derived -id wouldn't we need to redo the reconstruction after meraxes and stuff
do we think a gigahippodraco in musth would be able to kill brazilophaganax or is that a skill only derived hadrosaurs had
wow its hideous
this is vile
shaochilong's one of those things where i dunno where to even start trying to scale it and i'm kinda baffled as to how siw and franoys got the exact same size for it
this is fair i'm just going to use their consistency as evidence that shaochilong was actually that size
wild compa
oh god i can actually pull off making this look good
one sec i'm trying to see if i can fit the dorsal vertebra into the same animal
well i couldn't find the paper or the measurements but my scaling from neovenator was apparently 12.8 meters so close enough
welcome back aureosaurus monstruosus
brazilian theropods mk.iii teaser...?
i don't think i'd survive the fallout of posting a >14m brazilian carch on deviantart
the three monsters of the marfim fm
This entire conversation is like watching modern YouTube
at least suchomimus braziliensis is actually cool without being also rather distressing
i've been listening to epic music the whole time i'm doing this and it makes scaling poorly classified caudal verts feel like saving the world
even with this anatomy it's still larger than giganotosaurus
but like smaller than cope rex at least
this is absolutely sending me
Hey paleo peeps so Ive been drawing a iggy for a friend of mine and wanted to know a lil more about em like if their thumb spikes were decent weapons or like maybe if they were scary or smth
the flexibility on most dinosaurs's arms kind of sucks, so it would be difficult to aim the thumb spike at a vital area of an opponent
but assuming it managed to do that it would definitely be a dangerous weapon
not much use against like a T.rex, but luckily Iguanodon only coexisted with predators smaller than itself (that we know of)
What the hell is that
What base even is this
0k so i can remind myself that allosaurus amplexous is 11.4 meters and 5 tons
shaochilong
wth is this
We stan Cap
Random, my homie
Can you slide me the skeletal reference my man, my dawg!
no 🙂
you can have the silhouette though
I hate you!!!, this is why is Table is better!!!!!
/Sr
Man what is this
What are all this actually
i'm conflicted as to whether this or the bahariasaurus recon last night is a greater sin
on one hand this is working with objectively more ass material on the other hand its much more preferable to nearly every other scaling of the thing and the bahariasaurus recon gave the two people who care about the thing far too much joy and validation
Uh what name is the carcharodontosaurid suppose to be again
supposedly gomez but imo brazilophaganax has its charm
if it was known from actually good material i'd propose aureosaurus (gold lizard) so we can flex on argentina
but as it is, brazilophaganax fits its probably-sauropod affinity much better
Okay okay thank you 😌
anyone knows who made this
what abt lord of the shark eaters
carcharophaganax would be ironic considering the weirdly prevalent myth of saurophaganax being a carch
Hey Random did I do the lips right on my attempt at having Manu's skull on Justice body?
It would also just be way too on the nose
precisely, material this bad doesn't deserve a good name
lips look fine but the random line following the mandibular fenestra is weird
Am I a bad person for liking animals known from limited or bad materials?
only if it's bahariasaurus, then you're going to jail with those two other guys
time to find a new favorite dinosaur
I have yangchuanosaurus
torvosaurus
well my top 3 rn are allosaurus torvosaurus and giga
this megamonstroshaochilong convo reminded me that I know a girl whose favorite dinosaur used to be Shaochilong
@stiff osprey You got those three monstrously sized animals from this right
A reassessment of the historical fossil findings from Bahia State (Northeast Brazil) reveals a diversified dinosaur fauna in the Lower Cretaceous of South America
peak skeletal
correct
Do you have the pdf
oh right yeah why did that paper become closed-access
Tarbosaurus, followed by Camarasaurus and Pachyrhinosaurus
guys i just realized somthing
For the betterment of the public
Big T. rex doesn't want you to know the truth...
Why is the slowmode 30s lmao
this is great actually it used to be 1 minute
allosaurus is the realife indominus 💀
thats what you get for saying something positive above slowmode
We should start a debate about spinosaurus or something so the mods will get mad and lenghten the slowmode again
allo victim
Can get the OMNH 1188 out here like deadass
but it's a nice allosaurus dorsal
overly prepped
Imagine being only a dorsal
i just realized with the new martim formation caudal we have a 12m long legged spinosaurid in brazil
the prophesized jp3 oxalaia
i wanna know the vertabre size ( ill take its size with a grain of salt) im just curious abt the size estyamte
you planted it there because you're Brazilian!
Okay but all seriousness is Henry actually Brazilian?
if i did that i wouldn't also have planted a 23cm carch caudal
that thing scares me
no i made it up brazil isnt a real country silly
guys is random behind gomez?
Just like Denmark
what even
he is
I would only plant a giant theropod in brazil if it was a) smaller than T.rex or b) known from good material
Btw should the tongue be visible on non-avian dinosaurs
well yeah but like thats such a bizzare question 😭
not as bizarre as when zboomer asked me why i was brazilian
☠️ I mean isn't Zboomer a racist
hes many things, that is probably one of them
No its not flexible in most theropods iirc
I think he just says whatever will cause the most drama idk if he actually is any of that
but yes he's not a good person
50/50
Am still keeping it because it added character 
sigh
I hope no sane person think he is one
can anyone read this
Society
i have that table on my pc
unfortunately i have gone to bed
Yeah
NO DONT GO TO BED
Fortunately, I have already turned your bed into a deb thus waking you up because it's the anti-bed
Is the gigahippodraco centrum 2459 or 3425?
That just rotated my bed 180 degrees really fast
guys.. is this OMNH 1188?
Did it work? 
why is this so funny
whichever one was larger
random my birthday is coming up can you do a skeletal
The guy named after the specimen he chose not knowing the specimen bone
asking for OMNH 1188 does not count as a skeletal
i meant allosaurus amplexous but whatever
yes but you can't choose which animal or when it comes out
(it will just be the skeletal i was already planning to make)
Random modern spinosaurus vs 90s spinosaurus scaled to same size who would win i think 90s spino wins because of battle iq and combat experience but idk modern spinosaurus has more strenght and is square level instead of building level like 90s spino i think a modern spino can take on two 90s spinos on a 1v2 but idk
You mean the taxon that’s literally A. Fragilis
hth is it fagilis 😭
Do not ask the amount of brain cells i sacrificed to write this
Post your updated torvo already smh
What is the base for the gigahippodraco?
The 90s spino has a deeper skull which gives it more bite force but modern day spino has shorter legs giving it a lower center of gravity, they're really evenly matched fr
It’s referred to them and compared to be indistinguishable so pretty much
does this torvo count
Hippodraco ofc
when did I update torvo what
(Cartilage)
NO
Cartilage was invented by the skeletal companies to sell more skeletals
ginormous dorsal vertebra
do you even know that like deadass
People will love it if torvo gets taller lmao
Goes hard
What happens if Gallimimus with cartilage
guys can i show yall my favorite spinosaurus design
i think knowing basic photoshop should be mandatory to interact with any of these servers because it takes like 2-3 minutes tops to give something more cartilage
do you think dinosaur invented clothes because we don;t have them preversed in the fossils.
the silhouette silly
We went from big paleo to big skeletal 😭
fadeno hippodraco but i made it quadrupedal because it weighs like 12t
the most accurrate spinosaurus
can I get the silhouette on its own perchance
na id win
no i already turned off my pc
TURN IT BACK ON OR IM GONNA FEED YOU TO THIS
this channel is so interesting
Real
good thing its abt to fall asleep
This server is missing Sirblameson
i need to inv dan and paul
Pipe down buddy
on god bro shouldn't even be here himself
why do I feel like dan would just be peak memelord in here
When is path of titans gonna be available on Xbox ??
ok you can stop trolling now
bro just asked a question
it was one that got answered awhile ago lol
Also wrong chat
Not to mention the game is currently available on xbox lol
It's been like that since Rex came out
Yes
is Allonautilus extinct or alive
A. scrobiculatus is alive, A. perforatus I don’t think is classed as extinct but I’m not sure a live one has actually been seen
is it true we only known them froms shells?
from what I know that’s true of perforatus yes, there might have been one still in a shell at some point but not alive
if nothing else brasilophaganax's stomping grounds got some nice art when that paper released
Rex when he sees a sick and old adult Alamo too far from its herd:
i wasnt really expecting toothrow length to scale well in edmontosaurus but jesus christ
i'm not even sure if i can pull the bad measurements card because henzler's skull lengths are pretty consistent in how much smaller they are than campione and evans cause of i'm assuming measurement standard
and still got slammed by Rex
like i'm all against edmonto glaze but i should not be able to scale beckys giant's entire maxilla to the toothrow measurement of ROM 57100 and end up with a skull the size of mor 003
i really do have to wonder if this is a typo or not
nvm skull length's actually 1050 but same issue
even then it would probably still be a challenge
yeah ur right...
...
do they not have enough intelligent to do such pack hunting or what?
i mean
we technically have evidence of social living, but based on the number of rex caused injuries from other rexes they seem to be solitary
and tbh they arent very adapted to hunting sauropods, which is the only animal in the ecosystem that would justify living in packs.
even family units can be brought into question. if the babies hunted alongside their parents why would the youngsters look so different. it implies that they get their own food, and therefore do not hunt with their parents
Its likely more complex than that. Because despite the differences between juveniles and adults in Tyrannosaurs, we have bonebeds of multiple individuals of different ages so.
tmk sue was found alongside 2 other T. rex individuals ( might be another tyrannosaurus though I forgot )
well at least its not that bad when you look at every edmont skull ig
btw this nets a 1.22m skull for beckys giant but thats with an 80-90% shorter method of skull measurement than campione and evans
granted beckys giant also has a maxilla measurement but idk if there's any edmonto maxillae measurements anywhere
shorter
seems to be relatively close enough between specimens for me to not care too much
maybe the relationship is skewed by using immature individuals?
the snout gets longer in adults but that's mostly the premaxilla iirc
for example ROM 57100 is clearly a juvenile of a 15 meter edmusth
maybeeee? but there doesn't really seem to be much of a coherent trend in the first place
actually there is way better correlation as a quadratic but this results in an 80cm beckys giant skull
lmfao
with no need to think about how to escape predators, adult edmont's head begins to shrink
How well does the placement of Scipionyx as a young spinosaurid hold up?
Not well, trying to classify a newborn theropod will always be difficult because the babies of various clades look much more alike than the adults
You'd need to have good data for multiple growth stages of a species, like we do for tyrannosaurids or Allosaurus. But we don't have that for spinosaurs
Perhaps this is how sauropods evolved
After all, they had beaks and we don’t have any elder hadrosaurs…
that suggests they may have had parental care, but at the same time it doesnt suggest family units, unless there are larger individuals, like adolescent or subadult
if there are then ignore this
it may be noteworthy that the one described tyrannosaur with large bonebeds (more than like 3 individuals) is one where both the adults and juveniles are gracile and cursorial, unlike T.rex
that would be stronger evidence for social living
Is the eye placement okay?
Teratophoneus also has a >6 individual bonebed but we don't have a good grasp on its ontogeny because undescribed moment
Isn’t there a bonebed for Tarbosaurus as well?
there is one for albertosaurus iirc, which was also quite cursorial
Tarbosaurus bonebeds allegedly exist but scientists can't agree on whether they had 6 individuals or 60
Bones too scrambled?
i think the 60 came from currie just making it up and nobody questioned it
☠️ bro went with 60 because it sound nice
60 is a cool number man
60 is too much for sociality, was probably a predator trap
unless there were giant nemegtsaururs hunting tarbo mobs, which is unlikely
considering nemegtosaurus is like 7-9 tonnes tarbo doesn't even need a mob to hunt it
yeah, one tarbo could do it, if its 60 it was certainly a predator trap
maybe nemegtosaurus had humongous seasonal herds and were also in musth. tarbosaurus would need packs of 60 individuals in that case, surely
Males fought violently against one another leaving bloodbaths of dead nemegtosaurus in the surrounding area!
dead nemegtosaurus from territorial fights could actually draw that many tarbos to the area tho
although, that is entirely speculation so it isnt really concrete evidence
Oh? So it isn’t nessecarily confirmed that Tarbosaurus boneless exist? Or just the quantity of individuals ?
I would question their existance since i haven't seen it mentioned in a paper, but i could be wrong
you all are missing the answer, the megapacks were obviously there to hunt the 70 ton mongolian titan
well, megapacks exist in path of titans, this clearly shows that tarbosaurus engaged in megapacks in order to kos all the herbis in its environment
yup
I think he hunts with his family so he shouldn't be underestimated.
Just found out there are no Albertosaurus specimens found in the US and Alberta is in canada am I cooked chat?
Why
Albertosaurus hasn’t been found in the U.S. because we don’t really have early Maastrichtian deposits in Montana/Wyoming/Colorado
we do, morrison formation spans through maass
allosaurus in the late cretaceous??????
jk
yes
Giga need a reestat
??? Both rex and giga nowadays are about 10 tons
Ok so if bird came from dinosaurs was possibly that dinosaurs where technically both lizards an birds an later in year they just split of becoming two different species hut werr related back in the day but are like very very very long step cousins this is a general question
That skeletal is awful
lizards and birds are distantly related yes. A bird is more closely related to a lizard than either is to a mammal for example
But dinosaurs were not lizards, it just happens that lizards look kinda similar to the earliest reptiles which dinosaurs evolved from
so they’re like cousins
yeah
Basal Reptile split into a more Lizardlike Lineage, which evolved into Lizards and most marine Reptiles, and Archosaur-like lineage, which gave us Crocs and Dinosaurs (which evolved into birds)
I love how bro picked the least accurate reconstruction for neither animal
??
everyone thinks that rex is much larger even tho they are quite interchangable
Forgot to ask but should I make the arm smalelr ot is it fine the way that is it is
case in point Scotty and dentary giga
i mean technically no, rex is far more reliably 10t+ compared to giga, both due to the specimen it is based on, and the confidence in the multiview used
MUCPV-95 It's 700kg more heavy than Scotty
the Giga holotype is not heavier than scotty
Size in animals is measured by weight (that is, body mass). Until now, no tyrannosaurus has been discovered that weighs more than 9 tons.
*possibly 700kg heavier if using the highest possible upscale against a smaller scale Scotty
yes it has lmao?
bro gonna be on something 
are the hadrosaur in path of titan accurate
no
lamb is fine, bars is WAY too big
what about para
@kind orbit
I have the one with the weight
para is pretty good
becauee i can head tank a trex an win as para
pretty sure the only issue is the size though it's oversized
oohhh, I sure hope this is actuallt reliable!
"the average t rex weights up to 13m and 9t"
@sullen cairn looks like you were entirely wrong in your est for average rex, clearly you didnt take into account the gluppshittery that this 100% accurate source uses
onfg! get to fixing lil bro
why does Spinosaurus not have a volume or weight, that's rude
Haters idk
so Dan Folkes is a spinosaurus hater!
it sucks obviously
Then wth did he put the msnm as the largest spino individual
On theoconda
maybe look on his thecodontia
And the msnm is on the top bar for some reason
What’s
?
beckys giant toothrow scaling results unclear more at 7
I'm sorry but am I reading that previous conversation right? 💀
i meant what lol
Have we found out how big a hadrosaurs could get
yeah
stop tooth scaling larramendi
prolly approaching like 20t based on shantungosaurus granted thats easily double the size of like every other hadrosaur ever
Except of course the mighty Augustynolophus
btw I tried to make my 'eusauropoda' family tree and I was hoping it looks good
atlasaurus tends to clade brachiosaurid as the most basal member btw, if you need help tracking down brachiosaurs (half of them are undescribed with scant references) let me know
damn so uh what would make for a godo large eusauropoda besides Jobaria
it’s a notoriously unstable grouping so honestly jobaria is your best bet but let me do some digging
cetiosaurus is fairly basal but also where specifically do you want it within eusauropoda? I’m assuming outside of diplodocoidea and macronaria but do you want more basal than mamenchisaurs too?
am mainly going by size so the larger the animal the further down it is and the name of the group it's in it just that
in that case yeah I’d recommend cetiosaurus
alright because my concept game is of a progression 'survival' type
can you scale ingens?
theres several ingens out there
also how come thropad like trex arent in the same species Genius like giganotosaurus and Carch
Because they're not closely related. And I think the grouping you're looking for is "family".
For T. rex, Tyrannosaurus is the genus, and rex is the species. And T. rex is in the family Tyrannosauridae. Carch and Giga are in Carcharodontosauridae.
is this a accurate depiction of bars? i dont know much about dinosaurs/birds/reptiles and their relation to fat and stuff ( art by @NetchimenRevery )
no
is it too fat?
yes + bars might be more likely to be a Saurolophus relative
may i ask a question about how excess fat may work on dinosaurs?
Well I reckon not like a cow's, which is what that art is supposed to look like
oh i believe its in the style of 18th century cow depictions
I take the Torvosaurus one very very personal
Barsboldia is really poorly resolved it’s not more likely to be anything. Accept perhaps a synonym of S. angustirostris
i know that? but for parsimony i just said a "Saurolophus relative"
Our best guess is looking at modern archosaurs and where they store fat: for crocs & gators a lot of fat storage occurs at the base of the tail for instance. Birds deposit fat all over but notably around the breast & thighs. For a hadrosaur I'd expect their fat deposits to be more croc like than bird like in any case
my issue with the art accuracy wise is more that the body overall is too big, and the hindfeet are too hooflike
Lovely fella
Now that's a beautiful restoration
BUMPY
allo should be up with stego I feel but otherwise yea
Dinosaur Revolution exists
You had to go to 2011
True
Though I'll admit, the dinosaurs were a bit too...
Humanized?
They acted like they weren't just animals but like a person.
Terrible comparison, I know
Anyways, opinions on Torvosaurus?
Chad animal, just 10/10
also the person that made the art was specifically trying to mimic the old 1800s art peices of farm animals that everyone memes about
fav species of torvo?
if we consider edmarka as distinct then it'd have to be gurneyi
but the morrison complex overall is better
atleast for skeletal ideas ur not lamborlator who litteraly wants me to pay him to do it
oh if i was to make a new skeletal I'd 100% charge you for it
would it atleast be cheaper than lamborlabators price who charged me 300 euros for a spino neotype
no idea
Brother, may I have some oats
out of curiousity how much would you get payed to make a skeletal on leviathan (reclassified)
That would just be an edit of my Allosaurus skeletal, so much cheaper than a whole new animal
but including the weight
no issue, i would just scale up the DINO 2560 estimate
but as I'm too busy with university I'm not currently taking commissions anyway
ok
i mean, do you even know how big the verabre is? cuz i wanted to rescale it ngl
I know how big Shots thinks it is
But as the humerus and claw scale to a similar size, I don't find it too unbelievable that it was 13m if built like A.fragilis
number
no (:
is it cuz im a leviathan fanboy 😭 or you dont like lil kids
yes
it's because the measurements aren't public lol
Unless Shots already posted it somewhere publicly, in which case that is not my problem
carcharodontosauridae is right there
OMNH 1188 was censored by the PoT moderators
good I hate that guy
unless someone can some how scale the pic
$25 sigilmasssaurus
no way hes gonna do it for $25
lamborlbaor told me he was gonna do the spino neotype for 300 euros
it's one thing to make a skeletal from scratch and another to edit an existing one to make a similar animal. Of course the former will be much more expensive
taking this, the defense difference in giga and rex its too big
Could you make a Cope skeletal for $5USD and a Random Snack?
depends on what's in the snack
could you do edmarka rex and largest allosaurus size comp for $700
Peanuts
I'll do it for $700
ill do it for $1000
for $700 I'd scale every Allosaurus specimen
*that has published measurements
aslong as theres a 4 or five tonne specimen youve got urself a deal
remind me does the 4 tonne allosaurus specimen and epanterias have published mesaurments
You should contact random and talk because I guarantee with how wild Allosaurus gets, you'll find a 4+ ton specimen in there
I'm sure they'd be willing to take the money to make a comprehensive chart for Allosaurus
Not taking commissions
the nefarious JFD access to Random
im hoping for even a five tonne specimen
Epanterias is around that size, and yes, it has published measurements
You might with how many specimens we have!
To be fair
If someone actually offers $700 to scale every Allosaurus, I'm taking it, JFD or otherwise
whats jfd
Random is also really good, he's the one that has upscaled T. rex to ~10 tons, Spino to ~8 tons, and much more
This is fair, I will however not force you to do that because Nathan would kill me for distracting you from the other stuff ._.
Spinosaurus the biggest carnivore to ever live - BBC Earth.
He has posted them before yea
What's the validity of Epanterias vs Allo right now?
Epanterias is invalid, has been for ages. But we don't know if it is a unique species of Allosaurus or just a big A.fragilis
erm, what if I say 'nu huh'
I’d scale every brachiosaur specimen for that and whatever meds I need to regain my sanity
I’m already doing it anyway
I love Allosaurus
My fav mid sized Jurassic predator
(Fanboy warning) I think Allo could definitely beat a decent amount of large Jurassic predators Mid Difficulty.
Maybe high diff depending on what it's facing.
But anyways REALISTICALLY, who would win, Allosaurus or Torvosaurus?
depends on the species of allo
And Torvo
Not really for either lol
Let's just use their larger species for simplicity's sake
my bets on torvo tbh
So A. fragilis vs.T. gurneyi
Imma say Torvo has the upper hand here since it's larger, possibly stronger.
I'm giving it a rating of 1-10 (1 being easy dub and 10 being folded like an omelette)
MY OPINION its around 6 or 7
average allosaurus discussion
Depends on the size of the allo and torvo. Animal sizes aren't a static thing. Allosaurus especially is evidence of that
now are we using edmarka or not lol
Real
very real
For this ranking, no
so average size for both then
We're using their largest species
So it'd be this
yeah but are we using their average size lol
Average size for their species
Truth be told it's hard to say what the largest for Torvo is because tanneri specimens are...confusing
gurneyi
gurneyi only has like, 1-2 to its name?
we are using gurneyi right now
But if we were using tanneri... It would stay around a 6 on the scale
This scale for reference
I detest vs battle topics
Yeah, its a bit controversial at times
Now, for something completely different
How big was Spinosaurus really?
big
My current perception of le spoon is around 14-ish meters and around 8 Tons?
That's the biggest "spinosaurus", although truth be told what IS spino really is a hot topic
It didn't. It widens from the back like a cormorant
yeah it had a lower jaw more like a pelican
Yes, that I got from the start lol
what the hell are y'all yapping about
This cap
When it opens its mouth, the jawbones open like that automaticly, less it dislocates its own jaw just by opening its mouth or something to that effect. Memory is failing me
Must of been from the same people that said Rex is blind and Rex would break his own legs if he was sprinting
Agreed. Tyrannosaurus had some of the best eyesight in the Animal Kingdom
Irritator challengeri jaw opening mechanics.
Model and video made by Olof Moleman.
This video is supplementary material for Schade et al. 2023
https://doi.org/10.26879/1242
isnt epanterias allosaurus amplexus
Would have probably aided it in swallowing fish and such
it's Allosaurus something
Yeah, I like mah pelican Irritator
so allosaurus.sp
that's the safer bet ye
Likening it to a pelican has also been discouraged, and yet like a wildfire that notion spread immensely
Also yes, for Irritator, think cormorant not pelican. Pelican jaws are insane and not at all built like Irritator's
Oh, my bad
pelican are just freaky ah
They yawn by putting their pouch over their neck eugh...
but still something like this right?
Yeah
Brother scarfing down the flipper
What is the current validity on Arambourgiana
90s irritator was so ugly
Sarcosuchus wannabe
ngl old irritator head always had this weird rectangle shape at the front
Unique but odd
how accurate would you say ( in your opinion ) is the ranking of the least to most deadlist seas in chased by seamonsters?
7 - Ordovician
6 - triassic
5 - Devonian
4 - Eocene
3 - Pliocene
2 - jurassic
1 - cretaceous
Anyone who pronounces titanoboa, titan boa…..
triassic at #6 these days is pretty funnny when we know how many giant ichthyosaurs there were back then, and the few that were known then are just way better understood or even have new species lol
still a peak documentary though
It did both. Ankylosaurs had a shape that was hard to bite overall.
Why is the Anky so big
fadeno that’s why
I thought we’d moved past the Fadeno Era
implying we ever left
turtle maneuver still works nice with a reasonably sized anky
wasn’t ankylosaurus not that big enough for this to work
like it looks less rotund and more flat, and also i doubt it would be able to position its body fast enough since it sucked at turning, rex was more agile
it looks less round like in that image and more flat
so theoretically a 57cm beckys giant toothrow would translate to a 122cm skull which would translate to a 1.19m femur but something about that seems screwy
anky was very small, most reasonable sized anky weighs 5 tons
femur+tibia length seems to correlate with skull length a bit better than just femur length but thats mostly cause 5730 isn't nearly as much of an outlier
which is to say that femur length actually seems more consistent than femur+tibia length if you ignore 5730
Favorite underrated prehistoric animal
skipping the middleman and just plotting toothrow length against femur length is somehow even worse
How Tall was Carchadonto and giga cause im getting 2 differenet answer
brazil is so cool i wish these were real
No need to wish a lot of stuff to be found in the future.
How you doing these kind of things.
I tried doing one diagram with pyton but, it didn't work for me.
it's still useless for the Anky to do such thing considering Rex will always rip and tear her until she is cooked 😭😔
lol anky could beat Rex any day of the week. even if it was less than half the size, anky had entirely impenetrable armour that not even the mighty megalodon could crush. in fact, none of the herbivores in hell creek were truly hunted at all— such is why it is called hell creek ( hell for any of the predators ) giants like T rex only existed because they scavenged off the titanic remains of titanosaur sized edmontosaurs
who' s she?
Anky
fr?
nah
then i suppose i'm still right 😎 (ik i'm wrong lol)
why do you refer to it as female?
headcanon thingy. don't even ask
☠️ I guess...
i assume it’s something similar to how cars and boats are always referred to in feminine terms
Most likely the Tyrannosaurus wouldn't even interact with the Anky, why risk having a leg or skull broken when your prey doesn't even have that much meat? It's more reasonable that it would try to hunt Triceratops or Edmontos which, while still a good challenge, have a lot more food to offer, perhaps they would have preferred to hunt other T. rexes even before an Anky.
tbh
I can't imagine anything willingly taking on an adequately sized trike
A herbi that can fight face to face to the biggest terrestrial predator and win 5/10 times, trike is fire
what
I think they're being sarcastic... but then again, there are definitely people who believe that
They are joking yeah lol
I’m here
Spinosaurus was not heavier than Tyrannosaurus lol
Spin weighs more than a Rex people think Rex was so big when realistically they weren’t
Tyrannosaurus is considered the largest terrestrial predator on mass alone
https://x.com/pnso_official/status/1850145355595382856?s=46 also in hindsight I’m so glad I didn’t buy Saurophaganax
Tyrannosaurus weighed on average around 8-9 tons with the heaviest estimates being put at 10. Spinosaurus on average was around 7-8 tons
The spinos bones were lighter because they needed to be able to swim rexes bones were thicker but that doesn’t mean they were heavier spinos had more muscle and weight
Do you have a source for this?
Source: because I said so
show me an article which says rex weighed more than a spino
Do you know how weight is calculated?
My books and multiple websites
When are these books dated from
Oh, I finally make it to one of these
I don’t know literally look it up
those who sayin rex weighed more, show me the proof?
They almost weighed the same but spinos were bigger
Bro is in here demanding proof from scientists
Homie you're the one challenging the theory, the burden of proof is upon you
you dont have any do u
Aren't Spino bones denser ?
Show me an article from recent years showing that Spinosaurus weighed more than Tyrannosaurus lol
I can't believe that people still think spino was heavier than rex.
Physically larger, sure, but not heavier. Then again, lot's of "sources" still say 22 ton spino existed.
someone said they will prove it wrong in here, so how will you
Let me explain to you how scientific debate works
If you want to challenge established information, you need to bring your research to the table
AI as proof ? Really ?
Sounds legit enough for me
Google is not a reliable source lmao
Oh look, the same AI that says pregnant women should smoke cigarettes
Estimating it at 20 tons 😂😂😂
Google AI sources reddit threads, completely unreliable
I agree, this is enough evidence for me.
LOL
Sure buddy
Lmao these are not reliable sources 
You dropped a source now they need to as well.
I called it
I HAVE BOOOOOOOKKKKSSSS
From 30 years ago apparently
Outdated ones then I assume
Source ?
Bro yall wrong but can’t admit it im the only one showing multiple sources of proof
this is source from matthew wedel from school of natural sciences
I don't know...the paleontologists that discovered the thing ? Read a scientific paper, not google
Source?
That is a scientist I just showed proof of what he found out
Wait they're not trolling? People really thing Aegypticis is heavier than Rex??
Here’s my source now drop yours !
Google scientists amirite
https://www.sci.news/paleontology/spinosaurus-hunting-12749.html it literally says in this paper its weight. This is from 2024 btw and not outdated information from Google
They probably still think spino is aquatic too
It's 2024 guys
What do these guys know compared to google experts?
Do you realize we have full fossils of Rex but not spino Rex and spino seemed to be around the same weight but depending on the dinosaur it looks like spino could be heavier weighing around 22 tones
I don't think a theropod is physically capable of approaching 20 tons, anything with that mass range should be thrown out without a thought ngl
This paper also got saurophaganax 💀
Yep I can’t take this list serious.
Older than the paper that killed sauro
It is bro look at its skeleton and compare it to a crocodile or alligator look at its teeth look where its nostrils are it has a spino and fin on its big tail how the hell could it be a fully land dinosaur
Homie this is outdated information
https://www.esconi.org/esconi_earth_science_club/2022/06/massive-bulldog-faced-dinosaur-was-like-a-t-rex-on-steroids-fossil-paleontology-dinosaur-fossils-din.html T. rex doesn’t even have anything compared to this unnamed abelisaurid and you want to compare it to spinosaurus ???
You fresh off of watching JP3? It’s a great movie but it was 20 years ago
But yeah, this is a matter of not understanding how massive tons are as a unit of measurement.
A spinosaurus, nor t. rex, nor any other theropod is EVER reaching 20 tons.
No theropod should reach 12 tons. The only one I believe could ever is Rex
Rex is a chonky boi
They weighed about the same weight but spino was literally bigger physically it depended on the dinosaur itself and what they did to be heavier than one another
Physical size and mass are not intrinsically related.
Look at its teeth and where its nostril would be on the picture how could this be a fully land dinosaur it couldn’t it was a semi aquatic it could go on both land and water
Giga is literally bigger per averages and we only significantly less specimens
Size is not equal to mass
seems more like a wader than a fully swimming "semi aquatic" dino
Off topic, but why are fragmentary remains almost always treated with caution UNLESS it's giga
You can be longer and weigh less
When they fully find a skeleton of a spino I’m sure it will fully show you it weighed more than a rex we have full skeletons of a rex we know how much they weighed but they estimate spino weighed the same or more as rex but we don’t even have all the bones from a spinosaur
Tyrannosaurus rex fans need to get over themselves
It was longer and taller than the red but it also did have bigger mass
I don't care about Rex 🤷
I personally hate rex
it makes sense how you'd think this, the sail and everything, but when you look at them head on spoon is kind of skinny.
Paleontologists will find a hip bone and publish a new dinosaur
I do to spino is my favorite because it’s so unknown
Spino was more of a billboard than cerato.
This gotta be rage bait
Glupshittosaurus was bigger than Argentinosaurus look it up
#fossils#paleotolog#dinosaur#fossils#dinosaurs#egypt#africa
I mean the Indian titan is legit bigger than argentinosaurus
How bruva 🤡
2022
Ok, now you just sound like Jack Horner ngl.
I hate this animal so surely my favorite has to be larger.
what about them being unknown makes you like them?
2 things can be true
Nanotyrannus is real I swear. Saw it in my dreams
Let’s be real the biggest thing that was ever on this planet is a blue whale even weighing more than any sauropod ever
"this dinosaur is so unknown but I know it was heavier than a Rex"
Spinosaurus is really underrated, never met someone who likes Spino before
I'm sad that Miragaia isn't real 🥲
Jp3 if u wanna see who will win between Rex and spino . Bye.
dang fr?
I wanted to be a paleontologist and I just love the way they look and all the debates people have about it nobody really knows a lot about it because the only full Skelton we ever had of a spino got blown up in world war 2
I mean, that's a no-brainer, and not related to the fact spino is not currently larger than rex according to any reputable source
Audibly laughed. I love that fight, wish it was longer, it was so entertaining
interesting
I’ve done my research to know it was heavier it was proved heavier and it still doesn’t even have a full skeleton
That wasn’t even a full skeleton
The animal that the skeleton is from still existed, but the genus Miragaia is no longer valid
anyone have any accurate skeletals? cause the mira in game looks a lil funky i wondered if i was trippin.
when did it become invalid?
Guess they gotta take him outta the game
Laten isn’t valid either and that’s still here
Nah there's plenty of invalid animals in game it's fine, it's a game after all
At least they didn’t add saurophaganax
I don't personally and from what little I've heard, the available skeletals aren't the greatest. But mira in game is accurate to what we believe stegosaurs looked like.
It became invalid either right before or right after mira's release in game.
Most overrated dinosaur all time, I am so glad that it got debunked
Btw Wikipedia even states its around 7-8 tons. Where are you getting your research from lmao
Rex weighs the same it could also be 12 tons to 22
No it could not lol
He’s got one in his backyard, he knows something we don’t
it just looks kinda boxy shoulder wise. wondered if that was a design choice or an actual accurate thing, cause mira looks boxier than stego
This is all we have of "miragaia"
It's accurate. The problem is the in game stego is based on a juvenile.
I was very interested in the psno figure I’m glad I sticked to my guts and said this can age very badly
Never seen a mirigaia skeleton till now, this thing looks stupid 💀
ahhh
That is not a Miragaia skeletal 💀💀
“All we have” that’s more than a lot of other published dinosaurs lol
A 22 ton theropod is an impossibility
What is it?
Spinosaurus bro.
Not if it's quadrupedal 
12 tons isnt highest possible rex can go
How heavy was Lisowicia?
No trex is right there. He quite literally weighed 30 tons. Source: look at him stupid
dang bros kinda big
Then it wouldn't be a theropod anymore
Shantungosaurus is the biggest theropod
No,no it would still be a theropod but on four legs!
I don’t understand how they have bones of something like this and then say it’s no longer valid, what did mirigaia end up being?
About 5-6 tonnes using the original reconstruction, however as Liso is known from a bonebed of multiple individuals I'd be skeptical of any precise estimate
Dacentrurus or something stupid, they just got rolled into the same genus, can't recall if they're the same species now too
Dacentrurus
And 4-5m long?
darius_nau, esteemed Theropod expert
Whose bigger Dacentrurus or stego
Cause I see either it's stego
Or other says its dac
Yeah
He’s a paleontologist
Damn paleontology is so funny sometimes
No one answered my question about why the giga dentary gets treated with less caution than other fragmentary remains.
Stegosaurus, although dacenturus is a close second at 7 tonnes
Also if you're gonna reference from "miragaia" use this because it's scale and proportion properly
I think we're all confused by giga workers
Because it's ass it's a dentary aka a jaw fragment less materialized than the holotype
Such a cool animal
I am however happier that it's attributed to an even larger stegosaur
This right here is why you don't use "averages" when comparing such things. Giga's sample size is a grand total of two, the 2nd of which is just a jawbone.
Biggest Stego being 8 tons?
Largest estimate for stegosaurus is about 10
Are you sure it wasn't 22? Smile
Yeah, so why is it not treated more like one? I see the dentary being cited a lot more than any other fragmentary fossil
From where? dentary are treated the same as other fragmentary material is just that in giganotosaurus case it's an actual sizable figure that could be scaled
Oh so it's more so about the size of giga's dentary even if it's still fragmentary and less than reliable?
Question: is Geosternbergia still a valid genus? Or has it definitively been absorbed into Pteranodon?
Rajasaurus
Absorbed
i feel like the neck is too skinny
since the head is giant
The neck is fine
Yes, but have you considered giving it a funny hat
No
looks too thin
definitely, the legs might be a bit thin too
You sure?
Nice spine
skeletals don't generally have the ideal level of soft tissue as that's not their main purpose
So you mean I can't have an awkwardly long necked theropod with a big ass head ? 
PP's majunga by gabriel ugueto is a better reference
what bigger a hatz of a quetz becuad eeach time i look it up it different so i need a real answer
hatze is extremely fragmentary though from what we can tell it was probably more robust than quetz
ok so wat closer relate to dinosaurs pterosaurs or birds
Birds are dinosaurs, so dinosaurs
bird are related to dinosaur that what someone said to me before
in this sever so now im just confused
they’re a branch of theropods, they’re as much dinosaurs as any other theropod
So is a trike a theropod because i dont knew what theropods are i thought that was thing like trex, spino allosaurus
theropods are all the carnivorous dinosaurs plus things like therizinosaurus and gallimimus
So tjose that mean theri was most likely a carnivorous
Therizinosaurs had carnivorous ancestors, but evolved into herbivores
A theropod is a type of dinosaur, like a feline is a type of mammal
Or were omnivorous
yea but wat is considered a theropod an how come sauropod arent dont have any real look alikes an birds look like pterosaurs by minicing the ability to fly an there looks liek animal today
Giraffes and Elephants: Am I a joke to you?
yes
Theropods is a group of two-legged dinosaurs
Are you asking why sauropods don't look like birds?
if thats what u mean its because dinosaurs is a huge family
I feel like Wikipedia summarizes the classification fairly well
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theropoda
Theropoda (; from ancient Greek θηρίο- ποδός [θηρίον, (therion) "wild beast"; πούς, ποδός (pous, podos) "foot"] whose members are known as theropods, is an extant dinosaur clade that is characterized by hollow bones and three toes and claws on each limb. Theropods are generally classed as a group of saurischian dinosaurs. They were ancestrally c...
Yes also was possible that birds copied pterosaurs like some animal now in days they look slike but are very different
Convergent Evolution?
yes because how come some theropod dont have beck like face ir beck but pterosaurs do but bird have body shapes if theropods
Birds and pterosaurs both evolved wings and (potentially) feathers, but otherwise they're very different. Birds usually have small heads, many neck vertebrae, and are always bipedal, while pterosaurs have massive heads, few neck vertebrae, and are always quadrupedal, to name a few
wait is there any material on feathered pterosaurs
Id think they were more like Lil hairs
They are most likely feathers, but i'm in class rn so I can't access the paper. Came out last year
i'll try to find it that sounds interesting, thanks 👍
true i know nothing about paleontology or biology but pterosaurs like a very close to bird so do theropods like nord have becks an can fly but ther body shapes look like theorpod like ostriches look like theri
Having a beak is good if you're a flying animal, because it allows you to eat various kinds of food while also saving weight on producing teeth. Apparently beaked animals also develop faster inside the egg for some reason. So it evolved separately in both groups because it was an advantage
aslo y did bird have feather an maybe dinosuars what reasom for it liek y did they adapt for wat
Birds have feathers because they inherited them from their non-bird dinosaur ancestors.
an do to little research by me most pterosaurs lived hy shores an coastal habitat so wouldnit not have been moist an wet in that area
Feathers first evolved to keep the body warm, as warm blooded animals need something to cover their skin and help keep heat in. Later on they started being used as decoration and in some groups were later used for flight
so would pterosaurs have the same adaptation for there habitat an if so that could porve how theropod may have started or why they had feathers an adding to the theory of bird copied pterosaurs
Birds copied them how?
Pterosaurs copied insects
sued for plagiarism
It jsuy a theory by the info yall ahve gave me but so fair the idea is bird copied them to survive mainly by the beak an main trait in pterosaurs thay are seen in bird as a way grow an maybe out live or avoid predator
It's not really possible for a species to copy another (unless we're talking behaviour)
so fair this is just a theory
Birds and pterosaurs probably evolved beaks and feathers for the same reason, to save weight/development time and to keep them warm, respectively
How do cephalopods play into this I wonder
also on covergent evolution could have happened woth them
that seems more probable yea
W-well yeah. Not even more probable, its just what happened
Theropods can't just look at pterosaurs and say "I wanna do that" and just copy it and become birds
That's not how evolution works though.
Birds are a lineage of theropod dinosaurs, you know the ones that are bipedal and mostly associated with the carnivorous ones. Bird is a notable group of dinosaurs because they still are around today and now are, for most part, flighted animals : a feat achieved by few clades (being insects, Pterosaurs, bats and birds, though some other animals may be considered flighted).
The way birds achieved flight has nothing to do with "copying" Pterosaurs given that they achieved this very differently due to their physiological and morphological constraints : birds come from bipedal animals while Pterosaur ancestors were most likely quadrupedal to some extant. They way they throw themselves into the air is very different, with birds using their hindlimbs to push themselves off the ground and Pterosaurs catapulting themselves thanks to their forelimbs. Pterosaurs had membranous wings while birds, being as odd as they are, have feathered wings (feathers being inherited from their dinosaurian ancestors, which first function were thermoregulation, which basically means keeping body temperature stable).
As random said already, beak has evolved in both groups because it is a good way to save weights while still foraging. Beak shapes can vary quite a lot based on the animals ecology, or role in the ecosystem.
So, what birds have in common is that they are flying animals. It'd be like saying that bat's copied birds or that every flying animals have copied insects : that just doesn't make senses. As they have evolved flight differently, which is an analogy in this case, they are just cases of convergent evolution caused by similar environmental pressures.
I LOVE FLYING SQUIDS ❗ ❗
so they didnt copied pterosaurs but they developed flying in similar ways based off the thing u say I believe u bit but the main thing that confuse me is the e beaks how coem most theropod dont have beak like birds some dino that have that a triek related thing thay the only oen i knew that have beak an i cant really remember or comfirm that
also i cnat remember if theri had beak or not
Brother please look at your keyboard when you're typing
Most theropods didn't evolve beaks because they depended on sharp teeth to tear larger prey apart, so if they lost their teeth that would be a huge disadvantage. Theropods that evolved beaks were all small animals that ate prey they could swallow whole, so the teeth weren't as important
like wat
what they ate? bugs, lizards, mammals, amphibians, any small vertebrate
Terror birds
no liel what small dinos so far i only found taco an mircoraptors
Beaks evolved several times among theropods. I don't know if anyone checked the ecological pressures that caused this but I suppose it'd be related to herbivory. Then from that, beaks can change in several different ways to fit an animal's lifestyle as they show high plasticity in shapes.
we’re like the only somewhat large predatory beaked theropods
And they didn’t evolve beaks because it was better they just so happened to have beaks beforehand
exactly
Terror birds had beak as a plesiomorphic trait though.
Yeah exactly.
what I’m trying to say is that, yeah beaked theropods can still be successful predators, but for other theropods there’s really no reason for them to evolve beaks when they already have pretty effective jaws.
an how come trikes have teeth when they have beaks they have both
Their teeth and beak does not serve the same function.
The beak is here to cut down the vegetation while the teeth are used in mastication, as ceratopsians could chew.
so do small theropod have teeth in there beak if so then that would be the large differences between them an pterosaurs
Idk why pterosaurs and birds keep getting compared here when just on a fundamental level with their lifestyles they’re very different. Their body plans greatly change the pressures they face despite them both being flying animals. This applies to bats too.
It’s like comparing bats and birds to each other
They both fly and that’s about it there’s really not that many similarities
Perhaps proof of the bat-pterosaur anagenesis...
Pterosaurs evolved a quadrupedal gate that makes them perhaps the most efficient flying vertebrates to evolve, with the arms being the primary force when walking, taking off, and flying, it allows for great adaptation without having to change too much, ontop of what allows them to get to such large sizes. Birds meanwhile are reliant on both their back and front limbs in everyday movement, which means they’re not as efficient straight up as flyers, but they have much greater flexibility. No pterosaurs have evolved niches akin to macropredatory eagles, robust and fast ratites, or deep sea diving penguins. Bats meanwhile kind of specialized to being microflyers from the get go and kind of stay in their lane for the most part. Only two out of the hundreds of species can properly walk, let alone anything else. There’s great flexibility in that role they play but they’ve largely stuck to that for the entirety of the Cenozoic.
@scenic flame sorry to ping but is something like this okay, I added a bit more tissue
an early pterosaurs (not sure how true this is ) had teeth an the main reason i think pterosaurs may have soemthign in common main is due to the beaks an habitat an there an there feather my theory is that bird or threropod my have had a convergent evolution was apart of it but so fair the theory was debunked
Convergent evolution was def a part of it, that's not the same thing as copying tho
Hey are there any studies towards ceratosaurus being an animal that was semi-aquatic
chat is it true that cera could have been semi aquatic irl or just outtdated
No. It was a (now incorrect) inference made by Bakker. We don’t really know what Ceratosaurus was doing ecologically.
besides be incredibly based
Ceratosaurus: It did something Allosaurus didn't. Probably.
Thanks I would of never thought of that
Why would Cera be semi aquatic
It didn't even had any aquatic adaptions if we look at reconstructions
Or did i miss something ?
Would be cool tho
Do y’all think baby pterosaurs/ahzdarchids had fluff or were they bald
It doesn’t you’re right
how did he come up with the cera semi aquatic thing tho. there must have been a theory/paper ab that topic somewhen
the “alligator like tail” and the big banana teeth I’m pretty sure
tyrannosaurus banana teeth in question:
Also the teeth feel so od to be considered for a "semi aqautic" lifestyle
Bruh who step on his head
what? it's head looks fine
ugly bald babys
show me the tail pls
also, banana theeth are even more likely to be against it, cera didnt ambush from underwater and didnt had to hold onto its prey and drown it.
I’m not saying that it was semi-aquatic, that’s just the evidence people used when they thought it might have been
yea im not refering to you, just to talk ab how useless that argument is that people seemingly use.
also the placing of the nostrils isnt great for a semi aquatic lifestyle too
How probable is it that Smilodon had lips because I need it to be true
definitely not like that!
Someone said they read something about it, and I never heard of it and was super confused so I asked
I was just as confused as you haha
Thank you!
smilodon didn't have lips and if it did THIS IS NOT WHAT THEY WOULD LOOK LIKE
I mean it had lips, but the flaps thing is just nonsense.
How do they look like tho
Pretty normal
one thing i, and my paleo-inclined dentist father, are curious about, is how those fangs stated intact? is there evidence of them having a different type of enamel? something more like tusks? typically enamel needs to be wet to stay healthy… hence basically everything having lips, and those that don’t, a-la crocodylomorphs, spent time in water
neither of those are adaptations for such & it just has osteoderms on the back, nothing like a croc does
A alligator like tail is a Adaption tho, or are we talking ab a scaly tail that isn't as flat as a actual gator tail
Are we talking ab a tail like this?
(I totally not wanna show y'all the pic I took in the everglades
)
Was Pakasuchus a Herbivore, Omnivore or Carnivore
Insectivore and carnivore.
-# don't take this as super reliable tho
y'all think the Edmonto is cooked here?
he just needs to get a kb move off and combo from there
Trug...
He cannot lose! He musth win!

we are so back walkeribros
is there a reason that dinosaurs didn't stay in power after the KT? I know they had a little comeback with the terror birds but why didn't they stay?
taken at face value this would suggest an 8t walkeri but give walkeri's humerus was measured at 562mm in like 2018 you could theoretically scale it to a measly 5.5t
Well, they sorta did given that some part of the megafauna after the KPG were birds.
Mammals didn't reign supreme until the mid Miocene with a global cooling event. Until then, birds and reptiles occupied some important ecological niches as either giant herbivores or top predators.
Yeah, I did reference that with the terror birds, and I know that the raties and ghastornis happened for the herbivores, but why didn't they stay and take over the earth again? What was so special about mammals?
The conditions following weren't the best for them.
Continental drift (and distribution), global cooling, oceanic current changes all affected the environments throughout the world which didn't advantage reptiles overall when it comes to high trophic niches and large body masses.
Some groups went extinct and allowed other animals, in particular mammals, to fill their niches.
so it was more or less too much change in a short amount of time?
There was that and ofc the factor that terrestrial animals higher in trophic levels and larger body masses have lower ecological valences, so their "optimum of existence" requires more particular conditions.
Here is a good video about the subject :
https://youtu.be/0HS7uHXCZ4M?si=XDU-4G2rZAVMdhY6
0:00 Intro
1:55 A Bad Day in the Cretaceous
4:14 Struggle for the Paleocene
6:49 The First Cenozoic Dinosaur
9:46 A More Complicated World
12:26 Last Land of the Dinosaurs
14:46 Conclusion
#birdsaredinosaurs #extinction #adaptiveradiation #paleontology #PaleoAnalysis
This week I got into a very interesting topic from a question that was asked i...
walkeri larger than cyrtocirstatus, all is good in the world again
osborni humerus over 10% longer than the type... ancestor of the getawaycoulleeensis?
table stop beating the dead horse that is big para
granted its still like 40% the size of former big para
Inb4 a random crest double the size of tubicen’s is unearthed
Wut
big walkeri humerus that scales to around cyrtocristatus type size
Damn
for the record this is the biggest walkeri has been in years so if anything i'm doing big para a favor here
The middle Miocene was a warming event, the major cooling event which sent the cenozoic into its icehouse condition was the Eocene/Oligocene event
Climate change
what was the crouching abilities of sauropods? could the larger ones crouch? i dont believe elephants can so would the same apply to them?
i mean is there a need to crouch with a neck like that?
did pachycephalosaurus actually headbutt each other? some people say they did, some people say they didn’t and they just had brightly colored skulls, and another person said they might have kick boxed like a kangaroo 😭
Here you go https://youtu.be/eL8lbCW1yn0?si=DXDX5_iQo5xgkrBK
Finding the purpose for a dome-headed dinosaur. Prehistoric Planet Season 2 is now streaming on Apple TV+ https://apple.co/_Prehistoric
Narrated by Sir David Attenborough, and featuring an original score by multiple Academy Award winner Hans Zimmer, the captivating exploration of ancient Earth will debut with five all-new episodes in a week-lo...
curiously with bigwalkerihumerusensis all the paras cap out at the same size
does that three Para slams their predator? (unlike the L Edmonto?)
if dasp was 4.5 tons, no
They did, just likely wasn’t the full run up and slam like most people think.
do u think they used it to wind mid sized predators?
Probably not. Battering rams like that are pretty awful for defense.
Miocene is indeed following Eocene/Oligocene global cooling but it stays as the coldest period compared to Eocene/Oligocene with C02ppm being extremely low.
Then, during the middle Miocene, we again got a period of global cooling and even less atmospheric carbon (causing, for example, the evolution of C4 metabolism in some angiosperms).
running always works
is this why all the big reptiles like puru and barina died
It sort of is as it helped the formation of ice sheets and caused the sea levels to go lower, which then depleted the Amazon bassin from its water.
There is also the Andean orogenesis (mountain formation) that trapped a lot of carbon in the region and so drastically changed the conditions in few millions of years.
Wasn't there an issue regarding their domeshape? As in, if they collided head-to-head, they would slide off?
That wouldn’t really be an issue if it was just a fast clash, ontop of flank-hits and head-whipping.
We have dents in their skulls from frontal impacts, so they were definitely doing them in some form or another.
Yeah conditions deteriorate after the MMCO but there’s not really a detectable change in the frequency of crocodilians and birds in the megafaunal populations until the Pliocene. Even then a multitude of megafaunal birds still exist and continue to appear even if Phorusrhacids go extinct
It’s funny how most of these graphs are problematic in some way. The early paleocene should have some period where conditions are close to their Maastrichtian lows, two of these sort of underestimate the extent of global warming in the MMCO. Northern hemisphere glaciation also seemingly begins as early as the middle/late eocene.
Wouldn't it still be an issue it was a fast, forward head-on clash? Unless it was rather slow, a forward headbutt just seems like they would slide off each other due to the speed and shape (not ramming)?. Im aware we have dents in their domes, which is why I am curious because as you said, they did participate on head-on-head clash.
You know how I've reiterated that you shouldn't get into the water, no matter how bad things get on land, well... there is ONE exception to this rule.
If you speak a language other than English and want to help bring ExtinctZoo content to your country, check this out! https://forms.gle/CkTkgNX7emjojpKj8
Thumbnail Artist: Riamus328
0:00 Natu...
i like extinct zoo, most of their info is good, the only thing i dislike is the fact that they have to portray every single animal as terrifying
Then again, this assumes they were participating in straight forward head-on clash. Wouldn't be as much of an issue if they were primarily flank butting or head whipping, as you said.
So?
Any animal can be terrifying to a human tbh
Pretending like these alien creatures wouldn't be terrifying to run into is ?
The most terrifying bird, the whale that terrorised the oceans, the theropod from hell, the giant apocalyptic sauropod
"The horrific semi aquatic beast" only it's a video about Moo Deng
so u know how some animal can grow past the average size they were only .8 percent of the species population what if that was the ame as dino an otther pterosaurs they grow past the average makong thing grow largest so like a deinosuchos could grow twice as large how likly is this
dies of cringe
@last iron

We don't have a large enough and consistent sample to really say something about that. It can vary a lot, possibly be related to sexual dimorphism (which is unknown skeletally among non Avian dinosaurs) or even be absent in some modern taxon so trying to determine that in extinct ones is straight up almost impossible. The size variation can also possibly be caused by the animal's age and environmental condition that may or may not be optimal for their growth.
It'd be quite unscientific as we don't even have the average size of most dinosaurs. Though we do have some exceptionally large ones for some that have large sample (Edmontosaurus moment).
yeah, but it feels like 90% of the video is trying to convince you why it would be scary, when looking at the animal alone should be enough
This isn’t a source. There are study’s that suggest pschyceogalosaura did not head but each other due to neck and skull morphology though
Then how come the skulls all show impact pathologies? Though I will agree they most likely didn't go muskox mod and probably were doing some more side to side headbutting.
Though I wonder how that applies to the flat headed relatives.
I havnt heard of them having impact pathologies could you link it?
What about the stegoceras paper
Thanks!
Didnt it said their cervical verts were literally built for it to lock in, they had a furrowed shape or something like that
This is what I’m referring to btw https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02724634.2023.2190369?journalCode=ujvp20
Just like Meraxes and Taurovenator 
(though we aren't as far as we might think to headbutting Carcharodontosaurs imo)
pschyceogalosauea
PDF unavailable
Luckily for me my institution has access to it
OK so I see that your paper does cite the one I posted and disclaim it as :
- the specimens used are immature, so would not engage in headbutting that'd be more of a mature behavior
- show pathologies that cannot be assigned to intra specific confrontation and are more similar to that of animals going through rapid bone growth
So, I guess that headbutting in pachycephalosaurs is up the the air right now.
I knew ark giga was big, but not that big!
Small compared to the titanosaur
I saw something about anomalocarididae evolving into centipedes but I can't find anything about it, does anyone have any papers about it?
not centipedes only any anomalo evolution
yea true but yhe thing is some dini nay gave frown bigger or larger byt they where very rare an some bird (i dont knew how true this info is ):Bald Eagles: Some individuals have wingspans well beyond the average of 6-7.5 feet, with some rare reports of over 8-foot wingspans.
Harpy Eagles: Known as one of the largest and most powerful eagles, harpy eagles usually have a wingspan of around 6.5 feet but can occasionally reach nearly 7.5 feet in rare cases.
Vertebrate paleontology has an ontogeny problem.
I think I've solved it.
NEW PREPRINT and THREAD 🧵 (link to preprint at the end)
(Picture from Tetrapod Zoology, images owned by authors cited therein) https://t.co/nR3eMfkNde
Love Dr Napoli
Chat is this an accurate depiction of Arizonasaurus? (If it isn't then please ping me with one pls and ty)
That’s good yeah
Could Yixianosaurus only glide or could it do powered flight, Like wich is more likely
Hey everyone, I was wondering what's the current consensus on Brachiosaurus rearing up on their back legs briefly?
Could they do it? Personally I think so to reach higher vegetation or to...umm well males would need to probably do that to do the deed with a female I'm guessing.
But I've heard a paleontologist say that it couldn't do it so thought I'd ask what you all think on this topic 
Personally I can't imagine it doing it but I'm no expert
brachiosaurs were capable of it they would just need to be a little careful when coming down, losing balance would be a concern
do you happen to have any studies on it? i can only find ones saying it couldnt
I believe they could but they weren''t really that good at it or reasonably adapted to.
they could seeing there isn't anything stopping em
but its quite a risky thing
also hi josh
There's a center of gravity study(?) that found while capable, it wouldn't be smart or really beneficial
They're already the tallest animals on Earth adapted to reaching high places. There probably was little reason to go even further beyond.
only sources i can find are wikipedia, reddit and dinotoyblog, dont really feel like trusting those
Wiki is fine, just look at the source
Thats the key and one of the easiest things to do really. Look at the claim on wikipedia. Does it have an actual source attached to it you can find and look at to verify and determine whether it's legit or not? Then it works. Does it not? Don't trust it. Wikipedia 101.
oh thats smart, and yeah no source so
they probably could, but i dont really see the point
On another topic, was at a museum today and thought a lot about how whales have so much fat, I've never really understood why we see animals like this everywhere but when it comes to paleontology reconstructions still give low amounts of fat to exinct animals
Largely because Reptiles aren't mammals and don't have mammal type fat
Shrinkwrapping was a paleoart trend that has largely fallen out of favor nowadays. You don't really see that on modern paleoart. Something to keep in mind that is that just because it feels like flesh would be in a certain spot doesn't mean it actually is. Or that we don't actually know much therefore we can go nuts. There's a decent lot you can tell on the bones in terms of where muscles attach, and knowledge from reptiles and birds on how fat and skin is distributed.
parts of this skull seem to have been reconstructed incorrectly I wouldn’t take it at face value, the new species thing is fine but don’t trust that skull
Well, mammals are extremely efficient at fat storing in their tissues and organs. Reptiles on the other hand store fat in some deposits such as the base of their tail, thighs or cheeks. Also, reptiles getting "fat" is something that nearly never happen in the wild and is usually caused by over feeding in captivity.
Also whales are bad analogues because they are marine endothermic animals that usually swim in depth where temperatures get quite much lower than their body temperatures. So to conserve body heat, they developed blubber (same goes for Ichthyosaurs and Plesiosaurs, but Plesiosaurs weren't fat everywhere because of their foraging method).
This applies to mammals too. I've seen people ask why entelodont faces aren't reconstructed similar to hippos due to the initially similar appearance and close relation, but the details in the skulls show that the face tissue attached and was distributed very differently between the two animals.
Those cheeks on entelodont … Jesus
Talking about cheeks : https://x.com/Paleoartologist/status/1851679327668318560?t=J84xYPlfd11G55xS4ZEAHQ&s=19
so happy there are some accurate reconstructions of them though ❤️
more on this while I’m at it, but their reconstruction also doesn’t line up with the other known brachiosaurus skull material
Erythrosuchus in a nutshell
It honestly is
I believe it was said a skull was found with the new material
yeah the skull pieces were found with some new species material they just don’t seem to have reconstructed it right, brick has seen the actual material and agreed with me that this seems off
Oh yea, I agree it looks quirky snirky but at the same time, I dunno 100% how much would change
at the very least it looks crushed in a few places, I think it was the quadratojugal random said was “really concerning”, the other skull gives a bigger nasal ridge so probably that too
their COM is right behind their forelimbs, just for reference specifically for Brachio
big day for talking about brachi I like it
Sauroposeidon COM, Brach is a few messages below
You can still see the hippo’s zygomatic arch too
because reptiles arnt mammals, nor do archosaurs usually have a large amount of fat in areas that arnt the tail
Does ectothermy affect adipose tissue distribution
i may have overlooked that part
there is probably less overall cause the animal doesnt need as many calories as endotherms
Nonavian reptiles are much worse at metabolizing fat compared to mammals, so obesity has a much higher fatality rate for them. I don't know if that's also the case for birds, though
Many birds pack on fat seasonally for migration, they seem to handle it better than nonavians
How much fat is reasonable for a plesiosaur to be reconstructed with? Seeing a lot of different ones
Got it thank you!
yet another question but
Do we know anything about how dinosaurs pupils? like would they share shape or would it variate more
One thing we do know is that they weren't slitted like cats, with a few exceptions. Slit pupils are most effective for small predators (<40cm tall) that hunt in low light
What about horizontal pupils? I've seen a lot of paleoart depicting herbis with those
Unlikely but not impossible, horizontal pupils exist because grazing mammals have mechanisms to rotate their eyes automatically. We don't know if grazing dinosaurs had those
sorry for bombarding you with questions 😭 would the average pupil be the round ones or?
Circle pupils are safest, ye, because they work in all kinds of circunstances
And no worries
ic thank you for it all LOL
You could give slit pupils to something like a tiny theropod, maybe compy (although idk if we have any evidence it hunted at night). Or horizontal ones to a primarily grazing herbivore, like idk, an ankylosaur
did you hear abt sues buff
Maip the goat
wdym sues "buff"
its now 13 tons
no its not, i mean it could be.. but currently it is not
13 ton sue
why do you always ruin the hype, just like you did with leviathan 😭
The hype
maybe because instead of believing everything you read at face value without actually seeing if its right, you just take it like it was gospel
I’m glad I didn’t buy that saurophanax model from PNSO, I trusted my gut.
Wait until the paper is out!
You could just call it Allosaurus
youd still ahve to call it Cf. Allosaurus, calling it Allosaurus itself would still be wrong
There will be no allosaurus models in this household. I got annoyed today because people called Torvosaurus uninteresting and dull compared to allosaurus. I almost lost it. 😭🤣
(they are right)
Allosaurus is far more interesting, im sorry...
Well at least megalosaurids look cool
so do Allosaurids(literally just Allosaurus and Sauro)
I bought it and the post refused to send it to me
Evidence that the postal services were in on the saurophaganax conspiracy
They took the bullet so you wouldn’t have to, noble of them.
The real king of the Jurassic. mutes phone 📱 📵
I'm now questioning this but like how is allosaurus so liked in dinosaur community
Idk if this was posted here before but umm
Seems accurate
arist
He’s so dumpy
Funny enough I was going to ask for a spinosaurus skeleton reference earlier