#paleontology
1 messages · Page 108 of 1
The big ones I personally take note of as being egregious are bars, thal, and achillo. The rest are either passable or have reasons for being so that are kinda out of their control (sarco and eotrike).
Yeah I agree
Although I personally think Das and Allo should switch sizes. They are very uncanny when next to one another right now.
Or did Diadectes lay eggs on land in moist areas like Some Salamanders do
To be fair, Achillo would be a nightmare with a smaller hitbox
I mean it already is tbf
A single Achillo can reliably 1v1 almost any apex with Pounce and Shred
You could apply the same logic to literally any playable. Just account for basics and it's fine. There was no reason for its size. It could've been pachy-sized and it still would've easily been distinguishable from its underlings.
True. But imagine Cruel Swipe and Shred on something the size of Pachy
Hey chat are we still mad at Iggy
Did Bystrowiana and Chroniosuchians Lay eggs in the water like most modern amphibians (I know they are reptiliomorphs and are closer related to Quails and Humans) if so did baby Bystrowiana and baby Chroniosuchians in general have gills?
If we don't really know, Was it likely or unlikely they laid eggs in water and that their young had gills
And do we even know how big Dromotectum was
But actually was it likely or unlikely for Chroniosuchians to lay eggs in the water and for their young to have gills
Oh so more according to this image?
For TMP yeah 
Ah interesting, though this is the species A. inceptus but still I guess in game Ano is responsible.
Still though I wouldn’t be surprised if the devs did decide to do a TLC for Ano since Iggy was one that I wasn’t expecting considering that it was pretty solid before the TLC announcement.
Achillo is not soloing apexes with shred

a single achillo cannot reliably do that, anyways it could be abit smaller but otherwise its fine
How accurate is the iggy tlc?
TMP 1997.59.1 is slightly larger than TMP 1997.132.1 as well
Nvm I scrolled trough chat a bit

idk
now saying that cisio's still seems oversized and i'm pretty sure 5m was always the accepted length for ano regardless
can you throw pachy in there for me, I want to see something
Someone doesn't know how terrifying 180 DPS is
gobbless
I've always felt iggy was perfectly fine before and now it's even better so.
idk if/where amnh 8530's been stated to be immature but here's the relevant measurements
granted i think this was more a case of that one drawing being small cause neither seems much larger than gat's skeletal
97.132.1 being inceptus and 97.59.1 being lambei
I'm sorry but wdym? 
amnh 5266 is the once Coombs said was immature
The plates/spikes and vert count are wrong, potentially scaling (I’m not entirely sure) I paid for the skeletal to be done and maybe in the future it will be updated. But rn I would not say there are any good wuerho skeletals because it may be possible that the specimen is a chimera of a young individual (the humerus) as it does not match ANY known proportions not even close to any,
It’s difficult to say specifically but the 2 wuerho skeletals that do exist don’t overlap very well, there is a lot that we don’t know about wuerho
Ah rip, bro looked so good 
Corgi stego 
Stegosaur skeletals all have issues in one way or another other 😔
does wuerho even clade consistently?
W. homheni does (supposedly) with either Hesperosaurus or Stenops
W. ordosensis seems to clade better with dacentrurine taxa
that’s grody
Stegosaurs are stupid. :( Hesperosaurus is best preserved with the best literature and sampling of well documented specimens
why does such an inherently cool group have to be such disgusting animals
and who even knows what the late cretaceous ones were doing
It seems to be around 4m, footprint estimating, Iirc I measured it at like 22.7cm
I’m sure all three of them were especially remarkable
I want to draw it but the only other cretaceous asian stegosaurs are crap
The Dravidosaurus skeletal is upon us
I don’t have the patience to make skeletals but I can make a passable doodle of a made up stegosaur
A shame really, considering that stegosaurs are a very popular group.
This is an interesting recon of it.
Yall is the miragia not being a valid species anymore true?
I do feel like there's potential for it to come back (tmk there's some "Miragaia" material still being described) but the paper that killed it had a good enough reason to.
Hmm I see I wonder wat Alderon thinks of it
Probably nothing. Laten hasn't been valid for 3 years but they haven't changed that.
Technically couldn’t they just rename it to a similar species and change nothing another acctual dino
Like dacenturus
They could yeah.
I doubt they would tho tbf
they shouldn't its their game if they dont want to they don't have to
Chat I'm getting conflicting results by Google it's says argentinosaurus is 70 feet but also 31 feet??? I'm more inclined to believe the 70 feet one
I'm so confused
Argentinosaurus is around 34 meters long, or over 110 feet.
Google is so weird 😭
Guys what's the bite force of the ichthotitan
Thank you so much I was really confused what about height?
That greatly depends on posture which can vary in sauropods. Also we have no way to estimate ichthyotitan's bite force given its only scraps of bone right now.
What would your estimate be?
Considering this is all we have of the head?
At least 2
I wouldn't give it one. Cause why would I? There's no way to get an answer.
Ah got it but is 200k psi crazy or nah?
Given that's like 100 tons yeah that's not happening. No living thing has a bite force even close to that. Keep in mind the greatest bite force estimate I've ever seen is 50 tons for megalodon and that's probably questionable too.
Wait how much does the Meg weigh?
Why? Ichthyotitan is nearing the estimated adult size and considering the skull is nowhere near as robust as a Megalodon’s, I doubt it’s biting near 50
Was the ichthytitan a relatively new fossil?
Megalodon's size varies on the method used, but the current size range for adults is from 16 meters and 45 tons to 23 meters and 140 tons.
Hmm ok
I fail to see the relevance
I'm just gonna use this for palaeontology related questions google is very inaccurate
Yeah it's really not. At minimum google scholar would be better given that would at least give you actual papers about the topic in question (if you can read the papers which I can understand is difficult for those that aren't familiar with them).
Is a bite force of 23 tonnes for an ichthyotitan absurd or is it fairly accurate
anyone able to find valid zhuchengtyrannus skeletals? all I got is this and it's only the skull
Again, we have no way of knowing. Trying to give it a number is nonsense. Also, just to put it into perspective, keep in mind that anything over 2 tons is off the table for the vast majority of animals. The only animals we have evidence of surpassing that are giant theropods, crocodilians, and pliosaurs. Maybe some whales, ichthyosaurs, and sharks too.
Hmm alright
This is the best you're going to get really. The issue with zhucheng is that it's unclear if it's closer to tarbo or rex, cause it's just a partial jaw, and because of that (and other unpublished fragmentary remains). Zhu's size is all over the place. Estimates range from das-sized to comparable to T. rex.
also what do you think the skull in this photo is, do you think it belonged to zhuchengtyrannus?
Who knows. Never seen it before and multiple large tyrannosaurs coexisting has happened (In Nemegt, right now we have Alio and Tarbo, but there's probably at least 2 more that we know are there but aren't named yet)
From the view that the photo is at its hard to tell but it looks fairly accurate
the bonebed was the same one that contained multiple shantungosaurus
zhucheng's bonebed also has a maxillary morph more akin to tarbosaurus
In that case I wouldn't be surprised if it is but who knows really
there's franoys' which is like the same size
The pretty sure they only coexisted because of the size difference
the amount of fossils that are yet to be described 😔
Multiple large predators coexisting is nothing new. Hello Morrison formation.
gorgosaurus and daspletosaurus are comparable in size in the judithian
some old rich dude probably has like an entire skeleton in his property and isn't letting any scientist in 😔
Apex stego lore
I'm pretty sure they had different prey and usually stayed out of eachothers way
Yes that’s…how it works? Even then, not guaranteed (lions and hyenas)
Healthy ecosystems can maintain multiple top order carnivores. Reminder that just 10k+ years ago we had this in the western US
actually on this note i'm impressed at how every single depiction of daspletosaurus and gorgosaurus manages to make them the exact same color
The influence of Lancian has spread far…maybe it is time I break this mold………….
we got the coolest theropod depiction in recorded history in 2013 and then it turned into varying shades of brown
Daspletosaurus and Gorgosaurus is a fun and interesting topic, two similar sized carnivores co-existing with each other.
it looks like a tremor graboid 
laughs in Carnivores Iggy
laughs in Dino Crisis Giga
Was Yacarerani Herbivorous or Omnivorous
sigma rizz
Fairly wide animal irl too
I reject your brown, for I know blue is true
Does anyone happen to know which specimen the in game Allosaurus is based off of
Size wise mf is Sauro
For how it looks then idk

I believe this was already talked about but what are the most energy expensive colors?
Ik that's why I wanted to know which specimen they based the size off of
It doesn't seem to be based off of any specific allo in particular. Many PoT creatures are upscaled from their largest specimens
Or upscaled to absurd amounts. And others are only upscaled a smidge or not at all
a human-made landscape
lol
but Zhucheng does have some cousins in its place
Since Allo is basically Sauro size, its size seems to be based on "Fenris"
Ignore "Leviathan" PLS
But POT Allo doesn't seem to be based on a Allosaurus specimen in specific
And Sauro≠Allo
So they simply made an average allo design wise and upsized it to Sauro size
I think y'all are reading too much into it. "Fenris" and "Leviathan" didn't even have names let alone references when PoT Allo got upscaled. Which, on that note, PoT allo's size wasn't always what it is now. As I see it, it doesn't seem to follow any particular specimen for appearance or scaling. They made it that big just cus. My theory is for its gameplay, needs to be able to grab things. They made it bigger so it doesn't look bad while doing that.
I mean tbh it's still a fine playable, just makes it on the bigger end of Allosaurs
Accurate sized Allo would be disappointing to a lot of people
didnt know a sticknodes animator was here :sigma
Ah thank you
honestly i find it annoying when people praise prehistoric planet like its the gospel or smthn
Understand
They had large front legs
That's literally the same
And keeps the frill thank god but they could tone down on the nose horn
No it's more accurate ppl are just use to seeing designs based on other hadrosaur or jw dominion iguanodon 💀😭
What I'm saying that this might got a whole rooster chin and crocodile scutes
They literally look the same except they don't have godzilla spines and a tumor on its chin old iggy design was worse com on yall 😭
They fixed the toes
They know lol. Was already discussed
Would a Bissekty giant dromaeosaur (might be Ulughbegsaurus if they are the same I don't know) be Possibly likely accurate with it only having feathers on its hide, possibly a small amount the tip of the tail and some (maybe a tiny amount) on the arms as Most theropods that reach that size in that type of habitat usually tend to lose most or sometimes all of their feathers
Is there something about the ankylosaur remains from Bajo de la Carpa?
i have been waiting over an hour, someone please respond.
What if we don’t know either
Don't pressure people in responding
Man
It's kinda funny how in these early late cretaceous SA environments it's +10 ton sauropod after +10 ton sauropod and then ↓ small ornithischians with absolutely no in between
the way the edmontonia was still alive during this 😭
kinda like african hunting dogs and jackals (i didnt use lions and leopards cause they are part of the same genus)
Lokiceratops, yeah love him too :DD
Family is maybe rauisuchidae... OR maybe dinosauria, it's still a mystery.
Why you translate only genus name?
personally, instead of "other species" I would give the catalog name of a known specimen .
Btw I never heart about one tone body mass Smok xd.
Suborder and infraorder i think would be this:
Recently traveled to Svalbard, 80 degrees north and found this on a bean at the base of an cliff
fun fact, this was right next to the furtherst perm human settlement at the north pole, town of 40 people all scientists
cant tell if its some kind of fish flipper, or a fern. But the people there said alot of the lime stone was 50 - 60 million years old, but some is actually from the devonian, and a friend of mine said it looked like a very early type of fern
I wanted to go hunting for more but the armed bodies guards had everyone move in groups, this is because there are 4000 polar bears and its a fairly small island, literally not legally allowed outside the town without a heavy caliber gun because people die often in the summer because the ice melts leaving all the bears in such a small dense area with little food.
strange point, all the fossles are found easily because the stones often rouded by time, have perfect cracks in them and they just fall apart. Very odd since it takes a long time for errosion to round a riverstone, only for them to split in two so perfectly, sometimes you dont notice its cracked at first glance. So thousands of years of erriosion and they all crack perfectly randomly overnight? no one knew why but I guessed it could be water getting into small parts of the stones and then expanding when the whole islands freezes in winter. so couldn't ask for a better place to fossil hunt, just dont get hunted urself lol
I’m pretty sure it’s an indet archosaur
i wonder if the keratin sheath theory amargasaurus wouldve used the spines aggressively.
i dont think that would be healthy
Was Pisanosaurus more likely a Ornithischian or a Silesaurid or Like some people are saying, transitional between silesaurids and ornithischians like wich one I honestly don't know
Silesaurs are basal ornithschians, so the distinction doesn’t really matter.
I'm curious what's like the actual rate and stat's for wild animals to die of old age, like actual dying of old age not dying because they're old yk, cuz I imagine most animals die bc they're old and too weak to fight against whatever comes there way and rarely actually die of actual old age
Silesaurus being added as an AI is honestly really neat
I thought so too really hyped for the ai changes
is there a list of all the species being added as ai i want to read up on some of them. Or have they not all been named yet?
The first Triassic addition
that would be Wadiasaurus and Dynamosuchus
Was Eusthenerpeton a saltwater fish or a fresh water fish
I believe both.
So... 
Campananeyen
13-15 ton Carcha real trust guys
What's that
new Rebbachisaurid whose paper came out yesterday
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08912963.2024.2383708
I would check it if my Data allows me to but it isn't sadly
I just thought they spelt Campanian really badly
Koreaceratopos Is it a dinosaur still considered semi-aquatic?
No
It was never reliably considered semi aquatic, like Koreaceratips, Liangionosaurus, and Lurudusaurus all share this same missinfo
Is there anything that says something about just koreaceratops?
Korea isn’t semi aquatic so why would there be
What's the source of this and the previous stuff?
https://x.com/kiracuriee/status/1822288797570048470 opinions on this question?
This specific room in Chicago museum always makes me think, what if an azhdarchid accidentally lost control and crashed beak first into a sauropod. Can it take it down like an arrow? Would it just get stuck in its air sack? Or would the break not even damage the skin? (somehow)
It's imaginative. My answer: the azhdarchid would break its neck and die. Sauropod would be like "ouch" but ultimately fine
would it be like a bird flying into a window?
If not more gruesome. Bigger animal, and azhdarchids are known for their long necks
Could a drepanosaurus change it's skin color like a chameleon to blend in?
No evidence
If a UtahRaptor pack fight a Trike who would win?
Dromeaosaurs don’t have evidence for pack hunting
(Other than deinonychus)
why do some paleontologists choose to torment my nightmares with names like these?
Seymouria skinnerensis
Enigmosaurus
Futalognkosaurus
jaxartosaurus
Bustingorrytitan
Gigantosaurus
Ulughbeghsaurus
Cumnoria
Pantydraco
Rapetosaurus
Chungkingosaurus
Gigantspinosaurus
Ostafrikasaurus
Kol
Obamadon
Han Solo
kernitops
Jianianhualong
Pedopenna
Pegomastax
Eromangasaurus
ERECTOPUS
mei long
Suskityrannus
Eric
Kurrupi Itaata
I have thought a lot on this, and have decided that if I ever find a dino, I will name it regretodon
Zuul??? Why is he on the list
zuul is actually kinda nice, just goofy name (it's chill)
it also showcased the first signs of anky vs anky club action to my knowledge so it was a pretty big discovery
Even then not really in Deinon
It was more of Gang hunting
ngl i feel this tweet was the closest thing we can get for a coexistence with Utahraptor
https://x.com/Na185_Dragon/status/1823249963712934234?t=Va404IvpveiK3hkvr3CXlQ&s=19
東京・立川市 Green Springs にて開催中の 恐竜のグリーティングイベント を見に行ってきました!
この動画では、お盆期間中にGreen Springsで開催されているユタラプトルのグリーティングイベントの様子をお届けします。
少しわかりにくいですが、恐竜が歩く道順に沿って動画の撮影・編集をしました。
後日見に行かれる方にとって、少しでも参考になれれば嬉しいです!
▼開催日時
・期間:2024年8月10日(土)~8月18日(日)
・時間:11 : 45~、15 : 30~、18 : 00~
Video title: Utahraptor Appears in Tokyo! DINO-A-LIVE Greeting Event
In this video, I bri...
Dickinsonia
I so wish the first one was true
Han Solo?
There is no way this is real.
pretty sure that was george lucas's doing
This is not the only unusual scientific name erected by Turvey; in the same paper he named a new species Geragnostus waldorfstatleri, because of "the resemblance of the pygidial axis to the heads of Waldorf and Statler, two characters from The Muppet Show."[1] ```
oh wow
I shut my mouth.
Damn, that's pretty cool.
I get most of this list, but why is Gigantosaurus here? Doesn't seem like a particularly difficult or strange name to me.
Anyone have a Dromaeosaur and bird skeleton comparison? Talking with some “birds ain’t dinosaurs” dudes and it’d come in handy
how could you forget drinker
only things i could find myself
@lavish frigate
Thanks!
Np 👍
Oh yeah and add Ninjatitan, Thanos and Bulbasaurus phylloxyron
If it means anything, Drinker doesn’t exist anymore.
Incredible that Cope was such an unabashed racist with such a silly middle name like Drinker
Your name is too silly to do that
I thought it wasn't valid any more?
its really similar to giganotosaurus to the point my head hurts
If you mean Gigantosaurus megalonyx, it's not valid anymore (and it came before Giganotosaurus in 1869, so gig is the actual imposter despite having a cooler name)
may the true gigan rest in peace
Gigantosaurus is a sauropod
My brain skipped to Megalonyx and said "Yes, this is a sloth"
have you ever heard of Gigantspinosaurus?
Unfortunately
he destroys ur shins
Instant death for the Azhdarchid and a scratch for the Sauropod
It makes a very funny clip of an Azhdarchid folding in on itself as it crumples from hitting the sauropod
Coughing baby vs Hydrogen bomb
Lookup Microraptor’s skeleton and it’s paleontology correct life like model and a skeleton of a Hoatzin Bird and the picture of a crow or raven. Between those you have a dromeosaur that is as close as possible to giving straight correlation to birds while possessing all attributes eternally of birds of modern day. I’ll send some images through.

Now this more than likely won’t convince the individual you speaking too as proof is not enough for them. I got into about 4 arguments this year alone that I ran into the same issue and no matter how exact my profiles and or scientific evidence was they still think birds just pooped from I don’t know the airbenders or something.
The Hoatzin bird, shows the hand claws found on even the earliest dromeosaur species, showing a link that their family may be closely connected, and bird as well as Dromeosaur skeletons and fossils have near identical characteristics, but much like bird to bird their not all quite the same they have subtle differences, but this comes with the understanding that each bird like raptors live in different terrain, and environments that they live in alter their skeletons a little bit from another. But that’s nature. It’s ever changing but somehow remains the same just in a different package. Need proof of vastly different evolutionary traits, look at Concavinator and Carcherodontosaurus, both are related to one another yet the appearance and size and even the skeletal structure, is yet vastly different from one to the other due to their different external variables that cause change hence forth the process of evolution can be displayed little by little through out different families that segmented and changed throughout time becoming entirely new species yet also being in their original evolutionary order, much like the Dromeosaur family consists of these individuals but are not limited to. Troodon, Deinonychus, Giminiraptor, Pyroraptor, Dakotaraptor, Achillobator, UtahRaptor, Archaeopteryx, and Microraptor. Vastly different but yet are still the same in many ways.
Hand claws can be found on other birds too, not just hoatzin. Though i’m not sure do all birds still have it
Even in chickens I think? Idk also did you know fowl have been around longer than saurolophine hadrosaurs
ostriches have pretty pronounced hand claws throughout their lives
the 1st image looks abit cursed-
well they are both in maniraptora so yeah they are pretty closely connected (also troodon doesnt exist and dakotaraptor is a turtle)
troodon still exists as a genus, it’s just in taxonomic hell cause it’s a tooth taxon and all it’s other material was assigned to stenonychosaurus
Random but Also we do have avalians that looked Indentical to Basal troodontids like Hesperornithoides Known as basal avialans like Alcmonavis wich are transitional to some early cretaceous Avialians like jeholornis wich are kind of transitional to Avebrevicaudans like Omnivoropteryx where you can start to see the Tail shrink and transition to a more pygostyle tail that modern birds have and Creatures like Omnivoropteryx are Kind of transitional to Creatures like basal Pygostylians like Cratonavis wich are Transitional to Ornithothoracines and Ornithothoracines contains Enantiornithines and Euornithines (Group containing all living birds) and Some basal Euornithes like Archaeorhynchus wich are transitional to Ornithuromorphs like Apsaravis wich are transitional to Ornithurans like Ceramornis wich are transitional to Avians/Aves/ All birds alive today like Paleognaths like Tinamou (and I'm not claiming these creatures mentioned evolved into/from each other and I'm saying Creatures Like them not the Creatures mentioned themselves and im not saying Alcmonavis Evolved into jeholornis)
Dubious means it basically doesn't exist. It's not taken seriously as a taxa.
dubious somehow becoming equated to invalid has been a disaster for sci-comm
not necessarily. the material exists. it’s still assigned to troodon. it’s more of a “we don’t know” vs “it doesn’t exist”… otherwise it’d be called invalid
it doesnt exist until we have proof it DID exist
we do have proof it existed, we still have the holotype tooth that is still assigned to troodon. we just don’t know what the rest of it looked like, and probably never will as it’s nearly impossible to assign material to teeth taxon
Pretty much functionally useless as a taxon tho, which is where I think the "didn't exist" mentality stems from. It might as well not
i don’t disagree that it’s functionally useless, but like the bruhathkay material, it still exists. my only point is that the genus is, technically, still in use, and that whatever animal the holotype belongs to did exist
Well, the bruhathkay material was destroyed. It actually no longer exists haha
lol that’s true, brainfart, but i think you know what i meant X)
proof as in not a damn tooth
the tooth existing is proof the animal existed ..
Yeah lol. But even so, we put a little too much weight on named things that shouldn't have had names on the first place. "Still in use" only matters as much as well, it can even be used. After all, under the right conditions even with seniority, the name Troodon can become nomen oblitum
honestly my only point is that whatever animal that tooth belonged too, as currently under the name troodon, did exist. what is it? who knows
Its a troodontid
the genus is based off of a single tooth lol it could literally be any other troodontid in the area
yeah, i know, as i said in my previous message all i’m saying is that the animal DID exist 
AND the tooth isnt different enough from other troodontid teeth to be considered significant proof it existed
I think uh, indeterminate troodontid would be the proper classification these days ye
Well went and saw the Dueling Dinosaurs in Raleigh today.
Wasn't the Protoceratops biting the Raptors arm?
nah it was actually wrestles with it||/j||
that’s the fighting dinosaurs specimen, this is dueling dinosaurs which is a different set of taxa
literally what would happen in pot
Ah, nice, I haven't forgotten about this curious find.
How long was Dacen? Was it really that long?
this is the best reference for it right now
By the way, did they had side spikes like kentrosaurus?
No
It was also 7 tonnes
Guys, I know avian dinosaurs colors on large non avian theropods is a bit extreme but I wanted to try something and was wondering does it look a bit plausible
Alright so, from what I have understood from people more knowledgeable than me, if you just reduced the area/amount of blue a bit more + make the orange darker, then this is plausible.
Whether this coloration was beneficial to the animal itself is another question.
The orange looks fine. False gharials get a lot redder and as far as I know their orange color is derived from melanin and not carotenoids
Was Utahraptor the apex predator of its environment?
how accurate was Dinosaur Britian Bary?
https://youtu.be/2VUrZtHdjjg?si=RA9QDhvQcULy6Jt0
With help of @screentime4377
tags: Baryonyx. Dinosaurs. Screen Time. all scenes. Dinosaur Britian.
how?
the way the feathers just... yk
that’s how they are on everything with feather wings. The feathers grow outwards and down the middle finger
Are there described hadrosauroids from before the campanian in South America?
Yes
Hey @bright veldt, do you by any chance have that photo of what the proportions of a 60 Foot Mosa off of the material remains looked like?
Thanks!
How big is the biggest dasp, 10m and 4t? I doubt it was 11m and 5t like wikipedia says
we don't have an exact size for it, 10-11m and 4-5t is an appropriate range
What's size of the biggest carcha that we ever found? Is 160sm correct for it's skull?
Yes that's about right. It's in the same size range as the skull of the Giga holotype, but less robust
Wasn't the skull of the largest giga about 150 cm long?
that was pre-Meraxes, now it's 163 cm
I love using pre-Meraxes and post-Meraxes to refer to carcharodontosaur reconstructions. Everything changed when the Targaryens attacked
Oh interesting, what about rex's skull?
hasn't changed, the biggest rex skulls are still 151-153 cm. With maybe the exception of Cope, but we need more data
real ones use premax-quadrate
i like how absolutely none of the citations say anything about a 5t pete iii
$10 someone saw paul's schizo 5t sir william and thought big das = pete iii
and of the 3/4ths of the citations that mention pete iii two outright call it torosus and the other one calls it sp. so wikipedia's just lying there
Wait how, Wiki does say it's either D. torosus or .sp
wikipedia says its been proposed to be a new species
this is despite none of the citations saying its been proposed to be a new species
We ain't gonna talk abt the delta, this thing was this big 👀
Jeez dinosaurs were large
I heard reports of this guy likely being one of the longest theropods
summon the jfd guys
Delta potentially being one of the longest Theropods comes from lumping in Bahariyasaurus but from what I've been told the original author who suggested it is no longer convinced of this, though it's not been formally published anywhere yet
yeah delta is wacky
Default Delta however alone is just, distressing. My man is built like a 3 meter animal yet is over 8 while being the same mass as Ceratosaurus
i’ve seen some of your tweets talking about how horrifying of an animal it is
definitely the creature ever
I do sincerely believe Baharia is gonna end up as the longest theropod, regardless of classification
That kind of long leg in that environment is extremely telling of a tall and really lanky animal
The Brachiosaurus in question
the saurus ever
Rex can’t see well
Incorrect!
People who know dinos only from JP/JW be like:
POV a rex sees you from miles away and you can’t see it
literally the exact opposite
Rex has like the best eyes of literally anything ever on earth right??
(Idk😭)
no not anything ever but they were very good
some of the best binocular vision yes, but overall eyesight no
best binocular vision in non avian dinosaurs tho, with deinonychosaurs a close second
I will now place this information in the back of my mind for later use
Rage bait 101
Who win an territorial battle Tyranotitan or Sauroniops?
Sauroniops is known from a scrap of brow so I don't think we can answer that
If I beamed the Sauroniops brow scrap at the forehead of the Tyrannotitan, the Sauroniops would win
I think they would both lose
Ever a pessimist I see
i need a refresher on HOW much we have of psittacosaurus, because i remember it has alot of important remains
basically everything, hundreds of skeletons, including complete ones
so the sub adult sibling found with the baby horde is still that yeah, and the skin impressions yeah? just double checking because i thought there was abit of a fuss awhile ago on it
Good lord i thought dasp was like 3 ton range but 4-5 is a beast of a mf
Ye. We also found one recently that was locked in battle with repenomamus fighting-dinosaur style.
Daspletosaurus vs Repenomamus
oh yeah, thanks for reconfirming for me, just been a hot second on the taco
7 tonnes vs 2,5 tonnes SO FAIR!!!
I don't know what this mammal is doing tussling with a dinosaur several times its size but meh.
repanomamus mammalian cunning joke
he saw tacos younger brother was called a sheep so must've meant a easy meal trust
also one thing to check, what was that giant fragmentary frog( miocene i THINK?) haven't heard much from it
This is because most are around 3t and the largest specimen flirts with 4t
which is to say 5t is like the upper end of vaguely reasonable estimates for the absolute largest individual we have
"The agile Repenomamus, with his cunning and long-lasting energy, might well win"
Was this not called into suspicion?
It was but so does everything? Nothing anybody said was seriously convincing. It was just "eh idk".
having a almost badger fighting a triceratops great great uncle is way cooler than they just got lumped together randomly, or maybe it was aggressive hugging
truly
The Repano is grabbing onto the tibia directly and basically phasing through the entirety of the elephant thick skin, connective tissue, and robust musculature of the lower leg. There is no way it's not altered in someway
Could be a dead psittacosaurus
i dont know even the basics that well and I went straight for dinos!
feathers teeth and eye to be added
Oh tysm, I knew the leg was the issue but I couldn't remember the exact problem ❤️
Love this
Ah I see. I guess it was scavenging then. Although even then the angle is hella wierd.
Isn't there a debate over Tyrannosaurus being a scavenger? Correct me if I'm wrong yet again lol
there was one but it was kinda stopped after we found healed rex bite marks in stuff
Not really a debate, it's just one paleontologist that keeps saying it was a scavenger despite piles of evidence because he wants to be quirky
Ah alr, I thought that was highly unlikely anyways considering how many fossils have healed bites and it evolved to counter the herbivores
it was a small debate with slight bit of founding but like, most of it was just ignoring the evidence like random said
Like all carnivores, T. rex would scavenge sometimes, and it had one of the most advanced senses of smell in the animal kingdom which probably helped. But it's too big to survive off carcasses alone without hunting for itself occasionally
Exactly, it was the largest land predator ever, there's no way it wouldn't have been exhibiting predatory behaviour
To be fair weasels hunt rabbits several times their size. And even if it wasn't predation squirrels alone should show just how violent small critters can get if they feel they have to
some animals are just built different
Maybe it was opportunistic like eating anything it could find but also hunting too?? I dunno much but this could probably answer some things
Bc it was pretty big and heavy and it was an ambush predator I heard but it still had to use tons of energy to chase it down after for a quick kill (I think?) So if it was too tired to hunt, hungry again, and found food itd scavenge
I dunno but I just started chatting here, I still have tons to learn but this is my hypothesis
I also heard it was very smart too so maybe it just like knewwhat to do and what to hunt, when to scavenge after and where etc
Are there any hadrosauroid genera from before the campanian in South America? Or at least undescribed remains?
Last I checked, rex was the fastest multi-ton animal in its environment so I wouldn't say it was super slow
Obviously might've changed, but that's also just basic carnivore plan (Eat what you get)
Yea, I don't think I said it was slow but it mightve just been pretty adaptable and yes fast, ur right
Like rhinos and elephants today are pretty big and heavy but they can also run pretty quickly too, Ik this doesn't even compare to rex but just as an example or statement yk just wanted to say that
Isn’t Edmontosaurus the fastest?
Wait question, do dinos have a different taxonomy classification list than animals today or is it the same?? Like DKPCOFGS?? Or is it different because of the different time period and stuff
INDORAPTOR?!?!?!
It's almost certain that it was opportunistic, if a giant herbivore (or another tyrannosaur) happened to die in its environment T.rex would probably be able to track the carcass from several miles away. The amount of its brain that is taken up by the olfactory bulb is the largest of any animal afaik
ye
wait wouldn´t you get copyrighted from universal?
Also yes, dinosaurs use family, genus and species ranking. Dinosaurs are already a subset of "class Reptilia"
Yea makes sense
im not making a game or anything just in my free time
does that mean we can make JP/JW dinos 👀
Ohh okay, ty
I mean if you learn a bit of blender yeah why not (maybe more than a bit but still)
imagine JP stego bruh that thing will rival rexes 💀
not as good but eh. I happen to have attempted to make one
update btw he now has eyes feathers and teeth
Imo I think it would have been more like a grizzly bear were it primarily just ate all it could in its sight and took kills from other dinosaur while also setting up a ambush for prey if it could
That's quite the stego
I think 1 of there rexs got hurt by a stego in the novels before but I could be wrong
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQLN5tJM7TA&t=1679s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYh4DADhZcg
to add to this, these two videos about the ecology of Monster Hunter go in depth about the kind of adaptations you would see in something that mostly or entirely scavenges, tldr large terrestrial scavengers are next to impossible due to how inefficient it is to do so
Seemingly ready to brawl with just about everything, Odogaron is often called MH's honey badger. But is Odogaron quite as aggressive as he seems, or is there more beneath the fierce surface? And do other animals provide a better comparison?
It's time to invade once more as we cover the Bombardment Wyvern and his ecology in the New (and old?) World.
0:00 Intro and making the case for Bazelgeuse as a scavenger
3:26 Metabolism
5:11 Locomotion
8:15 Sensory Detection
10:39 Carrion Availability
16:25 Competition
22:48 Facilitation and Food Processing
26:14 Bazelgeuse and other s...
Unnatural History Channel is so good
Anyway Paleo Guys. What are your initial thoughts (I know its just a shadow).
https://fxtwitter.com/pathoftitans/status/1824645774124237027?t=VFC2YAYDQJPFYsVxwZw6zg&s=19
Coming to Path of Titans...
The herd will soon grow once again. Stay tuned for more.
#pathoftitans #dinosaurs
anything along the lines of these two should be good
what a coincidence, I was just watching the bazelgeuse video now lol
Can't explain exactly why but I'm really nervous about Miragaia. I hope it's unfounded.
me too. Mainly, I'm not a game developer, but changing its name to dacentrurus can't be that hard right?
Nah. But they're not doing that
Didn't with megalania
The purchase was for miragaia so it doesn’t really work like that
Didn’t do it for Laten either
but miragaia is dacentrurus
with megalania, that's still a frequently used common name
and laten was fine when it was first added
miratrurus, problem solved
Miragaia was also fine when it was first purchased
Yeah but in game its not common names, it's the binomial
Meaning megalania's is wrong
Is there any better skeletals for Stan out there or no
It's also one paper. Devs of a video game don't need to honor one paper over the perk dino as advertised for the sake of having the accurate name
Why did megalania get its name changed anyways?
since when? we literally have fictional "sub"species and the main differentiator between each playable is only the genus name
tbf Megalania makes sense because Varanus makes things more complicated then they need to be. Still fair though given laten's existed for 3 years now.
I don't think the devs really care about all that. I think they just found it simpler to keep the name Megalania as its long been advertised not only in the PoT community but also in general. As with Laten and prolly mira
I personally would like name swaps to be done with the exception of mega because of how fucky it is
Since always. The creatures in PoT go by their binomials, even including fictional species. They're fictional binomials
Megalania's name in game is not its actual binomial, Varanus priscus.
Again with megalania it's iffy because, we actively refer to other Varanus frequently. Komodo dragon is also Varanus. Changing that would just make it confusing.
Varanus Varanus priscus
It doesn't have to be. In the video game I don't think anyone would be really going "ummmmmmm Varanus??? Like the komodo dragon and water monitor? Kinda confused now"
Or rather, I don't think people would have been had it been called Varanus priscus. Specially not when its other species are fictional and have god awful specific names
I feel like you're missing the point. I'm referring to the justification to change it not the what-if if that was a thing.
I mainly just don't like it aesthetically
Ig I'm confused bc I don't know that I'm missing the point. You're saying its justified Megalania not getting its named changed bc its iffy to refer to it as Varanus and it would have confused people ye? I'm just commenting that I don't think it would have been so troublesome
im sure if they redid the ui a bit, and made space to include the species name to then have subspecies stay where they are it wouldn't be all too bad
Wanted to move the cheek talk here from modding. It's clear that at least derived thyreophorans had cheeks that went to the beak as seen in Pannoplosaurus. The question is if it's a unique feature to Ankylosaurs or if it's a more basal condition.
My personal take is that like ankylosaurs a lot of Ornithischians have a recessed tooth row which at least in Ankylosaurs seems to fill in with a cheek. A lot of Ornithischians also independently evolve complex chewing and food processing which is really hard to do if your food has a big chance of falling out of your mouth
good point
Even proportionally as well in comparison to other Tyrannosaurids?
for the whole body, not really, but remember his skull has a severe injury that caused that kinda dented shape, and that his teeth are really slipped. apparently they were mid shed but idk the validity on that
What's a more modern Halszkaraptor skeletal? Looking into it i've seen that the evidence for it being semiaquatic is pretty weak and apparently the descriptor is kind of an idiot about it (reworded because language)
Progigantosaurus
Dose anyone know what this animal is or if it's real or fake?
how much did mira weigh?
7.8 tons
that says dace?
Mira got clapped, no longer a valid genus
Yeah
Miragaia got clapped
Miragaia has fallen
Billions must refer to it as dace
is it me or is it everytime PoT releases a creature, something happens to said creature
This and spino were like the two times something awkwardly happened when PoT released it
Would they actually make it the size of D. armatus though, or are they more likely to keep it the size of D/M. longicollum since regardless of the genus that’s probably the species they chose.
Longicollum is also dead. It wasn’t just a lump.
I couldn't tell you
I would assume its the size of dace since POT makes things oversized
Yea but if they had already sized it around estimates for Miragaia I doubt they would change that now. We don’t even know if they’ll bother changing the name yet
Doubt
Yea Miragaia iirc was split with its European species being reclassified as Dacenturous and it's North American species being put back as Alcovasaurus do we know which of the ex Miragaia species it was based off of
I expect Pot will size Mira to fit inbetween Stego and Kent, rather then sticking strictly to a skeletal.
I hope not
What are the issues with this reconstruction? (I think POT based their Miragaia on this, we got to see its shadow)
depends if PoT uses dacent or miragaia as the base for it, since iirc recently miragaia was made invalid to become dacent
now if that means they pull an amarga and update its model to make it realismner or stay with miragaia we don't really know
I heard that this rec of Miragaia having spikes so closely knit together wasn't all that good + it had too many spikes and neck vertebrae I think
i dont think its based on that, at least not fully. You can see gaps between all the plates and spikes in the shadow
its probably based on whatever they used for the store silhouette, which is good cause its pretty close to the best reference you'll find for dacentrurines in general
Found a bit of a better one, even though it is older.
Franoys is better
Random but Could platytholus climb trees or other stuff
So the one I previously mentioned. Tragic that Stan doesn’t have any newer skeletals for it.
I mean Franoys still holds up pretty well
True
Also I didn’t realize that the Dueling Dinosaurs Tyrannosaurus was named Bloody Mary
Yeah I double checked Miragaia Longicollum has become Dacentrurus Longicollum and Miragaia Longispinus has become Alcovasaurus Longispinus. Though admittedly I think Miragaia was an uncertain genus for some time.
Well this is a very interesting skeletal for Denversaurus.
use lanican's
Chat was the smallest dinosaur?
Which looks like?
Oh I’ve seen that one. I was just saying how interesting GetAway’s was
^
Though yes, Lanican’s is better
Tbf, we aren’t a 100% what the smallest is as smaller bones tend to be harder to fossilize than bigger bones. As for one of the smallest, I’d say Sinosauropterx.
Thanks g
Also chat is prognathodon and mosasaurus two different animals or nah
At least one of them, yes
They have dramatically different skulls
I believe this was Mosa and Prognathodon side by side, taken by me
This was the wrong image lmao
Mosa vs Prog
Ignore the messages before this, GATs is better to use (Lancians own words)
Chat what is the largest cephalopod
Parapuzosia, a giant ammonite. Weighed up to 2 tons or so
Miragaia longicollum was thrown out entirely. It wasn’t a lump. They found that Miragaia longicollum was Dacentrurus armatus remains the whole time, and thus the younger taxa was invalidated.
Ah, interesting. Thanks
well, no it is a lump, its just a lump at an entire species level
Yknow what I mean
Oh so Longicollum is completely invalid? I was under the impression the Genus was desolved not the species.
The species was too yeah
Damn rip my boi
Is allosaurus amplexus accurate?
Miragaia is out people
They definitely already know
it's an invalid species
Thank u
its not
or well, its not really as simple as that cause officially i think it is just A. amplexus with a subjective entire lump
oh, interesting
its indistinguishable from Sauro AND Allo
Is amnh 680 Epanterias?
one of the most completely known theropods
look inside
systematics absolutely suck
no, its A. fragilis
so uhm, how good is
in the term of accuracy? ( i cant spell its name )
great
pretty good
Ye. Extremely disappointed by it otherwise though. Venomous stegosaur is cringe af.
Wasn’t expecting it to be venomous
@brave nova ^
wouldve been cool if it was based on dans dacen, but still nice
how the hell do you make a stegosaur venomous?
A great question.
So is it more its own species? (I’m very confused)
You can argue both lumped & split but only to Allosaurus amplexus, "Epanterias" doesnt really have much to go off iirc
rubbing its spikes on toxic plants, its not a difficult concept really
Are we allowed to talk about the newcomer?
oh because I thought being venomous means you bite your prey and inject venom into it
@next crest
ashleys isnt very good
I mean I get it, all of the stegosaurs doing bleed would have been a bit bland but the ability to hit 3x isn’t a bad idea. Being toxic is just a really strange thing for it.
TF HAPPENED TO IT'S HIPS
Should the hips look like that?
skeletals always being in perfect lateral and its consequences...
apparently 
look like what
Its whole kit is confusing as hell. Like it brings a lot of innovation with its new abilities but they just do not fit Mira at all. They looked at one of the most unique stegosaurs and decided its role would be “every status effect go”
the spike count is a bit much yeah
guys ilia aren't always just like super thin blades y'know right
Oh I’m happy that everyone is disappointed too
Yeah i hate that sm, sometimes i want to draw a something and i can't do a good angle because everything is lateral view
articulation of stuff too
And then give it the worst damage in the game!
(I do actually like it tho tbh)
Square and low
"low" ?
& this is Stegos https://www.deviantart.com/sketchy-raptor/art/Stegosaurus-Muscular-Anatomy-849218897
Like I do kind of like the idea of maybe a posionous stegosaur but it just feels off
i can never take this image seriously after that stupid kingpin version
Plus wouldn’t it have been the largest stegosaur in the game since Stegosaurus is based off of S.stenops. I wouldn’t have minded it doing bleed, heck the 3x hit it has is actually something I was thinking they would have added since Sucho has a multi hit attack. Being venomous and toxic just doesn’t seem to well…. make it seem well. If anything it’s a bit more confusing.
If they used the D. armatus specimen it would have been the longest but not the largest, their Stenops also isnt the most accurate
this is miras skeletal.
an outdated one yeah
This is super outdated lol
Mira does not have shoulder spikes
Dacen is like right behind stego size-wise. It being big is expected.

VIKING YOU LIER
True, stenops is not very accurate and it would have been the longest if they had went with D. armatus.
Mira straight up looking like the ice age kentrosaurus💀 lol
that's foul
Does someone have an updated mira skeletal
Oh nvm it’s above
best is ths
Thanks
no idea if a breakdown on what happened to Miragaia was ever given for those out of the loop, but basically we had the front half of Miragaia and the back half of Dacenturus. Both are found from the same region and time, but were treated as different species.
A specimen was described that half enough of both halves to compare between both Dacenturus and Miragaia, and this one animal had all of the traits of both species on the respective sides (all of Mira's on front, all of Dacen's in back).
This basically says "they're the same thing" so Miragaia, the more recently named species, would then be sunk into Dacenturus.
Alcovasaurus longispinus is also primarily known from the back half of the animal, and was the reference for Miragaia's back half before this new specimen. But Alcova is definitively distinct from Dacenturus, so since Miragaia's back half is now Dacenturus, Alcovasaurus became a distinct genus once again.
https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlae074/7696911
Wym by lumped and split? That entire thing kinda confused me more 😭
you can argue for both lumping amplexus into Allosaurus as a whole, or argue for it being Allosaurus amplexus
So is Mira's hips being that wide and back being thatflat actually accurate? it looks great laterally but at an angle ...
yeah stegosaur pelvises (and particularly dacentrurines) are just that wide, and the epaxial musculature seems about right... that's just how stegosaurs are built haha
it may not be 100% identical to how it should be, but its close enough to where it really does not matter
Oh so do u lean to either one more or equal on both in your opinion
Rub the spines in smashed mushrooms or fecal matter
so I'll become venomous if I do that? 
or perhaps this is just a game with magical healing calls and other things, it doesn’t need to max sense X)
Wait, is the new dinosaurs that's our a valid?
in layman’s terms, the name is. the animal isn’t
Why not the animal? What happened if I can ask?
this explains it well ^^
Thank you

Fun fact: if a stegosaur stabbed you, you would die, regardless if it had venom or not
no I wouldn't
lets test it
UwU what's this impales you
🚪
I know this is mostly coming from an artistic stance but is this kind of line detail okay?
does it seem a little thin to anyone else?
Amazing!
Why is the “if tyrannosaurus had lips” even a debate
primarily because jurassic park made it popular to have T.rex without lips
Yeah just JP fanboyism
Don't ask them why raptors are allowed to have lips but larger theropods aren't. It breaks their fragile minds.
Tiranossaur Need “hit-kill” bite in all small dinossaurs. And one hability to clamp another dinos using the foot, Like eagle, falcon…
mildly considering tlcing the squalicorax model, anyone got any pointers/cool refs?
mostly the fact that it has a worse underbite than my dog which makes it look pretty funny
this is the proper sideview* will prolly do heavy editing to the face area yeah
Scott Hartman redid his Suchomimus skeletal
Thoughts on the validity of its proportions?
it's much better than the old one, definitely
torso looks kinda small but I don't know of any proper measurements that have been published
But I thought since it was a baryonychine its proportions would look less similar to Spinosaurus. Is there new information about Suchomimus that was released that I missed changing its proportions so drastically from before?
If you're referring to the short legs, they are much longer compared to Spinosaurus, Hartman just put the animal in an oddly crouched posture that makes the legs look shorter
I see
lined them up with the same body length, the green and red lines are their hip heights
hartman's sucho is tall af btw Rndom you saw my sucho lineart?
Wait new sucho build?
I did not
oh mb I meant Randomdinos
The dip at the upper lob of the tail should probably be going more straight below the upper lobe.
The caudal keel could also be more pronounced but that would depend of Squalicorax ecology/lifestyle which idk if it was really a pelagic shark, but given the tiger shark like teeth it probably lived near the coastline. It seems your model lacks a precaudal pit which is present in pelagic sharks and rather deep (see Lamnids, Carcharhinids, Sphyrnids, Cetorhinus, Odontaspids).
The gill slits are off. Reminds of The Meg's gills ngl. Still, it probably didn't need as much oxygen as Lamnids themselves so you could get away by making them smaller (possibly Carcharhinid like ? size wise).
The head seem to need a lot of touch ups. Nostrils could be changed a bit so they are more like that of other Lamniforms (see here for sand-tiger shark). Having a top view could also help to visualize better how it should look like given that the only specimen we have is the one in the third picture.
It should be broad but not like to the extant of tiger shark (still given their similarity in teeth they probably had similar lifestyle so I could suggest to tilt the tail more downward, though I think this is suggested by the fossil itself?). It could need to be pointier but still short (so things like porbeagles and salmon sharks should not be the only references, but I still recommend to look at the so you have a better idea of how Squalicorax head could have looked like) and with wide jaws.
Also, a recommendation would be to give your Squalicorax (once you are at texturing) eyes more similar to Odontotaspids or Alopids given their basal position among Lamniforms. So, not deep blue eyes that Lamnids have + with their round pupil.
So, Squalicorax would be kind of like a porbeagle but with sand-tiger shark-like eyes, more downward positioned tail with a smaller lower lobe like tiger shark or sand-tiger, probably smaller gills than porbeagle, wider jaws and less pronounced caudal keel.
Tysm! here's the current topview. is it alright if i dm you once i have alot more work done based on these critiques?
Does anyone have any idea/reference where the idea for PoT miragaia to spit? I was having a look at miragaia research cause I know nothing about them, and haven't read anything about them spitting. I know it's likely just a game mechanic, and a cool one at that, but I was just genuinely curious if it's based off any studies or anything
Gameplay
Based off a beatle
It's just spit. That's it. It's not based on anything.
Is sigilmassosaurus valid or nah?
https://youtu.be/SoNVyro66hM?si=kKtPoWsDWa5W4lTC This video got me thinking, what are good references for dinosaur nostrils and eyes?
I have some anatomy questions...
#dinosaur #anatomy #paleoart #paleontology #bird #jurassic #art #digitalart #fypviral #kanatigoth
bird
Chat would a triceratops (prosus or horridus) against a tyrannosaurus
Dude really said bees aren't venomous I'm dead 😂
First of all, be nice and read the rules
I meant bees aren’t venomous in the ways that you would normally think of venom being *
You were being rude first? ( -_-)
Also male bees aren’t venomous since they don’t have stingers but I don’t think that counts
Yikes minute long cooldown : /
How??? We were discussing something and you said I was “mad cause i was wrong” 💀🙏
"he's pulling hard to be right" is pretty rude if you ask me 😂
It’s not rude though lol. It’s something you were doing.. you kept making up stuff to seem right
What was i making up exactly?
Slow loris eating birds, a bunch of other crap
It's a fact ( -.-)
Even if it doesn't eat bird it def eats bugs which means it has an insectivore diet as well making it not a herbivore
I sent you a literal wiki from a zoo stating their diet….
i'm legitimately intrigued as to how you even manage to get into an argument over lorises eating birds on the path of titans discord server of all places
Please remain polite and respectful towards each other and do not provoke or antagonize other users while in conversation. Refer to our #rules
Well i don't see this going anywhere let's just end it 😂
Also it rarely eats bugs. Just like how almost all herbivores irl eat meat, that doesn’t make them carnivores or omnivores in the long run, same with how carnivores eat herbivores food on occasion, doesn’t make them herbis or omnivores
Started by me trying to figure out why the mira does venom damage when a venomous herbivore creatures don't exist, and then people pointing out animals that aren't herbivores being venomous xD and it's turned to this
If you want to continue with the convo feel free to dm me we have talked about this enough no one else cares about our convo 😂
I mean it's interesting 💀
Nah we can't agree so it's just going to go in a circle no point you know? 😂
Just agree to disagree
There ya go agree to disagree
fwiw btw if you want to get into semantics about "this animal sometimes eats other animals/animal products" then very, very few animals would be truly herbivorous. Even ungulates, the most herbivore of herbivores, will eat small animals and eggs sometimes. Herbivore is probably more reasonably a term to describe animals that primarily eat vegetation, but not solely.
Yeah that whole thing comes from a failed understanding of what herbivore/omnivore/carnivore means.
if anything it might be best to look at it as a lifestyle rather than diet? A herbivore is something whose day to day life revolves around eating vegetation. Which sounds very similar but is actually different from "animal that only eats vegetation"
Your cat deciding to be weird and eat grass doesn’t suddenly mean cats are omnivores.
Tangentially reminded of when I was curious about sloth diets and whether they are largely herbivorous or not and wikipedia mentions them eating carcasses? Scavenger sloth is somewhat terrifying in a way
is miragaia poisonous or venomous though that’s the question
No dinosaur we know of was venomous. Poisonous? Eh no way of knowing.
Eyes, birds.
For nostrils I think there are some on the internet that looked into it. They'd be rather different to mammals and modern reptiles iirc given how much space there were. They'd be positioned at the foremost of the nasal opening. Here is how I do them usually.
@bright veldt accuracy on this wip shant base sculpt? made non muscular cheeks and was wondering if that would be acceptable
Cheeks in hadrosaurs tmk can be done in a lot of different ways. We don’t really know if they had cheeks to begin with, even if rn the vibes are saying they probably did.
I almost thought that Shantugosaurus sculpture was Deinoechierus.
same, they're very similar
I'm referencing these images
I guess I could push up to the blue line
So wait why are people complaining Mira is boxy?
Isn't that accurate for stegosaurs now?
miragaia’s design feels weird to me or am i just trippin and it’s accurate?
I think it feels weird cause the other two official stegosaurs are based on older less accurate reconstructions
assorted big (5t+) hadrosaur taxa that don't come with really stupid caveats
i dont know enough about it it’s just the neck feels really skinny to me for an animal of that size
I think that a neck like that is possible for Mira, I just kinda wish it had some kind of dewlap or fat along the bottom of the neck to make it look a little chunkier
that’s how i imagine it i think that’s the problem for me as well.
this one is extreme but i know what u mean
I also kinda wish ald would have some more speculative features on their dinos.
Then again I don't know how the community would react to that...
they could def do that more with the subspecies more often. i know they have done it but they could do it more. my favorite design though doesn’t have any really i love the sucho
Stegosaurs are just square now, wait until Stego gets its next TLC, it'll be a cube
Later Thyreophorans tend to be more cubeoid in shape generally, look at Ankylosaurs for example, they're wide and flat
Walking loaves of bread
Kentros TLC is also square as heck
Less so than Decent/Mira, whos back is so flat it dips down in the center. As for the neck, Stegosaurus itself is an outlier in stegosaurs cause it's neck is pretty short, but Decent/Mira just has a freakishly long neck in general
love the new stegos
Like, compared to Stego this thing is a freak
How accurate would you guys say is Hershell Hoffmeyer's Tyrannosaurus rex? Here are the links to it by the way: https://www.daz3d.com/tyrannosaurus-rex-3?srsltid=AfmBOooTYdNAdsq-wjbznPwS_NUg-XzgilqTyoHnOKyKegedwYpTm6bJ https://www.daz3d.com/tyrannosaurus-rex-3-expansion
The Tyrannosaurus Rex 3 is fully rigged and the next generation model being the most realistic, detailed, and optimized for better performance than previous versions.
The Tyrannosaurus Rex 3 figure includes:
Male and
Mira is a Stegosaur trying to be a sauropod
actually
compared to other stegosaurids, stegosaurus is the odd one out
the rest have that same kentro/dacent build
Even compared to the average stegosaur Mira/Dacent has a freakishly long neck and weird build
I mean
I love these guys
https://youtu.be/g61HrK6cquU?si=JVWwMkee9tFdOs1O robokaseki has made spino swimming model
良いと思った動画に「高評価👍」を押していただくと、一般投票になります。
(複数の動画に押してもOK。審査の参考にさせていただきます。)
水中ロボットコンベンション in JAMSTEC 2024
ビデオ部門のチーム紹介ページ
https://www.jam24.underwaterrobonet.org/video/
ビデオ部門の全動画は再生リストで:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7niPiAIqUjrdj8twEdQ6ga5YqlDMZz3_
how would hadrosaurs have ran on 4 legs?
2 legged animations aren't that hard but 4 with the 2 front legs being shorter
my brain
all I can think of is planting the front legs and kicking with the rear legs to push itself forward
Well, it is kinda hard to picture as they would most likely not run like lizards nor mammals on all 4.
So, you see Miragaia and how it runs? Kinda similarly but with 2 limbs of different side going together.
Basically yeah
They would have to slow down the pace of the hind legs so that they didn't overtake the front ones and faceplant. Which is the main reason they would run bipedally when chased by a predator, since there is no animal that intentionally cripples itself by running slower than it is capable of
You've never seen me enter a race I know I would have lost at full speed
Which is like any race I've ever been part of
true
Just to understand rq, the discussion's concerning hadrosaurs for which they've not been found to be obligate bipeds??
They’re primarily quadrupedal but can go on two legs.
I think the convo was wether they ran on 2 legs or not
^
All hadrosaurs are primarily quadrupedal but they probably ran bipedally when the goal was to move as fast as possible
https://youtu.be/gnBEQMc4SZY?si=a8jdFIFxiyAyaKJR counter point
Watches PP Edmontosaurus
yeah uh
a 6 ton plus hadrosaur is not galloping like that
Iguanodon gallop leak
Is pachyrhinosaurs be work on
I hated it back in the days
I mean I'd say stegosaurus fits in pretty well with these two
Wuerho is so short it's not funny
Neither of those are very good
so would they have ran on 4 legs for long distance running? to conserve energy?
Possible
to be real neither of those is accurate
their torsos are so blocky, love how weird they are
Meanwhile Wuerho I have no idea. Every skeletal is completely different.
ive heard the dacentrurine thing is something that was refuted ages ago, just sorta a fever dream
I mean still.
one species seems to clade dacentrurine, the other closer to stego
This skel is great compared to the stego, primarily because hespero doesnt require so many edits, i think there are only marginal things that the hesp actually needs compared to stego lmao (Stego is a horrible animal to reconstruct if ur trying to reconstruct something older than sophie)
I should just pay someone to figure out wtf homheni is doing lmaoo
Do we have any up to date styracosaurus skeletal?
lambeosaur misscellania
gooooddd
whats the green para
cyrto?
indeed
charonosaurus is funny because the tlatolophus paper says the undescribed crest is para-looking but also doesn't reconstruct it para looking (but that might just be cause its not published)
that or they use tubular very liberally here
ig thats para looking enough
tmk Tubicens is still bigger than charon
charono's cranial material's smaller but there's a really big femur too
the charon titan
People, could Allen have had a larger predator?
Looking through stuff it seems like the largest carnivore was Niebla, but at the same time the largest things were Aeolosaurus and Kelumapusaura
Second only to the Edmustho Titan
^
Femur based scaling
Any known info or concerns on this yet?
yeah why is the 1m rex femur as wide as sue
lol
the body masses in general are bad and don't use the most up to date version of that equation
what does Dig stand for?
how many feet underground they had to dig for the fossils
i hate when i have to dig CT feet underground, digging SS is way easier
Is Riparovenator still a thing or did it get the Miragaia treatment?
still exists
Ah, thanks. I was just curious
At least Tuojiangosaurus still has a relatively complete skeleton compared to others.
And while there will be people who will miss Miragaia, we can still love it as Dacenturus
And then there’s also Alcovasaurus being its own thing again.
Detail looks good so far?
Question are there any good skeletals for any ornithomimids that aren't galli or Struthi?
Leg looks a little squared out with how it just gets cut square like that
wait what
The first model
When the legs end at the hip, they’re cute squarely. It looks a little like you just slapped on the leg over the main body.
It’d look better if you made the leg tissue higher on one side than the other, preferably the anterior end. And also make the horizontal line inbetween a bit curved instead of do straight. Similar to the second model, which was amazing.
Also isn’t Lokiceratops one of the largest centrosaurines to have been discovered recently?
prolly largest one since like 2010 tmk
Interesting
How big we talking?
approaching ~3t scaling with styracosaurus
Why not scale with Albertaceratops? 
scale the skull and partial skeleton skeleton with a partial skull why didn't i think of that
Tuojiango genuinely sucks
I think it's just some vertebrae and a skull fragment, so the rest can be wacky
the whole “500 very fragmentary british baryonychines” thing as a whole is pretty wishy washy
valid?
What, pray tell, do they think a hoof is?
what does "pray tell" mean
I believe they were exaggerating the huge singular nail that makes contact with the ground in some edmontosaurus reconstructions
like in prehistoric planet
im used to seeing this but the x(twitter) post is saying the nail wouldnt have made contact with the ground
Just means elaborate on an oftentimes obvious factoid. A hoof is indeed a nail, but it also encapsulates an entire digit (in the case of cloven feet anyway). Hadrosaurs just have fleshy mitts encasing their digits with the nail sitting on top
An articulated group of skeletal elements comprising a sacrum, both ilia and a first caudal vertebra, plus an isolated tooth found in immediate proximity to the bones, from the lower Cenomanian Chalk at Saint-Jouin-Bruneval (Seine-Maritime, Normandy, France) is described and attributed to a new genus and species of abelisaurid theropod, Caletodr...
Was carcha bigger (longer, weight, taller and skull size) than giga?
💀
It's strange 
wdym it's strange?
a french abelisaur
I will never understand the carcha fans
It's huge
Duh ofc it's huge it's a megatheropod for crying out loud
Guys how accurate Saurian trex's tail is? Should it be a bit shorter and thicker?
That's fire 
In what sense?
we should make a Megatherium
Could I ask some questions on paleontology as a job? I’m still trying to figure out all the different parts so I can know what I want to do in the future 
ye
Tuojiangosaurus is fun until you realise we don't have the end of the tail and different authors suggest varying numbers of thagomizer pairs
two? three? four? depends who you ask 😂
10
all 3 of those are Ceratosaurus nasicornis
would make an interesting sub apex, kinda like what duck is at apex tier
wow nasicornis is SMALL.
he is a young man
Nasicornis is the only cerato species. The rest are lumped into it so it's whatever.
Do we know what ceratopsian this is?
I only found it to be "an unnamed ceratopsian"
anyone able to find good illustrations on hadrosaurs running?
I might be able to find one
It's a new species of pentaceratops from the kaiparowits. Currently undescribed
Here's a sculpt of it that I've had in the works for a while
I've heard it referred to as puggoceratops as well due to its short face. It's just a nickname but I find it to be fitting
horns give me antelope vibes with how long, thin and straight they are
Agreed, I've been kicking around the idea of giving it the same texture as antelope horns with the ridges and what not
Ooooh do it
I love those ridged horns ungulates have
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02724634.2024.2326027 can someone with access to this article give me an overview of it?
what brush do you use to make the muscle details
It's a mix of the clay strips, crease, and draw sharp brushes. I use blender btw
oh
Thank you so much
how come we don't call dinosaurs by different names?
for example we call panthera Leo "lions"
Them not being alive is one of the reasons if I had to guess. Don't exactly have the room to develop common names
Though in a way some do. Dromaeosaurids as a whole commonly get referred to as raptors, Velociraptor in particular. Triceratops is often shortened to trike
Saurophaganax from the upcoming dinosaur game extinction. That’s an amazing model.
(Just as a heads up the game is most likely a scam for those not in the know)
Well that’s unfortunate if true because damn it looks amazing lol
what makes you say that?
What’s extinction?
It's a whole story. I'll send you a link in DMs.
in 2024 here we have Koleken for our recent abelisaur
and then there's this guy
https://www.mdpi.com/2813-6284/2/3/9
An articulated group of skeletal elements comprising a sacrum, both ilia and a first caudal vertebra, plus an isolated tooth found in immediate proximity to the bones, from the lower Cenomanian Chalk at Saint-Jouin-Bruneval (Seine-Maritime, Normandy, France) is described and attributed to a new genus and species of abelisaurid theropod, Caletodr...
https://x.com/justin_an74/status/1473449167997472772
What's the validity of the 8+m Rolfodon specimen?
I always wonder how daspletosaurus and gorgosaurus would have been like to avoid competing with one another
Tbh I wouldn't be surprised if they actually did directly compete, it's not like there aren't predators that do nowadays (lions and hyenas for example)
In healthy ecosystems multiple top-order carnivores have no problem coexisting. There is competition and conflict between them, but it usually doesn't affect overall populations.
So, there's a chance that furileusaurians now originate from Europe? Or at least somewhere else outside of SA?
Ohohohoho, creativity time.
the taxa grading into furileusauria (ekrixinatoaurus/ilokelesia/skorpiovenator) are all argentine but a furileusaur genusaurus would well predate said taxa so could be either way for all we know
which is further complicated by there being several unstable taxa outside SA that occasionally are resolved as brachyrostrans (rahiolisaurus/dahalokely/arcovenator/that bahariya thing)
Could be that brachyrostra itself had a wider distribution so furileus could've originated somewhere else (maybe Africa, in a somewhat middle point to SA and Europe)
Or a ghost lineage of furileus dating back to the early cretaceous of which a few were airdropped into Europe
Idk it kinda fascinated me how there's this somewhat established endemic taxa and then someone says "Yeah there's a guy in France of all places that pre-dates the ones in SA"
the tragedy of the only good early cretaceous abelisaurs being spectrovenator and rugops
The tragedy of abelisauridae as a whole
can i get one aswell?
Can @storm spindle get one as well?
Is dakotaraptor's validity still on debate?
I mean I guess it always will be since its impossible to firmly answer unless the jerk that has the specimen gives it up, but basically everybody in-the-know believes it to be no longer a viable taxa.
Woah woah woah, Arcovenator possibly being Brachyrostran?
most topologies based off/following the elemgasem matrix recover brachyrostran arcovenator
granted that comprises a period of only a couple years and iirc caletodraco's description notes the caudal isn't too similar to caletodraco
although la boucharde is considered a potential furileusaur which is same time and place
but they're really not too similar
Hmm, I see
they both do that kinda droopy thing though which ig would be kinda odd if they were wholly unrelated but thats just me spitballing
Oh yea, the slight curve. Wonder if that is taphonomic.
Heyo, I've been a long time player but I recently joined the discord. Saw there was a channel for paleontology, so here are some photos from an exhibition that was in my region. Ferrisaurus has only been found in west coast Canada so far.
enjoy
and yes, the fossil is named Buster
no way
ferris ship lizard
small but mighty, hence the name Iron lizard
I love the model ref of him, he's so cute
@bright veldt juvenile shantungosaurus or am I dumb?
I'd have no way of knowing.
I at least know this one is an adolescent
looks like telmatosaurus
wait nvm i think it might be edmontosaurus annectens a young one
i doubt it, it's in the shantungosaurus exhibit
would make sense whyd you'd think so because shant is just edmont with a gigachad jaw
why didn't you say that?
Hello, everyone!
shant is slightly older than ed, i wonder if the tarbo- rex theory can be applied here, unless there is a north american ancestor im not aware of
Ed is Edmontosaurus?
I’m no expert but If it’s in the shant exhibit I would be inclined to assume it’s shant
yeah
Thank you for answer!
what are ur thoughts on the matter anyway
colonize north america, tyrannosaurini: grow over 50% larger than any of your relatives
colonize north america, edmontosaurini: shrink to under 50% previous size
edmontos nerfed themselves to give the carnivore’s a fair chance
They are so dear!
i never understood. did t-rex had something like feathers or it was completely bald?
As adult's they most likely didn't need feathers
As juveniles though they may have had at least sparse feathering here and there
We dont know
@serene valve this is what miragaia would more likely look like and looking at pot Mira just throws me off a lot
Dacentrurus
No it wouldn't. I believe miragaia is based on this, which is an edit of the same skeletal? But obviously with some changes like not having a million plates
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/913292305006485527/1182925484166746142/Miragaia_longicollum_Dorsal.png?ex=66c58335&is=66c431b5&hm=72cbfd5e921d695897e2ee26006dc7c54dd2b990356b4d0130237378f2c2125c&
What would be better though is this
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFQAS4tXAAAmxx5?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
cisiopurple has done tremendous hurt to people's knowledge about dino depictions lmao
Ohoho, there has been much more hurt to people's knowledge from other more common sources . . . .
Oh ok I see thanks m8
Very interesting!
probably a megalosaurid
Metricanthosaurid
I wouldn’t say that. Bro usually does his best to make accurate representations, especially of obscure taxa. Sometimes people just so happen to pick out his older drawings as current depictions of an animal (and many times they simply don’t know he updated that drawing)
His reconstructions are largely fine. It just so happens that the art is old. The only critique ik of is that he does not do any scale to speak of. Use a bloody scalebar. A dog, cat, or human without one is vague af.
Evil cisiopurple be like: I will include an accurate way to measure the animal
Sometimes the human for scale in those images are wrongly sized like It once made me belive dasp sized Shidaisaurus and Dasp sized Veterupristisaurus existed
Id disagree
Andre mentioned something about it and i agree a lot, + I do not think this is cisios aim
well the size estimates between the largest individuals are still pretty close
nope. the miragaia in game is very accurate and that image you sent is wrong
It wasn't completely bald but it did have some kinda like a shinx cat or a elephant
Ik someone else already lmk
How accurate is the ex argilla allosaurus mod compared to the in game one
in terms of size its more accurate, but i think the claws are too long
It's better than base-game allo.
yeah allo basegame is just a weird sauro
ermmm allosaurus maximumus
Is there by some chance a term that includes both the paleozoic and mesozoic eras but exludes the cenozoic?
Don't know that there is. I don't know that there would be reason to be
But in looking it up, I found that there is the Phanerozoic eon, a geological eon which includes Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Cenozoic
Basically just any time life existed
I'm slightly disappointed they didn't have a WWD Big Al skin
Are these up to date regarding allosaurus bite force irl, smn says allo should do bonebreak ingame
Most of these are significantly higher than they should be.
Oh, what's allos bite force meant to be and the others??
Ok nevermind they might be accurate. The big outliters are spino and giga, who are about 50% stronger than they probably should be. I also dunno anywhere that actually has done ceratopsid bite force. Cerato and allo are accurate though.
Hello
Ohhhh fair i thought giga had like 3-4 ton bite force, so allo shouldn't be able to do bonebreak then? Cuz 2k psi doesn't sound bb worthy
what animal ingame wouldn't have some form of bonebreak or bleed lets be real using that logic, even if its stubbing a pinky toe amounts, juvie campto?
I was just asking bc smn said allo should do bb instead of bleed and said "it used its mouth like an axe, which breaks not cuts" even tho I'm pretty sure axes are designed to slice things with good power, that's why I asked abt the allo part
i know, not fussing on you, just pointing out how odd it is for em to be saying that, where campto bb by that logic yknow, and also game variety
Ohhh, nvm mb lol
Why is Giga that high😭
Mf doesn't even has a proper one
Rex bites t 48500N which is around 4.8 tons of force
Even Carcha with the paper reached 25k N but with the new skeletal is likely it hitted higher than that, probably 30k
I present a Bayesian phylogenetic predictive modelling (PPM) framework that allows the prediction of muscle parameters (physiological cross-sectional area, APhys) in extinct archosaurs from skull width (WSk) and phylogeny. This approach is robust to phylogenetic uncertainty and highly versatile given its ability to base predictions on simple, re...
@sullen cairn I need the eye burner edmonto chart
New and improved to not actively make one nauseous
edmont
no see I actually want the nausea one
Didn’t spino have bonebreak once? Or is that charged bite I’m thinking of?
It had a charge bite
Just charge no bb^^
imo a mechanic where bone break can be applied to significantly smaller dinos would be cool
Im curious, did you ever make one using every Tyrannosaurus specimen?
He did
my eyes hurt
yet this is the most average meal for t rex (if only t rex didn't get like... bulldozed by those large edmontos on the back)
thing is it didn't
huh??
What is bro yapping about
No idea
I need a list of herbivores from the Paleozoic
that's gonna be a very big list
I mean... what else are they gonna be
Parexisaurs? Or Arthropleurids
Arthropleura, edaphosaurus, scutosaurus and more
Thank you. Got more?
Elginia and diictodon maybe?
What about bigger ones?
Like Moschops or Jonkeria
Oh yeah I forgot moschops
Lystrosaurus? Though it lived in the very latest Permian and through the mass extinction event and spread everywhere didn't it?
Do you want purely land animals or would aquatics also work?
Could Ceratarges eat algae and other water plants
Both is good
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurdiidae Maybe one of the hurdid radiodonts? For invertebrates, it's harder to discern whether they were fully herbivorous or not, but these guys are primarily filter feeders, so, close enough?
Incredibly Random but
Erm, Actually Petrolacosaurus didn't evolve into Edaphosaurus as Petrolacosaurus is a Diapsid and Edaphosaurus is a Synapsid, that's as wrong as saying Dimetrodon evolved into Spinosaurus or Saying Archaeothyris evolved into protorosaurus and For the Person who originally made it, it would've been more accurate to use a Potential Basal amniote like casineria instead of a Diapsid for something evolving into a Synapsid
Given the pokemon/digimon style 'evolution', I doubt that's even halfway serious.
Was Ramphosuchus really 11-12m or smaller? Same about Purussaurus
Don’t think rampho is very well understood
I saw this on another group. Iirc rampho was sarco sized and purussaurus 10-11m?
What’s species of cero is this? (I have no idea)
That would be Spinops
Ty Ty
Reliable estimates on rhamph are non-existent. Meanwhile the largest reliable puru is 10m and 6 tons.
Jonkeria is omnivore
What? And Titanosuchus too?
https://academic.oup.com/view-large/figure/478845996/zlae090_fig26.jpg
...so wait monolopho is a spinosaur?
🤓 and diapsids evolved into synapsids (mammal like reptiles)
No
Erm actually, Diapsids Didn't evolve into synapsids, This is Mis info as the oldest Known Synapsid Asaphestera is 100 thousand years older than the oldest Known Diapsid Hylonomus so From That logic, it would make more sense to say Synapsids evolved into Diapsids (Wich is wrong as they did not)
Hylonomus is the earliest known true reptile
I know but Synapsids aren't reptiles thats like calling teleocrater a pseudosuchian
Synapsids are theyre own group called the mammal like reptiles but theh are still generally considered reptiles
Nope, synapsids and sauropsids are separate
if synapsids are reptiles, so are proper mammals lol
Mammal like reptiles is outdated they are now called stem mammals and they aren't reptiles Like would you even call Embolomeres amphibians
Technically, yes but synapsids are closer to other reptiles
Yes but would you call dimetrodon a mammal?
No, that's worse than calling Lagerpeptids dinosaurs
no, but it's not a reptile either even if it kinda looks like one
Ima research lmao
For an example Amniotes aren't synonymous with reptiles like Casineria isn't a reptile for an example it is most likely a basal amniote
And Not all Sauropsids are reptiles I made a mistake, Reptilia is a subgroup in Sauropsida
Stem mammals arent nor reptiles nor mammals, they are their own group of transitions FROM reptile to mammal
They aren't transitional from one to another like They aren't they aren't mammals or reptiles and Reptiles didn't evolve into mammals that's a lie
A creationist?
No, Reptiles didn't evolve into mammals Synapsids are older than Sauropsids and I'm not a creationist
And Reptilia is a subgroup inside of sauropsida, Search it up it's true
Synapsids appeared in the early permian and sauropsids have existed as far back as the carboniferous or maybe more
Bro, Do your research, Look up Archaeothyris a Synapsid from the carboniferous 306 mya
am i missing something here
Sad my Big Caiman is only 6 tons
And Don't forget Asaphestera a Synapsid from the Carboniferous first appearing 318.1 million years ago 100 thousand years before Hylonomus
What about the common synapsid-sauropsid ancestors from 320 mya
Casineria the only known candidate for the common ancestor (NOT a reptile but a basal amniote) lived 340 or 338 mya but we don't know if it is as we will never know exactly what is the common ancestor of a thing
Idk but lets get to a conclusion.
Synapsids and sauropsids are both reptilian animals that evolved from a common ancestor and not each other. Sauropsids evolved into reptiles and synapsids into mammals
I need an Aspirin.
For context my academic career and research has focused entirely on non-mammalian synapsids.
The correct term for the transitional group that's previously been referred to as mammal like reptiles is non-mammalian synapsids. They are a transitional group as cynodonts are the direct descendents of crown Mammalia. They aren't stem-mammals because they aren't mammals. Stem-mammals encompasses any extinct basal member of Mammalia that has no living relatives today more or less. Synapsida first appears sometime in the Carboniferous but their exact placement is tenuous because they are so similar to basal sauropsids. Additionally Reptilia in it's modern incarnation is basically Sauropsida (Archelosauria+Lepidosauria). Synapsids are not reptiles by definition.
Also idk why but the info I found said that hylonomus would have been like a "final splitting point"
True, maybe not stem mammals but just Maybe Barely Close for some and Close for some But NOT mammals? Idk
Hylonomus is a Eureptile and is therefore too derived to be a "splitting point".
Idk I didnt write it. Also sauropsids and synalsids DID evolve from basal amniotes but also ampjibians
It's a clear dichotomy. If it's not a mammal it can't be a stem-mammal. Just refer to the grade excluding mammals as non-mammalian synapsids and call it a day.
Yeah, the same way you say "non avian dinosaur"
Yeah Non mammalian Synapsids is the best term
Amphibians in my tree are referring to the monophyletic group of frogs, salamanders and friends, and temnospondyls etc. The sister group to Amniota essentially not the last common ancestor they share with amniotes.
Oh, so it means the group that would STAY as amphibians and not the ones like tulerpeton who would evolve into mammals and reptiles
They aren't staying as amphibians. Amphibia is its own clade that's just as derived as Mammals and Reptiles today. All three groups are derived from early tetrapods like Tulerpeton.
Yes and those from lobe-finned fish like tiktaalik and pandericthys
The fact mono is classed as a spinosaurid now is freaking wild to me.
I mean it kinda makes sense but..
Isn't it a non Spinosaur megalosauroid instead of a Spinosaurid?
Nope apparently it's been classed as an early spinosaur
