#paleontology
1 messages · Page 100 of 1
Does anyone know what the creature in the image that is In the jaws of the coelophysis name I forgot
a drepanosaurid of some kind
all parankylosaurs are pretty basal iirc
mini alamosaurus
was there any kind of large flora similar to kelp in the triassic ocean?
I know kelp itself is purely Cenozoic. Don't know much else unfortunately.
Huh though they should on 4 irl
Camptosaurus was entirely bipedal
Featherless
Biped
clearly a man
Random question what are the current actually valid trodontid species?
stenoncyhosaurus
Thanks had a hard time finding what is considered valid anymore for trodontids
Troodontids as a family have a lot of members. It's just that outside of Stenonychosaurus nobody cares about the rest lmao
^^^
^
Woah woah woah. What about…ummm…and oh! There’s uh……and…..umm…..
don't we have camptosaurid tracks showing quadrupedal walking as well?
theoretically they could still walk like that without pronating their wrists also
Anyone got an accurate irritator skeletal? I need it for something
You DON’T care about Zanabazar??? (Had to look that one up to make sure it wasn’t invalid 😭)
alaskan troodontid is unnamed but cool
what are some differences between troodontids and dromaeosaurids?
I know troodontids on average have a smaller sickle claw and are omnivores but idk anything else
The doobus gloobus
https://tenor.com/view/flightreacts-gif-20043283 me when over-feathered tyrannosaurid
I do like the shaggy arm displays but IMO they don't belong on tyrannosaurids
is shantungosaurus still the biggest hadrosaur? what's its largest weight known compared to largest edmonto
Last I checked it still is, though the margin is smaller.
tbf, thats rlly nice for the coloring, reminds me the color from anole and chicken feather
Keep in mind there were other iguanodonts coexisting with campto that could go quad, so most likely it was one of those
dracornyx ?
Uteodon and Cumnoria exist
i was bitter in confuse, dont camptosaurus belongs to the iguanodontids or early basal member? or that was dryo basal part of the basal ornithopoda
Phylogeny-wise? Cause I think you said the rest lol
Also yes it is the biggest, minimum size estimates put it at 14 tons and some speculate it could reach 18 tons I think
That was not what they asked
Thanks bro
Is that shant estimates?
I genuinely don't what else it could be
So they can be 19 tons? That's so thick holy gyatt
yeah maybe
am surpised nobody has done a revised ver of this
Damn.
Yeah. Largest non-sauropod dinosaur as well. Edmonto is close but huge edmontos are really, really rare whereas literally every shant specimen that’s mature (afaik) is over 11 tonnes.
So shant was likely significantly larger on average
it's just larger not on average though
Yeah I’m saying that the maximum sized Edmontosaurus which are incredibly rare out of an enormous sample size are probably not huge by Shantungosaurus standards.
Shant is larger at maximum sizes with a much smaller sample size.
Bruh look at this nonsense I just came across
I mean, considering the Tyrannosaurus in this image is less than half its actual length... I wouldn't doubt a bengal tiger could kill it
This is like, Nanotyrannus sized
The neck is still way to thick to break
yeah, if it succeeded it would probably be by suffocation
Definitely could. Not sure that it would in 99% of circumstances
Why is its arms positioned like that😭
It's like that old Grizzly vs Rex thing
The grizzly with his long lasting energy might well win
they are imitating the posture of the t.rex's last descendant... the chicken...
Beautiful
I feel like people really don’t understand how insanely lethal large theropods would be
Komodo dragon scaled up to the size of an elephant…
we can kinda understand the scale of some large herbivorous dinosaurs because things like elephants and rhinoceros exist but no land predator even comes close to a mid size theropod like ceratosaurus
Unless you count crocodilians as land predators but they’re so visually different anyways that it wouldn’t help.
That makes me wonder why predators are small and prey is bigger (most of the time anyways)
easier to get big off of a diet that requires low energy expenditure and effort to sustain
like why baleen whales are so huge; they're effectively herbivorous in terms of how they eat
Literally just open mouth and then swallow. That's all they have to do. That's why there were no gargantuan mosasaurs for example, because sustaining the lifestyle of an active predator at a huge size is incredibly difficult without specific conditions.
and plants/tiny fish/inverts are vastly more abundant than larger prey items.
The very high metabolism of mammals and birds makes a giant active predator especially inviable, dinosaurs (while still warm-blooded) had much lower metabolisms, so they could afford to keep that lifestyle at larger sizes
toothed whales found some way around this I guess
eating other whales which are very rich in nutrients I suppose
Just had a friend unironically say they think 8-10 wolves could kill a Rex
8-10 wolves afaik usually don't win against large male brown bears
Thanks for answering guys
Those giant squids must really be nutritious, huh? Lol
Also being bigger can have its benefits in terms of detering predators
bigger = harder to kill
Bro my friend said some of the wolves could jump on the Rex's back 🙃
Jurassic world and it’s consequences
wolves are well known for their ability to jump 3 meters onto a moving object wdym
my god man im arguing with a guy on quora who still believes in allosaurus hatchet theory
its so annoying omfg
Your first and only mistake was assuming people on Quora would be able to comprehend anything beyond what YouTube shorts gives them
There's an account of a lone female moose fending off ~10 wolves
manga name?
No clue
have you considered that the awesome coolness energy and mammalian cunning of the big cat would allow it to win any fight
king tiger never loses
kills all gaur and sloth bear and doesn't afraid of anything
Does anyone remember the person who legitimately tried to argue a sabertooth would beat a deinosuchus in a fight?
just like how the swift and ferocious spotted hyena hunts grown bull elephants...
sigma
that would be like a house cat killing a nile crocodile
shun the nonbeliever
a lion hunting a healthy asymptotic male nile croc is pretty impossible let alone a smilodon killing an alligator the size of a bus
I mean it's also in a book btw
smilodon uses its mammalian cunning to take down the primitive deinosuchus
this thing is a freak
In what way? :)
wdym a freak
it's just a freak
very proportionally long flippers for a pliosaur
noticeably longer than its skull even
A freak of upmost nature if you will
i love how its kind of a reverse sachi (who has comically small flippers instead)
anyone remember in dinosaur revolution, there's an episode where a pack of utahraptors is after a baby sauropod but then some other rival gang utahraptors come after it too, and they fight over it amongst themselves and with a crocodile. I wonder if anything like that was possible?
I know there's no way to tell but it's just interesting to me
i mean....yeah, it happens currently, chance has always existed
Anything in nature is possible so this is possible
Bro is a jet
he's not a freak, he's just.... funkei
What are some "equal opposites" of a pachy? (・・?) Like a carnivore of similar stature and even time period? I'm looking to draw a pair of these two dinos (pachy and something else)
a large to mid-sized dromaeosaur might work
unfortunately the only carnivore of comparable size from its formation is dakotaraptor, which is almost certainly a completely invalid genus
i actually dont think there is any truly equal predator in its ecosystem, maybe just use a juvenile tyrannosaurus
if you just want it to be contemporary, then use this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_vertebrate_fauna_of_the_Maastrichtian_stage#
This is an incomplete list that briefly describes vertebrates that were extant during the Maastrichtian, a stage of the Late Cretaceous Period which extended from 72.1 to 66 million years before present. This was the last time period in which non-avian dinosaurs, pterosaurs, plesiosaurs, and mosasaurs existed.
just go through the non-avian theropod section and look for the ones that are about pachy-size
Oof yes, I was googling after you said dromaeosaurs and I also landed on Dakotaraptor for matching the time period and size. Why is it invalid? (;_;)
Thanks for the link !!
Chimeric, lot of things about it are sus and its privately owned and they won't let anyone examine the material to scrounge up what material might actually belong to a dromaeosaur
the skeleton assigned to it is a big ol' chimera
it's full of various different animals, some not even from dinosaurs
you might want to try your luck with some of the smallish abelisaurs. there are numerous from the maastrichtian and theyd pair nicely with the pachy's headgear
yes but some parts of dakotaraptor actually are part dromaeosaur, an unnamed one that's big like dakotaraptor was thought to be
or you could just use a juvenile T.rex
^^^
Perhaps the Hell Creek Alioramini Nanotyrannus?
depends on whether or not the ulna is dromaeosaur or not. if it is, then its a big one for sure. currently we don't know, though, and it seems like it may be from an oviraptorosaur of some kind, most likely anzu.
i would very much like dakotaraptor to be valid, but given how dubious literally every aspect of it is, i am highly doubtful
I solved the problem
I eated the holotypes
you need to stop doing this
dakotaraptor ain't valid but there's definitely large dromaeosaur parts in it
Does anyone have all the pictures of the old crystal palace dinosaurs
Don’t think the ulna is the big determing element, there’s also a large Dromaeosaur metatarsal
what other large theropods were there in north america by the maastrichtian besides t rex
Albertosaurus and mcraaensis are early maas and atroxicarius may or may not be existent/late maas
And ig depending on how you define “large” nano stuff if you entertain the idea
dryptosaurus too actually right
btw wth is an atroxicarius
sure but appalachia isn't real north america
anything “wrong” with how this conc looks
eh you know what I mean
also it's not hard to imagine alberto may have lived up into the kpg
naashoibito teeth thing
vaguely pointier than rex ish
explain
I have no clue what you're talking about lol
ziphodont teeth from naashoibito that are apparently aberrant to rex's dental morphology
supposedly a "bistahieversorin" according to dalmin
interesting..
afaik, not too much actually
there may be some things that are off, but the biggest thing is probably the hump/sail, which seems to have been positioned just in front of the hips instead of directly above them
Return of the late Maastrichtian Blade-toothed Tyrannosaurs
Also, are the teeth of Bistahieversor's really ziphodont/thinner than other Tyrannosaurines? I ask because I remember there being conflicting conclusions/descriptions regarding its teeth (or I may very well be misremembering).
Is he ugly on purpose
crazy
nope
bistah being scored as ziphodont has been kinda inconsistent but it has been mentioned before
its look accurate btf. i like the quills, god that lovely skin is perfect so good 
Are there any estimates for Pete III? Wikipedia says 11m and 5t but that's an exaggeration
I estimated it at 9.9-10.2m and 3.5-4 tonnes, but that may be too small
I liked this idea so much but struggled so hard to find any small abelisaur in North America, that I'm just scaling down a Carnotaurus o(`∇´ )o Thank you
What
Well the arms
Should PT devs change Daspletosaurus Profundis to Daspletosaurus Wilsoni
I think that's just cause of the camera angle
its a mod from what i can tell, probably using an existing animal's rig, so yeah it'll have pretty clapped wrists
Official Conca
reminds me a lot of an old JWE mod, from the original game lol
YES IT HAS LIPS
Looks cool
no its official
gathered that after second comment
I have seen 10.1m and 4 tonnes.
So close I guess?
no
How Big is Pete III then.
Bigger or smaller
1 mertic inch is how big it is
Fair
what are some cool things about daspletosaurus that make it unique?
it's big and the name is cool
are there any exceptionally large extinct octopuses known? Like proper octopuses not squids or almost octopuses like encho
Haboroteuthis is basically an actual late cretaceous giant squid
would the most accurate reconstruction for it be just kinda like a giant squid like old depictions of tusoteuthis and enchoteuthis were?
what is the current name for this creature? I've heard it called chlamydoselachus goliath (in the same genus as the modern frill shark), rolfodon, and proteothrinax
TLDR the naming crap was botched and it's supposed to be Proteothrinax, but it's currently Rolfodon
djadokta fauna like velociraptor, protoceratops, citipati and the like surviving up until the KPG isn't that insane of speculation is it?
Basically
It's Proteothrinax as P.goliath iirc cause Rolfodon is a junior synonym.
I love Proteothrinax and need to get back to making a model for it
What dinos lived in what we call spain now?
Iirc Pyroraptor lived in parts of Spain and other areas
whats spain
(concavenator, lohuecotitan, pelecanimimus, pararhabdodon, vallibonavenatrix and the other 20 spinosaurs, and more!)
I thought Pyro was French
it is also french
Ok ty
Found footprints in Spain iirc
Erm...don't you mean Baryonyx...?

We don't even have pyroraptor feet
we only have the second toe claws of Pyroraptor, aka the part of the foot that wouldn't be preserved in a footprint haha
I’ve been lied to
There is some referred material from Spain
If you're referring to the isolated teeth, my understanding is they're no longer assigned to cf. Pyroraptor and are now just Dromaeosauridae indet.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/spp2.1419
Several footprints as well, which are also assigned to it too (d indet)
@wary junco but iirc there was some other stuff
Lemme check
Yep
"Additional material from the Vitória Formation and the Tremp Group, both in Spain, was referred to Pyroraptor, including five pedal digits, one manual digit, a piece of a metacarpal, a right radius, a dorsal vertebra, and a tail vertebra."
I've seen these claims before but I've never managed to find anything to verify them, there doesn't seem to be any literature on them that I can find (all papers I can find are regarding the ?Pyroraptor teeth) and other repositories like PBDB don't seem to list them
could you point me in the right direction if you've managed to find more info on them? I'd love to read more about them
I just looked and Pyroraptor's holotype is a claw from the foot so if you are believing any sort of claim regarding Pyroraptor, then huh
pyroraptor and its referrals are like dromaeosaurus if dromaeosaurus legit sucked
yeah I just don't believe any claims of footprints that we can 100% attribute to Pyroraptor lmao because how does that even work
maybe we should be faithful to the name pyroraptor and just burn it
True!!!!
the only reason pyroraptor is as popular as it is is because of its name
We updated our Spinosaurus robot. Our robot started swimming smoothly. Special thank to many of you make us comment and information. Incl. @japanfossil
【QRT of Robokaseki 化石をロボットにして泳がせる。⭐︎AFK研究所(同)⭐︎…
💖 794 🔁 166
Heads up wrong place
Thank ants I thought I opened modding cause I saw the pyroraptor talk and sergi
No problem, figured I’d lyk before you typed a whole thing out haha
how
Not you
do we have any evidence of how specifically an albertosaurus pack would work
only family members right?
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1671/0272-4634(2000)020[0404%3AANGODD]2.0.CO%3B2
From this document (I was asleep)
This is the original paper describing Pyroraptor, and all the material referred here was collected in France, not Spain
It was the reference attached, lemme see if I can find anything of the Vitoria and Tremp digsites
http://www.fossilworks.org/cgi-bin/bridge.pl?a=collectionSearch&collection_no=13331
Somehow I can't access the website, don't know if you can
I've found teeth referred to ?Pyroraptor from the Tremp formation, and additional teeth from around Vitoria but no postcrania from what I can see.
There wasn't postcranial, only pedal and manual digits, metacarpal and dorsal & tail vertebra
All the teeth were reassigned recently to Dromaeosauridae indet. Tho
What do you think postcrania are?
Apologize my dumbass brain as I'm lacking my morning coffee
(I'm still half dead)
@wary junco I'm trying to find any of those but either the pages are taken down or just nothing shows up
I could try asking if any of our affiliated universities had somehow access to the original articles regarding those?
But unsure
Did Ankylosaurus get downsized to 4,4 Tons? If not can yall send me a recent study on its size if yall have one
I can't access fossilworks but I can't see anything anywhere else that suggests the referred material is from Spain, the parts you described are literally in the original description of the animal and are said to be from La Boucharde
Pyro's material is from Argiles et Grès à Reptiles, Bouches-du-Rhône location, which is in France, and closer to Italy than Spain.
Yeah, I can see it, it was the article quoted in the section of the Spanish stuff, so I guess someone missed the correct quote
Vhat
Yeah I think whoever wrote that wikipedia article misinterpreted the original paper, weirdly the next section on that page also indicates that because Some teeth from North Eastern Spain have been compared to those referred to Pyroraptor, suggesting that Pyroraptor may have also inhabited Spain is a strange sentence if we already have postcrania referred to it from Spain
Yeah but then we have the Trend Formation with some quote and said postcranial stuff there
But then the web is down and nobody can access it
Why this needs to be so confusing 
I haven't found anything interesting about Vitória one, and the only one is basically locked behind Catalonia
I don't know if we do, we have referred Pyroraptor material from Tremp but it's the teeth that are now Dromaeosauridae Indet. and even in recent papers summarising theropods of Iberia they only ever mention the teeth. There is no mention of any postcrania from Tremp
Yeah, this is confusing as hell
But in Tremp besides the broken tooth there was this other stuff attached
But then again, there's no articles rn about those so I guess I gotta cope lol
^^as I said before, the elements in the picture are referred to in the original description paper and are from the La Boucharde locality, not Tremp
there is an article, it's just the original description from La Boucharde 😂
Definitely gonna cope with it as someone did a huge oops then
https://www.mindat.org/taxon-4966365.html
On the other hand I finally found something about the Vitória stuff
But somehow has no proper spanish references attached besides the teeth one 
Mindat.org is the world's leading website about minerals and where they come from.
yeah that's all I've ever been able to find for Spanish Pyroraptor, the teeth that are now Dromaeosauridae Indet. haha
The other articles that I found referring to Pyroraptor are basically locked and unless you ask the authors (POV: they are catalonian), nothing
So, I guess Pyroraptor in Spain is a possibility (since animals move and migrate) but, at the moment, unlikely

yeah I wasn't really debating 'is it plausible?' because it really wouldn't shock me if we did find it there eventually, just speaking from a 'do we have any credible evidence now?' POV and I don't think we can say we do
Well, hoping we do in a future. Pyroraptor is such a cool name, and would be even better if it turned out an unenlagine lol (because shoreline hunter and all that)
does this resemble more of achillo or utah
utah, but could maybe say achillo too since achillo is reconstructed using mostly utah
but it lacks the longer legs it seems
Yeah the stocky body just screams Utah to me
utah ish
Both are perfectly valid answers since Achillo is just Utahn't due to scarcity of material and without any other point of reference, there's no way to say anything else
^
What are some of like the strangest prehistoric reptiles out there
Guanlingosaurus is really weird
Spinosaurus is an easy answer
Stomatosuchus, the throat pouch croc with an enormous head
Talking like longisquama levels of weird
wtf
Average Ichthyosaur
Ichthyosaurs are freaks of nature
Stomatosuchus
Love stamato
This is not a dinosaur
oh the image didn’t load
L
-Hector's icthyosaur, less weird as much as why are you that big
-Tanystropheus, kind of an obvious pick but still
-Albertonectes, see above
-Whatever tf Atopodentatus is doing
-Predator X/Pliosaurus funkei (why are your flippers that big)
-Snakes, just generally
-Kronosaurus (why are you flat)
-Eurhinosaurus
-Turtles, just generally again
The Triassic was weird
Ngl I’m surprised I already know about all of these or most
a lot of the weird ones are famous due to being weird tbf
Hector’s ichthyosaur is funny because we figured out why the measurements were weird and now it’s like solidly a blue whale rival when based on any other large shastasaurid
The best goober
oh yeah shout out to that one triassic thing with the leg-wings (i forgot the name D:)
Sharovipteryx
Tuataras are also really weird
yeah that one, goober didn't read the wing instruction manual right
but yeah like, half of triassic reptiles could qualify for this, really was a weird time
Notosuchia are a good grab bag of weird crocodylomorphs, for example Yacarerani and its dentition because why is it like that
alternatively there are the ones that are getting weirdly mammalian, Pakasuchus I'm talking to you why do you have mammal teeth
and let's not even get started on Poposauroidea
is there's a woolly mammoth speicmen around 10 tonnes?
Sillosuchus my beloved
The biggest one is 8 tons I believe
ight'
Day 145 of no elephant seal
wait wrong chat this isnt modding
Opinion of the validity of literally any Troodontid
It's just Troodon itself being dead. There's like 30 other perfectly valid troodontids in Troodontidae, including Stenonychosaurus which is basically just Troodon under a different name.
What are some of the largest prosauropodomorphs that we are aware of?
The largest non-sauropod sauropodomorphs are Yunnanosaurus and Plateosaurus
There's one currently being described I think (probably a species of Aardonyx last I was told) that's like double their size though
Double??? Dang
Alright on the topic of Elephant Seals
Are the largest Pontolis specimens bigger than them or not?
The current largest recorded male southern elephant seal was about 5 tons, so probably not. Although with typical individuals I wouldn't be surprised if Pontolis reached similar metris on average.
what abt ledumahadi?
ledu is like less than 5 tonnes
omg ark lied to me waaaahaaaaa!!! ( wait what does it look like now )
hupehsuchus
Eretmorhipis > Hupehsuchus
shringasaurus > eretmorhipis
from rooting around KoI I've seen statements of 16 meters and 12 tons
some things we know about WWD 2:
hell creek/lance/whatever episode focused on rex and triceratops
cedar mountain episode focused on gastonia and/or utahraptor
lourinha episode focused on lusotitan
kem kem episode focused on spinosaurus
"alberta episode"
and then unknown
while I hope the remaining episode is ischigualasto, if it's not it's prob jurassic and I'd say solnhofen would be a cool setting. I think the protagonist for the alberta episode could be a troodontid potentially
All troodontids are dead 


So what's the current thinking on whether dinosaurs could make sound that isn't just hissing or huffing. I know they found a pinacosaurus voicebox, did that change anything?
People is bruhath still a sauropod?
no but also yes
Bruhathkayosaurus is based on an ilium which may be a theropod and is too poorly documented to talk about anyway, but there ARE giant sauropod bones from the same time and place
Ok thanks
It's a bit too messy at this stage to really take seriously yeah
Do you think the dinosaurs in the game could eventually work out a working ecosystem?
Wayy too many predators in the 1 tonne + range
Pycno, Metri, Das, Allo, Cerato, Rex, Alio (as an adult). You can have 3 of those in the same ecosystem tops
There are a lot I guess lol
Do you think any of them would be able to carve out a niche? And which ones would go extinct?
Whichever ones reproduced the fastest I guess would take over
Rex just wins by default
Rex probably laid a lot of eggs and is the only one able to take on things like Eotrike or Bars (or Anodonto if we use POT's Ankylo sized version), so I think rex makes it
I feel like laten and deinon would either come into conflict a lot or be separated by nocturnal vs diurnal, they seem like they'd be pretty adaptable
Laten and Deinon will be fine because small predator diversity is naturally pretty high
Dasp might not cope well with not being the largest carnivore in the area though. And Allo is just Metri but better
The herbivores would probably have too much predation stress considering there's more carnivores on the roster than herbivores, (I think)
The existance of T.rex just no sells Amargasaurus lmao
I think Stego and Kentro could survive though. And obviously the herbivores that already coexisted with tyrannosaurs would be fine
Especially if you count flyers
Microraptor would probably be pretty safe up in the trees doing it's own thing? Especially if it's insectivorous, not much in-game competition for that food source
Unless we get more sauropods I doubt allo would last long. (Bias)
Micro's fine, Rhamph's fine, Hatz and Thalasso might compete with each other? But we have multiple different sized azhdarchids in many places so I think all the flyers are fine
Would cerato clash with conca? If metri is already outcompeted by allo, would conca also be?
Realistically cerato is double conca's size despite the similar dimensions
Hard to judge Conca's survivabity since we know fk all about its environment
How would the aquatics play into this?
They'd be doing mostly their own thing i imagine
Cerato is used to being bullied so I don't think T.rex being added into the mix would necessarily affect it. But I have no idea how Pycno fits into it
How would a stego and tyrannosaurus react to each other I wonder?
Would stego and mira compete? (Doubt it)
A stego probably wouldn't care? Big predator is big predator. Stego and mira also coexisted.
Depending on how you believe Carnotaurus hunted, Pycno either competes with Allo or with Conca
Oh yeah I forgot that carnos hunt style was still debated
Im in the more general apex predator camp
Isn't it similar with allo? Or has allos hunting methods been cleared up?
Abelisaurs grow faster than allosauroids, which would give Pycno an edge over Allo. But we don't know how many eggs either one laid, and Allo is known to be highly adaptable, so idk which one would be more succesful
Allosaurus was just a generalist overall to our knowledge (probably with a preference for smaller prey given its large arms and having to deal with kleptoparasitism from bigger carnivores)
Carno seems more like a large cursorial predator with a preference for small prey when you look at it's jaws
I think the concept of which dinosaurs of each formation would survive if two formations were to suddenly be put together
which allosaurus we talking about 
The issue with the jaws for small prey thing is that its jaws weren't actually that weak, and their flexibility can have its applications in large prey handling too
Well the shape of the jaws seem like they would be unsuitable for large prey or even ripping chunks of meat out of large carcasses. Conca would probably be outcompeted by alio in this case
Why are path of Titans dinosaurs so oversized often anyways?
The oversizing thing in PoT is overblown. The vast majority of the roster is perfectly fine size-wise
i was gonna say vibeo game but yeah that too
POT allo is basically saurophaganax
Allo, Eotrike, Thalasso, Sarco, Achillo, and Bars are the major offenders but that's about it
Oh is it? I always hear people complain about how big stuff is
the oversize of POT's dinosaurs is not relative to any objective standard anyway, it's just relative to the default unity human model or something
Alio would likely do well I think but depends on the environment
Alio would be the fastest theropod in its environment. It'd probably be fine.
the juvenile rex in question:
Fair enough but aside from that
that said alio was able to survive alongside juvenile Tarbosaurus, so if it was just Alio and rex it would be fine
pot community when you call large material separated from the type by an entire seaway half of which doesn't overlap spinosaurus: fine
pot community when you call large material from the same formation as allosaurus and regarded by multiple workers as allosaurus referable to allosaurus: evil
The spino thing isn't by choice tbf. It's a mess paleontology refuses to try and address and I hate it.
neospinus gigakemkemensis
spinosaurus has an advantage in which the known adult material only varies by ~300% in size and not 1000%
If we are using the PoT aquatic fauna then sucho and maybe spino would struggle
tbf this thing is still really stupid even if the largest allo is only ~3t
I love spinosaurus but i'm not sure it would survive long in an environment with deinosuchus-sized sarcosuchus
Half n' half on that. Suchomimus wasn't that much bigger and it seemed to do alright
Would megalania stand a chance with all the dinosaurs around?
They would probably evolve to be more aboreal
Spino could live in an environment like panjura since it would be hard for sarco to cross long stretches of land. In game megalania could survive but IRL megalania would be gone soon
Monitor lizard would do monitor things. I don't think there'd be an issue. It's a major mesopredator in its own right at the size that it is.
Megalania would probably become a lot smaller to avoid competing with the clusterfk of theropods, we don't have any mesozoic lizards bigger than like a water monitor (except in the oceans)
Amarga would be dead as hell for sure right?
There is already paleosaniwa though which would compete with megalania if it did adapt to be smaller
Probably yeah. Goannas get so big comparatively because of a lack of significant carnivorous mammal competition.
I hate the ingame paleo
Did amargas sails vs spines get cleared up at all now that I'm thinking of it?
scaling with this amarga is probably like 30t so its fiiiine
I forgot paleosaniwa was a thing, yeah megalania might be screwed then
Although multiple species of monitor of similar size can coexist so
The thing with amarga is that we do have sauropods coexisting with significantly bigger theropods. It's nothing new. Clearly they were defending themselves. Exactly how we don't really know.
Weird, I wonder how
what is the most underrated dinosaur? not counting things underrated by mainstream media (deinocheirus, miragaia, things like that) because we all love those making them not underrated
Coelosaurs are over rated
I kinda doubt this claim considering saltasaurus didn't reach those metrics and that tends to be what people put the speculative adult size at. Still bigger than carno but not that absurd.
bad take no dinosaur is overrated
i bet a couple pycnonemosaurus adultspecimenensis could kill a rex
Supersaurus doesn't have a single media appearance outside of dinosaur king which is just unbelievable
incorrect, fossil fighters
Baro and Super are both absolute kings of their time that're overshadowed yeah
Most people don't even know any non-coelosaur theropods
supersaurus is neat yeah, diplodocid with proportions kind of like a macronarian
fossil fighters is not real it was someone's dream they accidentally wished into reality
i feel like thats kinda cheating when most people can only name one or two theropods flat
Carnotaurus is also one of the most popular non-trex theropods
I guess you have a point
spinosaurus, giganotosaurus, allosaurus... there are plenty people know
Xinjiangtitan is super underrated but that's only because until 5 years ago we only had the least interesting parts of its body preserved
FF is a great game tho
since we lack the skull of supersaurus it technically cannot be disproven that it was actually a rhinoceros
rhino supersaurus vs building supersaurus, choose your fighter /j
Thermonuclear fission supersaurus
unsure whether Tyrannotitan is underrated, because the only reason people like it is to show how quirky it is that they aren't picking Giga or Carch
what did chrome mean by this
what makes tyrannotitan special at all
genuinely I couldn't tell you a thing about it aside from "another big carcharodontosaur"
How big was camptosaurus compared to allo?
it's better preserved than carcharodontosaurus but better described than giganotosaurus. that's it
The thing with tyrannotitan is that its remains are actually decent without it being acro. Meraxes kinda stole this from it too though.
well according to falcon... (I know it's not compared to allo but)
The biggest camptos were bigger than cerato at least.
i hope meraxes dosensis is described soon
ooh? new species?
actually it's meraxes gigas extragigas
the abstract explicitly says it is the same species after all
btw is it accurate to portay all carcharodontosaurs with that enlarged toe because of meraxes?
i love ai
why are all these images just showing up as blurred gradients
I like that the AI put "giganotosaurus" and "detailed information missing" together on its own
I one time asked AI to generate an image of beelzebufo and it made something satanic
can't forget mighty ceratovenator, killer of suchomimus as well
How do we tell him
lmao
So my real question is, if I were to write a story about the roster of this game, is there any way i could cheese it to where they could all live together without some dinosaurs immediately going extinct? Whether it be letting metri and stuff having their venom and special abilities and whatnot?
I mean habitat partionining would probably go a decent way
True
Maybe if you can change the environment and just give some creatures random adaptations which is basically what the devs did and would make it even more accurate to the game. You would likely also need more diversity among the smaller creatures for an actual ecosystem though
True, more herbivore too id imagine?
Cause herbivores outnumber carnivores as a default right?
Yeah the herbivore to carnivore diversity ratio is like jurassic park the lost world level
Truth be told you don't need to have herbivore diversity outnumber carnivore diversity to make it work. The population numbers are more important.
And as the other person said, I could make creatures live in different environments, so like creatures not adapted to say, a desert, wouldn't clash with ones that are very often
Shoutout to La Brea
based
Well most of the carnivores in the game are quite specialized meaning more herbivore diversity would likely be needed
Theres's 6 different 50+ kg cats alone. Forget about everything else.
Though I do have to ask, say a creature adapted to a forest or grassland wandered into a desert or savanna, they'd die right? Cause they can't go as long without water and the heat? But if an arid dino wandered into a grassland, it's not like being able to access water more reliably is gonna hurt it
Or am I like completely blanking on something?
It's not going to hurt it but it's longer intestines and adaptations would likely inhibit them in some way that would lead to them being outcompeted by indigenous species
Like the forest, sure, it wouldn't be used to hunting in a dense environment
Deserts often lead to specialization to adapt to said conditions, and that can mean going into more hospitable environments means more generalist competition
not asking about the likelihood of pack hunting but is it even possible dinosaurs could have the cognitive ability to hunt together like wolves?
It would probably niche partition in some way before going extinct but it definitely wouldn't outcompete the native species @wind prairie Probably, moderate levels of cognition have evolved numerous times and I don't think it is dependant on the time period in most cases so if there were pack hunting synapsids there definitely could be pack hunting dinosaurs
Longer intestines?
Probably not as coordinated but social gatherings are well-recorded in theropods at this point. Did they hunt in groups? We can't say for sure but I don't see why they wouldn't have in at least some cases. No predators get social for group-hunting to begin with. It's just sort of a benefit that's discovered after the fact.
And the generalist creatures would outcompete? Cause they can take full advantage of the environment whereas an arid climate creature wouldn't know how/be able to?
More that said generalists are already better adapted to said environment and are better prepared to deal with its unique challenges
@DEMON HONKER Desert animals evolve longer intestines to utilise more of the water and food they ingest but in a grassland habitat this would just be wasted calories to develop but may help them if they adapt to be more lethargic
Makes sense, I also imagine some partitioning not only by environment, but also activity schedules? Like being nocturnal?
Yes that could be possible but yet again there are probably already species who have exploited nocturnal niches there. Seasonal changes could lead to desert animals being more successful though since they are already adapted for extreme temperatures
Could be. For a la brea example there's Homotherium. Homotherium was diurnal, which is very unusual for a cat. Probably so it could be active during a time when most of its big competition wasn't.
Maybe I'll just throw a mountain range inbetween them lol
Or you could have seasonal changes as I mentioned before but that would require a more extensive map and just having a natural barrier would probably be easier
I thought you meant seasonal changes would lead to desert animals being more successful in a different environment? Did I misunderstand?
In a place with seasonal changes desert animals could more easily expand into other habitats but adaptation would still be required
This is confusing lol
I may have gotten lost in the replies and confused you with something you didn't ask for so I suggest you read a little on it
very well hidden but I think this is it?
that's the only one I saw, I saw someone say there are 3 things in the image
it also says predators so yeah I think there's 2 more
the grainyness aint helping
Ye-
yeah it really doesn't lol
I think there’s only one
someone in another disc said "hint there's 3"
It’s a stretch but maybe? Bottom right corner
this looks a little sus but idk
Eh? (Ima outline it)
Could be smth going on here to-
maybe???
Does anyone know any somewhat large and unique animal that lived in the Ciechocinek Formation that's not Emausaurus and thats also not undetermined?
I remember there being a small Therapod in there but it's likely undetermined as well
I only have Emausaurus and Saurohynchus to work with💀🙏
Three acros
what is the current thought on smilodon pack hunting? homotherium too while we're at it
guess who’s heavier
Man if I see one more person refer to Sachi's weight estimates going up as a "size buff" ...
Paleo enthusiasts try not to powerscale and sound like MMA fans challenge (IMPOSSIBLE)
IIrc, it was in one documentary but I can't remember the exact name of the doc itself
On the Science Channel's, "Mammals vs. Dinos," meet Supersaurus, one of the largest dinosaurs of the Jurassic period. Supersaurus was an herbivore whose lifespan could be as much as one hundred years.
Deer in the jungle when the tiger stands really still:
Oh yeah fair enough
@wary fable it is still mostly agreed now that sinornithosaurus wasn't venomous
We can agree it’s not but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t as we will never know from just fossilized bones
@wary fable yeah I get that but it's mostly agreed now that it wasn't venomous @mighty dagger If it was venomous where's the places in the skull where it's stores venom
Venom glands are flesh not bone
Why weren't its teeth hollow to inject venom or were they
It’s teeth had grooves just like a snake
Yeah but that doesn't mean it was venomous there are animals with grooves on its teeth that aren't venomous so other than that there really isn't that much evidence
Also here is a venomous snake skull as you can see no venom holding things as venom glands are flesh so you can think that there is no venom in the Sinornithosaurus but you could be wrong or could be right
It very well could have been mildly venomous/ an early example of its species gaining venom
But still the relatively wide furrows in the teeth are not consistent with what is seen in the teeth of creatures known to have venom-delivery systems in their teeth.
Sinornithosaurus seems to have venom delivery systems too here is a example
Also snakes have a postorbital venom gland which is made of flesh not bone
Still not that much evidence but we most likely will never know could just be hollow for other reasons
Both teams have a reason to think that though non venom believers can say there is absolutely no proof but venom believers can say due to its dangerous area it may have needed it
You're talking about the results of millions of years of evolution in modern times. The rattlesnake didn't go From a Gartner to Deaths Whip in a decade
But still is there any more evidence for it to be even more likely
It's having venom is not Irrefutable, but it's not having venom isn't Undeniable either: I would call it an early example of dinosaurs Experimenting with venom delivery systems
I see why people say it does have venom though in the Cretaceous china could be dangerous for a creature around the size of a cat
It wouldn't need venom to survive as it being one of the largest tree climbing animals where it lived at the time it was alive could just live in the safety of the trees
But it needed to eat and creatures slightly bigger then it like Psittacosaurus might need a dose of venom to be taken down
Didn't it not live with taco? Il go check
Okay it was microraptor that didn't live in the Yixian formation not Sinornithosaurus
we would need to look at closer relatives to the Sino to understand its possible biology first. Did they have grooved teeth? were its ancestors and descendants larger or smaller?
the tooth grooves are regarded as not indicating any sort of venom delivery system, is it possible? sure, is it likely? no
yea just read up on it, even baboons have tooth grooves, are they venomous? nope
Gila monsters have grooved teeth, are they Venomous? yes
there is no is it likely it’s a 50 - 50 we can say well baboons but I can say snakes have grooves and that goes against it right also baboons are not related to this creature
other dromaeosaurs had similar grooves, not venomous again
snakes are also not closely related to them
But birds are and birds don’t have grooves unless they are venomous
Now I will give a point to non venom believers venomous birds are not likely but this is a prehistoric species so it’s possible
Also you can use Dromaeosauridae to say it’s not venomous but we don’t know if they were venomous either as still venom glands are flesh not bone
Sinos relatives sharing grooved teeth and likely not being venomous does not indicate that Sino Couldn't be venomous. Not every species in the same family Has to have venom
That is correct saying that not all snakes are venomous
True, and while a snake is not a dinosaur, this speculation will get us nowhere without more concrete evidence in either direction. I suggest we all get degrees in Paleontology and continue this discussion in oh, 6 to 10 years
Unless there Are Paleontologists in the room with us with a case study on Sinornithosaurus
I heard recently that running on all 4 is better than on 2 legs for humans and that it will surpass the current record set by bolt
Do yall think humans ran on all 4 if yes how did they do that?
I see this conversation has digressed, good luck
No matter how good your degree is it’s impossible there is no actual proof as there is no flesh on the sino meaning no proof of venom glands and no proof that it didn’t have venom glands
Even if you had a sino skeleton in your arms you wouldn’t be able to say as still no flesh
Unless you have a just recently dead sino body sitting in your refrigerator you can’t say it does or doesn’t have venom
Also no because humans were built to be bipedal if you think I am wrong run on all fours then run on all twos and see what gets you to your location faster
@wary fable well the thing is you probably could
If it has bone structure that is similar to some animals today that posses venom but if you dont have anything you could either say it probably didnt but maybe it had
It does have a skull similar to venomous animals but it also doesn’t it has a reptilian like skull therefore unknown
I'm gonna run on two legs and on four legs to test this now and is Pisanosaurus a silesaurid or a basal ornithischian
Who knows
Are Silesaurids a sister group to Dinosaurs or Stem ornithischians with Pisanosaurus being a transitional form between ornithischians and silesaurids
Because Silesaurids Most likely came from lagosuchids as Lewisuchus is a transitional form between silesaurids and lagosuchids and is the most basal silesaurids but lagosuchids are basal dinosauromorphs and silesaurids are dinosauriformes and are closer related to dinosaurs in phylogeny is it possible lagosuchids gave rise to silesaurids and dinosaurs
Weren’t silesaurids from the Triassic
Well the thing is we have seen phenomenal progress in the 4 legged running with a new record of 15 km/h but the thing is the more they study about it the more they make long shot progress so it's just a theory but mayne humans run on both
As for the venompuse skull it really depends does it have a place where it could potentially be space for a venom gland or hollow fangs or anything that indicates venom ?if no those similarities are probably due to other conditions and do not indicate the presence of venom so it s mainly unknown
@zinc solstice going to set a new 4 legged running I'm telling yall
Image of lagosuchus a lagosuchid (first image) and Lewisuchus the most basal silesaurid (second image)
Many skulls have space for a venom gland but they aren’t venomous and it does have teeth like venomous snakes but that doesn’t mean anything because sino is a bird and not a snake nor baboon @cloud badger
The thing is hollow teeth are kinda trash I guess the hole probably isnt a huge reason but if it has a delivery system its probably venomous
I mean why else would you get teeth that would probably get destroyed easily for no apparent reason
Unless they are blood sucker lol it's a stretch but funny to think about
Also why do advanced dinosauromorphs and basal dinosauriformes look very similar to Lagerpeptids basal pterosauromorphs and one idea for this might be the most basal dinosauromorphs and the most basal pterosauromorphs look so similar is because they recently split from a common ancestor at the time (first image is lagerpeton a basal pterosauromorphs) (second image is Lewisuchus a basal dinosauriformes)
Delivery systems are flesh therefore still unknown
So it’s a 50 - 50 you can say “well it-“ but it’s impossible to know
To I will say you might be right but uhh
Hyenas
And If Silesaurids came from Lagosuchids with Silesaurids probably coming from lagosuchids with Lewisuchus being a link from Lagosuchids and Silesaurids and Silesaurids are dinosauriformes and are closer related to Dinosaurs is it possible that Lagosuchids gave rise to silesaurids and dinosaurs and If Silesaurids are basal ornithischians Like what one paper says then wouldn't Lagosuchids be dinosaurs if the paper is correct as they are most likely the last common ancestor for Silesaurids and dinosaurs
And It is most likely with the most basal Silesaurid being nearly identical to advanced lagerpeptids it is possible that the most basal dinosaur like the very very first dinosaur ever could have been very similar to Lagerpeptids too after splitting off from the most basal Silesaurids like Lewisuchus
Except there's 0 reason for any of those larger theropods to develop venom. They already have the tools to hunt what they need to hunt, what would drive them to evolve venom?
I'd also love to hear about these venomous birds you speak of. This would be brand new to science!
Just like the venomous thylacine...
or the pack hunting raptor! like a pride of lions...
Venom Glands would be right there.
There's a clear area in venomous snakes' teeth were venom is stored.
You'd be right if we were talking about Helodermatids like the Gila Monster, but those came long after the Non-Avian Dinosaurs. You'd get a better audience if you wanted to talk about something like Palaeosaniwa being venomous, being in the same clade.
NEW FAV CREATURE DROPPED
How big is rexy compared to a max weight trex💀 some kid is saying rexy would be 1000 times stronger then a max sized tyrannosaurus and stronger then a blue whale
Rexy ranges from 7 to 9 tons (The size changes a lot for some reason) and then irl Rex could reach over 10 tons
according to someone rexy has blue whale strength
But I'd say 8 tons for Rexy is probably the best one
As she looks a little skinny to be 9 tons
It’s because adults vary in size. Hell, humans range from 100-250 depending on a few factors.
rexy has moniter lizard dna so accurate dinosaurs couldve existed in jw
No I mean like Rexy herself changes size A LOT
Not Rex itself in the franchise
Oh gotcha. I thought you were talking about weight ranges in Rex lol
like i get it rexy is 8 tons or som but she does not have blue whale level strength
dinosaur fight discussions 
what is this discussion
JP lore arguments and more dinosaur power scaling
Jw
would dromaeosaurs have been able to climb trees/terrain using all 4 limbs (basically bear hug style/squirrel style), or would they be restricted to how modern birds tend to climb things, beak excluded of course lol. I dont really know much about how the joints on these animals articulated.
it doesn't matter, JP encompasses the entire franchise
Not really, there is a reason people say JP-JW or just one of them
it's probably possible they could've used their arms to climb
I tell you this as I tabbed out of beasts of bermuda to answer and my velo got pulverized by a megara
What is y'all's biggest gripe when someone is talking about Tyrannosaurus?
For me, it's when someone says they were covered in feathers. I have high doubts about it.
There's no reason for tyrannosaurus to be portrayed with heavy coat of feathering for obvious reasons
This is random but tyrannosaurus didn't have a thick coat of feathers but as a baby it probably was fluffy but as it grew it possibly shed it's dense Feather Coat and The adults most likely had very short almost invisible peachfuzz like feathers
Also a gripe for me is when someone says Trex evolved into chickens
Like we already have fowl like Austinornis 19 million years before the last known tyrannosaurus rex
Off topic probably but Could fowl as a group technically be called living fossils as we have fowl fossils older than saurolophine hadrosaurs and Austinornis is 1 Million years older than the saurolophine group
we don't know that it was fluffy as a baby
True it could've been scaly as a baby and could have still had very short almost invisible peach fuzz like feathers as a baby too
And I made a mistake the oldest known fowl are 19 million years older than the last known tyrannosaurus not 16 million years older
I still personally like to believe all theropods but ceratosaurs would've been feathered as babies
The first part, I'm ok with. The chicken part is ridiculous
I see a lot of conflicting info about Dimorphodons diet. A lot of articles say they were Piscivores who were decent at swimming, but a lot also say they insectivores and opportunistic hunters of small vertebrates (which I’m more likely to believe). What is the most recent opinion on Dimorphodon and its diet/swimming capabilities?
The JP roar 😞 and the teeth
But I don't really talk about Dino's much to people so
God I have no idea what I'm looking at
By teeth I mean the teeth being fully exposed also like in JP😣
So it seems to be mostly assumed as insectivorous? That’s what I was leaning more towards as well
Like most of its diet but the rest can also work just lesser parts of the diet
Ahh okay, I get what the chart is saying now, thank you!
What ctenochasmatid and pteranodonts have durophagus content?
Yknow I never truly understood how much larger the giant aust jawbone was compared to the blue anchor and lilstock ones
that’s almost comedically larger
What's the weight difference between Conca and Dilo?
Basically none. They're about the same mass.
Alright, thanks
icthyosaur moment (they just keep getting bigger)
Didn’t know if anyone is interested in this stuff, but if you are passionate about paleontology, this is one of the coolest events I’ve ever been too, highly recommend anyone perusing paleo as a career to do this
That seems to be the trend yes, it’s funny to me how hilariously large Triassic ichthyosaurs were compared to any other marine reptiles including post Triassic ichthyosaurs
The largest fragmentary ones could be over 10 times the size of the next largest marine reptiles that aren’t other ichthyosaurs…
What are the best dilophosaurus figurines that isnt beast of mesozoic’s? Im curious cause darren naish has been showing off a lot of dilo figurines but there doesnt really seem to be any up to date ones
Rexy is just tall and long.(5.2m/17ft tall and 44.3ft/13.5m long)
She is stated to be 8.4 tonnes consistanly
Mostly during JWD.
Tho iirc she is like 7 tons during Jurassic World but is 8.4 tonnes during JWD
mb.
A Gallimimus bullatus file i did, hope you like it. Also let me know which species would you like to see next.
how large is dearc compared to rhamph?
About the same size.
Dearc its pretty big
The biggest Dearc size estimate is about the same as the biggest known rhamph individual (3 meters or so)
Also another file i´ll share on my Twitter later this week
Which specimen in each genus? Thats pretty important
Is it? The specific species of rhamph isn't being asked.
No, specimen like FMNH PR 2081 (Sue) to compare it with other ones and see if its a correct estimation
???
Which specimen its the largest Rhamphorhynchus??
*** Dearc sgiathanach***: NMS G.2021.6.1-4 this one its the largest specimen i assume, a juvenile/subadult specimen.
I don't believe it's been confidently assigned to a particular species. It's in Rhamph sp.
I think you are confusing specimen with species.
sp. is used when it can be assigned to the genus but not a species, either due to it being a species not described yet or (much more likely) the remains don't give enough clues as to what particular species it is
For example, most of pteranodon's remains are technically sp. from what I understand because the distuinguishing features between P. longiceps and P. sternbergi are in the skull. If you don't have that you can't really tell them apart at all outside of maybe dating.
I found the specimen of that giant Rhamphorhynchus its ***BMNH 7002 ***almost the same size using that giant Rhamphorhynchus. from 2.5 to 3.5 m. Hope i could help you.
Yeah but im not asking which species, im asking which specimen its the largest, i just found it.
oohhh I get what you mean now, sry.
Dont be worry. 😃 happy you get it.
A photo when i travel to Argentina to check Mapusaurus, Giganotosaurus and this fella, Meraxes.
Its interesting to me when dinosaurs are named after pop culture
Next thing you know we'll have possibly an Azdarchid named after Smaug
sick
hehe the dino got stone hard plaque
thoughts on PE's tarbo?
The body seems a bit small compared to the head
Tarbosaurus is a bobblehead as derpy.stego pointed it out, so it's meant to look like that also model itself is in wip so idk personally why doofus posted so early
PEdro
I'm assuming Prior Extinction
That's right
The names all blend together
It's good
Not very educated on dinos, but I remember seeing/reading as a kid that the Triceratops was the sort of natural enemy/equal to the Rex. That true at all?
Pretty much, as far as I could tell Trike and Anky were some of the few herbivores that could consistently threaten a Rex (not to discredit Edmonto, it just didn't have the same weaponry as the other two). Though I could be wrong
Of course Trike would still prefer to avoid Rex
he sigma
if you gave a rex an option between hunting a trike or an edmonto, it'd most likely go after edmonto, but trike was so common that's probably what they were hunting usually
The legs 😭
can't believe dreadnoughtus was this small
It's not that skeletal is of different specimens entirely
As a sub adult was about 50t and was larger than thay
I'm pretty sure, correct me if wrong, Edmonto bite force (iirc it could give some strong bites) and bulk was enough to scare a lone rex
Probably, like I said I wasn't trying to discredit the bird cow
It wasn't
Not by a country mile
Trike is rex's biggest threat imo, although it was still regularly hunted. The average Edmont is significantly smaller than the average rex and would get destroyed in a one on one fight
I was gonna say, no shot an edmonto was the one scaring a rex
Fearsome Edmontosaurus has evolve-
I'd say a Rex's biggest threat.... Is another Rex
What about quetz?
What about it
So just the bulk then, correct?
.
Neither. Edmonto is chow
Isn’t quetz’s entire body mass lighter than a rex’s head lol
Average edmont is like what, 6 ton zone vs the average rexes 8 and abit smaller in frame than a rex(?) That we know of
True, I forgot to add "among its prey"
Pretty sure the 20t Edmonto estimate is cap
Well nothing is lmao
what the hell
why would it even be real in the first place 😭 the largest estimate and specimen for edmonto at 15 tonnes is like a tail
Edmonto was probably regular prey, it's primary survival tactic would probably been running from rex. However, just like a lion and a zebra, I wouldn't say it's impossible for a big edmonto to drop a rex.
Nothing is impossible in these ordeals, question is how often(the 1% of gnats escaping a dragonfly for a extreme case)
Sue, Scotty and X-rex ( obviously these 3 are largest of their respected species )
Rlly prehistoric planet said they would
Twig vs an absolute unit
They could probably be able to intimidate a Rex but not be life threatning for a Rex
( also that scene was about harassment vs a full on fight)
Quetz would be a serious threat to T. rex || as a hatchling ||
This skeletal is outdated
This current most up-to-date one ups Dread to like 50 tons
46t is about as large as you can get it, most other methods put it around 38t
how heavy was Stellar’s sea cow?
Again, 50 tonnes is for an sub adult not an adult
you don’t get 50 tons for either, I keep saying that
You do?
neither known specimen gets to 50 tons, but a fully grown one probably did
omg is that specificmammals 😭
granted this is based on vibes, since we do not have a dreadnoughtus growth curve, but assuming the holotype to be around 40, a 50 ton maximum is conservative
an adult can feasibly hit 50 but none of the specimens we have do that's what I've been trying to get across
11 Tons for larger specimens we believe
we aren't gonna talk about the 59t holotype estimate that doesn't count
Ight
Sea Cow having tusks amuses me still
Those aren't tusks, they're t
I saw a quite interesting estimate that puts them at 24.3 tonnes
but yeha somewhere about 8-11 ig is okay
They're tusks off the structure and are also present in dugong to a greater degree
Wikipedia has it at the late Miocene
Did edmontosaurus have the ability to stand up to?
maybe
All hadrosaurs could stand up.
A bit late but my biggest gripe is when people talk about Tyrannosaurus
Like "yeah yeah cool dino, NEXT"
Oh boy, here we go with another "T.rex is too popular guys, Kayentapus needs more exposure"
Yes.
Get off the stage!!! At this point, you've become the thing you complain about because no-one talks about Rex like it's the 2nd coming of Christ unless you go somewhere the collective IQ makes space temperature shiver from how low it is (YT Comments)
Wasn't the convo just before steller's sea cow about Tyrannosaurus (and edmonto)?
I was only talking about it because there's a lot of things that people get wrong about. I understand it's an overrated dinosaur.
I think overused is more accurate. Given all that is known about the taxa and how many records it has, it's far from overrated.
Ok, sorry for the random vent/rant, i tend to see red when someone mentions Tyrannosaurus
so comparable to baird’s beaked whale?
It was, but it was not unscientific or making T.rex able to fight God
There is a reason people like it and temper fits about it being "overrated" is beyond childish and does nothing but further alienate people who are casual and curious
Tyrannosaurus is a cool dinosaur and am not ashamed to say it!
Does anyone have pictures of Yutyrannus fossils and other non debatable feathered dinosaurs? I wanna show them to a person I’ve been having some evolution debates with since he claims Dromaeosaurs looked like this 
if you look up dinosaur feather fossils you'll get tons of results
yeah
i was trying to find that one fossil of the dinosaur with long tail feathers that preserved bands and all but i cant remember i- nvm, i just did i think
What's that guy
caudipteryx. Not the one i was looking for, but still a very good example
Zhenyuanlong is kinda the king of showing wings/fans in raptors
Real
So that thing already bigger than rex can stand twice as tall?!
I wouldn't say twice as tall but sure?
Ikr man
we also have the recent paper which stated that a few compsognathids were actually juvenile megalosaurs and carcharodontosaurs
one of which is scipionyx
Lil cutie Sinosauropteryx
too unstable
Speaking of, does anyone know if it's been determined how the scipionyx specimen died?
Pfffft
Thanks to everyone up yonder who posted the fluffy dudes 
Sherpenthes really is taking this seriously huh
Deer is def the wrong comp lmao, nothing good to compare to nowadays is a thing
Whatever, but to say that an 8 or 12 ton animal ocuppies the niche of a deer (an skittish herbivore that only runs from predators and is generally pretty small) is stupid me thinks
Like 6-8 ton zone if i recall
And since when is Trike smaller? Last time I saw they were around the same size and Trike was bigger on average, correct me if im wrong
I feel like disregarding the weight, a Triceratops is not built to run away in the slightest
Def not a deer niche seeing that thing wasn't exactly built for evasive style seeing it
Yeah sure, definitely the same thing. Just say you hate Triceratops or something
Cause your cappingggg
General chat reminder to remain polite and respectful towards each other and do not provoke or antagonize other users. Refer to our #rules.
Buffalo aren't as big as a Triceratops. Any comparisons to modern day animals should just fly out the window because they are just, not at all applicable especially in Hell Creek
I mean you also just said they'd be daily fodder a few bits ago lmao, they aren't facing a predator bigger than em headon non stop, but they did something beyond raw numbers to survive, and true flat out escape seems difficult for it
^^
Anyway, regardless if Rex had an edge or if it was bigger, to think it didn't even pose an ounce of danger and that "it was eaten alive daily" is disingenous
It's not some out there fact that Tyrannosaurus ate a lot of Triceratops. But to say it was mostly successful in hunting them, and did it without harm is just spitting in the face of it
That and there aren't any living predator prey relationships that we can comapre genuinely seeing how odd it is despite being a talk of the talk
trike outrunning a tyrannosaurus sounds almost comedic lol, I can't imagine many situations where that's plausible
Ceratopsians and the environment triceratops lived in is just not good for running, moreso than you'd see in any modern day animal (excluding turtles or whatever the land one is)
not even mentioning the endurance tyrannosaurs were capable of
Found the only LOOP fan
No one is saying t rex couldn't successfully hunt a trike, we have straight up proof of that, just that it isn't fodder seeing it, most predator and prey relationships for large animals are wonky af compared to smaller ones, and how its literally some of the least flat out escape built ceratopsians
God how much of a mess am I gonna get into trying to find reliable information on spinosaurus speeds
Messier than my room amounts id imagine
People can't even agree on if this thing could walk or swim, poor dino
Oh god I can't even find any answer
P sure this occurred due to the matriarch having PTSD from a jackal encounter when she was a calf so when the matriarch spooked, the entire herd did
nature is pretty traumatizing. a reptile probably wouldn't be able to develop ptsd
a reptile 66 million years ago?
what happen 😭
care to share?
Saturn the alligator
Goofiest goober
ptsd only comes with mammalian cunning
A channel reminder to please view pinned messages for appropriate paleo-chat topics. This channel is for educational purposes. Please do not post off-topic memes or troll in here. Refer to all our pinned guidelines in every channel you plan to use.
A Rex wouldn't slaughter a Triceratops easily, especially when they weight about the same on average, the end
Now, isn't this critter pretty cute?
Cute
did anything ever come out of the "25m" guizhouichthyosaurus that was mentioned once in a paper this year and then never again
never heard of it tbh
it was mentioned in one sentence and never again in the paper
the specimen in question (isometrically) would be comically larger than any other guizhouichthyosaurus, how do you just say "oh yeah there's a fin whale sized specimen" and then never elaborate on it 💀
its large to the point that isometrically its 100 times the mass of the other ones, how is that basically a footnote in the paper
got that answered elsewhere, it is indeed real.
very real
Obviously not edited
i was thinking more ai generated
Of course that's a thumb nail bruh the actual video talks about the topic
if youre trying to inform people on a real thing you probably shouldn't use generative ai to illustrate your point, doing so makes you look bad
I'm not using ai that'd the thumb nail on there video 💀
obviously i mean the video creator
:0
doesnt really look like ai but go on
well its not a photo and it has a bunch of errors an artist wouldnt make. Many of them are missing pupils, two have ear tufts on one ear but not the other, one's face is just a smudgy blur without detail, etc
That's not the point the vidoes is about feral cats getting bigger I'd literally show a hunted cat breed out growing a fox but I think that gose aginst the rules
and that would effectively be spreading misinformation, which doesnt belong on a video posing as being educational
pretty sure the "big john" specimen is 12 tons
it's not
no source?
because everything I can find about it says that one was 💀
i don't think a news headline counts as a source for the mass of a dinosaur
what did it probably weigh then I genuinely am curious
lightly feathered ceratosaurs are underrated
dawg even if I don;t have a source it's quite obivous big john isn;t 12 tonnes 😭
it's not necessarily obvious at all, just tell me what it IS then?
unknown proper measurements but according to Henry a possible reported length of 8m is there
Henry Cavil?
yes
I’m a big fan of lightly feathering every dinosaur 
I thought it would be cursed…but thinking of a lightly feathered Spino isn’t to bad ngl
Just a feathered sail
Feathered sail is. . . .kinda scary to imagine-
I always imagined a feathered Spino would look like a massive swan
Something like this
https://x.com/urlknight/status/1122318960819458048
“Murder Swan”
I like that
For the record I'm not confident in feathered Spino at all I just think that if it did have feathers it'd go honk
Scrurimimus = megalosaur and spinosaurs = megalosaurs so by that logic....
Modified a map of North America 75mya to include fossil/trace sites to draw a loose corelation on population distributions/preservation bias across the landmass. Thought I'd share it here for anyone who's interested! 
mehh I like lightly feathered on every theropod but anything other than that it depends
best baby spino
I would feather everything somehow
Eh actually idk loon Spino is kinda nice so full feathers might be it for me idk
Depends on how well it’s executed
agreed
though in all honestly I would probably make them not feathered either
outdated tail but josch's portrayal of feathers on the front of spino is neat
Unknown unrecorded measurements should not be used
It has people think that some tigers average 250kgs
Legs too skinny makes me feel weird even if it's accurate proportion
Not accurate because no tadpole tail!
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not lol
Then what would it be if estimated
What
So real…
What would it's length and weight be
I don't know what y'all talking about anyways I just got interested
which specimen for spinosaurus do you want?
Whatever you got
I always like seeing maps like this, it highlights how little we know about appalachia
not even specific but the holotype is scaled within 10m and 3t same with the neotype but a little bit bigger around 4t and then we have spinosaurus cf. aegyptiacus which has bee scaled withint 14.7m and 8.3 tonnes
the big dentary also overlaps with the holotype, so it’s more confident that those two are the same animal
by animal I mean taxa not individual
falcon you’re cryptically reacting me please don’t tell me I forgot something and embarrass me
That's literally what the video is about 💀
You’re good
I just wanted to screw around
but the issue is that people seem to be too “split-eager” in terms of Spinosaurus sometimes but most of the time, people are reasonable and don’t do that
I always use the holotype spino because am just sigma like that 😎
stromer left us beautiful notes and we should all strive to be more like that
Btw what are we talking about anyways
you wouldn't understand
I would but only some of it you got me interested by putting cool numbers and saying spinosaurus take responsibility @outer tusk
what 😭
Tell me now what is the topic
dude I don't know
is it me or anywon always thinking everyday there's new paper publish
Truly a Paleochat moment
So it's just randomly putting spino size estimate
I'm cool with that
Call me when spino get a cool update (I'm sure next patch he's gonna get a trunk and be fat
That's unusual
Where us my monthly spino patch
(There hasn’t been a majorly noticeable anatomical one in years)
@tough parcel to be fair they don't have a lot to work with from what I have been told
that doesn't matter though because the last actual new study done one spino was all the wat back in 2020-21
Still hoping to get my elephant seal spino one day
You see the British doesn’t want us to have more spino so they bombed a museum, this is obviously due to the fact that Britain is controlled by a secret underground government of spinosaurs and don’t want us to figure out there true form
Now now this is kinda racist bro spinos do not contrôle the world it's only the spinosit hight society
Man we all know britania is still rules like most of it
It's gone down since Lelouch did that weird thing of being king for 1 day
Ok grandpa let’s get you back in bed
Wait dint we get one like last year?
I remember there being a fuzz about spino swimming and I don't remember details that's all I could recall I was too busy to care at that time
new methods of paleontology fauna classsification be like :
i dont understand? wdym paleontology fauna?
paleofauna i mean
what are the 10 largest sauropods known as of right now?
What happened to the utahraptor block
nothing happened to it? It's still being studied
I always thought of tyrannosaurus rex itself as being a completely solo hunter, but is something like what is shown in the "swamps" episode of prehistoric planet 2 plausible, in which 2 individuals tactically work together to bring down an edmontosaurus? https://youtu.be/t9PZxPji4ks?t=48
As night falls, the Tyrannosaurus brothers hunt Edmontosaurus under the cover of darkness in the forest.
from Prehistoric Planet season 2 episode 3
yeah I'm curious about it, I haven't seen much from it
Possibly considering the size of hell creek fauna but I think it was likely facultative cooperative hunting.
I dont think there's direct evidence for it, but there have been some trace fossils showing 3 relatives of rex seeming to be walking together. 🤷♂️
The clip is purely speculative and has no real basis in fact. It's one of the few scenes in PP that personally find to be a bit too much.
People often cite the "3 rexes travelling together" thing as evidence but it's all hypothetical.
All that we have are the tracks of 3 individuals going in the same direction. The problem is that they're just tracks, and the theory operates on the kind of crazy assumption that the tracks were left at the exact same time. They could have been shadowing each other for territorial or sexual reasons, or not following each other at all.
These tracks could have been left weeks or even months apart if the weather kept. When I go on a walk through a park and I see other shoe prints on a trail, do I assume that they're travelling together with every other person who has used this trail? More pertinently, would I assume that every set of rabbit tracks along the margins are related individuals travelling in a group?
That is all to say that using fossilized trackways to infer behaviour is really sketchy.
Fair point. I agree that it's not evidence, just saying that it's a possibility. Though that's always the problem, lots of options are possible but it's hard calculating which are most likely. 😁 It is true that majority of reptiles and birds today are solitary and don't hunt as organized packs, but then generally modern reptiles and birds are fulfilling different roles in their ecosystem. We just gotta wait for more fossils to turn up and hopefully continue build a better picture of these animals.
It's certainly possible, but far from probable. coordinated pack hunting is a monumentally rare behaviour, and iirc the ones that do it are all mammals.
did Stan ( T rex ) have any injuries in its femur?
Tyrannosaurus working in pairs or groups in hunting is speculative (as are most behaviors of dinosaurs) but is very possible. We have multiple bonebeds of different Tyrannosaurids that consist of various specimens of different ages and sizes.
Also, crocodiles have been documented in participating in coordinated group hunting so it is not nessecarily a mammal thing (I am pretty sure some birds do it too).
There is a big difference between crocodilian mobbing and coordinated pack hunting
Harris Hawks specifically hunt as units. Plus crocodiles are known to collaborate while hunting, herding fish into kill zones. While I do think that in Prehistoric Planet it overdid the amount of pack hunting, I would call it plausible speculation.
Dinets, V. (2014). Apparent coordination and collaboration in cooperatively hunting crocodilians. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 27(2), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2014.915432
Whats that marine site in new jersey
hi guys is there an expert among you? i seek information about the correct jeholopterus proportions as they seems to be diverging in different art and diagrams
e.g. there exist version with short and long neck, the number of neck vertebrae is different
Don’t take david peters’ skeletals seriously
Rule out the top one. It's from David Peters. The bottom skeletal seems alright, and the paleoart looks good. Idk about the 3D skeleton tho tbh
im a friend of david peters. the 3d seems to be derived from the bottom, but seems to have additional neck vertebrae
the extra stuff he draws is just proposition to make people think more creative about pterosaurs. what he is wrong about is flight posture , but almost everybody is imho. the drawing by ugueto looks good.
David Peters is known to photoshop and manipulate fossils. Also the extra "creativeness" he proposes is absurd. He denies common logic and refuses to accept proper research, and also be-littles anyone who opposes his opinions and insane theories
An example would be pterosaur ground locomotion. Despite their being found tracks of pterosaurs showing that they walked with their wings and feet, David Peters still says that they only walked on their legs
everyone who has an opinion is be-littleling... he doesnt manipulate the fossils, he just draws onto them to mark out what he thinks hes seeing, like everyone does
Is that David Peters in the top center area................
maybe they could do both, like bears
No, he actively has photoshoped fossils to make people believe what he says
i dont know if thats true.
No, no. Bears can stand up on their hind limbs. They can't walk properly on two legs. David says that pterosaurs walked on two legs all the time
It is in fact true, he has admitted to it as he says it shows him things other people can't see, David Peters is literally the worst skeletal/Paleo artist currently making art
what i read from his blog and opinion is just that he considers both walking options viable
These are drawings of what he believes pterosaurs looked like. The first one is Pteranodon, the second is an Azhdarchid and the third one is supposed to be Rhamphoryncus
No, David Peters is legitimately horrible, please do not take anything he makes seriously
hes not saying they looked all like that. you put things in his mouth
correct. despite claiming they are accurate depictions
https://tetzoo.com/blog/2020/7/23/the-david-peters-problem
I recommend you read this blog
Lokiceratops rangiformis gen. et sp. nov. (Ceratopsidae: Centrosaurinae) from the Campanian Judith River Formation of Montana reveals rapid regional radiations and extreme endemism within centrosaurine dinosaurs [https://peerj.com/articles/17224/]
its boring, why should i have a fixed opion about a person than choose myself what uttering to believe
He is like well known in the Paleo community for being absolutely horrible
Have you not looked at any of his skeletals???????
and so what? the truth is beyond the mainstream
Reminder to please remain respectful. While critique is acceptable, paleo chat is not a place to make fun of or insult other people's art or depictions.
Because there are objective truths and looking at the objective truths of how fossils are reconstructed and the material we have David Peters is objectively incorrect
David Peters straight up makes stuffs up, modify pictures and make foundless claims about what he posts on his Website. He is just to not take seriously.
wrong, objective is only what you have sufficient information about.
And we have sufficient information to consistently say the vast majority of Peters claims are outright incorrect
And we have sufficient information about several of the things he has constructed
If you want an actually good and reliable pterosaurologist that doesn't lie and doesn't get enraged with anyone disagreeing with him, I recommend you check out Mark P. Witton. He is an awesome artist, and has contributed significantly to pterosaur research over the years
No, he is not
Funny how I was just looking into why David Peters is the way he is the other day
i already knew the claims about him before entering this chat room
I will however assume at this point that you are simply attempting to start an argument where there is none to be made
Y'all are feeding a troll lol
General reminder to please be respectful and appropriate to other users, refer to our #rules . If we cannot be civil on this topic, mutes will be handed out.
Discussion can be continued without antagonizing or provoking one another.
Explain psittacosaurus then
To be fair that specimen is only useful in restoring a single juvenile male from one species. Given how much scale size, shape, distribution etc can vary between species applying that to the whole genus is a bit muddy
Still minimal speculation
was this dinosaur hiding behind the bush on its tail? like a walking bush?
You'd be surprised, there's a bit of speculation involved we are missing the end of his tail, there upper portion of his body is covered due to how he died. There's a good chance plenty of the feathers in his tail brush fell out post-mortem etc. Most of his scalation on the upper skull is entirely unknown too due to it being upside down
Still a damn beautiful specimen though, genuine privilege to have worked on restoring it for the two recent papers alongside the rest of JFD
This is worse than the elephant remains don't actually belong to an elephant and instead belong to a surviving sauropod guy
Lokiceratops is strange lookin
Wait, it's not actually that big is it
working on an jeholopterus model. the black stuff is carbon rods. light green membrane, and rest will be stuffed by foam. do you think it is accurate ? i am not an expert paleontologist, but id like paleontologists affirm my models
Manz built like a sphere
Dunno, I'd say probably? this is from the paper so
so that's about a 2m skull length
very big but in the image above it looks more like 2.5-3m
either sty and/or loki have crummy scalebars here or this is the dumbest animal ever
although looks like the skeletal scalebar might also be just like lying
Table will you make an edit of this
Someone made this already
ah
oh thats cool looking
Hay guys if 1 species of dinosaur was brought pach today whitch would thrive the most no small ore medium just the larger species the Max's to smallest is the size of cerato
And which would bee doodo and doomed to extinction agian
What happened to the Utahraptor megablock?
Still being investigated
I don't really understand the points you're trying to make here, how does recognising and addressing the vast amount of issues with Peters' work distract from other problematic reconstructions?
should i add anything else?
added Aquilops!
Damn still? How long has it been
Ceratosaurus consists of only one species, also is 7 meters long, 1098kg, and 2 meters tall
what is this then?
hmm?
dawg do you not see the "?" lmao
i aint taking chances
then at least remove magnicornis cause it's been pretty considered not it's own speices
heres the new ceratosaurus. i also changed the info
looks good btw forgot to ask but what porgarm did you use to make these
Words lol
ah okay thx
i just used the table feature
It’d be C. nasicornis. The other two are lumped into it. A 7 meter cerato is also 1100 kg.
which looks better? 1 or 2
Sickle*
I’d say the next one tho
aight
Unrelated, but I kinda like his drawings and reconstructions
On the later one, as stated multiple times, I like em as their own thing and not representative of the animal
It is big
that's what they all say
dentisulcatus its dubious
lokiceratops is cool but why does the only size comparison of it have naked people 
what
.
Im doing a size estimation RN
because it's a size comp
?? literally almost every size comp just has a silhouette of a person or at least a fully clothed person
With other cousins of him
okay but like no offense I don't
think it's that deep as long as well obv the human is ig not meant to be super detail or whatever
The Alamosaurus skeletal in question
I agree, they look really cool and even when representing the animal they are hilarious (which is why I have one as my PfP)
Ye as much as some of its horrifies me it’s still super neat
what is the most accurately sized skeletal for ankylosaurus?
First time trying to do paleo art
it didnt really lived with saurophaganax
New Ceratopsid droppedhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lokiceratops
what...
different time
Where did you get this

