#paleontology
1 messages · Page 94 of 1
in three month of migrating from alaska to mexico. and some are staying during winter approach. intresting
so is probably coincident nor just random speculation
That is the exact opposite of what I said as well as taking what is clearly impossible as possible
I feel like saying coelurosaurs only is kinda outdated actually. Since we have fluffy ornithopods to my knowledge and feathers are likely ancestral to the group as a whole
So while it’s admittedly unlikely for large ornithischians to have full coverings I wouldn’t rule out the possibility of say, a few genera having display feathering
Considering that no (large) ornithischian has evidence of any sort of feathering (Ceratopsian skin, hadrosaur mummies, etc), I don't think it's all that likely to have "display feathering"
Well uuuuuh…yo mama 
But all I mean is like, a few quills possibly on the head or tail. Just speculation
unlikely considering quills would preserve
You shoudlnt/fur/whatever feather anything after Ankylopolexia imo
My rule is feather everything you want but if it’s bigger than like camptosaurus stop here (usually)
I thy demand every large theropod and sauropod to have feathers
Large therpods and sauropods likely didn't have feathers
Feathered ankylosaurid
Armored Raptor
feathered ankylosaurids would look so cool imo
Raptor with stego plates
It was a joke, is why
hey guys i found 2 fossils because i live in britain and i went to the jurassic coast
Do we seriously believe both of these are in the same genus
Kinda having a hard time processing howd that look. Would it just be the underbelly??
i meant like downy feathers inbetween the spikes, a good example would be sauropelta as it has wee gaps and yeah sorta underbelly/side
Hippopotamus gorgops and Hippopotamus minor would like a word
El wiwi
I think it might possibly be a bigger gap
Still the same concept. It is kind of funny looking at the Paleoloxodon species
Can't wait for PK to do them hehe
Also I did the math, they would not be able to breed
Not with that attitude
that sound silly
You sound silly
dumb yet silly speculation
Why didn't Alderon just use Ornithopod for Lamb's Family Chorus ability description
Because no commoner would know “ornithopod”, they would know hadrosaur
If an Ankylosaurid was feathered, I would imagine that there would not be relatively much due to the large scales and osteoderms that dominated the most of the body, though underbelly and limbs are possible places).
Apparently, there was a discovery of a 5 meter long troodontid that was found in Asia?
Someone mentioned it in a different server — here is the link to it:
https://www.earth.com/news/megaraptor-species-named-fujianipus-yingliangi-discovered/
Thoughts?
ichnotaxon
I will say that at first, I thought they were referring to "megaraptor" as in the megaraptorans (and thus thought it was an oof moment since they have a picture of a dromaeosaur/troodontid), but upon reading the article, they mentioned that it was a troodontid.
yeah all we can really say is “big” from an ichnotaxa
It's a footprint so I elect we ignore it because you cannot get that thing any sort of reasonable size unless you assume it has big enough feet to stomp a house on a normal raptor body
I will say that the footprints shown of the supposed troodontid does . . . Look weird.
Let me see if I can get the picture.
if we’re being completely reasonable troodontid is even a little ambitious, lots of deinonychosaurs with raised second digits
Ichnotaxons are not diagnostic at all, and not really worthy of an article like this. Alongside that, it’s supposedly a troodontid, which means it can be any species of terrestrial amniote known to man, and will be dubious for the rest of human history.
Here is the picture (Note: the upper one, I think, is supposedly the new "troodontid"):
The footprints look . . . Weird to me. Are those what typical dromaeosaur/troodontid footprints look like?
Why is the art of a Dromaeosaur if it’s about a megaraptor 
Oh wait
Do they just mean big raptor
Fluffy ornithopod my beloved….
Yall how is saurophaganax different from allosaurus besides it being bigger? Like how do we know it’s not just a huge allosaurus
That is due to warping from the soft substrate the tracks were preserved in
@kindred lagoon Saurophaganax is poorly studied and the public (verified) information is fairly scant. The big difference that I can recall right now is the difference in the chevrons (The bones on the bottom of the tail)
whats the largest nodasaurid?
Peloroplites? Correct me if wrong
Seems like it
yeah it’s peloroplites, the thing is an absolute monster
Isn't it only like 2 tons?
ONLY?
basicly you will have result of armadillo or pangolin like style
if ankylosaurus is like 4-5 tons, peloro has to be about 4 tons too if u had to ass pull a mass
yeah but this is one of those times u cant rlly downsize this by a lot, its still a 4+m animal (and wudnt be the first time we have giant troodonts anyways)
also belly feathers is one of the silliest copes for ankylosaur feathers
Literally said that
this is society
why do u choose to hang out here
That is a great question that I actually do not know the answer to 
Lmao
Aw RIP
they hated jesus because he spoke the truth
1984ed - also re: table someone has to stop the lies
No, someone needs to spread them
The ferocious 50 ton Edmontosaurus bull in musth must be made known
augustynolophus getawaycoulliensis*
gorgosaurus infradinosaurparkensis*
Siats vs Bahariasaurus
BRB lumping every NA tyrannosaur into Gorgosaurus for the meme
isn't that by definition lumping them into albertosaurus
Lump them all into Nanotyrannus
ppl would rejoice upon something being lumped into albertosaurus for once
Lump Albertosaurus and Albertaceratops
i assure you dear tyrannobro, these isolated indet tyrannosaur teeth in russia are clearly attributable to albertosaurus
So long as that something isn't gorgosaurus I 100% agree very much yes
"There are too many 'distinct' tyrannosaur genuses"
that's why we have a half dozen upcoming new taxa most of which are likely diagnosed by single incomplete bones
Shhh, they can't know about Tyrannothanatodoomkillersaurus
its rather telling that we couldn't distinguish if naish's very clearly satirical etymologies were actually intended for the new taxa
i feel like i can just lie here and itd just be believed
probably tbh
and i feel like this has happened many times already
not as much as you would think
me adding a meter to brachiosaurus every time I mention mature sizes until someone notices
i've learned the hard way in this server that there's a very fine line straddling sarcasm and flagrant misinformation
And that line is really funny to step on
how accurate was dino dan quetz
Which is more complete, Siats or Baharia?
No
About as accurate as the first drawing of a T-Rex I ever made at age 5
Which is nothing like Quetz
Siats, because its cumulative material weighs more than a few grams and will not be blown away by a slight breeze.
moderator ?
I'm new to paleontology, any good starting websites and stuff to get into it?
Dinosaur with Stephen Fry
Cool design but it's terrible as hell from a accuracy sake
Terribly inaccurate
This is pretty much what is what it should look like as of current knowledge
no
Is bruhathkayosaurus still valid? I seem to remember hearing otherwise?
How big was the largest tylosaurus?
It appears it was a 7-8m abelisaurid. The giant sauropod is still unnamed.
@sullen cairn is a world renown expert regarding the status of Bruhathkayosaurus, studying it deeply to better understand it
Cheers guys, sauropods aren’t my forte and I didn’t want to mislead my friend. Have a great day!
Oh ok, cool
A better elaboration:
It's (possibly) a chimera, which means multiple animals accidentally assumed to be one. Bruhath has a few bones that might belong to a sauropod, but the holotype is likely to be an abelisaur
Maybe it’s just a 200 ton abelisaurid 
Awesome, I’ll pass that on. Thanks again.
Here's an interesting topic
There's supposed fossil records of crinoids reaching 70 feet (likely based off extrapolation), with some apparently being candidates go exceed 100 feet
Is there any solid evidence on this? The most consistent cited evidence is a random book on paleontology, but there's so little love for crinoids it seems entirely plausible that it could just be real and almost completely unknown
@white matrix Please don't troll or provoke other users, refer to our #rules . Thank you
Petition to name Alderon Kangaroo to Alderon Procoptodon
Signed
fun fact, falcon is not human he is in fact a dinosaur
True! 
No crinoid fans?
Crinoids be based
Dinosaur fights, we love 'em and hate 'em.
Here's mine.
A thread of how depicted it 🧵(1/9)
A bit too lizardy to its credit. The straight up tail thwack’s a bit much.
I personally like it, it’s a depiction anyways
I like priors allo
I honestly very much like what Blameson does. This take on theropod interaction is cool and not very far off from what we see in animals.
Love this. It's very lifelike, and, like what Scanova said, it's very lizard-like, with the beginning of the fight and the movements of the Allosaurs when they are wrestling being very reminiscent of varanids, at least to me.
Don't know how I feel about lizard similarities, but makes a bit of sense since Allosauroids aren't super closely related to birds.
No love for tall Starfish :c
I like it up until they both fall over rather clumsly and then the tail slap. It very quickly goes from feeling natural to someone trying to make it look natural imo
Yeah that's my thing. I don't want to take away from the buildup that part's good.
To me it almost looks like the tail slap was an accident
i love it as a fellow dino modeler and animator i am interested to how you desided how to animate it
I don’t think they animated it
“Here’s mine”
I didn’t animate it :(
The person above me said How you decided to animate it
I wasn’t talking about the tweet itself
They look so silly (in a good way)
The end is a little odd but I know how hard animating is so I don't mind
long time since no post dossier updates
People, why does the hatz no longer attack in the air, now it becomes terrestrial? It's no longer fun, it's a pain to kill someone on earth and even any attack will kill the hatz. Did the chat disappear?
You will have an easier time getting questions like that answered in #path-of-titans since Paleo Chat is for people talking about natural history and paleontology related topics and not gameplay topics.
Also Hatz was more designed for the ground to begin with
^
Wait what why did our messages get deleted
Assuming for rudeness despite the dude's comment being unwarranted and offtopic.
Wasn't even rude, it's stating a fact lmao
Forgot but too add should I add anything to make feel "alive" ig at least with the detail such as lines
just do artwork i think my jakapil is accurate enough
questioning abt jakapil environment region. is it sub arid enviroment ? bc its live on candeleros formation
is it rlly arid subarid environment in candeleros formation ?
Yes
how i enter game????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Wrong chat
where i go for that
in the name of not giving people hemorrhages edmonto masses but now its a graph instead of an epileptic lightshow
Rex fooder graph
I mean its entirely possible at least for the majority, it seems a little too flexible at thge tip but overall its cool imo
why is lambeo ingame so small? saw pictures that make it as big as para
because its not as big as para
your probably thinking of big paul then (mangnapaulia)
what is its estimated size
para is also usually shown smaller than ingame in da media
like 2.5-3t
yeah big thing's now magnapaulia
big paul
i was wondering cus lambeo looks so small next to achillo allo dasp (wich i know are oversized) but then why they didnt oversize it to
dasp and allo need to swap size
guys the allo isn't really that oversized it's just a big allo plz
i dont like the idea of a big allo its just saurophaganax but not saurophaganax allo is really cool with it being normel sized
there's also large non-oklahoman allosaurid material probably referable to allosaurus proper
Pots allo is only big allo size if sauro is allo
there's non-sauro specimens that are pretty large
and even then the largest uncontroversial allosaurus isn't fully grown if you want to pull the pycno card
but i wouldn't say the case for big allosaurus is any worse than that for having a big spino
there's very few upsizes in this game over 20%, and most of those serve to make the playable less niche/serve their ideas better
megalania, sarco, spino, achillo. only ones that don't make a whole lot of sense are eotrike and bars, and one of them can be attributed to what the perk owner wanted out of eotrike based on what they knew
lambei is soo small
The Peterson one?
Eh, I would call it oversized still. It still has at least 2 meters over the largest Allosaurus. And sure you can play the "still growing" game as with Pycno and that's fair, and that means we don't know how big it would have really gotten. 2 meters worth is a lot of growing. But even so using the one Pycno we have as justification vs the plethora of Allosaurus that aren't that huge, that don't sit right with me either. Pycno is a greater unknown. Above all else, PoT allo used to be smaller. It got upscaled to where it is, not unlike a lot of creatures in the roster. I don't imagine PoT devs were using the fact that the largest Allo wasn't fully grown for this. I don't imagine they even know Pycno wasn't fully grown. They're just taking the estimate they see, and bumping it up a couple meters, unless you're Das.
Tldr, that's cope dawg.
it also depends on the animal in game, if you scale some things together they come out to accurate size (like amarga and allo next to each other scale correctly even if both are upsized)
I might go as far as to say even Alio prolly isn't a purported "adult estimate", and its size and the fact that (more) mature Alioramin proportions differ from other tyrannosaurids is sheer coincidence
So why do we use "claws" for non-avian dinosaurs and not "talons"?
Claws are for based terrestrial animals
Talon for bird of prey, claw for the rest of the world
Just semantics tho. I'm sure you could refer to them as talons occasionally and no one would bat an eye
i can see why
Could I ask here if a fossil is legit ?
si
Used a sub adult lambeo we hate u
tbf every other lambeo skeletal looks ugly
nuh uh GATs looks fire with some edits
true but that takes time and effort
and then it sets a precedent which means you're gonna have to use gsps hypacrosaurus at some point
also with the allo discussion how big is in-game allo anyways
12m iirc
I read GATS as Gyaat, the brain rot is consuming me 
well there's probably some epenterias scaling of questionable merit that ends up that large so i'll accept it
and it's not even 5% longer than nmmnh (i will ignore that the thing is 70% tail)
it's "only" a bit over 11 iirc
any specific sizing would need someone with devkit to breach NDA i believe
people usually measure these game models in a straight line, so if it's 11m the centra length is probably around 12
it comes to right about 3m tall at the hip too iirc
so what you;'re saying is its basically Peterson allo sized
coracoid scaling based on USNM allo gets larg size :3
anyways looking at it and the size difference doesn't seem too egregious relative to say pete iii and the peterson allosaur
notwithstanding the actual thought process behind the in-game sizes
how big is Pete iii & Peterson?
prolly a bit under 4t and approaching 5t respectively
I think its easier to say devs oversized it a bit than to try and push the envelope and explain its size with a might-be-allo that 4 people in this discord are aware of
I'm also of the opinion they went with the size they did for gameplay reasons. Less problems with an expected grapple mechanic if the Allosaurus isn't too small
fair but i like being contrarian
Fair lol
There are 100% more egregious upscales than allo tho, that's for sure. I think it just burns people, myself included at one point, to see das looking kinda puny
yeah i suppose when it all adds together das does just end up feeling kinda small
im a strong believer that allo was upsized to fill that size gap that used to exist there, as well as them just being like "well, some people think sauro is allo, so its fine"
and separating it from daspleto more, size wise. Cause back then there wasnt a lot of playables and seeing how random sizes are, i doubt they knew what they were going to do with future releases
Wasn't one of the species for in-game allo maximus during the earlier years of the game?
I swear it had maximus as a selectable species but was replaced with jimmadseni
nah, it was amplexus
Is this Mosasaurus tooth real ?
its saurophaganax maximus but i heard its still debate if it is A.maximus or seperate genus
They're referring to the ingame allo 3rd species before it was changed to jimbo
anything else I need to add aside from Edmonto's iconic back scutes?
The tail seems a bit thin to me 
hadrosaurs have notoriously thing tails if that helps
also based it off some tail bones I found in a museum I volunteer at.
frills
or skin tabs, they are made of soft tissue
(They're scales)
(they have scales on them, they cannot be scales lol)
Do show an image
Hadrosaurs had frills?
they have been reffered to as frills but more recently as skin tabs
you mean the scutes?
this?
i just said they artn scutes
then I am not sure what it is
Please provide visual reference for the poor guy instead of just saying it
i also JUST said they are frills / tabs
AND I AM FALCON BUT THIS CD
- you asked for pics

I think that has to added with the highpoly sculpt
A mention of "frill" im too lazy to find the more recent use of them reffering to them as like scale tabs or Midline feature tabs or whatever
Realistically im not even too sure of the consensus there was a discussion about them previously, although there are multiple depicts with a keratin like structure which is confusing
I do know they are not scutes though
(As well as multiple namings of them, Midline feature scales, scaled tabs, segmented frills)
I like tab, just because that's what they look like lol
Pretty sure at least the larger ones have a little muscle or meat on it like a snakes or els tail imo that's really to thin 😅
Yes
Yes saying they were more like bumps not pointed like scutes
Woah woah, the "scutes" of Edmontosaurus aren't scutes? this is news to me.
I wasn't aware they had scales on them. I wonder if there are any potential modern day examples of these "skin tabs".
Hadrosaur appreciation
their mummified sheet of skin
frills ?? i've never heard that one before
those bumpy things on the back of edmontosaurus ?
btw question: how many edmontosaurus synonym it has ? i heard tracodont, anatotitan/anatosaurus, and uurgunaluk. is there more synonym across edmontosaurus name in history'
Bout it from what I can tell
I feel like drawing a Pterosaur, which one should I do?
darwinopterus
Albadraco
Alrighty :)
It’s cool to think that lots of modern day animals can kill dinosaurs
What are you talking about
Yeah idk either. They’re still animals it’s common sense.
Well yeah some spiders kill birds (birds are dinosaurs) I know you are referring to non-avian dinosaurs but still wanted to point it out
İs there offtopic chat?
No, there are no offtopic chat on this discord
The gigantic Argentinosaurus when elephant gun
Titanfall
Scientific accuracy of my dromeosaur head?
looks pretty good
do ducks have recessive genes for bony tails?
not any more than other birds do
so theoretically with genetic technology advanced enough, any bird could be modified to have teeth, wing claws, or a tail?
I'm not jack horner I swear this is just me trying to make a concept for a game
the fearsome tyrannosaurus when it gets blown up by a landmine
The formidable spinosaurus when the fog
Iirc some researchers have messed up with hox genes in chicken embryos and it grew teeth to its beak in one case and more fingers with claws on wings in the previous experiment
neat
it's coming
It didn't grow teeth, just changed its beak into more of a snout
Getting birds to re-evolve teeth would be extremely difficult, though I guess you could get them to have beaks with tooth-like structures like Pelagornis
hey all, so my dino is stuck but /respawn wont work because my character hasn't "been alive long enough" Anybody know how long that time is?
It's like 5 minutes or something. also this is paleo chat
neat tip for cool kids going into paleo: dont call the hadro scales a "frill"
cringe terminology
neat tip for cool kids going into paleo: don't
Who calls scales frills?
thespesius, trachodon, anatotitan, anatosaurus, uugrunalak, but also claosaurus agilis, e. "saskatchewanensis"
also there were multiple species within trachodon and thespesius at one point or another that became current edmontosaurus
real as hell
also a second species of agauthamas
like any lizard with a row of midline dorsal scales (iguanas, etc) would be a modern example lol
theyre not exact copies obv but it gets the idea across
Yo can y’all dm me as many ACCURATE crichtonpelta restorations you can find
what was the largest early cretaceous carnivore for each continent?
reminder on how big maip was! art not mine btw
does anyone have the most up to date giga skeletal?
im trying to see whether I need to update this model, especially the head
I’d say it’s pretty spot on
Giga has not changed since Dan
I believe this was the one I used, but idk if its out of date now
Acrocanthosaurus, Tyrannotitan, Riparovenator, Suchomimus, Timimus, Ichthyovenator, No Antarctica Proper Early Cretaceous Theropods
That was a very niche question so I might've missed something.
UH UH
america, south america...europe? africa....asia? and autstralia
NA, SA, Europe, Africa, Australia, Asia
i was close
Timimus is literally the only early cretaceous theropod known from Australia it won by default
austrovenator was late cretaceous?
Yes
crazy, also, i swear there should've been something bigger then icthyovenator of all things
All the other contenders ik about like Siamraptor and Kelmayisaurus still aren't as big
asia fell off after the late jurassic 😔
also, i know this may be a dumb question but, was mongoliastegus the last stegosaurid? ( that we know of)
I don't think we have an exact latest stegosaur. Various early cretaceous taxa and undescribed remains are from around the same time in the Albian.
but none of them made it to the late cretaceous, correct?
also i find it interesting that every cretaceous stegosaurid was in asia i believe?
Yeah seemed like a holdout for them. And yeah the Albian's when we last see stegosaurs, although it's not clear if that's around the time they died out or if it was later
and then after all the stegosaurs died, the ankylosaurids exploded in variety and population in mongolia atleast
Me
holy Micropachycephalosaurus, its Acrocanthosaurus atokensis!
No way is that the world famous Acrocanthosaurus atokensis from Cretaceous North America
Yes it is I
whats your opinon on how to cook a sauropelta
I don’t cook them just eat them raw
arent they spikey and pointy
flip it over like the indominus rex
Oh yea, they visually similar to that of some lizards. But they aren't scales, they are some form of soft tissue. I was wondering if there are any modern examples of similar structures of that of Edmontosaurus (these raised soft tissue "scutes").
Tiny dragon
Guys, does anyone have the size of sauropods from the Morrison Formation?
probably inaccurate but idk
There are a lot of sauropods in one formation woah
It does span 10 million years and as many US states
more than 10 species. majority are macronerians and diplodocoidae
Tyrannosauroidea indet.?
i thinks is basal one but idk how it manage to live in world of sauropod and 4 main predator
I didn't know about it, but it seems really tiny
i thinks its proceratosauridae like
Btw why is there such a size difference between Barosaurus sp. and this species of Barosaurus lentus?
different fossil material but idk larger speciment of diplodocoidae like supersaurus, seismosaurus and barosaurus still in debate of its true size. i think supersaurus and seismosaurus are infact
could be wrong abt me
the huge barosaurus isn’t actually barosaurus, it got reclassified as supersaurus and promptly downsized
Actually, really?
so its supersaurus. and supersaurus is still currently valid ?
I've already heard about the 37m barosaurus but that changed again..?
yeah supersaurus is valid
seismosaurus ? invalid if i correct
seismosaurus got sank into diplodocus, which could change but for the time being it’s D. hallorum
oh so its become D. hallorum not seismosaurus again
What would you say is the more devastating defense measure
Stegosaur thagomiser
Or
Anyklosaur club
club i think
thagomiser
i would rather my shins broken than me torso pierced by giant spikes that also penetrate bone
I know this may be a dumb question, but do we know how fast each creature could move their tail? Because I feel I may have a chance to move somewhat out of the way of a anyklosaurs tail swing, instead of my torso being broken, only my arm gets shattered
idk but stegosaurs had a lot more range of motion ( the stegosaur image is of kentro but iont think that matters )
what ossified tendons do to an mf
It is a bit old but its not too bad
Inbefore the Maas stegosaur is uncovered
different shape and structure
it’s out there we just need to find it
Both are equally lethal imo.
To a human, yeah
To a larger dinosaur, the thagomizer is deadlier
The club might’ve been more use against rivals of the same species as opposed to predator defense from what some recent papers say.
I mean, I doubt you're fighting mating competitors as much as you are fighting the local hungry hungry hippo
I feel like the predator avoidance, armored skin and the wide body of ankylosaurus likely played a more pivotal roll in predator defense than its hard hitting but inflexible tail did. Not that its tail couldn’t do damage but I don’t think its tail was as useful in that specific situation as the tail of stegosaurs due to the limited range of movement.
The tail is flexible though? The rigidness only really starts ~middle of the tail
It looks pretty limited here
Yes, that does not go against what I said
Yeah, but if a predator is already within the range of the tail, there doesn't appear to be much that the club can do.
If y’all are interested in Cretaceous marine fossils, be sure to check out my newest video on my fossil hunting YT channel!
https://youtu.be/9w4T0JrGF9k
Alabama is one of the top states in the US when it comes to fossil diversity. One of the states most well-known fossil records is its Cretaceous record. This was during the time of the dinosaurs, when Alabama was half submerged under a warm shallow sea called the Western Interior Seaway. Hunting for shark teeth and dinosaur material have become ...
insert self advertisement here
What? If the predator is at a range that there is "not much the club can do" then the animal is already dead
I don't really know how to explain this well lol
I mean that if a predator is close enough to the ankylosaur that the club cannot hit anything since the end of the tail is rigid.
Ankylosaurs are generally not that large. A tyrannosaur with its jaws near the body still has the legs within striking range.
Smol
That and animals can pivot on their legs, they do not stand in one place and swing. They will be moving to angle the tail towards their opponent
If that opponent managed to bypass their main weapon, the anyklosaur is dead
True, I'm just saying that compared to a stegosaurus' thagomizers, the club has an extremely limited range where it is effective.
To be honest I don't really remember why that is relevent but it made sense in my head at the time 
God me too 😭
What is Thalassodromeus because I’ve heard some people call it a short necked azhdarkid and others call it a tapejara
Wiki isn’t a reliable source
Yes it is
So nobody can agree if it’s an azhdarchid or a tapejarid
No, Thalassodrominae is the one whose placement is in question
Oh okay that makes more sense

Or will it even come out?
Evidently
İ need new glasses💀
@rigid pilot Hey there! We're unable to confirm whether Path of Titans will be available as a physical media. If you'd like to see the game also available in that manner, please, make a post on our Feedback Board! Which you can reach through #suggestions.
Also, please keep in mind that for any Path of Titans related topics, utilize the #path-of-titans channel. This channel here is dedicated to Paleo discussions and conversations about the game would be considered off-topic. Refer to the channel's guidelines on it's pinned messages and check the server #rules. Thank you!
I consider thalassodromines their own family. They switch between ahzdarchids and tapejarids constantly and they're doing things different from both so.
They just built different….
Tapejaridae is within Azhdarchoidea. Azhdarchidae is a smaller family within it. So like how alligators and crocodiles are both in Crocodilia, but gators aren't crocodiles
are you sure


Ah okay I think I get it now so they are both tapejarids and azhdarchids but not true azhdachids is that what you mean
Well they are azhdarchoids, not azhdarcids
Alright now Im confused, are the "scutes" on the back of Edmontosaurus feature scales or not.
They are scales, I think the "they have scales on them" is a misinterpretation of the lateral bumps of E.regalis
Oh, yea I remember that the bumps on the neck of Edmontosaurus had scales on them so when stated above I thought it was another similar case where the dorsal scutes had scales on them. Appreciate the clarification.
@hallow spear
The lateral bumps on E. regalis are scale clusters right or at least that’s what I’ve seen them reffered to as
So they are raised feature scales on the midline, with raised bumps on? (On annectens)
They arnt scutes still from what I know
Feature scales, scale tabs (I’ve also seen them called that), midline scales etc
Sure looks a lot like scales tho ngl
Yeah they look like giant scales but aren't, because they have scales covering them
While the midline tabs of annectens are single scales
i think its the thyeropoda the basal like scutelo, scelido. but i think more intresting is jakapil and stegorus (half ankylosauria and behalf of it stegosaurid tail).
the gondwana theyropoda tho. they quite build different
No I know the smaller ones are scales and the bigger ones arnt I thought you meant the smaller ones arnt scales whoopsie lol (I only know this from a previous discussion)
So single scales with raised bumps? As the preservation has bumps which look scale like but arnt? (For annectens)
You mean Thyreophora?
yep
I like stegouros
and jakapil. south american thyreophora are cool
I think they meant that those bumps are actually raised soft tissue that have scales on them.
Pachycephalosaurids aren't in Thyreophora
the conversation was about Thyreophorans
they are magnirocephalia
they closet relative are the ceratopsia
Marginocephalia, so close
then what. but what i can see pachycephalosauridae they closely related to ceratopsia
i prefer Micropachycephalosaurus
funny name & used to be a pachycephalosaur but isnt anymore
so wait micropachycephalosaurus doesnt belong to the pachycephalosauridae anymore ? when the paper start been release ?
i dont understand what you're asking
Apparently, I'm hearing that the two largest "Spinosaurus" specimens we got aren't Spinosaurus aegyptiacus anymore?
"Spinosaurus" as we know it is currently, most likely, a bunch of closely related spinosaurini spinosaurids lumped together.
This doesn't change our perspective on spinosaurus itself too much, because we'd still be referencing all the same material anyway, but it's something to consider. Spinosaurus probably didn't roam across the entirety of North Africa + maybe South America if you count "Oxalaia"
I love Palaeontology as much as the next guy in this server but sometimes it truly does fry my brain
I mean it’s possible
It is but it's also messy.
Stegosaurus managed to get to Portugal and China, (as well as NA)
tf you mean China? I know of the Portugal Stego remains but that isn't much of a surprise.
There were quite a lot of Cretaceous stegosaurs found recently
I know that, but Stegosaurus itself Early Cretaceous?
Yea until it’s potentially refuted(split from Stegosaurus) but it clades sister to Stenops which is a key thing
If this is what the paper's suggesting then I have my doubts
Keep in mind stegosaur research is vastly lacking, obviously it should be taken with caution but it’s very clear that it’s extremely close to Stenops (and homheni)
It’s probably as Stegosaurus sp. Due to Stegosaurus homheni being present (instead of it being split as a genus)
This does however mean stegosaurs were more abundant in the Cretaceous then once thought
It did seem to be where their holdout was after Europe and especially North America got ravaged
they’re also just one of those groups that is notoriously spotty outside of a few select areas, we can tell they were there but there’s lots of gaps
insert cedar mountain stegosaur footprints
I’ve heard of that but I havnt seen it, can you get pics?
Also Considering the youngest stegosaur is from the Late Cretaceous we are def missing a lot of data on stegosaurs
ngl the jurassic-cretaceous kinda sucked balls at being a meaningful terrestrial megafaunal extinction event
People also forget we have very concrete cretaceous stegosaur footprints in the genus Deltapodus https://a-dinosaur-a-day.com/post/137849948025/deltapodus
what clades even died out at the end of the jurassic anyways
im not too sure
ig allosaurids but thats kinda cheating considering its essentially monogeneric
let me see if I can find them I’ll get back to you
allosaurus died, truly this is the beginning of a new age of the Mesozoic
ty!
look in thyreophora btw #646191752343978004 message
Diplodocids got destroyed. idk why the conditions were so bad for them in particular but they got thanos-snapped
There's one genus/lineage that held on in South America for a bit longer but that's really it
ok so I didn't find the tracks yet but I did find something weirder, this paper about cedar mountain flora from 1985 references a single tooth they attribute to stegosaurus itself
I don't have access to more than the abstract but the locality is in Utah, no dating given
Can you send the abstract?
Thanks! People also forget there are Maas stegosaur trackways lol
new
dropped?
Lameta fm india

wtf
stegosaur pes and manus are diagnostic, no "what if" for you
Dravido(Coniacian) and the Deltapodus footprint (Mass) both from India
🫦
The morpholy of Dravido seems to be similar to the Itat unnamed stegosaur
come to think of it i suppose sinostegosaurus lends further credence to camps torvosaur 
whAT
so like upper jurassic china has some cf. torvosaurus verts
and camps theropod is femoral fragment as wide as sue
but torvosaurus has really robust femora
so if you scale it with torvosaurus its like 6t instead of 11t
what is sinostegosaurus though 😭
the chinese stegosaurus sp
OHHHHHH
granted its early cretaceous but muh china-the rest of the world faunal interchange
there's yanbeilong recently discovered stegosauria from early cretaceous being the last of they species
not this emoji
Megalosaurids. Spinosaurids still persisted, but to my knowledge, the latest surviving "proper" Megalosaurids were Torvosaurus and Leshansaurus, who died out at the end of the Jurassic.
Also Weurhosaurus. It's got a few known species, and it's generally pretty well understood. Also quite large, even for Stegosaurids, topping out at about 4.5 tons and 7 meters.
there's probable megalosaurid teeth in lower cretaceous argentina
Had no idea, the thought of Megalosaurs surviving longer than previously thought does sound really interesting.
Argentina’s natural history is absolutely peak 
This is from GSP and is wrong
GSP?
Oh, damn. Thought it was from Dong, who described it, and who’s pretty reliable lol.
whats the most recent austroraptor skeleton reconstruction
probably this one
Aye. Hartman also updated his around the same time, but idk if he actually changed anything or just updated his formatting
No he updated his, Hartmans is older
Both are fine but I’d pick Hartman due to him being good ol reliable
Did anyone see the new paper on T rex that came out
Go away falcon noob
What happened this time 
Many stegosaur

Considering he:
A) Very often uses material not released, such as Utahraptor
B) Has no reason to post WIPs
C) Has nowhere to post said WIPS
Idk if that's even a good criticism
And tbh like
Random, Franoys, Dan, they all have the same amount of transparency lmao
That's...that's literally how you make a skeletal????????
How do you think he scaled it then
And you do realize if he went solely by figures, the skeletals would turn out significantly worse and he would not be considered a professional, right?
Also, I would like to see these skeletals where you "always find out he'd miscale somewhere"
Everytime I see GAT I read it as GYAT and want to die 
Good place to start when addressing a claim is the alleged errors
What are they
Yes, that is indeed one...and all the others? There should be a significant amount to warrant these claims, no?
Also last I checked, a gigantic majority of those "edits" were pose edits
As Hartman is apparently allergic to neutral lmao
That's not to say he or any other skeletal artist isn't incapable of error, but so far you've just provided blank statements that need a little backing in my opinion
I CAN FINALLY THE MAKE JOKE
Table what are you doing
I will never not hate this
LMAO 😭
Table's first funny moment (A lie)
As in not first
True Falcon you are lying
This isn't funny
oh no
The opposition is silent, we did it boys
(I assume they're getting the errors)
What even happened here 
Legit nothing?
For me, big words= chaos. Because I don’t understand them 
Ah
That is the single Qianzhou you have already mentioned
Where are the others?
So giving you the benefit of the doubt that these other two do have issues, that still lives his entire portfolio
So?
Random is simplified as well
Hartman is a bit moreso, but it is still close
Looking at his DA, he has 108 skeletals posted there, but I know he has more on his website, then even more on his Patreon/Twitter
if we are doing this i'd like to mention his maiasaura skeletal seems to have undersized limbs relative to the reported measurements
And Ima be honest, so far these egregious errors you lament are really just nitpicks
The shape of a femur, the slight size difference in a radius? No-one cares because they are not (or well, should not) be using skeletals to replace actual paper images
Erm wart der frick, you're supposed to gaslight, gatekeep, girlboss with me...
the tragic thing with maia is that all the specimens with readily accessible measurements are tibiae from that histology
so when you scale them to the skeletal they end up very large
Good
The true Terror of Egg Mountain™️
and then people take the 4t allometry estimates at face value and it all falls apart
Don't worry about it
its like killdozer edmonto but if edmonto was 2/3rds the size of rex at the absolute largest
Its superior speed and agility on account of its small size will win the day
the feeble daspletosaur will be slaughtered
granted im pretty sure horneri's like 2% smaller than torosus but i don't care enough to fix it
That 2% shrink decides the entire battle
unironically if those measurements are correct maia might be one of the most overestimated dinosaurs in terms of mass 
up there with rajasaurus
I'm not angry, I apologize if I came off that way. I am only irritated that you decided to belittle someone's living over something so trivial that it might as well not have even be stated.
If you have nothing else beyond saying, "you know whats with the paleonerd mentality, the smallest things can drive them angry", then I'm sorry, but I cannot conclude anything else beyond you have nothing and you're floundering for something
You still said it
in reference to me
And thus, I have no interest in entertaining this conversation, I have a Sucho to toy with
afaik there isn't much in the form of a thorough description of the thing
Is BYU 9024 Supersaurus or Barosaurus and how big it was?
Wonder how he feels when he sees an animal stand still/neutral pose in a documentary. Probably skips forward or gets up and leaves.
barosaurus, i cannie find the size though
Lowest estimate I could find is 28-29m and the biggest 40-45m. I think it was more in the 33-36m range and 20t. Could be wrong though
AFAIK we don’t really know wether it’s Bar or Super? I think Super is the current opinion but another big baro also exists I’m pretty sure so it doesn’t change much. Both of them got to like 40 meters long. Weight unclear but I’ve heard like 40 tons.
tmk both are in the 40-45 meter range, the one huge baro specimen which was lumped into supersaurus was just one of a few giant 40+ meter baro specimens, at least I'm pretty sure that's the case
So baro and supersaurus are the longest and argent the most massive. Kallamedu giant don't count bcuz it no longer exists
Basically
when I was a kid my favourite Big diplodocid was Seismosaurus, though iirc it's invalid now. It was mainly the depiction from the book "dinosaurus and other prehistoric creatures" that made me like it
Seismosaurus just got lumped into diplo (D. hallorum). It’s still huge, like 30 meters long, sauropods just keep getting bigger.
this one (online image, not the one I own), it's missing several pages in the front and back aswell as the cover since I've had it for a very long time and it survived a house fire
What about mamenchi. sinocanadorum, was it really 33+m and 40-50t?
maia is short 
Ayyyy I have the same book! Great one, even though outdated. 😁
Does anyone have a deinonychus skeletal similar in style to this?
I have that same one
the only one I have ever noticed is in his brachi and it’s easily fixable, the neck is just too short because he compressed a few cervicals for some reason
which maia is this, palps edit?
Excluding some JWE2 creatures I think sucho is probably the most accurate thing to come out of the JW franchise. probably due in part to (if I remember correctly) they got an outside source to design it lol
That goes for JW website designs in general. The one major flaw of that sucho is the small arms.
No? They're fine
Fran's is likely a better comparison as Dan didn't have his skeletal out then
Julius Csotonyi designed a lot of those visuals on the JW website, including that, and the Baryonyx, which explains why they’re oddly accurate lol.
I think he also designed the Metriacanthosaurus and Edmontosaurus but I’m not 100% sure.
hartmans in neutral
so in theory the legs should be a bit longer than they are here
Anyone have some nice allosaurus skeletals?
Any specific species?
Rawr! A Study in Sonic Skulls
Courtney Brown and Sharif Razzaque
www.courtney-brown.net/?p=21
Rwar! A Study in Sonic Skulls lifts dinosaur sound from disembodied simulation into physical being. Gallery visitors and performers complete this process by blowing into the installation, momentarily becoming the dinosaur. This work imagines the sound...
What's your opinion about these sounds? 1:25
fragilis!
This one that Falcon sent is Fragilis
Though europaeus is sort of the body type I’m looking for
Euro doesnt veen have enough to construct the body lol
I sent all three species 
Adult Jimmadseni(Scaled and primarily based on Big al 2) and a Younger (Subadult?) specimen
(cf. Hesperosaurus mjosi)MWC 71, (cf. Allosaurus sp.)NMMNH P-26083 & (Allosaurus jimmadseni)BYU 13807
7.2m, 11.5m & 9.5m (In that order)
It wasnt downsized?
smartest moment
CBS deinonychus… their models are so gorgeous and accurate with a hint of their own little charm
big
New smilodon paper:
video game weak spot
What do yall think about stegosaurids ( kentrosaurus specifically )being able to go bipedal mode for a bit?
Scary
Perfectly plausible
he doing the hadro position
Especially for young individuals
A lack of restrictive scapula mobility, Non-ossified tendons, COM at the hip, Flexible etc
Also we have bipedal stegosaur trackways****
I like to think of them like bears. Not a traditional form of locomotion but they can do it.
I love your tier lists
( completely off topic )
What about young saurapods?
( this was definitely less plausible )
It doesnt really make much sense to me
We have trackways of this too tmk
I thought they were disputed
I don’t know. I don’t think it’s that insane to suggest-lizard like bipedally sprinting though. That’s basically just rearing up, running forward, and letting momentum do lot of the work.
Yeah
Elaborate
I did hear talk of how smilodon likely hunted ground sloths by biting through the spine instead of the throat (although both would work in practice obviously)
For a large robust herbivore, the neck vertebrae of ground sloths is surprisingly gracile. Might’ve been a better target than trying to aim for the throat where the claws would be much more able for the sloth to defend itself
Paper about how smilodons can hunt ground sloths
Makes sense
I did not expect you to be such a paleo nerd
What exactly does “basal” mean? Keep hearing it get tossed around but confused on its meaning.
earlier diverging
any examples?
this slow mo is insane i gotta wait a whole 20-
something that is derived is what u may consider "advanced" or appearing later in the family tree- like humans are the most derived monkey-type mammals. the opposite is basal, or earlier diverging, like lemurs being among the most basal monkey-type mammals. it doesnt mean theyre more primitive, just that they split off closer to the ancestral state. i.e the basal condition for coelurosaur integument is fuzz/feathers that get lost or modified later, and so on
its a somewhat relative word to describe things relationships in regard to their family tree and to contextualize evolutionary relationships and whatnot. its similar to but not equal to the classic definition of "primitive" which is not rlly in use anymore because the connotations
or well, isnt as widely use, it still has utility but i try to shy away from it personally
So like, they did their own thing and split off?
not necessarily, its an adjective, a descriptor. like allosaurs are more basal than tyrannosaurs. sometimes they mean they did their own thing but thats just because unique lineages given time will end up doing their own thing anyways. its just a word to help contextualize relationships, usually in regards to distance from the last diverging members of any given tree. like baryonyx is a basal spinosaur, and its kind appeared a little earlier and is generally more similar to the ancestral state than like spinosaurus, the most derived spinosaur known
So it’s closer to its ancestors than the more derived ones? They just haven’t changed as much?
I feel like a picture explanation would work better, to explain this
so they arent walk in bipedal mode
baby sauropod dont walk on 2 legs
If it means early diverging, then basal means the member of the group least related to the other members.
Is this accurate or? Trying learn more about dreadnoughtus
That's one looong boi
mere in complete speciment dang
I believe so but @hallow spear and @stiff osprey would know a bit more cause I swear I remember hearing (at least Stego) say something about it, but I cannot recall
the tail is almost completed but the half of the animal remains what i know. also i remember two neck vertebrae on dreagnoughtus
also. what titanosaurid skull shape in general would look like. i heard it has this diplodocid head shape or kind of macronerian skull like
I have no idea what or why you said what you said in the first bit
And sauropods are terrible at preserving skulls due to their fragile nature, you’d just need to take the best titanosaur skull we have
i'm bit concern what the skull shape were look like but this is what we have got
well least rapetosaurus decently preserve skull i suppose
they are huge animal right. the remains are either been taken away by scavangers or got decomposed by the element. best sure that is what and why sauropod fossil are rare
iirc Rapetosaurus is also immature.
Yes that one’s fine unless you count it needing cartilage but that’s meh
Guys, could ornitholestes hunt a dryosaurus?
It’s like a baby giraffe
Probably not. Dryosaurus is like 10x it’s size.
also no dryo is nowhere near that big lol. the size everyone thinks dryo is is close to dryos actual size, so yeah ornitho cud prob hunt it
Is dryo not like 4+ meters and over 100 kg?
from what I remember estimates generally hit a little over 3m and right about 100kg
And weren't mature
Vs 15kg Ornitholestes
yeah I still don’t think ornitholestes was routinely going after it, there’s just easier things for it to hunt
Camptosaurus being 1.5t shits on everything, mid diff!!
this is a myth, some of those larger specimens are actually mature- i think the whole 'theyre all juvenile' thing was telephoned from some misunderstanding somewhere
Considering the 3 meter individuals are about 100 kg and there’s ones thatre even bigger the 10x bigger thing still holds up
I never said juvenile. I just said not mature. Even assuming they only grow 10% larger, that's still dwarfing Ornitholestes
Yeah dryosaurus is pretty large, all things considered. It's like, the size of a pony
Lion sized give or take
Ty
Well if they’re mature then there’s no need to account for further growth
Yes, however they are not mature as far as we can tell.
I mean it could try
The tenacious Ornitholestes
With its theropod cunning...
Its pack-hunting would enable it to take prey as large as the fearsome Allosaurus...
The advanced coelurosaur would run circles around the primitive allosaur until it could deliver a suffocating bite...
You’ve all been infected with the reptilian mind virus! Only mammals contain such cunning! Mammals 🔛🔝
I think it's too small (mass) but yeah
Cephalopod Cunning will take over both factions : 
The superior speed of the mammals will defeat the slow primitive reptiles
There are lots of large terrestrial mammals. There are few large terrestrial reptiles. This certainly must mean that mammals are superior.
Ah yes, Sarcosuchus holds up terrible T. rex toy
So, Teratorns
They would probably have voice boxes unlike vultures, right?
Why would you want to have superior intellect when you can Kakapo? 😊 He’s geen
I think its such a shame people say the jurassic park velociraptors are fake, they mention velociraptors mongolius but theres another version of the velociraptors which do look like they do in the movies
The Velociraptors of Jurassic Park are Deinonychus, and they ultimately don't look much like the ones in the movies for various reasons. Most notably feathers, or lack thereof in film
And then there's actual Velociraptors, even smaller and more different looking.
in pack ofc but do we have the evidence of them form pack
okay but why not take example of mustelids, they tackled they prey 3x of they bodyweight. so ornitholestes have small chance to taking down dryosaurus
i think general subspecies (D.atlus) is to large and heavy to take it down. i think elderae looks suitable for ornitholestes to hunt
oh wait second. dont tell me the isle ervima actually used D. elderae 
tmk no, but there's nothing saying that they definitely didn't
No, the JP raptors are actually deinonychus and irl the JP raptors would have been covered with feathers like a bird
I want deinocheirus and achillobator to be as popular as rex.
Not gonna happen until they appear in a JP movie + Achillo will just be called Velociraptor
mustelids also have a lot of adaptations specifically so that they can do that, and the two animals we’re dealing with are built completely different from both mustelids and their prey
there’s just easier options for the thing to go for, like sure if it’s desperate but it probably wasn’t a habitual thing
I think it'd be a fair comparison, if Dryosaurus was 3 times Ornitholestes's body weight. But it's not, it's like 8 times
Is YOM 429 really this big?
McIntosh 2005 states that the big YPM femur fragment is not from the same locale as the type specimen, & therefore has no reason to be referred to Baro
So no, they should be ignored
BYU 2085 or CM 21774 are the largest, but im not too sure if BYU is even lentus
I thought BYU is supersaurus
Hey chat! Give me four or so formations (preferably about dinosaurs)!
thats the other BYU
Morrison formation, Javkhlant Formation, Phu Kradung Formation and... Shaximiao Formation
Thanks!
Accurate?
Oversized by a bit, but other than that it's pretty accurate
Idk about weight though. I heard someone saying sucho was 12,1-12,2m and 5-5,2t
It's the good size though.
As it is based on Dan's, it is indeed as long as Tyrannosaurus while weighting approximately 5 tons.
Since BYU was brought up y'all think this is still good? https://svpow.com/2019/07/13/table-of-old-and-new-byu-specimen-numbers/
Whats wrong with this? Is anything wrong woth it?
Who is the 3rd biggest theropod after all?
First is Rex, then Giga, then who?
spino maybe
That depends entirely on how carchs are reconstructed
Some say Carch others Spino and others Saurophaganax
what about the acro
Rex is unfortunately the only large theropod with enough material and specimens to get a confidently definable size range
Spinosaurus could be second largest if the large snout fossil belongs to it. Giga could be second if the proportions of the unknown material are just right. It really depends on a lot
Acro was 11,7m and 5.5-5,8t iirc
oh
Someone told me that rex, giga, carch, spino and saurophaganax are the only theropods 8t or heavier and mapu, ttt and deinocheirus are 7-7.9t
Mapu or Carchar
How heavy was duck?
7 tons give or take. He’s up there but not insane
Well, I say not insane he’s like top 5 or close to it
Rex, mcraeensis, giga, carch, spino, saurophaganax, mapu, ttt and duck are the only theropods over 7t
Tarbo was 10,5-11m and 6t, same about zhucheng
I don't think we have any +5 tons Tarbo specimens
The largest definitive tarbosaurus is 5.5 tons. The potentially bigger ones are all maybes that ain’t published. Zucheng is a mess and can’t be reliably scaled really.
Zucheng’s estimates range from smaller than das to bigger than tarbo depending on what and how you scale
Acro, meraxes were 11,7m 5,5t, sucho 12m and 5,2t , torvo and mega 11,4m and 5t, theri 10m and 5t?
It does yes
Zhuchengtyrannus
Megalo is more 4.5 last I heard, and I don’t think Meraxes is that big either
Meraxes 10,6m and 4,5 lowest 11,6m and 5-5,5t highest
Ii'm not sure is wiehenvanator. Baharia 11-12m 4t? Oxalaia who knows it was destroyed
We don’t know wtf baharia IS, let alone reliably gauging its size, and oxalaia is basically lumped into spino until spino’s lumping mess is figured out
Which is probably never because the paleontologists are busy fighting each other over the same questions that don’t really matter rather than doing something productive like that
Also do we have any proof that rex preyed on sauropods?
We don’t but the south where sauropods lived is lacking in ecological studies compared to the North
Given Tyrannosaurus and Alamo overlapped I wouldn’t be surprised if it did
ok
Maybe bit oversize length with.
Biggest Sucho we have is 12.14m long and 5.4 tons.
It was a massive Animal tho
Depends on how Carcha is reconstructed ngl.
Same with Spino
You can get Carcha at 12.32-12.4m long and 8.2-8.4 tons.
Spino at 14.7m you cam get 8.36 tons BUT you can get it bigger or smaller this is more an middle ground but still can be higher.
You can MAYBE say Mapu since you can get like 8.39 tons at 12.7m long but its more reliable putting Mapu at 6.9-7.9 tons(this depends how less robust you put it)
Tarbo is 5.39-5.5 tons at 10.94m long.
So quite big but not 6 tons
I have seen 11.73m long and 5.7 tons Meraxes.
Oxalaia is ugh... Spino I guess
Carchar is
realistically thats like 90% of the large megatherapod / mega herbivorefossil record
Could Aetosauroides burrow in real life?
it certainly could dig, but could it make a burrow for itself to hide in? debatable
I mean if Thecelosaurus could burrow like some people are saying then Aetosauroides could burrow possibly?
also debatable for Thescelosaurus lol but fair enough, aetosaurs seem more burrow-capable than generic ornithopods like Oryctodromeus
is their any evidence supporting apatosaurus and brontosaurus neck spikes?
No. Probably weren't a thing.
Questions
So theres 2 dinosaurs I wanna get some clarification on would anyone be willing to help me figure it out?
I heard there was some controversy around the validity of Dakotaraptor...has that been settled or is it still going?
Ongoing due to the discovering paleontologist (DePalma) refusing to let others study the specimen
Second has to do with troodontids
I try to keep to reliable sources on dino news and Ive always heard troodons arent a valid taxa but...sometimes even..my sources mention the clade as though it is a valid taxa but then other times they dont? so...whats goin on there?
I've tried figurin it out and I get all turned around lost and burnt out
Troodon hasn't held water since 2017. It goes by Stenonychosaurus now.
Ah oki
Wait is it just the individual or the whole family?
Troodon technically does exist but it will never have solid skeletal material attributed to it as the holotype is a broken tooth
That particular genus. The family, troodontids, are still a thing. Titanosaurus and Ceratops aren't valid taxa anymore either but titanosaurs and ceratopsids are still perfectly valid families.
Not for long 
you could even say a wounded tooth
Aaah ok that musta been where my wires were getting crossed
Thanks
Guh...
Oh one last...silly note
Im a genius >:]
I had an Idea yknow those life sized plushies pokemon does like the big mareep that became a meme...yeah those...but accurate to scale dinos >:D
You could simulate feather fuzz the way old webkins used to (remember those ;n;)
Imagine having an accurate to scale Utah raptor to keep ya cozy in the winter
Bro just invented a million dollar business and called it silly 
Im a genius
Also obviously make it like... scientifically accurate (but made cuter) to current estimates of what dinos looked like
Sadly some dinos would be off the table
Sorry borealopelta youd be bigger than a queen sized bed
Although actually saying that... Hmmmmmmm 🗒️🖋️
Id kill for a accurate to scale utah raptor plush
I used to sleep in a mountain of plushies with an accurate to scale green anaconda plush I miss those days 😔
Is there something about how megaraptorans would've used their claws?
Killing
Like, yeah, it is known that they killed with their hands and not their heads, but how? What method did they use?
Just grapple prey and bite tbh
Eh, idk, seems like it would've been a lot of struggle if they weren't doing something specific
And i'm intrigued about the likes of Maip and other big later forms that took the responsibility of going after larger game
Idk what you mean because having big arms to grapple and subdue prey makes it less likely to squirm out
I wouldn't think so
big cats do it and they have to walk on their forelimbs. with claws made for grabbing!
While megaraptorans tho, they free to use their forelimbs
Ig that makes sense
I was focusing on their arms as their primary killing method, because big cats use their claws just for grabbing and subduing but use their mouth to kill, going straight for the windpipe
That's what...I said???
Yes i know, i was giving you the reason
I was imagining something like "what if they only used their claws to do allat and not their mouths?"
For all I know their arms might be more involved, but I think across the animal kingdom carnivores fancy using their mouths in a hunt. And in theropoda multiple lineages evolved in such a way that emphasized the skull
got your tyrannosaurs, abelisaurs, carcharodontosaurs, spinosaurs. they all have some very noticeable adaptions to their skull. Tyrannosaurids and Carcharodontosaurids in particular went the way of giant heads
Yes but megaraptorans went the other way with relatively small heads, slender jaws and massive Freddie Krueger arms
as did Spinosaurids, but that don't mean they weren't using them. After all, Spinosaurids have highly specialized mouths for a reason. I imagine megaraptorans probably used their mouths too just as a lot of carnivores generally do.
^
mouf's been a good tool to help in killing since the days when we were all fish.
Tbh i cant really think of anything SPECIAL megaraptorans would have done thats any different from other theropod dinosaurs. Just run up to somethin and go for the throat. Maybe they wrangled stuff? Idk
(Very bad doodle ik)
Yeah but, spinosaurids did because they had an extremely specialized diet, that megaraptorans presumably wouldn't have had (as in, their prey would've been similar to the rest of large theropods)
I mean, if allo is anything to go off of it probably did somethin really similar
point is, even something as specialized as Spinosaurids use their mouths. what's to stop a megaraptoran from doing what probably all theropod carnivores did
^^
I mean tbh only way i can think of it is allo, just more slender. Sure it didnt have jaws nearly as bulky as allos but
Yeah that's what confuses me
Perhaps it was a small game hunter instead and the claws are more for show
BUT it does make sense
Anyways what if austroraptor hid in the reeds like a bittern lol
Nah i was talking about the bigger megaraptorans
Idk then
If they evolve large arms and hands, it is likely to grab prey and hold it down with minimal struggle occuring. I mentioned big cats earlier and that still applies because they predominantly use their well-developed forearms to bring down prey and kill with their mouth. Megaraptorans didn't have astonishing thin skulls, they were fairly normal for theropods
wrestlers fr
Sorry if this is off topic but are there any images of Eutricodonts in the group Volaticotherini that are not Volaticotherium that are gliding in the air that don't have bat wings?
All we basically have are fragments of their skulls
Not that i know of, but they all would have looked the same externally anyway
It isn't, I just call every small bipedal non-cerapod ornithischian an ornithopod
it's not like the world's 3 non-ornithopod prionodontia fans are going to stop me
Is Soroavisaurus Valid?
yes
Finally getting around to watching season 2 of prehistoric planet and pair that with this game I have to ask why...arent...dinosaurs depicted more colourful?
I mean i guess safe to assume and indeed in some cases we do actually get at least a glimps into the colours of a dino like with microraptor or Borealopelta but...idk birds and reptiles today are often pretty colourful, although maybe using modern animals in this case isnt exactly a good idea
Yeah thats true
More modern media has been showing dinosaurs with a lot more life and colour
Especially prehistoric planet...my beloved
Because dinosaurs are gigantic thus meaning it becomes harder to spread vivid coloration across the body
Example: Modern pachyderms
I’m no paleo nerd so correct me if I’m wrong, but many colerfull pigments can be more expensive to make in large quantities across such a biiig body
Ye right above me ^
Thats true
Its not to say t rexes should be sparkle dogs just...idk surely smaller ones would be more colorful right?
- large dinosaurs seemed to prefer brute strength over fancy colors
Like I absolutely dont see large dinos being colourful but I could see mid to small sized ones having more color
Caihong and Microraptor were fairly colorful iirc, but we don't have enough to say what's what
Also consider all birds are very "drab", the only ones that get colorful are those in jungles where there's a lot of food + really dense cover
Eh
Plenty of colorful birds up north too
Such as?
Bluejays and cardinals are the 2 easiest example we also have some humming birds
Robins can have some bright red chests
Warblers
Finches
We also have some redwinged blackbirds where I live although I live pretty south of canada
I will say the cover of trees regardless seems to be a factor in that
We dont really have any warm jungles but theres lot of trees and mountains
we should ping lancian it'd be funny
These are all significantly smaller than the small non-avian theropods + they still live in a place fairly consistent with food
Like I said I dont see giants being colourful
I was not addressing giants, I am addressing Microraptor sized animals
I barely even see the mid sized ones being more colorful than a robbin
But I could see them in general being more colorful
Also consider these are birds that can fly, they don't need significant camouflage from terrestrial predators
But as said we really dont have anything o suggest as such
Pigments arent exactly easy to preserve
So yeah maybe they were just drab :l
Snakes tend to be very colorful as well even as they get really large
Not really? Constrictors are very dull
Actually...kinda sorta we have a snake up here whos VERY colourful in the sense that its a bright saturated colour
"the blue racer" its... endangered (if you guessed cause humans youd be right) with only 200 left in the wild
Theyre BRIGHT blue speedy constrictor snakes
Size?
Small but still
And also the fact that large colorful amounts of pigment can be pretty expensive to produce. Which is why I see most large dinosaurs using these colorful pigments on parts that really stand out. (Hornlets, crest, small amounts on sails maybe , arms, etc)
Googling it 90-150ish cm on average
Then my statement stands
Heres what they look like btw fascinating little creatures I was surprised I never saw one
don't you mean your statement slithers
Nuh uh
Lol
Anyhow my curiosity has been settled thank you
This was also just a fun discussion
This is very dumb but could Aetosauroides curl up into a ball and roll into predators?
Also go check out these little snakes theyre fun
Apparently they're one of the fastest snakes too
12-16 km per hour I dont know how that fairs relative to other snakes but yeah
Man I saw Karson coming in here and thought he was gonna show of his Spino, which only has the colorful pigmentation on its sail.
I ain't calling them dull
Dull is counted as anything other than green, brown, or something within these ranges
Eh
Id say depending on how green I wouldn't call it dull
Another thing that wasn't addressed here is that the pigments that make bird feathers bright evolved quite recently, and they probably weren't present in things like dromaeosaurids. Of course dinosaurs could have evolved their own unique pigments, but the conservative option would be to not make their feathers super bright even if they're small
Why are we splitting hairs in this convo?? 😭
The most likely place you'd find bright colors would be on the scales/bare skin of a small, herbivorous or omnivorous species
Honestly I'd just go with what Lancian does usually, though I think that complex patterns can still be a thing in large animals. Modern megafauna isn't necessarily the best of all examples but yet some biological limits, related to body size, are still applied such as how much they can gather/produce said pigments.
I'm not convinced of the large size = no complex pattern 'rule' either
There is also another point is that some scales can also reflect lightwaves and so produce quite interesting coloration.
Dull colors in highly contrasting patterns is based
i wonder if there's any causation/correlation between every animal losing both their aerial phase and somewhat complex patterning the second they exceed 2999kg
I find it fascinating when animals evolve to fill niches they normally wouldnt
Carnivores becoming herbivores or big animals becoming small
Or the other way around
I am rather curious what lead to the big Dromeosaurids in a group that's normally around the size of dogs or smaller
Also isn't it true that dinosaurs would've probably had much better colour vision then most mammals today? Making it more likely that they would use bright colours for signalling and species identification? 🤔
Were anchiornithids basal troodontids like some recent phylogenys are suggesting? Also why does Fujianvenator look kind of troodontid-ish in a way?
the correlation is that the number of animals that fit this description today is 3 and they're all sister taxa
Bright colors OR the dullest and most subtle colors possible, if that's the case
spines would probably snap
fuji isnt that distantly related to troodontids,
Now uh, on the topic of the previous and kinda dead conversation of bright colors
If this is true, and dinosaurs in general had better color vision than the blind af modern mammals, wouldn't there actually be heavier and more restrictive selective pressures on their coloration? Especially for ambush predators
Also uh, a question, if the latter is true, how realistic would be to depict theropods with extremely bright crests and other display structures? Because it came to me the idea that maybe these structures weren't really that bright, maybe just having a structure (crest, feathers, etc) was enough for social signaling
First point is interesting and makes sense to me
Second point is kinda flip-floppy because if it's restricted to a samll area (crests), it might not be horribly detrimental
Herbivores do fine nowadays with bright colors (particularly if only the males have them, or only during the breeding season), but yes ambush predators might have been even more restricted than they are today, given their prey could see them more easily
Teratorns would likely have had Syrinxes still, unlike modern vultures, right?
Also, i don't know how possible it is but i haven't seen people talking about UV colors
Dinosaurs certainly saw them, and likely used them for display
Kinda hard to talk about them when we humans can't see them though
yeah well I can see them.
if you stare at the sun for long enough you gain the ability to se UV color
yeah I got it during the eclipse last month
They're not overly close to them genetically AFAIK
Actually I suppose a large part of the question is why do NW vultures lack a syrinx
Maybe? But just entirely losing your voice organ is a pretty huge thing
Probably, I just have yet to see much useful documentation into it
They are. They were competent Scavengers, but far more predatory than a vulture or condor
Them being primarily predators is supported by their bill structure yes. It doesn’t mean they didn’t scavenge, eagles readily scavenge themselves, but them being just another vulture clade isn’t apt.
I'm designing mine somewhere between Secretary Birds, Caracaras, and Condors
Modern reconstructions to basically had them caracara esc just more robust
The biggest difference is the fact they're so huge they could barely take off
I do find it interesting how the largest Teratorns are similar in function to the largest pterosaurs, terrestrial predators specialized for long distance soaring
In all seriousness, those wings would give them some pretty solid control on the ground, wouldn't it?
A flap here or there for extra mobility, or to smack prey real hard (like a Goose but not)
Terrestrial stalking is pretty much the only hunting style that works regardless of how big a flying animal is, catching your prey from the air or in trees becomes increasingly difficult the bigger you are
Fair point. But scavenging is still an effective lifestyle, especially at larger sizes
I do think scavenging was a pretty major part of teratorns' diets. I can't really see them being agile or fast enough to reliably chase down terrestrial prey all the time
Especially with the likes of larger Phorusrhacids in the same environment
I'd like to see a study to test how much grip strength they had at some point
The average size (that we can discern rn) being ~2 tons lighter than the average rex + we have a lot of Edmonto skeletons, but only a handful of "mega-Edmontos"
Nah, Edmonto had laser eyes to defeat any Tyrannosaurus it came across
Edmontosaurus when T. rex
You can decide what that means 
It means it's pummeling that dumb biped like a champ 💪
But Gualicho, what if bull Edmonto in musth with short person syndrome, surely it would win 
The cunning Edmontosaurus...
Strong and inteligent, not like dumb Rex
Is bro a troll
It's not like its descendants survived the extinction or something 🤥
Y'all, it's legit an obvious joke exactly like the ones we pull regularly
I mean Idc, I find it funny
No need to get your buns in a bunch
That doesn't mean anything
Charonosaurus Americanis
Yeah, grow some meat on your bones dude
give me one thing that is differant between charono and para pysically
Considering ceratopsians are essentially absent from Asia despite being quite prolific in NA
One is know from more than one species
Oh my god, no-one cares about specifics, it is very clear what I mean
Ironic how Charono survived till the KPG but Para is more popular
sinoceratops 🤓
I said essentially, not absent completely 
One could argue the same for Spino's popularity pre-2014
But things like Troodon were quite popular, so its strange
North American fauna 🤢
troodon only got popular because it swallowed stenonychosaurus for a couple decades
Also speaking on this: I don't think people actually comprehend how amazing the JP3 Spino was at the time considering a few years before that, it was still "Allosaurus with a sail" (maybe even during production)
wait no is charono actually valid? i cant find a reason to why its separate from para
Which I did verify as I found a ~1990 poster of Spino being sailed Allosaurus
Unfortunately, it was a DA post and I have 0 hope of finding it again lmao
Parasaurolophini isn’t that stable
THE LOST WORLD JURASSIC PARK
Trug, didn't think of that lmao
Offtopic but this figure goes for like 170$
I wonder how this could be so expensive
Question, what's the current consensus or hypothesis on the function of the tail whip of diplodocoids?
Defense and possibly communication
The whip bit of the tail? Wouldn't it snap?
If they swung it at max power, yes it would atomize itself
But animals can regulate their bodies so it's likely they would stop before it hit such speeds
No, it's from a diplodocid fossil (Maybe Kaatedocus) that has a row of spines on it
@white matrix you seen this one
I believe so
Randomdino did a diagram of it
Ablooga
Now uh, another question, is there a reason why lacrimal crests (or similar structures) are so common and similar in large theropods?
Like, yeah, they wanted ladies, but why such similar structures? Is it possible that there was a practical purpose for them besides display?
Like, idk, just as an example, maybe some could be analogous to modern day raptor's brow ridges? Something like that
Boooo
I love my North American fauna, genuinely my favorite in this world
Nah, i mean yeah, it would be if it wasn't so overrepresented
So, north american extinct fauna 🤢
hey we’ve still got alligators and snapping turtles, that counts for something
South american and asian extinct fauna is the best
Clearly you’ve not seen (insert continent)‘s extinct fauna. Way more interesting than (other continent)
All continents have equally based extinct fauna. Except Antarctica, who has like 5 animals
"How many penguins do you want?"
what about the 20 ton bipedal ankylosaurs that we are going to discover next year?
Cringe, yes, but such statements should be made since north american paleofauna is so overrepresented, even PhP has an entire episode called "North America"
Don't ask why I just have this as a jpeg
Why do you have this as a jpeg
Average Gondwana thyreophoran
Im back with more question
What are some good paleo channels yall would recommend im subscribed to a few that I believe are reputable but Im always looking to expand on that
I think the biggest one I can name is Ben G thomas
Alternatively what are some other great sources on paleo news in general?
Could Incisivosaurus Climb trees? If not were there any oviraptorisaurians that could ?
whats the most preserved trodon fossil??
my mama says i have a good speaking voice so i would be a good news delivery source on deenosurs
Were Megaraptorans Neovenatorans or tyrannosauroids?
Charcharodontosaurus and it's relatives are so underrated
Considering how much attention they get when they’re all physically identical I disagree lol
Tyrannosauroids for both scientific and aesthetic reasons 
Side note. Megaraptors that ain’t illustrated as Tyrannosauroids are ugly 
Carcharodontosaurs don't get appreciated enough for the fact that the entire damn family reached sizes comparable to Tyrannosaurus
They're all identical and they're all huge except for same basal members
Also don't get appreciated because some of them are only mentioned for comparisons with Tyrannosaurus
not true!
Besided PNSO who has the most accurate dinosaurs?
nothings