#paleontology
1 messages · Page 93 of 1
The file name 😭
Is this metri?
Only reason why I think. Cera* wins against metri is because it has a more stronger bite and more armor, and also has horns on is head that could possibly be a weapon like a headbutt or something. And also is t more robust then metri?
Cerato is not a robust theropod. It looks it from the side but it’s hella thin headon lol.
cerato's crests were too delicate to be used as a weapon
I literally
Metri is just straight up bigger and I think it’s that simple. Cerato has the bigger teeth, and is the only theropod with prominent osteoderms, but idk if that’d make it suddenly have a serious advantage or anything.
Eh
to quote Unaturalhistorychannel, size is the single greatest determining factor in who wins a confrontation in nature
- the osteoderms are a singular row on the midline of the back, they ain't protecting anything 😭
There are actually other osteoderms actually, we just don’t know where they go on the body tmk. Outside of the fact that they exist.
erm, are you not familiar with how MMO armour works???
So is alio bigger than cera?
I know there are, but it is a singular osteoderm that cannot be assigned to the back. There is nothing indicating that it would be any more extensive
Yesnt. Speculative adult size is meh.
So therefore if metri is bigger, it’ll be more bulkier and robust?
I mean not exactly? Both aren’t really exceptionally robust/gracile compared to the other. Metri’s just bigger.
Hm
Considering Cerato looks like this, I feel there's a decent chance Metri is more robust
Fair, I just dunno the details.
Did metri have a stronger bite then?
I did not know Cerato was a paper mario character
We don’t have metri’s skull to get a bite force from
Did it have any competition?
Caseoh
Nah fr tho, did metri rival anything?
The only other theropod found from the time and area is Eusteptospondylus, which is only known from young remains.
I love RJ Palmer ❤️
He’s also based because he draws MH
Metri bigger than eustep?
Didn't he also work on concept art for the live action Pokémon movie or am I thinking of someone else
Probably but that’s my opinion. We can’t really know.
0.55 short tons💀
Is this another Jack Horner situation
We all agree Godzilla would be in ceratosauria, but where would Shimo be?
We do?
big armed abelisaur ❤️🔥
Shimo would probably be a Rauisuchian IMO
cough cough Trey the Explainer cough cough
Oh
Oh
The Majunga mod should have a claw attack
Speaking of him, what y’all think of Tray?
I think it also should be remembered Godzilla is a 300+ foot tall radioactive kaiju who eats radiation like it’s a smoothie
There are multiple different ways to interpret him and his ancestry
Honestly could not care, they’re out of the sci-comm role for dinosaurs last I checked, so I don’t need to concern myself with it 
Hot take: Godzilla isn’t a dinosaur. He’s a member of Pseudosuchia
Gojis og inspo being Trex, iguanadon, and stego 
scaling up from sinraptor they're both like just over 10kN with cera just edging out metri
but that's largely speculative because yeah lack of metri skull
Common Carcha W with its Bite Force
Is sinraptor bigger than both of them?
yeah
Bigger than metri and cera?
yup
How much does it weigh?
hey
dongi's type is like 1.6-1.9t depending on what you scale with
Metri is 1.2t & cerato is 1t
granted you could could scale both marginally larger than that but yeah the two are pretty comprable at the largest
Is sinoraptor taller than both?
sinraptor's larger than metri yeah
Bite force?
Yowza Cera bit hard for it's size
yeah its like 3/4ths that of something like das but still pretty impressive given its only a bit over a ton
morrison hyena ig
I'm asking not to scrutinize, just out of curiosity where you got your sourcing for BYUVP's size estimate. I've been looking all over for information but its not been described yet
That doesn't tell me where you got the size estimate from
"Most I know are in support of a digitigrade position, or have said that digitigrade is more likely but more analysis is needed to say for certain... but regardless here are the articles I was referencing if you wanted to read (yeah realising this is slightly more paleochat than modding)
https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ar.22863
https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ar.24298
https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/62/5/1281/6590043"
This was in modding, I did some brief reading especially for specific areas of interest. I may have missed it so I'll read again, but I didn't see any real mention to poposaurus gracilis's ankle as well as it's pillar based hip structure both which would be important for determining locomotion.
maybe google idk
theropod database has an 81cm skull measurement
Did they describe the cranium yet?
I remember hearing about dinosaur database good times
afaik no
Okay, thanks for answering me. Sorry to bother you w/ pings. Im just trying to figure out where the measurement is sourced from because if it isn't described yet, I don't know where the theropod database is getting their information. They didn't list it in references
It was a GDI done by TheToxicMidget
GDI, meaning graphic double integration, is essentially a program that calculates the volume of a given animal given the right neutral density and frame of reference (skeletal at multiple angles or a 3D model) to determine the mass. It's currently the most reliable method of finding body mass in dinosaurs.
Oh yeah, I understand that bit. I was just looking for the specific document that said it. Much appreciated
iirc i think i might've seen a length given for a cast somewhere on the internet (i'll see if i can find it) at one point but take that with the lightest grain of salt imaginable
shame its still not described yet though
I know. Been 30+ years. I was just excited when I saw a size estimate and wanted to ask about the accuracy/where the information came from becasue I've been looking and silently hoping someday soon more information would be published and described for us
it'd be nice if it showed up in that upcoming cera ontogeny paper
Oh? Upcoming?
from svp 2023
supposedly examines a few adult specimens
I'm not sure what do you mean? These papers directly address the likelihood of digitigrade vs plantigrade posture in Poposaurus (admittedly some in more depth than others) and aside from the first one I linked which is more focused on ichnological evidence, do talk about lines of evidence from both the hip and ankle joints:
okay, I will begin my searching. Much thanks ❤️
I cant believe Rhamphorhynchus means Beaksnout ._.
What else you thought it was
That's exactly what I looked up yesterday lol. I didn't know what it meant, hence looking it up, and it has the failure of a name xD Beaksnout
Honestly, the guy who named it was a genius
I swear God knows he had to nerff titanoceratops cause looking back only thing stopping it was it's downwards horns 💀😂
wuddaheeeeeel
It's all fun and games until you realize "Fredicthys murzodont" means "Fred fish banana teeth"
barinasuchus vs fallout yao guai
Huh
wow you used Eriklo from the paper that invluded a Juvie stego biteforce but didnt include the juvie stego :(
Stegosoros hate will not be tolerated Scanova!
There are several publications about Poposaurus posterior limb and girdle though
Isn’t alio stronger? How much does qianzho weighs at adult size?
they have the exact same adult size estimates
Yeah I just picked Qia because it’s more based
qianzhousaurus is larger and more mature than either alioramus specimen

the animal that wins is the one that doesn't die from infection after a fight. so, neither. can we talk about important topics yet
animal vs. animal. floods the chat meant to discuss serious paleontology topics with useless "who wins" about dead animals
^
Kewl
oh man i sure cant choose between the large animals with a =< 200kg difference between them
Alio we discovered is still considered a bby
Y’all. Stegosaurus vs Cretaceous flowering plants who wins 
Me with no difficulty

Spinosaurus is the largest carnivorous dinosaur 🪝
mods crush his skull
The chicken in my backyard:
i am the largest theropod dinosaur
Albertosaurus sarcophagus is cooler than carnotaurus
Facts
is this basically just general discussion ? as in we can talk abt anything about pot? Still new to this server :p
Gorgosaurus sarcophagus is cooler than both
And @north forum #path-of-titans is the gen chat
ok ty
if you could merge two genuses to make a hybrid what would they be
i am new as well
@north forum @daring forge This is the paleo chat channel. As in, this is for scientific discussion on the actual long dead animals. This is not the place for tier lists or "who would win in a fight" or fictional hybrids that wouldn't have ever existed.
Gorgosaurus and Albertosaurus are real animals...? And they're sister taxa (iirc) thus making them a target for lumping
Due to this, we would be combining the names (Albertosaurus libratus), but people can ask which name sounds better (Gorgosaurus sarcophagus)
ok i am really sorry
You're good, I dunno why tapping's getting on your case >.>
Ah sorry didn't scroll up. Yeah i know they're real. On mobile rn
I see
I am deeply sorry for misinterpreting the situation.
hey friends, im struggling to find a good reconstruction and size for Beishanlong, lotta variety in how it's depicted (standard deinocheirid, more ornithomimid or a secret 3rd thing??) so if any insight could be provided i'd appreciate it :]
Nah Albertosaurus is still cooler
Name wise or dino wise? Gorgo has the cooler name, alberto is the cooler dino
what
alberto is better than gorgo this is fact
alberto has a dinky tail and a boring name 
whenever you nerds are done debating which is better, ping me if you've got any help to offer
Carcharodontosaurids by size:
Giganotosaurus: 12,8-13,5m and 9-10t
Carcharodontosaurus: 12,4m and 8,2-8,4t
Mapusaurus, 12,7m and 7,9t
Tyrannotitan: 12m and 7,5t
Acro: 11,7m and 5,5-6t
Meraxes, 11,2-11,6m and 5,5t
Sauroniops: 10,5m and 4t
Veterupristusaurus, Siamraptor, Eocarcharia and Kelmayisaurus 9m and 2-3t
Romanian carcharodontosaurid: 6-7m and 800kg-1t ?
Concavenator, Lusovenator and Shaochilong 6m and 700kg
Lajasvenator: 4,5m and 400- 500 kg
Did I missed any of them?
I didn't mentioned Taurovenator because, most likely, is just a juvenile Mapusaurus, and I'm not sure what exactly Siats and Chilantaisaurus are...
700 kg conca
I've only seen it estimated at 650kg
oh, thought it was like 600. not as drastic as i thought, nvm
PoT's Conca is such of a disgrace
WHy 45s
Is the semi aquatic Natovenator/Halszkaraptor theory still accurate? I’ve seen people go back and forth on whether they would be semi aquatic or not but they seem to have too many adaptations to not at least spend some time in water.
The issues with it is a combination of Halszkaraptor’s environment being an odd place for an aquatic animal to be (The desert) and the original author is kinda biased. There’s probably other issues as well I can’t recall. It and Spino are the two closest ones to proper semi-aquatic non-avian dinosaurs and they’re mad controversial cause of it. We dunno right now.
oh min gode
don't act all surprised
oh sorry
omin gonde*
oh lmao
i think the beclespinax is the best
I think the beclespinax is the worst
y
The name is Altispinax. Becklespinax became invalid nearly a decade ago.
This guy?


but also when people call pteranodons pteradactyls
OH GOD YES. It makes my blood boil. I start tweaking when I hear people call Mesozoic marine reptiles: “Sea dinosaurs” too. It could just be me but what (outside of the fact they are both reptilian in appearance) would make one believe that they’re dinosaurs??? THEY DON’T EVEN LOOK SIMILAR 😭😭😭😭
same with pterosaurs being called flying dinosaurs
I hear it when I go to museums occasionally and I just look at them like this:
same
Why what?
when people call marine reptiles and pterosaurs sea and flying dinosaurs
The message cooldown
am i the only one who hates the cooldown
12.7m and around 8.4 tons for the holotype of giga and 9.9-10.1tons for the 13.5m lad ( tho i don't think its that big ) the rest seems fine tho iirc TTT is about 11.6m and 7 tons if you scale it using randoms carch
gorgo also has a dinky tail
i joined 4 hours ago so im new
Lets not pretend Gorgo's proportions are as goofy as alberto's now

Random did also save it from having "jacked up looking skull" syndrome
Alberto's only goofy because someone beat its skull in with hammers
Otherwise it's got this 90s racehorse tyrannosaur energy that's both cool and scary
Gorgo skull peak dinosaur skull
Gorgo's skull on Alberto's body would be the perfect organism
peak animal

Heh.....disagree, friend. The perfect organism already exists, and its Gorgo's skull on Gorgo's body.
Blud is ecologically indistinguishable from Daspletosaurus 😔
Show him what a real dilo looks like
done he is shocked
i think the jp one will get eaten by the real one if they ever meet
Good, daspletosaurus is also cool 😎
It's das, but better
give him the longer legs and they would match pretty well
one could say they would look the same XD ( minus albertos long pubis )
I mean ya, that's what I mean. Stupid long leg + short tail = goober
wat horrid animals
Based*
im with blub the daspetosaurus is very cool
wrong chat, and there isn't one and won't be one
Albertosaurinae is where Tyrannosauridae peaked.
albertosaurinae and allosauridae fighting over who's the most pointless theropod clade beggining wil "al-"
Pointless? I will have you know that albertosaurus is the best dinosaur to ever roam this planet...
Boy oh boy where do I even begin. Albertosaurus... honey, my pookie bear. I have loved you ever since I first laid eyes on you. The way you dominate the prehistoric landscape and strike fear into the eyes of lesser dinosaurs. Your graceful movements as you hunt and your powerful jaws in action. I would do anything for you. I wish it were possible to freeze time so I would never have to witness your extinction. You had a rough start in the Cretaceous period, but you never gave up hope. You are even amazing in your ecosystem, a great leader and protector, sometimes I even call you father of the Cretaceous. I forever dread and weep, thinking of the day when your species will one day fade away. I would sacrifice my own existence if it were the only thing that could ensure your survival. You have given me so much awe and wonder over the eons. I remember when your species first emerged, and it's like my heart burst with excitement. But a tear still fell from my eye when I witnessed the decline of your population, because deep down, my majestic predator deserved better. I just wanted you to thrive. Then alas, you did, my mighty dinosaur came back from the brink and I rejoiced. The Late Cretaceous was a hard time for us, but in your resilience, you made history happen. You survived extinction events and I couldn't believe it. I was marveling, in awe even, and I heard my majestic leader roar these words, "CRETACEOUS ERA, THIS IS FOR YOU!" Not only have you changed the ecosystem and the world forever, but you've eternally changed my perception of time. And now your species is getting older, but still the apex predator, my apex predator. I love you pookie bear, my majestic ruler, Albertosaurus.

Hi lads, I build Avial animatronic models of extinct species, and looking for guidance on what to make as my next model. Namely I am considering great yi qi, do you think it could fly actually, or exist actually and is not a a total misinterpretation, and is there are picture where it shows to be having large enough functional wings?
Damn, we have to put you in the octagon with the strongest glazers in history, allosaurus fans
This….deserves an award
We have to put you non albertosaurus fan in a zoo
Theri is the panda of theropods, until we meet again.
As in design-wise or specimen-wise? Cause one is so far ahead of the other, it's not even a comparison
not comparing em, but imma be fr, i mostly know about Broken Jaw
big al: who you callin pinhead?
broken jaw by far one of the first reasons i started liking dinosaurs
what do you guys opinion about yi qi.... is it actual?
Based birdbug pfp
It could fly
New copypasta just dropped
AMNH 680 cooler than both
STRN is one of the best paleoartsit in my opinion and has Monquriasaurus peice shows
How big was deinonychus? I feel like it's really small in game
3.5 meters 100 kg
So about leopard size?
is this basilosaurus core
Basically
Gorgo>Alberto
Got it
How big are the largest tarbo and zhucheng?
…What did I just read

was gonna respond yesterday but i forgot
one sec
afaik, cisios is a decent look. Tyrannomimus is a goodbase ref, but obv bei was much bigger
types are ~11m and ~10m respectively, but there's a vert from zhuch's quarry that's also ~11m
Thanks
anyone know what the small lines are? seen theme on a few clubbed ankylosaur skeletals
i see i see. ty both for the help
Ossified tendons iirc
ossified tendons, it's the handle
Basically they make the tail stiff and rigid, in Ankylosaurs case it allows them to hit with more force. Dromaeosaurs have them too and they likely used them to assist in turning while moving quickly
right so pot anodont is just kinda snapping them then
Alberto>Gorgo
Baseball bat basically
i thought this group was about paleontology not about renovating your house
eutyrannosauria
Alectrosaurus
evening cultured gentlemen, what is the debate today
I guess we are talking about the eutyrannosauria
m
Hola
who would win, gorgosaurus or tarbosaurus
tarbo
Tarbo is larger and stronger BETTER (I like gorgo mor)
is this size chart accurate so far?, this my second time making one
Random no, it's my job, don't do it
nooooo
Ok I will say something else then
Why are they so low res
If this helps
IM A FAILURE
Tbf to you, the Cera and Ava skeletals you used are old old (and the Cera might not be denti/nasi?)
oh, i using a different ceratopsian...
The skeletal you used came up as Avaceratops under Luis Rey's blog
yehuecaceratops
Cerato is the holotype, which looks about the right size
Not using the largest specimen
Ew 
do you have the most up to date skeletals?
Furcatoceratops...
https://youtu.be/76nCpMsVftU?feature=shared this is probably the best design I have seen of smilodon
Look at the terrifying Smilodon Populator that will be hunting YOU in the upcoming game Instinction 😱This beast looks amazing and terrifying at the same time 😱
Check out our Prehistoric Kingdom Playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLalbjoLiav8_uuiHzpGWwMJEFrKN1mdG0
Become a Member, support the channel & join the Kingdom to unlock e...
Why those vertebrae look so damn stabby 💀
PK looks like it did better
Yeah instinction's Smilodon is bad. Really bad. Worse than Camp Cretaceous almost
I don’t think it’s that bad, but I’m going to roast it to hell and back cause they have the balls to call their smilodon the most accurate when it looks like THAT
To be honest, this smil is the best ❤️🔥
they have an updated one.
What is institutional
Ik 
The best Smilodon is the one we’ve yet to make
What’s the general consensus on Saurophagnax nowadays? Was it just a species of Allosaurus or was it it’s own genus?
I believe it’s own currently
^
Anyone see the nature paper on the Aptian icehouse?
This is also true for all long tailed pterosaur
which one is Sino? the smaller lighter blue one?
AFAIK the consensus is that Allosaurus was just a pretty generic body plan for the group and a lot of relatives just looked quite similar
As of now what is chilantaisaurus right now?
A tyrannosauroid?
A megaraptoran
Or a carcharodontosaurid of some kind?
Who knows
safest bet tmk is placing it just outside of carcharodontosauria? i like it as a neovenatorid bc it looks neat
carcharodontosauria includes neovenatoridae
but real ones use carcharodontosauridae (=carcharodontosauria) anyways
Implying neovenatoridae as a clade exists
fax sigmar
The larger, bluer one is sino
is this skeletal up to date?
Scott Hartman's
What creature?
The repulsive monster, Nigersaurus


What?
That’s a lot to unpack there
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niger
There really isn’t
Niger or the Niger, officially the Republic of the Niger, is a landlocked country in West Africa. It is a unitary state bordered by Libya to the northeast, Chad to the east, Nigeria to the south, Benin and Burkina Faso to the southwest, Mali to the west, and Algeria to the northwest. It covers a land area of almost 1,270,000 km2 (490,000 sq mi),...
It’s possible that there may or may not be a lot to unpack there, but agree to disagree 🥰
Least racist paleo-user
I don’t judge on skin color or ethnicity or anything like that, I judge on character and personality :> you seem pretty cool
Anyways, I’m gonna bring it up, but the fact people sleep on Nat Geo’s rex is a shame
Bro I love that design just wish it had lips (ofc it was before then)
THAT IS SO PRETTY WHAT DE HECK!!!! 😦
Wait didn’t he make a Nanotyrannus (I assume it’s a studio I forgot)
https://youtu.be/gDeRBB57ryY?si=NTQIR7YUYMtwQ3dA
Made almost a decade ago and (afaik) still holds up fairly well
Yes, there was a documentary in the same series on Nanotyrannus
All clips in this video are the property of National Geographic and I am simply using them under fair use with no violation of copyrights.
The nano is perfect
Those eyes are crazy!!! If I saw that irl I’d die from terror, but it’s so pretty too 😭
The one thing I don’t get is why they made the “nanos” go after a 8 ton rex
I love that the video starts with ''but evidence is scarce and controversial. The long and short of it is- [cuts off]''
Tbh, almost every movie above it Dino’s, the Rex gets targeted tbh 💔
Who needs narration, we’re here for the dinosaurs 
The nanos got them honey badger genes (||Jurassic fight club||)
Ok that was kind of goofy
The 3 Triceratops hit squad calmly hobbling towards the rex who just stands there waiting to get gored 😭
Clearly the T.rex was paralyzed in fear…
Fr, I’d be terrified if a bunch of Triceratops were coming after me 😂
The rex just casually survived being gored by three trikes
He’s gosh dang perdy
which is more accurate
Scott Hartman's. The one with the head down is significantly older.
oh okay, nigersaurus is alot bigger then i remember
Why. Why does everyone do this. It’s Niger. As in Niger 🇳🇪 the country. In Africa. Stop being sussy.
I know 😭 I realized that, tbh I thought it was a made up Dino, like the indoraptor from JW or something, but it’s A REAL DINO and that’s cool, it looks silly 😂
How could you not love this face?
The wierd mouth is an adaptation for grazing.
He gotta get all the nom noms he can fr
anyone have the most up to date ceratosaurus and yehueceratops skeletals?
lil fat baby
I HAVE TO REMAKE IT, NO
Looong tail
What you mean? Cause I said it's the only skeletal that exists. I'm not too sure it holds up that well general anatomy wise.
could probably use a furcato skeletal as a base to update it
or any other nasutoceratopsin ig whichever is better.
https://hellcreekenthusiasm.wordpress.com/2024/04/28/polly-wants-parsimony-on-the-cretaceous-parrot/
don’t worry about a thing
SCOUT NO LMAO 💀
They are coming for him
Isn't there a thing/study about ankylosaurs digging themselves into the ground or smth like that?
Pretty sure that was debunked
Ankylorbsaurus
I haven't heard anything debunking it
Spec Evo spherical Ankylosaur would be funny ngl
Mb then
No study, but think about it logically:
You're an ankylosaur, whose major defense is hunkering low to the ground and using your tail to beat anyone who gets close enough to death. But if you were to burrow, you're rendering that tail useless because you can't move to swing it towards your attacker.
Then there's your head. If it's on/in the ground, the resident megatheropod can just step on it and c r u n c h, there goes you.
*I think ankylosaur nostrils are also downturned which means they'd be inhaling dirt if they were burrowing
https://youtu.be/gEBLkWnUN08?t=41 Why is he digging is he stupid?
I had to get some more footage of this lizard in action!
An ankylosaur could still get stepped on even if it was just hunkered down, no?

having a nice little dugout would be a good way to prevent being flipped over though, especially if this is a behavior they do to make a bed before sleeping
Yea, but that doesn't acknowledge the 2 other points brought up (Which imo are stronger arguments)
depends on how far they dig down really on both of those
No it doesn't because any form of digging is going to prevent you from moving well enough to call it a defense
no i forgot to save it
if it can hold the weight of something stepping on it then it would be more beneficial than a chance of being flipped over
That still doesn't address the 2 other points
mfw ignoring the Ankylosaur we literally found buried in its bed
especially given the animal would be stepping onto something unstable and spikey
If you'd like to provide that rather than vaguely allude to it then that would be preferrable. But it still doesn't change
You're an ankylosaur, whose major defense is hunkering low to the ground and using your tail to beat anyone who gets close enough to death. But if you were to burrow, you're rendering that tail useless because you can't move to swing it towards your attacker.
would it be like stepping on a stone fish just without the poison and death?
I am slowly thinking that you haven't read anything beyond the point you're responding to
It was suppose to be posted like right after my post I am suffering in slow mode
can someone give me a recap on what we're discussing?
My apologies, I assumed you'd have went and looked for literature on the topic before you decided to act like an expert on it.
bro sits in one spot and can be easily tipped over, what was he thinking?
Cap'n, I'm reading this. They only present anatomical features, there does not seem to be any mention of it being what we are speaking about
But instead of sarcasm, I haven't heard a good response to this
So please do enlighten me as to what you have to offer against it. I would love to learn what you experts need to say!
Here's two paragraphs from the paper you've clearly not read on digging and adaptations Ankylosaurs have for it. Do not claim to have looked when people can very easily check themselves.
I would like a response instead of sarcasm
And I did acknowledge they discussed anatomical traits. They did not say it was direct evidence of the animal burrowing.
This is a dinosaur video game discord y'all
Chill out
If it looks like a duck and burrows like a duck it probably burrows : /
But that wouldn't make sense considering: ```You're an ankylosaur, whose major defense is hunkering low to the ground and using your tail to beat anyone who gets close enough to death. But if you were to burrow, you're rendering that tail useless because you can't move to swing it towards your attacker.
that again depends on depth of the bed
How so? Because it would only be useful if up to ~knees or upper arm, but it would also make it difficult to turn quickly because of the ridge
So you're ignoring the paper then? That points out directly that they have anatomy for digging and notes there are multiple specimens interestingly half-buried in a resting pose.
So you're ignoring the practicality of what I said? Because you have not responded directly to the argument I have proposed. As well as the fact that the resting pose could be attributed to sandstorms, no? An animal hunkering down to hide would be buried. Does Citipati burrow because of "Big Mama"?
I feel like there's a disconnect here between arguments and the keyword here is "resting pose"
Also this is very interesting (Comes from the same paper you provided)
Animals don't always act smart
They can be adapted to things that may not seem advantageous but as long as it worked. Look at Koala's, sea horses, and sloths
Ok. I bet fifty dollars that an Alderon (insert animal) will appear in the next ten to fifteen minutes. Who’s in on the bet.
No because Citipati doesn't have any clear as day adaptations to burrowing that's seen across an entire clade.
Logical action =/= the action taken
Digging may not save an Ankylosaur from a Tyrannosaurus but it might save it from anything else
The same paper also says this (Regarding the anatomical adaptations)
A lot of animal defense is just making you not worth the trouble to kill and eat them. Ankylosaurs are already pretty good at being terrible food items (mostly gut space, full of armor, deterrent club) if you kill an ankylosaur and still can't get it out of a hole after the fact you've wasted your time and energy for a meal you can't eat
No because unlike the Ankylosaurs, Citipati lacks any anatomical adaptations for digging or burrowing. Given that anatomical adaptations are there it's a pretty good indicator they can dig.
Also we're talking about them resting in shallow pits they've dug out not full on burrowing so the screenshot you have provided doesn't exactly disprove what is being suggested.
But this one does, no?
No ankylosaurs have adaptations for burrowing
Here's the paragraph immediately following, try not to cherry pick we can read the article.
Yes, I did indeed read that. But it is only one of their interpretations of the data they received. I chose to not include that because it was not being addressed. Gonna clarify even further, as in you have already said + read about this, thus I wanted to bring up other parts that had not been.
They're very bad at digging forward, or above them, or to the sides
They are however pretty good at digging below them for roots or something
It also could just be an extra option they had just for emergency situations
Just saying @strange bridge you might like this conversation
why are most of the mods gone from POT
Update decimated them also #modding
and again if they're generally found half buried in resting poses then it could be the little dugout is just for when they're sleeping, ensures its harder for them to get caught unaware and flipped over during that time.
thanks
Also onto the "making themselves hard to eat"
Animals that do this usually employ tatics that would allow them to live before the predators found out. Most of them are very vile-tasting so the predators spit them out before they are killed
Question i know this is paleo chat but I dont know where the suport ticket is but is the new updated Struthi going to be omnivore since paleontologist claimed it was?
Turtles taste pretty good and get stuck in a lot of awkward places
Yes? And I've seen alligators make meals of them lots of times. It's just no regular predators (beyond crocodilians and big cats) are capable of crunching through the shell
I think a trench would work fine as a defense for an ankylosaur, except that it would have to dig one in a predetermined spot and somehow happen to be there when a tyrannosaur attacks it
It's not going to dig itself in in .05 seconds like a horned lizard
Yes, alligators arent slaughtering them en masse though. If the strategy allows for enough to survive, even if a small percent is consumed by specialiast feeders, it works. Nature is like that
But I am unaware of turtles digging a little ditch to hide in every time
Most of the time I'm aware of, they are in open water or land. Even then, open water turtle attacks use that to their advantage and maneuver the broadside of their shell to their attacker
having funny little trenches dotted around in ankylosaur territory would be funny. I'd wonder is sand substrate could help in the time regard tho
Yes, but it would still be time that could be used pivoting around smacking the tyrannosaur's skull into fragments
Nobody says it has to be frequent.
But evidence very clearly says it at least happens sometimes.
but personally the ankylosaur bedroom seems like a plausible idea
The pivoting it can 100% do when it's asleep of course
I am unaware of where that comes in? An animal needs to sleep?
Yes and the pit would let it sleep safer
Anything is better than nothing
I guess they don't really need the trenches in the first place, since in theory they could survive off just being a painful item to touch thats also low to the ground. Look at the lizards that lash away groups of lions. Though that doesn't take away from it just using the probably softer terrain to its advantage, since that seems to be a strange trend with ankylosaurs and the environments they are recovered from.
its a lot more common than animals that 'don't' sleep
Mind you I haven't read the paper proper and just reviewing the convo thus far, but if the whole "resting pose" is anything to go off of, I would naturally infer that ankylosaurs may have created or opted for small depressions to lie in during times of rest for added protection of their undersides where I presume they are most vulnerable rather than implying they used these as full blown defensive structures
And when it is asleep, would it not be best to be in a position where as soon as you detect a threat, you can jump into defensive mode?
Vs just not being vulnerable when sleeping
Tails covered in painful bits are good for that
You can still achieve the same effect when laying down (as ankylosaurs are not light), but also be able to pivot due to your legs being free to move better
Wasn't there also evidence of Ankylosaurs being nocturnal or am I mixing up details?
Based on stuff comparing eyesight to smell and hearing
I don't know of any such thing no
local tyrannosaurs after finding sleeping ankylosaur who wasnt in a burrow:
I am fairly certain, though willing to be corrected, that the best evidence for diurnal-nocturnal behavior is through the sclerotic ring which I do not think we have any for ankylosaurs
I'll do some digging later
Though I also just realized that, minus Ankylosaurus itself, ankylosaurs do not get very big compared to the local apex predator. Imo, this would indicate that the tyrannosaur could have just dragged the corpse out of the shallow hole the ankylosaur dug, essentially its own grave
Especially if we believe most tyrannosaurs were social to some degree
That'd happen regardless of if it was in a hole or not
ah yes, while in non conscience state of mind and easily able to be filpped over, exposing my soft underside, and thus being killed by what giant theropod of the area. When i can simply bury myself into the ground, thus only my armored dorsal side is only visable on the ground.
I have addressed this
two scenarios:
Anky is asleep entirely above ground. The predator sneaks in and immediately grabs the head or arm and is able to control the situation entirely, or it can get into position to attempt a flip before the ankylosaur is awake.
Ankylosaur is asleep in a ground depression, the arms, head, and legs are either inaccessible or very difficult to get a hold of. Attempting to flip the animal is also not really an option as the theropod cannot get even close to under the animal in this situation. No good angle of attack is present other than potentially breaking one of it's two legs by stepping on something that will panic and move
That doesn't matter if the Tyrannosaur already has you in its mouth
I don't think a small ankylosaur would be easy to drag out of a hole in the ground, though honestly I do not think it would be easy to flip while asleep either
would be harder to flip in a hole though ;^>
have you tried taking the ground with it like jack horner
The real Scavengers were the Jack Horners we met along the way
Illustration
smol
I question how often flipping was actually employed as a strategy when hunting ankylosaurs, I feel like it's less dangerous for the predator to hit and run aiming at the head or the top side until it gets through
^ This as well as the fact we have an ankylosaur skull with Tarbosaurus bite marks (I don't recall if there are two though)
I mean honestly I think there's no reason against it being something they did alongside everything else
A secondary option never hurts and they did clearly like to rest in pits, based on our fossil record
There’s only the one, that being the holotype of T. teresae or whatever it is now, which also interestingly enough shows signs of healing and I think infection as well
Also I feel the sandy substrate would work against a burrowing ankylosaur, no?
Think of it as like trying to pick up a penny. On tile, it's really hard because you can't get your fingers under it. While on loose ground (sand), it's much easier because you can dig your fingers under the penny and pull
That's... not even close to comparable
I am referring to the head area, not the entire animal, hence the usage of penny because their heads are essentially that size (A joke aimed to bully ankylosaurs)
Well, it would be easier to dig an ankylosaur out of sandy substrate than out of packed earth, yes
But an ankylosaur would never be able to bury itself in harder substrates to begin with, so it's not relevant
a little bed could also help make the ankylosaur less likely to be found since it'd make the shadows under the animal much less visible. Combined with the side osteoderms and hypothetical cryptic coloration it could be a good way to avoid confrontation entirely too
It would basically just look like a rock when sleeping, especially if partially submerged
Indeed it likely could be a great way to avoid confrontation
But I am hesitant to say it would be used in active defense which is the whole discussion
If your body evolved to be pain incarnate you can probably get away with doing a lot of environmental shenanigans. Even if you're asleep, a reflexive reaction will hurt or cause injury to an attacker.
Ankylosaurs had a variety of skull shapes for niche partitioning and from Borealopelta, employed countershading (said countershading goes up very, very high on the body, highlighting the low to the ground lifestyle)
Considering what they lived with and their adaptations it's safe to say theres a pretty big margin of pressures present that could have resulted in a lot of stealthy behaviors.
it does make more sense as a kind of camouflage yeah
to be fair I've stated that I personally believe it being primarily for defense while asleep
I am afraid there was a disconnect if the intention of the original was that it would be to act as a "natural camouflage"
Not as a way to defend against an in-progress attack
Oh my god, I think they stealth-increased the slowmode. It's 50 secs now 
cough Borealopelta’s countershading might be an artefact of human caused pollution cough
The initial question was just about whether they were capable of it not whether it was used in active combat. Which is why we were all talking about the paper mentioning it resting.
Then the "burrowing" being used as camouflage during resting is not a topic that should be focused imo
... why? The guy was asking if they dug at all and you outright said no without considering the actual functionality of digging. There is no reason to not focus on the actual functional uses for digging.
🤷♂️ Lots of animals have countershading, but even if that wasnt something they have, the pressures were present for them to develop adjacent adaptations or behaviors for a stealthier lifestyle
The initial question was just about whether they were capable of it not whether it was used in active combat.
This is why
Borealo's countershading is not a predator defense anyway, the authors note that it is most effective against predators that are eye level with Borealopelta
Which is... none of its predators
To also be fair, a pit doesn't have to be as tall as the entire animal
A shallow pit, deep enough to make it harder to flip without impeding movement much might genuinely be helpful
True
I did indeed say this, but due to how short ankylosaur legs are, the depth of this pit would need to be either incredibly precise or so shallow, it's useless
Jarvis pull up the list of short legged digging animals
What we need is a burrowing Ankylosaur
Crawl in a hole and nobody is fighting you
Unless... the Borealopelta was hiding from the Albian Deinosuchus
the suggestion I've seen is basically just enough to hide the legs and belly area. Far from useless as it'd further protect those areas. especially if these are beds
I beg to differ
Which are? And do they burrow in the exact same fashion and reason as the one being discussed?
Oh my jesus, the slo-mo's 1 minute, moderators why do you insist on being bad 😭
I mean Armadillos
Pangolins
The timer set on our channels is to help aid staff members, increasing or decreasing the timer will only be updated accordingly depending on the availability of moderators and how active the said channel is. Otherwise, let's avoid mentions of the timer as this is considered off-topic. Thank you! 
IIRC digging is more dependent on whats attached at the end of the limb rather than total length of the limb
iirc short limbs are actually a selected trait for burrowing animals; moles, pigs, badgers, turtles, gators tortoise
Is there a channel or a location to provide feedback regarding the discord?
falcon i think ya blind mate they do dig
Shovels can be short or long, the mechanics of digging would not be limited from ankylosaurs
However, the issue here is most of these (minus pigs and somewhat gators) actually burrow deep into the ground. They do not use shallow holes to defend themselves
Ok nah, this is actually miserable. PoT mail bot time
erm hippos have short legs (no, I’m not suggesting that it was amphibious)
You can either use our feedback board :https://feedback.pathoftitans.com/ Or you can message our @feral crane Bot
these are the depths I've generally seen suggested (ground level would be more in line with the belly in this case while it's asleep)
Animals with both wide feet and very narrow feet can be prolific at digging too
do ankylosaurs have the claws necessary for digging like they do(nvm) (i hate this slowmode)
Server took 3 to 5 business days to censor that message
more digging lads
General chat reminder to please be polite and respectful, and do not provoke or antagonize other users, Otherwise mutes will be handed out. Refer to our #rules
These are pre-made elaborate burrows though. They are not constructed at the moment of attack.
I was making a light hearted joke about the pangolin not burrowing, wasn't referring to falcon in said message
i feel like an important thing to mention was that thing abt the nostrils falcon brought up, wouldn't they need some kind of protection for their schnozz? in regards to snorting sand and dirt
since when have we been discussing it constructing a burrow right as its being attacked?
A lot of ankylosaur facial scales were extensively armor like
Like potentially even to the eyelids from what I remember
(it was deleted because Pangolins aren't Xenarthrans, not because you swore /jk)
The whole...time? The discussion is using a hole for protection against active predation. Unless it makes a hole every single time it moves 50 feet, then it is dug during the attack
ready up borealopelta!
I feel like throughout this discussion you are the only one who has been thinking of it for immediate defence and immediate defence alone whereas everyone else has just been talking about their ability to dig in general. The thing the original question was about.
Animals do tend to try and escape to premade burrows when attacked though it's worth noting
.
It's not that they dig a new one each time they're attacked, they either dig one before going to sleep or return to an existing one every night
resting pose!
no one said they needed to be made during an attack and they can be used to escape if close by
Animals aren't video game characters they arent limited by cooldowns or whatnot
Thats a nice argument senator, but why don't you back it up with a source?
The original message that started this whole convo was just a guy asking if there was a paper talking about burrowing ankylosaurs.
Okay but is there any evidence of Stegosaurs doing this
How would that even work
even worse, they're limited by physics
unless they're cats
Nvm I give up on finding these, there is too many and the chat keeps popping down and it annoys me
Anyways, that is indeed interesting, but I have not flat out denied digging as far as I know? Nor have I said anything disregarding the original comment. I have indeed focused on the idea of active predation defense, but I have acknowledge it is capable of being used at other times
Stegosaurs are bootleg sauropods
just like Frankenstein
Stegosaurus sitting in a 2 meter deep burrow to avoid the mighty allosaurus
Don't Stegosaurs have a miserably sparse fossil record?
Idk if this is relevant or not but found this hope it helps? Nvm wint show link?
I said so here
Wait goddamnit, that wasn't it
Stegosaur digs a pit for its deeper-than-wide body to hide in and then fu[king dies the morning after because it can't get out 😔
Here we go
Please give stegosaurs fat necks and please have that chinese stegosaur not be skin slippage it would be so funny
is there an official ranking for dinosaurs considered the most rotund
Unlike this chat
- Lianingosaurus
- Tyrannosaurus
- Jack Horner
Would ankylosaurs be disqualified because they are wider than deep, thus making them flat instead of round?
I’m pretty sure that article is referring to that exact same specimen that everyone’s been talking about
But that is an over-simplification of the conclusions of the referred paper
F l a t
I cant share the link sorry wont let me i rather not share whole thing im sure that would annoy everyone 🤷♀️
why is this channel only active when the conversation's stupid
Better image
Dumb conversations foster heated arguments❤️🔥
ah good you're here I can go to sleep
for the record i don't intend on adding any productive commentary
The paper link has already been shared though? We are also already in the progress of discussing said paper (and adding our thoughts)
i want to know which dinosaur i can look at and think "woah..,.,. circle"
i shall now leave but anyway before that
everyone vs this one guy:
https://tenor.com/view/choke-funny-wwe-wrestling-gif-12039207150533197720
what the hell why is lancian here
Remember to support your local fossil traffickers
for a brief second there we had a frieren gif posted followed by "lancianidolatry is typing...." and I think that's beautiful
anyway bye
Modern birds are a good start
Didnt know that i just now seen you talking about it was curious but animals are weird we can only Speculate how dinosaurs were through Paleontology as we cant study them Im sure they were just as wild weird , chaotic and violent as modern day animals just 10x worst who knows
im the biggest fan of PoT what can i say, and i hear this is where all the cool kids hang
well you walked into one of the more idiotic convos that have happened here in weeks so whoop de doo
this is true ! welcome
Imo if the only defense being provided (now) is the whole "We'll never know" argument, the convo's over and clearly my team has won
A great battle of wits has concluded
so does anyone actually like know what's happening right now
oh! oh! Can I be good at denial??
lancian is here and I'm scared
I don't see anything being said from you people that has not been directly countered (or outright debunked)
nuff said
Amazing
burrowing ankylosaurs and how that's used to defend itself/plausibility ?? i think
Ankylosaurs were dinosaurs (checkmate)
i got that part but when did this turn into a cheesy romcom
Eh rather silly to get heated up over such things we really have No clue how dinosaurs were we can only gather data through what they ate how we " think " they acted etc and so on but still dinosaurs are awesome
yiu see, round jsur like brain. ankylosur melt brain : )
anyways the primary issue is the overlap between the supposed digging adaptations and adaptations large ornithischians who are propelled by their front legs first (i.e ankylosaurs and ceratopsians) is rather large. ankylosaurs could probbaly dig soft sediment, sure, but in the same vein a lot of animals, including us, can- and a desert animal would prob need to dig to allow more oppurtunities for water and food. however, that is not the same as burrowing, and i dont see these animals as actively making their own burrows
Not heated, just stating my opinion on what is happening? As I've noticed everyone defending burrowing (to a decent degree) ankylosaurs has vanished. Though I assume they will claim that we're just not understanding anything and we're in denial
Nvm, I'm leaving cause this slo-mode was kicked up to one minute twenty seconds
can yall just make things up and kiss already
We've been taking about little dugout beds, not full on burrows
This is so sad can we make dakotaraptor valid
Who?? 😮
im seeing very minimal rotund dinosaurs and im very disappointed in paleo-chat. WOOOOO YEAH BABY THAT'S WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT
I sent the literal rotundest of dinosaurs a bit ago
you've been countered by like 5 dif ppl about ankys digging being a thing they are able to do and possible did in creating a lil bed like spot for themselves
Was Falcon in disagreement of digging or burrowing because they’re two different things
@keen forum
poor lancian he's been dropped into pot paleo chat brainrot kicking and screaming
Its starting up again...
from what I could tell falcon it's mainly talking about using it as active defense, rather than as a bed or safe space
clearly, ankylosaurs were capable of similar burrowing(digging? sand :3) as Hexophthalma hahni
Well I'm rather wide and I dig into a hole when stressed so it checks out
But why?as in the game or as what it would do if it was living and facing a predator?
i heavily doubt that theyd be making beds for themselves. being large xeric animals means they need to be on the move, and thats a lot of sediment they need to move around in order submerge even half of their body. its one of those things that might sound neat on paper but doesnt make sense in practice. if a tarbosaur spots an ankylosaur from a distance the anks not gonna have the ability to dig itself a bed in time. im unaware its front limbs are even capable of moving of fast enough to dispel sediment the way something like an armadillo might
Birds don't make nests for defense either to be fair
A bed for sleeping is the suggestion mainly here (which would probably be pretty useful during the heat of the day to lay in cooler sediments too), in addition to obscuring outline and protecting underside while inactive
If anything for defense of the eggs themselves
ankylosaurs actually used the tail clubs to lure in a mate, clearly
Still, a slightly safer spot to sleep never hurts, even if its not useful in combat
@tough parcel
"No study, but think about it logically:
You're an ankylosaur, whose major defense is hunkering low to the ground and using your tail to beat anyone who gets close enough to death. But if you were to burrow, you're rendering that tail useless because you can't move to swing it towards your attacker.
Then there's your head. If it's on/in the ground, the resident megatheropod can just step on it and c r u n c h, there goes you.
*I think ankylosaur nostrils are also downturned which means they'd be inhaling dirt if they were burrowing"
meanwhile there are a few studies about them digging and the question was asked about them digging into the ground something that these papers kinda agreed on and pointed too
i mean these animals would prob just be like any other animal and during the day just hang around and take it slow if it was getting really hot. again, theres nothing that points to bedding/burrowing that cant partially or wholly be explained by just how the ankylosaur forelimb fundamentally works. and youd still prob need to be moving around a little
I know tortoise make burrows for staying cool or hibernation same for turtle species but never know dont think it would use it for defence but like mabye do a huffle shuffle and flop down
The conversation has...evolved? I am unsure why you are focusing on the single starting message when there are, at this point, probably hundreds of messages of discussion afterwards
given the clubs might have (initially) appeared for combat between two individual ankylosaurs, not a terrible suggestion
New discussion: Spinosaurus
Bipedal, Tripedal, or Quadropedal
it's midnight and im getting silly
this conversation has gone down a different path... a path of titanic proportions... a path... of titans
I think Spinosaurus is dead
who up titanicing they paths
Its funny though
Titanic...? 
tail isn't the new terrifying length (+30-40 more vertebra) , which makes bipedal work as it actually puts the CoM in the right spot for standing like any other theropod
Quintapedal Spinosaurus
I figured it out
this channel is indeed a sinking ship
Some speculate that titantic wasnt titanic but thats not paleo talk so nvm
It happened in the past and is therefore paleo (real)
the paper did mention quite afew ankylosaurs found in resting postures that are half buried. Might be a notable thing towards the conversation of beds or not
Ah yes, the first clade ever to evolve digging to just make beds
the issue is if the interpretation that they (presumably pinacosaurus, but possibly more specimens) died in a sandstorm is correct there is a much more obvious reason why they may be half buried lol
That is legit what I said 😭
As well as the fact that the resting pose could be attributed to sandstorms, no? An animal hunkering down to hide would be buried
In a perfect world spino tail drags and has a goose posture
guess that'd be the thing of 'more study required' to see if it looks like they were just buried or if the half they were initially under was more dugout and then buried rest of the way by a later sandstorm
though that may be hard to determine ||this timer is killing me||
Thoughts on the Desmatosuchus i know its not a dinosaur but a aetosaur but looks intresting
Food
Desmato is cool but Paratypothorax is a much better Aetosaur
Weird question but do any accredited paleontologists talk in these channels
Alderon Lorikeet
I know but would be fun to play either one i think the Paratypothorax is smaller right correct me if im wrong
Thoughts on ant eater pinacosaurus
oh i misspoke it's just Typothorax that's the best one (aslo IIRC there may eb larger specimens of this lad)
Ohh thats cool! Wow its rather round but cute
Oh word, mad respect if so
I was just going to ask if there are any good visual references for ankylosaur trackways. Something clear and above 50 pixels in resolution ideally
PD no, i fear the sail man
what are some mesozoic formations that were most defiently deserts?
Djadokthta, Kayenta, and Candeleros come to mind
was the negmet formation a desert or a flood plain, well, not flood plain but not how its most commonly depicted
Nemegt was a temperate fluvial valley. Largely open plains with wetlands surrounded by mountains. The Gobi Desert (and Djadoktha with it) were contemporary with it to the west.
i remember falcon saying it could've snowed there if my memory from last year serves correct? do i believe that? ehhh, maybe not
Probably not commonly but it did snow yeah. It was temperate environment with the 4 seasons.
i was looking at the wiki page for the kayenta formation to see what fuana lived there and it said scelido was a controversial thyreophoran, i have not heard of any debates or controversy surrounding it ToT
i think its scelidosaurus' presence in kayenta and not the taxon itself that is controversial
oh okay, could the fossil evidence of it being there just be a different species?
It's just osteoderms. They're probably not scelido at all. A relative probably.
i know this might be a dumb question but why were the creatures in Moreno Hill Formation so small?
okay not tiny, but quiet small compared to species from that time
the real vegan crocodile
We found who pitched the Quetz-rex segment (Witton's new piece)
the woke mob...
the sun article
sir david attenborough's bbc1 dinosaur show presents softer woke version of the t-rex
I woke up to see this in my feed and I almost decided to go back to sleep
My 2 favorite weasels
Not gonna even mention all the temporal anomalies in this tree like Amphicyon being derived from an animal that didn't even evolve until well after it went extinct
Why is Homotherium classified as a canid 💀
Hm ping?
what word in that is not allowed???? there was literally nothing bad or even a swear in that i think the censor is broken LMAO
anyways, this makes way more sense than rex being driven off by quetz tbf, just scavengers harassing a predator for the good bits
Dang. Now I want this is a poster. That’d be sick….
u and me both
Hey everyone, quick question: what is the oldest boidae, or at least the oldest snake capable of constriction ? Thx a lot !
Peters
dont you see with the resemblance with dogs
this? this? this? this? this? or this?
the first and second one are good, the rest are outdated versions of the same works
Nerf allo
Wrong chat
Nah Nerf if, go back in time and nerf it.
whats the most recent/accurate Ceratosaur reconstruction
What are those weird holes always shown on the side of tullimonstrum?
Ah yes, my favorite phylogenetic group: South Americans
At this point, I am convinced Peters is just playing a prank on paleontology
Gills
I mean
We have Laurasatheria or whatever don't we? South American mammals isn't a super weird catagory
But that isn't the same as "weasel" or "canid"
It literally just says "South American" which, without the chart right next to it, tells you nothing about the animals relation to one another.
Not that the chart does its job well anyway seeing as it places homotherium as a canid
The question is, who is the scavenger in this scenario.
Mabye its a Lion and Hyena type of thing , both scavenge and steal food from eachother?
They seem so much small in game lol
Might just be my general familiarity with their sizes, but I never got that impression personally
PoT cera actually feels like a medium carnivore (unlike yknow)
y'all, can i say something controversial
Never we hate opinions/j
whats a paleotology/paleotology community opinion that will have you like this?
Life On Our Planet wasn't that bad
oh, why do people think its bad?
A combination of things mainly some animals not being all that accurate but I at least enjoyed it
It was mid.
do you have any opinions you wanna share
People have gone too far with the “hadrosaurs aren’t defenseless” thing and now people think that an adult edmontosaurus would be “too dangerous” for an adult tyrannosaurus to hunt. Even though edmontosaurus lacks weaponry to combat a similar size animal.
it wouldnt say it lacks weaponary, but yeah, i can see where your coming from
When you're as big as an Edmontosaurus, you are the weaponry
also your herd mates being with you are also weaponary as they can be a deterient
Remember when someone asked why Parasaurolophus would fight an Allosaurus in regards to Para in a certain other game? You know despite Para being several times bigger than Allo
Hadrosaurs and ceratopsids are prey animals in their ecosystem. It's as simple as that. They were getting eaten a lot. Doesn't mean they were worthless but they were also dying a lot. That's the reality of things.
Indeed
The issue is that it’s not a sauropod. It doesn’t completely dwarf tyrannosaurus the same way argentinosaurus dwarfs a single Mapusaurus.
It lacks weaponry compared to the likes of Ankylosaurus, Torosaurus, and Triceratops
i mean, its dwarfs majority of the tyrannosaurs seeing how trex could range from 5 tons to 10 ( i think, i haven talked paleo since 2023.... )
The average edmontosaurus is ~6t, and I would comfortably bet on a 5t Rex over a 6t hadrosaur
Now I'm curious what's realistically the average size for an adult Rex with things like early deaths in mind
can i ask a question
would stegosaurids have filled the prey item niche in their ecosystem like ceratopsians did but just for the jurassic?
Most predators are capable of handling prey up to double their size if they really want to, and even the largest edmontosaurs were in that ballpark.
Yeah
Me when
Stegosaurs were almost certainly preyed on by various theropod dinosaurs, but I'd bet on them being unironically one of the most dangerous herbivores next to giant sauropods.
Stegosaurus specifically, probably no, it was rather formidable and not as abundant as other, easier prey in the Morrison such as ornithopods and juvenile sauropods.
For other stegosaurids idk
Their thagomizers are unironically the most dangerous weapon ever conceived by a herbivorous dinosaur, especially stegosaurus's.
Adult rex? ~7-8 tons
My general rule of thumb as far as animals go is that everything can be eaten at some point in its life. Doesn't matter if you're a carnivore, herbivore, omnivore, etc
the reason i asked this question was because you left out Thyreophora, so i was wondering it stegosaurids, nodasaurids and ankylosaurids would fall into your common prey item category?
Excluding like… adult giant titanosaurs after the extinction of carcharodontosauridae
No those can be eaten as younglings
Oh I thought you meant at any point in their life lmao
Hmm, it depends. Ankylosaurs seemed to never really be a staple diet for large theropod dinosaurs, even if they were still taken. In the Morrison formation, the most common non-sauropod herbivores were camptosaurus and stegosaurus. I'd imagine the primary diet of most large Morrison theropods was camptosaurus and the plentiful young of the various giants.
also, would it be okay if you could elaborate why you think the thagamizer is the greatest precieved weapon option a herbivore has evolved? because i feel like a ankylosaurs tail club could give it competetion for that title
The issue is ankylosaur fossils are very few and far between with dietary studies on the resident tyrannosaurs being even worse
The only study I can think of is the Tarbo one showing ankylosaurs were a fairly common prey item with one individual having a taste for em
You can survive a broken leg in the right circumstances. You aren't surviving being impaled by a 3-foot spike in the torso and chest cavity.
i think the greatest herbivore weapon would be the devestating therizinosaurus claw
Easy, it's a set of big spikes on a body part far from the vitals so can be swung around with little worry to self harm
tail weaponry in general is extraordinarily effective, though the thagomizer has greater range, more points of contact, and can still go straight through bone as seen by some allosaurus fossils
The tarbosaur is impaled instantly…
ooh okay, but wouldnt the same apply to getting impaled by a ceratopsians horns or a claw swipe by a therinosaurid?
A stegosaurus's thagomizers could be lethal to even the giant sauropods if they strike the right area, let alone its predators.
though triceratops’ horns are also up there in terms of lethal herbivorous dinosaur weaponry
Perfectly positioned to gore contemporary theropod predators with insane musculature to back it up.
It really does beg the question of why clubs and thagomizers went out of style
did clubs ever really go out of style
I would give it to triceratops if current evidence didn't point to tyrannosaurus not being as regularly killed by them as many fans try to say. Also, therizinosaurus's claws, while still probably were used defensively, were not great defensive weapons. They were primarily for display.
In dinosaurs or animals in general?
Glyptodonts had tail clubs
i mean, theres still tail weaponary, just look at whales, im pretty sure a sperm whales tail could decapitate you, i heard that from a youtube video so trust
In general
granted a sperm whale is also somewhat larger than a person
A whale tail isn’t really a club though, just a byproduct of being massive
That’s just the result of outweighing everything by a factor of 200
Glyptodont tail clubs weren't really for predators, more for each other. Just hunkering down for glyptodonts was enough of a defense.
Understatement of the century
oh, then why couldnt the same be said about a sauropods tail?
What
They don’t have tail clubs aside from Shunosaurus
well i mean, i feel like getting hit by a sauropods tail would probably be lethal to alot of things
Yes some animals still use their tails but they don't typically have clubs or thagomizers nowadays
Yes, I do not think that was ever denied?
actually i denied it pay attention
I mean yeah but that really stretches what we mean at this point. If you want to be technical a sauropod's mass is one of the most dangerous things on Earth lol.
right up there with sharks and leaded paint
The feeble Mapusaurus when the Argentinosaurus elbow drop
Sauropod tails weren't evolved specifically for anti-predator defense. They are what they are haha.
They’re counterbalances for the gigantic neck
explain this mr smarty pants
Bro missed the memo, put his points into the wrong place
His neck has the density of tungsten and therefore requires the large tail
The black hole sauropod
if you could cook and eat one prehestoric creature, what creature would it be and how would you do it?
actually this reminds of that guy in ornithischia last week saying that brachytrachelopan had no predators because the almost nonexistant theropod material from its formation was smaller than it
Any dromaeosaur, fried like chicken
I feel like a lot of the smaller theropods might've just relied on still being chunky and dense cover.
would that make them tasty
Kinda like how tapirs deal with jaguars. They don't really fight and more just bolt and dare the predator to stop them as they crash through trees and tons of hard foliage.
a tapir in musth however....
Truly a fool, clearly he wasn’t aware the theropod hunted in packs of 200, akin to the fearsome Allosaurus….
I can't yo
Huh
Imagine seeing a small ceratopsian barreling through trees on a monday morning
The survival of nigersaurus is truly one of paleontology’s greatest mysteries :skrunkle_side_smile:
skrunkle_side_smile
it kinda isnt
tbf idek either
im pretty sure this thing is fat
The repulsive Nigersaurus, just as Larramendi described
Anyways what on God's green earth is this
Poor thing lived with a kaiju
It’s a tiny sauropod with absolutely 0 way of defending itself from any of the three large contemporary predators, nor is it at all possible for it to outrun them
what if they just breed a bunch and thats how they survive, just breeding alot and reproducing alot
Usually a herbivore can at least do one of those things to some degree
So we just pretending it didn't almost certainly live in herds?
sarcosuchus when the nigersaurus walks away from the water
is good imo with all of the other time periods, except the mesozoic
That’s my theory
you see sarchosuchus, actually transformed into, sarcosaurus, to go hunt them down
Eocarcharia and Suchomimus
sadly sarcosaurus is tiny and would be slaughtered
attack on nigersaurus
However, its speed and agility…
The Guanlong was an impressive predator because it simply used Great Unmasking to become a Tyrannosaurus to hunt
anyways i wouldn't say nigersaurus is too much more of a mystery than most of the other rebbachisaurs
okay but why are we question nigersaurus when we should be questioning how the hell the sauropod smaller then magysaurus survived with carnotorus
I mean we do
It’s just everyone forgot about it in a sum total of 3 days
it was bigger than magyarosaurus for one
it was?
its like 2.5-3t or something around that yeah
I'm pretty sure we've already gone over how Nigersaurus survived just fine in its environment
well, not everyone here was present for that conversation, no?
Yeah. Just seems funny to me that Nigersaurus lived with one of the largest macropredatory Pseudosuchians ever (which was also probably pretty common, sarco is one of the more abundant elrhaz megafauna iirc). And Nigersaurus is just a funny looking guy who probably used herding and fast reproduction to survive (at least imo)
when have sauropods ever been smaller than their predators before 
you can live in one formation, pick one
hell creek formation
morisson formation
do i get a house
Wait why is Frieren being used for size here
you get a sleeping bag
@tough parcel are we able to ping lancian here
was a stegosaurids thagamizers bone, ivory or whatever fingernails are made out of?
I'd imagine bone with a layer of keratin on top
🤩
Bone with a layer of keratin atop. Ivory is unlikely since that's almost exclusively a probosicidean thing. Like how antlers only exist in cervidae
Internets favorite dinosaur
Do it, it'd be really funny 
Wouldn't the tapir be clearing the way for the jaguar?
Afaik Jaguars prefer to ambush over actively pursue prey
not if you want to keep your spine intact
that's true
How big was Mourasuchus? I don't trust wikipedia.
So the largest crocodilians would be:
Deinosuchus: 13,5m
Purussaurus: 10-11m
Rhamphosuchus:10-11m
Gryposuchus: 10m
Stomatosucus: 10m
Sarcosuchus: 9,5-10m
Euthecodon: 8-10m
Did I forgot other giant crocs 9m or larger?
I would list deinosuchus as 12-14 meters
lemme make my own ranking really quick
Ermmm Sarco is not a crocodilian 🤓
- Deinosuchus (12 m, 9 tons) – (Fragmentary individuals up to 14m, 15 tons)
- Purussaurus (10 m, 6 tons)
- Astorgosuchus (10 m, 5 tons)
- Sarcosuchus (9 m, 4.5 tons)
- Chalawan (8 m, 3 tons)
6+7. Stomatosuchus & Gryposuchus (8.5 m, 2 tons) - Euthecodon (8m, 1.6 tons)
Chalawan in particular is debatable, and Rhamphosuchus isn't included because it's so poorly studied. There's no reliable way to determine it's size outside of "It's a really big gavialoid".
at least from what I can find anyhow
Couldn't go any smaller or else it started getting into Crocodylus territory
Thanks
Do we actually have specimens of 9 Ton Deinosuchus? I thought it was around 5-6 tons with fragmentary remains up to 15
Surprised to see Astorgo that high for sure
I've only heard about it recently
This gives me the idea for a scene in a paleodoc:
We see one Astorgosuchus sunning itself on a riverbank, the narrator talks about just how big it was.
But a shadow falls upon the croc, and the narrator says "But every big carnivore needs one thing: big prey"
Cue a paracerathere
【QRT of Lamborlobator ランボロバトル (@LamborlobatorAC):】
'S…
💖 0
Going to decrease the astorgo actually cause I didn't read the fine print. I thought it was just a larger specimen.
I know baha was destroyed but which one is more accurate?
There is no accurate Bahariasaurus
Bahariasaurus is more enigmatic than Spinosaurus
It's in limbo yeah
I wonder if it was in competition with carch.
Even if it was 12-ish meters, it'd still be like half carchar's weight give or take. So no.
We do know Baharia was decently gracile for it's size though right?
What is and from where sarco comes? I always read its not a crocodilian but don't know anything about it and seems like an interesting thread
Crocodyliform
Think of it like this. Crocodilians are to crocodyliformes, what birds are to dinosaurs. Crocodilians are just a single group in a massive and diverse lineage.
Yep. Baha was 11-12m and 3-4t
Sarcosuchus in particular is a pholidosaur.
Gotcha, quite interesting
There's a massive degree of genetic and niche variation in Pseudosuchia, but most look enough like crocodiles most people just call them all crocs
Nautiloid fossils that I found in my dentist's office in marble rocks!!! Fossils in metamorphic rocks are extremely rare so I was very happy to find these so well preserved
That's definitely cool
it's true I can confirm as a published author on the phylogenetics and ecology of pseudosuchia, me and all my co-authors just shorten pseudosuchians to "crocs" for everyday conversations lmao
It's sad that what is basically the sister clade of Dinosauria is reduced to a single thought
for us at least, we only use the word "croc" because it's quicker than saying "crocodile-line archosaurs" which was the scope of our study (we looked at the whole of Pseudosuchia and not just Crocodylomorphs) and not because we're reducing them down to modern crocodylians, which would be a huge misrepresentation of their ecological and morphological diversity
Quetzalcoatlus vs Tyrannosaurus is an overrated trope
I much prefer Mark Witton's art piece rather than the actual PhP. Stick to mobbing and stop trying to treat it like an actual fight.
Probably shouldn't be using the higher end estimate
I said I realized my mistake lol
Oh sorry, missed that, apologies
@jolly coyote afaik, Hatz was found in an area that was or is an island, and became the apex predator of said island.
Ahh interesting. Thanks!
Yw! Because the island was isolated from the rest of the main continent(s), the wildlife there evolved differently; similar to how Madagascar is the only island with lemurs. That is what allowed hatz to get so huge, and, since the rest of the island just had terrestrial animals, it didn't really need to fly, but it could if it wanted to.
(I know there's a lot more paleontology facts to it and technical terms, but that is the gist of it.)
Pretty wild! This game is definitely getting me into learning more. Never cared much about anything other than T-Rex as a kid lol
Mesozoic Tundras, depict them more 
Canada
Sarcosuchus could be larger (10.5m, 5.5t) iirc the weight is kind of small there because the study that estimated it used gavialid weight proportions and gavialids are slender compared to any other crocodilian really. That’s because they’re significantly more water adapted and at least in the Indian gharial they’re pretty specialized for a piscivorous, lifestyle, sarco is a generalist predator.
It’s really funny, gators and crocs are further from each other than chimps and humans yet get lumped together all the time
yes
Using Hartman's skeletal scaled to the largest material we have for Majunga, you get 1.5 tons (1.4 if you want to be super-precise, but 1.5 is nice to my brain)
How is this not really detailed majung? Is it accurate
Fairly, just missing the saddle on the nose (which would appear as a 2nd horn, as in my rendition)
Ok
What about metri largest estimate?
Like 1.1 tons or smt (probably larger)
1.3 tons the last time I looked
ngl i don't think majungasaurus gets called out enough for its largest specimen being a partial skull roof
Hush, you're so mean and fun-killing, fun-killer
yes no fragmetnary theropod remain will slide in this server!!!!
fragmentary theropods are fine if you can find mildly esoteric ways to downsize them
I just searched up what esoteric means
like yes i will totally accept that giant brazilian carch centrum but only if its ~7t because it retains more plesiomorphic anatomy
my basis for this being i don't want it to be over 12t
True! The power of choosing what is true 
i cast 7t allosauroid is more parsimonious than 15t or something like that
Is…is unicorn majunga a myth….
My life is a lie
Where's the 1.4 ton estimate for Majunga from anyway
Majunga has a single horn on the top of its head. It's drowned out in the reconstruction by the rest of the rugose covering on the head. The horn isn't really that big.
1.4t comes from hartman's skeletal is more pinheaded than franoys 1.1t skeletal
wait a minute why's there a 20cm spinosaur caudal in brazil too wtf
i'm really starting to question whether that paper either messed up terribly with the measurements or with neocomian brazil was just filled with kaijus for some reason
oh thank god baryonyx has a 144mm caudal
coincidentally the same exact size as the allosaurus caudal shielding us from assured 15t theropod
okay thats actually like weird though what the hell
When in doubt, blame Spinosaurus
I mean I know that but how the 1.4 tons, like what method? The only GDI uses Franoys's skeletal.
the exact size is from mostly vibes unless someone's done like an actual volumetric
although larramendi has an 8m majungasaurus at 1.3t so that seems close enough
ngl i totally vibe with this
this could be brazil if you guys accepted obscenely conservative caudal scaling
I do
how big is the spinosaur 🙂
like 5.5t
i would not recommend scaling it with any other spinosaur
I'm going to reject your reality and substitute my own
actually you know what go ahead and scale it with the neotype it'd be funny
You do it, I am literally about to indulge in my abusive relationship (Playing PoT)
I loved that episode
Predaking is legitimately my beloved
Lip scales? (Idk)
Iguanodon has got to be my fav Herbivore
also becuz he was One of the most successful
That's what I'm saying

https://www.patreon.com/YDAW -- Dilophosaurus was not just a giant Coelophysis! Let's talk about research into their appearance and ecology that's come out since our episode--and a couple things we should have mentioned the first time around.
Previous Dilophosaurus episode here: https://youtu.be/28NbtPqHPI0
Check out our merch on Etsy: https:...
Very interesting video, lots about the crest and how the sinuses work and why there is a boney core at the base of the skull. Good watch for anyone who hasn't already seen this
I love YDAW
Ya! I had seen a few of their videos but the dilophosaurus one was very interesting to me as it seems to be a pretty misunderstood animal
said no one
be kind for once
YDAW is pretty chill
I love YDAW’s videos, really wholesome and interesting
Look how's talkin about the sinuses, good to see you changed your tune
Was never an issue the discussion was about keratin sheets which still stands lol
In multiple videos this is mentioned, Like modern animals, was a boney core covered in keratin (more than likely) as we only have the base of the 2 portions of the crest and 1 older specimen which extends up more. It's not impossible for a skin covering as some reconstructions of hadrosaurs share this but for the most part it is agreed that dilophosaurus possessed a keratin sheet over the bone structure that would extend in many different ways.
Hey, it's always fine to admit you're wrong! I do this a lot, @hallow spear can attest haha
People aren't infallible, if they were, it'd be the 2nd coming of Christ
So is this you saying you may be wrong or I may be wrong, I am open to the idea of either representation as both have logical arguments to both sides I feel like we just got off on a bad foot yesterday
I just wanna draw and learn more about dinosaurs as it's what I love lol
Interesting way to say it, but no. It's me saying that despite a lot of people saying (X), it isn't correct
Case in point: Omnivorous ceratopsians (or herbivores in general)
hello ping
And I had elaborated pretty thoroughly, even showing you the difference in terms of structure between cassowary casques, oviraptorid skulls, and Dilo
Curious about your view there for the ceratopsians, do you feel they were or aren't omnivorous
Arnt
Nor would ever be according to ornithischians as a whole. Theropods are different though
I know they weren't omnivorous considering an isotopic study done on Dinosaur Park herbivores showed that they were just as omnivorous as ankylosaurs (Not)
There isn’t really any evidence of omnivorous ornischians rn
There isn’t any period lol
People have significantly overblown the "herbivores eat meat" while also ignoring all context for why it happens
I do want to point out with those though is there is a lot missing for the dilo crest, it's possible structures like that could have formed further up we just don't know as it's the base of the crest 🤷♂️ they also just aren't the same animals and keratin forms in all kinds of crazy ways and doesn't preserve properly most of the time, I don't think at this time there is a right or wrong answer just speculation based off various evidence
^ also the fact that even though things like deer do occasionally eat it, it doesn’t make them any less herbivorous
And ya I don't think they were omnivorous either lol
The funny thing with pachy is that the reason it was speculated they were omnivorous was because they had troodontid-esc teeth that they thought hinted at carnivory. Skip to 2024 and it turns out said NA troodontids are generalist omnivores. Pachies don’t have troodontid-esc teeth, troodontids have pachy-esc teeth lol
Could be like stego plates, covered in skin and pumped blood to it or the other way I'm open to both ^^
Very interesting
As I said, the sinuses were attached to the base of the crest (Which we have) and thus we know that it wouldn't have keratin covering that area. Assuming that Dilo wasn't a weirdo that changed bone texture of the same bone, it would stand to reason to that the sinuses would extend fairly high, but not all of the crest. The very edges could just be plain scales
Interesting point there as I saw them mentioning those sinuses extending up and how it could have been maybe used for a resonating chamber inside the keratin covering like some hadrosaurs, or skin would extend up the crest in that area but the rest could be surrounded in keratin
There's so many different ways it could work, it's pretty fascinating all the different views of how that could work, I hope in the future we find more of the crest so we can know more of this stuff for sure ;-;
The sinuses could not be covered in keratin because, as I said earlier, the sinuses need to be able to move with the animal's breathing
I'm not saying your idea is wrong, I'm just talking about other theories rn
I do need to take off though, going fishing lol. Have a good rest of your day
Does anyone have any good references for Spino's skull?
Hope this helps!
I have a 3d model of one I could probably take some pics of as well (if needed)
Got a front view perhaps? No idea on how wide any of it is supposed to be
Dunno if the skull is 100% accurate but sure
Ignore jw spino in the background I have to move him, I think this is mostly accurate but the lower jaw might be a little weird
Ignore how long it took I had to push a bunch of stuff out of the way 
Hm
what if its in musth
Then woe, death be upon the local tyrannosaurs
I'm working on an "anatomically accurate" Spinofaarus where I'm basically butchering the anatomy as far as possible without disobeying the skeletal
I'm giving it the very false Irritator split-jaw concept as part of this, it's only partially opened here but yeah
Between the pose and limited available references, it's hard to get the jaw working right
Phil Tippett's "Prehistoric Beast"
Post to FB: http://on.fb.me/1b1sQV9
Tweet This: http://bit.ly/16pdDMw (you can add text)
This stop motion short film, made in a garage in 1984, was the catalyst that launched the wild idea of creating an independent business whose sole purpose was to create animation for movies. And so began Tippett Studio. Ph...
I love it in all of its ridiculousness, wish I could help more but I'm not sure how, good luck 
Hadrosaurs with reasoning chambers do not have their sinuses exposed : these are inside of tubes within the skull, similarly to some extinct bovids btw.
I would not necessarily expect Hadrosaurs to have keratin coverage on their crests either, but Dilophosaurus case is different as the sinuses are exposed outside of the bones, which is observable on Sinosaurus skull, a close relative to Dilophosaurus that's used to reconstruct it.
Even yet, I think we have enough of Dilophosaurus' skull to really tell how far the sinuses were extended.
Most well preserved theropod fossil:
Dilophosaurus is actually rather surprisingly very complete, even if you go by all the fragments.
But jokes on you :
I’d eat that
Bahariasaurus ingens and Deltadromeus agilis are my favorite Noasaurids.
Thoughts?
(Bahariasaurus by kingrexy on DeviantArt)
What is the likelyhood of Rhinorex and Gryposaurus being the same species? I'm getting the feeling that Rhino is a synonym of Grypo. But I want other opinons.
They actually do look extremely similar, the only differences I'm seeing in the skull is the shape of the eye socket and the… bit behind it, whatever that's called. No idea though, not really a professional when it comes to dinosaurs cause I can't seem to find any trustable information I can go off of
Hence why I'm asking, not enough material and the skull shape change could be because of erosion? the right word is eluding me. But Gryphosaurus was the closest living relative of it and in a close enough time frame.
Yeah maybe, they definitely have to at least be closely related though (if not synoynms)
looks off
We don't know what Bahariasaurus even is. Basically every reconstruction is speculative.
I wonder where Cau’s megamatrix places it
What do you mean my favorite macropredatory Noasaurine is poorly understood? Just look at the holotype material there’s so much there!
cau has put it in both elaphrosaurinae and as a megaraptor, it can move basically all over the place
Elaphrosaurus with the hands of a Megaraptor
BRAZIL MENTIONED 🇧🇷 it also had a tyrannosauroid, sauropods and iguanodontians, if im not crazy.
Matheus Gadelha did the paleoart representing the Marfim Fm.
That's just an ornithomimosaur.
would the lips of smilodon cover its saber teeth or not
Probably
given rhinorex has been formally synonymized to my knowledge it looks to be 100% chance atm
or at least has plotted within the grypo genus so not a good sign for its generic validity
Unlikely
I prefer this over the other Noasaurid artwork which mostly has it be an upsize Deltadromeus with the same proportions.
that my friend was gold
Matheus is goated, really good artist
Some real talent for sure
heard of wolly pachyrhino ? i was doing bit speculation if artic edmontosaurus had fur
Looks cool! And to my knowledge feathers / fluff were common across a lot of families of Dino's so not impossible. However I think we have some fossils of Edmontosaurus that are super well preserved that have skin and scales. (Though I guess it could vary depending on species / environment?)
i just speculate if artic edmontosaurus had featherd or fluff cover
I wish we still had hadrosaurs today 😭
canadian geese:
hope gualinco, scanova, kuintara, and tableseating seeing this. hope reputation from them is alr
While a cool thought, fluffy dinosaurs outside of coelurosauria is very unlikely. These animals were likely migratory and didn't spend enough time in the cold environments for it to be necessary, and even then fatty buildup is more likely
thick layer of fat. can make sense