#paleontology
1 messages · Page 86 of 1
more like apatosaurus mixed with the one hadrosaur with a really big back that i cant remember the name of for some reason
protohadrosssss???????
nooo
the one that the spinosaur and carcharodontosaur fight over in that one docuseries
Ourano?
YEAH
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
the goat eyes are so unnerving
joshua knuppe edmontosaurus uuuuuuuuh crested
do you think its effective
imma test you goose
ok
ano has goat eyes in pot
whats the name of the sauropod thats build like JACK HORNER
Uuuuuuuuuuh
Alamo?
nope
Brachytrachelopan
nuh uh
WBAT IS THIS
Brachytrachelopan, aka the best Sauropod ever
this is a true statement
nah that goes to futalognkosaurus
looking at yet another medium-large therapod getting added into pot (everything else is underrepresented)
Nah
sauropod number 17374848
ngl futalognkosaurus sounds like it could be subways signature dinosaur
WHEN ARE THEY ADDING MY BOY MURUSRAPTOR
(or kileskus)
btw the dinosaur build like jack horner was atlasaurus
scalers when footprint
on a real note why tf did they give this thing a name
wth
there was a fossil discovered in Australia that could actually be rapator that was nicknamed "lightning claw"
uuuuuuuuuuuh
Brachytrachelopan my beloved
finally decided to shove into hartman's skeletal scale that wahweap cf. brachylophosaurus maxilla ft. scalebars and lythronax
vut is this fore
boredom
do a little bit of my dm request please
What if every mammal just suddenly disappeared
we wouldn't find out because we'd be in the backrooms along with the other mammals
Can't say I'm keen on that scenario
I am
No more fortnite
The sharks will finally take back control and play Fortnite for themselves
Blessed timeline. Here I am having to worry and stress about absurd, invented concepts like "finances" and "civilization" because some goddamn cynodont just HAD to be special and not die.
I think it's pretty decent too. I also like the fact how it combines ALL spinosaurus features, like it can be bipedal, quadropedal, and it also swims.
It's fantastic, and beautifully animated. Though I prefer it's other skin that lacks the distinct "croc" scales.
torvosaurus vs tarbosaurus would be an awesome fight
was this nose part of gryposaurus covered in scales or keratin? I am having a art crisis cause it could be either
you should known thi by now!!! jk but what animal is it suppose to be
thats a hadrosaur oboviiosisuslyyy
Now I’m curious as if we was to get an official high browsing sauropod, which of these options would be the most likely?
sonorasaurus
opis is better
opis is short
Is there anything known on the diet of Shastasaurus sikanniensis? I’ve heard it considered a macropredator due to relatives Shonisaurus and Himalayasaurus being macropredatory but I thought we didn’t have a complete skull for S. sikanniensis so we can’t exactly tell?
I'd suggest scales since that's where the fleshy part of the nose is.
We don’t really have an idea. Macropredation is the assumed but it’s just that, an assumption. It could easily not be.
it's impossible to know what would be most likely choosen by the devs
Choose the sauropod with the least fossil material 
Maraapunisaurus, it has zero material 
"Bruhathkayosaurus":
Yes I suppose that would be a tie
im going to call that natures bruh moment as some random dude from 2023 said that that thing could be over 150 tons
Guys what would be stronger a bull sperm whale or the maximum size of a livyatan
I wonder what if the reason basal non conodont fish evolved bony armor was that they were in an evolutionary arms race with faster Ordovician eurypteryds with spikes on their front arms so basal non conodont fish like arandaspis evolved bony armor to make it harder to be stabbed and eaten and when eurypteryds with claws evolved some basal fish group that is the last common ancestor of all modern fish cephalospidomorphans evolved their bony head shield that would one day give rise to the fins of placoderms and some galeaspids split off some other galeaspids that would give rise to the osteostracans and speaking of osteostracans they evolved a more flat arrow like bony head shield to make it harder to be grabbed by eurypteryds with claws and eaten
Depends on what size they are but most likely Livyatan. Sperm Whales aren't exactly built for big game hunting anymore
That’s what I said but some guy said sperm whale would eat it😭
Sperm Whale is almost definitely bigger but... they're basically just Suction feeders at this point
Imo I think that there will be a new species of livyatan that will be gigantic almost as big as a blue whale
I mean what is strength? Is it who would win in a 1v1? Because yeah probably Livyatan. But a bull sperm whale has more muscle mass in total, so it would be stronger
It's just not got the jaws to take on things its own size
hey nerds, what was Cryolophosaurus size wise like? im seeing a lot of 7m but also that it's an immature specimen, so i wanted to ask the smart people
8 meters
is there any reliable sources for it? i trust you, just wanted to know if there was anything
Immature specimen +1 metre 
so it's definitely immature, and definitely around 7 meters? gotcha
wow those words are ineligible😭 but i appreciate it!
Mobile copy-paste I apologize. It’s by Alpha08 using another reference I can’t make out there.
i searched that name and got an nsfw twitter profile
'cryolophosaurus ellioti skeletal edit by alpha8
original something something by Michael Hanson'
ah, original skeletal base made by Michael Hanson
Cheers
Early macropredatory theropods were so weird, never realized its legs were kind of short for its body size, its been depicted so frequently as a lithe, agile, almost "raptor" like creature in popular media (Dinosaur Revolution, Dinotasia, Primal Carnage, JWE2).
Early theropods were short and long
Maybe same might be for early Herrerasaurids and early sauropodomorphs?
Same generally was true for sauropodmorphs, who were very long and possessed kind of stubby legs, Herrerasaurus, and the rest of Herrerasauridae were decently leggy as early dinosaurs go.
Random but Wasn't being Leggy ancestral to ornithodira
I mean the proof is that lagosuchids the most basal dinosauromorphs and lagerpeptids the most basal pterosauromorphs were very leggy and something random the reason they look identical might be because at the time they recently split from a common ancestor at the time
Yeah, for the most part. Herrerasaurids didn't really have a reason to evolve out of leggy-ness since it was one of their main advantages over other archosaurians and synapsids, early Sauropodmorphs did since they weren't using their long legs for speed anymore, and began to evolve into stockier builds
Having a long neck and head was probably advantageous for catching medium-sized vertebrates, and a long tail to counterbalance the head and neck. So that may be why early theropods quickly became long
Also something random I noticed in the fossil record the closer you get to a groups common ancestor the more alike they look and there are tons of examples
After they evolved to start taking things similar to their own size they started becoming more compact to optimize the amount of bite per body size
Most things evolve from a common ancestor, and it takes time to evolve from that common ancestor, there's a reason why some people think that some Herrerasaurids may have just been early Theropod-relatives, while some were early Sauropod-relatives
Also I wonder are anchiornithids just basal troodontids or stem birds? Like anchiornithids do have troodontid like sickle claws and most recently phylogenys place them as stem troodontids
the "low and long" gross morphology of these early theropods would be taken to its natural progression as the largest theropods of the early jurassic became sauropodomorphs (see sinosaurus shawanensis and dandakosaurus)
even in the late jurassic, enlightened authors are aware that the mighty torvosaurus was actually a sauropodomorph
This is satire obviously for people who don't get it
Never knew Eustreptospondylus and Elaphrosaurus were actually relatives of Plateosaurus, I think I have reached an epiphany in my knowledge of dinosaur evolution, and have learned of a trade-secret of the paleontological community.
All organisms come from a common ancestor)
Yes, and what you said completely went over my head lmao
Sarcasm 100%
Also, Sinosaurus was pretty deep into Theropoda, currently being considered an early member of Tetanurae related to Cryolophosaurus, unless I'm also falling for a joke again, then it's 100% an early sauropodmorph
It's obvious that synapsids are just archosauromorphs
Sinosaurus triassicus is a theropod, Sinosaurus shawanensis is a chimera of theropod and sauropodomorph bone that was said to be a 9m dilophosaur
Did you know I'm actually a highly derived, extant species of archosauromorph??? (my cousin is an alligator, and my sister is a pigeon)
Spinosaurus are aliens that died on earth during a war with the ornithischian carcharadontosaurus and humans are gibbons
Nah I come from a rare ancestor 
And Andrewsarchus is just a giant tenrec
We're all giant tenrecs*
Gibbons are actually conodonts and pterosaurs are lepidosaurs
David peters is that you?!
….
Canids are actually Megalosauroids, I came to this conclusion due to the upper maxillary structure of my dog resembling that of the Megalosaurid Wiehenvenator albati, and his propensity for swimming reminiscent of various Spinosaurids, I've currently found that Canis familiaris actually falls in Ceratosuchopsini.
Venetoraptor is a cynodont
this....creature appears in here every odd month
Peters longisquama I assume?
💀 Oh god...
yea the peter, the unfunny one
What does he think filled the niche of Pterosaurs during the mesozoic? Birds? Who only diversified to the degree to fill those niches in the latter portions of the Cretaceous?
The thought of avian azdharchid-analogues does sound awesome tbh
Still pterosaurs, just not the like 3 taxa of giant azhdarchid
What if because jungles are terrible for fosillization imagine because jungles usually have unique and epic and weird fauna all the organisms there that are lost to time
Honestly any doubt towards azhdarchids's ability to fly is silly, because literally the first remains discovered of them were their wings. If they were flightless they would have reduced wings like every secondarily flightless vertebrate. Instead they have the biggest wings of any animal
something something peramorphosis 
Imagine how big a flightless pterosaur could get with how big hatz and quetz are while still being able to fly
clearly at the same time as they became flightless they diverted their wings to use for display, making the males who could carry the largest stretch of useless wing finger the most attractive...
nature is simply incredible....
B-but their size means they were too heavy and fat to fly!!!!!! They must've been at most arboreal!!!!!!
i would prefer flightless azhdarchids so much more than arboreal azhdarchids
arboreal quetzalcoatlus is definitely one of the artpieces ever
Also, reminder of how awesome Peters's art was before he went insane
He made that Quetz pic
Honestly, the concept of large, secondarily flightless Pterosaurs is a fun one. Keenan Taylor's science-fantasy spec-evo project The Illustrated Menagerie has a few species of secondarily flightless Tapejarids, with a couple species mirroring primate evolution culminating in a sentient Tapejarid species.
99 percent of animals never fossilize so also imagine all the cool species that are lost to time
With art like this, I think he was always insane, I know it wasn't 100% confirmed that dromaeosaurids were feathered at the time this was made (1996), but it is still very cursed, especially because of the very pronounced nether regions.
Sentient, humanoid descendants of Suminia??? (They didn't fossilize because they went into space)
Imagine all of the missing links that never fossilized and animals that break records of biggest land or aquatic or flying animal ever
For the 90s, this was the peak of anatomical accuracy. Most paleoartists back then barely looked at the skeletons before/while drawing
Greg Paul, Peters, and Bakker (there are more but I forgor) were the exceptions
oh no the censor got table
i think that's more of dromaeosaurids have stupid looking pubises
god forbid someone says plural of pubis
Same thing happened to me when I said the scientific name of H. habilis, I get why it was censored, but its still a bit annoying
Shoutout to the censor at one of the SVP events who censored the word "bone"
i want to send the megaraptor censor thing but i think mods would kill me
Also, thanks for reminding me of Greg Paul, his art was the coolest thing to me when I was younger. Him and Wayne Barlowe are some of my all-time favorite paleoartists just for the nostalgia factor alone.
greg paul skinwalker yutyrannus
rip
wow what a nice rajasaurus i sure hope it's not 5x its actual size
Random thing you didn't need to know: diplocaulus is closer to you than to platyhystrix as it is a reptiliomorph
i keep thinking people saying "random" are referring to random and i get very confused
I'm beginning to think "Random" is just like, their catchphrase
stegotitanus...
I want someone to so badly remake this, it's so gas
one does not simply remake perfection, darling 
what
Hey everyone! I’m doing a commission for a Rex pfp, and I’m trying to do realistic scaling. Here, I’m referencing Sue’s life reconstruction. How is it so far?
short end of the stick
who's who they all look the same
they are different colours
whos who tho
stego what
Well the red ones Jimmy then there’s Greg, Gerald, Charles, etc
whats the big yellow one
lil Timmy
no but fr tho what dinosaur is that
what the guac
7
Lil Timmy
What?
holy macaroni!
indeed
What's the size for the agathaumus, cuz Wikipedia says it's a 17 ton ceratopsian then other pages say it's a fckn 6ton hadrosaur💀💀 so which one is it
it doesn't exist
Whatever you want it to be
it it quite literally a triceratops
literally a synonym for triceratops
its 6 to 8 tons
So it's just a fancy way of saying triceratops??
Basically. It was its own taxon, but now considered dubious and generally regarded as a triceratops
me when i'm in a not having postcranial characters competition and my opponent is ceratopsidae
ohhh, damn how come some sites say it's a whole ass hadrosaur😭 like ts had me lost lol
Agathaumus doesn't exist. It was one of the like thousand bone wars taxa that turned out to just be a clone of something else (In this case, Triceratops). Only reason it's relevant is because the paleoart from the time slapped. Don't treat it like an actual taxa. At this point in pop culture it's basically a fictional retrosaur.
Oh that explains
tbf if someone decided to actually acknowledge that ceratopsid postcrania is a thing that exists you could probably revive agathaumas and kill some other unlucky lance taxon in the process
but that's never going to happen 
although ideally we end up with a. sylvestris and a. peterhewsi
It's good but I'd suggest a straighter lip of birds and other archosaurs
the squamate lip is fine but id use a different dyapsid lip structure (like a crocodile skink) instead of a komodo dragon
id also suggest to make the nasal crest at the top of its snout to lighter because if im not mistaken it is part of a tyrannosaurs crest
you can use my tanked quality carchar for a ref I guess
just dont give it komodo lips if your going for 100% accuracy
id also suggest the lip scales of alligators and crocodiles, but just make them shorter
I'm back and ready to dismantle things
I'm.........:)))))))))))))))))))))
I REALLY WISH THEY'D TELL ME WHAT WORD :))))))))))))))))))))))
depending on your definition of "good" prolly either argentinosaurus or patagotitan
:::))))))!!!11
WHAT, I SAID NOTHJIN BAD, THER WAS NTHOING
I'm going to lose it, I am actually going to go ballistic
yunnanosaurus youngi maybe?
Hello!, Your messages may be getting Removed due to our Bot,
please try to rephrase your message avoiding the sensitive words 
I found the word and I understand the censor, but also it's the correct terminology so 
skill issue
So ONE MORE TIME
There is no such thing as a realistic scale texture beyond a generalization. The commonly cited evidence for different texture on the snout (the maxilla pits) do not show up on every tyrannosaur, heck, not even every Tyrannosaurus rex
erm... prehistoric planet..?
also id probably change also but thats up to you and all
but I think you should connect the brow crests and kinda make it.... fade out around the bottom, like this! (artist uuuuuuuuuh idk I think its the publisher of the paper im reading abby crawford)
Could prolly reduce the size of the lacrimals ye?
just use archosaur scales
No
its an archosaur tho
not a squamate
Still no because crocodiles are incredibly derived to the point they should not be referenced for oral integument
And birds have beaks
wouldn't phylogenetic bracketing indicate tyrannosaurus had a beak
back lips
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh velociraptor moment
Okay the mods need to tone down the bot because I barely use the english language with it
lips are just kinda the default condition in terrestrial vertebrates, there's no reason to suggest they didnt have them outside of bias
Isn't the face integument of crocs not actually scales
water
Yeah there's more benefits for lips, and its likley that lips are ancestral to reptiles as a whole as only certain groups lack them and most that do have beaks and no teeth lmao
Took me 3 times to figure out which word was triggering the bot
Less that and more that the integument on the face doesn't NOT allow lips, they just don't have them for unrelated reasons
Literally not even what I'm talking about
the land crocs of the triassic were probably lipped
In response to this
as much as I like squamate lipped rex ill just take flat lipped rex for the most part
I like how I can say crap but not double hockey sticks
crappy
Anyway this was already conveyed but to reiterate, there isn't an archosaur still alive that we can really refer to for rex face scales and such
Me too, big flat scales on theropods seems unlikely from the skin impressions we have, it looks like they either had some sort of keratinous beak like thing seen on the php raptors, or soft lips made of skin and small round scales
bird leg scales?
and the lips at the back of a birds jaw?
Yeah there's more benefits to lips than not. It's reasonable to assume most if not all non-beak having dinosaurs had them, and considering some turtles have a beak and lips covering it, maybe even some with beaks
In what dimension do you live in where you should use the scales of a bird's foot to reconstruct a Tyrannosaurus's face
I love how we got stuck in the darkest timeline where all our archosaurs are extremely derived to the point we can’t use their physical appearance to make any judgement about past archosaurs 
Other than like….feathers
at this point we should just agree that all terrestrial theropods and most dinosaurs in general
had lips and or beaks
I think most animals have lips don't they
Yeah and if you choose to reconstruct them without, you aren't wrong just a little outdated
If it means anything, I believe beaks and teeth can't mix.
Despite pterosaurs and birds having both
Not beaked in the modern bird sense, if still beak-like
So you have wierd stuff like hesperornis only being partially beaked
Dsungaripterids, ludodactylus, rhamporynuchus, icthyornithids, pelagornis(beak teeth)
no teeth but close enough
Please someone inform me what toothed pterosaurs had
I keep hearing this and getting EXTREMELY cursed images from my imagination 
I mean a jaw can still look like a beak without literally being a beak. Beaks as we know them are keratinized.
sharp needle like teeth
Don't those pterosaurs not have actual beaks
And those that do don't have teeth
What do you mean partially beaked? Are you referring to the soft lip like structure at the back of the mouth? In pretty sure all birds have that
Here's a more detailed example. Only really the front half of the top jaw is a proper beak.
.........
a beaks a beak man
pterosaurs have beaks, just not curved ones like hooks
I have a sudden urge to touch this guys mouth…..what will it feel like….
thats gonna hurt
What if its not a beak, what if its all skin
It can look like a beak without literally being a beak
Not the teeth. Just the….umm….beak mouth?
Are you talking about the rictus?(cheek of birds)
No. LOOK at the image closely. Only the top half of the top jaw is an actual beak. The rest isn't.
Never mind pterosaurs, where does this come from
Pterosaur "teeth" arent teeth in the sense that they don't have enamel (I think)
spinosaurus
Oooh i see that now, thanks for clarification, im pretty sure some modern birds are like that but ill have to check
Nowhere, blud is makin it up
Rhamphorhynchus as another example
I've never heard that about spinosaurus ever, and its far from a dinosaur I would ever hear that from
A fish eater with an affinity for water
I'm pretty sure there's theropods face impressions right? From carno or something
No
spinosaurus has lips and my proof is a fish
I feel like we'd see a lot more beaked carno's if that was the case
I highly doubt most theropods outside of birds had beaks
Probably small circular scaled lips like that seen on php, Probably only the small derived coleurosaurs had beak like structures above their teeth
I got a ping, y’all talking bout mouths
I mean, a bunch of non bird theropods had beaks
dinosaur lips lmao
Why would coelurosaurs evolve beak like structures in place of lips if ancestrally they already had lips
Mostly onithiscians though
Lips can get infected and irritated when hunting and when infected can alter the animals ability to hunt
That can be said for anything with lips ever
Yet they persist
Yes but maybe it was a bigger problem with dinosaurs specifically
Then why did only coelurosaurs evolve it
I mean mammals have very soft and floppy lips that don't get in the way all that much, while reptiles have immobile lips that cover the teeth
Nah, infection would be more prevalent without lips
Infection by cuts when bitten or scratched on the lips
as well as brittle teeth and bad dental
I'm saying beaks would be better because they can cover the teeth the same as lips but also provide more protection
Lips are there to keep your teeth moist, protected, and keep your gum tissue safe as well. It's easier to fight off an infection on your lips then it is to fight off an infected tooth
Are we actually having this conversation
You see the point I'm getting at though, its a leap of logic to think that coelurosaurs at large didn't have lips when ancestrally speaking they did, especially if the reasoning didn't evolve independently in other carnivorous theropod lineages or other animals in general. Idk why mouth infection would be especially worse for dinosaurs
Bro has NOT seen what big cats do to each other in fights
Or really any other large mammalian carnivore...
Bro is not adding anything important to this discussion
Beaks and teeth also cannot exist in tandem, on the same bone. There's a reason most animals with beaks only have teeth in the backs of the mouth, where they're conveniently covered by cheeks and kept moist
what would be the extent of said beak on theropods?
are we talking php beaks or bird beaks?
Php beaks ofc, definitely not huge beaks on large theropods, only small dromaeosaurid type dinosaurs
I am because I just mentioned that big cats (and large mammalian carnivores) fight bloody and brutal, just like theropods. They have no difference when it comes to wounds. If you search for any sort of severe face wounds in large carnivores today, you will find bloody and torn lips. Weirdly enough, lions and co. don't have beaks or no lips
Falcon you talk with smart people, do you have an idea where the "pseudo-beak" like so stems from
I heard something on it, but it was legitimately so long ago, I cannot remember anything beyond that it was mentioned, I apologize
Just fun speculation, wouldn't call it a beak, just some keratinized skin
This is all your fault.
Beak implies that it's a structure supported by a bone. This is just some keratinized lips
Yeah I can't think of a word other than beak lmao its a keratin sheathe over the mouth, but at the same time they have teeth so its a pseudo beak thingy lmao
Also, this is a point that I never see being acknowledged:
Why are theropods the only terrestrial predatory vertebrate group that would have no lips/beaks out of every single terrestrial predatory vertebrate group to ever exist?
RIIIIP, Table lemme DM you the word
BROW CREST BROW CREST BROW CREST BROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW CREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEST
Huh
That is not what they're talking about...?
i again find myself contemplating whether theropod face integument or carcharodontosaurid size discussions are more grating
keratain sheeth
Because they are extinct and have no real modern counterparts probably
birds
Face integument because at least carcharodontosaurids, you can go "Well we need more material" while theropod face integument is very straightforward of "They didn't need to lose them"
Birds have beaks and aren't anything like non avian theropods
Anyways, you can say that for Dimetrodon (whatever their family name is), rauisuchians, phytosaurs, gorgonopsids, etc
Not exactly
feathers, foot scales, and extended claws
They have some modern counterparts or relatives
What modern counterparts or relatives exist of gorgonopsids? Dimetrodon? Rauisuchians?
They are just as much of an outlier as theropods are
The answer is they don't, all are dead lineages with no modern descendants
Modern mammals
Hear me out
no
What 
So...rauisuchians...are modern mammals
I was mostly replying to dimetrodon
Synapsid =/= Modern Mammal Analog
Cool, but that doesn't reply to anything else I said then. That leaves ~3 more examples that you didn't answer
Dimetrodon and all of its relatives are no more related to you than Tiktaalik was
Gorgonopsids are also related to mammals, more so than dimetrodon
Ok but they're still distantly related
Never said they weren't
Gorgonopsids and dimetrodon, etc can be compared to mammals because they are a similar size, not super distant, and share similar niches
They are close, meanwhile theropods have almost no modern analogs besides modern dinosaurs themselves
So its more likley that they would be assumed to have lips while theropods wouldn't because they are so distantly in almost every aspect from modern animals
Sure, in the sense of size and niche (which ties into size), but in the over-arching picture, they do not differ from overall ecology compared to large modern mammalian carnivores
All I'm saying is that it's easier to believe they had lips rather than the giant 10 ton lizards in some wyas
This is the most society reasoning I have ever seen. It's 1:20am, I just got my chest stomped in by a mugger in an alleyway, so Ima sleep. Blub, Table, Pi, have fun
Ily all 💕
Why would it be assumed theropods didn't have lips at all
What animal without some sort of specialized adaption just doesn't have lips for seemingly no reason
im tired so @sullen cairn can you just scale the willow creek tyrannosaurus for me please
It is, thats what you where asking, right?
Don't include the obvious here, you know what I mean to say
Yeah thats my reasoning for theropods lips
Why wouldn't they have them? Its just a good choice evolutionary wise, it protects the teeth and mouth(only way for vertebrates to get energy) and it helps with touch and sensation
In the case of something like crocs their mouths are super sensitive without lips because of the tissue they have, and they live in water so its always moist, also they don't need protection because they have super strong skin and immune systems
Good night everybody, nice talking and I'm glad we all sorta came to a conclusion if thats what you wanna call it
Afaik ancestrally speaking they would have had them, so then it becomes a question of "why did it lose them"
Which, features like that don't seem to just spontaneously disappear
Already kinda went over it, beaks help protect the face, and are lighter than teeth so flight is easier, beaks are also more accurate.
They also didn't spontaneously dissappear. Both pterosaurs and birds have beaded and toothed variants and even some with both beaks and teeth
You are confusing me, 2 comments ago you said "that's my reasoning for theropod lips"
As in megatheropods not avians
Megatheropods didn't evolve flight to my knowledge so lips are a good thing
Well, yeah. But who's arguing about avians having beaks or not
Ofc they had beaks, they're birds. They still got em
Thought you just asked about the spontaneous transition
Oh no that's my b. I was still talking about non avians
Yeah you asked why they would evolve them and I just gave my feedback in that
Me
Yeah no I just meant in general for why nonavian theropods would lack lips as some think. Or hell, just tyrannosaurs, why would lips disappear from that group
Usually the conversation likes to revolve around tyrannosaurs
These are rhetorical questions btw
Ooh, my bad. Probably because the people who hate lips are jp fanboys
I know they are. I'm just trying to make some excuse for the non lip believers but their reasoning cannot be justified lol
Anyway new topic this one kinda stunk
Nah I gotta sleep(game with the boys)
there's a skeletally mature maiasaura with a 75cm tibia for some reason
meanwhile there's older still-growing individuals that would be like 175% the mass
i'm mildly concerned that if i include any individuals larger than the smallest individual with an efs (which includes at least a few still-growing individuals) then maiasaura's average size isn't even 7.5m, but even if i only include individuals with an efs the average still stays like 7.5m
kudos to the 1000kg skeletally mature maiasaura you have my pity
Late cretaceous herbivores when the local tyrannosaur is a behemoth
imagine it in musth...
well you see, hadrosaurs are far more aggressive than they are portrayed in media. they are totally not fodder smh and the average hadrosaur would totally beat the average tyrannosaur easily /s
Mouse trap vs hydrolic press
AND YET I have to TRY
stop trying 
No
Ok so yeah, I did do the lips sort of accurately. Saw their images
short faced bear mod when
Fair enough tbh, but also I feel you don’t need to hurt yourself by doing the scales that small
You can always do something like this haha
Is there any size estimations for BYUVP 12893?
I always forget how wide the jaws of theropods could open
its so damn cool
makes me wanna to play cerato now
Ok fair. I’ll do that for some small segments
Yea, I know the pain of scales and seeing what you were doing made my hand hurt
So what areas would be best to have those
Nasal area for one. Also the area around the back of the mandibles?
I’m sry… WHAT. The same thing in fingernails.. is in there?
Yea?
Give me a moment to redline
As in a real moment cause I'm also playing BoB haha
Isnt BoB bad for thy health?
Oh 100%, as is any dino game, but I play anyways
Lots of things are keratin, just depends on how it's arranged/how thick it is
Scales, feathers, regular skin
Shush, I'm the expert now, you are a underling
(Please don't leave, I need your intelligence)
The left is trying to wimpify our dinosaurs........
I’m going to ignore that, and just make that area leathery
But that's not...correct 😭 also it wouldn't look like fingernails
I never said that. I just said make it look leathery. Or just no visible scales
What kind of beak did pachycephalosaurus have?
Wdym
TRAUMA RESURFACED YOU JUST REMINDED ME OF THIS GUY IN A COMMENT SECTION A PREHISTORIC PLANET VIDEO WHO, DEADASS, DESCRIBED DINOSAUR. FACIAL. EXPRESSIONS. AS. WOKE.
I heard somewhere that the pachy only had a beak on the lower jaw, but I feel like that's wrong
Wasn't that an unironic news headline about the DePalma Hell Creek documentary?
@errant iron
Making T.rex woke or something
ngl for old paleoart, this Lythronax is pretty gas
“ Grrr the LIBERALS are turning my MANLY and COOL dinosaurs WOKE “
Considering Pachy is horribly described (as in very little), not sure we can say for 100% certain. Last I checked though, it only had a lower beak because it has a beak bone there, but not for the upper jaw tho @stiff osprey can decimate me if wrong
I'm not certain about it either, the space for an upper beak in Pachy is very small because it has premaxillary teeth
But also having a lower beak with no upper beak doesn't make sense why would you do that
keratinized lip/pseudo beak on the upper jaw is kind of the way to go at this point, it’s safest
Erm...Stegosaurus...........
Already changed the snout tip, moved the nose, and fused the bosses. No further requests to change the shape
?
Just tell me about the scaling in some regions
Ah, I mean it's up to you, I already showed my example. Anatomical, I showed you my edits
Just how would YOU do the scaling. I’m up for suggestions
I’m already had my mouthful with Sue’s reconstruction
I showed you my Alberto example
that's how I'd do it
Oh my god, another """"""""""""study""""""""""""
(It's a load of bullcrap)
Pretty sure that’s just a dude making sounds through a voice changer
You sure?
It is
There is no way to find what any dinosaur sounded like outside of crested hadrosaurs
The Hadrosaur….
A reminder that this channel is for educational purposes. Please do not post off-topic memes or troll in here, all memes must be in direct relation to Path of Titans and posted in #pot-memes only. Refer to all our pinned guidelines in every channel you plan to use.
Bro what
Yes, speculate is the important term. The videos you posted are not speculation. They are presenting their noises as fact when in reality, they are completely made-up with no scientific basis whatsoever
Every dinosaur sound reconstruction is made up
Except for when they aren’t
^ As I said, we can know a pretty good approximation for crested hadrosaurs as their nasal passages were likely the way they generated sound (by blowing air through them)
The sound is cool but I hate it's usaged
This is real cheeky of me but Vegavis also has unambiguous indication of Anseriform-like sounds too
what is the sound even made of
who?
Mesozoic birb
No because none of them are legit (besides the crested hadrosaurs)
Even then, YT videos are horrid sources of info
this doesn't sound legit at all 💀
the quatily and the soundbox is so bad it doesn't sound like a real animal
I mean it sounds kinda scary
So you made that?
I didn't say I made that
didn't read your message well
Doesn't matter if it sounds scary unless you're designing some form of dinosaur media (Movie, game, etc)
I did try copy the sound of a kiwi and it sounds bad
what about this one
Dreambully?
These are so goofy oml
I am going insane, they keep posting the same kind of videos and we keep saying the exact same thing
Is it wrong that many websites put placodermi in condrychthes? (I spelt it wrong I bet)
Yes, placoderms are rather famous for their bones
fr we need more people to react to them
So is it right or wrong of placodermi being in the group chondrichthyes as wikipedia says it is?
they don't say that, do they?
but why because there's no real point into doing it
wiki page for gnathostomes
Okay it was fixed then someone said they were condrichthyes
why blug soundin like gollum
What should I change about this piece?
What is it
How good is this argent?
LMAO NOOOO
Gooning since the jurassic
give me the names of 3 relatives of t.rex
Jerry, Timmy, and Bob
Tarbo, Dasp, Gorgo
thanks
Of comahuene…
In my opinion theropods are the peak of dinosauria as they outlived all the other clades
Maybe even the peak of reptilia now as they are the most widespread and common reptile as of now being on every continent and many isolated islands.
Theropods are indeed the peak of dinosauria
false
i think desert tortoises are the peak of reptilia because i saw one eating grass once and it looked really funny
That's also true
Funny rocks with personality
do we still not know what turtles are closely related to?
We do now
Well kind of either they are anapsids or are In the group archelosauria closer to birds and Crocs than to lizards and tuataras
But archelosauria is the most likely one it's more likely that some anapsids are similar due to convergent evolution
Same like how eshanosaurus probably isn't a therizinosaur and was most likely a prosauropod that converged on a similar jaw structure to therizinosaurs due to a similar life style and diet
So archelosauria is the most agreed and likely group of Wich turtles belong to closer to birds and Crocs than any other modern reptile group
Hope that helps
thx
In my opinion, nothing
All goated names
Which is more accurate?
Dan's. I haven't seen anything from Franoys in ages
Clearly Para used its crest to impale the predator
Thats not a bull para in musth ||idk how thats spelled||
you got it right :L
Dang did we have the hadrosaur musth conversation again 
did all these hardosaur live with daspletosaurus
Yup
clearly dasp would have cowered in fear from its hadrosaur overlords
Just add four more Dasps in that chart cause Tyrannosaur pack hunting
mamenchisaurs
looks better than random assortment of colours
This is just the species list for the Mamenchisaurus genus
Don’t forget Omeisaurus
I think this is the world's first instance of random using an emoji (important emphasis on think, my memory is comparable to a concussed goldfish)
So many totally real taxa 💯
Yea, text emotes is what I mean 
Names
Ok one last checkup
Do y’all approve this Utahraptor study?
And it’s suitability for a base
Deino approval
I feel like that’s way too light
Wasn’t Utah like, somewhere within the 800 pounds range or something? Could be remembering wrong
Bros lighter then Caseoh
It was comparable to a Grizzly Bear in weight, with some proposals putting it at well over 1000 lbs, while others putting it around 800 lbs.
Didn't hadrosaur out compete and populate them?
Or am I tripping
Birds a class of theropod lived and are still alive unlike hadrosaurs
I'm talking about when they were around
You're either tripping big time or you're actually thinking of sauropods
Sorapods died out before hadrosaurs right? I might have to look it up
In some places hadrosaurs replaced sauropods as the big ass herbivores, or just became more common than them
Sauropods did stay dominant in certain places like south america
how close were tarbosaurus and daspletosaurus when it came to looks? would they have looked similar?
Sauropods*
And das, if I cannot find the image I'm looking for, well it looks like how it does in the game for the most part so here's this for now lol
Avian-Therapods, “Am I joke to you?”
so would it not make sense for them to use this image from php as inspiration, for like a tlc
Tlc for what exactly
Das?
Here's skeletals of the two
If we're talking das tlc, nah. Better to actually have tarbo inspiration for a Tyrannosaurus tlc, especially since one of its subs is called Tyrannosaurus bataar, which is technically Tarbosaurus
Hey they got there kick off when everything else died out lol
I mean…they were already starting to appear before everything else died, I think the mammals r the ones who really got there kick off
Idk why but I wanna see campto or stuthi vs a lion 💀😂
Roll out the size charts baby
the sauropod decline in a lot of places (which really just means western north america, basically everywhere else still had sauropods) seems to have been related to a climate shift, there’s a lot of cases of sauropods and hadrosaurs seeming to coexist with no problems
sauropods really stayed common pretty much everywhere
if there's one benefit to this why is maiasaura so small business suddenly acristavus being tiny makes a bit more sense
also this thing's skull is peak
does anyone know where this came from
Raul Ramos’s
🤯🤯
no like a link
For anyone who doesn't know this is the guy who does the loading screen art for pot
He makes bangers
All of it is mamenchisaurus? Like, different individuals, specimens?
mamenchiSAURS, the family not the actual genus Mamenchisaurus
Ohhhh, ok.
basilosaurus enjoyer 
It's kinda sad to see the last Diplodocid, Brachiosaurid, Stegosaur and Mamnchi in the cretaceous before they're gone forever.
Is that my boy Wuerhosaurus?
No
I’m using average estimates
250 - 500kg for Utahraptor
Sticking to the lower estimate
good on you
500kg is generally what I see for utah, 250 seems extremely low, lower than achillobator
ah fair
what is an lesser known four hand theropod I could draw if people would like to see that?
Eoabelisaurus
bet
Thank you as I was gonna remake this old 4 handed theropod I did
mosasaurus
Dinosaur Park formation theropods
Yo paleo chat is Plateosaurus looking like this and being this muscular actually accurate?
that is not a good plateosaurus at all
DP goes so hard
💀
does anyone have skeletons for metricanthosaurus
Richardoestesia…. The microraptor….
a gigantic microraptor.... you could even call it a normal raptor
A… macroraptor
So I was right I was just in an argument with some kid who said it was accurate because prosauropods had big muscles for some reason
they do have big muscles, mainly in the chest and thighs
but that doesn't excuse just getting the skull and body shape wrong lol
Plateosaurus JWA is a bad design
Megalodon stole the mass of perucetus too
Bottom Meg is 23m and 141t ( btw is this reconstruction by Evoin useable )
who’s ornithomimid, hesperonychus, caegnathus, and dasp is that?
Hartman's Ornithomimus, an old Sinornithosaurus of mine, hartman again, and mine with GAT headswap
dinosaur park hadrosaurs is just gonna be why is prosaurolophus so big
bold of you to assume i'm gonna take ''private specimen allegedly 11m long'' seriously
ah but what about hadrosauridae indet tibia
which is also smaller than elvis' tibia but you didn't here that from me
although saying that idk how the proportions line up
did the dinosauria always have brachylophosaurus and ?maiasaura in dinosaur park
Prosaurolophus is from Bearpaw too right?
The guy that nake it: https://x.com/khriskath/status/1763371359860674793?s=20
Maip
Really liked this Maip, the head shape, specially.
You guys think there will be a livyatan species will be bigger then sperm whales?
Sperm whales are less robust so its possible, the main thing is individual variation because the largest sperm whale ever was double the average, so a very beefy leviathan could possibly out weigh some sperm whales
Imo I think that there will be a new species called livyatan maximum that will be way bigger then sperm whale like think about it we have dwarf sperm whales so just imagine
the yellowstone hyperpredator 😂
a whale that thin existing is so crazy 2 me
does anyone have skeletons for metricanthosaurus
might work but id try find a more recent/reliable one
ty mate
Still up to date?
accurate or nah
Not a chance
Why is it overly hairy
Nope
Out of curiousity, between Yehuecauhceratops, Avaceratops and Furcatoceratops, which of them is the smallest?
Seeing a lot of different ranges for Avaceratops, so I am having a bit of trouble figuring out which Centrosaurine is the smallest.
They’re all about the same size
Ah I see, good to know.
avaceratops is pretty handily the smallest but also by far the youngest
Keep in mind the Avaceratops specimen we have is immature
we dont have a head?
yeah avaceratops (juvenile) has only one partial LAG vs furcatoceratops' (subadult) two LAGs
meanwhile yehuecaceratops is considered at least an old subadult
Wait is Avaceratops based on an immature specimen?
Lil' goblin
Do we have dromaeosaur nests/eggs?
How do these compare to Albertaceratops and Styracosaurus?
I know they are going to be a chunk smaller, but I don't have a perfect idea as to how much smaller they are.
Anyone have an up to date representation of either:
A side by side comparison of Otodus megalodon and Livyatan melvillei
Or 2 separate skeletals of both mentioned species
I saw this in PoT memes…..can someone tell me what this is…..it looks suspiciously Archesuchus but idk.
What’s everyone’s thoughts paleo people
Very interesting, hopefully they still having running bipedaly
Too upright, particularly while walking
Hm, yeah it is a bit too upright.
That's my only thought about it really
I guess they are replacing its crouch with that.
Or adding a new button. Devs aren't as constrained as modders with that
Hm, true they really aren’t constrained
would be nice for mods to have a new button tbh
i think X and whatever its playstation counterpart is has no link atm
All I hope for is after they do the foliage update is that we get an official high browsing sauropod for the game, even though we do have quite a lot of modded sauropods coming.
console and mobile count as constraints to be honest
mobile lamb players seeing buttons all over their screen and console players making a epic combination of 12 buttons to make lambeo stand up
while on pc it could be a convenient button
Idk about mobile but you can combine buttons to do more actions. Like say, pressing down on both thumbsticks at the same time to stand biped. I can't really explain well how they could potentially do it on mobile but I can imagine a way
Point is there are ways to do things. And this is paleo chat
trex fart study 63
Its probably too upright to give the kick hitbox more room
What other niches are not filled within PoT?
small pterosaur (not really a niche) small aquatic herbi, large herbivorous aquatics, idrk
Thats basically it, add large marine predator and dumb stuff, like a trout or a rat
Huh, interesting. I mean the smallest pterosaur we have coming is Rhampho, I could name a few aquatic herbivores like Henodus and such. As for large aquatic herbivores, that’s a bit of a tricky one to think of. But for me personally, I wanna see a high browsing sauropod come officially since we have so many mid to low browsing herbivores in the game.
how large was stellers sea cow?
also, i could see AG giving leed a plant diet ( if the seaweed becomes edible )
As has been said, too upright during the bipedal walk, but also hadrosaurs likely moved predominantly quadrupedally (running, walking) so I dunno if a bipedal run would work...or look nice due to how upright it is
How's about flying herbivore?
id say about the size of amarg (not including neck and tail)
pretty big ngl
tapejara or tupa or whatever one was aparently a omnivore got u covered
Lamb runs bipedally already, ofc not in that high of a pose, but thats probably more of a "Square up" stance
so the blue one is a juvenile right?
Yeah
so what's the name of each anima going from smallest to biggest?
Ik it already does, I'm just saying in irl 😭
its ava and yes
Ava furcato yehueaca sty Albert
Irl, i think it would be fine, ofc not in that high of a stance, they could maaaybe do it, just like how you can maybe run while tilting your head as far back as you can, not comfortably thats for sure
What
what
I think my grammar was correct.
Since we found a tree climbing basal pterosauromorphs I wonder when will the gliding ones and poor flyer pterosauriformes will be found
btw does metri still have a short of skin under his chin? or is that unaccurate these days?
its speculation, we cant know for sure without having an intact fossil of their skin
lmao i agree was just wondering if it was still goin on or not
agree? bro its a fact T_T
How I’m feeling atm
https://tenor.com/view/charlie-charliekelly-kelly-always-sunny-gif-13283537
Random fact: meganeura the Giant "dragonfly" is a flying crustaceans as insects are crustaceans just like how birds are dinosaurs and meganeura and all other hexapods are closer related to krill than to arthopleura and arachnids
Swinn says there is discussion about Sucho being dubious and being a crestasaurus [whatever that is] and the only source they've provided so far is a Clints Reptiles video when he is notorious for spreading misinformation
Not right hold on
cristatusaurus kinda swings back and forth between being a nomen dubium, being a senior synonym of suchomimus, and being a valid taxon distinct from suchomimus
What is going on sucho dubious?
finally i know what theyre talking about T_T cristatu doesnt even have a full jaw bone iirc??
according to some authors yes but cristatusaurus' material is ass and its similiarity to suchomimus is equivocal
cristatu's holotype is some anterior cranial fragments
There are two spinosaurids that were discovered cristatusaurus was discovered first but we don’t have much knowledge from them. We have a lot of fossils from Suchomimus, which was named later, but overlapped in existence and they say that they might be the same dinosaur but because cristatusaurus was named first, suchomimus would technically not keep its name (the former would)
And I said this Lumpy, but you ignored me and dismissed me. And now someone else is saying basically the exact thing without sources and you are accepting it…
homie you've been calling it crestasaurus this whole time and I was asking you what that even is
you also didnt explain what you meant until right now, because the first thing you said was "arent they arguing that suchomimus isnt even real?" and you kept saying crestasaurus, you didnt call it cristatusaurus ONCE until now, multiple people asked you what a crestasaurus is
tbf cristatusaurus literally means crested lizard
yes i was there
anyways this is the most recent conclusion on cristatu afaik
Dinosaurs are the peak reptilia as of today but dinosaurs are still cool in the past
I mean peak as in success as birds are the most populated reptile group today
plus this in 2022 which is a bit more thorough with the history
i also said "what is a crestasaurus!??!??!?!?" in all caps before i said i dont like clint either, bro all im saying is that you finally explained yourself better rather than getting upset at us for not knowing what youre talking about and for you only using clints reptiles as a source
Table, where do you get access to your research papers? I keep getting stuck by paywalls? Or do you purchase/have a subscription?
usually scihub but with the 2022 paper i got it from paleostream
Wtf...pirating..................
okay but the 2023 other one was open-access so its fine now
I apologize. It was really hard to reply to three people all arguing with me and catch autocorrect fails at the same time.
the evil falcon upholds a system violating his humanity
anyways if someone's talking about suchomimus being a junior synonym of something and mention a "crestasaurus" i'd imagine it'd be most parsimonious to assume they're talking about cristatusaurus
Yes but at the same time I was literally trying to EXPLAIN what I was trying to say and still somehow you think my claim was “Sucho isn’t real”
uh oh mods everyone scram
Yes, thank you, Table. That was exactly it. I appreciate also your guidance on open-access research articles.
This channel is for the discussion of past and present paleontological discoveries, scientific news, and depictions of prehistoric creatures in media in relation to palaeontology. Please remember while taking part in paleo discussion:
While critique is acceptable, paleo chat is not a place to make fun of or insult other people's art, depictions, or research, and debates are not an excuse to insult another member of the community or to be disrespectful.
In my opinion the genus name dinosaurus should've been saved for a Fossil like a common ancestor of all dinosaurs or a very close relative of the common ancestor and not a therapsid
If it was found)
yeah but its kinda funny if the thing's named dinosaurus
I mean it's therapsid it's closer to us than to dinos and we are therapsids
an insightful commentary on the ultimate futility of sensical biological nomenclature
What
dinosaurus isn't just a taxon it's a statement
Too bad such a genus name was spent on a therapsid there is a genus of therapsid called dinosaurus
And yes it's a taxon an actual species and I don't think I'm allowed to send Sources and like links
Apparently you CAN! I learned today
So I'm Allowed to send a link to show it exists then okay
How do you feel about the dinosaur wikis? Compared to….other wikis?
wikipedia's generally good for summary and finding sources/citations and prehistoric wiki is very funny for the wrong reasons
Hehehe could I ask you one other thing? If you ever have time, could I get your expert opinion on this video: https://youtu.be/F5y5ThG6mWk?si=zuYzlYWjZbhsX6TO
I was warned that Spinosauridae is too controversial to discuss; to talk about Spinosaurus and its relatives is like walking into a hive of killer bees while dressed like a honey badger. Well, we're doing it anyway! Buckle up, it's fight time!
#clintsreptiles #dinosaur #spinosaurus
====
Spinosaurus Hoodie: https://clints-reptiles.creator-sp...
deceptively informative considering how much of a powder keg spinosaurids usually are
Clint usually puts out pretty good stuff
Ahh nice! Yes, this was the reason the debate started and escalated ha. Many others do not like Clint, but I’m also a dinosaur science noob, so I didn’t know if it was actually a very poor video in general (the sucho debate and everything else) as they thought or if the source could be trusted. I liked it. Learned a lot.
I loved all his taxonomy videos.
Question.
How was it called the "few offspring with great investment" type of reproduction?
And is there evidence for it in any non avian dinosaur?
k-selected?
there's maiasaura and stuff
although with at least some hadrosaurs there seems to be a period where they ditch the adult herds for a couple years and eventually reintegrate around when they hit sexual maturity
I’ve never considered the chaos of what would’ve been little herds of adolescent herbivores running about
Yeah that, more specifically, something more birdlike
I want to believe that there will be evidence for at least one dinosaur with very few offspring that would allow to speculate about biparental caring and possibly monogamy
Because monogamy is one of the cutest traits of birbs
Enantiornithes or something
I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case in most broodnesting dinosaurs tbh. One of the reasons it probably evolved was because of the necesity for constant incubation by a parent.
Oh wait those are precocial
Precocial birbs is something unexpectedly cursed to think about
based on trackways sauropods seem to have put at least some investment in their offspring once they were big enough to not get stepped on
Oh yeah speaking of that, that's why i find the "one mother one calf" trope for ornithischians that was even used in Prehistoric Planet kinda cringe
Now, are there nest fossils from dromaeosaurids? Or just non avian paraves?
How would the blank parts be filled? Other than scales
yeah I don’t know why that’s so popular
you see it a lot in sauropods too, there it makes at least a little sense because in all likelihood an adult would only be looking after like one baby because not very many would make it
I love this rex design so much
So skinnyyyyyy
Rex with a das body
Rex was the original dad bod
god's strongest soldiers (smol centrosaurines)
How well supported is the current Sillosuchus data?
You will have the 20cm cervical and you will be happy
lol
What if plesiosaurs could produce electricity with there necks.....
What if T. rex could generate lasers
What if spinosaurus could walk
(It could)
how to kill a chat room
Damn 💀
Yes :)

(Don’t worry I’m not that dumb
)
Ik, just making sure others know too haha
Wait
Spino could walk
joking
Imma continue to say this. Spinosaurs would be one of the most majestic beautiful animals to see in the flesh.
fresnosaurus
FR
anything interesting on fresnosaurus
Thank you, gotta love the smoll bois.
did yutyrannus live in or at least interact with snow
No!
I’m pretty sure it did
yes snow was possible where it lived
Should i asking this question to guys
I actually really confused when i Saw vintage version spinosaurus head it looks like a tyrannosaurid
Yes you know reconstruction always happened in years to years but now spino have a crocodile head but the vintage version was really confused for me because have a different head like a mountain theropod like t rex and acrocanthosaurus
Back then spinosaurus uh, "relationship" (idk what other word to use) with other theropods was unknown and it's remains were very fragmentary, so it was reconstructed as a generic theropod with a sail
Vintage Spinosaurus was reconstructed with a typical "Megalosaur" head because the first fossil found had only part of the lower jaw as far as skull material was concerned. There was no complete skull found and because "croc-headed" dinosaurs like Baryonyx had not yet been discovered, a simple "Megalosaur" head was the only logical conclusion.
Smok wawelski was a Triassic animal with an uncertain placement within the clade Archosauria. It is still uncertain weither or not it was an early dinosaur or simply a bipedal croc relative.
Booooooooo Dino Smok needs feathers. Ugly naked little thing
Would’ve been horrendously overcompensating if it didn’t at least experience freezing winter temperatures
There's no evidence of scutes or osteoderms in poposauroids is there?
all false, its a polish dragon
tbf if it's so basal we can't tell if it was an early dino or a crocodile relative, the early feathering would've probably been so minimal that it wouldn't have made a difference.
i dont think there is, all ive found online is leg and ribcage material, nothin on scutes or osteos but thats only for poposaurus itself, ill go look more
wait Qianosuchus did have evidence for small ostoderms alone the neck and torso
but qiano is only part of Poposauroidea and not that closely relatef
I want more people to remake old inaccurate paleoart from the 1800's
Cue up evidence for feathers in pseudosuchians
If it was in fact an early dinosaur I think feathering would be very plausible
If not full fluff maybe peach fuzz
That's what I mean. Considering how early it is, it would most likely be limited to light fuzz, which wouldn't affect its overall appearance that much imo.
Different than covered in croccy scales
Well idk if how early it is affects levels of body integument. Since both pterosaurs and dinosaurs use feathers as insulators I’d assume their common ancestor also used its feathers for that purpose. And if so I’d assume most early dinosaurs had noticeable coverings. But that could realistically fluctuate depending on climate.
I think feathers might have evolved after the basal avemetatarsalians like the aphanosaurs shrunk in size maybe due to pseudosuchians that filled the same neiche as them outcompeting them forcing them to either fill in a new neiche or go extinct and spondylosoma does show proof of when avemetatarsalians started getting small again and as they got Smaller they evolved feathers to help keep in heat as smaller animals lose heat faster
I have to resort to using David Peters skeletals and diagrams for Sillosuchus :(
It feels wrong
Because of it, I have no idea what is actually factual and what is Reptile Heresy
remember using david peters skeletals is always morally incorrect
yes, but there's literally no other reference material on the hands and feet of shuvosaurids
The next best bet I have is basing it off the PT Popo model lmao
Can confirm, my Great x10 Grandfather's neighbor fought Smok with a flaming holy sword, and was canonized as a saint for his battle
effigia skeletal and shuvosaurus skull, ik it isnt hand material but ill try find some more
Yeah i hybrided some stuff from Effigia into a rough skeletal, but having my source literally be that I made it up is nOT good lol
ive got a sillosuchus skeletal from 1997 if that any good lmaoo
better than NOTHING I guess
alright, theres also a shuvo one too
:(
One of the best skeletals I’ve seen
its nearly 3 decades old lmao
I love when my bones are vague geometric pink shapes
Peters was killing it even back then!
In my opinion I think that maybe the reason bony armor in Basal non conodont fish evolved was that early non conodont fish were in a evolutionary arms race with smaller faster eurypteryds that had spiky limbs specialized to stab fish so basal non conodont fish like arandaspis evolved bony armor making it harder for eurypteryds to stab them then later eurypteryds with claws evolved being able to grab the armored fish and then cephalaspidomorhs an ancestral group to all fish today even hagfish some of galeaspids that didn't split off and gave rise to all modern agnathans evolved bony head shields to make it harder for eurypteryds with claws to grab them and for some galeaspids like tujuaspis were the first fish to evolve pelvic fins and some advanced transitional galeaspids that would give rise to osteostracans like tujuaspis had pelvic fins a dorsal fin a booty fin a dorsal fin and later in more osteostracans the bony head shield would become the pectoral fins seen in placoderms.
Punctuation and some paragraphs go a very long way
I forgot I was rushing
i just hopped in this channel and was jumpscared by that lmao
is there actually any fast eurypteryds that were at a similar time to them tho
I mean there is megalograptus an Ordovician eurypteryds that was still fast enough to catch the primitive fish at the time
The rivalry between eurypteryds and early fish is one of the earliest challenges that early vertebrates had to face known as We don't know what threat caused them to evolve bones to be faster or to protect organs or maybe that's wrong and we don't know what predators made them evolved light sensing organs that would give rise to eyes maybe it could've been some radiodont or another undiscovered creature or a creature that will never be found as 99% of all life never fossilized.
"The strongest swimmer of today vs the strongest swimmer in history" typa rivalry
i remember hearing somewhere that it also had to do with metabolic stuff
Calcium storage comes to my mind
The reason bony armor evolved most likely would serve Multiple purposes like for protection and for storing calcium. And also I forgot to mention that eurypteryds that were faster and had claws may have even been the reason why osteostracans re evolved dorsal fins,booty fins and even the reason why they gave up part of the bony shield modifying it into pectoral fins and the reason why they evolved pelvic fins probably was as bigger ambush predators eurypteryds evolved that evolved a new strategy that was hiding under the seafloor and osteostracans and even the basal placoderms they gave rise to were bottom feeders eating algae and cyanobacteria on the seafloor and they were the perfect prey for ambush predator eurypteryds that hid under the sea floor.
How do we feel about LOOP's Arandaspis?
I think It's great actually a 9.9 or a 10/10
I must learn which is more accurate
the far right?
if Peters is saying both are accurate then neither one is accurate
I did these pieces in art class and I was wondering how acccurate are they
save me Random, you're my only hope
Shuvosaurus
good enough
guys what does basal mean
if multiple species share a common ancestor, the one that diverged first from that common ancestor is the most basal
Oh I thought it had something to do with where it was located💀
Technically not wrong... where it's located on the family tree lol
I just watched life on our planet
Aint no way they call a pliosaur a plesiosaur

Pliosaurs…..are plesiosaurs….
Pliosaurs are the short necked plesiosaurs
(Mostly)
any tips
But they are…
So uhm….
Old paleo art is funny because this is how animals are often depicted regardless of size
twenty inches long
Godzilla
Oh
They're the same thing?
Does that mean kronosaurus and liopeaurodon are mostly closely related to turtles?
tbf that one's from Weird N' Wild Creatures, which made a simple maggot look like demonspawn iirc
Still amusing
Nah. Pliosaurs are plesiosaurs, but not all plesiosaurs are pliosaurs
So venomous animals usually evolved vibrant colours as warning signals for predators right? So why something like a black mamba doesn't
Poison vs Venom
Oh
You lick a poison frog and you die. A snake bites you and you die, big difference
So it's a warn not to eat sign instead of not to mess around
Yep. One's a defense and one's an offense. Snake doesn't want to be seen, frog does
it doesn’t always work out that way for venom either it’s more of a mixed bag, some venomous species are very brightly colored as a warning
Honestly depends more on where in the food chain it is
there’s a lot more that goes into it for venomous stuff than for poisonous species
coral snakes are a good example of venomous wanting to be seen, scorpionfish are the exact opposite
hi guys
It does
It's pitch black mouth works as a threat display
Cobras and other snakes also have forms of threat display, they're just less obvious because they're predators that also use their venom as a weapon
Anyone have like a top view skeletal for an icthyosaur?
What one
which one
Probably not regardless of which one lmaooo
Idk like any in general
Idk man I’ve been searching all over the internet and found 0 icthyosaur top view skeletals.
there always this
Yea, which is what I said. Ichthyosaurs are horribly understudied and if you were to find one, it's probably bad
and mid!
This looks obese af, you sure? 😭
idk it's the only top view that exist ig
Sooo it kinda just depends on they're ecosystem?
Oh alr
I can edit it maybe
Idk how you’d edit it tho
Eh forget it.
Ill use pot eurhino for top view gg
Trug
Could Poposauroids pronate their wrist
I mean they weren't exactly advanced bipedal at that point
was is it hunting?
couldnt find any ornithomimids in prince creek so i was just a little curious as to what it could be
Spec ornithomimid of some variety
There's an unnamed ornithomimisaur from the formation
When Prehistoric Planet doesn't use a specific name, it's usually because it doesn't have one yet
really not much on it but ill look, worst comes to worst id just use a relative with more study as popo has got preserved forelimbs but with not much study on them
another question regarding prince creek, was it possible for cryodrakon to travel there? always see it depicted there in art
Not all warnings are visual, also it depends on predation pressure
Could Spinosaurus teeth be good in other animal's meat ? A part from fish
spino is the grip king
Yoink
They arnt really made to rip and tear flesh off large animals. could they? sure though its not what they evolved to be.
I asked because I seen somewhere that someone wrote that it would been impossible to Spino to rip other dino's flesh, which I really doubt
people saying that spino couldnt harm large animals have never heard of false gharials ( sometimes ) hunting cattle
Spinosaurus’s size means that most animals would’ve been on the menu regardless if prompted. There’s also the fact that spinosaurus doesn’t really have a weak bite, at least overall (a bite force of 1200 kg/si, which is akin to American alligators).
Thank you guys, I really like to know more about Spino, it is my favorite dinosaur so far and I love to know more of it, of cpurse if it's coming from people that are really interested in paleontology, not people that sees dinos just as wwe fighters lol
the best thing about spinosaurus is someone should make artwork of intraguild predation between the kem kem abelisaur and spinosaurus
altruism...
Gigatitanvenator vs Spinosaurus…..
this will be adult spinosaurus vs subadult sympatric abelisaurs in 2018
wholy guacomole
What abelisaur is that? Is that titanovenator??
lowkey not a fan of " titanovenator "
the name, i hope
yuh
understandable, it isn't an official name or anything
I like the name personally better than ones named "thanos" for example imo
Nah that's a hatchling
Man that thing is huge
Could Spino walk in four for short periods of time ?
If it knuckle walks it would break its hands.
I’m not a fan of it either, but can someone offer an explanation as to why this Gigantoraptor design is so hated in palaeomedia?
Prolly because of the male display thing
^ It's very bright and speculative which Ig is fine, but I personally hate waddles
Yeah, would have loved to see some colorful wings instead
A Nicobar inspired Gigantoraptor would be awesome
Some people are just not enlightened to it’s beauty 😔
People hate this? Damn this community gets boring sometimes
I like the Tropogan influences but other than that there’s just something that irks me about the design
The only problem I have with it is that it feels too skinny, but thats probably a giganto quirk.
Waddle and dewlap supremacy
Waddle?
How big was the largest Temnodontosaurus?
Can anyone give me these deinosuchus skeletals but in better quality
Or whatever is the best deinosuchus skeletal
Might just be that Gigantoraptor is taller than Tyrannosaurus and yet still has the proportions of a small oviraptorosaur that’s like five feet tall 💀 disturbing creature
Yes yes a metre long wattle on a 2+ tonne animal 
It’s not that it couldn’t be a thing, but imo it’s the wrong way to do speculation
It’s literally just a modern animal slapped onto a dinosaur
Brilliant, thank you. Got one with every single osteoderm?
Bringing this back up because the chat has revived
no
the osteoderm pattern is speculative anyways
Idk does this answer directly to your question but i found this thesis https://media.proquest.com/media/hms/ORIG/2/nzwCK?_s=P6GNbW2S5yBuJuIyOtR8BNXIzQM%3D and while i only read bits from here and there, the writer states biped dinos lost some kinematics of their forelimbs so i think the logic could fit biped pseudosuchians too. Need to read it thoroughly later though, an interesting thesis
it's 350 pages long
The answer is no, although later crocodylomorphs got it figured out
grr we dont know if x wouldnt have y because it doesnt show in fossils!
y gets shown on x
ew
from what I've seen, it's less about having speculative features and more that it's a 1:1 copy of a modern species
there are ways of showing speculative courtship behaviours and displays without copypasting the exact display structure (along with pattern and colours) from tragopans
@twilit perch Largest confirmed allo is around 9'3-9'5 meters, anything larger isn't really allo or is doubtious
They have literally found bigger specimen's 30 feet was just it's average. The bigger allosaurus specimens grew more than 35 feet it's literally bone evidence
Send the article or skeletal then
Literally everywhere it says allosaurus (average) length was 30 feet every single time the question of *what's the biggest allosaurus specimens pops up its always 36 plus feet long and people even go so far to say allo could be 42 feet long
Idk how to do that
Where is everywhere, wikipedia? Google? There are places where still up spino to 18 meters, doesn't mean its true
Grey is largest confirmed allo
which isn't fully grown
most adult allosaurus specimens fall in the 8-9m range, that 9.3m one is the biggest widely considered allosaurus but it isn’t fully grown
They've found bigger allosaurus bones that the largest (confirmed) one so they just estimate the length which I'd think be pretty accurate with them being scientist and all
I mean you keep saying they found that but you can't provide any evidence
there's several large morrison allosaurids you could make a good argument are allosaurus proper
buts its not unanimous so womp womp
so what happen
