#paleontology
1 messages · Page 81 of 1
^
Same here. I think we have a decent accounting of the groups present between Appalachia and Europe at the time, their specific diversity is an intriguing mystery though. Probably plenty of birds and mammals doing interesting things as well.
Tbf, Mammals are doing interesting things everywhere during the Maastrichtian
lajasvenator is from Mulichinco btw
but the two are laterally congruent so
wait is there not nodosaurines known from marine deposits thought to be from appalachia? I could have sworn there was
Yes indeed
There are but not Maastrichtian
There are New Jersey nodosaurs though too from later
ah I guess I thought they were later than they are
The best record of Dinosaurs we have from Appalachia are the Birds, and taxonomically they are a chaotic mess
And various ones in Europe from the latest Cretaceous, they were definitely there
so in terms of late cretaceous stuff (late but not necessarily maastrichtian) we have nodosaurids, basal hadrosauroids, tyrannosauroids, and I think an ornithomimosaur? there's more I'm forgetting but it paints a picture of some weird basal lineages
okay
larramendi is going to find and tooth scale a 25m long late surviving turiasaur in appalachia just to shatter my remaining sanity
Technically all those have some capacity of Maastrichtian representation in Appalachia
Plus a cheeky leptoceratopsid
further reason to believe in abelisaurids absolutely manhandling carcharodontosaurids
Illokesia manhandling Mapusaurus is clearly very real and present
Exception to the rule
God must give his largest early Cretaceous abelisaurs his smallest early Cretaceous carchs
Will be a nice addition to those Large Abelisaur's army.
achillobator's a cool animal
There is a very large dentary fragment reffered to Timurlengia
iirc the scalebars on that thing are obscenely grainy
how to defeat very large Timurlengia: the [unit of measurement shown in scalebar] is actually a typo for [smaller unit]
this will be timurlengia in 2018 trust
the top one isn't to scale
probably should mention that
i mean i don't hate it its just there is no way im taking the scalebars seriously considering how grainy that crap is
How is the new achillo design looking?
Thethtehththethe Bisskety Giant.................................
and that its scalebars for a literal 1/8th of a dentary
I think achillo's the best model in the game at the moment
i like its funny hat thing
How accurate is achillo tho? Genuinely curious. fluff on it head excluded.
it looks like Utahraptor
that what i was thinking.
It basically is a Utahraptor
which is what an Achillobator should look like
I'm not a fan of it personally. It looks fine accuracy-wise but they made it absurdly huge and the 3 call animation is yikes.
on the topic of timurlengia and now achillobator can we please have paleoart of achillo and the bayan shireh tyrannosauroid fighting i think that would be very cool plz
wait like how big
the bayan shireh carcharodontosaur intervenes and kills them both (there are teeth somewhere in cedar mountain therefore all big dromaeosaurs coexisted with carchs)
It's cerato-size. They literally made the wish of UtahraptorFan come true.
touche
Honestly this feels more like the Bissekty Giant than Achillobator
the bissekty dromaeosaur is real
considering the Thalassodromeus is twice its actual dimensions, a 7m achillo including tail feathers is not bad
(the holotype was like 3 meters)
does he know?
It is when it also is a problem mechanically. PoT already suffers from like 5 mid-tier carnivores all the same size. They didnt need to further add to that issue but they did.
There are remains comparable to the Arctic "Troodon" material from hateg
me when the alectrosaur-grade tyrannosaur is alectrosaur size as an adult (this is a paradigm shift in tyrannosauroid evolution)
Yeah I agree here, it's less of how they are the same size and more how a lot of them do the same thing
(you fail to understand that this now means that alectrosaur grade tyrannosaurs can now be classified as alectrosaur grade tyrannosaurs)
this is big
achillobator?
-oh
Well, ig we can call Achillo at the very least decent?
THE
Oh yeah the actual model is fine. No complaints there.
I’m only using the plucked one because it shows the build better
i get that like all the dinosaurs are kinda oversized next to the human model but like um um what
Achillo gigachad
I expected it to be pachy metrics. Not whatever this is.
scaling in POT is less of a science and more of a vibe
....
💀
Lmao some museum tried to reconstruct Baby Bob with an Adult Tarbosaurus skull
Achillobator is mid-late turonian...
...Bissetky giant is late turonian-santonian..
...bissekty giant is adult achillobator...
AND an Adult Tyrannosaurus skull.
Baby Bob is 2 years old
an adult tarbosaurus and an adult tyrannosaurus? I didn't know baby bob has two heads
The Cretaceous Ghidorah Big Paleo doesn't want you to know about
The t.rex relative only three phylogentic trees across
wait no other way around
achillobator is bissekty giant shrinking from old age....
POT Sarcosuchus is 12 meters long... deinosuchus is an adult sarcosuchus?
achillobator uberaptorensis
you may point out they have no temporal overlap, however, there is a sarcosuchus species in south america, and things always last longer in south america, therefore it could've waited until the santonian to migrate north and become deinosuchus
i finally have an excuse to post this here without getting beaten to death
Tyrannosaurus is simply an adult Moros that went on a spiritual discovery journey to asia and came back
Must've been some spiritual awakening goddamn 😭
POT trying to not oversizes things:
"temporal overlap" means nothing
Erm the fossil record will never be complete and it won't tell us the first/last of every species so...............................
Bro unleashed their inner apex predator 🥹 🙏
if you ignore a timespan comparable to the entirety of the cenezoic they're pretty much contemporaries
Yes, Utahraptor religion was utahceratops
SIGMA male Moros channel
the time difference between utahceratops and utahraptor is roughly the same as the time difference between utahraptor and dilophosaurus. this means the first utahraptor fought dilophosaurus just like in the isle
Oh I see why I got that Timurlengia thing so large, I was scaling with GAT
Wait what ☠️
I knew it
This is so real guys
tbf i think theres a good bit of wiggle room when we're talking about effectively the entirety of the cretaceous
Since Tyrannosaurus is closer temporally to humans than to Stegosaurus, we must be sister genera as both of us are hairless bipeds
its so sad the bissektydromaeus is real
I'll never forgive Maidment for naming a new Stegosaurus sp. from the cretaceous
This would be cool if you just remove the beak ngl
That means Stegosaurus is no longer further from T.rex than T.rex is from the Iphone
Accoding to topology humans are Postosuchus
just wait a few more million years
make an iphone 2
problem solved
Beaked non-avian raptor
Arnold (Last Name Here) as the size comp
Yeap, this is a alpha sigma chad male with massive social status and
three months
10 months if you wanna be generous
oh come on its not going to be ten months
Is this not Timurlengia material
no we're not upsizing timurlengia
Wait what's been assigned to the big dromie now anyway
phalange is dromaesauridae indet and ulughbegsaurus material is either dromaeosaurid or carch
Bigotry will not be tolerated in this safe space
damn i was about to answer the question and then they exploded
granted both the phalange and ulughbeg material kinda suck
Why isn't achillobator creatable?
sins of the fathers
Uh not builable, it's in an unreleased set
@zenith fossil Hey there! This channel is exclusive to Paleo related discussions. Please head to #path-of-titans for game related issues.
God I love that character
TFP peak
Anyways, let’s get upsizing
Transformers prime 😍
on the topic of scaling where are patagotitan measurements i need to scale ninjatitan
Scale up everything because it would be peak, trust
i need like verts
i have verts what do you want
wow this is bad
He consumes Tyrannosaurs
the cervical vert tells me that there is no distinction between complete and incomplete measurements, otherwise ninjatitan's the shortest necked titanosaur of all time
Isn't this... small?
its like 17-18m scaling by scapula because idk what patagotitan skeletal is even best
Like…including Brachytrach?
yes, because brachytrach's not a titanosaur 
Yes it is now
anyway patagotitan's caudals range from 26 to 36 cm, while its shortest cervical is 42 cm
oh
outlook not good for ninjatitan
apparently its the last four cervicals
for ninja
why the hell am i calling a sauropod ninja
the last four cervicals are 24 cm? damn my neck is longer than this thing's
A master of disguise
being generous with the patagotitan scaling, i get 16-17m for ninja
18 meters of tonnage that you will not be able to see... until it hits you
A true giant 
Okay I need this ask this but for the validation of Oxalaia, could it be a different spinosaur all together or no solely not because it's known from very very fragmentary remains? ( This maybe imcldues Sig )
having successfully convinced a Pycno that my Yunnano was a tree yesterday, i think this is possible
Has anyone scaled Nullotitan?
i never realized how much i hate this thing until i actually had to say its name a conversation
hmmm yes the ninjatitan
I mean, it is a different spinosaur altogether, it's not synonymized with sigil or spino
What how flipping stupid do you have to be to think a dinosaur is a tree ☠️, then again this is POT
i'm just going to go with 17m until i decide to try and crunch the numbers again to get a marginally more specific number
Chances are he had on the bright White skin too
just wait until I name Paulbunyantitan
Bold of you to assume it isn't a tree
Oh wait really?
Unironically (kind of) I’m surprised striking black and white dinosaurs or even something like an Okapi scheme aren’t more common
of course it is every single cenomanian spinosaurin is spinosaurus aegypticus don't you remember
No I had a black and brown skin and was standing next to an actual tree
Does your idle at least have animation where you at least resemble sort of a tree
every maastrichtian tyrannosaurin is tyrannosaurus rex... i'm sorry nemegt sauropods but it had to be done
If I recall correctly there was an abstract some time ago about an antarctic dromeosaurid, can't seem to find it though. Does anyone have it?
oh wait patagotitan literally has an appendicular osteology
am i stupid?
Lump bataar into Tyrannosaurus and split efremovi because efremovi may be campanian 😏
appendicular yes, axial no, much to my sadness
SVP thingy. Imperobator
Why patagotitan specifically again?
because futalognkowhatsit doesn't have a scapula and its like earlier or something
Was there any more news on it after the abstract?
Is Imperobator like even real, cause iicr it's know from a simgle toe bone but again I don't want to question just yet of animal's validation
its remains are decent, for an antarctic animal at least
Dromeosaur toe bones tend to be somewhat distinctive
specimen is a foot
no ginglymoid distal metatarsal II
must be a Dromaeosaur
Yeah my bad I usually don't get behind animals known from feet remains
holy crap lois 1 minute slowmode
achillobator must be popular
anyone vividly remember rickraptor's "antarctoraptor" deviantart posts
Oh no sub arcto-metatarsaly for a supposed Unenlagiine. Gotta love it 
Yes
according to 15 year old me rickraptor is the best spec evo writer
This is so true, just keep this one at 20 seconds at least
Hey table how did you get Timurlengia so small, I keep getting 8.5 meters
I hope the maxilla material is ended up being a referral, cause I’m not seeing very Dromaeosaur-y characters in impero’s foot
it is currently a tetanuran indet., which is way lamer than dromaeosaur with no claw
Option 3: mysterious Gondwana Avialans
woah.... balaur 2...
Maybe Imperobator is a megaraptoran?
I meeean. Apparently they share a few characters according to the description
this confirms the hell creek carcharodontosaur
Appendicular fusion
turn it into a basal Avialan
I know this been discussed many of times but specifically regarding to Deinosuchus again is 7.2t a okay estimate for hatcheri which maybe is Rugosus
you might be able to get it a bit more around 6m if you're nice to it
maybe just under 7m at the absolute most
although i'd imagine gauging something's size from "projected dentary morphology" isn't the best grounds for any form of real upsize in the first place
Hiya
projected dentary morphology is the best way to conveniently upsize animals (1.05 meter Dryptosaurus skull)

are there like, adult alectrosaurs you can scale it off of
jinbeisaurus maybe
bajada colorada and co find its actually normal sized animal
ninjatitan is that early? christ
i guess that makes 1 interesting feature besides its name
direct evidence of competitive displacement of diplodocids and megalosaurids by titanosaurs
oh god i'm gonna have to scale those megalosaur teeth won't i
if i had a nickel for every time a diplodocoid lineage shrank in order to survive into the cretaceous i'd have three nickels. which isn't a lot but sincerely f*ck you maraapunisaurus
why
oh wait even better the only confirmed subadult material is mll-pv-014 which is this
are you just doing the entire early cretaceous of south america
just bajada colorada and mulichinco
same thing really
romualdo and cerro barcino sobbing
actually saying that there's not much in cerro barcino but unlike the others it has taxa people actually acknowledge exist
wow this thing is even more stupider than i thought
Why can’t table waste his time scaling irrelevant Maastrichtian fms
i already scaled like every maastrichtian abelisaur
you people can't be happy with anything
i was going to make a la colonia chart but when i saw the titanosaur was small i changed my mind
Think of the mammals and shtuff 🙏
"wow the la colonia abelisaur is a mostly complete articulated skeleton, i sure hope they figured more than a phalange and partial maxilla!"
it's only funny if the only viable prey item is one that dwarfs carnotaurus
la colonia has much to learn from mata amarilla/pari aike/cerro fortaleza/whatever its name is today
Does Spinosaurus preserve an ulna or radius
You can be the first person to scale Chubutinectes too
i hope the la colonia hadrosaur ends up being cool
an ulna, but it's undescribed
i swear i visited like four different websites while waiting for the one minute slowmode to end so i could type this
Oh unlucky, what about all those arm pictures that are circulating online?
I don’t think it’s possible to make the austrokritosaurs cool
Average Morrocan privately owned fossil (composite of different sized individuals and possibly multiple species)
FPDM skull vibes
After looking into it well enough, this thing is really cerato sized. If this thing was as big as it is in this game but in real life? There is no way that its mass would be under 900kg..
Its nearly as big as Maip its absurd
The real Megaraptor….
Big ass "Kryptops" tooth
laughs at bissekty - utah
“Utah” 💀
?
Were you calling that Utah?
no
I mean I think the new dino resembles the Utah mod pretty closely. That's just my opinion though
Yeah they're basically the same animal
Its laughing at bissekty and utah, its not a Utah obviously but might as well be at this point seeing how massive it is (even then it'd be almost twice the size of normal utah imo. utah is huge but not like THAT huge)
a h
iirc utah's roughly similar height wise to a polar bear, its shoulders/hips would have been about the same height as our shoulders. Which is kinda terrifying
Not quite true. A utah would look you in the eye but it's firmly shorter through most of the body
I'll give them at peast a pass on this because the sheer size makes it a LOT easier to fight, especially since it can be hit by almost everything while pounced
whats bissekty
A possible giant dromaeosaur identified from a single toe bone
Not even sure if bissekty is even bigger than Utah there's so little to go off of
It's a toebone. It don't mean jack.
either it has really big feet or it is reallt big
Just claim individual variation and you will be fine.
What an interesting interpretation
Please fix this. I cannot with how big it is.
(Utah for comparison.)
It is obvious that the game does not use the editable unreal engine square as a metric system. Iggy looks well sized yes but honestly, rocks and trees are ginormous all around too.
That argument works for just about any oversizing that is done ^
except this one this one is pretty crazy xD, it is about +200% larger than the actual Achillobator, not 30%, not 50%, 200% -- might even be more
I get it, as game developers they do want their own playable to fit a certain niche and playstyle, all respect to it but being close in size to the real creature? This is one is the furthest away, way worse than Bars and EO by a longshot in their oversizing
YES. When I saw how big it was I said… “this isn’t right.” Everything in PoT is funny with sizing but this is too much imo.
yo
Hello
Thalassodromeus would like to have a word:
Also, I feel like the devs oversized Achillobator this much to make it more distinct from the other raptors — especially since it's meant to be the "mob boss" of the smaller raptors and with Laten already basically near IRL Achillo's size . . . Yeah . . .
Fun Fact:
Laten Isn’t real
invalid fetus
nanotyrannus becoming valid
No. Little fetus baby dont deserve genus title
It also affects gameplay, achillo now doesnt play like the raptors at all just from the model size alone, it cant do what the raptors can.
Anyway, Rex skeletal vs Microraptor skeletal
NANOTYRANNUS SHALL BE NO MORE!!! 🗣️🔥💯
Please remain on topic for this channel
i like that larramendi's supposed largest Pilmatueia vert in addition to being an incredibly fragmentary neural arch is like half the size of the overlapping elements of the only other preserved dorsal
Omg, Achillobator is huge
😭
Christ almighty it's big.
Certified Path of Titans moment.
dicraeosaurus coming in clutch for pilmatueia scaling
consider my whelms unsatiated
largest you can get it seems to be with the cervicals
Thats a warcrime in skeletal format
I read this as “dicraeosaurus coming to church for pilmatueia scaling”
pilmatueia does sound like the name of a religious ritual
i can't spell pilmatueia
I can't spell it but it's a fun name to say
We shall see 😈
I need permian fungi taxa give pls
Question, what fossils of achillobator do we have and are there any pics
Current best skeletal of Achillobator tmk
just to make sure i'm not screwing something up here but a 3.5cm megalosaur tooth would belong to a pretty small animal right
yeah
At least it isn't in the same situation as Dakotaraptor
Pray for this guy to be truly valid 😔🙏
Too bad, he's a turtle now 🐢 /j
truly one of the biotas of all time
so what are all the aniamls in order from biggest to smallest
abelisauroidea indet megalosauridae inet lajasvenator leinkupal abelisauridae indet bajadasaurus pilmatueia ninjatitan
wow ninjatitan is really small and also bipedal
Just like ninjas…
I need to make a chart of something should I do udurchukan, kirkwood or djadochta
kirkwood and udurchukan are hard choices
wow a 6.8cm metacarpal what will the benevolent random do
actually i'm torn because kirkwood has this which is also very funny
tooth not diagnosable to family level
make it megalosaurid
profit
Udurchukan I wonder if there’s any Titanosaur material to scale
realest thing ever said
i'm impressed, the udurchukan formation wiki page probably has the highest number of unsourced faunal claims i've ever seen
bajada colorada was surprisingly pretty normal if we ignore the unsourced deinonychosaur
...paleobiodb has 3 sources for udurchukan, one of them is this
Amur tyrannosaur the mightiest ever
the second source i haven't looked at but the third source is this
impressive how they just made this formation up. i'm going to do kirtwood
kirkwood has a totally definitely 25m brachiosaurid too
it is a brachiosaurid and it is big btw it’s just also only known from like 2 vertebrae, but brick scaled it to 25m so I’m going with that
tarbosaurus
Found most of the Udurchukan stuff. Lots of paywalls
Oh but I’ve bypassed yippee
TIL Kirkwood has a very large goniopholidid. Like half of Deinosuchus's length
well, I don't know if it is a goniopholidid, but that's the most abundant and largest non-eusuchian croc around, so probably is
i wonder if i can save leinkupal's life because the dorsal seems to be not that tiny
although idk if all the verts are even one individual
galeamopus conveniently doesn't have a complete D2 to scale with
favorite crocodylomorph?
save him, be a hero
allodaposuchus looks so cool
hard pick, but i think i'll say Pakasuchus
protosuchus is peak tho
favorite one of these things
this size comparion is bad so no reponse
this image is wild they took shonisaurus, scaled it to the length of sikkaniensis, and labeled it pacificus
random may I ask if there was a crocodilian that was somehow larger than deinosuchus what woudl it's weight limit be as a lot of animals do ( how it make sense )
if it was fully aquatic then it probably could exceed Deinosuchus size, but we have many fully aquatic crocodylomorphs and they never got close to Deino's size so maybe not
Make up some random Metriorhynchus vertebrae and say you can scale it to 20 tons 
Allodaposuchus mentioned 💯 💯 🗣️ 🔥
This is painful. Mosas fluke……
also regarding megalodon again so you said 127t is a fine esimate for a max megalodon?
he’s so silly
ONG I CRINGED SO HARD LMFAO
Why is its fluke so small 
is there a lore reason i got the same size scaling with all the overlapping elements of dicraeosaurus and galeamopus respectively
You know him, you love him, sarco
Also 4 mutual servers
crap i forgot the actual important part
leink continues to be screwed
No, find a better chart. This is nasty
now i'm torn between if i'm supposed to consider these all one individual because larramendi calling the thing a partial skeleton and franoys labelling them all as coll. would seem to imply so but also like i don't know if that's ever actually said anywhere
and i need to find a diplodocid with actual dorsal and caudal measurements
sauropods are stupid
Do we have any good visual ideas of the size of some of the Early Cretaceous Glacial systems we have direct evidence of?
why do all of us only talk in the same five minute intervals
are we senile or something?
Kirkwood formation
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08120099.2019.1590457 should be a figure in here
me when i'm in a dying competition and my opponent is 20% of sauropods
This it?
Seems like a really big system
Yep that's it, didn't read the whole paper but yeah it does seem big
Surely perennial at that size too right
Glaciers are by definition perennial
Well definitely larger than that Piedmont. But a Piedmont contributes to a huge icefield. Bigger than what the figure shows I think
thank god i found the stupid diplodocus vert measurements
its getting increasingly annoying that all these 100 page pdfs keep freezing chrome every five minutes and i need to scroll back to find the stupid table after i reopen my tabs each time
I know your sins
alright i think i've been able to get leinkupal to a point where its >10m no matter how you slice it
PBDB shenanigans again, relatively old reports of Ceratopsids from Campanian-Maastrichtian deposits in Kazakhstan
i'm 90% sure i mentioned those on paleomedia or something a couple weeks ago
nvm i forgot where i said it
That seems kind of real
and the whole redating from santonian-early campanian to campanian-maastrictian seems kinda iffy
If only Kakanaut wasn’t lame and preserved diagnostic fossils
i think i can live with this being the absolute largest i'm getting leinkupal
The Abelisaur is merely fodder at this stage of size
it also shrinks a bit if you consider the holotype and paratype the same individual so ha
He did know
what if i say it isnt 10m
Did dilo had a claw on its fourth finger?
Kodiak and polar bear victim
faaax
Bro chose two of the largest terrestrial carnivores alive today and said it'd kill a mid-sized theropod 😭
No, most archosaurs have the first 3 claws and then the last 2 aren't
I'm a dilo hater so I had to 😭
How the hell can you be a Dilo hater
L
Here's a place who would enjoy seeing how damn robust Trike's pelvis is
Gotta keep the rexes from severing your spine somehow
Didn’t stop em anyways 
The slow and dimwitted Ceratopsians. rex was merciful in comparison to its rambunctious Asian counterpart who quickly put an end to their antics
so like did rexes teeth fall out like gators? it would be pretty wearing on them with that bite force and diet
Basically all dinosaurs regularly lost and regrew teeth throughout their lives
Which one is more accurate?
Idk jack about accuracy, but the second one has the cooler head
both good
Heh. Left definitely better. 😈
The crest is indeed more satisfying
i'm leaving leinkupal like this until i have an excuse to figure out how many individuals comprise the material
I think I said like months ago I’d be adding passeriformes to my updated theropoda cladogram but I definitely did not completely forget to do that
So hopefully in the coming weeks, if I have time of course, I will be making some new progress on it.

table is that English
Holy crap Lois new dacentrurus skeletal
i can do it
if i can do every non-passeriform theropod then i can finish the job
so how big Dacenturus again?
In length?
length and mass
Ill be gding it tomorrow
9.1m
okay
I would say 2nd one
neck
guys i love the new achillo i was today with a pack of 5 we had hunting strats 1 on each side of the animel and the others follow behind it
Lion activities
fr
ngl it was epic asf running stratigectly with the boys hunting a lamby phrew the woods
I’m from Alaska.. Cordova, our glaciers there have melted tremendously since I was a kid. Extremely sad, yet I cannot wait to dig in the silt and rocks eventually
THE LION OF THE JURASSIC
Douse any one know when a new herb will be add and what it will be
its finally out
if i were to want to become a paleontologist, what steps should i take before applying to a job that would offer courses? i dont really know how the whole business works but i truly want to get into it
A) Tf is your pfp
B) AFAIK you need to go for courses first (Bio-Geo are the recommended) then internship then you can start jobbing
A) my pfp is my little doggy, his name is orgalorg ❤️
B) I’m looking at different colleges that have undergraduate and graduate programs for geology. So would that be a good start for courses?
C) ty :)
so you have to go for a bachelors first, some sort of geology or bio depending on what you want to do, and then you go to grad school for paleo
grad school is kind of a different beast so it’s best to look into that as well but in paleo you can skip over the masters and go straight to phd, while you’re earning your phd it kind of functions like you’re in an internship
this might be a stupid question because its literally just college, but im looking at the university of colorado, and it has minor, major, and graduate programs. so would minor be bachelors, and major be phd? also the school doesnt seem to offer paleontology, but it does offer geology. should i look at other schools?
Minors aren't your primary degree, they're something you study alongside your major
For example, I am a marine science major looking to minor in english
English isn't my main goal, I don't want to be an author or professor necessarily, but its something I'm interested in and want to further my education in. Thats really all a minor is
As for your other question, I'm not sure if you can take undergrad programs in paleontology. At least my school doesn't do that, afaik you study as a geoscience major and then focus on paleontology as a graduate student
paleo is only a graduate program
your major is what you’re getting your bachelors in, the masters and phd are a grad school thing
Both
Alright, so in that case I’ll take geology as my major bachelors degree. I’ll try to find bio-geology, if any school offers the program
Ty guys!
I hope this goes well for you! I took the paleo track at my college and it was wonderful. It’s a great way to meet notable paleontologists and have a chance to actually discuss the current sciences with them.
Even if it doesn’t turn out to go anywhere, it’s still a great experience. The one I took even had a month long trip to excavate from a multiple-burial site of triceratops in Hell Creek.
And I can confirm you’ll want to do a mix of biology and geology going in. Some folks will say to major in geo, but Carr recommended to me that I do bio instead. It also probably depends on what you want to specialize in within paleo
yeah what you specialize in definitely has an impact, I’m doing wildlife bio/evolutionary bio first before moving on to paleo
Evolutionary biology is definitely the big one, and you’ll want to take some more specialized anatomy courses if they are available.
comparative anatomy is a really good one for anyone going into paleo
If you want to be one of those folks using fancy microscopes to determine pigmentation in extremely well-preserved fossils, you’d probably want to get into cellular biology and physics
As well as organic chemistry
I work in a cancer micro lab, considered molecular paleo after talking to someone in it but I just have very little patience for non cancer micro lol
Ok this has just been floating around in my brain and I need to say something
Idk how much personal stuff there is on Thomas Carr available to people, but man that guy is something. Every day he’d come in wearing this red velvet tailcoat and leather shoes.
He looked like he was trying to evoke the classical era, even with his ponytail.
Also he was like, weirdly intense? When I had first started he had me sit down in his office and talked to me about whether I wanted to do paleontology as if I was joining the army. Otherwise he was super reserved.
Until you saw him interacting with students he’d known for longer, in which he was crazy casual and fun?
Real interesting guy, pretty swag.
Man y'all in America are lucky. here in Canada we have to go to university to become a paleontologist (Uni is significantly harder to get into and in general)
No this was in college. And yeah you still have to go through crazy schooling
For context since this is kinda out of nowhere, he was head of the paleo track at the college I went to. He also was one of the regular biology professors.
I didn’t have him as a bio professor though, I think the pressure would’ve killed me if I had the same professor for two different topics that were so important to me.
That's why I said y'all are lucky
Uni is wayy more difficult both to get into and the work at least in Canada
Ah, fair enough
Although the money side of things is still hellish agony. You’re pretty much screwed for life if you get higher education nowadays.
pretty much
unless you find something extraordinary and a museum is willing to buy it for good money
Yeah, but the odds of that are low. Plus you’d have to stay afloat in regards to paying loans in the meantime.
Tysm for the kind wishes! So biology and geology are both good, noted. I’m thinking of going to University of Colorado, so I’ll see if they have all the courses you guys mentioned.
For what role in paleontology I want, I don’t entirely know, I’m not super knowledgable on what roles there are. But from what I do understand, I would love to either go out on excavations and digging up fossils, or being in a lab and preparing the fossils. Oh and maybe inspecting the fossils to understand what species they belonged to
And funded digs
Try to major in bio or geo based on what type of paleontologist you want to be
Honestly don’t worry too much about knowing the paths you want to take within things yet, you’ll get a better idea of that later on. Colorado is a great choice btw! I’m sure you know this already, but you’d be right near Morrison. The fossil sites there are some of the most beautiful and stunning I’ve seen, highly recommend it.
Thats why I want to go, it’s smack dab in the west, where a lot of fossils are preserved. The Morrison formation is my favourite formation ever, so it’d honestly be a dream come true
Also it just seems like a great school from the research I’ve done
btw if you can getting a mentor is a massive help
You’d be going to colorado-boulder, yeah? That was one of my dream schools tbh.
Oh a mentor? For what specifically? Choosing classes, or doing classes?
Yeah lol thats what i was looking at actually, thats pretty cool
I don't know the specifics but try to get one based on what you want to do
Usually an already established paleontologist if I understand correctly. Thomas Carr was the one I studied under.
Ohh ok, ty both of you.
Thomas Carr seems really cool from what I’ve heard from you. What college does he work at?
Carthage College in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Pretty far from Colorado unfortunately.
But you would be real close to the famous Field Museum, which is a wonderful place. Plus the Kenosha harbor has several nice museums of its own.
I’ll check it out still. It’s wayyy better to have multiple options
I gotta go now, since my lunch break is over. I’d love to talk later though! Btw Boulder is lovely. I used to live near there and I plan to go back someday.
The one in chicago? Going there is on my bucket list so I can see Sue and Fleshy
Tbh I don't even know what ima do for being a paleontologist but i still have 6 years bare minimum
Oh, well have a good day! I really do appreciate all the advice, it means a lot
Well, good luck on your journey too, I think we’ll both make it
Same to you
is there actual evidence to brontosaurus and apatosaurus having neck spikes or is it just speculation or artistic liberties? im seeing many depictions with them having those spikes
speculation
Punishment
what did gsp mean by this?
Why not just lump all of Triceratopsini into the genus
Because no
@vernal hornet Hey there! This channel is dedicated solely to Paleo related discussions. If you'd like to discuss gameplay mechanics, please utilize the #path-of-titans channel. You can check what content is appropriate to what channel via it's pinned messages. Thank you!
we should it would be funny
It would be so awesome, it would be so cool
As a fellow Carthage paleo alumn I'm curious what year you graduated? Might know each other.
Guys can 12.4t megalodon be considered an average or an adult ( just want to still know the answer to this )
The smallest adult megalodon are 13-14 meters and 35 tons or so I think? 15-16m and 50 tons seems pretty apt for average.
okay I sadly probably can't be about to reason with my friend here as he finds megalodon "overrated" because of how big it is
Second largest animal known to ever live on earth and largest shark ever equates to "its just a big shark, nothing special"
Which is like, the most ridiculous sentiment I have ever heard
^
fun fact
according to gsp rajasaurus is 120% the size of magnapaulia
Tbh, the only paper I trust for meg size is Perez et al. Which is where the 20 meter estimates come from most recently afaik
It uses a more reliable scaling method than literally every other meg paper since 2002 and finds a maximum length of around 20 meters. Which isn't far fetched when you consider the vertebral column we have belongs to like a 16m individual
Yes! It’s wonderful. I don’t actually know what you mean by Fleshy, but they have a spinosaurus named Sobek and a patagotitan named Maximo that are absolutely breath-taking
Given the small size of the paleo track there I’m not quite comfortable giving information that specific since it could narrow down my identity quite easily. I will say that have actually paused college for the time being, however, so I have not graduated yet.
It was getting a bit too expensive and I didn’t feel mature enough to jump head-first into such an intensive field.
So for now I am using the knowledge I gained and building the relevant skills outside college as a hobby
Fleshy is the rex statue based on Sue, it isn't at the Field Museum atm but it was there first
this one
Ohhhh, makes sense. Yeah I did miss its visit.
I didn’t actually realize the name was Fleshy lol, very cute
i think fleshy might be a nickname, like how people called the Spino Swimbo
Also makes sense
I do think I prefer Sobek for the spino, given the whole Egyptian crocodile god thing
yeah Sobek is a better name, Swimbo is just funny
I still haven't seen it yet, wasn't able to go over the summer when it was first put in
It’s magnificent, to put it lightly. I was there for the unveiling and had a hard time holding back tears of nerdy joy.
it was cool to see the pics when it was still basically on the ground for sure, hopefully i'll have the time to go and see it
Having it suspended low over the lobby gives a fantastic sense of how spectacular of an animal it was, as well as a great chance to point out little bits of its anatomy
I hope you do as well. Even if the Field didn’t have Sue, Maximo, and the wonderful pterosaur models, Sobek would be reason alone to visit.
Oh lol, doesnt the field museum have the super accurate live sized model of sue? And people call it fleshy because it has “flesh” from what ive heard
It was a traveling exhibit that was only at the Field for a short while. Thankfully, there are numerous permanent life-sized models of equal quality throughout the museum. These models include rhamphorynchus, pteranodon (although they follow the classification of geosternbergia), and an absolutely terrifying quetzelcoatlus.
It does still have a wonderful exhibit dedicated to Sue, including a short show that goes through the numerous injuries preserved in her skeleton.
their brachiosaurus mount is something I have to see every trip I make, even if I have to walk all the way around the outside of the building
nope there’s two, one there one at the airport
the original got moved the one at the museum is made of steel now, it sits at the northwest corner
huh, that’s like right after I was there too
I do know there's another at O'hare at least
well that’s a damn shame
that actually makes me sad there isn’t a close place to see brachiosaurus now
Wait…..so that brachi was fake right……I’d assume so if they chucked it into a bunch of dumpsters
yeah we have no brachi skeletons actually on display only casts
the holotype is the most complete (and is a subadult) but it’s a very rare dinosaur to find fossils from, there’s only one partial skull that may not be fully grown either
How big is adult brachi projected to be?
27ish meters long, I can’t remember the tonnage
you can get 28m but it’s iffier and based of real fragmentary stuff
WHAT?? Nooooo, I wanted to see her so bad 😭
Is she still on exhibit anywhere else?
Ngl, cerato destroys Para, due to Para being a herbivore
this is so true guys like so true TRUST!!!
famously, all herbivorous animals just roll over and accept death, especially if their predator is several times smaller than themselves
the allosaurus that died from a thagomizer to the crotch actually just happened to fall on the already dead stegosaurus's tail
interestingly, this is a common phenomenon reported by walk-in emergency patients at hospitals, where they report to have found objects in strange bodily locations after simply falling on them
Clash of the Dinosaurs.........
||mods please dont kill me lmao||
It's funny, it would be an actual war crime
Mods kill em 
Did indoraptor and indominus rex exist? Can someone provide a up- to date skeletal reconstruction?
they are my fav dinos but i cant seem to find much paleontology studies on them
indoraptor and indominus skeletals
If spinosaurus did somehow survived to the modern day would the amazom rainforest be a suitable environment for it thrive in long enough to be successful?
@tepid grotto Indom and Indo!!!!
None of these have massive arms
they do you just gonna IMAGINE
lmfao i was trolling but ty, this is actually very interesting 
I think they’re also playing with you haha
we are not.
Oh :(
we take our paleo chatting very seriously here 
The 20t American spinosaur…
the 20t american
The 20t
did we ever do damage control for the arizonaspinus containment breach or is that like still out there
Uhh it’s…it’s just out there now, yea
The world's first north american spinosaur
So what exactly were Megalosaurs built for?
Abelisaurs wrestled, Allosaurs bleed and Grapple, Tyrannosaurus crushed, Spino slashed, but Megalo and Torvo don't seem to really have much in terms of adaptation outside of standard theropod
Wrestling, bleeding, grappling, "crushing", slashing, are all possible hunting methods that most predatory Theropods did.
Indeed, but most lines have specializations of some form into one or another
Not pointing any fingers, but Carno ain't really slashing as good as a raptor
Megalosaurs were pretty much doing what the allosaurs were doing
Torvosaurus has teeth similar in size and shape to carcharodontosaurids, I'd say even more knifelike. Can't get a better bleeder than that
I thought the most derived Carcharadontosaurids had more blade like teeth than other Theropods?
They did, yes. But Torvosaurus isn't a normal theropod
That’s because torvosaurus is a FROG 
Ah,
Torvosaurus also has a good inch on Carch teeth in the size category
Right whale and fin whale???
I sure do love placenamesaurus
The largest right whale weighed 100 t, the largest fin whale weighed 81 t with unconfirmed reports of up to 112 t. The largest estimate for megalodon is 127 t
What about blue whale subspecies
and the average Is 50?
How did meg even go extinct? 💀
Start of the ice age tanked its preybase
Are there any inaccuracies with the PoT Achillo? Other than the ridiculous size
Not really
What about the scaly feathers
The feather textures also have cracks in them like they're made of stone but I wouldn't count that as an inaccuracy.
PoT textures are some of their weakest points ngl
Yea that is very true
That's a pretty tiny nitpick
Which one
Texture
Well aside from the general look of the textures there are also some screw ups like some dino’s teeth having scales
Nah, they just need to brush more
well
This is a joke right lol
Why would it be a joke?
Teeth are modified scales, therefore Dinosaurs had scaled teeth 
Also like Vividsky said anything besides it's achillo size are just personally nitpicks
This means that having scaly teeth makes sense? (Replying to you both)
No
I was being satirical
It’s very clearly just the modeler using the scale brush on the whole dino, the inside of the mouths have scales too in some
You'd have to be looking incredibly closely to even notice that, and that's a degree of nitpicking over models that kind of isn't worth it after a certain point
also in regards to the face on achillo, i feel like that's meant to be wrinkles + scales, like a lightly scaled wrinkly skin sort of texture. Not feathers over top
In fact, I'm curious what models you've actually noticed this on? It got me interested to check and as far as I've been able to see so far, teeth in PoT models are usually either untextured or have a subtle vertical grain
Just a heads up, this talk may be better for #path-of-titans
Its not very visible on photo but zoom in in game you can very clearly see it’s a brush issue, it’s the same texture as the feathers overlayed on scales
Is Ostafrikasaurus a ceratosaur?
Isn't osta known from like 1 tooth
My trilobites just arrived!
Got a goofy looking one (Flexicalymene) and a dead family of 3 (Gerastos)!!!
It’s known from 2 teeth lmao
We really don’t know what it is because it’s so fragmentary but it’s thought to be a Ceratosaur, a Megaraptorian, or a Spinosaurid
How big were Lajasvenator and Lusovenator
Lajasvenator is 5 m, I think Lusovenator is 8 m
I got this unidentified tooth from the hell creek formation years ago. It was definitely a stupid decision, and i shouldnt have trusted it, but i was curious if theres any way to test its authenticity? I got some close up pictures of it with a microscope, and so i was curious if maybe the textures and patterns on the tooth could mean anything?
I’ll just upload some of the images now. The pictures are pretty bad, for a basic description:
The tooth is very slender, is very smooth, and has minor serrations only on the inside/back of the tooth. The top is very rough and sort of broken.
Fully grown Lusovenator? Bcuz I think the holotype is a juvenile
It's a subadult/young adult
iirc sassy's lusovenator is a touch larger than justice's
If i had a nickel for every time a basal carcharodontosaur beginning with letter "L" named in 2020 was substantially smaller than another predator in its ecosystem, i'd have two nickels
Which isn't a lot but it's weird that it happened twice
2 is a Silly goofy ah humpless conca 
Guys, is this accurate information? or is there no answer yet? (I'm talking about it's eyebrows🤨)
that's just fake
as we all know rex was green 
We have no confirmation on if it has any filaments when they reach adulthood because we have no impressions of such as of now
They likely didn’t roar per say though, that part is more likely
Rex from Prehistoric Kingdom?
unpublished specimen currently stored in CAU
The lacrimal crests may have been brightly colored to attract a mate but we don’t have confirmation on that either
Sad 😢
What was a tyrannosaurus rexes biteforce
~48-63kN
“green dinosaurs are an admission of defeat”
What about in psi?
that depends on how you're measuring psi
anterior bite force is about half of the total posterior if it means anything
Whats anterior and posterior
Front and back respectively
What about tthe amount for each one
25kN anterior assuming 48kN posterior
scaling that to the 63kN posterior would be 33kN anterior but idk if differing models would have the same anterior/posterior ratio
dwarf basilosaurus
It’s like Vaquita but better :0
Adorable!
I love him
is so cute….
so 2 in a few years sadly
Not to be that guy but it’s a kekenodontid, not basilosaurid nor basilosaurus
I own this book for 2 weeks, anyone ever read this one
@primal ice TLDR on why "Dakotaraptor" doesn't exist, at least how we understand it.
Dakotaraptor is described by paleontologist Robert DePalma. DePalma has been a controversial figure for many years and for many good reasons. Most relevant to Dakotaraptor, instead of having the specimen in a museum like a normal person, he has it on display in the private top floor of a Mall, where he only lets the people he trusts actually view the material. Red flag.
Then, more importantly, he was exposed last year for his "KT Extinction happened in Spring" paper, where it was revealed that it was stolen work from the paper of a colleague, just with data points slightly changed to not look plagiarized (Pictures are copy+pasted too its so blatant lmao). If a paleontologist is a complete fraud like him, and nobody else can even see the bones themselves, then can we be sure it's even legit?
This revelation has also made people look into the dakota paper itself further. The turtle bone thing was funny when it happened but also only the tip of the iceberg. Since then, not only is the wishbone a turtle bone, but the backbones are probably ornithomimid backbones, the leg bones are probably oviraptorosaur legbones, and the supposed sickle claw is likely just a T. rex hand claw. After you remove all those bits (which is basically dakota's whole identity) you're left with like...2-3 little bones, and even then those might belong to the other raptor of the region, Acheroraptor, so we can't really be sure.
Is there a large raptor in Hell Creek? Sure. Is it "Dakotaraptor"? Probably not.
Maybe we need that guy 
Link to a TED talk describing the whole DePalma Fraud scandal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIarqUj_4tE&t=6s and paleontologist Andrea Cau disclosing why most of dakotaraptor's bones are chimeric https://theropoda.blogspot.com/2023/09/dakotaraptor-non-esiste.html?fbclid=IwAR2GlY5b06xSVIGDgzKM9RVqMeey2xPIaXyuW2QAwiq9s97a0qPOiv3A38E&m=1
Vertebrate paleontologist Melanie During astonished the world of science in 2022 with a discovery published in Nature showing that the extinction of dinosaurs 66 million years ago was so catastrophic because it happened in spring, but then the tale takes a darker twist when rival scientists tried to steal the results, showing that we need to fig...
Google still says second largest raptor
Outdated page on Google
A detailed response with reliable sources vs "Google says so"
But it's is a the bait so we don't know
Well I mean dakotaraptor is a chimera consisting of multiple bones from different animals soooo
Plus if it was a acheroraptor why are the specimens big
With all that being said, would the remnant definitive Raptor bones still be classed as Dakota? If they're not Achero
Prehistoric wildlife is not exactly a credible source
Prehistoric wildlife 🤮
Who even knows at this point lol
Acheroraptor itself is only known from a partial skull which tells us nothing about its age, and the few actual raptor bones in dakotaraptor suggest a smaller animal than what's typically described (Still bigger than deinonychus but not really close to utah sized anymore). So it's possible. Keep in mind it's still likely that it's not acheroraptor, but it's not really "dakotaraptor" anymore is it? 95% of the taxa was founded on a combination of chimeric material and lies.
Turtle wishbone moment
And then why would there been turtle bones and rex bones at the same place of time it kinda doesn't make sense to me
Because Turtles go where they want?
"Dakotaraptor" was found in a mass bone bed, which is where a load of animals were acclimated together over time due to water flowing dead animals to the same general spot.
Cause after death bones get scattered a lot?
Oh yeah I forget do we know which turtle from hell creek it was?
in theory yeah but essentially every "dakoraptor" element's dromaeosaurid affinities have been called into question in some form to the point that the only material generally agreed to likely belong to an actual dromaeosaurid would not be even remotely diagnostic as a genus
So yes by technicality, but it should be a nomen dubium
Again, is it really "Dakotaraptor" anymore if 95% of what we know from it is either something else or lies?
Then we don't know what animal it is so we have multiple bones in a place once though to be a raptor its a debates are going on
It was "discovered" and named by a fraud.
Yes but why are there so many bones at one place there's dromaeosaurus Tyrannosaurus turtle
"Dakotaraptor" as a name has been irreversibly tarnished anyway, if/when an actual specimen of a larger dromaeosaur is found, it will more than likely not be Dakotaraptor
and even then some people like cau question any of the dakotaraptor material has dromaoesaurid affinities
Dakotaemys 
although iirc lancian thinks there's a good case for the caudal and metatarsal(?) being actual dromaeosaurid material which is what most people seem here seem to adopt
Lets say an animal dies by a river. When the animal dies in said river, the flowing water carries the body downstream. Eventually, the body gets caught in either a bend in the river or at a blockage. This happens with more dead animals upstream, and then more, over hundreds to thousands of years. That's how mass assemblages happen.
Then why would the bones I'd be at one single place like it was at movement
because the rivers deposit them all in the same spot
^
And keep in mind, such bonebeds look like this. "Dakotaraptor" wasn't a neat skeleton. Bones are all over the place.
Mhm
All I can pick out is some leptoceratopsid skull in there
Thos are protoceratops
This isn't an actual picture of the bonebed. This is just what mass bonebeds tend to look like.
Is it leptoceratopsid or leptoceratopsian?
topsid
Aaaah, gotcha
using this as an example only because i remember the image is in the supplementaries but the leinkupal type/paratype quarry has several clades over multiple fossiliferous zones in a seemingly very small area
kind of a when it rains it pours type thing with outcroppings sometimes
also on the topic of cryptic hell creek taxa of questionable existance 
There's no photos of the Dakota bonebed cause it doesn't exist /j
gsp shennanigans
But yeah, when mass bone beds have bones all over the place, it can make things....difficult. A modded creature example is Ampelosaurus. All of its remains are in a mass bone bed as well. While we know unlike dakota, it actually exists, the fact we can't really discern what specimen goes with what means that we don't really know what it looks like, outside of "big titanosaur".
and our other favorite bonebed taxon of somewhat controversial size estimates
That does explain the many different interpretations of Amp
We have no evidence yet until we have a bigger bone of a dromaeosauride that doesn't have Mitch Mash is all over until then it's a the debate we don't know if it's valid or not valid it could be just unknown
Dakotaraptor, as of now, is likely invalid. And, as the name has been tarnished by association, if there is a large Dromaeosaur in Hell Creek it will not be named as such
Sadly this ain't a brontosaurus situation where it can come back 
Exactly.
And nanotyrannus
Ironically nanotyrannus has a greater chance. At least while Bloody Mary still has yet to be fully looked at.
One specimen in private collection 
It has
Don't forget the Montana Deuling Dinosaurs as well, they're currently being examined at NCNHM
I’m fairly certain the bone bed is a real place
This is what I meant. Bloody Mary is being looked at there, but the results have yet to be published. It's either gunna actually give nano some validity or kill it for goood.
gsp revived copei for some reason too
honestly i'm not sure what gsp didn't screw up in some form in that book
I'm going to see the Deuling Dinosaurs in a few months :D
Nanotyrannus if it were genuine would it be a tyrannosauroid like alioramini?
And some folks are still relatively confident in the presence of large Dromaeosaur material. Forget the nomenclature though, none of it is diagnostic beyond, “probably big”
There's been plenty of funny theories on it being an alioramine or albertosaurine, but we don't really know.
It would likely be a Tyrannosaurine, just given the time range and location. But it being an Albertosaurine or Alioramine is a fun thought
lets just wait until 2043 for carr's jane osteology 
Foxy please stop quoting the first page of Google as an argument
Because turtles can live alongside other animals
That study is flawed and inconclusive, as such Nanotyrannus is not yet considered valid
If someone has the image comparison between Carr's and Longrich's studies on nanotyrannus that'd be grand.
i really want the actual alamotyrannus to be published because that thing is probably not even tyrannosaurus and i am being 100% sincere here 
Tyrannosaurus mcmasterae or whatever it was
that's different
The metatarsal is kind of big right? Idr where Lancian’s silhouette for it is 
You mean this?
because remember folks
alamotyrannus is a large terminal teratophonin/teratophonin adjacent taxon
sounds like bissekty giant (prob got name wrong
i think brontosaurus should become valid again
it is
Yup. And would you look at that. Using less data created the result the paper was looking for 💀
oh
Brontosaurus has been valid for like... 10 years now
Carr brutally mogs
raptorex is rizz
nanotyrannus is sus
no one ever told me 💔 or i just dont remeprr
jesus has it really been 10 years since 2014
The world is an unfair place
2018 was 7 years ago
🤫🧏
Misinformation 😁
more gsp antics 
wasnt there a vertebrae too
Why couldn’t he just do one based thing and call it ?Albertosaurus lancensis
Again, study is flawed and upon further testing and review does not hold up
just saying pre-late maas tyrannosauroid biogeography/dispersal is far more interesting than this stuff
The issues with the study are right here
Albertosaurus lancensis is sus
Albertosaurus libratus is rizz🤫🧏
Then we wait till a fossil of a juv rex is at a 14
Bro is lumpmaxxing mad sus
Both are sus
Albertosaurus periculosus is rizz
Albertosaurus suprahorseshoecanyonensis
So skibidi
only in ohiotyrannus
Skibidohiorizzosaurus drippyensis
Studio's stuff is garbo poop. Leaves a sour taste in my mouth calling it a "study" when its just living animals pitch shifted
Dinosaurs sounded like Eldenritch creatures because we said so
So…..so are these real…..I still don’t know and every second I’m unsure is a second the life is sucked from my soul
It is pain
Me when this is the sixth server I ask for the identity of this bone
pelvis
probably a theropod
@ruby patio geological context?
Nemegt formation, was found alongside very large Tarbosaurus remains and some ornithomimosaurs
I'm gonna eat you
I'M SORRYYYY please dont digest me
I don't like being digested 😰
Are there any theropod pelvis pictures I could compare this to
Looks fairly ornithopod-like
hello people what did I miss?
what carnivores lived in the hell creek formation, aside from well...tyrannosaurus rex obviously
Nananannnananananannatoraynnus
(Acheroraptor, Pectinodon, a couple other unnamed raptors, and of the heaviest salt grains Nanotyrannus)
these names are getting too complicated
what do we know about raptor teeth? do they have serrations on both the front and back? is that with only a few raptors?
I'm pretty sure that is almost every carnivore with serrated teeth ever
interesting. in that case, can a tooth with serrations on the back be narrowed down to a general species?
No just genus indet. or family indet.
sorry, what does that mean?
Hell Creek in terms of predators is just
TYRANNOSAURUS ft. Acheroraptor
with indeterminate troodontids and dromaeosaurs pending
E.g. you can tell the teeth are from the genus Acheroraptor but not whether it is Acheroraptor temertyorum
Is there an American shant?
Indet = indeterminate
And paleoswania iirc
Edmonto's the best ur getting
The super-Edmont specimens' pathologies may actually represent automorphic characteristics of a Saurolophine
Ok but also don't jump ahead
That's just one of the large specimens
Ah i get it, so an indent is just a more general idea of what the tooth could belong to, be it genus or family or others?
Also another interesting point; Sue was mentioned to have been excavated 4.6 meters above Fox Hills in Larson, 2008. That means its around 69 million years old accounting for regular sedimentation rates.
Stan is 15 meters under the KT boundary so it would be around 66 MYO, and CM 9380 is 67 meters over the Pierre Shale so it's close to 67 MYO
Yarp, it can be designated at any level afaik, it's just used to say "It's in here, but beyond that idk lol"
This literally means nothing to me, explain why it's an interesting point
So erm, if an unidentified tooth from the hell creek formation had serrations only on the back, what would the indent be?
Tyrannosaurus' timespan is variable in literature but it may stretch significantly far into the Early Maastrichtian, which is approaching Hall Lake dating
Bro's late to the Judithian Tyrannosaurus train
Got a picture?
Puts into question the validity of mcraensis
Yeah, they kinda suck because trying to take a picture through a microscope is really annoying
Guh, any full images? 😭
Do you have pictures taken with a regular camera
Heres a full picture of it sorry
Check the fossil forum page for Hell Creek tooth characteristics and automorphies
I dont have a measuring stick but heres a general size idea
That seems similar to Acheroraptor but with seemingly smaller serrations?
Where can i find that? Sorry
Ty ty
brb
Updated March 29, 2023 Changed information on Avisaurus archibaldi A few years ago most of the smaller theropod teeth from the Hell Creek/Lance Formations were identified based on teeth from the Campanian assemblages of North America. Over the past couple of years new discoveries have shed new li...
Yeah the serrations are extremely small, and again, only located on the back. Thats why i got closeups so yall could see it better
are denticles the serrations? im not very good with terms, sorry.
Kk so discussed it with an idiot (Lancian), it's dromaeosaur indet.
Didn't... they alread know that before?
ah interesting
Huh?
that looks like a dromaeosaur tooth
oh, thanks discord
well, i looked at acheroraptor. i tried to understand some of the terms, and some of them match, others dont. apparently theres a difference between the front and back teeth, although i only have one tooth. there seems to be something about extended ridges alongside the sides of the tooth, which i cant seem to see. the pictures do seem to match my tooth, but i cant just go off of that
Say it's a juvenile Dakotaraptor, no-one can prove you wrong
the tooth seems to be pretty worn, so the ridges are less visible. Its likely it had seerations on the front as well but it just got too worn down
i see no serrations on the front, at all. so it has to be really worn down. i dont mean to doubt yall, im not expert at all
Heres some pictures that can hopefully highlight the front of the tooth. I think there actually are a few ridges along the side
i think i can see some faint serrations there
might just be the light
Its possible. If there were serrations, what would that make the tooth?
Imo its probably acheroraptor, seems to fit all the characteristics
its def a dromaeosaur tooth, but with the mess that hell creek dromaeosaurs are its hard to pinpoint which one it is. It'd be hard even if they werent a mess lol
Well, its nice to have an indent at least. Ty guys, i actually learned a lot from thus
Jon Kuo
i see its almost like moder day alligators, instead its limbs are a bit change along with its massive skull,
Kaprosuchus isn't that large (200 kg, about the size of American Alligator). Kaprosuchus definitely had terrestrial affinities. It's teeth don't lie. But it still has high nares and eyes and its likely body frame based on relatives. Think cuban croc really and you got kapro.
^ this applies to the other Mahajangasuchid as well
Weird Cuban croc
and irregardless afaik hell creek isn't usually considered to have even begun deposition by 69 Ma
Yeah hell creek deposition starts at 68+- something i forgor. However what we do now is that Sue is one of the stratigraphically lowest specimens alongside B-rex etc, and Stan is one of the highest ones.
texas (ft i'm too lazy to include any other glupshittos)
How long are Giga, Tyrannotitan and Carch skulls?
Hominids are soo underrated 
what the hell is that ceratopsian
Also where did aguja nanotyrannus go 
Arboreal deinonychus
agujaceratops and i don't want to throw up a teratophoneus edit or something for the latter
- Agujaceratops 2. Texan Tyrannosauridae indet and 3. Angulomastacator ?
@little mauve I was wondering if you’ve some answers on Theropod metabolism
Controversial subject but I'll try my best, what's up
if I was to do a piece of a sleeping Halszkaraptor, would a swan be a good analog for that
Lucky me, I was wondering if anything has tried to estimate values for things like BMR and FMR for any Theropods
yes.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341362189_The_fast_and_the_frugal_Divergent_locomotory_strategies_drive_limb_lengthening_in_theropod_dinosaurs#pf16 Table 3 but I'm having a hard time corroborating the sources, I think the bibliography may be wrong 😵💫
Bingo
I did a quick wikiepdia search
also petiton to name the Texan Tyrannosauridea ( Texannus 🙂 )
Your scales pixel ratio neever ceases to amaze me at how utterly garbage they get
@light osprey OK ran down the sources for at least one of the columns. First it's https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301279301_Body_Size_as_a_Driver_of_Scavenging_in_Theropod_Dinosaurs then https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263100656_Dinosaur_physiology_Evidence_for_mesothermy_in_dinosaurs. Hopefully gets you started, it hasn't been freshly modeled in its own paper afaik
I've been wanting to say this for some time, thank you
But why save the image when I can just screenshot it which takes five seconds shorter
^^^ he just like me fr
although if the will of the people demands it
Me who saved and screenshot this image:
Wow this really is a fickle topic huh
There's also Wiemann et. al. 2022 which deals with actual specific biomarkers but it's not open access (though I'm sure I have a copy somewhere) iirc they produced ranges rather than specific BMRs
it is fickle, it's been somewhat sketchy modeling until Wiemann figured out those biomarkers
but even then we don't have a precise picture, I'll try to find the pdf for you
not it, but here's a histology based look that's open access https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301279899_Palaeohistological_Evidence_for_Ancestral_High_Metabolic_Rate_in_Archosaurs
basically we can say with some confidence that theropods had avian or slightly sub-avian metabolic rates, overlapping with ratites and things like that
So not really befitting a Mesothermic label I suppose?
sort of a bad label to begin with tbh, both ectotherms and endotherms show a pretty huge range of metabolic rates that dinosaurs easily fall within
like I see what they were going for with that but ecto and endo are much more descriptive, it kind of flattens the differences betweeen them. Tyrannosaurus definitely wasn't thermoregulating like a crocodile, it was a true endotherm, but it had significantly lower BMR than most birds. That doesn't make it not an endotherm though
with mesotherm they were trying to come up with a new descriptor specifically for dinosaurs which kind of makes sense but like I said also can be misleading
Yeah I remember reading as such, Mesothermy being kind of a spurious term
I wonder though… I’ve also heard talk about Xenarthran metabolism. Especially regarding integument. How might those compare
More so on the comparisons to those megafauna taxa
Hey guys, I don't quite understand which version I should get, can anyone help me... Platform doesn't matter, I have everything so far but the question is, are the dinosaurs that I bought also available on other platforms ?
This is a Paleo-Chat, you should write in the Path of Titans chat
Oh sry 
Fascinating idea, I know xenarthans have lower than predicted BMRs for their size but not much else. Lmk where your research takes you
And yeah, they'll be available on other platforms too
thank youuuu
Apparently someone has calculated the BMR for Eremotherium at 560 W. I’m gonna have to dig deeper for how and where they extrapolated it
Oh it was Micheal Deak!
Most of my sources for dinos are in ml O2/min so you might need to convert to compare
The conversion would be 20.1 J/ml O2
Still one more step to get to ml O2/min i assume but I don't know the formula offhand
My mistake, the papers for the dinos are not ml O2/min it's mL O 2 h −1 g −0.67 which translates to mass specific metabolic rate. A value they invent for the paper. Too much math for me I'm afraid
I concur, guess I’ll wait for someone else to have done a conversion for the Xenarthrans
In my brief look it seems like they may not even be convertible. Might be a dead end coming at it from this angle.
I’ve tried looking at the distribution of woolly taxa during interglacial periods. Specific MATs would be nice but it’s hard to find
What are ya trying to figure out?
Temperature threshold for Elephantimorphs and Rhinocerotids retaining relatively dense fur
loop me in with what you find too this sounds interesting
So far the most intriguing thing I’ve found is Coelodonta in the Nihewan Basin
The paper on its paleoclimate however doesn’t have an MAT 
Late surviving Megatherium in the Holocene I wonder if the current 14.1 degrees Celsius annual temperature today is a well enough analogue
https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/pdf/S2211-1247(15)00639-7.pdf this might be something
Look I know it looks bad, but I just wanna know how accurate is my 2022 gasosaurus
How accurate is POT turtle man
this thing is actual crap
why him feet so thick
because i forgot to trim down the background tissue when i put brick's utah into neutral
to which you might ask why use utah when the ilium looks ugly but gat's spiclypeus does the same thing so i don't care
Accounting for stylization, pretty good, but it should have a more allosauroid skull
just found out about the yellowstone hyperpredator today and i'm baffled
What? The puma?
no
a friend led me to this
apperantly its a 130 o 200+ ton macropredatory sperm whale from the late oligocene
link it
the friend i was talking to said that there would be a paper posted at the end of march
apprently theres a good amount of specimens although there pretty fragmentary
Yeah I see no basis for any of that, it would be essentially physically impossible
you just needa wait
The AI generated image of a sperm whale really adds to the aura
nah nah nah
Really don't, 26 meter long 200 ton Macropredator goes against our entire understanding of a foodchain
Ah yes. No source. Vividen popularized it. It's totally legit. 💀
Let alone all governing principles of biology
Oh wait I zoomed in, that's a beaked whale attacking a medium sized shark
This is literally David Peter's level
FragentaryAfTaxaVividenPopularizedtoTheAnnoyanceofEveryoneThatWantsSubstantialEvidenceBeforeSubstantialClaims#15
Vividen making a video on the most fragmentary remains and making it big:
does yellowstone border the ocean or is this the famous rival to the missouri forest shark
It lives in the hotsprings
okay obivously don't hate Vividen as a person but his recent videos aren't it chief
Like I get the guy's pretty rigorous in his videos but its honestly annoying at this point. His work is not helpful for dino nerds.
^
the bible did say Leviathan could boil the waters around him 🤔
Okay ngl though hotspring marine ambushers would be a nifty role for something
First Copium Rex. Then bettisky giant. Now this. Just stop.
if y'all want actual context this is prolly the best we're gonna get
incidentally "180t+ marine predators from the americas" have a wonderful track record of maintaining their titles in the past year
apparently the the hyperpredator thingy has like...... a 11% complete fossil with 10+ specimens or something?
the comparison to bruhathkayosaurus really emanates confidence
11% complete fossil of a 200 ton animal
mfw the sizes of most giant marine taxa shrink once there's actual substantial bones of them. Megalodon's like the one exception that keeps getting bigger for some reason.
scaling based on the primary estimates for Perucetus we can see that the yellowstone hyperpredator weighs ~45 tonnes
and to think i was questioning if i was being too hasty scaling a squamosal to "somewhat above average chasmosaurine" size five minutes ago
thats what i heard
one of us should bug vividen to make a urc 44-r video
Let's be real the issue isn't scaling fragmentary remains, it's scaling them to sizes that defy all fossil knowledge and ecological systematics
Swiss Tyrant? Big Ichthyosaur, not that weird. Maybe bigger than most. Same with bruhathkay, if it existed
like c'mon its a giant abelisaur that lives in the middle of a desert thats cool
I can see the headlines already
we should bug him to make a video on the last stegosaur 
the last stegosaur
the new CHONKY stego- actually wait no thats more like what edge would do
yeah im still iffy on 130 to 200+ tons of a oligocene predator
I'm waiting for the spam chain that usually follows the last stegosaur
is there anything that could even sustain that weight?
a baleen whale, but those weren't around then
yeah im still iffy on 130 to 200+ tons of a oligocene predator
also found this funny image when i looked it up
The biggest predator of all time lived in a time when it had nothing to eat
lol
it was eating the last perucetus 
real
what size did perucetus end up at?
like 75 tons
80 tons or something
Still damn huge to be clear
