#paleontology
1 messages Ā· Page 80 of 1
but i dont know much about this, i like pterosaurs more
I mean, baryonyx doesn't have any "back ornament".
Behold, something of a middle ground
I think with bars it's more of a hunp.
Acro, Sucho, and Bary have the exact same thing lmao
thats weird
It cut off the sizes one moment
That looks cursed as hell.
Society
There full names in order of size
Mmm Iām wondering now, how would you make this work without a full set of lips
Sigilmassasaurus is north american, it also has a quite big sail
Wait, does it say when it lived?
No just that it existed
Bruh, ok.
Never knew Sahara desert was in North America.
Me not using Wikipedia
oops thought it said america
Kinda looks like adol spoon
sorry north america no big spinos for u
Montanaspinus?
There is a wiki page explaining the origins of montanaspinus
mhm decent sail, maybe
No spinos in general
Unless you count some controversial stuff
https://twitter.com/_paleogeek_/status/1509724767808536581?s=21&t=Th752-aW8VYe49wO99hklA
spinosaurus news jumpscare
i dont get why so many people are obsessed with spinos, is it because its semi aquatic + longer (+ taller?) than rex?
Oh cool
Petition to change spinosaurus abbreviation to spleen like if you support
funi croco duck
because its cool
like most animals
because it looks unique compared to other dinosaurs 
ok
Damn.
My spleen gif wonāt work š„ŗ
I know montanaspinus is fake I was just joking
I know I thought it was funny tho
Haha gif failure.
what
Peak game play
Fr tho the model is decent for Roblox
this channel is so ontopic right now!
certainly a topic
Has anyone scaled Tethydraco (not flying pose)
pterosaurs from prehistoric planet!!!!!
Wouldnāt it be cool if pot and pre historic planet partnered
nope
So Saurian
Missing the well executed part*
Neither are so 
Paleo chat! What are the wing leg lizard things from the Triassic!
Sharovipteryx
Thank you! You single handedly caused mild ecological growth in the Bahamas 
A new study has found that Megalodon was actually longer than we previously thought, plus cannibalistic Jurassic fish have been discovered, a new dinosaur species has been named, and much more!
Become a Member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDSzwZqgtJEnUzacq3ddoOQ/join
Join our Discord server: https://discord.gg/jTsGYtRBHZ
Follow us on Inst...
I knew that megalodons had a shape like this +-
basking shark
Megalodon fans when it bocomes even bigger:
It becomes longer and thinner 
Spino: heavier old brother
Sucho: taller young brother
I mean.... If you are talking about hip height, then yeah.
yes i'm talking hip height
also nice to see u again
Yeah, I just decided to take a VERY long break from social media. I was only using YouTube to watch some videos and Telegram for studies.
ur last message was like... june 
Yeah lmao.
So the guy dipped out by uttering out the biggest L that has been said here.
I'm pretty sure it's eathier a joke, eathier out of context.
50/50
oh hi pinky
Hi 
Technically speaking Trike has a higher chance of winning
I never said that Rex can't kill adult triceratops.
I remember what the situation was:
The entire chat was schooling someone who thought that triceratops was absolutely invincible. My comment was a joke.
T-Rex vs T-Rice was probably 50/50, could go either way
Arguing about what extinct animal wins in the fight is very difficult. Not only because we never actually saw them, but the outcome also depends on the individual and the enviorment.
Ah Okeh
About that T-Rex couldāve been a small group hunter (like 2 individuals or maybe even 3)
Same opinion. I never imagined that tyrannosaurus always was alone and hunted alone.
me when the incredibly questionable proximal metatarsal scalebar scaling ends with a relatively reasonable estimate rather than tears
If by winning you meant escaping with its life intact then itās statistically parsimonious. But that fruit of labour only goes one way, the animal whoās method of eating includes killing things constantly, they are at far less of a risk from dying in the given interaction then their prey.
In powerscaling terms, Rex and predators have a better fight IQ compared to Trike and prey.
Learn how Lane the mummy triceratops changed what we know about dinosaurs š¦
Do YOU think the quilts were for defense or another purpose
What are those?
Trike must have done something right, i think its the dino with the most fossils found
And we have evidence that 1 trike that did fight a trex and survived
the horns obviously
Ohhh, we had the rex vs trike arguement again
Something random but yesterday I learned that hyneria the giant Devonian lobed finned fish is more closer related to us than to lung fish... (Dipnoi)
Lol
In nature looks can be deceiving for how closely related some animals are :/...
- What's its name
- Can I use this
Anyone got a size comparison between Isisaurus and Rajasaurus?
They'll done fine
Ty
Raja dropkicks Isi and defends its title
I hate my phone it auto corrected actual words
A quick little scaling (probably not 100% perfect but about right I'd guess)
There are tertials but they are shaped differently and mostly help the body to be more aerodynamic
And for sauropods, what kind of locomotion is the most up to date for them?
A more elephant like walk or a hippo like walk
Since like in PhP season 1 the sauropods had more elephant like walk but then in PhP season 2 they're shown to have hippo like walk
That made me curious
both work for sauropods from a mechanical standpoint but thereās some evidence the hippo walk may be more efficient, you can get either one to fit with their trackways
they definitely switch gait several times in php, even in the second season you see the isisaurus do the elephant walk a few times
I suppose maybe the gait accommodates the framing of the shot. The Elephantine walk for the arrival of Dreadnoughtus is a striking image
Why of all things they use ai ā ļø
Like why not just be normal and use an artist's drawing
YEAH
I don't hate AI much but when it's being used in anything related to art and not even in a good way, then it's a big FAT no
I personally think AI should be illegal if it's going to be used to sell something or be used for anything other then concept art
Like ai in games is fine, they've always had it to some extent
But- GAAAAAAA Nevermind
Dinosaurs are robots,they were made by the fish to spy on the land creatures
They do not have to spent money
Ah that too, my apologies
Wait what exactly do they have spent money for?
Commissions?? š
But at the same time, prior to AI, news sources didn't care about commissioning people and just yoinked one from Google so idfk
To pay the artist.
Yeah it is basically the same sort of scummy process.
Ah okay am stupid but I thought it was just idk one big collaboration where no money is involved cause yk this is something professional
But yeah I was wrong
At least they arenāt using real peopleās respectable art for their 500,000th āBIGGER THAN T-REX DINOSAURS. NUMBER 10 WILL SHOCK YOUā article
š
M rex haunts me
NANOTYRANNUS SHALL BE NO MORE! š£ļøš„šÆ
Better than that stupid thing about Oxalaia being a Spinosaurus sub-species. That arguement genuinely annoys me.
True
Like, seriously. Oxalaia live in northern South America, in a swampy jungle surrounded by deserts, long after the Gondwanan supercontinent broke apart. How the hell could it possibly be the same species as Spinosaurus?
The article then proceeds to list 7 dinosaurs multiple tons lighter, 2 that are roughly the same, and then a 30+ ton sauropod they say was more terrifying than any of the other creatures listed
You forgot the part where they mention the āsea Tyrannosaurusā which is just Liopleurodon š
Peak dinosaur content.
isn't alcantara like explicitly more similar to north Africa than the rest of South America
Yeah lmao.
The article also has to mention megalodon or dunkleosteus. Because big fibsh scawy.
Erm...bull sauropod in musth...
and also coastal
My favorite part when they mention megalodon, there is always one of two pieces of art they use;
They either do the one with the livyatan biting the megs head, I think we all know which one I'm talking about
Or they show a piece where a meg is pulling a great white and breaching on an unsuspecting whale that just so happens to be a species that hadn't evolved yet
To a point. According to what I'm reading, that region was a humid forest dominated by horse tails, ferns, and conifers, and was surrounded by arid or semi-arid landscapes that was subjected to brief periods of heavy rainfall.
Exactly.
Don't forget that the authors of the article will probably wright something about megalodon still being alive.
If you mention megalodon, you just HAVE to mention the fact that it might've survived in the Mariana trench.
"Maybe we will learn the answer some day."
https://fxtwitter.com/aberrantologist/status/1750628499294179623
One of the few nanuq that I like
this an alright baluar bondoc skele? its by jaime heddan
so whats the point here
like i agree that oxalaia being outright synonymized with spinosaurus is questionable but I'd imagine there's better reasons than just environment considering alcantara was pretty similar to north africa
Not really. Oxalaia is just another casualty of "the great species crunch", where a bunch of scientists keep trying to cut down as many unique dinosaur species as possible.
so why are we bringing up the environment 
I feel like making it out to be a giant conspiracy is also not a valid reason to doubt this
Big Paleo strikes again...
i feel like there's substantially better arguments against synonymization like... y'know... not overlapping with the holotype or proposed neotype
because alcantara's been repeatedly stated to be similar to kem kem especially
Which doesn't really say much. Convergent evolution is a thing, for all that people like ignoring that it exists, so two distantly related species evolving into similar body patterns and lifestyles due to environmental factors doesn't mean that they are the same species. Look at African and Asian elephants, or the Emu and the Rhea. Similar body patterns and behaviors, but not the same species in the slightest.
.
These examples are also incredibly closely related, which doesn't go against what Table has been saying
how is this at all environment

i'm not even saying the morphology's similar because they literally don't overlap under most people's definition of spinosaurus 
How large would a 49 cm maxilla be on Das
I got you
Also, the Polish university is working extensively with Tarbosaurus bones to better categorise and understand the animal. It's going to be very interesting considering half the individuals are undescribed.
while falcon's doing that imma just say again that environment is an odd reason to not lump oxalaia when a) its from a very similar environment to kem kem and b) even if they were from the same formation most of us still wouldn't synonymize them
my brain hurts
There is also a tyrannosaurid uncovered in Denver which is being worked on by BDM. As far as I know all of Denver is Early-Late Maast so I wonder if its Tyrannosaurus
Is it the one in the background or foreground
BG
New nanotyrannus fossil

i blame you people for me reading that as something else
I can label it, one sec 
This is going to be a very interesting year for Tyrannosauridae
- Bertha paper
- More Tarbosaurus
- Gorgosaurus being split into multiple species
- More news on Bagaratttswtdwtwdetdewednn (idk how to spell)
rise gorgosaurus infradinosaurparkensis
I'm going to attack
Ok so the Wangshi thing is already bigger than Das even whilst being incomplete
See for yourself
Yep this is a maxilla
^ Genius statement
assuming its the one here it'd be funny to commit downsize
although iirc pin 551-1 doesn't have a subcutaneous flange either but i still endorse funny downsize
PIN 551-1 itself is only 10.94 m because the skeletal author probably had to regress body length to match the associated vertebrae, which are smaller in proportion to the skull. If you were only to scale the skull based on other specimens it would be almost 12 m
true but it'd be funny
It'd be about 9 meters using PIN 551-1
But the femur etc indicate it was probably closer to 10
so like zhucheng size
i wonder how stupid it would be to try and make a regression for franoys' tarbosaurus/zhucheng skull/body length ratios
I have all the measurements give me a moment
57 cm for the largest metatarsal, 107 cm femur, 107 cm tibia, dentary that is 42.03 cm to the 11th alveoli
also i lied the maxilla is 53 cm
that's a big tibia if same specimen
Since the femur is gracile and the tibia is robust, it is either two different specimens or a subadult
The pursuit predator...
If David Goggins was a theropod
Yes(?)
This is the dentary
ngl alcantara is deceptively close to kem kem relative to bahariya
The new abstract mentioned Kem Kem fauna are not comparable to Bahariya, whilst they may be comparable to Alcantra
Accurate? Should i finish it?
One of like two Nanuqsaurus that doesnāt look like a Yeti
Apparently a allosaurus was found with well preserved skin impressions
It also had a lot of pathologies
- What reference did you use
- Yes you should finish it
This is great. Yes, absolutely you should finish it.
NatGeo Spino
I'm going to guess it's the 2014 spinosaurus arts.
Knew it.
maybe something more like Random's head would be more accurate
guys
uhh...
uhm...
who named this blud š
do you guys know what dilophosaurus evolved into?
TRex
I was just about to say that lol
Clever
Don't forget where it all started though
Was Ouranosaurus fully bipedal or was it quadrupedal, or a mix of both?
As I understand it, mix of both but mostly bipedal. Sort of a case of it could go quad if it wanted, but it prolly wasn't doing that on the reg.
Someone can correct me if I'm wrong because there's a few dinos in this grey area that I may mix up
Rhahdodonts, Ouranosaurus, and Tenontosaurus were all facultative quadropeds. They were almost entirely bipedal, but could crawl on all fours when browsing on low vegetation.
Well you see erm, Ouranosaurus has 2 different genus in it 
(There are two differing proportions based on two different specimen groups iirc, but uh have fun getting anyone to care enough to look at em
@stiff osprey please tell me if I am horridly wrong
)
Wouldnāt that just be differing species 
Nope
I will fight Big Paleo's attempts to shrink dinosaur genus numbers
Sworn enemiesā¦. Iāll lump everything in sight
What's the biggest tortoise
Regarding wieght in this discussion are these very somewhat reasonable for these marine animals
Sharks, Mosa, the Crocs, and Shasta are about right. Basilo's too light. Pliosaurus has two entries for some reason. Monquira and sachica are too light. Use of the term "Eiectus". Guanlingsaurus is probably too heavy. Lilstock, NHM, and Aust Colossus being in the conversation at all. Temno's high weight is far too high. Tylo's far too large overall.
17 metresā¦. Absolutely filthy š
21 ton Temnodontosaurus what lol
so what would be a more reasonable weight for the basilo and others
The largest basilosaurus species is 24 tons. Monquira and Sachica are in the 15-17 ton category. Guanlingo I have no idea but wtf is that weight. That's, like, shonisaurus mass.
yeah Guanlingo would be like a fraction of that
I know Random said Sachica 13t a few months back but idk if that holds out ngl
Does anyone have and accurate pinacosaurus skeletal? I donāt know too much about ankylosaurs except that they have mobile tongues, Ty
Ty
@outer tusk wide
Whyād you ping them when it was already an @ message lol
literally
wrong chat, try #suggestions or at least #path-of-titans
Hello! If you have any feedback or suggestions for our development team, we highly recommend posting a well-written post on our Feedback Board at https://feedback.pathoftitans.com/ 
Turtl
Wait... Isn't it oversized here? Or the woman is just short?
Nah, nevermind. Found the high res. Seems about right.
t rex beats giganotosaurus
de-na-zin is unironically cool and more people should like it
There are Albertosaurine remains from the El Gallo formation, so the large femur may not be so large
Also the scapula and phalange assigned to "Alamotyrannus" are ginormous, I suspect they might be from Tyrannosaurus instead
is this el gallo albertosaurine material actually albertosaurine
https://bioone.org/journals/acta-palaeontologica-polonica/volume-59/issue-1/app.2012.0003/First-Tyrannosaurid-Remains-from-the-Upper-Cretaceous-El-Gallo-Formation/10.4202/app.2012.0003.full
A metatarsal that looks closer to Albertosaurus than Das/Rex
We report a complete left fourth metatarsal collected from rocks of the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian) āEl Galloā Formation exposed along the Pacific Ocean near El Rosario, Baja California, MĆ©xico. The metatarsal IV was part of an arctometatarsalian metatarsus, as evidenced by a deep medial notch proximally and extensive articulation for metatarsa...
At this point, no assignment can be made beyond
the level of Tyrannosauridae.
if anything the el gallo metatarsal is lacking a character shared by known albertosaurines but also said character's informativeness has been questioned anyways
but being less robust than tyrannosaurus isn't exactly grounds for a referral to albertosaurinae either
Do yk about the abingdon pleosaur?
Guys can sm1 help me grind my Dino on path of titans
Hey there, please use #looking-for-group for such things. Thanks!
plus the el gallo metatarsal's comparable in robusticity only to albertosaurine metatarsals like 125-140% its size which isn't helping
my heart will always loathe belong to additional creatures 2 anthracosaurus
Isn't it supposed to look more eel-like?
Anyone know (If there is one) a decent biteforce estimate on Sachicasaurus?
ziapelta is adorable
Wait, is Pentaceratops that big?
Why do basal thyreophorans like scutellosaurus and jakapil look like bipedal nodosaurs? Also with jakapil living in the Cretaceous is there a ghost lineage from scutellosaurus from the Early Jurassic to jakapil in the Cretaceous?
I mean, all dinosaur families started out as bipedal.
If silesaurids are ornithishcians then they started as semi bipedal
The first dinosaur could have had a body plan in between that of the basal dinosauromorphs and the small theropod body plan
I mean that's a very different can of worms
Was referring to the fact that the earliest known marginocephalians, ornithopods, and thyreophorans are all bipedal.
Oh ok
I know that the earliest thyreophorans were bipedal but also I noticed that there is no transitional fossils between the basal thyreophorans and stegosaurs
I really just watched a 15 min lecture, just to end up at the same conclusion I had before watching it. https://youtu.be/ELm8lTsr81Y?si=GCCJmMwvzqzhUmwP ||cool video tho||
Talk given at the IMGRAD 2021 by F. Bouabdellah, E. Lessner, J. Benoit
uhh anybody got some stuff on leptosuchomorph locomotion or just how they hold themselves?
Which one looks better and is more accurate? I wanna buy one
Giga
id go for sucho personally
Sucho
duck or sucho
Giga or the pliosaur thingy
@bright veldt sorry to ping but update on the marine reptile size chart and this is what the creators said
It's so weird to hear him speaking in english when I usually watch his content in French.
Sucho
But hey it's up to you my friend
Sucho is most accurate the giga looks like itās from 2017 and the deinocheruis is a little too skinny and idk about that pliosaur
It's Kronosaurus
Tbh Duck wasn't that Bulky
And while yes this is from some years ago, iirc its more reliable/accurate then the Thick Duck
So, Duck isn't 8,2t anymore?
Kronosaurus
Dizzy rose kinda makes some overestimates sometimes
Agreed
Nope
Thank you!
how big was cretoxryhina?
from what evidence
Isnt this a warcrime? Mods, crush Kevins skull thank you.
No plz 
Most tame David Petters pterosaur reconstruction
So true
Donāt worry I have more 
Nvm theyāre too disgusting to even be posted
Good, cos the death squad was just behind your door.
Plz no 
Hear me out
If I delete this, shall I live?
Nah
Wdym 
So ur telling me someone before can post something like this and get away with it but I canāt-
Yeah

Your sins shall be erased if you find a backfliping dilophosaurus video
Donāt worry Iāll not
Anyways switching topic.
Nanotyrannus in-valid yet?
Idk 
Ahhh wtf
yo
Prehistoric Planet 3
!!!!!!
For 3500$ š
NOOOOO
w h a t
wait what
w vids, but where did you get this information.
We need this for watching new short film of Prehistoric Planet
no
NOOOO, CURSE YOU APPLE
(Use English subtitles)
I hope this video is a joke 
For 3499 I expect to be able to touch the dinosaurs
And thanks btw

No, the new PP "season" is literally just an Apple headset exclusive VR thing
Solution: watch season 2 again
why havent we gotten a single spinosaurid or charcarodontosaurid š
Because they never made it to the Maastrichian
a betrayal of self...
Which is the latest part of the Cretaceous
Unless we count this guy, but it was discovered too late to be included in PP
unpublished thesis moment
Listen, if it's known, it's fair game 
maastrictian brachiosaur 
Heās a monsterā¦.
An unpredictable killer...
Demonstrably vileā¦.
whats scout doin there lol
helping measure animals for 3 lollipops and a soda of his choice
Is gigaspinus Maastrichtian?
Yes
Am I being lied to 𤨠why is there a š? Should I be concerned š¤Ø
Idk Pronto's losing it
This is exceedingly suspiciousā¦..hmmmā¦
You doubt the legitimacy of Grant et al 2023? Damn
Just because he's a fictional character doesn't mean he doesn't do good research
gigaspinus is weird because its technically a thing in that the thesis/manuscript was leaked a few months back
but also like its not actually published and the name "gigaspinus" is entirely informal
the material was just assigned to carcharodontosauridae indet in the actual thesis
hopefully they'll change the name to bajatitan based on its discovery in baja california
there was also some talk of a revision of labocania although that was only a citation but there's prolly some connection there
publishing hell sucks
oh wait
could gigaspinus and the totally 10 ton nunavut carcharodontosaur be the same taxon
too early to say imo
and nunavut carchardontosaur was santonian iirc
so they must've come from the north instead of the south....
really? i thought some of them did
seems like it
since unquillosaurus is later in the campanian and thats SA
presumably thats how they got to france by the maastrichtian as well
Another (place name)asaurus, I thought you'd be better 
there's a couple in the campanian and earlier but the only somewhat reliable maas one is formally unpublished
perhaps you would like Bajakrixis more
Californiatrox
the baja blast 
Ok but like yes, I would
mexican dinosaur
names it after taco bell
what did random mean by this?
you can't accuse me of discrimination silly i am latin american
On the topic of unpublished thesis
How was that venomous mosasaur paper coming along?
paleo chat is booming today
Hello my fellow latinx
(I fully expect random to block and then downsize me)
I can't block you you're funny

And I can't downsize you you're already small
The bait and switch
Oh...
sbobing nad criyng
sbob
Not sure I donāt keep up much with lepidosaurs
and all it took was us spreading misinformation on the internet 
Between you Falcon and I weāve probably ruined several dozen peoples perception of dinosaur paleogeography here
for every action (honest and constructive discussion) there's an equal and opposite reaction (lying)
Itās not lying itās being wacky and silly
Just being silly goobers

I HAVE SPAWNED IN
What sort of of devilish delinquency has transpired while I was away
DO NOT FEAR
anyone have some knowledge about Yunnanosaurus?

my profile is the silhouette of the dinosaur
the size variation between the two species is very silly
i bet huangi is just a juvenile
it was the.. first sauropodomorph... named by.. seven authors..?
thank you sauropods facts and figures for the useful and versatile information
Why havenāt we gotten a Yunnanosaurus huangi modā¦.
big herbi doesn't want you know sauropodomorphs can be small
because we have youngi?
just don't do any quests after you spawn in, you will lock yourself at huangi size
Brilliant!
this is how I'd play the Citipati mod if i wasn't pissed off by the baby camera being 0.1cm off the ground
its so cool pot added tatankaceratops
lmao
i love that between hatz and quetz you can roleplay as literally any azhdarchid
except the hornby island one i guess. they don't make em that small
Pterosaurs being diverse in the latest Cretaceous is a lie by bigpaleo
if you think about it the diversity of playables in POT is incredible
you can play as every megaraptoran, every azhdarchid, half of all titanosaurs, and all the fragmentary tyrannosaurids and parasaurolophins using only 6 models! š
Dinosaurs really do come in every shape and size. All six shapes of the shape-abet in fact!
why are his legs so short
I think it being bulky makes them look shorter
Heās a semi aquatic heron like predator 
hey guys am doing a Hansen formation piece and I was wondering would it make sense for a group of cockraches scaveneging off a corpse
Iām assuming thatās a misspelling of hanson and if so yes
is it true that genus and species is arbitrary?
and doesnāt really define for example how close two animals are related
Is it true that a new Tyrannosaurus specie has been discovered?
No. It was discovered awhile ago
mcraensis was a while ago
Were all Ctenochasmatids filter feeders or just the members of Pterodaustrini?
yeah first thing said on the wikipedia article
It seems to vary. It definitely wasn't the majority of the family but wasn't restricted to pterodaustroines either. Balaenognathus is another ctenochasmatid that isn't that closely related to pterodaustro but was also a filter feeder
I think so?
This is how far I got, if I need anything to add or change I would gladly appreciated it
Question, do we have any juvenile Spinosaurus remains?
@crude latch here
Interesting
Potentially weird question, but what is the largest Great White we have in the fossil record?
whatās the sauropod supposed to be?
likewise a massapoda being feasted upon by young cryos and roaches
Argentina!! How many clucking giant sauropods do you have!?!
tmk white sharks in ancient times weren't that much different to now
Was about to say that those are some tiny cryolophosaurus
The largest white sharks get today (in females anyway) is believed to be around 6 meters and 2 tons
Thank you. I was just curious because I know in modern times pressure from humans largely selects for smaller overall body sizes in fish.
I've been told they could get up to around 7 meters during the pliocene, so yeah, not much larger.
Just on a general accuracy rating how are these guys for large ichthyosaurs?
Anyone got some good paleo pics of the extinct giant otter
Teehee the HC Otter 
Oo ty
Wait no! Thatās not a real otter!
Oh lol thatās what I thought
Here
(not from hc)
Ty!
I found this at the bookstore so I bought it
Oooh this is intriguing
It is and the art in it are amazing
If its on Amazon I might invest in a copy 
Thereās a picture of a bunch of pterosaurs and sea creatures eating an edmontosaurus carcass
I think its based off a fossil they found of a hadrosaur with shark bite marks
Ooooh
How accurate is this
Anatomically? Not that good
Size? No idea, looks ok
doesnāt look that bad sizewise
Dunno about the quills
The quills are a design choice
glory to azdharchidstotzka
if i had a nickel for every time a tyrannosaur from the mesaverde group was mentioned to potentially have interesting implications for tyrannosaur paleogeography but ultimately didn't really go anywhere for one reason or another i'd have three nickels which isn't a lot but its weird that it happened three times
Coincidence? I think not
Lol
i wonder how many people i could convince we have somewhat conclusive evidence of an albertosaurine dispersal into central utah/colorado before darth kills me
hey kids mesaverde albertosaurines trust
Has anyone recently dealt with an EPRM isue when launching?
Hello, Just right click your launcher and run as admin 
^^have tried across several patches now. just returning to the game after a few months and still occuring
Re-installing currently but will attempt again and touch base after I suppose
If after reinstalling it does not solve your issue please open up a #1150510168073850971 ticket and our moderator team can assist you, Please include as much information as possible devices/screenshots etc 
of course, will do. I very much appreciate the timely response.
Nanotyrannus in-valid yet?
No I think it's still in the grey zone for now
Nanotyrannus will be no MORE š£ļøš„
Probably lol. Though it would be interesting if nano was a valid genus. That wouldn't make it and trex a north American parallel to tarbosaurus and alioramus in asia
Is it possible for snow to appear in the negmet formation?
Stupendemys is MASSIVE
Yes
Think Lhasa, Tibet though, very light
baryonyx ceratosuchops and riparovenator
Does anyone here have an orthographical view of Thalassodromeus?
anyone love trisertops sorry dor spelling
paleo chat been booming
hi
dont think there would be many out there if there even is one, id just use a more popular close relative but if you need 100% accuracy (im guessing your making a model) then id make one yourself :)
Was Suevoleviathan actually built like this?
(from archesuchus's weird birds arg) anybody know if this is a real trilobite, if so, what one
yes
The images youre showing look different my guy
I'm talking about the proportionally large fins
the fourth image is you're guide then
Hello, I know this is off topic, but for those who ever view this paleo chat, I'm just generally going to ask if any of you have some form of career or job in fields like paleontology, or use of a degree or work role of such things, I'm thinking about possibly going back to school and could use other people's stories on how that journey worked for them, I'm sort of ideally trying to maybe work in education or museum type settings rather than out on the field digging up the fossils halfway across the world, I'm not trying to segway or make this channel be off topic, and if anyone sees this post and feels like DMing me some ideas or their experiences in the matter, it could be much appreciated. Primarily I'm just looking for realistic pathways or ways to start researching various career paths for myself. Not trying to be a bother. Just send me a few dms if inclined, I don't want to drag the paleo chat here off topic.
I donāt, but I hope I can go to college for it someday
It takes 8 years tho
8 years counting a bachelors and masters, you can skip over the masters for paleo and go straight to phd which cuts it down to 6 counting a bachelors
Yea but idk if they are accurate now I think one time they thought they had quills
Yall are the competent peoples, what are your thoughts on the whole Proteothrinax vs Rolfodon thing?
yo guys I need help with a debate
Is it which colors are the best? Cos the answer is obvious.
The debate is about whether tyrannosaurs had feathers or not. Iām on the disagreeing team (no feather).
Well you're not gonna find the most help lol. But no physical evidence of feathers and instead show scales, so that would be a plus for team no feather.
That's really it
alright
I personally believe tyrannosaurids may have had feathers in reduced coverage. After all, even your regular bald bird like a vulture or cassowary aren't as bald as they seem
I think the debate is less ādid Tyrannosaurs have feathersā and more āwhat amount/covering did they haveā since phylogenetically they should have some. Prehistoric planet does it well with the light elephant like fuzz
Well technically phylogenetically any dinosaur can have feathers but the statement stands lol
I don't think reduced feathers is any more right than no feathers. Just a matter of finding feathers if there are any
Nah it is since itās very unlikely that they completely lost all feathering. Especially being in the group their in. Peach fuzz is probably the most accurate depiction rn
Who can say for certain? There are birds with regions I believe are completely devoid of feathers, or nearly devoid. I don't see reason to claim one or the other. And for tyrannosaurids it might have even been case by case, these species had them, these other ones didn't
Not speaking on any actual likelihoods, just that I don't think its wise to rule a view out. To use the cassowary again, that's a single animal with three varied integuments
To my knowledge no land animal has ever completely lost its fur/feathers, so since Tyrannosaurus comes from feathered ancestors, few feathers are more likely than none
I'd say that's true of all dinosaurs, but we have pretty extensive body coverings of hadrosaurs and ankylosaurs and they've never shown a single feather so who knows
Aye. And depending on how far back one thinks feathers went could have greater implications. And I'm not exactly coming from a place of knowledge I admit, but just thinking about it and looking at our extant feathered friends, feathers seem quite variable. Idk if it's actually less than I think it is, but that's why I pointed out the cassowary having distinct varying integumental regions on a single animal
Fairly sizeable regions
On Animals that had more elephant like tiny fuzz Iād say itād be pretty hard to preserve so that could be a reason for no feather preservation on them. But who truly knowsā¦.
Preservation is so biased š
(Preservation bias reference š)
Hey random, didn't you say something at one point that psittaco quills would likely have been like a specialized feather or something of the sort, or am I misremembering
Yeah I did
You can't really do a histological section on an imprint burned into a rock, but people always strategically avoid referring to the Psittaco quills as feathers because surely it would be impossible for a non-coelurosaur to be feathered, these must be something else
Just like they said about pterosaur feathers
Eject the heretic
Pterosaurā¦..heresyā¦ā¦
My new growing headcannon is that feathers are more variable than we give them credit, and this is based solely on one bird and not given any more thought but goddamn it I'm gonna run with it
You're right, they're highly variable especially when you include their entire evolutionary history
Showing deinoche... I'm sorry, the duck, before spinosaurus.
2/10, not accurate.
š
OH GOD BY INTRODUCING A DEBATE I HAS CAUSE A DEBATE
Guys, what's your opinion about this image? Is Good or not? Many people didn't liked rex's arms 
Yeah they pronated them for no reason. Like, that was an active decision they made to change that when that wasn't the default.
you can kinda tell by the render quality and all that this was made by a different studio
It looks like a hybrid of Jurassic Park/World's rex and Prehistoric Planet's rex. And it leans more into Jurassic.
I hate PHP rex so uh not good!!!!
Is this a good para?
Kinda cursed ngl
But why tho?
The only things I dislike about it are the longer then I prefer eyebrow horns and the beer belly.
Must I explain myself why
If you are talking about actual T-rex from the Prehistoric Planet show, then yeah. Is it too fat for your liking?
It's not tyrannosaurus rex enough for my liking 
As not a fan of PP rex, that doesnt make sense to me.
Kuitaran is kinda in his own plain of existence, his reasoning is beyond our comprehension.
same vibes
Yeah, kinda.
Like, I prefer my Rexes like this, and thats why I like PoTs rex, JP rex and a lot of other more vintage reconstructions, but PP rex is clearly a rex.
Tyrannosaurus Walk Cycle.
A closer look at my T. rex animation. Fully rigged and animated in Cinema 4D, rendered with Corona renderer.
#Tyrannosaurus #Trex #Dinosaur #Animation #VFX #Cinema4D
As a fan of Jurassic Park/World universe, I also like Jurassic franchise Rex. And I'm also a fan of accurate prehistoric animals, so I like PP Rex as well. In fact, that is my definitive look for irl Rex.
I like vintage reconstructions (1930-60-70s), but only when they are not very silly.
Christ almighty, the video is loud. I'm legally deaf now.
gross
Then there's Life on Our Planet tyrannosaurus. Which..... I mean, it's fine, but from some shots it looks ugly.
Not from these ones tho.
Also, there's an inconsistency, the male Rex is missing proto feathers on the neck. It has it only for the mating scene, but not in any other appearence.
It lacks some more pronounced keratin, it feels extra flat.
Thats about it mostly.
The rest are minor looks wise, like the number of teeth.
Maybe it's a mating display, but then Morgan Freeman should've said something.
I think thats cos on every other scene, its a female with the males colors.
During the mating scene they were on all the time iirc.
Yeah, but, you know, it looks too 3d model, you know? PP just looks more refined and more detailed, and looks like a real breathing animal. This one is fine, but it's just missing something. Probably because Netflix wanted to ride that sweet Prehistoric Planet hype and make their own documentary, but with less money and effort put into it.
Really, thats the only reason why they avoid calling them that?
Well, the academic reason is that we cannot prove that they are feathers and not some novel integument
But bruh
The headā¦. It just a giant block of flesh, seems to be a huge disparity between the end product and whatever skull they mightāve been referencing
Ah, I see
Is it weird that I odly love LOOP Rex? Even if itās not the most accurate It makes smth in my brain just click and feel good
I like the roundness
Ye smth about it just makes me really happy
anyone can like something, difference is knowing quality vs preference( anyways uhhh dead animals)
Dead animals are tasty
I highly doubt there were any but likeā¦Fresh water Ichthyosaurs?
I mean it is possible, in theory a lot of marine animals can transition to freshwater
Probably the color scheme. And this weird sort of nostalgic feeling about it, like this documentary was actually supposed to be released several years ago.
It's the same feeling like looking at Planet Dinosaur's spinosaurus from 2011.
Thatās probably it tbh
Yeah, it really looks like rex was ripped out from Planet Dinosaur. It really radiates that sort of vibe.
Not confirmed, but given that plesiosaurs, pliosaurs, and mosasaurs have all been found in freshwater environments before, it seems reasonable
I meant it's just the colour scheme and overall vibe of LOOP Rex falls in line with PD.
Yea, hence why you show the Das š
Is it just me or do all of the loop dinosaurs designs look like trash and aren't really that accurate either? Still a nice documentary but also the fact they said a triceratops cannot face off against a rex annoys me too
Maybe sure, but likely not considering ichthyosaurs were already oceanic by the Triassic, so any later into the Mesozoic, they didn't need to go into freshwater
Oh, I got what you mean now.
Thatās what I was thinking
I'm actually watching it right now, starting ep 7, and the doc OVERALL is solid fine. But some creature designs and constant flip floping between past and modern day is just too much, makes you feel like Morgan Freeman and the show have adhd.
And it time skips SOOOOOOO much cool stuff.
Generally I don't hate it but it's just the designs that catch me, reminds me of alien worlds the way they spend more time in the modern era than in the past
The same logic could apply to Plesiosaurs and mosasaurs, but both have been found in river areas
Finally something high quality
That's what I'm saying. I was also looking forward to seeing someone like dimetrodon or paraceraterium, but nope, they just don't appear. Because massive 40mln year time jumps.
Come on now.
It doesn't seem out of the realm of possibility just thinking about things like river dolphins that the water is just what they live in and not what they breath
Mmmmmmmm
It's fine to make comparisons but sometimes it also becomes confusing when we're flip flopping and some people I know who don't know a lot about paleo media thought for example that ostriches evolved right after the KPG mass extinction
that ostriches evolved right after the KPG mass extinction
Yeah, I get what the show is trying to do, but it uhhh... doesn't explain stuff in an understandable and coherent manner.
What does when they evolved have to do with whether or not they entered freshwater?
Also, what you see in the intro are basically 90% of animals that appear in the actual show lmaooooo.
Oh is this about freshwater Mosasaurs?
ichthyosaurs
One of the only good ones is arthropleura
But he aināt a dinosaur so who cares
š
We have T-rex, who gives a damn about the rest, am I right?
- Netflix executive
Exactly
But they managed to fit awful CGI lions in
Also, diplodocus and allosaurus from that show REAAALLLY look like they are from Jurassic franchise.
They are kinda accurate, but at the same time....
Because they areā¦
There literally just edited versions
I suspected that.
It's fine for Jurassic franchise. But in this instance it's a GOD DAMN DOCUMENTARY.
Fr
the diplodocus is pretty terrible
The attention to fine anatomical detail is simply not there for most of LooPās models
Life on our planet is just 90% modern animals anyway
Or ROUGH anatomical details
May as we just watch Planet Earth instead
I mean, it's better than just straight up plagiarising and using models of the Jurassic franchise in a documentary. At least they resorted to editing them.
The Life on our planet deinonychus is kinda ugly too imo
There is definitely a dificite of prehistoric documentaries. If I want to watch smth about modern day, I will watch smth about modern day.
At least they picked a couple obscure creatures
me when why has PD been like the only decent campanian NA media rep in the past two decades
They did?
Erythrosuchus my beloved
Also LOOP triceratops is just Jurassic triceratops but thicc and with accurate tail.
South American carcharadontasaurus
When I first saw this I thought it was a new Jurassic project lol
Me when the
the
Am feeling of remaking this guy, I was wondering is it accurate to the reconstructions we know of from Halsazraptor
Heās looking spiffy
So I just need to deepen the drive of the head and beak
the nostril's also in the wrong place, it's at the end of the snout
and the eye's too big
yep also I kind of expected the eyes to be big yk cause uh small animal
Idk I was just wondering from this message and could Triceratops swivel it's head 360°?
āTyrannosaurus head wasnāt even that strongā 
Tyrannosaurus's bite force is over 5 tons. It's not rocket science that something that can crunch through metal can crunch through alligator scutes+
Tyrannosaurus also had literally the best turn of any large theropod, specifically because of said triceratops prey.
Triceratops still had the better turning but this is mad underselling rex.
Counterpoint; Triceratops in rut
My well-researched, succinct argument when my opponent mentions solitary lions donāt hunt adult elephants
The youngster on its way to stray from the herd
Ankylosaur when 5 tons of force is exerted on softer parts of its body: 
Isn't ankys whole deal that it's designed to be hard to bite in the first place
ngl given it's much smaller size, I don't think it's at hard to biting down on a right spot to kill it but eh
Oh if Anky just lays down most predation is hard to impossible. Spiky ball of hatred
But it isn't spiked
Ankys real strength is denying ankle privileges 
That's more what the armor's for yeah.
Now what could behold upon an animal to want to put armour made of bone all over its bodyā¦. š¤
Darn it alderon! It was a joke!
LOL
Quick if we all apologize to each other maybe they wonāt ban us!
Iām sowy Karson-Chan UwU šš»šš»
Is a throat gurgle plausible on tarbo?
Define āthroat gurgleā
Like the one on pk tarbo
At times like these I wish my Apple subscription didnāt run outā¦.
reduced to atoms
tyrannosaurus had pivotal hips right? or something along those lines that gave it an extreme edge
idk the details
So a throat like this is plausible?
a droopy one?
Ye
there's no reason to think it wouldnt be plausible. but since it'd be soft tissue there wouldnt really be any trace of it
True
i can see them having a dewlap for display purposes
maybe brightly colored to attract mates or serve as intimidation or to just throw off predators
Like maybe a bright blue or green during mating season
imagine if trex had a balloon neck š
jp buck rex was my first thought when dewlap came to mind ngl
yeah that isnt farfetched
Just realized thatās supposed to be tarbo
thats a very reasonable thing i think some metricanthosaurids actually have documented dewlaps
I might be trippin tho so dont quote me on that
This is trex I think
You are tripping incredibly hard, no dinosaur has any sort of dewlap preserved
Erm.. tarbosaurus..?
I will eat you alive
You are only able to do this because of said dewlap
Tarbosaurus also preserves very nice skin impressions
Well. New favorite tyrannosaur art
š i swear it wa ssomewhere
I will be in the cold ground by the time we get a dewlap dinosaur
A decorative air sac is just a dewlap with extra steps
-me
Both are bad
Air sac is a worse sin though 
I just started a coughing fit after I read that, you killed me
Why you not like dinosaurs with air sacs 
Behold, Tarbosaurus
No, I just hate 8 ton theropods with bright blue ballsacks for skin
But what aboutā¦ā¦.
I knew youād love it
No
It is totally realistic and plausible 
No
Yes
Why canāt Gigantoraptor have it 
PTSD
Gigantoraptor killed my gramma okā¦.
Bro mockin my scarring trauma, I see how it is 
āI ATE MY GRANDMAā
Also is this some lore Iām missing?
What trauma do you have with blue Gigantoraptor
š
Gigantoraptor in general
Ok valid
Gular Neck things can also just be, flush with the colour profile of the rest of the animal
No š
Real
Bright blue Tyrannosaurus bataar š
Avians
Not non-avians
Donāt try to pull the erm actually on me, I am far beyond you in power level
Heās⦠literally Lancianā¦.
Why is Non Avian Dinos being a frigate bird so impossible š
Behold something completely reasonable
Heās rubbing off on me, I hate it 
Irritator be like
A) The frigate bird shares a completely different lifestyle, niche, growth cycle, and existence than your standard non-avian dinosaur
B) I hate air sacs-dewlaps-inflatables
Tf do you hate them for š
The tyrannosaur inflates its purple triple sacked gular pouchā¦
Theyāre ugly and never look good ever
š
The hideous ever
And with that, my point is proven 
Blud needs a haircut
Itās so thin and sad
This looks so god damn goofy š
Birb weirdest
āSir Is that Uranium ā
Yes
Though, iirc, Pelecanimimus did have a gular skin pouch
Weird crow
Hmmm I wonder how it got its name?
Though it is not large in the slightest
Thatās a weird ass fish wtf? When did fish get necks
Since 1655
Speaking of dewlaps on dinos
This chat needed obese sauropods
A general reminder for everyone currently in this channel to please be polite and respectful, and do not provoke or antagonize other users. Refer to our #rules .

Weāre people even doing anything 
Yesā¦.teehee
what is your guys opinions on the new backtobasics jp movie and what are you hoping for when it comes to dinosaur design
Iām hoping itās secretly just them reanimating accurate dinosaurs into the first three movies and then making a new accurate trilogy fr

this will be ceratosaurians vs allosauroids in valanginian argentina
this dont feel like a fair fight
why is the valanginian just the early jurassic 2
Isnāt Valanginian in the mix of those funky Early Cretaceous Cold Snaps
Every Mesozoic period goes through the same bootup cycle in the first ten million years or so
lmfao
why were dicraeosaurids
The diminutive Sauropoda
why is larramendi's leinkupal 3x larger than franoys'
sometimes larramendi stupid
how so
that sauropod isnt real
you canr convince me small sauropods are real they are just made up to have more variety
I just really don't get why people expect accurate dinosaurs from Jurassic franchise.
The design of Jurassic dinosaurs is pretty unique and should radiate 90s or early 2000s energy. Also, brand recognition. You will probably know what Rex or raptor is from Jurassic franchise just by looking at it.
The only time actually accurate dinosaurs should've appeared is Dominion's prologue.
Also, what do you mean back to basics exactly?
who believes t rex could reach over 12 tons
I think it's possible that it could have happened once or twice. Essentially a Gustav moment were one individual gets lucky af and manages to live for a really long time
Nobody 
like a restart, not a sequel. (i think) Original screenwriter for JP and TLW is onboard the project
So a JP movie, but again. Basically like a multiverse.
table I beg stop making random giant abelisaurs and giving them to tiny sauropods
Fret not. The Maastrichtian brings sanity
I guess? Its just a restart/remake i think?
in my defense its only like carno-sized and it was already big when it was described so this isn't my fault
isnt ed cope like 11.8 to 12.4
Nobody because avarage rex is 8 tons
at least scale the ankylosaur there too
its isolated scutes and i don't think the paper describing em even exists online
It's not a remake.
It's just another Jurassic movie, but with the writer of JP1 and TLW.
So it at least has the potential to be good
I mean, I like the entire Jurassic franchise so far. I hope this movie will be more about people living with dinosaurs, because Dominion opened that whole era.
But Dominion itself only scratched the surface, so that new movie has a chance to develop this topic more.
Patagopelta the very real Panoplosaurine 
didnt help that all tye stuff i wss looking at kept yhrowing around reboot
7t-7.5t
It's the media for ya, it really **likes **to disinform people.
By their logic, Jurassic World is also a reboot.
~10.7t
vividian lied to me
You're first lie was using Vivid at all
Thats a sequel tho
What
That is what I'm saying. Media likes to throw terms like reboot when it actually isn't and it makes people confused.
no idea why itās a nodosaur in the first place
sobbing
What is a dinosaur name part (like -saurus or Deino- ) that you feel is underused in the fossil record?
For an example, some of you may think the suffix "-venator" needs more love or that more dinosaurs should be called "Australo-".
What are your picks for underused dinosaur names?
I copypasted this from dinopedia, yet I'm still asking this question
ganax
-therium
para-
therium?
Yes 
Because nobody knows what the diagnostic traits of Parankylosaurs are
Ok 
Iāve always liked the feminine saura, it just sounds nice
looks fine
Personally I donāt feel like they need them. Meraxes for example, thats a dope asf name and I will stand by it
if Meraxes has 1000 fans I am one of them. if Meraxes has 1 fan that's me. if Meraxes has 0 fans know I am no longer on the earth
Sbobing
Fellow Meraxes enjoyer I see
that's from chorillo
Basekti giant moment
Chorrillo has a Parankylosaur?
its just ankylosauria indet
Me talking to my paleo friends ^
erm i stand with you
Meraxes fans united
Hey how plausible does this look for a speculative āmodernā Tyrannosaurus descendent? (Those are feature scales and not osteoderms btw)
Modern as in living in modern day?
Or you mean speculative evolution's modern standarts?
As in the KPG didnāt happen and this is something that exists in the āmodern dayā in that universe. So ig modern in spec evo standards
So, this tyranno would be living in our times in that universe? 66my after KGP?
Well 66mya after the KPG happened in our universe since it didnāt happen there but ya 
Alright, got ya. Overall, it looks ok.
How big is it?
Itās the one on the right just above the teal hadrosaur
Vastatosaurus š„±
So it's kinda the same size as Scotty? Or other rex of that size?
Itās around the same size as the largest Tyrannosaurus specimens in height and length and about 12 tons in weight
You summoned the giant crayfishā¦..
A Dune snake
large legged snake that lives in desert environments and constricts its pray. It doesnāt swallow it whole however and it eats by biting off chunks like normal predators
Did you draw it yet?
Oh, I guess you did, since that chart is just colored in versions of finished drawings.
The one in the comparison is a little to big and thicc lol (I guess I mixed it up with its semi aquatic oceanic cousin)
Cool. Is it all north american fauna btw?
No most of them are from Eurasia. The only NA one is technically the large Tyrannosaurus descendent but the legless azhdarchids do range into NA occasionally
Nice.
Oh and the sapient species ends up being worldwide so ig thatās technically a north American thing if you think about it lol
Is this like a sapient snake?
No lol itās an abelisaur with opposable feet
Lmao.
It adopts a kangaroo like posture to manipulate objects
It mastered the art of tootsie-grabbing.
Exactly lol
I like the fact that abelisaurs' arms will just never evolve lol)).
The only reason they even have their arms is because they strap tools to them lol
Completely useless other than that
That's what skipping the arm day does to a man.
š
Its closest relatives lost their arms since they arenāt sapient and canāt fashion tool sleeve things for themselves
Oh alr
Was argentavis a scavenger or a hunter?
A hunter
why is this titled like a disappointed parent
Does this mean the animal is 2 meters or the axis is 2 meters...
sweet 160m abelisauroid
anyways i refuse to believe argentina looked like this at one point
Such is a summary of paleo chat
Also I'm gonna email Dr. Carr asking about the phylogeny of the other Iren Dabasu material
Because we have Late Santonian Tyrannosaurid material from Japan too
on one hand guh
on the other hand TYRANNOSAURINI DIVERGED BY THE LATE SANTONIAN WE LITERALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT WAS HAPPENING THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONIACIAN-MIDDLE SANTONIAN ITS PERFECTLY REASONABLE FOLKS
cretaceous japan is weird
Chiliantisaurus
The World sets itself right in the Maastrichtian
2/3rds of those were dead in the maastrichtian
I remember having a pet theory at one point that Bahariasaurus, "Prodeinodon", Chiliantisaurus and Siats were all giant proceratosaurids because of the fibula ratios and how they lined up stratigraphically
Based 
was japan a part of the bigger asian landmass or did it wind up isolated by the late cretaceous?
Proceratosaurids: disappearing for 5 million years at a time before appearing somewhere 5000 km away!
But then again half of those things are dust/lost so
I know most of what we have from it post cenomanian are marine deposits
But it would be interesting to plot them as Proceratosaurids to see what happens
enter angeac totally definitely an ornithomimosaur --> deltadromeus --> bahariasaurus --> gualicho --> alioramus anagenesis
ALIORAMUS š
Hm what is Carr's email. I remember sending one once about Celeste's surrangular measurements
Depends on what map you use. Usually a part of the rest of Asia though
Apparently it was a haven for Mesodermochelys
Man Aussie wifi is killing me
Page cannot load
Ok got it
Ok I sent the email now, hopefully he replies soon
in the meantime
the bistahieverse canon version is that the iren dabasu and kazakh tyrannosaurs represent the earliest tyrannosaurini in santonian-early campanian asia, with tarbosaurus and zhuchengtyrannus diverging ~77 Ma, and Tyrannosaurus-line taxa entering NA ~75 Ma
Meanwhile T. bataar, Udurchukan, and Nanxiong represent the terminal Asian lineages
This is not Carr, this can't be
Like no way, nuh uh wtf
...what did you think he looked like..?
One se
lol
Exactly š
LMAO
The
i concur
the
on topic jumpscare
Quetz species size is funny to me
Northropi being just as big an anatomical outlier as rex is to the rest of tyrannosauridae
Hokkaido was still connected as recently as the last glacial maximum, during the Cretaceous its still totally continental
The Hadrosaurs were find there are so weird it feels like it should be insular
Yamatosaurus
Nifty late surviving basal hadrosaurid
I am ghost lineage so I must be insular anachronism 
I'm imagining a map of Latest K Asia and there's just a perfect modern Japan
Yamatosaurus was just living that easy beach life and was too chill to evolve
what map do you like to use for late cretaceous? I know this sort of thing is in your wheelhouse
I like the Koppen paleo climate proxie one fron the recent paper
Probably divered around 83 mya
There's milk river stuff from that time actually
Also yeah Carr looks sm younger than I thought
can you share that? I think I know which one you're talking about but I want to be sure
that's less of a split down north america than I'm used to seeing
That one is great, Scotese's work is the classic go to. It's best to go region by region geologically though, the big picture is more contentious
Medium picture let's say lol, we know the general idea
Keep in mind itās not a perfect reconstruction. Same methodology applied to the Holocene sometimes lumped hot-summer continental climates into warm-temperate, warm-summer continental into oceanic climates, and sub-arctic climates into humid continental climates. Things were a bit chillier than it could lead on to be
I'm mostly looking for continental structure rather than climatology but I'll be defaulting to this for climate now too
Yeah the extent and duration of the WIS is one of those debated things. Someone on Twitter just did a thread on it I think I could find
you also tend to see northern europe large but pretty isolated too, hard to say what's going on there in terms of fauna with so few fossils
I wonder if the persistent WIS models clash with the extensive glaciation predictions in the South Pole
Can't find the thread but yeah there's some good support for the WIS not closing until the Paleocene
I just want to know more about what's going on in those weird isolated places like inland appalachia, there could be so many cool animals there that we just haven't found yet (or can't find because of terrain)
'so what is this formation?
bajada colorada
peak formation!!!!
Iām self convinced Nodosaurines persist there
btw can I use this image wihtout giving context?
= š¹