#paleontology
1 messages · Page 56 of 1
I’m just too much of a lazy ass to post results when they happen, it doesn’t help you can reasonably reconstruct carch 50 billion ways tho
ngl this aged gracefully
applause to the show for accurately depicting/predicting how three prince creek tyrannosaurs would slaughter a pachyrhinosaur in mere seconds
That is really beautiful Pachyrhinosaurus model
Goodie me I found some (mostly) high res images
are we tooth scaling again
Don’t you dare pull a troodon
How does that relate to Troodon?
Clearly you haven’t heard of the Troodon cranium material (I made it up)
i can't believe i'm in a timeline where i'm being prevented from upsizing a ceratopsid by gat of all people
giant hartman vs normal-sized gat
sophie's choice fr
although gat's scaling is like the same size as gsp's estimate which is either good or bad and i'm not sure which yet
Tbf, GSP has dorsals that look like they were run over by a steamroller, so always go for the larger estimate vs his 
i meant length
the big hartman pinhead is actually the same weight as gsp's for some reason because gsp's albertaceratops is obscenely heavy for its length
but the objectively shorter gat skeletal is also the same length as said gsp estimate which is totally not confusing
i must now shove said gat skeletal into neutral so my eyes don't bleed
ngl gat's looks kinda stupid
but that might just be cause i've been looking at hartman's too much
meanwhile gat's sinoceratops is even larger than both albertaceratops despite having a skull like the same size
skull scaling of all time here folks
actually i think gat's is just anorexic
or smushed i can't tell
this shouldn't be so stupid for two skeletal's scaled with the same postcrania
jesus christ
Individual variation less go
The individual variation within the individual…
Also Albertoceratops head is huge,
Literally the only good thing I could find with a scalebar was from gat so let’s hope that’s accurate
That or trying to retrofit half of it from the description onto Hartman’s but that sounds like a terrible idea and I’m 40% sure the figure was at an angle
this people from #modding is what im talking about this vid sums it up pretty well but feel free to ask me any questions https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWP2q1ypTSY
Larger than a grizzly bear, polar bear, or even cave bear, The giant Tremarctines such as Arctodus Simus and Arctotherium (usually just called the “short-faced bear”) are usually seen as bloodthirsty Behemoths. But what were these Prehistoric Bears really like?
If you want to learn more, then PBS Eons made a great video about the Tremarctinae (...
Cenozoic animals
Yeah, everything suggest it really was the equivalent of a grizzly. Just really big.
Common @chilly knot W
Does anyone else remember when dinosaurs look like this
Yeah I remember waking up and walking around and seeing them basking on the river beds, those were the days
i'm deeply confused why the human for scale appears to be some kind of sorceress
People need to stop complaining about the human scale
Would you rather a t-posed black silhouette of a generic man/woman with no soul or character? 
At least it's a human with normal (ish? i can't really tell) size and proportions
When it's a four foot tall girl with 3ft of legs and 10cm of waist it does kinda defeat the purpose of putting a human for scale
Finally, a man of taste and culture...
Idk, humanoid abomination scaling for skeletals could totally take off if everyone started doing it
Hey, my women are 5 foot tall 
Yes
We need to all as a community agree that we should use Jerma985 as a reference for our human scales
I will die before I use a guy as a scale reference (I am biased against males)
this is just boring
It's just a human with weird clothes 
I love men, we are not the same
I do like fadenos human scale thos won't lie

I should use shrek next time
use jerma trust
why is there 2 bars
Idk if you pinged the wrong message
your the creator so i am asking u
good point now what bout the evolution in the teeth what happens
Is that chatgpt man again?
yep
@bitter oasis
What?
Ty kangaroo for deleting that quickly
What was it
I’ll DM ya
Not again
this is some committed trolling
Thank you for the ping! if another suspicious account shows up again do feel free to tag us.
Funny how it’s always paleo chat
Cause it’s an active chat but it doesn’t have too much activity where the mods are always watching
Dinosaur (I think)
Unironically yes
It’s not very good honestly. The teeth in particular are a yikes.
Not very good as opposed to what exactly?
Yeah I have to agree with Archetypes here, the LOOP Gorgonopsid is a step up in terms of design from a lot of other documentaries imo
Plus the model looks a lot better in the scenes it was used for anyways
Sure its not 100% accurate but considering this for a general audience not paleo nerds specifically, this asset is perfect for displaying that these animals were forerunners to mammals, not reptiles, and definitely NOT dinosaurs
I particularly like the choice of adding lips
Same, love it's boxy head
it’s certainly a step up from their dinosaurs
Out of the dinos that appeared I think Rex looked the best
Rex definitely was the best but it still wasn’t great
Either that or the Juvenile Sinraptor
Still amused that a Rex got cockblocked by a space rock
Worst day in history to get down with business
I also liked the terror bird territorial dance scene
I love this design I must say
Lystrosaurus and Eythrosuchus were also pretty awesome
Arthropleura too looked awesome
The best scene was definitely the Smilo and Doedicurus scene
Just a cat being a cat
Loved how the Smilodon basically acted like a housecat and the Doeds were like "bruh, get out here"
The mammals in general were pretty amazing to see, especially Maiacetus, a highly underrated whale forerunner
The mammoth vs cave lion scene from an ecological standpoint was disappointing.
The WWM gorgo is still better overall tmk, although some things have aged with it
The scenes featuring titanis, erythrosuchus, allosaurus, and cave lion are all easily the worst scenes by far. I’m surprised they were given the pass at all.
I wanna see a predator get stomped by the big elephant
I feel like the Dunkelosteus scenes could have been better
There’s nothing really wrong with them. Keep in mind the scene was in production before goldfish dunk most likely
Is there still a debate on whether Dunk had lips or not?
It’s an on and off thing. It’s personal preference. I’ve seen golden reconstructions with and without them.
Nah those Lystros we’re dum af they we’re practically letting that Ethryo eat ‘em, like bro how do you not see that big ah head from a mile away
Oh Anthracosaurus was also pretty neat imo
Wish we spent more time exploring the Carboniferous amphibians
Same altho I am sad we only really saw Arthro for the bugs
Well we did also get dragonflies, clearly referring to Meganeura
True
Granted Meganeura was never properly namedropped
Mmmm imagine if we could breath with our skin
Well that took a sudden turn
Wonder what swimming would be like
Believe it or not we can actually absorb oxygen through our skin, its extremely slow though and definitely not like an amphibian
Hmmmmm
Cave lion being depicted as white colouration
Reality they would have been brownish/red
LOOP ignores this
Yk it’s crazy to think how much many bug species have barley changed ever since they came into existence
Also the lystrosaurus were not dumb, they never evolved an instinctual fear to predators, especially since the earth was practically devoid of life after the Great Dying
Mammoth calf gets taken down to easily (irl sometimes a single lion can struggle to take down a baby elephant)
Herd has more numbers yet chooses to not help that calf.
Hence the reference to the dodo
That’s true I just thought it was funny af seeing them get yanked and then the others just being like “ Meh not my problem “
I do agree the cave lion and mammoth scene was silly
wasn't even silly, just flat out bad
Its basically the same thing with the dodo and the Europeans
Poor dodos 😭
To be fair to the Dodo, it wasn't exactly dumb, just couldn't adapt to the new threats
Too friend shaped
To derp
Humans weren't the only threat, we also brought cats, dogs, rats and pigs that would kill the dodos and eat their single eggs
They ran out of melons
Basically what happened to the lystrosaurus, they were everywhere in the southern hemisphere but new species appeared, predation and competition pushed them towards extinction while new dicynodonts appeared to take advantage of new ecological niches
Me when Lisowicia
Ok but like why tf does ethryo have such a megamind
It works out at the library
DX
Evolution gets pretty wild after mass extinction events, Eythrosuchus evolved a big head likely for a powerful bite
how much did albertosaurus weigh?
Hopefully more then your MO-
that kinda implies predators just popped into existence from thin air
2.5-3 tonnes
They also were largely solitary
Them being social is a remnant of when they were considered a paleo subspecies of modern lions.
With that out of the way nowadays it’s been put under a lot more scrunity.
I forgot that they also showed off a member of the Otodus shark genus during the Maiacetus scene
Now the question is which Otodus species was it
also minor and unrelated criticism but ive noticed the predators in loop do an excessive amount of snarling/growling when hunting which is odd
hunts seem way too easy too
I only really noticed that with Ino. As for the speed of hunts I imagine it's a time constraints thing
Tbf it could help with intimidation scaring prey is beneficial
Not mention a lot of times fights in nature don't last long anyways
but they also don't end in 2 seconds fair bit of time as well, stalking planning waiting and possible endurance hunting for some cases
From the few scenes I’ve watched the designs aren’t an issue as much as those very stiff animations
The whole mammoth herd being scared of 5 lions and not even trying to scare them off never fails to confuse me.
Except for the allo 💀
Movement is much more distracting than the model even then
the diplodocus is pretty bad in both regards
iirc they depicted sauropods with triceratops?
Not…wrong wrong, but the whole environment and implied location is wrong (Unless they explicitly said it’s Hell Creek)
They depicted sauropod gallop..something that should have been kept in Pandora's box!
Yeah that was pretty cringe
a big sauropod at that
Speaking of galloping, how exactly did ceratopsians run? was it the awkward 'pooped my pants' shuffle we see in PoT or could they actually shmove?
Depends on the ceratopsian, smaller ones most definitely ran like you’d imagine but the bigger ones did the shuffle
iirc alb has a pretty darn good run animation for its size, i think its best to assume thats the "basic" run for a lot of ceratopsians about alb's size and higher
Yeah Alberta’s run is basically how ceratopsid running would go
Yeah exactly
ah, a shame, poor things are relegated to the truffle shuffle
They are all huge so it’s not uncharacteristic
Protoceratops: 👁️👄👁️
this is a very real alb size
Very real
Small Alberta, or giant woman? Hmmm
Both?

By Falcon9 if Albertaceratops was accurate
RIP
Man I wish POT was accurate 🙂
no
What tyrannosaurid is this?
daspletosaurus torosus
aint no way
Alr
Daspletosaurus
why table, why
Wait wait -- Albertaceratops got downsized?!?!
My attempts at downsizing the giant Hartman one kinda spiraled outta control
The monkeys paw strikes again
On the bright side I downsized bruhath another 50cm 
So is the size on the charts above the correct size for Albertaceratops now, or nah?
Posting this with names
PoT Alberta downsize when?

WHAT
How do you know this?
spirtual discernment
Oh sick
Table is this an adult Alberta?
Yes
WTF so this downsize happened today?
Are your downsizes even reliable? Or are they just things you goof around with
I don’t think table goofly upsizes/downsizes stuff
Upsize sarco plez, base it's size on that of terminonaris HW
Table downsizes legitimately, he just acts goofy (Like me fr)
I feel like clarifying the downsize would help, like elaborating on the process and reasoning
Yeah I’m sort of loss at words
alright gimme a sec
Like stego fr (I don't even know what stego does)
stego gdi's stuff
which stego? Derpy.Stego or xStego
if you had to guess lol
Ah ok, I wasn't exactly sure what he did, he basically just acts goofy all the time, thank you for informing me of this
xStego gdis extinct snakes I think
xstego hasn't even talked in paleo chat once
So uh, did you make a bruhathkayosaurus size comparison ever? Because Ik you downsized it
tiny alberts 
compared to my last one or sauropod bruhath?
cause falcon has one for the latter
Last one
sure one sec
Why does it say theory
scaled with grillcourt raja length instead of justice's
What is the estimated mass?
What would it take for me to convince you to make an estimate for sarcos size based on terminonaris
me to be good at scaling crocs 
bro wants sarco upsized bad
i feel like asking me to upsize something is a terrible idea considering what just happened with alberta
table can you do something for me
sure
I want to see how MOR 692 is size wise when you throw its skull onto the appropriate body, nasuto or furcato whichever is more appropriate
on it
EZ, just use head width, sarcos head is 2x wider than something else, multiple the thing that sarcos head is 2 times wider than and bam you have length
(Basically)
furcato is known from a subadult so idk if that makes it a bad choice where postcranial anatomy is concerned, but its between it and nasuto for more mature nasutoceratopins
You talk about sarco too much
Yes, yes I do
What I’m saying, it’s genuinely making me hate sarco
I have similar reservations when it comes to Saurophaganax
Be based like me and vary your taxon focus weekly
But sarco 😦 (sarco fans are just crocodile fanatics with no other outlets considering it’s the only croc in the game)
be like me and ruin everything 
Now that’s based
Vased indeed
i can't believe devs would overtune alberta like this!!! herbi bias!!!!!!
Nah I just like sarco the most
Whahhhhhh? Why?
Wait, so what does Alberta look like compared to sty now
Because it's just my favorite Prehistoric animal
Smol
We need an actual croc guy in this chat (no bias towards sarco)
lmao
Sry for asking why again but why
we should scale some Maastrichtian mammal teeth
Pleistocene heel bone scaling ftw
Metatheria are cool and rad
Deinosuchus is pretty awesome, easily one of my favorite creatures
So cool
bro only talks about carnivora
I also talk about sauropods, I have a love for the big dubious sauropods
what's your guys's favorite sauropod
Too many
hot take: Europasaurus
But in all seriousness dreadnoughtus is my favorite
Inform me on diplo’s ecological niche
small lil brachiosaur looking guy, I vibe with it.
maraa I don't vibe with but that can be said about the majority of those giants.
Omei now that I like. Big fan of mamenchisaurs
Wait wait, I think I figured out a favorite Sauropod
So, basically (at least to my knowledge) instead of feeding on tall trees it would feed in foliage closer to the ground, but contrary to popular belief it may not have held it's Neck in a low hanging position
Why on earth would your neck need to get that long
Aeolosaurus because it’s a megafaunal animal that shows full continental distribution in the fossil record
The real question is what’s everyone’s favourite ungulate 😈
oh that's a toughie. A whale obviously but which one
Bigger = better silly
its probably between orcas, humpbacks and gray whales tbh
Uhhhhhh idk, because I don't exactly know what that is? I feel like it's deer so I'm gonna say red deer
what are some cool prehistoric ones tho, excluding whales
Wait what- today I realize whales are ungulates 😳
you're welcome
now to taunt table favourite abelisaur that’s a tooth taxa
I was reminded of Plataleorostrum recently, that’s a cute guy
(don’t answer)
there's only two and i don't care about either of em 
unless you wanna count cf. megalosaurus crenatissimus but that's a referral not a taxon
how many named genera of abelisaurs founded on teeth are there
Did getawaytrike get the scalebar wrong then for Alberta's skull? This is what I referenced for the OG size chart
evidently
how big is that guy
He looks huge (maintaining the headcanon)
keep in mind the front half is also missing lol. It's already like half the guy's length even disregarding the fact it's farther back
hoping that guy is just a behemoth also
The guy in front of him must also be huge
i wish
What about the guy in the back 🤔
That doesn't look like it adds up to me
That’s who I am referring to
Again with the image, it's slightly farther back than the person in the frame, and it's at a back angle. The brow horns to the horns at the top of the frill look much longer than what you depicted there.
there's two figures with scalebars at that length
and its not like a small basal centrosaurine is weird either
Albertaceratops lived on a marginal island in the WIS. Clearly this is insular dwarfism (please don’t repost this, I am lying)
ik I'm just saying
diablo and a foremost skull fragment are only slightly bigger than this
I suppose the question would be then, why is GAT's wrong and the other one is right
Smaller = better
The main thing I can think of is if GAT made the scalebar 50 cm and stated it was 1m on accident. But I'd like the know the sources on your end too.
christ if that was the case, GAT buddy its been nearly 4 years lets go make the correction already
I'm just trying to confirm both sides here.
mind you issues with a GAT recon probably aren't unheard of
skull itself is using description's scale bars
picture's from royal tyrrel museum
Of course, but he's usually really good with ornithschians
So it just caught me off guard
I would like to say that this photo means nothing really. you can't glean any sort of measurement from this
gat's skull is physically impossible considering the museum exhibit
Again, I wouldn't use that as a reference when it might be perspective. At least for this particular argument
i know but it kinda discludes gat's size from being even remotely useable
Is there an image in the description with a scalebar? I'm trying to find it but can't.
and the only actual precedent for big alberta was a gsp estimate that easily could've been medusaceratops material
It doesn't say what the scale bar is tho
So it’s real and true then
and 10cm scalebar is congruent with what the mount seems to be
gat is so wacky and silly sometimes
and the skull/person's shoulder height are bout the same in both so it lines up
like 10% difference which seems fine considering its a blurry angled photo
unfortuantely i don't think this can be chalked up to angle
Is it immature maybe
this is actually really funny though
Or two different specimens?
alberta's just the holotype skull and all material was discovered within like 1.5ft of each other
Yep mb
The well-developed parietal and postorbital ornamentation and the highly fused nature of the cranial elements suggest that this specimen is from a large adult sized animal that still retained some subadult features at the time of death (Sampson et al., 1997; Ryan et al., 2001). Significantly, the preserved nasal (Figs. 3, 4.1) is unfused. Large adult-sized, unfused nasals are also known from the Montanan bone bed (Fig. 5), suggesting that, atypically for other centrosaurines, the nasals of this taxon did not fuse and develop the characteristic adult morphology until the animal had obtained full adult size (Sampson et al., 1997; Ryan et al., 2001).
mfw irl deino could reasonably hunt alberta
Average Deinonychus mobbing attempt
man
Would this thing reasonably fit within rexes mouth?
A trex could unironically crunch it in one bite.
Let me see this thing's weight based on just shrinking down what GSP gave (cause nobody else has bothered cause it's just a skull)
about 450 kg, utahraptor is bigger than this thing
i got 360kg with the sty gdi lmao
potato poetatto at that point, mf tiny
Y
Hang on what that reference. I've seen a few styrac gdis but not dibble.
idk if there was a gdi or not but i'm assuming the weight is from somewhere
Oh beautiful
oh stego
should be good then
So yeah...300 kg.
hmph
wasn't expecting to make albert 10x smaller today
It is easily one of the smallest ceratopsids period. Like there's others that're in the same ballpark (ex: avaceratops) but DAMN.
all in a days work
Arrhinoceratops when mcraensis pulled up to the function
nature is... pettable?
I would recommed using the scalebar from the paper over that photo with a guy in its general area if you haven't already
that's what i did
the two scalebar images fit together real nice which is a bonus
nice
Maybe Random should make a skeletal to make it official
you might be seeing an Albert from me soon
WHAT
but not this Albert
Albertonykus of course
i implore you to do as much as you can to reduce the rattail and make it normal
I will make it normal by reducing everything else
worth it
albertavenator I beg
frontal scaling 🎉
Albertonectes
there's as many alberts as fukuis now
Fukuipteryx erasure
das weighed 4 tons, correct?
For the largest individuals, probably
is there a gimp app for morons video, because every time I use it, it feels about as user friendly as a cactus
i find it amusing how i went from scaling albert as potentially bigger than das to less than 10% the size
square cube law
I want to know how you got it bigger than Dasp
did Alberta get the Tatankaceratops treatment
The OG estimate by GSP is like 3.5 tons
for alberta or dasp?
former
Albertavenator of course is what he means
we should stop naming dinosaurs after states and give them more creative names
smolceratops
triceratops
buts its tiny
tonkaceratops
sinoceratops. . . .. 5 tons. . .. .
@sullen cairn why do you keep messing with ceratopsians sizes
i may be stupid
first you made sinoceratop 5 tons, and now alberta is 400 pounds?
Sinoceratops has been 5 tons for years
technically the big sino is more like 6t if gat's skeletal is to be believed
I don't think I've seen that one lemme see
how big is trike?
The only GDI of trike has it at 7 tons, but I really wouldn't be surprised if with the size variation they have that they got bigger.
was it the big ceratopsians that were lone wolves or just triceratops?
Triceratops itself wasn't really a lone wolf either, at least probably not. Just not in the large herds that most ceratopsids probably lived in.
It’s hard to make a concrete assessment of its sociality
like, 2 - 5 instead of the thousands of others?
We assume this cause most ceratopsids probably relied on said herds to defend themselves. Triceratopsines (like triceratops) were likely more defensive, given the more practical horn shapes and significantly larger body sizes compared to their past contemporaries.
oh yeah, didnt we find a skeletal with a trikes top part of its horn missing? or was that toro?
unless you're coahuilaceratops
then you're vibin
Eh, their size is in proportion to their predator, I feel like that’s not a considered factor in their behavioural condition
oh, why?
giant horns
coahuilaceratops is normal boring ceratopsid size despite being closest to 3t sierraceratops and 5t bravoceratops
oh
How you get those sizes? I'm currently looking for which ceratopsids are over the typical size lol.
too many skeletals mushed together in one image
The only ones I've found outside of the 6 giants are penta and centro. I didn't get to sierra and bravo yet.
what are the 6 giants? torosaurus, triceratops, eotriceratops, sinoceratop and titanoceratops?
- pachyrhino
lemme check what I have
is this a accurate torosaurus size?
well, which torosaurus is that
It would be very appreciated
Torosaurus Latus
Sierraceratops and Bravoceratops aren’t big?
More-so table was saying that the three are closely related, but coa is normal-sized while the other two are huge
specimen I mean. Toro isn't only known from one
can we compare who was more abundent in hell creek, torosaurus or triceratops?
I mean we can't say for certain but there's way more trike than toro about.
Triceratops by far
Toro is known from maybe, like, a dozen specimens? Trike is in the hundreds.
oh.
The mysterious preservation biases
at least 3
i always thought torosaurus had like, alot of fossils
these nerds all seem to be over 2t
although nedo is... nedo... and i am far less trusting of the medusaceratops skull size after what happened with albert
Even if taken at face-value medusa wouldn't be above average anyway
There are a lot of "trike" fossils without a skull that might be Toro
But if by hell creek we mean the depositional environment, and not like, all of late cretaceous NA, then trike still wins by a landslide
are torosaurus's and triceratops only different in the head?
Torosaurus dominates somewhere in Laramidia maybe
also i have no idea if liam's ojo skeletal is actually useable but whatever
That's ceratopsids in a nutshell
oh.
the vicious cycle
so if you find a headless ceratopsian skeleton you jsut gotta take a guess?
What’s the fella after nedo?
of course he made an Ojoceratops skeletal
only ceratopsid skulls are studied because only the skulls differ. No differences found outside the skull because nobody studies the postcrania. Postcrania not being different leads to no studies. etc etc
i think lakustai might be over 2t as well
now, how many valid ceratopsids are there from hell creek? 3 or 4?
Species?
centrosaurus
One species of torosaurus and two species of triceratops
so nedoceratops isnt valid?
There’s one more species of Ceratopsian that is valid if you’re interested in broadening your range
dont tell me, dont tell me
It's contested but there's nothing that suggests to me it isn't just an abnormal trike.
leptoceratops?
😠
omg, do i win a prize?
I mean -> this way
Erm no, cause I said so
Ojo?
right is liam's ojo
also blub rest assured i am working on the avaceratops thing slowly but surely
Never knew he made one
albertensis is scollard iirc
So, contemporary (??)
seems to be
is trike absent from lower scollard
Im not an expert im a generalist
can you post the ojo
this is from april i have no idea if it still holds up
Squamosal looks funky
well either way you can slap that on a trike body and call it a day
after all post crania doesn't differ much and no one bothers to research their postcrania because it doesn't differ much
and also. ojo is just a head if that's all there is to it lol
It’s useable yea
But there’s defo a reason I never actually posted it
Skull to body is based on Eotrike for mine
Iain helped a little bit with it
Here is the skull by itself
I hate ceratopsids
Dang it liam
I was hoping that tag was about mor 692 but it was just you correcting me
Ojo more like uggo
i'd have mor 692 done by now but i need to shove furato into neutral because i hate non-neutral ceratopsids
have the skull in the meantime
There she is
Non-neutral anything 🤮
real
@woeful falcon
Every ceratopsid that isn't 5 meters and 2 tons or less (from what I can tell)
- Triceratops (8m, 7 tons)+
- Torosaurus (8m, 7 tons)
- Titanoceratops (7m, 6.5 tons)
4, 5, & 6. Bravoceratops, Eotriceratops & Sinoceratops (7m, 5 tons) - Pachyrhinosaurus (7m, 4.5 tons)
8+9. Achelousaurus & Sierraceratops (6m, 3 tons)
10+11. Centrosaurus & Pentaceratops (6m, 2.5 tons)
So only about 1/4 of ceratopsid species
Thank
@woeful falcon also these if you want em (i shrank it like 5cm)
and the neutral furato
Sweet
anybody here to confirm that alberta got downsized?
im pretty sure this aint the alberta im thinking of
yeah alb kinda shrunk
Alberto's past size was the result of outdated estimates and scaling errors
It really is this tiny.
This whole thing is so absurd I don’t think my mind’s actually processed it yet
I wonder if Medusaceratops size has changed or not.
good news for alberta not being a midget, there is a lifeline in that it turns out the scale bar in the description skeletal is 20cm its just stated below another figure for whatever reason
the bad news is a) the tiny gat skull diagram w/ meter bar still exists and b) according to that scale bar, the royal tyrrel museum is home to 10ft+ people
and i doubt the thing in a museum is cast considering its in glass and all
and even then lmao
So what is it? If it's double what was originally thought then the scalebar in GAT's does line up correctly.
but then there's the tiny one which i'm also pretty sure is by gat
and this has a 10cm scalebar for the same thing which is even more confusing
which means we have two gat skulls for the same thing and each one fits a different scalebar used for said skull
AHA
i can't believe the phillip j curie dinosaur museum would lie to me like that
and thank the heavens he has been embiggened once more
return to normalcy 
now we can return to the originally scheduled program of das getting steamrolled by a 3250kg centrosaurine
let this be a lesson in ceratopsid dominance and that I will never trust whoever runs the pjc museum twitter again
great now somebody's gotta do damage control for this
This among other incongruent scalings and measurements just goes to show how messy some of them are. Literally all over the place
luckily we got the good ending here
with that i'm mind i think i'll make an oldman chart
Ye it's GAT. Had to hound the internet to see if I could confirm this for myself, but with how some of the text is in Japanese I should have just accepted that it was GAT right away lol
kinda digging oldman so far
Yaknow.. I Just Realized How Quite The Cambrian Probably Was....
Could Early Animals Like That Even Pick Up On Sound?
Could They Make Any?
Yeah but uh that's like uh, super fragmentary so it's best to go with the small specimen because the big specimen is super fragmentary
they're all the same specimen and the figured stuff is very inconsistent so i'd rather just use the fragments i can be confident in the size of
(i also like giant albert way more but that's not the point)
How you get that mass?
Yo is that Scanova the Carnotaurus from YouTube 😲
Best dromaeosaurids ( Adasaurus & Achillobator )
scaled with sty gdi
Gotcha
and i think i've put the final nail in tiny alberta's coffin
thanks scalebars
So, whoops
Actual question guys, what do you think are the most interesting palaeontology quirks/recent discoveries etc?
spinosaurus and dilophosaurus
spino's paddle/salamander tail discovery and dilo's crest and skull structure
Me
Understandable 
dilo's skull and crest is a weird thing
That one Prognathodon with three other mosasaurs in its stomach was absolutely wild
One being it’s own kind and another being a brand new discovered species
Jesus Christ that is kinda wild
crazy stuff, maybe he just wanted a snack 
Honestly, this whole smallbert thing seems like a lesson in how much an unclear photo and wierd angle can mess with your perception of something's size.
Narp it was measurement shenanigans
Unclear photo didn't help certainly. But it did further prove a point that if you don't have a clear image of a thing at the right angle, perspective can mess with it big time and validate an incorrect scaling haha
I told y’all the image was sus
Hello friends, I discovered someone that haves a prehistoric crocodile teeth and I wanted to know if it's real and if it's possible to know what species is it ?
it's amusing this whole thing could've been avoided if presumably some random intern running a museum's twitter didn't assume a scalebar was 10cm instead of 20cm two years ago
there's quite a few crocs from the cretaceous sahara so that unfortunately doesn't narrow it down much
Table scale this
I think it could be a Machimosaurus maybe
30 metre Theropod incoming
Sorry ?
there's these scales that people use to measure table dimensions
blub wants one of those
i'm not sure if its diagnostic of machimosaurus but it seems to lack the silly lines machimosaurus teeth have
This is super interesting, I ll try to find more info
the worst part about ceratopsids is having to make all the gat skeletals tolerable to look at
Troubling sacrum
oldman herbis so far
That woman has so many dino cards
dino cards? I dont get the reference
Dinosaur King
What do you guys think are the most underrated/understudied extinct mammals?
Personally I gotta say ground sloths, I think they're very unrepresented and really cool.
Maybe certain cervids as well.
I say gomphotheres
based proboscideans
I would say desmostylians because they are just so odd and we know very little about them.
Give the edited and scaled ceratopsians to me so I can smash them into a drawing format
i have developed an extreme distrust of ceratopsid scalebars
It’d be funny tho
smolbert will be missed (no he won't lmao) but now i'm wondering why there's multiple alberta figures with completely off scalebars floating around
also some guys
You should give me their names NOW ⚡
wendi, random thing from foremost, c. belli, p. perotorum
Taking that Chasmo, been wanting to do one for a hot second, thanks bbg
it's literally just gat's 
bbg?
falcon is a mental case
Yea well, I didn’t feel like t-posing GAT skeletals, so thank you
bro thinks he's alectrosaurus
Multituberculates, monotremes and metatherian relatives i think
based choices
Enantiornitheans and other latest Cretaceous Birds
birds aren’t mammals
Only in the abstract sense
No
yeah this exists 
my guy has one bone in his entire body
Unfortunately
Whoops I didn’t see the mammal part
But erm, research birds anyways
would be interesting to hear you're thoughts on the actual question lol
Yeah, just reptiles for now
Probably Cretaceous metatherians and such
I don't know why but I just hate metatherians, like I dislike marsupials in general, and I don't know why.
Gondwanatheria done dirty
Thank you PP for featuring them in the best episode of season 2
Average opinion of felids crossing over from North America during the GABI
It was a really beautiful sequence as well, regardless of muh discussion on Gondwanatherian reproduction
GABI?
Great American Biotic Interchange
This is funny because there is potential P. atrox material in SA (in Argentina I think)
Oh yeah I remember that
wow
and so it begins...
I wanna see how this goes
oh god
Spino would beat tf outta rex (I love to start arguments 😈)
It's not Giga or Carcharo so no where
All of those are light work for a spino
Sue gotta thick neck
who gonna tell falcon they have sue listed as fmnh "fr" 2081 (lol)
there are quite a few fellas missing
Who is to say that's not intentional
that was an attempt to make it funny guess i failed
I need to find a coronosaurus ref and be bothered to put a pachycephalosaur in neutral
It is ok, old friend. Subtlety is the key to comedy
@sullen cairn you don’t happen to have a stego and dacentrurus comparison do you? I remember one getting made in here but I can’t remember by who
yeah beags dace, if you’re making one anyway could I trouble you do throw randoms newest allo in there?
is there another dace out there? I can’t actually remember
@west coral made it
Stego doesn’t like something with it but idk what exactly
Should allo be dino or 680
I knew that but yeah I don’t know what exactly is wrong with it lol
680 I guess, doesn’t make much difference to me
I’d do this myself but I’m not home and you’re just better at it lol
why is stego so big
use reverse psychology whys dacen big
can you compare it to diplo, allo and cerato?
with allo, man he is small
And allo still hunted it 💪
piss i'm late
sure
did only stego have neck armor?
As far as known, yes
bro why is stego so massive compared to diplo
Something about that Dacentrurus 
say it
Kinda ugly
tbf I just want some cenozoic talk thats the only reason I reply to you
Less than a day old account #5
Reminder to please be polite and respectful towards other members, Attempts to stir conflict or start an argument will not be tolerated.
Please refer to our #rules and check the pins to see what's allowed in this channel 
thank you lorikeet I was just asking for help.
ima just be watching, so uhhh alb size is...wonky right, "tiny" and "normal" sizes are valid or just confused unga bunga
Sure bud.
Do keep an eye on the channel, mod. Had a troll that likes to pretend to be dumb and then post some heinous video involving a blender
Who cares
He back?
Please drop the backwards and forwards argument ,
This channel is for paleo chat - read our #rules and please check the pins to see what can be discussed here lets get back on topic
He posted the cat video again, so I got pissed mind the language
fair, but what is the alb size stuff now seeing the rollercoaster it had for a second
It’s still big thankfully, table did an oopsie
ah ok just wanted to check if it was more than just a small group ordeal or actually widespread and consistent, thanks
pretty much some alb figures and images have really really bad scalebars
Biggest Stego is like 8 tons, bro was big
it was?
Almost 8 meters long and 8 tons
Biggest Allo atm is 2.7 tons
random sauropod, angolatitan
Nice
chat
angolatitan is cool but it suffers from basal titanosauriform syndrome
and whats that?
so it’s a taxonomic headache by default
anything sitting more basal than euhelopidae is pretty messy at this point, even euhelopidae itself is pretty unfortunate
whats the largest early jurassic sauropod?
Wow it must be so stable and easy to place
enjoying sauropods is a life of suffering, but it’s the life I choose
I only enjoy based Maastrichtian ones, minimal headaches 😎
You enjoy the nearing end of any major geological era dont you silly?
humuhumunukunukuapua'a (is a fish name)
Fenris and Leviathan Compared to Tarbosaurus
Fenris is the 11 meter 5 ton Sauro
Leviathan is the huge one
It'll be 5 years minimum before I take this dinosaur seriously
Why lol
The very nature of it
im ngl whenever someone mentions skorpiovenator i think of some concavenator or maip looking thing but nope its an abelisaurid
Spectrovenator the best venator fr tho
Maybe an article how different prehistoric animals hunted you could use comparisons with modern animals
You should be able to find plenty of articles based on dinosaur behaviors
You might not find an article that compiles a bunch of different behaviors, but you should be able to find articles that cover rex ambush hunting vs persuit predation vs scavenging for example.
Or Pteranodon skim feeding vs diving for fish. Look for articles that go in depth about a specific dinosaurs hunting technique to find enough information to form an article that allows you to showcase multiple dinosaurs hunting techniques.
And then do what kestrel said and draw your own comparisons with ecological niches of the modern animals we still have around.
Now I'm not educated much on paleontology, but that's what I would do if I were struggling to find articles.
And obviously don't plagarize.
wendiceratops if it was based
maybe it is based, just incomplete
That is one big cynodont.
largest egg stealer
Something looks off there
only 2 tons?
last time i checked it was like 3.5 or sum
right?
That length/height compared to weight tho.
It’s around 2.5 tons, so too light in the image yeah
It looks a bit too tall
thats just how it was🤷♂️
Can't wait for them to add the utah birds bigger then the tiny Raptors but they can still pounce and be much stronger
Utah? you mean achillo? unless you mean PT Utah
Lagomeryx by ville sinkkonen
yup
Are bearded dragons related to marine reptiles like plosaur and mosasaur?
Better yet, what’s the largest prehistoric ancestor of them
How do they even sustain themselves on eggs at that size
They're distant relatives of mosasaurs, but more closely related to chameleons and iguanas
Pt utah
I heard they are adding ai Dino into the servers
abelisauridae is once again ruined 
What makes you think they're sustaining themselves on eggs?
Well they said largest egg stealer. Gotta be some reason they got that size, especially considering most egg stealers in this day and age are kinda scrappy. I’m just thinking in ratios. If an egg stealer is that size how damn big were the eggs? What’s the point of getting that big?
Unless they just steal eggs on the side
They called it an egg stealer bc its an oviraptorosaur, oviraptor's name meaning egg thief. But it wasn't an egg thief, it was a parent
A pretty good parent as well
be late cretaceous theropod
have eggs
protect your eggs so fiercely that you literally die for them
70 million years later
''this thing is on top of a nest... must've been a cruel egg stealer''
Others have said this but the idea that oviraptorosaurs stole eggs as their main source of food has been disproven. That’s not to say that none of them ever consumed eggs, since many birds do it on occasion as a dietary supplement, but oviraptorosaurs were a majority herbivorous and lightly omnivorous group.
When the first oviraptor fossils were found, they were frequently found on top of eggs. In one of the most galaxy-brained moments in all palaeontology, people decided “surely these were dumb primitive animals so driven by food that they killed themselves en masse, even though animals don’t do that,” instead of making the conclusion that they were hyperprotective of their own young to the point of fully disregarding their self-preservation instincts, which is a thing many animals do.
Oviraptorosaurs being egg-eaters at this point is a myth.
It’s thought that they had a generalistic diet that was primarily herbivorous. Kind of like Ornithomimids. The meat they ate was probably just whatever they could scrap and swallow.
Yeah, they probably had a diet similar to pheasants and such. Very generalistic but mostly herbivorous
hello
while we are on the discussion of fossils have you guys heard that scientists think they can actually bring back dinosaurs from their fossils/dna at least the ones that have dna present
DNA doesn’t survive past a few thousand years so it’s not happening.
how big is Leedsichthys?
Mmm Polytomys
12 meters, 17 tons
AKA, Facultative Herbivores, more closely to True Herbivores than to Omnivores.
@light oxide hello! i understand how the conversation got to this point but as per server rules i will have to remove the video as we don't allow posting any kind of gore or dead animals, which the video seems to contain.
Oh, okay -- my apologies.
No worries! 
No genuine scientist believes that
have you researched that
Dr. Doofenshmirtz
some dinosaurs did survive extinction
they're birds
I have no idea where this goes, never seen the argument before at all
is this serious
same
I am not an expert or anything bro but-
Ah yes ocean dinosaurs
The underground society of ocean dinosaurs in the centre of the earth!
Mosasaurus is the ultimate ocean dinosaur

Actually, on the topic are there any other lineages of dinosaur that occupied the water besides spinosaurs, birds, and I suppose halzkaraptor (however you spell it)
😱
Some Unenlagiinae probably ate fish
Same type of "scientists" on wikihow
entertaining the notion that there are proper scientists that believe in young earth, I really wonder what valid reasoning they could possibly give for how all of the life that to ever have existed could coexist in any ecologically sound manner
On the most basic level there are HUMAN artifacts dated far beyond 4000 years old lmaooo
that's something I've always wondered. I always see people harp on the "oh so humans lived with dinosaurs? how did everything die" when the real question is how could everything have possibly lived together like that
Its so funny too especially since, again, people are older than that date.
exfoliate nice one autocorrect
there isn't a dimension where mammoths and tyrannosaurs are coexisting well. and allosaurus and acrocanthosaurus and stegosaurus because this means all dinosaurs would have lived at the same time as well
oh and plesiosaurs aren't dinosaurs
We really got someone tryna argue the existence of the Loch Ness monster huh
They’re old and have scales (but not really) wdym
nah thats sill its a plesiosaur but people call it the loch ness monster or "nessie" because of the legend
That belief doesn't have to coincide in not understanding basic science + that information is wrong (it doesnt say that), but also any religion talk isnt allowed
Why would there be a plesiosaur in Loch Ness
why would it die out if it only lived there a few thousand years ago
oh srry i forgot
what if it didn't
What are you implying 
what if it didn't die out in the loch but one still somehow lives there as there are lots of caves and such and the loch is pretty deep so who knows.
Nessie is obviously real despite being extremely common knowledge that the loch ness monster was confirmed to just be a media troll
When I say common knowledge I mean REALLY common
bible doesn't matter here. think about it logistically, something like an invasive species like a rabbit or a fish can drastically affect an ecosystem. and those, in our minds, are quite small.
now, take a woolly mammoth and a Tyrannosaurus and an Albertosaurus and a Daspletosaurus and a mountain lion and a grizzly bear, do you think those are doing well together?
anyways im done on this subject
Please, it's so incorrect it's painful
You seriously considering the existence a giant water monster in a lake which has been closely monitored for years just in case there might be a giant water monster, yet no evidence has ever been found
I see
Obviously the loch ness monster adapted to be immune to all shapes and forms of human detection (within 4000 years)
The amount of niche overlap if all these animals existed together would be CRAZY
Ah talking about implausible cryptids I see
Aye aye
Now. I could bring up a very plausible Cryptid that I talk about quite a bit…. But I only do that on Arazoa 
And also falcon might bring up Sasquatch feet pics again and I don’t wanna jinx it

Hmm
Most lake monsters are misidentified known animals or just hoaxes
The Loch has been studied extensively with sonar and EDNA, and the most interesting thing that’s been found in those is the presence of large European eels
Why do I always miss the good stuff?
Silly dummy, we all know a single individual plesiosaur survived isolated in that lake for 66+ million years, it just uh, like slowed it metabolism, and other science stuff to make my belief based argument more realistic
In my opinion, at the beginning, the Loch Ness Monster was probably just either a whale or a Greenland shark that went into the lake, caused some peeps to freak out, and then, after some years, died to old age or some other cause.
However, due to its impact on the peeps who saw it, they started to make the monster a legend.
And this brings us to present day.
how wacky and uncharacteristic of paleo chat
You could say a little Tom foolery
Great scott, this is paleo chat not... whatever this was...
To be honest, it was probably a whale ||freeing its willy||
i should shrink something for a day again
Megalania
Ahhh
Megalania would be funny
Shrink a sauropod or hadrosaur
#shrink megalania
we already shrunk angulo by 50%
Oh yeah I forgot about that
Probably, in all honesty -- has happened before.
ANYWAYS . . .
I got a question for you all--
How do you think ceratopsians may have responded to predation threats? A fully defensive measure, or maybe flight first and then defense?
Shrink torvosaurus
We had to give the aguja nanotyrannus a chance, otherwise angulo would have been too powerful
depends on the species but most prolly would've tried running if they could
now its only 7x smaller instead of 15x smaller 
We were cooking that night
Hmm . . . See if there are any ceratopsians that need a size update?
We already did Albertaceratops (which almost ended in disaster
). Are there any more that could use some?
i mean for a majority id say a middle ground, sometimes on retreat, sometimes on fending off, the ones with more formed weapons 100% would've been more about fight over flight if push came to shove overall( save for not exactly favorable cases)
if i could find actual refs for them sure

what fellas are you gonna shrink?
gsp's achelousaurus is pretty big
It’s considered likely that most ceratopsids relied on numbers and evading to protect themselves, given they were usually significantly smaller than their predators and had horns kinda impractical for combat with no real trends in shape. Triceratopsines like triceratops seem to be an exception to this, seeing as they are significantly larger than most ceratopsid species, and there was a similar horn-plan across the group, which implies a more practical function than just display.
This seems fine enough
Shuffle away, maybe huddle together
or avoid your predators in the first place
especially when nanuq would be bigger than pachyrhino irl
Retconned sub adult or something
Assuming that there were larger P. perotorum out there, but I don't doubt a Nanuq would stand taller/appear larger than them em account that tyrannosaurs are leggy dudes, tyrannosaurines included
Table what was the length of the nanuq you did earlier
8.4m iirc?
i think that was the highest i got though i talked about it on another server
7.9-8.3m scaling with torosus
You should totally attempt to shrink pachyrhino fr fr
well my attempt at a perotorum edit ended up the exact same length as gsp's lmao
😔
comp again
And that is the largest pachyrhino?
drumheller and lakustai are bigger
You should totally shrink suchomimus fr fr
shrinkage only really happens with things that don't have extensive skeletals
What's one thing you think you could possibly shrink
like i said gsp has a 6m achelousaurus but it sounds like a headache to dig for refs
and i am not very trusting of scalebars after the albert incident
I'm so sad it un shrunk
i mean technically those images with the tiny scalebars are still there (and posted by a museum because lmao) but the image with an actual physical scalebar makes it big again
for some reason people think tiny albert was scaled with the grainy picture that doesn't even have a good scale ref and not the actual images with scalebars which is funny though
imo the fact there's images with scalebars that screwed up is even more stupid
which makes it funnier too
Predator detection and avoidance is a question mark for me with derived ceratopsids. The endocasts of Anchiceratops, P. lakustai and Triceratops show remarkably little sensory specialization with reduced olfactory, auditory, optic lobes, and cerebrum. We know they herded, individually they may have been sitting ducks
cringe fail animal
ANCHICERATOPS!! THE ALBERTOSAUR IS RIGHT BEHIND YOU!!!! ANCHICERATOPS LOOK OUT!!
why does it look bipedal
I don’t like that
Why is its neck so skinny
First miragaia, now anchi
What is with ornithischians wanting to be sauropods?
Dan's skelly is of drumheller ye? I assume it was bc of what it says on its site and how it looks but it doesn't explicitely say "this is the drumheller specimen dawg"
Walter = sympatric hadrosaurs
Contextualises every PhP ceratopsian scene
They are all blissfully unaware of anything
I’m still disappointed we haven’t gotten to see an herbivore properly deck a carnivore in a recent paleo doc
Aight gucci
we need to show the people that sauropods can in fact defend themselves, I don’t know why that one in particular is so hard to grasp for people
it was nice to get the brontosmash
Maybe next year 
I'd pay money to have a hadrosaur fend off a predator. In every piece of paleo media ever they are always defenseless fodder. They were MASSIVE animals and were no pushovers. You don't need to have spikes and horns to be a threat
I'm here to tell you the average hadrosaur was not, in fact, massive compared to the contemporary apex predators
"X-rex" (which is often the most cited animal for this kind of thing) is a complete outlier and does not represent the average Edmontosaurus. The average Edmonto was as big, or even smaller, than the average rex
shant, no?
Shant is not the average hadrosaur 
Once again, the outlier should not be used as the norm
Sampling biases, so checkmate Rex fanboy
(I can win any argument with this)
Trug...
I mean that's the case for all dinosaurs, but I meant the typical big hadros that people are familiar with just like any other "largest of their kind so they're the most known" species
I also meant the typical large hadrosaurs, as by my use of Edmontosaurus as an example
The only hadrosaur that consistently outsized its local predator is Shantungosaurus, which as I have said, is an outlier
Regardless, I doubt they just rolled over and died every time a therapod came a knocking
I mean that might be kinda exaggeration
Sure, but they aren't the hardest animals to butcher
Edmontonian moment
I mean look at deer. They look unassuming and non-threatening but they kill people way more regularly than one would think
Exaggeration in what way 
There’s more than just shangt (most of which have a sample of one but I do not care)
They kill people, but do they kill bears/wolves regularly?
People are easy to kill...not that I speak from experience 
Tbf bears and wolves do kill me regularly
Erm well actually, Shant is the only one I can remember, so all others are invalid
True
Touché
Are you a deer? 
I’m a man of few words
I wonder how big Nanxiong’s Hadrosaur was
Nanxiong megafauna when it inhales secondhand Deccan smoke
Point is, they were more than walking steaks for Rex to munch on, that's all I was trying to say
What about Charonosaurus’s environment
Any animal is "more than a walking steak", but it also doesn't mean that hadrosaurs were steamrolling every tyrannosaur they came across
How big is the guy
I think tenontosaurus has it the worst in terms of "just there to be eaten" though. I can't think of a single depiction of it where it isn't being dogpiled by raptors. Every. Single. Depiction.
Nah that’s real, walking meals for Deinonychus
I meant it's never shown "as is." It's always shown just to be a template to show off raptors
Ok everyone name all the fauna from early cretaceous utah and texas, particularly cedar mountain and that one other formation that i can neber remember the name of. Its for a project
Wikipedia is your friend
Cedar Mountain, the very real formation
Is it not considered one anymore?
Just make sure to read which member they’re from 
Came across it while researching acrocanthosaurus
Looking for things like acrocanthosaurus, deinonychus, tenontosaurus, sauroposeidon, that general ecosystem
Ah much easier to find things
Tenonto gets mulched
Ty
Afaik it's not a probably anymore, @sullen cairn can destroy me or back me up, but iirc there was a juvenile Acrocanthosaurus specimen found in or around the area
Correct
My mind wins again
Cool and rad
Could you possibly make a size comparison of acro and the sauropods it lived with or would that take a fee?
Aucasaurus garridoi is an abelisaurid theropod from the Anacleto Formation (lower Campanian, Upper Cretaceous) of Patagonia, Argentina. The holotype of Aucasaurus garridoi includes cranial material, axial elements, and almost complete fore- and hind limbs. Here we present a detailed description of the axial skeleton of this taxon, along with som...
This is a very interesting phylogeny of Abelisauroidae.
i enjoy that i pointed out i didn't like the skorp osteology's phylogeny and mere days later an objectively more cursed version is released
Abelisaurus being sister Majungasaurinae, Arcovenator no longer being in Majungasaurinae but being sister to Brachyrostra,
Though I am not suprised to see that Furileusauria is just one big polytomy.
the european furileusaurian ghost lineage predating rugops in question:
i suppose now that all hope is lost with abelisaurid clades being even remotely geographically segregated that bahariya thing being a brachyrostran wouldn't be too weird
i miss the days when dahalokely and rahiolisaurus still stuck in majungasaurinae and things actually made sense
Speaking of Rahiolisaurus, wonder where it is now,
seems to usually clade with dahalokely at the base of brachyrostra nowadays
or just unresolved at the base of abelisauridae
Probably,
tbh at least with that in mind arcovenator isn't that weird here
furileusaurian genusaurus on the other hand
Yes, that is a curious occurrence. Genusaurus went from being basal Abelisaurid/Majungasaurine to being among the most derived of them. . . .
genusaurus isn't even that incomplete or anything 
wait achelo's two medicine not oldman
it's nice each das formation has a complementary big centrosaurine then (dp is kinda cheating but whatever)
judith river is also kinda cheating too but at least they could get big in all of em
Im sure the presence of large ceratopsins is balanced out by the pack hunting Tyrannosaurids.
and it's not like das can't hunt a ceratopsid its size
especially when one of them doesn't even have horns
Yea
the guys in question (I am being an ass to medusaceratops scaling-wise)
how come i never see you draw a tenonto before
ur last tweet is like... 1 months ago (i'm always look up ur art in twitter/x)
Man Trike was a lot different than I thought/j
get that ai art 💩 away from me
I'd also like to draw your attention to the title
Ah yes, everyone knows Triceratops for... Shuffles paper Its strong bite force
tf is wikipedia yabbering about
I imagine that 22 probably elaborates further
thats achelusaurus right?
the bigger one
yup
alr
Aight ya it seems to stem from this
so similar in size the basal skull is 30% larger 
Who's the second tyrant
second up or down
up
wilsoni (rip bozo)
Isn’t that dans daspletosaurus
you had literally one job
2h of sleep caught up to me
its just torosus skullswaped with mortimer's fmnh pr308 skull for dinosaur park das
Also read that wrong
why are we stupid
are we stupid?