#paleontology
1 messages · Page 43 of 1
A take of all time
all
It might not be a hot take, but I think it would be nice if all the attention to the northern Lancian group formations was directed elsewhere
cool
you dare question t rex and triceratops primacy
no no I think we should just forget about all those other formations, not like there's anything interesting there
how about southern lancian groups
just so you know I'm not going to say it, I know you know what I'm thinking about
I won't take the bait because I'll breathe one word and get sent to the dunce corner
southern laramidia when campanian tyrannosaurus
Africa is definitely a maastrichtian hidden gem of endemic fauna I think. Let’s go over there more
africa probably has so many clades we thought died out earlier, we just need to find them....
I think you're on to something there, northern europe too you can't bait me into saying it
more african expeditions in general would be great, there's so many interesting formations there with some real oddballs
...oddballs including anachronastic clades, who's survival while surprising, would make sense
on the subject of anachronistic clades that I will be skirting around there's a lot of really weird scattered stegosaurian fossils
I got down a rabbit hole and there's more early cretaceous stegosaurians than I realized, it's just that none of them are described
Pteranodontid diversity is what I’m curious about
the last stegosaur?
ok and apparently there's a random kazakhstan stegosaurian from the late cretaceous, but it isn't described so we basically know nothing about it and can't even get a more specific time range
it very well might not be a stegosaurian but what exactly it is is unclear
i hate the last stegosaur i hate the last stegosaur i hate the last stegosaur i hate the last stegosaur
Formation name?
what is the last stegosaur? there's something horrifying I'm missing here isn't there
how fast was Barinasuchus?
you're better off not knowing
none 🙂
km said it could run as fast as a grizzly, falcon objected, so whats yor guys answers?
I found it
I looked up that name and couldn't find an actual formation for it
well now I just need to know, you can't tease me with horrors beyond my comprehension and then just not elaborate
ok I remember now
it doesn't even have preserved limbs 
Any updates to the hatz coming to official
Okay. Is this real cause I’m bamboozled
Did someone say the last stegosaur?
holy crap
the last stegosaur on the planet
The last EVER stegosaur to exist!!
by jove they've found it!
The hell is the last stegosaur
its the last stegosaur on the planet
I think someone should post the link so I can learn about it fr fr
Well uh, how do we know its the last????
the last stegosaur
The last stegosaur…to exist…
..on the planet
guys check out the last stegosaur on the planet
https://twitter.com/df9465/status/1644869635269963777
The last stegosaur to exist
on the earth...
The Last Stegosaur
Butbutbut how do we know it's the last 

...on earth
...ever....
mongolostegus is younger anyways lmao
No way the last stegosaur
the last stegosaur on earth!!!
No, I'm the last stegosaur on earth
Okay it’s not real. This chat is poopy
Alright cool. But have you heard of the last stegosaur?
in more pertinent news general psa on urc 44-r (mr big adamantina abelisaur) and why you shouldn't call it an adult pycno
Dinosaurs have come so far...
How large was hatz and was it actually larger than quetz?
Everything outside the holotype is referred with 0 overlap so good luck
Bruh...........
This feels backhanded but this fella is unironically majestic.
Listen to that screech ☺️
it was heavier but not taller in height
top 7 largest theropod with their most up-to-date length and weight 2023?
How’s this Barinasuchus looking? Any glaring inaccuracies?
on my way to gut abelisaurus' size
me (aerosteon's strongest soldier) about to kill abelisaurus (sinner)
Doing the lord’s work
already 87% length and thats not even taking into account the proportionally shorter skull
preliminary estimate is 6.9m
man has been knocked out of 7m+ crew
bro is just removing preserved bone from the animal
Ermmm cartilage 🤓 ☝️
everything's there (on the side thats actually figured)
although i could go with that and shrink it even more 
rn its been reduced to being slightly smaller than aerosteon
6.7m now lmao
man is now a couple hundred kilos smaller than aero
I'm sure it was a worthy competitor to Aerosteon
true but abelisaurids just lost the probably only second documented instance of them being larger than sympatric megaraptorans
what is that skull you're using as a base
I assume that's the kenyan giant
yeah its the fossilcrates titanovenator
ah
then it is too short
i kept the same snout angle as yours, but the preserved abelisaurus nasal doesn't allow for shortening the snout more than this
eh this is even shorter then the first image and the nasal only seems marginally too long (it ends about halfway through the lacrimal in dorsal
there's no gap to get rid of, though
the nasal can't move backwards any amount
https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/before-man/images/f/fe/Abelisaurus_-_2(Skull).jpg/revision/latest?cb=20140204015209
the shortening happens because the rostrum stoops upwards more
the only part maybe getting smushed is that portion in between the lacrimals
as sloped as I can make it without giving abeli a spinosaur head crest
my bad, i can make it a little shorter
about 5cm of nasal has been erased in this one
yeah looking at it the parts behind the lacrimal are a tad smushed but this is version was even shorter than the first image
and even accounting for the nasals most of the lost skull length comes from the squamosal being shoved forward
if we don't break the nasal then that reduces skull length to about 76 cm (assuming the 85 cm was premax-quadrate, i think it was)
this is Abelisaurus right
ye
which is 1300kg using the old caro gdi
and nearly 200kg smaller than aerosteon
mission accomplished 😎
table made a chart of all maastrichtian abelisaurs to trick us into thinking he's an abelisaur fan
then proceeds to downsize them all
i feel guilty over the carno sized colombian tooth
i'm making amends
and i'm mildly annoyed by the complete ambiguity of abelisaurus size and if that means gutting it then so be it
you were right!
: (
73cm?
i don't think there's any smushing going on here
might be a little exaggerated of a slope but it allows the lacrimal/distal nasal to move forward a bit
not on PC but i think that works
adjusted the lacrimal to fit a bit better
main difference is this is allowing for three "breaks" for the nasal to slope higher
the distal end pretty clearly seems to have been broken off and the middle portion is missing the entire left side so I don't think its too unreasonable
but if there's only two breaks then i can't get it below 76cm either
i am evil downsizer
6.76-7.04m and 1150-1300kg scaling with old carno gdi
previously 7.36m and 1490kg
Doesn’t seem like a big downsize, still huge
Big thing is it’s gone from being inconsequently larger than aerosteon to appreciably smaller
And I just like having an actually abelisaurid-akin skull for it
Agreed, i got tired of Carcharadontosaurid Abelisaurus.
the two are still close enough in size that either wouldn't be too dominant over the other but it's probably at least somewhat important that the size difference was effectively been reversed
and better skull pictures (middle 76cm, bottom 73cm)
who is this abelisaur?
It would be funny if Aerosteon gets downsized
its a megaraptoran being scaled so anything could happen
abelisaurus
that's it?
that's the name?
that's just same but added with -us
yup
abelisaurus comahuensis
so...
the first abelisaur (to ever founded and described)?
technically majungasaurus is older (though wasn't recognized as an abelisaur) but abelisaurus is the foundational species of abelisauridae
which is also why the skull recon was so bad
most of the indian abelisaurus were also described before but weren't recognized as abelisaurs until abelisaurus was described (which is when abelisauridae was created)
as lizard said the skull was initially reconstructed after carchs
isn't amargas nostils in the wrong place on the PoT model? correct me if i'm wrong
how big is dimetrodon realistically??
not too big not too small
so like mega?
what mega?
megalania?
yes
ehh... maybe
idk
but yeah
alr ty
Like 3.5 meters and 350 kg. Megalania was the larger animal but it still wouldn’t appear to be small.
The larger lizard
Not a lizard (For Dimetrodon)
Didn't Dimetrodon possibly have fur?
Yea but for megalanian yes
Did you mean the largest then ?
Probably not. We have integument remains from other more advanced synapsids and they didn’t have fur either. It probably start somewhere with gorgonopsids, therocephalians, and certainly cynodonts
abelisaurus continuing the abelisaurid tradition 😊
what about it
being smaller than local megaraptorans
It’s coz they respect the raptors and the hardships of their cousins being small
Cousins is certainly a way to describe the relationship between Megaraptorans and Paraves
is there a megaraptoran associated with titanovenator? there’s a size chart with all the stuff in its formation but I don’t have it on hand
Maybe some indet. Theropoda material but nothing reported as Megaraptorid
I don't think we have evidences so far of Megaraptorans reaching Africa.
Isn’t there something from North Africa that might be a megaraptoran. The one that sounds like a disease?
Rhabdodontids seem to be the only cool thing here. And maybe whatever that other Ornithopod is
titanosauriformes indet could turn out interesting, depending on what the remains actually are (sauropod try not to be an isolated vert challenge)
(They will forever remain undiagnostic)
osteoporosia's a carch, but there is a potential megaraptoran centrum in albian(?) tanzania
and some people like to think parts of bahariasaurus belong to a megaraptoran
I don't touch the thing so I can't comment on it
also of note is that osteoporosia was initially estimated at 15m
and of course pakistan's beloved megaraptoran, vitakridrinda is worth a mention
Ist syntarsus invalid?
I think so
I thought it was renamed Megapnosaurus or something
hence the quotations around Syntarsus
does anyone have an image of this art but higher quality?
There’s coelophysis, megapnosaurus, and “Syntarsus” katentakatae
That last one needs a new genus name but hasn’t gotten one yet.
And mexicanum which barely exists in any capacity whatsoever
Woohoo new brick skeletal
are you fr that the diplo I grew up with is fake?
Yes
there has been a shift towards a more vertical resting posture in the last few years, something less extreme than that is still in the realm of possibility just not the classic horizontal
Is this neck position still plausible as a neutral position?
AFAIK rebbachisaurs and dicraeosaurs are the only remaining horizontal sauropods
that's still reasonable yes
Maraapunisaurus remains vertical (maraapunisaurus probably doesn't exist tbh)
This is valid. We don’t mean totally upright. Most sauropods were probably somewhere in the middle like this.
Yeah thought so, I already knew about horizontal necks being outdated I just didn't know what was still considered plausible
Mfw there’s no neck or front torso vertebrae to confirm this
yeah rebbachisaurids and dicraeosaurids are the ones closest to horizontal
I don’t care these reconstructions are fake WWD on top 
diplodocids are more vertical than them, titanosaurs more vertical still, and then brachiosaurids take it to the extreme
That's why I put in the "it probably doesn't exist" I'm an adamant believer in maraapunisaurus being completely fake, and if not completely fake highly exaggerated
There is a chance it exists but it probably doesn't imo
I’m a believer of maraapuni cause of how diagnostic sauropod vertebrae are….but that’s it. There’s no way to properly reconstruct the animal given how bizarre it’s context is.
We don’t really have a clue what it’d look like
I don't think it's a new colossal sauropod but if it did exist it looks like a rebbachisaurid
I mean that’s the thing. What does that mean? Would it look like a proper rebbachiosaur? Or maybe not because it’s an early member and thus would look more basal, having more general diplodocioid features? Nothing to really say.
I don't believe it because it's been lost for over 100 years and the description has some errors (like abbreviating millimeters with m instead of mm) i'm not opposed to it existing but it's sus to say at the very least
I am a very big fan of it though, it's probably my favorite sauropod despite it being kinda sus
it looks like a more advanced rebbachisaurid for one thing but their sort of body plan is more basal to diplodocoids as a whole
either way the specimen being mysteriously lost and found during the bone wars isn't great for it's validity in addition to the potential typographic errors
If the material did exist in the first place it probably crumbled apart as opposed to just being left in a museum basement for over 100 years but you never know
It would be cool if we found more of it but that seems extremely unlikely given it's size
if it even is that large
Yeah
Btw, speaking of large sauropods based on fragmentary remains, did that giant Morrison sauropod vertibrae end up being supersaurus or barosaurus?
probably supersaurus but there’s been several giant morrison vertebrae lol
AFAIK both super and bar a have giant representative
How large did that specimen end up being? Like a year ago I heard it was 110 tonnes but I never really trusted that, how does that look now?
Wow
Both are like 40 meters and 40 tons
That's kinda insane ngl.....
Like
Obviously that's not argent size, but that's still massive
The longest dinosaurs ever known
I think the comically oversized baro got shrank but super is still obscene
Atm, yes. Syntarsus (the beetle) turned out to be an already named species before then, so it goes back to the dinosaur
Good it deserves it the name is freaking cool 🙌
the 40m baro wound up being supersaurus too so baro is sitting at 30ish meters right now
Last I checked somebody told me there was a 2nd giant baro vert
how long is it? I haven’t had a chance to look myself
baro is sitting at 27 meters right now with maybe a bigger specimen but it hasn’t been described yet
Maybe I’m wrong den
There are three giant baro verts, estimated to be ~43m (the fourth, now Super, was 50m)
granted this is not accounting for possible neck allometry, and since one giant baro vert is definitely Supersaurus, there is a non zero chance those other giant ones are Super too
I think Curtice is working on those now too, he’s got a lot going on lol
I know for a fact he has some brachi stuff on the way that might give it an upsize
I'm guessing that the 3 ones marked with ❌ are now super?
the third one from the top is super, the bottom ones just... don't exist
they're fragments from an unrelated quarry that have no reason to be referred to Barosaurus
So uh, how large is the super they are from? Because if the baro is 78 tonnes the super is probably a Similar size m?
Being Super changes the position of the vertebra, thus its total size. Most recent estimate I've seen was 39m and 40-50 tonnes
So still massive
Nah, as a 51 tonne sauropod myself, I consider that pretty average
Definitely totally 100% real
Pretty cool, albeit a bit mundane finding tyrannosaurus teeth in that area I think
more URC 44-R (not) being pycno food for thought: Campanian Laramidia (broadly contemporary with Pycno) had Bistahieversor, Teratophoneus, Lythronax, Dynamoterror, Gorgosaurus, Thanatotheristes, Daspletosaurus torosus, D. wilsoni, D. horneri, and Tyrannosaurus running around at varying intervals
How much material do we have of Dynamoterror how would you reconstruct the fella
the paratype
nothing spectacular but a hell of a lot better than the holotype
probably best to reconstruct it after teratophoneus and secondarliy lythronax cause it clades with terato
What is a paratype?
material assigned to a taxon to better define its diagnostic characteristics
Not too shabby, was expecting something infinitely worse. I suppose It’s pretty big as well?
So there’s holotype, paratype anything else I should know about?
Neotype is the last term I think
there are many other types but you're unlikely to come across them
neotype is just a specimen to replace the holotype if its either a) complete crap and the iczn is feeling nice or b) has engaged in other wacky dissapearing and/or being destroyed antics
The best part about this channel is the unique terms I’ve never heard of every 30 words or so to me
👍
Who are the iczn
international commission on zoological nomenclature
Classic Paleontological scandals
how wacky and uncharacteristic
Btw, what are the most up to date barosaurus and supersaurus skeletals?
Fadeno's or Brick's Barosaurus are equally good. There's no up to date Supersaurus
RIP super 😔
What exactly is outdated with the super skeletals?
neck and tail too short
Bro is getting even longer 😳
So uh, much larger is the biggest super than the one in this skeletal
As in "specimen Xis 10% larger than specimen Y"
That is the largest one
Oh really? Damn, that does not look 40-50 tonnes
Wait they have a complete skeleton for the Supersaurus?
no but the skeletal is filled in based on relatives and multiple specimens
Oh I was about to say
Did the pachyrhinosaurus have feathers or was it a scaley dinosaur?
I dont think we even got evidence for that
Heard someone say we had skin impressions which… I kinda hope isn’t true but idk
More than likely it didn't have feathers. Quills are a maybe, even then it's unlikely. We do have skin impressions from a Pachyrhinosaur that show irregular hexagonal scales
Tldr; musk-ox Pachyrhino is almost certainly not the case
P. perotorum doesn’t have any preserved integument to my knowledge
Given skin impressions from close relatives, feathers are still unlikely
Ceratopsids as a whole were probably scaly. There hasn’t been a sign of such a thing in the various taxa with skin impressions, including in such areas where we expect it (like taco-esc rear quills) which suggests that feathers are a more basal ceratopsian trait rather than a ceratopsian trait overall.
Fluffy pachyrhino is a thing that exists for fun. It’s not scientific in any way and I wouldn’t try to treat it as such.
^
There’s no reason to suggest that a quill structure is particularly unlikely based on this information, especially if said Pachyrhinosaurini scale impressions aren’t representing its dorsal plane.
I mean there is…given in the case of triceratops for example we literally have skin impressions where they’d be and there’s no sign for supporting such structures.
Not every single taxa is going to have the the same dermal structures.
Ceratopsids right now aren’t feathered. If you want to speculate otherwise that’s fine. But I wouldn’t try to outright argue for it like you could with feathering on Trex.
Triceratops does, however, have raised structures (likely something akin to spikes) on at least some of the scales along it's back. Which is way cooler in my opinion
a quill structure and feathers aren’t the same thing, I’m not conflating those two things with each-other
Quills on dinosaurs are feathers m8, just less advanced
It's also worth noting that not even all Psittacosaurus species posses quills
Yes, that would be an inclination so as to not be so absolute in the condition of quills in Ceratopsidae
When quills are that rare in what we’ve found in ceratopsians then wouldn’t logic dictate that they’re an exception and not the rule?
Like cmon now
Currently, at least, there's more evidence that more ceratopsians lacked quills and feather structures than didn't. Skin impressions prove as much
^ Again, if you wanna speculate otherwise then that’s fine. But it’s more accurate for them to not have them as of now.
marginocephalians as a whole, I'd argue, likely lacked quills and feathers on more advanced forms
Am I mistaken, do we have copious amounts of dorsal scale preservation in Ceratopsia?
M8 are we going to drop this or are you just going to argue for your confirmation bias? Nobody here is denying it as a possibility. But it’s very important to draw lines in the sand when discussing these things so people don’t try to strawman things.
It’s not strawmanning, you’ve used an single specially preserved specimen as evident enough sampling to say quills are a rare structure.
?? There’s scale preservation from numerous species. The triceratops is just the best example.
Species of Pssitacosaurus indicating they don’t have quills? Species of Pachyrhinosaurus that show without question their lack of presence in areas with which you’d be more inclined to reconstruct them in?
Or even are these scale impressions for other genera in the same circumstantial areas of the animal where we would associate hypothetical quills with
If we have numerous taxa with scale impressions, and none of them show such evidence for such structures, especially when we have scale impressions in the exact same area as said more basal taxa, and it doesn’t show evidence for such structures, we’re going to assume the clade doesn’t have them. It’s not that crazy of an assumption.
There's several good examples from various taxa showing scale impressions across the entire body. Including but not limited to, Triceratops, Centrosaurus, Chasmosaurus, and Protoceratops
Those would all still be on the lateral plane based on this image
The image is in lateral view, so yes, but using the power of deduction we can assume that the skin impressions on the top of the body would curve, and by association, be considered dorsal impressions.
This image also doesn’t include said dorsal impressions of triceratops.
Said quill presence only pertained to the tail of psittacosaurus as well. Could in go in circles discussing how you can’t claim inaccuracy for a structure which would have such difficulty preserving, much less a lack of preservation in the specific area we can associate it. As if the condition can’t be variable, or even just still including the structure as a plausibility regardless of perceived rarity
M8 the issue is less the possibility of such a thing existing and more drawing a line in how we currently reconstruct taxa based on the given evidence. You could technically argue for feathered abelisaurids given feathers are ancestral to dinosauria, and carnotaurus is only 90% preserved with scales, so the rest of the animal and other abelisauroids could’ve been feathered right? We don’t see that.
Could some ceratopsids have quills? Sure. But rn it’s not the best way to reconstruct the animal.
Are the scale impressions pertaining to areas we associate with feathers? I would assume so because they provided insight on torso feature scales. So not seeing how that’s a strong pertinence to this particular circumstance. And if you can say “sure” based on a strong correlative relation to related animals that have said structure, than I’m not seeing how scale impressions not pertaining to regions of quill inclusion are enough to substantiate saying it’s wrong of someone to include them in said ceratopsians which don’t have extensive scale preservation.
Are there any recent papers regarding the beak structure of cynorhampus?
I see it mentioned that it could be similar to open billed storks but all paleoart I see of it has a closed beak so I'm unsure if it's been "confirmed" the mineralizations on the upper jaw closed the beak completely
The mouth closed all the way thanks to funky soft tissue
Yesn’t. While I’m all for following scalation preservation though mind you that such varies even between closely related taxa, and outside of Triceratops we don’t possess huge skin blocks from other species, tiny filaments like what we see on PP’s Rex for example are a feasibility in my eyes.
Like what’s on this Kentro
Yeah that’s def possible. I wouldn’t be surprised if a lot of traditionally scaly dinos had something like that
Should Purussaurus be added to the game?
you are in the wrong channel
omg thank you so much
why did protoceratops have quills, and did triceratops have them to?
There’s a whole discussion above as to why ceratopsids with quills isn’t a guarantee and is in the “probably not” category. Same goes with protoceratops, albeit it’s more likely than with proper ceratopsids. The one we do know that has them is psittacosaurus, and they were probably for display given that there’s really nothing practical about them in terms of uses they could’ve had.
We don't have evidence for quills on either taxa, so at current, no. Triceratops did, however, have raised bumps irregularly on its scales (too thick to be quills but likely supported spike-like structures)
Less Psittacosaurus, more PK Styracosaurus
Which is infinitely cooler in my opinion
yeah that looks dope but porcupine triceratops is a cool idea
Um. Why do I hear boss music?
@light osprey it is with great sadness that I must inform you that you're legally unable to like prince creek now
also relevant
Likely not
LET ME HAVE THIS
Wait wtf is happening? I'm slightly confused lmao, does this mean there was significant individual variation or something????
No, your fun will be ruined by science and logic
beckys giant might be a saurolophine
i'm more excited for the looming daspletosaurus fight
Basically, one of the giant edmonto specimens, "Becky's Giant", has features that aren't normally seen in edmontosaurus. This can mean 1 of two things. One, as table pointed out, really old edmontosaurus might just have features not seen in most of the species. Or, case #2, there's been a giant hadrosaur under our noses in Hell Creek this whole time.
So there could be 2 different giant hell creek hadrosaurs? (Wasn't Becky the one found in hell creek or am I thinking of something else?)
potentially
Omg I need this
I think it’d be funny if it’s just Edmonto ontogeny
Rex but hadrosaur
Truuuue
even more shockingly bagaraatan is a probable tyrannosaurid
I have made rex but hadrosaur
is dakotaraptor valid?
No, probably not
edmontosaurus rex lol
So not only is there Edmontosaurus, there’s also a Saurolophin?
Horrendous
Like one of those silly hybrids from the Jurassic Park/World games
Depends on if it's distinct or not. It might be a new dinosaur, or it might just be a really old edmonto. We don't have a lot of really old edmontos so they might have features we don't see in most other edmontos.
I think you mean beautiful
(We don’t have a good grasp on Edmontosaurus in general, osteology is heavily needed)
No
dakotaraptor's adult nanotyrannus
bruh
please don't be paraxeni 2.0 please don't be paraxeni 2.0
(It will be worse)
Montanacheirus lives!!
whos the biggest tyranosaurus specimen today?
Me
The war against misinformation continues… (It’s me actually)
mcraensis when it actually does something
Paraxeni 2.0?
paraxeni is a bad animal
how so
Bad material and chimeric
10 ton polacanthines 10 ton polacanthines
I want to believe
so i asked if brevi was valid somebody said no now im wondering
what is brevipropus than? also jumpscare warning
I wouldn't trust prehistoric wildlife
it's a footprint from a brachiosaurid of some kind, so there's no bones associated with it
Wait....... then why does it have a name......
Several footprints have names
i dont trust it either
ichnotaxa get an informal name all the time
But why...............
Like, just a couple days ago, a terror bird track set was given a name lmao 
so this could be like the largest branchiosaurus and or branchiosaurid
Footprint scaling is bad
very
Ischotaxa get names because it’d be a pain in the ass to keep track of/organize them if they didn’t
They’re generally grouped by what they’re broadly diagnostic as
I only knew of brevi because of dinosaur simulator on roblox 
Nonsense, what could have transpired
It’s campanian now
also back on the topic of brevi, was it found in any formation of any kind????
As an ichnogenus, the taxon is represented by (and named for) a 90-metre (295 ft) long series of fossil tracks, or ichnites, found in the spring of 1979 in the Atlas Mountains of present-day Morocco.
Late campanian
when does it date back to
They are commonly dated to the Jurassic period (approximately 160–175 million years ago), though they are more likely from the early Cretaceous, roughly 130-120 million years ago.
hold up
Like the early Maastrichtian layers got redated? Cause certain sections have always pertained to the late campanian in Prince Creek they just weren’t the most fossiliferous
mcraensis????????!"091209?´´ damn finally
L
clearly based
on la colonia ankylosaur
Second, a virtually complete postcranial skeleton of an ankylosaurid with an associated skull roof and lower jaw indicates the presence of a small bodied and slender limbed new taxon.
did brevi (or what ever it was) live with, or lived at the same time as maraapunisaurus
Why’s everything about Utah
Late Jurassic is all you’ll get for Maraa, but idk if that’s relevant?
Today is truly one of the days of all time for Paleontology
Apparently it’s a Diplodocoid now
maraa is now the biggest diplodocoid?
Source on that?
Last I heard it was a basal rebbachisaurid
maraa is a rebbachisaurid, assuming it exists at all do not trust the huge estimates for it
b-b-but it it had a huge fossil
bro did its fossil just get dusted or something?
so its not 80 to 99 tons 😦
the fossil mysteriously vanished shortly after it was found
i heard it was because of erosion right
We don’t know, but that’s a leading theory considering it happens to a ton of fossils
my question is how, are'nt they stored in a warehouse or something?
Chemical reaction with open air
wow
Its not anything. You can try to categorise it’s phylogeny, there’s no reason to take any size estimate for it seriously though
2 and a half grams
do yall think all the huge sauropods just got eatin by like the whole ecosystem when they died so there where no fossils, other than trace fossils, vertbra, or fragments, of like brevi, maraa, argent, and bruhath. where probably just scratching the surface of how big sauropods
similar to a whale fall
Most likely, rotting carcasses of say an argentinosaurus size would attract every predator within atleast a few hundred miles. That much meat you dont need to work for? You’re gonna flock to it
yeah
hello sorry if this is wrong channel, I don't know where else to ask where I can attach pictures, but can someone please tell me which dinosaur this is? thank you 🙂
It’s Pachycephalosaurus
thank you!
Dracorex
Pachycephalosaurus spinifer
how chimeric is archaeoraptor?
are we sure spinosaurus can even walk anymore it has tooth pick legs for a 7 ton predator
what if it pulled a tripod stance with its tail
you see...
idk
i'm just gonna wait the professional to answer ur question
based
Waiting for the arm description to come out and reveal quad spino was real all along
quad spino is so cool
but weird imo
Either way it isn't walking well
more and more everday spinofaarus is getting more real
Forget Crabs, Seal is the final form of evolution.
And rabbits, strangely enough.
Seals fr get the best of both worlds though. Chilling on a beach, basking in the sun. Go for a swim. They just have beach parties every day.
than getting killed by an orca on land
i had enough with those seal spino 🪦
no you have not
wrong chat blud💀
Definitely the scene of all time. Loved it when the Pachycephalosaurus pachycephalosaurd all over the place. Truly a film in history
back on the topic of brevi what brachiosaurid is it?
i wanna do some art of it
yes IK the image is bad
like what could it be specifically
Ah yes. The footprint. Aka who cares.
WAIT
HOL UP
Iws dat Swcandova the Cwarnotwaurus? 👉👈
I think I just gave my autocorrect a heart attack with that sentence lol 💀
i wonder if a sauropod ever died to a heart attack
Probably
Oh, most definitely. 
Anyone have an up to date and accurate skeletal of Baryonyx?
Thanks man
did sauropods shape there enviorment like elephants
Faarus's hips make no sense to me
At the size many sauropods were, it very much would be the case they would have major impacts on their surroundings. Prehistoric Planet gave a small taste of this with the Beelzebufo segment in season 2
A lot more than elephants
now you see why would spinosaur look like a parapalegic short legged fatass if its cousins in the same genus stood on 2 legs and looked the same without the sail
look at wolves or k9s not much changes and if it does its never that significant
this isnt correct and not what i think but its a hot take
I should put sails on all the spinosaurs that don’t have sails
please
like turning forests into plains boims
What a few million years will do to you
Sorry, should have been more specific. Brevi is now a Rebbachisaurid according to Larramendi
brevi is still regarded as a brachiosaurid as far as I know, the narrow nature of the tracks and thumb claw being in contact with the ground both line up with that
It's incredible how Brachiosaurids have spread themselves/distribution all over the world and evolved along the way
Let's goo
I'm just glad we have more evidence to kick the old "large dinosaurs were probably grey" idea, I hate how based on mammals that is. Non-grey sauropods waters my crops and clears my skin
More happy about the fact that sauropods might have been pretty colorful
Not really, the colors proposed can still be dull/watered down. Not gray sure, but not billboards of color
I do doubt they were super contrasted/patterned/etc, while you can see that in the largest reptiles today it's more of an exception, but it is nice to see they still had Something going on
It is interesting to think about what individual variation might have done in large dinosaurs though. When you look at large crocodiles they're usually all fairly uniform in colour with pretty minor variation, and are only more contrasted while younger and smaller. But you get the occasional large adult who is weirdly vibrant lookin
Pigment doesn't come free, so it implies a pretty healthy life for that individual to have maintained that colouration. So i wonder if the occasional Peak Performance large dinosaur may have looked quite striking compared to their peers
The healthiest Diplodocus would be a really punchy ginger colour 😎
called it
(got a diplodocus model from almost exactly 2 years ago that's primarily a pale orange colour)
my eofauna Diplodocus is mostly yellow on the upper half, so W for me too
i think fred wierum also gets a W here (picture related)
brown fans stay winning
is the e.d. cope trex specimen bigger than scottys??

😭
from what i can gather, Probably Not, and if it is it's not by a whole lot
Its uh... dubious... so I guess.. cope?
sees
That rex looks like it seethes 😂💀
it cant change its eyebrows so it always looks angry
Its angy cause its got no lips, and isnt accurate in general
true
wonder if there gums covered there teeth like a komodo dragon's or partialy covered them like other lizards
"hey, it's me, pls open the door I'm freezing here"
Open na noor
boom
Thought that was a rat for a split second
Ew feathery rex
Ew saurian rex
Who has a actuate picture of how big eo was
I took this from a paleo chat somewhere. It shows irl eo, bars, rex, and amarga next to each other
I think that’s scotty too so not an average rex
True, I like it though because it emphasizes eo isn't a behemoth like in game
Fr they need to change that
I was just gonna but saw you did first
I mean, maybe, and if he is it's not by much
The best method for estimating copes size would be figuring out what relatively complete rex specimen has the most similar femur proportions to his and just scale that rex up
They wont, they can either change it to Triceratops but changing its size to Eo irl size would probably diminish its status ingame as apex
They aren’t gonna do any of that
If they made it smaller and not change any of its stats itd be so broken.
But they wont, cos the perkowner wanted huge eo.
How big's the largest eotrike specimen?
The one above
Theres only one specimen, so the competition isnt there lel
has anyone talked about how thw SVP thing mentions a possible Hell Creek Unelagine
i don't know if anyone in here has talked about it yet, but i swear i've heard someone suggest that before...
all i know is Dakota is being suggested a possible Unenlagine
Size difference between eo and rex is not as bad when you don't use a giant rex
Which part of it
the part that actually is raptor
I mean, it's still a very significant size difference
Yeah but it's not as big of a difference
and uh... which part is that?
(read: from what i've heard, pretty much any part could plausibly not be a raptor)
as far as i know something in there is a raptor just no clue
Eo compared to more average trikes.
i think Eo suffers from "Bobblehead syndrome" cause it probably has a abnormally large head..head just looks unproportianally large to me
unrelated to eo, but all those differences between the trikes...
individual variation in ceratopsians my beloved 
wait till you see Styracosaurus
i am so aware of the Styracosaurus Splitting Debacle and i am living for it. so much natural variation in frills and horns that it was mistaken for multiple different genera
Rubeosaurus lives in our hearts
isnt Stellasaurus the only surviving one?
cause i know at this point Rubeos validity is near nonexistant
Stellasaurus still exists for the time being
while checking if that was true, i noticed that i... May have misremembered styracosaurus having remains previously assigned to Multiple genera (aside from itself). seems like it might've been just rubeosaurus (unless stellasaurus is lumped back into sty someday? or already has been?)
idk all i've got is that stellasaurus was described as its own genus back in 2020
rubeosaurus got sank back in and stellasaurus got pulled out
Stellasaurus was originally a specimen of Rubeosaurus, upon its lumping into Styracosaurus, those remains were re-evaluated and placed into their own species
very cool! 
every time I'm reminded about the Ceratopsian species rabbit hole I have to stop myself from getting lost in it
Maraapunisaurus
yeah
You all thought you could ban me? Nah, let the rex glazing continue.
what do you mean
I got banned for rex glazing 😦
Uhhhh maybe but the measurements of the material may have been exaggerated and we lost the material so it's dubious for now and probably will remain dubious unless we find more material (assuming it even exists)
glazing?
I was hyping rex up a lil to much 😦
aw 😦
anways, Im not hear to bable about rex
if its somewhat dubiou for now what the biggest rebbachisaur now than
But before I stop glazing rex, why in god's name is carchardontosaurus so big in pot?
I swear its actually massive, when its actually a 7 ton pred lol
its not too big
Maraapuni is unquestionably the largest rebbachisaur . Just….don’t ask how big it is. A number’s practically impossible.
Yeah, it's like trying to estimate the size of hector's icthyosaur
Yawn, I have no idea what you're talking about, I'm going to assume its a sauropod
Yes
Actually? Guess I'm the guy >:)
whats the second largest than?
What you on about btw? There’s no carchar in pot rn, modding included.
"its actually only 7 tons"
DB carch:
the next largest (and what I consider largest because maraa has issues) is rebbachisaurus itself
Ngl you should all watch plotuke, he is such an accurate paleo yt (I'm sorry what happens to yall next)
Oh, ngl I forget it exists because it barely looks like an actual carchar. I think acro before carchar looking at it.
carchar looks shrink wrapped
In pot? nah its way to bulky fr
It’s a gremlin creature the size of a bus that boy ain’t right
its face looks shrink wrapped
Im going to screen shot an image of carchardonotosaurus in pot, mf massive as hell
second largest rebbachisaur?
If you see how carchar is actually shaped it’s really not the same
rebbachisaurus
I think Rebbachisaurus itself? I think it’s similar in scale to things like apatosaurus
womp
I consider it largest anyway because maraa has issues, we know it’s large but there’s a few estimates (the latest from larramendi has methods that make me want to cry)
I mean that best it looks it. In game it’s built like glass for its size.
Another from a streamer named sucho king
As a mammoth I quiver in my boots if I see a rex but can repel 2-3 carchars comfortably.
BB is underestimated, plus it depends if the server touched the stats or not.
Large theropods > your favorite mammal fr
Fair, but let’s not talk about gameplay specifically anymore
I saw someone try and argue elephants beat mega theropods because they have "hollow bones"
Eh it depends on what you’re talking about, albeit not for that reason lol
Aside from paraceratherium, all the largest land mammals are elephants
Not wanting to get in the 1v1s cause that's not paleo related, but people think a large mammal, such as an elephant, could manhandle a creature larger than itself
Seeing as elephants are paleo related though, largest only got 11-12 tons max, and thats an african elephant 💀
They ain’t really built for that. Elephants largely rely on their sociality to protect themselves if sheer size won’t work.
Tbh, they do fight amongst each other, so that has to count, but I dont think theyre used to dealing with carnivores their size.
Keep in mind I said elephants as in the clade. Zyglolophodon is a mastodon that’s nearly the size of a paracer. The elephant palaeoloxodon is in the ballpark too. Then you got the 14 ton steppe mammoth.
Also, hot take, Modern day birds of prey would neg any small dromeosaur
Define small dromeosaur, cos if youre talking like, a velo vs a hawk, youre trippin
hawk negs velo, Im being serious fr
is this not just bird vs bird essentially, size would be the determining factor wouldnt it
I had an experience this one time I should tell you all with a hawk..... it was not pretty.
It really depends. The strength in the legs in feet is something they both have. It’s more so the air advantage if anything.
I will say that there are records of golden eagles taking coyotes and wolves, but it’s not common for a reason.
The air advantage is also a disadvantage, theyre lighter, frailer, not to mention their beaks dont compare to actual dino jaws
So I had this, 35 pound turkey right, and Im just minding my business and stuff and then I see this dark thing come out of the sky, and grab the turkey by the head, smaking it against the ground and giving it a purple eye
No turkey is 35 lbs but that’s me being a nerd
Boiler turkeys reach that weight, yes
Fat turkey created just for meat, checks out
Nah its good, but all I can say is I would be less afraid of a velo than a hawk
You can punch both of them to death
Now if we are talking about dromeosaurus as a whole, then daktoraptor takes the cake
But yeah, golden eagles have been known to take some absurd things. It’s just, again, not common for a reason.
I didn't say utahraptor cause yk, it might not be real ☠️< MB
Also, Dakotaraptor isn’t real. It’s a long story. You mixed the 2 up.
Velociraptor was hunting hundred pound protoceratops
AHH SHOOT, I CONFUSED MY RAPTORS
If it was hunting it. I’m not entirely sure given velociraptor is like 30 lbs but some protoceratops are 10x that weight.
You see, that dont count, cos, I wasnt there to film it, we gotta run it back
There was a dromaeosaur in the hell creek though, sadly Dokota raptor aint it
Three actually. Only one is named though.
Nice, finally some real evidence besides turtle shells and rex fragments 🙂
It was definitely hunting it. The thing is that specific proto was a juvenile
Shouldn't be used as evidence that Velo hunted adult Protoceratops, which as you said get to 10x its size. But it was hunting juveniles around 3x its size
hunting is hunting
Fair I suppose. Also shouldn’t be doubting such things when you got that mammal bugger tackling a taco several times it’s size.
Fair enough, that's bigger tougher prey than a turkey at any rate
Eagle negs with ariel boost 🙂
Acheroraptor, and fragmentary remains of a microraptorine and unenlagine
Sad Fact, There are some people that believe megatheropods are too slow to survive today
Megatheropod is such a weird term
Put an allosaur, a Torvosaurus, in any modern day evironment and we have problems
Velo vs like a big eagle like a golden or australian eagle would be a fair fight, I think. They hunt prey of about the same size
I dont think anyone thinks that.
Release that thing in the elephant sanctuary and report me about their number after 2 months
Problem is terrain, If the eagle catches the raptor in the sky then its over, on land velo negs
If the velos in the sky its got bigger problems
Sir we have dead elephants and a fed theropod, we need more MEAT,
yeah if the eagle yeets it off a cliff or something then L
Eh it’s not that simple. If attacking such large prey didn’t come with tremendous risks then we’d see them getting deer and canids more often.
Rip raptor, thought it was "badder" then its relative since its a famous pop culture dino, sadly eagles neg with speed bost
Its evolving flight, let it cook
utahraptor is bigger so..
smilodon vs utahraptor who wins
Utahraptor is real 💀
utah, mid diff
No fanboyism, utah is actually a massive animal
I’m betting on the Utah. It’s larger and has overall more formidable jaws and claws.
The head alone is the size of a man’s torso.
smilodon if it manages to wrestle it from a surpise attack and pin it safely but more then likley Utah due to size, if it was a pack hunter, and bigger claws
Im betting smilidon leaves before it gets these dino hands, mammals never were better than the dinos (HUMANS DONT COUNT)
Its like, 350, 450 kg, smilo is like, 300-400 depending on the species or smth
Utah's overall larger, the largest Utahraptor is 500 kg and we have wayyy fewer specimens of it than Smilodon. If they were the same size Smilo would win
Populator can get to like 450 kg so it’s actually pretty close size wise. Utah’s still bigger tho.
Mammals had to evolve intelligence to stand a chance, Match basing skill issue fr 🥱
Nah mammals are based. At the same size cats and bears trounce any theropod
And I'm a theropod fan
A 8 ton tiger isn't going to happen, ever
yeah im betting utah if in an open feild
but smilo could get an ambush win
It doesn’t help smilodon is a brickhouse that is kind of used to wrestling larger prey regularly
For some god for saken reason, the Mammals antaomy for preds doesn't allow anything larger then 5 tons on land, wonder why
Of course lmao. But a 300kg tiger can take much bigger prey than a 300kg theropod
homotherium still the better saber cat..
300kg tiger vs a metri, tell me who wins >:)
Both hunted big game, its close
I think animals are suited to their environments and such. I think Paravian animals are especially beautiful though.
Cave Hyenas casually being THE dominant predator of classic ice age Eurasia but nobody cares about them for some reason
could a utah see a smilo ambush comeing?
because their hyenas and Disney ruined normal peoples view of them and lions
That has been ruined way before that, I dont think hyenas ever were or are respected.
Plus, big cats are just cooler
based
nah hyenas..espechy Pachy and Dinocrocuta
The Jaguar is definitely one of the most visually stunning extant predators
Also are kind of out of time in a sense
I’m not informed enough to comment on these Viverroids though
what theropod has the best chance of beating a rex?
anything in the size range depening on circumstance
Big cats are awesome, especially lions and tigers, waaaay bigger in person then you think.
Literally any other large theropod. When both are several ton predators with multi ton bite forces it’s going to be close regardless of the slightly higher statistic.
i saw a abstract actually that literally said Rex is overrepresented in media
Its the Goat, duh
Of course it is. (It’s also the most studied extinct species in science so it’s kind of over represented in that regard too)
rex slams ever other therapod doe
The Bisti Beast and Gore King want to challenge that notion
The fact that I cant recognize those nicknames means that they have a long way to go before that.
Bistibeast is Bistiahaversor and Gore King is Lythronax,
Pft, yeah, maybe if those 2 come back to life.
lythronax literally means gore king
I dont think that will make it as popular in the general publics eye
because the general public is ignorant outside JW
Prehistoric Planet casually being the biggest name in dinosaurs aside from JW
And whats their mascot, still Rex.
Like if anybody is doubting it’s impact just give it a few years to sink in
the rex is technically AMNH 5027
Numbers numbers numbers
no thats the specimen designation
If it doesnt have a normal name I dont care about it
yes cause dinosaur names are "normal"
What's more dubious, maraapunisaurus or bruhathkayosaurus?
WWD tho......
also, MASSIVE HOT TAKE, I believe tyrannosaurids would have killed there prey similar to modern day dogs
Way easier to call a specimen Mark or smth then a bar code in normal conversation.
...uh well the Bruhathkay pictures were recently rediscovered so its valid in name, meanwhile Maarapunisaurus only has a sketch or something
Bout the same tbh. If I had to pick probably Bruh cause one of the two bones that existed was probably a theropod and not a sauropod
WWD the goat, they should remaster it bar for bar and that would be the best dino doc ever.
i mean we found the pilot episode
Wait, are you the guy who thinks that we can't prove that palaeoloxodon may not have been an elephant or was that Another guy with a slayer PfP?
paleoloxodon is a elephant end of story
we have plenty of material and species to say so
The whole thing with paleoloxodon is it’s relationship to the African forest elephant, which is very confusing
i thought it was closer to Asian elephants
Nah, Asian elephants are close to mammoths
oh i thought it was both
Yeah, wasn't there a lot of interbreeding to the point that the African Forest elephant is actually more closely related to palaeoloxodon than African bush elephants?
isnt the columbian mammoth hypothesized as a hybrid
TLDR, the african forest elephant is closer related to paleoloxodon than it is to african bush elephants: Loxodonta africana. So the african forest elephant either is a palaeoloxodon species or needs a new genus name.
cross fingers for Paleoloxodon
scientists have named a new genus of animal
Columbian mammoths originated from interbreeding of steppe and woolly mammoths and became their own distinct population
isnt the Steppe like in between Woolies and columbians in hairiness
is agustinia valid?
also did sauropods have tail spikes on the top and bottom of it?
Agustinia is valid but the spikes were just ribs
^
all of them?
as far as we know no spikes
so whats the most armored sauropod, other than probably saltasaurus
the closest to sauropod spikes was Titanosaur Osteoderms and whatever Ampelosaurus had going on..as well as obviously Dicreasaurs like Bajada and Amargas sails
We know ampelo had osteoderms but we don’t have a grasp on what the animal exactly looks like.
Some giant titanosaurs like alamosaurus have also been found with osteoderms, but they were limited to a few on the lower back, probably for mineral storage rather than anything physically practical.
if anything decent hip protection depending how large they got since id assume the hip area was a prime target
also did saltasaurus actually have armor
yes
another guy
Saltasaurus was the first sauropod discovered with osteoderms.
The human urge to pet everything is strong rn for me
Feels very salty for the non osteoderm sauropods believers
More little osteoderms
and despite being called "saltasaurs" in Alphas Egg they arent Saltasaurus
Saltasaurus actually hails from a pretty neat formation
also how many osteoderms did that have?
also what would of hunted them for this amount of protection
it didn't need more protect, its already unhuntable LOL
I think that might be an exaggeration. Don’t know for sure
i mean Saltasaurus by sauropod standards was not big
Saltasaurus isn’t a particularly large titanosaur, and abelisaurs and megaraptorans were pretty omnipresent across South America
A Sauropod is a Sauropod, and sauropod equates massive beasts
magyarasaurus and Paludatitan Nand Europasaurus disprove this
Probably the best Saltasaurus depiction around
Thats too shrink wrapped, im going to need bigger
That’s John Conway’s opithshocoelcaudia (totally spelled that wrong)
Shrink wrapping. We can never escape it
welcome to trying to spell its name
But seriously, why is it shrink wrapped?
its..not thats probably a tad much honestly
best depiction a_round_
BIGGER
my knowledge on Saltasaurs is limited to the ones in Alphas egg being Nequeanosaurus since Aucasaurus and Aereosteon being the predominant theropods
Trex and Megalodon being the popular big bads of the prehistoric world that scientists keep making bigger and more OP with every discovery for some reason
belly is literally dragging on the ground
TOO SHRINKWRAPPED
Because funny
I finally found a good Saltasaurus, no osteoderms though.
BIGGER
If you told me 5 years ago we’d be back to megalodon rivaling blue whales in size I would’ve called you a lier
im just waiting for Megaraptorans to get their spotlight in media
Stop the shrink wrapping, not accurate fr 😠
Only if they get mentioned to t.rex, they ain't coming back
Here. Finally something pleasant to look at
You will have the amazing dinoworld maip and be happy with it
Prehistoric Planet will deliver trust 💯
That thing is not accurate at ALL, beat a sauropod
Before I see another Megaraptoran I’d like some proper Enantiornithean representation first. Or Ornithuran. Something Mesozoic that flies
The polar allosaur in wwd is technically a megaraptoran too
Maip somehow beat a sauropod, beyound unrealstic
its not accurate cause its painfully obvious they just had Orkoraptor and just upscaled it
That isn’t an Azdarchid important distinction
at least they got the claws... right?
you cant just upscale a animal and call it something else
was cryo feathered or scaley
most likley some form of filament
Me when every megaraptoran reconstruction is just a composite of the entire clade because they all have crap material
We don’t know. Early theropods are in this gray area where we don’t really have a clue what they got in terms of coverings
Anyways, Tyrannosaurids are just a big dogs and acted/hunted the same way, change my mind fr
Last climate study said Antarctica was something like southern Patagonia at the time so good money on substantial covering of sorts.
theres literaly a perfect hunt by rex in PHP2
Tyrannosaurids aline similar to dogs ngl, expect rex though, but tyrannosaurids are fairly close
doubt it
I still wish there was an austroraptor abelisaur fight for no reason other than it’d be cool
dogs are run down predators
That could aline with certain tyrannosaurids
did a abelisaur coexist with Austro..cant remember
I forgot where austro even lived 💀
Argentina, hence Austroraptor
Quilmesaurus and niebla
getting hunted by an adolecent tyrannosaurus would be scary tbh
so 2 smallish ones
getting hunted by a tyrannosaur is a gift, enjoy it while it last
id rather not have my leg snapped like a twig by a theropod
see my problem is Austro had relativley tiny arms so id think it wouldnt really fair well in a proper fight
Bonapartenykus comes first, no exceptions
Tbf quilmesaurus is pretty middle of the road overall in terms of abelisaurid size and still like double austro’s mass
id watch a person get eaten
sauropod with the longest neck other than my pfp
I've really started to notice in the past decade how much of hunts are cut off. They show the chase, the initial takedown (usually, if it's "clean" enough), and then it will always suddenly jump cut to a half-eaten corpse
to be fair imagine a rexs bite on anything...probably for the best they did it
Because nature isn't clean, thats what people need to know fr
correction thats what disney lovers need to learn
Ive seen how crocdilians kill their prey, nothing disney about that
The preds in prehistoric planet, if similar to modern reptiles/birds, would have ingested their prey violently
i mean..Raja and baby Isisaurus
I keep snakes, tarantulas and flesh-eating isopods (among others). Don't have to tell me twice 
abelisaurus would be... dear god
PHP2 continued the tradition of mass Sauropod baby murder
they kinda just picked them up than swallowed them so there was no need for them to you know... bite them i half
I once saw my turtle rip flesh of a fish with its claws
Heck, my parrot took a chunk of flesh out of my cheek once
Even though this is a bit childish, can we see an animal actually fillet an animal the proper way?
its a tiny baby whats the chance the jaw strength wouldnt just bite them in half
maybe, 0.01%?
But I doubt the mosasaurus got all the baby in its mouth, probably bit a massive chunk out of it and had the rest float away.
...we are talkin about Abelisaurs
MB
They still would have been somewhat ... violent in there successful hunts
yes cause nature is violent
Sadly it isn't disney and rainbows and dinosaurs having a "good time" happens not so often
Man, I wish prehistoric planet depicted real unknown behavior
how excellent is rex' senses?
Really good
thx
Np mate
Mainly its sense of smell. Eyesight is good but not exceptional and idk about the hearing
If you really want to see violence, monitor lizard hunts. "Thrash and bash"
hearing was good, can't find the study though
isnt the eyesight suggested 3ish miles
3 miles, and they had massive eyeballs.
last time i heard rex can see 4 miles better than those of eagles and hawks
i normally dont care about rex personally so i just never look into studies
might be a bit much, but yeah it was better
The study gives huge error bars for rex vision, it could be better than an eagle or worse than a human. It could see in color better than us at least
I want a more accurate and gorey documentery tbh man 😦
Oh sh, I remeber that study..................
dont forget to credit artists
Goofy rule fr
mark witton and uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh idk
i forgor how strong is rex bite force 💀
is it still 35.000-58.000 newtons or updated?
yes, and its larger with bigger specimens
1st is Brian Engh and second it Witton
I was about to say that.
yeah, sure................
i was looking
no one talks about Dryptosaurus, thing has big talons
Anyways, Tyrannosaurus Rex would at some point decapitate a Triceratops
A general channel reminder to please keep this channel and all posts in our server appropriate and SFW while in conversation. Refer to our #rules
y'know what
forget abt rex
this is day 103791819173927 of me waiting kenyan giant abelisaur to got described
HUH?
yes cause we have evidence that they regularly pulled frills off to get to neck meat
the paper is in the works
They really aren't leaving much fossil evidence for anything, those darn tyrannosaurus
not likle its the most common theropod in Hell Creek
And consumes a absurd amount of food plus the bone
ehh one decent Edmonto and trike sustains it
If a tyrannosaurus rex scavenged their bodies, there is going to be not much left
depends how much was on the carcass before it got there
if there is bone, there is food 😎
Certainly won’t he getting that from prehistoric planet. In case that wasn’t clear
how did spinosaur walk on 2 legs with that toothpic femur
my theory is that they pulled a tripod with its tail
or they had longer legs
or it was, just light
it walked cause..it could, if itcouldnt it wouldnt have legs
^
Don't ask, Spinosaurus is too weird
Fr and those spino fanboys who thought it could beat rex
spinos normal
do not talk to my precious controversial boy like that 😡
Kind of a wonky characterisation of its posture too. Just a bit silly looking to me. Here’s a pretty one
he wants to eat fishy 🙂
Gabriul N. U
Yeah mb
god Gabriel Ugueto is such a 🐐
Might of not hunted large dinos, but they certainly ate big fish
big ass fish
Large ahhhh fish
it wouldnt normally since Carch filled that niche
id still bet on spino beating a carch
mawsonia moment
Carch ate fish??!?!?!??!? 🤯
i mean maybe.. any meat is food
50/50 split between a spino and carch fight
Mf carchardonotosaurus gaining the ability to hunt fish 🤯
I mean you don’t need to specialize in fish to hunt them
Based on average size I don’t think so. Or maybe mature Spinosaurus are a hard find
if its a drought and fish are caught in small pools carch probably could
plot twist: spino & carcha are actually lover, not fighter
Dogs catch fish after getting used to it it wouldn’t be anything crazy haha
Spine bitten by carchar moment:
nah 💀
spino got no enemies
logically spino could beat any theropod if it slapped them and just discouraged them
Ergh all of Ugueto’s art on Google is low res. Pain
Every single land theropod:
or, stay in the water, challenge them, watch them leave, win B)
Why’s it extinct then 🤨🤨
the Turonian Turnover
i recommend to download Ugueto's arts at twitter (or X) it has a good res trust me
to much water
Bro couldn't handle the land 🗣️
its because spino is a prime example of being too overspecialiazed
No seriously, spinosaurus had close to no chance simply being land based
Oh ok, to X I go. Nabbed this from Instagram though
the big three vs an argentinosaurus who gonna win
By the time its habitat got destroyed, it already became a whole crocodile 💀
less habitat destruction and more sea levels lowered
giga carries, rex steals the win, spino uses it magical powers to do all the damage
No more fishies 😔
insta is good too
Fishes go bye bye
i have a Bichir solely cause Bawitius
we know sea levels went down but it's hard to say what exactly was happening in north africa in the later cretaceous
Spinosaurus came back for a comeback 🤯
no spinosaurs are extinct after the turonian
joke
turonian?
turok?
rex stomps ever other theropod with a 20% of losing
Abelisaurs, Titanosaurs. Copy and paste it everywhere post Santonian or something
Based + cry more + get dogged on + strongest bite force out of any land animal + negs your favorite theropod 🗿
More delicious Spinosaurs
eww it's lipless
blocks you
rex feasibly can easily lose any fight with something in its weight class...or under with Denversaurus and anky
there's several places we don't really know what happened past cenomanian assuming we have cretaceous rock there that even goes that late
abelisaurs are always a safe guess outside of north america though
yea Abelisaurs became apex anywhere Megaraptora didnt exist down south
I bet the biggest theropod will be a abelisaurid
Pteranodontians in Western Asia and Africa. Sampling biases be damned I believe it’s real
Spino=longest theropod and rex is heaviest so i doubt it
I can respect a belief like that
whats the chances of a African Megaraptoran
giga tallest my height
no Spino has height too ptretty sure
aw 😦
yea helps when you get a extra 6ish feet with a sail
hey atleast giga is the second haviest
idk abt the heaviest tho
it can be rex, it can be giga, or it can be both according to https://www.thecodontia.com/blog/the-largest-theropod-dinosaur-known-to-science
13 ton rex when
i doubt gigas weight estimates considering all we got for the big ones a jaw
MSNM v4047 has them beat in sail/neck height. Don’t know about proper S. aegyptiacus though
i just want more material for Tyrannotitan
should i trust the vividen than
there is a dentary specimen that gets to those sizes as well, and the holotype had the dentary so honestly the big one is decently close to S. aegyptiacus proper
WOAH
Lovely
idk abt cope tho but last time i heard according to @stiff osprey (srry for the ping tho) he's 9.5-10.8 tons so yeah...
WHO SAID SPINOSAURUS WAS THE TALLEST?
BY THE SPINE
Me me, I did
uhh...
10 years old me 😔
ITS BY THE HIP, RAHHHHHHHHH
Don’t care 💅
spino is tallest..
so cope is 10 tons than
its not....
6 foot sail
Spinosaurus is taller than you, that’s all that matters
it's not, theri is taller than him (spino)
measured by hip, not sail
i forgot about dat damn turkey
