#paleontology
1 messages · Page 40 of 1
^
Common PoT scaling issue
It disheartened me most when allo got upscaled
Alio I can at least play pretend a bit
man
Stego is hella short too in the game too right? Or is he actually that size irl
Cus man he is short in the game. So small and not bulky
The real thing is pretty big. Idk
Thyreophorans in general are built like literal boulders. Tyrannosaurus would appear like it towers over stego when the two are basically in the same weight class.
jarvis pull up the stego gdi
Isn’t stego in game way upsized
Height > Weight, this is Theropod heritage
It’s not bad. It never stuck out to me size wise as having an issue.
Pls do. I want to see stego vs dasp
largest stego's like 8t
Main problem I believe with stego are its proportions are that of a younger specimen, not an adult. Mainly because its what they had to work with at the time I believe
And honestly, that's probably for the best because stego is compact
blobolour form
I want fat, slightly taller stego pls
Which ones better
Bottom
no frontal though 😭
I like bottom too
The proportions are getting wild out here sheesh
Sauropods own that category tbh
Bottom. Top is based on sophie
Only sauropods would evolve to be this size and shape and still be a functional organism
Best of the Mesozoic
anyways stego and rex for whoever asked
stego's upper estimate is .5m longer
i'm out of free saves okay i'm resorting to screenshots 😭
bars and rex is also fun
Yo check this out
Some of the best instances of tyrannosaurus behavior I’ve seen
I wonder how agile an animal that size would be
One of the PT Rex emotes is similar to this
Like, would it’s movement be comparable to a modern Elephant? Or entirely distinct
Entirely distinct considering it has a completely different body plan
Like in the speed, yeah definitely should’ve embedded some context or phrased it betta
Whoa. What is that video from?
Victoria the T.rex museum exhibit
Just use this so that all estimates are visible https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/391564113722998794/1140476165254025216/Stegosaurus_2.1.png
I don’t think I will
Falcone you’re a noob shur down
Yeah but then I have to put in like marginally more effort and stuff
🔭
You can see where this causes problems
Table’s got a point ngl
very weird very random question but maybe someone here can help me, so if I were to reconstruct a lambeosaurine crest and nasal passage what material would probably work best?
Bone and flesh
ah yes of course
I mean like building a replica, I feel like I can’t just use anything but idk what would be good to use
People have used PVC pipes
that’s what I was thinking, I can build the ‘larynx’ easily enough
getting pvc to cooperate into the right shape is the tricky part
👍 Yea, everyone who’s made hadrosaur crests have used pvc for the Hjronk
That is so cool very amazing and realistic behavior I love to see dinosaurs “fight” in natural ways other than just to the death like monsters
oh, that rules! i love how they try to minimize physical contact, instead mostly trying to intimidate eachother by showing off their teeth and bellowing - and when that fails, briefly biting eachother before breaking off and returning to the intimidation tactics.
it's a lot more plausible than both animals immediately going for the throat, since neither one really wants to risk getting a major injury over a dispute, and would prefer to just convince their opponent that they're too strong to fight.
Hey peeps -- what is the up-to-date rough weight estimate for Metriacanthosaurus? At least based on Dan Folkes's skeletal?
~1500kg scaling with yang gdi
Isn't Yangchuanosaurus proportionally differenct compared to Metricanthosaurus?
It’s the only recent metriacanthosaurid gdi so it should be at least useable with metri
Wait -- isn't Sinraptor more similar to Metriacanthosaurus than Yangchuanosaurus? I thought Sinraptor was a metriacanthosaurid?
Metri doesn't have the most material to go off of in terms of establishing proportions
I know -- hence the "rough estimate" part and why I stated Dan Folkes's skeletal.
Gsp sinraptor gdi would legitimately be under half a ton at metri’s length
Well since Yangchuanosaurus isn’t in Metriacanthosaurinae I think there’s cause to assume they are different in their proportions
Oh
Yea? It’s a weight provided by a professional, so it’s more valid than your unofficial GDIs
Pwned
Pwned
Wait I can’t do math it’s 1.3t
This is what I get for trying to type long numbers on my phone
1350kg-1500kg is pretty small margin of difference at least
Here are the skeletals Dan Folkes has for the three metriacanthosaurids:
Ah, you got two Allosaurs and then an Abelisaur
That is outrageous
Big true
Although the sinraptor gdi dorsal is fit to yangchuanosaurus proportions
Sinraptor gdi for reference
I'd like to see someone make the case for abelisaurids being an offshoot of metriacanthosaurids based solely on the way yang looks
I was about to say -- last I heard, Dan said it was a metriacanthosaurid. XD
Big head
This means it's more powerful
Today’s moral dilemma: do you use the 5 year old gdi of a closer relative or the few month old gdi of a marginally less close relative
Both, do an average of the two
Just as you find average weight by finding the mean of every estimate ever
👍
Anyways average between the two’s like 1425kg or something
Real
Now we wait for gsp to curbstomp us for even looking at his skeletals without paying royalties
Imagine the wonky cladogram you’d get
Not really wonky, it’s just a straight line from Yang to Carnotaurus 👍
The only abelisaurid
I saw somewhere dan’s Yang holotype skeletal labeled as rugops
Nevermind rugops which its skull is likened too
Was that…planned? Cause that was lightning
Heh, adult rugops confirmed
Rugops, a 30 foot long killing is on the hunt (again)
That's what we call great minds thinking alike
WAIT I FIGURED IT OUT
So iirc I’m pretty sure choc at one point tried saying that the “Kryptops” postcrania was a metriacanthosaurid for some reason, and Rugops and Kryptops are both middle Cretaceous basal abelisaurids from Niger known from cranial elements, meaning they’re basically the same thing, making Kryptops and by extension Rugops metriacanthosaurids
Quite possibly the realest thing
It all makes sense now
Beagliam making skeletals^
Paleo chat
Paleo Chat
it's been a while since i'm making prehistoric animal size info
oh well. here's PT anyway
In this short video, we meet a bird named Lyrebird that can mimic any sound!
This amazing bird is so amazing that not only can it mimic any sound, but it can also learn new sounds very quickly. If you're interested in animals or nature, then you need to check out this short video and see for yourself what this bird is capable of!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...
I got a question -- what were the weight estimates for Pachycephalosaurus and Struthiomimus?
I dont know how much the struthi estimates hold up.
Forgor to attach image lol
Hmm . . .
From what I saw, from that 330 kg to 430 kg.
The latter from a laser mass estimation study for an Ostrich, Struthiomimus, Tyrannosaurus, Acrocanthosaurus, and Edmontosaurus.
400 kg ostrich, based
Okay -- I'm seeing 450 kg for Pachycephalosaurus. Is this correct or nah?
Probably.
Hmm . . . Interesting . . .
I think this might be an underestimation of their size and stature
Someone should have a skeletal for S. altus and it’s a bit taller than that
Altus can be 350-450 according to the paper, so it checks out, also that siluhete is while its running so its not max height probably
Nah I found the skeletal it’s too short
https://translate.google.com/website?sl=auto&tl=en&hl=da&client=webapp&u=http://theropoda.blogspot.com/2023/09/dakotaraptor-non-esiste.html Dakotaraptor stuff
how much did daspletosaurus weigh?
the largest species
I know the largest is pete, but I dont remember the weight
Iirc big pete was like, near 4 tons?
Lower estimate is 3.5t. I don't have the upper
You got a skeletal for it?
go away
I haven't looked at daspletosaurus in years but every measurement i saw of sir william back them was the most mid sized tyrannosaur ever
it having a 122 cm femur would be like 116 cm femur alberto
oh I found my old scaling, sir william is an epic 2% larger than the torosus holotype
Thank god that is so much more palatable than the thing nearly doubling in mass
Stares at Camptosaurus

idk if this is the right chat but did they ever talk about adding weather hazards???
Wrong chat -- that would be for #path-of-titans
Is the Evanston Formation a part of the Lancian Group?
Oh wait hold on, would the Lancian Faunal Stage just be anything in Laramidia between 70-66 mya?
I think it's 68-66
That would exclude a good few southern formations
Infact I think the Lance itself extends 69mya
Yes, technically North American but it doesn't really account for the Laramidia/Appalachia split faunas. It's therefore most useful as a reference to the typical Laramidian fauna. The extent of the WIS at that point is a whole other kettle of fish though too
Speaking of Appalachia, do we have any other substantial vertebrate formations besides New Egypt and Hornerstown for it?
iirc there was something in an svp abstract a few years ago
and lewisville
A lot of them are pretty similar, like decent marine fossils with 1 random dinosaur every 200 years
The Demopolis Chalk in Alabama is like that, a few others in NJ like the Navesink
Absolutely delicious stuff, you fellas are clutch as always
Yeah Brownsteins been doing great work reevaluating this stuff
Estupida mi juega desgracia da
Any good edmontonia skeletals?
Plus gdi
Wish I was built like that
don’t we all
Same
1k+ pings 😨
1k+ pings 
Figured as this was the only one I keep on seeing and it’s from 2013
Monitor Lizards are a fantastic group of animals, as they include the largest lizards alive today, but at one point in time they got even bigger...
Thanks to Joshua Ashby for suggesting this video!
Join our Discord server: https://discord.gg/3KgpG8J
Subscribe to our subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/BenGThomas
Subscribe to explore the wond...
@little mauve is there a good explanation for the chronostratigraphic situation in the Bauru Group?
no
there's also presidente prudente which is sometimes considered part of adamantina
and afaik vale do rio do peixe is effectively adamantina minus presidente prudente and rio preto
and marilia got split up a few years back as well
so there's also serra da galga
brazilian statigraphy is not fun
Don't have much to add, it's a mess
thank god pycno got thrown out of there
now it's just in some needlessly obscure campanian formation nobody cares about
Common Brazilian Paleontology L’s. Now I’ve got to comb through all these to find the maastrichtian taxa
bauru maastrichtian deposits are gonna be marilia, serra da galga, while presidente prudente sits at campanian-maastrichtian, and some of adamantina's dating suggests its upper layers could have lasted until the late-ish maastrichtian but that's a very hard could have
cambambe formation isn't bauru group but that's also maastrichtian although i have no idea what's even there
That’s what I was gonna go for, just gotta discern which taxa are uppermost Campanian-Maastrichtian in Adamantina
personally i wouldn't touch adamantina with a ten foot pole but good luck
https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/185/2/312/5047416
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322920354_The_Baurusuchidae_vs_Theropoda_record_in_the_Bauru_Group_Upper_Cretaceous_Brazil_a_taphonomic_perspective
https://peerj.com/articles/5594/
https://web.archive.org/web/20171107015150/http://vertpaleo.org/Annual-Meeting/Annual-Meeting-Home/SVP-2017-program-book.aspx
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5990825/
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351229355_Reassessment_of_Aeolosaurus_maximus_a_titanosaur_dinosaur_from_the_Late_Cretaceous_of_Southeastern_Brazil
i hate adamantina
Abstract. The Bauru Group has three crocodyliform taxa: Itasuchus, Pepesuchus and Barreirosuchus. Within these taxa, the skulls of Itasuchus jesuinoi and Barrei
PDF | PurposeThe Bauru Group is worldwide known due to its high diversity of archosaurs, especially that of Crocodyliformes. Recently, it has been... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
Field work conducted by the staff of the Centro de Pesquisas Paleontológicas Llewellyn Ivor Price of the Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro since 2009 at Campina Verde municipality (MG) have resulted in the discovery of a diverse vertebrate fauna from the Adamantina Formation (Bauru Basin). The baurusuchid Campinasuchus dinizi was describ...
Aeolosaurus was used as a possible index taxon dating thr Adamantina to the campanian/maastrichtian
I trust Aeolosaurus is around there. So many other stinky Titanosauria floating in Adamantina
problem deposition could've begun as early as late coniacian
This is why I like nonspecific biogeography; yeah there were some titanosaurs, abelisaurs, yadda yadda you get the picture
it's like how tyrannotitan and patagotitan are from the the same member of cerro barcino but are separated by like ten million years and it's made even worse by adamantina having it's weird notosuchian thing going on
And afaik there isn’t any comprehensive dating of adamantina by locale which would be very nice to have because of how massive adamantina is compared to everything else in the bauru group
And adamantina interdigitates with a few other formations
It was going so swell this little undertaking of mine until I stumbled upon this stupid thing
I’m pretty sure at least some of the adamantina was campanian-maastrichtian (iirc there was a study relating to that) but then the question is what’s from the maastrichtian parts
I think I’ll just use Menegazzo’s chart for now
i will say one nice thing about the whole "adamantina is a hellspawn and i hate it" thing is it makes it easy to dismiss the whole "urc 44-r is adult pycno" thing
like that's even worse than something like "suciasaurus is adult thanatotheristes"
Speaking of, I think I mananged to sort out the Maastrichtian aged fellas. Now I can move on to another continent 
what'd you end up with for maastrichtian guys
Adamantinasuchus
Aphaurosuchus
Armadillosuchus
Barreirosuchus
Brasileosaurus
Caipirasuchus
Caryonosuchus
Roxochampsa
Montealtosuchus
Morrinhosuchus
Sphagesaurus
Lepisosteus
Brasiliguana
Adamantisaurus
Arrudatitan
Gondwanatitan
Maxakalisaurus
Boipeba
Brasilestes
Roxochelys
Bauruemys
Some of them are upper-Campanian but with more possible records into the Maastrichtian. Just Adamantina
menegazzo et al by beloved
The notosuchian diversity is pretty interesting
Anyone know if Loons are descendants of Hesperonis?
No, albeit they are convergent in a lot of ways
yeah hesperonis was part of a lineage distinct from modern birds that died out at the end of the cretaceous
Hesperornithids are an ancient lineage of birds that are more basal than the ones we’re familiar with
They’re quite interesting in a lot of ways. They had teeth, mostly had no beak (except for the front of the top jaw), and many of them were still capable of flight, again being pretty convergent with loons until you get farther in their evolution when they got larger and lost flight.
Speaking of Hespernoris, is it those infamous eroded lower Maastrichtian deposits of the Pierre Shale which imply its Maastrichtian presence?
Time to pull out oceans of Kansas again
I don’t know the fine details sadly
Alr thx
The author's noted that H. regalis was not present in the uppermost Millwood Member of the Pierre Shale (Middle Campanian). Unfortunately, rocks of that age have been eroded away in Lansas and we have no way of determining what species were present here in the final years of the late Cretaceous.
It seems ambigous in kansas, but maastrichtian hesperoronis seems to be based off a potentially early maastrichtian specimen from the canadian arctic
maastrichtian one seems to be mason river not kanguk
Oh the thing I clicked on said that’s where it was reported from so which one is it
ye I reread it I’m a dummy
kagnuk lasted quite a while so I'm assuming they had reason to be specific with a campanian assignment for the kanguk material
but i wouldn't know cause i can't find the full paper
At least there’s something in the Mason River
boy this sure is a wikipedia page of all time
There are so many wiki pages like this. Really kills me when I’m looking for stratigraphic age
early maastrichtian age for mason river seems to still be possible as of 2020
Correlation of the fauna recovered in this study with agglutinated foraminiferal (Dixon and McNeil, 2008), diatom (Tapia and Harwood, 17 2002), and silicoflagellate (McCartney, 2011a) zones indicates an early Campanian age for the Smoking Hills Formation and a middle Campanian-Maastrichtian (?) age for the Mason River Formation.
Good to know I don’t need to include Smoking Hills
let's just ignore the question mark for conveniance's sake
We only deal in absolutes 💯
why the hell is there a smoking hills formation and a smoky hill chalk in late cretaceous north america
smoky hill chalk is objectively better
They’re dated roughly the same too
that isn't helping
Found another cool Rex video, they actually show it failing the hunt
Ngl though with all this research feels like the Maastrichtian NA marine fossil record kind of stinks
real
Except Appalachia, but no one cares about that
probably has something to do with the seaways rapidly receding
I wanna know where these Rex animations come from, seems like some sort of dino attraction
Could we at least get something in the Gulf of Mexico 😔
there's probably like invertebrates and stuff there or something
jesus christ this is sad
So I looked it up and it seems the Rex videos are from an exhibit for a Rex named Victoria
Wikipedia coming in clutch with this once. Good to know Cardenas Formation is indeed a geologic formation that exists 💯
I sure love my geologic formation that is checks notes mexican. And even better it gasp preserves fossils and is from the adjusts glasses cretaceous.
Considering it’s assemblage of fossilised eukaryotic organisms, I’d have to say this is probably the best formation
the cretaceous geologic formation of mexico is truly one of the formations to be deposited
Does every bone from the skeleton of Big AL came from a single allosaurus or it came from different Allosaurus, so they just put them all together?
big al's one single individual that's ~95% complete
Oh I wonder what happened to its tail . . .
Seems like someone may have had a huge bite on it . . .

(Seriously though -- where is Big Al's tail? XD )
in the infinitesimal split-second before its death, big al drew upon its inner diapsid to detach its tail like a lizard
XD
. . . Huh -- could they, I wonder?

Cause it's a VERY big coincidence, in my opinion, that the whole tail is missing in an otherwise VERY complete skeleton.
Nah probably nothing too crazy, the fossilisation process and what not will do a number in not preserving the whole skeleton
True. Was just a thought. 
Yeah nah that can just happen. Wyrex is a tyrannosaur notable for being fairly complete but having the tail conveniently missing. A lot of people and docs say it was an injury in life but it’s highly contested and can easily not be true afaik.
Yeah -- another good example is the whole mystery that dealt with Deinocheirus's arms when we didn't find all the other skeletons. That was something.
Not true actually. The reason it was just the arms was cause that was all some fossil poachers dug up and were caught with. The reason we know what Deinocheirus looks like now is because in 2014 they actually managed to figure out where the arms came from and dig up the rest.
Its something I keep hearing about with Mongolian fossils in particular. I guess it’s also the reason why Mongolia’s the only place I hear in relation to insanely strict fossil exporting laws.
I see
there was a massospondylus that had over 1/3rd of its tail amputated
and it survived for at least a bit after
Mkay -- so tails are somewhat just hard to fossilized in general. Noted.
Anyways, Ima need your all's help in figuring out the average mass of these prehistoric animals (Note: the mass at the end of each are not final -- hence why I'm asking help in proofreading it and seeing if there's errors or not . . . And there will most likely be some):
Tyrannosaurus (6000 kg)
Spinosaurus (6000 kg)
Deinocheirus (5800 kg)
Barsboldia (5500 kg)
Stegosaurus (5500 kg)
Iguanodon (4500 kg)
Albertaceratops (3500 kg)
Amargasaurus (3300 kg)
Saurophaganax (3250 kg)
Pycnonemosaurus (3200 kg)
Suchomimus (3150 kg)
Daspletosaurus (3062 kg)
Lambeosaurus (2900 kg)
Anodontosaurus (2000 kg)
Kaiwhekea (1500 kg)
Styracosaurus (1500 kg)
Metriacanthosaurus (1425 kg)
Kentrosaurus (1150 kg)
Ceratosaurus (1100 kg)
Camptosaurus (830 kg)
Alioramus (754 kg)
Megalania (610 kg)
Concavenator (600 kg)
Struthiomimus (423 kg)
Pachycephalosaurus (410 kg)
Thalassodromeus (200 kg)
Stenonychosaurus(160 kg)
Deinonychus (67 kg)
a good chunk of those have one specimen
I personally am not a fan of averages with extinct taxa cause of how variable the data set for each species is. Its never exactly fair.
Well, what I'm mainly looking for is what animal is larger than the other, in terms of mass, really. The average version of them, anyways.
Since getting the specific numbers is . . . Well tedious to put it simply.
even then off my head concavenator's nearly 600kg, styracosaurus is ~1500kg, if you assume dentisulcatus is the only osteologically mature specimen than ceratosaurus is 1100kg, and pycno's 3200kg (projected adult size is stupid)
Yeah I’ll just copy and paste with better values, hang on
a couple of these have multiple species which makes an average difficult as well
and laten's invalid too
so it'd be steny's average size
I know -- it's Stenonychosaurus. Let me change that real quickly.
I think GAT's bars might be a bit larger too but I'd have to check
Tyrannosaurus (8000 kg)
Spinosaurus (7500 kg)
Deinocheirus (5800 kg)
Barsboldia (6500 kg)
Stegosaurus (5500 kg)
Iguanodon (3500 kg)
Pycnonemosaurus (4000 kg)
Albertaceratops (2000 kg)
Amargasaurus (4200 kg)
Saurophaganax (3200 kg)
Suchomimus (5300 kg)
Daspletosaurus (3062 kg)
Lambeosaurus (2900 kg)
Styracosaurus (1600 kg)
Anodontosaurus (2000 kg)
Kaiwhekea (3000 kg)
Metriacanthosaurus (1425 kg)
Kentrosaurus (1150 kg)
Ceratosaurus (980 kg)
Camptosaurus (830 kg)
Alioramus (1000 kg)
Megalania (610 kg)
Struthiomimus (423 kg)
Pachycephalosaurus (410 kg)
Concavenator (650 kg)
Thalassodromeus (40 kg)
Stenonychosaurus (85 kg)
Deinonychus (85 kg)
Some of them are specific, others might need more than explanation, some are very general.
man i guess we're going all out with alio and pycno projected adult size
The pycno is half and half cause subadults can be very meh on how much growing they have to do. With alio you kinda have to do a speculative adult size, given the other option is a pair of juveniles thatre like 9 years old.
Thalassodromeus was extremely heavy though. Outside of the 5 giant ahzdarchids, no pterosaur was heavier than 70 kg
I see
i'd say going lower with pycno's adult size is probably better though cause a 25% mass increase seems a tad much
The thing is that I did do that. The fragmentary adult pycno bones produce a 4.9 ton animal.
is from brazil
maybe campanian?
wouldn't really call it at all referable to pycno
Its iffy but eh
Most average masses based on all representative taxa can end up skewed in the fossil record, probably only one or two of these are broadly reflective of the in life condition
like i said earlier it's about as reasonable as considering suciasaurus an adult thanatotheristes
only those have better defined temporal bounds afaik
The only things I personally look into with size variation are when it gets extreme, like with plateosaurus and megalodon.
An updated version real quick.
Tyrannosaurus (8000 kg)
Spinosaurus (7500 kg)
Deinocheirus (5800 kg)
Barsboldia (6500 kg)
Stegosaurus (5500 kg)
Iguanodon (3500 kg)
Pycnonemosaurus (3500 kg)
Albertaceratops (2000 kg)
Amargasaurus (4200 kg)
Saurophaganax (3200 kg)
Suchomimus (5300 kg)
Daspletosaurus (3062 kg)
Lambeosaurus (2900 kg)
Styracosaurus (1500 kg)
Anodontosaurus (2000 kg)
Kaiwhekea (3000 kg)
Metriacanthosaurus (1425 kg)
Kentrosaurus (1150 kg)
Ceratosaurus (980 kg)
Camptosaurus (830 kg)
Alioramus (754 kg)
Megalania (610 kg)
Struthiomimus (423 kg)
Pachycephalosaurus (410 kg)
Concavenator (600 kg)
Thalassodromeus (40 kg)
Stenonychosaurus (85 kg)
Deinonychus (85 kg)
Btw, the 754 kg size for Alioramus is on the basis that it would've reached a similar size to Qianzhousaurus.
qianzhou would've been a bit larger with hartman's length iirc
Hartmans should be the best as well
neither's really better than the other tbh since it's all conjecture
^
I just go with 7 meters out of preference and it’s what I’ve heard as a number before
Prehistoric Planet made Qianzhou 9 meters from a 6 meter subadult
True.
Hmm, maybe instead of a exact number, Ima just go ahead and just list them down from largest to smallest in terms of average mass.
That’d probably be less confusing
Yep
Lemme find the Saurophagonax gdi. The taxon’ a mess rn so just going with whatever the composite is will probably work
I'll be using the latest list we have above as a basis to start off with, and go from there.
Didn't sauro get massively upsized or something?
We don’t know jack rn about what sauro looks like or it’s true size potential, and we won’t for a while until there’s actual published stuff reevaluating sauro. So rn this is the best we got.
It’s way too wrapped up in uncertainties otherwise for my liking
Alternatively risk pissing off 7shots and ask him for a size
Allosaurus’s “average” size is a whole other can of worms because of how gray the lines are between subadult-adult and allo-sauro
Mfw the largest confirmed allo’s a subadult but there’s plenty of mature adults smaller than it
allo is a weird little creature
2t is probably a relatively safe bet but yeah its Pandora’s box with that
For subadults and juveniles you could prolly just have the range be actual size and projected size in the name of transparency
Okay, so here's the list so far:
- Tyrannosaurus
- Spinosaurus
- Barsboldia
- Eotriceratops
- Deinocheirus
- Stegosaurus
- Suchomimus
- Saurophaganax
- Amargasaurus
- Iguanodon
- Pycnonemosaurus
- Daspletosaurus
- Kaiwhekea
- Lambeosaurus
- Anodontosaurus
- Albertaceratops
- Styracosaurus
- Metriacanthosaurus
- Kentrosaurus
- Ceratosaurus vs Alioramus
- Ceratosaurus vs Alioramus
- Camptosaurus
- Megalania
- Concavenator
- Struthiomimus
- Pachycephalosaurus
- Stenonychosaurus vs Deinonychus
- Stenonychosaurus vs Deinonychus
- Thalassodromeus
Any placement changes needed, other than figuring out whether Alioramus or Ceratosaurus is larger, and whether Stenonychosaurus or Deinonychus is larger?
3t flat might be a bit low for dasp when you throw in Pete iii
Stenonychosaurus is one of those with a million specimens and deinonychus had pretty variable size to. What I CAN tell you is that the largest deins beat out the largest stenos. Alio’s size is basically up to you.
If you’re doing them in size order, keep in mind eotrike is like, 5 tons.
Hmm . . .
Okay, so I'll make Deinonychus higher than Stenonychosaurus, now as for Alioramus . . . I can't quite figure it out -- it depends on whether we should let the largest Ceratosaurus specimen we have be the average adult size or not.
As for Daspletosaurus, do you think it should be larger than Pycnonemosaurus?
I'll go ahead and adjust Eotriceratops -- I though it was 6 tonnes. XD
Or 4t
Eotrike is funny cause trike weight scaling
Which is hell
Noted
I lowkey fear the day trike is added in mods because of how conflicting it will be applying a mass to the thing for a project I’m doing
Okay -- the updated list as of now:
- Tyrannosaurus
- Spinosaurus
- Barsboldia
- Deinocheirus
- Stegosaurus
- Suchomimus
- Saurophaganax
- Eotriceratops
- Amargasaurus
- Iguanodon
- Pycnonemosaurus
- Daspletosaurus
- Kaiwhekea
- Lambeosaurus
- Anodontosaurus
- Albertaceratops
- Styracosaurus
- Metriacanthosaurus
- Kentrosaurus
- Ceratosaurus vs Alioramus
- Ceratosaurus vs Alioramus
- Camptosaurus
- Megalania
- Concavenator
- Struthiomimus
- Pachycephalosaurus
- Deinonychus
- Stenonychosaurus
- Thalassodromeus
I can share what I have when I get on the pc , cause when I do a PoT server I wanted to test having the ingame drag weight being irl weight values. But thatll be in a bit. Also uses maxes (mostly)
Honestly, the reason why I'm trying to figure out the "order" from largest to smallest is so that, when I do plan on making my own server with realistic-ish stuff, I don't have to just use the irl weights -- I just have to be within the size order.
That and for game balance reasons.
Anyways, what's the size estimate for Pete iii of Daspletosaurus?
Ranking in size?
Size as in average mass and whatnot, yeah.
But without using any specific numbers to determine their ranking -- just based on whether or not they'll be larger than the ones above or not.
Kaiwhekea looking very heavy, I’ve got no clue on Aristonectine mass though
I want to say they're genrally pretty hefty but that's moreso because a lot of them are just huge, and I am also not a plesiosaur guy
(That and things can afford to be heavier in the ocean, since, you know . . . The ocean can support their weight much better than on land.)
Generally derived sauropterygians like Elasmosauridae are pretty slim for marine animals of their proportions. But there is some notable change in Aristonectinae morphology.
Okay, so I decided that Ceratosaurus was gonna be larger than Alioramus, just on the off-chance that an adult Alioramus is smaller in mass than the adult Ceratosaurus we have now.
Here it is the updated list, as of now:
- Tyrannosaurus
- Spinosaurus
- Barsboldia
- Deinocheirus
- Stegosaurus
- Suchomimus
- Saurophaganax
- Eotriceratops
- Amargasaurus
- Iguanodon
- Pycnonemosaurus
- Daspletosaurus
- Kaiwhekea
- Lambeosaurus
- Anodontosaurus
- Albertaceratops
- Styracosaurus
- Metriacanthosaurus
- Kentrosaurus
- Ceratosaurus
- Alioramus
- Camptosaurus
- Megalania
- Concavenator
- Struthiomimus
- Pachycephalosaurus
- Deinonychus
- Stenonychosaurus
- Thalassodromeus
10 meters and 4 tonsish? It's not a described specimen yet but is pretty publicized despite being so.
Interesting.
Would Dasoletosaurus, on average, be larger than Pycnonemosaurus in mass, or nah?
*I know Random did a lil mock skeletal of A. quiriquinensis no ideas if he GDI tho
Eh can't really say. I'd say Daspleto purely on it being better understood and the one definite pycno specimen being less than a typical das.
I see -- I'll go ahead and update it then.
Very interesting. 
Here's the updated list, as of now -- does this look good, everyone?
- Tyrannosaurus
- Spinosaurus
- Barsboldia
- Deinocheirus
- Stegosaurus
- Suchomimus
- Saurophaganax
- Eotriceratops
- Amargasaurus
- Iguanodon
- Daspletosaurus
- Pycnonemosaurus
- Kaiwhekea
- Lambeosaurus
- Anodontosaurus
- Albertaceratops
- Styracosaurus
- Metriacanthosaurus
- Kentrosaurus
- Ceratosaurus
- Alioramus
- Camptosaurus
- Megalania
- Concavenator
- Struthiomimus
- Pachycephalosaurus
- Deinonychus
- Stenonychosaurus
- Thalassodromeus
Some stuff is a big iffy compared to typical measurements. Microraptor is less than a kilo but 1 is the minimum obviously lmao. I'm not a fan of 14m 15 ton deinosuchus due to fragmentary uncertainty but KTO's deinosuchus really pushes the limits.
True.
I'd also switch struthi and pachy. I completely missed that struthi's too heavy on your end.
From what I found, Struthiomimus was around 423 kg.
The source? I've only seen 250 kg by Franoys.
There was a laser imaging and 3d computer modeling study on Struthiomimus, Tyrannosaurus, Edmontosaurus, Acrocanthosaurus, and an Ostrich.
Body mass reconstructions of extinct vertebrates are most robust when complete to near-complete skeletons allow the reconstruction of either physical or digital models. Digital models are most efficient in terms of time and cost, and provide the facility to infinitely modify model properties non-destructively, such that sensitivity analyses can ...
Yknow what fair enough. Stan and Acro are consistent from what ik of their masses even if not exact.
The bad news is that PoT's smallest herb is still a significant order of magnitude larger than dein and steno.
Yeah.
Though with pounce on the way . . . Things may start to brighten up for those two.
Troodontid pouncing on big animals 😔
What’s wrong with that
🤨

(I know -- but games also gotta do game stuff -- can't all be realistic, or else it will just become a simulator. But that's just my opinion.)
Anyways, what was the mass estimate for Hatzegopteryx, out of curiosity?
I was confused cause you ended it with “😔”
Just that it’s not a thing really. Games will be games
So irl they wouldn’t be able to pounce on big creatures?
Doesn’t seem like that’s what they would’ve been doing
Capability I think is less of an issue
Troodontids hunted prey smaller than themselves while dromaeosaurs drifted more towards macropedation.
You would likely never see a troodontid jumping onto larger prey like you would with raptors.
Ah so kinda like abelisaurs (as in hunting things smaller than themselves)
Between 200-250kg from what I can find (hatz ain’t too heavy)
Interesting.
Eh afaik there's not much holding that up. Especially when many abelisaurs were the apex predators of their ecosystems.
Hatzegopteryx was probably around 350 kg. Quetz's GDI came out at 350 kg, and hatz certainly isn't going to be the lighter animal at least.
Most of them anyways.
Stares at Rugops not being in an apex predator in its ecosystem
Not even enough described tiny dinosaurs in most late maastrichtian deposits for it to be viable 😭
Titanosaurs tho 🗿
I only say 350 cause that's the last number I heard about it. I wouldn't be surprised if it's heavier than quetz given it's only slightly shorter but is porportionally a much heftier pterosaur.
in fairness swarms of baby sauropods would probably make up a good number of tiny things in ecosystems that had them
Yep, and that most likely was the case in the Morrison Formation too.
morrison does have some tiny stuff too but you probably couldn’t throw a stone without hitting a baby sauropod there

Another thing to note is that I think there actually a fair bit of maniraptoran material known from those deposits, they’re just undiagnostic/formally undescribed
How do we even know that hatz would be larger the quetz when we have so little material of it? (Upon some further research (google) 350kg+ seems to be the general consensus for the weight of hatz
)
The referred material is all pretty comparatively dense. So when it’s all scaled to the humerus and skull it gets big
Abelisaurids were apex predators in their ecosystems when there wasn’t a megaraptoran around to murder them unless you’re maybe abelisaurus or presumably pycno in which case you’re not being murdered by your local megaraptoran
It was basically half n half I wouldn't call one dominant over the other
Off my head elemgasem, llukalkan, viavenator, and thanos suffered said “local megaraptoran curbstomping” syndrome but then you have multiple things in Brazil hitting 3t which would’ve been as large if not larger than the largest megaraptorans
The only formation I know of that didn’t have a huge disparity between abelisaurid and megaraptoran sizes was anacleto
And even then abelisaurus size estimates suck because we don’t even know what the skull properly looked like
And on the topic of abelisaurid ecology the larger taxa likely had vastly different ecologies to their smaller relatives once they started hitting if not surpassing the size of some of their local sauropods
👍
Abelisaurids are actually pretty well adapted towards sauropod hunting
What would you say Megaraptorans show an inclination for
elasmarian hunting
Carnotaurus (presumably) beating them at their own game 🗿(maybe)
megaraptorans also benefit even more than abelisaurids from being reconstructed as pretty much the same thing because they're all too fragmentary and so just form one big composite megaraptoran skeletal with each other's preserved elements
Crazy that megaraptorans are so fragmentary to the point of THIS being one of the most complete megaraptorid skeletons.😭
on the topic of sizes it's kinda funny how nemegt's hadrosaurs and sauropods were pretty much the same size (ignoring mongolian titan)
saurolophus and opistho match pretty well, same with bars and nemegtosaurus
hefty lads (+ ischotaxa)
Bro I want it on Panjura SO BAD 😭
You can’t ignore the inevitable 😎
me when nemegt has larger hadrosaurs than hell creek (barsboldia has one specimen and i have no idea how large the average angustirostris was)
Saurolophus is a bit iffy, cause afaik it's large size is specifically from scaling the barsboldia material and lumping it into sauro. If you don't do that, Saurolophus is much smaller.
giant saurolophus is if you don't scale it with a baby, bars is irrevelant
that's why fadeno's is a bobblehead
Oh, huh. So is his unreliable?
probably
Good to know
I've just found this artwork of a new species of sub adult camptosaur found, is it real?
Ah yes, C.godzillae
Its a juvenile actually
best angustirostris skeletal rn is probably this because gat's has an obscenely oversized head
imma check if the cranial osteology or anything has an average skull size or something like that
old gsp hadrosaur posture hurts to look at
150mm skull vs hunchback of mongolia
which is more painful
Isn’t there some dispute over Opisthocoelicaudia as not being separate from Nemegtosaurus?
I think they're currently separate there was something with a quarry a few years back too i'll check
Yeah the post crania from the quarry demonstrated a lot of similarities
The sauropod femora from Nemegt Formation differ from the femur of Opisthocoelicaudia by the medial condyle extending more distally compared with the lateral condyle. Most likely these femora and PIN 3837/P821 belong to Nemegtosaurus, which would make this taxon distinct from Opisthocoelicaudia by discussed characters of dorsal vertebrae and femur.
Oh that’s right Averianov’s stuff
geez adult saurolophus angustirostris is 7500kg+ minimum
and that's already barsboldia size
so tarbo was running around with hadrosaurus 2000kg+ larger than edmontosaurus
wait forgot to cube it, 5500kg minimum
so edmonto size
even then minimum adult size is comprable to edmontosaurus' asymptomatic size
Really makes it seem like T. rex's added bulk compared to T. bataar mainly has to due with hunting ceratopsids
Tarchia could possibly be even similarly sized to Ankylosaurus as well
How speedy were "raptors" in general? Were the average Troodontid and Dromaeosaurid faster or slower than those they shared their habitats with?
Troodontids were the more cursorial of the two and for their size may have been somewhat quick. Dromaeosaurids are not built for speed
tarbo and sympatric hadrosaurs vs rex and sympatric hadrosaur
I think generally the Alvarezsaurids would’ve have been the most fleetfooted contemporaries of them both, Troodontidae coming a bit closer to them
don't mind me Mr hadrosaur I'm just evolving to be at perfect neck biting height
yep tibia+met/femur ratios pretty much follow that
and then there's shant and zhucheng which we don't talk about
5 tonne Tyrannosaur with the largest Saurolophine
although i like the idea that tyrannosaurins got progressively larger for the explicit purpose of one-upping hadrosaurs
man
How big would the Tyrannosaur from Udurchukan be
Probably the metacarpal then
cause this is the metacarpal
periculosus is like 3.8t or something scaling with gorgosaurus but that's assuming it's an albertosaurine when it's literally just tyrannosauridae indet
can't imagine it being much bigger than that though
Makes sense the Saurolophines there aren’t as big
Shantungosaurus & Zhuchengtyrannus are pretty interesting, indirect evidence of sociality in the latter perhaps? It's a stretch but whatever
is olorotitan/amurosaurus udurchukan?
i don't think hongtuya has enough described material to make any definite statements on the ecology but something like that would be interesting
why is it so big when it's body mass are only 3.8 tons???
air sacs
in all seriousness afaik joans made that as a joke because someone in theropoda kept asking about that metacarpal
this is how i imagine rex size when I was 10
real
Bro skipped leg day
Was GAT's head really oversized? or did it belong to a large specimen?
Largest specimen had a 1220mm skull or something along those lines, GAT’s was like 1500mm
Wikipedia lists Albertosaurinae indet material in the Udurchukan Formation, no references though. Anybody know anything about this?
Mortimer
Ah good call
Some paper placed the udurchukan tyrannosaurid material (mostly teeth iirc) into tyrannosaurin and albertosaurine morphs, and Mortimer threw all the albertosaurine-like material (and all the smaller material in general) into albertosaurus pericolosus (a tooth taxon) for convenience
Ah, yea seeing it now it is rather oversized (for whatever reason).
Mind you the author refrained from actually referring anything to albertosaurinae
Gotcha, thanks!
And Mortimer makes it pretty clear they could easily be alioramin/juvenile tyrannosaurin material
Hopefully there’s more material to come it’s a neat little dilemma
Albertosaurines crossing Beringia and persisting to the late maastrichtian would be really cool but I’d be hesitant to make any definite statements considering the ambiguity
Yeah teeth are teeth
It’s not too cooky, they persist a bit into the early Maastrichtian of Alberta
Albertosaurines and tyrannosaurins were both present in early maastrichtian NA but the former disappears by the lancian
Early Maastrichtian Tyrannosaurines?
Elephant butte tyrannosaur
I’m more confused
There was a tyrannosaurin in latest-campanian—early maastrichtian New Mexico
What’s the deposit called
It was McRae formation but that was raised into a group so I think it’s hall lake now
It’s referenced as cf. tyrannosaurus in the sierraceratops description
Yeah that’s what I saw. Would be pretty cool if it is Tyrannosaurus proper
Yeah it’s pretty neat to have tyrannosaurus-esque taxa contemporary with albertosaurines
But back to earlier the implication is that albertosaurines died out in the judithian-lancian overturn along with centrosaurines and lambeosaurines
Which was probably spurred by the WIS receding
That's what I found intriguing about the Amur albertosaurine material, lambeosaurines were doing just fine there
And then it’s a question of if we have Asian lambeosaurines (and maybe albertosaurines) did they enter Asia before or during the Lancian overturn
I would think before
Yeah tsintaosaurus was there by the campanian and while olorotitan and charanosaurus are closer to NA taxa it would be reasonable to assume there were regular interchanges going on in the late Cretaceous
In which case it’s kinda suspect we don’t see any earlier possible albertosaurine material in Asia but that’s more of a sampling problem
I think the interchange was very fluid back and forth, once heard holtz describe laramidia as basically just a peninsula jutting off Asia and I think that's a useful way of looking at it. Sorting out which groups started in which hemisphere is very tricky business
I could see alioramins filling that albertosaurine niche in Asia, whatever it exactly was, I think that's a fine hypothesis
if we ever find evidence of a definitive albertosaurine population at any point in asia it'd make the udurchukan material's assignment a lot more pallatable
btw this is the largest of mortimer's periculosus material as an albertosaurine (~20th caudal scaled with gorgosaurus' 20th caudal so could easily be smaller)
Ill take a stance and say it’s Alioramin
That a headswap of random's skelly with dan's skull?
yup
dan's skull is aesthetic
Wish you woulda did ruth's skull bc random's is that one too 😡
@stuck chasm
The babe.
There is something pleasing about the body of random's tho with dan's skull
the surangular makes it look like a chipmunk
yeah why didn't i use that skull
we need chipmunk russian albertosaurines
Albertosaurines, aesthetic
aesthetisaurines, even
Gorgosaurus, you can have mega chin or mega entire back of the jaw, and everything in between
the beta 960mm femur DP daspletosaurus vs the sigma chad jawline 1.093m femur gorgosaurus because i trust mortimer's femoral measurements with every fiber of my being
Shoutout to exactly what I've been saying for the past about Dakotaraptor not being real for a while being further backed by a paleontologist just now.
hmm if your using the largest hardosaur estimate edmonto would also be bigger than rex
it's average angustirostris and average annectans
idk about them being therizinosaur or oviraptorosaur remains specifically, but the whole point of this was that the "definite" dromaeosaur remains in there can easily not be
i sure love my maniraptora indet material locked in a basement in florida
ah i was wondering if you are using the largest estimate looking at the rex size
yeah rex is average rex length 11.7m(?) from one of the rex size sheets
Removing D. steini doesn’t even make the Lancian ecosystem more weird tbh. Still no proper mesopredator
yeah about 11.5-11.7m its around the same size as edmon iirc
stares at the giant chickens about the size if not larger than gigantoraptor running around
i want giant anzu
jokes aside im pretty sure those are just omni's but it would be funny to see them being hunters
we have giant oviraptorosaurians in two formations in late cretaceous asia why not add hell creek to the mix
Well actually, would Dakotaraptor have made the benchmark for a Hell Creek Mesopredator
there are something like that in hell creek two fo them iirc
my beloved
as a mid ranking hunter? not really imo nothing juvie rexes ain't taking up
is that cope or big bertha? Wait what is that?
just searched it in koi and that popped up
huh and people are talking about giant anzu there rn too
trippy
found it
https://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/thread/1344/larger-undescribed-specimen-anzu-wyliei
ah the big anzu iirc there was a svp from like 2022 that talked baout even larger lads
Here’s a gift for paleo chat. Relish in the glory
i love fat saltasaurus cow
If you love that you’ll love this pain!
IT. HURTS.
least mentally deranged peters anything
Tbh that’s probably meow go bark
Idk why it’s just completely the same until they add skin….
no no no it's modified to fit canid model
as you can see it has been superimposed on the dog
Point out every modification that wasn’t just putting a wolf face on a cat challenge (impossible)
I'm looking up prehistoric animal size estimates for a size chart I'm working on in relation to ARK. I am going to lose my god damn mind if Phiomia irl was the size of a whole asian elephant, if what I found is correct.
if homotherium isn't a dog, why does the skull vaguely fit on a dog? checkmate
ark's phiomia's probably somehow comprable to an asian elephant in mass with how big that thing's gut has to be in-game
CONFIRMED???
I’m surprised we didn’t see the resemblance before…
They were just tusks all along….
That Aeolosaurus one was deliberately ridiculous as it was on a page in a dino book where the goal was to figure out which dinos were fake
Ah good finally an explanation
Granted the actual dinosaurs were a product of their time
Yeah no. I just got it confirmed. Phiomia was this big. I'm losing my mind at 3 am.
Ark undersizing anything feels wrong
That makes two things ARK undersizes then. The other is dilo. The rest are about right or oversized.
At least dilo has an excuse of copying jp
Two things that Ark has undersized? I sort of find that hard to believe (considering they have a huge amount of paleo animals of various sizes and only two is undersized).
I’ve seen this so often but I’ve never seen it without the “true or false” cropped out 
Quick question -- what is estimated to be the average mass for Sarcosuchus? Or at least the range of mass estimates for Sarcosuchus.
So sad I missed the peters slander
While I'm at work, can some of you try to maybe make a ranking on the average run speeds of the animals in this list? Doesn't have to be specific numbers, just a ranking from fastest to slowest:
Ranking of Average Mass:
- Tyrannosaurus
- Spinosaurus
- Barsboldia
- Deinocheirus
- Stegosaurus
- Suchomimus
- Saurophaganax
- Eotriceratops
- Amargasaurus
- Sarcosuchus
- Iguanodon
- Daspletosaurus
- Pycnonemosaurus
- Kaiwhekea
- Lambeosaurus
- Anodontosaurus
- Albertaceratops
- Styracosaurus
- Metriacanthosaurus
- Kentrosaurus
- Ceratosaurus
- Alioramus
- Camptosaurus
- Megalania
- Concavenator
- Struthiomimus
- Pachycephalosaurus
- Deinonychus
- Stenonychosaurus
- Thalassodromeus
I'll check back on my break times to see what you all come up with.
Im not an expert but wouldn’t laten be at 28th spot and deinony 29? And surely in game thal would weigh more because of how huge it is?
I'm basing the rankings on the IRL versions -- not the in-game versions.
Off to work I go.
Anyone know what Labocania is nowadays
NO NOT DAVID PETERS
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
It’s not just David it’s accompanied by fat saltosaurus and flying nodosaur! MWAHAHAHA
Those I don't mind. Because fat saltasaurus is funny (and I am definitely not biased because I like chonky dinosaurs) and gliding Nodosaur is a depiction that was made like, 50 years ago? David Peters is an actual fraud and a liar that edits fossils to provide "evidence" for his crazy theories
Apparently David has a cladogram that’s almost nothing but individual specimens of the same pterosaur in completely different places and specimens of archaeopteryx
Well there’s no other dinosaurs besides birds in Lecho Formation so it must’ve eaten everything 💯
Oh and Noasaurus
big (2500kg+) nemegt things
They are going to beat tarbo to death
Now, do the whole Nemegt Formation
finding skeletals for nearly a dozen ostensibly indistuguishable oviraptorosaurs sounds like a gas 
Get to it c’mon now
those wikipedia skeletals better be at least decent reliability
Don’t question just copy and paste ☺️
i'm going to get curbstomped by larramendi phalange scaling aren't I
what did they do this time
2.2m rinchenia frontal that's like 25% longer than the skeletal i could find
great start
Doing the lord’s work don’t you forget it
next do every single mammal from middle eocene china 
let's see how much of an absolute dumpster this becomes when I try cross-examing sizes
I swear you just can’t escape it, every dinosaur family you go to larramendi has done something unspeakable to scale it
I still have nightmares about 40 ton tooth scaled rebbachisaurus
reminds me of 2000kg tooth scaled paraentelodon
giant megaraptorans lived with tarbosaurus
you what now
Is very big
bro thinks he nanxiong
Big ol gentleman
how fast is Amarga at max speed cause I heard it was decently fast in irl
Likely. It wasn’t that large for a sauropod and the big ones were already surprisingly swift
I don’t think anyone has tested amarga’s speed specifically though
I heard at max speed it was nearly as fast as an allo
how fast do they run?
15-25 mph if i recall for modern elephants, 15 being more a jog and 25 being in a hurry
25 is very much so on the max end for such a large animal but i haven't seen it be disputed ever so: idk
Amarga’s really slow larramendi has an estimate
What material do we have from achillobator if anyone knows?
The holotype’s material
I mean like, what parts of it?
How much of its skeleton do we have would be better ig
I swear I saw a skeletal of it once
achillobator when tyrannosaur nearly twice its size
Alectrosaurus?
some alectrosaur grade thing yeah
Ah thx
I just remembered Wikipedia existed and saw it there lol
Thought it was more fragmentary then that tbh
Dumb question but is Allosaurus part of carcharodontasauridae?
No. Allosaurus is an allosaurid. Closely related though.
Ah alrighty then
does Gigantopithecus blacki line up with descriptions of bigfoot besides coloring and location?
Not really. Gigantopithecus wasn’t bipedal and Sasquatch is generally described as larger than Gigantopithecus ever was.
Nevermind a gorilla-like ape specializing in rainforests somehow appearing across mainland North America in most habitats
I’m an optimist on Sasquatch myself but it ain’t a Gigantopithecus or close relative if it is out there
oh, i thought it was bigger
This is the only G. blacki scale I’ll use because everything else uses human proportions or forces it into some sort of mega-monkey
also, wouldnt bigfoot be heavily overlapping with bears in niche and location?
Yessir, that’s the current understanding, but animals can overlap, nature doesn’t do “one and done”
Considering the yeti (or at least one variation of it) is a bear, I guess?
it is?
Yea, there’s like 2-3 types of yeti afaik? At least one of them is distinctly the Himalayan Brown Bear
You use short people to make it look bigger tho......
oop
That’s my ~1.8m tall girl, so it’s pretty big still 😎
how tall is that, im american
Average Human height
6'2?
5’10-11
oh
Yeti is a very misunderstood cryptid.
The idea of them living high in the Himalaya mountains and being giant and pure white howlers is based on the public perception of the “abominable snowman” from Rudolph the Rednose Reindeer
Prior to that, they were described as living in the mountain’s highland forests, being black/brown, and being quite short, maybe around 4 feet tall.
oh
yeah a big part of the description was that they're only really seen when they cross the peaks between forests, and that kind of turned into they live on the peaks
does the megalodon count as a cryptid?
I guess but that one is definitely extinct
I'd say it does. A lot of meg depictions are very much fantasy.
Combine that with the lore of it still existing today it would have to be a completely different creature
In the same vain as nessy it is I suppose. But megalodon was an actual extinct animal and doesn't have the same traction of any other cryptid
a lot of things can technically fall under the cryptid banner, the actual definition is basically any animal that has been spotted but not scientifically verified
😭
dakotaraptor. . . . .
Tbh it wouldn’t even resemble a real Sauropterygian
well, dakotaraptor the species itself, not the remains
Any cryptid status megalodon has is just bc "we don't know a lot about the ocean"
well that and the supposed sightings but those just aren't reliable in this case
all meg sightings are just bigger great white sharks
or whale sharks, for somereason
or people lying
Trust me bro, I saw it
oh i have a good question, would leedsichthys do this?
also how did the first whale miss almost all the damn fish
Leedsichthys kinda did a mix of filter feeding strategies afaik
so. . . yes?
Idk if it straight up ate fish or was mostly just plankton. It’d have a lot to do with its behavior.
now that i think of it, a prehestoric bait ball and the feeding frenzy after would be epic to watch
wait, leed wasnt in oxford?
no it was, this size chart i found just dosent have it
but like, imagine a feeding frenzy with the oxford creatures
what formation is this meant to be from? it says kayenta but that's in north america and much earlier
i looked up oxford formation size chart and this is what i got
ok that makes much more sense, I figured it was oxford clay but the animals aren't labeled
No
Leedsichthys is more of a suspension feeder iirc : so it took on small organisms and particles in the water and not macrosized preys. It would have used ram feeding : so it would move forward as it gaps in order to filter feed the water as it couldn't actively pump it. Think of paddlefishes, basking sharks, whale sharks, manta rays, menhaden or striped mackerel.
Note that some of these fish still do feed on small sized fish : that's the case of mantas and whale sharks. But a strategy similar to rorqual lunge feeding? Probably not.
There may also be evidences of substrat feeding in Pachycormids, based on some feeding tracks in locations where filter feeding ones are found.
Rorquals just broke the game with their swift body plan, goular pouch and massive sizes.
I recognise most of those but what about 1 and 4 idk what those fish are
4 is striped mackerel, I guess 1 is menhaden
yeah 1 is menhaden
The reason I say a mix is that there’s some evidence of benthic feeding as well afaik, even if suspension feeding was the norm
@light oxide there's your sauro size, prolly isn't getting much better than that for now
Interesting.
Right now, I wanna do a ranking based on run speed, from fastest to slowest.
I'll go ahead and update the mass ranking though.
That’s going to be a lot more vague I’ll be honest
Wait, would that mean that Saurophaganax is larger than Suchomimus?
Guess so?
Huh . . . That's unexpected.
I still say the composite is currently more reliable but that’s just me.
Well, I'm trying to avoid specific numbers as the main factor if I can, in terms of ranking them.
That said, Sturthiomimus would probably be the fastest. As for the slowest . . . I don't really got a clue.
amarga maybe?
Or Anodontosaurus.
yeah maybe that
Anodonto yeah, with stegosaurs not far behind
Hmm . . . Which one would be faster -- Stegosaurus, or Kentrosaurus?
Probably the smaller one
Okay, so Anodontosaurus is the slowest, then Stegosaurus, then Kentrosaurus, and then Amargasaurus. That good so far?
Poor kentro
Probably why it was a pincushion
What would that mean?
Worse at running
Does anyone know where dinocrocuta is placed, I'm aware its a hyena like feliform, and not a true hyena
Hyena enough
taxonomically ofc
It’s a pachycrocutid. It’s a sister family to hyenas. I think pachycrocuta is the only other member of the family.
Percrocutid* I mean. And the other member is Percrocuta.
Pachycrocuta is a proper hyena
Sorry if that came out confusing
Ah I remember something regarding this family, didn't Belbus and Allohyaena get removed from percrocutidae?
Never even heard of those before
Who tf names a hyena belbus
Lemme look I’m up
Better question, who names a prehistoric hyena, not smth like, old hyena
Belbus vs yoshi, battle of carnivorans
"Belbus Werdelin, Solounias, 1991"
Both of them are extremely obscure. Like, they don’t even have a Wikipedia page. The very limited sources I can find on them place them both as hyaenids.
https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/126/3/319/2684301?login=false its been cited here, about them not being in percrocutidae in this paper it seems
Yeah that was one of the ones I found
So that’s why nobody cares about it
you should do the morrison next and the legion of sauropods
that is a legitimately concerning amount of oviraptorosaurs though
Beautiful and stunning.
Anserimimus looks pretty damn big
yeah a bit over 4m
Don’t forget about the Avialans 
thank god larrmanedi exists
He’s scaled all that material? damn
man's a saint
larramendi has had a go at most of the sauropods at this point too so I have to be grateful
without larramendi we would never have our valued 660g cf. cimolopteryx maxima
and other such renowned specimens
idk
maybe faster/slower than komodo dragon
That’s not very helpful haha
probably a bit slower than a komodo dragon just given the size
shout out to that one tiny seal
Adorable
That’s the speculative adult size I think
Probably
It is yeah. Here's the most recent gdi
This is a good ichtyovenator skeletal?
Ye
Poggers
The Mongol Horde
Which dino is the big one?
galllimimus
Figured, and the smaller one? Struthi?
anserimimus
Interesting
Someone in another paleo chat posted this and OH MY FRICK it’s so beautiful
Freakin HD
Oh my god
It’s beautiful is it not?
How are bones so well preserved? Heard bones dont last in the soil for so many thousands of years and when the fossilize and degrade over time they leave a cast that we then find? I find that so confusing
Buried bone and shell contain tiny air spaces into which water can seep, depositing minerals. Reinforced by these mineral deposits, bone and shell can survive for millions of years. Even if the bone or shell dissolves, the mineral deposits in the shape of the body structure remain.
OHH well thats very cool
I love how the whole premise of fossils is that they aren’t actually anything biological and yet we somehow have random Rex soft tissue from that one Jack Horner affiliated woman 
Yea thats very cool and it honestly baffles me that some preeps say fossils arent real :/
They no smart 
"cousin of t. rex" ABELISAURS IS NOT EVEN RELATED TO T REX
i would say eo would be smaller than stego and chirus at the largest also i seen your updated list but here's some more info so far for it
bars is like 7tons ( at largest )
chirus would be around 8
spino on average would be alot smaller about 7.8 at the largest ( for now )
Eo would be about 4-5tons
Stego at the largest is over 8 with the sub adults be around 6tons
that's a good reply
i feel this picture XD
not disagreeing, just sharing a neat dino few people have probably heard of
true. I take every opportunity I can to bring up llukalkan every time conversation about Pycnonemosaurus's head happens
my son, Pycno will one day not be a carno reskin
alas, its release in PoT was not that day
that came out a long with the spec adult since its a subadult so either would be good to use
still sad about that, i was expecting the big bad ogre looking face
Does anyone know what maastrichtian formations Archaeomanta would’ve hailed from
I think I was fearing big carno from the get-go just based on PoT's track record. And big carno is cool and all, but it would have been nice to have something different
hmm no idea
Granted the big sad ogre face is literally just hornless carno
Like random’s skeletals skull is just a hornless carno because that that was the only well-described late Cretaceous brachyrostran skull at the time
I mean, you can easily create a hypothetical Pycnonemosaurus head without making it a hornless Carnotaurus.
ie llukalkan
Although I do find it funny when people use random’s pycno as a base for urc 44-r when it’s explicitly discluded from having a skull like that
Yea,
I'm always humored by the take of "well we don't know exactly how it looked like so it could have been like carno" when carno is the only abelisaurid that looks like carno, even among its closest relatives
A general problem with abelisaurids is that they always get compared with carno, despite it being very well-established that carno is extremely derived even among brachyrostra
I maintain the standpoint that PoT pycno should have been:
Attack- Majunga (horn pokey poke for damage)
Balanced- Pycno with no horns (standard)
Stamina- Carno (It's the speedy boi typically so stam makes sense)
I don't subscribe to that take primarily because of majunga. different subfamily so off limits in my mind
It can just be heavier set with a unicorn horn
Brachyrostrans are really boring in the cranial ornamentation department bar carno
You can speculate an Abelisaurid with a single horn on its head, even considering the variation in many other Brachyrostrans
Oh yeah it’s fine but I just realized carno’s kinda an outlier
yeah all zero of them with singular horns on their head
We do only have like five skulls tbf
It would still be better than 2 carno clones
This Llukalkan’s skull?
Yup
some of them were made around abelisaurus who has a really nice looking skull as well but yeah newew pycno would have a longer more square head
not sure how that discredits it
five skulls, only one of them has horns at all
Oh this skull shape looks a bit more appropriate
Just meant low sample size but I agree no horns is a lot safer
given where pycno falls it would more than likely not have any horns at all
for the record, I wouldn't have even minded horns so long as it wasn't a carbon copy of carno
If we wanna be more specific, two of those skulls out of five display a pointy ridge above the eyes or a circular bulge.
My biggest problem with carbon copying carno horns is that it implies pycno, a more basal campanian taxon, would share an autapamorphy with the markedly more derived maastrichtian carno
Which is like bleh
I think it was just easier for them to base it directly off of Carnotaurus (Or they wanted Carnotaurus from the start)
prolly something along those lines
Probably a mix of both
I quite like llukalkan's skull, and its description predates the publishing of the carno skin paper, which we know the Pycno model had to have been made or worked on after that paper was published
Do we know where the Kenyan material sits?
i think they just wanted carno but went with pycno because it was bigger and the name was distinct from carno
abelisauridae indet
some where in a lab collecting dust as we wait another 8+ years for the paper to come out
Well it being bigger sort of means nothing in a game where you can upsize or downsize things with a snap of the finger
Cladistically*
I think its a mix of wanting something like carno from the start and not knowing pycno's phylogeny, especially in relation to Llukalkan which was described that year as well. So they probably weren't exactly snooping around looking for an updated cladogram
hopefully titanovenator gets a phylogeny because the only other late cretaceous african abelisaur that's been placed in a matrix is chenanisaurus, and somehow i think a partial dentary may be a tad lacking in characters
it's also like actually reasonably complete unlike everything else on the continent
Will Titanovenator prevail as the genus?
from the skull that it had possibly close to majunga
Speaking of Chenanisaurus, its dentary is rather deep, which is interesting to me
i think the skull's actually reconstructed a good bit after abelisaurus
no thats just a nick name from fans online Titanovenator is not gonna be its real name
my thoughts are majunga as well, based on how the skull looks and how much it resembles franoys's majunga, and fran is the one who made the skeletal for it
Let’s hope the description doesn’t give it a mid name
I am curious of how much material was discovered of the skull
yeah man has them thick jaws
lemme find the pic if someone isn't quicker
I still think that Rugops skeletal has a proportionally huge dentary compared to the rest of the mandible
Yea, seemingly even more so compared to other Abelisaurids
This much, assuming there isn't more material beyond this. But that's what we have to run with since we don't have a description
Femur and tibia’s pretty good
Let’s hope the rest of the material in Lapurr can get properly described, or heck if we’re really lucky named
as far as topical undescribed specimens go, the kenyan giant is one talked about very frequently but not a lot shown off of it all things considered
Well, it is undescribed so not much will be revealed of it for a while
tbf though a lot of the skull seems more based on abelisaurus and fran literally said he had to update abelisaurus' skull for his titanovenator skeletal
Hang on, Fran said that?
So not a Majungasaurine?
given that the abelisaurus skull holds some material that use carchs as it would have to be remade quite a bit
we don't know what it is, just speculating
ft. you
also seems we were robbed of an updated abelisaurus skull
lmao
that feel when you were in the conversation in question
Well this is funny pfft
fran has been gone for such a long time man popp'ed up from the grave made a updated giga updated sucho skull and carch then died again
lizard rn
Yes,
Btw is it really Dryosaurid material in Lapurr? And not something more reasonable like a Rhabdodontid
I remember talking to Fran about Abelisaurus' skull but do not remember them stating they had to remake it when making the Kenyan Abelisaur
Well there’s two I think, the other one I haven’t got the slightest clue what it’s being reconstructed as
lancian's chart just says ornithopoda indet
So I take it that the Kenyan Abelisaurid's skull is similar to Abelisaurus,
Upon further inspection I think that ornithopod is being reconstructed as a Rhabdodontid
Figures
And yeah the two seem pretty similar besides the actual orientation/rotation of the material (like the parietal moving way up)
I wonder… new African Titanosaur clade?
Reminds of Llukalkan.
Do we really need more titanosaur clades 
Did we really need an 11 metre Abelisaur
Yes
Hm yeah maybe that’s reasonable
Who doesn't want Disney's Carnotaurus to exist
I just wanna know where the maastrichtian African guys fall
Apex pycno when
pycno uses projected adult size
dies
If it’s maastrichtian it’s worthy of all our love and attention
Watch this thing end up clading as a brachyrostran like the bahariya abelidaur
Would Chenanisaurus end up there too?
This isn't reffering to the big Morrocan vetrebrae, is it
Nah this is a cervical
Chenanisaurus ends up as very basal but I think Andre has it as somewhere more derived(?)
Cau?
Pycnonemosaurus and Viavenator being more basal than Majungasaurines
That phylogeny certainly brings up more questions than answers
That it does
If there is one thing that seeming remains stable in these Abelisaurid phyogenies
Its the Skorpiovenator + Ekrixinatosaurus duo (or trio if you include Ilokelsia).
I love that little unnamed Rio limay clade
Viavenator and Pycnonemosaurus together sounds fine and dandy
Honestly pycno being a giant archaic basal abelisaur does sound pretty cool but it’s not like it’s placement is at all resolved or anything
Also elaphrosaurinae outside of noasauridae is neat
More basal than Ceratosaurus itself lol
Yeah elaphrosaurinae has flown around a lotta places in its time
seems like nemegt had an ankylosaur ~anky holotype size and another ~zuul size
now to wait for someone to point out i oversized/missed something
Whats the azdarchids name?
Unnamed it’s just a cervical iirc
Pog.
I though duck was bigger then tarbo by a decent margain
It’s ~3000kg heavier at the largest
They look the same size wise
hartman's skeletal (the one in the chart) appears shorter because its legs are mid-stride
the one above is in neutral so the legs are straight and it looks taller
this is with duck in neutral
Toss in a human model for funzies
This is absolutely delicious
randoms lady added for aesthetic
and unhid raptorex because it was behind the other tyrannosaurids
I was literally just about to mention it before you posted the fix
Nice job
You should do more, the dopamine hit I get from seeing these is just too good. Okay it’s not that euphoric but I like it
Ornithomimids would be great
Wym, there right there
I mean a chart of only ornithomimids, but include the whole family.
Gross 🤢
only formations
half of the ornithomimids would probably just be larramendi's silhouettes
Lol fair
although i'm kinda surprised by nemegt having two ~3.5t ankylosaur specimens
Ornithomimosaurs perhaps then
Are they attributable to anything?
one's indet and the other's "dyoplosaurus" giganteus
Sounds like it’s probably a relative of zuul
indet being a tail marginally larger than zuul's and giganteus being a caudal centrum slightly thinner than those of anky's holotype (which i went with for the estimate) but taller
I know the Barun Goyot material is big, and I think thats usually attribute to Tarchia. Idk what to make of these guys though
and i just skull scaled tarchia teresae because i couldn't find any figured postcrania
Curious, what are making these on
Yeah, tarbo do be mid ngl
Do you guys want to know something about the largest species of allosaur
people talk about rex having it hard with its herbivores but tarbo was the *real * tyrannosaurid getting curbstomped by assorted giant herbivores
prolly amplexus assuming it stays in allosaurus
if not than fragilis/whatever amnh 680 is
It's not a genus of Allosaurus
I never saw the " rex had it hard" problem, like sure its prey was huge and insane, but so was rex.
real
The spiritual Morrison successor
This is SauroPhaganax, a relative of Allosaurus that measured 3.3 meters tall, 12.8 meters long and weighed 4.2 tons (10 foot 9 inches tall, 41 foot 11 inches long)
It lived in the late Jurassic along side allosaurus and ceratosaurus in north America
I love how it looks exactly like allo
It ate sauropods, stegosaurs and small dryosaur like herbivores like camptosaurus
why did i read allosaur as allosaurus
@heady thunder I couldn't find a good picture
All the pictures still look like allo, cos, it basically looks like one
@heady thunder people do debate on if it's a different dinosaur, a different species of allo (A. Maximus) or if it's just a large allosaurus
i have a hunch if i say it looked like allo 7shots is gonna beat me to death
Smooth skinned Dinosaurs, just how I like em
It does look like allo, like, having eyes tells you that
I just noticed the picture I got of it shows it having eye shadow
All I'm saying is if we got a super-sized campto maybe we got a super sized allo
Real
sauro's pretty much a giant allo built like a brick already
@sullen cairn it really is though 🤣🤣
i've heard "billboard" and "brick house" in reference to its build too many times to say no
What would win, a SauroPhaganax or AMNH 680
@sullen cairn sauro isn't that much longer than it but is heavier, AMNH 680 is 3.1 tons and sauro is 4.2
AMNH 680 is only 3 tonnes? Pfff big deal 🥱
sauro was prolly 5.5-6t, larger specimens potentially even larger
A large ankylosaurid in Nemegt, interesting.
It ain’t that interesting 🤨 there’s always been big ankylosaurs in the Nemegt Basin
They would mate
If they were in the same genus/family, sure
Maastrichtian Europe is more well understood than I would’ve thought
Had no idea there was a whole Eurasian family of Lambeosaurines
And the little guy that hopped to Africa that I can never spell
Ajnabia. Skill issue Fr
😠
oh i have to add this pin 551 -1 the tarbo there may not be fully grown
When will someone make a chart of middle Eocene China 😔
@kindred hawk Please keep all discussions in here on the Paleo topic only, we recommend all off-topic conversations be directed to DM's or another server entirely. Refer to our #rules
I Wonder how distantly related dinosaurs would have to be to crossbreed? Creatures today can crossbreed up to like the family level or whatever so it’d be interesting
I Wonder if we could tell through fossils if something was a natural crossbreed. Like grolar bears (grizzly polar)
