#paleontology
1 messages Ā· Page 38 of 1
š
So beyond the minutiae not much
I mean between Triceratops and Stryacosaurus there should be some pretty apparent major differences.
as far as I can tell Trike also has a wider body from the top, and there's Styraco's classic giant frill horns, which in Trike are almost nonexistant
that's about it
Look pretty similar on the surface to me š¤·āāļø
The vast majority of ceratopsids only have major differences in the head and that's it
These animals are clearly synonymous
yeah, they're all kinda headswaps of eachother. Not because the animals all looked the same but because 80% of the time all you find is the head
so it is hard to study the rest of them
Koreaceratops ontop
We have it in large and we have it in Venti š
True!
Not sure how good Hartmanās is, but itās enough to get a feel for itās anatomy
Beyond its head, looks like a difference in ribs (styra has more looks like and shaped diff) and its.....what's that bone is under the tail
The ischium?
That sty looks funky.
Ur mom looks funky (It is literally Sergi's skeletal)
That is also funky, sty is funky, deal with it.
the frill on sty can also be really asymmetrical which is a lot of fun to deal with
Megafunky.
you find half a skull, is it a new genus or is it just sty being a nuisance again
What did you use for Triceratops 
Would be interesting to see further frill customization in game.
Dempseyās old muscle recon, might redo it someday
Ok cool, so better than Hartmanās I presume
no dempseys old musculature is bad and the scaling likely follows
@hallow spear@tough parcel Please remain polite and respectful towards each other and do not provoke or antagonize other users. Refer to our #rules
But we are dating, i love him
^ Its simply flirting
What would theoretically happen it i bit into an ankylosaur?
asking for a friend
Mammals are cool
Ever bit your finger?
like that except it wouldn't hurt the anky and your teeth would break!
sounds like a pleasurable experience š
will recommend this to him
Especially entelodonts
Entelodonts > Mammals > Dinosaurs
Stego are you a swifty
how has Koala not sniped us yet
nvm š
Lmao, as you say that
Please avoid less serious topics in this channel. Make sure you read the pinned messages in all channels you plan to use. This channel is for educational purposes.
Oh, Oopsie
W Hartman then, cause his aesthetics go hard
Dempsey has a new one and thatās good
I think I found it
Raj is right iirc (referring to the message below)
@late atlas Megarachne is in the same family as sea scorpions, it was originally thought to be a spider but it later became a eurypterid.
Ye but it has that title, because it was thought to be a giant spider at one point
Megarachne also supposedly lived in freshwater unlike its kin
Yeah, its dwarfed by all its relativeās pretty much as well
Scorpions to boot btw are a relative of the spider under the Arachnida title
It is technically not far fetched to say the Megarachne might be a spider before it changed to become what we know as a spider š¤·āāļø
But it still holds that "title", the Largest Spider to have ever live"
Not anymore, it was until it wasnāt
Honorary spooder š
. . . Just . . . HOW?!
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373708840_Dinosaur_eggs_with_fossilized_embryos_on_the_Moon
PDF | We have discovered from NASA LROC images two dinosaur eggs on the Moon containing fossilized embryos. One egg (Lat. 38.39144, Lon. 321.00588) is... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
Click on the link, then click on Saxenaās about page
Idk, but they are funny
Okay, it's most likely a hoax.
Was about to say -- how in the world did two dinosaur eggs get on the moon. 
Oh well. For thee best.

There's a pachy with a beak in the works?
If so send pics
Certainly fake, I just donāt know if itās intentional parody
Parody of what, exactly?
It's not a parody, just a predatory journal. A particularly funny one tho
the authors seem to have a good few papers like this, i don't know what brand of conspiracy theorists they are (optimistically, maybe they're doing this on purpose) but this claim is 100% not actually true, just some neat rock formations
step 1: pay journal hundreds of dollars to publish an article
step 2: wait for them to check it
step 3: they don't care enough to put it through peer review because you already payed them an exorbitant sum of money
step 4: (lose) profit
i don't know if this should be illegal but i do think it shouldn't be Allowed
how fast could diplodocus run?
Absolute chads
All hail Lunasaurussaxenaii and Chandrasauruspolaris
Larramendi has it at ~24km/h
Does anyone know the projected adult size of yoshis trike
that's too fast for a sauropod like him
only other estimate i've seen recently is something like 17km/h
Mummified edmontoš
Proof the dinosaurs didn't originate here but elsewhere and when the meteor struck it brought em with it. 
Anyone have nice gallimimus skeletal?
this is what i can found rn

Me taking a bite out of the mummified Edmonto's leg (It is not mummified, there is no soft tissue, it's all rock)
Teeth go bye bye. XD
Dan Folkes's skeletal of Allosaurus jimmadseni, holotype specimen (DINO 11541):
iirc didnāt Dan say this one was a juvenile/sub adult?
Maybe -- can't quite remember. Let me go and see real quick.
Yeah, the holotype is a subadult
Oh, there we go then.
dont worry
Bro
Itās not even your fault lmao, theyāve been cited as the doppelgƤnger of random many times (by me š )
Wrong channel, mate.
which one?
Hmm . . . #path-of-titans maybe? Not sure since this is the Path of Titans server -- it doesn't really deal with the Isle stuff, if at all.
Here is a size comparison I found between the adult Ceratosaurus specimen and the average sized Allosaurus specimen:
Throw in a huge allo now
Hmm . . . Now that I'm looking at this, I do wonder what their niches may have been.

I do know that Scanova said something about Ceratosaurus being more plains specific in its niche than Allosaurus, which was more of a generalist in terms of habitat preference.
I honestly would've thought that Ceratosaurus was more forest orientated due to its slower speeds, more agile nature, and being a billboard would help going through thick vegetation. Slower speeds are more useful in forested areas than open areas, as ye can change directions more easily. That and Ceratosaurus may have been better at acceleration too. But who knows.
š¤·
Allo does everything. And even its specimens kinda show it, being extremely common and ranging from full adults being as big as cera to way bigger.
Some peeps have thought of Allosaurus as the "hyena" of the Morrison Formation. Due to some bits of evidence, according to some, showing them chewing on bones and whatnot.
Isnāt Cera called that? Never heard Allosaurus called a Hyena
Itās always been āTHE GRAPPLING ANIMALā for me
Nah -- Ceratosaurus is sometimes called the "honey badger" of the Morrison Formation.
The Ceratosaurus = "hyena" and Allosaurus = "lion" comparisons, to my knowledge, are mainly from popular media sources and whatnot. No guarantees though.
Well the Ceratosaurus atleast makes sense, small body, bone crushing bite.
Kdksjwk
Allosaurus = lion is because
Lion = Cool = Dinosaur = Allosaurus
It didn't really have a bone crushing bite. It just had larger teeth compared to its head size. Though it would've had a bigger bite force compared to an Allosaurus its size.
Bone crushing was just me being dramatic, but for its size itās bite was really strong, like hyenas
Sheesh ecological comparatives try not to use Sub-Saharan Africa challenge (impossible)
Yeah, it do be like that. XD
Try not to base reptiles and birds off large mammals challenge
(Impossible) (Gone wild)
Like if nobody noticed lizards are a bit different than a honey badger
I really wish we had a realistic allo in game.
erm T. rex is basically a lion right?
A Tiger
Mmmmmm myes this bird lizard thing the size of a building probably was just a bearā¦.
Keep in mind that by dinosaur standards, allosaurusās growth is weirdā¦..
Or bear maybe
Technically, Metriacanthosaurus is pretty close to an accurate sized Allosaurus. Just with a dewlap, somewhat different structure, different crests, a bit shorter than length, and has venom . . . Yeah . . .
Allosaurus is way to weird for being one of the most common fossils we find
Like, the largest definite allosaurus we have is immature, but we got proper adults smaller than it. It had a wide adult size range.
Either we donāt have allosaurus here or itās just like alligators
Personally I think the closest ecological comparative for T. rex is Tarbosaurus
Hmm . . . I wonder if it could be due to environmental changes and food availability?
I do know that alligators can have stunted growths if they're not in properly sized areas or not enough food to grow larger.
some lizards can just warp their sizes when they get hungry, granted itās usually just tail length
I mean growth sized based off of food availability is likely I think. Its the explanation given to plateosaurus, who is way more insane. Adults range from smallish 500kg 5m individuals to all the way to 10 meters and 4 tons.
Like that one iguana Darwin called literally disgusting and verbally assaulted for just looking funny
It changes tail sizes and maybe even body size depending on how much food is around without any real consequence
But yeah the Morrisonās top predator dynamic is interesting. Torvosaurus as the top of the pecking order and preferred forest edges where it could ambush larger prey. Ceratosaurus is a bit of an enigma, since it seemed to stick to dryer and wide open expanses. Allosaurus seemed to live anywhere and eat anything, which probably contributed to why theyāre so damn common.
Now that ye are here, actually, what makes ye think that Ceratosaurus was more open area orientated? Was just curious on how ye got to that conclusion. š
I really am more interested in their behaviour than anything
Last I saw, Cerato was a dense brush/wetlands predator (NOT SEMI-AQUATIC)
Erm semi-aquatic?
Same here
La tooth in the water, it must be semi-aquatic 
Apparently Ceratosaurus is kind of rare outside of the myooropelta assemblage, which was a wide open fern prairie.
If you find a drowned dinosaur in the water I doubt it was semi aquatic (no Iām not saying it drowned pls donāt hurt me)
I kind of doubt allosaurus was regularly taking large prey, given the larger arms allowing for more diverse prey options, and thereās not much of a point risking life and limb for a risky prey item if a bigger carnivore is likely to steal it after the fact.
Oh no itās literally just a tooth, no other attributed material
Interesting.

Didnāt like, they have super big teeth, that would take forever to grow back if they fell out >->
You see such things in intact ecosystems today. Puma are capable of taking prey as large as elk, but in ecosystems where they have to worry about wolves they donāt really do that.
No, the "mega tooth Cerato" is a product of tooth slippage. They had decent teeth, but not monstrous
Same with leopards and whenever they live in not Sri Lanka
A puma can take down an elk yeah but a elk can heavily injure a Puma before it can kill it
Those hoofs are sharp
Itās more that only apex predators frequently kill large prey because they donāt risk wasting energy if that kill is stolen
Eh the reason is less the risk and more the amount of effort required to take down the raid boss only for it to be taken from yah in the end.
When wolves arenāt around even bull elk make up a good portion of cougars diet
Smaller prey is easier to cache away, less noticable, and easier to consume in entirety.
We do know that Allosaurus does sometimes go after Stegosaurus. Based on that thagamizar that went through the jewels of one Allosaurus specimen.
Iāve never seen or heard of a cougar killing an elk, I feel like a cougar isnāt really built for that
It is.
Cougars are rather accomplished macropredators
Felines are much more muscular than most people think.
I know theyāre strong but an elk is pretty strong too
You see how they hunt guanaco? They put up the most fight out of any large animal Iāve seen but they manage anyway. Even if it means nearly getting their neck broken from all the shaking every single time.
Real?
Iāve seen them hunt Guanaco, elk are a whole different deal
Iāve never seen it but Iāve never seen a puma hunt anything in the American wilderness actually caught on video commonly. Keep in mind coyote apparently manage to hunt adult moose in some localities somehow. Donāt ask me how.
Wtf they did to simba wtf
Probably in 20ft of snow
Simba took some creatine
Coyotes just eat things when theyāre weak
They are North Americaās premier mesopredator
But yeah, back to topic, allosaurs basically lived anywhere and ate anything. Probably how they outlived torvo in the end.
Like large cattle getting killed by boars or something else it shouldnāt
Usually just happens when the boar jumps the sow during birth
Allosaurus was like the most extreme version of coyote when it comes to survivability
anyways elk are one of the most common prey of cougars
males particularly kill more bull elk
Whenever I tried looking for a video, the closest one I got was like, three cougars trying to kill one bull elk
Iāve seen a cougar body stuck to a elkās antlers though.
Actual video footage and whatās statistically shown arenāt always the same thing
Well what to hunting incidents go off, a half rotten body with a cougar next to it? Or just people saying they saw something
Leopards consistently take gorillas but itās never seen as it happens (cause of course you donāt see it) and you still have the internet parading gorillas as these roidheads that have the strength to take grizzly bears and bench-press cars.
Leopards do kill gorrilas yeah, gorrilas arenāt built with loose skin around their neck so they just kinda die when one even looks at them
King Kong killed 3 T. rex's in his movie, so that is clearly applicable to IRL gorillas
I mean gorillas are insane roidheads, getting killed by leopards doesnāt change that
But gorrilas also consistently scare them away
me when felines ambush prey
Yeah, they ambush their prey but Gorrilas arenāt exactly dumbfounded when one runs out behind them. They usually arenāt alone
^ a silverback also isnāt dying quickly or easily in any circumstance
Itās gonna wrestle with the leopard, and then the leopards gotta consider going back in for another attack after the gorrilas throws it 20 meters
Iām just saying thatās pretty scary.
Humans can scare away stuff we probably shouldnāt, just because we make loud noises and are tall
Another example is honey badgers and wolverines being prey for a lot of animals despite their reputation and the fact itās rarely physically recorded.
Wolverines less so Tbf, the vast majority of their mortalities are from wolf packs that catch them trying to take their kills when their not looking.
Real and true
Wolverines fr being like: "Oh no, the consequences of my actions!"
If leopards could just, remove gorrilas easily and without trouble, we wouldnāt have gorrilas. If two apex predators were constantly successful in killing elk, we wouldnāt have elk
I feel like youāre saying whatās already obvious to literally everyone here rn
Iām still not quite sure how every study about cougar predation accidentally screwed up by thinking one of their staple prey items was elk
Eh how they determine such things is typically pretty rigorous. People that actually know what to look for can tell a lot from a corpse (IE killed vs scavenged)
That was sarcasm
ambush is just a good strategy for going after elk and cougars are good at that strategy, elk just reproduce fast enough to deal with it and get away enough, thatās just basic predatory interaction
I also said it cause someone else questioned this earlier
Ah
Iām saying an Cougar wouldnāt want to go after elk unless it really needed to, itās mainly solitary, the elk dwarfs it, I would say elks scare them away or even kill them a lot more than cougars do
š
Cats arenāt exactly know for being fearless
If elk were killing cougars more than vice versa cougars would all be dead
Even killing, Iām not saying they kill them 24/7
Most predators are capable of taking on way more than what is typically expected tho. A similar example is lynx taking whitetail and mule deer
And thereās also the studies which clearly state elk compose a significant portion of cougar prey which is kinda important to the discussion
Also that one case of a Nile croc somehow fighting with a white rhino for a while before eventually dragging it under
Huh š
I've seen that case too, but I don't have the article
And the very rare recorded instances of tigers taking rhinos as well.
House cat vs elk
Lone wolves took on elks
Same with moose surprisingly.
Itās important to note that a lot of it comes with specific individuals being very good at what they do tho.
Or a moose in 12 ft of snow in the middle of the winter
I heard that the giant chin on shant is just an error of casting the fossil, anyone know anything about that?
Well yea, it goes aftyer everything it can, it is after all a generalist
from what I can gather some of the weird things about it like the chin and weirdly rotated predentary are not mentioned in the literature but idk if I'm just missing something
Its not an error
so we do actually have the predentary?
To be fair they are stinky swimmers
I think there was also a case of a hyena taking down a Cape buffalo once but she was pregnant and on the floor
Hyenas and honey badgers are also know for going for the jewels of animals sometimes.
Which makes ye think about which regions predatory dinosaurs may have attacked for larger prey items.
Calmest and most on topic conversation in paleo chat:
Considering dinosaurs didn't have external "jewels" (I might get deleted for saying it outright), I doubt they were aiming for that region. Besides, it's really only a canid-hyena thing to aim for that area
I was just making a point that not all animals aim for the neck, using the hyena and honey badger as examples.
Try those tasty tail muscles
Its a myth with honey badgers given if something is so big they need to aim for a vital area then they aren't looking to kill it to begin with and thus aren't doing that.
I see. Noted.
My friend said he could beat a Komodo dragon in a fight with a Bowie knife
I mean...he's got a knife? So that automatically makes him incredibly dangerous towards any "small" animal
Eh the komodo dragon still has better odds of disabling him than the other around.
Oh yea, but like if the K. dragon grabs a hold of his leg and thrashes, that brings the thing close enough for him to stab the knife through the neck or head (Though this implies he'd have the thought to do that, being shredded is very traumatic)
Komodo dragons also have osteoderms
I knew about that, but I do wonder how well they'd work against a guy slamming a knife into the skin š¤
The knife would still likely penetrate, esp considering heās got to hit fast and hard
But what if the Komodo dragon also had a knife
Oh god, oh frick, the komodo already has daggers in its mouth, why does it get a knife š
What if we gave the Komodo Dragon a Komodo Dragon?
komodo dragons have been recorded doing parthenogenesis once or twice right, so given enough time yeah probably could
That and nothing really has a resistance to piercing weaponry. Hence why bullet resistant vests are still very much able to be pierced by a knife.
I mean, they already do if ye count their teeth. XD
Are there any videos showing an accurate depiction of dimetrodons locomotion
Hmm . . . Give me a moment.
I remember someone showing me a documentary scene that had a dimetrodon hunt sequence.
Walking with monsters? Iāve seen that but idk if thatās outdated movement for dimetrodon or not
Not Walking with Monsters -- It was this: https://youtu.be/r-UlEal40Qk?si=LMRENwseTZg8-qgG
Pack hunting Dimetrodon šØ
Ah
š±
Iām just saying bro a Komodo dragon would throw you to the ground so fast I think he would lose
But wait, isnāt dimetrodons stance more like this?
What if im in a car
Really depends on how quick your friend can dodge.
Komodos have a few advantages
- size (in length)
- natural armor
- run speed
- bite force and venom
However humans do actually have a few things going for them as well.
- Height
- Tools (in this instance the knife would negate really any armor advantage the komodo has)
- reach
- agility (getting on top of the komodo in a grapple could probably keep the person out of reach from its mouth though claws could still do a good bit of damage)
Overall I'd say maybe 55/45 komodos favor. I'm unsure how often a komodo would try to take on a human though. Intimidation is a factor and outside of a rules 1v1 humans do have more going for them.
For example, if the person is allowed to pick up a long branch to shove in the way of the komodos bite, that could provide a large advantage. It would open opportunities for a stab.
Yeah . . .
Also, is the human able to kite? A person could probably outmaneuver a komodo long enough to tire it out. If they're a fit person.
Humans have a few unique advantages compared to the animal kingdom:
- our throwing ability is unmatched
- tool usage is unmatched
- some of the best endurance runners (most humans do suck at running since we do not do it much anymore.)
Take those things away and... yea humans aren't that great. But they're what we evolved to do, and we do it well.
Well . . . Ankylosaurus got downsized:
"Ankylosaurus magniventris for GDI. Lateral, Dorsal & Anterior by Brennon valdez (Armour was removed in the GDI, I'm just too lazy to remove it here). 1m = 560 & 600px. (Larger scalebar depicts holotype size, smaller scalebar depicts largest specimen, CMN 8880)
Ankylosaurus magniventris GDI results.
(CMN 8880) Large Canadian skull specimen, results in a total length of 6.96m and a mass of 4414kg. (You can add 5-10% for an estimated amount of mass the Osteoderms would add)
(CCM V03) Handle specimen is also about identical size to the Canadian skull."
How large was it previously
To my knowledge, 5 to 8 tonnes. No guarantees, though.
Sheesh
That's the smallest I've seen it.
Before Fadeno it was like 8 meters and 5 tons.
Ok, upon some disection. It didn't get shrunk. It's just a reconstruction/GDI of a smaller specimen. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/512496784547905547/1149818542192087080/Ankylosaurus_specimen_skeletals.png
V003 got downsized
The skeletals been out of date for a while iirc, also the proportions are very different between the 2 skeletals
So what would be 003?
About the same size as 8880
In that image or in general? Cause the latter don't help lol.
In general
Well how would 8880 be in general.....
Wouldn't it logically get bigger? Given 880 in the new gdi is greater than the old one? I don't get it.
The new gdi 8880 is like half the size of fadenoās
And v003 is the same size of or smaller than 8880
How about we post that gdi instead of 5895
Is there a gdi of 8880 itself?
From what I know the weightās just scaling with 5895ās
Doesnāt make a difference but yeah itād be a lot more digestable if there were a gdi of just 8880
Meh. Still a cool animal.
Ye more digestable is exactly the word I was looking for. I presume there isn't tho
Yeah an 8880 itself gdi would be very helpful because right now itās āanky got downsized because stego giād lanceās 5895 and scaled it with the largest specimen 8880 which came out as under 5t and also fadenoās v003 estimate got downsized and isnāt any larger than 8880ā
And not everyone is gonna know that v003 is handle specimen
For a GDI this is more vague than I expected
Guys, 8880 is not proportioned different from 5895. It's a skull. Scale it up
But stego already did so, Ken's post above says CMN 8880 is 7 meters and 4414 kg
that and handle being v003 are mentioned but ig it's kinda easy to gloss over
i think me saying 8880 is the one in the gdi was confusing because the gdi itself is 5895 and 8880's size is mentioned directly below it
Imagine how silly and confusing this conversation looks to someone not reading carefully enough or don't have the knowledge to assess it appropriately
"why is paleo chat always dead?"
I'm just kinda confused how y'all got "it's a smaller specimen" and then assumed that the big Anky from Fadeno was still valid
yeah idk where that came from
We live in a society where big Anky doesn't exist, good
yeah it's only the size of an asian elephant
Smaller and weaker tyrannosaurus food š
the greater tragedy here is lancian's sanity with the osteoderms that weren't even included in the actual gdi which is the only part anyone seems to care about
I have it on good authority that his crazy side kicked in mid-way and he started enjoying the circles
dont know the conersation but is Anky still the largest Ankylosaur so far?
yep, by a wide margin
Even with the downsize, Ankylosaurus is still the largest ankylosaur.
pinacosaurus just amuses me as a coffe table though
was Pinacs wideness a asian ank thing or probably more diverse..cause i think Tarchia has some form of wideness
how big is tarchia?
Fat š
gdi's 2660kg
i was unaware someone GDIed tarchia
oh word
Huh, well I'll be lmao
if Tarchia reaches 7m, as i've occasionally heard it rumored, then it could surpass Ankylosaurus
if a 5.9m one weighs nearly 2.7 tonnes a 7m one would be 4.6t
Oh boy, can't wait for the next big paleo video: "Ankylosaurus no longer biggest ankylosaur?? Tarchia on top??"
(the Tarchia scaling is based on a footprint or something)
then we find a giant nodosaur that gets bigger than both for some reason, because what are they even doing
a sauropod mimic nodosaur along the same lines as miragaia would be really cool tbh
anky's now smaller than gsp's suspicously large cedarpelta
why does he have that thing at five tons
because itās gsp thatās all the explanation you need
I will say for some reason his sauropod estimates are shockingly reasonable a lot of the time
4000kg rajasaurus 
I still think larramendis mass titanosaur downsizing of 2020 is hilarious, he just had an absolute field day with it
maybe he just wasn't in a good mood that day
I like to think he got frustrated with one particular titanosaur and decided to take it out on the whole clade
āfine, be that way Iām making you all smallerā
This anky downsize is hitting me harder than the sarco downsize
I can't even make a funny joke because the name of the penguin is censored here
The jack#ss penguin? More like the jack#ss titanosaur
all titanosaurs are like that theyāre a complete nuisance to deal with
I couldnāt blame him for getting mad at them
titanosaurs are just a pain to talk about, sauropods in general actually
my official diagnosis on sauropods groups is this:
titanosaurs - I hate them, theyāre a mess, all of them
brachiosaurids - theyāre my favorite, but they preserve horrible and like to pop up in weird places and times
camarasaurids - camarasaurus is easy but the family as a whole gives titanosaurs a run for their money
diplodocoids - what are rebbachisaurids doing?
the rest havenāt done anything to agitate me yet but itās only a matter of time
ehh id say camarasaurus in of itself is a headache
it can be yeah but at least we know a lot about it, the family as a whole moves around a lot though
controversial 4th species
a lot of early cretaceous somphospondylids really belong in camarasauridae or brachiosauridae but they thought it was too late for that and made a new family
we donāt talk about that
then theres titanosaurs where each new one if just trying to be bigger then Argent just for it to come out it isnt
basal titanosaurs are a catastrophe
Peloroplites and Cedarpelta are genuinely huge but no one talks about them (measurements are scarce so ig that's fair)
I'm sorry I'm still confused on the context of the anky
Kirkland is not a small man
isnt Titanosaurus itself tiny for a titanosaur...
You should make a silhouette of them, scale it to the toe bone and then publish it as fact
i did scale that thing to the head once
I was in moviewatch and DnD for like 3 hours so idk wtf I missed
big cedar mountain ankylosaurians
I like scaling fragmentary sauropods but Iām too lazy to do it frequently
Can one of you copy-paste Lancianās explanation to this chat? (Random or Table)
Iām about to go dunk myself into juice
i just know i think about kaiju titanosaurus more then dinosaur titanosaurus
thatās terrifying, Kirkland is not a small man and he looks puny
this is on handle man
Comparison of the anky holotype and Scotty (credit to Dan folkes and Brennon Valdez)
Somewhat rough but it's as close as I could get
this is what i got scaling peloro using the 56cm skull
Cope and anky
tissue likely sucks and it's obviously gonna be a bit off but whatever
I hope you aren't using that insanely massive cope estimate
Meybe
Cope is likely much smaller than 12 tonnes, being roughly 10.6-10.8 in reality iirc
so the theory or hypothesis that ankylosaurs would hunker down or make themselves a pit to effectively make them unflippable while swinging tails at wouldbe predators..is that..a still possible thing
Still body slams anky
Well.... yeah, but like, still better to use more accurate sizes
"body slams" as if anky wasnt like top 3 most dangerous prey items
Obviously
boy that sure is a skeletal
but yeah, near 7m animal
Well.....
Anky holotype VS Scotty
Obviously it's gonna be difficult but uhhhhhh
tail club v legs
comparing largest rex to average anky š
truly one of the skeletals of all time which totally wasn't me turning up the image brightness
and yeah the thing was like 7m TL
No way Dynamosaurus with osteoderms
brings me back to the hypothesis i remember, where ankylosaurs were suggested to hunker down or even make little pits to sit in to prevent flipping and basically swing the tail freely
Well... you have exposed me
After I did some critical thinking, I discovered why this doesnāt make sense. You dig a pit, put yourself in it, and now you canāt move your body to face your attacker⦠A rex would just need to twinkle toes around the Ankyās club and crush its skull
wrong the anky would spin its tail as to generate lift and hover out of said hole before instantly shattering the rex's ankles with a mere whiff of said tail
Trueā¦
It's a strategy that makes sense if you're a 300 gram lizard that can bury itself in the sand. Makes less sense to a 3000000 gram ankylosaur
unless it was for nodosaurs who had shoulder spikes for more defensive capabilities
I have a different theory.
Maybe they just used their flat wide bodies to deter attackers (AKA, Adjust their bodies to where their very wide top is facing their predators)? It would be hard to exactly bite onto the widest part of an animal like that, especially if it has osteoderms. Of course, the club tail may have been evolved to further deter predation.
being a table is an efficient strategy, i will endorse for wholly unbiased reasons š
pinacosaurus moment
its just perfect Pinaco means "Plank Lizard" and it is just a table
Makes sense. Just tilt your body to the side and become the shield.
Turtles have been shown to do this whenever being attacked by sharks.
Well tbf, ankylosaur skull shape literally evolved to prevent tyrannosaurs from getting a grip. Ignore that one unlucky Tarchia. I would have assumed as well that within the shallow divot that the anky is still capable of pivoting
Interesting divergence in American and Asian ankylosaurs though is general width and club size. Asian species all tend to be wider with smaller clubs.
Rex could probably fit anky in its mouthā¦. š
with great difficulty
Wouldn't it be funny if the reason why Asian Ankylosaurs tend to be wider than their American counterparts due to the local Tyrannosaurs being more proportionally big headed (E.g. Tarbosaurus).
Me as a kid trying to fit the whole fork in my mouth sideways?
I think there might be some dispute over why bony clubs appear in the clade.
It likely evolved initially for interspecific combat and also functioned as defensive shin smashers.
as far as i know, weaponized structures like horns tend to first evolve for intraspecific competition, and then later gain the secondary use of defense against predators. the clubs probably started out the same way, since there's some evidence of ankylosaurs using their clubs against eachother
This was actually noted in Doedicurus first funnily enough due to the fact that in their case the tail would've been very impractical as a defense, on top of wounds from one another.
Ankylosaurs were massive hindgut fermenters too, a lot of that width & low slung body is due to gut size and general lifestyle
Do we have any good presence of the structure actually being used in defense?
Not really but we don't have evidence of T. rex's getting stabbed by trike horns either.
Maybe neither were used as defensive structures š¤·āāļø
thatās usually what I try to imply with my questions lol
I mean its a matter of 'Why not". We don't have theropods crushed by sauropods (on purpose) or anything similar either. Stegosaurus thagomizer holes punched through allo bones are the only direct evidence I can think of involving herbivores injuring carnivores.
Iām pretty sure thereās a few allosaurus specimens with blunt force trauma inferred from sauropods but Iād have to dig for them
Even then we can't really know if those are from sauropods. Blunt force injuries can come from a lot of things.
We have sufficiently injured allosaurs that I could see them being fairly regularly at least injured while hunting. It's much rarer in other theropods and does deserve examination imo
I mean some of the ones I heard about are so extreme in specific places the most logical explanation is that a sauropod walloped it
Itās more evidence that the Morrison actively hated Allosaurus and sought to torture them
The wile e. coyotesaurus
we also have evidence that some sauropods were actively hitting things with the end of their tails
it could be other sauropods or an object but itās not a far leap to assume that theyād be hitting a predator with it if need be
If it's able to hit other stuff, why not hit a predator 
should i updated my anky size info now?
Probably
How big was Cope after all if that 13,1m and 12,4t estimate is an exaggeration
13.1m and 12.4 ton was like max estimate, more conservative was like 12m and 10 tons.
yea
No because Iām making a new one lol
The osteoderms on the back have spikes, thats cool, never noticed it before.
Crying, itās old af (years old), ignore it š I was a fool
Nah its cool.
Yes
Once Falc finished her recon
Yes please wait, Iām almost done, soonā¢ļø
What dinosaurs did megalosaurus hunted? (need for a school project)
Thanks
Are there any confirmed burrowing dinosaurs?
Oryctodromeus, Leptoceratops, a couple other small ornithopods
beat me to it
Thanks
Do you think stegoceras would have burrowed or is that impossible for it?
Arenāt there arms quite flimsy/small?
There could be "burrow squatters" like burrowing owls or rattlesnakes calling prairie dog burrows home.
Yeah, could likely take over an existing burrow but I highly doubt it would make one
I am confused
So youāve got two major groups, Synapsids and Diapsids
Synapsids are more closely related to mammals, while Diapsids are related more to birds and reptiles
Gorgonops, Dimetrodon, etc are all Synapsids
Ah okay
The easiest way to tell which is which is by looking at their skull https://cdn.britannica.com/63/117263-050-47D5043F/skull-types.jpg
I used to be matching with someone lol, but here is a Dimetrodon skull
What the hell is a parapsid lol
Cool
Synapsid, anapsid and diapsid are real, the others are mental illness
Icthyosaurs and plesiosaurs are in that category
that's euryapsid, I think
Which in turn evolved from the diapsid condition
Polyphyletic groups š¤
Were there ever flying mammals besides bats?
No, but there were (and are) many gliding ones
Aren't turtles really weird and for a while they were classified incorrectly?
Iām pretty sure turtles classification is still shaky but yeah theyāve moved around a lot
Turtles are definitely diapsids. But until like 20 years ago they were called anapsids because they lost their fenestrae independently
I remember back in Bachelor's they were considered anapsids. ATM they seem to be in Archelosauria (I think that's how it's spelled.)
In schools they're often still mentioned as anapsids to this day, because linnaean taxonomy schools moment
Me when schools say we didnāt come from monkeys instead we just share common ancestor for the 2000th time because they donāt understand monophyly
I remember in my biology class my science teacher was talking evolution and said that chickens are descendants of the trex š¤¦āāļø
Average school
In 5th grade we were told caiman were the ancestors of dinosaurs
At least your science teacher wasn't a Richard Dawkins simp. 
Oh no
Flashback to the most disgusting possible canine cladogram Iāve seen
Cerdocyonina you will be missed
That reminds me of the tree where Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Homo were all polyphyletic
AYO??
Some dogs fr be looking like a dif species though
Perhaps more egregious is vulpes lycaon and canis being in a polytomy
Shouldāve done maximum trolling and included eastern wolves in addition to red wolves
Shouldāve added hyenas too
Caniform hyenas
Tbf theres so many people who believe Hyenas are related to Dogs, Wolves unaware of the fact they are feliforms.
Hyenas are goofy ahh
Were there any small herbis that could climb trees?
I assume we're talking about dinosaurs in this case
yes
Aardwolf only relevant member fr
We have evidence of aboreal heterodontosaurs
Iām trying to think of more but theyāre pretty much the prime example, I wouldnāt put it past other small ornithopods though
Most raptors could probably climb trees until you got to the largest ones.
Thats crazy, do you know when bats evolved into their flying form or what they evolved from? (Id assume some sort of glider but Im still curious)
yeah, wouldn't be too shocked. sometimes animals that don't look like they'd be any good at climbing trees are actually pretty good at climbing trees. (see: goats, and their desire to be in trees despite being ungulates)
Well, goats are pretty good at climbing mountains for some reason
Fuel the paleo-memes š„
Bruh who the hell named a dinosaur "Thanos"
i've been trying to write a more complete answer to this that's Factually Sound, and i'm not getting very far with it, so i'll just give you what i've managed to scrounge together:
-bats are usually placed near ferungulata, as far as i can tell?
-they don't fossilize very well (on account of being small and fragile), so it's rare to find Good Bat Fossils
-might be a pterosaur-type situation where they just Appear in the fossil record already fully flighted? (unsure)
-microbats were around at Least 52 million years ago. the early microbat in question was already Pretty Much A Normal Bat
They do just randomly appear already fully flighted in the Palaeocene right after the KT. Echolocation appeared very shortly after as well.
Since we're talking about bats, I like Vulcanops
There's speculation that they might've actually first evolved in the Cretaceous but it's unlikely I think.
I agree they probably evolved from some sort of gliding critter
I wouldnāt be too surprised, by the Maastrichtian we got some sort of Ornithorhynchid monotreme in Patagonia, so specialised mammals were appearing
awesome. i love it when small flighted animals suddenly manifest from thin air
me when I'm walking at night and a bat swoops 2 feet from my face
Woah really?
There's at least one species with leg anatomy that points to perching like birds
Manidens?
That's the one
I wonder if Herrerasaurus actually had the body for tree climber, probably not
well i like onychonycteris more
Username checks out
is it true deinosuchus mostly likely lived in the great interior sea and was like a saltwater croc
No
damn
Deinosuchus hatcheri did live in the western interior seaway though.....
Yo frr?? Thats sick
Why those skull emojis? šš
It was a primarily estuarine species. They lived in the coastline estuaries and swamps, occasionally travelling out in both directions, inland and sea.
We are debating about how fast giga could run they say 30 which from what I found is outdated. However I found 8-15 or 15-20, is either accurate?
I donāt know the exact speed, but rex ran at like 15 kmph, and giga was probably a lil bit slower.
15 kmh is far too slow, that's like 9 mph, the Lowest I've ever seen rex is 19 kmh/12 mph
Ok fair. I donāt know kmph so I didnāt do it right.
Personally I just use the MPH to KMH Google converter
It's very helpful
Gigas speed calculations
Speed calculation for MUCPv-95:
-
Weight: 8000+ kg
- Optimal Cadence: 1.5
- Optimal Stride Ratio: 1.6
-
Total Leg Length from MUCPv-Ch1: 3180 mm
-
Size Increase estimate for MUCPv-95: 6.6%
-
(T+M)Ć·F Ratio from MUCPv-Ch1: 1.22 ~= 1.2 - 1.3
- Optimal Cadence: 0.92
- Optimal Stride Ratio: 0.88
- Leg Length of MUCPv-95: 3180 Ć 1.066 = 3,389.88 mm
-
Cadence Result: 1.5 Ć 0.92 = 1.38
-
Stride Length Result: 1.6 Ć 0.88 = 1.408
- Velocity: (3389.88 Ć 1.38 Ć 1.408) Ć 0.0036 = 23.7120207667 km/h ~= 23.71 km/h
So the Giganotosaurus specimen MUCPv-95 has a rough estimated velocity of 23.71 km/h.
Thank you Fred 
Thank @light oxide and @stiff osprey they are the ones who did it
But np
Well, tell them I said thank you as I donāt want to disturb them
It's alright, mate. š
Does anyone have a good Peloroplites skeletal? or something similar to reference?
Le āskeletalā
The term āskeletalā is used incredibly liberally here
good enough, thanks!
i'm not mentioned to be rude but 23 km/h seems too fast for a big theropod like giga š
Nah, that's actually about right, rex is like 21 kmh for sue iirc
Really?
I just found this Bullhonky https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oRDid4OK-w
A new study points towards the T. rex being much, much larger than previously estimated...
Mega dinosaurs is not a reliable source at all
Surely he could at least use a thumbnail that isn't from jurassic world
Donāt be silly thatās not from Jurassic worldā¦.they clearly made it themselves by stealing Jurassic world renders š
large animals are capable of traveling at speeds
what did you say...
Jaguar: Struggles to take down a 2 meter long caiman or a 77 kg capybara, and is fat
Leopards: known to take down prey as large as male wildebeest, zebra, male kudu and male eland, each of these species capable of reaching anywhere between 3-10+ times the weight of a leopard
In fact a male eland was once killed by a leopard and this eland weighed around 1 ton, assuming that this leopard was only 130-160 lbs (average weight of male African savanna leopards) this eland weighed roughly 12-15 times the weight of the leopard
Checkmate jaguar fan 
Oh and leopards are not jaguar ripoffs, more like the other way around, leopards are thought to be the most basal pantherine and their body plan, ecology and adaptability somewhat proves this
Is that a reply to a 3 week old post?
Tho its a leopard W, so Ill encourage it
"we don't see jagaurs killing animals 10x their body mass"
largest animal in the amazon is barely 300kg
hmm yeah i wonder why we don't see jaguars killing 1000kg prey
Black caimans and tapir can reach very large weights
I just searched "panthera" to see if any goons were spreading misinformation
They can try a big domesticated bull if theyre lucky enough, but thats almost cheating
Jaguars have taken large specimens of domestic cattle and horses
but so have leopards 
i shoulda said terrestrial so fair enough
Obviously my jaguar slander is a joke but people should not compare animals based on strength and hunting capability. I only brought up the leopard side to prove that leopards are not puny weaklings
I respect the hussle.
@sullen cairn Arent tapirs also terrestrial tho
Yeah
i don't think tapirs really get much past 300kg unless it's an exceptional specimen
Yeah I don't think so either
Thats the most entertaining thing the animal community has to offer, especially when regarding extinct ones 
Yeah which is unfortunate. Animal interactions are always fun to discuss but stupid comparisons or unnatural debates are just annoying and not worthy of scientific discussion
jaguars and leopards are dumb to compare in prey anyways since besides entirely different environments with totally distinct prey composition and leopards aren't typically apex predators unlike jaguars
so obviously there will be a bias towards leopards hunting smaller animals and even then they still kill big things frequently
Yeah true. Although during the Pleistocene jaguars were subordinate to many predators. However today their only real threats are black caimans, american crocodiles and morelet's crocodiles. Leopards have to deal with 5 bear species, 4 other large cats, 3 canid species, 4 crocodilians and reticulated pythons throughout their range. They're only considered apex predators on Sri Lanka and Java
and the animals i listed don't even cover the threats to cubs, although I forgot to include spotted, striped and brown hyenas
and in sri lanka they are routinely killing ungulates multiple times there body mass
Indeed
i think it was something like only 15% of prey items were smaller than em or something along those lines
That I'm not sure of specifically but I do know they take larger prey quite often in Sri Lanka because their biggest threats are other leopards and mugger crocodiles
Very little competition
yeah i think that study concluded leopards usually hunt smaller prey to avoid competition
similar to how cougars hunt more elk in the absence of wolves
Yeah, which makes perfect sense, especially in Africa. You have lions, hyenas, dogs, cheetahs, jackals, crocodiles and other leopards all eying up your prey, so it's best to take a hare or small antelope as compared to their capability to take a much larger meal. Niche partitioning at its finest
I wish this chat was just changed to "biology" nobody has animal discussions in the pets channel. It fits this channel anyways since many living animals are discussed here all the time
Also, cool art of a Pleistocene North American jaguar Panthera onca augusta that took down a bull elk
goes hard
wasn't there that jaguar wandering around arizona a few years ago? El jefe or something like that
Yes, he was actually sighted last year in Mexico, alive and well. But I think he is at the end of his reign; today he is likely anywhere from 13-16 years old, already very old for a wild jaguar. He may not have much time left or even be alive at all but his legacy will live on and provide hope for a positive reintroduction of jaguars into the United States.
Anyways, I should get to sleep now, I plan to go herping tomorrow, peace
nice to hear he's still kicking
night
Ah Sri Lankan Leopards
One of the unique dominant terrestrial predators of the land
Do we have a mean temperature for the Hell Creek?
Tbf, there are populations of jaguars who hunt black Caimans a good bit, there was a 3.8 meter black Caiman killed by one of em
This despite jaguars in the amazon being smaller on average than the more southern populations
do you mean hot temperature or cold temperature?
They mean just an average⦠mean⦠temperature
Bruh i suck at maths but that i remembered
Lovely; now, mean temperature?
Delicious thanks
Damn thats pretty cold
Yeah a bit cold from what I was expecting
huh, that is pretty chilly. weird.
glancing at the paper, it doesn't look like it'd frequently drop to 0 °C in winter, but it gets closer than i'd expect. guess it's yet another reminder that the mesozoic had biomes other than Hot Jungle and Hot Desert
Itās like a fully temperate climate according to this though
yeah that's a lot more temperate than I was anticipating
Hell Creek had crocodylians so I'd definitely err on the higher end of these estimates, including the margins of error. Paleoclimatology is really tricky stuff and frequently produces lower than expected results
ahh, i see. understandable 
I was about remark something like that, because even 11-12 degrees Celsius as an annual mean is pretty much identical to current northern U.S.
Yeah these results are pretty fishy imo, not the fault of the authors it's just a really hard science
It was further north & definitely cooler and more seasonal than a lot of people think. The crocs & turtles are fairly modest in size & may have brumated to get through the cooler months. I'd still say it was subtropical or right on the line though. It had a big honking monitor lizard too which is interesting from a climate perspective.
Now Iām left questioning a whole bunch of mean climative estimates lol, should I be more cautious when referencing those Polar deposit temperatures?
The devils in the details right so don't expect them to be exactly spot on necessarily, look at a range of indicators (which is mainly what the good studies themselves are doing) and be satisfied with only having a general idea in most cases rather than a specific number
how many fingers did nanuq have?
2 iirc since i think it was in the tyrannosaur family
you'd figure as much, but i've seen some recons with three so i'm a bit confused
Nah i stand my ground on two fingers
(Wait- that sounds so wrong now that ive reread itš)
Manual didactyl locomotion
Huh?
walking on two fingers
Im still confused as hell
if you stand on two fingers, you locomote with two fingers (didactyl)
TABLE
Youāre not supposed to leak unpublished tyrannosaurs š
embargo is for nerds
(dear authorities and/or federal agents, the preceding statement was and still is a joke)
Nah my brains empty (early shifts this weekšš)
manual (hands) didactyl (two fingers) locomotion (moving)
David Peters trying not to call an extinct Felid taxa a canine (impossible)
Southern pops still too scared to hunt the water buffalo Patagonian water buffs are terrifying
mandible from sinonyx
"we must give up bear-dog andrewsarchus"
Sinonyx:
Oh its a canine
it is true that a 3.8 meter black caiman was killed, but it is not true that interactions between these 2 animals are commonly recorded at all. Jaguars don't take black caimans often due to their large size and the general population of black caimans; they are heavily poached and slaughtered either for meat and skin or just out of fear
Hahahah
LMFAO
Broš
lol you got that from Meta's server
Warthunder moment but for dinosaurs
"Dinosaur simulator player leaks unpublished paper on new found, finger walking, tyrannosaur, in order to prove Rexes inaccurate, in game locomotion."
mesozoica when dakotaraptor
the dakotaraptor incident is such a blunder
breaking embargo is always unfortunate when it happens but that one crowns the list, it hasnāt happened in quite a while though at least
I can only say BASED
we can't even attribute it to malice, i think the mesozoica devs were just incompetent like that
thatās honestly the worst part
Iām bored so does anyone know about anything big coming soon? I feel like itās been a bit dry lately (the only things I can really remember lately were perucetus and cope rex being clickbaity)
Cmon, some break embargo for this
Potential new material from the bugti hills might be assigned to P. intermedium
do not break embargo to answer me, if any feds are reading that it was not my intent
Do it, for the memeu
well you see we have this s-
Wait.... someone broke an embargo on a paper FOR A GOD DAMN VIDEO GAME??????
It was on Dakotaraptor, who turned out to be a super sketchy paper anyway. So like. Fair?
dakotaraptor is truly one of the taxa of all time
My friend. People have released classified documents to make war thunder more accurate.
People have inaccurately edited classified documents to buff or nerf a tank...
Yes I know, im just saying, maybe people should like.... calm down
My favorite Unenlagiinae š£ļø (definitely still real and true)
Was there all 4 seasons durning (sunny summer, cool autumn, snowy winter, rainy springs) the Cretaceous or was it just the wet season and the dry season?
For most of the planet during most of the Cretaceous it would have been wet/dry seasons. Some upper latitudes may have had more temperate seasons but with subpolar/polar light regimes that make a pretty unusual combination
Thanks for the answer! š
This certainly is a thing
David Peters moment
hey i heard someone broke embargo on a tyrannosaur? whats the word?
Can someone explain to me what embargoes are on dinosaurs and why we have them?
Word, it was a joke
Any new discovery should not be talked about publicly before it turns into a scientific paper, unless the author working on that discovery allows it. There's various bureaucracies around it but it mainly works to prevent research theft
People can go take a look at the newly discovered X, write a sham paper about it, then publish it before the original author does and get their credit
Gotcha, thanks for the info
What does that mean? If you don't mind explaining
It was one of the devs that did, Fabiani specifically. He revealed Dakotaraptor's existance early by announcing it coming for the game along with its model.
So basically revealed an entire dino before it was revealed to the Paleo world?
Ye
That's funny š¤£, id imagine its not that big of a problem though right?
Breaking the embargo on research is a massive deal.
Any new discovery should not be talked about publicly before it turns into a scientific paper, unless the author working on that discovery allows it. There's various bureaucracies around it but it mainly works to prevent research theft
People can go take a look at the newly discovered X, write a sham paper about it, then publish it before the original author does and get their credit - Randomdinos
So it was a massive mistake?
It wasn't a mistake. Dude was just a jerk and didn't respect the wishes of the scientists to keep the secret.
That sucks, did the paleontologist get the credit they deserve?
I mean yeah
Did anything happen to the dev? Id imagine it would be a massive problem for them
I mean idk how that drama ended. Everybody knows him as a jerk at this point anyways.
Do you think Spino walked on its hind legs, or on all fours, or both?
hind like any other theropod
but wouldn't it be easier for them to walk on all fours, especially near river banks, and only stand up for intimidation?
Well if your arms arenāt designed to bear your mass, Iād imagine it isnāt easier to try to walk on them
true
Currently it's a "we have no clue" but the consensus is leaning to bipedal
Which andrewsarchus pic is more accurate?
The one with human shadow shape on a blue car??
wait is that supposed to be a dakotaraptor???
why it is not a turtle ššš
Well, Dakotaraptor isn't only a turtle, a good amount of it's material was but not all of it, although Dakotaraptor is still super dubious
Theyāre all wrong in there own ways
Too cool to not pretend itās a part of the Lancian group ecosystems š
None of them are chonky pig so Iām saying none of them are accurate š«µ
I think spinos a rare case of it decided it wanted to evolve to do everything except be able to fly but as far as quadruped, bipedal stance I'd reckon and argueeven though they argue its hind limbs were kinda short, that might be the exception of the like one or 2 specimens cough Ibrahims that have said short legs. Not that it couldn't use its forelimbs in a quadrupedal stance/ certain movements like getting up or down (my argument on that being if they assume a trexes arms which can only bear 800lbs can help do the same why can't spino who's arms can exert over a ton of force)
So with my t rex analogy layed out in numbers as a ratio, the average t rex was around 8-12 tons with a forelimb strength between 8-1k pounds. Spinosaurus estimated between 7-9 tons with forelimb strength estimates between 2k-2300 pounds. If t rex is bipedal and has an ounce of credible anything that would support the idea it could use its arms to stand up I don't see why spino weighing less and having stronger forelimbs couldn't by almost twice the amount
Isnāt it something to do with the wrists?
Wait hold on do we even have any spino arms?
They can't pronate to the degree they portray in per say jurassic park but pot spinos arms I'd reckon are about as accurate as u could get
"Theropod arms can't bear weight" is a meme that hasn't actually been tested in the last hundred years, because all theropods we've found have long legs that can easily reach under their center of gravity, and thus are bipedal, no reason to question it
And no, we don't, "Ibrahim is working on a spino arm paper" is another meme. We do have a single finger bone but that doesn't help much

Most everything about spino comes from. Just copy pasting suchomimus upscale in the places we have gaps
Which is like 85% of the damn thing if not more
Me going tee-hee after I spread the idea of a Spinosaurus arm paper (weāre never getting one)
The neotype is pretty complete, I think thatās a bigger number than reality
Well holy schmolies
But still why it ever evolve the sail??? Why was that evolutionarily advantageous when none of its cousins or relatives have it š¤ is my question. It got bigger but grew that and a thicker tail along with it
My guess is display to be honest, since thereās nothing better so far
Well that's the thing, cousins of it do have their own sails or similar structures. Look at Ichthyovenator
Well here this wild theory that ties in w yours I've always speculated if display was the case. WHAT IF spinosauris was so sexually dimorphic only the males had sails and all the suchomimus/baryonyx are either female or juvenile spinosaurids as the sail would've been fairly hard to hide from any sort of damage making the lifespan of the males way less
I was about to say yeah other spinosaurids have sails
And thays also true just not to the scale spinosaurus had cuz even acrocanthosaurus has a neural spine
Buy whyyy š¤£š¤£š¤£š¤£ššššššš
Nature said "grow this thing out" for whatever reason or reasons
Acro's hump probably evolved for different reasons than Spino's sail, it's much shorter and thicker to support muscle attachments. Whereas Spino's literally just
Like the only modern examples I can think of that even have sails have them for maneuverability like sailfish or certain gliding species of lizards and yes thank u that one in particular
Acroās spines were for tearing sauropods asunder (it was a muscle attachment site last I checked)
There are PLENTY of modern examples of similar things spread across fish, reptiles, birds etc
You can tell Spinosaurus was based because after some ninety million years God decided he missed it and decided to remake it 1:1 on a lizard
So then what if spinos was both display and something similar to acros or is acros not actually like the spinos in the sense where if it flips on its side its a dub
Acro spines were significantly shorter and as said, were muscle attachment points. Spinoās was not built like that
Cuz again that always made me wonder how and why it'd evolve in that way unless it never was on its side or worried about falling over cuz if thays tye case then wtf even more spino š
I mean ik falls for tgeropods in general are bad but spino seems like it needs a life alert on itself 24/7
I remember someone saying that due to the way Spinoās sail was made, falling over isnāt a death sentence considering that (if it were to roll over onto the sail), the tall spines would break before causing severe spinal damage
Theropods* and wouldn't that still cause nerve damage though?? Maybe like you said not as bad but still irreversible
It would cause some pretty decent damage as any bone break would, but it wouldnāt severely wound or paralyze the Spino
(Breaks 90% of bones in spine) āātis but a scratchā
Might I also add that for another comparison, Dimetrodon spines in the sail would snap or fracture quite frequently and theyād heal back fine enough (sometimes not perfectly but they werenāt serious injuries)
Well good heavens and here I thought if u tripped it you would claim victory 𤣠and are dimetrodons fused to its spine in the same way???
I donāt see why they wouldnāt be? Itās the same principle, dimetrodonās are just thinner
I didn't know that well if that be the case then maybe spino was just an oversized overthicc sucho going through an identity crisis
Spino physically cannot be a type of Sucho considering theyāre separated by millions of years and land
I know I know š¤£
Lived a long time
š
Truuue
I like to think of it like PokƩmon. We start off with a baryonyx, it evolves into the sucho and it's final evolution is the interior crocodile alligator the spinosaurus itself
Only Spinosaurs isnāt even in the same subfamily as Bary and then Sucho is further apart being in the Ceratosuchopsini tribe
suchomimus and baryonyx didn't live in the same time or place as spinosaurus, and are also quite distantly related to it as far as spinosaurids go
Wasnāt there a theory where spinosaurusās sail could be used for shade on the water which attracted fish or something?
I like to think that spinosaurusās sail was used for display and maneuverability (?)
Sexual Display, and Intimidation are probably most likely explanations for the sail
Finish astorgš š”
What would this giant dark green croc be? Deinosuchus? Purussaurus?
Itās Puru, the one in the very BG
Ooh, is there a skeletal that silhouette is based on?
Not released because the scaling is iffy, so they donāt feel comfortable with it
By dragonthunders

puru scaling insecurity is a major problem in today's social landscape
What's iffy about the scaling or are you not allowed to say
I donāt know because they never elaborated so
A major problem is the undescribed state of Purussaurus postcrania
That puru definitely seems larger than 11 meters so I'm guessing it's based on the same type of scaling that got the 12.5 meter puru maybe? Idk
Looks more like ~11m
Didnāt someone make a lipped P. brasiliensis
That definitely seems more than 11 meters assuming that astorgosuchus is 10 meters because purus head alone on that is like the size of the human model
Hehe I found it
Different ratio
I will spend the rest of my life attempting to find this purussaurus skeletal

why lip
because :)
Guys, have a question:
How valid are speculative creatures? (Specially in paleo-art if you can discuss this in this chat)
I imagine there's a fine line between speculative evolution and topic appropriate discussion. At some point its just gonna shift into talking about made up gobble
explain why kaprosuchus isn't the long legged sprinter crocodile
someone in general asked to do this
Its close relatives are not sprinters and we have no leg material that would show Kapro is one
We only have kaprosuchusās head. To find out what the rest of the body looks like, we have to compare to its closest relative, mahajangasuchus, which is pretty complete, and it looks like this
Artbyjrc has a better one
Kaprosuchus mightāve still done a fair bit of the terrestrial life due to how its teeth are built, but thereās no evidence of long-leggedness. The Cuban crocodileās probably a decent parallel. Inherently pretty standard for what youād expect but with some terrestrial adaptations
Also for another pretty normal looking boi being oddly terrestrial, have a dwarf crocodile https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxInw4NbPnInYokkUtraCzX1xZerVLNOfu?si=V9dW5DokbTCmqQ0f
20 seconds Ā· Clipped by Scanova the Carnotaurus Ā· Original video "Terrifying: A Dwarf Croc Holds Its Breath Until It Attacks š Cave Crocs of Gabon | Smithso...
Mahajangasuchus' legs were definitely a bit longer than modern crocodilians, but it wasn't much. It's possible Kapro's were longer than Mahaja's because it was more basal, but even Kapro's distant terrestrial relatives weren't extremely long legged. JRC's depiction above is probably about the maximum extended height.
Also thanks for that clip, I need to steal that for something lol. Good crocodile walking vids are hard to find š
you can just use the average theropod density which is 0.97-0.99
But what if that's not accurate....
well it hasn't changed as far as I'm aware so why wouldnt it be?
I mean what if that's not the bone density of acro
0.95-0.99, not 0.97-0.99
And bone density doesn't matter to full body density. Unless you're Spinosaurus, I guess
Hmmmmmmmm, would .91 be completely out of the question for acro?
does 10 meters long and ~5 tons tarbosaurus is still accurate?
Not if you believe every theropod is .91
So if someone were to GDI acro you would recommend using .95-.97
around 0.97 for everything other than Spinosaurus and maybe Deinocheirus
Very interesting seeing as these were the results with a lower density and it gets 6.88 tonnes, maybe this skeletal just isn't good or something? Idk
ooh what server's that
Gonna DM you because idk if I'm allowed to mention it here as it may be considered advertising
Can you dm me too please?
Likely the latter, I've seen both GDIs and 3d models of Fran's and Hartman's skeletals and they consistently get 5.7-6.1 t
This is the skeletal it's based on, what skeletal do you think would be better?
Fran's? Though i still think Beagliam's is great too
How unreasonable would a 6.6 ton acro be?
Sometimes the humans for scale are so funny. "Here's an Acrocanthosaurus for only $99.99! What do ya say?"
Jesus, he needs to go on a diet
Looks like a guy bringing in his pet for show and tell.
"Hello class, this is my pet Acrocanthosaurus, hes very cool, I have trained it to imitate truck noises."
And that was the day that all his bullies suddenly became much more friendly
Very... Very unreasonable for the acros we have
So then wait what's spinos bone density???
2000 magic numbers
knowing spino it's probably something stupid
So sad š
iirc itās 1. Something
bone density
How big was T.rex? New data shows that the T.rex E.D. Cope, the "Copium rex," was the biggest theropod ever found, increasing theropod size limits to new heights. T.rex was a powerful predatory megatheropod. While Sue and Scotty are currently cited as the biggest T.rex specimens, new measurements of E.D. Cope, from the Black Hills Institute in S...
Sobbing because this video hasnāt left me alone for weeks
Copium rex exists but really isnāt that reliable, especially when the only measured element is a femur in a taxa thatās the most studied of its kind on the planet.
Thereās also conflicting stories on how big it actually is. The video is only one of a few takes.
Unreliable moment
you know how some mammals play with their prey while birds and reptiles just rush in, would dinosaurs be on the ladder with just rushing in and and getting the job done?
We have some potential evidence of young tyrannosaurs playing with bones, but determining what they wanted to do with that bone is near impossible. They could just have been trying to figure out how to eat it
its way more complex than that but short answer is: probably, every animal likes to play in some way so wouldn't be surprised with them doing it, heck dinos today play alot
Pretty rare for them to play with live animals, though. So i doubt non avian dinosaurs did it
At least not often
well. is this fact i found true and would it apply to dinosaurs?
Mammal Brain needs reinforced study and response actions to learn hunting variables (play).
Reptile/Avian brain more instant reactionary and instinct direct to receive outcomes. 0 to 60 attacking of birds to make the kill. The calm to snap of gator jaws.
I think that's more of a predator vs prey thing. Prey do not need to learn to be afraid of things, while predators need to learn how to hunt
Iirc predatory birds have been known to bring live but weak prey to their nest to "teach" young to kill
That's something dinosaurs definitely could have done
didnt juvie trex have the bite force of or around a acro already at its age?
Juvie in this case is like 11 years old, almost old enough to reproduce
oh, maybe ado, i forgot which
Using publicly available silhouettes I have made a (very rough) comparison of all the mapusaurus specimens (take it with a grain of salt though as it's pretty rough but it's also not the most horrible thing ever)
Sizes based on this chart
i'm very tired with this video for god sake
Guys can anyone help me
I can try, wassup?
It was too late, they died š
Sobbing (crying)
Hey, random, what would you say your favorite member of carcharadontosauridae would be?
Hard pick between Giganotosaurus and Mapusaurus, I think
What about Acro or Carchar š„ŗ
Carcharodontosaurus and I are not on speaking terms at the moment. Acro's alright
just pick one theyāre basically the same thing (please donāt hurt me)
Carchar really cheated on random with Spino š
What about the ascended Rio limay carch, taurovenator
No you're right that's why it's hard to choose
They look the same. Giga is more complete but shittily described. Mapu has interesting behavioral implications but is an unreconstructable bonebed taxon
If Mapu is just Giga but lankier and smallerā¦can I name it Nanogigas?
I like the mapusaurus distinct taxon known from a single postorbital
I canāt really even make fun of them for all looking the same because Iām a sauropod guy, I have to deal with rebbachisaurids aka limaysaurus 1 2 3 4 and 5
The name makes no sense, but itād be funny
Taurovenator combines the completeness of Sauroniops, the validity of Nanotyrannus, and the novelty of Tyrannotitan. It's really impressive
Truly one of the taxa to be described
Kinda random but how large was the "giant" Alamosaurus specimen?
According to Larramendi, 26 meters and 40 t
is this from before or after his 2020 bender?
Would there happen to be a size comparison or a skeletal that does along with this estimate?
ok rebbachisaurus gets weirder by the minute
in the middle of his 2020 sauropod downsizing bender, Larramendi upsized rebbachisaurus to 26 meters
so the current state of rebbachisauridae is limaysaurus clones 1 through 6, the hoover, and rebbachisaurus being gigantic for some reason
No
During
ah that makes sense
The 26 meter Rebbachisaurus uses tooth scaling via Nigersaurus, it's hilarious
oh dear lord I didnāt know that, thatās somehow worse than normal tooth scaling
Rebbachisaurus, as you know, having no teeth preserved, literally cannot be tooth scaled. He did it anyway
the absolute madman
he had to have done it as a joke thatās the only explanation that might let me sleep at night
either that or larramendi has ascended beyond what we mortals are capable of
Larramendi did it for the meme, I can respect that
Waitā¦what about tooth socket scaling? (Idk what Rebbachi has preserved)
I don't think it has skull material
This is so sad guys
there was some isolated teeth and I think it was a dentary fragment referred to it, but they were probably from a few formations and times just lumped together
itās why you see supposed rebbachisaurus teeth for sale all the time, they are from a rebbachisaurid they just canāt be properly referred to rebbachisaurus
yay tooth scaling
Damn thatās not far off from the silly little Tibia
man
what's wrong with it?
11.5 meters long and 3.9 tons (rounded into 4 tons) sinraptor seems reliable to me
man
Eh, itās only a little off
i love tooth scaling because it gives me my beloved 2t+ ceratosaurus
Teeth when we try to scale off of them (donāt do it)
What do you guys think about the finding of Big Al
Allosaurus
I think big al is the fossil equivalent to Peter griffin busting his knee
Search up the size of E. D. Copes trex femur fossil, it's circumference gives it an estimate of a weight 2 tons more than Sue and Scotty
no.
š
I love you Stego š„ŗ
Denying Cope fans is so good
š
What's that for?
Wdym?
I hate to tell you but the claims of it being 2 tonnes bigger than Scotty is bogus, here are some more reliable estimates although still shaky due to the fragmentary nature of the specimen
Kill the cope hypeš£ļø
Fr
Yes, we don't consider awful fragmentary specimens with dubious scaling 99% of the time (I'm seriously sick of people using the most fragmentary garbage as evidence of something crazy)

Couldnāt be me (avid quadrate believer)
How does this chart look for a size comparison of all the mapusaurus specimens?
Decent ig
Hmmm, how bad is my scaling for this? Like is it really bad or is it just ok?
why were prehestoric amphibians able to go in the sea/were sea drewllers but not modern ones?
Not at home rn so can't judge
Oh ok
Probably because Modern Amphibians have evolved to live in fresh water?
Just like Fresh Water Fish canāt survive in Salt Water
Also what Prehistoric Amphibians are you talking about, Temnospondyls?
Iofrida released a new andrewsarchus skeletal today
No he didnāt
Itās basically GATS readjusted
how are people guessing what its skeleton looks like? what makes them think its like that? this is a gen question btw
based on skull features itās sitting right outside entelodontidae right now so itās based off that
It's through a process of phylogenetics, where essentially the thought process is "If we don't have ___ of an animal, then we can assume it looks like close relatives that we do know about"
While not an entelodont itself, andrewsarchus is very closely related to them, so it most likely looked like them too.
i figured thats what the process was, thanks for explaining :]
š
Some sauropods from Argentina (Patagotitan, dreadnoughtus and Argentinosaurus)
I accidentally made Pata floating a bit
What server is that from, out of curiosity? Is it a paleontology server or something? I'm curious.

I believe theropoda, I could be wrong though
Yeah it's theropoda
If only I was in theropoda š
It's literally open access, no-one is stopping you
Bro I can't find it, literally nothing comes up when I search it š, I've tried like 6 times
what? u need invite, i think i have perm to invite u
Yea, everyone should lol
Can ya send me one maybe?
Sure
Let fred find it
Consider it a trial
Lisowicia weighed more than eo right?
Bro, I search up theropoda discord and like nothing comes up
that's because u can't find the server in any place on internet iirc, Fran created it, so in a while Theropoda was a mysterious place
you can find it on the internet pretty easily
that's how i totally intentionally found it in my infinite wisdom
what the, how? i think i joined theropoda in 2020 or 2019 by a friend
Eotrike is around 5 tons, and Liso ranges from 5-7 depending on what source you look at. I go with 6 down the middle.
it's an exclusive club
Iāve been wondering how to get into theropoda and now I know
I saw a link on Deviantart too
Damn I wonder how smok was hunting this mf
It wasn't. It's too big.
Smok was likely only going after juveniles
Not sure if you can determine if bones in coprolites are adult or not
Who is Lisowicia?
tyrannosaurus "E.D. Cope" is 9.5-10.8 tons?
ok, noted that
Yeppp. The E.D. Cope specimen may be as much as 12-15 tons if you factor in the fact that the algorithm used in the studies tends to underestimate bipedal saurians by about 20%.
Iāll see if I can find the paper.
The method of estimation I am referring to utilizes the circumference and length of the femur. Here are the published measurements.
Considering that Copeās femur circumference was ~100 mm greater than any other tyrannosaur, it could handle thicker muscle attachment had and a much greater potential load bearing capacity.
While healthy skepticism is necessary, there is some credibility.
Spinosaurus candle was to keep the torso rigid and balance in the water, his short legs were to row in shallow water without touching the ground. Espinosaurus was only on the surface, it was not good to immerse
The fin also had strong tendons that helped him keep his neck in position "S" and his head high effortlessly. With the rigid and flat torso, the fin that gave him stability in the water, short legs to row and his rowing queue as it is clearly seen that Spino evolved to be a boat
An animal that hunted and lived without much effort is why he could become gigantic. (Although it was not a defenseless animal, I hunted giant fish and lived next to giant crocodiles too)
It is the safest thing that he slept floating in the water so I did not damage the fin leaning aside
I feel like the whole it's too buoyant to dive and yet too dense to float argument is invalid when several modern species with body plans and density that wouldn't make sense in a aquatic/semi aquatic environment exist without issue of maneuverability/hindrance of movement and knowing that theropods were basically reptilian like birds, I'd reckon that if if had any sort of similarities the spino at least it'd be acting like a giant gooseheron or a swan but with salamander/crocodilian like features. Floating on the surface and diving when necessary but not for long periods of time. I used to think spino was more crocodile like in the idea it would wait for prey underwater fully submerged but it's not evolved for that kind of hunting
Are Ballast stones/gastroliths entirely out of the question?
I wonder how much a spino would really need to dive at any rate. It doesn't seem like a pursuit predator and probably was more of a coastal wader. Probably swam just as effectively as it needed to. No more no less.
Could it dive and swim? Probably. Was it the best? Unlikely.
Well even if we do call it an apex it's bite was just barely highers than carcharodontosaurus, and sarcosuchus blows spinos bite out of the water so for it to be spending as much time in the water as we'd suggest makes me think it had to have been able to at least keep up with a Sarcho unless when a spino became fully grown it like you said didn't really swim all that much and kind of stayed near the shores and waded and wouldn't venture too far away from bodies of water unless it needed to because unless it's forelimbs could exert more power than it's bite as a whole even in water I don't see how else it could've fit an aquatic niche
Semi aquatic*
What I'm saying is it may not have needed to be a fast swimmer because it's role wasn't a pursuit hunter. It's role was likely more ambushing while standing in the water.
It would still be a semi aquatic as it spends its time dwelling in swamps, likely swimming between patches of dry land. It just probably wouldn't be very fast or dive for very long.
When it comes real life predators there's much more to take into consideration than just pure bite force alone. As you said the claws are very mean (and also likely safer to use against a sarco than risking your face for a bite. Additionally intimidation is a factor. Spino stands much taller and has a much larger silhouette with its sail. In fact one theory for its sail is as an intimidation tactic.
I imagine the two would just steer clear of each other if given the opportunity.
the being taller and higher off the ground just means itās got a general advantage in a fight, not just intimidation
Spino is also like, 4-5 tons heavier then sarco too
mb
That too
Iirc tho, spino did not live with sarco, it lived with smaller croc thingies, so it probably, did not give a singular sh#t about most of them.
Sucho was the one dealing with sarco.
Rip sucho
Was bary or sucho the more terrestrial of the two? I can't remember which was which...
Sucho
Sucho is too buoyant to dive comfortably
I find it rather ironic that those who sink are typically more comfortable in water.
The volume of Spinosaurus mass is calculated and the conclusion was concluded that it floated, that is why it was said that it was not good to submerge, of course it could but naturally spino floated as a ship. But these things always have to be taken with tweezers because it was also said that Spino could not be bipedo through the center of dough but that was because they made minimal muscle estimates of the bone that does not take into account as extensions of muscle insertion. Problemally the tail of the spinosaurus was much more massive than it is represented
I dont think thats a 1 to 1 type of deal, chimps sink, we dont, but humans are way better in the water.
Ankylosaurs sink, but I dont see people saying that they were hippos.
Ankylosaurs also flip upside down if the water is deep enough for them to sink
Torpedo anky
True
But hippo ano would like to have a word with you
Hippo ano is a fun concept, its probably as realistic as that dream where I rode a TRex, but realism sucks anyway.
Spinosaurus does not generate more force with its bite than C. saharicus and lived quite a few million years later than Sarcosuchus
S. aegypticaus was actually downsized to like 3t, so sarcos actually bigger lol
Idc about the holotype, I only use the msnm thing.
I think it would be the neotype thats 3 tonnes
Argh darn I talked about mass. Iāve betrayed my values
Whats the holotype at? Or was, since it got blown up.
So it seems Copium was around 11.3 tons
12.4, 11.3, 10.8, 10, 9.5, who cares, hes huge.
Most recent estimate is 12,9m and 11,3 tons
Next week itll be 12.8 and 11.4 tons.
I heared people talk about that big dubious Rex specimen Celeste, any idea how big it was?
No idea, Sue still the OG.
And the most complete Rex rn
Overall or out of the big ones?
Big ones
Sueās aesthetics go hard
Trix and Scotty are big but less complete
Doesnāt Trix have a pretty decent mount
Trix is 75-80% complete. Not sure how big it is thoug hand i don't trust wikipedia
The mass for the largest Rexes seem to be all over the place from what I see
I see that "Sue" was GDI-ied as around ~10,000kg (or was it more than that?) but I've seen a recently posted GDI of Scott Hartman's "Sue" put it at ~9400kg

