#paleontology
1 messages · Page 29 of 1
I can’t wait to successfully find a good triceratops weight estimate
That's fair but as I said before the Triceratops would not have been its first choice.
Isnt there already multiple gdis for it?
True. I really wish we understood their range of diet like with tarbosaurus.
That isn't to say the Rex didn't feed frequently enough. Because even doing so a few times a year would be enough for it to develop such a method.
Like I said it was an equally dangerous thing for both of them to do but that's the same for most predators and prey today
i feel like it's worth noting that the whole frill situation does make it trickier to get to the neck, apparently both in life and in death.
in death there's the good ol' decapitation method, but i do wonder what kind of strategies would've been employed to get around that while the trike was still alive.
I meant for big John and co.
Man all these points would've been useful half an hour ago when I was talking with some people trying to say T. rex was an inefficient hunter of literally all its prey items
I believe it's possible the Triceratops could move its neck back possibly slightly but that's just brainstorming
Everything we've said has shown the Rex has been a very effective hunter.
Found a new theropod phylogeny (by. Torvosaurus)
I know, thats why I wish this convo happened half an hour ago
They were the two most common large animals in the environment & the extreme anatomy of both is almost certainly a result of their interaction. It's called an evolutionary arms race.
Predators are predators to their prey species for a reason. They have to make hundreds of kills throughout their lives in order to survive. I believe the only case known in nature of predators frequently dying to their prey is lions vs African buffalo, and even then it is a very complex relationship that isn’t universal throughout both species.
I love the Tyrannosaurus Rex but it wasn't some untouchable beast.
there is a lot more than just lions and buffalo but the point stands, they have to make a lot of kills and prey need to get away a lot it’s not as cut and dry as it usually seems
Tbf this happens with tigers and Indian gaurs as well, it’s just not recorded often
I think it comes down to the success of the ambush, which is key for many predators
Eh not exactly. Keep in mind im saying predators frequently dying to said prey. There are a handful of prey animals that pose a threat and do fend off said predators, but said predators having a statistically high chance of death in said encounters is extremely rare.
That's why crocodiles can be a viable life form
apex predator's in general tend to hunt big dangerous things
They always resort to ambushing them tho cause it's almost impossible to beat them in a head to head fight for example leapords and silver backs
it also depends on the predator hunting them but it’s decently common in some cases, with large herbivores the chance of the predator dying is much higher
Most predators do not have high success rates but it’s because they fail in a wide variety of circumstances that don’t involve them dying lol.
and hunting success rates are extremely volatile from any number of factors
I don't think dying in these interactions was remotely common for the rex. I think if an ambush failed there would probably be a standoff followed by a strategic retreat
A trike was faster than a rex, and they're said to be very aggressive along with almost every herbivore
Dragonflies with their 95% hunting success rate:
dragonflies are insane
tyrannosaurus - the mesozoic dragonfly
Saying all of this, triceratops likely was aggressive in order to fend itself. It had the size to properly pose a threat while also being too slow to reliably run away. I just think in such situations where the rex clearly didn’t succeed that there would be little in the way of contact and injury and just giving up instead of death lol.
African wild dogs have a high hunting success rate too afaik even more than hyenas
Ceratopsids in general likely relied on numbers and fleeing akin to hadrosaurs, but triceratopsines had a common and more practical setup to their horns which, combined with their larger size, means that they likely had a defensive purpose.
especially since triceratops was likely less social and herded less than other ceratopsions
Triceratops is faster than a rex, it could run above 18 MPH while the Rex's speed is at 18 MPH cause it could only move at a fast walk
Wasn't it 13?
I highly doubt that. Every model I’ve seen has had tyrannosaurus as the fastest large animal in its environment. Edmontosaurus is the only competition I’ve seen in terms of speed/endurance.
Triceratops was slower than rex, though by how much I think is dependent on if it's truly graviportal or not
T. rex is the fastest multi-ton animal in its environment, I don't see Trike running down a rex, stamina or speed-wise
african wild dogs have such a high rate partially because of their hunting style, but it’s also because they tend to stay well within their prey comfort zone, still really impressive but they do less well with new things
A trike is believed to run at a max speed of 20 MPH
As stated above, Triceratops probably didn't need speed to defend itself. Simply exposing its horns to an attacker would be enough
African wild dogs have very high hunt success rates but also tend to fare more poorly in competitive interactions, especially against lions.
Source please because there's no good Triceratops estimates 
Everything is bad and outdated, but just by common sense that the quadrupedal, graviportal animal is slower than the bipedal, speed McGee
lions are also like 10x their size
If a trike manages to face a rex the Rex's best option is to run cause I don't see how it can get through the trikes frill
yeah that ones probably the worst matchup for them, sometimes vultures manage it too but get enough vultures and they’ll drive off anything
Regardless
I agree, it would be a failed ambush at that point
I wonder why do big cats usually have low success rates when it comes to hunting?
Fun fact: We have evidence of Tyrannosaurus 1v1ing and face-tanking Triceratops, not just taking them from behind, but actually slamming their face into the face of a Triceratops 
because a failed hunts include ambushes that failed before they even began
It’s less big cats having poor success rates and more that it’s kinda the norm. Hyenas and wild dogs aren’t exactly normal in that regard. Gray wolves have much lower success rates than they do and they have a similar hunting strategy. It’s all on the context.
Is that the horn pathology specimen?
Jaguars and Tigers have an above average or average success rate but lions have a low success rate cause they hunt oryx which are faster than them and can escape from they're ambush and they also hunt buffalo's which destroy them
There's a couple of them
context really is everything with interactions like these
hunting success ratios generally have lots of circumstantial variation
Lions hunting buffalo isn’t actually as common as people think it is. Buffalo hunting is usually relegated to prides who dedicate to that strategy exclusively and have learned said strategy over many years and generations. More typical lion prides that hunt a wider variety of antelope and other ungulates typically avoid buffalo entirely, and when they do attempt it it usually goes poorly.
in conversations like these sables get left out a lot but they have a lot of hunts against them end in failure and death, it’s a unique circumstance that doesn’t have much bearing here I just wanted to throw it out because it’s cool
Oh I only knew about the one. Rex was truly insane. It was operating with a much much larger brain than Triceratops too, maybe it could effectively attack head on as well. Calling a bluff or something. We really have no idea what eithers temperaments were like. Triceratops could have been a bluffer more than a fighter, it wouldn't be that unusual.
This damn slowmode omg
Another question, usually I know a single male lions can scare off 20-30 hyenas, but why is that, are hyenas really that afraid of just 1 lion in its prime compared to like 30 of them?
because one lion can easily cripple or kill any one of them very quickly
You're saying if you were 6'3 about to fight 10 5 year olds you couldn't take em?
Sometimes 20 hyenas can kill a male lion
The size difference isn’t that drastic
It's more like ur 6,3 abt to fight 5,3 5 14 year olds
Could still take em.
One swipe from a lion can put a hyena out of commission. Much more scary when you don't have respawn. They could yolo and kill the lion ofc, but one may die. And when none want to die, that can scare all of them off.
same reason herds don't all just fight predators
That’s not quite true, and is another thing that typically isn’t well understood about lion vs hyena interactions. Hyenas are likely a key component as to why lions became social in the first place, in order to properly be able to compete in competitive interactions. Lionesses are larger than hyenas but hyenas are able to subsist in higher numbers in groups, so lion prides and hyena prides tend to be neck and neck in most interactions and victories are usually based on individual circumstances. Male lions turn the tables however. Being twice the size of females, they have the power to kill hyenas reliably and are often the leading cause of death for hyenas. Male lions are not invincible, and a large clan can still threaten them, but the male lion’s much larger size means they are substantially more dangerous than lionesses are.
Yeah, animal pack behavior is almost always regulated on each individual thinking "hmm, that thing might kill me, i won't mess with it" instead of "if we all work together, we'll eventually kill it"
If they had the 2nd mentality they would be destructive
Can't heal by sitting for 2 minutes irl.
People often look down on hyenas in such situations but said people also don’t know that hyenas are likely what caused lions to be social in the first place, and during the ice age hyenas straight up dominated cave lions in competitive interactions.
The only thing that could stop migratory 1 million+ wildebeest herds if they thought the latter would be nukes, lmao
I think the hyena stereotypes came from the lion king tbh
I love this chat. This is glorious.
look at paleo chat not being dead for once
and it's because it's modern talk 😔
Lmao I made it paleo just now don’t worry about it don’t tell
And it's not being used for paleo talk and instead modern animals zoo/paleo chat💪
at least it’s not a debate about spinosaurus
We're actually having a genuine healthy discussion based of of facts and not opinions. Unlike some groups that shall not be named
Do you think something like the tsavo lions might happen again?
actually come to think of it how'd we end up on extant predator interactions when tyrannosaurus is 20x the size of the next biggest predator in hell creek
Tsavo lions?
Do yall think a parasaurolophus can defeat an adult spinosaurus?
Exactly how true the tsavo lion situation is is up to debate. Unfortunately most man eaters at that time are a result of human encroachment pushing said animals to desperation for various reasons.
.....no
That's like comparing a child to an aduly
What do u think the spino will do against the para?
Wdym by the how true part? As in like they might have not been man eaters?
the very largest Parasaurolophus could probably bowl over a Spino and escape
Does someone have an up to date para size charg? I heard they got pretty big.
Is it on water or land? If it's on land then the parasaurolophus can get away but if it's in the water the para is getting it's throat ripped out.
fadeno had the largest at ~12.5t
It’s unclear as to whether the tsavo lions were truly the same pair attacking again and again or if it was multiple different instances that only looked to be from the same individuals out of assumption. Isotopic studies in particular suggested the two individuals shot and killed mostly ate the nearby ungulates rather than people.
A parasaurolophus could destroy a spinos legs considering they're small and a para uses its whole body for offense
Chunky, thanks
big lads
I don’t see either killing each other realistically. There’s nothing really stopping the para using it’s sheer mass to shake off whatever the spino tries and run away.
more fair of a fight than I expected tbh
Conclusion: Trike and Anky can beat Rex and vice versa
my main two questions in a vs scenario are always:
1: why (read: does this discussion actually achieve anything useful)
2 (if it's spinosaurus): are we sure it'd take that fight in the first place instead of just eating a fish
Interesting, ever heard of machli the one tigress who preferred to hunt mugger crocs, would there be any reason why a tigress would prefer to hunt crocs rather than ungulates?
The para can just crush it, this fight would play out as t rex vs edmnoto the only difference being is that it's close to impossible for a para to lose
Spinosaurids we’re specialized for fish but we have multiple instances of them being opportunistic as well. Shoutout to Suchomimus for being so massive in its ecosystem that there’s little that it wouldn’t have been able to catch and kill if it wanted to.
no 6 ft tall human for comparison
me no like it 😤
Bro thinks Parasaurolophus is made of lead
I don't think spinosaurus and tyrannosaurus would hunt large hadrosaurus the same way especially when the former didn't live with any
We don’t have a good record of herbivorous dinosaurs in spino’s ecosystem. Most you’ll get is a few sauropod species and fragmentary unnamed ornithischians.
Yea they were adapted for fish but people tend to forget that and make them look like killing machines
(If anyone knows that be nice)
Forgot about the weirdo probably-herbivorous Deltadromeus as well.
maybe someone in the crocodilian server knows?
what spino ecosystem?
Kem Kem or Bahariya?
Bro do u think a spinos legs would support its body after being pushed by a 4 ton para?
Machli didn't prefer to hunt muggers, there is one recorded instance of her successfully killing one. I heard she went after it because the area was in an unusually severe drought, and so the croc was vulnerable
Ah damn I should stop listening to these rumours
If it’s the video I’m thinking of then she by no means came out of that clean. That one fight she had with the large mugger took 12 hours and broke some of her teeth.
either way the large herbivores were probably reserved for the multiton allosauroids and abelisaurid
Usually the main reason is entertainment, which isn't "productive" but in a discord for video games, is to be expected.
Dinosaurs don't study kung fu moves, the Para isn't going to throw itself on top of the Spino to break its legs. When attacked it will likely try to keep standing up, as its instinct would be that falling on the ground means both injuring itself and leaving its neck vulnerable. You can see this with most large herbivores irl
Elephants are a large herbivore and they charge threats same with hippos and rhinos
I was also assuming we were talking about a 10+ ton para. A 3-4 ton para can easily become spino food if it gets grabbed. That’s enough of a size advantage on the spino’s part.
elephants are exponentially larger than their threats than parasaurolophus is to any megatheropod
I don't particularly mind X vs Y talks as long as no one takes them seriously and everyone has fun with it.
they don't body-slam carnivores as tall as them, though
They don't belly flop on top of threats, either. That's more likely to hurt them than whatever is attacking
There were certain hadrosaurs that likely relied on size for defense but they were usually 2-3 times larger than the top predators. Spino is not the one fam.
this chat was so nice before para vs spino conversation 
Hadrosaurus are said to use they're head, legs, body, weight as offense which means the para will most likely break the spinos legs by charging it
Said by who? No part of a hadrosaur's body is a specialized weapon, at best that is a secondary use
by who?
Hadrosaurs were usually not defensive animals. From what we know of their ecology they were herding species that relied on numbers and fleeing from danger. Ceratopsids too.
the closest thing a hadrosaur has to an explicit weapon is its tail
How do I become a supporter in path of titans
They're actually said to be very aggressive
Support the game.
What evidence suggests this?
the closest evidence to aggressive hadrosaurs is tail pathologies that might've been from smacking things while running away
No-one says hadrosaurs are aggressive animals other than people going "Oooo but all herbivores are actually killer animals!!!"
@white matrix ok I get that I'm just trying to get to the point of how to obtain it ?
Harristsang
Who is that
you're asking in the wrong place, this is the science zone
try #path-of-titans
Hadrosaurs had incredibly fast growth rates, reaching sexual maturity within 2-5 years based on the species. You usually see this fast growth and reproduction from prey species that are used to being snacked on very frequently.
Also they have incredible birth rates
Magnapaulia, shantungosaurus and edmontosaurus were definitely getting preyed on very frequently
Edmontosaurus definitely was, idk if we have any growth data for Magnapaulia and Shantungosaurus, so they might not be as focused on fast growth
You're right, edmontosaurus would be a frequent target for predation considering the predator it shared its habitat with
edmontosaurus was definitely getting snacked on a lot
An adult edmontosaurus had a chance of defeating a rex, well the chances were on the rexes favor but it still had a 40% chance
I’m confused as to what ur trying to say here. In the case of the larger species in particular I’m not suggesting every hadrosaur. There’s room for exceptions. I even said some hadrosaurs likely were defensive given the massive size difference they had over the top predators. And yeah edmonto got snacked on a lot. Individuals larger than trex were rare, and the average edmontosaur was smaller than rex.
An average adult edmontosaurus is like two tons smaller than an average rex
I love these precentages I keep seeing get thrown around
a 14m one sure. but most adult Edmontosaurus were ~11m, and would not stand much of a chance against a rex
They were much larger than two tons
ah, this guy?
Even with the 14m meter individuals I’m not so sure. It’s more dangerous on the Rex’s part, but most top order carnivores are capable of tackling prey larger than they are.
average adult edmontosaurus is actually quite small (relatively speaking), the giant ones you're thinking of took a long time to grow to that size - they were very lucky.
two tons smaller, not two tons total
We can see instances of this with Carcharodontosaurus with sauropods at its time
average edmontosaurus is about ~5.5t
Yes, he just reacts to bad documentaries and paleo videos and proves them wrong, but he also uses recently studied articles
wait so you're getting it from a youtuber?

Welp
Yes but as I said they use recently studied sources
tbf getting information from YouTuber isn’t bad (IE YDAW) but it usually is bad ig
how's largest edmonto to ever estimated?
last time i heard largest edmonto reaching abt 10-ish ton
edmontosaurus is literally smaller than rex bar like 4 specimens
Getting it from a youtuber isn't bad as long as the YouTuber knows what they are talking about
oh yeah, I'm sure rex would still be tackling the 14m+ individuals. just a lot riskier of a chase than a 11m one
If there’s anything to be learned here, it’s that not dealing in absolutes is best lol. Herbivores weren’t fodder but at the same time they have strategies that don’t involve murdering their enemies. Being prey is ok and doesn’t mean their fodder. Impala are frequently depicted as lion and wild dog kibble, but they’re one of the most successful African ungulates of all time. Clearly what they’re doing is working and they don’t care about some people on the internet trying to talk down to them about being food.
when your main source for scientific information is "a youtuber said it", though, that aint good. grabbing the source the youtuber used would be better, and if that youtuber isn't providing their sources, they're probably not that reliable
@regal schooner what harristsang video that mentioned that hadrosaur is very aggresive and use they're body part as weapon?
Well it depends, the youtuber I've gotten like 50% of my paleo knowledge from doesent say random things or outdated things he uses recently studied articles as he once implied in his videos
What article has he sourced that says hadrosaurs are aggressive
Oh I've seen the videos of Gazelles literally frolicking away from Cheetaha lol
Brick’s skeletal is like 15.3t iirc but I’m not sure what it’s be with the new folkes one
His said that in almost every video, lemme try and find it
Exactly what the largest edmonto’s size is is debated either way.
Most my knowledge comes from articles and actual studies but I have learnt some things from videos.
Yeah it’s somewhere loosely around the 15t range at the absolute max which again isn’t even close to average size
15 is crazy
Here’s a very good and scientific video about the reality of herbivore aggression and exactly what goes on in most predator-prey interactions. https://youtu.be/be8QWbQDnXA
Whilst carnivores are generally regarded as the supreme killers, this is chiefly for food. In recent years herbivores in fiction have began to fall into similar tropes - but what's herbivore aggression like and why does it occur? Plus, how many fit such tropes? Let's have a look!
Witton's post : https://markwitton-com.blogspot.com/2023/02/horne...
Human culture has a certain bias towards predators, we're predators after all, but at the same time we tend to admire any animal we can describe as big, strong, & dangerous- which extends to many herbivores as well. Look at sports team mascots: you have the Sharks & the Tigers but also the Bulls & the Stallions. It's an interesting phenomenon imo and extends to extinct animals as well
📣 do not blindly trust any video, always check if they provide sources and what those sources actually say, yes even if it's YDAW because even generally reliable youtubers are not immune to mistakes
I think people see them as kibble because “herbivore don’t use horns to fight back”
here we go
Even then a lot of them do. But horns in both ungulates and ceratopsids are primarily for social reasons, and only occasionally used in defensive situations.
https://youtu.be/lm7-HbyxWVA he only said what part of they're bodies hadrosaurs weaponize
Main channel! → https://www.youtube.com/c/HarrisTsang
Subscribe! → https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKJNxdHxOlx1n8R8bCx7kaQ
Follow me on Twitter! → https://twitter.com/HarrisTsangYT
DISCLAIMER: Do not send any type of negativity to anyone/anything mentioned in this video.
concerningly big lad
t rex vs edmontosaurus
Winner: both
Ive gotten all my permian knowledge from articles and studies but most of my Mesozoic and ceonozoic knowledge is from videos
No sources broski
Hadrosaurs would’ve used whatever they could to defend themselves like any other animal, but they do not have special adaptations for defense, or anything sharp that could be used in such a way like horns and spikes. The main weapon of hadrosaurs is their size, and most predators don’t care too much about that when the average hadrosaur is 2-3 tons and their predators are larger than that.
He doesent put links his just claimed he uses updated articles
eh I think 3-4t's a bit closer to average adult size for the judithian-lancian ones but the point remains
what is hadrosaur self defenses?
oh right, they will ran away
his source is literally "dude just trust me", then. if there's no sources he's just expecting you to trust what he says
The classic social herbivore defense of fleeing and large numbers.
We have pathologies on Edmontosaurus tails indicating some use in battle
I have a special hatred with this slowmode
and that one that survived getting bit in the face
I wonder how old this fellow was
I highly doubt this. What sources? I’ve usually seen them explained as either environmental injuries or the result of various accidents or strain.
Were you being sarcastic and I didn’t pick up on it again?
I'm trying to find it, the dodo was meant to be a loading 
Nvm, Table found it, I think
I mean the idea that the tails these dinosaurs had weren't movable is crazy Tyrannosaurus's Rex tail was most likely used for stabilization
tbf dinosaurs did generally have relatively stiff tails, especially hadrosaurs and dromaeosaurs if i'm recalling correctly
Looks like the rate of pathologies is about 1%, I don't know what would be expected but that seems low
Idk how much to take from this given they only bring up defense as a possibility, only one of the many others which involve strain and pressure from within the herd, which seems more likely to me.
having a tail that is actually fairly stiff and stable actually makes it a better counterbalance rather than a flexible one that wiggles around every time you take a step
we're back at "Dinosaur tail is stiff, not flexible like those of Cats"
yeah this 2020 abstract seems to lean towards social accidents but the two aren't mutually exclusive
Regardless, I think we can all agree that hadrosaurs most likely kicked . . . And they could kick pretty damn hard. XD
Tails in such animals were also very valuable in housing the muscles for movement, so idk how helpful it would be to face that part of yourself to a predator. Better than the head and neck I guess but still.
yep! there's a reason why dromaeosaurs went the extra mile by turning basically their whole tail into a stiffened rod by ossifying some tendons (i think? i think that's what it was. lmk if it isn't)
What is everyone's opinion on Utahraptor?
see
told ya
their tail is stiff, not flexible like those of cats
If you're running away, a predator's on your booty cheeks and one of the largest organs on your body is within hitting range, I feel like a tail swipe would be logical
very cool thing
Raptors kinda overrated tbh, but the whole wing counterbalance theory is pretty neat.
I'm sure hadrosaurs bit too. I mean I don't think it would do much, but basically any cornered animal with a mouth will bite if you get too close to the bitey parts. And if they get lucky it can actually work as a deterrent, just not often.
Hadrosaurs had em too
Yeah I don’t think a hadrosaur is going to stop mid run and say hmm “I think I want to kick instead”
I mean this is implying that they even had the flexibility to do so? Most ornithopod tails were stiff tmk, and I’ve never really seen studies actually dedicated to figuring this out.
The base would still be flexible, no animal to my knowledge completely stiffened out their tail
The issue is people struggle with finding a happy middle ground. Something can have the capability to defend itself while still preferring to run (after all we don't have respawns irl). And something can choose to fight despite not having much of a capability to fight.
Eh . . . There have been studies that suggested that if a predator tore through a certain muscle at the base of the tail, the victim will most likely be crippled.
Hence why we see battle injuries on the face of predators from other rivals instead of the other region -- a heavily crippled animal is a dead one.
carnotaurus sorta did
It doesn't help that we don't really have a single thing we can base this on, there's no large land animals today with tails big enough for it to even be an effective strategy in the first place, so that makes it harder to evaluate whether its a behaviour that can happen
Teraneurans in general had stiff tails. It’s why I’ve always rolled my eyes at these animals having tail attacks. It’s not stiff as a rod but it’s not practical to use in that manner either.
With how fast Carnotaurus would have ran it would need a stability
@meager sedge Can we please get this slowmode lowered, it's not conductive for discussions + there's no reason for it to be so high compared to #path-of-titans
Nah -- they'll just keep running instead.
yeah, mammals unlocked the secret tech of "just don't put giant essential muscles in your tail lol???" . and so, they can have skinny tails
this comes with the drawback of It's Slightly Harder To Be Bipedal Now
Caudofemoralis
Watch them mute you, rip my homie falcon.
Mammals unlocked the fascinating technology of a fat ass to power your legs 👍
I understand the cd rn tbh, there's a lot of folks here rn
does 31 mph carno speed estimated is still accurate?
or he became slower/faster?
I kinda doubt an animal that big moving that fast.
We do not need a one minute slow mode, there's no "moderation" reasons for that
Slow-mode is used to help moderate channels when there are a lot of people talking. Moderators will lower it as they see fit and are able to. Please do not ping regarding this or discuss slow-modes, as per our rules.
Ok they didn’t mute you at least lol, but lame.
Welp
Depends.
Last I heard, Randomdinos did a chart with some speed calculations and had Carnotaurus at 45 km/h. Unless that's outdated now, of course.
totally reliable carnotaurus speed calculations are somewhat hindered by the lack of a complete tibia as well
That is true, sadly.
I’m not going to talk about it beyond this point for obvious reasons, but we all know this. This server is moderated with the intention of to just control and nothing more rather than to actually make a productive place for its community. I’ve been on moderation for games like this one before. There is no good reason for this kind of moderation.
Yeah without that I'm skeptical of the idea that it was fast solely due to the caudofemoralis
tbf, giraffes are only slightly smaller than Carnotaurus, and they can arguably move up to 37 mph. They have much more efficient lower limbs for running than Carno, but also much less powerful thigh musculature, so 31 mph Carnotaurus is not unreasonable
I believe Carnotaurus was quick but it turning while running was almost impossible
yeah cause the hips and tail had to move as pretty much one unit
that is more or less true, which makes its hunting strategy really weird. Don't need to run that fast to chase sauropods, but you can't really catch small (relatively) ornithopods without decent turning
Carnotaurus would have most likely been an ambush predator solely .
carnotaurus was a kickboxer
Carnotaurus was a drag racer
Carnotaurus was a rocket
Meanwhile, Jane over here being much faster at the relatively same size and having MUCH better turning.
femur/tibia ratio go brrrrr
I personally think it’s likely that tyrannosaurus young became independent fairly quickly but still stayed within the territory of their parents. They got to a size quite quickly to where the only real threat they had to worry about would be unrelated tyrannosaurs.
Their incredible speed and not really going after the same prey would probably make it easy (relatively) to live in the same territory as the adults, and then once they sexually matured they could be booted out. Not unlike how male crocs are afaik
Luckily we already have the definitive guide to carnotaurus paleoecology already
Thank you Tierzoo, very cool.
oh dear
i will never forgive tierzoo for making people think cheetahs are incapable of existing on their own
Is La Colonia close enough for it to be slapped the contemporary label?
There has actually been a study on tyrannosaurs about their possible lives and growth.
The hatchlings grew quickly to their juvenile forms, to where they were pretty much independent and could fend for themselves. And they actually stay at this stage for a LONG while, up until near their sexual maturity where they rapidly grew in size, to their adult sizes. Some even died at these rapid growth spurts.
What is also intriguing is that the mortality was high for hatchling and adult tyrannosaurs, but it was actually very low for the juveniles up to the slim subadults before the growth spurts.
i will never forgive tierzoo in general
channel's meant to be educational but so many misconceptions have been spread because of it, about both prehistoric life and modern life 
they're maastrichtian argentina that's about it and orkoraptor's like mid-campanian
Cheetahs and carnotaurus aren’t comparable at all ecologically, even ignoring how cheetahs being bad at survival isn’t true. Carnotaurus was the unrivaled apex predator of its ecosystem, and had a very high bite force. It certainly wasn’t a small prey specialist.
Cheetahs, pandas, and koalas would all be doing fine if it weren't for humans shooting them all / obliterating their habitat until recently
Check your temporal ranges fellas, never get caught lacking like that theorist did smh
are pteranodontids even recorded from south america
Maip is Maastrichtian, so it might well have bullied Carnotaurus off kills, but their formations are a decent distance apart so maybe not
I imagine any type of flyer would have traveled thousands of miles similar to birds.
Don’t think so, Azdarchids yes.
Their habitats are also different afaik. La Colonia was a warmer plains region while Maip’s formation was more chilly.
That and they may have had different ecological niches
Most of the time you see animals end up in a genetic bottleneck with more inbreeding than normal its due to outside forces, such as climate/geography change splitting up populations or yknow. Humans. Thylacine are a great example, they went extinct on the mainland likely at least in part due to dingos. The tasmanian population was smaller than ideal so there was a lot of inbreeding, even before white humans finished the job and wiped them out they were in the decline
the 300kg austroraptor bullying a carnotaurus off a carcase
The idea a bird that is no more than a few feet tall being 600 plus pounds is absurd
Maip when it travels 100s of miles just to bully another apex predator from its kill.
Also just going to point this out, while inbreeding is bad for any species, that doesn’t automatically mean it will doom them. There is no statistical correlation between inbreeding and extinctions/population-dieoffs. Some species aren’t bothered by a lack of gene pool and/or incest and can bounce back.
orkoraptor travelling millions of years to bully a predator half a ton larger than it off a kill
are you sure about that
What is the size of that human
I've no idea what Carnotaurus was doing, but megaraptorans are heavily geared towards going after prey around their own size or smaller. Unless Carno was going after even smaller prey
it's nice that la colonia has like no dinosaurs besides carnotaurus
Probably the same as any human silhouette
it's a marine formation, Carnotaurus was living in the bottom of the ocean 😂
Hmm . . . Ye do make a good point.
Actually, I just thought of something-- different preferred habitats? It is said that Torvosaurus and Ceratosaurus may have preferred forests to hunt in while the Allosaurus may have preferred the more open areas.
I’m curious. Is it possible that the stiffness/strength of carnotaurus vertebrae and lack of flexibility would’ve favored them on great impacts? I’m not suggesting ramming prey, I’m asking if tackling prey at very high speeds could’ve been a hunting strategy.
stomps you to death with my hooves vibe ig
OH I GET IT
austroraptor bullied carnotaurus by tailriding them because of their bad turning radius
If I had to guess, Carnotaurus had to be fast to hunt some big Elasmarians
Scanova said smthn about this earlier, iirc Cerato was open field/plains stuff
it's not going to make austroraptor small unless everything except austroraptor is the Ant Version. i mean, utahraptor's right there
I recall there being a study on Carnotaurus's neck that showed it was much more built than that of say, Majungasaurus. So while their skull is not built for ramming, swinging down on prey at high speeds is probably something it did
Though depending on the definition of tackling, that would require Carno to fall over along with its prey, which is not gonna be fun for a near 2 t biped
I'm gonna be honest I feel like Austroraptor would break
The latest studies provide a different if very interesting case on Morrison ecology. TLDR, torvosaurus favored forest edge habitats to ambush big game. Ceratosaurus favored open plains and shrubland. Allosaurus didn’t seem to care and could be found basically everywhere in the Morrison, although it’s smaller teeth and long arms might’ve suggested a smaller prey base to avoid torvosaurus competition, if still capable of tackling larger prey given the opportunity.
Here’s the Wiki size charts we happy now?
Could still beat it in a fight lol jk
Ah, I see. Thanks for that info, mate.
Hmm . . . Could a maip be more suited to tackling prey?
We still don’t know much on megaraptorans tbh.
they've been a weird enigma for a very long time now
Megaraptorans preferring denser environments than Carnotaurus at least makes total sense, though we lack any statistical evidence
Honestly to be fair literally everything was super sized during that time
I think Chorillo was pretty open. Maybe. I’m gonna go check
direct size comparison
Austro ain’t having fun
Now imagine that staring you down honestly when I saw the replica of Sue they made for Tyrannosaurus Rex I was shocked. She was gorgeous
Ok, Chorillo overlies La Irene, which is a deltaic environment
I know a few people who get paleoclimates more than I do, and they think Chorrillo was more or less like a cloud forest
Ooh and the Austroraptor/Carnotaurus comparison is pretty neat, Allen and La Colonia are pretty close to each other
Carno and Maip too
fwiw i'm not arguing that austroraptor could reliably 1v1 a carnotaurus. simply that it wasn't a small dromaeosaurid(/unenlagiid depending on whether or not we think unenlagiidae exists atm (determined by throwing a dart at a board, as is tradition))
it's not as chunky as utahraptor, but it's a decently big lad
Wait -- why would an Austroraptor be challenging a Carnotaurus in the first place? I thought they were mainly feeding on fish?
I think it’s just to show it’s not small
I see
idk, ask the screenshotted person who said carno could've been bullied by austro
Anyone that thinks Carno got bullied by Austro a literal bird in raptor clothing that fed off fish should get a reality check
because vultures are as well all know very frequent kleptoparasites of cheetahs
Even then, there have been records of cheetahs having enough of the vultures and clapping them.
most raptors are birds in raptor clothing. theyre birdtype beasts
Table’s playin
What are we defining as a raptor? Accipitridae are called raptors too
Yeah it's a mild frustration of mine that raptor has become such a broad term used for dromeos and troodontids, when it has a long standing history as the word applied to birds of prey
Well you see, cheetahs are fast. You know what else is fast? Carnotaurus. And cheetah are, as tierzoo told me, incapable of keeping kills (they actually only lose ~10% and can afford to lose 1/4th of them but that isn't the point). So clearly, Carnotaurus was a routine victim to kleptoparasitism by unenlagiines 1/7th its weight.
This is real and true. Almost as true as my supreme genus
not gonna lie, megaraptorans kleptoparasiting abelisaurs actually sounds real interesting
though at least the northern end of South America had Maip-length abelisaurs... might not work well with those guys around
Organismus vivus needs a paper stat. It’s a stroke of pure brilliance.
What...
tratayenia would've eaten llukalkan and viavenator for breakfast, same with that huge sao paulo one and thanos
It’s an all encompassing binomial name, works for literally anything considered a living organism. Shenanigans in another paleo-chat
ah, my favourite organism, Living Organism
with the mess that brazilian stratigraphy is, the huge megaraptoran might have lived with the even huger abelisaur 💀
god i really wish i could post memes in this channel because i have the perfect one for this
I absolutely love Organismus Vivus
Dm me it
iirc the closest abelisaurid/megaraptoran relationship in size was abelisaurus and aerosteon in anacleto if either one actually lived there
wtf was Ibirania doing being a dwarf titanosaur in an environment with a giant megaraptoran
Show me the meme please
There’s tiny sauropods in the Morrison too yknow
at least bonatitan lived with <500kg carnivores
anyone remembers a sauropod named "Jobaria"?
Idk how -1ton sauropods managed in the Morrison but they did somehow
Feels like Allen Formation is the only sensibly reconstructable SA Maastrichtian environment
I mean I'd imagine their tails could act as whips
Morrison Formation in Nutshell: they have too much sauropod
Whips on diplodocoids acted primarily as communication rather than defense.
Can I have some help
that size chart also has some major wonkiness to it with some old reconstructions too
POV only the megafauna are getting preserved
Still probably won't say no to smacking something that looks at them funny from behind
theory from a guy who knows little:
maybe they stayed in more heavily forested areas to avoid larger theropods?
That's...actually reasonable
That’s likely. It’s a trend with smaller species in the Morrison in general (except for the Morrison ankylosaurs apparently).
Hehehe boney tail go brrrrrrr
pycno's from the same locale as a megaraptoran but idk how big it is and can't find any figures
and urc 44-r's maybe with something adamantina's too stupid to try and figure that out
Yeah what the heck is even in that formation
I'll see if i can find that one
PDF | Mato Grosso State is the main area of paleontological investigations in central Brazil, especially regarding Upper Cretaceous beds. Fossil... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
I spent one night reading on brazilian stratigraphy to figure out pycno's locale and not I'm not touching that again
Oh look, Gondwanatitan
Ew adamantina
South America still looking for an ounce of variety in 90% of their formations
brazilian stratigraphy is a nightmare
As much as dating Adamantina is a nightmare and I hate it I do find it funny how it’s dominated by various notosuchians with the exception of the 4t abelisaur
in fairness south america does have the weird dicraeosaurid formations where we have no idea what’s going on
Dicraeosaurids in South America sounds somewhat normal to me
I know bajada colorada’s a bit odd but that’s just cause it’s clinging onto some of its Jurassic fauana
did you look at stuff like Marília and Presidente Prudente as well or just Mato Grosso? cause i am curious how they work
the fact that they’re there is normal, what’s weird is that we have no idea what was going on in the ecosystem around them
Cambambe basin stuff mostly cause bauru group stuff was pretty much just trying to figure out adamantina without a satisfying conclusion
Hold on is there a Stegosaurian in La Amarga??
There’s a good paper on cambambe I just need to find it again and then there’s like a dozen on dating adamantina
let me dig a bit but there’s definitely one around the formation brachytrachelopan is in, there’s a lot of weird undescribed stegosaurians knocking around
La Amarga is like 125mya, I guess I underestimated their longevity
ok it is the one I’m thinking of, it’s not named but there is one there
and they all disagree with eachother 
https://www.periodicos.rc.biblioteca.unesp.br/index.php/geociencias/article/download/12026/8740/
cambambe basin overview
there’s a few trackways and bits from cedar mountain and nearby formations that seem to be from a stegosaurian too
How big was achillobators snout?
I would love to get the chance to dig through all the random undescribed stuff from early cretaceous NA, there’s so much weird stuff that we just have hints of
Yeah I don’t hear much about early Cretaceous NA now that I think about it just Cloverly I suppose. And that’s not even that early.
there’s some weirdness, rumors and evidence of stegosaurians in places, some inexplicable migrants, and a lot of brachiosaurids with big temporal gaps between them
about a foot long, black bar is a meter
Who doesn’t a love good spotty Mesozoic fossil record. It’s so lovely isn’t it
therizinosaurs are another weird one, we found a pretty old english one recently (the first european one afaik), iirc it was wessex too
alright so for adamantina temporal constraints judd 2017 suggested late campanian-possible maastrichtian through biostratigraphy and magnetostratigraphy, castro et al 2018 suggested coniacian-possible maastrichtian through zircon dating, geroto and bertini 2018 suggested campanian-possible late (but not latest) maastrichtian age through biostratigraphy, brusatte et al. 2017 and Martinelli et al. 2018 suggested latest-santonian-cenomanian age through the interdigitated uberaba formation, and silva et al. 2021 suggested a santonian-possible maastrichtian age through biostratigraphy
and that's just from the past six years
So when it releases in-game it won't be big like the Utah mod?
jesus christ
Achillo is ~20% smaller than Utahraptor, so probably halfway between the KTO utah and default Laten
A Therizinosaur in Wessex? What on Earth does that mean
Bettt
I found it again it’s thecocoelurus, it might not be wessex but it’s still early cretaceous england, it’s position is debated but most recently Naish and some colleagues put it back in therizinosauria close to falcarius
the whole situation with it is weird, all of the 3 competing options for what it is would be bizarre in that time and place
I'm not too surprised, we have therizinosaurs in both NA and asia. What with europe being inbetween I think it was just a matter of time before we found one
I assumed it was a shared transpacific biota
it is a bit younger than the other basal ones so it makes the most sense for it to be a therizinosaurian, the other options are ornithomimosaur and oviraptorosaur
Now that I read Wessex Formation is just a melting pot of confusion
wessex is one of my favorite formations it’s weird and I love it lol
Are British early Cretaceous Eudromaeosaurs a thing?
Oh and there’s Tyrannosauroids too
europe generally likes having cladistically unstable small theropods
vectiraptor?
and are you talking about nuthetes or eotyrannus for tyrannosauroids
Yeah, and some other Velociraptorine (wtf lol)/Proceratosauroid
there’s a possible turiasaur that just happens to be there too
basically all of the wessex sauropods minus the turiasaur have had a stage where they either initially weren’t a brachiosaurid or were but got shifted to something else, and then a closer look gets taken at them and they get moved back into it
Is all of Macronaria stinky?
I still find it funny how there's an angloposeidon and a francoposeidon and neither is formally described
brachiosauridae is the most stable in the clade it’s just that most of them are undescribed, other than them everything in it is stinky yeah
Tbf it feels like if you go deep enough, there’s a sh*t storm in every Dinosaurian clade
especially basal titanosaurs, half of what’s there just got thrown there because it was initially described as a jurassic group but they decided it was too late in time for that, but nobody has gotten around to putting them in a better spot
mfw the very foundation of it is messed up (nobody knows exactly ornithscians, theropods, and sauropodomorphs go relative to each other)
furileusauria doesn't do a whole lot which is nice
I'd just say brachyrostra but dahalokely and rahiolisaurus kinda throw a wrench in that
And because the evidence that would help us figure that out is all gonna be early-mid triassic age, good luck 👍
actually the best clade is alioramini because there's a grand total of three specimens across the entire clade
No gifs? Why is it so stinky in here
For some reason discord told me I was @ed 9 times
God help us all in terms of this.
any updates on the Turkana Grits Abelisaur?
100% real updated skeletal 
In all seriousness though not much has really happened since random found the actual skeletal and the skull recon started floating around
this guy needs to get described
I’m mostly excited that it’s like the second abelisaur specimen in Africa known from more than a single cranial fragment or vertebra
Or a load of indeterminate teeth
Maastrichtian Africa coming to life it seems
If it is a majungasaurine that’d be cool since it’d be our first definitive record of them from mainland Africa
Plus they kinda had to be there at some point anyways considering their presence in Europe
pretty sured theyd be on mainland Africa if they made it to India
Yeah they’ve been in Europe since the Albian and their earliest possible record in Madagascar is the turonian
That said you would expect some in the reasonably well sampled African cenomanian rocks but most abelisaurids there end up as rugops sp. or abelisauridae indet.
Just happy one the few remaining parts of the Maastrichtian picture are being filled in
isnt there another supposed giant one in Morocco
CMN 50403 and OLPH 025 from the Kem Kem are around 10.7m and 8.1m respectively
i remember whn rugops was the Kem Kem abelisaur
There’s several assigned to rugops sp. there
But yeah both of the big ones are indeterminate
i also heard of a giant brazilian one but hey
says its referred to a subadult...thats terrifying
People speculate it’s an adult pycnonemosaurus since that’s a subadult
But without overlapping elements and probably not being coeval we can’t really know
ahh the debate of Pycno v Ekrix of biggest current abelisaur
Also called: why skull scaling is bad
case and point: erythosuchians
Although ekrix is still fairly large by abelisaurid standards
oh yea isnt it probably bigger then Carno
Nah carno’s longer and heavier
granted we probably dont know carnos average due to the curse of terrible abelisaur preservation bias
Are there any named non-majungasaurines even known from anything besides the holotype
Besides referred teeth
We talkin bout sausages? Man makes me wanna have a hot dog lmao
the sasauges bite back
Angy sausages
still blows me away that Majunga is so long but short enough to look most people in the eye
I love/hate my sausage Titanovenator
i dont care what Turkana is named Titanovenator is canon
I love all sausages i just love abelisaurs theyre basically hot dog sausages on two legs waiting to be put in hot dog buns
well non euro-AfroAsian ones arent
OMGG thats so adorableee
its like when i hold my lizards upside down and they cant do shut as i give them belly rubs
Some lizards dont have a diaphragm like beardies dont so putting them upside down makes them unable to breathe just as an fyi
You could probably pet a smaller manjungasaurine
....I AM A TERRIBLE PERSON
It’d be like lioness sized but it’d be doable
doable in the sense that yod die probably
Nah just get a hot dog bun
Majunga is within the group of dinosaurs id classify as the right size to hunt humans
All mighty sausages would eat us
Hunter becomes hunted
people call me crazy when i say the Juvie rexes would be worse then a adult..
Faster, more stamina, still strong, more endurable, more stam yeah id see a scenario like that
Tho i imagine theyd be tameable with a hot dog bun
It’d also actually think it’d be worth murdering me
also adults wouldnt waste precious energy on a human sized morsel thatll give hardly anything back
Yup
The larger hot dogs are decent riding size come to think of it
probably not good for their backs
Right
trade a good back for flexibility
Id ride a megalania but riding a prehistoric sausage would be even better
Both don’t sound optimal
screw riding it thats my guard dog
A wiener dog on two legs named princess
a prehistoric sausage unicorn named tinkles
Or sparkles
Or Gabriel
im still upset about Elasmotheriums horn disapearing
no longer the Siberian unicorn
It looks like a mood now
so..the largest basilosaur and the smallest in a week
The cetacean pendulum remains in balance
then we will find some whale that disrupts it
The most normal sized basilosaur
a normal whale
Maybe a tiny whale that becomes a normal whale
its why i love the Piscu. you have Megalodon, various murder sperm whales, sea going gavials and sea sloths and then...just small baleen whales..just average
He's trying his best okay
he gets murdered by meg and livy everyday ok its a hard life
But he can take it
the sea sloths are still the weirdest ones
miocene's just weird
its a shame WWB barely talked about it
Anyone know of any other Maastrichtian African sites?
couche phosphate beds
...i dont know..i know its loaded up till at least mid cretaceous
tooth scaling 
theres that big pterosaur site along the Mediterranean that PHP 1 used with Barbaridactylus and Phosphatodraco
Those are Marine deposits right?
and Morocco is loaded with various mosasaurs and that weird tube faced marine turtle
yeah it has load of mosasaurus but also chenanisaurus, that tiny aguibjia whatever hadrosaur and some titanosaur
ajnabia
so i assume morroco was mostly coastal or island chain deposits
probably
Oh, it’s just the Ouled Abdoun Basin?
yeah but the whole basin extends well into the cenozoic
i swear i know thebasin for something mesozoic
I got so excited when I thought Dasornis was Maastrichtian the first time I saw it
cenozoic not mesozoic
there's duwi formation in egypt too which has a maastrichtian abelisaur tooth
yay more scant abelisaurs
there's even more teeth from arabia but I forgot the formation
and then there's that weird sudanese one that apparently got redated from cenomanian to campanian-maastrichtian
The one underlied by Quseir?
wait M. hoffmani is in Ouled?
just checked it's adaffa formation but idk about the sedimontology
oh Paleophis is in ouled
possible arambourgiana in Ouled..
doubt it
the only cretaceous thing I even know in southern southern africa off my head is kirkwood and that's not late
pretty difficult to dig in the rainforest in all fairness
I mean… I found one formation. I was hoping there would be a teensy bit more than that 
which is it
Mocuio dips into the Maastrichtian
again creteacous africa just..isnt great...then again i keep remembering how terrible the Tendaguru is for theropods right now
Two taxa
amazing
the weird thig is the sudanese thing has presumably multiple carcharadontosaurid taxa
It’s something. One of them is even a Pteranodontian. But now you feel my struggle hehe
pterandontidae sucks bro...its a ghost lineage and those are just terrible
tendaguru theropods are just generally really crap taxa
They seem to like Africa maybe
i crave a new african carch thats big..or at least more tyrannotitan material
there's that massive kirkwood one
How old is Kirkwood
theres a carch in kirkwood?
initially it was classified as that but it might be a megalosaurid
oh its jurassic
Excitement reduced
or early cretaceous
paranthodon and Nqwebasaurus
Wait a minute what is this Pteranodontian doing in Russia
volgadraco?
Ye
uhh i dont know if the Ptera stance changed or not due to Pteradontian taxonomy sucking
there's a czech one too
Damn bruh someone fix this clade
i just want more Kileskus material
Ew, not another freak
what?
what'd kileskus ever do
Middle Jurassic. Automatically stinky
....ok i agree about the time but Kileskus is a beautiful animal just like all proceratosaurs
and aristocotus is a really cool specific name
i just wish Sinotyrannus got as much love as Yuty for biggest proceratosaur
it's also actually stable as a proceratosaur
also more then likley coexisted with yuty
jiufotang immediately overlies yixian so it might not have
Yeah 5 million years between them or something like that
ahh i see...speasking of mid jurassic..the Yangchuanosaurus head shape...how recent is that
since Y. magnus was named in the 80s
oh i remeber when i was youngerr it was still vaguely generic allosaur
shangyouensis type has a pretty normal skull but mangus had the funny skull and got lumped into shangyouensis
whats the chances this could translate to Sinraptor or would this be a Yang specific
sinraptor already has a skull
oh thats right i forgot...
even less weird than either of yang's
W Sinraptor for being a generic Allosauroid
S. hepingensis has a weirder skull but that's probably not sinraptor so still w
pretty sure dan has an updated sinraptor skeletal
Isn't Maip just Austrolovenator
isnt heping the debated one between the 2 speciees
here we go i'm pretty sure this is the most up-to-date dongi
not even close. Maip is a giant megaraptoran fron argentina while Australovenator is fromAustralia
There is literally no overlap other than being Megaraptoran
Oh ok. Thanks for the clarification
look at megaraptoridae actually being useful as a clade for once
its great for cool names
maip is one of the dumbest sounding names ever
tratayenia and aerosteon sound cool
maip does not sound cool
its meaning is great though cause if you interpret it right its a cold wind from the arm that only takes a single swipe, also to be fair most native names arent cool cause its just native tongue..
and then you have boring macrothorax
i mean thats just describing its unusually big body for a megaraptoran
Maip has the edgelord meaning if I’m not mistaken
Its meaning isn't even that, that's just a description of the being its named for
shadow of death or something like that
"the Shadow of Death that kills witjh a cool wind"
Aerosteon is definitely a better binomial name for sure
People took it and really ran with that as a 1 to 1 meaning
I like murusraptor and megaraptor because they sound similar and represent a succesive line of megaraptorans in the neuquen subgroup
I still say Wiehienvenator has one of the best informal nicknames to this day
ignoring los bastos but there's nothing there anyways
is the lightning thief considered Australo or is there decent differences
different
good cause its a cool nickname
it's notably older too
isnt it possibly bigger too?
remember when Aerosteon was the Carchs in Alphas Egg...we've come so far
and everyone would argue over why they called them carcharadontosaurus
because we still made giganotosaurus look like that at the time....
air date 2003 yea this was before pretty much all the other giganotosaurines and Mapu wouldnt be named as its own thing till 2006
the irony that Alpha's Egg Aerosteon is one of the two most accurate Giganotosaurus in media ever...
the irony that jwd giga wasnt far off withe nueral tissue if meraxes did indeed had a hump like structure
they put the hump on the opposite end of the back 💀
oh i know but points for predicting something
Was one of my first introductions to carcharodontosaurids, Alpha's Egg
and somehow aerosteon ended up being anacleto with aucasaurus after the mess of where it was from so bonus points
That I would hardly call a prediction personally when conc exists with an actual protruding structure on the back
i still ascertain that as much as i like JWD giga the chins the most accurate part i think
anacleto's predator guilds were just allen on steroids
I yearn for Gojirasaurus validation even if its not possible
I had no idea what this looked liked. Just looked it up, and yeah… it’s something alright
also some of the best dino sound design
you will have your indeterminate large coelophysoid and you will be happy
no its bad enough kaijutitan or whatever isnt japanese i wont lose gojirasaurus
I wouldn't call new mexico japanese either
hey gojira has the size to deserve it kaijutitans...not even in logknosaurian size class
either way megapnosaurus is clearly the superior coelophysoid name
it sounded more like someone flicking a doorstopper tbh
What doorstoppers have you heard in your life
springy ones
bro is living in an alternate universe where springs make the sounds of the damned in the ninth circle of hell instead of ''sproing''
but when they sproing really fast
when they go fast it sounds like lucifers cat screaming
slightly off topic but I always wondered why WDRA sounds were always kinda plain jane but then for dilo they dialed it to an 11
its 2001 post jurassic park gotta show it aint tiny
but dandakosaurus was from like the same time and was over 2t as larramendi told me and larramendi is never wrong
isnt dandako like rterrible material
yeah and chimeric
i may have both Larramendis books but i doubt much of it..the art is mostly why i got them
I mostly like it for that and cause it has obscure material
ill give it that.. it also gives decent art of bones
as a certified Larramendi scaling hater, most of it is quite reasonable... just has a few notable exceptions, most of which are from them thinking tooth scaling was a good idea
i hear rumors theres finally gonna be a ornithscian one
Yeah best part of the book is having reasonable estimates for lots of obscure taxa it’s really hard to find figures or dimensions for
try finding size estimates for insert obscure theropod number 10 here
meanwhile t.rex and allosaurus are everywhere for size refrences
Although I do question some of his taxonomic assignments
i literally have the 2 right beside me let me see
BYU 9024...isnt that the supposed 180 ft Barosaurus
Isn’t that now supersaurus
diplodocids annoy me in general
I’m somewhat cautious of the half dozen tooth taxa he calls basal tyrannosauroids
he has Austroraptor under paraves
That’s cause unenlagiinae can be kinda finicky
pyroraptor and recently Dakotaraptor
Dakotaraptor’s just weird
i argue it exists just probably needs more work
Yeah depalma’s just cringe
people act like it having afew bits of turtle change much as if this is the first time
It’s cause then someone says the legs are anzu and someone else is like no they’re clearly different but we can’t technically confirm so now everyone’s questioning if it exists
whys Siamotyrannus under coelurosauria here...pretty sure its placed as a metriacanthosaur
I think it’s a basal coelurosaur thing but its not very stable
he should just go back to doing elephant skeletals...
I just want that ornithischian one to be a thing
dacenturia my beloved
To be honest, why hasn't anyone just went ahead and do a DNA test of--
Oh wait -- I forgot that the individual who found it is . . . pretty secretive about it, for some reason. Unless, of course, my memory is wrong on that part.
Permian > mesozoic ( triassic excluded )
anteosaurus and gorgonopsians my beloveds
Common depalma L
Honestly, though, if Dakotaraptor does indeed not exist . . . So what?
The juvenile Tyrannosaurus would've filled its niche anyways, especially since they had a relatively low mortality rate during the juvenile - sub-adult growth, with the hatchlings and somewhat the adults having higher mortality rates.
Because I like the saurian colors
Fair. 
i remember when i was younger going to Carnegie when they first put up Anzu as a indeterminate Hell Creek Ceanaghthid
Huh anzu’s almost a decade old now
remember when it was the biggest Hell Creek topic at the time
Yall still discussing sausages? Got hot dog bunnss!))
Cursed hell creek majungasaurine
blursed Hell Creek Carnotaurine
Lmao alr
Okay so like labocania’s an abelisaurid because of temporal diagnosis even though it probably has a better chance at being an allosauroid than that but whatever so what if it liked north and by the time it got to hell creek it was the maastrichtian
i thought labocania was a tyrannosaur
What, when was Labocania an allosauroid, I've heard abelisaur-tyrannosaur 😭
I too have heard abelisaur tyrannosaur
Prolly tyrannosaur but it’s been called a carcharadontosaur a couple times (namely Mortimer)
isnt there a thing of like either we havened found NA abelisaurs or they never made it north due to tyrannosaurs or natural barriers
Abelisaurs aren’t north of Brazil period so who knows
remember when Pods travels implied Tarascosaurus was dwarf Arcovenator
Tarascosaurus is an abelisaur that exists and nobody should touch its phylogeny with a ten foot pole
isnt it just like a single leg bone
And some verts from another specimen
so i guess its reasonably safe probably unless david peters comes along
It’s an abelisaur of some form that doesn’t seem to be particularly close to arcovenator
i just know arcos french
There’s also la boucharde and porcieux or whoever you spell it
france has untapped potential
France also has the weird maastrichtian maybe small carch maxilla I can’t find anything about
grumpy and...Alice?
Accurate dinosaurs
far from it
Its a joke….
im aware
lythronax has a cool name
Lythronax is competing with teratophoneus bistahieversor dynamoterror and thanatotheristees for “edgy eutyrannosaurian name” from the past 15 years
Of those Lythronax is also probably the smallest so it looses points in the edgy department for that
to be fair isnt it also the earliest of them
Yeah
Thanatotheristes is also smaller but wasn’t fully grown
so size wasnt fully acheived yet
It’s pretty much daspletosaurus so likely yes
daspletosaurus is hell
It’s cool though
now that D. wilsoni is official its so weird going back and seeing old D. sp on things
Even then there still is some D. sp
people thought albertosaurus was everywhere but it was actually Das
Yall still at those sausages? Hot dogs are done yet?
Lmao 😭😭 i love me some abelisaurs
A sausage named Pete iii
a sausage named majungasaurus (it literally was one)
a sausage named majungatholus
nah thats a pachycephalosaur
💀💀
what being a cranial fragment does to a mf
pretty sure at one point pachy was a troodont due to the weird and scary teeth
everything is megalosaurus
everything described before like 1910 enjoyed a brief tenure as megalosaurus
counterpoint everythings iguanodon
everything that isn't megalosaurus is iguanodon mhm mhm
then theres Hyleasaurus the sad and forgoten third child
theropoda = megalosaurus spp.
how many Megalosaurus wastebasket taxa even still remain...i know theres "M." ingens
dunkeri ingens pannoniensis hungaricus chubutensis tibetensis off my head but theres a lot more
Megalo will persist till we die
yeah they're all teeth so nobody's in much of a rush to do anything else with them
not like teeth are diagnostic enough
its like i hear ingens might jusr be a african allo and im not sure but with allo being literaslly everywhere for it not to be in Africa is not right
ingens is a megalosaurid last time I checked
then probably torvo or torvo like
yeah it's either that or a carcharadontosaurid
people seem to lean more towards megalosaurid from what I've seen
i just realized that torvo and allo are always together it seems
it was more like troodon was considered a pachycephalosaur, iirc. maybe "pachycephalosaur" wasnt the term used but troodon was considered to look Like That
pachycephalosauridae was called troodontidae for a bit it was this whole thing
pachycephalosaurs aree just scary...
yeah the US portugal tanzania and maybe uruguay have lots of overlapping fauana
portugal wins cause mirigaia is better then stegosaurus and hesperosaurus
then again theres debate if stego is in portugal
still probably no miragaia in America
uhh alcovasaurus? is it a dacenturid
yeah but the material's kinda gone so it's a bit of a mess
but it seems to be a miragaia thing
What do you guys think about the paleo accurate Spinosaurus
I like the nighttime one
That first pic is so nice
I dont even consider any spino paleo-accurate anymore, it changes so fast i just see “wow nice art”. First and second are really nice (diver and fluffy)
Fluffy spoon looks so cursed to me, but yea spoon art is usually outdated in a year or so. We still haven't even gotten that spino arm paper yet right?
Hey dont ask me i have very basic understanding of what you guys do over in this channel
Fair enough, I'm mostly in that boat too since I'm usually providing questions rather than answers lol.
But yea AFAIK spinos arms haven't even been described yet or at least some of the newest discoveries regarding their arms. I'm pretty certain that spinos current/historical arms are theoretical based off suchomimus? But I may be misremembering.
we technically have arm elements from spinosaurus through a humerus and an ulna respectively
humerus gets funny sizes scaled to some older skeletals
What does this mean for spino reconstructions and pretty art?
not much because neither of those have associated material
Ah
We also have a single phalange iirc. Also, I am not sure we have actually discovered any new arms from Spinosaurus (I seen this thrown around a lot without any direct proof),
From what I see, it seems to be an assumption that from the undesrcibed material of Spinosaurus, that more arm bones were part of it.
Otherwise, do correct me if I am wrong.
What are its inaccuracies
Or rather, what are Alex's comments on it
don't remember exactly but he mentioned quite some things regarding how the head shape was too entelodont like
In what way though exactly bc like, I don't imagine duck changed it much to it's skull. It's the only thing we have of it isn't it
That said, I imagine duck did that bc it clades close to them
I'd provide a screenshot of what he said but problem is he said it in a public game discord server which got deleted due to toxicity.
Well this got me no where
Love most of them although I fundamentally disagree with floofy spino
How about abelisaur Alberto
So I asked him on twitter and I mean tbf that is a valid reconstruction since we only have a skull. It's just that we only have a skull so there currently is no way to make a truly accurate andrew but he said the entelodont-like (as in this isn't very likely) compared to the hippo/anthracothere like hippo is more possible
Why's that if its not even in whippomorpha let alone comparable to an anthracothere
Different phylogenetic analysis?
With what little remains we have it is hard to make a set in stone judgement with it's relations since it's skull shows similarities but also notable differences with other ungulates. Although Helohyids seem to have a very similar skull.
search up "Achaenodon" if you don't know what helohyids are btw.
So its just different phylogenetic analysis then
It's mostly just an observation some people have made. Theyve said the similarities are the eye socket placement and shape, cheekbones, teeth, sagittal crest, and cranial bone shape.
how large would an average bull sperm whale be?
Like 40-50 tonnes iirc
ooh okay, thank you 
"A semi-aquatic Didelphodon climbing up on the horn of a Triceratops deceased from a flash flood." - Gabriel N. U., the artist
Sussy background Azdarchids
Potentially stupid question, but would theropod dinosaurs have crops like modern day birds?
Guys, please help me. What does this mean?
probably not considering they appear absent in enantiornithines
crops presumably first evolved in early ornithurans
What if some sauropods were essentially like reverse white sharks with their coloration? They have lighter or white colors on top, since it's speculated some of them lived in hot and arid environments, and a darker belly so that animals can have a better warning when they are directly under one. Idk if this has been thought of but I just thought it was a cool retrospective
On top of this, they wouldn't really have a reason to hide, so having most of the body be brightly colored would make sense for the animals survival
Darker coloration protects from UV rays, and brighter colorations and body patterns are hard to produce in large quantities in larger animals. It's why elephants and most other large animals are solid grays/browns.
Essentially, the coloration will be darker on the top and lighter on the bottom -- helps against the constant sun shining on them since they're most likely as big as the trees around them anyways. XD
what evidence do we have that supports paraentelodon being more omnivorus than other entelodonts? is it the tooth enamel?
is it because paraentelodon have high-crowned teeth? which iirc lacks certain tooth folds.
But I also heard it has similar features as other ruminant-like species from Asia in the Oligocene and early Miocene.
Sounds sus
Found someone who actually did a bit of muscularity of some of the dinosaurs:
It would be pretty cool if someone made one of these for a certain pholidosaur
matt dempsey makes them
this tenonto's better btw
Huh, interesting
So uh, does anyone know where a thing about the skull dimensions of terminonaris? Or just have the numbers themselves? I've been looking for it for a while but I can't find it (skull width is what I'm looking for specifically)
~120cm long and ~43cm wide for big bert
Incredibly rare case of correct scalebar
Oh thanks
Was just reading through a paper about that lol, I actually literally just posted this image like 2 seconds ago, now I just gotta find the HW of sarcosuchus somewhere
Comparison between 2 different sarcosuchus estimates ( credit to @chilly knot and @stiff osprey ) they are 10.13m and 9m respectively
It's a little rough but whatever
Aren't these two silhouttes different from each other proportionally?
Is the polar bear in the top 5 largest mammalian land predators
Probs
Cave bear probably 2nd or 3rd
I know paraentelodon is the largest mammalian land carnivore at 1300 kg.
So Andrew is second biggest then 3rd is cave bear?
Cave bear was like 14 feet tall right?
Andrew was a contender but iirc it lost its title but there isn't much you can get frm andrew when all we have is a skull
THEY FINALLY REDUCED THE COOL DOWN BY LIKE 20 SECONDS OH MY GOSH THANK YOU MODS
Is third cave bear
And is fifth polar bear
pretty sure arctotherium would be second I guess
What is the largest land mammal
Although you can get 2000kg paraentelodon specimens using tooth scaling but I wouldn't recommend it because well its tooth scaling 
Paraentelodon
Hmmm. I'm pretty sure Elephants weigh more
paleoloxodon is the largest iirc
Palaeoloxodon but that's based on a single fragmentary bone
Sorry read it as carnivore mb 😭
But yeah it would be paleoloxodon but iirc thats based on femur/tibia scaling
Yeah if we going mammal indefinite then it's Elephant
Palaeoloxodon
African Bush Elephants weigh 13,000 pounds.
Palaeoloxodon could weigh up to 22 tonnes based on this fragmentary femur
That's just off a femur.
There are many mammals that have existed in the past that are larger than African bush elephants
Paraentelodon aff. intermedium and Archaeotherium mortoni by Alex james
Again just a femur
paraceratherium for one
African bush elephant isn't even in the top 10 largest land mammals iirc
It looks like a cow and a giraffe mated then the baby came out more giraffe than cow.
It's closest living relatives are rhinos
That ain't paraceratherium that's a Girow
Then where are it's horns?
And yep a cow and giraffe had babies.
Is polar bear top 5 tho
I guarantee we killed one of these things during the ice age.
I killed four
Nope, it existed way before early humans
for anyone wondering whats under its jaw its basically the same vein as some oreodonts, warthogs and forest hogs, both of which also have sexually dimorphic wart-like structures
Aren't those guys actually closer to hippos?
Hell pig, more like hell hippo
Yes...... It's based on 2 different estimates
Seems entelodonts also likely face bit
But anyways, if you could choose one species to bring back (specific species must be listed so you can't say trike or something) what would you bring back a population of?
Paraentelodon
Prolibytherium
ectopistes migratorius
In this scenario would current oxygen levels climate and other stuff heavily affect said creatures?
nope, oxygen levels wouldn't have any impact now and didn't then
main thing to account for in terms of climate would just be temperature but you can probably address that by just putting the population in a climate suited for them. Atmospheric composition wouldn't matter (not even for invertebrates)
Eh for invertebrates it might but it’s half n half.
There were plenty of big invertebrates even during the permian when oxygen levels were lower, so it probably didn't contribute anywhere near as much as we first thought (and doesnt matter at all for vertebrates, we're good at this whole breathing thing)
in terms of the sizes of prehistoric invertebrates, arthopleura is an outlier adn should not have been counted
I'd like to pose a question, just how ancestral are feathers? I personally subscribe to the idea that the pyconfibers of Pterosaurs are a kind of feather, which would make feathers an ancestral trait to all of Ornithodira, or perhaps even all of Avemetatarsalia. I'm interested to hear other's thoughts on the matter though.
I also think feathers are basal to Ornithodira. I don't think they're basal to Avemetatarsalia, though, because the first avems had osteoderms and that feels weird to have both things
It does seem quite likely that it's ancestral to pterosaurs + dinosaurs at least, though not archosaurs as a whole. Not only do pterosaurs have pycnofibers very similar to typical "primitive" feathers, there are even pterosaurs with more complex branching integument iirc
There have been filament like structures recovered in crocodilians though (embryos specifically).
's hard to say for sure where feathers first popped up, but personally i think they're at least basal to ornithodira. some pterosaur pycnofibres very closely resemble simple branching feathers, and i'm of the opinion that they're approximately the same thing
You would be refering to Aphanosaurs correct? Unless I'm forgeting about some other basal Avemetatarsalian. I've seen some depictions of the Aphanosaurs with fuzz, I will admit, it does look rather strange, but I don't think it would be entirely out of the question.
I tried to read that paper, but it's pure genetics jargon, the part discussing evolution is really short and vague. So I have no idea what's going on with crocs
And yes, aphanosaurs have osteoderms
The one on the right is scarier tho fr
Oh?
Passenger pigeon, ectopistes migratorius because we wiped them out
Id pet them ngl
k so I was digging through my room and I found this spinosaurs tooth that my mum bought for me years ago.
I think its a juveniles judging by its size but idk
any thoughts?
sry not best quail
Def a spoon toofer but they had diff size teefers so its a 50/50 guess imo
I know nothing about spinosaur ID but of course i think some rough measurements should help others
👍
Nah, teeth are definitely diagnostic, it’s a new Spinosaurid genus 👍
100% a spinosaurid toofer
alr thx guys
Did spino go extinct before the asteroid impact
Long Before the impact
Big sad
From what I recall spino went extinct with the entire spinosauridae lineage. It was the last, and the most confusing.
Montanaspinus 😔
Carnosaurs as a whole died out in the series of extinction events that occurred between 90 and 85 million years ago. A lot of groups did.
What major theropod groups were still around by the KT extinction?
Tyrannosauroids and Abelisaurs basically, if ur only talking about the big predatory ones. There’s plenty of others.
Abelisaurs were very good at what they did, I don't know much about them but it seems they were able to stick around through most if not all of the cretaceous and thrive in every environment
you also have the various post-cenomanian teeth assigned to carcharadontosauridae that totally won't be reassigned to abelisauridae and maybe unquillosaurus in the campanian and sudan being weird with that maybe campanian-maastrichtian thing with carcharadontosaurids
Doubt
Africa is pretty weird 🤷♂️
africa might have a megaraptoran too which is neat
Bahariasaurus 
nah it's some vertebrae in tanzania

What we really need is more cases of ecosystems where abelisaurids would be stomping megaraptorans because it'd be cool
Hym
Megaraptorans have no excuse to fossilize as poorly as they do, the absolute audacity
and yet somehow multiple megaraptorid genera have more specimens or referred material than any south american abelisaurids
we also don’t have maastrichtian rock in a few big areas so it wouldn’t be entirely shocking if a few carnosaur lineages persisted, in most places they definitely died out but there’s those weird places they could still be
not necessarily a huge chance but there is a chance
there are bits and pieces that might be carcharadontosaurids but they're fragmentary and almost all teeth
gotta love non-diagnostic teeth
and that stupid maxillary fragment that got reassigned to abelisauridae 
if there is a relict maastrichtian carcharodontosaur it's gotta be in like central america
every other continent has giant megaraptorans, giant abelisaurs or giant tyrannosaurids in their place
this is exactly what we almost got with labocania, though it's now generally assumed to be a tyrannosaur
northern europe is also a possibility it has some strangeness and stayed mostly isolated from the maastrichtian europe stuff we have, south africa probably doesn’t have carcharodontosaurs but who knows what’s going on down there, central africa is just a weird spot overall too
there's this potential weirdo in europe that'd be like 4m but the only two things making any reference to its existance aren't online
and then there's teeth in brazil assigned to carcharadontosauridae in um.... 2006
yeah those definitely didn't become abelisaurs along with all the other carcharodontosaurid teeth that became abelisaurs in 2016 
What’s in Central America anyways
was there a 2016 one cause I only know about the 2021 one
poor allosauroids
hadrosaurs and titanosaurs and.... presumably something to eat them
Why was Adolescent and now I'm juvenile and I did not die, I have no idea what happened
Mmm, Tyrannosaurs?
Troodon is my favourite dinosaur 
probably tyrannosaurs considering at least parts of northern central america seems to have been close to mexico even in the cretaceous
And we don't seem to find abelisaurids north of Brazil. Although we don't really find anything north of Brazil in South America period.
Granted our total tyrannosaur record in mexico amounts to random teeth and potentially labocania
Sounds good enough for me
our total central american dinosaur record amounts to like a metatarsal a femur
The tropics are just lovely aren’t they
god only knows what’s going on in central africa
hmmmm
🥱too fragmentary no one cares about it
Oh wow, that’s actually little
Dunkleosteus in nutshell: deadly chonky fish
Didn’t a recent study said that the Dunk was actually a fairly smol fsh?
well they are
They got hit with a downsize. Along with leed iirc. Meanwhile meg got bigger.
Yeah, that’s what I’m saying because before this was the standard size of the Dunk, so now that they basically got nerfed into being a small boi, it’s very funny to see
I've heard prehistoric wildlife isn't a very good source but I've never heard why.
Tbh I kinda like new dunk better. Funny round chomper
History of being less than reliable vs other resources of the same animals
I’ve heard of that too, I just used this pic because it was what was first when I googled the Dunk size(and I’m lazy), also ngl me too, a round chonky chomper fish is oddly adorable
This is the kind info they have
Spreading fire is a speculative behavior, but you have to keep in mind that all it is. There's no founding on it whats' o' ever outside of the fact that other theropods (3 of the around 100 bird of prey species that exist, nevermind of the 10,000 bird species) do it. Which is fine, but you can pit this behavior on any smaller theropod and it would make just as much sense.
@white matrix
Did you end up catching my message in the other chat? Or?
Good evening
I only managed to catch something broadly about troodontid intelligence, which doesn't work either because troodontids being really intelligent by dinosaur standards isn't really true, at least from how we understand it. Intelligence is an incredibly hard thing to quantify, and it's an incredibly controversial field even in modern animals that we can directly observe rather than just look at bones. Troodontids were originally considered super-smart cause of their brain to body ratio, which is now known to be inconsistent and doesn't really tell you anything. Yeah this works for elephants, cetaceans, and primates, but there's no garuntee that this applies across various clades that all are hard-wired very differently. Look at crows for example. Their porportional brain size is about average for a bird yet everyone talks about how smart they are. This also doesn't go over how the intelligence of reptiles is heavily underestimated and they're likely smarter than we think. If this was actually never about this then I apologize but I hope it was at least fun to read.
There have been attempts at quantifying dinosaur intelligence in other ways (looking at neural density rather than brain size) but it's a very fishy and uncertain line of work as well.
I mentioned their intelligence measured by the size of their brain, mixed with them being found in areas likely to be more prone to bushfires and such - which is something they have in common with particular species' of bird that exhibit this behaviour.
But yeah i'm not trying to pedal it as a definitive fact or defending it to the death or anything, i was just trying to explain why it's a theory to begin with. I just accidentally presented it as a fact and made people mad(?) 'cos i assumed people just automatically take most talk about prehistory as theory. q:
It's all good. Just really wanted to clarify about the process of it all.
Yeah i getchu
Which reminds me, if you want an idea about how well we can deduce the lifestyles of some prehistoric animals. Look at plesiosaurs, especially the non-pliosaur variety where this has been researched the most. We know from fossils that their newborne babies, compared to their parents were huge (about 1/3 the mother's body size). They only had one offspring at a time, and these babies were pretty poor swimmers, making them pretty defenseless. It is such an investment that not only does it almost certainly confirm that these animals showed parental care, but also likely lived in family units in order to properly compensate for rearing the young in this way. It's often been compared to cetaceans like dolphins in how they would've lived in pods n' such. While probably not to dolphin-levels, this likely would've required sophisticated social behaviors. More than their otherwise tiny heads and brains would suggest anyway.
It's not well-researched in the more brutish types like liopleurodon and kronosaurus, but them being similar is not off the plate as well, which is kind of horrifying to think about. If uncertain.
Aquatics: Born poor swimmers
Meanwhile baby horses: ZOOM
I feel like the argument could be made that parental and pod bahaviour are due to instinct, rather than intelligence? - but idk enough to actually back that.
How did plesiosaurs defend themselves? Were they fast? Biggest around? Nippy? Just pod tactics?
That's the thing. It goes back to how we classify intelligence, which is a whole thing that I'd rather not get into further. I guess one way of looking at it is instinctual learning versus mechanical learning and culture. But I only thought that off the top of my head just now.
Yeah i see
I wouldn't be surprised if being able to back each other up in large groups was how they got away with having those super vulnerable long necks (on top of their bites actually being very powerful, more than what you'd expect coming from those tiny heads).
Oh they did have powerful bites?
oh yeah, look at these muscle attachments