#paleontology
1 messages · Page 27 of 1
Mmmmm time to cook
You can get it using the holotype as well, It depends on your scale differential for the holotype and neotype
That's a shame
Anyone know what kind of fish could’ve been in shoals in the Maastrichtian?
Can you see it?
enchodus?
What's that from?
looks like sauropod footprints
Enchodus faujasi, many smaller sized pycnodonts including smaller species of Anomoeodus (such as foriri) and Phacodus, and Hoplopteryx or any berciform fish that existed back then and using modern relatives to compare in terms of ecology
Especially the last one being Hoplopteryx being related to modern day beryciform fish of today's oceans including reefs and bathayal regions. @light osprey
Reefs and bathayal regions? Interesting
If ya include slimeheads and alfonsinos, hence why I included bathayal for some species
Oh yeah tried to dm you about the penza/quadrate GDI but I don't think you got it, was going to ask whats the difference between along the curve and along the centra (granted I know what a centra is)
Does anyone know which study has the most up-to-date and reliable cladogram of macronaria?
I'm far less familiar with sauropods than theropods
how far up do you want to go? camarasauridae up to brachiosauridae is pretty simple and agreed upon but as soon as you hit basal titanosaurs it gets messy fast
Only up to titanosauriformes, I'm mostly concerned with the relations of the largest groups in macronaria
the wikipedia trees are usually pretty good honestly and list their source, I would start there and compare the latest papers
if you have any specific questions though I can do my best to answer, sauropods are what I know the most about
where you'll really start to hit a wall is somphospondylidae, probably half of the stuff in there really doesn't belong but it got thrown in there because it looks a bit weird for its original family
yippee 
I'm probably going to use D'Emic 2012, unless anyone protests to that.
This is being used for a cladogram of greater dinosauria, if anyone is wondering. It's a personal project that I'm doing mostly for fun, but I intend to use it as a tool for personal study.
First run of sauropodomorpha, if anyone sees any mistakes or inaccuracies, please ping me.
Not necessarily an inaccuracy but it wouldn't hurt to include Turiasauria
I will, but I'm struggling to find good info on its relations within eusauropoda. Do you have any resources I can use?
Based on what I could find, this is my current understanding of its placement. If anyone can correct me on this, please do so.
it's a really weird group that seems to have lasted an absurd length of time so it's placement is pretty funky but that seems about right based on current understanding
Alright, thanks
is the purusaurus basically a big caiman?
what
no, they are separated by millions upon millions of years, puru is not a caiman afaik
nah bro its a lizard :)
(it is actually in caimaninae though, so yeah it's more a caiman than anything)
purussaurus brasiliensis, they say it's part of the caiman family but the caiman ik are super small i'm wondering how they are so small but nile crocs are so big and they are further related
incorrect. it's a caiman
There is always variation within groups. Just because modern caimans are generally small doesn't mean past genera couldn't be big.
Size is not typically used as an indicator of relation
yep. modern dinosaurs are often very tiny, but some of their ancient relatives (sauropods) were easily the largest terrestrial animals ever
but they were the biggest its so weird and interesting that they are the smallest now
Things change. Moz made a good point regarding dinosaurs, where the smallest known dinosaur is the bee hummingbird.
maybe because there aren't that many large herbivores in South America as they used to have? but America and Africa still do so hence the size or s*** happens?
Prey size isn't the only factor. Competing predators in the same niche can cause changes in size to be necessary.
decided to try tracking down a source that outright states puru is a caiman and. well. have fun interpreting this i guess
(source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428266/)
(what's really important here is purusaurus being under caimaninae, which is The Caiman Zone. caiman (the genus) is different from caimans as a whole group btw)
Some of them also got small in the Mesozoic
And ancestrally, pseudosuchians were just lanky little guys. Things can always change.
also, for what it's worth, bigger isn't always better - small animals are often more resilient to change in their environment, as they need less food to survive and reproduce, and can support larger populations.
Absolutely. There's a reason why almost every terrestrial animal that survived the K-Pg was a small generalist.
ngl i don't know why i didn't think of that example, but yeah, that's a very good case of being small paying off.
going back to caimans briefly, purussaurus was good at what it was doing, for sure, but clearly that's not the Optimal Niche for caimans these days. if they're almost all really small, that might not be because they can't get big anymore, but because there's not any benefit to getting big right now. sometimes staying small is just The Strat. who knows, maybe the quaternary extinction will eventually leave caimans as the most diverse crocodilians... but on the other hand, most of the other crocodilian groups seem to be doing fine
aight check this out 😎
I also have neotheropoda, but I did it a while ago so it's messier. Also it gets super compressed as a png 
Here is neotheropoda as a PDF if you want the less compressed version. I drew special attention to the surviving modern linneages, marked by saturated colors, white text, and bold lines.
sorry to leave, had to take an anatomy test but all true, it used to be a big scary guy though. hope it gets screen time in the game
Puru isn't planned for the game though
ik just a thought tho
PT is making it though
Ah, I thought they cancelled that one.
The Neovenatoridae and Megaraptora made me laugh
It's still in the roster chart iirc
Literally had to revise their placement more than any other grouping. Drove me more insane than titanosauria did today.
I mean technically there's still a bunch of titanosaur clades you could do
I’ve only recently spent time with Megaraptora only to learn they just float around in Coelurosauria
nah bro i value my mental health too much for that right now, maybe some other time (though if you could provide me with some good resources to use for adding them thatd be swag)
but who doesn't want to hear about saltosauridae, saltosaurinae, and saltosaurini?
Someone save Titanosauria
oh and saltosauroidea
The issue is that you could arguably go into a bajillion -idaes and -inaes, even more so with the -inis. I will certainly try to be more specific with sauropodomorpha at some point though since I can afford to clutter the image some more.
tyrannosauroidea has the same issue where you have way too many clades comprising like two taxa
Yeah, I was only really willing to go so in depth with neotheropoda because the notable variation and public knowledge of the contained taxa is probably more in depth than any other section of dinosauria. I intend to use these as a quick reference tool so it needs a lot of stuff. I will probably declutter the birds at some point.
Ok, you need to make some for Ornithischia now because that is truly confusing stuff
the 2000 subclades of cerapoda
I am dreading ornithischia but I do intend to cover most/all of archosauria so I kind of have to
Do it for me 🫡
for reference the entirety of dryptosauridea is dryptosaurus and dryptosauridae gen. et sp. nov.?
Yeah
and for sauropods there's khebbashia which for some reason exists even though it's just slightly more exclusive rebbachisauridae
some clades can really just be ignored and nobody will ever care
If you could direct me to some papers on it that would really be helpful. You know far more about sauropoda than I do so I trust you more than I do myself 😓
I just use mortimer and double check the source if need be
https://theropoddatabase.com/Sauropodomorph cladogram.html
Oh man that's a really good one, definitely going to make use of that
yeah mortimer's a literal saint
my man is gonna out-compete me with my project 😭
powered by mortimer
although usually I just browse the theropod database looking for weird obscure unnamed crap which can be fun only to then realize the citation is some paper from the 60s I have zero way of looking at
Honestly that bothers me more than any paywall, it's awful how many papers have just been lost
Honestly the best part of online journals
Alamosaurus placed outside of Saltasauridae, neat
Just to be clear though, paywalls should be illegal. The above statement was not me excusing their existence.
I love scihub
And then Larramendi's sauropod books's good too because a) pretty pictures and b) lots of unnamed things mentioned that would be really hard find in literature anywhere else although I have no clue how screwy the size estimates are
If you are referring to something in my cladogram, I primarily used González Riga 2018 and D'Emic 2012 for macronaria
I don't see anything in there that would place alamo outside of saltasauridae though
Specifically alamosaurus is pretty far within saltasauridae
I was just reading through the cladogram Table posted
Oh the database one, yeah that's interesting. It seems they referenced a lot of older and less extensive studies, so maybe that's why.
Is there like a list of Lithostrotians with preserved skulls? I can’t find anything 
No clue, but I hope so
sauropod
preserved skulls
haha no
nemegtosaurus is just a skull iirc
This is cruel and unusual punishment 😐
looks rapetosaurus has some partial skulls too
"If I had a nickel for every time I found a lithostrotian with a preserved skull, I'd have two nickels - which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice"
No Lognkosaurian skulls 
so about the saltasaurid alamosaurus it seems that alamosaurus likes to hop around true saltasaurid and being slightly more basal but as per González Riga 2018 it's a saltasaurid and I don't know about any more recent phylogenies
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14772019.2016.1183150 I found this paper on it. Slightly older unfortunately
yeah it seems kinda volatile
There always has to be one that refuses to sit nice in the phylogeny 
It would be strange if it was still considered to be close to Opisthocoelicaudia though
granted in the 2018 one the rest of saltasauridae is a massive polytomy so that's fun too
you should put gualicho and deltadromeus and bahariasaurus and co. in that theropod cladogram

and chilesaurus
Damn, there are like… no Maastrichtian Titanosaurians further north than Brazil 
They don't really have their own grouping so it'd be kind of hard to place them nicely. Same reason I didn't have eoraptor in the sauropodomorpha cladogram. They may be fairly significant taxa, but it would be hard to include them in a simplistic quick-ref cladogram.
exactly why you should do it
Also gualicho could be anything from a neovenatorid or something close to a megaraptoran, which is clearly a sign to leave it alone as far as I am concerned.
I’m gonna assume it’s more likely this guy (Alamosaurus) is a radiation of Lognkosaurians cause that geographically makes more sense 🥱
there isn't much dinosaur material north of brazil period as well though (in south america)
Yeah
larramendi puts it as a saltasaurid as well in 2020
Where in Saltasauridae
just realized i spelled saltasauridae with an o in my cladogram 
Dreadnoughtus in Saltasauridae too?
I’m dumb Aeolosaurini are in Saltasauridae
yeah larramendi can be wacky
The taxa contained within colossosauria have traditionally been placed within a large grouping defined by its relation to saltasaurus, so that may be why.
saltasauridae also has bonatitan which is tiny but gave me a headache over trying to figure out if it was adult or not
Larramendi’s makes more sense than Alamosaurus being nestled into Opisthocoelicaudiinae
Have there been any studies analyzing the remains for determining age?
Titanosauria giving me a headache 🤕
It’s a whole mess give me a sec to see what I wrote down about it
Man, everything between sauropodomorpha and sauropodiformes is so based. I love this guy so much.
Hmm are we suuuure Alamosaurus isn’t closer to Futalognkosaurus 🤔
Look bro, it's in titanosauria. Nothing is certain and nothing is sacred.
Alright… This clade stinks 😔
"Two braincases are preserved for Bonatitan, both corresponding to subadult individuals as suggested by visible sutures that are otherwise obscured by fusion in most adult dinosaurs" (Carabajal, 2012).
"This braincase is slightly larger than the one originally assigned to specimen MACN-PV RN 821, although it seems to correspond to an earlier ontogenetic stage(because the sutures are not obscured by fusion) (Salgado et al. 2014).
"The sutures and the vascularization marks are not visible in the endocranial casts of Bonatitan" (García et al. 2015).
And those two specimens were split into like five but didn’t get new numbers or anything so it’s just annoying to keep track of
Nightmarish, cursed animals
That whole conversation was a mess though because I posted a little cobbled together image of austroraptor quilmesaurus and bonatitan but someone thought the scale bar was like 10cm or something case they thought austro was some velociraptor sized thing
Turns out minimalism is bad in size comparisons
Tbf that’s what austroraptor gets for having such bizarre proportions for a large dromaeosaur
Yeah but unenlagiinae is fun to say
Fair enough
@compact leaf is right. It is a sauropod’s track. The dig site is in Switzerland
Ik theres austroraptor but whats the other two
"why people keep saying that birds are dinosaur descendants???
as far as the taxonomic goes, birds are literally dinosaurs"
quilmesaurus and bonatitan
Alr
monophyly's too complicated for some people apparently
Monophyly’s 😔
@compact leaf here's some general unnamed cretaceous brachiosaurid records I could find
-Possible Dahkla Brachiosaurid – Maastrichtian, Egypt (Could also be Titanosaurid (=Saltosauroidea/Lithostrotia?)
-Possible Charentes Brachiosaurid – Early Cenomanian, France
-Possible Longjing Brachiosaurid – Albian–Cenomanian, China
-Possible Sao Khua Brachiosaurid – Barremian, Thailand
-“Angloposeiden” – Barremian, England
-Possible Kirkwood Brachiosaurid – Valanginian–Hauterivian, South Africa
-Possible Jouâr Es-Souss Brachiosaurid – Berriasian–Hauterivian, Lebanon
There were a few other ones (Korea, Mexico, etc) but those have been disputed or otherwise debunked, but from some light searching these here seem to be fairly uncontested.
Cos no respect
Pain. Agony, even.
Knowledge
what are some acctualy good sourses?
websites,papers whatever,all i want is good dino sizes and such
For sizes go to google and write [dino name] skeletal 2023
Ornithischia complete 😎
I'm gonna have to trim and organize some stuff, but everything is essentially there
@light osprey I checked and Quaesitosaurus, Tapuiasaurus, also have skulls, as do Sarmientosaurus and Diamantinasaurus, but those two are in a clade basal to Lithostrotia
could Cygnus falconeri fly? ( giant prehestoric swan )
at that size it’s still possible that it could fly but it may not have been great at it
what do u think that wing is used for???
this has wings therefore it can fly
as a art reference ofcourse
so it could fly but not very well?
Are there any Nile crocodile skeletals? Like skeletals with the bones
Something like this but a Nile crocodile
Just get Lambor to make one lol
Wait no, better question: are there any skeletals of crocodylus anthropophagus
You should try to make your own yk, I’ve tried skeletal making it’s fun
I've got no clue how to do it 💀
I actually attempted one but gave up because thorbjarnarsoni was easier

Bro needs a skeletal, crocodylus anthropophagus skeletals literally do not exist, side views of oy basically do not exit
Do you have the remains of the skeletal or did you just completely delete it and make thorbjarnarsoni instead? Like do you have the unfinished one? Or did you just not start making one
bro needs that skeletal bad
I hate it, it's just scrappy skull parts all belonging to different individuals 😡
composite skull time
It's a beautiful creature (and you made astorgosuchus sooooo)
Isn't astorgosuchus like 2 jaw fragments? Btw that astorgosuchus skeletal is great, easily your best one
DW i still have everything, I just won't start up my pc at 4 am and being unable to see further than 30cm without contacts
Ok, Keep up the good work with skeletals, not Many people make croc skeletals nowadays
thanks
Btw, how far did you get on it?
Everything is drawn but has yet to be scaled
Ah ok
Sounds good, I think it's funny how even the lower estimates for crocodylus anthropophagus put it at Cassius lengths and uh idk the weight but I'm gonna do a random non reliable guess and say it's like 1-1.4 tons for the lower estimate
I'd just isometrically scale it to something with a weight estimate
A devious smile
How big is the largest Majungasaurus?
Tbh depends, if you use Hartman's scaled to the largest skull, you get a much larger animal (iirc ~8 meters) compared to Franoys
is the orange the quadrate?
Narp, largest specimen that I don't actually know what we have of it, but it's not the quadrate, I know that
Penza probably, a dentary
yup seems to be penza
Guh, the / was a typo on Incin's part and I didn't realize 😭
OHHH WHAT THE HEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLL
whats is the bitforce of astrogosuchus
is it allowed to gif in paleo chat
https://youtube.com/shorts/pB89gW7_Ze0?feature=share
Imagine if the Deinon could bb
Seeing "extant" slapped on to neotheropoda makes me so happy
"livyatan is the only known competitor and potential predator of the megalodon"
also livyatan:
Danosar
I mean, using those estimates the size difference isn't that extreme
Checks out
Is livyatan even bigger then a normal sperm whale?
Smaller, but it has a wider and more powerfully built skull + teeth
the speed rex is based on bataar but not a good model tbh
iirc sperm whale teeth are more designed for fish/squid
they usually don't use the teeth when eating squid, they just inhale them. Hence the lack of teeth on the upper jaw
Shoutout to sperm whales for teaching us how big giant and colossal squid are
Virgin chewing vs chad inhaling
Why the hell does this skull chart say this skull was 2 meters long? Isn't it like.... 1.6 meters or something like that?
that feels a bit oversized
The megalodon pictured is the average 15 meter one iirc
seems so it's 16m compared to 12m levi i was wrong either way seems proper sized then
Didn't know Liv had a such a stubby lil tail
I'm gonna try to avoid going nuts with the birds this time, but I do intend to cover them extensively
The teeth are vestigial. There are some that completely loose them and feed just right.
They don't need them to forage as the jaws itself is enough. They also are capable of some suction feeding in order to gulp their preys. Their white jaws also serve as lures to trick preys. It also can produce luminous substances to act like plankton.
Would it be possible that in a context that lacks any aerial or medium/small predators, pterosaurs could evolve adaptations to hunt prey nearly their size/grab prey items that are on the ground while flying, like seen in Keenan Taylor's tapejarid descendants, or would the raptor-like hunting style remain locked to birds and their relatives that had the freedom of being able to grapple prey with their talons (Asking for a speculative evolution project)?
And then theres sigma filter feeding
Does anyone has an up to date Parasaurolophus skeletal?
What subspecies
cyrtocristatus
(Wouldn't recommend using the one shaded at the back @snow python)
You mean species?
Yes
What is inertial feeding?
Using gravity to help swallow food, i believe
https://twitter.com/fishboy86164577/status/1584928023694159872 so uh, on a scale of 1-10 how reliable is this post?
Pretty reliable
Can someone give me a list of the currently invalid dinos and pterosaurs? I want to be surprised
https://prehistoric-wiki.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Dubious_dinosaurs
Probably not the best but seems to cover a decent amount for dinosaurs
Damn scrotum is invalid 😭
It’s chimeric and the coelophysoid material might not be diagnostic
1772 was a wild, wild time.
Question, since it’s well known that most spinosaurids lived with some sort of carcharodontid, did any spinosaurid live with concavenator
We haven't found one, however Vallibonavenatrix lived in Spain at a similar time
Any idea how wide the skull of chalawan is at the base? Just from eyeballing I'm guessing ~65 CM
That is a pretty broad snout
HW is based on the base of the skull, not the snout but yes it is, it's actually a close relative of sarco
what modern frog beelzebufo related to?
Horned frogs
~62.5cm off the scale bar
Is the CREODONTA order still valid?
Maybe
It’s sometimes recovered as polyphyletic and sometimes it’s not but idk enough about them to make a judgement
what kind of crocodilian astorgosuchus is?
a crocodyloid
a crocodile?
no
hmm
does astorgosuchus is even in crocodilian??
a crocodile is a crocodylid, Astorgosuchus is more basal than that but it is within crocodylia
Any of you guys have any of the studies or links to them which show how strong thallas bite was?
what thalas ru talkin abt?
we got thalassodromeus, thalassomedon, & thalassotitan
The one we have in game
The one that reasonably shouldn't have anything to do with the thala part of its name
Ok so I found the correct one by myself then, I wanted to double check, thnx.
What's the biggest pterosaur excluding anzarchids?
Interesting
I know Oxalaia isn't valid anymore and the specimen was destroyed but how big was that animal?
Oxalaia is a dubious fella but it's not completely confirmed to be invalid iirc
the fossil just doesn’t exist so we can’t say one way or the other but it was regarded as synonymous with spinosaurus before that happened
So mr lapparenti in game is not actual sucho?
The subspecies ingame are generally loosely based off relatives if applicable
I'd say its more of a case by case basis than general
Yeah I guess more if there’s a history of synonymization. So kinda, but probably not because if cristatusaurus and sucho are synonyms it’d be called cristatusaurus.
Weird
So it’s a fictional species of suchomimus named in homage of/very loosely based off of cristatusaurus
I get it now thx))
Any idea why this skull is listed at 2 meters in this chart? Isn't the skull actually like 1.6 meters?
Only god knows because this is based on scale bars, not measurements
yeah until we find more remains it’ll stay in it’s weird little grey area
Fadeno try to be credible challenge: impossible
I mean he marked it with a big "?" and wrote "Based on the scale bars..."

I thought megaraptorans where coelurosaurs
they are tetanurae indet.

Tetanurae very indet.
I love phylogeny
megaraptora causes me pain
It certainly doesn't help that it is sometimes nested in groupings that have uncertain placements themselves
I personally follow the papers placing it in coelurosauria, particularly near the base of tyrannosauroidea, but I think it is important to show a lot of the prominent theories for its placement.
This is everything I have mapped out at the moment. I'm going to expand on the area around avialae later on since it is such a massive clade.
If there are any notable inaccuracies or missing clades, please let me know.
Sorry if this has been discussed before but anybody notice that the Pachy models in-game don’t have beaks? Is that accurate? I always thought they had them
It's sort of unknown at this point. There isn't really any evidence for or against a beak or lips.
Basically it's fine to have either lipped pachy or beaked pachy, we just don't know enough yet to say which is more accurate.
Ah interesting, I presume that’s different for other dinos like some ornithischians that people seem much surer had beaks?
Beaks seem to be something that appears and reappears throughout archosauria, so it varies greatly depending on the clade.
Alrighty, theropoda cladogram completed except for avialae.
Don't use diagrams from prehistoric wildlife, very little of their stuff is even remotely accurate.
What should I use?
Wikipedia is generally ok, but there are individual researchers and respected paleoartists that post their own references in various places.
Achillobator is accurate tho right?
Fred Wierum generally has good size refs and art to accompany. It'll take me a bit longer for achillo
Bet
Alright, this achillo ref seems good assuming the squares represent meters.
Bettttt
If you want to make things more confusing elaphrosaurinae has been recovered as more basal within ceratosauria before
What do you mean by bet
Bet just means like ‘sure thing’
I love the Achillobator
Were Ornithocheirids able to plunge into water, like modern Gannets (Or a less extreme version), or would they have been restricted to dip feeding and landing on the water's surface to dive?
Imagine the austro raptor in game. Probably being able to dive
I don't believe we have any conclusive studies on ornithocheirid feeding methods, but given their size and general lack of strong aquatic adaptations I wouldn't assume they would dive underwater. They probably could submerge if they wanted to, but it probably wasn't an ideal strategy for them.
Thanks for the correction bestie
@honest wave So if I’m not wrong the Achillobator wouldn’t have been able to pounce on larger prey because of how their legs were built. Right?
Ewwww, prehistoric wildlife, bleh
Noasauridae has also been recovered as basal ceratosauria if you really hate yourself
And allosaurus wouldn't be able to do the axe head thing but that's in game so it doesn't really matter at this point
Hmm. I want to try on making a realism dinosaur survival game as a project, and a way I thought I'd reduce competition between fisher pterosaurs was by making them feed in different ways (Pteranodontids landing on the water's surface and diving, Nyctosaurids dip feeding and Ornithocheirids plunge diving)
I haven't heard anything regarding this. It's true that achillo and the larger dromaeosaurs would have been less acrobatic than their smaller relatives, but given modern predators of comparable mass can still maneuver themselves on top of their prey, I don't see why they couldn't.
Good to know. I love raptors
For some reason my brain was interpreting ornithocheirid as deinocheirid
My bad, disregard my other answer.
I don't know enough about pterosaurs to really say much on them unfortunately. I'm eventually going to do another phylogeny project on them, but until then I don't know a ton. I'm more of a coelurosaur person
Ornithodeinocheiridae
I wish I could point you towards a big pterosaur nerd 
megaraptora could be anywhere, at any time. they could be a bird. they could be a mammal. they could be a cartilaginous fish. they could be you. they could be me. they could even b 
megaraptorans are actually the shadow government
Hey I actually couldn't find anything pointing towards this as having been a thing. Do you know if you could link me a study just so I could verify?
I don't really doubt that placement, but I want to keep as close to recent studies as possible
Ah swag, thanks
The achillobator pics I sent, are they accurate?
Corrections made for noasauridae as a whole
This is the best I could find on those guys’ feeding ecology
whats stopping deinocherius and baryonx from drowning their attackers like kangaroos do
i mean, so are the creatures doing the drowning
I moreso mean that a Tarbosaurus at the same depth as a Deinocheirus is going to be much higher above the water level than if a dog and kangaroo were at the same depth, at which point it would much more ineffective to try and drown it
oh
All I have left to do is aves and I've completed theropoda
It's always amazing to see just how diverse birds were outside of aves
Sorry if the enantiornithines are a mess, it was rough trying to organize them
Mass estimates for this guy? I've seen 8 tons so far but idk if that's still accurate
is this magnapaulia aka big paul?
Yes
iirc wasnt the estimate around 8.2t or something
the larger one (which is oversized in the image) is around 10t
Is that the size when not oversized? Or is that how large the one displayed would be if it was that big
the correct size
Is it true a massive new paper is coming out on the second? I hear it's gonna be something huge but I wanna see if what I'm hearing about is real, I've seen this along with a couple other things and I wanna know if an embargo on a massive new paper is actually lifting in 2 days?
rewriting the evolution of vertebrates is a pretty massive statement, this is the first I’ve heard of it but either way it’ll be interesting to see how it pans out
I've heard some rumors (unconfirmed and the source could just be making it up) that it's a massive early toothed baleen whale that's like 100 tons, like llanocetus but massive but idk if these hold any weight
I can assure you it doesn't rewrite vertebrate evolution, nor is it a 100 t whale
Sure is big though
Sensationalism? In my rumors? It’s more likely than I think?
Anyone know an accurate depiction of how the scales on the head of a theropod would look
Nvm found a good one
just saw meg 1 thought abt its accuracy and thought it was pretty close or am i wrong?
It's too big but that's about it. It's design at least is perfectly fine for the most part.
Behold, a man
I made sure to include some of the major clades of extinct members of aves, not just the extant ones
Welcome back
Oh yeah, hey Scanova. Why do you have the new member icon?
I've been in and out. I only came back in here today
whatever the case, welcome back
What are some species of smaller tyrannosaurids?
For specifically tyrannosauridae, the smallest ones I can think of off the top of my head are alectrosaurus and alioramus
Alectrosaurus is outside tyrannosauridae but both alioramus specimens are the smallest
Teratophoneus and Lythronax are both under 2000kg as well
In general, tyrannosaurids are quite large. None of them can really be classified as small theropods, just medium-sized. Tyrannosauroidea is where the smaller taxa are.
Actually teratophoneus might have larger more mature specimens
But yeah the only “small” ones were alioramines or the earliest member of the clade
Gotcha thanks
Given that the genera just outside of tyrannosauridae are already quite big, I feel like not even the earliest member would've been small. The smallest of the three taxa just outside tyrannosauridae is still over half a ton.
Yeah I say “small” loosely since lythronax is still at least 1500kg
Do any of you have an accurate alioramus depiction?
Probably random’s skeletal but keep in mind it’s not fully grown
Oh god that image quality
Someone needs to rescale this one to an adult
Given that alioramus itself is only known from juvenile and subadult specimens, it wouldn't be unreasonable to assume they looked more like qianzhousaurus as adults. For that, the prehistoric planet qianzhou is great, but we still have reasonably accurate depictions of adult alio.
Idk if this is a weird question but is there a tyrannosaurid with a boxy skull
Oh looks good, thanks
The taxa closest to tyrannosaurus (zucheng and tarbo) tend to have fairly boxy skulls, but I don't know if I understand what you're asking.
Ohhhh yeah it’s tarbo, thanks. Do you know any accurate tarno reconstructions?
This is a really nice one
Thansk for the help, helped a lot
What was the most annoying dinosaur?
The megaraptorans were easily the worst as a singular clade, but aves was a nightmare.
Oh ok
thats what i was thinking
You would think that aves would be easy since the majority of them are alive today and we don't have to rely on fossils to classify every single one, but there are so many taxa that it takes up half the cladogram.
Alectrosaurus is not a tyrannosaurid
What family are the raptors in?
Technically you forgot megaraptoridae 
Yes, table corrected me on that earlier. I just recalled incorrectly.
Dromaeosaurid
The smallest tyrannosaurids are the alioramines: alioramus and qianzhousaurus (even accounting for the fact specimens are immature, they likely didn't scale up to lythronax or nanuqsaurus either way even as adults).
Good to know
Megaraptorans are a bit up for debate. The first paper to actually reasonably classify them, which was released relatively recently, proposed them to be tyrannosauroids (funnily enough closer to proper tyrannosaurids than yutyrannus is).
1 of my fav dinos ❤️
When people say raptor they usually just use it in the sense of "non-avians with sickle claws", so these are the ones that get called that the most. Raptor is a very informal term.
Eh I think it's 1-1 with dromaeosauridae. Some people use it for troodontids but that really bothers me. It's like, you either keep the term to dromaeosaur or might as well make all non-bird paravians raptors. Sickle claws in paravians are way more common than people think.
Was achillobator Chinese version of the Utah?
It annoys me when people use it for troodontids as well, but it is such an informal term that I don't see much reason to correct them. The only issue is when people assume dromaeosauridae = troodontidae.
Mongolian but they’re both quite robust
Achillobator isn't that well-studied. It's generally acknowledged as "utahraptor but asia" in size and build.
Yeah they like to clade together pretty consistently
Achillobator needs to be studied more
Many animals need to be studied more, but yeah.
You guys don't understand my love for achillobator
There’s also the potentially huge bissekty one
Is the terror bird considered a dinosaur?
Yes, any bird is a dinosaur. Also, there isn't just "the terror bird". Terror bird is a word used to refer to most extinct members of cariamaformes and even some close relatives of ducks that weren't even carnivorous.
Imagine hearing this in the distance
Those videos are not based on research
Damn
They only prehistoric animals we have a remotely close recreation of regarding their calls is parasaurolophus and corythosaurus, and the one for para is still very dubious due to the methods used to create it.
What ever they sounded like id be scared
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvpdCadEWdc The project for corythosaurus is marginally more accurate since it does more to recreate the soft tissue for the resonating chamber.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtpSOpUDCb8 This one for parasaurolophus is less realistic since it doesn't do much to take soft tissue into consideration.
Both of these are still likely nowhere near reality since they only really succeed in speculating on the possible range and texture of the sounds the animals would have made in life.
Rawr! A Study in Sonic Skulls
Courtney Brown and Sharif Razzaque
www.courtney-brown.net/?p=21
Rwar! A Study in Sonic Skulls lifts dinosaur sound from disembodied simulation into physical being. Gallery visitors and performers complete this process by blowing into the installation, momentarily becoming the dinosaur. This work imagines the sound...
Listen to the sounds produced by the dinosaur Parasaurolphus! This was created in a US Government lab back in 1997 after scanning an unusually complete skull. As a product of the US government, this audio is in the public domain.
Updated video: https://youtu.be/bLb9i3v4ap0
For more on dinosaur sounds head to http://www.dinosaurculture.com/soun...
If an asteroid comparable to the Chixalub Asteroid hit the the same place today what would happen?
Damnn
Given that it likely caused the global atmospheric temp to raise to combustion for hours after impact, a near-global tsunami, horrific earthquakes, years of darkness, and decades of acid rain and global freezing, we'd probably be screwed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxeRdZ0gn8k This video is a decent portrayal of the event happening to current Earth, but it has plenty of inaccuracies aside from the innate margin of error present in a project like this. Take it with a 17 kilometer grain of salt and remember that it is more for entertainment than actual study.
The last day of mankind and Cenozoic is coming. The red comet discovered last summer is the twin of the impactor who wiped out dinosaurs 66 million years ago. Same mass, same size, same impact location. Chicxulub impactor was probably an asteroid, but a comet is more beautiful. The comet has simply to be bigger than an asteroid to release the sa...
basically the same thing as last time (read: a really bad time for everyone that isn't small), except maybe with less volcanism (because afaik there's not a massive area of relatively high volcanic activity that can be made worse by the force of a Really Big Rock hitting the earth at Really High Speeds)
Iirc the mantle plume underneath Hawai'i is comparable to the one for the Deccan Traps. If the impact happened in a way that disturbed it then we could have a repeat of the previous post-asteroid volcanism.
Ah,
Thankfully it's fairly deep at the moment, but it's still concerningly large.
well im sure thats Fine probably,
anyway, for related reasons i retract the bit about Less Volcanism. really big rock hitting the earth at really high speeds has basically the same result throughout time, apparently 
Yep!
How large?
big large, idk
Valid
i dont know much about volcanism but i assume this is bad
I just remember folks talking about various effects of the Chicxulub impact discussing how there was a mantle plume under Hawai'i that is near the size or larger than the one that formed the Deccan. I don't know if Wikipedia has an accurate representation of that data, but I recall various people who know more than me talking about it.
I wouldn't worry too much about volcanoes though, since the processes we are initiating through industry are already comparable to or surpassing the chemical processes that caused the Permian's Great Dying.
All-in-all, it's a great time to be a palaeontologist 
is tyrannosaurus scotty is still 12.37 meters long & 10.4 tons?
yes, you can definitely be accurate to the length of an incomplete animal down to the centimeter
@honest wave did Iggy run like this?
honestly it's hard to parse a gif from a 2000s movie from that perspective
idk how iggy ran, but most of what ive heard supports quadrupedal walking and bipedal sprinting. my brain is out of science juice for the night.
Phorusrhacos, yall's thoughts?
Iggy walks with 4 legs & runs and sprint with 2 legs
yeah, it wouldnt be able to move fast with its weight that far forward when on all 4s
Why
What’s larger, Shastasaurus or Shoniosaurus?
Probably shonisaurus
S. sikanniensis flip flops between the two but I think it being shonisaurus has more support
Alright, thank you
Shasta
anyway...
Deinosuchus
All birds are considered dinosaurs, those birds you may see outside today are dinosaurs
It’s generally agreed on nowadays that iguanodon and hadrosaurs and such spent most of their time quad, including while running. They still reared up but to observe their surroundings and feed from higher branches rather than run. Stegosaurs were probably similar.
Oh hey scan was wondering when you left the server
New here so sorry if it’s been discussed before (because it probably has) but does anyone know why they named the Pycno as such when it is clearly based off Carnotauros? Just curious, guessing they’re not planning to change that?
They are not planning to change that and we don't know why they based it off of Carnotaurus considering the two aren't closely related (other than being abelisurs)
Thanks for the response! Did they state that they’re not planning to change it or is it a hunch? Because I was also wondering if perhaps they’d change the Thalasso or Kaiwhekea’s diets/gameplay too 😅
It's a hunch considering it's a fairly new animal and well-done in terms of modeling. If I had to guess, I'd say they would make any changes to Thal-Kai-Pycno after every animal is released (or almost every animal)
We all know it’s to rip off of carno’s popularity rather than give the thing it’s own identity.
Astorgosuchus is pretty cool
My gamer theory: a combination of capitalizing on Carno's popularity, not knowing Pycno's closer relation to Llukalkan and also being made probably soon after the Carno skin paper dropped.
The default sub being a carno one tho I'm not a fan of
A carnotaurus subspecies is not inherently bad. I even encouraged it. But why does it need two carno species, including one being the default.
should've done a Skorpiovenator subspecies, it looks way cooler than hornless carno
Isnt scorpio more related to metri or am I mixing it with smth else?
I don't know what you could possibly be mixing with, besides maybe....sinraptor? Yang?
Skorpio is an abelisaurid
Sinraptor yeah I mixed them up
This, exactly this (btw I love your content)
How accurate are these size comparisons? They seem decent to me but I'm no professional
They’re about right although idk the details.
Really, the "accuracy" of PoT is very questionable. Dinosaurs sitting upright like dogs, oversized creatures for no reason, whatever in hell Thalassodromeus is supposed to be, and Kai
Eh at the end of the day it’s the designs that matter most
Gameplay and animations never really were, and that’s ok. If they were accurate then sucho wouldn’t be semi-aquatic.
The issue is that it's lazy to bank off the popularity of carno when you said you were adding pycno.
No one is upset with how metri looks because it has a good design and a gameplay niche. However pycnos feels ripped off of carno because it's default sub isn't even actual pycno. They should have gone the pachy route and made a different sub for different species. Instead of reusing the same species twice.
Metri also gets flack for similar, and its arguably more egregious in some ways. But with metri I reckon most people don't know better with it, unlike Pycno which uses one of the most well known dinosaurs
At least make it look like some kind of other South American Abelisaurid than carno. We have a mod for that
I mean the only other metricanthosaurus in media is JWE and That's not really a great start
They both gave good designs and gameplay niches, but one is ripping off smth insanely popular and the other, is like, unknown.
True
To be fair I don't really think they're trying to be 100% accurate especially since in some cases it would detract the fun and I think they said the accuracy was more to add ''flavour'' to the dinos. But still kinda stupid. BTW what is POT's mos accurate dino?
JWE’s Metri is better than PoT’s
Most accurate dino is probably Camptosaurus.
Most accurate? Cera, campto, duck, rex, deinon and laten, dasp, sucho, alberta, iggy model wise, amarga too.
I'm kinda sick of the "venomous creature niche" being a thing in these games, especially when it's with stuff like metri or dilo, I don't mind it as much with meg but it's still really dumb, you take a creature that's pretty unique, give it something it didn't actually have and instead of people knowing it for the unique things it actually did have they just know it for being venomous, dilo is a great example of this
I’m sorry but after Primordial Tyrants released their rex I can’t take PoT’s seriously. I can’t call out the specific inaccuracies but the differences are night and day.
I mean fair but eventually something will have to be venomous and hey at least its not dilo again
It wouldn't matter if the designs aren't accurate as long as the designs are also unique and original in a good way, something most of the PoT designs are not
I was talking about designs (and animations along with them). I 100% agree that PoT is more fun the way it is gameplay wise, and not realism based. However, there are many, many small and big details that are overlooked. Deinon's and Laten's wings don't fold, Thal just has David Peters spay-painted all over it, Kai sucks, Struthi doesn't have a beak, Pycno is crying in a corner, Pachy doesn't have a beak, Rex is just JP Rex but with lips and more color, and the list goes on. There are many more inaccuracies, but it would take too long to list them all here
ALSO WHY DO THE DINOSAURS SIT UPRIGHT, IT LOOKS SO WRONG
Like damn the more i see it the more of a travesty the thing is. Like its so bad the subspecies without lips look more accurate like sanguis
PT's got some minor inaccuracies as well, ear hole being to low, nostrils facing sideways instead of forward, front toe being wrongly positioned
Modding and community servers are keeping PoT alive, especially PT
at least it looks less awkward
FINALLY SOMEONE SAID IT.LIKE WHY DO THEY SIT LIKE THAT JESUS.Wanna know the worst part? They actually used to sit somewhat decently prior like allo.Then they changed it
That doesn’t bother me personally
Still infinitely better than official rex
Allo sits upright tho
theres something off abt POTs rex, even beyond just inaccuracies, and I can't tell what it is
duh hence why I said minor lmao.
I can tell you.
It's likely old. Has characteristics of models from 3-4 years ago
Yk what nevermind
It looks dried up to me
It kinda looks like the laten model from when the game first released on mobile
So uh, what's everyone's favorite dinosaur? My personal favorite is between acrocanthosaurus, tyrannosaurus and deinocheirus
^ it doesn’t need to be literally perfect. That’s asking to go the Saurian route of constantly being behind.
Sheesh, idk if you've ever tried modelling or animating off of a skeleton, but it aint easy cut PoT slack it's not like they aren't also consistently updating.
YES. I mean, seriously, the goddamn Isle got it right, and they are actually going for Retro-like designs. Rex looks like it's in pain when it sits down. I think I have just been spoiled by PT and them being very accurate
mine is Pinacosaurus, Velociraptor, and a bit of a tie between Ceratosaurus and Microraptor
My favorite is Gorgosaurus
No I'm talking about how before they used to
lie with all their legs and arms on they ground now they sit upright
A modding team for their own game is outdoing them
It’s a mixed bag and worthy of criticism. Amarga was the last dinosaur they released that was actually decent. And yeah, a modding team making the same dinosaur but better looking in every way is kind of embarrassing.
Im sorry have you heard of an open source game before? They left their stuff available FOR modding teams to do great things with
You can still critique models, esp since Path of Titans has shown they can do better, along with modding teams that don't even have their own game. Even games that aren't trying to be accurate have rex models that look less awkward.
Deinocheirus, Dromeosaurus, Oviraptor, Citipati, Acrocanthosaurus, Gigantoraptor and Icthyovenator
Its cos of this.
Like, it single handedly killed any hype I had for future official dinosaurs. Why should I care about future dinosaur additions when they’ll likely be worse than modded ones?
Embarassing if it wasn't probably 3+ years old. So what's more embarassing is they let it out that old. You compare rex to current campto or sucho, the quality difference is apparent
It's old
Critiques are fine, but referring to a model as a travesty, or that you can't take them seriously because of a model isn't critiquing.
this is true rex is old, its not PoT's fault, it'd be 100x better I assure you once jiggy updates it
This implies that their strategy of basically having all the dinosaur models on standby and releasing when ready’s a smart idea. What you pointed out is the problem with this system.
Mine's Monolophosaurus,Dracovenator,Changdongcoelurus Dilo,Lilien,Guanlong
I kind of wish they didn't hold back a super old model for something meant to be a massive update
Kai is a travesty, it's so ugly looking
I never said it was smart. It's just that its what they did. Rex isn't reflective of jiggy's current ability
Why did they give the one thing without lips lips?
I don't even want to touch on how much of a failure Thal was, both gameplay, stat, and design wise
It also doesn’t help that they likely won’t be touched for a long time because they’re “new” despite the fact they need the touchup more than some older faces imo
I really do wish rex was redone before release even if it meant the update was delayed
God bless Kaiwhekea man. You can argue for the rest but it’s the worst model rn straight up.
If this debate is about how realistic PoT models are, there’s almost no defending a few of the latest ones IMO
my opinion
Doesn't thal have a pretty decent model, its just the scaling that's way off?
In my opinion, spino has one of the best designs in game, it may not be the most accurate but it has everything a good dinosaur design should be, it's very clearly a spino but at the same time it is very clearly PoTs spino, it's also very unique looking along with the skins being pretty great and plus I love the sounds
i still am curious why they made thal so big, this makes me slightly scared of how much they'll oversize hatz
edit: whats that bad about thal? the only thing i noticed was the neck missing or having too many bones and the wings not folding right
No, no, Thal is. Thal is an abomination. I would have preferred a retro Thal with scales, but dear god is the current one so goddamn bad. It makes me want to vomit
Spinosaurus was perfectly reasonable for the time it released. It wasn’t their fault the new fluke got revealed like a month later.
the current one isn't really bad besides the wings being incorrect and being vastly oversized
Spino's textures also hold up pretty well imo.
I agree with what scan said but I feel the textures etc are the main issues for rex, kai, etc
Spinosaurus with some minor touchups to the tail could easily be the best PoT model
i still dont like deinoys model
it looks like a wet owl
Like I know I am in no business to say this as someone who isn't a modeler but jesus Everything is wrong. Lips,It's a carni not a herbi I could say more but i'm lazy
I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s one of the next on the list given steno’s touchup. Steno in general overshadows deinon.
They really destroyed thal just to make it into pteranodon huh 
deinon also had a touchup recently but just for the posture and subspec
just say laten, I was genuienly confused for a sec lel
They do that to a lot of creatures, PoT having unique and lesser known crearures is very superficial
Incorrect wing shape, wings don't fold, it was only 5 pycnofibers, it has the wrong type of hand position, stance, leg position, tail membrane, wing membrane and also the its eyes look like human eyes
For what creature? Thalassodromeus was a thalassodromid, which are predatory, not a herbivorous/omnivorous tapejarid.
It's kai
im still sad about kai being a fisher and just being a generic plesiosaur when its irl lifestyle was so much cooler
Btw, does anyone have any skeletals for modern animals, as in skeletals like this but for modern creatures, I literally cannot find any
uh, kai isn't a herbivore
Kai wasn’t a herbivore either. I said “underwater herbivore” due to the fact it’d function similarly in gameplay if implemented correctly. It’s a bottom filter feeder.
https://twitter.com/ivaniofri this person has some modern animal skeletals, mostly big cats and extinct herbivorus megafauna
Exact same argument for thal
Crap Mb
yeah gameplay wise it would function like one, would like to see a creature that eats near exclusively shellfish
Got to love how they took a plesiosaur with one of the most unique lifestyles ever known and made it basic plesiosaur #15
it has one of the best preserved fossils for a plesiosaur too how did they mess it up that bad
Feel like hatz is gonna be a ground dwelling wader with bonebreak and a 24m wingspan at this point 💀
Like they could have chosen Styxo which Woolunga was lumped into and Styxo doesn't have much in media
Yeah no if they scale it compared to Thalasso instead of having common sense like PT quetz then we’re seeing something akin to Jurassic World quetzalcoatlus
i really wish they'd fix the scaling in the game completely
Screw that It'll be damn Rodan at this rate
if it were
Gets two shot by allo
And is the only creature unable to recover health naturally
Wait what?
Bruh, if all modern crocodilians can death roll including false Gharials and Gharials what the hell is wrong with sarcos skull structure that doesn't allow it to death roll lol
Sarc be built different
If the Siberian Traps erupted againt today what would happen to humanity?
The Russian currency would crash
Bro was a generalist croc that couldn't death roll, I wanna know what sarco was doing in life
It'd evaporate
What's worse is that the devs won't hear us out for a deserved remodel for the creatures that need it in terms of accuracy. PoT claims to be accurate, yet the designs feel like a huge let-down
i have some but no full skeletals i have parts and skulls
Gharials don’t death roll. They can barely shake large food items without risking injury.
The DRCI values close to or greater than 1 are correlated with species that have the potential to perform the death roll (crocs and gators). In the case of Sarco its DRCI value might be significantly below 1
DRCI means "Death Roll Cranial Index"
Well, that still doesn't mean it's not weird sarco couldn't death roll because sarcos skull is like..... Much more robust than even most tomistomas, I just wanna know how the hell sarco was doing generalist things while not being able to death roll
.
sarcos still probably death roll since they are incredibly larger than gharlials
Maybe it just did head whips and thrashes
@clever sable
i doubt that a crocodillian of that size wouldnt deathroll
it simply couldn't its DRCI level was less than 1, compared to other crocodyliforms who have a DRCI level greater or equal to one
Yes I know, however sarco was a generalist so it had to break up prey somehow
then would it thrash like modern day fish and crocs?
thrashing probably? death roll would put too much stress on its skull
What's the DRCI level of a false Gharial?
got it i just realized its skelital structure was more similar to gharlials than any other croc so that makes sense
not sure tbh doesn't state in the paper, all I know is sarcos DRCI is 0.18
It's not that similar
oh ;-;
Sarco is more like a slender-snouted crocodile than a gharial
I mostly compare them to false Gharials and stuff like Orinocos
how easily would a suchomimus be killed by a sarcho?
Pretty decently matched, I'd assume it's akin to lion-crocs of today, maybe
thats what i was thinking but i think a baryonx would struggle to hold its own
Theoretically definitely
I mean, depends considering the Bary we all know and love isn't adult sized iirc?
The most complete Baryonyx we have might not be adult if I am remembering right
wdym im confused?
That old big vert scaling time
I don't think it would be super even, idk though I could be wrong
I’m pretty sure it’s the holotype that isn’t fully grown but beyond that it’s just isolated fragments, it’s also being questioned if a lot of pieces are even bary
That's uh, pretty low lol
yup
Does anyone here know what the DRCI of the false Gharial?
for clarification this is where im getting my info from
Yeah ik
Yeah holotype’s maybe subadult and then there’s bits and pieces that suggest a larger size eg larramendi’s 9.7m phalange and Dan’s 10.4m dorsal (which needs to be downsized)
Suchomimus is huge, and has only been getting bigger with more recent discoveries.
5300 kg sucho peak (thats its actual weight currently)
Acro sucho
Sarco has more muscle, an armored back, and has it’s powerful bite. But sucho’s larger, taller, and it’s claws are formidable as well. It could go either way honestly. Last reliable mass estimate I saw is 4 tons. Where’s this 5+ tons coming from?
based on the scanned material from sereno apparently someone gdi'd it and got 5300 kg sucho
That thing doesnt look like 5 tons, idk about the math.
Wouldn’t that make it the same size as tarbo?
Yeah
Ok when I said it was getting bigger that doesn’t mean I asked it to keep increasing
Too bad
sucho went from 3.6 > 4.2 > 5.3 lol
Yeah I think sucho’s more favorable in that fight with sarco then.
Why is the cooldown 20 seconds longer now
sucho and sarco weigh roughly the same iirc, sarco is like what 5.5t now?
@clever sable was it 5.5t for sarco?
What. Is there also anything more rigorous on sucho’s new size instead of just some discord messages.
It's weighed from the 3d skeleton of Sereno et al., 2022
Gotcha. Did sarco get the same treatment or something?
nah, the sarco upsize is just people citing dubious estimates based on crocodylians, which Sarcosuchus is not
We gotta obviously tie the opponents, otherwise the fight wont be good for promotion.
Yeah sarco was playing 2nd fiddle to sucho then. Ain’t no way.
Oh btw random, should I use DT's Sarco skeletal? Or your Mark 3 one? I've been told yours doesn't match the skull which is weird cause I swear it's the same size as DT
And it also makes things much more ominous for all the herbivores lmao. Ouranosaurus and nigersaurus are half it’s size now.
Mark 3 as in the silhouette? I'd recommend DT's over that, it's more rigorous
I still think every single estimate we have ever gotten for sarco is kinda crap because nobody measures the postcranial, although I do think it may have been bigger than 4 tons because it's skull is like, almost 6 feet long and pretty wide and robust, ofc I'm not gonna say for sure this is the case but 4.3 tons seems a little small (seriously it's been like 20 years, can someone properly measure and describe sarcos postcranial)
giant extinct croc have measured postcrania challenge (IMPOSSIBLE) (500% fail)
Make it up (real)
I am gonna raid wherever sarcos postcranial material is kept and force people to measure it
I think 9.5 meters and 4.3 tons is too small, but I also think 12 meters and like 8 tons is far too large but I also don't fully trust the size chart 2021 estimates that put it at 10 meters and 5 tons
9.7m and 5 tons so we meet in the middle.
No because that's based on nothing other than being in the middle and I don't know if being in the middle is correct
9-9.5 m is the result based on Terminonaris, which is actually related to Sarcosuchus, so that is the best length. Though I guess someone could try scaling off Termino using skull width instead of length
Basically I won't put much trust in any sarco estimates until it's postcranial is measured
What's more reliable, width or length? For some reason I feel like width is better but idk
neither is too reliable when dealing with different genera at very different sizes, but an average of both would be nice
Well, I don't know the skull width of sarco or terminonaris
L
I can’t get over this. THATS ONLY ONE VERTEBRAE
Hyped for this paper, definitely my most anticipated paper
That's only a single vertebra...... That thing looks absolutely titanic
Too damn real ong
Does anyone know the DRCI of false Gharials
"The “death roll” is an iconic crocodylian behaviour, and yet it is documented in only a small number of species, all of which exhibit a generalist feeding ecology and skull ecomorphology. This has led to the interpretation that only generalist crocodylians can death roll, a pattern which has been used to inform studies of functional morphology and behaviour in the fossil record, especially regarding slender-snouted crocodylians and other taxa sharing this semi-aquatic ambush predator body plan. In order to test this hypothesis, we surveyed death roll behaviour across animals representing all extant crocodylian species. Animals were prompted to death roll using two methods of stimulation: a feeding cue and an escape cue. The feeding cue involved presenting each animal with a bait item, to which resistance would be applied during a biting event. The second cue involved capturing each animal with a rope or catch pole, a standard technique for capturing crocodylians, but one that also often prompts an attempt to escape. All species tested, except Paleosuchus palpebrosus, exhibited the behaviour in response to at least one of the stimuli. This included the following slender-snouted species: Gavialis gangeticus, Tomistoma schlegelii, Mecistops cataphractus, Mecistops leptorhynchus, Crocodylus johnstoni, and Crocodylus intermedius. The patterns of death roll behavior observed in this survey suggest that this behaviour is not novel to any one crocodylian clade, morphotype, or dietary niche. Also, the prevalence of death rolling behaviour across Crocodylia in response to perceived threats indicates that it is not solely, or maybe even primarily, a feeding behaviour, but is also utilised during inter- and intra-specific conflict as a means to escape or injure an opponent. The results of this case study highlight the importance of using multiple modern analogues when attempting to correlate form and function across diverse clades, both living and extinct."
Oh you meant like that. I know they spun in an attempt to defend themselves I just thought you meant with biting.
Ah ok
It makes the context a bit different. Like I’m sure Sarcosuchus would’ve “death rolled” in a similar matter if put in the same circumstances
So tomistomas also have a very low DRCI but can preform a death roll.... So sarco may have death rolled? Idk that's what I got from this
it quite literally says it at the start
Yes, but, tomistomas also have incredibly low numbers (0.11 and 0.2 compared to sarcos 0.18) and tomistomas are known to perform death rolls and intensely thrash prey
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FT5UmbBUc_k tomistomas can perform violent thrashing motions and even death rolls on prey (ofc death roll is kind of a misnomer, while it is occasionally used on live creatures or to escape from the bites of rival males, the death roll is actually primarily used in breaking up food)
Maybe there estimates are outdated now is what I am guessing, but I havent found any other recent paper that measures the DRCI in crocodyliforms
Okay one can say false gharials are analogous I suppose
but they're not Sarcosuchus. they are not the same animal, not even remotely
Tomistoma underrated
The point is, just that something has a low number doesn't mean they cannot death roll (as shown by tomistomas) but ofc this is just speculation that sarco may in fact have death rolled despite a low score but ofc that's all it is, amateur specialation so
Mfs took on cattle and tigers but the latter is anecdotal
So sarco death rolling isn't completely impossible?
It depends on what you mean by death rolling.
Just spinning in water, death rolling to break up food, and death rolling to tear into struggling prey are very different things, likely with different stresses.
Breaking up food
Tomistomas have similar DRCI and can deathroll while feeding so seems feasible for sarcosuchus
especially when considering the sort of animals sarcosuchus could have been tussling with
Feathers?
Yeah
Yea they likely would’ve had them
Ok, what about this pic? Achillobator btw
Looks good thought it as a yutyrannus at first glance
Keep in mind our dromaeosaur feather samples come from small species. We know the big ones had wings, but that's about it
RIP sarcosuchus upsize 😭
Wait when where nigersaurus and ouranosaurus downsized
Ouranosaurus is like 2.5 tons, and nigersaurus is like 3?
RIP those guys lol, I don't doubt for a second sarco ate them
nigersaurus is in the 3-4 ton range yeah, so it’s pretty dinky even by rebbachisaurid standards
How did lil bro survive in the erlhaz formation (probably just reproduced and grew really fast) although it wasn't completely defenseless it still had to live with sarco, sucho and eocarch
i suspect ourano and niger might have just been absolute herbivore menaces to cope with their predators
but mostly niger cause that thing couldnt really run
It's a 3-4 ton creature, if this skeletal is size accurate (which I'm kinda skeptical of but idk) it would be detrimental for it to be aggressive to stuff like sarco lol
it looks squished
Idk if this is better
Lmao the squished hartman skeletal
Being aggressive to Sarcosuchus would be detrimental, but it's not going to escape Suchomimus or Eocarcharia on foot so it might as well fight
does 7-8.3 meters long & 2.4-4 tons ourano is still accurate?
I suppose as a range it works
You appear to use it in this size chart
I always take hartmans sauropods with a grain of salt, his titanosaurs are usually really good but other ones can have some issues (missing vertebrae and squishing being big ones) 1:30 slow mode is killing me
yes, when it isn't horizontally squished it's good
it’s just painful
nigersaurus is 9-10 meters long & 3-4 tons?
thereabouts yeah
While we understand users' frustration with chat cooldowns, please note that these can be set and altered throughout the day whenever a staff member feels it is necessary. These cooldowns are designed to help moderators and staff manage high traffic in the channels or prevent further potential rule violations. Otherwise, conversations related to the chat cooldown are considered off-topic.
Not our fault there isn't an off topic chat, this server is set up very poorly tbh, long cool downs, no off topic, 4/10 wouldn't recommend but I'm staying because I have no other Paleo server things (please someone invite me to a Paleo Server or something grahhhh, I just wanna talk about prehistoric creatures)
how accurate is this rex model?
https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/tyrannosaurus-rex-d44914f3fa654633b5445376fd4d5fcd
Here is the mighty Tyrannosaurus Rex, the most famous prehistoric creature, the reconstruction of the 3d model is as accurate as I can and include most recent information about the creature, it has an accurate anatomy and musculature, and overall I’m happy with the 3d model.
The rig features shape keys which cannot be exported, thats why the fe...
The face looks pretty stubby
better
I like GATs the most here for Mirigaia
b i g p a u l
b i g p a u l
Spared all expense for the eyes.
ngl i've heard a lot of debate about which miragaia is Correct. what's the current info on that? is there any consensus, do we know anything, did it have the cool long plates distributed super densely or was it Normal, how long the neck, etc.
GAT’s is more rigorous with what we know but Ashley worked with the palaeontologists that are studying the latest miragaia remains for her reconstruction, including unpublished stuff.
In that case, would it be more reasonable to assume that Ashley's Miragaia recon is the most accurate of the two?
You could go with either or. I go with Ashley’s.
50 minutes left 👀 🐋
I just learned about it like 2 days ago but I’m hyped for this paper
50 mins for what?
uhhhh
Is that, mosa?
That's Whales.
^ ...
So basilo is the thing under the conventional whale?
i don't think that's basilosaurus. not noodly enough
thats not basilo.. thats its bigger brother
Idk whale evolution, I just watched Walking With Beasts 5 years ago.
Tf
from the article ive read its called perucetus n it said this.. 25m n 85-340 tons💀
85-340?! Talk about covering all bases.
That’s a generous range
does anyone have a link to the paper?
Seine Entdecker Eli Amson (Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart) und J. G. M. Thewissen (Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA), beschreiben den neuen Urwal Perucetus colossus als das möglicherweise größte und schwerste Tier aller …
That's the creature 💀
💀 yes-
Is that a blue whale above it 💀
look at how much it weighs ...
Where do I see that info
I can’t get past the paywall how do the methods seem so far?
this is bizarre
Well uhm ackchually according to the paper it's a 340 ton whale even though this is unlikely 🤓🤓🤓
Not unlikely at all, i think this is very congruent with whale lifestyle
What are your bets for it's actual weight?
Pufferfish whale
wh. why is it shaped like that
This thing’s basically a manatee but you made it a 100 ton predatory whale instead
85-340 but my guess is around 190-220 tons for the biggest maybe
I doubt it’s bigger than a blue whale myself. But still 80+ tons.
i would say about 80ish
I'm guessing roughly as large as like a fin whale maybe? Although 100+ tons is pretty likely
Possibly 140-160 but that's stretching it
Right whales at 16 meters long get up to 80 tons, and this guy is longer, just as beefy if not more, and denser than a blue whale. It’s probably bigger than that imo.
even it being denser i don't see the same amount of soft tissue they have here
this is just waay to much on this animal and there is no good enough reason here for them to be basing it off of sienians, from waht we have it doesn't even have the build to hold that much soft tissue
They took inspiration for the PHP sauropods
must have
If this is actually looks like I'm gonna laugh
https://twitter.com/DigitalLife3D/status/1626271691763482629
https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/model-93a-blue-whale-mesh-51a1e06a393b4817bf5cdbc484a4cddc
how a blue whalke is built like
Female Blue Whale 3D model is now available! Check it here! https://t.co/vctfGa4YSA
(Free download for non-commercial use)
To learn more, check out this publication: https://t.co/lO0TI8DXRg
This is a three-dimensional mesh model of an adult female blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus) reconstructed from photographs and videos of a live individual taken aerially, underwater, and from a tagging boat. Aerial photos were taken by the Duke Marine Robotics and Remote Sensing Lab (https://marineuas.net/), and underwater videos were taken by ...
And we thought shonisaurus was a sea blimp 💀
i don't like how it still has hands
Early whales go brrrrrr
the soft tissue is horrible imo that's way to much
Nah this is definitely totally real 100% (even though it's definitely not 340 tons it's still probably like 80+ tons)
whats the new whales name?
Dave
Perucetus colossus
Do you see this thing’s vertebrae? This is not excessive by any means lol.
yes i do see it's verts and that amount is still excessive
It’s a whale. It absolutely is not.
that's the point it's a whale why is it using sienians as a soft tissue ref
Some of the most bricked out vertebrae of any cetacean on top of being denser than the blue whale.
whos the better prehestoric sea blimp?
The reptile by default
I mean, it's kinda excessive but it's not far too much, it's still realistically possible, like, it's not that bad, it may be a slight overestimate of soft tissue but it's still not that bad
Shoni might be surpassed considering it likely wasn’t that round.
Counterpoint, the reptile doesn’t look like a mushy banana with baby arms
I’m pretty sure it’s based less on sirenians and more on other basilosaurids, which kinda makes sense considering how massive and wide the vertebrae is, compared to the already present other bones
it can be all that that, but it won't give you the right to use creatures outside of its family to base it's soft tissue on when it has none of the adaptions of holding it not only that these animals are herbivores as well that give them that bulk, and no they based it on sirenians not any basilo, cause if they did it would be a lot skinner
could they hug eachother or are their arms to useless/short for it
idk i don't think they can? if your talking about the new whale
yeah
What basilosaurids have you seen that look like this
I don't mind how robust it is, the biggest issue with the reconstruction in my opinion in it's tail "fluke" it's literally just the tail of a manatee, which is kinda a weird choice
none but it seems like sme artists are already sliming him down a lil bit going off of this guy https://twitter.com/branartworks/status/1585794097138356226?s=46&t=tUb_izmZum0jnPzVKRV9wg
That's not perucetus.... That's literally from Last year.....
they are using that animal as a ref .......
Oh Jaime does good work. I look forward to their eventual take
Well don't say they are slimming perucetus down when it's just a close relative that's been slimmed down, now as I said I don't think it's as robust as pictured here but I also think it was more robust than the average basilo
The model doesn't have swept back ribs, so the torso depth is likely exaggerated of Peru
they are using the close relative to slim him down, that's what they are doing
Seems you missed the all important words "going off of this guy"
Yes I did indeed miss that
It's based on sirenians. We have no soft tissue from basilosaurids
Man really puts into perspective how weird early cetaceans are compared to modern ones. Literally every single modern cetacean has a pretty huge head compared to their body. Even in dolphins their heads are a decent size. Basilosaurids though are all like....... 95% body 5% head
Boi is still fat (credit to randomdinos)
ah random has killed him
Random already doing blessed work
Un pinheading the Beast
In Random We Trust
I'm liking the build of this guy so far, looking like its not absurd in the length department like basilo
This is still almost certainly one of the largest prehistoric Whales ever
if that head is correct that is a scary sob
Oh for sure, the picture of a researcher next to some of the vertebrae is still pretty insane
@bright veldt a better way to do the soft tissue if you haven't seen it yet
has no right having spine this big
#sciencenews An ancient #whale could rival the blue whale as the heaviest animal ever. The newly described Perucetus colossus from the middle Eocene of #Peru pushes extreme growth in whales to a much earlier phase in their evolution than previously thought https://t.co/uEPjs9a0Lx
232
My guess will remain that it's probably around 70-80 tons possibly even 100+ but 70-80 is more likely
Already more based than Megalodon
hopefull there will be a gdi done on it soon
My bad
There are no reasons for visible hands.
Antaeucetus has similarly build ribs and vertebrae.
that's a nice lad. still got a tiny head and a thick body, but the proportions are way more sensible
I wonder how heavy that reconstruction is
one day we we'll see
published
immediately nerfed
Sucks to suck
the downsizer strikes again
Upsize it again
If we assume it was very blubbery and dense, the 85 tonne estimate from the paper may be possible. But no higher
I love our new chunky lad, but I wish less research papers were like "omg i just found the biggest thing ever and it rewrites evolution!!"
it seems they did that to get funding for the rest of the dig. which. valid
^ it’s still the largest extinct whale known so it’s not an L tbh
The bones found are from an adult right?
Yes, there are indicators that bone growth had stopped
Fair enough, but still symptomatic of a larger issue. Science shouldn't be so inaccessible to both researchers and the people who want to read their findings that "clickbaiting" becomes necessary for serious work to get done.
every new titanosaur before getting hard downsized
Random is the downsizer
We need more people to downsize it so the ignorant masses can learn through many different sources that it wasn't 300 tons
Upsize it, Im tired of the blue whale.
Blue whale cool tho....
I dont like the hegemony it has on the biggest animal ever.
I liked it more when the 100+ ton sauropod estimates were around full force.
Well, if you hate it that much just say hector's ichthyosaur may have been bigger (don't actually do this, it's an awful idea, the only known remains of hector's icthyosaur were lost in a shipwreck hundreds of years ago)
That's most likely an over estimate. By a lot.
All the media is capping with "ong bigger than blue whale" rn
I stopped taking paleo stuff in mainstream media seriously when I saw an article about a new predator discovered that hardly reached a ton and the first sentence was "move over T. rex"
Nope. It’s real.
That’s what happens when you name a 4m abelisaurid something stupid like “the fearful harbinger of doom of the eastern wind”
- -, estimates of 106-108 tonnes are equally valid as the 122-127 t ones for a 20 m meg
Tyrant lizard king just isn't good enough for people anymore 
Nope, it's accurate
There’s been various studies on megalodon appearance, size, and ecology over the past 5 years or so. The largest megs were in the ballpark.
Also that livyatan is too large btw, newer estimates put it at 12.5 meters
Huh -- did it get upsized at any point? Or am I just uninformed?
The 20m size (and thus the 100 ton range) is from Perez at al. from 2021
Mmm, so there was a recent discovery I didn't know about. Okay then.
yea livy is 12.5m ~40t
For a 15-18 meter shark?
50 tons or so
I doubt any Meg could reach 100 tons
I think it’s definitely plausible for them to reach 100 tons or more
That sounds as unrealistic as 300 ton perucetus
Aren’t sharks supposed to be relatively lighter than cetaceans at same length and girth due to their cartilaginous skeletons?
I've never heard that before. I'd think it would be the opposite since they don't have as many air cavities
Perucetus has high estimates of around 340 tons, how realistic is this? I think it may just similar to what happened with Dreadnoughtus.
Not realistic at all
It got immediately downsized from what I've seen
It’s more in the 70-80 ton range now
How recently was it discovered?
Officially?
It’s from a gdi that gave it proportions more according to relatives https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/512496784547905547/1136352488065347594/image.png
It’s insane chonkiness was due to its body being reconstructed like a manatee’s, which isn’t really the most supported thing, even if it’s still insanely chonky and slow-moving for an early whale
Gimme a couple minutes and I'll post a rigorous skeletal

Welp, RIP bozo, lost 200 tons immediately.
💀
ah fat
Well one thing I've learnt about animals and life is that it gets kinda crazy
Sea blimp
Current estimates for Argentinosaurus put it in the range for 80-100 tons.
75-85 tons really
How heavy would an Argentinosaurs neck have been? Is there any estimates in tons?
if you scaled to another titanosaur and did a gdi on it someone could figure it out but I don’t think anyone has measured specifically the neck, doesn’t help that argent is sort of fragmentary
when I say sort of I mean very, we don’t even have the neck from it
All sauropods are very very fragmentary, save few exceptions
diplodocoids are the best preserved as a whole, we have a few really well preserved titanosaurs but most of them are fragmentary, and brachiosaurids just refuse to preserve well
I’d assume they are so fragmentary due to their vast size? The chance of all their bone’s fossilising would be next to none.
In general the bigger something is, the less likely it is to completely fossilize. This is seen across dinosauria, with the exception of tyrannosaurus for some reason, which decides to fossilize nicely regularly.
Sauropods also have super fragile skulls. Shoutout to Nemegtosaurus for basically being 100% complete…..except the head was gone.
Kind of a chad move on its part, it has my respect
yeah there’s just a super low chance of them being buried quickly at such large sizes, it’s why we usually just find one or two disarticulated pieces
Wait wheres bros tail gone 💀
WIP. The finished one has the fluke.
Finished version
The Vividen on YT is not an accurate channel, right?
Ahh makes sense sry my brains bit doodoo rn
Who is that?
A new giant predatory ichthyosaur has been discovered! Paleontology presents us with the Swiss Tyrant, a giant sea monster that may be bigger than Livyatan and nearly as big as Otodus megalodon. This oceanic superpredator rivaled Livyatan and O. megalodon as one of the biggest underwater monsters in natural history. In this video we analyze the ...
He gave the largest Meg a minimum length of 15-16 meters based on the new vertebrae found
The problem is that it’s a bloody tooth
ahh perucetus...
the nikocado avocado of the whale
Not anymore
For an early whale that is still obsurdly hefty
Largest whale that isn't a filter feeder, as well as the largest animal in the world in its time, and the second largest whale overall by average size
Honestly the fact Argentino got to the size it did while being an herbivore is insane
I'm confident we haven't yet found the sauropod equivalent of a blue whale either. There's several sauropods that rival/come close to Argentino in size, while the blue whale is an outlier that is 50+ tonnes larger than the next largest whale
Bruhathkayosaurus obviously (this is a joke)
Honestly tho I think Argentino could rival blue whale in length
oh that's easy, my reconstruction of argent is .5m longer than the biggest blue whale lol
Well yeah but I feel Argent is close in weight
Not really iirc The Blue Whale is a lot heavier than Argent
No, Argentinosaurus is like 85 tons, average blue whale is like 150 iirc and the largest recorded is 190 I think?
average blue is 100
Like I said similar weight
Not really
If Average Blue is 100 then yes Argentino is similar weight.
It's 15 tons smaller, that's not similar
I wouldn’t consider something that is around 15-20t heavier similar weight
The largest blue was nearly 200 tons so let's assume that the Argentino we found was average then the biggest was probably around 120-130
I wouldn't do that
That's a baseless estimate, don't use baseless estimates, the blue whale is like, much larger than argent
Okay Larger or Longer?
I mean there is a limit to how big things can get on land, whales are only so big because water and weight don’t get along. I don’t think 110-130 a Argent is possible
argent and several others exceed blue whales in length, in weight they’re not really similar
Larger, size is measured in mass, not length or height
Mass and weight are pretty much the same thing
I keep writing height but it autocorrects to weight 💀
Not really Mass is the measure of how much matter is in something, Weight is the measure of the size of the pull of gravity on something
I feel people use them interchangeably.
Because for all intents and purposes it is the same thing
Yeah the weight of something is directly proportional to the mass it has, but they are different things
I'll say this from what we know Argentinosaurus is the longest creature to ever exist. It's also nothing to scoff at considering it's weight is around 85 tons. The only problem the Argent would have is moving blood around it's body. However if we take a look at trees we see that they grow to incredible sizes regardless of their weight. So I believe Argent could grow to at least 110 but not much past that.
The largest recorded blue whale is like 50 tons larger than the second largest creature lol, that's what makes me feel like there may be a couple creatures that may be in the 120-150 ton range, if there is a creature larger than a blue whale it's either a icthyosaur or a prehistoric whale and not a sauropod (at least this is my guess)
Argentinosaurus isn't the longest. The longest animals are supersaurus and barosaurus (generally the same 40m length anyway).
Imo I still consider Argentino to be the largest land animal
Argent could almost definitely grow to 120t+ sizes, it just needs a not very vertical neck posture so that blood can reach its head safely
It is, you don’t calculate size by height or length
Size is only measured in mass
I feel Argent could compete with some blue whales but not with the larger ones.
I know
Do we still have the material for the aust colossus? Was it just recently found? I'm very interested in this creature as it's supposedly like 130+ tons
Also earlier someone said 15-20 tons is a lot and while yes it is when you compare to these sizes it's a little more lenient
Sadly the fossils we have of it are from Antarctica right? Argentino I mean
I dunno, I don't think so
Thought they were from the UK
Really? I heard they found the fossils in Antarctica. Maybe I'm wrong.
Aust Colossus is UK. Argentinosaurus is from Argentina, hence the name.
Here are some big icthyosaurs, idk who is who other than the grey one is hector's ichthyosaur, also know that most of these are undescribed and in the case of hector's ichthyosaur undescribed and lost at the bottom of the ocean
And do we still have the Aust colossus fossil?
Yes. It's discovery was quite recent.
How big is it estimated to be
Like 130-150 tons iirc? Although since it's not described take these with a grain of salt
Yeah I don't take it that seriously. If it's not diagnostic enough to name then it's not good enough to scale.
Also did you guys see that recreation they did of a trex with the skeleton of I believe it was Sue? She looks gorgeous.
Maybe one day it will be described
https://youtu.be/cBQmTdElvas
Here she is and she is gorgeous.
On July 30, the Chicago Museum of Natural History revealed a life-size recreation of Tyrannosaurus rex specimen FMNH PR 208, also known as “Sue,” which showcases Paleontology’s most accurate depiction of our most complete T. rex. It has muscle and flesh, and she’s even holding an unlucky hadrosaur in her mouth. They nicknamed the recreation of t...
Bit too fat but it's still great.
I just want KG description 💀
Also the lilstock monster which is estimated to be smaller at 110-120 tonnes but same case, take it with a grain of salt
I'm going to guess these mega icthyosaurs are in the same size range as the other non-blue-whale giants. Somewhere between Perucetus and megalodon
Icthyosaurs are the largest animals of the mesozoic right?
using conservative estimates sauropods are larger, if not then ichthyosaurs are larger
Shastasaurus/shonisaurus is 81 tons and 21 meters and aust and lilstock are larger by a good bit from what I heard (although didn't Shasta/shoni get downsized?)
Shonisaurus is about 30t and Shasta's not much bigger, in fact it's skinnier, but longer. No more than 40t
Ok so it was downsized, I'm guessing this happened when we stopped estimating icthyosaurs while thinking they are sea blimps?
