#paleontology
1 messages · Page 24 of 1
brain to body ratios do show some general stuff( p sure the main one is how social something is in relation to the brain size thing) but not the end all proof
In conclusion, the most accurate reconstruction of a dinosaur is whichever one looks the coolest ‼️
afaik troodontids were pretty smart, but not much smarter than related animals like dromaeosaurids. neat lil guys in their own rights, i love 'em dearly (and maybe given time they could've ended up being little geniuses... i like to think they would), but they're not on the same level as crows n such iirc? i think?
Who knows, interpreting intelligence from a fossil sounds tricky
i mean like they can mimic other dinosaur's sounds
and if they lived in modern ages, (not the modern birds) they could speak modern languages, albeit not understandably
true. i guess a better way to put it is that there's not much compelling evidence for troodontids being smarter than most of their other relatives
Maybe they are dumb as hell 👹
estimating intelligence is incredibly tricky, even in modern animals because not everything will display it in the same way
ive heard from some people that a trex as about as smart as a chimpanzee, but im not sure if thats true
That study was quite the conundrum
yeag
it also doesn't help that - despite me Also using these terms because it's easier to understand and also way less wordy - the whole thing about ranking intelligence by Level is a bit flawed. i think a slug is just as intelligent as a human. the slug just does something very different with that intelligence (it trundles around and eats detritus and has a great time and has no care for "taxes" or "divorce")
or, a less extreme example: a parrot and an eagle are the same level of intelligence. the parrot's type of intelligence makes it better at cooperation, vocal mimicry, and language learning. the eagle's type of intelligence makes it an effective hunter and nest-builder (bald eagle nests are wild, dude). we call the parrot smarter but it's just doing something that's more familiar to us
I mean we as humans have vastly different brains to that of other aninals and vice versa.
Lost me at the slug intelligence
No, it's highly exaggerated, modern birds like corvids are much more intelligent
someday you will understand the reality of the slug
I can confirm the average slug is smarter than me
I love how we have well preserved panthera spelaea cubs.
you have to love it when you can get workable dna preserved
sort of related but there’s some really weird developments happening with dna and other microscopic preservation, we do not understand it nearly as well as we thought
😳
JP moment?
Just a permafrost moment
I'm not talking about permafrost either btw this is stuff happening with dinosaurs
I was moreso talking about the preserved Cave Lion cubs when I said that
no it's not
rex was still a smart ass animal sure, but... not chimp leveled
Definitely not chimp
exactly
Oh that’s neat
Wait theres a myth that megalodon only went after small prey?
Unless I'm missing something, I never got the impression megalodon hunted only small prey. Rather that megalodon was so damn huge pretty much everything would have been smaller than it
Megalodon isn’t a picky eater
^
There was nothing larger than itself to go after
Especially if the specimen we have is a male as female sharks are significantly larger than males
does this mean that meg vs livy is possible?
livy is like smaller than a bull sperm whale, meg is like way bigger, meg demolishes it lol
How big is Livy
A pod of Livy's is a different story though (but we don't know if they lived in pods soooo)
it would be kind of weird for them to not live in pods
True
Most whales don't tbf, sperm whales are one of the few that do
Well, most toothed whales do
So it's more likely than not livyatan lived in pods
Most toothed whales are dolphins anyway, although ultimately what we call a dolphin vs a whale is arbitrary and has little bearing on relatedness. Though just by virtue of being related to sperm whales it is more likely than not that they lived in pods
All dolphins are whales but not all whales are dolphins
so u sayin that orca's are both dolphin & whale???
An Orca is a Cetacean
Whale and dolphin are common names so they don’t really mean anything. Afaik
can i still call it killer whale or orca?
You can call it whatever you want I guess
ok imma call it "John"
That myth exists? In basically every piece of media ive seen its obliterating a pod of whales 💀
may i pls know the three aquatic preditors larger than meg (besides blue whale)
winterwhitelodge said there are three, i was only aware of one
Pretty confident there are none
I don't think there are any
Meg is like 122 tons
Megalodon is a bivalve mollusc. How did it get so big
Due to the prey animals that lived during it time period
Damn no one got the joke
there are none
😭
The largest "prey animal" that lived during its time was livy which was abt 70 tons. It makes no sense meg would be 120
Don't know maybe it overspecialization
I think it’s based on how plentiful they were
So Megalodon could eat comparatively small prey and keep its size
Livyatan is smaller than 70 tons, by a lot, livy got downsized
Would Livy really be the largest cetacean? Did all our modern baleen whales not exist at the time then?
I dunno
Who was this made by
I'm not completely sure
bruh alright
“Idk man but it looks pretty legit” xD
So anyway what is y'all favorite dinosaurs
@tough parcel who made this chart
Not really seen the source, so I can’t say
Bruh, I would @ KM because they are the one who originally posted it but I can't get the crown symbol in their name so I can't @ them for some reason
Megalania teiidae
Wait if a sperm whale is bigger than Livy how would it be the largest
@keen forum
Sperm whales probably evolved later I guess
meg also got downsized it's definitely not 120 tons anymore
RIP meg (deserved tbh)
from more recent gdis you get an absolute max of 100t with the average probably being considerably lower especially for males, that's still a huge animal but it's not 120
What if the specimen we have is a male?
I'll give you that one because we can't really tell, they may not have even been extremely dimorphic not all sharks are
regardless 100t is still the current theoretical max for the species and probably smaller than that
Ah
so... should i updated my meg size info or what???
I think so 🤷
At the time? Idk
But overall? Not by a long shot, the blue whale is literally the biggest thing to have ever existed on the planet (if my info serves me correct)
Ohh I read the message wrong forgive me its 1 in the morning
Balleen whales are pretty old i think but idk if they're livyathan old, im no cetacean expert
There were baleen whales but they hadn't reached absolutely titanic sizes yet
Saying megalodon has never been downsized is a bit ambitious
Most Odontocetes live in organized pods, either they are sperm whales, beaked whales, dolphins or something else.
I would out my money on Livyatan to be relatively social, as it is seen in dwarf and pigmy sperm whales, but also in female sperm whales.
By a person on discord with the pseudo Evolutionincarnate. She made the Otodus skeletal based on extant Lamnids, Cooper's model, fossil record and 'Cretalamna. She used the Livyatan silhouette done by Tosha Hollman, Shastasaurus, Cymbospondylus and Shonisaurus by Dragonthunders, which he did the skeletal of both Cymbo and Shasta (as none exist) in order to make this size chart.
There was a Balaenopterid during the Pliocene that may have been similar in size to fin and blue whales. The fossil is known from Italy.
Fin whales can get larger than the biggest Meg and so do some bowhead/right whale species (being also the most absurd looking cetacean).
Look at this head/body ratio lmfao.
Funny things about those whales : their jaws are shaped like those of flamingos, they live up to more than 200 years and they break the ice sheath with their head.
meg is 122tons still
and yep dragon thunder and absolute unit both got livy at 12.5m that would drop its weight quite a bit
what would actually happen if rex and giga met each other: (they will bcome besties)
https://twitter.com/KGiofha/status/1678765606840193029?t=uQZyU6ISBk9j4ryjyaF-jQ&s=19
Seems legit
Probably just look at each other with confusion before walking away. If they weren't hungry there wouldn't be a reason for a fight to break out, and they would most likely move on
https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2023/3878-a-new-solnhofen-pterosaur new pterosaur. Because as if people calling all pterosaurs "pterodactyls" wasnt confusing enough, this guy is named Petrodactyle
just a silly lil guy
…named after the guy responsible for Dsungaripterus i guess?
Isnt Pterodactylus also a genus?
"‘Petro’ from the Ancient Greek for ‘stone’ and ‘dactyle’ from dactylus, for finger. This name harks back to the original description of the first pterosaur, Pterodactylus, a ctenochasmatid from the Solnhofen archipelago which was called the ‘Ptero-dactyle’ at the time, however, the name ‘Petrodactyle’ appeared on the cover of the description (Cuvier, 1809), apparently in error. However, this name would have the appropriate etymology of ‘stone-finger’ and thus is echoed here. The species name ‘wellnhoferi’ honours Dr Peter Wellnhofer who spent most of his career working on pterosaurs from the Solnhofen archipelago and associated beds."
accurate for a sarco + human size comparison? (even if it's a low poly art)
Too big
i wanted a rendered version, not just skeletal 
ok whatever, this is a last chance for me
what is more accurate sarco + human size comparison?
left or right?
Depends how big the human is, that sarco can be anything from 16m to 7m.
Sarcosnake
si hay foto hay video
I can’t find a consistent answer so I’m asking here, do we have an idea of how much Megalodon weighed ?
I’ve seen anywhere from 17 tons to over 100, I’ve had a lot of trouble gathering information about it.
100 is a good estimate iirc
And how many meters would it be alongside that weight?
Also Jesus that is a big fish
I think like 15-16
Alright, thanks.
Wait nvm this one’s better
yeah, the 100+ tonners are 20 meters long
a 16m one weighs about 50 t
Well with this one there’s massive jumps between numbers. I need a consistent amount for both length and weight.
I’d say 18 meters and 100 tons
Is that a upper estimate based on what you know or an average?
I’d say slight upper estimate for a larger megalodon
Alright, im gonna run this by some people and if I have any other questions I’ll be back. Thanks man
Alr
Poor livyatan
Wym poor livyatan that mouth will mess things up still
And being a whale, it is presumably a very intelligent animal
I was about to say, even dolphins bully great whites. I see no reason a Livyatan wouldn't nibble a meg.
True
Big melon too
Was it downsized or something?
Yeah
You have a paper on it?
(Or article whatever)
Thanks
I wonder if pods of livyatans ever tried to hunt Megs
I doubt it, unless the meg wasn’t full grown it’s just so risky and they’re better off hunting something different
Idk, pods of orcas have been recorded hunting sperm whales (although it's incredibly risky because the sperm whale can easily kill orcas)
And it depends on how large livyatan pods are
I don't doubt that a pod of like 15 livyatans could hunt a Meg, but if they lived in small pods of like 5 I don't think they would hunt a meg
It’s all theoretical considering we don’t know how large their groups were, and also orcas tend to hunt sperm whale calves, not adults
Also it depends on the sex of the livyatan specimen we have, if it's a female it's possible males got much larger than the specimen we have and if the specimen we have is male than females would be much smaller
thats like super rare, its not a daily food source
I mean livyatans got some chompers, but beyond that we don't know how they were socially.
Yeah, sperm whales can seriously mess up orcas
a single sperm whale click can seriously hurt an orca, that click is no toy
Well, seeing as most if not all toothed whales are pretty social I don't doubt that livyatan was social
A click from a bull sperm whale can literally kill a human, it will explode your lungs, burst your heart and cause your brain to hemorrhage
Right but what is a pod composed of I'm saying. Are they purely matriachal and bulls run off solo for most of their life or what are we talkin here
How big would their pods be
Idk, I'm guessing similar to sperm whales I guess but idk
aren't sperm whales just usually mother and calf? bulls are around iirc but dont usually stay with them all the way
Off topic, but do we have an idea of how many teeth megalodon had?
I said this bc this is what sperm whale pods are like
But livyatans could be very different in their behavior. They're macroraptorial and have the teeth to prove it
Females form large pods and occasionally males will join those pods but it's predominantly females
gotcha
source?
Males mostly live alone but males will occasionally form pods with other males
The noise is literally over 200 DB, that's louder than many bombs, 230 DB to be exact, the bomb set off in Hiroshima was just over 250 DB
and the source for that?
Sperm whales are literally the loudest animals alive
their clicks could basically melt our insides if they wanted to, they understand how fragile we are so they tone it down around us but they very much could
They use these incredibly loud noises to stun their prey iirc
that's-
it doesn't matter now since i tracked down a source myself, but that's not a source bud c'mon
it’s pretty easy to find it’s a well documented thing
Livyatan could probably also make these super loud clicks albeit on a smaller scale
Huh, I wonder how large estimates for livyatan would be based on pygmy sperm whales
This all sounds very hyperbolic but I don't doubt sperm whale or livyatan clicks would be physically damaging
And also probably mess up your hearing if not just clap it
I think they would be physically damaging as sperm whales literally use their clicks to hunt massive creatures such as giant squids and tuna
(well, we don't know if they use them to hunt giant squid)
Do they actually or are yo-
you're pulling this out of your ass. They use their clicks to see
i'm seein' a lot of news articles about it, and it's on wikipedia, but i'm having a bit of trouble finding a paper about it
also no they don't
https://pubs.aip.org/asa/jasa/article-abstract/120/2/1118/892989
https://www.nature.com/articles/srep28562
(also turns out the second paper does have some info about the volume of sperm whale clicks. i had a source all along...
my folly)
You sure? I'm hearing that they use their clicks to hunt, although I may be misinterpreting what they mean as now that I think of it they may just mean they use it to locate prey
they use the clicks to locate prey but not generally for hunting, were they to actually click at a person with full volume it would vibrate our insides to the point of it being fatal just based on the sheer volume of it
But I don't doubt that it could be physically damaging seeing as they make noises almost as loud as nuclear bombs (albeit it's not a massive bang like a nuke and more like a deep vibrating/rumble/clicking noise)
Well, I guess my info was outdated
when they hit that volume it’s usually in one short burst, they can do quieter sounds for more extended periods of time (and they’re still ridiculously loud) but it’s not unheard of for them to paralyze peoples hands when they touch the whale while it’s vocalizing
Was Quetzalcoatlus able to fly vast distances?
Almost certainly seeing as hatz could
Hatze lived on a small island with pigme dinosaurs I think it's called I don't believe it was tho I don't specialize is pteorsaur info I mainly research herbivores
How do you think it got to that island?
Quezt I don't know much about but I do know the basics
It walked of course
It's possible but I don't think it was that much of a endurance flyer
No tf it swam over there obviously
Bro, it needed to get to that island somehow
Hatz was so successful because it could fly around Europe island to island and have a buffet basically
Damn 
Azhdarchids were probably short burst flyers, however, short burst flyers are still capable of long flights if they stack up on fat reserves and all that. So it's not whether they could fly vast distances, it's how often they would (very rarely)
Well you seem to know a lot more about fliers damn lol I don't know to much
I gotta know how big livyatan is based on pygmy sperm whales, smh, nobody loves da pygmys
But back to a debate that happened in game amarga is actually surprisingly fast for being a sauropod
Its a dwarf sauropod so its bound to be faster than that of Brachiosaurus,etc
Yes even very oversized amargasaurus taking into account said oversize and comparing thickness its speed would be 25 mph while running pot amarga I mean
I doubt Amargasaurus was a fast as a rhino though as you were saying.
25mph sounds difficult for that animal to achieve
Smaller realistic amarga was around that speed
Didn’t amargasaurus have stubby legs aswell?
Well it wasn't just a smaller sauropod it was built differently
Lmfao, by my amateur calculations, based on pygmy sperm whales, I get 74.8 feet long (using skull length, I can't find a skull width at the base for either of them) let's just say i don't think this is reliable
I don't believe so but not all sauropods were slow sluggish animals
Most were though tbf
Brygmophseter is a close relative, so it was used to rescale it.
Nah, 75 foot livyatan is real fr fr
Btw I did look it up to refresh on amarga most sources are saying 31mph
elephants can hit that if they’re really hauling it but their cruising speed is much lower, probably the same for some sauropods
Proof /j
This is why I'm disappointed with pot amarga speed in game slower than rex is a exaggeration even if you think all sauropods are slow
Ark diplo running speed when
Though I wouldn't compare elphants to sauropods I would compare them to a few hadrosaurs when it comes to speed that is not a bad comparison
All sauropods would be quite slow because they didn't have the range of motion in their limbs to run rven if we're referring to a smaller one like amarga
Not all sauropods were like that especially a smaller one like amargasaurus I mean research it amargas speed was quite fast
There are always exceptions amarga just seems to be one of them
Where are you getting your information
they couldn’t run like most quadrupeds but they were still capable of jogging like elephants (albeit with a different gait in some cases and on a bigger scale), their limbs were sturdy but still pretty mobile
From multiple different sources so it's not like it's just one specific place I get info from
Such as?
we don’t have a decent estimate on how fast amarga would have been though, probably similar to an elephant speed
Any that said anything about it's speed all said 31mph
Like I would be looking around normally to make sure but everything that actually said anything about its speed said 31mph
your source is jurassic world the game
in reality amaragasaurus could only reach 14 km/h, or 8.7 miles per hour
Blud got caught in 4K
No
Makes sense 
make sure to check your source are reliable
For some reason I always thought vivid was a girl
Are they?
Look at his bio
Damn I’m dumb
No you're Chonksaurus
🫡
Chonksaurus solos
I am Batman
Uh oh it's actually Batman
Meanwhile Baguette solos ( bageherpeton*)
Idk what the hell were they thinking while nicknaming it
BAGUETTE
Didn't know that atlasaurus turned out to be an interesting sauropod
Oh i saw you in Pce discord
Oh really?
66*
65 is the graveyard
Where does Mr Jaekelopterus live?
In the graveyard

Bro lives in a wasteland 😎
I'll die on this hill...Deinosuchus was both a Crocodile and a Alligator. 🗿
No 🗿
🗿 Yes! When I see Deinosuchus I see the ultimate Hybrid 🗿
crocogator
But crocodile and alligator didn’t even exist back then iirc
It’s an alligatoroid I guess, but it doesn’t belong to the genus Alligator
^it is an alligatoroid, so it is closer to alligators than any other crocodylians.
However, you are somewhat right because crocodiles are what we call crocodylians in the common way, but it can also design animals within crocodylidae (which is the definition I stick with). So, no, Deinosuchus was not a true crocodile per say, but can be qualified as one depending of your definition of "crocodile".
Deinosuchus was a true crocodylian
Yes, we know
Alligators are also crocodilians
Obviously, but Deino is not a alligator or croc
It's part of the superfamily that includes caiman and gator
Yes, we know
Some folks clearly don't
No ways to know. If we go by closest relatives, you end up using Kogia and Physeter which have different social behaviors : one is quite social and live in organized pods of females while the other has a more solitary lifestyle.
If you want to look at ecological homologues, then you have killer whales and false killer whales, living in pods. However, pod size varies greatly among orca ecotypes : some can be as large as 3 while others up to 20 and more. Also, dolphins show themselves to have very complex social behaviors that are not similar to that of sperm whales, though sociality is still a thing within odontoceti.
So, I guess that Livyatan probably lived in pods, but how organized and how numerous they could be is and likely will still remain unknown. It depends of the model you will base yourself on, if you go by phylogeny backtracking or with ecological homologues.
It's a relative of alligators and caimans, you are right on that. I would personally call all Alligatoroids "Alligators" just like all crocodyloids "Crocodiles" as it includes various genus (Crocodylus, Mecistops and Osteolaemus). The distinction between alligators and caimans is more about their geographic range : one lives in the Northern hemisphere while the other lives in the Southern hemisphere. Of course though, Caimaninae form a monophyletic group as well as Alligatorinae, but in a large sense they all are "gators".
bro who is unnamed 💀
Some livyatan things I guess
Is this the newer estimate?
Some are
I think the sperm whale estimate for livyatan is pretty reasonable (13.5 meters)
I’m not sure if that’s the new one
The new one is 12.5 meters
Livy was 15m long.
Source: It was unveiled to me in a dream.
Those megalodon length estimates seem wildly tame.
Id say theyre pretty wild.
A 100 ton mollusk? Yeaj I dont buy it
And for starters why is a bivalve being depicted as a shark 😈
Idk
the latest one is dated 2015, so that may have something to do with it.
a good few of the images seem to be pretty old, anyway
I wish we could find more livyatan fossils
We will, and theyll be sold to private collectors 
Love this guys art
Same
bro imagine baby nanokogia (the smol 4th whale)
I feel like the largest reasonable estimate for livyatan is 14 meters
I recently found his Herrerasauridae stuff
Smol boi
Well depends, idk how whales change sizes from the big ones vs average ones, but if its like, a whale shark where the average is like 12 and the record is 19, a big livy could easily be 14, tho idk how whales scale and I dont really find whales cool enough to research it
baby
tiny, tiny boi
nobody knows, hes unnamed 
It also depends on the sex of the specimen we have
16m average megalodon when the 19m bull livyatan shows up
Very real
the fact that a 19m livy is even remotely possible is terrifying
I also don't know how to feel about the fact that sauropods have made it so that 19m doesn't seem very long to me now
Well, if the specimen we have is female it might be real
But we don't know it's sex, if it's above average, if it's below average or anything like that
What do you think the chances of this being a female livyatan are? Do you think it's goofy for me to say "well if this specimen is female it may be possible males got much bigger"
50/50 :^)
We gotta find more livyatan specimens smh
at least with megalodon we have a decent sample size from teeth livy it really is a 50/50 shot
Maybe there was only one Livyatan. Just a single individual representation the entire genus for all of time
Real
It's too bad whales aren't very sexually dimorphic in bone structure other than stuff like tooth count
I would claim that the livy specimen we have may be male but we have 0 evidence of it being male
Although I Don't think it's super unlikely what we have is a female I have no evidence that it is a female
Alright I need some big brain experts you to inform me on the cranial kinesis condition in Spinosauridae
Apparently there’s a discussion of sorts to be had
Oh, I found a post of Neeco already mentioning this lol. Though idk if they mean all Spinosaurs across the board or what. Gonna leave the tag on so they can elaborate
I think they’re referring to the kind of cranial kinesis that all theropods have being present. I don’t know how Baryonychinae fit into it, which is what I’m curious about
So all theropods had wide jaws? I know rex had sexy cheeks but that's it
It’s a very smol amount of movement in the bone. Not something visibly distinct from what I understand
Nuuuu, I'm sad now
Well yes but they mention that it is obligate, that whenever spinosaurs open their mouth it spreads their jaws (the condition found in Irritator). That's not the case for all theropods
Yes that makes sense
So like monitor lizards
The Quadratojugal is the fancy thing in Irritator, so you can’t really articulate the face in any other way.
Well that and it pairing with the surrangular too
No it was 5 sources saying that just about and those are the only ones the said anything on it not my fault jw games say that is its speed and also man 8 mph is way to slow I know for a fact it was faster than that
Than show them
I thought this over but nvm now I gotta do work to prove to people on a pot discord a amargasaurus speed
Also that's way to slow considering how if something is lets say 30 tons and there's another species that's 6 tons the one that's 6 tons is obviously going to be faster
You have to put work into your side of a debate? No way

No it's the fact I'm trying to chill now for the last 10 minutes I got before I gotta do something
Look up how fast is amargasaurus and see how many say 31 mph
I mean don’t claim something if you can’t actively prove it directly
you will never be at peace that way
I do not feel like doing this rn when people can look it up much easier
What’s the source give it to us
If it’s google, you’ve made yourself look wrong
Look up how heavy Spinosaurus is and see how many sources say 20 tons. Clearly Spinosaurus is 20 tons. “Look up” is not a source
Look at how many say 31 mph is all I'm saying even if I'm wrong every one I saw said 31 mph
Again, by your logic, Spinosaurus is 20 tons.
This is based off math, yours is based off Jurassic World: The Game
It isn't because that isn't what I based it off
You sure are good at providing evidence, you seem like a very credible source everyone should believe at face value
Blud would believe spinosaurus could fly at this point 😭
I love it when someone’s source is “a couple of dudes said it somewhere” 
Fr
Wdym? Look it up is such a great source
Pachycephalo was the size of an Argentinosaurus, just look it up, a couple of dudes said it on like two size charts
Utahraptor could dive 6000 ft underwater
Source trust me bro
No need to belittle
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GVpHchzogtjkTqQrP7PFM2BAWMGHYHABD-Xnk_6KPj0/edit#gid=0 chart is cool
Sheet1
Species Name,Length,Weight,Specimen,Red = not updated/unreliable
Giganotosaurus carolinii,13.5 m,10.5 tonnes,MMCh-Pv-95,Holotype is 12.7m and 9.02 tonnes
Tyrannosaurus rex,12.4m,10.45 tonnes,RSM P2523.8,- 11 tonnes
Tyrannosaurus cf. rex,12.32m,9.92 tonnes,NMMNH P-1013-1
Mapusaurus rosae,...
You guys are acting like I offended you if I'm wrong like I'm sorry but I don't care how credible you think I am man this is a discord pot chat it was the most common answer I got simply because no other's said anything on Its speed
The homie was wrong and/or didn't know where to look, so let us show them
I’m sorry for mocking, I’ll go grab some sources for this 
But using basic reasoning I doubt amargasaurus was that extremely slow
Is that a knight riding a dripped out pachy
Aye. We give ourselves so much crap that its easy to forget not everyone is in the loop on a lot of matters regarding dinosaurs
(Yes it was hard to find)
Very nice
Amarga is funky
Kind of hard to help people when they become arrogant and/or refuse to believe it
ok so first off when it comes to the sources, I’m pretty sure the thing you got it from was a older website article that claimed it has the same speed as a rhino. This is further spread by JWA which made it on a website labeled Paleo whatever, and this got featured by Google.
Speed is a bit hard to determine when it comes to prehistoric creatures for the most part, especially sauropods
Yeah it is but I tried to simply use my knowledge on other creature's to help find out
Which is perfectly fine ofc
Yeah but we can all stand to be respectful to one another. I've slung my fair share of mud in the day but it doesn't feel good to get dunked on for not knowing something
Or having the wrong info
The source Vivid gave is based off various math, I’d read through the chart. I’m unsure as to where they got it from, so I can’t confirm if it is credible, but I’ll also check for that
It’s from larramendis book on sauropodamorphs
Is livyatan Still large enough to be considered the apex predator of it's environment? I'm guessing not
Thanks
Hm basic reasoning already tells me 8 mph even if it's slow is way to slow
Because it was living alongside megalodon and it's much smaller so I don't think it would be at the top of the food chain
iirc Facts and Figures: Sauropods is the title or smth
I mean, I would think. Depends on its range too. Apex can be pretty loose. Take white sharks and orcas for example
True
I stand by the fact that the livyatan specimen we have is female and the males were actually 19 meters (I'm joking)
On that note, the chart can be a little hard to read. Basic reasoning often isn’t what the final word is when it comes to things. Sometimes science and math itself can surprise you. The book in question was made by an expert (as far as I know, or at least based off the word from some.), whom likely spent many hours checking this through, I can assure you everything was taken into account, even if basic reasoning may seem otherwise
Sauropod speed is kinda goofy, though. Isn’t atlasaurus faster than/similar speed to allosaurus simply due to stride length, despite being several times larger?
Not exactly comparable but environments with multiple top predators exist as well. Daspletosaurus and Gorgosaurus have coexisted
Meg and livyatan probably had a relationship similar to great whites and dolphins I guess? I can't really think of a good comparison
Would hyenas and lions fit too?
Probably? If modern animals and research is anything to go by, they likely would have rarely coexisted except if a Megalodon ventured deeper than its preferred place to hunt, the shallower waters
Keep in mind, (for his theropod book, at least) Larramendi’s formulas were “fact-checked” by fossilized trackways iirc and they got around the same estimates as the trackways
Saltasaurus you mean?
Sorry I don't know that many species
Atlasaurus is different sauropod
Atlasaurus has insanely long legs too so it makes sense to be faster than the stubbier Amargasaurus
^true
Livyatan estimates should be based on pygmy sperm whales fr fr
Maybe not exactly comparable, but I think its worth mentioning along with everything said before that ecosystems aren't necessarily rigid and simple
Again Megalodon and Livy would’ve rarely come into contact unlike any of the previous animals mentioned
The sperm whale is probably my favorite living animal, and livyatan is my favorite extinct non mesozoic animal, so I'm hoping the specimen we have is female but I don't have anything to support my claim of this so for now I will have to settle with males being 12.5 meters
Course we can't exactly know what livyatan and megalodon's ecosystem was precisely like, but I can imagine Livyatans didn't like being around were large adult megalodons were
Especially mothers
the “battle in the deep” that is so often shown would’ve rarely happened, as, well, that’s not where Megalodon is shown to have lived or hunted, they just most likely had different preferences
Livyatans and Megs probably didn't encounter each other much as we can assume that livyatan was a deep diver and or pod oriented persistence predator
Can we talk about how maip is only 3t, I expected to at least clock in minimum 5t
think of it less like a great white and dolphin and more like a crocodile and alligator (I wasn’t sure how else to explain it). These animals rarely coexist except for a few select examples, and when they do, they tend to avoid each other still
when they do, it’s out of desperation or because one individual was small enough to go after
I really, really hope that another livyatan specimen that isn't just a skull is found
Or teeth
I hope to find more spinosaurus specimens
But that's highly unlikely
Who knows
Oh wait I forgot to mention this
I am working on a review for a website regarding dinosaur figures, and accuracy is a pretty big factor when it comes to these reviews. I’ve gotten a couple things down like improper feathering, strange skull, etc, but want to know if there’s anything else
(This is Microraptor Gui by PNSO)
No lips?
Mentioned that as well when it comes to the strange skull
afaik there's no evidence for the raised "crest" of feathers? could be wrong
Controversial opinion: I don't think the 15 meter estimate for livyatan is unreasonable but that's just me
Thanks! I’ll bring that up
15m would be a fairly large livy to our current understanding, but I don't see why it couldn't be possible
anyone will be nice enough to get me path of tittans ive been wanting the game sence it came out and right now my family dosent have the money to buy it if not please dont give me a rude response thanks and have a good day
I mean 15 meters for the specimen we have rn, personally I think 12.5-13.5 meters are the best estimates though but I don't think a 14-15 meter estimate is super unlikely
Very minor but afaik shouldn’t there be feathers connecting to the second finger which covers it up a bit
Oh that's different. I'll stick to 12.5m because, well, I don't have reason not to lol. But I can imagine larger Livys being 15m
Is this chart reliable (other than the livyatan estimates)
Did spinosaurids have lips
Most likely
Been trying to keep this guy as accurate as possible. I know that the head is too small and the legs may be too long. It’s based kind of off of both of Dan folkes most recent skeletals.
I started by basing it off of his one from 2021 without knowing he had made a more recent one, which I switched to when I found out, but I was already a good bit into the drawing so I didn’t want to start over… any critiques?
I mean without personal preference
Arms seem a little skinny? Mainly at the top of the arm. Overall it’s pretty good
It's legs are also a tad thin? Like, they sorta look like they'd snap carrying his body mass
^ not mean negatively btw, just tryna help
What does this sign mean?
You or a group member was attacked
Not the right channel, go to #path-of-titans
Also, is this an accurate herrasaurus?
Damn that’s some awesome art, do you know the artist
FredTheDinosaurMan
Ty
Fred the GOAT
Ohhh he’s the artist of my fav spino drawing, always wondered who made that
Which one is that?
This one
Awesome all around, flat tail like a basilisk too.
no, "deino" isn't meant to mean dinosaur there. the "dino" in dinosaur and the "deino" in deinosuchus (and deinonychus, deinocheirus, etc.) both mean "terrible" (as in "inspiring terror", not "bad"). so terrible reptile, terrible crocodile, terrible claw, terrible hand, etc.
it's usually used for clades that're particularly fierce or awe-inspiring
(edit: also the two groups were fully separated around the start of the mesozoic, as far as i know)
Meanwhile irritator*
Irritator is just, an annoying guy fr.
No other way to slice it.
Split jaw incident
Yeah, Crocodillians and Dinosaurs have been separate since the start of the mesozoic. It's funny that we still have both in the modern day
i'm gonna add a lil note to what i said just bc i wanna cover my bases: if we're being really technical, dinosauria specifically may or may not have shown up until like, the middle-ish triassic, but dinosaur-line archosaurs were fully separated from crocodile-line archosaurs around the start of the mesozoic, which i honestly feel is Close Enough. the individual groups may not have existed, but the things that'd evolve into them were still definitely different from eachother, so like. it works it's fine don't worry about it!! 
Highly doubt it
Alligators and crocodiles dont have lips because their environment..idk..helps their teeth remain moist or whatever
But they dont have lips cuz the water covers that
Spinosaurus lived in around the same enviroment and most likely hunted a lot by water
And having lips would probably get in the way of the piercing effect of the teeth of spinosaurus
and other spinosaurids ex:suchomimus,baryonyx,and so on and so forth
Probably
They probably did have lips, simply because lips are likely the ancestral condition and their teeth don't really have the specialized enamel for it. They also have the supporting foramina on their jaws and lack the rugosity that would be characteristic of liplessness
damn
Proximity to water isn't a good reason either, plenty of aquatic and semi-aquatic animals still have their lips
Notable examples are whales and dolphins, hippos too
Most modern marine reptiles also kept their lips
Yes, it's how we know Smilodons teeth weren't covered
Tusks also have that enamel cause they're just specialized teeth
Im certain on why prehistoric planet probably wont ever cover spinosaurus now jesus
That and Spinosaurs is an ever changing enigma of an animal
yeah
(Not really) 
Shut up falcon (with love)
But fr, you’ve got one point here, in that lips would intrude on a sweeping hunting style (snapping shut quickly on fish and swiping to the side to grab them)
I have a point😳
I mean, keratinzed lips are stiff. I'm mostly joking though, that's a cursed thought
Having lips pushes water out of the mouth iirc (more so than just the jaws snapping shut) so any type of lip might be wrong
Also whats the word on those studies saying spinosaurus couldnt swim cuz if its body shape and if it went in water it would just tip over
And another thing against spinosaurus being a fully aquatic hunter
Drag
Spinosaurus wouldve probably been too slow in water to be effective no?
It could swim, it just wasn't an underwater pursuit predator
Which is why im fully in support of spinosaurus being
Whats it called
The "waiting its jaws above water and catching fish"
That was never gonna happen, the sail produces far too much drag for it to be. It was likely a wader like all of its kin
Well, Spinosaurines anyway. Baryonychines were probably more terrestrially inclined, still fish eaters but wouldn't pass up an Ornithopod or adjacent taxa
Whats that dino doc back in 2011 was it?
Or was it 90s era?
The one thats with spinosaurus and david attenborough when he didnt have a lazy eye
It had rugops
Monsters resurrected?
It also had spinosaurus vs Carcharodontosaurus
Monsters Resurrected or Dinosaur Planet I think
Well either one
It had spinosaurus lake feeding and being a wasteful sod
And then rugops comes and eats the scraps
And now in prehistoric planet 2 the same situation was happening with austroraptors
Am i the only one who thought that was a reference?
Planet Dinosaur, very cool
Holy curse word
David attenborough is 97 YEARS OLD
he finna die 😭😭
i hope he doesnt before prehistoric planet 3
Hopefully coming this October
Eh, it's based on real behavior, stuff only eats the best parts of some things and just leave the rest to be picked clean or decompose
Nah, it was a year between PP1 and 2, will likely be the same between 2 and 3
Or even more, considering PP2 was basically just scrapped PP1 segments
yeah, php3 is probably going to take... A While
Eh idk i was thinkin the same but i feel like pp1 was just like an opener to see if would do well
And now pp2 is the 15th best appletv show so it might be sooner
VFX takes time, as does writing
Just because it did well doesn’t speed up the research, animation, and just production time in general lol
And the clock is ticking on david attenborough so they best hurry
And now that we know they're open to commissioning papers, it might take even longer if they want to do some interesting stuff
They what lol
They commissioned/funded a whole research paper for the Mosa segment
Zamn
Inb4 we see Spinofaarus sponsored by Apple
I wanna see spinosaurus so bad in pp3
I mean they covered north america and asia
Africa is logically next right
I hope it stays out of PP until we get the skeleton we have fully described
Cant we all agree that this is just close enough
Cause right now, Ibrahim is just publishing the skeleton in parts 😭
Not really… 
Flipper Spino
Oi, JP3 Spino goes hard as hell
Oh btw Ibrahim’s dead on account of this image right here, so no more Spino 
Theres been no more spino since whichever world war destroyed the first fossils
Which country was it so i have a reason to hate them
Probably germany
Inb4
That’s not right, I know that for 100% fact now 
Yeah
Why are its hind legs so thin
with how much flip-flopping i've been seeing about this over the past couple years, i wouldn't be surprised if we go back to quad spino for a while. it's just part of the cycle now
Common Pie L, it’s incredible how many he takes
I will not tolerate MF KNUCKLE WALKERS
Iswtg if it turns out to have flippers 💀
If it was a flipper why does it have more bones than it should have usually flippers are like idk straight
And not like \
Quad is probably a no though, from everything I've heard
And why does it have the capability to make a fist flipper 😭😭
Ichthyosaur
Flippers come in a variety of shapes and bone count. Icthyosaurs for example just crammed as many as they could in there. Spino would have more of a pseudo-flipper, something like a clawed penguin wing I think
Yeah but its not going in like more than 1 direction its basically a plate on Ichthyosaurs
For Now ™️
(tbf it could be For Forever, but you never know with this thing. ya think ya know how it works, then it turns out it doesn't work like that, on account of Spinosaurus Reasons. i don't trust it! i love it, but i don't trust it!)
Flippers are normally like long fingers no?
Digits two and three fuse to support the flipper structure leaving digit one as the only independent finger (digit two would keep a claw as well but be rigid)
Just my crackpot theory though, just a fun little thought in my brain
more like hands with no fleshless gaps between the fingers, really. some marine mammals still have quite hand-y hands
I'm not actually pushing for it, I just like messing with falcon
Im too tired for this
I think it's not too crazy for it to be the case. But I know its not likely
sacabambaspis
Besides I'm not qualified to say for sure, yet
Fun debate question: what extinct non-avian dinosaur would you say, could be brought back to the modern day and possibly thrive
I saw someone argue for allosaurus on YouTube
Anything larger than an ostrich is probably a no go. Smaller Dromaeosaurs and Troodontids could probably thrive in urban areas
Though, I'd probably say a small ceratopsian would be best, something like Leptoceratops or Psittaco
Carnivores smaller than a bear, and herbivores smaller than a hippo would all probably do ok . Obviously, smaller ones would have better chances of survival.
I asked this same question in the bob server and they agree velociraptor
Crichtonsaurus
I'd say especially with it being armored with a small club tail yet not being to large
Release some tyranosaurs in Botswana and lets see how the elephant population copes.
Someone on another server said any Ornithomimid
Deinonychus in Greece, for simple reasons
- Big enough to prey on the numerous cats here
- Agile enough to prey on the many pigeons and birds
- Can climb and is very agile, making it able to survive in cities
- Possibly nocturnal, decreasing interactions with people
- Small enough not to overheat during summer
- Feathered, preventing freezing during winter and spring (we have a lot of heavy rains here)
It seems that almost everyone is in agreement that at least some sort of dromeasaur would thrive
Tbh, a lot of velociraptorin dromeosaurs would have had a lot of success in rural areas. Their giant relatives and their long-snouted fisher cousins... not so much
It ofc depends where they are released, a carno or smth that size could probably live comfortably in somewhere like nature reservations in Africa.
Deinocheirus would probably out-compete hippos in Africa, Nanuqsaurs and Yuttyranus would have much success in Russia, many pterosaurs would thrive and drive thousands of bird species to extinction, Elephants would cease to exist and there would be much chaos
Generally everything mammals do dinosaurs did it better
I dont think elephants would seize to exist cos of them, tho they will cos of us if we dont change our behavior.
Yeah lol, but generally any large herbivorous dinosaurs and any large therapods would either outcompete, or hunt Elephants to extinction
I think there's another answer, microraptor and dinosaurs like that
It depends, like an allosaur isnt big enough to just merk entire elephant herds and it will also supplement with the vast amount of buffaloes and maybe some rhino and hippo, tho rhinos would probs have a harder time.
Smth like Rex would probably be too much for the current elephant populations.
Oh definitely
Yeah, but if we place dinosaurs in enviroments similair to those they inhabited, Rex wouldn't be in Africa
Keep in mind, dinosaurs need significantly less food than mammals of similar size. So a rex (or at least a mid-sized tyrannosaur) could comfortably live in Africa
Yeah Rex cant really make a living in america rn, maybe when we bring the mammoths back.
Tho maybe that would stunt its growth and it would always remain like a semi sub rex thingy closer to an albertasaur
I’ve seen a lot of people so far specify Africa as the main environment for a dinosaur in the modern day
Mainly because that's the only place where true megafauna live in decent populations 😭
I mean it makes sense, lots of large prey
Africa is so much dryer than the environment Rex lived in
That was said with only food in mind, not environmentally 👍
Which one? Which dinosaur lmao
Anything carnivorous bigger then a cera tbh
A Nanuqsaurus appears in Africa and dies 2 days later lmao
Well so far people have only said dromeasaurs, troodontids and ornithamimids. I asked this on like 4 other servers
Put the nanuq on an african mountain range where its not super hot and it may cope fine.
About the food there idk
Tbh, I could see hadrosaurs or ceratopsians making a decent living somewhere with enough food to grind up
Could something like Shunosaurus (Lii, the smaller species) or a similar sized sauropod survive today?
Also Pachycephalosaurs, Megaraptors, Ceratosaurs, Tyranosaurids, Stegosaurs, maybe Spinosaurids and a lot, and I mean A LOT of Azhdarchids, Tapejarids and Thalassodromids
Tarbo would probably love Africa, Rex would sweat a bit much.
Did dinosaurs sweat or pant?
We making Jurassic world dominion up in here. I wanna see some specified environments tho, like what you said for deinonychus. Really loved that
You can drop quanzhi on like a natural tiger reserve in India and it would do fine.
Unless it got hunted but if were going Dominion mode thats illegal.
Jurassic World Dominion but it actually focuses on stuff other than big crickets
I am already writting a book, maybe I'll do something like this as a side-project. Suddenly a bunch of prehistoric creatures appear in the modern world and everything goes bonkers
Sounds pretty damn neat
I'd still say small Dromaeosaurs like Velociraptor could thrive in urban environments, like foxes and raccoons
They'd definitely eat garbage
Some small species of Pachycephalosaurs too, since they were omnivorous
Narp
Pretty sure the whole omnivorous pachycephalosaur thing is still just a theory
Some ankylosaurs would probably do well too, given how many of them are generalists
Oh ankylosaurs would definitely
But without something to hunt them, theyd end up overpopulated since there’s almost nothing that can take them down on land
I would
punches an anky
I'm willing to be annoyingly nitpicky and argue that a lot of herbivorous dinosaurs, regardless of size, would likely struggle due to the plant life they were specialised for eating no longer existing. After all, certain plant groups dying out is likely responsible for the decrease + extinction of certain dinosaurs iirc. Herbivores that would do best today would be those that fed on plants that have stuck around, or at least have very similar modern analogies. Generalists would probably be better off too.
Carnivores wouldn't have quite this same issue because meat is meat. If you can catch it and eat it, you're set
So uhhhh sucks to be a triassic herbivore because plant life then was pretty different compared to the late cretaceous which wasnt too far off from today
Triassic herbivores being blipped into the modern day just to starve: 
We have to deploy the tyranosaurs
Or at least something they can flip them over if it doesn’t get it’s shins shattered
But what would be a tyrannosaur fit? If we just throw in T. Rex, it would cause many animals to go extinct.
Legit any mid-sized tyrannosaur might be good, but those are 3-4 ton powerhouses on their own...never mind the fact they were likely pack hunters
Depends what ankylosaurs were deployed.
Maybe Ano? Sauropelta?
For ano?
Pffdf, an alberto or dasp if you wanna go overkill.
I just realize no one has mentioned any sort of Oviraptor, they may be able to defend themselves against small predators and maybe outrun those that they can’t fight, but if all else fails, there’s a possibility that they could be breeding like rabbits
Maybe all dinos bred like rabbits.
This one, YouTube video I watched mentioned that allosaurus laid a bunch of eggs so that could possibly have caused overpopulation if in the modern day
Allo is by far the most numerous dino in some of the bonebeds its found, so you can make that argument.
Tho how much of that is preservation bias and how much is allo being built different is tough to say.
I’m gonna find that video and link it here
have large batches of offspring relatively frequently would somewhat diminish humans ability to hunt them to extinction.
(This is a reupload due to audio issues in the first upload)
I’m not sure how much of this is fact or cap, but he makes some solid points from what I could understand
Allo is a good allrounder for any habitats really.
Didnt need insane amounts of food and water probs, versatile, it could fit in plenty of habitats today as long as there are some big animals to eat, maybe it could even manage in the places its remains are found today as long as it isnt too cold or not enough big prey like bison.
Humans with guns moment
Allo destroying the meta is pretty much what it’s known for at this point
I dont think they destroyed the meta, even with allo outnumbering everything, there were still other theropods close to their size coexisting with them, like cera, torvo. Tyranosaurs on the other hand, they were doing some trolling.
Tyrannosaurs be like: I came. I saw. I conquered
Yeah. Theropod skulls are very little kinetic, though Spinosaurids may have them more and also are obligate to engage it when they open their jaws.
Now this makes me think, was there any time period when some decently sized tyranosaurs and the late carchs like idk, Siats were competing?
Narp
Narp?
Hm. I never thought of something like that. Usually when I think of another theropod competing with a carch, I think spinosaurids, and even then it’s not much of a competition
No lol, it's from Hot Fuzz 
But afaik, carcharodontosaurids all died out then tyrannosaurs came in
No dino battles, cringe
Yeah we went way off topic. But at least I got most of the answer I was looking for
And obligate is thought to be a characteristic for all Spinosaurids right? Baryonychinae included?
I’m so close to an answer
What answer youre seeking?
I feel like it’s self apparent
The question I asked lol
Could anyone direct me to information on the fossil flora of Niger's Irhazer Shale? I'm struggling to find papers on anything other than animal fossils.
It’s not much help but it’s a Bathonian formation so if you can find something adjacent with more information on it. That should be relatively insightful.
So, do you think livyatan would have a dorsal fin? Or would it be like a sperm whale and have no dorsal fin?
No way youre a real person who is asking about somthin that specific and what for (i desperately want to know)
Yeah I'm real lol, I'm just a big paleo nerd trying to do a very in-depth project requiring extensive research of the flora, fauna, and geography of mid-jurassic Niger.
sperm whales do have dorsal fins, albeit quite reduced
How accurate is Dino Dana's rex out of 10?
Unfortunately this section of my project revolves around the environment of spinophorosaurus, so it has to be pretty specific
A good 6 cos I quite like it
It's okay, definitely recognizable but very monster-ified. Teeth should not be exposed, lacrimal horns are off, no idea why it has spikes on its neck, arms are too scrawny, hands are broken.
Basically it's clearly intended to be a tyrannosaurus, but there isn't any science put into it.
p much, the middest rex ive seen so far
not as mid as pot rex
PoT rex is eh-bad zone, this rex is literally as mid as can be
There is also the movie version as well but it’s the same thing with the only thing being different is feathers
It's like a 5, it kinda looks like a carcharadontosaurid imo
so the general agreement is literally 5 then huh, there is one 4, one 6 and two 5
Tbh this is probably worse, looks way scrawnier, still has broken hands, lacks proper lacrimal horns, and shouldn't have feathering this extensive. The feathers are pretty much in the right spot if it had them, but we know from skin impressions that if it did have feathers there, they would be way more sparse
Most designs are stinky 
PP rex
PT's rex mod is absolutely beautiful as well
Even the bestest of designs have flaws
Even PP rex
the exposed teeth are cuz its a pretty old show iirc but other than that yeah i agree
resembles vlad's work. a lot of his stuff isn't lipped
pretty much all of it I think
Nah doesnt work like that, having a small flaw wont ruin a great design.
his alberto
Who’s design are we talking about
Age isn't really a good excuse. There's a misconception that exposed teeth as a paleomedia trope is the result of old science, but there never was any point where science favored that idea. From the start of paleontology we have been depicting dinosaurs with lips, with only a few exceptions. Liplessness was popularized mostly due to JP.
Spinophorosaurus eh?
Elaborate
Oh god my chat just now updated
Why now and not hours ago
But spinophorosaurus
Gravisaurian Sauropod
probably is his
I'd say age is still a fine excuse. Lipped renditions weren't really widespread then. You could argue they still aren't
What are we thinkin the accuracy rating on this is
What’s an accurate argent size and an accurate quetz size, like a diagram
Is Epanterias still valid?
at the moment no, it’s a nomen dubium
it’s also been considered either a large allosaurus fragilis or just a different species of allosaurus, the holotype is non diagnostic though
you beat me to what i was going to say lol
I’d put it at a solid 7 but I’m not a professional so idk anything lol
why is there just a black hole where bathonian central-north african flora is supposed to be, i have been researching for hours and genuinely found nothing
Mesozoic fossil record moment
what was the overall climate in the area like? if there’s a similar formation maybe you can work backwards from there
I think that’s what they’re having trouble with
Are there any mass estimates for the 12.5 meter estimate for livyatan?
Hear me out
.
It overlies the Tiouraren Formation, a depositional, swampy environment. Seasonal flooding in a braided river system
No flora listed as far as I can tell.
Did torosaurus live with t rex?
yes
probably some habitat preference separating it from triceratops but it was in hell creek
Was Trex was only in hell creek??
Tyrannosaurus spans pretty much all of Laramidia
I wonder what alectrosaurus main food sources were.
The Iren Dabasu Formation (also known as Erlian Formation) is a Late Cretaceous geologic formation in the Iren Nor region of Inner Mongolia. Dinosaur remains diagnostic to the genus level are among the fossils that have been recovered from the formation. The formation was first described and defined by Henry Fairfield Osborn in 1922 and it is lo...
I love livy and megalodon
chilan bomb @white matrix
W
Neovenatorid recon?
Chilantaisaurus
Seasonal warm and wet fluvial plain and lake system, iron-rich soil primarily composed of fine grain silt and clay
And I've been trying to look at the neighboring formations, but they all completely lack any sort of publishing on the flora found there
Extend your range of extrapolation I guess
Yeah I've started genuinely just making my way down the list of Bathonian flora found in Africa, but so far I am only finding stuff for the far north and far south despite the rich deposits elsewhere on the continent.
But I mean there absolutely are plant fossils there though, it's frustrating how little description work has been done on the ecosystems of these formations.
They’re too busy going to same formations over and over again
I guess so, but it's strange how there is genuinely zero publication on central African paleobotany
Certainly a perplexing predicament
(all humans height used is 6 ft tall)
argy by fabio alejandro aka dragonthunders
quetz by @tough parcel
Preciate it
👍
finally a decent argent comparison
What are the most agreed upon length & mass estimates for livyatan and megalodon?
Rip our siats mod was based off Duncan’s siats, is his ok still?
Yeah absolutely
encounter: youtube commenter who thinks birds aren't dinosaurs because then humans would be reptiles
they're insisting that synapsids are reptiles
Real and true, I can confirm I’m a reptile
We are all Mark Zuckerberg
i wish i was a reptile ngl. seems like itd be a lot more convenient than being a mammal. and imagine if we were lucky enough to be birds
Crazy how someone can think they know something, and then not know what they’re talking about
What’s incredible is how easily accessible Wikipedia is. Man’s really done 0 extra research.
Convenient?
if i was a reptile, i wish i can do camouflage & then turns invisible with my surroundings (yeah i wish i became a chameleon-like reptile)
This took very long to find (sarcasm)
list of ways:
-(if lizard-type) shedding skin in larger chunks instead of tiny little flakes
-(if cold-blooded) excuse to sit around and do nothing for long periods of time. generally less pressure to be active
-(if avian) Birds
-no more periods it's all egg (sucks in a slightly different way)
-born immediately ready to eat instead of needing to rely on Nutrient Sweat
-tougher skin
-dont have to deal with facial expressions
What’s wrong w facial expressions, full on shedding sounds inconvenient too
if camouflaging type like chameleon?
well thats just facial expresions 2
I like facial expression
Only reason you wouldn’t want facial expressions is if you don’t know how to interact with people, they’re super great parts of being social
also, no no no, they say wikipedia doesn't count, because teachers don't let you use it as a source!
i don't get it either.
Aren’t reptiles in the middle of the shedding process in a vulnerable position?
If they don’t like wikipedia we can also always use the sources wikipedia itself uses
The whole “anything on wikipedia is bad” idea is stinky
Where else are they going to find easily accessible cladistic information 👹👹👹
well, ya see, Autism, and thus I Do Not Care For It
The Wikipedia agenda lie to the world and tell everyone birds are dinosaurs. Very real thing.
The mods are probably going to scold us soon but I wish there was a biology channel here. I know there is animals and pets but that is mostly used for pets.
I wish more people would just accept that birds are reptiles
yeah, i don't know why some people fight it so hard. it's just science, dude! it's good that birds are dinosaurs because it represents the continued advance of science!
It’s also less finicky from a phylogenetic standpoint.
I think it’s partly because most people are so used to sorting animals into their own little boxes so to speak.
Wouldn’t be such a difficult thing to conceptualise if people would just depict them with feathers as a default 👹
Edit - of course there’s exceptions
People will probably just keep calling birds their own thing tbh
Birds are actually tigers
What is the size of the average megalodon? Ik the largest specimen is 122 tons and 20 meters but whats the average?
Wait wut? 122 tons?
big cats are stupidly muscular, its insane
It's also very cool revelation that against mass extinction, dinosaurs lived on and flourished again
Dominant animals? Maybe 🤔
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbm-P7jaa_c only a lion in his prime can enter the water to make a croc backoff
A Clip from movie African Cats, King of the jungle vs Crocodile
why felidae does this when they're heads got held back???
its bc the skin is being pulled back which makes their faces weird
They channel the irritation energy
anyway update on the youtube guy: they've decided they don't need to provide a source because, for some reason, the burden of proof is on me, and not the guy insisting that modern cladistics actually allows organisms to evolve out of clades, which is not how that works at all.
luckily for me, wikipedia has citations!
here's the papers i found for this purpose, in case anyone else wants to have a look:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0117-4
https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490503026
(the second one is about reptiles specifically, but it does touch on synapsids Not being reptiles)
Evolving out of a clade, if only 
if that was possible, bats wouldn't be mammals, they're just too weird
Bats are bats silly, not mammals
Imo people refusing to provide sources is a very good indicator that they did a quick google search, saw they were wrong, and refused to accept that fact
bats are disease source (like covid) 
i mean, considering this dude's acting like they're the king of cladistics and also specifically said i need to find "a single palaeontologist that believes synapsids should be reclassified outside of reptilia", i think they read one old science book and decided they were done researching forever
hell, both my main sources are from the 2000s! the oldest is 2004! this debate was already settled 20 years ago, where did this guy get their info from??
People like narrow vision I suppose, ignorance is bliss and all that
don't need to know cladistics when T. rex has a wishbone, which only birds have
We often get comments which argue that birds aren't dinosaurs, or otherwise totally misunderstand how scientists research how animals are related to one another. That's the process of taxonomy, where researchers look for different traits, run some statistical tests, and then get a phylogeny. And from that scientists try to piece together the his...
Ah the toothless T. rex paleoart, we meet again
Anyone know of any big maastrichtian Ornithurans?
I love raptorchatter.
What are your opinions on spinosaurus?
Weird, annoying to deal with, changes all the time
How about it's lifestyle? Like wading VS aquatic pursuit predator?
it def wasn't wading with those stubby legs
coulda been floating. sittin on the water's surface and doin a heron thing there
And I doubt it was doing much aquatic pursuing with that sail
Well it definitely wasn't chasing prey underwater with that sail
abominations
arent there various birb people here lol?
Shame
Ight time for some wishy washy Chonksaurus special estimate
I mean, aren't all paleo nerds technically birb people of some description?
im a known birdliker but unfortunately i dont know anything about antarcticavis' size
birds stink
Biblically accurate sinoceratops
You stink
yeah. I sure do. and so do birds.
you read my mind I was literally going to say that
Here’s the material I think
rizzlerceratops
My life would've been so much better had I not seen this image
if it's black bear, fights back
if it's brown/grizzly bear, lay down
if it's polar bear, goodnight
true
🤨
Im pretty sure it’s “black, fight back, brown lay down, white say goodnight” but idk maybe that could be misinterpreted or sum
Yeah it’s this
that’s what they say but always fight back no matter what kind of bear, if you lay down you’re just making their job easier
I think that depends on what situation you’ve found yourself in with whatever bear you’re with
Yeah fighting back against a brown (grizzly) bear sounds like a bad idea. In particular if the reason its attacking you in the first place is because its a mother with cubs. All you're doing is affirming yourself as a potential threat to her cubs, so now she needs to eliminate you
Opinions
yeah. standing your ground might work against a grizzly that's contemplating eating you (fighting is... probably inadvisable if you can just scare it off instead), but if it sees you as a threat you absolutely do Not want to reinforce that perception
Bear sprayg
yeah looks about right
Speaking of fights could three Rugops hypothetically put up a fight against a full grown adult Ampelosaurus?
Idk, probably not but I could be wrong
No
Was ichthyovenators tail more like a paddle or a sail? I'm pretty sure it was a sail
Do we even have ichthyovenator tail remains?
Yes
it was probably more paddle like
Huh, that's kinda weird seeing as spinos was probably more sail like, anyways I'm heading to bed, it's super late, GN
How do ichthyovenator and concavenator connect pieces
All dinosaurs are actually puzzle pieces that all connect to form the outline of John Hammond
ZAMN
Idk if it still remains 100% correct.
Then again the default answer from google isnt always the best too.
Alright I see now
Yeah the guy could gut you pretty badly if it felt like it
Ayooo
wait so, dinosaurs could potentially reproduce by themselves?
some of them already do! there's been two different reports of unfertilized californa condor eggs hatching, both from the san diego zoo, a few years apart. neither of the chicks lived to sexual maturity, but it does still indicate that some birds are capable of producing viable offspring using parthenogenesis, and it's pretty likely that some non-avian dinosaurs could do the same! (how many could do it, though, is another question)
It's extremely rare
does a 7.5-8 meters long & 1.3-2.1 tons carno is still accurate?
okay that's pretty cool
8 ish meters and 2 tons
Turkeys have been known to exhibit parthenogenesis quite a lot, at least compared to other birds. Still rare and the offspring usually aren't viable, but you do sometimes get one that survives just fine to adulthood. But turkeys are also just really weird in general so its honestly not surprising
Which one is older Acro or Tyrannotitan?
TTT
Than wouldn't ttt have a more allosaurus like appearance, with longer neck?
?
Since its a primitive carcharodontosaur i'd expect tyrannotitan to look more like concavenator and neovenator than giga and mapu
It's decently complete, so no
It’s still in that tribe so why would it exhibit characteristics of another tribe
not really. this is still a large cretaceous carcharodontosaurid. some recent papers place it in giganotosaurini, even.
Older doesn't always mean more primitive
It’s also not primitive, it’s still a giganotosaurine lol
Tyrannotitan and Giganotosaurus look almost the exact same
Cause they're used to fill in the gaps of each other
Gaping carchs 
Heck, I'll eat you all
Acro is even more complete fr
hey falcon would saurolophus have front feet like edmonto here?
A lot of reptiles can have partho babies it’s super rad
possibly a little different but for the most part yes
That makes we wonder, what other mummy Dinos do we have other than that and the ankylosaur
The issue is that hadrosaur hands do not follow anything, however iirc Edmonto hands are incredibly special
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02724634.2023.2213287
Gotcha, bc I want to be quite accurate for the Saurolophus mod we’re making so I was curious if that would be a good reference for the front feet
I'll go looking, but don't copy-paste Edmonto feet
I know Emily Stepp did a study on it
What is the bite force of tyrannosaurus rex? I've been hearing 2 different numbers mainly, 8,000 PSI and 12,500 PSI, what one is the current number?
they’re similar across pretty much all hadrosaurs but not copy pasted, basically same sort of hoofish formula with some differences
Pretty sure sakamato made a paper on theropod bite forces, you can find Rex’s there, it’s pretty accurate
Well where am I supposed to find that?
I present a Bayesian phylogenetic predictive modelling (PPM) framework that allows the prediction of muscle parameters (physiological cross-sectional area, APhys) in extinct archosaurs from skull width (WSk) and phylogeny. This approach is robust to phylogenetic uncertainty and highly versatile given its ability to base predictions on simple, re...
Oh btw, don't use Fadeno's Saurolophus skeletal
Has fadeno just lost all credibility? Because recently I've seen a ton of people saying his skeletals are inaccurate
To be fair, a lot of his skeletals were "firsts" for him, not unusual for first skeletals to be wonky
Is there any better one, we used fadenos lol.
Time to restart ig
What ones are accurate and what ones are inaccurate? More specifically would you consider his deinosuchus skeletal accurate?
I'm looking for one for ya, been told GSP or GAT's (edited), but dunno if anyone has that yet
is that so for both of the species
I'd assume so
Also Fred, I dunno, but his Deinosuchus does need edits (might be too big)
Also holy heck, the timer went from a great 20 seconds to a minute, what is this
Ty.
every time we’re happy they raise it, it’s like they’re toying with us
I know right??? They don't need to touch this channel in the slightest, no-one comes here 😭
No one until its a Rex vs Trike debate
so uh, who wins trike vs rex
Your mom
I knew Rex had it
@tough parcel I found it 😭 (GATS)
Needs to be edited, so gimme a sec
Alr
"A sec", might be a bit longer cause NO-ONE'S RESPONDING 
He is the one who knocks.
Tho no one answers.
Is that Saurolophus?
Yes
Nice. I feel like everybody overlooks that dino and they just pay attention to Parasaurolophus
Can I get the suggestion link?
I can't find it lol
Thanks!
How accurate is this chart (other than livyatan)
The meg looks a little small according to our current understanding, but that is a great design imo, love the coloration
Yeah, it is a couple years old
Mosasaurs is slightly too long
likely a 50/50 but think of it this way
if the rex gets the ambush,then rex
if the trike sees it,then it will likely win
If the microraptor was alive..what sound would it make when i slam it againsed the wall..would it squeak?
How so
guys rex has intelligence and dp so it wins, tiktok told me
The trike actually couldve been front heavy,it probably be able to turn in time to atleast get a hit on the rex. Like in prehistoric planet we see a rex that has killed a trike.but he was injured with a bad scrape suggestin that the trike was able too turn fast enough to scrape the rex .but it was to late
right
does that mean that trike would win more times then
What is “winning”
killing the opponent or forcing it to back off
Most likely the trex would have a slight more chance of winning because it possibly couldve been heavier than the trike.the trike would indeed damage the rex but one bite on the leg or hip and its doomed either way..one neck hit and auto gone
Any questions?
Triceratops is a prey item for Tyrannosaurus… it’s a self evident premise that it must be at least somewhat well equipped to hunt the thing
Not to mention trex bite marks have also been found on torosaurus edmontosaurus.and that one sauropod from prehistoric planet 2 that the name i cant remember
i mean lions are well equipped for their prey and get man handled alot( GRANTED, alot of said prey is far bigger compared to body size) so id say its a closer fight than that but id favor the trike...that is if it came to that, most of the time would probably just be scaring each other off since: why risk it
Rex VS trike is a pretty even matchup
The problem is when the rex bites the trike the so called rhino of the cretaceous.it panicks and tends ti swing in every direction.not to mention if the trex does die if it gets one bite on the trike..infection finishes it
We can all agree on that if Triceratops saw the Tyrannosaurus coming, Triceratops would have the upper hand, because I'd imagine that getting around that head would be difficult, but if the Rex gets the ambush on it then it is in Rex's favor
I think you underestimate the immune systems of creatures, most creatures will survive getting bit if they are able to get away
Isn’t there a fossil of an edmonto that survived a rex bite to the face or smthn like that, swear I heard smthn like that before
Im just saying infection can get them over time if that wound dosent heal quick enough
id favor the trike abit more since the frontal defense and very clear case of a arms race, but way closer than lets say a wildebeest who is fighting vs a lion namely because well: size( seeing how wildebeest are around 450-600 vs a lions 300-400), rex and trike are like what a ton apart or so, still a close match up compared to alot of predator prey relationships
We have multiple fossils of trikes surviving bites from rexes, you are thinking of a deep wound in the tail of an Edmonto caused by rex
Even if it was a 50/50 a rex would never risk it unless it was desperate.
And if it was so desperate that it would take a trike head on, both would not come out looking pretty.
The way you worded it was one bite = death tho, which isn’t true
@clever sable ahhh gotcha
that goes for both of em though is the thing
Rex would probably risk it, but I don't think it would be actively looking for trikes to hunt either
What does it actively hunt then
I forgot how powerfull the bite force of a rex is but...a bite on the head from a rex on a edmonto???
Edmonto probably
I was thinking of tail apparently
I mean going head on without the element of surprise.
Plus what would it hunt then? Trike was the most abundant prey species there and we have plenty of proof of them doing so to even adults.
It would be quite the peculiar scenario if it could only hunt a single animal it lived with.
Probably would depend on the prey population
Well it could hunt multiple animals, trike probably just wasn't what it hunted the most (probably)
Oh god oh no are we actually doing this debate
Triceratops was overwhelmingly the most common large animal in its environment. Edmontosaurus and Tyrannosaurus were roughly as common as one another, Triceratops was definitely an abundant and common prey item. In fact it's probably a big part of the reason for T. rex's extreme anatomy
I wonder what a trike would taste like..
What about torosaurus, I always see it gets sidelined from the convo
Torosaurus is much rarer in the fossil record
Always thought that Edmontosaurus was the most common animal there, well ya know what they, you learn something new every day
No guys remember t rex is obviously only a scavenger 
I called it, this place only gets traffic for the rex v trike convo and discussing the accuracies of the roster
What we do have is something amalgamating to the average sized Triceratops iirc.
Guys dont forget the ankylos were everywhere...they were fully gray tho and hard.not breathing. With no legs or head and smooth!
Sadge, toro is way cooler.
Tbf iirc toro is known from higher elevations? So it may be it simply lived in environments lese condusive towards fossilisation
Interesting
Based rare mountain bull dino
Hey, I remember asking way back about dinosaurs found in non-fluvial environments. Any other genera in a similar predicament?
First off all, why would ya do that
Preservation bias is a sucker
it makes it very difficult, id argue impossible, to actually figure out the balance of an ecosystem
Itd cry if you did it hard enough
I bet those pesky neornithischians are more common than we think 🧐
Preservation bias <<<<<<< Human bias
with some environments at least we can sort of work backwards just based off niches, we can kind of do that with parts of the morrison
Yixian is that special little cove of being nicely well understood 😊
you gotta love it when a formation gives you a lot of stuff with clear niches
Itll always be flawed though
smaller animals make up the majority of an ecosystem, funnily enough, but also fossilise far less frequently. I think if we could go back in time we'd find a huge diversity of small dinosaurs that are seemingly nonexistant in these environments
Who wants microraptor fried crispy meat?
Whatever you do find, just pretend the fossil record says they’re everywhere 😞
Im gonna go out on a limb here and say that tyrannosaurus in fact likely didnt outnumber ornithomimosaurs is all im sayin
https://tenor.com/view/fried-chicken-chicken-fried-cooking-pan-gif-3377398 who wants fried microrator wings?
Microrator
why would you want to know this, may I ask 💀
So i knew before i did it..and cooked this fried microraptor a bit above.
I feel like these are a bit skewed
Well the interesting thing about the Hell Creek Project (which gave us those percentages) is that it was an extremely broad sampling of mostly microfossil material so non-geographic preservation bias is weaker than say sampling museum collections or partial skeletons etc. Similar patterns occur in the Morrison with a surprisingly low abundance of smaller dinosaurs based on what we expect from contemporary ecosystems. That probably is due partly to preservation but stuff like ontogenetic niche shifting & R-type breeding also suggests their population dynamics would be quite different than we might intuit based on the modern world
Uhm, can you put that in PoT terms pls?
Uh...... Lots of people like to play as T. rex but very few make it to adulthood
So, the environment didnt like the small dinos got it
The young of large dinosaurs were so abundant they may have been preventing species that were small as adults from being more common
Oh thats definitely a factor. Sampling like this is just the population as a whole, not just adult population which is usually what we consider when discussing ecosystem structure
Oooooh, makes sense actually with dinos having a like, more indenpendent growth thingy so a baby rex would be put in early in the arms race and the small sized carnies suffered.
Exactly, and that's why dinosaur ecosystems are so funky.
Did microraptors eat grass and meat?
You have one genus filling multiple niches as it ages, ecologically it's like being multiple species over the course of growth. It's very strange
Do any species today do that?
Crocodylians, komodo dragons, most fish
Sharks?
Plus dont crocodilians fill the same niche? Big aquatic predator, small aquatic predator?
Niche has a lot more to do with your place in the food chain than that as well as your relative abundance. So no they transition from arthropod eaters to fish eaters to large vertebrate eaters and become rarer apex predators as they age. Komodo dragons might be a clearer example, they start out climbing trees and eating insects before gradually adapting to moving around and hunting on the ground
It seems that sort of ecology is not the most abundant in dinosaur/Mesozoic ecosystems though, cause we find plenty of variously sized predators in other deposits
Dont abelisaurids, tyranosaurs and carchs have like, basically a chokehold on the carni populations at places where theyre found?
They’re the apex predators in ecosystems they’re in, at least the derived ones
I know some late Maastrichtian ecosystems with tyrannosaurs typically have genera operating in different size ranges, regardless if those are just more contemporary tyrannosaurs or something else entirely
T. rex is the most famous example but ontogenetic niche shifting was probably the norm for most dinosaurs. Hell Creek's lack of mid sized theropods is an anomaly that I don't think we have a really good answer for yet, including niche shifting. It's just weird.
Wouldn’t it just be all of maastrichtian Laramidia not having a midsized theropod? Afaik there’s nothing anywhere until you go to Appalachia or Alaska
Yep and only one large theropod, which is almost just as weird
How likely that there was a mid sized theropods kicking about in Hells Creek but we just don’t have any fossils of it? I mean I suppose adolescent Tyrannosaurus’ could fufill the niche of a medium sized theropod.
There was almost one, a big eudromaeosaur, then it ended up being a mess of a genus
I’m not sure even if Dakotaraptor’s presence absolves the issue
That's the running theory but I'm not totally convinced. It's a very well sampled and well studied formation so if there were mid sized theropods of any significant abundance we'd probably have some evidence for it. However there could have been a rare genus that lived in some poorly preserved corner of the ecosystem possibly, that's been floated before for Dakotaraptor
Pff who needs the Hell Creek when you have the Prince Creek. Less genera but a more unique ecosystem
What lived there?
prince creek is coolio
No big theropod, sadge.
Nanuqsaurus was the big theropod
Lol I was about to say
What I wanted to say more accurately is a megatheropod I guess.
Wait scratch that nanuq seems to have been bigger then I thought.
It depends. I’m not sure if it is categorically a megatheropod, even using a higher estimate
Yeah, its like what, 3 tons at high estimates.
They’re just length estimates I think. No mass per say to assign to it.
The actual material (for the larger specimen) we have only scales to 7 metres iirc.
Isnt it 9?
I think that’s just a guesstimate for an adult.
It wouldn’t need to be much bigger, the edmontosaurus and pachyrhinosaurus species hailing from there are not particularly large
It was big enough to be the top predator, we can say that for sure lol
So this chart isnt really accurate then I guess
I think the larger estimates are becoming more popular based on undescribed adult material, who knows though without the description.
At least the prince creek has a mid-sized predator (kind of)
It seems to be quite rich in spite of the 120 days of darkness per year, truly no modern analogue
Snow Hill Island gets close
Dinos too based to care about daylight
Nah, way too little vegetation no?
I thought just referring to the fauna

Definitely allo
It’s me
Wrong, it's T. rex again
from what I can tell, 9m comes from the material being described as "closer to other Tyrannosaurs like Albertosaurus". I didn't see a 9m estimate from Druckenmiller himself so I've come to assume that came from people defaulting to 9m as the maximum estimate for their adults because that's sort of where the other tyrannosaurs are at their largest. Scaling of the material in question results in an animal between 7-8m, but this is without proper description or measurement I think. Unless I'm wrong in that
this also presumes said material is what is described as Alberto/adult sized. Based on what the material is said to be and the various skeletals of Nanuq with comparable material (as well as videos of the material), I currently believe it's referring to the same stuff. Without a proper description though who can say
another presumption, the new material is truly mature or full grown lol. We need a description damn it
kenyan giant comes first tho
No, Nanuq first 👹
KG>
dark knight has the right idea
the mountain of brachiosaurids has been waiting longer than either of them ;-;
they can continue that
what's another 10 years
How about this, none of them get a description and we do a reevaluation of Maastrichtian India deposits because those are a mess
no
big giant from kenya!