#paleontology
1 messages Ā· Page 11 of 1
Did hadrosaurs even exist yet
hadrosaurs may not have existed yet but iguanodontids were around
definitely nothing too large though, the ornithopods were pretty much all on the smaller end at that point still
Ah, gotcha, thanks yall
Hadrosaurs didn't appear till the late cretaceous
There have been some individual leopards known as hyena killers, and there is plenty of proof to show they can kill animals that would normally rip them to shreds such as lycaons or spotted hyenas
Leopards are absolute crackheads, pretty sure there isn't an animal in their range they haven't killed besides elephants and brown or sloth bears (yes, there are reports of them taking sun bears and giant pandas)
Wait, that means that leopards in Asia have killed Indian Rhinos?
Oh lmao forgot about that, also ig to specify I should have mentioned that I was talking about babies and adults. Don't think there's anything on leopards taking Indian rhino calves but there is for white rhino calves
Yeah leopards are impressive, seeing them take an antelope twice their weight 3m up a tree will never fail to be impressive.
Painted Wolves isn't much of a surprise. It's kind of like wolves and puma, where normally the cat is the one running away but if caught individually it's not a contest. Big males do rarely kill hyenas too.
Yeah, their strength despite being such small cats and their adaptability is the reason they're my favorite animals, their coat is pretty too but that doesn't play much into it for me
I do have proof of African leopards killing an adult of basically every animal in their range except for elephants, rhinos, hippos, crocodiles, buffalo, hippotragines (Sable and Roan antelope) and lions. Really goes to show their versatility, they can eat from small critters like springhares or guinea fowl but if they want they can take on bull gnu, kudu and eland or zebras
You probably forgot adult tigers and crocs.
I did include crocs but I did specify African leopards. If you meant the tigers in Tiger Canyon in South Africa there are no leopards there, the only other carnivorans are cheetahs, aardwolves, and i think black backed jackals and bat eared foxes
Oh I meant it overall, so thatd include all the asian leopards which overlap.
And, theres tigers in south africa?
Yeah, there's a reserve in the Karoo region of South Africa where they put tigers to help keep their wild populations healthy. There are a lot of problems with it though, the main one being they plan to reintroduce lions which will definitely outcompete the tigers due to the lack of forest, not to mention why not just put that money into tiger conservation in Asia
Yeah, weird, they should have just put in lions in the first place and made some reserves for tigers in asia, maybe in Sumatra or Siberia.
Agreed, the whole thing was just a big experiment to prove that tigers could adapt to life in Africa. Like of course they will if there's nothing competing with them, they rarely even stray into the grasslands in Asia despite having extremely little competition there, they prefer the forests
Id assume they havent had a problem with the hunting and living conditions there.
Yeah they haven't, not yet anyways. Pretty sure all of the tiger deaths there were due to natural causes such as complications with age or disputes with other individuals
Id like to see more efforts for the asian lions, since those guys are very low in population numbers.
I haven't been keeping up on their conservation but last I heard some disease keeps wiping them out and making conservation harder
Yeah sadly, seeing their current range compared to the old one is depressing.
so campto aren't a hadrosaur but a smth?
Iguanodont
I guess "Iguanodontian" is the better term. Most ornithopods are iguanodontians.
i see
and this is my question
the main differences between hadrosaurs & iguanodont?
both look "Same to Me"
Hadrosaurs are also iguanodontians. It's basically like how tyrannosaurs are coelurosaurs. Hadrosaurs are a specific group of it. So are iguanodontids, rhadbodonts, and more primitive members like campto.
i see then
thx scan š
R
Mammal inter-predator predation is pretty fierce, especially where meso-predators are concerned.
Coyote diet will consist of mostly housecats in some areas.
Fishers will readily take lynx, and foxes/other canids and smaller species of hyena will hunt smaller mustelids.
Leopards and other animals will often hunt the smaller African Felids etc.
Shouldnāt the hind limbs be more defined?
Yes, yes they should be
I thought so 
STEGOROUS
@strong river just to illustrate what was being discussed in main char
Ok but for larger flying reptiles I'd imagine it's quite different. They've got such a short body compared to something like Hatz or Quetz.
Its the same, just needs more space.
No, it's the same take-off mechanic- ^
i mean hatz and quetz are the largest flying animals, it is a similar system just needs more run way
Regardless, very cool
But lets forget the trivial stuff, the important question is, could it take off and fly with an average human on its back.
No
What about a below average human and off of high elevation
Maybe
SHORT SCRAWNY PEOPLE FOR THE WIN šššš
Falling with style? Yeah maybe
LOL!! With its wing span we might glide forwards a little bit and crash land to my demise but hey itāll be fun
No pterosaur could carry the weight of a human on its back.
Not flying obviously, I mean like gliding. And Iām under avg human weight. Also theyāre like what giraffe sized I think theyād be fine š
Giraffeās are significantly more heavily built than the largest Azdarchids
If we're talking adults, it'd have to be a small woman or very small guy (considering women are usually on the smaller side)
Ik. But hypothetically if me and a hatz were at the top of a mountain and I jumped on its back we could glide around before crash landing.
And Iām a small woman, Like 105 pounds on a good day.
Maybe a gigachad hatz could pull it off.
105 lbs is very light.
Yes šš¾
I could see a small woman riding a Hatzeg
Hatz could prolly pick me up n fly away how come I canāt ride it šæ
maybe, small person tho they could seeing the whole weight thing
Id say, a 800 pound quetz could probably take a 100 pound person, maybe a 140 with a lot of struggle.
Yay!
Iād have to come up with a saddle design tho that things head is humongous. Might end up having to hold on to its neck so I donāt get in the way of the wings, and idk if bros neck is strong enuff for that š
800 POUNDS OH MY GAWD?
Yeah
The picture makes me glad they extinct aināt no way you running or hiding from that
Ouch that beak looks sharp imagine getting pecked with that. I doubt they did much pecking tho
They didn't, bad and weak skull combined with funky neck means no strong pecks
Maybe they penetrate small prey?
They probably just picked them up.
If they canāt peck then idk what kinda attacks theyād have in game. Theyād probably make them peck regardless. Not like their bite would do too much. Lol imagine if they give them a kick instead of a tail attack
You think thereās any chance they couldāve threw some prey around for brunt force trauma or just ate everything alive?
Considering most birds today eat their prey alive, I'm gonna say the latter
Meh. If itās small enough to where they can throw it in their mouth they probably swallowed it whole.
If they did end up pecking oh my gawd thatās piercing a lot
Damn horrible way to die either way then
Lol yeah. Saw video of a seagull swallowing a whole hot dog so Iām pretty sure hatz w do something similar
Seagulls have zero chill fr 
š
Says you
Hatzās neck vertebrae at the very least are stress resistant as hell
Yes says me because I hate pterosaurs!!!
Skimming through the paper, it's mainly saying "Hatzegopteryx is robust and was likely a large prey predator while other azhdarchids (namely Arambourgiana and Quetzalcoatlus) had a bit of a weaker neck"
The first is neck type, since some taxa had relatively short (though perhaps not shorter than expected for other pterodactyloids), robust necks (such as Hatzegopteryx; R2395), and others had much longer, more gracile and mechanically weaker necks (e.g., Quetzalcoatlus sp., Arambourgiania). The second is cranial morphotype: this also comprises robust forms, with relatively short skulls and proportionally broad jaws (e.g., the possible azhdarchid Bakonydraco; Javelina Formation specimen TMM 42489-2), and gracile forms with elongate rostra and slender jaws (Quetzalcoatlus sp.; Zhejiangopterus; Alanqa).
So does that make it top heavy then?
Yes, but not ridiculously unbalanced
Tbh you might have to lay on it and have handle bars to hang on
i've heard that thing on fishers taking lynx but the only thing i've seen of it is some article claiming that they follow lynx in snowstorms, haven't actually seen any proof of it but i dont doubt it
Lol like a hang glider. It w be fun regardless. Till we crash of course
What are fishers?
a large species of Marten
Who's Marten
Is that a mustelid thingy?
Yes, martens are mustelids along with badgers, ratel, weasels, otters, ferrets, mink and wolverines
does anybody have any papers on radiodonts
I wonder how much power would be behind hatz peck
Azdarchid beaks were not built to stab in the same way as herons and storks, which they artificially resemble. While they could definitely pierce through smaller prey (IE humans and similar sized prey in their habitat), they probably couldn't to large animals without the risk of injuring themselves.
Do you know where I could read more about this
PP2 majungasaurines (:
THE SILLIES
Xiphactinus
Save some for the release gob damn
Might request spoilerinos on this stuffs
i can't afford pot or apple tv + šæ
Free trial my friend
my father won't let me take it don't try to understand he is arab
Majunga looks like he has a lil party hat on
A reminder to please view pinned messages for appropriate paleo-chat topics. We recommend all off-topic conversations for paleo-chat be directed to DM's, the appropriate channel or another server entirely. This channel is for educational purposes; for the discussion of past and present paleontological discoveries, scientific news, and depictions of prehistoric creatures in media in relation to paleontology.
"This channel is for educational purposes; for the discussion of past and present paleontological discoveries, scientific news, and depictions of prehistoric creatures in media in relation to paleontology." Normally I'd agree in the case of it being unrelated dinosaur media, in literally any other circumstance I would agree, but Prehistoric Planet is as paleontological as a documentary series gets. It has the most accurate and state of the art dinosaurs ever seen in film so far and is created and supported by paleontologists who very much engage with the community over its content and relevance in paleontology. If this isn't "paleo-chat", I don't know what is. I really don't understand why you need to dismantle perfectly civil and on-topic conversation purely because it deviates .1 inches away from what YOU deem as on-topic rather than what....common sense usually dictates.
I would argue that this is the case
Discussing the Paleontology behind Prehistoric Planet is just fine. Discussing Apple TV+ free trials however is not relevant to this channel.
Just because the channel was warned as a whole, does not mean the warning was directed to you.
Was just a general reminder for the channel.
That was mentioned once but ok
Anyways, back to Prehistoric Planet
Apologies. Lack of context n' all.
Lovely hesperornis, although I thought they were not Maastrichtian? Same with Xiphactinus but I'm not sure.
Are these leaks or stuff they have prereleased?
Prereleases stuff
Proper look at the austroraptor. Looked oddly troodontid at first but I guess it was the angle. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/512506314631675924/1104154905477914747/Prehistoric_Planet_Photo_020301.png
This has probably been talked about a lot here but what do y'all think about T-Rex being 70% bigger
Its just a hypothetical, not a reality
70%, so like, 15 tons? Kinda big
Complete nonsense. Purely hypothetical that isn't backed by any actual data.
70% seems like a bit of a reach given the already quite wide range of known sizes for adult tyrannosaurus
I aināt gonna lie, I didnāt like how austro looked for a bit the first time we saw it, but it looks better in this pic, itās feathers kinda looked like play-doh near the face
I think 70% bigger is a bit of a stretch but I do think T-Rex would grow bigger but not by 70%
oh yeah, absolutely - the largest specimen we have is very unlikely to be the largest one to have ever lived, so tyrannosaurus probably could've grown a bit bigger than scotty did. the question is really just how much bigger would be plausible
Very well Said
I'm still holding onto hope that the rex skull that was auctioned off a few months ago was actually 6 foot long and not overexaggerated to make it sell for a higher price.
Cant wait for Rex estimates to reach 6 morbillion tons in 2069
Speaking of rex, what specimen is the smallest adult we've uncovered?
Depends on what you mean by adult.
His name is Marf
Hey I know this is outdated but can we talk about how different the novel and the movie description of the dinosaurs in the jurassic park series are?
Probably not unless we also throw in comparison to their real life counterparts too. Otherwise we're just talking about two works of fiction
I mean, both are innaccurate now, but they were pretty good for their releases. I think people who complain about any of the JP designs (except dilo, and the new introductions in dominion) seem to forget that its a franchise and designs need to remain consistant
Yes true. But the novel description of the size of a dilophosaurus is much more accurate. Especially without those stupid neck frills.
Besides. The creatures arent even true dinosaurs. There is a ton of other factors and dna that was introduced, they were made to be attractions. Not to be accurate. Not true dinosaurs
Yeah, but Crichton's rex for example is a little less accurate. Seeing as it had a forked tongue.
Ofc a huge detail in jurassic park the novel is that Wu didn't know what he was making, so any innaccuracies can be excused on account of the plot
Literary cop-outs or backdoors if you will to create an excuse for scientific inaccuracies
That doesn't make chameleon carnotaurus much better, or venom
Obviously yes. And in the novel he literally pays for his crime in blood. Eaten alive by his own creations. Besides that Hammond didnt care. He wanted them ready so he would stop losing money and start making it. The precautionary measures were half assed (excuse my french). But the novel makes everything far more terrifying. A brightly colored rex so people could easily see the main attraction
Chameleon Carno is dope.
I forgot about chameleon carno tbh.
It was a good concept looking at it from a horror perspective, but yeah, not the best decision otherwise.
Absurdly fast Carnotaurus is doper
The down on the necks of the tyrannosaurus hatchlings, the way the Raptors havent perfected social hierarchy, a true sized but venomous dilophosaurus, brightly colored, size differences in male and females.
I do really like venomous dilo tbf, just not Spielberg's take on it
They were the same take
I do too. Although I enjoy Crichton's version better. (Misread it sorry)
In fact Crichton's was arguably worse because it wasn't just a venomous dinosaur, it was a very large predatory dinosaur. One of the largest of its time
The novel dilo didn't have frills or was super short is what I mean. I probably should've just said I don't like Spielberg's version of the dilo, thats my bad
At the time didnt we believe dilophosaurus was 10 feet tall?
Crichton's was the size of a regular dilo and presumably overall similar in anatomy. Spielberg added the dwarf size, frills, and frog skull
Xiphactinus lasted to the end of the cretaceous funnily enough. It almost is a 50 million years lasting taxon.
Though for Hesperornis you are correct, it went extinct in the middle Campanian. From the Maastrichtian we have Canadaga and Asiahesperornis. Depending of the place the sequence sets in, you could guess which of both genus it is.
Either they used "Hesperornis" to get the public attention and simplify things (which I doubt honestly given that they named animals by their generic names), they could also have decided to bring Hesperornis back from extinction or maybe new Hesperornis remains have been found and re/dated to the Maastrichtian.
There also is another intruder in the show which is Thethyshadros, but I think it has to do with the fact it was previously thought to be Maastrichtian but I am not sure. Don't quote me on the last part.
or maybe that's a time traveling hesperonis 
I thought they were just referring to it being venomous when I first read their comment
rex is currently 10.4 tons max i think thats a bit of a stretch
That's not the max
it is
recent blog about gigas weight also mentions the current max rex weight. paratype and Scotty are the same weight now basically 10.4(even tho its debatable for paratype its the most accurate one we got so far)
rex vs quetz=stork vs lion (it was a bad idea lol)
Yeah basically
that quetz is not gonna enjoy what is going happen to it
I wonder if the Rex would get intimidated by the quetz because it looks so big
nah prob wont rex literally hunts trike. its prob not gonna back down to a birb
its still not wanting to get hurt, either of em, so prolly a stand off and dunno who will bugger off
Tbf trike isnāt 6 feet taller than Rex
that quetz prob doesn't want to get bit with a 6 ton bite force or slapped with a heavily muscled tail. nor the rex wants to be pecked with that beak. i really dunno whos gonna win
If it comes to blows, quetz loses. Quetz wants to bluff.
since we know rex is bulkier and quetz is more mobile at a basis, just seems to be going off intimidation which quetz might pull one there seeing 2 of em and the raw height, also quetz is taller than rex, unless rex is kangaroo standing whichcase same height
no its not lul where did you got that from
Is Rex 12ft or 15ft tall?
rex is 12-14 feet hip height, quetz is like 16-19 feet tall at the head so in a comfortable pose, quetz is taller
remember rex is also going for a intimidation thats why its keeping its jaws open. tbh rex is more intimidating for me then a literal birb that is tall. i would not want to be bitten in half by a 6 ton bite force..
4 meters. trike is the same height if not less p sure rex also weights more then trike
i mean i wouldn't wanna get stabbed by a solid 5 foot spear even as a big boi, plus it looks weird therefor dangerous is normally how logic works
Reject modernity, embrace kangaroo stance tradition
Yeah thatās why I think quetz could intimidate Rex with its height and wings, and the two quetzals could scare it off. @normal folio I was saying quetz is 6ft taller than Rex not trike
the original spino being a allosaur with a sail, gliding ankylosaurids, flame thrower para, heck yeah
it could intimidate it but rex could easily just bite at it. and quetz will just fly of we gotta wait and see however
Final finger uniting hands and legs in pterosaurs is probably my favourite old paleontological mistake
Tbf lions could easily kill ancient humans but they got scared because of the humans height (Iām aware lions still attack humans sometimes)
Flamethrower parasaurolophus is definitely one of my favorite old paleontology things
lions didnt got scared from the humans height they got scared by the tools most likely yeah it could happen in the rex's situation but if you look at the image if you scroll up you'll see that rex isnt that much smaller in height then that specific quetz that is attacking it
simply put: no living thing wants to risk harm unless it benefits it greatly enough, and there both of em got heavy weapons, however the main key is rex is far bulkier while quetz is more mobile so could come down to harassment and patience for either of em, like how small vultures can snag stuff from larger ones even, or the larger one driving em away
true
No lions were definitely intimidated by height (and weapons) , and unless the Rex has fought a quetz before it would probably think the quetzals are big and strong
weapons are considered tools. but yeah rex will prob get intimidated if thats the case
to be fair most living things know taller is a sign of beefier....sometimes, tho rex is a big game specialist so who knows, watch it be a seagull who gets the body after all lul, or better yet a crab
Rex either runs away or it absolutely destroys the quetzals
true
or the quetzals run
Itād be cool to see a theri rip a quetz apart in the next season
if that's the blog i'm thinking of, i would like to once again remind everyone here that that's one estimate using one method and the author specifically stated he thinks some other estimates using different methods are also valid
theri didnt live at the same area as quetz did it ?
yeah but they stated that this is also the most reliable way if i remember it correctly
No but quetz could fly and thereās an episode where quetz is in South Africa so it can nest
it wasn't quetz it was hatz. iirc
No it was a quetz
The author in question is the one that made that disclaimer in the first place
if he thinks there are other estimates just as valid as his, that implies he doesn't believe there's just one Most Reliable Method
true true
Good that the person who estimated the weight literally stated that it could be higher up to ~11t if they just added slightly more tissue
i didnt see any part stating that one or im just not looking that well
You are just not in the servers where they wrote this
i just readed the blog... thats what most people do if that was true they would also state that in the blog since its also a important thing to know about
yep
man mosa is now 7 tons
well at least tylo got upsized to 16 tons
I was never mentioning giga once since there but yea
mb then
idk i dont really research about mosa or tylo those were the stuff i heard from a trustable source
Tylo ain't certain yet
Just as a lil reminder to homies who read this stuff anyway, an upsize to 16 tonnes doesn't mean all tylos were about 16 tonnes. This goes for any animal
That's not to say you were implying that, but so many people tunnel vision to the number as the end all be all
yeah i know those stuff are normally the max estimates. i dont really get those stuff for average
I thought as much. Not everyone does tho so I always like to say that where I can haha
Iād say absolute max for Rex is 11 tons
yeah its good to know this stuff i agree with ya
I'm sorry but there is no logical reason why an adult tyrannosaurus would get intimidated by a quetzal. A rex of that age would already be more than familiar with quetzals and know their games. That rex's head is heavier than a quetzalcoatlus. It's like a vulture running off a lion.
This manz gunna die
It'll be cool if it was kinda keeping the rex at bay and rex just walks away or something like whatever
I could imagine them just annoying it into submission
poor fella doesn't know who he is messin with
Crows do chase off dogs and coyotes where I live, despite being smaller and lighter
Try telling that to honey badgers that are going against lions.
Jokes aside, I would assume that the tyrannosaurus is wary of the quetzalcoatlus's beak -- that may not kill a tyrannosaurus, but it may peak an eye out or whatnot if it's not careful enough.
Animals in real life tend to be wary of getting injuries.
When the T. rex can chomp it in half, a little peck that probably wouldn't even break skin isn't that much of a concern.
yeah rex skin is most likely really thick
Vulture beaks can hurt too but you don't see lions giving a single f about them.
it depends entirely on the animals and other factors, not just size
despite being able to swallow them whole neon tetras(yes those lil guys) can drive piranhas off of carcasses, for example
Piranhas are deemed vicious in the media but theyāre pretty timid
I'm also talking about intimidation. Mobbing is pretty reasonable.
Fair. But a better analogy would be a hyena against marabou storks.
I was just saying that the rex may have been being a little too careful -- hell, this may not even be an experienced rex. That or it was just observing the courage (or idiocy) of the quetz's before shooing them off.
Theres a thin lin between courage and stupidity and the quetzes are crossing it hard
exactly, despite size being on their side, and strength being on their side, they're normally quick to dip if even a small shoal of neon tetras 
alternatively, the rex could just logically deem the quetz to be too much work to drive off and let them get their fill before returning to eat itself, sorta like lion prides will do if a nile monitor walks into their midst to eat from their kill 
And the rex doesnāt know how heavy quetz is it jus sees something big
they can kill the lizard in a single bite, but is it worth the effort and being swatted by a monitor lizard that will only eat a mouthful of food before moving on? nah
A rex of this size would already be more than familiar with quetz though, considering it's already established that azdarchids are common scavengers at kill sites
also size intimidation exists and works for a reason ^ quetz can make itself look bigger and make itself seem like its too much work
nature doesn't like working by human logic in any case so
Just cause it sees something big every day doesnāt mean it wouldnāt deem it as a potential threat.
I mean ofcourse. It's big enough to where it can't simply be ignored, but I really don't know why a rex would be afraid. It knows quetzalcoatlus, it would know their games, it would know that they aren't dangerous. Intimidation alone doesn't work with that context.
I do feel like we may potentially be missing a major point or two with the clips of the tyrannosaurus and the quetzalcoatlus duo -- we may just have to wait until the season comes out for us to truly see how they handle this interaction.
Lol imagine quetz just gets smashed
Donāt think it would be fear rly, just a āthis really isnāt that serious.ā Bro prolly thinking āI already ate Ian tryna mess with this big ahhs thing and fight to the death. not even worth it.ā
Oh Quetzal will 100% intimidate the rex because PP always works on "muh subversion of tropes" (or at least, so I've been told that's their design motto), it's just annoying that it will happen
What if the T. rex has a heart attack
Yeah I really hope that's not the case. Like PP subverting expectations has worked because they kept it actually plausible.
Imagine speculating so hard over a goofy ojo alamo rex quetz encounter in PP
A heart attack is plausible
Need I remind everyone, we are only seeing the initial interactions of the encounter -- we never truly see the whole outcome.
For all we know, we may "think" that Prehistoric Planet will let the quetz be successful to subvert common expectations, only to have the tyrannosaurus pummel the two flying reptiles to the ground, subverting OUR expectations of their potential resolve.
Wait, can quetz walk backwards?
idk actually, probably not?
Dumb quetz canāt even walk backwards
Hmm, it depends on whether or not bats are able to (specifically, vampire bats).
If one of those quetzes gets too close the Rex had a chance to charge them
You don't really see flying animals do in general. It's much easier to just turn/flap around.
quetz could prob walk backwards(most animals can, just not well and since its not a natural movement they dont like doing it)
LOL
Inb4 the Rex is revealed to have ptsd when faced with Quetz, as itās the last survivor from a nest raid made by them
Imagine the rex got pecked as a baby and was traumatized or something
talkin abt rex...
ok bestinslot, new video, linked a place where apple showed all PP s2 pictures
its got XIPHACTINUS! but im not gonna spoil anything
spino - changes its looks every year
rex- gets bigger every year by a ton
gig-
90 percent of most dinos-
I can confirm that I weigh over 600 pounds and am 18 feet long yes
Speaking of, Utahraptor vs Inostrancevia who wins
Ima go with inostrancevia
Utahraptor is over 50% larger and got them talons. It's not that fair.
How big was the ankylosurus?
7 ft tall utah š
Largest ones could get to 11 tons. Pretty hefty fellas
there is a twitter post that has all pp season 2 dinosaur teasers
i was not expecting my boy inostrancevia to be personally attacked like this what it always this small?
it could be something else (i dont really know since i dont do research on creatures like that)
Cheese
pack of ino might do somethin
Majungasaurus moment
rajasaurus and accurate pycnonemosaurus are hard to tell about change my mind
What about Majungasaurus
***oh yeah that thing that makes king julien not want to move it move it ***
Easily done, Pycnonemosaurus isn't a majungasaurine so it likely wouldn't have resembled Raja and also Pycno is huge compared to it
I just like seein abelisaurs
Abelisaurs are neat
Agreed
Fasolasuchus eats both for dinner
no lol
my man can only eat the inostrancevia for dinner, not with utah (ig)
i don't think that inost is scaled quite right, seems like you scaled it to the person rather than the scale bar
utah is still a bit taller even when the scale is corrected, but things like this bug me easily 
Oh yea, please scale it to the bar
The human in the Utahraptor scale isā¦kinda smol
Become ungovernable, scale it with the text
y'know what
@covert lintel @tough parcel i tried my best (by scale it to the bar)
yippee!
Okay yall. Need your thoughts. Since this is a dinosaur chat. Do you think some dinosaurs had feathers and proto feathers?
most dinos have feathers thats for sure proto feathers are also possible and some dinos did have them
Because if you look up velociraptors, they are smaller than Utah raptors
they are smaller ofc and they do have feathers same with any other dromaeosauridae
Yes, but did the Utah raptor have feathers and / or proto feathers?
All dromeosaurs would have feathers
utahraptor is a dromaeosaur... that says it all
All coelurosaurs really, and there's some evidence for it in other groups too, just not the same kind of feathers
Ik I thought that it was different somehow lol my bad
its ok utahraptor is the biggest dromaeosaur. there is evidence for some tyrannosaurids to have feathers too and other dinosaur groups there is alot of dinosaurs with feathers alot alot
All dromesaurs had fully developed feathers like birds today, some tyrannosaurus had feathers and larger ones like the rex might have had very sparse proto feathers but there is no evidence to support that atm
Has there been evidence of some suarapods having proto feathers? (Iām a little slow lately)
Rex was proven wrong regarding feathers since we found a skin of it iirc i might be wrong. oh also juvie rexes are really likely to have feathers which drop when they grow
Not that I'm aware of most large animals don't have feathers/fur because it would make body temp regulation difficult
It was just a small portion of skin, so it just showed that part of Rex didnt have feathers more so then the entire animal
but yeah feathers are unlikely rn since no evidence to support it. we just assumed since yuty had feathers rex might have had some
We haven't found every part of a rexes skin and proto feathers would be too small to leave a mark so we don't know yet
yeah its good to not use a feathered rex rn till we have more information since anything can change really
It looks better anyway lel
without feathers rex looks better imo. with feathers it just looks like a buff chicken
Even if Rex did have some type of tuft I feel like itād be on the most important parts of the body. Such as around the face/ears to protect the senses from dust n such
Thats, thats what I said.
yes and i was giving my point.....
Yes and I agree, it does look like a gigantic chicken
Forgot to add ceratopsians and pachycephelosaurs might have had quill like feathers on their tails as we have evidence of them on psticatosaurus wich is a ceratopsian
there's a lot of space between chicken-level fluff and 100% scaly. the prehistoric planet tyrannosaurus is feathered, but it'd be a massive stretch to call it chicken-like
prehistoric planet rex has small amount of feathering on hes head... its almost impossible to see if you dont pay attention
yes, and that sparse feathering is what tyrannosaurus probably had. the thick coat of bird-like feathers has been outdated for a while
plus i was talking about a complete feathering of the body like the 2020 rex people draw and all that. prehistoric planet rexes feathering is so small nobody ever prob noticed it till sometime after the show came out. yeah rex is possible to have that kind of feathering prob remaining from juvie stage
Fasolasuchus is like 30 feet long and 3 tons.
digital duck's model is another example of a plausible feathered tyrannosaurus
i didnt even notice it had feathers
"2020 rex"...? i think that went out of style a bit earlier than that
also yes the point is literally that a feathered tyrannosaurus doesn't necessarily look like a giant chicken oml
i think it was 2020 or smth i dont remember that well. could have been 2014. and my point is that a 100% feathered rex looks alot like a chicken but just scaly and buff
yeah the general consensus from what ive seen is the chicks having large amount of covering, teens losing it a fair bit and adults having none to elephant hair amounts
thats not really feathers its more like prehistoric planets peach fuzz type of plumage
sparse simple feathers are still feathers, dude.
Those are feathers
Yeah that is whatās most likely. I find it really hard to be believe tyrannosaurus was completely featherless. Theyāre just too omnipresent in coelurosauria.
Whale shark roaring sound - Did this whale shark just roar? #Shorts
Watch the full Shark Bytes episode here: https://youtu.be/fdydXvc-d9o
LIKE ---- COMMENT ---- SUBSCRIBE
Shark Bytes is a youtu...
That sounds like its suffering
Those are feathers
A lovely example of sparse feathering in a Tyrannosaur.
why that hairing look like my uncle
bruh that skin print was most likely a theigh pring it wasnāt a spine print not enough evidence to say it wasnāt some proto on top or sprose hairās similar to asian elephants
its still some kind of evidence that it didnt have a fully feathered body
yeah im saying your pointing as if it couldnāt have any proto on spine area there no need for rex to have a full feathered body its its climates it lived in
i didnt point like that.....
Ngl it definitely seemed that way
Tyrannosaurus is scaled to an extent. Thatās all we can say for certain.
didnt you read the i might be wrong area?
Anyways rex definitely had some sort of feathering
Also anyone know what an accurate weight and size is for Leeds currently, ik it got downsized
All of them are accepted from what Ive heard and seen, some are 12m and like 20 tons and some are 16m and over 40
Don't certain species of fish never stop growing?
They do but itās really negligible
Most fish dont stop growing but it plateaus out except in certain species where individuals randomly grow larger than the rest
Is the whale shark the biggest fish ever or does it have competition? Wait megalodon exists I forgot
I.e sailfin mollies which normally max at about 3" long save certain males who will hit 7", or clownfish where the dominant fish, which is female, grows to larger sizes than the males, if the female dies the largest or more dominant male will sex change into a female and continue growing
Leeds
Even in modern times the basking shark gives it a run for its money
There are almost 19 m whale sharks recorded
Megalodon outweighs Leeds and whale sharks by a country mile 
Really? Nvm then lol
Also ngl I forgot about sharks
Yeah, even whale sharks usually arent that big, mostly from 9-12 m.
iirc a lot of reptiles also don't stop growing entirely, but they also generally have an upper limit of sorts for a variety of reasons
Leedischthys is 12 meters and 17 tons, which is among the biggest fish but even large whale sharks are bigger. Meanwhile megalodon is the 2nd largest animal ever, aside from the blue whale.
Is shonisaurus 3rd biggest of all time?
Thats no fish, thats an icthyasaur , idk how to spell it tho
Close, ichthyosaur
Should have guessed that it was an o lol
Shonisaurus is an ichthyosaur, not a fish. Itās in the top rankings in terms of marine reptile size next to temnodontosaurus though. The largest marine reptile is shastasaurus, which is 16 meters and 30 tons I believe (probably not exactly correct but itās around that).
What clapped leeds's weight estimates btw, I thought there was a time where it was in that ballpark too
They say that the 16m estimates are plausible from the last time I did any digging.
Leedischthys is a tad incomplete, so it was recently reconstructed more rigorously based on new info from close relatives.
Ahh that'll do it
Shasta cola
Wonder how theyāre gunna handle leedsichthys reproduction given its reproductive strategy of spraying and praying eggs with the young being plankton lol
The same as they did with everything, just a smaller leed.
That is assuming, of course, that megalodon truly had the shape that we may think it had -- we only have found their jaw bones and teeth, to my knowledge.
I didnāt realize you were talking about fish, and i always mix shasta and shoni up
We have vertebrae and a potential skull as well. On top of understanding the shape of otodontids in general
Whats megalodon mass estimat?
20 meters and over 100 tons
I think the fin whale might be slightly larger in terms of mass, or around the same size, I could be wrong
Fin whales are about 70 tons
Someone tell me the top ten largest creatures of all time pls š
I thought it was around 95-100 tons? As I said I could be wrong
Largest Animals to Ever Exist:
- Blue Whale ā 30 meters, 200 tons
- Megalodon ā 20 meters, 100 tons
- Argentinosaurus / Bruhathkaysaurus ā 34 meters, 85 tons
- Northern Right Whale / Bowhead Whale ā 16 meters, 80 tons
- Fin Whale ā 22 meters, 70 tons
- Puertasaurus / Maraapunisaurus ā 30 meters, 65 tons / 27 meters, 65 tons
Modern animals are based on averages for obvious reasons, while we can't infer such from prehistoric animals. Only exception is that the blue whale uses one of the largest estimates because, unlike other baleen whales, their populations haven't recovered so an average can't be assessed accurately.
tbf, while we don't have a super large amount of postcranial material from otodus species, it's not like it had no close relatives we can look to - just like we can infer much of the shape of... *throws dart at board* pycnonemosaurus based on other abelisaurids, we can infer the rough shape of otodus based on other otodontids, such as cretalamna.
and yeah i know cretalamna is Kind Of Tiny compared to otodus, so there'd be some difference in shape between the two, but the overall shape probably wouldn't be drastically different, y'know? they're still relatives, even if they're very differently sized relatives.
there was going to be more to this message about how lamniformes tend to have broadly similar shapes (part of why it took me. um. 30 minutes to fact-check and write this.
) but then i looked closer and realized there's also some lamniformes that get really, really weird with it so it wasn't as good a point as i thought. that said, the predatory pelagic ones do generally follow that trend so i feel it's worth mentioning at least
So 2 things about that, we don't even know bruhathkayosaurus existed, it may actually have just been a fossilized tree trunk with some therapod bones by it, and second I'm pretty sure megalodon got a downsize as it is no longer scales off great whites as they are no longer thought to be it's closest relative
Megalodon's closest living relatives are actually mako sharks, also I love your content
Megalodon not being scaled off of great whites is nothing new. This massive size increase is actually from a recent study in 2021. Beuhathlayosaurus also, to my knowledge, is most likely real given that images of the fossil were found recently and it was reevaluated in another recent study, which safely placed it as similar in size to Argentinosaurus.
muh boi argent still making the list, this does put a smile on my face
the problem with bruhath is less that we're not sure it existed (2022 paper came to the conclusion that it's real), and more that the holotype disintegrated so nobody can really study it anymore
The photos are real but we don't know if they photographed fossils came from the same creature even with the photos especially with the lack of detail in the sketch that was given to the discovered material
I like to think the illustration is actually on point and the bones just looked like that
actually wait hold on. are shark clades Weirdā¢ļø or is otodus equally closely related to mako sharks and great whites? bc otodus doesn't seem to be a lamnid, but both mako sharks and great whites are, so why would it be closer to one than the other? or am i missing smth
Sauropods are weird and many of the potentially largest can't be officially recognized because of how dubious they are, the largest one that can be officially recognized as valid is Argentinasaurus
funny wiki says Otodontid Lamnoid but not Lamnid so
kinda close
Thanks
which doesn't come as a surprise to me if the "not just a giant great white" restorations still end up looking like a giant great white
come to think of it, I've known Megalodon was a behemoth but I never really stopped to think just how huge it was like, compared to any other shark that exists ever
this thing (cretalamna, small otodontid) just looks like a slightly stretched salmon shark
Anyone got a skeletal reconstruction of Megalodon or they dont exist?
Plenty of body reconstructions do but not skeletals
Huh, big great white
When did spinosaurids start to die off? Midway through the Cretaceous?
There was a massive series of extinction events at the start of the late Cretaceous that wiped out a good chunk of organisms.
I haven't seen this posted here but here is Dan's newest giga
Patagotitan is also around the same size as argent in terms of pure body size it may have gotten a weight decrease though
Iām a bit late to the topic but oh well
It changed again??
These extinction events mostly affected the oceans (nerfing the base of the food web, tanking pterosaur diversity beyond repair, wiping out ichthyosaurs and pliosaurs) but it also affected terrestrial organisms too
The entirety of carnosauria disappeared (including the spinosaurs), and also wiped out sauropods from North America until the migration of Alamosaurus to the continent.
The cenomanian-turonian one?
this is old also haha.
Poor spino, he wasn't even an aquatic pursuit predator (probably)
Yeah. It wasnāt a singular event but instead about 5-6 of them over the span of 10 million years or so. Some of them were apparently comparable to the Devonian mass extinction in terms of ecological damage.
in fairness we donāt know what happened in a lot of the world during the mid-late cretaceous, so there very well could still be sauropods in eastern north america for example and we have huge chunks of africa and europe with little or no late cretaceous material
I'm honestly really disappointed with thals and probably hatzegs wings, first off they don't fold properly and second they are spoon shaped which is a big no because that spoon shaped wings helping with flight was created by David Peters and spread around as a meme so it basically has no credibility
in western north america though the sauropods do disappear other than alamosaurus
el giga de dan
The North American sauropod thing is a bit wrapped in mystery yeah. Them actually remaining but rarer and with lack of material is a theory, although not likely. Itās also not clear whether Alamo came from South America or Asia.
wait hold on did he update it AGAIN and clap the spines over the hip? I just noticed the silhouette on the blog is now like this one
- dan can you stop updating this damn thing jesus christ
- change the year for the love of everything we are 5 months into 2023
How do you feel about maraapunisaurus? I'm personally not 100% convinced it existed but I like asking people how they feel about things
Iām a lot more fine with it now that scientists have looked at what remained of its description and gave it an actually reasonable size estimate.
the late cretaceous sauropod diversity in general is a weird mystery, a bunch of the places where we have huge non titanosaur sauropod diversity go dark in the late cretaceous so we just donāt know whatās going on
personally I think if thereās more north american sauropods theyāre probably in the east and not just lurking around the west with no material, itās still possible but not necessarily likely
Certified pseudo-description moment
that skeletal has gone through like 7 updates homie needs to give it a rest for a bit. Giga looking like igor now
at the very least do the bare damn minimum and have the correct year
I find maraapunisaurus very dubious due to the grammatical errors in the field notes along with abbreviating millimeters with M instead of MM along with a contracting measurement on the dimensions of the intact vertebrae, it's possible it existed i just don't exactly trust it's existence, it's possible but imo not likely
Whatās every oneās take on Oxalaia? I have a feeling itās actually a South American population or species of Spinosaurus
oxalaia is incredibly fragmentary and also the holotype got destroyed so rip
whatever it is, be it its own thing or a spinosaurus sp, its a south american spinosaurine and thats incredibly dope
I also agree here but uhhh we don't have any material ATM and before it was destroyed it was minimal at best (ignore the outdated general model)
Oh my god no lol. Thatās it?! Thatās even less than I thought
I really feel like paleontologist should stop naming creatures that only have 1 or 2 extremely fragmentary bones, or at least not giving them such distinct looks, I know you can just look at the bones and see what they are most similar to but oxalaia has such a distinct look for such little material
Monsters resurrected spino
It just feels very redundant, it makes sense but how are you supposed to know it's not just a different species of a already named genus
thats the old one, the newest one is from the blog https://www.thecodontia.com/blog/the-largest-theropod-dinosaur-known-to-science
reminder that most skeletals are not done by the paleontologists who described them, but instead paleoartists, so dont blame the paleontologists for the unorthodox design above, unless it was in their paper 
I know this statement makes me sound like an idiot but uhhh maybe don't give something an entire look with 2 fist sized bones, just give it a name and wait for more material
yeah read on two comments after my first reply
on the contrary, don't name it.
you will never know if more material belongs to the same species unless you find those exact 2 bones
The one in this article is using the dentary specimen while the one pictured in the Paleo art @woeful falcon posted was the holotype so it's different specimens
Some paleontologists really fall for the allure of fame. Fragmentary spinosaurine remains donāt make headlines⦠but a new genus? Jackpot, baby
the specimen wouldn't make a difference, the dentary specimen is just dentary
everyone I know now please don't tag me lol. these updates are fresh
The dentary specimen is significantly larger being 10.4 tons compared to 9.5 tons of the holotype
I'm not talking about the mass.
ah well, in a year it'll change again, maybe twice by that point
Fun paleo fact here near my home, in one of our caves that we used to grow shrooms we found a fossils of a Squalodon Bellunesis
not gonna lie to you, the build up to that did not make it seem like it was gonna be a paleo fact
Were the shrooms paleo accurate?
Well that's how size is measured
Yes I know, I've read the blog. What I didn't know was the skeletal had been updated, which isn't to do with the dentary specimen or its size.
Also, DR Allan grant from JP is an idiot, he says "giganotosaurus, the largest carnivore to ever live" which is blatantly incorrect
I mean, theyāre just trying to hype up the āvillainā of the story lmao
thankfully Alan Grant is a fictional character
š¤actually he said that in the JW series so actually you are being factually incorrectš¤ snort snort
This is the same guy who went ''don't move, its vision is based on movement'' based only on T.rex fossils and called a 40 t sauropod over to his hiding place because herbivore = friendly
let's face it, Grant gets things right by pure luck
I'm pretty sure the blue whale still exists and even in universe the mosasaurus would be the largest because JW mods is like 66 meters long
He said terrestrial predator you silly goose (Iām aware heās wrong but itās called a joke)
Anybody who knows anything about large herbivores know their first response to everything is to try and squish it
Tbf is a huge sauropod tried to attack you, you could just outwalk it lol, exceptionally large sauropods like dreadnaughtus, brachiosaurs and Argentinasaurus all had speeds below 10 mph
I mean fair haha
Nooo? The larger ones were pretty fastā¦also who walks at 10+ mph lmao
10 mph walking speed* due to their massive legs a run would probably be pretty fast because of how far their legs would move but nothing fast enough you can't outrun
I know, but no human walks at 10mph, I assume most hit like 2-3 at maximum
You can probably speed walk close to that.
You wouldn't really be collapsing from exhaustion after running at 10 mph for a while
Have you tried running at 10mph for an extended period of time?? Not everyone's a track star
tbf I don't think a giant sauropod is running for an extended period of time either.
But you're definitely going to have to bolt to escape one
Yes I have, the average run speed for a human is around 15 mph so even a below average runner can still do it
Oh yea, I suspected that as well, but still a sustained running speed of 10mph is gonna knock anyone out unless they've trained
I know my ass ain't holding 10 mph for long š but probably longer than a 30 ton titanosaur
a lot of small things also probably just werenāt even on a sauropods radar so the crushing might not even be intentional lol
I swear Argentinasaurus practices black magic to keep it the largest dinosaur, literally nothing has been placed over it that hasn't been labeled dubious or straight up invalid and one of the contenders for largest dinosaur got their only known fossils disintegrated
it can run fast, but can it turn fast enough???? dodge maneuver
no one has brought up a bone that is larger than the corresponding bone in Argentinosaurus since 1993, people just like to claim they have the biggest sauropod based on the most random scaling methods possible
(Maraapunisaurus doesn't count, it was found AND lost over a century before 1993)
Technically bruhathkayosaurus is thought of as valid by some paleontologists but we can't tell because it disintegrated and while it's definitely not a tree it still has the possibility of being 2 different dinosaurs that got jumbled into 1, most consider it dubious at best though
bruhath got close, but no one brought it up because it was left in the ground for monsoon floods to destroy 
you donāt need to turn when youāre w i d e
dont tell me he updated it again
you know what would be terrifying? you swerve to get out of the way of a sauropod, it grabs you with its mouth and throws you like a camel
I'm curious how much they could actually lift given how massive they were. I guess it also depends on the strength of their skulls but camara had a pretty powerful bite.
Also maraapunisaurus is now thought of at around 60-70 tons and 30-35 meters as it is now considered a rebbachisaurid so it was scaled off those while the 66 meter 150 ton estimate was scaled off diplodocids as it was once believed to be one but due to the taller vertebrae it can be identified as a rebbachisaurid
relative to their size, probably very little. But a truly large one could probably yeet a person with little trouble
Thinking shiz like this
I think this is pushing it, the skulls are super delicately built. although if any sauropod could do it it would be camarasaur-like skulls
Also short throw is more possible than just grabbin and holding(think horse throwing things with its mouth)
I think you landed in the wrong discord.
Big sauropod grabbin and yeeting a megatheropod 
nahh bro's neck will break
Where would it even fit it's mouth around a megatheropod
Skin go brrr
Also true but the mental image do be amusing
Or just grab it by the tail and YEET
Rex, with a skull that far outweighs the skulls of the largest titanosaurs, can lift about a ton with its head+neck
a giant sauropod i'd guess would be able to lift like 500lb
So, shall we talk about the largest rodent to ever live?
Here's a size diagram to show how big it would be:
I like to imagine some stupid small carnivore harassing a large sauropod and getting flung into the stratosphere by it
ahora no la veo xc
The name alone makes it my new favorite
Apparently The Smallest Sauropod Was Still 20ft long so Still huge From a quick Google search
Could ceratopsians actually gallop or no?
unclear, their limbs are not similar to any modern galloping animal other than maybe rhinos
but i'd say ones under 3 tonnes could gallop
Honest opinion AI creatures need to come desperately to path of Titans as well as a PvE option because player's are honestly toxic
eh
Sir this is paleochat
^
albertas players gonna have to learn a normal dino after this update lol
This channel is for the discussion of past and present paleontological discoveries, scientific news, and depictions of prehistoric creatures in media in relation to palaeontology. Please stay on topic and refer to our ā rules and pinned messages before posting. For conversations related to in-game topics please head over to our #path-of-titans or #backer-chat channels instead. Thank you!
amazing dinoworld š
what is deinocheirus da biggest duck most up-to-date length & weight?
12 meters 8.5 tons
thank you very much š š
Isnāt the duck closer to 13 metres in length
where did u get that dan's giga skeletal?
No
He pulled up
The fact that growing shrooms brought to the discovery of a rare fossil to me seems pretty funny toh, they found an entire skull of Squalodon , is kinda a big deal , now is exposed in Venice or Padova in a museum
Hello paleo people
Tell me your fav therizinosaurus depiction
I like when feathers are shown , it makes it more unique and eye catching than a slim lizard with long nails
The All Yesterdays's depiction:
The Walking With Dinosaurs one, it may be outdated but I grew up with Wwd
Gotta admit I like it but Iām not sure the tounge is rly accurate
To be fair, we never truly know how long a dinosaur's tongue is just based on its skull -- for example, you can never really know that, based on a woodpecker's skull, its tongue wraps around its skull, resulting in a long tongue, or that, based on a giraffe's skull, a giraffe has a very long tongue.
You'd be surprised, we actually can get a basic understanding of an animal's tongue based on the jaw, muscle attachment leaves signs on bones you can use to figure out how muscles likely looked on the animal. And the tongue is just a big muscle. IIRC most dinosaurs had pretty stiff, immobile tongues. An exception I remember is ankylosaurs apparently having quite flexible tongues
Keep those lushes lips moist
oh yeah i just rewatched the pp2 trailer and i think i just realized smth...
What hadro is that?
theorized to be a Tethyshadros but they're even didn't make it to Maastrichtian so i'd say an impostor hadrosaur
it was discovered that they weren't maastrichtian 2 years ago, PP was already mid production
They have remains of their beaks being like that?
so pp was mid?
its subtle in this picture but yes
Cool, I thought it was just PP being hypothetical like the Dreadnoghtus air sacs, or was it another sauropod idk cant remember.
yes, duck are also big back then million years ago
explodes
Guess the male Hatze kidnapped the babeh and presented it to gurl as a present perhaps
Can we talk about Nanuqsaurus its crying in the corner
Are those sinraptors
Utahraptors (Old versions)
pretty damn sure no1 knows about this onw
Micro
Simosuchus >> any dinosaur in pet potential
Velociraptor
Clearly compys are the best option because imagine you're getting mugged, you can just reach into your pocket and throw a few angry chicken lizards at your attacker.
Pocket compys
any sort of dromaeosaurid would be terrible, the best would probably be a really small ornithopod of some kind (simosuchus is better than all of them though)
Microraptor, microceratus, or someone else
@tight kettle
Parvicursor or shuvuuia
Imagine something with the sociopathic tendencies of a corvid, the mass and athleticism of a good-sized dog, and the predatory instincts of a cat. No thank you
Parkosaurus
Eh microraptor would work. Itās basically just a weird crow.
Yi Qi as well
Okay, any of the truly tiny dromaeosaurids get a pass, just because I think they would be too small to do real damage
Just get yourself a dryo
Any small herbi is probably the way to go
like šµāš« magic shrooms or just normal edible mushrooms?
Apatosaurus.
Yi qi
So...quite a lot of cat species?
You're not wrong...
Can someone please explain the difference between triceratops and eotriceraratops because they look the exact same to me
The biggest draws are proportionally larger skull and differences in the cheek bones
And Triceratops is bigger iirc
Eotrike is also a couple million years older iirc
Normal edible champignon
Oh lol
That is also true but that alone usually doesnāt designate a different genus
eotrike is a bobblehead and trike is relatively normal
Eotrike casually being mid
Was Eotrike smaller? I thought it was slightly larger
Nah, smaller than trike
This size chart seems to differ. Mind you, it is off of Wikipedia
Inaccurate, L
eotrike was formerly thought to be larger than trike, since its skull is larger than trike's and it was reconstructed with the same proportions as trike, but later on another specimen was found that revealed eotrike just had a disproportionately large head compared to trike
I wouldn't really trust Wikipedia as a "reliable" source.
Sadly, Eo aint that big anymore.
Itās wrong
Eo just has a big head now
Huh, interesting
afaik eotrike skull isnt even bigger than the biggest trike skull, so this was misleading since the beginning
The chart must be labeled incorrectly then. Or just plain wrong
's probably just outdated. a lot of the problems with wikipedia as a source stem from palaeontology-related pages not always being updated as often as they should be
to be fair wikipedia is mostly accurate, this is just a case of it...not
The movie is made for entertainment not for accuracy
this is a channel about paleontology and the accuracy of extinct animals in media, bud, i'm not sure what you expected
āMade for entertainment, not accuracyā
The JW movies, yeaā¦JP movies, ehhhh
Its true either way.
I do prefer the novel version of the dilo to the movie version
JP the movie did a lot right, but there were certain decisions (like dilo) which were just bad.
In other cases there were details from the novel that absolutely shouldn't have been cut, such as the reasoning behind the rex only being able to see movement.
Keep in mind too, most inaccuracies are cause of Spielberg, the concept art and such were pretty good
[Sweats in Velociraptor antirrhopus]
Not really Sadly, happily Eotrike is mid
that's also a good point; they weren't immune to exaggerating stuff to look cooler, but there was certainly an attempt at accuracy; the raptors even got feathers in one of the sequels. sure, the feathers weren't great, but that still means they tried to keep up with the progression of science (and maybe the feathers were good for the time, idk)
I want to imagine the r rated movie looks more book accurate
Even JW went so far as to explicitly say "these aren't the real animals"
I have a meme explaining this exact situation, but itās a meme so itād be deleted instantly by the moderators
I wish we got an R rated jurassic park, the lost potential kills me
Imagine a purple forked tounge wrapping around you as you get pulled into the eager jaws of a mutant rex
Or the craddle scene with the compys, that alone is worthy of a jurassic park remake
Wu's death freaked me out the most when I first read it
Wu's death would've been great to put in the movie, would prevent him from becoming a science hippy 5 movies later
Did he become a hippy? He seemed more "mad scientist" to me
Wus death was awesome.
In dominion? He was giving off major hippy vibes
I feel like the most horrifying scene in any book was probably Nedry. He has a much better reason to be a traitorin the book.
Imma be honest, I only saw the first JW movie lol
dr wu deleted death scene:
while it is interesting to have em try to redeem creating living things and creating these literal global problems, having em die and the problems haunt his team would've been more fitting id say, also paleo chat so bones
I didnt like the giganotosaurus in dominion
And I loved the death scene for wu
so, š¦“bones, huh?
That man has a legendary mustache
"terrifying creature" "monsters"
leedsichthys: *is a filter feeder*
also this video is literally a conspiracy theory along the lines of "megalodon is still alive its just in the mariana trench!!!" except even worse. like. this video is implying that leeds is still alive in the modern day when its latest known fossil is from the jurassic (and it's trying to act like an intact, isolated spine of a giant animal laying exposed on the sea floor isn't at all suspicious)
Do we know where in the water column leed lived?
āWe havenāt discovered all life in the oceans yet!!!ā
Yea, most of that life is like under a pound, if that š thereās no multi-ton mega predator fish living in the oceanās depths that we havenāt discovered yet
"But- but- DEeP SeA GigAnTIsm"
the video was fishy (heh) basically as soon as it started calling the prehistoric equivalent of a basking shark (!this is not entirely literal!) a "terrifying monster" tbh. similar energy to hyping up a compsognathus as a cold-blooded killer
It was a cold blooded killer tho, all predators are by default.
true(-ish. it's kind of anthropomorphizing language) but it's also like the size of a cat. it's a bit silly to hype it up the same way you'd hype up, say, a utahraptor
R rated Jurassic park would be cool but even if we did the 1993 film is still a masterpiece and would probably still be considered the better of the 2
Well, to us, but to a small lizard, is as monstrous as it gets.
Animals aren't monsters, predators Hunt to survive not for pleasure (except orcas and humans)
Calling something a cold blooded killer just because they need to hunt to eat is incredibly ignorant
Depends on the animal, cold blooded means without emotions or remorse, I doubt the snake has any remorse or strong feelings towards the mouse it just killed. Also there are plenty of animals who just, kill for fun, like a house cat killing everything it finds, just to not eat them.
Technically they are cold-blooded as they do not feel remorse for the prey they kill 
Yes but they don't get enjoyment from it like serial killers and such, they hunt to survive, they are not monsters
Cold blooded doesnt mean they feel pleasure, thats called sadistic. And Im not implying that predators are evil, Im just saying, they dont care, like the wolves eating the deer alive, it doesnt get more cold blooded then that. Doesnt make em evil nor sadistic, but these are just semantics.
Cold blooded and sadistic are usually used together
it does feel kinda misleading to call an animal a cold-blooded killer in general tbh, it makes it sound like a murderer and not something that's just doing what it has to to survive. it's Awesomebro "Documentary" language, basically
Thank you for including those sea devils, when I tell people I actually despise orcas they act all upset or shocked until I spend the next 10 minutes describing the literal war crimes the species commits daily
To be cold blooded you would need to understand that what you are doing causes pain and suffering and still not care that your doing it, the majority of animals do not know the pain and suffering they are causing
I love orcas but they are evil
Thats literally what cold blooded means, they dont even consider the other party,, textbook definition.
Cold blooded means they are ectothermic 
Like what
because most of the stuff people use is overblown
i'd argue that it's less that they don't know (many animals communicate at least partially through smell, and the smell of fear can be similar between species; it's hard to imagine that wolves don't recognize that their prey is scared), and more that they can't be expected to understand the concept of morality because the way they think is fundamentally not the same as the way we think. maybe the compsognathus knows the lizard is scared, but what can we expect it to do with that information? lil guy's gotta eat
Orcas just like us thatās why theyre awesome
Cold blooded cannot be applied to animals because the majority of animals don't possess the level of intelligence to know what they are doing causes harm, this is the same reason why people with mental disorders usually get sent to a mental institution instead of prison when they commit a crime because they cannot comprehend what they are doing
Launching seals in the air, not to eat them but to watch them splat against ice for one.
Orcas killing for sport is based
yes 
Animals do know what they are doing, they know the signs their prey give when in distress and hurt, they know that ripping the other guy in half will kill it, the fact that they dont care cos they have to eat at the end of the day doesnt make them less cold blooded, it just makes not evil.
There is a difference between simply not caring you killed something and physically not being able to know that what your doing is bad
Orcaās supposed sadistic behaviour must have been exaggerated.
It absolutely was blown out of proportion
see, there's also a difference between knowing you're hurting/causing fear to something, and knowing that doing so is bad. the first is just the ability to comprehend the body language/smells/Existence As A Living Being of other organisms, the second is morality (which is not a common concept among animals)
But, its not bad tho? They gotta eat. Its just cold blooded, like the lion killing the other lions cubs so he can have its own, its not bad for them, and thats all that matters in nature.
Chickens will cannibalize each other when under lots of stress
Being cold blooded would imply that what your doing is needless and that even though you know what your doing is gonna cause immense pain and still not caring, killing something for survival is not cold blooded because it's required, they would die without doing it
Hamsters looking at their extra newborns after a stressful day š
Yummy
the meal
to be fair those are both domestic animals as examples but yeah..... otters when see literally anything smaller than them
It doesnt, it just means emotionless, but were going in circles. Cold blooded can be attributed to a soldier killing other people in a war to survive.
It's like saying a human hunting a deer so you don't not literally starve is cold blooded
Hippos will kill and or maim anything they find even a little annoying. If anything the larger the herbivore the more dangerous it might be. Imagine if the sauropods were like hippos. It would change everything.
honestly i feel like "this doesn't fit the exact definition of cold-blooded" is a less helpful way to frame this than than "cold-blooded is an anthropomorphizing way to look at things because of its strong association with human murderers (and as a result exaggerated documentaries)"
Not hesitating to kill something for survival and being cold blooded is not the same thing
Feel like we wouldāve found some evidence of animals being crushed or something along the lines of that
Wild hamsters exist
yes, in fact, domesticated hamsters do not exist
True but also if we look at nature today we could find similarities
Similarities in what.
i'm aware same can be said for chickens seeing jungle fowl, also there goes a good year and a half of info of the hamsters for me
To ancient social groups. Should have specified
Dinosaurs probably were not very social animals
hadrosaurs
i mean they most certainly would've had variety so id just base em off of: yes, some solo, some pairs, some family groups, some mobs, some mega groups, some boy bands, ect
Sociality is finicky. 
Very
yeah we can't really take a whole massive clade of animals and go "these were all social" or "these were all solitary", because even species in the same genus can vary (like panthera leo being social vs basically every other species in panthera being mostly solitary)
I love social dinosaurs, I love social dinosaurs!!!!
I see some of the smaller genera assumed to be social being significantly less social than mainstream media depictions had people believing.
Lmao I meant to write theropods
We have multiple theropod bonebeds indicating some form of social behavior though?
still not really based in solid evidence, avian dinosaurs alone cover the full range between solitary and social
Some may have hung out around each other but they werenāt really coordinated groups at all
[citation needed] (by which i mean, there is literally no reason to assume that)
I think we differentiate those forms of interaction on premise.
Think less wolf and more Komodo dragon or gator
We donāt really know though
we still don't know that is the thing, they could be more effective than chirping dogs or went solo despite all reason, some could've been like squirrels being alone but lending a helping hand, even through some barriers, which is why id say the best answer is yes, esp seeing the variety and amount of em
Probably the same amount of sociality and cooperation variation that we see today. We shouldnāt go willy nilly assuming a condition to appear in every genus regardless.
Pretty much all modern day archosaurs arenāt pack hunters. They hangout in groups yes but they donāt usually stage coordinated attacks on prey
We see some pretty good cooperative hunting in birds.
you're aware that modern archosaurs hold different niches to the majority of non-avian dinosaurs, yes? like, birds and crocodiles don't have the same ecological niches as a tyrannosaurus, so we shouldn't be relying on either to judge whether tyrannosaurus could've been social
could be for mating like some snakes do
Not much that Iāve heard of. Only instance I can think of is harris hawks
Damn, like 4 different tyrannosaur genus' got buried while mating, this is SO sad guys 
But non avian dinosaurs didnāt posses the cognitive abilities that many pack hunting animals nowadays do. However you do have things like Komodo dragons and sharks that join up in unorganized gangs to hunt prey
i mean they both have different niches by a long shot with non avians having a main stay with so much while modern birds being mostly aerial and crocodilians being.....bitey logs, also even then there are still fair bit of stuff who do it today
Crocodilians have been observed truly pack hunting (iirc Cuban crocodiles were observed distracting their keepers while others snuck in from behind, luckily they were caught and the keepers were changed out to avoid any lasting incidents)
Then you have Nile crocodiles that loosely work cooperatively during mass migration feedings
Yes the uncoordinated groups is what Iām referring too. They likely did do that like
But there is evidence of more
I could see a lot the larger genera being solitary. Although thatās also conditional because a lot of big carcharodontosaurids lived with big prey 
also you do realize we don't have any way of telling that beyond a basic brain size and shape (which doesn't have much to do with it anyways) also niche moment
1: animal cognition is hard to gauge even in extant species and we're still finding out that they're much more intelligent than previously thought, it's very bold of you to assume that we know enough about the cognition of extinct theropods that we can conclude that none of them were coordinated pack hunters
2: since you mentioned fish, i would like to remind everyone that there is a species of fish that's capable of coordinated hunting with entirely different species, even developing body language to communicate with those fish that it wants to hunt and that it's seen prey
But also. Letās not get ahead assuming everything is a cooperative hunter. It goes both ways in nature
about the sociality of ancient archosaurs, which if ima be real the simple answer is yes
But highly doubt most dinosaurs were as coordinated as animals like lions or chimps
There is no simple answer 
Chimps especially are a massive exception among animals so yeah, I doubt even the smartest dinosaur has sociality similar to chimps
Lions would be more plausible
those are two vastly different types of intelligence you just provided there
those both work differently and think differently, a lion isn't built for a tool use as much and a chimp isn't as built for grass stealth, esp seeing how intelligence isn't really a line, moreso a web: intelligent in W H A T
Sociality of predators also probably is determined be ecological pressures. If something is big enough within its environment it might not resort to that condition.
There is also the question of which dinosaurs would need to hunt in groups given their size and the size of the other animals in the area
I kinda want to think bigger theropods were most likely lone hunters or hunting with a mating partner. But i assume since they were so big, reaching sexual and/or bone maturity took years so until then they could have been joining a local boyband or girl gang to hunt together which could have been easier for young animals to survive
isn't it like 19 years for a rex to mature or something, so sounds like a decent guess
Yea it was similar to a human
btw if anyone wants more info on the fish i mentioned, here's the study: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms2781
it's relevant to this in that it provides a """simple""" animal that's capable of complex coordinated hunting, but also generally pretty important in the field of animal cognition because it suggests that at least one species of fish understands that other animals A: may not know everything the fish knows, B: are not always present and may not always see the fish, C: will react to the fish communicating information if they can see it, and D: can benefit the fish with that reaction, which is neat as fish have for a while been unjustly regarded as less intelligent than most other vertebrates 
Entirely possible it was a mating ground for different species who would go on their way at different times of the year.
common Moray Eel and Grouper W
But also, donāt discount smaller species of theropod carnivores being solitary as well.
The issue is, all 4+ (I forget if there's more) are separated by millions of years and in one case, different continents so having it all be death via mating season is weird
Yes afaik deinonychus is the only dromaeosaur with evidence of pack hunting behaviour
Nah
i mean. yeah. just because it's possible for some theropods to be social coordinated hunters doesn't mean all of 'em would've been, solitary animals are pretty common at all sizes
i mean yeah i don't think anyone is, the thing is its prolly Y E S, so doesn't mean to discount either, both solo AND groupings of various styles
I'm very wrong.
But saying Y E S literally is by definition lacking nuance. Sociality should be observed case by case.
I think prehistoric planet explained this topic the best saying that they would have joined forces to hunt large animals but that doesnāt necessarily mean they lived and exclusively hunted in social
....i mean thats what it means, anyways its abit hard to do that with bones i feel like
What about allosaurus. Do we still think that it was a "land raptor"?
I think itās safe to say allosaurs were more like Komodo dragons or Nile crocodiles when it came to that
Do we have evidence any of these theropods predated on adult mega-sauropods? š¤
What..?
Think of like the scene on the salt flats in the Ballad of Big Al
so sometimes solo, sometimes mobs and sometimes consistent groups
We have no real evidence for both of that
Yea but for the most part just mobs and solo because they wouldnāt need to hunt in consistent groups
Why do we make the connection to Komodo Dragons? They are very distantly related to Dinosaurs.
I mean my own bias is those arms could definitely kill a smaller creature and it could possibly make any other large creature bleed out with enough patience. So it could have been a solitary predator.
Komodos are probably the best modern analogy of how allosauroids hunted
They have similar behaviour to various species of crocodilian but terrestrial
There is no way to know that^
Know what?
watch allo live like a butcher bird or something just because even against its own build, oh dear do i hear boss music
Ontogenetic Niche partitioning like this was probably common amongst theropods. Rex is just the best known case.
That allosaurus (or any theropod) behaved similar to crocodylians
Theyāre closely related so it would make sense
Lol what
Why would Dinosaurs exhibit behaviours in crocodilians? Much less toxicofera?
I find it more likely that young tyrannosaurus stayed in their parentās territory until they got large, and while they may occasionally have protection they probably looked after themselves past a certain size, especially since they probably werenāt threatened by other predators much past 4-5 meters or so
Yeah not a lot of big theropods in North America during that time
I wouldn't call their relation close and no
You just said their hunting behaviour may have been similar to Komodo dragons which behave similarly to crocodilians
They are not that similar tbh
komodo dragon behavior is not very similar to crocodilians
Best connection to make is to birds. And when they donāt exhibit similar niches in the extant world, we find the closest mammal, and make the loose connections we may on behaviours.
Crocodile sociality isnāt completely understood, but it is known to be very complex and vary between species. Komodo dragons meanwhile largely exclusively look after themselves and would probably be a lot more solitary if islandic conditions didnāt force the population into such densities.
Iād reckon the theropods like Nanuqsaurus weāre probably cooperatively hunting, seeing as theyāre an apex whoās noticeably smaller that the largest surrounding fauna.
The best you can say is dinosaurs behaved like dinosaurs
Nanuqsaurus was still the largest predator in its habitat by a country mile. At 2 tons or so, with the next largest carnivores being 100 kg troodontids.
Yeah thatās what I saidā¦
There was larger prey but thatās not exactly abnormal in most ecosystems.
even then they were still a similar size to pachyrhinosaurus with edmontosaurus being not much bigger
I haven't seen crocodylians ripping out flesh chunks out of their prey and then patiently wait for it bleed out as their usual hunting method. They mostly rely on brute force to kill their prey
I thought Annectens was the species in prince creek?
Yes the only predators in the North American arctic at the time wouldāve been really nanuqsaurus and like latenavenatrix or similar troodontids and dromaeosaurs
Oh no edmontosaurus even back then were huge next to most fauna they coexisted with, but they were always the largest animals throughout their range anyways.
no regalis
Isnāt laten not a thing anymore or smthn like that
Troodontids go brr.
Regalis is smaller than annectans but they still got to like 12 meters and 7+ tons.
yeah laten got absorbed into steno
I thought troodon got split into stenonychasaurus and latenavenatrix
It did, then laten was thrown out, so everythingās steno now.
average regalis is still somewhere close to 4 or so tonnes tho iirc
Whatās stenoās full name
So laten is just a species of stenon yes?
Stenonychosaurus. Troodon and laten arenāt a thing no more.
no nothing at all remains of laten its all just stenonychosaurus inequalis
I canāt find anything about laten not being valid anymore though
Laten is gone, reduced to atoms
Even then, nanuqsaurus on average being two tons lighter than the largest fauna seems like a pressure for them to adopt some sort of cooperative hunting condition.
If troodon got split up to two, then merged into one again why not to keep the old name troodon lol
because of how taxonomic law works
Troodon is only known from some teeth which isnāt enough to make something a species
Well that explains
despite pectinodon still existing also being a tooth taxon
Troodon isnāt kept because Troodon was named on the basis of a fraction of a tooth, with basically any passing resembling troodontid lumped into it. Itās only when the taxon that got wastebasketted into it were taken apart and looked at closer did they realize āOh, the foundation of this genus is garbageā. Ceratops and Titanosaurus, the two now-dead namesakes for ceratopsids and titanosaurs, got a similar backstory.
The name troodon became widely considered a dubious genus name correct?
Generally you canāt name a species of a few small fragments or footprints
A lot of valid genera were named on fragmentary remains.
But I mean very fragmentary like with troodon
theres a big difference tho between a fragment of a tooth and a few vertebra
I found a lot of species that are named after founding just an eggshell or footprint when i was reading about coelurosaurs but didnāt get to dromaeosaurs yet
Oh yeah. Part of a tooth becoming a wastebasket taxon is downright silly š
It depends less on pure fragmentedness and more on if itās ādiagnosticā aka unique enough to tell apart from relatives. Tooth taxon, or genera whose sole representation is teeth, are notoriously bad in dinosaurs because, as an example, all troodontid teeth look the same. So how would somebody tell what they found was Troodon specifically? You canāt.
And you have āgrillatorā which is only known from a set of footprints
most dinosaur genera are based on incredibly fragmentary remains, tooth taxon is the issue(naming a genus based on partial or singular teeth which generally are NOT diagnostic)
footprints and cropolites have their own naming conventions as they are considered their own thingy. very, very rarely will a trace fossil like a footprint be attributed to a named species
But if we were to find a discernible genus fossil, could the nomenclature Troodon be reused for said genus?
How would you find that? The holotype, which is what the name is founded on and all remains are compared to to see if theyāre the same thing, is a tooth fragment.
My father used to be a palaeontologist a number of years ago back and he found part of a hadrosaur leg bone but it was fragmentary enough that they couldnāt name or identify what it was
like, if we got a giant theropod footprint from hell creek, we would not call it a tyrannosaurus rex footprint, despite to our knowledge rex being the only giant theropod
instead we'd call it something like Ichnotyrannus nublarensis or something 
In literature anyway. Most dub footprints more casually based on what we know of the local ecosystem.
Whatever happened to the Mongolian Titan?
yeah common sense may say its a tyrannosaurus rex footprint but the naming conventions go brrr
I ate it
I have part of a hadrosaur tail vertebrae in my basement that couldnāt be identified
Thatās actually my vertebrae could you put that back in me 
Sorry man the Royal Tyrell Museum said my dad could keep it
I thought it was a titanosauria?
talking about my example 
If I could find the vertebrae Iād send a picture
Oh
I am proud to say I live in the same province that the largest tyrannosaurus so far was found in
Troodon isn't a valid genus anymore
IIRC, wasnāt the issue that paleontologists basically threw any non-dromaeosaurid paravian remains they found at that site into Troodon without actually nothing to try and distinguish them?
Yep. Some wastebasket taxon manage to survive being fixed despite this due to some distinguishable remains they had off the rip (Megalosaurus, Apatosaurus), while others donāt (Troodon, Ceratops, Titanosaurus)
Bronto beat the allegations of being invalid as well
Everyone when Brontosaurus is discovered to be valid again:
https://tenor.com/view/loki-thor-i-cant-believe-youre-alive-gif-25788941
Itās been valid for like 8 years
Even though it's not new news it's still hilarious because it was probably one of the least likely things to be proven valid, it was the famous thing that at the time we thought didn't exist, in every single children's book about dinosaurs there would be a section dedicated to how bronto was fake
I read this educational dinosaur comic published in 2015 and it had a bit about brontosaurus being invalid but at the end of the comic they included a bit about how when the comic was in editing it got re-validated
any updates from dakota's validity?
is it a valid species/chimaeric?
technically its still valid, but its validity has been questioned
Wasn't it like disputed because one of the bones was a turtle bone
Yeah there was a turtle bone mixed in. Iirc there's still enough material to show that Dakotaraptor is likely valid, but it's been a while since I looked into it.
Nah it was a missed shot that boiled when you froze it in the microwave
Itās lack of validity isnāt because of being chimeric with a turtle (this was addressed rather quickly in literature), and more that itās ādiscovererā is an absolutely horrible person that is known to fabricate his finds and refuse for anyone else to see his data and specimens, almost like they donāt exist or something.
Dakotaraptor, for now, has no evidence for it actually existing in the first place.
there is still evidence of a big dromaeosaurid in hell creek itās just tricky to tell what it actually is, but yeah the ādiscoveryā of dakotaraptor isnāt exactly trustworthy
So does that mean that Dakotaraptor as a name is off the table? Or if another previously undescribed dromeosaur is found in Dakota, could it take the name?
it kind of depends on whether or not the original material is actually valid, unfortunately nobody is allowed to currently study it afaik
If someone else can study the holotype and determine the holotype is from hell creek and not elsewhere, then dakotaraptor remains valid
Otherwise the hell creek giant dromie will be assigned a new name if found to not be acheroraptor
Yeah thereās a real possibility it might just be a large archeroraptor if the specimen is actually real, given that the animalās supposed size has been up to scrutiny. Originally claimed to be Utahraptor size but that held up like a really bad jenga tower, with some recent estimates making it the size of a large deinonychus.
Itās really weird and frustrating in general.
it upsets me greatly that no one can scale the damn thing because the definitely dromaeosaur elements are teeth and caudal vertebrae, and even those seem to have dubious measurements
Hmm, it could very well just be Anzu again (the Dakotaraptor chimera situation).
Quick question paleo chat i saw these website selling this and just wanted to know if these are real teeth
Probably real, spino teeth are a common find in north Africa
Oh, I thought spinosaurus material as a whole was quite rare
Im assuming other material from the other spinosaurids is rare tho
Teeth are pretty much the only common part, there's a handful of vertebrae too but any kind of bone is much rarer
Dang only 30ā¬
Weird tho I visited their shop and they had a nanotyrannus tooth for 1500⬠? even though its invalid
Ikr
Baby Rex tooth
Rex teeth are that expensive?
yeah they actually are
juveniles more so, there's much more adult rexes out there than juveniles
Rex poop for 200 million $
It surprised me how a literal tiny rex tooth was more expensive than an entire progathodon jaw which was 400ā¬
The reason is simple, Progathodon, just isnt the Rex.
Probably a smaller species as well.
Its better, Marine Derpy Lizard is better than fat overweight jaw monster
The free market clearly doesnt agree with that.
I don't know the average mosasaur jaw price, but if they're selling a whole jaw, it's about 300x more likely to be fake than the teeth
I mean what really got to me was that I didnt have enough to afford a cave bear š bone ffs š¢š¢š¢ . Would of been a fine addition to my collection

For comparative and research purposes of courseā¦
š
There's a gem and rock shop near me with a complete cave bear fossil for sale. It's been there for years for like $40,000. No idea how much of it is authentic, but it's cool to look at every time I pop in there
The shop I visited had an Allosaurus skull cast on sale and it so mfing expensive omd š«š«
Allo skull? That must be 2k+ easy
And TIL that Robert DePalma exists
Is there any other carchardontosaurids with a hump like Concavenator?
rn current dunk is rlly fd up
That great white illustration is equally fd up
I was gonna say arenāt their head a lil more robust?
Are there stronger things than a Trike except like Argentino etc. Maybe a Ankylo?
Flesh Eating Bacteria
Yeah, pectoral fins and top tail fin look a little long as well.
You is NOT a surgeon š£ļøš«āļø
Bros salty that flesh eating bacteria solos Triceratops Horridus
Fr
On a serious note tons of things would probably stronger in brute strength than a trike such as a variety of sauropods and large megatheropods, some of the largest hadrosaurs such as Edmonto would probably be stronger as well. But I doubt any of them would be able to just ignore damage sustained from the two death spears that Triceratops has attached to its head.
Ok, ty
only other mega herbivores and like...2 megatheropods maybe( tbh most are in a similar range save mid-large sauropods and ankylosaurids), the water is a different story
Iād say Mapu, Giga and Rex have the most even chance of beating a Trike. Maybe even Tyrannotitan as well but probably not
Altispinax
Knew there was another one thanks! Also I found this depiction of Eocarcharia with a hump. Inaccurate Im assuming.
It was proposed for a while but not likely. This is better. https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/897994654916689961/899896712594849812/Eocarcharia.png
Oh thereās a newer one. Cool!
If icthyovenator was a carnosaur
Spinosaurs are carnosaurs.
So my professor is having me reassemble these humorous(?) bones but he couldnāt quite remember the name of the dinosaur. It was something like āCompadasaurusā but that isnāt a thing so I was wondering if anyone could take a guess at dinosaurs with similar names
Location/formation/time?
I could ask him
Morrison Formation, Jurassic
Ah then perhaps Camptosaurus? Closest sounding name to what you have
Yes thatās it! He just confirmed. Thank you!
Yeah, Campto was going to be my guess as well
Should probably switch it out in KoI lol
Should've been more specific a carcharodontosaur
The dip in these carchar skeletals bother me, cause wtf suggests that itād actually be visible in life.
This tbh.
I'll take "Shrink-wrapping" for $500, Alex
Something something soft tissue follows the spine closely for them something I don't remember the specifics and I am too busy to find the answer right now
yeah, there are no indicators of massive amounts of soft tissue that would fill in that portion.
Unless you subscribe to camel humped carcharodontosaur theory, then you should be making the dip be a raised mound instead. But speculative fat deposits aren't usually for the realm of skeletal art
So⦠no amount of any tissue would smooth out that portion of the back?
It would, but fatty deposits would likely be large (because it's storing fat) and thus probably be a bit lumpier
no musculature attaches there, and it's hardly likely that it had a dewlap of rigid skin standing up on the hip, so your best bet would be fat
Does anybody know what the biggest pliosaur was
Sachicasaurus
Oh that's why that's the one that got a mod lol
New dinosaurs. New habitats. New season. #PrehistoricPlanet Season 2 streaming May 22 on @AppleTVPlus
I couldāve sworn there was a clip of Majungasaurus recently released?
there was a half second clip of it meeting Simosuchus, or it might've been the majung and simosuchus clip spliced together
Found it
oh it was a whole two seconds, impressive
I like that the Simosuchus are being portrayed like the Diictodon in WWM
Bruh majunga is so long
Well in terms of all living creatures several would have been stronger than trike, in dinosaurs other than sauropods I can't really think of many except maybe anky and maybe shantung
not technically paleo but yāall might appreciate it anyways.phylogenetic spread from Smithsonian natural history visual guide, illustrates how birds are reptiles while also setting aside amphibians as its own branch(clade?)
humor
yoooo it's eocarcha with it's idol
uhhhh how big meg can get????
https://youtu.be/sCW0djw_cg4
Get ready for the ultimate adrenaline rush this summer in āMeg 2: The Trench,ā a literally larger-than-life thrill ride that supersizes the 2018 blockbuster and takes the action to higher heights and even greater depths with multiple massive Megs and so much more! Dive into uncharted waters with Jason Statham and global action icon Wu Jing as th...
Idk the dimensions but ik mega is estimated at the second largest animal ever, only behind the blue whale iirc
Never mind the size, how about it casually beaching itself to eat an animal that went extinct well before Megalodon existed lol
also the trailer depict them doing "Hunt in Pack"
even though meg is (likely) such a soliter shark
why are they're do with that hunt in pack metodes
hunting livyatan?
nah bro is smaller than meg š https://twitter.com/FabioAleRomero/status/1596707421774569473?t=O-COpkyvhpoPrnM0ZndJ2g&s=19
Ohohohohoho, Majungasaurus and another Abelisaurid, nooiiice
No way, apparently that other Abelisaurid is Rajasaurus . . . . this is just music to my ears.
I canāt find that clip on YouTube can you give me a link to the teaser
can we rule out scorpiovenator yet idk i havent watched the clip im trynna sound smart
Its possible since they did not show every animal that will be shown in the . . . . . show
HAHHAAHAHAHHA WTF
Poseidon will estimate
Then maybe donāt enter the paleontology chat?? šš
Also thereās nothing even explicitly evolutionary in that tree. Just displaying how humans interpret the different animals on earth
I want to know what the little salamander dog things are supposed to be. They're cute
what cause the extinction of meg 3.6 mya?
Global cooling, baleen whales were able to cope with the cooler temperatures and moved to higher latitudes, while megalodon starved in the warmer regions. Megalodon preyed on large whale species, and were too big to hunt dolphins, fish and other things. Thatās the main theory anyway
The current theory is that the joining of North and South America dramatically affected the ocean currents, and resulted in high plankton dieoffs that caused a great decline in baleen whale diversity and populations. This dramatic decrease in food supply being what did it in. Megalodon itself had a really wide distribution and was rather comfortable in cooler waters, with teeth being as far North as the British Isles and as far south as New Zealand.
It is interesting that it was enough to completely kill off megalodon rather than just drop the population. Baleen whales survived in relatively high populations right up until we realized that we could light lamps with them. Even if the shifting ocean reduced diversity, the remaining whales might've been able to support a smaller megalodon population. I wonder what actually pushed them over the edge entirely.
I did
Can u undo that
No
my hubris led to their downfall and I live with it every day
Just like how I killed the dinosaursā¦
The availability of food can have a huge impact, it doesnt need to disappear completely for the animal that eats it to go extinct. It may be that particular whales they primarily predated on went extinct and without them, the other whales werent enough to sustain high enough populations with enough genetic diversity to avoid extinction
If i had to guess it might have thinned out their population enough that they rarely met, and when they did they mightve felt more inclined to compete than mate because of food availability. Its not like they comprehend their whole species going extinct, they only care about their own survival
Not quite true. Baleen whale populations bounced back rather quickly when the ice ages started and plankton exploded due to the colder water at the poles, but initially they declined a good deal in a lot of places.
You can thank a good portion of baleen whales becoming huge due to their being no predator to stop them for about 2 million years, combined with the new food surplus.
Thankyou meg for going extinct, without that we might not be lucky enough to live at the same time as the largest animal to have ever lived š
Honestly the fact other animals cant comprehend extinction, let alone the extinction of their own species, makes endlings that much more depressing. Being the last of your kind and having no idea, attempting to live your whole life as if you arent the last.
remember that poor bird that tried to call out.. but he was the last of his species :( god that wouldāve been hard with any animal
its pretty sad when you think about it from the perspective of a social animal trying to find others of its kind, but I think there's something uniquely lonely about what it must be like for a non-social animal. The fact they could go their whole life and never think something is amiss.
Reminds me of that scene in Jurassic park
Skorpiovenator was extinct for about ~30 Ma by the time PP is set, so yeah we can probably rule it out (plus the animal in question has already been confirmed as Rajasaurus)
Itās been known as rajasaurus before PP2 was even confirmed to exist lol
yeah they even didn't make it to maastrichtian
Yeah Rajasaurus, Isisaurus and Pachycephalosaurus were all known as the "cut" animals from S1 before S2 was eventually confirmed
Lowkey just did a presentation on Ceratosaurus to my class and some mf said dinosaur arenāt real 
Fossilize them
First of all, excellent dinosaur choice. Secondly, that's person makes me sad and angry all at once
Thank you but yeha itās sad honestly dinosaurs play a part of history
Your so real for this
"dinosaur aren't real"
ok then let him/her explain what is this???
the giant human that were in a bible???
I hear they say something about the Bible (probably used it as an excuse) to real history of dinosaurs I even had pictures of fossil and accurate photos and they still deny it smh
either Fake, Dragons, or some secret third thing
Wdym
i am genuinely not sure how to clarify this
Question, was latenavenitrix a dromeosaur?
Troodontid
So whatās the difference?
troodontids generally have smaller teeth, longer necks and legs, smaller toe claws and wings, and larger eyes
Troodontids and dromaeosaurs are very closely related, next to birds (some studies place troodontids closer to birds then raptors, and vice versa itās complicated). Troodontids trend more towards generalistic diets and lithe body frames while dromaeosaurs are more robust and tend to be more obligate macropredators, but it varies.
So if Iām drawing a laten should I make it āskinnyā
Also latenivenatrix doesn't exist anymore
Stenonychosaurus now?
Yes
Why is that? Can someone explain
Little skeletal difference to stenonychosaurus
Itās just that more recent studies showed that there isnāt anything to differentiate it from steno, so theyāre actually one and the same. Steno was named first so thatās the name that sticks.
Real question is T formosus actually considered invalid yet?
It's been invalid for more than half a decade
Troodon hasnāt been a thing since 2017
I thought it was just considered dubious.
Why isnāt troodon real?
Because it was all based on just a tooth.
Because troodon was described from a fragment of a tooth
When it comes to how we discuss these animals, dubious still isnāt worth treating as real. As for why, itās a long story with new vernacular so lemme explain.
So the nomen dubium nomenclature is essentially what determines a former genus as invalid?
So is laten completely debunked or is it kinda a hot topic
Completely deleted
Every genus/species of dinosaur ever created has what is called a holotype, which is the specimen that said taxon is founded on, and what every following specimen is compared to in order to see if the new material is more of that species or not. Hereās where the issue is. The holotype of Troodon is a fragment of a tooth. That is a serious problem when troodontid teeth (and most dinosaurs for that matter) are extremely similar across close relatives, so for a while, Troodon was this wastebasket taxon where any North American troodontid from the late Cretaceous is thrown into it. That has been getting remedied the past few decades, and nowadays, Troodon is discarded all together. Cause hereās the thing. The name of a species is only as valid as the holotype itās named on, and when the holotype has absolutely nothing unique about it, it becomes useless scientifically.
So what do we attribute that original material to? Is it just āTroodontid indeterminateā?
The fragment of a tooth still counts as āTroodonā but literally everything else is under Stenonychosaurus now
So why did they throw out the name troodon and not keep the name for the actual āTroodonā
I just asked the same thing yesterday lol
Cause the holotype is just a fragment of a tooth with no unique characteristics. How can you possibly attribute any other material to Troodon when every troodontid tooth looks the same? You canāt.
Yeah but your saying that the Stenonycosaurus is the closest thing to troodon so why didnāt the name change? Also so how many āTroodontidsā are there if they keep changing
They're sort of stuck with it because its an undiagnostic tooth
Iām confused as to what youāre trying to say exactly. Stenonychosaurus actually has a holotype that has unique characteristics, so we can tell what it is from relatives. Therefore itās the better name to use for the animal. Or, rather, itās a taxon that actually does what a holotype is supposed to do so itās usable.
Itās kinda confusing for me thatās why Iām not necessarily asking the proper question. However I am wondering how many āTroodontidsā are there if they keep changing? Also what was the Troodontid that was in Prehistoric Planet
i'm of the opinion that if someone finds and describes material that could be the holotype of a new genus but it's so fragmentary that it's highly unlikely anything can be reliably assigned to that genus, they should simply not make it a holotype for a new genus and instead make use of a thing called patience
I don't think all Troodontids were a part of the Troodon wastebasket, mostly Steno and Laten
So what was this āTroodontidā in prehistoric planet supposed to be
Yeah thatās the smart thing to do but whatever scientist named Troodon 100+ years ago wasnāt thinking ahead. Also Troodon has historically been a wastebasket taxon, it just hasnāt been relevant in recent years.
pectinodon has a similar situation to troodon in terms of being Just A Tooth, although i guess time will tell if it gets similar treatment. got lucky avoiding the whole wastebasket thing though iirc
