#paleontology
1 messages · Page 10 of 1
Really? Well if you finish your book let us know! I would happily read it. Edit: never mind I forgot it was in your native language lol
Maybe ask for that at #path-of-titans
I’m curious but could pachys eat meat IRL? (Probably not) I could just google it
They did have canines from what I know. I am very unsure on this though.
...how. just...... how
Could they? Probably, I doubt it would kill them or something. Did they? No, not any more than a deer or cow eats meat
(and yes I know deer and cows eat meat once every thousand years, that's what I mean)
holy crap a 2 minute slowmode
Maybe? But sharp canines are also found in plenty purely herbivorous animals so it’s not something that exactly tells us that
guess the carcharodontosaurid
Dinosaur
giga
But seriously me think it’s carch
Its a big charc, they all look almost identical.
Mapu?
@white matrix Please do not post any content where animals or people are getting injured.
It's Giganotosaurus but it looks like an Acrocanthosaurus
ight answer time
Giganotosaurus
What’s your favorite dinosaur?
The baby muncher himself.
AkshuallY thats not a dinosaur🤓
Fair enough.
🦖🦕
Ye Rex is pretty rad.
I know. The slow mode is so annoying!
I was right😎
deinocheirus* its also my favorite
Just something small, like bannykus, parvicursor or natovenator
I first learned about it in the documentary Amazing Dinoworld and I have been in love ever since
POT server moment
Deinocheirus and maip macrothorax
T. Rex and the american crow
Shunosaurus
Awesome
Yutyrannus
It has been wild to be alive in the timeframe where Deinicheirus went from "big carnivore arms" to "probably just a huge ornithomimisaur" to "ok so it is a huge ornithomimisaur, but it's also sort of a duck and a camel and it's fabulous"
parasourolophus
Acro
The best spino skeletal
Fantastic!
Real
wait really? lmao
when I first saw the art and was scrolling down reading the answers people were giving I was like "what, it's an Acrocanthosaurus just look at it" until I got to yours
Unfortunately I don't have the time to explain the very real facts about why leopards are stronger than any dinosaur ever
ignoring ligers pretty sure it was a relative of smilo who takes the crown
Arent ligers infertile, so they dont count?
They're also just, hybrids.
thought they could do the do but still felines that don't flop over 2 seconds at existing so good enough( or just label it in a diff category)
And non-functional outside of zoo-life due to their many health-issues
Soo, then smilo is the biggest ever? Or was it those cave lion thingys?
European Cave lions weren’t that different from modern lions iirc
Y-yes.
I was just saying that I feel like in questioning of largest felids that would naturally exclude hybrids.
Werent those maneless tho? And what about the american lion?
O yeah it would, just pointing out that ligers rlly shouldn’t count because they kinda can’t function at all naturally.
They were maneless yes, American lions I’m not sure what their estimates are
i mean its still a feline that exists, but anyhow pretty sure it was a relative of smilodon who takes the cake for biggest natural feline
I also remember hearing about some tiger variant or subspecies idk really being very large, dont remember the name tho.
Siberian Tigers?
No, some extinct variant, idk I cant remember it correctly.
ngandong tigers?
I think so lemme check.
Yeah that was it, big bois, 350 kg plus maybe
heard that sumatran tiger is the smallest tiger while siberian tiger is the largest tiger
afaik Ngandong tiger might've been slightly larger than the largest tigers but if so, it wouldn't have been by much
ngandong tiger location?
what hippos would probably look like if we only knew them from fossils
Do you have an image of that?
Well the cool thing is that we have modern hippos, so we can use those as a reference point for reconstructing extinct ones. The point of art like that is showing how weird modern animals would look if we treated them the same way we treat a lot of extinct animals, in particular attempting to reconstruct something when we have no good modern analogies to use. Hence the "if we only knew them from fossils"
May you send it. If not in this chat then DM plz.
He still knows what modern hippos look like though correct?? Even if he wasn't looking at actual pictures of hippos at the time as reference, if you have a vague idea on what a hippo looks like that helps a LOT in knowing how much extra tissue to put on them lmao
Even without looking at a hippo, if you've seen one before you know hippos have huge cheeks and lips so you would likely put those features on an extinct hippo you're reconstructing
send the picture
I believe it was a manatee, not a hippo. He missed the giant lip covering the front tusks that manatees have, but was otherwise correct
Regardless, future artists who are well versed in animal anatomy would reconstruct modern animals much more closely than some people think
These images also tend to follow the logic of "if we also had no idea how soft tissue worked, that a hippo was a mammal and not a reptile, etc."
Agreed, I think this meme is a little counterproductive at this point
Yeah, these days we're getting pretty good at it, I think all of this would largely apply to decades past when we still had a lot to learn and were getting plenty wrong
a lot of posts like that also ignore the fact that muscle and tissue scarring is a thing
well the thing is, images like the original posted are just making light of the tendency to shrink wrap prehistoric animals by doing the same on extant animals which we know how they actually look
An issue with that though is that reptiles are much more shrinkwrapped than mammals are, so if the prehistoric animals the meme refers to are dinosaurs it becomes apples & oranges. A croc skull for example:
well that's why it is a meme I don't think it's meant to be taken seriously, and generally artist depictions of dinosaurs that showcase shrinkwrapping aren't to such extremities either and are largely centered around the various openings in the skulls
most notably, the orbit and antorbital fenestra
True True, my main point being that it's just a completely different approach reconstructing the facial anatomy of a mammal vs a reptile and with these images it seems like clade misidentification was the fictional artists first and biggest mistake
though with every paleo meme there's crap where peeps take it too seriously or meme too hard. when you meme too hard the meme becomes real
Yeah well put, I'm just memed out on some of these lol
the meme that always grind my gears is the antithesis of this one, where dinosaurs are then overly soft-tissued into obese monstrosities or overly featherly
or in an adjacent manner, like in the case of Tyrannosaurus, the absolute largest is treated as the standard
To reference Dan's recent estimates of the larger giga for example it makes sense because we only have two. But for Tyrannosaurus where we have a good number of specimens that are fairly complete, Sue and Scotty really shouldn't be treated as the standard rex in the sense of mass
The greatest wastebasket taxon 🫡 ✊
why did they do this
Buckland described it as 12 meters though iirc
The 1822 description of Megalosaurus
Return to the OG dino
S. humanum
Oh no....
I was gonna joke and tell you to say the full name but I don't think you even can here lol
Its a baller name, people go nuts over it
Its a damn shame it got sacked
Question to… someone, do we know the ecology / climate of the Ouled Abdoun Basin?
The book I have doesn't cover Ouled Abdoun specifically but has this to say about Algeria during that time
So I’m guessing the climate stayed the same into the maastrichtian as well?
Marine transgressions occurred, so it was repeatedly flooded by the sea. Sea levels were high during the Maastrichtian so I assume it was underwater by then. In terms of temperature and stuff it would have been broadly similar: very very hot
Well the whole formation couldn’t have been underwater, seeing we have pterosaurs, and I think an abelisaurid, and lambeosaurine iirc.
Marine sediments can still contain dinosaurs from washed out carcasses. The marine transgressions were just a general trend, there would have been coastlines or islands etc
So the surrounding area would’ve still been arid floodplains.
That's probably a safe bet
where can i found candeleros?
Is the eotrike really that big? That thing is a tank in game
no, ingame its upsized, irl its a bobblehead which gave rise to the false estimates
can anyone tell me which skin this is
WWD sty
iirc Smilodon populator was the heaviest but there are some estimates for cats that may be larger (meant to reply to a diff message)
iirc Homotherium, Amphimachairodus and Panthera tigris soloensis (Ngandong tiger) have weight estimates that overlap and even exceed some average weight estimates of S. populator. Also to what the other people were saying Siberian tigers did used to be very large but due to human conflict and habitat loss the most up to date estimates for them put their average weight at around 400-420 lbs, thus making Bengal tigers the largest extant tigers. American and Eurasian cave lions were also only about 10-25% larger than African lions so an average male individual of those species likely weighed anywhere from 450-600 lbs
Here's a comparison of femurs of extinct cats, from left to right:
Panthera tigris soloensis 490 mm
Panthera atrox 462 mm
Panthera spelaea 480 mm
yellow is eotrike
greenish blue is trike
art credit: @tough parcel
anime... woman... 🐺😡
noo that's @tough parcel oc 😭
featureless 6 ft tall silhouette that looks like my sleep paralysis demon is better than a 5 foot something anime character because the demon is more relatable (i do not talk to women)
So, S.Populator still has the largest max estimates from any cat ever I presume.
Found this on Devian art and thought it was pretty cool
Its pretty cool
any idea of why we should "never underestimate hadrosaurs"?
Theyre big and lived in herds.
Hadrosaurs, at least the ones that people say not to underestimate, were quite large with powerful legs. Not to mention they tended to either be larger or rival their predators in size. I believe we even have fossil evidence of them surviving predation attempts, healing, and living to fight another day
Tho I must say that hadros these days are being overestimated a lot, a lot of the community did an 180 on them
Oh for sure, they're definitely overestimated a lot as well
This is typical of people who tend to stan a dinosaur though so I can't be surprised
If big cats today hunt and kill ungulates which sometimes can be like 5 times the size, Im sure big theropods which were tied in size or slightly smaller or larger then the local hardosaurs did too.
Depends on a lot rlly, mammalian predators like Mustelids and felines generally posses traits that allow them to do so which many other animals, and likely theropods don’t have.
Not saying theropods couldn’t do it, but given how they tended to weigh similarly or were heavier than their prey items it likely suggests that they didn’t do how cats do
Like they’re just build different to one another, so comparing theropods to big cats doesn’t rlly work
Mammals are super flexible, predators in particular. This agility gives them a huge advantage when taking on larger prey items. They don't need to use brute strength to kill their prey most of the time, they just need to be quick, clever and have the endurance for it. Even hunts which seem like they use mostly strength, eg lions grappling the back of a zebra to bring it down, are really more down to endurance. Huge generalisation here but large theropods seemed to tend more towards the brute strength aspect. Their agility wasn't to be underestimated mind you, but there's only so agile you can get when you weight multiple tonnes, and there's only so much of an advantage that can give you over big prey.
That said I think how they reproduce is something to keep in mind too. Hadrosaurs seemed to gravitate towards a decent amount of babies that grow up as fast as possible. They reach sexual maturity at an age surprisingly comparable to modern day ungulates, indicating there is a need to have a constant supply of new adults: because adults get eaten a lot. Generally speaking I think there's a lot of comparisons to draw between ungulates and hadrosaurs in terms of their role in the ecosystem, and I imagine as prey items they filled a similar role. AKA pretty common prey items that were generally the "safe" option for predators, though can and do fight back sometimes causing injury and fatality to hunters. Maybe some were exceptions but I think a lot of hadrosaurs fit this pretty well
Genuinely its pretty funny, hadrosaurs seemed to reach sexual maturity at around 2-3 years give or take. Funnily enough so do a lot of ungulates :P its a good age for prey items that get eaten a lot
I still cant get over sauropod diagonal gait.
The elephant gait sauropod are already growing to me.
Wasnt it like 5-10 years to become sexually mature for Rexes? I doubt they became fully grown at 20 when they usually only lived till 30.
Idk the actual article, but I might give it a look
2004 is a pretty old paper
dw about it, the text was pretty small 👍
weird since afaik all known adult specimens were like 20 years old
Yeah no idk where you get tyrannosaurs maturing that fast from. It generally took 20 years for them to properly mature. Sauropods took about the same time. You’d see much faster growth rates in smaller theropods (I believe guanlong matured at around 5 years) while hadrosaurs grew extremely quickly, reaching sexual maturity in about 3 years.
That study said that Sue was like 54 years old, so if they managed to live that long, it makes sense that they matured at 20ish.
I’m pretty sure Sue was 28 when she died. You don’t really see theropods that old until you get to some carcharodontosaurs (One of the Meraxes specimens I believe was nearly 60)
eh that’s a lot bigger of a difference than 15 and 20
54 years old for sue is also a pretty absurd estimate
wdym that’s 27 years vs 18 years using that lifespan
Rex starts to breed around ages 12-14, is fully grown around 20. That's the result of every study on its growth ever
Considering upcoming studies that suggest rex probably laid 25-60 eggs a year, that's 350-960 eggs produced in a lifetime, assuming it dies at age 28
When did I say I didnt believe you lol, I said it makes sense.
I thought you said Rexes werent sexually mature before 20, not fully grown. As the studies say, they could reproduce since 12 or 14 depending on other factors. Also, did tyranosaurs always continue to grow like crocs or did they stop at 20? Iirc they always grew
@white matrix I did say right here that I agreed and it made sense lel.
Its strange for me to think of "Jane"-aged individuals breeding and laying eggs.
tbf i wouldnt be surprised if its like a lot of animals where your average individual won't actually mate for the first time until they're closer to physical maturity, be it because of the strain on the body or difficulty competing for mates etc. Would be a lot easier to figure out if we know how exactly they reproduced tho 
like as an example, if we knew males physically fought each other to compete for females then that'd imply most males won't mate until they're physically mature so they're actually big enough to do that. Buuut we don't really know so ¯_(ツ)_/¯
ghost ping?
@hybrid trout this one might be good
Sweet nice pic xd
@hybrid trout
Thanks guys
iirc the lower life expectancy for earlier humans was less because they rarely reached old age, and more because of a high infant mortality rate pushing the average lifespan wayyy down - it's only very recently that medicine has progressed to the point where most infants can be saved.
Imagine if they changed Oviraptors name to Ovimaia
this is not the right place for that
I like it but it should probably go into the art channel
This man is my literal childhood! I hope he does another time traveling series. Prehistoric park season 2!
another season of prehistoric park would be the godsend we all need right now
I know! I think he should do one more season before he retires
7000 seasons imo
Yeah pretty much
S.fatalis was smaller tho iirc
There are some close contenders with Smilodon, mostly P. fossilis I believe, but S. populator’s still the largest solidly verified
Well with cats it definitely has something to do with brute strength considering their endurance is pretty low
Yes I would have infinite seasons if I could but to be realistic I think if they were to continue prehistoric park they would only do one more season
Yeah S. fatalis was only like lion-tiger sized (and S. gracilis only like jaguar sized), also P. fossilis iirc was not much bigger than P. leo
S. is about the size of a large male lion or tiger, while S. gracilis is around the size of a large leopard, and is much more built like typical big cats rather than having the sloping back posture Smilodon’s typically known for
a large leopard is only like 170-250 lbs
Yes
I'm not sure if there's enough accurate evidence for P. fossilis size since lion fanboys love to overexaggerate the sizes of extinct lions, even P. atrox and P. spelaea which were not true lions 😹 I've seen so many people claiming that they averaged 700-900 lbs
Im guessing lion fanbois are like the TRex fanbois of the cat world
I’m talking about apparent exceptional specimens and thatve been recently recovered from the Middle East, although it’s reportedly questionable if they’re actually P. fossilis and the size is likely exaggerated
Partly though im also referring to endurance in an actual fight, like how big cats will try to latch onto the windpipe and keep holding on as long as possible until the animal suffocates. Their strength helps here for sure, but even if they dont have good running stamina theres a degree of endurance required to maintain that
Yeah, tiger fans are nearly equal but at least tigers are more impressive to back up the claims, some of the stuff lion fans will say has made me have a permanent imprint of my palm in my skull from the facepalming
So then lion fans are more like the giga fans while the tiger fans are the trex fans lol
Well when cats catch their prey they usually sit there for a little while latched onto the throat regaining their energy before wrestling it down again
I also think it’s likely that homotherium might’ve been convergent with hyenas in their endurance, given their body plan and being diurnal, which would otherwise put a lot of stress on a large cat hunting in the heat of the day
A. horribilis
yeah, compared to their reputation, lions are kind of wimps. like, they're still large (for their time) terrestrial pack-hunting predators, so they're not complete pushovers by any means, but they're way overhyped, yknow?
Yeah I have heard that theory with some Machairodonts being more endurant than other cats
Yeah they're certainly the apex predators of Africa along with Nile crocs (even though I've had hyena fanboys try saying hyenas are also apexes) but I definitely agree they're way overhyped, like have you seen that video of them catching a buffalo and as they're killing it they start fighting and the buffalo just gets up and walks away
For a great picture of lion vs buffalo Relentless enemies is a top tier documentary covering the life of prides specialised in buffalo hunting and herds of buffalo who have adapted more with the lion threat
Hyenas very much are apex predators. Their conflict with lions is likely what drove lions to become social in the first place. Also that video is often taken out of context. The background is that the pride was hunting on the border of another pride’s territory. The chase went into the rival pride’s territory and they opportunistically took the buffalo mid-hunt. The males didn’t care. Females are females and food is food. But the lionesses very much cared and when one of the lionesses from the other pride caught up and tried to share she got jumped. Then chaos.
It also shows some damn big lions, those lionesses were shredded
And liger fans are indom fans
While I certainly agree that hyenas did push lions to become social it definitely wasn't the sole reason, nor do I believe they are apex predators in competition with lions, they definitely are high up there but rank slightly below lions and crocs due to how easily they can be intimidated by a single lion let alone a whole pride. I would say "what about American lions or Smilodon" but those were in equal competition with grey and dire wolves, the reason other large cats like tigers, pumas or leopards arent social is because they typically stick to more forested environments (although leopards can be found in grasslands they arent in the very open ones that have 1 tree every 200 miles 😹)
The other cats are also becoming more social with time tho, like cheetah coalitions becoming so wide spread
I can't say for certain but it might be likely that cheetah coalitions have existed for longer than we think, and tigers do certainly have a minor social aspect to them but it's not as prominent as lions or cheetahs
It’s the males that hyenas get easily intimidated by. Lionesses are very much under threat of hyenas and it’s much more of a back and forth without male support.
Hyenas still usually dont mess with lionesses unless they have double the numbers or more.
That doesn’t matter much when hyenas almost always have the numbers advantage anyway.
60 seconds · Clipped by Scanova the Carnotaurus · Original video "Bird wyvern ecology : the dromes and the greats of Monster Hunter" by Unnatural History Cha...
what is that thumbnail
That thumbnail is single handedly discrediting the video for me
It’s a monster hunter related video, but it uses real world ecology. I’ve learned a lot from these. I clipped it cause mobile for me doesn’t have linking a specific point. Regardless it also goes on to explain that male lions are rarely contested by spotted hyenas and are often their biggest cause of death. As stated though, with lionesses it’s a much more even playing field.
The information provided in the video is well researched and cited, UHC takes his stuff seriously
Yeah but a lion can cripple a hyena for life in a matter of seconds, plus lions often steal kills from hyenas, and there is plenty of evidence to show that lionesses are not easily intimidated by hyenas, there's this 1 video of a lioness getting mobbed by dozens of hyenas and then a few other lionesses show off and this huge swarm just runs away, lionesses certainly can be intimidated but the males will face whole clans even when alone
It sounds almost like.....its situational and a case by case basis
In the end is a confidence game, ive seen lionesses who give to like 3 hyenas and and others who havent given up even with 6+
Sorta but not entirely
No no it sounds like it is. It sounds like when the situation is different, the outcome might be different
Who woulda thought
Anecdotal of course but honestly ive seen more clips of lions being intimidated by hyenas than vice versa. Hyenas are ballsy and play the numbers game to a pretty significant degree. Id say lions may tend to rank higher overall but not by much, and it really depends hugely on the size of the pride vs the clan
I’m sorry but this really sounds like personal opinion rather than what actually happens.
hot take labeling things as "apex" this and that has skewed peoples view of ecosystems into onesided black and white conflicts and that's kinda unfortunate
Yeah I've seen 5 lionesses be intimidated by 3 hyenas but it was very likely due to the fact they were eating a buffalo corpse stuck in mud and were already on edge from the mud. Also I would like to note that lionesses and male lions hold slightly different ecological niches, for example lionesses are more social, are more easily intimidated by rival predators and typically hunt smaller prey whereas male lions are less social, are very rarely intimidated by rival predators (with the exception of large crocodiles or large hyena clans) and typically target larger slower prey
Oh man panthera its almost like you described it as a case by case basis
Of course there is some difference in niches, otherwise the 2 species wouldn’t still be competing for millions of years, but both are very much the dominant predators in their ecosystems.
Well sorry if I'm coming off like that but due to the interactions I've seen I really don't believe hyenas can be considered "equal" with lions
I really feel like hyenas aren’t given enough credit here due to singly being weaker than a lioness, but in reality that really doesn’t matter in the ecosystem’s context.
Hyenas get pushed off their kills by lions quite often and have individuals of any age group killed by lions much more often than hyenas kill lions
Also consider that hyenas and lionesses rarely actually kill each other in such conflicts, and the deaths you see are cubs and vulnerable adults. It’s only adult male lions that kill adult hyenas with any form of regularity.
I totally agree with you, hyenas certainly are impressive in their own right and definitely don't get enough credit for their place in the ecosystem. It is often believed that Spotted hyenas are scavengers that bully lions off their kills or wait for them to finish feeding when it is in fact quite the opposite
Again though, its hugely case by case. Ive personally seen more videos of hyenas pushing lions off kills. It really depends on multiple factors here. As individuals lions are typically more powerful but from the perspective of their role in the ecosystem at large their place in the overall food web is largely comporable
Yeah, I guess to revise my statement I would say the male lions are the "apexes" due to their slightly differing ecological niche from lionesses
But I do (somewhat) agree that it is based on case to case, there are no rules in nature except inevitable death
I would be pretty curious if theres a study on which species pushes the other off of kills more often. And i wonder how thatd differ from place to place too
From what I understand lions typically push hyenas off of kills quite often, in some areas of Africa Spotted hyenas are known to kill 80-95% of their prey
Probably varies from place to place, lions which deal more often with hyenas are way more confident then lions who dont.
Brown and Striped hyenas definitely fit the "scavenger" stereotype better than Spotted hyenas but by no means does that make them incapable hunters that rely on scavenging either, there is plenty of evidence to suggest these 2 species hunt their own prey as well
also I would like to note that African leopards aren't entirely pushovers when it comes to hyenas either, there have been a few individuals known as hyena killers that have actively killed lone hyenas (the only one I can remember in detail was unfortunately killed by a large male Nile crocodile somewhere in the Tsavo region I believe). But of course leopards are without a doubt ranked lower in the food web than spotted hyenas
The term is facultative predators, which are basically predators that have specialized towards scavenging without being completely reliant on it either. Brown Hyenas and Wolverines both fit this category.
Yeah definitely, I would say wolverines fit that term much more than brown hyenas though since wolverines are more omnivorous
also aardwolves are just silly little dudes
look at those deadly sharp teeth perfect for killing termites
Anybody here knowledgeable on Paleocene shark species? I recently found this tooth at the Point A Dam in Andalusia, Alabama. Can’t find anything matching it online.
Looks to me like scaphanorhynchus?
it could be a lot of things tbh, it's almost easier to rule out what it doesn't look like
it looks like it could be a tiger or hammerhead of some kind but like I said there's a couple things it could be
Very possible, as I found a massive Scapanorhynchus from the same trip.
But idk, the original looks a bit too wide to be that. Not to mention it’s quite a concave shape, having a considerable curve shape to it that can’t really be seen in the photo. Idk if that’s just pathology or the way they’re usually found.
there's a few species that have an extreme curve like that so it's probably just the way the tooth is
Hmmmm ok. I’ll keep doing some online searches. Even without an ID, I’m beyond happy with it. That color is wild
Just came to the realization too. That larger tooth is probably some sort of sand tiger rather than Scapanorhynchus. I was under the impression Scap’s had cusps, but I guess not. New to this stuff too so I’m gonna be revising a lot of the stuff I got lol
i need a list of prehestoric island creatures
nah, trust me, even if you dont care about monster hunter its worth watching, man dives a lot into modern behaviors and ecology.
Hatz
i said list, not just one formation
I didn’t say the hateg basin I said hatze.
Still not a list
i found something for my research
i only have 3, well 2 + europasaurus, hateg and phillipines island fauana
Tho
Paleoloxodon falconeri and cygnus falconeri
Of Sicily-malta (they were the same island at the time) are relevant
Truly the elephant genus of all time
is ampleosaurus from a island?
Europe at the time was an archipelago (in fact for the majority of the Mesozoic it was) although I’d be hard pressed for it to be considered small enough to cause islandic pressures with ampelo’s large size
yeah late cretaceous europe probably had a mainland of sorts but we don’t really have deposits from it so far
didnt it live with Rhabdodon priscus? i thought that was found on hateg
Rhabdodon isn’t just hateg. It’s found in other parts of Europe as well.
Shark
https://maxs-blogo-saurus.com/2022/09/25/a-complete-guide-to-the-prehistoric-life-of-madagascars-maevarano-formation/ Madagascar is an island
ty, is there any good size charts of it? because this is the only one i could find
Anyone here ever heard a gator(irl) sound like an actual dinosaur
There is no exact scaling of ampelosaurus because all of its remains are in a very messy bonebed, which makes it hard to determine the size of any specific individual. 15 meters and 15 ton is the spitball I’ve seen float around the most
any dicreosaurids that lived in a island/island chain or archipeligo?
Let me check
Just checked the dicraeosaur thing. Nah.
I can’t find anything but I found this size chart of extinct and non extinct megafauna if anyone is interested.
Where did you find that chart?
devianart
Ok what makes you need lists of island creatures are you working on something?
yes, well more creatures that could fit in a island chain, so like, not large ones from all around prehestoric times
Found cool chart of permian creatures. Doesn’t give the size but still worth looking at.
Ok cool
Here is a Cambrian chart
North and South top predator
estemmenoosuchus looking shrink wrapped as usual
wdym
its face has too many weird bony protrusions
thats normal
oh okay, whats the most recent reconstruction of desmostylus
The little one on the right is so cute
As a matter of fact, despite being an island now, from what I know Madagascar was not isolated in the Cretaceous, I believe, could be wrong tho, you should probably google it yourself
What
An actual island tho you could look at would def be hateg island, and any English dinosaur for obvious reasons lol, a good chunk of Europe was just a bunch of islands during the Cretaceous
It was an island then too
Download scientific diagram | Late Cretaceous Paleogeographic Map showing known fossil localities (clustered by state if applicable) of Albula, Egertonia, and Paralbula and the location of the Madagascar fauna. PaleoMap modified from global Molleweide projection at 66 Ma (Scotese, 2014). Localities are condensed by state or province in North Ame...
Ok so according to google I’m wrong lol, by the late Cretaceous it was an island
Yeah figured it out mb
Once an island always an island
@fossil hazel
Yeah that thing is weird looking

How does one explain to a non intellectual that birds are literally dinosaurs but lizards snakes turtles and crocodilians aren’t
show evolution graph
favorite dino?
Won’t work, this guy is very very stubborn and insists that birds aren’t dinosaurs but lizards snakes turtles and crocodiles are. The argument is getting very tiring
don't argue with idiots they'll always win you're just losing your time
Tell him that birds are reptiles lol, that might be fun
Now he’s saying all amphibians are descended from dinosaurs 💀💀💀💀💀
Honestly, he's probably just yanking your chain 
he was looking at the meteor and just thinking, "idk should i get out the way??"
Yeah gotta agree with Gualicho there, hes either extremely ignorant, or he has caught you hook, line and sinker.
he shruggin :)))
“Ugh! This is exactly what I DONT need on a Monday! I JUST had my feathers preened!”
LMAOOOOO Trueeee
If you want you can compare the osteological differences between them. Hard to argue with bones.
Dude already blocked me 💀
Ur both wrong clearly dinosaurs are actually aliens that hanged around for a couple million Years then glassed the planet 66 myo🙄🙄
I’m…going to find your house
Bro is dumb for thinking crocodiles are dinosaurs
Out of what's left alive on earth, he's as close as he can be without actually naming a dinosaur
Lol, u gotta admit when you only look at crocodiles surface level you can see origin of the confusion. Only actual research would inform you otherwise.
When you see stuff like this in the media all the time you’d think they’d be at least distant cousins or somethin. 😂
They are distant cousins tho, they're both archosaurs 💀
They both have scales!!11 clearly they’re the same animal!!!
In the context of the argument I doubt that’s the point they were trying to make lmao
Is that the Mesozoica T.rex? Ugh. Gross.
Is Mesozoica still a thing?
That Rex looks meaaan.
It looks like they've done the bare mimimum to avoid getting copywrite striked by Universal
No, it's been dead for years lmao
Yeah, that's what I thought. Was surprised to see anyone mention or recognize the game, forgot it even existed
Yeah, I remember it insulted the Isle when Deathly was still with that dev team, then it died a few months later.
A weird move.
Wow that guy sounds very annoying. What an idiot. He must be like four or something to believe things like that.
He was VERY annoying, luckily he blocked be cause he refused to accept the hard proven facts
He blocked because he couldn’t find a way to prove that amphibians are dinosaurs 😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
K
😂😂😂😂
A reminder to please view pinned messages for appropriate paleo-chat topics. We recommend all off-topic conversations for paleo-chat be directed to DM's, the appropriate channel or another server entirely. This channel is for educational purposes; for the discussion of past and present paleontological discoveries, scientific news, and depictions of prehistoric creatures in media in relation to paleontology.
Also, please remain polite and respectful towards each other. Refer to our #rules
Birds are dinosaurs but crocodilians, turtles snakes and lizards are not, crocodilians are however archosaurs and are much more closely related to dinosaurs than turtles and snakes but birds are actual dinosaurs not just relatives of dinosaurs like crocodilians
Whats a good site for accurate dino stuff
Does anyone have a comparison between megalanias irl and in game size?
Thanks someone is claiming meg is heavily undersized in game, which I'm fairly certain is false
Eh the scale is like, super off in game anyway
Doesnt look like its the case for meg tbh
So I'm seeing that there was a species of rhamphorynchus that is like as tall as a human. Is that true?
Yeah definitely not
No. The biggest Rhamph is like knee height
It's about as long as a human is tall, maybe that is what you meant
Nah I saw some sort of depiction that had it sitting like a thalassadromeus in a sense and it was about as tall as a person maybe upper chest/neck height
Rhamph with that height would have a wingspan as big as Quetz's, this one is already 14 feet across
Oh does the Ramph have an abnormally large wingspan?
It has both long wings and short legs compared to later pterosaurs, so that ends up with the one above having the same wingspan as Thalassodromeus, while being like half the height
Honestly that's quite cool. I'm guessing that means they have capabilities of very long flight times?
Due to the large wing surface area they'd probably be able to fly pretty much effortlessly
Is the red all that’s found?
Of these specimens yes, we have a much more complete skeleton but it's still under wraps in the Queensland museum
Wait since when did Rhamph get that big?
Then how do we know
the base skeletal is based on said more complete skeleton
They were talking about a size chart I found. I found some website that claimed the largest species of rhamph could be as tall as a human
And a lot of that is composites too 
Megalania is surprisingly fragmentary, but because we have living relatives its p easy to restore how it looks
No I'm talking about the provided skeletal with a nearly 5 meter wingspan. That's new to me.
It's based on some very large cervical vertebrae, I don't have the paper on me but it explains where they're from and why they belong to a rhamphorhynchid, possibly Rhamphorhynchus
Maevarano Formation fauna, featuring skeletals by Justin (Kelyophis), Scott Hartman (Araripesuchus, Vintana, Adalatherium, Miadanasuchus, Vorona, Mahajangasuchus, Masiakasaurus, Simosuchus, Rahonavis, Falcatakely, Majungasaurus, Rapetosaurus) and brick (Vahiny)
thank you
done by @stiff osprey iirc
would it be possible to train a dinosaur to do something like you would train a bird of prey
basilo's most up-to-date length & weight?
Theoretically yes, but it would require you to survive every time said dinosaur lashes out at you/misses the target during training
a falcon landing on somebody without the proper equipment hurts, a dromaeosaur jumping on you would hurt a lot more
simple fix just get a dromaeosaur that cant jump
generally speaking there are vanishingly few animals that're full-on impossible to train, so i think non-avian dinosaurs could've been trained. whether or not it'd be a good idea (and which ones could be trained for something imitating falconry), though? that's a whole 'nother can of worms
any prehestoric island dwelling rhinos beside the one in the Philippines
or any island dwelling rhinos actually
There's a island dwelling rhino still around today it lives in Indonesia
javan rhino?
Sumartan rhino but it was declared extinct in 2015 but idk if that's factual or not
googles
Not extinct but on the brink it would seem. Could count the number
yeah the Javan rhino is extinct
Javan rhino is still around, just critically endangered
Yeh I have one as a pet my uncle dejesus captured one for me and brought it to San Juan
I might just kill it tbh it eats to much.
it is still around but I think it's functionally extinct
The Javen Rhino has a population of around 72 or so individuals living in Ujon Klong National Park in Indonesia. There were a few in Vietnam but the Vietnam War killed a lot of them and the last one there was shot a few years ago.
They were hunted for entertainment by colonists in the late 1800s, early 1900s, and by soldiers on both sides in the 70s. (The Vietnam War)
Sumatran Rhinos are also critically endangered but a few have been bred I think and they are a tiny bit more stable population wise but still critically endangered.
@scenic drum Please stay on topic in this channel, thankyou! Occasional jokes are fine, but please avoid continuous diversion of the topic.
Here is a photo of a Javen Rhino. (I didn't take it obviously.)
its bratz, not barbie, try again
anyways, what island did this live on? same as javan rhino?
Borneo
oh, boreno elephants are still alive
I've already posted this on this channel a few days ago but I'm gonna post it again. It's a big chonky aligator.
someone explain what this means
different theories on how they lived... maybe...? i think?
really weird reconstructions for both though, imo. paleoparadoxia doing somethin weird with its hind legs and ambulocetus looking all sad and skinny
well, which ones are more accurate to how they lived? obligate aquatic or semi aquatic
obligate aquatic means their were restricted to the water, but are seals obligate aquatics if they can traverse on land with minor issues?
I think maybe a more in between would be likely?
i feel like pachy charge should do either more knockback or damage
god im so tired of ambulocetus in particular always getting shrinkwrapped. it's so weird, why does it happen lmao. Usually mammals don't get this treatment because we know what mammals look like and know what sort of soft tissue to expect. But for some reason SO many depictions of ambulocetus are really reptilian. I love WWB but part of we wonders if it's to blame because it's depiction was pretty awkward
I can't speak for palaeoparadoxia but at least in ambulocetus' case there currently isn't a solid conclusion on whether it could venture onto land and how much it could afaik. The study that proposed it couldn't go on land cautioned that they lacked material that could actually make their point conclusive.
If you would excuse me I'm going to go bleach my eyes. Because that thing is just pure Nightmare
Their physical puppet was a lot better, the cgi from the show is overall quite dated. Though even the puppet still has this weird reptilian vibe
shoutout to julio lacerda's ambulo actually looking like a mammal 🙏
wait so then which of them is extinct
sumatran or javan or is it another one?
i swear i saw this one earlier at SOME point today, and i was blown away by how good it looked in comparison to most of the other ambulocetus recons i've looked at. it's still an extremely weird animal, but it actually looks like a mammal that existed, rather than some kind of furry lizard or very late-surviving stem-mammal.
Given our modern view of ungulates it's always surprising to see these weird carnivorous ones lol
Tryna find this out myself. Just skimming the internet suggests sumatran, but not as a whole, rather a couple of its subspecies may be extinct. Course, sumatran rhinos as a whole are also on the brink.
Yeah as are javan
Shame. Could count the total of them both without even thinking, a freightening thing to be happening to a lovely animal.
Sumatran rhinos are the most threatened of all rhinos. Sumatran and javan rhinos are very similar in number (under 100 individuals), but the conservation of Javan rhinos is much better enforced and are much better protected in their limited range. Sumatran rhinos meanwhile have declined by 13% every year since 2015.
they were semi aquatic animals
obligate aquatic means completely aquatic
whats the most accurate model of desmostylus we have today
Such an important one no less, every animal serves a purpose but megafauna typically are "more" important if they're naturalized into an ecosystem
Hey does anyone know what kind of herbivores allosaurus lived with
Sauropods, ceratopsians, etc
As well as any pterosaurs
If you can please ping me when you respond, thanks
Stegosaurus, diplodocus, camarasaurus, apatosaurus,camptosaurus and im pretty sure dryosaurus
For pterosaurs I'm pretty sure pterodactylus was found in the same formation as allo
@elfin pulsar
Ty ty appreciate it
If anyone has more feel free to ping again
So cute
Lots of sauropods. So many. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dinosaurs_of_the_Morrison_Formation
No ceratopsids because they didn't really exist yet. For ornithopods there was dryosaurus, camptosaurus, nanosaurus and uteodon. For thyreophorans there was the ankylosaurs gargoyleosaurus and mymoorapelta and the stegosaurs stegosaurus and "Alcovasaurus" (might be synonymous with miragaia). There's also Hesperosaurus from the morrison but i recall it being a bit older so im not sure off the top of my head if it overlapped in time with allosaurus. There was also the heterodontosaurid fruitadens. All the sauropods would take forever to list so I just suggest checking that link.
As for pterosaurs the only conclusive ones are harpactognathus, kepodactylus and mesadactylus. There are other dubious pterosaurs from assorted fragments
The Morrison Formation is a distinctive sequence of Upper Jurassic sedimentary rock that is found in the western United States, which has been the most fertile source of dinosaur fossils in North America. It is composed of mudstone, sandstone, siltstone and limestone and is light grey, greenish gray, or red. Most of the fossils occur in the gree...
Worth noting that I don't know with certainty that everything listed lived in the exact same time and place as allosaurus specifically enough for them to have met, but its a good starting point and at the very least you can generally speculate that they did, or had the potential to. Morrison covers a range of different biomes and not all animals listed would have been ubiquitous in them
i found a worthy opponent
they're battle will be legendary
This might be a bad question but why aren't there efforts to clone the Javen or Sumatran Rhinos? I know that clones released back into the environments could decrease the gene pool but it would increase the species numbers?
At that point there’s no point
Cloning just isn't good enough yet. We have cloned animals before but we're not good enough at it yet to actually guarantee the viability and health of the animal which is really important. There's sperm and eggs saved from a lot of critically endangered/recently extinct animals that could get used for cloning in the future, but it's being used very sparingly at this point because its a finite resource that you dont want to waste on a baby that'll die in 2 hours
is that like saying that we can't clone non avian dinos or what?
We don't have the material to clone them from, no. DNA degrades over time, and they're so long gone that there just simply isn't any DNA we could use. The only animals actually on the table for cloning have to be anything that's quite recently extinct, basically as old as you can get from what we can tell so far is the mammoth and even then their DNA samples aren't perfect
i'd wager it's also partially due to the fact that cloning is usually done for endangered animals when individuals not closely related to the current population have clonable material preserved - the przewalski's horse wasn't one of the ones the current population is descended from because he was part domestic horse and so wasn't considered for breeding programs during his time, the black-footed ferret didn't have any surviving descendants, etc. - so cloning would've introduced valuable new genetics. cloning animals that're still alive and contributing to the population's genes, however, doesn't add any genetic diversity, just another individual.
so jurassic park/world can't be happened in real life? (atleast i can still see dinos as birds or smth)
The only way non-avian dinosaurs could be "brought back" is if we somehow made their DNA from scratch and recreated the exact same DNA they had (which uh, not happeneing. Not in our futures at least) or through selective breeding of related extant animals to select for traits similar to that seen in non-avian dinosaurs. Which is actually something we've done to a small extent, they've just been terminated before hatching because of concerns over ethics.
Awhh!!! Darn
i see
Yeah to a certain extent I only think cloning for a lot of these cases will be worthwhile if we get good enough at tinkering with genetics to artificially create genetic diversity. Species can and do come back and thrive despite having once been on the brink but it makes their future a lot more uncertain as they just don't have what they need to adapt anymore.
Is it possible that the government does stuff like this without telling ppl.
Like cloning sht
??????
governments are really not that good at keeping things secret
Why would they do that? Genuinly, think what they would actually realistically have to gain from keeping something like that a secret. "Oh yeah actually we can return extinct animals back to life but shhhhhh"
Idk there’s gotta be some nerd wanting to do that somewhere in the government
doesn't mean they can, or would have any reason to keep it under wraps, or would be able to keep it under wraps given there'd need to be a whole team of scientists working on that
likely not
like ppl said non avian dino's dna are....
what can i say...
Dead?
Again: why. What benefit is there to that. It just doesn't make sense beyond going "well just because"
I mean think of the atomic bomb, half the ppl working on it didnt even know what they were making till it was done. Tho u are right there really is no reason
cloning extinct animals costs more money than it gives back, so the government won't do it, secretly or otherwise
that's why everyone trying to clone things are private organizations atm
(likely) another reason why jp/jw are impossible 👆
Didn’t even know this happened
And here's the thing to keep in mind: Scientists can and do sometimes keep things largely to themselves and avoid it being public knowledge. But that's because:
- The general public simply wouldn't understand it. There's no point making it public knowledge because the average person doesn't care and wouldn't get it. People interested can seek out the information themselves or
- It would be dangerous for the public to know. Chemists know how to make drugs and bombs, but they don't go telling everyone because you don't really want people knowing that. Certain dangerous things can be made at home in your kitchen if you know what to get.
Knowing how to clone animals and that it is possible even with potentially long-extinct animals has no bearing on the day to day lives of the public, and presents no danger, plus its not like you could do it in your backyard.
I see. So no Jurassic park? 😔
jurassic park isn't happening one way or another on account of "DNA that old is literally not usable"
Nope. Who knows, maybe it'll be possible in the far future if humans develop beyond our understanding. But with our current technology I don't see it happening in our lifetimes
Ik this is a stupid question but I gotta ask, what makes something a dinosaur? Ik I saw something about certain sea animals not being dinosaurs but they looked like dinosaurs to me
One of the simplest ways to define it is just how they're related to other animals. Dinosaurs all belong to a group called archosaurs. This group also contains crocodilians and pterosaurs, and by extension of dinosaurs being there also contains birds.
Marine reptiles like mosasaurs, plesiosaurs and ichthyosaurs are entirely unrelated. While they are all reptiles, they're not archosaurs. Mosasaurids for example are squamates (group that contains snakes and lizards) and likely descend from monitor lizards specifically
a million years dna are (likely) dead
being in the clade dinosauria, which is defined as the most recent common ancestor of triceratops and modern birds, as well as all the descendants of that ancestor
(serpentarius' explanation is uh. probably more intuitive though
)
Ahh
pterosaur is in archosaur group?
why we ain't called them dinos?
is this the same case as crocs that in archosaur but are cousin to dinos?
while birbs are dinos itself?
yeah, similar case. pterosaurs are much closer to dinosaurs than crocodilians are, but they're still not quite dinosaurs.
What’s a clade?
So Pterosaurs are archosaurs but not dinosaurs for the exact same reason that monkeys are primates, but aren't apes. Archosaur is the larger group that contains various related groups (applies to crocodilians too)
i was gonna quote wikipedia at you (i'm tired. my brain aint workin well enough to make the words myself) but it turns out googling it provides a slightly more digestible definition
anyway it's. uh . "a group of organisms believed to comprise all the evolutionary descendants of a common ancestor"
So yknow how things are typical divided into families, orders, class, phylum, etc? Clade is basically just the non-description version for when you wanna talk about any taxonomic group of critters.
Ahhhh
its a convenient term to you for any group of animals that's related. a genus of ducks is a clade, a family of lizards is a clade, all sharks make a clade. good word to just use for "all of these are related"
i have a kem-kem group question:
does spino & carcha peacefully coexist with each other or dislikes/hate (or likely fight) each other?
(unless the taxonomists decided they wanted to make a paraphyletic taxa)
Big words 😵💫
We probably dont have enough material to conclude, but they probably avoided eachother.
We can't go back in time and tell so we don't really know. Chances are though there was some significant niche partitioning going on and they largely avoided each other. Carchara was a terrestrial predator, spinosaurus a semi-aquatic piscivore. They likely didn't need or want to bump into each other often
There is no way to know that currently
yeah, see, that's why i decided not to go with wikipedia - the first sentence is all Monophyletic and Phylogenetics and Lineal Descendants, which is cool when you already know the terms but confusing when ya don't
Welcome to Phylogeny, it can be rather rough to filter through. Especially when invertebrates are concerned. (Trust me i would know)
Lol @covert lintel always comin in with the big words n’ I be googling mid convo every time 😂
...
lovers?/j
Believing spino is carchar prey item=based tho
Would spinos rly be that good at fighting? They don’t look super balanced and if they get ripped over it looks like they’d have trouble getting up,not like they can just roll over
I mean paleontologists can't even agree how it moved on land, though at the very least most agree it was fairly awkward and not well built for it. I imagine it would fair pretty badly against a healthy carchar most of the time. But at the same time, drop a carchar into a river and I'd wager the tables would turn, so its simply a matter of being in their element
Tru tru
spino's claw: hello🤨
not for fighting apex predators but it wouldn’t just fall over and die
YOU CAN'T SAY THAT TO MY PRECIOUS CONTROVERSIAL BOY 😡😡😡
I’d hope not. They could probably kick and stuff LOL
Given spino’s bigger that doesn’t bode well for it being outright prey.
sooo....
spino as carcha's punching bag?
It’s still huge with teeth and claws. I’m still betting on the carchar winning the fight but why try? It feels like it’s asking to get a chunk ripped out of it in the struggle.
Tbh claws specialized for catching fish wouldn’t fare too great against any other dino that isn’t directly infront procent under them, as it’s out of their range. Idk if they had a shoulder socket or not but they look like they can only move in and out.
yeah, I'd put my money on carchar surviving more often in a to-the-death fight between the two but that doesn't mean its getting away without injury. Predators really really do not like getting hurt because if you can't hunt you're dead, so they tend to avoid hunting something that can hurt them pretty badly
so...
say no to spino as carcha's bff?
mind you wounds can get infected and do major inconveniences to an animals life. from a logical standpoint cachar would win, from a realistic standpoint both animals would have nasty injuries
i would guess their relationship to be much like tigers/lions and crocodiles, where either will attack the other if it's in a vulnerable position but avoid healthy adults (in hindsight this is kind of obvious, it's how most predators deal with most other things)
So erm… I can kill babies as a sarco and technically not be a douche cause it’s realism
babies are the easy pantry snack of nature that you grab when you're pekish. It's always realism to eat babies
top 10 sentences ever said
It is quite amusing to me that some people complained too many babies died in prehistoric planet and it was kind of depressing. Welcome to nature unfortunately
Im surprised more babies didn’t die to be completely honest
Too many babies died, not enough multi-ton megafaunal battles
that olorotitan hatchling infested with mosquitoes shouldnt have made it smh, ruining my immersion /j
the baby mortality was fine, but i was indeed disappointed with how few adults died. you had the one pterosaur eaten by the snowleoparaptors, a Corythoraptor, and a Pachyrhinosaurus where we didn't see any of the kill actually happen
Yo that made me itch just looking at it I had to close my eyes bruh
don't forget the completely off-screen triceratops
I was kind of surprised that we didn't see many successful hunts. I am really glad they showed unsuccessful hunts because that's common and how the majority of hunts go. But php is pretty comparable to documentaries like planet earth and those do tend to show a decent number of hunts simply because its interesting for the viewers.
With them lil nugget legs, ofc they'd be awkward on land,they ain't sturdy
you mention trike?
LMFAO NUGGET LEGS
most animals that exhibit any parental care don't eat their own offspring unless something is Very Wrong (i.e. severe stress or malnutrition)
i love the horn and frill individual variation
Take example from the komodo,if they see their hatchling hatch they'd eat em,why? Well who asked them to put scavenger metabolism on
Believing it's a jaguar-yacare relationship
Soon those mfs are gonna evolve to have slat glands like the salt water croc,and then you know what happens? BOOM we got mosasaurs back
i have a ptsd abt mosa atm 
when the jaguar has no crushing teeth 
do you guys think this is a lambeo or corytho?
New dinosaurs. New habitats. New Season. Prehistoric Planet returns May 22 on Apple TV+ https://apple.co/_Prehistoric
Prehistoric Planet, from executive producers Jon Favreau and Mike Gunton, and narrated by Sir David Attenborough, combines award-winning wildlife filmmaking, the latest paleontology learnings and state-of-the-art technology to u...
Looks like theres going to be alot more fighting and hunting this season.
Remake eo n give it these horns
Yeah, hopefully theres some more dino violence in Season 2
That could come with that edited dinos mod. Perhaps +damage - turning. Would be unique.
Or maybe the devs can find some magical way to change appearances of dino genders
The colors already do the trick for the most part. No real reason to have it.
B-but...ok 😔
nah we need sexual dimorphism in pot but the issue is there's not enough material to get it right let alone add it at all.
I think they should make the babies look like actual babies first
We dont need it, people want it theres a difference.
I agree
Most babies look like babies tho? The only one I can think of which should get more "babified" is Rex
No we still NEED it
this is paleo chat
Sarcos definitely. Just make their heads a lil bigger along with their eyes. This isn’t a croc or w gator btw but still usable (caiman)
I mean we still are talking about difference between age and sex of dinosaur appearances so that kinda counts
Cool dog,where did u get it?
Maybe for the hatchling phase, but juvenile crocs arent that different proportions wise.
Lol these are actually pets, they’re called dwarf caimans and they get just big enough to where you can keep if as a pet but it won’t kill you
Interesting,caimans are gators right?
Sorry someone already posted didn't realize
Dunno where to put this but official Prehistoric planet season 2 trailer dropped NVM LOL
Not exactly, no. They’re in their own family but they are still crocodilians clearly.
Oooooooh 
Did the same thing lol
Caimans commonly get smaller than their crocodile and gator “cousins” but they still pack a punch, and while dwarf caimans are pretty small they can still do some damage. Their teeth are sharp, and if ya look up some dwarf caiman feeding videos they’re lil savages lmao
This one actually looks deranged
I think their eyes should still be a lil bigger. Rex is definitely first on the list tho lmao
Even Rex doesnt start out that bad, it just gets chonky very quick.
Quick question,is it possible for pterosaurs to fly with feathers replacing their wing membrane?
It doesn’t look like a baby though, it just looks like a little copy pasted adult rex. It should be skinny jaw wise and body frame wise for later into it’s life.
Tbh its not really a baby, none of the dinos are babies, theyre juveniles, so thatd be like, a 1-2 year old Rex? Idk.
Even then they still would look skinny. Only adolescent to maybe sub adults would start getting chunky
Baby Rex should be changed it’s too chunky it’s face is wrong and it should have feathers
Unlikely, pterosaur brains would be highly adapted to adjust their membrane during flight and wouldn't be able to work with a completely different material
Exactly
Also sarcos need more saggy skin I want fat sarcos where’s the fat reserves. Baby crocs are fat asl, like lil sausages with legs. I wanna see dat
Depends if you call alligatorids or alligatorines "gators"
I meant baby Rex not adult
Ohh ok. I think they’d have some body hair but not full blown feathers. As a baby that would be cute tho
Tbh pp’s baby Rex is really good
But the adult is too chunky because of the misplaced gastralia
Bb Rexes would look like lil scrawny raptors, and I think the adult rex rn needs a lil more body fat
No Rex is good for now
Any1 wtf is this?
Nothing is bad enough to change, I agree. I might jus go thru all tha babies n see if they look like babies or copy paste adults
Phosphorosaurus, maybe
The chunkiest it could get would probably be the muscle mass from the last tyrant but that’s still a bit large
I thought that was a metriorhynchid until I realize this is the cretaceous
Maybe it’s a tylosaurus I mean it’s not as chunky as the mosasaurus but has a very similar body shape kinda like the actual animal
Spino=plesiosaurus confirmed
That be terrifying to see
Lol u just see its head just sticking out of the water
Looking at the baby model, its not really that bad, the head is narrower and the snout is longer, the body is still way less robust, the only problem proportions wise is the body being overly thick and the legs should be a little longer, some lips when its a baby would be nice, as for feathers theyd be cool, but theyd need a separate model which might now work well with continstent growth.
It’s pretty bad. If still looks like a mini adult instead of a child.
Exactly but it probably has proportionally longer arms than the adult
Wait a min,I think the baby rexes from the console trailer are more real looking hold on...
I will say, there’s probably limits to the changes they can make to the babies while making the growth look seamless, but still putting it out there.
Even then, while they might have to make multiple models to show the growth, i think it’d be cute. Also the bb rex steps are so heavy already they should be a lil lighter, and being a scrawny bb might help w that
yo is this (likely) trike specimen "Yoshi"?
Horns are based on Yoshi but otherwise it's the default trike model
Yeah
Oh this is the wrong chat but the footstep sounds are kinda strange don’t you think? Like they’re booming for some reason when it’d probably only be slight thump noises. Maybe my volume is up to high. And shouldn’t it be based off of weight more than age? Why the heck to meg footsteps sound so damn deep when they’re barely bb sarco sized?
I agree also to be honest rexes steps should be quieter considering the fact that it was most likely an ambush predator
More of a balancing thing then a realism thing, the big stuff makes more noise.
Idk if it's just me but this seems more closer to what a babu rex would look like I failed my screenshot 😭
Yeah but they could make like crackling of the leaves or the dirt or snapping branches louder than have this base boosted booming
It’s still a mini adult, so no
hello everyone
my man is confirmed to be austroraptor 

💀 it looks like a therizinosaurus on crack
also I’m tryna grow another sarco and I’ve hit that sarco puberty stage to where your footsteps are extremely base boosted and your calls sound like an adult but you still do baby damage. Been stomped out multiple times when I really shouldn’t be making much noise at all
yo lessgo rex vs quetz
1v2 👀
It’s still not a fair fight lmao
Rex stomps frfr
All it takes is one sneeze from that rex and poof
Baby Rexes really got it bad, they sound like an adolescent as a hatchling
no
If the Rex gets "intimidated" that will be goooofy
Huh- >.>
Oh it probably will be, read the description of the episode on that episode guide they released
fair not fair whatever it's I N T E R E S T I N G F I G H T
The Rex just one shots them how is it interesting
If the rex is not hungry, enough pestering from quetz and it may well move off
I hope they make up a good story to explain why thatd happen, its like making a lion get scared off by two jackals.
the Rex probably isn’t hungry, assuming it already ate. It’ll just walk off and leave the quetz to eat.
Do you know how aggressive Rex would’ve been also i don’t think it would take a sauropod down to not eat it
yeah man rex size & his 57.000 newton bite force are such a deadly combo
...
except for quetz 👀
It didn't take a sauropod down, the Alamo has no injuries and only the rex left footprints in the sand. That carcass has been there a while
we don’t know how aggressive Rex was, and no.. that sauropod probably died of natural causes
I’m quite sure it would’ve been quite aggressive judging by it’s competition like anky trike Edmont and especially towards other rexes
lions, who casually get driven off kills by a singular monitor lizard:
so this is like a same case as 1 lion vs 2 storks?
it probably wouldn’t be too aggressive towards herbivores.. other rexes, maybe. It’s only ‘true competition’ are other Rexes.
Wait, what monitor lizard? And I doubt those were actual adult lions.
nile monitors are known to walk right into prides of lions, flip their tail around, and take over
the lions tend to oblige since letting the lizard eat for a moment is better than a broken jaw
the rex does seem rather small, it's not even as long as the alamo's neck
but knowing rex ontogeny it would be very disappointing if they used an adult model on a subadult
Agreed
generally big cats try to avoid being whacked by the monitor lizards they share their ranges with, even if they normally can easily kill said lizard if they try
Lion encountering monitor lizard at Sabi Sands Game Reserve, South Africa
maybe an average 11 meters rex (ig)?
respect the tail, it hurts and is unpleasant at best 
prenocephale instead of homalocephale 
this is crime
Does it really matter though?
bro knew right away not to mess with it. I watched a video of some younger lions testing it and being whacked
they have a baseball bat for a rear end, it hurts and can cause serious injury, best give the lizard its space and let it do its thing
and whats better is that lions and leopards both will hunt them, its just normally that they deem dealing with a monitor to be more work than its worth
I saw one that whacked a lioness and the lion just, stood there, ngl I was expecting a more violent response lol
LMAO- got stunned- imagine that but with megalania
theres a vid somewhere of a young leopard pestering a nile, then yeeting into the next dimension when the lizard popped its tail 
that may be it 
That one didnt get hit tho.
honestly prime example of why predator-prey relationships dont always go the way you'd expect, sometimes you just dont wanna get hit by the lizard thats only like one days meal 
I have a new appreciation for lizards.
Please keep the chat on topic. This channel is for the discussion of past and present paleontological discoveries, scientific news, and depictions of prehistoric creatures in media in relation to palaeontology.
Thank you!
ok time for an incredibly important question
if you threw a nonavian dinosaur, would it try to right itself like a bird, or would it go into "bleep blorp does not compute" mode that other reptiles go into when thrown?
I think the latter for sauropods, the former for theropods
Basal sauropodomorphs have birdlike head stabilizing mechanisms for going after small prey, which presumably theropods also started out with. More derived sauropods lost the mechanism
Ornithischians uh... idk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWlmzl2jCNs
This looks amazing!
New dinosaurs. New habitats. New Season. Prehistoric Planet returns May 22 on Apple TV+ https://apple.co/_Prehistoric
Prehistoric Planet, from executive producers Jon Favreau and Mike Gunton, and narrated by Sir David Attenborough, combines award-winning wildlife filmmaking, the latest paleontology learnings and state-of-the-art technology to u...
Most ornithiscians had pretty basic or poor gaze stabilization, if you flipped them they'd be pretty whacked out
yeah similarly with honey badgers, the overly aggressive nature is just not worth getting hurt if they're already full on food
Except that honey badgers rarely if ever actually go looking for trouble. Their abilities and attitude is mostly a myth.
the first and third ''fact'' 😂 💀 https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/other/20-mind-blowing-facts-about-dinosaurs/ss-AA1aCvwt?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=722c9769c5864eefb31dc43fa88ebae8&ei=13#image=1
Their abilities not so much, just that the honey badgers people think are casually strolling up to lions for a show are actually fighting for their lives against a predator they are hopeless to escape
Basically. Albeit they still get predated more frequently then people think.
Yeah exactly
besides african leopards are prominent predators of smaller carnivores such as ratel and nile monitor 
nah can we talk about the disrespectful nature of ant-eaters or hippo's speaking of hippo's imagine how H.Gorgops would've been
Are you one of those people who thinks anteaters are vicious jaguar killers, because they aren't, in some parts of their range anteaters make up a large portion of jaguar diet
no i aint one of them but they still are just disrespectful vacuum cleaners tho
AFAIK the structure of their skulls suggest that H. gorgops were likely less aggressive than modern hippos despite their larger size
I know they wouldn't really need that aggression but still imagine one just chasing a lion
They also get eaten, a lot, it is worth the trouble
From what I've seen leopards seem to be the biggest killer of honey badgers along with crocodile and python
Brown hyena also do it fairly often
Leopards are menaces, werent they also very prominent early hominid hunters?
Yup, and they still are
Y’all lookin forward to prehistoric planet 2?
Hell yeah! The new trailer looks awesome. I hope there is a crocodilian like dienosuches in the swamp episode.
I'm not
Wait…your not excited for season 2?….why?
In this trailer there were 2 quetzals facing against a trex but would it ever be possible for 2 quetzals to win a battle against a full grown trex?
A battle? No, not even 10 Quetz. But they could annoy the rex enough for it to leave if the rex was not hungry
Rex could probably grab one quetz and swing it around to beat the other 9 lol.
I feel 10 quetzals could definitely injure a rex
Injure yeah, but several of them would die in the process. That's not something irl animals are willing to risk
Injure for sure but ten quetz added together are still like a quarter of a rex's weight. Unless one manages to brain the rex, they're not winning.
the best quetz could do is try to intimidate it, they weigh barely anything compared to a rex and a blunt beak can only do so much
Bro I can solo a quetz
I know a quetzal doesn't come close to that of a rex in weight and strength and I know it was very light for it's size but was it really that weak
not really, moreso rex is just fat, quetz is still a animal capable of man handling fair bit of the stuff it was built for
The average tyrannosaurus's skull weighs more than quetz in its entirety
big skull and a flying animal, so a skull over 550 pounds is....alot
Quetz is very good at hunting things human sized and smaller. meanwhile rex is very good at hunting things 10x quetz's size
quetz in the modern day would be considered one of the largest land predators, but rex is on another level
the bone alone weighs at least 200lbs, factoring in the added weight of muscle it's well within the range of possibility
iirc that's like a 1 lion vs 2 storks
god of land predator 
So like 10m high things? 👹
are you suggesting quetz is 1 meter high
When y’all said Quetz, my brain instantly went to Ark 💀
It was a pain to tame the one I have 😭
Who would win? A person sized chicken or a chicken sized T.Rex?
A person sized chicken.
Yeah.
k-pg asteroid
ez win 🥱
Wait, how does their skull structure imply being less aggressive?
Im curious to see how the Quetzalcoatlus and Tyrannosaurus interaction goes. It can display some of the weirdest and somewhat unexplainable occurrences that occur in nature.
I will not be surpised if the Quetzacoatlus manage to make the Tyrannosaurus leave.
@pearl briar No no the KFC asteroid.
To be fair the rex might be able to kill the quetz but the risk of injury that could happen and the sheer size (even if it’s not as heavy) would probably be enough to intimidate a real life animal
Idk that’s my view and not to mention a quetz might not be able to immediately kill a rex in one go but a few well placed jabs and stuff could pose a very dangerous issue for the rex cuz of infection, and permanent damage, like for the stork vs lion example used earlier, a stork of it jabs it’s beak into a lion in the shoulder or neck area might not kill the lion at the time but it would be very dangerous in the long run for a lion because of the risk of infections and hunting problems and all sorts of stuff
was there any pterosaur species that could match or beat the speed of the fastest modern birds?
I dont think so
i need a reminder on wth silesaurus is suppose to be
an almost dinosaur
Is the pycno in game with no horns an actual species?
I forgot the exact details, but the jaws seemed to be less suited for the territorial fighting that is known today in hippos. This implies they might've been less territorial, and this territoriality is THE leading factor for hippopotamus aggression.
Hornless pycno is the actual pycno. We don't have a preserved skull to assume it had any horns. Many closely related abelisaurs don't have horns, Carno is the one odd one in the group to have any
ya. by name its not an actual species but by appearance its the most appropriate to call pycno.
Ah okau
It says in the episode description that "No one can intimidate North America's top predator, T.Rex... -except for a giant winged foe"
I haven't talked about it in here, but such a thing occurring is absolutely rediculous for a multitude of reasons.
Quetz trying to intimidate a T.Rex? It could surely happen. Geese have a pretty easy time scaring away animals larger than them, and a giraffe sized stork would be able to give a good scare to Rex. Although, if the Rex is smart enough to resist the Quetz's bluff, and tries to attack it, the Quetz will have to either flee or die
The issue is that it's like a vulture stealing a lion's kill. The size difference is ridiculous, and an adult rex would already have enough experience with quetz at its kills to know their games.
I had this thought earlier but never made a comment because I was busy but in my mind if the rex was younger, less experienced and say unfamiliar with Quetzalcoatlus perhaps it might then get intimidated by one, but such a bluff might only last so long.
It's really not. A vulture is smaller than a lion, while a Quetz is taller than a T.Rex. Also, the individual T.Rex could be a young adult, so it could be inexperienced. Still, a screaming Quetz opening it's wings and fake-charging at a T.Rex would give the predator a bit of a fright
a young adult I think is enough years of hunting experience. maybe not against a full blown Triceratops but enough to have a handle on what they're doing
Lemme get the paragraph I made that summarizes why it's nonsense
Lets say even an adult. If perhaps caught off guard it might be startled by a quetz but the size discrepancy between the two, I can only imagine it being momentary.
and lets say its response isn't attack but threat display because Tyrannosaurus aren't the swiftest animals all things considered so its response might be "I'm bigger, step off this kill is mine", I have to imagine a Quetzalcoatlus wouldn't dare that.
-
Tyrannosaurus rex is the apex predator of its ecosystem.
-
Azhdarchids in PhP are already established to be common scavengers at kill sites, even if it is not their main niche.
-
This tyrannosaurus is at a size and age where, given the last two statements, it has likely already met quetzacoatlus before and would be already familiar with them.
So, again, with the information presented above, how does a mature Rex being intimidated by a quetz make sense?
I cannot reiterate how massive the size difference is. This T. rex's head alone is heavier than the quetzalcoatlus. The quetz literally cannot do anything to it and it would know it.
unless, of course, the Quetz's lose in this case and back down. because we do see the rex stand its ground so perhaps what's unseen is the Quetz realize quickly they're outmatch then backdown from the kill. won't know til its out
Yeah, I'm hyped to see how the confrontation goes between them
I'm also hyped to see Austroraptor appear, along with Pachycephalosaurus
Damn people really think rex would be scared of quetz?
I don’t see anything inherently wrong with the confrontation. Quetzalcoatlus is an imposing presence, regardless of its actual weight, but from what we’ve seen the Tyrannosaurus stands his ground as they would’ve probably done in life.
Tbf, it’s a very bizarre creature. The Rex may very well have grown up in an area where the 5 meter tall murder stork with a wingspan just as large as Rex is long wasn’t a common occurrence. To see that for the first time would undoubtedly be unnerving, even for an animal with no real reason to.
quetz vs rex
Well, that’s true
I see it being more likely as a "is this really worth my time and energy" rather than "ooh aah those things are actually intimidating". Assuming the rex has already managed to eat a decent amount why waste energy guarding it from these tall angry things that can give you really painful pecks. Smaller scavengers can and do bully larger animals off of carrion for this reason. The larger predator isn't necessarily actually worried about it, it just really doesn't want to have to deal with it. It really depends on how hungry it is imo
Makes sense
^ especially if more Quetz show up on the scene, which I’m personally hopeful for
yeah. 1 quetz isnt much, but when the whole flock rolls up? You gotta figure whether it's really worth it
sometimes the optimal survival strat is to just be the biggest most annoying nuisance anyone has ever seen 👍
Watch the unexpected moment a cheetah not only loses its food to vultures but then the vultures lose it to an opportunistic lion!
BOOK YOUR TRIP TO KRUGER: http://bit.ly/BookatKruger
When vervet monkeys in the area start to alarm call, the rangers usually head to where the commotion is coming from, to see what might be the cause. This is when t...
For me, i couldn’t care less of this quetz & rex ep. I’ve never liked rex, it’s overpresented in every dino media, it already made appearance in the show, there are a ton of dinos to choose from and yet it’s rex again smh 😂
Even though Quetzalcoatlus co-existed in the region, the question is how often did a Tyrannosaurus have to deal with a pestering Quetz? This could play a role in whether the Tyrannosaurus is experienced in knowing how to deal with them or not.
Maybe the two animals do not cross paths often, but there is a sauropod carcass in the trailer, and that can very well attract a lot of carnivores in the region so.
I will point out, quetz is less than 1/10 the size of an average (8 ton~) rex
wait-
could it be an alamotyrannus???
I have to remind myself how large Arzdarchids (I hope I spelt that right) can appear even to other theropods.
I cant wrap my head around how that flying giraffe weighs like less then the Rexes head.
gotta agree that rex solo all 🥱
Its impressive how some of these giant storks can tower over one of the largest terrestrial carnivores to have ever lived, even if it weighs less.
Ok so i had a debate on how big gallimimus was and they said it was 2m tall, later i did some research and found that thats its hip height
Also about the weight, ik it says it weights about 440kg but i think 500-600kg is reasonable too but im not sure
yeah thats why how tall something is is often misleading and debatable, because in a lot of animals (and in basically all theropods) height is measured to the hip. This is because the hip height isn't really going to change regardless of what the animal's natural pose is. But if you measure to the head, an animal that naturally holds itself more upright would be "taller" than one that holds itself more horizontal despite the fact they could literally both be the exact same shape and size
Ok i get now
But now, what about its weight, also hot topic incoming, galli can solo achillobator
Weight wise <500kg is still pretty reasonable, while it is tall keep in mind that it is very lithe in its build. And its not like thats light anyway. That's the weight of some adult horse breeds.
It probably weighs more than achillobator and with legs like those I'm sure a kick would be nasty. But it has a lot of neck that's prime grab real estate tbf
Yessir i agree
I feel like it’s experienced based tbh although if achillobator lands the raptor prey restraint than it’s kinda over for the galli simply because achillobator’s weight is pretty damn close to galli’s then again galli could turn over if achillobator jumps on it
Rex was the largest terrestrial carnivore by 0.2 tons for instance giga was 10.4 and Rex was 10.6
wait
why allo got the nickname "Lions of Jurassic" while there's torvo and sauro twice the size of them?
Well a 200kg difference of size between two giant theropods (especially those that exceed ~10000kg) isn't really big (you got to consider potential variations in mass estimations, size variations on life, how heavy they get after a meal).
I know but based on the data that has been given Rex is the largest terrestrial carnivore discovered also I think Rex would get heavier after a meal because of giga’s fast metabolism
Lions arent really the biggest either, but they do dominate their habitats, allo had torvo and sauro outnumbered 10 to 1, so maybe cos of that.
If you just look at the raw data/numbers, sure.
What are the weight estimates for tarbo and zycheng?
Wasn’t it like 30 to 1 or was that sauro or certato
Maybe, but its a fact that allo outnumbered both of them significantly
Well a GDI found the largest described Tarbosaurus specimen (PIN 551-1) to be around ~5392kg. Though there are mature specimens smaller than that (and I think possibly larger too?). Zuchengtyrannus mass estimates will vary depending on whether you base it on Tarbosaurus or Tyrannosaurus (due to proportional differences).
Hmmm, so how does the average tarbo stack at? Like 4.5 tons?
Iirc it was 5.5
I wonder how strong the quetzal was
In what way?
iirc tarbo is uhh...
~5 tonnes
Hmm, I would assume the size range for Tarbosaurus would be between ~3000kg to ~5500kg (Some of the smaller specimens are comparable to Daspletosaurus and Albertosaurus in size) but that is just a pure guess (I dont think there are any mass estimates for the smaller adults).
We have no idea which specimens of Tarbo are adults besides the holotype, because lacking histology moment
I would disagree because of dasp and albertosaurus having lighter builds than tarbo when it was closer to the body shape/build to T.rex
why allo "Different"?
is it ugly?
It was different to the megalosaurs and tyranosaurs previously described, so maybe thats why they named it that.
That’s what I was going to say
i see
Really? does this include PIN 551-3, MPC-D 107/2, and ZPAL MgD 107/2?
Potentially
ahh what an interesting names sm tarbo got there/j
That third tarbo name sounds like a headache
Funny you say that, the third specimen has a weird skull (either because of variation or distortion or both).
I speculate scientists give dinosaur specimens such odd names so you know for a fact that that’s the one your looking for
So, kinda like Sue with a crushed top?
The specimen is the bottom one.
Heh, funny nose
Bro probably ran into a rock and bumped it’s nose
I wonder how these paleo nerd people can even remember such specimen name
bro got bonked
Idk bruh it’s engraved in their being
They probably see it all the time while doing research, or they just keep them in notes lel
how old brachio can get?
~100 years?
they probably lived a really long time yeah, we know they got to at least 50 but probably a lot longer
a big part of it is that big animals have slower metabolisms and typically really good dna repair to deal with cancer, long lifespan comes as a side effect of that
safe to say giant sauropods would have lived into their 60s, at least. which puts them comparable to elephants
Don’t old wild elephants marginally keel over because they run out of teeth and just slowly starve to death? Zoo captives can live into their 70s iirc
Yeah and agreeing with the message below yours they still are but are not as prominent with hominids as they are with hominins now
actually I confused those 2 terms
Well, tbf, there arent really any hominids around today, unless monkeys and apes count, then its business as usual for the leopards
Hominids are all the extant great apes, what I meant to say is that they aren't as prominent of predators of humans as they used to be
Chimps slowly but surely becoming less tribal asshats towards one another and building villages: 
Because of innovation
Leopards are just menaces to everything, they turn the tables on pythons that ambush them, beat the life out of the seemingly invincible ratel, attack the living pincushion known as the crested porcupine and then have a 2,000 lbs Eland or giant silverback gorilla for dinner
Can anyone ID this tooth?
If I had to guess I would say that's the tooth of an acorn
LOL
I woulda guessed that too if my professor didn’t tell me it belonged to either a croc or shark
Looks like a croc crusher tooth
Any nerds know of any dinos with a foot like this?
Please remain polite and respectful towards other members. Refer to our #rules
it's a jab (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/jab) with no malicious intent, just a joke
I’ll have to respectfully agree. Nerd is never used in an actually disrespectful manner anymore.
That aside, the flexibility of the 2nd toe is weird. Aside from that, looks like a carcharodontosaur foot to me, maybe the South American variety specifically cause Meraxes
aye thank you was wondering wat that could have been
do crocs actually have some flat teeth like that?
definitely looks like a tooth from something durophagous, where is it from may I ask? It looks remarkably like a lot of Globidens teeth fossils, which are quite common in fossil markets, although a lot of the ones with multiple teeth are composites
Oh thank you so much!!
I’ll ask where it’s from, can’t remember the name off the top of my head. I’m in the PA area but I’m not sure if that’s where my prof got it
Ah no worries, glad I could help! I owned a Globidens tooth at one point so it immediately looked familiar ahaha
Globidens seems like a really safe bet, is the prof sure it was a croc or a shark? @trim crag yeah there are fossils from probably durophagous rocs with very rounded or flat teeth. That shape repeats again and again in reptiles that specialize in crushing shells (or sometimes nuts/seeds)
Cool
possible they weren't sure it was a croc or shark but is familiar with the shape in those kind of animals in particular, especially if its a shape that likes to repeat itself in a wide variety of animals.
I'll also throw a vote towards Globidens
Now tell your teach that it's a mosasaur, not a crocodile 😉
Minty fresh giga.
I can't lie when I saw this I thought it looked like mint chocolate chip ice cream.
What sauropod could the minty Giga be eating? I'm assuming not an argent
Probably a young Candeleros giant (It's likely not meant to be the C. Giant, but I don't think any other sauropod is close to that in its formation?)
Ty
What is the largest species of the raptor family?
Do you mean dromeosaurids
Raptor is basically just predatory bird, could be a lot
Well whatever their called I'm not too in tune with their genus name
Utahraptor
What was the largest plesiosaur?
i think sachicasaurus is one of the largest
Sachica is yes
Literally the same weight as leedsichthys
Is there fossil evidence for Ceratosaurus eating any sort of fish?
No, it was a theory put forward by Bakker at one point but wasn't supported by direct fossil evidence
Ah okay just cause one of my friends said there was evidence for Ceratosaurus eating sharks.
Yeah no
Whaaatt?
Lmao
I ain’t to sure bout that
iirc sachica weight is anywhere from 14-15+ tons
They are mistaken, it was an inland predator and did not interact with sharks
Leedsichthys is a huge fish but it may be smaller than a whale shark with a weight about 15 metric tonnes. Some people recently scaled the specimen to like between 11 and 14 meters long but it may change a bit as they modify their reconstruction.
https://twitter.com/FabioAleRomero/status/1577501282964742144
Thought so. Wasn’t the theory only brought forward due to it having a dense tail?
No there were a few other reasons. Niche partitioning from other carnivores, finds that were presumed to be near lakebeds, large lungfish were also very common & Bakker figured it could have specialized in those to some extent. The tail was proposed as being deep, like a crocodile, but AFAIK there's nothing particularly deep about it
Ok, thanks for clarifying this for me👍
You're welcome, I recommend the book Jurassic West by Foster for more info on the Morrison Formation (Cerato's home turf)
Did Stegosaurids live mostly through the Jurassic? That is what I know - and if it's true, how exactly did animals with such a simple survival plan possibly have gone extinct?
Climate change
if i recall the sub set of ankylosaurids were probably a factor seeing the heavier armor and predators aiming for more bulk with the cycle, food changes climate and all sort of other things were always part of it
Is adapting to different food sources that difficult, evolutionarily speaking?
I get that cases such as a clade of Theropods like Ornithomimus being herbivores are like needles in a haystack, but with the probably constant change of food sources & competition, would it be that hard to switch food sources belonging to the same diet group, E.G. supplementing meat for fishes or one kind of fruit/vegetable/lead with others having similar nutritional values?
Cuz like, purely from a survival perspective, stegosaurids are scary.
When we're talking so far back in the fossil record, why an animal could or could not adapt to a changing environment is a completely random guess.
But stegosaurs did survive into the Cretaceous, just highly reduced in diversity
Ankylosaurs: Go extinct already 
I’m not saying that stegosaurids did but it’s also worth noting that a couple groups that seem like they go extinct in the early cretaceous may have lasted a lot longer (some groups like that tend to pop up, like diplodocids), there’s a couple areas we still just don’t really have late cretaceous fossils from still like parts of europe and africa
You get a bad drought and then a disease outbreak and boom, even the toughest species are felled
family not genus
The genus name is what we usually know them by (such as Tyrannosaurus or Triceratops)
https://youtube.com/shorts/0Nw1-n5UvPw?feature=share
Devs where you at?
it dosent help that shunosaurus came first before any ankylosaurid
and its club wasn't actually that big or specialized like the ankylosaurids 
its tail is kinda like a spiked mace
Anyone have a list of the monocots that existed during the Cretaceous? 
Monocots started diverging in the early mid cretaceous, so primitive forms of all the modern groups likely existed somewhere in the 114-66 my range. It's hard to determine exactly which is which. Palms were common and recognizable by the end of the Cretaceous, pandans/screw pines too, we have evidence of grass in the Late Cretaceous but it wasn't common
Im super excited about prehistoric planet, it’s one of the best dinosaur documentaries out there, and the fact that it’s still continuing puts a smile on my face, and the triceratops scene in the new trailer made me freak out cuz I wanted more trike bullfighting in documentaries… trikes usually fight Tyrannosaurs, and it becomes annoying imo, trikes fighting each other over dominance is gonna be so fun to watch!!!!
Id be happy with any sort of natural behavior instead of just fighting to the death like from most dinosaur media. Although I felt the hunting in last season was censored in a way.
...
ankylodocus is that you???
I feel like that's what made S1 so boring though, besides the Nanuq vs Pachyrhino there really was no intensity, just dinosaurs living normally, the most tense scenes that werent that scene was probably either of the mosasaur scenes or the mosquito scene lol
I honestly didnt find it boring, I love watching animals just thrive. My issues lie in the censorship of natural behaviors. Such as during the nanuq vs pachyrhino hunt the camera angles all felt very far and they seemed afraid to show any sort of blood from anything that wasnt already dead even if its pretty minimal. Not really a huge deal it just makes me feel like im missing out on whats actually happening up close… anyway back to dino facts
That's kind of the point. I wouldn't call PhP boring in the slightest. It managed to show them as interesting and engaging without resorting to that.
But yeah I do agree on the "soft-censorship" Prehistoric Planet's doing. Walking with Dinosaurs and Walking with Beasts did not shy away from the blood and brutality when showing hunting and fighting.
on the contrary, I think the "just dinosaurs living normally" is what makes Prehistoric Planet so good and what made the Walking With franchise as a whole as successful as it was, showing dinosaurs in a light we could never see, their day to day lives for better worse or mundane in the frame of a nature documentary as if it was something genuinely happening. It's what I loved about the original Walking With and why I loved PhP, the portrayal of them as just animals. Which they were.
That said, I also am in agreement about the "soft-censorship" as scan put it.
Yeah, I mostly enjoyed PhP for the same reasons, because it's not "RAAAAH I AM GOING TO KILL. MURDER MURDER MURDER" jurrasic fight club cough cough, but it shows much more natural behaviours
At the very least with the nanuq and pachyrhino scene im not too fussed about it being shot from afar because to me its pretty clear they're trying to replicate drone/helicopter footage, which is a very very common angle for hunts in modern documentaries to be shot from. Easy to track the hunt and see it all up there.
that being said it would be nice to see the more intense aspects. I wouldn't want it to be the focus because I think paleomedia has a tendency to focus on it too much. But it would better bring the show in line with the modern documentaries its trying to replicate by showing all aspects of nature, even the sometimes gruesome ones
Wasn't there also the hunt of the Qianzhousaurus and of the Velociraptor?
I personally found the Quanzhou scene pretty tense, especially bevause it didn't really resort in a fight - you've got something fast trying to catch something fast and in a group, in a forest. The slow walk to try and not make a sound was pretty neat.
The Velociraptor scene was just exciting to me, like a grounded eagle that tried it's best without flying, lol. And it was awesome for it.
I'll agree that, especially in the raptor scene, the soft censorship was present, but on the other hand having the camera farther away conveyed the "do or die" decision of jumping off the nest very nicely - both the sheer height and confidence it must've had to do it and the feeling of hopelessness of flightless eagles being surrounded by a flock of very angry flying reptiles if they don't.
On that note, you could make the argument that the soft censorship is also a product of the cinematography - be it the attempt to recreate drone footage, or to better give off the gravity of the situation to the viewer.
Plus, both in the Rex vs Trike aftermath and Qianzhousaurus hunt, I like the approach of "Well, you see, you can easily die as a Dino too! One bite or one unfortunate trike horn to the leg is all it takes to down these guys" - an aspect that I feel often gets forgotten. These things aren't tanks relative to one another, not the ones that didn't evolve to be tanks at least.
Im glad im not the only one who thought they seemed a little shy in the production of it, im hoping we will see some of these changes in season 2. As for the nanuq and pachyrhino distant shots, it wasn’t really the angle itself i had an issue with more the reason at some moments they would do it to intentionally shy away from specific scenes, I actually love the wide angle shots. All in all Im very excited for season 2 and I think itll be great and I could honestly go either way with the details I mentioned and I will still love it.
still uses the small shunosaurus smh
anybody knows what is leed most up-to-date weight?
got they're length from 9.2-12.5 meters
if you mean out of these images, all of these are equally up-to-date
pardon me but i'm asking abt leed most up-to-date weight
Depends on the estimate, the more conservative estimates are like 15 tons, the biggest one is 45.
Basically, measuring a giant pachycormid based on fragmentary material is tricky.
its also worth noting that like most large fish it probably varied in size by a LOT, so unless you have a pretty significant sample size (hint: we dont) trying to come up with any actual average size is gonna be rough. Adult whale sharks for example can range anywhere from 8 to up to potentially 18m, which is a pretty insane size range
Fish when sizes
Fish across species also can vary in weight a ton despite being the same dimensions due to how much internally is gas, fluid, or flesh
So unless we got good cross sections of the animal, gauging weight is p hard
I got 17 tons from scaling it from Bonnerichthys (which is about the same as sachica like I said)
There was some discussion about stegos and nutrition so i’d want to add some insight. There is one long-scale research done with italian wall lizards which was introduced to two small islands. They had no competition and iirc not predators. 5 males and 5 females were introduced to both islands. After 35 years these populations showed significant changes; head shape changed, higher bite force to support eating more plant material and less animal material, new organ in their intestine to help digest plant matter and they didn’t show territorial aggressiveness anymore. So changes in diet can be done quickly, but in this case they had not much pressure and stable conditions. Herbi dinos had competition and predators so it makes things more difficult (or it can speed up the process, maybe that’s why only birds survived) Overgrazing may have led their fav plants to go extinct and if they were highly specialized to eat just that, nutritional changes may be too slow (think about koalas for example, i don’t think they can change quickly) and then above all, climate change as mentioned
so leed most up-to-date weight is anywhere from 15-45 tonnes?
In short, yeah.
how heavy is leed specimen "Gill Basket"?
undescribed?
Idk who that specimen is, but NHMUK PV P10156 is the biggest leed iirc, and its estimates vary from 12m and 15-20 tons to 16.5m and 45 tons.
It’s clearly mentioned here that this is the gill basket specimen, meaning 12 meters is Leeds current known largest size.
leeds always throws me off and ive had a hard time pinning down why, but i think its because it looks like a small fish thats just been scaled up. like i could picture having fish that look like that that're like 3cm and fit in a home fish tank. such a freak
Its probably the long flowy looking dorsal fins, lots of tank fish have those or something similar
That image is visually unsettling for me. Something about the pectoral fins being where they are make it look like a fish with no... Well neck sounds stupid but that's what my brain is stuck on.
For me Leed looks weird cos it looks like a sardine did all the steroids it could find instead of looking like a big fish like a whale shark or smth.
What would it taste like? 🤔
Fish
So dinosaurs more related to birds then reptiles Right?
What no, dinosaurs and birds are reptiles
Birds are dinosaurs. It’s a bit complicated with typical reptiles, because crocodiles are the closest modern relatives of dinosaurs while others like lizards and turtles are pretty distant.
Which means yes, crocodiles are closer related to the bird outside your window than they are to a Komodo dragon for example
Bird and most Dino’s (as we know) were endothermic. reptiles aren’t so if you look at it from that area they’re more closely related to each other then to squamates
Like the legs under the body rule?
Courtesy of Vividsky
Dinosaurs are reptiles, birds are dinosaurs, therefore birds are reptiles
I agree crocs and bird also have very similarly constructed hearts so that also shows their closeness in relation
I guess, although that’s only if you look at modern reptiles. There were crocodiles and crocodile relatives that had the legs under their bodies and were more warm-blooded. The ancestors of crocodiles originally started out as warm-blooded but became cold-blooded over time.
Croc heart is so cool. Heard that they can control the valve thing to continue circulating blood thru their lungs to stay underwater or sum like that.
This sums it up best
I just took a vertebrate class on all this stuff it’s so interesting to be able to use my knowledge somewhere. The heart stuff was so interesting. Also how birds basically never breath in old air. They constantly have new air circling in. I wonder if any other Dino’s were like that!
Saurischian dinosaurs (theropods and sauropods) at the very least had a similar system to birds. I don’t think it’s clear if ornithischians were similar. It is known that they lost the air sacs that are known to exist in saurischians and pterosaurs.
That’s so cool! I know the ornithischians were more distantly related
It really bums me out how much crocodilian diversity was only just recently lost. Crocs, alligators, and caimans are cool, but there were so many other ways that crocodilians existed in the past that are gone now.
Agreed, I miss the notosuchians
Little armored herbivore crocs, so cool
I don't think I actually made that, if I did it was prob years ago and I don't remember, idk
if birds aren't reptiles, crocodilians aren't either
Birds, and modern crocs are archosaurs according to Google. So yes, they are closely related to dinosaurs, and technically are dinosaurs. Which is very cool if you ask me 🙂
Archosauria translates to "ruling reptiles". Dinos, birds, & crocs are all archosaurs
That's not how it works 
Only birds are dinosaurs, crocodilians are not
Oh my...
I am not very understaanding of all that
Oof, I really apologise!
basically dinosaurs and crocodilians are both archosaurs, birds are one of many types of theropod dinosaur
this message is technically now redundant but i'm sending it anyway
Beautiful
lol!! literally back-of-the-envelope diagram
Are the dinosaurs in the game from Jurassic period likw cerato is?
Most are cretaceous, although there are other Jurassic dinosaurs. Allosaurus, Stegosaurus, kentrosaurus, and Camptosaurus are all from the same time as Cerato.
generally a lot of mesozoic-focused paleo media (yes, even JP) focuses more on the cretaceous than the jurassic, and the triassic is lucky to even be acknowledged
there’s a Jurassic dinosaur pack :) which includes allo, cera, stego, and something else, maybe kentro?
Thank you paleo chat people 😼
Wow, impeccable
Ahh! I understand! Thank you a lot! ^^
Y’all I’m a doing a informational project about Ceratosaurus for school any facts y’all wanna share so I can add?
That it was(and still is) awesome
It is the only known theropod with osteoderms.
Although on average it has smaller vertebrae & limb bones than those of Allosaurus, its teeth were larger
That’s the boney like armor it had running down its back right?
It's unlikely to function like armor specifically given their position, but yes.
Ahh alright then
A very close relative called Genyodectes is found from the Early Cretaceous of South America. Ceratosaurus had slightly flexible skull bones, possibly to accommodate the stresses of struggling or large prey.
Wait so are crocodiles more closely related to birds than they are to other reptiles?
yes
Makes sense I suppose
I never really thought about that though
A crocodile is closer related to a robin than it is to a lizard.
I finished the project YALL 😼
Letsss goooo
Damn looks fancy
He's fun and a good addition
I think Rex’s Epipostorbitals technically count
Technically
no, cera (likely) didn't get bullied or have a rival with allo iirc
they're (likely) seems to uhh
what can i say?
peacefully coexist with each other?
cmiiw
i might be wrong but arent there preserved carnotaurus osteoderms?
In 2020 it was discovered that the osteoderms were actually just big feature scales.
Big feature scales?
Oh didn’t they compete?
gotcha! if you dont mind me asking whats the difference between the two?
Prob have different niche in the environment
Between allo and cerato?
I think they mean feature scales and osteoderms
But at some point surely they met paths or something as food migrated for them?
Can’t imagine anything consistently happening out of that interaction, cerato would just keep moving
They yell at each other then move away from one another assuming one isn't desperately hungry or provoked
I don't think there's any reason to assume that. They probably predated on one another at different stages of growth if/when the opportunity presented itself
True I could see that I was just thinking that they might’ve had some problems with territory maybe or going atfer the same prey
niche differentiation doesn't mean they didn't interact, they very likely could have been hostile to one another
Allo & Cera Probably act like modern predators do today
Ignore one another because risk of injury
Yeha I guess it easy to forget they are animals at the end of the day trying to survive 
I think ignore is being used where "avoid out of risk of injury" should be
I thought it was a given that they would go after younger versions of each other if they could lol
afaik both species had different environmental preferences, the morrison is a massive area. From what we know, Allosaurus generally preferred more open conditions while ceratosaurus and torvosaurus preferred riverside forests. Likely for the thick cover in cerato's case, and megalosaurs in general like torvosaurus really loved tropical forests and wetlands.
Well non-fully grown individuals would be the bulk of the population in either case and therefore the bulk of the interactions going on
Also ya I had also assumed we were talking two adults because why else this is a hypothetical
Me too, pointless not to be
So it would be unlikely for them to come in contact basically and even if they did not much would happen
Tbh the issue is Allosaurus has such a stupid range in adult sizes
Allosaurus would dominate whenever the two came into conflict, although it probably wasn't terribly onesided, because most allosaurs known, while still larger than cerato, are close enough in size for cerato to stand a chance in a contest.
They're asking about the actual environment & life patterns rather than a straight matchup
This. The largest allosaurus are nearly 3x larger than cerato, but there's a lot of mature individuals that are only, like 25% to 50% larger also. Allosaurus were weird like that.
Right but
I feel like if they meant specifically if there were predator prey relationships between the two or implication of different growth stages that would have specified. But they talk about territory and going after the same prey items
Well we have Ceratosaurus & Allosaurus from the same quarries, frequently, they did apparently overlap in territory and presumably prey as well
They did overlap in territory but it probably isn't as intense as typically thought. Did they compete? Yeah, they're large predatory theropods that overlapped somewhat in territory. There would've been conflict, but it probably wasn't particularly intense given different environmental preferences.
With the cycles of droughts in the Morrison I expect it could get fairly intense at times
I find that when people ask these kinda questions there's an image of "every encounter is a fight to the death" which, sometimes it might just be a screaming match between the two and one backs down
alternatively, they scream at each other and then both get trampled by one of the 10 sauropod species in the area at any given time
Now that's the canon outcome
Wouldn’t it also depend on how aggressive they could’ve been since some animals like to resource guard and will hurt or scare off the other animals?
It often depends on the context of said competition. When intense, like in the case of lions and hyenas, fights and injuries between the species are pretty common, although death much less so. Then you have like, wolves and bears, where they do have some overlap in prey but not too much, so outside of kill theft they often benefit each other ecologically instead.
Of course, but the overt shyness and caution we see in mammalian predators shouldn't be assumed to be the rule in dinosaurs either. Reptile dominant food webs, particularly in harsh environments, like the one seen in the deep Outback are more or less "are you smaller than me? OK I'm eating you"
On that same note, dinosaurs, and archosaurs in general, are in many ways not your run of the mill reptile
much closer comparison than mammals by any stretch
Keep in mind that with the only modern megafaunal reptiles we have, crocodiles, species overlap and the conflict from it really varies depending on the species, and can often depend more on individual species territoriality than actually being in competition.
Of course but you're playing with the unknown regardless, and the reptiles of then are occupying a variety of very different ecological positions than the ones today. And in the case of allosaurus and ceratosaurus unless its an exceptionally large allosaurus its not "I'm bigger than you I'm eating you" it's "you look as big as me"
IE Salties are very territorial with each other, and often means that freshies get displaced and/or eaten wherever they overlap despite not overlapping too much in niche as adults. Cuban Crocodiles are notoriously territorial and aggressive, so they often displace American crocodiles, despite them being way larger and more likely to win physical fights. Then you have american alligators and American crocodiles, where american alligators are so generalistic they don't really care about coexisting with similar species or each other.
If the extant archosaurs are proof of anything its that you can't be so quick to generalize them. And crocodilian behavior is also something that stands to be understood perfectly
I just think it's interesting when the details of interspecific behavior dictates how they react with other species, rather than competition or predatory/defensive pressures.
I'm basically just stating that inter-predator predation (is there a better term for this? lol) was likely a stronger force in the Mesozoic than in contemporary mammal-dominant ecosystems. Agreed on all the points about generalization
The reason why hippos are so aggressive for example is their territoriality. Hippos fight viciously with each other over territory, and that often bleeds over into them willing to attack basically anything by the water. While still capable of charging and murdering on land, it is nowhere to the same extent as when they're defending their waterfront.
intraguild predation, that's it
Also true. This can be seen in some mammals too. Like leopards being known for hunting other smaller carnivores.
I suppose that boils down to, do you think two predators meeting each other is immediately going into intraguild predation
Depends on the risk tbh. Unless it's a large allo I don't see it.
I think if one is larger, hungry, and has the opportunity then sure
I know we talked about mammal and reptile predatory competition as models, but do we have any examples of bird dominated ecosystems with competing predators? Places like New Zealand? Flight probably makes it not as useful of a comparison, but it'd still be interesting
Southern Ocean perhaps? Would be interesting
Most bird dominated faunas on islands are super weird though, it's a tough comparison
So we’re bugs much bigger back than, compared to todays bugs?
yes, there are a lot of insects back then that got… huge.
What made them go much smaller then, cuz I know the trees must’ve played a big part but that couldn’t been the only thing I think?
Lower oxygen plays a part in that
Giant insects only really existed from the Carboniferous to Early Triassic. While oxygen does play a factor, it is often overstated. The influx of giant insects in the Carboniferous was due to them being the first truly terrestrial organisms, without much vertebrate competition, so they were in a prime position to get massive when the ideal hothouse habitat came around.
Makes sense
This Dino would be so cool in path of titans.
Idk if this is a dumb question but did the morrison formation contain any large-ish hadrosaurs
