#paleontology
1 messages · Page 7 of 1
I’m fairly certain there is some confirmation of Ceratopsians willingly eating meat, and with Pachys it’s on the basis of dentition and a theropod body plan
Could be Red Deer to Boar
The former who consume meat on a more than incidental basis and the latter being out and omnivores
Anyone got an up to date giga skull with views from different angles?
Like for dichotomy
So now Sucho rivals Rex length wise, though its only half of Rex's weight. Not sure if that 12,4m Sucho was fully grown
Probably
Also same question about Baryonyx, was it a subadult or fully grown?
Holotype is a subadult
Estimated length is still 9 meter’s though right?
8 meters
Yall ever just
sometimes yeah

My reaction to spending 4 hours growing growing a modded para just for the server to disable mods.
iirc that wound was actually theorized to be inflicted by a ground sloth
Yeah agreed
I found this meme on reddit that kinda explains how I feel pretty well
Everything that can make my insides outsides is scary, it having feathers doesnt really change that.

Likewise, I just personally think that by appearance some inaccurate dinosaur designs are terrifying and their presence only adds onto such factors
Yeah, they look scarier cos theyre more unatural Id say.
Its like a sick person with scars and deformities charging you with an axe looks scarier then a perfectly normal one doing the same.
it's weird that fewer people draw modern animals inaccurately (whether intentionally or by ignorance), and even fewer people complain that hairy mammals are ''not scary'' compared to feathered dinosaurs
what did tylosaurus hunt/contend with?
e v e r y t h i n g
like the most noteworthy ones
Hesperornis, Bananognmius, sharks, sea turtles, Dolichorhynchops, and other mosasaurs
which other mosasaurs
Clidastes and Platecarpus
as for its full menu: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Shale
The Pierre Shale is a geologic formation or series in the Upper Cretaceous which occurs east of the Rocky Mountains in the Great Plains, from Pembina Valley in Canada to New Mexico.
The Pierre Shale was described by Meek and Hayden in 1862 in the Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences (Philadelphia). They described it as a dark-gray shale, foss...
Am i allowed to say ignorance for $500 and intentional for $100? 
People don't draw modern animals inaccurately because we know what they look like
we know dinosaurs don't look like they do in JW but people still draw them that way because they think it looks cool
you could argue this looks pretty scary or cool, but no one draws this and calls it a german shepherd
I will
What a kind pit bull
Has anyone got like facial reconstruction designs of dinosaurs where skin isn't kinda just attached to the skull, and there's like meat, flesh, maybe even fat there?
Dunno how better to explain it, but yeah
Recent restorations of Sinosaurus and Dilophosaurus would be good for that.
she’s super friendly around kids
Definitely named princess
They aint omnivorous
Really?
are you joking
I thought omnivorous pachy actually has stuff behind it
no it doesnt
Uh huh (I have no idea)
anyway i was going to say, They are strictly herbivorous likely doing what modern day Deer may do when lacking in certain proteins. Eat small critters for extra sustenance, whcih still classifies as a herbivore
But in no way does that make them omnivores by definition
Pachy had canines, hence why omnvivore pachy theory..
Omnivore still aint happening
I’m a carnivore
They're already omnis in the game tho, and there's also been other evidence for them and Ceratopsians to have been more than incidentally omnivorous
Even Hadrosaurs have been found with like, shellfish in their stomachs suggesting at least supplementation
That's not omnivory though. That's just herbivores occasionally eating crap they typically don't. That's not unusual for animals of any diet.
Also true
IDK, I just wanna have some omni-representation. Also love your channel and I do agree with you on most things
And bark.
(Though it may have something to do with it being rotten and filled with crustaceans. But still.)
True
So then Pachy being an omnivore is a flight of fantasy on the game-dev's part?
And carnivores can eat plants too.
Hell, even caimans eat fruits and leaves occasionally.
nah i know
It was speculation that got out of hand basically.
Yeah -- blew my mind when I found out that caimans actually ate plant matter. XD
A pity
Wonder if we'll get some more actual omnis in game or somethin', could be fun
Honestly (hot take moment), the "metabolism" of every creatures aren't really metabolisms -- they're just diet choices.
What I would honestly like is if, depending on how much hunger drain you are willing to want, you get different benefits.
For example, say that you want a slow hunger drain. Then you can be more tanky. Or if you want a fast hunger drain, then you can be faster and more agile. That way, you can still make creatures have unique diets, while also giving them a choice as to how they want to go about their playthrough. The slower hunger drain can promote a more lazy player, with the extra tankiness helping them in fighting stuff, while a more pvp focused player can go the fast hunger drain route to fight more, and have the extra speed and agility to help out (as well as helping you move from point A to point B so that you can find more food options faster).
I'll simplify that for you ken
Hot take: it's a video game
That is...actually a cool way to think about it
IDK, I like having a mix of fantastical and realistic, y'know? Like, scientific-accuracy for diets and appearance and stuff but also allowing for some speculative fun
Pachy omnivory is like, the only ornithischian with the potential for maybe eating other bs than just plants outside of heterodontosaurs purely based off the fact they have fang like teeth. That being said, there are plenty of examples of herbivores with large teeth that don’t have meat as a large portion of their diet.
Ceratopsids, at least based off Triceratops’ isotope study, were pretty strictly herbivores
I retract the heterodontosaur part, as we apparently have isotope studies from them aligning with strict herbivory. If I had to guess, their larger teeth were either defensive/built for cutting into tougher plants. Thescelosaurus though apparently has omnivory suggested
do we have any isotope studies that cement any dinos as true omnivores?
Oviraptorians?
No
Damn just speculation then
Got a link to the heterodontosaur study? Can't find it
Seems surprising; I’ve heard that a number of Theropods for example were omnivores
Did pterosaurs actually have rounded wing tips
i also ask for azdharchids specifically
I say i say i say
Yeah i think people would be surprised by the number of ungulates that have big canines, or just generally have sharp pointy teeth 👀 has nothing to do with meat eating, they're just nasty
We don't know with 100% certainty but it's pretty likely they weren't rounded. iirc they were previously reconustructed that way because it was thought to make the wing stronger and more resiliant while flying but that's not actually necessary, their wings are strong enough as is anyway.
Somewhat rounded is fine, but it’s likely that the wing ends were pointy. The huge blunt ends were the result of too much soft tissue
Aye sure
something like this, there's a vaguely round, smooth shape. but the very tip itself is still fairly pointed (art by Mark Witton, he's an excellent source on pterosaurs)
I say i say you boys are very helpful individuals
Heterodontosaurids comprise an important early radiation of small-bodied herbivores that persisted for approximately 100 My from Late Triassic to Early Cretaceous time. Review of available fossils unequivocally establishes Echinodon as a very small-bodied, late-surviving northern heterodontosaurid similar to the other northern genera Fruitadens ...
Tysm!
Peccaries are a great example of this, and some rhinos. Large fang like teeth are usually fight adaptations
Yep, I know in both male horses and camels (the two examples I posted) it's used in intraspecific combat, although with camels its also good for helping them handle rough and difficult to eat foods. Generally speaking if I see a herbivore with some very mean teeth I'm gonna assume its for beating each other up
There are rhinos that fight with teeth even though they have horns?
i mean donkeys have hard hitting hooves but will often times go in to man handle with a bite because they can, so wouldn't be too far from it id say, but i'm not much of a rhino expert so idk
Asian rhinos have tusks in their mouths, which are their primary weapons.
Its just wild to me that something so specialized would be discarded in such a scenario, although I didn’t take into account that it could be socially fighting and not defense.
Are they used for self defense, socially, or both?
Both
Thats so wild.. did the wooly rhino have these tusks?
Nah. They primarily invested in horns.
Makes sense considering how big they got lol.
Inversely, indian rhinos having the smallest horns, using their teeth to fight makes sense
Im just going to make a wild assumption and say african rhinos do not have this adaptation?
Yeah they don't either. Also a bit wild how violent rhinos are when fighting each other in general. Like, I think with african rhinos, 1/4 of rhinos will die from fighting other rhinos.
also nice vid, glad i got a cameo, anyways interesting seeing how animals always don't just focus on one thing since while they will min max( R E X) still uses the other parts that have been...left out more shall we say
I guess it's because adults very rarely die from predators, so the death toll has to go to something
True, but I'm pretty sure even hippos and elephants don't have that high a tally.
They are generally pretty skittish towards other animals no? Strangely as they are probably the 3rd most powerful animals in their environment. That mixed with what you said about them killing each other frequently it makes me think about their intelligence.
i mean they are more skittish than folks make em out to be but will most certainly be ready to deal with stuff
Yeah I did some digging and hippos and elephants by comparison don't even come close. With elephants, the primary causes of death are predators when young and starvation/droughts as adults. With hippos it's primarily disease. Interspecific killing isn't a big percentage in either.
huh, that tells you a lot about each one's lifestyle
elephants have only four sets of teeth, which end at age 60-70 or so, so they are fated to starve if they make it to adulthood
hippos live in crowded communities in filthy water for half the year, so they can get an achievement for every disease
and rhinos are rhinos
Why are trikes so overpowered
Wrong chat?
What are some of the extinct creatures we have with the best preserved specimens? Like yuka the mammoth or the mummified nodosaur.
Iirc and I could be wrong, it’s mainly because of the environment they live in, musk deer for example do have antlers but small ones because of the dense vegetation they live in. To compensate for this they have tusks.
In dense vegetation having bits that stick out a lot isn’t handy when moving around, so a lot of forest dwelling herbivores have tusks.
He is wrong, right? about Spino having a stronger bite than Carch.
Youtube comments, a haven of accurate statements.
Why there is almost none properly found dinosaur fossil from these areas ? Do we know anything about these ecosystem from maastrichtian greenland, scandinavia, central africa etc.
Out of curiosity how omnivorous/opportunistic do you guys think Ornithomimus might’ve been?
I’d wager at least small animals and insects, possibly carrion (I recall a great comic series, Age of Reptiles, where the Struthis that were part of the herd gnoshed on a Heterodontosaur’s guts after it had succumbed to a Velociraptor attack. In terms of species not wholly accurate but still interesting)
wondering this came to your mind 3 minutes after I asked mine question ? Have at least some respect jesus
you're not more important than anyone else here
Well a lot of herbivores that do live in dense forests have large horns and antlers. So it seems they are able to move around fine even with the length of their antlers/horns.
a big part might be that circumstances for preservation are just not as favourable as in other environments, since we know australia did have dinosaurs, just found very few
aye mainly larger deer species ofc, hence why i dont think it is the reason but moreso part of/a reason for some.
tho antlers aren't permanent structures so they don't get in the way that often either
That is true, though there are other herbivores that do have permanent horns such as Asian Buffalo.
aye as are Gaur and african forest buffalo

Lets not forget some dinosaurs too.
Was there a significant size difference between dire wolves and the grey wolves?
Cos Ive heard that they were sameish size length and height wise but the dires were bulkier.
From what I remember, Dire Wolves and Grey Wolves were very similar in size to each other.
i think thats about right, a bit more mass but it's not that much bigger
Yeah, the dires had some other differences too iirc, like a broader snout.
Who me?
Oh sorry
But uh, for that I think it’s jus that Dino fossils can be sporadic where they show up almost
As well as a more sloped head, shorter and stouter legs,
Reminds me of the Hanshu wolf
Sorry again
I dont think you have to apologize, especially when youve done nothing wrong.
Can someone explain why panjura is called panjura when it's name is based ofPangea the super continent but gondwana is based of gondua witch is an island yet gondwa is larger than panjura
I don’t get why your asking. Do you mean why Panjura is larger than Gondwa in-game?
they just kinda are. my best guess is that either the devs were better at optimizing maps by the time gondwa was made, or the growing playerbase + addition of fliers meant that the map had to be larger to accommodate 'em.
all you did was ask a question, nothing wrong with that
Absolutely no need to apologize. It's possible for multiple questions to be asked and answered at the same time. You did nothing wrong and the other person was perhaps a bit persnickety for no reason.
Don’t apologize, nobody has a priority pass in this chat, your fine!
Theyre the same, 8x8 iirc.
Yeah for the namesake
Than why does it take longer to travel across Gondwa
Verticality.
That doesn’t mean their the same size tho
It does, but Gondwa has stuff like unclimbable mountain passes, rivers you have to pass. On Panj, you can ignore most of that and just walk in a straight line. Theyre still the same area.
Yeah but panjura also does have like 10 million cliffs, hills, mountains, etc
As I said, on Panj, you can ignore them. In Gondwa, you have to pass through.Walking from riverland to sll is like a straight path, with a few cliffs who have big distinctive paths you walk through.
I feel like they just named them that because it sounds good and has a relation to the general Mesozoic.
I rlly don’t think there’s much more to it
honestly yeah
the maps don't need to be fully accurate to their namesakes anyway. panjura is mostly coniferous forest, redwood forest, and oak-heavy forests, with a few grass plains scattered in - pangaea was much more diverse than this, and if memory serves pangaea wasn't even intact when grass became a thing. gondwana was also part of pangaea for most of its (gondwana's) existence
I could say the same because of the river system on Gondwa
Gondwa is smaller land wise tho, dont forget the ocean eats up surface from the land area. @ocean drum That only works if youre a semi, if youre an albera, its harder to travel with rivers wou have to cross.
I have a baby deino save who’s currently stuck by a river shore because there’s two cliffs surrounding a patch of land by the river that I can’t get around
Or Dasp who has to find very specific routes in order to cross because they can’t swim to safe their lives
You guys do know that there are Little Rock bridges you can get on right?
Lemme guess, titans pass towards grand plains? @slim ridge Yeah that too, those make Gondwa feel larger, if it was flat, you could run through all the land in 10 mins in like a midtier.
Aye but those aren’t everywhere, the water between Young grove and dark woods is just barely within Dasps ability to swim but your other alternative is a good long walk around so gotta do what ya gotta do
Yeah, I park my croc there and kill the dinos which can barely pass, have caught like 3 baby raptors and let two go.
young grove is the worst place for a baby spawn but I’ll talk bout that in another chat
HT takes the cake imo, but this is no paleo deal.
Ngl I don’t even swim through that place cus of the amount things in it lol
But yes it’s not paleo
tbh i think it was dubiously paleo in the first place; the maps aren't going to be paleo-accurate because panjura =/= pangaea
It was geological lel
Ya talked about grass and conifers so perhaps you can stretch it
Are there conifers in Gondwa? I forget to look at the trees.
Panjura has em iirc
Yes, most of the major forests are still coniferous
thankfully the existence of conifers is paleo-accurate
also i'm pretty sure gondwa has some? since there's pinecones and those usually pop up in coniferous areas, and i recall some conifer-shaped trees bein' around
I think they are more in dark woods and the north, the south doesnt look like its coniferous.
young grove has conifers iirc
I think the deciduous forests are literally only central
Yeah, I spend 90% of my time central, so my brain thinks 90% arent like that.
who is wining in a fight gp3 spino or scorpios?
no
the show being cancelled
Me
are you sure about that????
Yes
Or 
can i change my answer to or
I’d bet on Escanorflex, he could do it
Please keep the chat on topic.
Look at this Rhino charging at a group of three Elephants, the definition of fearlessness.
Did mosasaurus have to compete with any pliosaurs?
very early on iirc but the pliosaurs were mostly gone when the mosasaurs became dominant
from what i can tell, seems like pliosaurids died out a bit before mosasaurus itself came around. either way, there was at least some general overlap between pliosaurids and mosasaurids
yeah there was a few holdovers right up to the late cretaceous so the pliosaurs were still around just not in the numbers they were during the jurassic
So no cool Pliosaur vs Mosasaur fights
.
Well at least the sharks never gave up.
Sharks: shrugging off mass extinction events since 400 milion B.C.
I think brachauchenius existed around the same time as some Mosasaurs 🤷
Never heard of the guy, Ill go read smth about it.
Anyone got any good skeletals of it, I can only find ones from Prehistoric Wildlife
He’s about 5 meters long at his biggest
Thanks.
On the smaller side eh, yeah no cool Plesi vs Mosasaur fights, well at least not with the big mosasaurs.
David Peters
Oof
So not a good skeletal?
Brachauchenius most up-to-date reconstructions
(and yes not a good skeletal)
yes
The tail looks hilariously small, is that a pliosaur quirk?
what is this chat for
Palaeontology discussions. But I’ve just dropped in a David peters reconstruction so the accuracy part is in question 😅
Sounds like someone has a very poor grasp on the metric system
For sure
I can’t find any estimates that suggest it was that long, but it should be obvious that’s not a reliable length
forgot the censor 😔
23m Spino is based on a very bad scaling of NMC 41852, a partial humerus. It was between 65-76 cm long but was misreconstructed as 96 cm long
How big is that specimen anyway? I don't think is bigger than 13-14m, i heard spino's max size would be 15m in extremely old individuals and maybe 8,3t.
Could dinos survive in icey climates given the opportunity? With some being warm blooded and having the ability to grow feathers, could a penguin Dino exist?
Penguins are dinosaurs, and we already have numerous examples of non-avian dinosaurs living in snowy conditions. The Mesozoic rarely had proper ice but there’s no reason to think they wouldn’t be fine if they’re already accustomed to cold.
some dinosaurs did live in relatively chilly environments, although in terms of non-avian dinosaurs, i don't think many of them were on the same level as the modern antarctic - snow wasn't very common back then.
the prince creek, yixian, and nemegt formations are some examples of ecosystems that were on the chillier side and may have seen snow occasionally (prince creek probably less than yixian and nemegt iirc, and all of them still had warmer seasons)
Given enough time, likely.
Still this one is too deep. Also isn't that Megacephalosaurus instead ?
Here is what we have of Brachauchenius. The skull seems to differ in some ways but the animal isn't well diagnosticated as far as I remember.
It probably looks like megacephalosaurus given that it’s brach’s closest relative.
Yeah just don’t mind that skeletal I used… 😅
guys which type of spino u would take? balanced, speed or def?
Wrong chat
why does everyone always come to Paleochat for POT questions
A mystery as old as time
Its active
Lucky, I can't even find one fossilized shark tooth at the beach XD
Might be surprising to learn that not everyone around this part of the server actively plays PoT as much as someone in another channel.
Now paleo stuff, there you might get answers
The exact same thing happens in the isle server, I have the theory people look for the word 'chat' first and assume the 'paleo' is just a reference to POT being a dinosaur (=paleo) game
I think maybe they believe that the matchups and dino viability are dictated by how they went irl, so they ask here lel
Breh
tell that dude "unfortunately, thx to the new 'paddle-like tail' discovery, spino length got nerfed from 23 meters to 13-14 meters"
Spino was never 23 meters
Exactly
Ik now about the messed up estimate that gave a 23m length, and obviously that estimate was pure bull
i
Who remembers when this was considered accurate, it kinda is… but that face is horrible.
Puke colored Rex.
ironically has almost as many problems as the JP one
Ahhh, much better…
lacking lips, lacking the pterygoid muscles, arms not nearly muscular enough, shoulders too far forward, toes weirdly rotated, skull is asymmetrical so the eyes are lopsided, not enough binocular vision
Has feathers tho so its good
But the feathers look weird.
Beautiful
Also has a problem that one dunnit
Not fat enough of whatever
it’s a little too fat afaik
there’s an issue on the chest but I forgot exactly what it was, the same issue is on the Prehistoric Planet Hank
Idk if hank had it but I believe the issue was that it is based on a skeletal mount with backwards gastralia, resulting in a deep torso, ie the chonk
The snout looks a bit too… wide maybe
It also looks smooth, maybe too smooth, but young rexes probably had feathers, which probably left the skin smooth-ish, and like a crocodile, the skin might’ve cracked as it got older, idk. :p
Hank is a beautiful T.rex who just wanted to prehistoric grill his way to paleo-media.
it's fat
it never be ballin
It wouldn't have been like a crocodile.

improved my tylo, how does this new one look accuracy wise?
ew
who thought that was a good idea
I’m not being rude, but it looks like it has fat rolls lol
it looks like a childs toy im sorry
Oh ye lol it looks like one lol
i dont mean to be mean to the creator about it
iirc it's going to be a 3d printed articulated figure, which is why it looks like that; it's built to move
kk
as someone with the limp articulated figures that many jointed tail looks incredibly satisfying to me
Looks better from an accuracy standpoint! Still an amazing piece in general artwise, you are talented 
(Allegedly) A Spinosaurus tooth embedded in Carcharodontosaurus vertebra
Yikes, bad day for the carch.
I’d pay millions to see that happen
That's likely fake lol
Why?
Private fossil
a lot of fossils from that region are fakes so there is reason to be wary as well
The bite marks also look like someone carved them in with a random stone or knife 💀
Sad
Unfortunately it was auctioned off to private buyer so no one's been able to study it
you mean spinosaurus couldn't just bite around the whole vertebrae?
It's unfortunate but yeah, a lot of "fossils" from the Negmet and Kem Kem that end up in collections are either fakes or illegally poached
i would be very interested to see how spinosaurus would need to bite carch in order to get a tooth lodged into that specific part of the vertebra
That too, it's not an easy spot to get to
in reality, if it were a real fossil, it likely would occur from scavenging 
Unless the animal was already dead at the time of tooth breaking
Keep in mind, carchar verts are usually buried in a lot of muscle (all of em have a small hump, Acro just took it to an extreme), so if the tooth was buried in that deep, either
A) Spinosaurus has a stronger bite than T. rex
B) Scavenging
C) It killed it and ate it, somehow.
spinosaurus gave carch some homeopathic medicine to cure his cough and ended up giving him heavy metal poisoning, cured the cough at least tho 
Ehh even then the bone should show signs of healing as your processes don't fully stop until like, a few days after you die. Although that would require analysis and since I doubt the fossil is even real and the fact it's in a collection I doubt that'll ever happen
Private collections are where specimens go to die
if spinosaurus was scavenging bone, i dont think the carch was very fresh 
Nah, gigachad Spoon piledrived it and ate it.
"Oh man, what a lovely day to be a Carcharodontosaurus in the Kem Kem Beds."
"Wait, what's that? IT'S SPINOSAURUS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!"
especially if it had to bite down hard enough to not just dislodge a tooth, but embed it in the carch's vertebra
everyone talking about the tooth being embedded in a weird place but i'm pretty sure the part that is going inside the vertebra is the root. this tooth is backwards
actually hold on. how would any of it get fossilized if it was still exposed to large scavengers after all the meat had decayed/been eaten? wouldn't that be incredibly rare, since scavengers and microbes would be picking at it and breaking it down?
This
EVIDENCE OF DINOSAURS GROWING TEETH IN THEIR SPINES?!?!?!?! (REAL) (NOT CLICKBAIT)
spinosaurus took it and sank it in the dinosaur version of those hippo mud puddles 
Inb4 this is one of those tumors that grows teeth
tl;dr fossil almost 100% fake
The individual fossils themselves may be real, but the bite is bogus
unfortunately, rich fossil collectors have no critical thinking
ACTUALLY could the tooth have just lodged there randomly?
to explain, i have an alligator vertebrae that had a snail shell stuck inside of it, the snail likely either crawled in there and died, or the shell got pushed inside by the elements, it wasn't super stuck though so im thinking the latter
maybe a similar thing could've happened? 
(nah def fake)
does anyone know pycnonemosaurus nevesi weight and size?
10 meters and 4ish tons
Alr
Any skeletals u have?
The only proper specimen we have is an immature subadult individual, which is 9 meters and 2.5 tons, but scaling up just slightly (in combination with fragmentary potentially adult pycno remains) give the size I stated
Proof?
OH CRAP, u right
Was posted 11 mins ago
There better be a spinosaurus in there or imma riot
66 million years ago is closer than you think. Prehistoric Planet returns May 22 on Apple TV+ https://apple.co/_Prehistoric
Prehistoric Planet, from executive producers Jon Favreau and Mike Gunton, and narrated by Sir David Attenborough, combines award-winning wildlife filmmaking, the latest paleontology learnings and state-of-the-art technolo...
Same time span as the last one, so no Spino
Probably not hesperonis itself. It’s too late in time for it I think.
RAHHH!😭😭😭
Lol
Mom can we have concavenator we have concavenator at home concavenator at home XD
Did the fangs of Smilodon make eating more difficult?
Eh they coped fine.
Ey they seemed to have made rex the correct body mass
important to remember that smilodons fangs were not poked out that bad, it could still fully open its mouth and eat
modern big cats don't really use their canines to eat, they chew with the sides of their mouths. same for smilodon
it did make it more difficult to get its mouth around prey for a kill though, hence why Smilodon's jaws needed to open an insane amount compared to other cats
nvm 😦
The moment they add spinosaurus it'll completely change that's why they're probably not gonna add it XD
😭
few folks take into account the slippage, see that dark area on the tooth? that would not be visible, it would be in the skull
tbh spinosaurus is an F U from god to paleontologists
i've seen the teaser and.....
are there any possibilities for rex vs quetz?
so its fangs, while still big, were not that much bigger than species like clouded leopards, so it didn't need to do anything unique to feed or hunt outside of its jaws opening wider
more like a standoff, rex one shots quetz
That's not even a fair fight by far
The best fight after male lion vs jackal.
Looks like theres a corpse in the back aswell so prob a standoff
looks like a sauropod
(i theorized it) an alamo corpse
They do show a bit
that's an azhdarchidae pterosaur not hesperonis
also i theorized it as a:
A) Hatzegopteryx
B) Arambourginia
C) Cryodrakon
but i'll go onto hatz by now
cat canines go way, way back into the skull, most sabertooth cat depictions dont account for the slippage so they end up up to 2x too long 
The picture is not related at all to what i said about hesperornis
Also thats hatz because we know how hatz already looked in the show in the previous season
As well as quetz
wait
yeah, as you said, literally half of the tooth is meant to be deep in the skull - the areas that've been pushed out to make room for the roots of smilodon's canines are clearly visible on the skulls, even
YAY!
it seems we’ll be getting more in-depth stuff on creatures already shown and also even more creatures
@white matrix Please do not encourage or mention participation in illegal activities, refer to our #rules.
🫨
that babies are so cute bro i cant
Halzkaraptor looks very nice, the new season looks very fun.
https://youtu.be/7ci0OHJVWm4 OHHHH MY GOD
A New season of Prehistoric Planet is just around the corner! In this trailer we get a glimpse of the life we are going to expect to see!
🦫 Join The Discord Here: https://discord.com/invite/thegamingbeavercorner
🦫GamingBeaver Energy Drink Choice: https://advanced.gg/?ref=TheGamingBeaver (Code Beaver for 10% off)
Watch more TheGamingBeaver:
🦖 P...
May 22
Yesssiiiiirrr B)
it is hatze, same model as season 1
The hesperonis is at 0:32. Interesting they're sticking with hatzegopteryx in what appears to be the Javelina formation
No? It’s just a stretch of beach.
When it's facing off with the Tyrannosaurus near the sauropod, presumable Alamosaurus, corpse
Those are Quetzacoatlus
ah okay, so it has both- that makes more sense
So… new prehistoric planet teaser has launched , and a couple of Hatzeopteryxs was shown, I’m kinda even more hyped for Hatz on pot now❤️
I post this here to cuz I wana talk about what u guys think about the models used
the entire series is excellent
Yo but they made a difference between genders and I love the idea of Hatz
It's not n Hesperornis though. It's a relative sure but cannot be Hespe itself as it isn't from Maastrichtian.
Oh yeah they’re all perfect. Only the highest quality with PP. There are some issues (small Nanuqsaurus, dreadnaughtus having claws, carnotaurus osteoderms) but they’re info that’s either not published yet or wasn’t known in the years leading up to its release.
The biggest downright inaccuracies in S1 are Maastrichtian velociraptor and the out of place quetzalcoatlus.
Small nanuqsaurus could get fixed by just having larger ones here. Probably won't get that, but it's the only one that can be basically handwaved away without a model change
right it's an hesperornithid but that's a pain to type out and not in my autocorrect lol
Rapetosaurus, quetzalcoatlus vs hank, possibly tarchia and daspleto considering this takes place 80-70 mya
From the size it might just be plain old hesperornis,
too old, they're sticking in the Maastrichtian
72-66 mya
Rapeto is Maastrichtian. Quetz too and T.rex is even late Maastrichtian.
Naish has confirmed that on twitter
It looks like the same time as the first season, so late Maastrichtian ~66mya
Saw more focus on land Dino’s this time tbh from the teaser , it contains many shots , can I post the link here?
dinosaurs
The Spinosaurus is the biggest carnivore ever recorded that we know of. This mammoth dinosaur measures 50 feet in length and weighed 7 ½ tons meaning it trumps even the biggest carnivorous dinosaurs in the size stakes. It is larger than the Giganotosaurus and the infamous Tyrannosaurus Rex! wod win
spoon got a slight length nerf, similar bulk at like 45 feet and both rex and giga are heavier at 10-11 tons vs spoons 6-7
Rex was the biggest carnivore lol.
Prehistor Planet 2 lets goo
Any notable late maastrichtian spinosaurids? (In reference to PhP)
No
No spinosaurid survived to the Maastrichian
but what about montanaspinus
True!
Rex grumbling rn
Montanaspinus inexpectatus 
I have a personal theory that eastern north america is overrun with spinosaurids like spinosaurus just to taunt us
Spinosaurus isn’t even in the top 5 largest theropods anymore lmao
Longest still tho
It’s not?
Tyrannosaurus, Giganotosaurus, Mapusaurus, Deinocheirus, and Therizinosaurus are all larger
Theri is larger?
Theri no it’s been downsized
Not by much but it is
No, it is not. It's spine does a lot of it's height, but it does not make it a large theropod. It is just longer, so in 1 spino vs 1 rex match up, rex wins.
Nobody was talking about in a fight anyway
I meant in comparisons. Not a fight fight match up lol.
pretty sure theri is slightly heavier rn, but duck giga map and rexy are all fatter most certainly rn
Where?
Toxic iirc it lost like 2t
I’d just like to see something physical that verifies it
What’s spino current weight
3
Could I get an invite to that? In DMs?
3 tons?
Spino’s 7.5 tons
no that was a joke response idk off hand
Mapu weight?
Giga and Mapu are around 9 tons
How much do all of these weigh
Tyrannosaurus is 10 tons, mapu and giga are 9 tons, Deinocheirus is over 8, Theri’s 5.5 apparently
duck is like 7-8 tons, map 9, giga is in the 9-10 zone and rex 9-11 zone from my knowledge on it, and theri was 7. something tons but might be smaller now seeing that
What happened to T. chubutensis?
Tyrannotitan’s around 7 or 7.5 tons iirc?
Giga was recently re scaled the largest individual being the dentary at 10.5-10.8t
Dentary estimates are trash tho
We were able to get better estimates with pictures by darkinx
It clear that the dentary individual is much larger
I’m gonna ignore mapu from now on to call spino 3rd largest carnivorous Dino ever
But even without Mapu, it's not the third 
Doesn't TTT take that place if we ignore Mapu
You forget that deino is 8.3t but ok
you could always still call it the longest without ignoring several animals
Wait whats mapus size estimates?
8.8t-9t
A yeah I forgot about mr gator
Deinocheirus*
not the gator, the D U C K, the gator is even fatter
Deinonychus*
||the 15 ton Deinocherius||
Gator(Deino) is the largest predatory archosaur iirc
Damn it I forgot duck ate fish
Probably but i haven’t finished the musculature diagram
disgusting
to be fair that requires a unhealthily obese one vs these being just.....there
Oh well spino will always my fav big boy megatherapod


gators is not dinosaurs
Oh yeah
Btw if you guys are interested in learning how much larger is the dentary compared to the other individual (it was scaled by dan and random) but this comparison is by Dan
very cool comparison
Hoping the new carch info i heard about will give us an upsize when described
Also if theri is 5.5 tons who takes the 5th slot in largest therapods?
The fifth biggest theropod
Ah yes fifthosaurus thank u
Snax prob
please don't call it that 
Too late, can't wait to talk about my new favorite dinosaur Fifthosaurus cheloniformis
Too bad its not a dinosaur or a therapod
deinocheirus
Oh, I'm dumb ignore me. Got too used to a server I'm on calling it chierus because of deinosuchus
Here’s a copy of my personal footnotes for top 10 theropod sizes.
- Tyrannosaurus (12m, 10 tons)
2+3. Giganotosaurus & Mapusaurus (13m, 9 tons) - Deinocheirus (12m, 8.5 tons)
5 + 6. Spinosaurus (14m, 7.5 tons), Tyrannotitan (12m, 7.5 tons) - Carcharodontosaurus (12m, 7 tons)
- Saurophagonax (13m, 6.5 tons)
9, 10, + 11. Acrocanthosaurus (12m, 5.5 tons), Therizinosaurus (9m, 5.5 tons), Tarbosaurus (11m, 5.5 tons)
I’m sorry deino does not mean duck duck is duck
And deino is big alligator
The sauro is actually 11.6m
Oh also i forgot big zhuchengtyrannus
What’s that tonnage difference between T proriger and M hoffmanni?
Awesome ty
No
That sauro size is from the composite isn’t it? Also not considering zucheng because depending on what you follow your sizes can range from smaller than daspleto to larger than tarbo.
Yes
A lot.
T.proriger is a Tylosaurus specie. Tylosaurus is defined by its very triangular head shape, renforced rostrum, round shaped flipper and very numerous caudal vertebrae. It also is much shallower than M.hoffmani but is known to have reached greater sizes.
M.hoffmani lack this renforced rostrum, the head is less of a triangle but still very lizard like, the flippers are less broader and shaped similarly to dolphins, it has a much deeper and wider body, it's tail is less elongated according to a more advanced swimming style than Tylosaurus.
There are other characteristics that differentiate both animals but I gave you the major lines and what most people would notice.
tonnage. as in, difference in tons
Interesting I was could’ve sworn M hoffmannii was a bulkier animal but I’ve always gotten some contrarian information.
Still helpful difference description though
The bigger tylos were like 18+ tons iirc?
That depends on the size of Brocker, which is up in the air atm. Not counting him tylo probably didn’t exceed 10 tons given that’s the size of the largest Mosasaurus, which is the proportionally heftier animal.
I thought Tylo was the bigger in general one iirc?
Unless Bonker changed that, probably not.
Who named the specimen ‘bonker’ lol?
Bonker bonked bunker you see
There are mysteries in the universe we were never meant to solve 
The funny thing is there is another tylosaurus specimen that’s named Bunker. Took me a while to realize Bunker and Bonker were different tylosaurs and not people making typos.
Which are both enormous
wait so is bronker a typo or another infuriating specimen name
sauro got size buff?
I think typo but I like to think there is a 3rd giant tylosaurus with a similar name
we all forgot banker as well, making lots of money working at wells fargo
Of course, Binker too
Bonker Tylo with the Backer skin
bonker backed bunker with a bonk, bonking banker who backed a backer bonker bonking bunker
Would baby dromeasaurids be covered in downy feathers when they were young?
or were they just lookalikes of their parents with fully developed feathers
I don't think any feathered animals are born with fully formed feathers.
So would they have looked similar to eagle chicks?
I'd imagine so.
New study on marine reptile locomotion
https://phys.org/news/2023-04-paleobiologists-reveal-diverse-techniques-ancient.amp
Saving
the rex vs quetz
are there any possibilities for rex & quetz to met each other?
I mean yeah quetz could fly hella far
is scotty the trex a canadian?
yes
damnit he was right
I wonder if Scotty likes maple syrup
Of course I was
Does kentro have the ability to gallop irl?
No. Too stiff.
true galloping is a hard thing for a skeleton to accomplish
Stegosaurs are very heavily built animals despite the lack of armor like ankylosaurs.
Among stegosaurs, Kentro is pretty flexible tho
Nanotyrannus
Does any1 have metriacanthosaurus size and concavenator sizes?
i only have the concavenator one
Skeletal credit: randomdinos on deviantart
big appreciation for him/her
anyway
first spino, then dunkle, now edmonto
Thx
why is edmonto trending lol
dont know but let me remind you an albertosaurine can outrun you
unless youre Usain Bolt
I dont need to outrun the albertosaurine, I just need to outrun my friends.
So, fun fact; Dinosaurs, as many of you know already, are divided into brid- and lizard-hipped. However, modern birds are not bird-hipped, as they evolved from lizard-hipped dinosaurs.
Funny
wait what
uhhhh yeah but birds do have bird hips cause yknow they are birds
ornithischians and birds just convergently evolved the same similar hips
Arent they lizard hips? Thats how they are seperated iirc, lizard hips vs bird hips
birds are in saurischia but they do not have the same hip structure as the rest of saurischia
birds are bird-hipped but they're lizard-hipped dinosaurs. hope this helps
considered birds are theropod & theropod are saurischian dinos
yeah
it's my sister
she asked me "can dinosaurs get sick? is there any fossil evidence?"
what should i answer with?
thank you & sorry for the disturbance 🙏
They can, as for fossil evidence, there are a lot of fossilised infections of dinos, so if they count we definitely have.
Anyone else see the new Pachy screencap for Prehistoric Planet?
Weren’t there also some with cancers specifically
there's even evidence of dinosaurs suffering from parasites their modern-day descendants have to deal with, such as trich/frounce/canker
Yes, I love the colours
There is fossil evidence if a sauropod having a severe respiratory infection
We also have several specimens of extinct animals showing infections and cancer
Treat themselves? Probably as much as modern animals, so probably licking their wounds and washing them to try and avoid infection, I dont think much more.
Apple TV account has been deleting any mention of Edmontosaurus on the Prehistoric Planet teaser
Why lol, edmont was in the fist season?
We dunno
somehow
apple tv is having a fear of edmonto "edmontophobia"
Edmonton is barley scary infact it has a great water-park that's right beside a recenter with a pool there's also good restaurants nice scenery etc. as a Canadian the only thing you should fear there is the Canadian geese. Even tho I may not be from Edmonton it still is a nice place.
They're still technically right, as theropods are lizard-hipped dinosaurs :p
Ye but they aint bird-hipped dinosaurs I was explaining to them that bird-hipped dinosaurs are called bird-hipped because there hips are closely if not the same shape as a birds hips
I said technically they are because theropods = birds, theropods = lizard-hipped, birds ~ lizard-hipped dinosaurs, it's weird
I know but the therapodic dinosaurs are still non-avian so that is kinda irrelevant well besides archaeopteryx and maybe microraptor
No, but ok, it's too early for this 
Tell that to someone with insomnia
Ok sorry
People on other servers are saying P. Spinifer (aka stygi)
just ends on a dude scarfing down bugs, but yay more crackheads in the media
...how does that break the rules making a joke related to paleo subjects
Because you said c head and the devs go after you even if you something as little as d i m w i t so I'm giving a warning because any language that's ''offensive'' is considered rule breaking
dunno what happened on that but i'm just making a joke about the pachy/stiggy( and its moreso the mods) anyways, bones
Yea lmao, you called someone a dimwit, they're just taking note of Pachys in media, very different
I just got in trouble for saying a minor work such as d i m w i t
infact in another disco I was stating that their stygimoloch's as a joke so people study/gain the knowledge that the stygi is a theoretical juvi/sub adult of a pachy
???
Anyways, Stygi is a separate species of Pachy, but the current specimens we have described are juveniles, so Ig they're technically right?
that's what I'm trying to say but it is infact agreed upon that stygi is a juvi and or sub-adult of a pachy so it's technically not a sperate genus anymore
anyways getting more babies, prolly more herding showcases, dude just hoovering bugs up, more swimmy bois and tall thin man staring at fat mega fauna
Not entirely true, its more complex than this
The specimen of spinifer is agreed to be juvenile/not fully grown, but it is not pachycephalosaurus wyomingensis
There is still an ongoing debate on if spinifer is pachycephalosaurus(P. spinifer) or if stygimoloch is still a valid genus for the specimen, with evidence possibly pointing towards stygimoloch remaining valid
Dracorex, however, 100% invalid
AFAIK P. spinifer is all but done so I doubt Stygi will ever make a comeback
Last i heard stygi was being discussed, likely a "wait for the paper" situation 
Eh, I have doubts Stygi will ever be revived 
This spinifer guy took its place?
Essentially Stygimoloch spinifer was lumped into Pachy, making it P. spinifer
So, its just a sub species like the pot stygi?
Not sub-species, just a species
So a species of Pachy, I mix them up, I forget that the second name decides species not subspecies, thats the third iirc
Yarp
Yeah, tbh its just pedantics, the main thing mentioned is spinifer is geologically younger than wyomingensis and also wyomingensis looks noticably differentbat that lifestage than spinifer
In either case, spinifer is distinct from wyomingensis, its just a matter of how distinct 
Ima still call it stygi.
Don't, it causes an incredible amount of confusion
aight ima call it stiggy then

I feel like cf needs to be used more in paleontology
Confer, "compared to", used to basically say "its likely this but more info needed"
crazy fields, where they just use the bones like a pillow fight and whichever doesn't break they get to keep, oh and guess where it takes place on
Yo the POI from the Hit Niche Game Fortnite
fortnite is one of the least niche things ever, but that sentence is funny so more, anyways B O N E S
Or was it Fatal Fields? Anyway, I dont care enough to search it
you drop a few dollars and it auto converts into V bucks whenever you step foot on the field
When does that come into play, when you dont know the specifics of the animal?
no it’s a spiky pachy
No, pachy is a smooth stygi
😈
its a pachy in the process of balding, draco has a full head of spikes seeing its young, old man pachy is bald and stiggy is in the middle stage
Its used in literature if you dont know the genus but have a good guess(i.e. Spinosauridae cf. Suchomimus), or in a species scientific name if you are unsure of species(I.e. Pachycephalosaurus cf. Spinifer)
(None of these are true examples just showing how it works, most actual examples are insects and fish
)
Spinifer is spikier than wyomingensis, and also came after wyomingensis
So pachycephalosaurus got treatment for his baldness and was cured 
So P spinifer is just the last species of pachy, with wyomingensis being the more notable but older species, and the previously described stygi was a young growth stage of spinifer and is not its own genus nor is it a growth stage of wyomingensis?
I dont want to be that guy, but, look in the mirror lel
the good ending
That is the current thinking, though there is debate on if spinifer is Stygimoloch still or if it is pachycephalosaurus proper, its really just pedantics at that point though
Also Dracorex is a juvenile spinifer
RIP Draco, invalid to science but not to us.
L Draco imagine being an invalid genus
Hmmm gonna have to consult with the man David peters on this. (Satire)
I wanna see David Peters reconstruction of spino.
Spinosaurus doesn’t exist, it’s actually a pterosaur - David peters probably
Spinosaurus is a derived syngnathid
So male spino got pregnant, got it
And if you call it a spinifer, you can be correct on either outcome 😈
No Spinosaurus is a F U from god
im very very late. but it depends what we mean by treatment here
complex medicine? No.
but some animals do treat illnesses in a sense; rubbing ants on their feathers to get rid of lice, eating poisonous plants to rid themselves of intestinal parasites, eating clay to protect themselves from toxins, etc. - whether or not it's done with any conscious knowledge of how it works is more debatable and the answer will probably vary between species, but either way, it's a thing that happens sometimes. modern medicine does have its roots in natural remedies, after all.
(NOTE: i dunno how widespread the complex end of this thing is, although i'm fairly confident the simpler end is pretty common, as many animals will bathe in water, mud, sand, or otherwise to rid themselves of parasites (and/or to keep cool, in the case of mud and water). take it not as a "yeah" answer, but as a "depending on how complex we're talking, which dinosaur, and which illness... maybe?")
Dinosaur with a medical phd.
dinosaur doctorate: "if ate bad thing, uneat"
wise words
In the case of triceratops horn laceration, submit ur flesh for consumption
has anyone considered the idea of bacteria growing in a broken Triceratops horn, causing whatever the trike slightly scrapes to have an infected wound?
probably wouldn't be good for the trike either tbh, but it's an interesting concept
Well if a Triceratops had a broken horn with an active infection, its body is going to be working to repair that damage just like any other injury. Otherwise there's painful inflammation and the risk of infection spreading, blood toxicity, & death
yeah, if it's broken down to or past the bone, that's A Problem for the animal, to put it lightly (and even if it's not, iirc that can still cause some issues? keratin isn't exactly living matter, but it's still not great to have a bunch of bacteria in there i think)
also if nonavian immune systems were anything like avian immune systems, oof they were likely near immortal until they got a protozoan in their throat 
For sure can still cause problems, the horns were full of blood vessels. An ingrown toenail can result in something like a keratin infection and it's no fun, can cause big mobility issues & blood vessel inflammation- all the bad stuff untreated
infection in the keratin will seep to the bone and cause an absess between the keratin and the bone, not very fun
and because ceratopsian horns are part of their sinuses, you get an infection there and now you got an URI
oof, yikes
thank you both for confirming though 
AND species like triceratops have their sinuses going into the horn a bit
We know from lesions on their skulls that this kind of thing was something they dealt with
so if the horn breaks or cracks from day to day wear n tear, instant, permanent sinus infection
Do you have a chart because I’m having trouble imagining sinuses in the brow horns
lemme see if i can find one, but its not that weird tbh
Just picture looking straight up into the nostril
basically as the horn core grows upwards the sinus follows it up, its most noticable in the brow horns
Source please because I’ve never heard of that
i love learning about the weird hacks dinosaurs did to make their anatomy work
That’s not in the horn 💀
it doesn't go up the entire horn lol, it grows into the base
Yea no, not far enough to warrant a break being fatal
It's full of blood vessels, the infection could quickly reach it
i don't think anyone was making the claim that it'd be fatal, just Really Bad
i never said fatal, just a chronic infection if it every cracks or breaks
& I just said there'd be an immune response of some kind
though if nonavians were like avians, anything respiratory and sinus related can be very dangerous
Is it worse than in other groups?
Well, issue is, we have a couple trike horns that are snapped off and afaik, none show signs of major infection
They're calloused iirc, which is preventative for infection
fragile lungs and airsacs make avians extremely prone to mortality from even a minor respiratory infection
Ah well airsacs wouldn't be a problem for triceratops at least
chronic infection =/= major infection, you can live a relatively normal life with a mild case of chronic bronchitis thats left untreated, you will jsut cough and hack up mucus, while also having a less robust immune system
in bovines we see similar infections all the time, often not fatal, but present and, without surgery and outside care, it will never go away and the animal will be in constant discomfort and pain for the rest of its days
yeh, birds have a very optimized (for want of a better word) respiratory system, but they rely on it working properly. if it doesn't, Well.
iirc pet birds can quite quickly go from sneezing a bit to being on death's doorstep if not treated quickly
birds when you spray fabreeze on the other side of the house: 
birds when you use a non-stick pan within 10 meters of them, also
and bovines have it worse off than ceratopsians, because their sinus goes up the entire bone core 
also broken horns are not pretty, they are bloody and they are painful 
i looked so y'all dont have to
A triceratops with a broken horn is having a very bad day, but perhaps the evidence we have of them surviving those kinds of traumas indicates a powerful immune system in the species or group in general
indeed 
Bonus shot of the supracranial sinus showing how it hangs out just above the braincase
Screw triceratops, what about the thing that the rest of the horn is stuck in (in the case of it being predation related)
Well one of the known healed brow horn injuries was very likely inflicted by a T. rex attack, as in the rex broke it off
No arg here just a discussion
btw the reason why I asked the original question is because of this model, which has lore that the dudes horn broke and hosts some bacteria that kills/causes an infection with the slightest scratch, but the animal isn’t harmed due to it
bacteria that causes infection needs something to feed on or it goes dormant
Yeah works in mouths because they're full of goop
so unless the trike has a wound the bacteria is feeding on(aka trike has infection) its horn is p much as harmful as any other trike horn
which, ceratopsians were prob kinda grimey and dirty
it says that due to a previous fight, there’s rotting flesh in the horn from a Tyrannosaurus thus what the bacteria is from
so i wouldn't recommend getting impaled by a triceratops and then not washing it with a disinfectant
At least we know the tyrannosaurus definitely died
technically would work...but only for like a week max before the flesh was decayed and washed/worked out
constant fighting (that got stuck in the horn) would allow for the bacteria to stay, correct?
probably
the odds of it working through are slim to none but technically possible
it'd actually have a bigger risk of spreading viruses (think using random used needles, good way to get fun bloodborne infections like HIV) than giving a bacterial infection 
oo
I respect the creativity and it's a gorgeous model, from a realism perspective it is quite far fetched. Kind of overkill too, I mean the horn is bad enough probably lol
the idea of the slightest scratch then becoming infected is kind of a funny image too, Triceratops just lightly scratching stuff
Yeah I don’t bacterial infections are a tyrannosaurs’ biggest problem when his spike is lodged in your torso
would be really dangerous in in-fighting
The lore seems to be going for an upping of the danger factor yes, & if it worked as described it would certainly be dangerous
you spill the dudes coffee and he gives ya a virus or bacteria infection not even from his own skin, abit overkill ngl instead of making me pay for the coffee
animals aren't exactly sterile anyway, a normal wound from a triceratops horn would be decently likely to get infected by just kinda. existing
wym he cleans his horns everyday to keep em looking pretty, good reason why he gets the ( even more) expensive coffee: image
uhhh
scotty is shorter than sue but heavier than sue????
❓❓❓
my brain isn't braining rn 
it's a difference of 2 centimeters
I understand the appeal of precision but the OP comparing them to the second decimal point is a little absurd with such enormous animals
cause you can be shorter than somebody but still be multiple pounds heavier
is it like quetz & hatz case?
ahh ok mb
Shouldn't be that hard to brain. There are people taller than me that weigh less. And like gbone said, the difference is so minute that it doesn't really matter. The difference in their weight is also pretty negligible. Would only take a good lunch to put one over the other.
If I'm correct they forgot to update the site because after that was posted there was a diagram that showed 10.6 tons for rex instead of 10.4
Dinosaurs are real
Australia is not real. Never was and never will be
And that’s a fact
You’ve been lied to
How strong was sarcos bite force in tons if anyone knows?
It just doesn’t exist idk what to tell you man
Do you see Australia there? Cause I don’t
that’s exactly what someone who isn’t real would say
no way 😱
Agreed
Wow… this is… a strange debate…

Strange but true
You never did
This. I am entertained.

Australia is made up by the developers to make their secret spy backstories more plausible
Obviously
I bet their reverse spinning toilets sucked up the entire country. If you looked at the bottom of the ocean where Australia used to be... toilet...
this guys got the answers
what is deinonychus most up-to-date length & weight?
3.2-3.7 meters and 70-100 kg
mega thank you 🫡
I initially read this as 32-37 metres.
Deinonychus is both the longest and skinniest vertebrate, nice
ok another question
any idea for dasp and albert's most up-to-date weight?
To my knowledge it’s around 3 metric tons for the largest Daspletosaurus, and 2.5 for the largest albertosaurus. I could be wrong about the weight but I do know they were proportionally similar in terms of height and length.
thx for the help man
very appreciated🫡
I would assume their mass wouldn't be too different from each other since they do share similar proportions to an extent, as well as being overall similar in width, height and length.
What is maip macrothoax up to date weight?
3 tons
are u sure? Cuz ive seen ppl say 4 tons or 5 tons or 3.5 tons etc
I'm sure. It surprised me as well how light it is for a 10 meter theropod but that's what the most up-to-date estimate came out as.
To be fair it's 3.something, not quite 4 tonnes but it's higher than a flat 3
Alright. Can i have like proof or something. I wanna prove em wrong lmao
Okay
Daspletosaurus is more heavily built
Both seem to be very similar in robustness and width.
Skeletals aren’t proportionally accurate to each other. Daspletosaurus T is a bulkier animal
the shadow of death that kills with cold wind
loses to grizzly bear
Tyrannosaurus had great bulk and a tough hide, but it was a slow moving and slow thinking creature, compared to the agile grizzly with it's cunning and long-lasting energy, it might well win
the bear's confidence is nothing short of admirable
Thank
its almost 4 tonnes for dasp and around 3.1 tonnes for albertosaurus
Jeez the estimates have gotten huge
Isnt there an 11m dasp discovered too? Thats probably the 4 ton one.
What about this one?
thats pete III
Of ye me forgor the name. So the 4 ton estimate is for the average dasp then?
thats the bigger side average is somewhere near 3 tonnes
So Pete then should be around 4 tons or over.
likely larger
Bro did not just say Rex was a slow thinker 💀
Its an old meme
Oooo
Oh yeah I remember these debates
Looks very nice, WAAY better then that Stephen Fry thing that happened.
is that what I think it is
GRASS?
It’s official, life on our planet sucks smh
mm, grass, my favourite jurassic plant
Based grass.
grass is highly offensive, -10 documentary accuracy points for not ripping out all the grass in the picture and replacing it with ferns
Grass came in the Cretaceous right?
Shame the diplo is too jp-esc
yeah but even then wasn’t in fields like that (for most of the time) so it thereby sucks
yeah, early-to-mid cretaceous - took a while to get that common too, iirc
never watching life on our planet, 0/10
Timetravelling diplo spotted then
diplo the dimension hopper
I mean. Could they have feasibly filmed at any real world location that actually looked like their paleo-environment?
well yes
I really like that diplo design tbh, wished it was more colorful, but big animals are usually boring grey, at least the mammal ones
they coulda just filmed in a place with no grass and conifer trees, wouldn’t be exact but it’s closer
also I’m joking abt not watching it, i don’t even care about the grass 
Where on earth could you find a semi-arid environment with coniferous plants exclusively??
The diplo's legs are way too chunky
idk figure it out
maybe in the imaginary Australia
Emphasis on imaginary
i care a little about the grass but it's not exactly the end of the world, just a bit jarring.
im a paid actor
Obviously
anyways, does anyone know camarasaurus weight and size?
big
Brachi is the best sauropod anyway, diplo is a close second tho.
Depending on the species, 17m and 19 tons
Alright, is that from the biggest species?
Nah megalodon is the beast sauropod Quinkana is a close second
tbh im still waiting for a documentary that manages to accomplish a CGI environment
I’ve seen some pretty impressive works, curious how it’d work out with dinosaurs
Technically it’s giraffatitan
Nuh uh
Nah theyre different, close but different, unless they changed it very recently.
Brachiosaurus brancai = giraffatitan
So technically, giraffatitan is brachi not the other way around.
technically the species everyone associated as being brachiosaurus is actually giraffatitan and nobody knows about the actual species of brachiosaurus altithorax
Even if it ends up as smth else, brachi will probably end up as their name again seeing brachi is old.
yeah but large fields of grass that we see today didnt appear until the cenozoic
brachi is older than it therefore giraffatitan is brachiosaurus
I dunno what’s so confusing
If a species is older than another and proved to be the same thing, then the older species becomes the name for them both
But giraffatitan and brachiosaurus are not species they are genera
yes it applies to that as well afaik
Yeah, thats what happened to stygi and laten sadly
let me put this in simple terms
you have insert genera 1 and insert genera 2. If insert genera 1 is older than insert genera 2, then 2 takes the name of 1, and vise versa
They are two distinct genera, why is one being referred to by the other’s genera?
you just said brachiosaurus isn’t distinct
Nobody said that.
.
people referring to it as brachiosaurus are correct in that case
as it’s older
That comment says that brancai is not a valid species and is in fact it’s own genus. Brachiosaurus still has a species called altithorax, but that’s not the animal most people are referring to when they say brachiosaurus
ah Alr I understand
Slower than a bear
Rex was a slow thinker
No it was not lol
Anyone know the sizes of the large carchs?
Both animals here are around similar height and length (Sure, Albertosaurus is ~9m while the Daspletosaurus specimen here is 60cm longer). Albertosaurus being estimated to be around ~3266kg and Daspletosaurus being estimated to be around ~3000-3300kg.
There’s a lot of them
So it is safe to say they are both similar in "bulk" to each other proportionally.
proof?
I met one in college and he was good at baseball
fool, baseball is a sport for slow thinkers
He was a master at hitting fastballs
Mammals: ∞/Reptiles: 0
(i keep an unbiased and up to date track of how much better each clade is)
Imagine not being a mammal tho
i cant imagine that
honestly i think it's good for the chat to have a resident mammal-liker. keeps things fresh
Indeed
Imagine not being a homo sapien tho
The 2% Neanderthal in me is screaming rn
Idk what to tell ya daspletosaurus Torosus is Like almost a ton heavier
Is this reffering to the ~4000kg specimen of Daspletosaurus?
The Pete specimen I believe yes
So based on the information I have provided you, and your knowledge on the mass of "Pete iii", what do you think about Daspletosaurus size in comparison to Albertosaurus?
Giga is like 8.7-9.7tons possibly 10.4( take that with a grain of salt )
TTT is 7.4-7.5tons
Carcharo is 7 - 8tons ( he's kinda a mess so anywhere between there )
And Acro is about 5.7-5.8 tons
where's mapu-
realizes mapu weight is undescribed
nvm
Mapu probably weighs about as much as the Giga holotype, 8.7t
A good comparative is gorgosaurus, which lived alongside daspletosaurus. You can compare their morphology and then get an accurate estimate on their respective “bulk”. Gorgosaurus and albertosaurus are sister taxon so it’s pretty easy to compare them as well. Anyway when comparing Daspletosaurus with gorgosaurus you’ll find that the latter is generally leaner in it’s proportions, especially visually apparent in the caudal vertebrae and the skull. So naturally despite being the same length and similar heights, daspletosaurus on average was a bit larger than gorgosaurus, and by extension albertosaurus. Infact I think gorgosaurus was slightly larger (than albertosaurus)?
Fooking fat
So putting it in order of weight
You have
- Giganotosaurus
- Mapusaurus
- Carcharodontosaurus
- Tyrannotitan
- Acrocanthosaurus
- Meraxes
That should be all the large lads
I compared the mass of the similar length + height specimens I posted above, and both have similar masses (9m + 3.3kg for Albertosaurus vs 9.6m + 3-3.3kg for Daspletosaurus). Similar size no? I'm not currently well versed with the length and mass of Gorgosaurus/A.libratus so I'm not sure about they compare.
If we use "Pete iii", all that will tell us is that the Daspletosaurus genus can get larger than Albertosaurus (This can change when more specimens are found). Also, we do not have a good idea on the "average" size of Daspletosaurus, as well as Albertosaurus (even with the amount of specimens we have).
did the smallest carcharodontosauridae goes into Concavenator?
Sounds like a rather dubious weight for any of the Albertosaurus specimens seeing as liberatus is definitely larger and most likely did not exceed 3 tonnes.
dunno if conca is the smallest, but it's probably one of 'em. bit of a little guy. basal type of dude
Eocarcharia?
And by average I was referring to the range of weight we estimate not a direct average size. Sorry for confusion
Its the result of a GDI of the specimen ROM 807, as seen above. I'm not sure about Gorgosaurus being larger but last time I check, both Gorgosaurus and Albertosaurus are rather similar in size.
Lajasvenator and an unnamed Brazilian carcharodontosaur are both smaller than Concavenator, however neither is fully grown, so adults may have been larger than Conc
Anyone got good giant hadrosaur size comparison?
Similar, we still think liberatus is the largest species of albertosaurine. I suppose it’s within the realm of possibility that Albertosaurus could reach a weight of around 3.3 tonnes, but the Pete specimen (which I just starting looking into lol) was probably exceeding 4 tonnes making daspletosaurus’ weight range “on average” larger than albertosaurus.
Whats ttt?
Sweet ty
TyrannoTiTan and np
Okay
I don’t think we have a good idea on the weight range on both animals just by knowing the mass of 3 specimens (there is definitely more than that for both animals).
Also we need to be careful in using the terms “weight range” and “average” together, as both terms have different meanings and imply different things.
Gorgo and Alberto are about the same weight. Daspleto was larger than both.
I’m still pretty sure the largest gorgosaurus specimen is slightly heavier than the largest Albertosaurus
It’s negligible
You mean Daspletosaurus can get larger than both.
That's what he said
He said that Daspletosaurus is larger than both, which is only true if you take the largest specimen.
That's just semantics at that point
That’s pretty much what everyone said
Let me explain what I mean through an example: what do you consider to be bigger, humans or Jaguars?
Jaguar (based on weight)
Humans. Buff people weight more than buff jaguars
Naturally? No
Yes. Case closed
stares at Pete 3 Yeah if that mount is right you have a 11m das, https://twitter.com/Mosasaurologist/status/1433827637579816962/photo/1 '
I think 10 meters is safe to assume at least
So wait is he trying to say albertosaurus is the same size as daspletosaurus still?
the largest estimate for ablerto is about 10m but even if its the same length as das, das would be a heavier built animal. Not counting that das can possibly break 10.5m in some scalings ( iirc you have alberto at like 3.2-3.4 tons to das's 4.1 )
jaguar weight can vary pretty heavily depending on the region, tbf; some of 'em average much lower than humans do
(i'm not sayin' jaguars overall have a lower or higher average weight than humans, just saying some of em can be pretty tiny)
Damn I thought jaguar’s sat around 139-ish or something on the lower end
The largest population’s the third largest cats on earth. The smallest ones are smaller than puma.
So, considering the variability between jaguar sizes, would it be correct to say that humans are bigger than jaguars?
If you’re trying to use this comparison on dinosaurs then there’s a problem with that
No
And humans and jaguars are not even close to as comparable as daspletosaurus and albertosaurus
in some regions, jaguars are around 50 kg or so, while in others the males average out to around 95 kg. extremely large males can be a bit over 150 kg
You can reliably use averages on modern animals cause we have good sample sizes for them. With dinosaurs, and most extinct life for that matter, we don’t. Only exception I can really think of is ice age fauna and some dinosaurs like microraptor where you got dozens to hundreds of specimens. Using largest is just easier and more consistent all round for dinosaurs.
pteranodon with its 1000s of specimens that let us determine it had sexual dimorphism
Yeah that’s another example where you can reliably get an average, but they’re exceptions in the grand scheme of things. Most taxa only got 1 specimen to their name.
Carnotaurus and concavenator
I wonder why that fella asked for the difference anyway? At least I learned the updated high estimates for dasp and alberto🤷
to really gauge a population's size and whatnot you need 1000s of specimens from the exact timespan, something we dont get in fossils normally 
and then you have animals with massive size ranges within a locale that seem to be due to random genetics
(i.e. sailfin mollies, who have a size range of mature adult specimens of the same sex in a single population of between 2 inches and 7 inches, often these individuals are siblings too)
Certain dinosaurs also have that, like plateosaurus and allosaurus.
The largest definitive allo specimen is immature while also being bigger than other actually mature allosaurus lol.
inb4 allosaurus had chadly alpha individuals like many fish
also sizing for large theropods amuses me
everyone is so into "oh x is bigger than y" when reality is that in life, that size difference would not be noticable until you stuck both animals on a scale 
when you get into multi-ton animals, half a meter of extra length and .4 tons of extra heft does not really show
we can make it look bigger than it actually is by using 2d t-posed skeletals, which dont take into account things like slouching, neck posture, etc etc etc etc that these animals would be doing in life
i mean, in their normal posture they would have the same height as in the skeletals. that's the point
but humans don't have a built-in eye caliper, so you can't guess the height of a 1.5 story tall animal with a precision of 10-20 cm
Imagine coping over the like 100-300kg difference between Dasp, Alberto and Gorgo
@leaden vigil
Thats nuts, howd u find the correlation?
Between what
How did you find out that this was the cutout I mean.
it just matches up pretty sure, like you can tell the outline of lets say batman if he fell thru a floor face down
Veloccis video lol
I mean yeah thats fair 😂 I recognized it as I saw it I just found it interesting how the original image was found or if someones lightbulb went off as soon as they saw the cut out or smth.
I mean... if we were using America..
Lajasvenator
insert joke about the U.S not having the highest obesity rate( insert another joke about the U.S not being first for once while also toting a cannon on a mobility scooter eating Mcdonalds...per square inch of invasive species)
So I have a question about Yutyrannus does anyone know what the feathering on their for arms was like
likely just basal filamentous stage 1 feathers
oh this guy?
it's kinda cute
god the link being feathered dinosaurs had relationship, which implies unfeathered ones never get one, also cool new stuff
Amber fossils are bad 👎
The amber was ethically sourced
( no amber was harmed in the making of this study ||Maybe||)
Yeah these are from Spain. It's the amber mines in Mayanmar you gotta be aware of
THIS IS SO COOL WAHT
Does anyone know when blue sharks evolved? Literally no where I check tells me which is odd since normally I can at least find an ancestor or something
thoughts?
context?
these kinda lips for spinosaurids
I don’t think lips make much sense on some spinosaurids but this depiction is nice
if it's a trait basal to dinosaurs then they could still have them but spinosaurids could also get a bit more of a pass for liplessness than other theropods
Why do sauropods have long life expectancies
They need to have long lives to produce enough young to offset natural losses, since the vast majority of sauropods die before reaching adulthood
Ok
big animals also have really good dna repair mechanisms in place so that they don't get riddled with cancer, long lifespan tends to come as a side effect of that
we don't fully understand how it works yet we just know it happens and helps cause a long lifespan
I recall seeing some joke drawing of how featherless raptor depictions were actually the result of them getting parasitized by feather-eating beetles or something. Funny to see this now
who is the largest avian raptors?
Spinosaurids don’t really have any other specific adaptations in their skull for liplessness. I suppose it’s possible but a little unnecessary to evolve to not have lips
Largest raptor was the haast's eagle of New Zealand that only went extinct about 600 years ago
Today it's the condor, or active hunting raptor that goes to the philippine eagle
So how do they know velociraptors had feathers? Is it a fact or educated guess?
velo itself has impressions that would be from feathers anchoring to the arm bone iirc, and there's evidence of feathers in related animals
Was there any Dino that would’ve been similar to the velos portrayed in Jurassic park?
in size, Achillobator or Utahraptor. without feathers, none
Depends what you mean
No dino had it’s arms like that for example, the raptors in jp have broken wrists
tbh jp raptors are just naked with hands built for gaming, otherwise looks pretty much the same
Poor fellows in JP - I always figured it was just for shock value to make em scarier
to be fair it was basically 100% accurate for the time, just alot changes in 30 years
it was also time. that's a 30 year old movie
It’s a fact, pretty sure there is even a velociraptor fossil with feathers preserved
Well, feather impressions or whatever
Ah, honestly I was just watching the prehistoric planet episodes on Apple TV with David Attenborough cuz I heard new season coming out in may - saw the velo and I was like “Wait a damn second”
The Velociraptors weren't that large mind you, they were basically really big Deinonychus with the name Velociraptor because it sounded more intimidating
( also pretty sure the name thing was due to confusion on fossils and no formal agreements on le names so they just slapped one on)
Don’t most theropods have some sort of feathering
What’s a theropod? A species?
no, it was just because it was more fierce sounding.
and conveniently Utahraptor was discovered not long after
idk how many theropods in general, but coelurosaurs likely have some amount of feathering
Theropods are one of the big dinosaur groups, most associated with the carnivores. T. rex, Velociraptor, but also Gallimimus and Therizinosaurus
Utahraptor sounds like he should wear a cowboy hat - might have to make a meme lol
If it's bipedal and has sharp hand claws, it's a theropod - generally works regardless if the theropod is a carnivore or not
trueeee
Last question before I hit the hay, was the brachiosaurus not the largest of that species?
of the sauropods? no. Argentinosaurus is currently the largest estimated sauropod, and dinosaur, and land animal ever.
Brach's one of the tallest, maybe the tallest, but not nearly the longest or heaviest
Perfect, I can’t wait until Friday when my family gets on and I have all this confirmed intel to lord over their JP knowledge, thanks guys lol
Okay Diogenes, slow down
Admittedly abelisaurs do break that rule, but you can't really mistake an abelisaur for any other kind of dinosaur lol
Brachiosaurus is a lovely animal
It was just a little joke
what is that second one, some sort of Pachycephalosaurid?
It has horns, it is clearly a Ceratopsian.
oh true you are right. an offshoot ghost lineage clearly
Ik, was referencing this
Pfffft
beaut
My favourite army general of prehistory
Speaking of Pachycephalosaurids, I do remember there being some similarities shared between Carnotaurus and Pachycephelosaurids.

