#paleontology
1 messages · Page 3 of 1
they're undescribed but multiple good specimens, will be a paper eventually I'm sure
Real question is who let paloeartists shrinkwrap theropod fenestrae 🤢
Paleoart evolves. Shrinkwrapping started in the 80s and got big in the 90s because before that artists wouldn't pay much attention to the anatomy, like at all, and we got all these lumpy bipedal lizard looking guys. Then Greg Paul and others came along and started building up from the skeleton, the shrink wrapping was to show anatomical detail. Now we've rightly moved beyond that but it served its purpose in its time.
I did 😈
shame
where did people get the idea that troodon was the "most intelligent dinosaur" when (iirc) we only have a fossilized tooth that might not even belong to it or something
probably the Troodontids once synonymous with it
which, ironically, Latenivenatrix recently was considered a junior synonym of Stenonychosaurus also. Both formerly Troodon
Stenonychosaurus skull material specifically was the original subject of the big brain study & the inspiration for the original dinosauroid
Is deinocheirus oversized?
it PoT? yeah prolly. whether its oversized relative to the other large animals idk but best to just throw most sizes out the window for accuracy
and if it is upscaled, idk by how much.
pretty sure duck is fine on height but longer than it should be, can't confirm though
yay theropod has lips is canon
I honestly think the same as some of the experts, we can't be 100% sure of most things about dinosaurs, paleontology is always changing, so we can't be totally taotally sure of it, but i think that's not bad, is really cool
Pretty much
You mean you agree ?
Any size estimations for the White Rock Spinosaurid?
No and how
What is the most rarely spoken dino species for you? For me, it was the megaraptor. Any expert on this dino ? Cuz I recently discovered it
The most unspeaked dino is . Stygimoloch
artic trex
Under this explanation, there are three types. These are Tyrannosaurus imperator, a robust form with two incisiform teeth; Tyrannosaurus rex, a robust form with one incisor; and Tyrannosaurus regina, a slender form with one incisor
thanx and was thinking of the feathered ones from the when dinos roamed earth series i believe
they must be furred or feathered who knows
dinosaurs were very much not furred, there's currently only one species of tyrannosaurus, and also that's a picture of nanuqsaurus
Google image searched "arctic rex" and sure enough that image was the first.
Ya that's a Nanuqsaurus
how does a radiodonts mouth work
i am very confused
did they just slurp up food or did they somehow chew their food
like WHAT
There were a few furry tyrannosaurids, notably nanuqsaurus and yutyrannus, but the vast majority of genera show a condition for scales.
Yutyrannus is not a tyrannosaurid. No tyrannosaurid has evidence of feathers (though it's likely all had them to some extent)
Uh yutyrannus is definitely in the tyrannosauroidae family. And it did definitely preserve direct evidence of feathers
Yes, tyrannosauroid, not tyrannosaurid, two very different things. I never denied it had feathers either
Typo, my mistake.
The “O” escapes me lol
Np np, it's a common error so I just wanted to make sure it was known 👍
Technically feathers are a form of scales
That’s not actually true. The structure and formation are extremely different
Nonetheless, they did evolve from scales
if you wanted to be generous, you could call it a highly deprived scale (though isn’t correct)
Wait are they not highly derived scales? I haven't looked that deeply into them but I thought that's how feathers initially evolved?
They did, but morphologically they’re quite different now. Fun fact tho, psittacosaurus’ quills are actually specialised scales
they are a derived scute, not a scale
feathers, the leg scutes of birds, and the scutes of crocodillians are the same structure
but they are different than the scales of the lepidosaurs, and definately different than mammal scales
Why would feathers be derived from scutes if non-avian dinosaurs had scales
Well I don’t know if it’s fair to call them the exact same structure, because the dna for the scutes in birds comes from feather dna while the scutes from crocs do not
the feathered alligator would like a word
also nonavian dinosaurs would have scutes like the legs of birds, ig you could call em scales but think bird leg but whole body
One can apply a bone morphogenic protein to bird scutes and they turn back into feathers. This doesn’t happen with crocs
What’s the definition of a scute
https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/35/2/417/4627828
^ the primitive feather like structure in an alligator embryo paper
With crocs, it’s quite a stretch to call the frayed scutes produced from this study, feathers
Feather-like is not feathers, what was produced is more like frayed scutes, Whereas in birds it’s a direct transition from bird scutes to full feathers as the researchers say.
In addition, the study done on the alligators only produced feather bud like structures. The experiments on chicken scutes were the ones that produced the similar structures to the ones found in coelurosaur dinosaur fossils such as sinosauropteryx
A scute is a solidified keratinous outgrowth from the skin. Mammals, birds and the other reptiles all have different ones.
I got scutes ‼️
β-keratins are only found in reptile dermis & bird feathers, so the two are more homologous than either are to mammalian skin. Feather-like is feather imo, it reminds me of differentiating between pycnofibres & feathers- I don't see it as anything more than semantics
The alligator study produced "Some morphotypes resemble filamentous appendages found in feathered dinosaur fossils, whereas others exhibit characteristics of modern avian feathers."
So they managed to get both, you can disagree with their definitions but I don't see the practical or technical advantage of doing that
was palaeophis colossaeus capable of moving on land?
If modern sea snakes are any point of reference
No
This part of the study was part explained as part of the chicken study. If you look at the alligator part, all they managed to do is generate structures that are close to feather buds.
Agreed, that reptilian scutes and bird feathers are more similar to each other than mammalian scutes, however I think the distinction is pretty significant, given that feathers have quills and these Pycnofibers do not.
Most likely not but maybe for a short span
I'm assuming it wouldn't really be able to move properly on land, but it could wriggle itself back into the water easier than most
Yeah
i mean the literal ceratosaurus might know
How did you know
how come?
just had a hunch
Didn’t think it was that obvious
Ah I see, so am I safe to assume you don't consider simple filamentous covering on stuff like sinosauropteryx to be feathers? May just be a matter of personal definitions being different rather than a technical debate
do pterosaurs' pycnofibres count as feathers?
In my opinion they do but it's not a totally settled matter, some people prefer a stricter definition. Pterosaurs also had more complex feathers than just the hairlike pycnofibers, so the view i agree with is you might as well just call them all feathers
I've been calling them feathers recently, excluding context where in I would refer to them as pycnofibers for clarification purposes
Yup that's my rule of thumb as well
is opabinia's mouth the thing at the end of its trunk? or is that just a grabber
No its under its head its like a elephant its trunk grabs its food and puts it into the mouth
!dino-list
what did silesaurs eat??
Bugs and/or plants
Yeah I say feather-like filaments or pycnofibers. Feathers makes people think penaceous branching feathers. So I usually make the distinction, especially when talking about complex gene manipulated outcomes in experiments
did giga ever live with argent?
I think it was mapusaurus, but I am no expert 🙂
nope
Giga lived with a giant titanosaur that hasn't been named yet. Js is right, mapu lived with argent
only mapu that lived with argentino
giga lived with that 'unnamed titanosaur'
Fair enough, glad we clarified
Fwiw I don't make the distinction as a way to invite the comparison, I don't necessarily see the harm in it and it's a useful precaution against BANDitry. I respect the position you're taking though, it's certainly more precise.
Have any of the unnamed specimens in the Nemegt formation received any new neotypes or general research to determine genera / species names?
alright this is gonna be weird, does anyone have apatosaurus feet pics? Preferably the front not the side, and skinned, not skeletal.
should i use a 12.4 meters long rex or 11.8 meters long rex? (left: 12.4 meters right: 11.8 meters)
(all arts credit by @tough parcel he/she are good at drawing dinos)
i see we have the same servers @pearl briar
What are you using it for? 12.4 meters is the largest rex, average rex is around 11.6 meters which is closer to 11.8
Thank you, that’s why I downscaled it. I remembered I did, but couldn’t recall why
can i use both 11.6-12.4 meters?
You could do 10.5-12.4 meters as that covers smallest and largest size
ok thx
anyway what @tough parcel rex art should i use for?
left or right
I'd go for the average tbh, but I'm iffy on you using it cause it's fairly dated in terms of my ability 
well ok
thx for ur art @tough parcel ur art is always amazing
👍
(i'll always credit you)
👍 Tysm! Very based of you
ok
time to work then
Wondering if it’s got it’s gastralia 👀
left is using the 12.4 meters rex
right is using the 11.8 meters rex
(all of this work belongs to @tough parcel a big appreciation for your beautiful work)
idk don't ask me
ask god 🙃
I plan on making a torvosaurus profile suggestion on the server I play on, is there anywhere to get reliable info
If so please send it to me please
don't ping me without knowing at all because I'll come back expecting an answer
Thanks! I respect your decision as well.
Dose anyone know if a certain hadrosaur would store water in a hump or any other way if not tell me.
Nah there are no animals that store water in humps
Camels for example use them to store fat, bison humps are pure muscle
Ok thx for telling me Ouranosaurus had me worked up 
3 - 4 tons Carcharodontosauridaes?
Siats and Chilantai are just over 4t iirc
Lumper
Oh
They're not Carcharodontosauridae are they
What is the current consensus on Carcharadontosaur spines: fat storage or muscle hump.
Eocarcharia, Sauroniops, and Kelmayisaurus (probably)
AFAIK Siats-Chilantai are in some sort of weird limbo
Muscle hump. Except Concavenator, its hump purpose is unknown (probably display?)
I thought there was the possibility that Concavenator's "hump" was akin to that of a Camel
Yeah it was most likely display
It is possible
Siats and Chilantai I personally put as close to carcharodontosauridae but not quite (whatever on earth is going on with 'neovenatorids' in general)
Eocarch and Kelmayi are 2 ish tonnes, Sauroniops is [REDACTED]
I thought they were, like, just about 3 tons
American tons maybe :L
I should've said 2.something tonnes, they may be closer to 3 tonnes than to 2
Ate too many cheeseburgers :[
how accurate was the planet dinosaur centro/das scene?
could daspleto's actually walk through hundreds of centros without getting beat up instantly?
It's largely up to the vibes tbh. Sometimes entire buffalo/bison herds will let lions/wolves run through them, sometimes they will turn around and trample then
damn
Yea, there is a lot of uncertainty of how a herbivores will react at given times
so if you a carni and you have good vibes you get a vip pass through the herd?
I think it aged oddly well, considering its now known that the majority of ceratopsids probably weren't as well defended as typically depicted.
E.g. you can have Rhinos chasing off a pack of lions, then you can have Hyenas just strolling and casually biting a one Rhino in a group of three Rhinos.
wait what?
Herbivores usually don't realize that if they all work together they would easily trump the predator, so most of the time they will just run and let predators single one out
But sometimes they do realize it
Ceratopsid horns/frills were primarily for social display rather than defense, and most barely work as defenses.
Triceratopsini was probably an exception considering their larger size allowed them to fend off predators easier, on top of the more universal appearance/shape of their horns implying a more practical purpose.
was trike a expection to that? everything in hell creek is a expection it seems
Wouldn't say most, there's only a few ceratopsids that cannot easily stab predators. But the predators would have ways around that, and predator defense wasn't their main purpose
I read about this in Whitton's blog regarding horns, but I have to ask, what is the reason of why Triceratops' frills did not have holes in them (other Triceratopsins are also large but have holes in their frills), and what is the purpose of the holes then?
The holes are for lightening the weight of the skull, allowing for a larger display surface
IMO horns were originally adapted for display, but as time went on they became useful for defense as well
question, you know how tigers and lions can crossbreed, could torosaurus and trike crossbreed?
Thats something that can't really be figured out purely from bones. That'd require detail on exactly how closely related they are that's lost.
Tigers and Lions are more closely related to each other than Torosaurus and Triceratops is
As for why Trike didn't have them, either it had some different fighting style to other ceratopsids, or the walking hydraulic press it shared its environment with has something to do with it
Is this referring to Tyrannosaurus? the walking hydraulic press
I know many speculate that the more brute-force attitude they had at interspecific interactions might've led to the lack of holes, and their use in defense in general, but idk why that'd make trike an exception there rather than triceratopsini in general.
Well, we don't know whether Eotrike had frill holes (I would guess not), which leaves Toro as the only triceratopsin without a solid frill
What if Titanoceratops was a Triceratopsin, is this being debated still or is it more likely it was a Pentaceratops relative
Maybe, maybe not.
It's debated
Because doesn't Titanoceratops have holes in its frill?
What grounds are there for titanoceratops being a triceratopsini? Like specifically?
Titano afaik doesn't live with any giant tyrannosaurs, so the holes would not have impaired it if that is the purpose of the solid frill
what ceratopsians are valid in hell creek?
Triceratops (both species) and Torosaurus
Hmm, how certain are we with the lack of holes --> associated with large Tyrannosaur presence? Because Torosaurus co-existed with Tyrannosaurus as well.
these two 
I'm not convinced about either of them.
oh, why?
Not to mention many other Ceratopsians lived with Tyrannosaurs, and while they may not have been +7000kg giants, they were large compared to the Ceratopsians while having proportionally high bite forces.
afaik aren't the specimens that people suspect being this 'nedoceratops' being just hunches by people without any literature backing, with little attention paid to what makes this supposed 'nedoceratops' a taxa in the first place?
Toro's presence shows the correlation is not exact, but since this is common in biology I don't think it discredits the idea in any way
I haven't even heard of this Tatankaceratops either
This however is a solid point, my guess is that solid frills were not strictly necessary for survival, but once they happened to appear in Trike's lineage, they were positively selected
It's a super small, supposedly adult animal (Black Hills Institute is holding it hostage last I checked)
ah, then who cares, got it
who isnt holding dinosaurs hostage
Which is supported by the fact that if rex really wanted to, it could just bite through a solid frill anyway.
But it's harder to do than a big hollow frill
may we discuss the nodasaurid that lived with tyrannosaurus?
Denversaurus?
yuh
Yea it is harder to bite through a solid frill than a hollow one.
how good did saurians denverasaurus hold up?
Golden afaik? By Saurian's standards I've always heard their ankylosaurians were exceptional.
is there any bad saurian depictions or are they all pretty good still?
I don't know if this is a good comparison, but this somewhat reminds me of how Cape Buffaloes' horns form a boss in the middle and the Forest + Asian water Buffaloes do not. Regarding the solid frill vs hollow frill in Ceratopsians.
I'm not a fan of the Tyrannosaurus in general. Dakotaraptor's entire existence also hasn't aged well.
Their Trike 
Their Denver might also be wonky, but it's Denver so no-one's cared about it in years
dakotaraptor hunting champosaurus
dakotaraptor is a better turtle than stupendemys ever will be
I say dakotaraptor's existence being questionable, not because 'har har turtle' or 'har har chimera' and more just DePalma's work in general being questionable af
you know who also is questionable? jack horner
Jesus Christ it’s been forever since I’ve been in here
yes? this matters how?
Horner's a questionable figure but he hasn't had accusations of fabricating his studies and refusing for anyone to even see his 'supposed' specimens
how many of his theories held up about the hell creek gang?
didn't david peters reconstruct yutyrannus bald??
The Saurian tyrannosaurus looks like a big chunk of salami
vomit
What in the hell
I'm not a fan of Saurian's tyrannosaur because they jumped on the featherless rex thing way too quickly.
uh let me think of jack horners theories
torosaurus and triceratops being the same
nanotyrannus is a juvie trex
stgy, draco and pachy are all growth stages
BALD BALD BALD
MY EEEEEEEEYEEEEES
Can someone elaborate on dakotaraptor’s existence being questionable? I think I’ve been in the dark about this (aside from the chimera stuff)
It is described by DePalma, who is a very controversial figure that has had accusations of fabricating his studies and refuses for anyone else to see his work, which is mighty suspicious. As far as I am concerned dakotaraptor doesn't exist unless an unrelated party is able to verify that it does.
Ah I see. It would be a shame if dakotaraptor was fabricated this entire time 
At least we have little archeroraptor and an indeterminate troodontid
I would eat acheroraptor
Chimken wimg
Looking up this Robert DePalma and he isn’t a good person I’m finding
Why are there so many weird paleontologists out there
Scientists are nerdy wierdos. Who knew?
Who let em cook?!
I call them paleophiles
Holtz and Hartman, the fuckin goats
Maybe not just weird, just insane 
Sorry for ping I forgot to turn it off
This is why I want to study fossil invertebrates rather than dinosaurs, as special as dinosaurs are to me
Having studied fossil invertebrates, at least dinosaurs make sense 😭
The Paleontologists who name extremely fragmentary fossils are insane.
But opabinia, my beloved 
You know what’s really weird? Tunicates, acorn worms.
I like shipworms
What’s the fear of small holes called again?
trypophobia? (don't post anything that'll trigger it)
What kind of invertebrates did you study?
Ostracods, one of many kinds of bean shaped crustacean
and maybe I was just bad at taxonomy but their classification seems heavily based on ...vibes
Didn’t know those existed until today ngl
Ty for enlightening me
Although Dakota is questionable, is there still evidence of a large dromaeosaurid in hell creek due to the huge claw?
The teeth and caudal vertebrae in Dakota are unquestionably dromaeosaur. But it's debated if it's a giant dromaeosaur or just like, a moderately large one
I've seen estimates from Utahraptor size all the way down to Deinonychus size for the material
iirc there are also possible Dromaeosaurid teeth that was discovered before the Dakotaraptor holotype was discovered.
theres also acheroraptor
is this accurate for a gigantopithecus blacki size?
No
no?
Gigantopithecus has been downsided significantly in recent years. Still the largest ape to exist, but is now only slightly larger than a gorilla rather than up to 3 meters tall.
is this blacki?
G. blacki is the only valid genus of Giganopithecus. The others were found to be Indopithecus instead (and even then they're smaller than blacki).
so g. giganteus is invalid?
It's Indopithecus giganteus now.
ok then
is 200-300 kg gigantopithecus is still accurate to use?
Yes
ok
so when gigantopithecus stood on its two hind legs it was 3 meters tall like this?
More like a little bit over 2
here?
Better.
again thx for the help
It stood about 290-300 cm tall
Gigantopithecus is not 3 meters tall.
Gigantopithecus Blacki stood at a nice 2.98 meters tall on Average
No it did not. Those tall estimates are largely from comparing it to australopithecines (and is largely a contributor to the bigfoot appearance popularly seen) but when actually scaled to closer related great apes, like gorillas and orangutans, you get a much shorter animal. Still the largest ape ever but not that giant.
So a gorilla sized orangutang.
I will continue to perpetuate this information as multiple reputable sources state it is 2.9 meters tall
Eh gigantopithecus being just a giant orangutan are likely exaggerated (it's comparing an aboreal animal to a terrestrial one after all) but yeah. Modern sizes come out to slightly larger than the biggest gorillas.
There's sources going as far back as the 1980s of Gigantopithecus being 20% to 25% larger than gorillas, using closely related animals like gorillas for comparison. Again, the methods of estimation matter.
what is the location of gigantopithecus?
China
southern china?
special thx to @bright veldt for the help
i presenting to you guys Gigantopithecus
(likely) the direct relative to orangutans 🦧
Monke.
All the sources share this issue
no more 3 meter tall monkey ehehehe
lmao
Azhdarchid gameplay
Did Maip Macrothorax (The Shadow of Death) can jump like the dromeosaurs?
No
Japan lied to me
RIP
do you expecting a 3 ton maip can jump?
NHKスペシャル「恐竜超世界2」の関連動画をNHKラーニングで配信中!
https://www.nhk.or.jp/learning/search/?q=恐竜&cid=dchk-yt-2303-153
2022年に発表された新種の肉食恐竜マイプ。この南米最大級の肉食恐竜が超巨大恐竜との激闘を繰り広げる。強力なカギ爪が、すべてを切り裂いていく。
【放送情報】NHKスペシャル「恐竜超世界2」
[前編]巨大恐竜の王国 ゴンドワナ大陸
NHK 総合 3月21日(火)夜 7:30~
https://www.nhk.jp/p/special/ts/2NY2QQLPM3/episode/te/RQMP6RXZXQ/?cid=dchk-yt-2303-153
[...
https://www.patreon.com/YDAW -- Details of this animal are surprisingly ambiguous, for such a famous dinosaur. Nonetheless, we can say these toys are wrong in interesting ways.
Check out our merch on Etsy: https://www.etsy.com/shop/YDAWtheShop
For more updates and paleo-related fun, follow us:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/YDAWtheShow
Faceboo...
This is the reason why I thought it could jump
Guys guys!! New carcharodontosaurid
Holy heck, 1 minute CD timer 
When you give a dinosaur documentary into the hands of anime studios
Genjutsu on this level doesn't work on me
Good point
introducing the real life jwd giga
Lol I will share this
note: it's mid fragmentary so length and weight are still on gdi testing (ig)
Source: PrimevalArtist on Twitter
but wait
here's the weird idea but likely fricked up
giga length and weight + spino length and weight=gigaspinus length and weight 
What is carnotaurus doing there 
Possible contemporary
Both were in Argentina around the same time
Is this real or just April fools thing I'm not sure whether to believe this
OMG MY NEW FAVORITE CARCHARODONTOSAUR GOT REVEALED
real😱
I’m ducking stupid I got Maip mixed up with fukuiraptor
“Substantial toe beans”
Thinking about concavenator toe beans
I love the Meraxes bit
“Its toes would’ve had substantial beans”
Giga toe beans 
found a side view of Max Belliomos rex 
So amazing
no
its a hope 😮
am I stretching it to make a carnivorous pachyrhinosaurus based on speculative evolution
Yes
yeah that’s a pretty huge stretch
carnivore pachyrhino sounds like it has diet problems tbh, might need some greens in it
what about mostly carnivore pachyrhino but with some greens still in its diet?
if we doing on muh realism and wanting pachyrhino to curb stomp something with more reasons, id go omnivore road
moreso eating far more meat than other ceratopsians, but still eating veggies as well due to it not being that deprived
basically an omnivore
and I can explain
pachyrhinosaurus. P has multiple fairly sized creatures in its environment, but it is still one of the largest. What is interesting is the tomial tooth Pachy. P has, which is also present in modern-day birds of prey. What was this for? Killing prey quickly via biting the necks and severing vertebrae. Pachy P. Has something very similar to that on its beak. Ceratopsians also have remarkably strong bite force, or at least far so more than one would expect.
Is it a big stretch? Sure, but IMO this could have assisted in its diet.
Why would Pachyrhino need to do or have this? I’m not sure.
the need for it to do is: because it could, so no need to worry on that end, though i wouldn't count biteforce in as the sole factor but yeah go for it if ya doing speculative, but best bet would be le omni route
for comparison here’s the tomial tooth of a modern day raptor and Pachy. P
the beaks aren’t too similarly shaped but maybeeeeeee
omni route is probably safest yeah, doubt pachy would be completely carnivorous considered it’s relatives
Parrots have it for eating tough shelled foods, it’s not a carnivore exclusive
Im aware, that’s what I considered too, imo it seems more likely but I wanted to bring up the carni possibility in addition
I’m sorry I just was thinking bout it and thought it would be interesting 
not suggesting that pachy definitely used it for killing stuff or that the carnivore theory is more likely than whatever else, again, I just thought it’d be interesting to mention and hear peoples thoughts
also not tryna go for “well it’s cooler so thus I’m gonna ignore any other possibility”, again, I just wanted to mention it
i do 100% see pachyrhino just murking something and grabbing a leg for the go leaving the rest for raw carnivores though, just a funny idea
I think there are better candidates for a ceratopsid omnivore than pachyrhinosaurus
But I always like seeing omnivore ceratopsids, it’s fun
Doing something for jira rn
How long would a 8t teno be?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHZmRr3EhOk is it really finally true ???
Finally, a paper looking at multiple lines of evidence regarding dinosaur lips is out, and seems pretty conclusive!
Read the Paper here: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abo7877
It's dangerous to go alone, check out our Links!
Patreon: www.patreon.com/raptorchatter
Twitter: www.twitter.com/raptor_chatter
Redbubble: www.redbubble.c...
I would go the boar route of things if that makes sense?
Mostly a low-foraging animal searching vegetation in the leaf litter, eating whatever unfortunate animal it comes across, or carrion if it comes it’s way.
Or could to the hippo route. Built for herbivore diet yet eats meat so much for funsies that they get sick.
Hippo being a menace for lolz.
https://youtube.com/shorts/xDdvN9Wh-nc?feature=share
This critter looks very cool, is it between an ankylosaur and stegosaur or is it debated?
Prehistoric Kingdom Scelidosaurus Nigel Marven Commentary
Thank you for watching 😀
—————————————————————————————————————————
If you enjoyed this video please remember to click the thumbs up button and consider subscribing if you would like to see more content just like this.
🔴Subscribe Here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo1u0C9pey3_fnQZ4...
it's a basal thyreophoran
Big words, more resarch needed.
So from what I researched, its a cousin of stegosaurs and ankylosaurs, cool critter.
What's the fastest (projected) dino we know that's larger than a raptor and on land
Probably an ornithomimid. Though "larger than a raptor" doesn't help to much just because there's raptors of different sizes.
Well I kinda mean anything bigger than a Utah or achillobator pretty much
how fast is the fastest ornithomimid?
I couldn't tell ya off hand
atleast 1
Maybe 2 if you lucky
fairly large bodied animals that I immediately throw in the bracket of speed would be things like Carno, Deltadromeus, the Albertosaurines
I assume Qianzhou is probably rather swift as well
Colin Trevorrow discovered?
Late af but the art is by Dragonthunders
Actually iirc alioramins (maybe just Alio proper) aren't built for the ZOOM as much as same-sized juvenile tyrannosaurs were
yes
theropod canonnly has lips
Lipless theropods has always been an inherently biased idea that had numerous holes in it for years.
Hmm. What dino has the strongest leg strength proportional to body weight that we know of. I'm pretty sure pachys are one of em?
me
thx again scan
hummingbird it's a confirmed fact(It's a joke on the 1 of April )
I meant dinosaur. Also the dung beetle is ridiculously strong too
Hercules beetle.
How did Rex become the king of predators?
it's mentality?
big
humans liking big animal is how
Basically this. Along with holding like 5 other world records for some god-forsaken reason.
rex won out with its name
sounds cool, easy to say, fits it in so many ways beyond the original that its comical
Because late cretaceous fauna were all insane
you know though
tyrannosaurus is also just a cool looking animal too. it has a nice aesthetic to it
Sauropod sized hadrosaurs, giant walking tables with flails for tails, the anomaly that is Deinocherius, etc etc. Maastricht Cretaceous went all out with the weird
course I'm biased towards tyrannosaurs. but how could I not be
TRex is just, THAT guy.
can a homie get a new albertosaurine pls and thank
is there any newtonian spino and giga bite force test?
Spino was like 1.2 tons and giga was around 2.5
Which is 12000 and 25000 newtons
thank you
is my largest 'wolf' trophy i've ever hunted is too big for a Aenocyon Dirus?
she's 860 kg big lad
is she too big even for an accurate dire wolf?
WAY TOO BIG, aenocyon is only slightly larger than a modern wolf, 860kg is larger than polar bears
Aenocyon was less than a meter tall at the shoulder and about 60 kg
Hatz when😩 sarco grab when😩
wrong chat m8
does my 'wooly rhinoceros' is too small or too big for being a Coelodonta?
also is it true that brontotherium is larger than coelodonta?
what are the differences between aenocyon and modern grey wolves?
About right physical size but it's too heavy (Coeladonta was about 2-3 tons afaik). Megacerops (the proper name for Brontotherium) is about 50% larger afaik.
what are the biggest terrestrial synapsid carnivores? (proper mammal or not)
what we talkin about rn
Obligate?
? oh just primarily carnivorous
so megacerops is really bigger than coelodonta?
Yes
Ye obligate then
Uh idk the answer to that. Sort of shakes things up a bit. I don't think short faced bears were obligate were they?
to my knowledge arctodus itself is a more carnivorous omnivore whereas arctotherium is more herbivorous
I think the largest hypercarnivorous synapsid is anteosaurus? I think it's 1.2-1.3 tons?
wait really? megistotherium and paraentelodon look bigger (unless anteosaurus is bigger than I realized)
Megistotherium at it's largest is 700kg, and Paraentelodon's about the same size but is an omnivore.
so are these all accurate?
Arctodus didn't have a diet spectrum too different from modern brown bears. Arctotherium started out similar but became more herbivorous over time when more competition from the north showed up like dire wolves.
And yes
i find it hilarious that the largest terrestrial predator of the cenozoic is still an archosaur
barinasuchus moment
love me my 1.7t sebecid
how big is andrewsarchus as of now?
last i saw 600kg or so
did titanichthys still have teeth to bite with?
are those not teeth?
no
what are these then what are they for
they are just extensions of the plating around the face, they are not teeth in the same sense as our teeth
didn't dunkleosteus also have those and use them for biting though
yes but they arent teeth
oh yeah I mean technically sharks don't have teeth either right?
no sharks have teeth, placoderm dental plates arent teeth tho
how did titanichthys defend itself from dunk
didnt need to
why didn't it
iirc they didnt live together
they did
pretty sure titanichthys appears slightly after dunkleosteus
idk I see lots of modern paleoart depicting them living together
ok yeah they did overlap a bit
istg if someone said "Only in Ohio" 🤓🤡
I mean they wouldn't be wrong
given the body plan that titanichthys has it wouldnt be out of the question for it to just outswim dunkleosteus
yeah right but ohio joke is cringe now (for me)
also only in montana
how did triceratops and torosaurus not compete?
probably different diet and habitat preference
isotopes indicate trike was spending a lot of time in more wet areas so toro may have preferred upland environments, or where they overlapped they were just eating different things
they were just chill like that
If Deinosuchus was round to day?
then there would be a obese gator every now and then, would prevent alot of home owning but would also spark animal right wars over mega mega fauna
deinosuchus need love
It would probably die out relatively quickly because of all the prey items being too small for it and competition from other gators
or, as is the case of many herbivores, they just didn't need to compete since food was plentiful
What was a ceratas bite Force? I've been told they had really strong jaws
what?
What is the difference between "Carnivore" and "Hypercarnivore"?
The percentage of meat that makes up their diet.
Hypercarnivores have a diet that consists of more than 70% meat.
Wolves for example, are not hypercarnivores, Cats are.
gatitos are???
Iirc all felines are hypercarnivores yes
How are Wolves not hypercarnivores?
What project?
Jukin Media Verified (Original) * For licensing / permission to use: Contact - licensing(at)jukinmediadotcom
Submit your videos here: http://bit.ly/2iFnUya
The recent lip paper
Robert reisz has been accused of sexual harassment of his students
Hypercarnivores are apparently carnivores that have a diet of >70% meat, which means they aren't completely carnivorous. So how are Wolves not considered hypercarnivores (Does their diet consists more than 30% plants or vegetables?)?
Maybe its 69%
Wolves are much more generalist than most give credit
Wolves and Canids in general are eat a larger amount of plant matter than most would assume, wolves will readily take fruits, acorns, seeds etc. Up to about 20/30%, making wolves Carnivores but not Hypercarnivores like Felines, who practically don’t consume any plant matter at all.
Ofc the amount of plant matter consumed will vary per season and per wolf population, but generally that seems to be the norm.
Foxes and domestic dogs are true omnivores.
There’s a lot of wolf populations that eat mostly plant matter in the summer months
It rlly shows the adaptability of Canids very well, and why they’re so successful and widespread
I wonder how much plant matter the . . . . "Sea Wolves" I think they are called, eat.
whats the problem?
Very little from what I can tell, I see statements saying that around 90% of their diet consists of Seafood of various sources, clams, fish, carcasses, seals, otters etc.
They’re definitely an outlier among grey wolf populations.
Dinocheirus 🤝tyrannasorus
Being infinitely cooler than a dinosaur
Placoderms don't have teeth.
you know what I meant ok I know they don't technically have actual teeth
https://youtu.be/zcTWA-aY5zk meanwhile I wait for dinosaurs in this game to sound something like this.
Checkout my social media:
Discord - https://discord.gg/bBBkxXS
Twitter - https://twitter.com/Bushzillafish
Twitch - https://www.twitch.tv/bushzilla
Steam - https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198216713481/
yeah it is sad that most of the dinosaurs' calls in PoT are loudly exhaling
I mean, some hissing for some things is ok but I want more guttural, somewhat booming sounds. Using modern animals as inspirations is often not a good idea to do since a lot of the time mammals are used and well we all know that dinosaurs and mammals are definitely not related.
The tricky thing is birds often aren’t a good analogue either because of how sophisticated and derived their calls are.
The best bets, if I had to give any, are the most basal modern archosaurs, which are crocodiles and ratites.
Oh I wasn’t suggesting birds to be used but yeah, something like crocodilians and ratites could be used.
What was the suchos bite Force as opposed to the spino?
I saw a paper which had it at about 400 kg, which is powerful but quite lacking for its size. Ceratosaurus is a 1/4 it’s size and had over 50% more bite strength.
Ah okay. But didn't the spino and sucho have serrated teeth?
No. They got conical teeth.
iirc spinosaurids in general were some of the few carnivorous theropods not to have serrated teeth; since they were specialized for catching and holding onto fish more than tearing into the skin and flesh of other dinosaurs, conical teeth served them better than serrated teeth
They had those croco teeth
Grabby teeth
Ratites may actually be more derived than Neognathes though.
The actual basal condition of bird palate would be the one seen in Neognathes, as seen in Ichthyornithiforms actually. Ratites however would have potentially re-evolved a more Archosaur like palate afterward.
Isn't sarco geting a grab soon in the future? And allo grapple?
Yes, but why ask in here?
Because I'm built different
Youre a spino, thats a given
Oh my god, your PFP, I know that
Can I ask for the original?
Sure
what is the most up to date desmostylus?
What's the largest hadrosaur
pretty sure its shant and edmont, might be oloro, but could also be none of the above
Shant
Oloro isn’t even top 10 lol. Safe option is shant but the largest edmontos rival it
How would a herd of shants even fair against predators. Or would they not be attacked?
It depends on a lot of things. I wouldn’t discount them being completely immune as adults given the affinity for tyrannosaurs to be social animals. It coexisted with zhuchengtyrannus. Still easier prey around anyhow.
Yeah. I'm sure a lot of things would rather attack anything else. I'm guessing larger sauropods like anything larger than the brachi is immune
ah so the oloro one is outdated, noted, but ey atleast i was 2/3 of the way correct
Is prehistoric planet a pretty accurate show?
I'd contend its arguably the most accurate one out there. But aspects of it are already outdated, and as with many things as time passes it may get more and more outdated.
It's only like 8 months old
yep. but one aspect in particular is outdated because the information regarding it was published when it was a bit too late for the producers of Prehistoric Planet to go back and change anything.
referring to Carnotaurus's skin, of course.
Ah. What's up with this news that I've heard that the Cera has like really strong skin/scales
Ceratosaurus is the only theropod known to have osteoderms: a single row on its back. They would’ve done little in defense.
Ah okay. Wouldn't the best defense on a animal realistically be a ton of loose skin?
Depends
for being grabbed yeah but having a triple double whopper neck folds doesn't exactly go well for being clean
Apparently there's a couple (maybe one?) floating osteoderm not akin to the back ones, so it might've had another row on the torso
No, it helps when being grabbed as said before, but it doesn’t prevent being grabbed in the first place like quills do for example, there is no single best defense, tho you could argue size is.
the single best defense is just not spawning in, boom can never die and never worry, best survival strat in the real world
Or install creative mode
that might get ya banned on the live stuff though, might pass in Australia though
Idk of anyone said it yet
But I think the 3rd largest is parasaurolophus crytocristatus
I have a general list that I gathered up cause I was curious hang on
noted, got the memo oloro being 3rd was just off, but knew para was in top 10 but 3rd, got it
- Shantungosaurus (14m, 15 tons)
- Edmontosaurus (15m, 14 tons)
- Parasaurolophus (13m, 12 tons)
- Angulomasticator (12m, 9.5 tons)
- Magnapaulia (12m, 9 tons)
6, 7, 8. Amurosaurus (11m, 7 tons), Charonosaurus (11m, 7 tons), and Gryposaurus (10m, 7 tons)
9, 10. Barsboldia (11m, 6.5 tons) and Prosaurolophus (10m, 6.5 tons) - Saurolophus (10m, 5.5 tons)
- Tsintaosaurus (10m, 5 tons)
Keep in mind that edmonto and shant are about the same, Shant is still the safe option as #1 tho
Hmm don't think I've heard of angulomasticator before
para is bigger than charono now?
Yep
What about lambeosaurus or corythosaurus
both are quite small
And muttaburasaurus ?
lambeo and cory are small by hadrosaur standards but both are still decent sized animals
I see yeah
How many para specimens do we have as of now?
Isn’t muttaburasaurus an iguanadontid?
The average hadrosaur is like 8 meters and 2-3 tons. I wouldn't call it "small".
small when compared with things like edmonto, they're definitely not small animals
Hypothetical 18-20 ton Shant is still feasible
What Corythosaurus skeletal did you use? The only recent one I got doesn’t have a scale bar iirc
Edited GSP
It’s a rhabdodont (?)..somewhere in elasmaria, but not an iguanodontid
whats yalls favorite bear
arctodus simus
Panda.
What's the difference between a sucho and a baryonyx
Size, morphology, bone density, time, location
sloth bear
Polar bear
Hey Paleo chat, may I have some help in finding some scientifically accurate Tyrannosaurus art? I'm planning on comissioning an artist to draw a scientifically accurate version of my PoT Rex
Any pose is fine, but something like this would be great!
me ready for hatz lol
Not the exact same pose but seems close? Pretty sure this is accurate, too
Made by Fred the dinosaurman
Yeah I say that's pretty close!!
Just type in mark witton/rj palmer t.rex art
where is parasaurolophus walkeri?
9 meters and 4 tons
What species of dinosaur is that?
parasaurolophus cyrtocristatus?
Holy crap!!!
Im guessing that’s one of the biggest hadrosaurs? Or rather on the larger side?
Potential adult remains. And yeah P. cyrto makes para the 3rd largest hadrosaur period
Same
what's the most accurate desmostylus?
This is true: osteoderms with "amorphous" shape + a large "quadrangular" osteoderm/plate were found.
also, is the haast's eagle hieraaetus or harpagornis?
Which specimen of Saurolophus is the size estimate in the list based on? If I may ask.
Oh snap, I based it off of this (I think the giant saurolophus estimates are lumping barsboldia in with it?) but I did a mistype
Ah, Well there is that other Giant S.angustirostris specimen that may be larger than the estimates given in your list (MPC 100/764).
What do y’all think about some dinosaurs having lips
I think it makes sense, keeps the teeth moist and safe.
Next to no terrestrial animal that isn’t a bird doesn’t have lips
I’m a big believer in lips except for possibly in spinosaurids, dilophosaurs, as well as potentially masiakasaurus.
Mostly because of the notched dentaries as well as masiakasaurus just having insane teeth
accurate carcharodontosaurus?
tbf spinosaurus only being partially-lipped at most would still make sense because the teeth overlap in a very crocodile-like manner. Dilo and masiaka though could very easily be covered by lips despite how odd they look
All it takes is looking at the skulls of various mammals and reptiles alive today to see that they can hide some absolutely insane looking skull and jaw shapes behind their lips. The shape of the skull itself often has little bearing on how the lips are shaped, in that they don't follow the shape of the skull (imagine how beavers would look if their lips followed the skull)
was the lilstock ichthyosaur a filter feeder?
In fact here's a great example of a reptile with somewhat notched dentaries reminiscent of something like dilo and I can tell you now this lad is fully lipped (keel-headed worm lizard to those curious)
Worm lizards tale the cake for weirdest skulls ever
Did Iggy run bipedal or quadrupedal in real life and why do you think?
Iguanodon couldn't gallop(as well as p much all other large herbivorous dinosaur, you could even make a case for no dinosaur being able to gallop but thats not why we're here) because galloping requires either a flexible spine or some jank leg adaptations to properly work. Iguanodon(and other ornithopods) have very robust, squat bodies with fairly inflexible spines and weirdly positioned ribs, which keep them from flexing up and down enough to actually gallop(crocodillians, most ungulates, and p much all carnivorans gallop/run in this manner, flexing the spine to put their rear legs further forward, then pushing off)
Rhinos have fairly stiff spines too and dont have much bend, but perissodactyls have some of the weirdest leg anatomy in the animal world, and are able to acheive a gallop via tucking their legs way in and bringing them forward without using their spine, which is again something a dinosaur like iguanodon is incapable of.
Theres also the case to be made of basal conditions and how that affects locomotion. You rarely see animals within a group adapt a wildly different method of locomotion(and when it does occur, its due to some really weird specialization such as becoming aquatic or avian). Stances may change(species like humans became bipedal from quadrupedal ancestors), but generally the method of locomotion does not change as there isn't a massive change in bodyplan. Iguanodon's relatives all have the same bodyplan, and all evolved from small, bipedal ancestors. they became quadrupedal due to their size, but did not exactly change their methods of locomotion. Large ornithopods could either do a shuffle(think elephant run in a way, but not quite as fast), or a bipedal run.
There's also a size thing. Most large herbivorous dinosaurs were simply too big to gallop and not injure their wrists.
Ofc an adult iguanodon likely didn't do very much running, since it could just rear up and stab its attackers without issue.
I know a common opinion nowadays is they walked and ran on all fours but went bipedal when foraging, on alert, and various other actions, kinda like a bear does. Stegosaurs were likely similar, if not as mobile.
Are crocodile spines really flexible ?
not as flexible as most, but watch videos and you can see them curve their spine a bit when galloping, especially noticable along the pelvic region
im on the side of elephant shuffle iguanodon myself, basically a fast walk, not very fast, but never off balanced
but also, not much that an adult iguanodon really had to run from, so it likely didn't do much running, again sorta like elephants 
basically, it could've ran bipedally or quadrupedally, it just couldn't gallop
First I just want to first thank you for for typing that all out for me. Iguanodon is like my favourite dinosaur along side t-rex and I’m very interested about how it moved as I’m going to animation school soon and I want to create a very accurate animation. I was just wondering what your education is? Like you don’t sound like the typical paleo nerd. Are you like a palaeontologist? I always thought personaly iguanodons would run similar to a rhino why can’t they? They both had inflexible spines what’s the next thing stopping it from moving like a rhino? Also how do we know iguanodons spins was inflexible? Like what’s the biological science behind that? Just out of curiosity. Also I am enclosed towards the quadrupedal fast shuffle then a bipedal run aswell.
how big is giga again?
is it 12-13 meters long and 8-9 tons?
Quick question, is stygimoloch still considered a juvenile pachycephalosaurus ?
yep, there's still some proponents of it being its own thing, and at the very least if it is within the pachycephalosaurus genus it's probably still its own unique species (spinifer as opposed to wyomingensis) but most people tend to agree it is just a growth stage
There's no way we can know for sure though right ? Both sides can be correct I mean
We are speculating about an animal that lived millions of years ago and left only sediments of bones behind. Of course we can't know for sure.
some things can actually be known for sure, such as nanotyrannus not being real
paleontology does involve a lot of speculation, but it's not pure speculation; the idea that there's nothing at all we can be reasonably certain about is just as unhelpful as the idea that we can be certain about everything
I never said its pure speculation. I was only replying in the context of stygimoloch being a juve pachy.
what is the most up-to-date triceratops prorsus length and weight?
is that the actual pot rex model or did you edit it
Up to date dinosaurs are more horror energy filled then JP could ever make indominus rex
Nah not edited
thank god I keep agonizing of how skinny the pot rex because when I'm walking with my rex the knees don't seem to go higher than the belly at least that suggests that its still pretty accurate then
well no duh I mean are people scared of bears because of how they look or the fact that they know what it can do to a person
If it’s bigger then you, is drooling, and is looking at you with both eyes, bear or giga I’m gonna do a dump unintentionally.
the point I'm making is that there scarier than the jw because of the fact we know how they could shred us apart plus they actually look like real animals
isn't barsboldia supposed to be 13 tons
Pot rex isn't too skinny
I’m crying at a 2001 estimate of bruthakyaosaurus. 44.1M and 225 tons 
I meant the pot rex is almost to skinny
Bruhathkayosaurus was estimated to be larger than Argentinosaurus some time ago
They’re about the same. And no Barsboldia is not 13 tons.
It's fine in that department, it's unwise to use the 2 largest most robust specimens of rex as a base line, PoT rexs robustness is fine, it's mostly the head and textures thatt are the issue
I said it WAS estimated to be bigger
225 tons is heavier than a blue whale by 25 - 35 tons by the way
isn't the pot rex based on either Stan or AMNH
to be honest I think rex would've been more similar to the pot rex than prehistoric planet because of agility than again the prehistoric planet rex was based off sue and scotty
One of those, but that doesn't make it inaccurate
I didn't say they were inaccurate I just stated my opinion based on locomotion data from we know of this animal
indom was pretty good and could most certainly be scarier but feels off folks call realistic dino not scary
Honestly now looking back at the original 10 dinosaurs and looking at the formations they are from, it would have been easier to implement particular dinosaurs that now have been made redundant by the perk owner dinosaurs. Chasmosaurus could have been a easy Chasmosaurinae to add since it lived with both Daspletosaurus and Styracosaurus instead of Eotriceratops. The stretch goal dinosaurs are fine since they didn’t really harm the roaster that much if at all. Gargoyleosaurus would have been a more interesting thyreophoran to see considering it lived alongside Stegosaurus. A lot of interesting species from the formations the devs chose that they could implement but now I feel will be obsolete due to the species that we have and are coming in the future.
Agreed. JP settled with cheap hollywood monsters instead.
chasmosaurus is also really small though, so i don't see how it would be a replacement of Eo, it's hardly sty sized
if wikipedia's sizes are correct/close (key word: if), chasmosaurus would struggle to be a good replacement for styracosaurus, let alone eotriceratops. it's just a little guy
ah chasmo, perhaps the chaddest frill boi, but on the "smaller" end( still cow sized if not bigger)
Good point, though tbf, sty and chasmo did live side by side. Perhaps Pentaceratops could be the Chasmosaurinae.
When we use terms like mid-sized carnivore for an animal that’s 6/7 meters long, that’s funny to me.
yep, chasmo would be a medium-sized herbivore in many of today's ecosystems, but by cretaceous standards it was just a little man
Rlly puts things into perspective
Perhaps have sty be the more bulky brawler and then chasmo be more of the swift charger or some sort of faster ceratopsian.
chasmo is the kid who dodges when a nuclear bomb is dropped
that's already how sty and alb are
I can still beat all of them in a fight
Sorry for massively late reply i fell asleep 
I am not a paleontologist, i am a mere nerd who studies ecology and behavior as a hobby, and dabbles in the paleo world, in my spare time i sit around p much all day and read scientific papers and articles 
Then Pentaceratops instead of Chasmosaurus perhaps?
not from dinosaur park so at that point adding it isn't different from having Eo
So what makes you think iggy couldn’t gallop? Like you said it has an inflexible spine but so do rhinos and they gallop. Why couldn’t iggy do the same out of curiosity.
Rhinos have unique leg adaptations that let them pull their legs up and foreward without needing to bend, like how horses gallop, iguanodon did not have such adaptations
Neither is Eo. Pentaceratops is at least more interesting than Eotriceratops.
Ungulates generally make terrible comparisons for dinosaurs since they are so weird anatonically
Could Iguanodon have used its tail as a weapon? Or is that all made up.
All dinosaurs could've used their tails imo, just how effective would it be is the question 
Hadrosaurs show potential applications of using it as a weapon, although it would’ve been as an extension of their body rather than with any dexterity or purpose like thyreophorans or sauropods. Iguanodon isn’t a hadrosaur so idk how much that applies to it.
It could prob thwack preds with it like a hadrosaur, but it also could just turn and face its attacker
And again, i doubt much looked at a healthy adult iguanodon and decided to try it 
I did (I am the apex predator of Iguanodons)
We're competing for the same prey? A potential rival I see
Yah honestly I think I could even see an adult t-rex not mess with a full grown Iguanodon irl.
T. rex is like 3x the body mass. It’s right within its kill zone.
I feel like a rex would most definitely go after a iggy if it had the opportunity
Adult iguanodon irl were likely safe from predators though. They dwarfed the largest predators in their environment, let alone the thumb spikes.
Even beyond the inflexibility and limb differences, Iguanodon’s still too big to effectively gallop. Adults weigh some 4-5 tons, so it’d be relegated to a more hippo like swagger or elephant paced walk
More like 3-3.5 tons. There’s an 11 meter 5 ton individual but that’s one out of hundreds.
A large sum of the Iguanodon we have aren’t the oldest iirc in the first place. Difference in ontogeny was kinda part of why there were so many species (outside of literally every iguanodontid getting lumped in once upon a time)
Iggy solos 
god iggy is still massive, forgot about that
Rex would definitely have at the very least a brief struggle
Question: what makes a pterosaur an Azdharchid? And what pterosaurs are classified as an azdharchid other than the obvious ones
Azhdarchidae (from the Persian word azhdar, اژدر, a dragon-like creature in Persian mythology) is a family of pterosaurs known primarily from the Late Cretaceous Period, though an isolated vertebra apparently from an azhdarchid is known from the Early Cretaceous as well (late Berriasian age, about 140 million years ago). Azhdarchids included som...
idk what makes one a azhdarchid beyond being related enough but stuff like hatz and quetz are part of le group
An injured one maybie. If it was a fight to the death Iguanodon would get bodied by a t-rex easy. But In real life a rex would rather go after young and injured then risk taking deep bloody gouges from a fully grown healthy Iguanodon.
So I was doing some reasurch and elephants can run 40km/h that’s pretty fast and elephants were even bigger then iguanodons so maybe Iguanodon could have run that fast I don’t know.
I don’t know man when I look at the run animation In path of titans and look at the real life bones of Iguanodon. I don’t see why it couldn’t run like a gallop. There isn’t much spine movement from what I can tell and it’s got big long strong legs. Maybe I’m just horribly bias because I love the idea of iguanodons being kind Dino horses.
Like it just looks like it would be able to move like this to me.
elephants don't really gallop though, it's more of a speedwalk; again, weight does play a role here, and iguanodon was a Big Lad
(plus PoT doesn't have very realistic running animations, this game's sarco has air time)
also, there's actually a lot of spine movement there, particularly as the hind legs come forward; the spine has to bend pretty significantly to make that happen
oh also moz check backer chat for a...interesting ordeal
How goes it in paleochat
It's also a video game too, is the thing. Sarco also galloped along in game but it wasn't bouncing around in life
Just looking at bones without a clue is not how it works
I miss iggy gallop so much
whats happening for some reason i dont have the backer role
guy sayin' brachiosaurus was faster than tyrannosaurus and citing google
that
Me too I’m obsessed with it. It just looks so beautiful and cool to me that I want it to be able to move similar to that and real life lol.
Iggy physically couldn't gallop
iggy gallop reminds me of a dog and I liked that :(
Too much stress on the bones and muscles
Rex in a full sprint is kinda funny
At best maybe a brisk shuffle but galloping is completely out of the question
as a large animal, i can confirm, galloping is too difficult for my spine
A 5 tonne animal simply can't bring itself entirely off the ground (except it falls from somewhere down)
I think Iguanodon likely moved similar to an elephant in real life a very fast walk or trot as it would not have needed to do anything else. But I would argue a gallop is more believable and plausible then the bipedal run we have right now
Iggy galloping is like the largest elephant we have galloping…or average, I forget which is which
gravity
gravity is a harness
i don't like gravity, whenever i look down i get hurt but nothing happens if i keep walking
I guess it’s fantasy right? Like To a certain extent dinosaurs don’t need to be accurate in paleo media. They just need to be cool. Maybe you can have like a scientifically accurate design but can take some creative liberties with how it moves and behaves. Bottom line real dinosaurs just animals . Not blood thirsty super monsters they are just animals. Still it’s fun to imagine out favourite beasts moving and acting in certain more dramatic ways.
while they may not look like it, many large ornithopods like iguanodon were facultative bipeds, meaning they could walk on two or four legs depending on the situation. iirc it's thought that bipedal locomotion would be better for bursts of speed, while quadrupedal locomotion is best for stability (and probably would've been the resting state for heavy lads like iguanodon)
the speed PoT's iggy goes at when bipedal is probably unrealistic (iirc a lot of dinosaur speeds are exaggerated for gameplay), but the basic action of Going Fast On Two Legs is something iguanodon's anatomy is better suited to than a proper gallop
I would argue Iguanodon is better suited for running on 4 legs but not as a gallop
PoT Rex doesn't have the gastralia (the bones that are in the belly of the T.Rex) that is found in fossils. Prehistoric Planet T.Rex is more accurate than PoT Rex. Also it didn't need to be fast, T.Rex ate prey that couldn't run from it
Edmontosaurus
T.Rex would most likely need to ambush prey like Edmonto. It maybe could have run at small bursts of quick speed to catch fast prey
tyrannosaurus certainly wasn't the fastest thing alive, but it was decently speedy for something so huge
How do we know the deinocheirus was a good swimmer? All sources I've found say it just lived in swamps
Deinocheirus probably didn't swim, but waded through water like black cape buffalo. Although I like the thought of it sinking to the bottom of rivers and running like a hippo, although that's unlikely
we don't know that it was a good swimmer, iirc. personally i'd wager it was pretty bad at it; eating fish and aquatic plants doesn't necessitate being good at getting around in the water, and it was tall enough to wade through water as long as it wasn't super deep
Yeah, 25 miles per hour is crazy for such a big animal
Yeah and it had super long feathers/hair which I'd assume would create terrible amounts of drag
I don't think there's direct evidence for that
Not really. It was probably too heavy to manage to swim
How does that compare to a rhino or elephant?
we don't have direct evidence of feathers on deinocheirus, so we don't actually know how long its feathers were, assuming it still had them (likely but not guaranteed afaik)
Yes, judging by the environment Deinocheirus lived in it would have very short feathers, or no feathers at all
I mean we think the iggy was a really good swimmer
i don't think shaggy feathers are out of the question, especially since the nemegt was on the chillier side if memory serves, but they probably wouldn't be very dense if they were that long
I do speculate that regularly wading in bodies of water might’ve given deinocheirids an edge in terms of thermoregulation, which allowed them to get larger without requiring feather loss. That’s just an idea though.
being overall more bird like might change how dense the covering could be on large dinosaurs but it's a complicated topic, nemegt could be on the chillier side though (especially at night in the more arid areas)
same speed as a elephant, slower than a rhino, rhinos are like 35 mph if using top speeds for all
Today we learn that T. rex is the fastest multi-ton animal in its environment 
So like, twice as big as an elephant, same speed, scary.
all in the feet baby, anyways thats top speed, id wager a elephant is faster on cruising speeds unless those magic feet work more for rex
Adult Iggy actually is a more stable runner on all 4s due to just how robust its arms were (along with a somewhat smaller tail than what a hadrosaur of similar size would have). Juvenile animals didn’t have as dense armature, thus would have been primarily bipedal. That said, bipedal movement would have been faster, as removing the effective kickstands of the front allows for a lengthier stride.
tbf i recall it tying with edmontosaurus for that, unless the paper i saw about that is outdated (could be. it happens) or i'm misremembering (also happens. every single day i enter this chat with the desperate hope that i haven't forgotten important dinosaur trivia again)
i saw three people typing at once, i think i forgot important dinosaur trivia again 
Argent obv the fastest runner due to size
Hmmm, idk how 4 legged walking compares to two, but Ive heard the tyrannosaurs were good at long distance jogs and stuff.
well hold on now. giraffes don't run faster than cheetahs, size isn't necessarily everything here
Edmontosaurus iirc is more stamina based despite being slower, add that with hadrosaur senses just being all around great, and an adult can shuffle away before a Rex gets too close for an ambush
that and if the rex does get close enough but the edmontosaurus still notices it there's a decent chance of a big edmonto coming out on top (assuming the rex botches the ambush anyway)
The issue is the "stamina" Edmonto was before the "stamina" T. rex so
I dunno if that needs to be re-evaluated or not
Mapusaurus after getting outrunned by a territorial bull argent
https://tenor.com/view/no-no-no-wait-wait-wait-gif-23893070
Not all Edmonts are 14 ton giants tho, average seems to be about 7 tons (or maybe smaller, I forgor)
bro just turn, smh when folks forget you can outturn something fast clearly
I feel like it should, alongside an actually decent speed estimate for a bipedal Edmonto
Giant elongated tail, massive caudofemoralis, and forelimb-hind limb thickness discrepancy are in definite favor of Ed generating a pretty significant burst of speed imo
it also varies by species afaik, I can't remember which one was actually in hell creek now that I'm trying to go figure
Annectens
ok that's what I thought but I wanted to be sure (I had to wait a whole minute to say that
)
can't relate, i've spent a worrying amount of time fixating on hell creek fauna 
ark iguanodon does the same too :0 thou the first time i saw this about iggy so the both bipedal and quadrupedal thing for run etc so was in WWD also i remember that iguanodon was able to chew ? is it still true or outdated too
it was also said in the wwd episode so thats why im not sure
What does iirc and afraik mean?
If you've read my previous posts you should've noticed that I stated that pot's rex is more based on AMNH or Stan rather than sue and scotty (they would be a decent margin skinnier) yes pots rex needs a slight remodel as I have previously stated but it would not need to be as chonkey as prehistoric planets rex and when I said agility I meant dodging attack wise otherwise I would've clearly stated speed the rex most likely was an ambush predator so it doesn't get destroyed by a trikes horns not to mention the fact that pot's rex has its kneecaps/legs standing in a more vertical position ( not as bent as saurian or prehistoric planets rex . So next time you criticize read the whole story not just 1 comment or in this case all of the posts about that topic
Most all ornithischian dinosaurs possessed the ability to chew (except stegosaurs? Can’t remember off the dome) but the way they did it isn’t like mammals
oh ok ! cuz i know the ones who werent able to chew has gastrolits stones in their stomach in order to help them digest so i wasnt sure for the iguanodon but what about ceratopsians ?
Wdym pot rex doesn't have gastralia
I need le answer
"If I remember correctly" and "as far as I know"
The most useful shortforms I've learned
it kinda doesn't because it has very soft flesh where its belly is
I don't understand, there is no indication you can see on any pot model to suggest the creature lacks gastralia
As I said, ornithischians (ornithopods, marginocephalians big word for the family comprising of ceratopsians and Pachycephalosaurs, and ankylosaurs) could all chew
I don't think ankylosaurs are in that group
Stegosaurs:🥲
oooh ok sorry xD but then what about anodontosaurus ? dosent his name mean something like without theet or something like this...
Ankylosaurs/nodosaurs can chew
they're probably in a group of like 9 or so
Oh, it looked like you were saying they were maginocephalians
What would yall say are the most perfectly evolved animals. I know this is subjective but I wanna hear opinions
I am
Anodontosaurus is an ankylosaur, ankylosaurs chew
Anodontosaurus : The generic name means "toothless lizard" in Ancient Greek. But if im right its because the theet of the fossils were like absent or destroyed ???
“Toothless lizard” is misleading yea. It’s simply because of damage done to the specimen over time that it was found without them
oh ok ! makes more sense tbh
Were there any duck like creatures larger than the deincheirus?
Smh that’s why they went extinct
idiots couldn’t keep up with the times
Not really, unless you call hadrosaurs duck billed, then theres some hadros bigger
So bad + skill issue
Gastralia isn’t something you’d visibly see on the outside of the animal. We don’t have rugged chests because we have ribs
Hadrosaurs and ankylosaurs: We revoke your rights to feeding at any feasible level
Kinda sad to think about tbh. Driven to extinction just cause you can’t eat hard things
how accurate is this pentaceratops ? I migh get it one day but im curious
It’s legs are weird
too long ?
Bad feet, bad face, n tail too chunky
my styraco figure has the same kind of tail problem so i see !
I just realized how inaccurate the pot deinocheirus model is
the styraco in question xD
Wdym, it's decent enough?
The deinocheirus sits way lower in posture than in game
No?
Penta is honestly quite a weird ceratopsid. Quite leggy, elongated face, oddly flat sacrum, slight hump, and relatively large nasal horn
Some PoT models got problems but Deinocheirus ain’t one of them. It’s fine.
ive heard it be called the elk of ceratopsids seeing its more tall and thin yet large frame, i can see it
oooh true but for this figure i just like how it looks thats why i want it and because i wanna start a collection of ceratopsians figures...i know thou beast of mesozoics made high quality ones too
Idk every depiction I've seen they sit lower in posture. Kinda like the new spino model
The guy looks like its eternaly suffering.
The colors make me not really a fan of the ceratopsid series compared to their raptors and tyrannosaurs, but they still got the best and most accurate figures around
The posture on that skeletal isn’t the greatest. Fadeno’s Titano is far better
the figure from beast of mesozoic i want its the custom styracosaurus so the 'old buck' if you was the series on youtube
Now were talking, this guy actually looks healthy.
I’ve heard it be called a moose, n honestly pretty apt comparison
looks like the speed subspecies of the duck xD
Thats obviously defense, bald head
i can see that as well save the more bulky nature of a moose, but yesh
its defense one just bald but still has the tail feathers ?
Speed has the head feathers but no tail feathers, bal is the fluffiest.
you mean pachycephalosaurus
ok last figure this time ! how accurate is my boi right here ? he is the first one i got before the styraco , its diabloceratops
Playable belzebufo when
who plays jurassic world here?
Diably right? Probably needs to be chunkier, shorter tail, head might need some changes.
@hardy ravine Thats not bald, its boneheaded.
more like the isle dibble i guess ?
Probably.
What's the biggest prehistoric frog
i mean on this figure i feel like hes too high up like this legs are too long xD ?
An undescribed species from the Eocene of South America
That too probs.
Holy. He gonna eat my whole leg
its a cat next to the frog O_o ?
Too tall, too skinny, tail too long, eye too big, beak keratin too short
Yall picking it apart damn XD
now maybe its just the picture but the actual one i have in my hands the eyes are a bit smaller at least
He probably would taste awesome, that much cooked frog legs would be nice.
i live in france so frog legs is a known dish but i hate the texture xD thou a big leg like this ? i wonder how it would be....
The same probably, just more frog.
guess so :0 anyway thats all ima say for today , night or day yall
I've never had Frog legs
Theyre nice, the problem I have with them is that theyre too small most cases, but a big frog like that would be nice.
A reminder to please view pinned messages for appropriate paleo-chat topics. We recommend all off-topic conversations for paleo-chat be directed to DM's, the appropriate channel or another server entirely. This channel is for educational purposes.
Anyway. What dinosaur age mammals were there?
that's a very vague question. Mammals were everywhere post-triassic
There were a lot, not big, more like cat size and smaller.
Ah I meant like larger
oh, larger ones would be like, repenomamus and didelphodon
Ah le badger
What were the birds with the Y shaped crests in prehistoric planet?
Barbaridactylus
I personally don’t think there is a correct answer as you could argue a all animals are perfectly evolved for where they’re supposed to be.
A koala is perfectly evolved to survive in Australia and feed on Eucalyptus etc etc.
Crabs
koalas definitely aren't perfect
Honestly. Maybe. Other than the fact that they get merked by burds
no such thing as perfect but man crabs went hard on it, the only major downside is the armor they got is normally mid
Platypus(they are silly)
what did cronopio dentiacutus eat?
It’s perfect for what it’s niche and environment, which is what it’s supposed to do.
but they lack the power to adapt to major changes, rn kinda needing humans help from....humans
Which can rlly be said for most if not all animals.
eh not all, look at crabs as said before, some species are majorly specialized but alot are so generalistic they can go almost anywhere and do well
Not being able to survive drastic changes or a mass extinction doesn’t mean animals aren’t perfectly evolved for their niche.
Many crab species have come and gone.
Well, that is admittedly true, even if a niche is super specific koalas are great at that niche
they hadn't said their own niche, they said in general, niches come and go as well, but a fair bit of stuff has remained a constant able to survive major world changes and events, which would be a good indicator of being closer to perfection vs something that starves to death if the leaves aren't on a branch
Oh in general? Then yeah def not koalas those things are abysmal when it comes to general
They don’t even recognize food if it isn’t on a tree
They do but they wont eat it because leaves that aren’t on a branch carry the risk of being old/rotten/low quality
yeah if it was niches then stuff like yeti crabs, flamingos and yes koalas would count, but in no way are they are going to survive in another habitat or major change
Honestly my answer is cockroaches
Yeah, in terms of general stuff koalas have to be some of the worst animals lmao
They can do 1 thing and 1 thing only, opposite of general
They actually have a reason instead of just being dumb by default, thats honestly suprising.
Honestly, pretty great answer
German Cockroaches are for the most part entirely reliant on humans to survive in the regions they’re common now.
They wouldn’t exist in much of the world if not for heating and human leftovers.
def a decent contender, the only downside is humans helped alot more
Yeah. Cockroaches or dung beetles are my answers
Ants are p good
I feel like if you’re gonna pick any animal, it would be humans, humans have taken their niche, perfected it, and gone so far beyond what they evolved to be.
anyways Crabs are my name choice, Ants are a decent one, oh and song birbs to a extent seeing the spread of em( though it is through more families)
wouldn't say humans entirely namely since the rng and costs of us( almost everyone in the world having permanent health problems of some form go brrrrrr)
We are only better than everything due to our intelligence. Without our intelligence we would be clapped
Skill issue on their part.
But we evolved said intelligence, and while crabs are still doing crab things, humans have gone far beyond what humans used to do
says the human brain, if i'm being honest we did get a good roll on rng and range atleast but man general health and enjoyment of life is concerning even with our power, then again crabs
If their still doing the same thing their doing something right
( also note don't take this as some weird ordeal, seeing how successful humans are, wouldn't say we are the top but we are somewhere above the death zone atleast)
We techically are doing the same things, we just got more filler.
I’m not saying they’re not, but if people are gonna say what has been the most perfectly evolved animal, I’d argue for the animal that went beyond the niches they evolved for
But again I don’t think there is a thing as a “truly” perfectly evolved animal at all, and that all animals are perfectly evolved for their specific niche.
would prolly have ants then seeing they kinda shifted their own futures varying on species, but nothing is perfect anyways, whether it be ant circles of death or Human health, Crabs mid armor or koalas doing anything
Why tf do sea turtles reproduce the way they do. Their babies have to go through the Normandy landing when they hatch
Because it works better than caring for a select few apparently
Weeds out the weak quickly.
because
or the unlucky, since survival is a game of fitness, brains and sheer chance
''humans are the most perfectly evolved organism because we lead to the extinction of the most other species''
''crabs are the most perfectly evolved organism because all sort of animals want to become crab''
limulus:
oh yeah those guys, they exist, they do a good job at it, holding a record at this point
Triops is another contender since horseshoe crabs are a whole family, but triops split from its sister genus back in the Jurassic
Skill issue ofc
aren't those the funny guys in certain farms that eat the bugs and growing plants to help? or am i thinking of something else
They legit just exist tho lol
The goat 💯
Maybe they are the most perfectly evolved cause most of our illnesses are cured through their blood
Super serum
murdering short old men to use their blood to heal us(real)
Yeah. Their blood is a like neon blue too. It's brighter than most
Also why do crabs eject all their limbs if attacked. All they become then is a floating pebble
because
what is the largest desmostylian?
But calling iggy’s front legs kickstands is weird to me. They were fully developed weight baring limbs.
The new spino model?
So basically real Iguanodons did not have the proper anatomy or adaptations to be able to gallop specifically they did not have the flexible spine needed for it. Although they definitely would have been able to do a very fast trot or shuffle similar to an elephant or hippo which can run very fast actually.
picking its front limbs up and running bipedal would produce a faster speed at least based on computer modelling and the idea that it’s legs could have more room for longer strides. The question is did the hind limbs have enough muscle to support the 5 ton beast while it ran.
So basically adult iguanodons either did a very fast quadrupedal walk or or a short speedy burst bipedal run.
It’s too bad as I absolutely love the idea of iguanodons being big horse Dino’s.
Yeah the most recent edition of the spino is very low set to the ground
Oh yeah it is I thought you meant for PoT 😂
how aquatic was baryonyx?
like a heron or egret most likely. not acting like a crocodile, just perusing the edge of the water and associated uplands for whatever could be caught
Yes, the hind limbs are strong/large enough for it rear up and “run”
in any case, run is a bit of a stretch with dinosaurs, they weren't going zoom 
Ornithomimids…juvenile tyrannosaurs…small ornithopods…
Does anyone have a complete list of described fauna and flora of Mazon Creek's freshwater environments? I'm trying to find one but literally the only information I'm getting is "yeah they found a really old beetle and some other neat nondescript bugs". I feel like I'm going to enter my joker arc.
shut, those dont count they're stinky 
i meant large dinosaurs 
||abelisaurs||
you know what i mean
the heckin chonkers aint sprinting at 40+ mph they're fastwalking at like, 20mph
Anyways I am once again asking for your exhaustive list of Mazon Creek freshwater biota, I am in physical pain from how bad the information on Carboniferous environments is.
I invision the spino hunting like a brown bear does trout
anyways i may do some fossil hunting this weekend 👀
i found an exposed bit of the shell rock that forms the fossil formation of my area, great place to find fish jaws, shark teeth, etc. as well as all sorts of fossil shells and worm traces
last one i found and chipped through i got a cow shark tooth out of 
hell yeah dude
its just gonna be destroyed to build a house on top of so i may as well scavenge before then
I found a megaladon tooth in a river when I went down to florida
man that sucks
ye im like an hour south of the peace river which has a very rich array of fossils, last time i was there i got some bone fragments and a chunk of dugong rib
Peace river Florida? That's where I found my megaladon tooth
I read megalodon as "megamouth"
ye, that peace river, apparently theres also shark teeth in the caloosahatchee but i've never bothered to try, a friend of mine found a meg chip there though
I also found a segment of some sort of a fossilized fish's jaw
my issue is going into the peace river without a spotter is pain and the good spots are often well away from where tourists can reach, so usually means kayaking a mile or two, which for me would be alone, then wading around waist-to-chest deep water with the freaky river alligators 
I didn't use a kayak I was there last week and I just walked along the bank for like a mile. Didn't know there were alligators in there. I'm also pretty sure I may have found a hip bone of some kind of animal cause it was super smooth and rock like. It looked like it had a ball joint so idk
oh the peace river has some biggggg alligators, but they're very shy compared to the swamp dwellers since they dont get to gorge on fish freely, they hunt more land based prey 
Ah well good to know XD. I'm from Ohio so honestly my tourist brain kicked in. Oh there's nothing dangerous here. Damn well coulda been a shnak
Florida + water = alligators
they like to snatch deer that come down the steep edges to drink since they cant escape easily 
def not my favorite place to encounter a gator in
Well besides all that. I found a megaladon toof. Unidentified hip bone, and a gator toof
but the fossils are great, most of what you'll find are unidentifiable bits and pieces ofc, like my lil bone chips
I also have a like 3lbs bag of various shark teeth
I'm like 100% positive what I found was a hip bone and it was rather large. Just idk how to identify a god damn hip bone XD. It was also fossilized too
Giraffatitan keeping pace with an elephant: 
So if I may ask. Did pachys likely ram each other like Rams do?
If you can take some good pics from multiple angles & items for scale you could probably email a paleontologist and get an ID, or better yet bring it to a museum or university & ID it in person 👍
Yeh. It was about the size of my hand and I'm rather tall I'm 6'3"
They should at least be able to determine if it's mammalian or reptilian etc based on the bone structure, even if it's too fragmentary to ID beyond that
its likely mammalian, the only reptile would be an alligator
What kind of stuff do people find there?
Actually now that I think of it it resembles more of a scapula
I wish there was like a good chart for the way different bones look in different animals
So I don't have it on me right now but I decided to draw its shape real quick. It's horrible I know. But the circle in the center represents like where the bump/possible ball joint was. I was kinda worried it was a human ball joint at first but idk lol. It was really worn down
You found a Sasquatch remain son, how’s it feel?
Idk lol. It was broken off at the top and bottom left
Idk I was trying to see if anyone had any tips cause I know there's peeps here who can identify a dino by its goddamn pinky toe lol
its likely a deer in all honesty, thats a p common broski
Well we’d need a photo, not a drawing…as excellent as it might be
but theres all kinds of fossil species present so it could be anything really
you are unlikely to find a primate fossil of any kind though so dw about that 
Miocene Florida Man
Nah XD. Its definitely deer looked to the T like that bone
Nice! Good sleuthing @neat drum
As someone who hunts I should definitely knew that lol but oh well. However it was definitely fossilized, or in the process.
yeah p much everything in the peace river is a fossil unless you see it bleached on the shore
example: i have a softshell turtle skull from the peace river, def a fresh broski, not a fossil
Well now you've hunted a very old one
Without evidence I'm just gonna say it was a megalaceros lol
There were no holes as if it was porus it was completely solid like a rock
we had a lotta stuff here, from basilosaurus to columbian mammoths to jaguars
Hmmmmm. One guy we met at the river said he found a whole manatee mandible
Damn that sounds like an awesome site
(just an fyi for the future, its illegal to collect vertebrate fossils from places like the peace river without a permit, its a cheap and easy permit to get tho and i support getting it)
Well didn't know that. None of my family did lol.
its $5 a year, and the only requirement is that you report your findings to the florida paleontological society, if your finds are deemed scientifically valuble they have the right to take said fossils from you for science purposes, but since 99% of whats found is not scienficially important, odds are you get to keep what you find 
Yeah. The guy that took the manatee mandible definitely didn't have a permit lol. Cause he mentioned it to us after. He sells the stuff he finds illegally too
yucky person
He was one of those the government shouldn't have what I found people and he claimed all fossils there had high monetary value
but yeah most fossils found are either undiagnostic or just too fragmentary to matter
also lol, most of the fossils are worth very little 
He offered to sell us a Meg tooth for $150 that he found there. It's one of the few whole ones he found. He uses an airboat and everything
you can buy a dugong rib for like, $10 tops
meg teeth are different but they're also p easy to find tbh
a friend of mine had a felid limb bone taken by the state since it was a fantastically preserved specimen, i forget what species it was though
I found an ammenonite fossil broke in half. Thought about keeping it but didn't know if it was legal too
invertebrate fossils, petrified wood, and shark teeth are legal to take
Ah. That's why I don't have a picture of the hip bone I found cause I left it lay
good choice, removing the fossils entirely is not a great thing tbh
they do have a purpose in the ecosystem
Really?
yeah, they break down and become part of the sediment, provide nutrients to the water that the ecosystem requires, and reduce erosion by merely existing
Oh yeh. I went to the beaches on the east coast of Florida. They legit were made out of sea shells
was halzkaraptor actaully semi aquatic or is that just an ourdated theory
Looks at Nasutoceratops figure I still love you
I'm not sure about halzkaraptor but natovenator which is pretty close seems to have been, halz lived in a relatively arid environment which makes it a bit odd but it has the adaptations for being aquatic
It's an online misconception that halszkaraptor was limited to an arid environment, both it & natovenator had access to a mix of dry & humid habitats. It was a diverse region. They were both likely semi aquatic
you can also have semiaquatic adaptations and not stay in wet environments
Very true
At any rate the type locality for Halszkaraptor has clay & siltstone facies within the sand dune system. The whole region was like the Okavango, seasonal wetness & dryness, a lot of variation. Semi-aquatic adaptations would be incredibly useful, to the point there appears to be a whole group of animals experimenting with this body plan in the area
even in the more arid localities they probably wouldn't have a ton of trouble as long as they kept up with the rains
it likely lived like a weird flightless stork or egret, during the dry period it scavenges or hunts tiny prey/insects, during the wet periods targetting fish and amphibians
It definitely seems capable of swan-like propulsion in the water, surface paddling-not talking penguin or anything, but comfortably taking to one of these seasonal lakes when it could
I expect in the consistently wetter "Nemegt" lithobiotope there may have been an even higher diversity of halszkaraptorines but the preservational bias is strongly in favor of large animals vs baruungoyot or djadohkta
are nemegt and djadohkta separated by locality or temporally or is it both?
I always just kind of lump them in my head for some reason so I can never remember the degree of separation between them lol
man all the little broskis lost to time
I'm more sad about the massive areas that we just know nothing about from the mesozoic, eastern NA is mostly a gray area (especially in the north), a good chunk of africa and SA we'll probably never know about because of the rainforests, antarctica (for obvious reasons), and there's some parts of europe that we don't have stuff from the late cretaceous
there's so many lineages that may have holdovers there or that we just don't know about yet
these ecosystems likely were incredibly diverse, hundreds of small to medium dinosaur species filling all kinds of niches
Both are parts of the same large chunk of time. The difference is mainly in what the predominant deposition type is to each one
oh ok that makes sense, thanks
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/cjes-2020-0148 good paper laying it all out
I don't think it's that out of the question (definitely not just because they're my favorite family) that there may be some late cretaceous brachiosaurids knocking around in some of those grey areas
I mean they were booming in the early cretaceous and were pretty well suited to staying out of competition with other sauropods, we may never know but I just think it's an interesting idea
Macronarians basically took over 3/4s of the planet by then, I could definitely see a relict population of some old grade brachiosaurs hanging around somewhere. It is a shame the things we'll never know but then again, you never know what they'll find. I think that's one of the best things about this interest, there truly is always something fascinating just over the horizon
The early & middle Cretaceous record in general isn't that great iirc, I think it's still not completely settled when brachiosaurids died out
yeah the early cretaceous has a pretty good record but there's a huge gap in the middle cretaceous so it's not entirely clear what happened in that time frame, some areas just have a complete gap for the whole mesozoic going forward from there so it's possible a lot of weird stuff survived past what we think
Certainly, probably many lineages. Jakapil was a mindblower on that one, I think there will definitely be a lot of cool discoveries to come filling in that gap
What could a pachy Full charge do if it hit the side of a rex
can deinosuchus became C H O N K like this pic?
Yes, but is that healthy?
Well they dont chase down the pray they surprise attack it so it wont effect much really maybe slow them down a bit
obesity causes more issues than being too slow to catch prey
bruise its ankles or perhaps knees
Thats as much as i know
Annoy it.
From what I've read pachys had such strong legs they would probably shatter its whole ribcage. On that side
pachycephalosaurus couldn't reach rex's ribcage. it's a little guy
I meant like maybe if it was laying down
Rex just swipes its head or tail and throws the poor guy 10 m away, I doubt a broken rib makes it worth it.
Well a rex will hear it coming anyway
Idk I've watched a lot of videos about pachys and all of them pretty much say their leg strength and speed was so strong that if they headbutted something they had a chance of demolishing its bones or jaw
Thats for sure
even if it was laying down I doubt that it would do that much damage
it's Yutyrannus
she's beautiful
my question: how accurate is length and weight?
What is Yuty related to, megalosaurs, tyranosaurs?
Tyranosaurs
Neat, must be basal since it has 3 fingers
Depends of who you ask.
Yuty is between like 7.1 meters and 8.3 meters for high 900kg or 1.3 tons.
yutyrannus is a proceratosaurid rather than a tyrannosaurid, but since both of those groups are tyrannosauroids, it's still much more closely related to tyrannosaurids than it is to megalosaurids or allosauroids
can i use both 900kg-1.3 tons?