#paleontology
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
The devs really need to backtrack on some of their recent releases 
feathering, in one way or another, is an ancestral trait in all dinosaurs and pterosaurs, so it's likely that they appear frequently throughout Dinosauria, even if it consists of sparse fuzz like on Digital Duck's Tyrannosaurus
Like its a personal preference for fuzz despite there being no evidence? Is this some sorta Gate Keeping for a Dinos appearance? Lol!
You're really beating the dead horse with that one
I just want accurate models and calls… is that too much to ask for

Thats why we have modders always can Commission them.
Maybe no direct evidence, but feathers are an ancestral trait therefore its highly possible Tyrannosaurus had feathers in very sparce amounts that, if were there, just haven't been preserved. Often compared to elephant hairs.
If the basegame says they will give us accuracy we shouldn’t need mods to get accurate Dino’s
That's why you don't see full blown plumed rexes anymore, but you will see some with a lil fuzz
Yutyrannus also broke the mold a bit for large feathered animals.
Jiggy promised us accuracy in models and calls and after amarga has not delivered, understandably the community would like accurate basegame Dino’s since she promised it and not have to use mods to get a Dino that looks good
You are beating a dead horse on that since most devs arent into "realism" like Saurian is.
@woeful falcon Im a firm believer of evidence and where theories are nice but right now all scientific evidence doesnt really support it no offense ofcourse if you guys like Fuzz? Cool not alot of us agrees and thats apart of science its always changing for a reason and why we get new revisions,theories, and etc.
Skull react lol idc
Jiggy said the models would be accurate to time of release.. so yeah they promised accuracy 
Its still in beta lol this isnt a full release game yet.
The promised accuracy ON RELEASE of the Dino, not on full release of the game
Where was this stated??

Jiggy told us in interviews
I mean jesus paleo, rex isn't even the worst culprit of inaccuracy, far from. Kai probably is.
Yeah Kai is atrocious
to compare, I found artwork someone did comparing a more accurate kai with the PoT one
kai has super good textures but it was such a missed opportunity
I agree. Kai with lips is by far the worst inaccuracy in the game. It not Kai it’s a monster XD
You got any clippings or screenshots?
that's the funny part, kai is like, the only creature in PoT that shouldn't have visible scales, because plesiosaur scales were extremely small
Look how cute real kai is, I guaranty that more accurate and good to look at models will make more players play those Dino’s
from the alderon games site btw
But also yes no direct evidence of rex having feathers on the fossil but phylogenetics supports that it may.
Tyrannosaurus skin impressions are few and far between and they are so so so so small
KTO Rex
What is that supposed to mean
TY lol
paleo accuracy is taken into account, basically
Rex most likely had sparse feather coating like elephant hairs
So they try to be paleo-accurate while still putting their own spin on it
That means that accuracy is taken into account, but its not the be all end all.
Which is by all means also valid lol
what the rest of the message says is that they won’t edit the models everytime there’s a new discovery
Would they edit the models if on release they were inaccurate and ugly?
Which is why I am waiting for more evidence lol
Until then my man Im on team Scales. 💪🏻
¯_(ツ)_/¯
If they want.
also, the literal first 7 words of their funding page
With what is suggested on rex, it's both
"teamscales with a little sprinkle of teamfeathers"
@charred gulch
I'm gonna boggle your minds but the rex model isn't as inaccurate as some of y'all seem to be deluded into thinking, its just clearly old.
It’s not too inaccurate my main issue with it is that it’s just really ugly
Aight well that has no concerns for paleo chat
rex will be updated eventually as most Dino’s are getting remodeled, but it’s not inexcusable
They do say Aim but Jiggy recently did say not all will be remodeled so we gotta see in the future overall? This is the best dino game.
With the additional lack of keratin it’s not looking good, plus we know they had keratin so that is inaccurate
Poor Kai is in a much worse boat, the thing isn’t even what it’s name says, it’s just a plesiosaur with lips 
As far as inaccuracies go of new stuff, the things that bug me are thalassodromeus's size and kai
Most if not all the dinos seem to be either Upsized by a LARGE Margin or just sized up for balance reasons.
At the rate they are pumping out remodels it couldn’t be too long, probably less than a year
Kai is honestly just....why
Yes I’m aware of that message but I think they will get to the necessary remodels
(Kai, bars, sty, lamb, Rex’s head, ect)
Light mode sick_emoji
You wanna complain about a Tyrannosaurus inaccuracy, bataar looking like an Albertosaurine rather than Tarbosaurus is one I don't like. If its to be named bataar
https://tenor.com/view/reaction-my-eyes-cant-unsee-burn-gif-7225082 anyways kai and whats its name were the ones being really off
Kai bars and lamb have the worst models imo, those really need help asap
🗿 Yall talking about that but we need a JP3 Spino design asap.
Idk why they did that tbh, having 2 lipless subs and also having no lips until sub for the one with lips is very inconsistent, every other Dino has lips except 1 subspecies for most.
Kai could have been so cute, even a herbivorous aquatic, sifting for algae
would also be something no game has done before, such a missed opportunity
You would have to find algae patches and then sift through them, kinda like bushes in land
having kai be able to scrape along the ocean floor for algae or rays every now and then would've been lovely
Yeah, would be cool for some Dino to get increased night vision ability, laten or maybe even Rex with its big ass eyes
Nice accuracy ability’s are great
aristonectines like kaiwhekea are so unique, being filter feeding plesiosaurs, turning them into generic piscivores is a very bad missed opportunity
Would have been awesome to eat gastroliths 
Here also is an artwork by Tosha Hollman of Kaiwhekea.
Rex needs a texture update and its ok
The issue for me is that rex is just "ok", it lacks character or personality, nothing that makes it unique, may as well be a jurassic park ripoff rex
For example, dasp is mostly accurate, but dasp has some character to it, just the way it looks feels more convincing than rex
But yes, accuracy wise rex is fine, save those lipless subs which are massive oofs
Some teeth are fine, its fun to have some variety.
Funnily enough, the more I think about it and the more I despite PoT's aquatic roster ngl.
First off we have Leedsichthys, a giant filter feeding Pachychormid from the Jurassic Europe. This animal wouldn't really be fast and likely lived similarly to how giant filter feeding fish live and not like whales (whales are capable of lunge feeding and fast movements).
Then we have Kaiwhekea, another filter feeders but this time it is more likely for it to go for the benthos (so the sea sediments) as well as soft bodied preys like squids and possibly shrimps.
Following this, we have Eurhinosaurus and oh God not this animal. Most people think that Eurhinosaurus was analogous to swordfish and marlins, but it absolutely is not. The rostrum is far too weak, not laterally compressed, the teeth are pointing downward instead of sideways and its body plan doesn't reflect the one of fast pelagic Ichthyosaurs. So, this time, we don't have really much clue of what Eurhinosaurus was doing. It possibly could also have been a benthic feeder looking through the sediments with its elongated upper jaw to look for preys in the sand.
Though we have Tylosaurus, which is a neat Mosasaur compared to everything else lmao.
But, as we saw with Kaiwhekea, I highly doubt they will care about this.
In the end, theyll do what they want playstyle wise.
If they wanted to have some more basic stuffs, they definitely could have chosen other animals.
That really is something I don't understand with dino games is that the developers will pick animals and then do whatever they want with it without looking at what we know of them.
If you want a certain playstyle, look for a creature that fits it and we know is close to what you want. As simple as that.
isn't leed in a family of super fast fish though
They are, just like lamnids usually are fast sharks but basking sharks are quite slow (minus when they sprint).
Leedsichthys feeding strategy would have been kind of similar to how giants sharks do as well as how gray whales feed on the bottom (I recall Leed also being a benthic feeder as well).
Isn’t the reason kai is inaccurate cus it’s actually based off another plesiosaur that was scrapped as it was invalid “woolungasaurus” I believe?
Still doesn’t explain why they called it Kai or why they gave it lips
I’m guessing it’s cus they already made the model and couldn’t re do it without extending the release date
kaiwhekea was publicly visible on the list of planned playables for years before its release, i don't think that's it
That was just a silhouette from a Google image
and it was labelled as kaiwhekea.
Hmmm yeh you have a point may I ask how long ago this list was
september 2019, i think. it's in #please-read-faq
Ahh I see so I guess it was just a bruh moment like with pycno
how much does utah weigh?
like 800-1.2k pounds or 400kg-600kg if i remember correctly, that zone
Yes
and how much does chasmosaurus weigh?
I was about to say woolunga isnt invalid but i was thinking of umoonsaurus smh. Missed opportunity to add one of the coolest plesiosaurs imo, dude was opalised and had mini crests on its head
Strange beaft
like 1-2 ton zone is all i can find about it so my guess is the 1-2 ton zone
<2 tons sounds so wrong and small but i always forget that chasmo really isnt that big compared to most notable ceratopsids
Plesiosaurs are all super nifty but they went and fubared it
ikr, esp when alot of the more popular dinos are literally the biggest in their zones and chasmo is "mid" sized( still bigger than even a obese cow)
Like chasmosaurines are all usually pretty huge. Its the namesake of the family but its a baby in comparison lol
Giganotosaurus is a charcharodontosaurid specifically which might be the confusion here
Afaik its never been asigned to charcharodontosaurus itself or anything like that, or vice versa.
Also obligatory "be careful how you use wikipedia" comment, their featured picture of giga on the wiki page is this awful skeletal mount which speaks for itself really
Why does it have neck arms
The same? Chacharodontodauridae as a family predates giga's discovery, because charchar predates it. The 1996 date i think you're getting here is just about a new skull for charchar that was found, not the discovery of charchar itself
Foul beast
Real
If the shoulders were place just a little better it wouldnt be anywhere near as bad. Its funny how something that small can throw it off entirely
L + ratio + no gastralia + arms in ya neck
i need advice
You should have bought Bitcoin in 2015.
Time travel isnt possible so you cant pet the dinosaurs
lets say a utahraptor pounced on a chasmosaurus's head while its down, could the chasmo throw the utah behind it?
It actually didn't have a crest.
Opinions on this anatomy? It’s a giga
This rex is so good 
i have bunch of pic accurate rex pic tbh
yes
The third one easily.
if only we had this ingame, the devs wont hear our plea though :C

i got carried away with the orbital boss on that one so the entire area looks fused almost
wait could u elaborate actually your making me second guess myself
Its the way the osteoderms on the eyes and the neck that reminds me of acro, I see a Rex, but my brain sees an acro too.
i agree with the neck i went a bit overboard with it
tho the orbital boses yea thats to much i got carried away but commissionor likes it so if it aintbroke im not fixing it kinda deal
I want accurate rex in PoT so bad you don’t even know 
But I do understand that many other Dino’s need it much more so I just have to be patient and wait for rexes time
You keep saying that and when people tell you its mostly accurate you say that you mean "not ugly"
I more mean both ig
Everyone wants not ugly rex in pot 
Pot's rex is fine accuracy wise hes just in need of a texture facelift and maybe a lip job 
Like having lips at all 😄 well one is gonna be lipless regardless bc that's how they've been doing it
Oh yeah, if the costumer likes it then its gg, no need to rework it.
This look for the bal species would be nice, gives it personality but is still grounded in accuracy
True true, its moreso that multiple are lipless thats mmmm
Anyways if you revamped the textures pot's rex would look like this dude, nothing fancy but def a rex
Multiple lipless :sick_emoji:
Having keratin alone would go a long way
I would prefer a head remodel, not retexture, it’s the general uncanny shape that many don’t like so going and sculpting a new head for it would do wonders
The head looks fine, its just not modeled after the usual rex specimens, theres rexes who 100% looked like the PoT rex in the face
Not looking like Sue or Stan is actually p dope
Ehhhh the head is very ugly but that’s just my opinion
Only weird gripe is the eyes are too big, but ik why they did that
If rex had accurate lil dots for eyes it would look weird on mobile/lower graphics
It’s very uncanny, maybe it is the eyes looking huge and dry like bouncy balls
Rexes had a lot of facial variation
pretty sure it's based on Stan
boy do I love my triangle eyes
Welp that’s not good, Stan had a dip because he got injured so we have a Rex universally with an injury in every individual 
I thought we figured out it wasnt based on stan looks wise, just size wise?
thought it was stan look wise, last I saw anything on it though was when rex released and people were just comparing it to references
Things that a texture update would cure 
If i actually was invested in this convo i'd go dig for some answers but tbh i dont wanna go through paleo chat looking at every mention of "Rex" 
fair
Kai rex and lamb are highest on my list of must be remodeled
I choose life
Notice how weird it looks next to Sue
When in doubt, I always assume its based on something Hartman made
I wouldn't use Sue's museum mount as a reference
Hartman's frequently used, especially for older Jiggy models
Yeahhh it’s only just been remounted and it’s already outdated
Sue is also huge and with a tonne of injury’s that make her not a great reference for the average Rex
Surprised Hartman’s work spawned the horrid Rex in PoT
I would say the time of which jiggy made the model likely spawned it.
Rex is 100% old asf, def around the same age as sucho model wise 
I'd say closer to Spino model age, old sucho was pretty old
WAIT!!! Jiggy is remodeling old models Rex model is old so Rex gets remodel! Let’s f-ing go! Took my brain wayyyy to long to connect the dots
That’s really optimistic
The sheer intellect, y’all could never have such brain capacity as my terrestrial ape brain
rex is still more recent than the ones getting remodels
Rex was also recently released. We don't know how old it is. Taper those hopes
Maybe, its likely itll just get a texture revamp at most since it looks rough on that front but is otherwise fine
It looks old old. Maybe as old as campto when you look at it’s textures and accuracy
Campto was worse accuracy wise
Judging by that and the textures though
We're gonna have this conversation repeatedly at this rate but I think its important to get one thing straight:
As far as accuracy goes, PoT rex is mostly fine, other species aside. Model quality is another story but that's likely due to the age of the model. Regardless, that doesn't matter to ol paleo chat
Let’s take it to pot chat, we can talk about model quality there
Hey question, should lambeo have a “hoof”?
Yes All hadrosaurs had them on the front feet
You can go ahead I don't want to have this conversation a 4th time
I'm curious about those suspicions of stan being PoT rex's base
Yes or no, depends on who you ask
I'm 109 pages in the search in and nothing yet.
Wait so all hadros had hooves?
It seems like it, it’s got the dip in the snout but maybe that’s a coincidence
Well we can make new comparisons. Someone hook us up with a good side view of PoT rex's head
Edmontosaurus is p distant from lambeosaurus in the ol family tree, so it couldve had a hoof, or something more akin to the usual lil glove feet
Oh so it’s not confirmed that all hadros had hooves
It’s safe to say most hadrosaurs had hooves, there are many footprints that show it and the Edmonton skeleton
Bars can have a hoof
Maybe it was an adaptation to Carry all the weight
Get rid of the sponges they're calling feet currently though
I hope both bars and lambeo are given hooves then
Bars and lamb deserve remodels
Also keep in mind, it’s not a “hoof” like an ungulate, it’s more like a human nail on their hand
yeah bars is squarely Inaccurate rather than just a bit bland - it's a bit dire really, the whole head is just... Weird
Basically only certain groups had derived feet with hooves akin to edmontosaurus, other groups had large nails, but likely bore more weight on their other toes and had a more glove-shape going on vs giant human thumbs
Also this ^
Thanks
I wish you went with any other skin but imma also get my ass outta bed and look in game too
Oh ye ik, it’s just a hoof as in a big nail to bear weight. Nowhere near as specialized as ungulates right?
can just take another pic, you want albino or something?
Yeah nothing like ungulates, ungulates are built dif
Whichever offers better contrast with bg. Maybe a lil blur in the bg too, I forget the setting
Depends, lambeo, as well as probably all lambeosaurins, had nails, now the thing we don't exactly know is how large these nails were and if they formed a "hoof" like what edmontosaurus has, afaik atleast on parasaurolophus it probably had 2 (similarly sized) large nails in contact with the ground based on how its hand bones are structured
You worded it better than me but same point i was tryna make 

im havin a bad time with words tonight so thenks
Too bad
that'll work
couldn't get the blur to look good bc it blurred the outline of the head
not enough skeletal artists do closed mouth. Closed mouth theropoda is such a nice look
Alr, comparing it to Sue (which seems to be the specimen the base model is based on), the biggest issue PoT's rex has on its neck/skull area seems to be how tall the back end of the skull is, and how it connects with the neck. Alongside that, there's the lack of lacrimal horns and the eyes being too far apart 
So essentially the whole head and some of the neck is the issue?
Thats just the neck and head area, the torso is also too deep, should be slightly more slender, but besides that yeah
Too deep?
But rex as a whole is alr accuracy wise like blub mentioned, its nothing too major 
it's the definition of mid
Apart from the head yes
To me PoT has a fine rex but not THE modern rex
It's missing the M A S S that modern rexes have
Doesn't it have a pretty huge mass already? It has a deep and wide torso, a bulky neck
I forget how massive modern rexes are 
I love the horns & bosses on the Prehistoric Planet Tyrannosaurus
Does modern = since Prehistoric Planet
I guess until season 2!
https://theconversation.com/prehistoric-planet-tv-show-asked-us-to-explore-what-weather-the-dinosaurs-lived-through-183701 I thought this article about how they used paleoclimate models for the show was really cool
Nah it was like that prior. PP just popularized it and is the best example.
Goathrob is the oldest "modern rex" iirc
Does modern rex mean
Fat
The ones above the eyes might not have been crests and were just raised orbitals iirc, but afaik the nasal crest is still a thing
Im pretty sure the PP rex has a bit too much meat, especially in some areas that wouldnt have that much meat in any case
jesus
Oh wow didn't realize it was that bad
Is this the PP rex? It doesn’t look like the outline of it
it is, its from the official bts stuff. Its the model overlayed over hartmans skeletal from what ive been told

But it…the dewlap doesn’t look like it’s from the PP model
uncovered or whatever the bts videos are called
i thought pp using this skeletal 
(no pp rex didn't use dan's scotty skeletal bcuz scotty possessed smth i called 'small horn')
It is muscular
Bulky
Tosha came back on this statement and actually believes there were no crest covered by keratin on the nasal. Though, yes, a ridge was present.
yes
fat, chonky, and full of muscle
Guy has a tripple chin, he should stop skipping cardio.
what is the most up-to-date megalosaurus length and weight? (pls don't based on google and wikipedia they're are the worst)
wdym Wikipedia is pretty fine in that regard
That is an interesting interpretation of Megalosaurus, snake-like with a deep neck
I think largest Megalosaurus is about 11 meters for 4 or so tons. Though it is based on fragmentary remains.
Though the most complete specimen is much smaller : https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/897994654916689961/955206237329444905/FOPGYapXsA0UUYB.jpg
I have no clue if that’s his updated one or not he updates it so much
i'm afraid that if i'm using wikipedia there's always a big chance that the length and weight is outdated
Found this Rex model, was wondering how accurate it is? The lips may be too mammalian and it has a skull dip sooo
Wait I'm confused, isn't the fact that theropods have lips alr been proven or smth?
This is the newest one
Not proven 100% but basically a given at this point for most theropods
Woah
Has Paleojoe released a new skeletal of Torvosaurus ?
Oooof, alright
got the weight here
1.627-4.624 kg
need someone to help me convert it to ton it'll be so appreciated to me
Literally 1.6 - 4.6 tons
Also that’s the old model so idk if it holds up too well
appreciated falcon thank you 🙏🙏🙏
Any reason on why lips are more accepted than lipless theropods?
dinosaurs are awsome reptiles my favorite reptiles
Because lips are the default mode for all tetrapods. You’re need to be pressured to lose them, not gain them. Also bird beaks are derived lips iirc so
Paleontologists can’t let preference cloud the scientific truth or probability’s
Ah I see
Yeah that's why I was confused, I thought there was a new paleontology discovery regarding lack of lips on theropods
No, as of current knowledge theropods evolved from a lipped ancestor so most likely had lips except for extremely specialized genus’s and species
what a W
Although the Rex model is a different problem in itself, it’s not inaccurate it’s just not a great model regarding quality so that is also a big problem.
Yeah I can def see it being accurate, but idk. The model ingame feels kinda off (I also think the slit eyes are apart of the problem for some reason)
Yeah, the model is fine accuracy wise for the most part, it’s just very old, I think it may be one of the earliest made models, maybe around when spinos model was made, so it will likely see a remodel or at least touchups
Ideal Rex remodel imo, max belliomo is an amazing paleoartist and does such accurate and realistic work
Though I highly doubt we'd get that high res model 😭 . But here's hoping we get a better one sometime in the future
Got this picture at the museum on Saturday, looks like the duck is judging you
They did say Old models not old releases would get touched up.
Rex has an old model so it will likely get a remodel some time though it’s not a priority due to the fact that it’s not too inaccurate, I would give it a couple months.
Couple of months is fair, I even thought they wouldn't do touch ups on the guy lol
Campto was a priority because of how inaccurate it’s model is
yeah and honestly, lovee the new model. I can def see the difference more than the metri, cerato and others
We aren’t really sure. But I’m assuming due to the backlash for the model on its release and the fact that is very old
Wait did PoT genuinely get backlash when the model first came out? Wasn't really into the community back then, what happened lol? (just give a brief summary so we don't get off topic)
It was huge, the backlash for not only Rex but the general update was crazy.
They shut off the discord to wait for it to die out, that update caused lots of crashes and some people couldn’t get into the game
That’s not even mentioning how mad people were about rex due to the fact that we had such high expectations
Plus the lack of lacrimal crests and the model being generally not great made people very very angry
But it was Also for the update, wasn’t just Rex though the whole thing was kinda a disaster
damn, Its funny how something that made me consider getting the game on ps4 was something that caused long time players to quit entirely
Oh yeah I heard people were mad too because in the trailer they showed sarco being able to grab dinosaurs (which wasn't implemented in the game) with a lot more mechanics that were just for show. Also yeahh... when I first saw the trailer the t rex model looked off as well
Why were people mad about the sarco thing, it's a cgi trailer, it's inherently gonna be not exact to gameplay
Well it's just high expectations ig, since sarco atm isn't that good of an ambush predator (unless you're ambushing something twice as weak as you)
Not gunna comment after this cause off-topic but I think it’s very reasonable to get upset at a low-quality trailer that low key clickbaits the new update and what you can do in it
Low quality for sure
But the grab thing specifically, idk I've seen way more out there things in so many other cgi trailers noone has complained about
Disappointing sure but idk about misleading, nesting scene more understandable
On the topic of rex accuracy tho, was it mentioned above about the eye spacing
No from what I can recall
Oh yeah, talking about the ingame model. What's up with kaiwhekea having lips 😭
No idea tbf
Yes, it's head needs to be squashed lol.
Got stockier and smaller head no?
Dinosaur soft tissue syndrome
Plesiosaurs being one of the few reptile groups that blatantly don’t have lips
Thats dans Megalo lol
Is paleontology more of a guessed based work when it comes to studying prehistoric creatures?
If what you mean speculation based on what was found then yes
Not really no. Its like any other science I would say. Where one might say its more "guesswork" is places that scientists can't exactly observe or study because it involves extinct animals, such as in depth behaviors. But I wouldn't really call it guesswork either. I'd say it all comes from a place of education and attempts at understanding. But can't know everything.
Ehh kinda but not entirely
I'd argue "guess" is the wrong word. Palaeontology is rooted in the fossil record which by its definition is inherently incomplete, but where there are gaps we extrapolate from the data we do have. It's not guesswork 😛
Hunnit
O dang, you're here too
But yes, can agree
Not even to mention the fact that they released a Dino that didn’t really feel like the quality we were used to from the devs
Which also caused large backlash
I see.
I find it so interesting that ceratopsians and parrots have the same beak,
It’s such a great piece of evidence go see what they ate and even what they behaved like in some cases
Just learned of Holtz's hypothesis that Triceratops might have had the highest bite force of any land vertebrate, for my money it was the beak that was the real danger zone to any potential predator
Looks at T.rex
Yea..ok
lmao
Triceratops 100% did not have the strongest bite force, and didnt need to
I wanna hear the reasoning…however poor
Beaks using physics and a sharp cutting edge to do the work without needing beefy jaw muscles
Think of garden shears and how with just a lil bit of force they can cut incredibly thick branches
triceratops evolved from Tyrannosaurus, obviously
They had enormous jaw muscles, much larger than tyrannosaurs. It hasn't been studied yet, but he expects it will shatter records
There was an argument somewhere that I'll need to dig up, but I doubt it was the highest of any terrestrial vertebrate
Yeah you'd have to take it up with him lol, like I said still just a hypothesis, I'll try to find the twitter thread
https://twitter.com/BradtheCurator/status/1552636459554930689?s=20 tweet contains link to the lecture with the relevant bits
@MercuryMercM Like I said, unfortunately we don't have any concrete studies just yet to put hard numbers on the bite force. But you can hear @TomHoltzPaleo talk about it in more detail in his dinosaur Paleo college course here https://t.co/rDXogQVJpa at the Shearing Dental Battery section.
Please note that reminders and warnings are posted so the conversation does not go further than it has, or is a general reminder for the chat as things are being discussed. If you are not tagged in these messages, it is a message for the channel as a whole and should not be taken personally. As per our rules, rule enforcement is determined by the staff team, and is not for personal interpretation. If you have an issue with a staff member, please direct concerns to @feral crane as to keep the channel on topic.
The 4.6t thing isn't megalosaurus proper.
I wouldn't use that estimate for megalo itself
wow deleted my message
Dinosaurs are actually just pebbles
S C R E E C H
Wonder if a sassy little baby Rex would do this
If this would be the new rex model ill be so happy.
New rex skin when??? 👀
can you guys help me choosing the most accurate andrewsarchus?
All of them are perfectly valid.
I would say first one but all are possible
ok then thx
So it seems that carnivores ice age lied to me 
instead of wolf-like appearance, andrewsarchus provides a half pig half hippo-like appearance like entelodonts
That’s just how andrewsarchus was depicted at the time. The more up to date depictions came much later.
oh ok then
That game is older than most people here
When was it released?
Its from 2001
I am younger than it by 1 year lol. 2002 here
3 years😔
Testament to its age. The only other depiction of Andrewsarchus of that time, and probably the most well known showcasing of it, was Walking With Beasts.
Out of those I can stay with relative certainty that number four is less likely to be accurate
How is the maximum size of a species determined if they only have one specimen/skeleton to examine?
Short answer, it isn't
Long answer is that you could assume the specimen to be average sized (statistically speaking, it's more likely for an average sized animal to fossilize than a freakishly big or freakishly small one). Then look at either modern animals or dinosaurs with a higher number of specimens, see how much bigger they can get compared to average, and apply that to the first specimen
We were reminded that #Anomalocaris canadensis ,#Amplectobelua and #Eurypterus have completely different types of propulsion style. The striations of the fins on the fossil tell the story, and interesting to find out by building the robot! It's interesting to see real swimming .
swimming patterns of three paleozoic invertebrates

looks like a thick snake
God help you if the snakes you find are like tyrannosaurs
I know, I didn't say it was PaleoJoe's Megalosaurus.
A carnivorous hippo.
They updated the model of Andrewsarchus?
Large, bulky, and having powerful bites; Pythons are like Tyrannosaurus ha.
how accurate this meme?
T Rex thinking they are 'the mightiest ever'
Triceratops, Ankylosaurus, and K-PG Asteroid: 😃
3 funny out of 10
Prehistoric Planet bars is so good!
Love it’s design, anyone know how it is accuracy wise? I think it’s pretty good
General prehistoric planet designs are very accurate, would be cool to see BBC make it into a dinosaur game though I doubt they will
Yes it is indeed a very accurate design. Especially the shape of its beak 👀
It’s doesn’t exactly have the distinctive back. PhP clearly made edmontosaurus and then basically reused the model for most of the hadrosaurs.
.....
what t rex I've ever hunted in Carnivores match with t rex specimen Scotty?
is it my 11.45 ton rex?
my 11.47 ton rex?
my 11.37 ton rex?
my 11.59 ton rex?
my 10.27 ton rex?
my 11.25 ton rex?
or my 10.85 ton rex?
(ignore they're length)
Bro what
what t rex trophy i have is match with....
what can i say
scotty ig
The biggest one cos Scotty is big
Bro I remember this game it was so good
Deinocheirus and Therizinosaurus which one would most likely use it’s claws and long arms for defense? I was thinking Theri for the longest time there however the Theris claws really whert as strong as some might think they would honestly break off easily to where the Deinocheirus has smaller claws making it more likely for defense? What I’m asking is which species would most likely use there claws for defensive purposes?
Deinocherius
That’s what I figured
Therizinosaurus could not use its claws at all irl
If this were pre-2022 maybe Theri
prolly le duck, though both would def use them for fighting and feeding, but seeing how duck is built id say duck would use em more
Now honestly I could see theri using its claws for more of a scare tactic kinda like all bark no bite kinda thing
Well their claws were still properly attached to their digits so they wouldn’t have fallen off lol. Based on some analyses they could’ve definitely been used to stab but that it
having human sized claws would certainly help with that id say, alongside being freakishly tall at a constant and whatever noises it could make
I used to play thatgame with my cousins
The memories
even with stabbing, the claws would shatter, they were extremely fragile
That’s where I’m gettin at
(or at least with any fairly sized animal, I’m sure it could be used on smaller stuff)
It’s less a case of falling out and more so the claws literally shattering
Now could theri be a omnivorous dinosaur? Like eating small mammals and baby dinosaurs? Or has that Been debunked
Mmm no, I’m pretty sure that’s incorrect
it’s not, lemme get the paper
Both certainly used their claws as weapons for self defense
again, I can see it for smaller creatures or interspecific combat, but if the papers theory is correct then it ain’t goin slashing at Tarbosaurus anytime soon
Oh for sure
Communications Biology - Biomechanical and shape analyses explore the function of forelimb claws, revealing adaptations for digging and display in maniraptoran theropods.
What was the largest Phytosaur: Rutiodon or Colossosuchus?
Also I would love to think theris where grumpy animals like modern day Elephants just attack and kill small animals because you dont like them hahahah
Stress tests are for pressures applied adjacent to the point of the claw, meaning the animal couldn’t slash, but could safely puncture other animals
not sure how well this paper holds up cause I haven’t been keeping up with the discussion
do you have a source for this? genuinely curious bout it cause I’m working on some paleoart atm ❤️
If theri wasn't able to use its claws for defense then it was free tarbo fodder
Again it could of been a all bark no bite situation where the theri could scare off large theropods just with its build
still very possible for theri to use its arms, beak, etc. too fragmentary to discount just yet
@chilly knot it is fodder
Theris claws were fine for stabbing, ez
If a tarbo ran it 2 them they are snapping off tbh
Strongest point of the claw was the tip and ventral surface
What do you guys think are the best marine prehistoric reptiles? i need some ideas
Idk
Tylosaurus is the best
@hardy ravine shasta
Hoffmann’s Mosasaurus undisputed goat
Thalattosuchia
Milked by media+smaller
For sure milked, but we’ve yet to dispute the studies showing maximum length of upwards of 50ft
Thanks!
Same 4 rex its weak how u get murked by a space rock
Not close 2 50
When
Skeletal by incinerox
Could I get a reputable paper on this cause I’m genuinely curious. I’ve yet been able to find a paper refuting the original maximum estimated length
Hey I'm looking to get some ideas for a dino oc I will draw in the future! I mainly want to better understand the habits of the Suchomimus. Are there any irl animals that are comparable to Suchomimus in terms of habits and behavior that I can study?
we don't know entirely but id base it on animals that live around water ways and will swim a fair bit but not just diving non stop, like a beach wolf, a bear( some would say a beach bear), kinda like that( watch it be a turtle)
Ah ok thx!
If it was around with Tarbo it had some way of avoiding or defending itself from them, otherwise it simply wouldn’t exist.
No animal is rlly canon fodder
And animals that are canon fodder usually have enough fodder to survive.
look at living archosaurs: waterbirds like herons & storks, crocodiles & alligators
I'll keep those in mind too! I was also thinking to study diving birds like loons maybe! Thx again!
Honestly, if we had to compare Sucho to something in the modern day, I'd go grizzly simply because it seems to be fishing a good amount of time, but also hunting terrestrial dinosaurs
yeah agreed I think it's highly unlikely to have been exclusively a fisher. Maybe it took more land vertebrates as it got bigger and older, dietary shifts are very common in living archosaurs
Yeah, wasnt a baryonyx discovered with iguanadon remains in its stomach? If that guy did it sometimes, the bigger bulkier sucho probs gave it a try from time to time.
Aye juvenile Iguanodon
Their social behavior would almost certainly be quite un-bearlike however, you could justifiably draw a bonded pair of mates for instance similar to many types of waterfowl (which are a relatively primitive group of living birds)
Maybe even croc like, so mobbing suchos.
Bears are also a lot more generalistic than spinosaurids would likely be, bear food preferences and habitat vary wildly between populations as they aren’t specialized fishers etc
Not a paper but by a person who is among the most reliable on the scaling field
or really croclike with coordinated hunting strats that are comparable to cetaceans and primates 
great idea or a huge group lazing around together
Suchomimus was also the largest terrestrial predator in its environment. It didn’t have much to fear.
As a rule skeletals are generally better than papers for size
But id doubt it, with suchos probably requiring more food in shorter intervals cos of their faster metabolism, I doubt theyd tolerate each other that much unless there was a huge food surplus.
Good point! Make sure to include a healthy run of Cretaceous fish nearby if you go in this direction 
No, ya'll don't understand, we have definitive proof it was going for terrestrial dinosaurs (or at least, currently definitive proof) in the form of isotopes in da bones showing it was a pretty decent fisher + eater of dinosaurs 
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2018.0197
I think this is it (the paper discussing it)
isotope studies are the freakin best
Still, I doubt huge apex predators with decently fast metabolisms would tolerate eachother that much and congregate like crocs do unless under specific circumstances.
Now I’m interested in seeing the scaling behind Primordial Tyrants Mosasaurus 🤔
They've been in papers
Can you give me one????
Anomalocaris Type Robot underwater swimming Test.
アノマロカリスに学んだロボット、調整と改良の後スピードも向上。ほぼ自由に泳ぐようになりました。羽ばたき主体のアンプレクトベルアに学んだロボットよりも、常にのんびり泳いでいる場合にはエネルギー効率も良いようです。一長一短の特徴も。
561
131
I don't recall the name at all so I can't, but I remember laughing at it because the authors didn't know his real name so they credited him as "Incinerox"
I haven’t read on it much but what’s with the whole spino looking like a walrus kinda theory 😂
There isn't a theory, it was meant to be a shitpost, a satirical take on Spinosaurus after All Yesterday's. It was never meant to be taken seriously and you should not do so
Naaaaah, walrus spino.
Spinofaarus is not funny anymore, just pure cringe
Suchomimus was probably really efficient in stealing Eocarcharia lunch too
For spino itself maybe, but I do quite like the concept.
Thoughts on this?
boi be looking hella THICC
that obesity appears to be a rising trend
What abt this
Would it be a far off concept tho? I mean look at elephants the bigger you are the fatter you tend to be looking at modern day animals
Iirc elephants don’t rlly have a high body fat percentage
Modern large animals are also mammals, not reptiles. Mammals have a lot more soft tissue
reptiles and mammals have very different soft tissue
Aside from that yeah I don’t think Spino compares well to herbivorous mammals
So yeah, it’s a well made drawing and it’s funny to look at, but not very likely
Still, spino's whole deal is spiting in the face of scientists so who knows
It's not "who knows", that level of soft tissue is obesity, plain and simple. Like, morbidly obese
Honestly we know practically nothing about spino we look at spinosaurus like specimens to learn about it so honestly we can’t say he looked or didn’t look like that
the simple answer is: that spoon went to mcdonalds abit too much, talk over, next spino debate: why is spino
we know quite a lot about spino, actually. there's a good few specimens by now, and some close relatives that offer information too
the main Big Questions are "was it bipedal or quadrupedal?" (some have found that it couldn't balance as a biped, but others have found that it'd be fine) and "how aquatic was it?" (it seems to have adaptations for a semi-aquatic lifestyle of some kind, but it also seems to be pretty bad at swimming)
We can use related animals to infer about it, it's not a complete random guess as to what Spino was like and it very likely didn't break any trends seen in soft tissue of related animals
A good chunk of said specimens don’t overlap so what is and isn’t spinosaurus is kind of up in the air
"Riddle me this Ba-Paleontologists, am I bipdeal or quadrupedal? and if I were quadrupedal, would I walk on my knuckles?"
isn't it also looking like a few things are chimeric at this point?
Not really chimeric, just may or may not have material assigned to it that doesn’t belong. Some things afaik are inconsistent, not to mention the fact that we now know ecosystems with multiple Spinosaurids coexisting isn’t unusual
fair point tbh, although they're probably at least close relatives that can tell us something about spino
it's at least not one of those fragmentary weirdos with no particularly close relatives to base its anatomy on
A friend and colleague of mine gave me a Tyrannosaur gift one time, a skeletal reconstruction that could be anatomically manipulated and stood on its' feet. The interesting thing was it could be put in poses that would cause it to tip over. I've since wondered if a similarly accurate Spinosaurus model could be made to EVER stand on two feet 🤔
It ofc can be made to stand on two feet depending on how you make it, will it be accurate? Idk
Right, anatomical accuracy is important here 😅
We gotta wait for those arms to be digged out before we try tbh
We have found a way to make it bipedal
(With its current legs)
The rest of my day has been made better now, thanks
Please share the weight and balance research, I've got nothing to do today, would love to look at it 👍
Yeah thatd be nice, havent heard new stuff for bipedal spoon.
http://markwitton-com.blogspot.com/2020/05/spinosaurus-2020-thoughts-for-artists.html Witton talks a bit about posture here, Cau & a few others favor a somewhat tripodal stance with the center of gravity thereby pulled further back but still over the hips
from The Desert Bones by Ijouiher (2022) :
"Cau (2014) suggests that the morphology of the cervical series allowed the neck to be held sub-perpendicular to the rest of the spine, creating the pronounced U-shaped bend seen in the neck of some birds.
This would have allowed the animal to remain upright, despite its reduced hind limbs, as folding the neck backward would help support an elongated head (Cau 2014).
Supporting the head in this posture would have required a series of
elastic nuchal ligaments, which in turn would require large attachment
sites, hence the enlarged neural spines. As these ligaments are passive,
constantly pulling the head and neck backward, the animal would require powerful flexor muscles to move the head and neck, and the spinosaurids have large pectoral regions perfect for anchoring large neck
musculature (Cau 2014).
Cau (2017) took this idea further with the suggestion that caudofemoralis, iliofibularis, and epaxial muscles would have had the same combined force as the neck extensor muscles. These effectively acted
as a counterweight and gave the animal the leverage needed to hoist its
front end upright. In this scenario, the tall spines over the hips would
have acted as an attachment site, much like the towers on a suspension bridge"
No weight or balance study, just certain quirks in the anatomy that was discovered when someone was digging through to make a skeletal
wow discord formats copy/paste from pdf pretty oddly, apologies for that
That sounds interesting, and bipedal spoon is always a W.
@little mauve I agree with the author: I have often wondered if we weren't stereotyping Spino's upper body too closely with other well established Theropods. I suspect if it were capable of anything akin to bipedalism, it was built much lighter pelvis forward, and heavier posterior.
even Ibrahim & his team have walked back the claims of obligate quadrupedality and they were the only ones really pushing it. Until we get very strong evidence to the contrary, it's always going to be safest to assume it shared the default theropod bipedality
That's basically it, heavy rear end balancing a sort of "folded up" front end similar to a heron
The simple method of reconstructing S. aegyptiacus with its neck vertebrae curved up and backwards like a bird immediately balance the animal’s weight distribution
What Cau suggests too is the neutral position for the muscles is holding the head and neck into that folded up position, i.e. it would have to exert its neck and chest muscles to move the neck & head outward/downward whatever. Picture how a heron rests in that neutral S curve position but can strike out
Is there ANOTHER Spinosaurus posture discussion rn
All contributioning to the ecological niche of wading ambush predator 👍
indeed
Yes, a very informative one at that too.
I am a firm believer in both a quad and biped posture
why not both? what if spino could stand both as a biped and a quad?
quad for casual movement on land, biped for faster land movement or wading
No satisfactory evidence for quadrupedality, no other theropod is a quadruped
Yeah its very derived, also the arms are yet to be described.
no other theropod is even close to Spinosaurus, either.
That's not a reasonable position imo
quad is worth considering, or at least until we get arm material
Why assume it though?
I disagree that it immediately does so. I think the simpler fact is you don't even get into the ballpark of bipedalism without the "craned" neck. But there's so much inferred mass here it's headache inducing to try and speak with absolute certainty.
considering how fast new discoveries are coming, and how different Spinosaurus is compared to… most animals in history I don’t think it should be discounted entirely
You can still get in the ballpark, Cau's model is just the most rigorous currently and it neatly coincides with other skeletal and muscular adaptations
im not automatically assuming spino is quad or saying “yup, this boys, this is it.” Simply, I think it should be considered and looked into again, which I assume won’t be long because Spinosaurus gets a paper every month or so
The issue with suggesting quad for spino under the pretense of “ no other theropod like spino” is that short legs in theropods isn’t exactly as unusual as typically thought. Sure it looks absurd on spino, but most other spinosaurs had comparatively short legs. Abelisaurs like majungasaurus and Metriacanthosaurs like Yang were also rather low-slung.
The legs show no sign of muscle reduction either, are four-toed presumably for support, & become semi-columnar when in that tripodal position- supporting even more weight
This isn’t that far off from spino if you look at it.
Of course, but I am not talking purely about the legs when it comes to spino being ‘different.’ Again, im not saying spino 100% was quad, or that it was more likely than whatever else, just saying it shouldn’t be entirely discarded yet
People slowly forgetting we have done small studies on Spino's CoG, showing that no stance would support bipedalism (at least, with the old models. Might've changed with the skeletal changes, needs to be re-tested)
Daily spino discourse @last iron
I believe, with arm material, it could be interesting to look into
Considering the amount of things that also point away from bipedalism, it’s more than up in the air.
It ain't the arm material that's interesting :)
Palm walking Spino 2025
The only thing I feel most confident about Spinosaurus is: if indeed it were capable of dedicated bipedalism, which I'm not saying it wasn't, it must have been the most awkward biped 😅
Or maybe,
Spino ain't interesting.
Know what is tho?
not saying the arm material is particularly more interesting
Very true, it was certainly ponderous on land
The jaw mechanics of helicoprion and how it on paper could have been used to pull soft bodied prey like ammonites out of their shells
I think you missed the point. The neck posture is also indicative of its ecology. It’s not just a morphological trait we made up to dispute ibrahim’s original claims
It would look weird thats for sure, but thats in character for spoon.
what if spino barely even needed to go on land
I've got a Helicoprion tooth in my coffee mug I'm drinking out of. Found it last year while volunteering on a job 😊
Studies suggest it did go on land, more often than crocs anyway.
which studies? I’m interested!
BhUt it CaNT sWIMm- some weird paper
has anyone done studies on a hippo style bottom walker for spino? it wasn't particularly hydrodynamic but you don't exactly need to be if you aren't trying to swim fast
Like hippopotamus behavior? Because I know it’s leg bones are very dense, but not sure about the rest of its skeleton
It’s an older one that looked at isotopes in the bones.
that’s what I’m curious about, I’ve been thinking about hippo movement for like a year or so now but not sure if it holds up
Spinosaurus's bones weren't all that dense compared to other animals, last I heard. Maybe slightly moreso but nowhere near a hippo
Understand all 👍 I was simply pushing back on the idea that "craned neck" = bipedalism.
But it does. It’s hands aren’t designed to carry its weight 😭
What hands?
They did show a trend towards density when compared with other spinosauridshttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04528-0
Nature - In extinct species including non-avian dinosaurs, bone density is shown to be a reliable indicator of aquatic behavioural adaptations, which emerged in spinosaurids during the Early...
(which could also be an adaptation towards bipedality, strengthening those long bones)
Much cooler than spino
Yes but nowhere near that of a Hippo, as for hands we don't know what exactly spinosaur's hands looked like, so it's very hard to say for certain if they could or couldn't support said weight Palm walking spino is just as likely as it is not last I remember
Helicoprion is cool AF 👍 But I'm a little biased. Also, shout out to Oryctodromeus 😅
aegyptiacus specimens have preserved the upper arm bones and some finger bones
would spino need as much density as a hippo though?
Oryctodromeus is very very cool, dino burrows!!
rip ammonite for showing us how they hunt, bro gave it his all to educate us
coughs
afaik nobody has studied it yet, but it would make an interesting paper
Uhh yes, that’s why hippos sink…. Because their level of density is required to become that kind of semi aquatic animal
Perhaps not. Spinosaurus appears to have some biology for aquatic locomotion. Hippos do not, they literally bounce on the bottom of the river to gallop along 🤣
the channels we've found in its environment show depths of 3-6 meters, make of that what you will just an interesting geological tidbit from this book
That sounds quite deep for a coastal delta. I’m not a geologist tho so who knows
Nothdurft et al. 2002 & Baioumy and Boulis 2012 are the sources on that if you're interested, it's specifically referring to the Bahariya Bight which was a mangrove embayment of some type
The land I bought a few years ago is on 95 myo strata: It's been fun combing the debris while we build. It's disappointing however the mountains of Laramidia weren't as conducive to fossilization as say, the Morrison Formation 😔
You're more likely to find a new genus though probably!
That's very cool, I live in NJ where most of our fossils were paved over long ago. Got a few decent sites though
Everything is so smashed up though, it's like putting together a ceramic plate tossed out a window . . .
that's where the fun (arguing) begins!
We have the site we're building, and a big one to the South were a forest service road was cut into my mountain, exposing a huge layer.
Did ya have a geologist out to look or are you going off geo maps? *for the age of the strata I mean
I paid to have a geological survey done, very helpful.
Sooo cool, what kind of sediment is it?
So the land was bought for wildlife preservation, so when the geology report came back that the mountain was on Cretaceous era rock, my wife just laughed. She knew I had struck a personal goldmine 🤣
That’s amazing Kailani!
lmao relatable!! My wife and I prospect at a place called Shark River, which is latest Cretaceous coastal marine deposits, and she wasn't into it until she found her first tooth. My best find was a Mosasaur tooth but still holding out hope for a washed out dinosaur
Is this pretty accurate?
2 for 1 lel, gg.
Strange recreation of quetzalcoatlus’ crest. But yeah it’s accurate
Yeah it’s good
Just about coming up on fossil season too, the winter thaw & spring rains always exposes good stuff
It's Idaho Batholith, the Atlanta Lobe of my particular property is a light colored Granodiorite.
Fossil season is right! We're doing another fossil scavenger hunt this year and tree planting event 👍
bro speaking those science channels you see at 3 am
ok so
could dinosaurs roar
probably
oh :P
is that the first google result( yup it is)
Hears cooing outside
Goes to feed the doves
*Gets eaten by Tyrannosaurs rex instead . . . *
then again there is a debate about what counts as a roar, i just call it a loud noise from something angry
Godspeed! Always loved a combo fossil/nature preserve, connects the past and the present in an awesome way
i think avian dinosaurs might have made for "bird-like" sounds while non avian dinosaurs might have made more reptilian sounds
Avian dinosaurs is literally just another word for birds
also didn't we just find out stuff about chirping ankylosaurids or something like that
Non-avian dinosaurs are all the dinosaurs that aren’t birds (aka the ones we typically call dinosaurs)
Similar internal anatomy but it doesn’t mean bird like chirping noises. A lot of the auditory organs most typical birds have are very derived and specialized.
ah
A lot of dinosaur auditory anatomy seems adapted for ultra-low frequency, which I've always found really interesting
ah ok, so just looks the part and the question now being if it sounds the part
wait really?
i though theropods were avian or something
Nope. Avian dinosaurs are birds while non-avian dinosaurs are the rest of them. It’s terminology to further explain how birds are literally just dinosaurs.
ah
im aware birds are dinosaurs
i didnt know that all the other dinosaurs are non avian
what about dromeasaurs?
They are close to the border line, but non-avian. Basically anything more birdlike than a dromaeosaur or archaeopteryx is on the avian side of that line
Still non-avian dinosaurs. Avian dinosaurs and birds are synonyms lol
Animals can make a lot of creative noises without a specially adapted vocal chord or syrinx. Crocodilians for example can make your hair stand on end with some calls, shake your office windows even.
ah
neat!
absolutely, all you need is a larynx and lungs and crocs indeed use theirs very well. The recent ankylosaur paper got kind of lost in the hype but it's really just the first description of a preserved one in a non-avian. The lack of preservation isn't surprising, considering the larynx is cartilage, but it's safe to assume all dinos had one
Avian means bird
a croc bellow is also low frequency, as low as 19 Hz has been recorded, I imagine it was a similar dynamic for dinosaurs
The American Alligator for instance has a particular auditory call where they clap their jaws: sounds like a car accident. I've since imagined Tyrannosaurids communicated similarly 🤷♂️
A better clarification would be to give the line where non avian ends and avian starts
uhhh Birb is the line, you're welcome
Which I think is avialans?? Pls correct me on that
It's debated, some say dromaeosaurs, others troodontids, others archaeopteryx
personally i consider avialans to be birds but i'm not sure whether or not that's the generally agreed upon cut-off point. there's probably some people out there who only refer to animals in aves as birds
We're talking about evolution, so that line is always going to be hazy
What I tend to see is avialans as the more agreed upon group
With the occasional debate on troodontids and/dromeaosaurs but not often
well avialans would technically be considered within the avian side of things
but just barely, it's safe to consider them the line
Birds are avialans. Not all avialans are birds. And it goes further down.
any new papers on anomalocaris (or other radiodonts)?
We cannot really say what dinosaurs did and didn't do as vocalization. It likely is much more complex than what we think it'd be. Though, as far as we know of, dinosaurs likely didn't roar in the same manner as pantherines do (as they evolved a very special sound box). Roaring though is a vocalization heard in crocodiles.
ah
Gator-like hissing with the resonance of a multi-ton body would be something to hear
Mongolian Tarbosaurus throatsinging.
The bass on that bellow though 😳 Blow your windows out 🤣
Take the air out of your lungs ☠️
You'd feel it in your bones & gut, infrasound can spark feelings of terror and panic in mammals and I don't wonder why
10/10 Home Owners Associations do NOT approve of Tarbosaurus throat singing 😐
Gotta read the fine print, my tarbo is free range and will not tolerate a muzzle
What are they gonna do, take it? Its a tarbo.
Good luck! Doesn't even listen to me, just kind of stares... and drools.... 🤷♂️
omg-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHg0TTqkO5A hiss is at ~30 second mark, this isn't even a big gator & it makes a very big sound
I was at least 14 ft away quietly observing this alligator resting in the marshland and was just about to get up and leave. I guess he feels threatened when I was about to stand up and hissed at me.
Amazing creatures they are.
bro tempting fate to prove a point
we also know it varied a lot between different groups, the lambeosaurines in particular were changing it up a lot even within their own group
Crocs have cool vocalizations
My stomach at 3AM be like.
The gentlemen having a civil convo
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/801233640641789973/968364786867925012/My_Movie_461.mov
Yeah every headcrest was like a different musical instrument, must have sounded amazing
sauropods with big noses like brachiosaurids and camarasaurids were also probably doing some neat stuff with vocalization
They might have been like walking giant bagpipes with that respiratory and air sac system too
at the very least, insane resonance behind that potential nose power
yeah with that much lung power and a resonating chamber to boot they were probably loud
a lot of that resonance would be going into the ground and conducted even further than via the air, with low frequency sensitivity they could hear each other through their feet potentially at vast distances
second one is just starting his engine
Props to the cameraman who captured this, great example of spring-time mating behavior:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIxl10Qvgw8
Notice where the balance of detectable signature is made, it's meant to be felt as much as heard.
http://Ojatro.com
http://Ojatroblog.blogspot.com
American Alligators bellowing, mating behavior, Stock Footage at www.Ojatro.com
The water dance is one of the coolest things in nature
like parallel subwoofers under the water
The amount of variety within crocodilian vocalization is really fascinating
Anyways, yes, the audible calls across the diversified range of Dinosauria was probably spectacular 👍
Thousand species worth of calls was definitely amazing.
plus the huge variety of Mesozoic insects, crocs, amphibians, pterosaurs, & avialans all croaking, calling, chirping, etc. Amazing soundscape for sure
when I saw the cross section in the one paper it looked more dense
here's the graphical cross sections from that paper. Spinosaurus does appear denser than Hippopotamus
I wouldn't go that far, not by a long shot, but it did have dense bones
what is the general consensus right now about whether or not apatosaurines had back spines?
ah so spino is denser than me confirmed?!1!!!?!!1!1!!+
I've always thought those were liberal applications of paleo-art freedom 🤷♂️ I've never seen fossilized evidence of them, but I've never looked deep for them either . . .
there is fossilized evidence of them on diplodocus itself iirc
No, on an animal related to Diplodocus, likely Kaatedocus
ahh
but yeah, I see most art portray apatosaurines like bronto without spines, and some with them. What's more likely as of now?
I remember some Hadrosaurs being discovered with dermal spines, but never Diplodocus. I think like feathers, the application gets broadly associated to an entire genus because of a singular obscure find. I recall one discovery of dermal spines associated to an "unknown" Diplodocid 🤷♂️
It’s healthy speculation honestly, since we know they were present in at least some diplodocids.
Frustrating thing about skin impressions are they get so easily destroyed during recovery.
also, what is the likelihood of the other psittacosaurus species having quills?
fairly likely
Likely, but not likely at the same time. Integument varies between species heavily (“Ubijara” and Compy) so some species might have had quills, some might have not
btw, how many toes did taco have on the ground? Was it just the 3 like normal or the dewclaw as well like in theri and spino
Oh my bad I read that as psittacosaurus Mongoliensis lol
That thing looks like it's from Tatooine.
Spinosaurus the most controversial dinosaur in paleontology history
Guys what’s was Quetz flying speed again
Can cruise at 70 mph and fly at over 100
damn that fast
watch PoT make it butterfly speed
fr
Quetz isn't planned for PoT 
Ur right
Fat quetz is
And thal could likely have been faster lol, shame that it’s so slow ingame in flight
What sucks more is that when you make suggestions for accuracy the devs never act in it even though they said they would be accurate
Nevermind that its twice its size in game than in life
Part of the reason for their high speed is their size so likely not lol
Why is thal so slow ingame?
Using momentum it’s the single fastest thing in game, but ye only sprint-flying looks weird with the speed
w/ momentum it's fast but it's a balance decision, if it could fly as fast as it could irl then it'd be pretty strong overall. prob why Hatz will be nowhere near as fast as it could've been irl
That’s what mods are for, several I can think of that add very accurate dinosaurs into the game.
there is the problem of devs claiming for accuracy and then....not doing it
I mean at least all the theropods have lips and correct wrist orientation
is that really the bar though, having their hands be normal and having a basic body function, no one is talking about the plates being 2 inches off or lambs healing call because they are fine and work, but man when they make em entirely different stuff is the problem
Path of titans seems to be the most accurate out of all the paleo games I’ve played, save for PK. Yeah I wish it was more accurate but if the devs won’t there’s nothing we can do
Gonna level with y'all, I think complaining that Thalasso isn't a flying missile shouldn't even be an accuracy concern. This is a video game, not a dinosaur documentary. Its also important to note that accuracy wasn't in relation to every single aspect we could possibly know, and after the accuracy comment it mentioned feathers and semi aquatics. I think its plain to see what the accuracy claim was in relation to.
You know what isn't perfectly accurate? Pycnonemosaurus. Or these animals even living together. Thalassodromeus's size. Choose smarter battles to wage
pretty sure bob has gotten their game up recently and whats its name saurian, and clearly pk, and they are doing something but leaving out certain ones feels off esp seeing how they tend to be the bigger problems
I’m not part of the Thal missile convo lol
same, thal being a missile is funny atleast and doesn't go against their own stuff, i'm talking about the actual things
Just commission Darren Naish to make a paleo accurate survival game, that’d be perfect. Or better yet a collaboration of a bunch of high end paleontologists. God I wish I could move to whatever parallel timeline that happened in.
or let this game fulfill their word on it and not have debates over it
BoB and Saurian are way more accurate than PoT, PK is the most accurate behavior wise and generally more accurate looks wise
BoB doesn’t have lips tho does it? The acro looked like it didn’t in gameplay I saw of it
its got lips now
BoB is making a playable snake and it looks GOOD, so they are def doing the most rn it seems
its not perfect still either but its not uh...lipped theropod anatomy plesiosaur levels of bad 
BoB is also going back and updating their older models
Name one, just out of curiosity. There are plenty but I want to know one you're thinking of
Tho for me PoT satisfies my thirst for accuracy with mods, courtesy of KTO, PT, JFD etc
Excluding kai that one is obvious
thal is p rough and not great on the visual side of things
yeah its technically accurate...kinda like how if you un-pronated the JP rex's hands it would be /accurate/ its very underfloofed and looks a bit thin in certain areas, the wings dont close up properly, the eyes bug out of the skull in a rodentlike fashion, and the keratinized nares move
kai- oh, metri and rex are in that zone, sty and bars are deformed but not that bad, others would be bias and then a few just being outdated, playstyle is another story but the only ones id say is the actual problem are kai and thal just being eurhino and rhamp but not
oh yeah metri doesn't look anything like metri, its arguably worse than kai
bars and sty are p terrible but thats a gray area because of model age
metriacanthosaurids have very reduced arms, tyrannosaur levels of reduced with some outliers rivalling the abelisaurs
so metri's arms are entirely too big, the head is off a bit too, the proportions are off a bit too, legs should be a lil shorter, etc.
Abelisaurs, well now that sounds hyperbolic
Spinosaurus tho
What metriacanthosaurid has arms comparable to an abelisaurid
the yang by KTO mods has proportions more in line with how metri should be
A beaut
They should’ve picked Yang in the first place because metri is fragmentary
Also how’s Pangea Survival in terms of accuracy
The perk owner picking metri was such an L
Eh not quite.
That one ain't even done and the proportions are still about the same
Now we’ll just get yang but with bigger arms
I mean if you want to pretend that its not basically complete be my guest but Justice's is outdated and even canned by the artist themselves. Does the job of showing the known elements though.
And either way you slice it, much smaller arms than PoT's.
I think the main reason it has huge arms in game is because of its claw attack. Since there's no fossils of metri's arms, they took artistic liberty with it. The same way they took artistic liberty for making pycno into a carno clone.
Oh I know why it has huge arms I was just saying they would be smaller than how they are in game based on our understanding of metriacanthosaurids
👍
I personally dislike pycno more than metri for that reason
Same here
We lack the arms of Metriacanthosaurus, and Sinraptor as well. While we do have arms of Yangchuanosaurus, which indicates proportionally small arms, proportions can change within genera (We see this multiple times).
So while Metriacanthosaurus, can have small arms, they can also have big arms as well.
On the topic of bad designs, let's talk about pachy eating meat and how much of a missed opportunity there was with how its diet could've been the most unique in the game.
This is not Isle 😩 pachy here is.. pretty bland in a way, but very nice sound design.
Pachy has teeth that are similar to canines right? Well, those teeth are situated further back in the mouth which would make meat consumption difficult for the animal in large quantities, but you wanna know what other animal has a similar teeth plan to pachy?
Sure. But in the conversation of accuracy, best to restore metri referencing material of its relatives until more material is uncovered. Just look at Spinosaurus's depictions on that note
Spinofaarus 😳
every time spinofaarus is mentioned from here on out, ima go destroy a scientifically important fossil
👀 i'll start with Sue
Noooo 
Camels. Camels are desert specialists and their teeth are specially designed for consuming tough and spiky plants. In particular, camels are experts at eating cacti. If there was just a little more thought put into pachy's diet, we could've had the first desert specialist in the game, which would've gone well with the release of Gondwa. (I actually thought that's where they were going with pachy when they first teased it).
Metri isn't trying to capitalize off the name of another taxa
Last time I tried eating a cactus.. haven’t ended up well for me.
Just saying, instead of a strictly carnivorous pachy, it would've actually made more sense to make it have a unique diet rather than copying and pasting one they already had.
fr camels will eat cacti bc their extremely hard palate can crush the spikes down so they won’t damage their internal organs, but they still get spines stuck in their lips!! ouch lmao
In terms of arms, Spinosaurus recons have varied arm proportions: they have these large arms or proportionally "small" arms (Oho, in the past, they were commonly given very large arms). So there is room for interpretation in taxa that lack arm material.
omnivore pachy needs to die, I don't know where it came from but it's dumb
I agree with that. Although the idea did come from a scientific study, it was just that. An idea. The only evidence used to suggest this idea was because they had teeth that looked similar to a carnivore. That being said, it's possible that pachy did it meat from time to time like some modern herbivores do. However, in game, pachy doesn't function or play like an omnivore like the devs intended it to. The scavenger ability only allows for consumption of meat and bones, while the herbivore ability only allows pachy to eat water melons and berries. There is no crossover during gameplay like we see with normal omnivores.
i honestly fear sucho
I wasn't talking about its arms I was talking about its legs. And I suppose, the tail as well. Just generally early 2000's, Spinosaurus took after baryonychines. That is how we understood Spinosaurids to look those days. Likewise, you Metriacanthosaurus restorations would be based on our understanding of its relatives.
many, many herbivores have teeth "similar to carnivores" people seem to forget that sharp teeth also help shear up tough plants as well
real talk: why does deinocherius not eat waterbased plantlife in PoT
More accurate than PoT’s theropods?
That's a wide variety to compare it to, and BoB Acro ain't perfect neither.
Their Tyrannosaurus on the other hand, I'm a fan
Good thing everything’s getting remodeled (I am their new modeler, my inspiration is David Peters)
Could you imagine, david peters based dinosaur game
That’s just because of how the ability system works now. It doesn’t remove the fact that they made the playable omnivorous, even if they can’t eat both at the same time in officials at least. On community servers where sleep ability change is allowed, you can switch between meat n plants
wouldn't call it a omnivore, its either a vegan or chugging bacon down but never at the same time
But also also, the idea of Pachy being a desert specialist akin to a camel is honestly more out there than the idea of it eating small animals or eggs or bones (like practically all herbivorous animals do in at least small doses. Giraffes will casually swallow bones for the phosphorus) when Hell Creek had no cactus adjacent plants.
That still counts as an omnivore. Pachy isn’t making a fuckin chicken salad
omnivore is being able to eat both at the same time is the whole thing, it cannot do that ingame seeing how its literally either a meat eater or a plant eater, never both
if i'm vegan half my life then suddenly eat only meat i'm not a omnivore now am i?
also they did have omnivore diets before, as in actual ones like being able to eat shellfish and stuff yeah for the ceratopsids or something like that, unless those were just 1 stop shop ordeals like rn
Omnivore just means the animal can freely eat plants or animal matter, doesn’t mean it has to be at the exact same time. Pachy or Deinocherius isn’t making a salad with everything in it that they can eat. The diet split is simply a game mechanic. It doesn’t remove the fact that if you want fish you just sleep n switch, or with a bush you do vice versa…I feel like arguing this is as arbitrary as you can get.
They’re omnivorous, but for “balancing” you just pick which one you wanna run at the given moment
Hell, I don’t see anyone arguing that herbivore diet should actually just be labeled frugivore since all you eat on that diet is berries and melons
if we ignore needing a homecave for most of the whole changing diets it still isn't really being a omnivore beyond the option of one or the other, never both its a omni choice but not a raw omnivore feel like is the best way to put it, and if we talking balance they could just give it high drain or more specifics, and probably because frugivore is a much more niche term seeing how omnivore is pretty much eat anything organic
sure is paleo chat out here
smuck become a backer so we can have this talk in backer chat and not general
but this feels like one of those things that will go in circles, so the reasoning behind a 2 headed animal is a sister cell/child/whatever ya wanna call it being absorbed or something improperly yeah and gets more difficult with stuff like mammals and birds, so i wonder how often it'd be for dinos beyond birbs, also ignoring they die after awhile apart from like...4
No. Backers are stinki
imagine if we found a fossil dinosaur with this
absolutely astronomically rare and basically impossible, but just imagine
it'd probably be an embryo or very young hatchling, which in itself would be an awesome find since those don't preserve very often at all
two birds with one stone, except the stone is an egg, and the two birds are conjoined
any idea of metriacanthosaurida like metri and yangchuano's weapon?
Their mouth probably. At least for yang. Huge head.
Mouth and arms. Reduced armage ≠ useless armage
Yeah mostly the head, it’s still the most obvious and far reaching weapon they have.
Exactly
Yang is also overall pretty different morphology wise from other metracanthosaurids
what is the most up-to-date mosa length and weight?
12 meters and 10 tons
any posibilities for 13 meters mosa?
No.
....
too late 🫠
Always make the animal bigger for chad points.
Sometimes I imagine that some ankylosaur cant flip back their body and just dies of exhaustion because of it
Is it possible ? The only animals that have this problem as far as I know are tortoise
What can flip an ankylosaurus tho, being flipped over isn't a problem for the large tortoise
another ankylosaurus
And possibly the environment
My dad
Where
destroyed in seconds, dear lord thats brutal
It's still a problem for big tortoises, no different than smaller ones: tortoises have developed techniques to right themselves for sure, but the viability of these I place at about 60% effectiveness. However cute it is watching fellow tortoises right a goofball friend gone inverted, in captivity we would usually permit 3-5 minutes of struggle before a keeper intervened.
As it pertains to Ankylosaurids, the tanky Dinosaurs could obviously benefit a great deal by their large, heavy tail, to swing in order to build momentum to right themselves. Tortoises by comparison often only have their long necks to pivot off of. But I can't overemphasize the cuteness of a Red Footed Tortoise waving it's tiny legs in the air in a hopeless attempt to right itself 🤣
Oh yeah, the tail would probably be great help.
Would be very interesting to see that modeled with some real physics, similar to the tail-as-a-weapon studies. I could see being flipped as a potential problem for ankylosaurs and we know their tails were strong as anything, maybe it was an important secondary function
Just thinking out loud: but the tail could be swung in circles to create a gyroscope effect, making the animal stabilized on all fours, and even more difficult to overturn by virtue of physics 🤷♂️ But more practically I think it would be swung in order to produce momentum when overturned to right the animal. But a gyroscope hypothesis wouldn't be out of the question, although I'm unfamiliar with an extant creature that can do the same 🤔
me, oh wait that requires a shell, darn, lemme go find one at the walmart nearby
The gyroscope effect is a veeeery interesting idea. And yeah exactly, extremely qualified comparison would be like a horseshoe crab using its tail for leverage to get on one side- even digging in the stiffened distal end somewhat for added oomph
Yeah that was a stretch what I said but personally I've never seen a fully grown galapagos tortoise flipped over
horseshoe crabs have been around almost as long as Mr.Krabs so they do have some tricks up their sleeves, also don't they got special blood or something that folks go nuts over
Their blood is super important for us, it makes vaccines possible
thats something a ritual hoster would say
but also ah interesting, didn't know that
A lot of it depends on the tortoises' personality and habitat. Small tortoises for example are actually eager climbers and are more accustomed to rollovers, Galapagos and Aldabra not so much. You would sooner see the giant tortoises righted by a fellow herd mate.
if ankylosaurs flipped they could prob use their stiff tails and head to push themselves over
but the odds of one flipping on its own is likely nil
Perhaps a stretch, but I don't see Ankylosaurs being the type of animal that intentionally put itself at risk of flipping over. But many would say that about tortoises 🤷♂️ I'm firmly in the camp Ankys didn't spend much time upside down 😐
I heard that there's evidence of thescelosaurus being fully scaly, is that true?
Meanwhile I wait for nodosaurs to be in dinosaur games (Denversaurus does count but it’s sadly not playable). Sure they are just ankylosaurs without the club but they can exist with ankylosaurs since they have more selective diets.
Gameplay wise, Nodosaure could also be decently different.
I have basically no knowledge on nodosaurs except them being ankylosaurs without the cool clubs, how do they differ besides that?
It’s not true
ok since then I was told only its legs are known to be scaly
Not true either
feathers don’t preserve well in the HCF (if at all lmao) so it’s impossible to determine
Wouldn't it be fairer to say evidence of scale impressions
Who is telling you this? And did they provide you greater or lesser amounts of evidence than strangers on a video game discord channel? I might encourage you to find the answers you seek at a museum, speaking with staff or the curator. They love to take questions. Also, spring time is coming: All field work and exploratories are taking volunteers 👍
Based answer ngl.
(Also keep in mind, staff and curators have opinions too, some not necessarily correct. They are not the end-all, be-all on issues)
💯 But the same could be said of you or I 🤷♂️ The difference is a Curator for example will be able to provide evidence, or connect you with somebody more knowledgable 👍
DePalma isn’t exactly the best in this either :p (speaking in “more knowledgeable” in this case)
But that's a very good point: Scientists and researchers have opinions, too. It's important for people to distinguish opinion from proven fact or testable hypothesis.
Nodosaurs had much more selective diets compared to ankylosaurs, meaning that they didn’t eat every plant they saw but had a particular preference for specific plants.
There is evidence for scaly Thescelosaurus but DePalma isn't a reliable source nor evidence for it
Hypotheses can't be made on fossils kept private locked in a glorified strip mall safe
You talking about private collections?
I'm speaking on private collections and someone who has a history of data fabrication and academic misconduct.
ah big words, can't be me then good to know
For example, Ankylosaurus and Denversaurus lived at the same place and the same time but had their ranges and ecological niches didn’t overlap with each other enough to have them somewhat coexist with each other, though Ankylosaurus may have preferred upland areas.
Private collections are a problem, but toxic academics are supposed to be naturally weeded out . . . emphasis on *supposed * to be 🤷♂️
So, just them being picky over ankys not caring, thats neat.
DePalma is able to worm his way in with his family's pretty large wealth and influence but he's starting to get kicked out.
Yeah. Plus the well known Borealpelta specimen was found to have ferns and charcoal in its stomach, meaning they can take advantage of new growth after a forest fire.
I thought that was a really exciting discovery: it not only provided us diet information, but a glimpse into the animal's ecology as well.
Yeah. It really tells a lot of what an animal eats, which is really exciting when you don’t know much about them.
Yeah thats cool, borealpelta was insanely well preserved from what Ive heard.
It is. From what it’s colors were to the placement of its osteoderms to what was the last thing that it ate before it died.
Lil guy, ate some charcoal then became a mummy, sadge
A good reconstruction of it.
Nodosaurs remind me of a dino toy I had, same body plan and everything, except a crocodile style mouth and head.
Well good thing there are better figures out there now.
Yeah, think I still got the figure, Ill check and compare how science has progressed.
Never heard that, why come?
The environment is just not based enough
Smh. Become literally anywhere in China
Why did concavenator have that weird part on its back
Evolution baby
Yeah but what is it for
We dont know, probably display or smth.
To fit into Ichthyovenator (jk)
Nah no jokes there, they worked together to form the ultimate beyblade.
If you want a rlly good example of Similar animals coexisting in the same environment feeding on practically the same thing, then the African Savannah is a good one.
Several species of Gazelle, Zebra etc feed on grass, but only very specific parts of the grass. The first species eats only the tips of fresh grass, the second only the middle part and the third the bottoms.
Then the other species do a similar thing with dry grasses.
It’s genuinely amazing
Niche partitioning goes hard
nemegt formation question: is there any posibilities for deinocheirus vs therizinosaurus?
Weird gazelles ngl, why not eat all of the grass, probably cos the grass is taller, but whatever works for them i guess.
just play jwe2 in a day or a modded PoT server, boom( ||but for real, i don't know||)
also the fact that its generally quite hard for herbivores to outcompete other herbivores without harming themselves in the long term
If you want a dino battle, I don't see why they couldn't fight. Contemporary and similarly sized
They lack clubs as a whole: they both lack the handle and the hammer. Nodosaurs also usually are higher limb-ed than their cousins Ankylosaurids. They show much more developed osteoderms on their shoulder.
The diet can also vary a lot but that's generally something common in Ankylosaurians from genus to genus. You can have multiple species of Ankylosaurs in a same environment exploiting different resources.
Anyone know how tall the tallest ancient trees got?
tall
.....
theri and deino both dislikes each other
I see no reason why theri and deino would fight often, don't they eat completely different things?
I mean, it could, and I'm sure did, happen. While they may have fed differently, I could see a Theri coming across a cherius while wandering through a marsh. Big birds can come into conflict with each other over just about anything from nesting to food to space. So I imagine a mother or father Deinocherius wouldn't be too keen on a Theri getting close simply due to parental instinct. The Theri, put on the defense, is gonna splay its claws and what not.
Turkeys fight with chickens
Geese fight with swans
So on and so on
maybe, but rarely
they have 0 reason to fight and likely lived in completely different areas, ate different food, and had completely different specializations
geese and swans, turkey and chickens, etc fight because they live very close together and eat similar food
Equivalent heights to modern redwoods were not uncommon in Mesozoic conifers. So up to 300 feet or so potentially? I forget what the record is for sequoia
Coastal redwoods can get 115 meters, so close to 400 feet was certainly possible and probably not rare with growing conditions back then, pristine ecosystems, etc
Depends on if either one had a hippo attitude then...
I would say they probably interacted, they both lived in the same time around 70 million years ago in late cretacious with fossils being discovered in modern day Asia in the nemegt basin (golbi desert mongolia) so they probably lived very close to eachother and probably interacted so I'd say yeah there's probably a high possibility it happened just because of the millions of years they've existed its had to have happened before.
Ha
Modded quetzal tho (I think so)
Yeah
Yey Happi
what was this god forsaken noodle of a tail used for
What is that
most likely not since they held different niche
leaellynasaura
I hear it might not actually be that long or something. I can't quite remember what it was
??
alright was trying to look up what exactly was the case and I knew it was talked about here and this^ was all I could find in relation lol
aahh
so it's not properly designated as leaelly's tail yet, but it's most likely that so people just say it is?
I can't comment on the likelihood. I can't even comment on if that statement is true. its all based on memory which I am especially poor with lol.
but I'm under the impression that its just a case of, the tail exists, its not attributed to anything, but people restore leallynasaura with it
or at least Patch did. but again, my memory fails me.
Yes it’s currently not included with leallyn but it does exist which makes one wonder
It’s been said before but Geese and Swans feed on similar food items and desire similar nesting spaces being both waterfowl, same with Coots, as they come near each other’s nesting spaces and food sources frequently.
Chickens and turkeys have a similar think going on, tho in the wild they wouldn’t do this given that they naturally don’t live together outside of human influence.
Perhaps they had minor squabbles if one went to drink water and came across a parent with young, but that’s very unlikely to end in a fight, and yeah encounters would likely be minimal given their respective preferences.
I think when concocting any versus scenario to look at it from the lens of them being animals, their behavior animalistic. Did they fight? probably. were said fights full blown death matches or brawling for the sake of it? I don't think so. I like to think of them as situational conflicts rather than "x vs y"
^
Aye, most fights are animals doing threat displays, hissing and perhaps a quick snap where one party backs off quickly as it would rather not deal with that.
istg if someone said "Only in Ohio" 🤓🤡
https://twitter.com/FabioAleRomero/status/1639694923225071622?t=-QZuif_aYYfCVQBobva3CQ&s=19
Purassaurs fans
what is the most up-to-date elasmo length and weight?
This is essentially a more winded version of what I said. I merely said turkeys n chickens as a prominent example to come to mind. While they likely preferred different areas (we're not particularly sure where Theri was hanging out, but high browser is definitely the easiest label to slap him with, so woodland area probably) overlap and conflict of interest isn't impossible.
If ya’ll haven’t heard an Australian meat company has just made a meatball using Mammoth proteins and sheep cells. Link to the article below:
Our race is messed up beyond belief 
Honestly yeah it doesn’t even look appetizing. It looks like a dung beetle took a mammoth turd and rolled it into a ball.
Fr
It isn’t entirely impossible no, but aside from very specific situations, such encounters are generally unlikely/uncommon.
So messed up lol.
sounds like a human thing to do
Totally.
Probably not going to find another use for mammoth proteins, likely hood of resurrecting them grows dimmer by the day: we got activists trying to murder our Moose now, because, big animal eats too much grass - bad for the environment 🤦♂️
who else but humans trying to kill everything
dolphins but they don't kill always, they uhhhhhhhhhhhhh do stuff
like what stuff
questionable stuff to say the least
Like a dog that hasn't been neutered stuff . . .
They do things that we could be arrested for
I think dolphin rap has been exaggerated to a heavy point, especially due to Casual Geographic. Iirc not many dolphins do it with it being a specific population using fish to get high too
dunno esp seeing how they also tried humans abit as well( which was kinda our fault as well for keeping em captive and doing all sorts of stuff in that case) but they aren't the only ones i will say
I understand how this conversation got to this point but lets keep the chat on paleo topics please
atleast you understand, thank you for atleast being nice about it, anyways whats its name the super preserved ankylosaurid who was red
Borealopelta
I don't even know how the conversation got here myself . . . my head is kind of spinning 😅
ah thanks, anyways beyond the color and general bones of it, what else was preserved? since ive tried searching it for all of 2 seconds but got nothing beyond: R E D
I think Borealopelta was the really cool, partially mummified, fossil found in a Canadian quarry.
why
Stomach contents iirc too
Read the the article and that’ll answer your question
He was forced to eat charcoal when he was 5 (meters)
i too like eating charcoal daily
made a paleo meme of it, can’t share it though cause rules
after all these years
what eating charcoal does to a mf
Эйййййй

Я руслааааааанннн
эйййй

No lips has always been a biased viewpoint so I appreciate that there’s actual literature saying the obvious now.
Чоооо.?????? :LatenL
OL:

100% sure nobody would complain if all of the dinosaurs in JP1 had lips
Exactly
which is why nobody complains about lipped dromaeosaurs lmao
Mfw people say that accurate dinosaurs aren’t scary
just the small ones had lips in jp1
you can see one raptor's lips curling up in the kitchen scene
Still wouldn’t make sense to why such a change in facial tissue would happen with size. The lipless thing breaks down once you actually look at theropoda as a whole and see how dumb it is when applied to other taxa most people just subconsciously assume are lipped
Hello, this channel is for the discussion of paleo related topics, however other topics can be discussed here #русский if you so desire
Lipless therizinosaurs anyone? 
I've always thought that lipless dinosaurs looked dumb anyway, makes them look less aware. They're more personable and cool looking with lips....
now the next debate, still reptile lips or movable mammal lips 💀
Monitor lizard lips
Basically. That one’s less of a debate.
https://twitter.com/TomHoltzPaleo/status/1641506214222651410
Incredibly rare Holtz L 
@LordTrilobite On its boopable snoot, sure. Not on its lips.
awesome study! Very stoked to read this
Which is actually false lol, large grazers are super important
https://twitter.com/hfclennon/status/1641503388016971777?t=ZYuiq9lQp9UeUt37Fc81fA&s=33
The amount of copping
Along with dinosaur feather revisionism, this is just another assault in the Woke war against the aesthetic of Western Civilization
LMAO 😭
XD💀
Last guy’s joking
“Nooooo f you science for not aligning with my artificial consoomer childhood, everything woke!!1!1!”
worst part is folks start treating the original works as being bad instead of realizing its outdated and then other folks blindly go along with it even if outdated
No effort required to convince me, Ecology is kind of my *thing * 🤣
Believe me, many a time has my face met my palm reading a nature article espousing destroying nature . . . to save nature? 🤦♂️
I couldn't care less about what some random brainwashed twitter losers have to say to be honest. They can barely hold their sphincters closed most likely.
I am glad this paper finally came out.
Internet is a dumpster of bad information
If T. rex having lips rises to your threshold of wokeness, I doubt you could even spell T R E X, or point to one in a pop-up picture book. Can you imagine trying to explain to a person like this, that perhaps their favorite Dinosaur is described by a single caudal chevron? And the totality of paleo art is a brush stroke of imagination 🤣
Lipless theropods look ass, change my mind
Please remain polite and respectful towards each other and do not provoke or antagonize other users. Refer to our #rules
mind changed 🪄
🤣
fr
Lipless theropods just look like they have an overbite
ong
It looks goofy
How I eat my burritos when I’m hungriest
That is some incredible rex art. Assuming Mark Witton? Can't quite read the signature but it looks like his work.
Yes it says M witt 
http://markwitton-com.blogspot.com/2023/03/new-paper-fresh-evidence-and-novel.html?m=1
He's actually got a blogpost on it just went to check.
another awesome image from the supplementary material
Wait what? Something about Rex lips or mouth?
theropod lips, a paper supporting that they had lips
yep just scroll up to the discussion above or the link to witton's blog
Sick
Pretty sure
I do 100% believe theropods had lips. Look at modern reptiles.
Same
Also lipped dinos look cute.
did australovenator ever actually live leaellynasaura?
