#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 452 of 1
Good thing there are way more tropes than just the ones limited to the D&D community.
If you take the classic YouTube dnd stereotypes, that's annoying
Character tropes and archetypes are peak.
Dnd class tropes and archetypes are…. Not
Like the Bard seducing anything and everything, that's annoying
I was once a life cleric/necromancer. my motto was “no matter what, you’re getting back up.”
Homie asked me for the D&D combat playlist and now he's all confused asking me "Why are almost all these songs from a card game?"
Who am I to question why a card game designer decided to go so unbelievably hard for a game where you put numbers on a board
Did you ever get to use the necromancer part on them?
Oh my g. Yes!! It was bittersweet!!!
Did you manage to full revive or was it more “lights are on but no ones home” scenario
Dude was a zombie.
"Don't worry, I'll keep you alive. One way or another..."
We kind of just went with it and that was his character after that point.
Really made the paladin aspect for him quite awkward.
Speaking of, what deity did your cleric serve?
Haha. Lolth.
Sacrilege...
That tracks
I always worship Lolth.
@nimble isle #tales-from-the-table message
A Lvl 10 Spellslinger would scare the pants off of him.in an instant
What was his AC without magic (if you know)
Spellslonger
Fair play, I went with Lathander with my Cleric
Then we’re enemies.
C’mon. Everyone in the party loved the idea of a zombie paladin.
Minor spelling error
My order cleric served Tyr
Ah like from god of war /silly
Although typically I don't imagine Lloth as a deity for life domain clerics
I would just like to remind everyone that he was in a family of assassins, which were the other players
Oh damm, wonder how that dynamic played out
Death domain cleric watching in disgust
Let the dead rest
He didn’t mind too much, except for when his father did it, because his father was the most sadistic of the family
Yea. I mean it is cool. I did a full barbarian campaign and my character was a drag queen named Chunky Tinsel.
Now I hate to umm actually but that’s grave clerics who wish for the dead to remain resting
Wouldn't that be grave domain? (I think that's what it's called)
Yeah. Death domain cleric would love that idea
I mean death Domain literally gets animate dead
Next session i do is gonna be uncharted waters for me, im multi-classing for the first time
Listen I meant to type that I am just quite tired
Death Domain is Myrkul territory, Grave domain would be Kevlemor
I fell in love with my current character. Probably going to stick with that dude.
Personally I prefer Anubis
Share with the class Jimothy
Anubis is pretty goated
My super kind myconid that automatically accepts any request asked of him, doesn’t understand how money works, and has ridiculously high self confidence.
What a sweet sentient swarm of spores, I'd let him eat as many corpses as he wanted
Sounds like a plasmoid I recently had in my campaign
He wouldn’t do that. He eats mushrooms.
My old players still haven't realised the hoembrew deity I made was literally just Anubis
But how else will he make more of himself to start a colony?
Called Sibuna
Oh. He’s been excommunicated for giving himself a name and wanting to mingle with the other races.
Nah, his name was Ba, as in the term Egyptians used for soul
And for eating mushrooms? I can't see cannibalism being appreciated
People eat other mammals. It’s the same thing here.
Yeah but we don't eat elf and onion soup, or monkeys, they're too closely related, it'd be like you eating yeast, but you eat mushrooms
Mushrooms are just mushrooms. They aren’t sentient.
Or slime molds actually
You tell that to the mycelium networks that bind trees
Look. I made a character and he is who he is.
People do eat monkey in parts of the world though. So I wouldn't call that a great comparison
I didn’t want to bring that up.
My point being is, that a myconid isn't just a random mushroom that suddenly grew legs and started walking they're entirely different from regular mushroom and fungi
Exactly.
Eating regular mushrooms is like a human eating cow meat.
Plus, wouldn’t eating mushrooms offer the best nutrients for another mushroom?
All the nutrients are in there already.
how do i send messages that adjust to people's time automaticcally
You can use a website like this: https://discord-timestamps.com/
Then copy the format you want and you get something like <t:1777537920:f>
Damn. I really want to upload my homebrew here. But it's pdf file and those can't ve shared in homebrew section T-T
Yeah, no direct uploads are possible, but you can upload it to something like google drive and then share a link.
Damn. No GIFs. I tried to send Gale's thank you :3
Yeah don't feed the gif dragon.
Gif dragon is On a diet
Hello. I am not new to D&D but I am new to the server.
Ive got some fun ideas for running my first one shot
Welcome
Hes gotten too chunky
For the final puzzle door its not enchanted no traps and has them yell something embarrassing about each person even though they could just walk through it alerting the enemies around them
My brother is running a Curse of Strahd game and he says he is taking inspiration from the game Fear & Hunger... I am terrified. 
Hey ive seen that youtube short 
Fear & Hunger is a game that is objectively more dark than Curse of Strahd.
Oh.... Cause Curse of Strahd wasn't disturbing enough of course
One of the endings, that is in every game, is you jump down a chamberpot hole looking for loot in the roleplaying game and starve to death.
So you just starve to death in a poohole.
You look into a well and what do you find? Theres nothing there-matt
And that's like... One of the more tame deaths. There's a boss called Shivers or something that turns you into a human centipede.
Hell yea
Just get them trapped in a cycle of dying starving reversing then feeling it over and over just so they can watch for fun
I think we should perhaps stop here before a mod casts smite
I dont wanna fight shades
Yeah valid.
Sorry, was just trying to communicate... I am terrified to play this game.
The whole going to 0 strenght you die and come back as a shade
Or shadow whichever enemy it is
Should I play a gnome artificer or a satyr paladin or a tiefling bard?
Yeah and curse of Strahd is not exactly a very happy module by itself
I know. 
I wanna try ravenloft
I'm super worried I'm gonna die.
Honestly if the campaign just keeps going we can at least play it to a TPK.
We'll get more ravenloft soon
Every time I play a campaign it drops.
Satyr paladin is such a vibe. I love being immune to magic.
I also never realized that healing magic counted as white necromancy
Of the three the Paladin is probably the toughest, if you're worried about dying. But honestly, how dire a threat death is an any campaign is up to the group. If you don't want it to be such a threat all the time, express those thoughts to the group and DM and work it out.
If you're somebody, then where you were somewhen when something happened to someone?
[Noir detective music]
Can you have multiple auras going at a time like Aura of Protection and the magical aegis aura?
Cure Wounds has been many schools over the years and editions. Necromancy, Evocation, Abjuration, Transmutation.
I dont mind the threat of death. It adds flavor to the story
I don't think there's any reason for why not?
I'd prefer if they just got over the necromancy stigma and made everything affecting the transition between life and death into necromancy.
Like raise dead? Necromancy. Cure wounds? Necromancy. You cannot evoke healing energy because there is not elemental plane of healing.
I was somewhere somewhen when something happened to someone
@olive storm wait! Wait wait wait wait wait wait wait! Your pfp. Is that reference to Mr. Tumnus from Narnia!
Damn...you free to go. Have a nice day, sir
No actually! It is a Picrew from an artist called Baydews.
Honestly it just goes to show that the difference between the various schools of magic is largely arbitrary.
Cure wounds in my head makes more sense to be transmutation
The artist makes a bunch of assets to be used to make custom artwork.
Another picrew pfp user, greetings
Heyo!
Hey Amity
I like satyrs. I am the goat.
Oh. Okay. It just looks really similar
I will gladly use that in my games, I like magic being mysterious, so having the labels of the schools be completely arbitrary and humanoids’ attempt to rationalise a wild aspect of the universe is very on theme for my setting and interesting to me
Umm acktually not every satyr is related to Mr. Tunmes.
Goats are cool yeah
(I have never seen Narnia)
Theres some really cool spells though
Hi Somebody
I mean. The design is kinda similar. Naked torso with just a scarf, big ears, more humain face,
Das fair. Like I said, I never watched Narnia. 
artist that made the picrew may have used them as inspiration
I do truly need another name don't I
Well. As someone who saw it as a kid and now as adult I could state that you didn't miss much
Like. It's basically a fantasy version of Bible
Perhaps
I do like to give Wizards and Wizard schools some benefit for having classified magic, but I also like there to be a more wibbly truth under it. The schools of magic are true-ish and it might be so because wizard schools are enforcing those classifications in a quantum observer type way rather than having discovered it.
Make them have pacts with different realms
I am... Not sure I know what you mean...
Like... What does that mean? That can have so many different meanings.
Not like warlock parts, but more like corporate agreements
It adapts the Bible into a fantasy world basically. The books are all Christian allegories
Ahh okay. I thought you were speaking in like hyperbole.
I can use that too! Controlling magic is seen as very villainous in my setting, so I can use this as a way that the god of magic and wizards are trying to take control of it all
I am currently writing a setting where the only magic that is accepted is life magic. The setting is based around the idea that reincarnation is a fundamental part of the cosmology and life magic draws on a reservoir of energy used for reincarnation within an individual.
I tried to explain but mentioning certain persone whose name starts with J is forbidden by bot))))
Jay? Mistah Jay?
Is the interception fighting style any good after tier 1? I really love the idea of it but not sure if i'll be falling behind at later levels
@gusty charm see)))
As in the husbando of Harley Quinn?
Huh yeah I just got my message removed when I tried using a different term
The Jorker?
Yeah uh no religion here that's why
Let's call him mr. J. Sus
Fair enough
Do you guys have time to hear about our lord and savior Shalim?
The lord of the void? The neverborn? Literally Shar but better?
Settings with magic restrictions narratively can make compelling stuff.
Shalim is a World of Darkness creature whose cult preaches that it is better to feel nothing at all than to be happy and experience the trauma of losing that fleeting joy.
I mean overall wizards might not even be purposely trying to control all magic. There just happens to almost always be people who want to study and understand something in a systematic way, and the power of systematic thinking when applied to magic could just be that they spread their paradigm around and the more people who believe in it, the more true it becomes.
Oh don’t worry not all wizards are villainised in my setting
In my setting they're generally feared.
It was wizards that first learned that the god of magic did not in fact invent magic
-# Long story, can’t explain
Who did?
Oh okay sorry
"Hey, lowly peasant. Toss this rock or I will throw a fireball at you."
"Did I control him with magic? Does that count as controlling magic?"
This is always the logic that frustrates me with the "mind control bad" mentality. Like all magic is potentially evil.
Can I interest you in hearing about our lord and savior baphomet
Which... One?
Dullahans as main characters are really underused and underrated. In every setting
I mean. The only really popular and famous are Selty from Durarara and horseman fron Sleepy Hollow
No one. It is a force of the natural world, it came before everything
It's cause Enchantment Magic is generally the most evil school when used evilly
I know. Same with satyrs. They're quite literally GOATs.
Cool
Blowing someone up is evil, but it's not forcing them against their will to murder their own family
And they have to watch as they're murdering their own family and can't control their own body
It is if you threaten to blow them up unless they do it.
I take a lot of inspiration from eastern myth. I find it more peaceful
Same end result. Just different methodology.
Most would probably choose blowing up.
The one from the abyss
He's cool but isn't he like a minotaur deity?
Mind control removes that choice and makes them have to watch it like a spectator.
Same, I also think it helps mix things up a little since players are used to games that are more based in Western culture
I prefer Baphomets to be manipulative cult leaders like the IRL inspiration for Baphomet.
A seductive tempter.
MotM even says evil Enchantment wizards are the most evil wizards in the multiverse.
Not just Minotaurs!
Cause there's so much you can do with Enchantment and just get away with it.
Choice is the ability to choose. There are many people who argue that threats are the same act of removing choice.
The notion that mind control is evil is like saying evocation is evil. Mind control can be used to ease traumatic memories in the same way that a fireball can burn a rotten forest.
If I'm not mistaken in dnd Baphomet is demon, while his historical version is much nore like devils of Baator
You blow someone up with fireball there's very obvious proof.
The only reason there is no proof is because the author says so.
And mind control can be used to start mass murders and nobody can explain why.
Sure they can.
"They controlled me."
I’m back, losers.
Fireballs can leave no evidence when dead men tell no tales.
There's memory erasure spells
Hi, Back
They're meteor swarm.
Fireballs leave charred bodies and land
How do we know it was a spell and not an act of nature?
Divine intervention
Like it's semantics.
Cause it leaves magical residue.
Hi back, I'm somebody!
Lot of dad jokes here.
No it doesn't. There is no mechanic in D&D for detecting magical residue of a spell that has already been cast.
And is no longer in effect.
Enchantment is the one school you can never get caught if you use it correctly
Since you make everyone else do the crimes for you
Why are we arguing this
Idk. I'm bored.
Cause I think they like Enchantment spells a little too much
Speak With Dead says hi.
This would also work on mind control.
.. are you in the habit of killing suspects before interrogating them?
So you're telling me that mind control, all mind control, is objectively evil because it has the potential to be misused on occasion and is harder to investigate?
So a sword of amnesia is instantly evil?
It's usually misused
Many people find the loss of internal mental autonomy to be absolutely horrifying.
Zone of Truth is probably one of the only ethical Enchantment spells that force things on people.
Killing people before interrogation is generally not a good idea. The dead are under no obligation to answer truthfully or at all
My guy we literally have spells to incinerate a 40-foot by 40-foot area.
Magic is pretty universally evil in the game about killing things.
I'd rather be blown up then forced to murder my own family against my will.
Semantics.
It's not really semantics.
Different people find different things more or less terrifying/horrifying/evil seeming for different reasons. Let's not universalize our own personal biases.
If someone is gonna blow you up if you don't kill your family they're probably gonna kill you anyway.
So may as well blow up so you can still be with them in the afterlife.
I'm just saying in Vampire: The Masquerade if you have the option of having your memory of the last ten minutes wiped to keep the secret that monsters exist, and you choose to instead be blown up by a fireball, you may have a misunderstanding of what your priorities should be.
This is not really an area where one person is right and another is wrong.
Nuh uh, let's not tell people what their priorities should be okay?
I'm just saying that all magic can be misused and very few spells are objectively evil, and no entire school if objectively evil.
I'd still choose to be blown up by a fireball.
I'd rather have a secret wiped from my memories than die for knowing it.
Cause if it's WoD there's like a likelihood that the Mage kills himself trying to fireball me without making the universe think he can.
Same world ain't it?
Yesn't,
Mmm ... you'd probably die first.
Every game is its own timeline.
Ah well. Still better than being affected by mind control.
And that's a valid personal feeling to have.
Like how Lupines don't commune with spirits but Garou do. Same creature, but from the vampires quantum perspective it works differently because WoD is weird.
Cause who knows what else they're gonna erase.
Idk. I'm sorry for arguing. I was just trying to play devil's advocate but I can see how I came across as patronizing. I'm sorry.
In my setting the only magic that is allowed is life magic. This is because of the inherent bias of the dominant factions that any other kind of magic is harmful to the life > death > rebirth of the setting.
Necromancy actually isn't nearly as demonized as Enchantment is unsurprisingly.
In FR and other DnD settings for example Enchantment Magic is illegal in most societies.
Where?
I don't think there's a blanket ban on enchantment magic. It's not in the Code Legal of Waterdeep.
However the dominant factions are exceedingly ignorant of their own bias. Elves and vampires possess no "essence" so magic is different for them. Elves cast magic purely through artifice and vampires use siphoned quantities of essence to do magic very sparingly.
Yeah like I don't think that is true...
It certainly isn't in Eberron and Dark Sun.
Looks like I misremembered. There's places with blanket bans on arcane magic
And Enchantment is a big reason.
Yeah but that's all magic.
One bad apple ruins the patch kinda thing
I know Waterdeep does consider it's use illegal depending on its use tho
Like if you use Dominate Person or anything of the like and get caught, you're donezo
Pretty sure enchantment is never cited as the specific reason as much as summoning devils and whatnot.
They consider it akin to assault at the very least.
I wonder how much shenanigans the spell Suggestion could do if it was used for crime…
In Thrayn in Eberron, necromancy is illegal and all magic other than divine magic is heavily stigmatized. In Karnath, magic is pretty universally hated by the Russian martial nation. However in Zilargo enchantment is favored over evocation because it solves conflict without violence when used well.
Right, but not Enchantment specifically. It's just magic used to commit a crime or against a Noble or Magistrate or Lord.
I should play a Tiger Leonin
Ah
Gnomes hate violence in Eberron because they lose nearly every physical conflict they get into. So enchantment is a way to resolve conflict without physical force, which is heavily stigmatized.
In my setting it's a death penalty offense in most places unless it's a "justifiable use"
Also wouldn't Illusion magic also classify as evil under your logic? If I make a man hallucinate that his family was killed by his brother, and he kills his brother, doesn't that create the same situation where there is no evidence that magic was used?
RIP people wanting to play glamour Bard or enchantment Wizard or order cleric or Archfey Warlock
Also unlike Enchantment, Illusion magic directly affects the senses and can thus be used for torture. And let's not forget illusion being used for direct harm with Illusory Dragon.
The uhhh .... oh yeah, Watchful Order of Magists and Protectors is the mage guild that monitors magic use in Waterdeep. If you are a magic user you basically have to register with them and they make sure people follow the laws and don't commit crimes with magic.
Brb.
Well that kinda falls apart if you touch the illusion at all
No, illusory dragon literally harms people psychically.
If you touch it, you can't pass through it.
Isn't that a Dragon tho?
And there's the fact of making people hallucinate pain.
And phantasmal force
Brb
Well the argument was making a man hallucinate his family being killed by his brother not a ghostlike thing attacking them or a force throwing stuff at them.
Specifically Enchantment magic? Or any magic? Does this include Bless?
A specific illusion would be like an Image spell wouldn't it.
Specifically Enchantment that takes away free will.
Much of the world's destruction was cause the entire magic country was basically mind controlled to start a war of aggression that led to the world's current state.
So people never want that to happen again.
How do people feel about Calm Emotions?
It usually falls under justifiable use, tho it does often lead to more issues.
Unless you're using calm emotions to make someone calm after killing their family or something so they don't run off to the guards. Tho in that case you'd probably use Charm Person
If you can make an argument that you used mind altering enchantmenrs for good and the evidence supports it, you'll generally be alright
Tho people will lose trust in you.
I'm back. I need you to not make the very, very naive assumption that any illusionist can only create illusions that affect sight and sound and not touch.
Well if I'm seeing a Dragon killing them, why would I see my brother killing them too?
But I digress. It's your setting, I'm just trying to critique it. I'm sorry if I'm being rude.
These were two separate counterpoints:
Counterpoint 1: Illusion magic also creates situations where someone is robbed of their agency and compelled to do horrible things I.E. a man is forced to witness an illusion of his brother killing his family and goes on a quest to kill his brother in revenge.
Counterpoint 2: Illusion magic has far more potential for violence than Enchantment magic due to their being entire spells meant to kill people using illusions. I.E. a spell that conjures an illusory dragon that does psychic damage which can kill people.
Ah I thought you were saying illusion spells that have specific forms can be twisted.
I can see that, but there's at least free will to potentially stop things from happening.
If you see the illusion you might be able to get some sense knocked into you and listen but Enchantment you're gonna kill your brother, ain't nothing stopping you except him killing you.
This feels like a very subjective thing. I just wanted to provide some constructive feedback.
Guys do you wanna hear about my setting? 
It's like using a knife to kill someone vs a gun. Will a knife work? Absolutely. Can someone potentially disarm your knife or survive your stab wounds? Absolutely.
A gun, you can just keep firing till they stop moving. It's an absolute surefire way of handling what you're setting out to do.
In this metaphor, Illusion is the knife, Enchantment is the gun.
But your criticism of enchantment is that it removed the agency of the individual. So would magic used to create a motive for murder.
A gun can be disarmed as well.
Like... That doesn't really make sense.
Yeah but that relies on the shooter letting their agency make them make mistakes. Without agency as a puppet, they'll just do what their ordered.
I'mma be honest I'm not beating a guy with a knife who makes no mistakes but I feel we're getting off track.
Unless the puppet master is an idiot which a Wizard probably isn't.
I definitely see where you are coming but classifying something as objectively evil because of a subjective ability to be misused is kind of strange.
It's margin for error vs no margin for error basically
I would classify something objectively evil as something that is purely anathema to intelligent life with no chance to be used for good.
A puppet will do what it's puppet master does.
An emotionally distraught person is unpredictable.
Enchantment has uses that are humane. Does it deserve strict regulation? Yes. However should it be completely outlawed? Not really.
Like is necromancy as in animating undead also outlawed?
Some places yeah
However the friends cantrip can be used to help with interrogations without resorting to sleep deprivation, forced confession, bullying, etc.
That'd be a "sanctioned" use if used officially.
Okay, so it's only outlawed to the general public?
You need a license basically
Ohhh that makes more sense. I thought you were saying the entire school was illegal entirely for everyone.
There are probably a couple necromancy spells that can have good uses, false life for example
Yeah.
Nah just stuff like charm/dominate person will usually lead to the gallows
Use false life to make a surgery patient survive an invasive surgery that could save their life.
Yeesh. A deathly hanging is kind of much for a 1st-level spell. Is this intended to be a dark fantasy setting?
Notably these extra harsh laws are in one country.
Oh okay.
Where their patron deity is the God of Free Will
So they see the removal of free will as possibly the most evil act one can commit
That makes sense. Personal bias and whatnot.
I'd imagine you'd want to charge them with whatever act(s) you made the charmed person do
Yep all of it gets pinned on them
Yeah that sounds like a good metric.
Some countries basically remove their ability to use magic instead as a response to magic crime.
Tho given what happens to evil spellcasters in the underworld. I'd say the ones who get their ability to use magic removed are the ones better off than the ones who are just executed
They usually get thrown into an infinite loop of suffering related to the magic they specialized in.
Like an Evil Evoker will be the shopkeeper that the murderhobo Wizard fireballs for not giving him an item for free.
For people who view personal mental autonomy as a fundamental right, the removal of such can feel like the most horrible and violating thing you can do to someone.
Necromancy is one of those hardly enforced laws ones mainly just because of potential disease spreading. If you do it away from towns, or properly dispose of the corpses, nobody cares.
No, I understand that. It's just that the ethics debate for magic is often heavily biased. So I was trying to show what I felt could be seen as fallacies in the worldbuilding.
I view mind control and the like as evil but also feel there are times where it can be used for good
As a person it's just something that bothers me in fantasy.
I feel it can be used for good but when its used for evil then its really evil
Yeah MotM says so as well
Like I'd rather you kill me and animate my corpse than mentally enthrall me and make me do horrific things for your bidding
Like MotM puts it the best
I'm not sure everyone was quite signing up for a debate on their own personal views.
In VtM the "Dominate" discipline's first power is the ability to make someone forget the last ten minutes they experienced. This is really useful because when your options are kill any humans who know that vampires exist, and just mildly amnestic them, it becomes really obvious what is the most humane.
"Enchanters know how to magically influence minds. Benign enchanters use this magic to defuse violence and sow peace, while malevolent enchanters are some of the most evil of all spellcasters."
Yeah sorry, I should have been more reserved in starting a debate.
I think "Enchantment" is broad enough a school that I would say Enchantment inherently is not evil, but instead that things like mind controlling people and Dominating them or magically coercing them into bad things is evil
I don't even have an excuse I was just idly chatting and it got out of hand.
It was a perfectly respectful debate tho.
Like there's a lot of necromancy I'd call evil but not something like False Life
Like, I hope, nobody is angry for the most part.
It's kinda why I like the "School specialization" in 3.5e I recently found out due to trying it out
When you cant decide
Dragonborn oath of zeal paladin
Or dragonborn eldtrich knight
Oof
I played a heroic Enchantment Wizard he was great his death was very tragic
I can be rewarded by completely rendering my ability to use enchantments and necromancy inert lol which makes me feel better as a player cause iirc in older editions Necromancy would bind the person's soul to their corpse.
But necromancy is so chill!
I like the wizard subclasses being focused around different schools of magic
That's something thats very satisfying to me
How else am I gonna do a sick dance lineup! It's practically killer!
Where as in 5e it's just recycling.
I cant decide which one though if I were to create oath of zeal dragonborn I be creating an arbiter
Can't wait to play my Transmuter Wizard in 3.5
what's a underrated class in like the main general classes?
Probably monk
Monk!
Well if you consider all the negative hype on the internet, Ranger is probably it.
People love to hate on Ranger for some reason and it's not deserved.
Easy clicks/engagement
@humble cairn would you choose dragonborn eldtrich knight or dragonborn oath of zeal paladin
Path of Zeal Paladin? Do you mean a Zealot Barbarian?
I don't know that Oath.
Ah ok nvmind then
What does zealot do
Path of the Zealot Barbarian does radiant damage while raging and can heal themselves. Theya re very hard to kill.
Trying to see if I could create an arbiter using only 1 class and using the race dragonborn
How many spells does it have
Zealot Barb doesn't cast spells at all.
Describe what you mean by "Arbiter?"
A little bit about the themes and then the play style you're after.
This whole game is about using your words to describe your character and powers, so better get some practice.
Lol if not back to the drawing board
So .. Arbiter? What do you mean by that and how do you want it to play?
We love rangers here
It’s honestly just the negative minority being vocal, I believe
Rangers are fine, it's fun
Rangers are fine and fun, the question of what is the most underrated class came up, though. And I feel all the internet hate counts as rating.
There's alot of meaning to the word in google,wuwa games, manhwa like sss grand saint knight so many to be honest I would just say nvmind on the topic
Because the majority of people enjoying the game are likely just enjoying it in privacy and not wanting to go online and be mad
I think I just had an error message in my brain
Try? Summarize the themes in one sentence and the intended gameplay in another?
a sick as hell alien
Mhm, honestly it's all just a matter of preference, some try to shove their opinions down the newbies which then leads to them not trying rangers
Going from the definition of the word, a judge who settles a final authority on a matter.
However, the manhwa part of my brain is remembering something
Like me, my least favorite class is the Artificer, though I know a lot of folks who like using it
It's a Halo thing, right?
There's a halo thing called The Arbiter
That... doesn't narrow it down
What do you mean "on par with a divine"?
do you mean with gods in D&D? if so that's like... impossible even at level 20
I would say just look it up
I don’t think looking it up helps all too much
Yeah I did. "a person with power to decide a dispute : judge"
They get beast master, enough said. Who dosent want a little animal companion
That isn't a build, nor does that answer the playstyle.
Well that's why I said nevermind try looking up wuwa arbiter meaning
That word has a general meaning and has been used in so many things that I'm going to get a whole lot of nothing useful. If you want to create characters you're going to have to put in some of the work here,
I still have my goblin ranger beast master in the back of my head
Basically, someone who has high amounts of Authority
Having their little worg
Telling people to "look it up" when trying to explain something and having it be completely unrelated to the topic is just annoying, tbh.
Keith David my boy
guys my players are locked in this is some S tier roleplay going on
Im cutting off that subject
Hell yeah
That's great
They're arguing over whether they should be trying to kill, arrest, or wipe the memory of an enemy of the party
Next project that could work
Dragonborn eldtrich knight
compelling as hell arguments on all sides
Though I cant be eldtrich knight again
Amazing roleplay topic
I mean to be honest, it doesn't make me want to help you in the future if you just push all the work of thinking onto me.
I didn't even prompt this they just talk about this stuff they truly take everything i touch and turn it to hold it's so good
this is a genuinely heartbreaking discussion
Well my bad
Everyone locked in for the roleplay!
I've been. A dhamphir eldtrich knight but now a dragonborn
Oof
Someone save me from the cycle of eldtrich knights
I mean, that build seems 1000% simpler than what an "arbiter" is
It was my first option
I really want to try and play a campaign but at the same time I know I would be lost and mess things up
Sora (kingdom hearts )-just follow your heart
Wdym? Like you think you’d be asking too many questions?
Yeah or maybe I do "too much"
No player is perfect, a good DM will appreciate effort. And absolutely no one has all the rules and stats memorized
Listen, don't worry about what you might do wrong
Also don't feed the gif dragon, he's on a diet
Yes, plan to do right
I didn't know that
Now that I I finally found some interest in dnd tattoos cant wait to try it out
the main thing is to have fun. right?
Exactly
Yeah have fun and let others have fun. Not too hard
Yeah imagine you're a cast of stranger things playing dnd you got this
although I'm not the type of person to be confidently find a campaign and invite myself in
that's why you apply 
I feel like as a dm, making a session fun for your players isn't as difficult as making a session fun for them and for you
Some online ones hold “interviews”. Maybe in person too
But we like new players! We want to help!
True words
I hung around in #character-discussion for two years or so just making friends and helping people and then I was invited to a game and have been having a blast.
Some more than others, you should at least read the basic rules first
It's part of the process. I had to cycle through two different characters before truly finding something i like
Yeah definitely at least try to grasp the rules, but as long as you’re making an effort the DM or other players should be willing to help
They say that whatever character you make in dnd will be you in another life or great great ancestor oh wait wrong thing
Do they though?
Lmao
Never heard of that saying.
I would hope not
oh god I hope not
The players in my campaign haven't read them cuz english is hard and there's no translations yet and it's been a bit difficult. I think I'll just translate the rule myself atp
my character is just a single lamp shining down on nothing. My imaginary character sheet: blowing off the dust off the sheet
Roll a skill, make an attack, your character's spells and features, keep the list of combat actions to hand.
Then you're ready to play. Listen to what's going on, ask questions when needed, have a bit of fun. Despite the famous phrase you don't die for real if you die in the game.
Wait... you don't? I've been killing all my players
List of combat actions is so goated for new players tbh
Listen, easiest character ever to get into, human fighter. No matter how many people hate on it
I kill my players fr if they die in the game. Consequences of their actions ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Lmao
I can see why. Sounds basic ._. no offence
Basic doesn't mean bad.
Basic can be good!
It is basic
Class is a bundle of features. Character is what you make it.
You can even be a stick bug
That is debatable
@pliant sapphire @reef tundra thanks for resilient con feedback for bless!
Yeah. Tbh human fighter can be just as basic and as complex as you make them. It's probably the most versatile combination because either can be do many things
Humanoid stick bug at least. There's a species of humanoid ants iirc
Sorry should have clarified champion fighter
I never knew
Gnome fighter with resilient dex is neat to have a perk for each save , with champion kind of tanky
Heck, I could even see the most boring fighter as a fun character. They adventure to try and reawaken their sense of wonder and find meaningful connections.
Champion fighter is probably the second most free subclass for flavour and such
What books are you reading to get these species cracker
Dragonborn do they have human faces or scaly faces
I don't remember but i know it exists
Flavor is Free
I haven't once in my life heard of a playable ant species
I just wish sword and board fighters had as much usefulness as gwm, dwf or pam or shillelagh. Their damage doesnt scale enough unless you have good gear
tbh I could create a character. it just depends on dm's approval. but also either they allow other species/classes from outside d&d?
True
They're bug people
I guess you could argue Thri Kreen to be ants
Yeah those guys
Formians?
Wouldn't bet on it. Start with the free rules, get used to the process first.
Yeah, Formians
so the basic player's handbook then
Basically first find a group, i think the dm will be able to help you create a character if needed or at least give the general tone of the campaign to wrap the character around
Sure. Rare is the game that restricts the free content (although not unknown).
Whats cracker backwards can you pronounce it in the name of dnd
rekcarC?
Thanks
Is this like a swear word in another language?
Oki, good
Just curiosity
Let’s be careful here as cracker can be used as a slur in certain contexts and this would not be appropriate for our server
But back to D&D
at this point. I would just be a human ranger. playing mix and match is dizzy-ish
Nice! One of my kids loves to play a ranger
Get a decent mix of martial fighting and magic casting
either go long range or tank(?)
Mix - you’ll want ranged attacks and close combat stuff as well
Rangers are not for tanking but can be good at pinning enemies down with some of their abilities/spells.
Anyway hope you have fun with your ranger character!
If a wizard takes the magic initiate feat (wiz), do you add the first level spell to your book and can you cast it with your own slots?
Never let anyone ever tell you rangers suck. They might not be the most optimised but 99% of the time DnD groups are just here to have fun.
Oh I know that very well! My kid’s ranger character has been amazingly fun in game for them (and deadly for the monsters I’ve thrown at them lol)
Subclass?
If only I can be a human artificer. Artificer sounds cool being a tinkerer
Artificers are complicated but when you understand the mechanics they're one hell of a good time
Yes, if you're new I would stay away from multiclassing entirely. And Ranger is a great pick, though "tanking" isn't really a thing in D&D.
Unless you're in a minmax-heavy campaign or have an actual lore reason for your character going into another class, I'd stay away from multiclassing.
got it. I'll stay away from it until I can get used to it
Artificer is weird because when you think about half casters, you almost always assume it's half caster plus half martial. Artificers are also half casters, but the other half is... just completely whack
You do get better martial stuff if you pick armourer or battlesmith, but it doesn't come with the base class
The other half comes almost entirely from the subclass.
Artificer is a Support based Half Caster with extremely impactful subclass choices.
Artificers are fun. Just that it's half caster and half "whatever the heck this is". It's very different from other classes
I recently got to try the cartographer subclass and it felt very unique. Artificer is like warlock when it comes to selecting magic items, it feels a bit like "assemble your own class". I loved it
Cartographer is when all the PTSD from my geography lessons before I got to choose my school subjects floods back
~15 iirc. Was a hot minute since I saw but I recall the 25 was from him stacking mage armor with near max Dex plus blade song plus cloak of protection plus shield spell
Ah so 15 Ac? Yea hed be scared
Spellslinger (Gunslinger Subclass) lvl 10 gets an ability that just allows all ranged attacks to Ignore/Bypass all Magical defenses (i.e Mage Armor, Shield , Magic Items/Armor)
Which is something I think should be more common. AC from magical boosts or nimbleness should have some different properties than armor in my opinion.
The shield spell especially to me feels very busted in some ways considering five AC is very generous and unlike most reaction abilities, it lasts a whole round instead of just a single attack.
Part of 5e's problem of casters overshadowing martials is there's just too many ways for casters to have as much if not more AC than martials, especially given they pretty much only need dexterity to do that and can totally ignore Strength and Constitution (which in itself makes strength being underpowered or underutilized even more noticeable)
I mean technically the Spellslinger is a ⅓ Caster Itself
I mean i think since the whole class is more wild west than fantasy based its meant to be counters to other Spellslingers
As some of the subclass abilities are directly targeted at countering Casters
Which I think is perfectly fine given the core class. 1/3 casters are actually some of my favorites subclasses given the utility
Spellcasters should never ignore con, nobody should ever ignore con
D&D Question of the Day (D&D Beyond: Playing the Game):
True or False: Temporary hit points stack from multiple sources if they’re different features.
Negative. I'm a Paladin.
I only saw you doing these questions, but they're definitely fun 
I took an oath to my order that I would do a question of the day on Discord Mondays thru Fridays until the new rule set was internalized.
I cast. Toe stub on a very pointed table leg
I cast thoughts and prayers for the targeted toe.
I cast
Song you hate gets stuck in your head!
i hate to tell you, but people still don't learn the rules even by 3030
Too late I already get songs I like stuck in my head first
lego movie ref
I cast “aware you are wasting time on your phone”
Yeah the people in this server are largely the few that do know the rules
False
Learned that the hard way
I'm on my laptop >:3
I'm already aware
And don't care 😎
I do have a uni assessment due tmrw I haven't started on but it's late so idk if I'm bothered to care
I should check if I can use the shower
I cast “now you do”
Ultimately, I do these to learn from all of YOU. Each question is a starting point and always generates all sorts of interesting edge case and nuances.
Counterspell!
Reminds me that RPGs are organic, communal activities.
Oh yeah that's definitely true. A lot of questions don't always have a clear answer. Todays question is an exception 
Hello
a classic
Probably something like a giant eagle. Depends on the abilities that let you transform though!
With some irl aspects
like players will need to wear pirate costumes?
No, swabing the deck is to protect the ship from rain water, that kind of thing
oh so some in game activities, that makes sense...
unless you're gonna make them actually mop your house?
"okay today we are larping the quest to clean up the npcs house to get them to tell us about the amulet"
Nah
But I might include the head's part of a ship
Players, I need you to clean my room. Yes it’s for the game.
"I can't tell you about the amulet until we find the note that I wrote the details on. You're gonna have to help me clean this place up to find it"
as dm i cannot meddle in the cleaning myself naturally
I only set the situation, it's up to you to solve this however you want, but know that if you mess up the "npc's" room more he won't help you.
"You get charmed into cleaning my room woooooo"
chaotic evil
bbeg level worthy
is it weird to have a human barbarian but with a personality of quiet and somewhat mysterious?
Not at all
cause ngl I may be taking inspo from frieren because dnd reminded me about that show
Makes sense. Frieren is D&D inspired.
Course not, not all barbarians have to be the strong and stupid type
If you want help with that character, there's the #character-discussion channel!
Barbarians don't have to be loud and brutish
It's just a class stereotype
Why did i read that as british
ah okay still getting used to navigating the channels here. sorry
Because it's roughly the same thing?
One day surely I'll be able to run a Frieren inspired campaign... Surely...
Im gonna make a zealot barbarian, that would be fun
dibs on stark. kidding
I still wanna know why Zealot gets to fly and revive people
Friren💕
Because it's awesome?
Their simply that divine
they're basically a very angry angel or maybe devil?
Perhaps i can make one a selunite zealot
It's a barbarian, I fear a situation where they need to be a healer
I mean... Monk has a healer subclass.
That also has a feature called Hands of Harm, and that's still not that much healing
Paladins also heal and their quite tanky too
And the Zealot Barb still does barb things, your point?
The point is that they can revive someone as a reaction
If paladins get to heal, why not barbs
Mercy Monk can ALSO revive people.
Well cause barbarians get their powers differently than paladins
That may be true, but that dosent change the fact that they should be allowed to heal people
Zealot Barbarians aren't a healer subclass through and through, they literally only have the capability to heal themselves until level 14 when they CAN revive someone
Also paladins are half casters which is the mechanical reason
Could you elaborate on your reasoning here?
In a minute, im walkin home rn
Barbarian halves incoming damage, so basically they heal half of the taken damage
What?
For BPS
Basically the same thing unless they mean healing others
That's not the same thing
I think they're referring to Paladin's "Lay on hands"
They also only resist like, three damage types
I could see a barbarian with their rage flavoured as a regenerative surge, but.
Resisting Damage and healing are nowhere near the same thing
You're just taking less damage
The 3 most common ones to be fair
which yeah, would be able to use on others and not just on themselves
True, but three nonetheless
Resisting damage is better then healing it.
wait I thought Barbarians are resistant to every damage type (except psychic) when raging?
Nope
That’s Totem Bear Barb
Nope, sorry echo
Ohh thanks Nugget!
Paladins undo damage and Barbarians incentivise them being hit by having like a lot of HP and the free advantage against them
And the old one, at that.
Old Bear Totem Barbarian
So ultimately they're just two different tank types
Yeah I thought I was going insane for a minute
It’s not called Totem anymore is it?
To be fair, Totem Barb was common as dirt
It's Wildheart now
Because it was uh...unbalanced.
Oh right .. uhhh, WildHeart
Paladins "undo" damage?
By healing
They heal, so pretty much undo
There's really no definitive "tanking" in D&D
Lay On Hands.
Probably because of said resistances
The best way to "Tank" is to kill something quickly in D&D 🧐
Tbf, barbarians don’t often have a great way to draw aggro (not many classes do) so there’s not the most incentive to hit them for smart enemies
Totem Barbarian wasn't that unbalanced in comparison to some of the alternative martials that exist; and even then the best way to mitigate damage is to outpace/outperform the opponent before they can get a chance to react.
Yeah I know, still, never heard of healing being refered to as "undoing damage"
The Chad Battlemaster and Goading Attack
Well they incentivise them being hit as well as triggering like every attack of opportunity across the battlefield (at least until the DM wises up)
I love using Goading Attack, it's fun
Barbarian shimmies up to the boss to give them a kicking. "Protect me, you fools!" the baddie cries. Minions swarm in. Seems legit.
Even that isn't really a taunt
"Tanking" would be Control of enemies and Support of allies. And I do think Grappling 2024 makes it closer to real, I just haven't had the chance to test it out yet.
Oh yeah the grappling thing is huge
I think oath of the crown is my favourite “tank” in dnd
5E doesn't really do Taunts or thinks that make Tanking really a thing.
Functionally
Yeah, it is.
It doesn't incentivize hitting you, but it makes hitting an ally less appealing with disadvantage
Marking the bingo card...
it's great, I already got two bingos
Because the enemies can just...ignore it and hit other, more obviously dangerous targets.
They have ‘soft’ taunts, cuz they can incentivise hitting you more than allies, but it’s almost never forced
yesterday's AI talk and the "ranger" talk again boosted it
Are you gonna focus on the idiot going "COME AT ME BRO! Nerd! Stinky!" Or are you going to stab the Wizard who just exploded you with Fireball?
If we want to get technical....
Just use Mark of Sentinel, when someone is within 5 feet of you and gets hit with an attack roll, you can use your reaction to swap places and take the hit for them
Barbarian who is just into stand up comedy and just makes people watch his jokes
You say you want to tank in D&D, I'm not going to get into it, I'm going to offer something durable.
The DM has the ability to hit the "tanks", which they definitely should! Not just them but hit them a little more than the others
My Warforged Pugilist has this 🧐
He's also immune to crits!
Adamantine Armor?
That's one of the Eberon feats, yeah?
Juggernaut Plating from Exploring Eberron
It's a warforged specific feat
Oohh
Hell yea
Also, we can't forget crown paladin taking damage for its allies too!
I'm still mad that Paladin capstones still kind of suck
I like the idea of taking hits for your ally admittedly
But unless you've got good hp It's rough lol
Paladin capstone let them nova if they want
I like them cuz they’re EXTREMELY cool thematically for my favourite ones
That the level 20 power up ability the got right?
Slightly harder to ignore the combination of hard and soft control that the Grappled condition represents.
I wonder what's the most HP you can get in D&D
From their subclass
minus temp hp
At least 2
Aye, a good pick a good pick
Warding Bond is probably simultaneously both the best and worst option for tanking for your ally.. though, you're just halving damage they take and taking the other half
I mean
So long as you have HP, it's fine, I s'ppose
Dwarf Barbarian with the Tough Feat is probably pretty beefy.
Less then 20k
Probably a Dwarf with the tough feat, Barbarian max rolls, the boon of fortitude, 30 con, and getting that lucky 1% chance to boost max ho from mixing each of the 4 healing potions.
Finally Aid and Heroes feast
I've played a level 20 one..
I had over 400 hp
Pwk is childs play to you 
I also took the boon of fortitude for more HP lol
Plugs ears I'm sorry, what?
I think he had...
425 hp in total?
Gotta commit to the bit
To be fair from what I recall off the top of my head, none of the capstone features are all that amazing no?
“Neat words magic man.”
Off the top of my head, max rolls level 20 dwarf barbarian with tough is 22x20 so…440.
And I’m sure you can do better
in 2 hours gonna be playing my Oath of The Ancients Paladin again
Huh..
I might've had more then
Tonight I'm playing more of my Tortle Cleric 🧐
In 2014 I think like 2 were generally good, the rest were meh or outright "This is the good one, but you know, made crap!"
He's OLD!
And 2024 has the SAME problem!
Do Dwarves still have the extra hp in 24?
I should stop saying to my DMs "Do your worst" last session I nearly got to half hp from one attack alone
Yes
Yup, dwarven toughness
You asked for it😂
"Yeah basically everyone gets 60 foot flying and hover, something that triggers in their aura range, and generally doesn't matter."
Behold, 5 automatic Radiant damage a turn!
I play Bards! playing a Paladin makes me feel powerful
Truly...a tide turner...
My Warforged Pugilist got jumped last session.
He was dragged upstairs into a room with like.. 5 people by a creature with a 15 foot grapple range 💀
He survived though
And kicked ass
First time I used "Bloodied but Unbowed"
Reminds me of one of my players, rolled insane stats and was pretty confident. Enter Allosaurus encounter absolutely bodying him within the first round
The party had to chase me because I was dragged up two sets of stairs
my stats weren't even good 😭
It's fine, I'll lock in for the session
oh yeah and in two days I'll be pitting my Battlemaster PC against a Mini Boss Battlemaster in a 1v1
Friday I
HOPEFULLY...
finally get to play my Firbolg Moon Bard
Ooo good luck
He plays a fiddle that's a size too small for his giant hands..
Yet he's still good at it lol
What would he do if the devil went down to Georgia?
We're gonna be in the Feywilds, so, hopefully he can use his ability to speak with animals naturally to his advantage
Does he play for the animals?
Uh..
Big Iron on his hip
Yes.
He does, In fact
Had my first short session yesterday, loved it!
That’s cute I like that
Yippie
He's a big himbo looking hunk, but he's an incredibly shy man
He really only speaks with animals until it's necessary for him to actually talk to people
I'm going to choose to interpret this that you've had long sessions previouslty but didn't love those
Why’d he join the party?
Well, the party was kinda brought together through circumstance.
All of our characters were once storybook characters until they were made real.
We loosely based our characters off a few fairytale characters
My lad is a bit inspired by Disney Princesses in general lol (most of which were fairytales before)
Oh cool
Im bad at math, a lvl5 eldtrich knight & lvl1 wiz is what lvl for spell casting?
lvl 1 still?
2 caster levels so still level 1 slots yeah
Aye, we don't really remember how or why we were brought into the real world, buf obviously fey magics were at play
Unless 1/3 casters round up in the new version? Then 3 caster levels so you get level 2 slots but I don't think you get any level 2 spells
I hope the DM has a great story for y’all
:3
I think almost always you round down
Half casters round up now so idk
More that I never played a proper session before
Hi quick question me and my friends just picked up DND recently and I'm dming for them and one of them plays wizard I'm kind of confused about adding spells to spell book do I give him those spells or like he makes them himself?
Oh and if I do give them to him how often should i
so they get to add some themselves, but you can give them more to add by dropping scrolls or spellbooks
this is a bit trickier, since you want to kind of just make sure they get as much stuff but not more stuff than anyone else in the group. you kind of need to feel it out based on how much of the spotlight they have versus other folks
They get 2 spells per level up that they can pick from the Wizard Spell list, provided they're of a level they can cast, if they find a Wizard Spell in a spellbook or spell scroll, they can spend time and money to add it to their own spellbook.
They start with 6 spells at level 1 and every level up they get 2 more spells.
In terms of treasure the DMG has some loot tables. If they find a spell scroll with a Wizard spell on it they can copy it into their book with a gold fee.
Wizard bad guys/npcs usually have a spell book with their spells on it.
I wanna know what the hell this was
If a creature has a skeleton, you can attempt to turn its bones to jelly with a touch of the Hand of Vecna. You can do so by using an action to make a melee attack against a creature you can reach, using your choice of your melee attack bonus for weapons or spells. On a hit, the target must succeed on a DC 18 Constitution saving throw or drop to 0 hit points.
They can also double as a focus item, like a component pouch.
If a Wizard loses their spellbook, well, they're stuck with only what they last had prepared. It's a core part of their class.
I honestly forget you can just swipe a wizard spell book away
Waterproof spell book
Push a Wizard into a river of lava
that would kill anybody
There's a reason Enduring Spellbooks are a, IIRC, common magic item
solves the wizard casting spells problem
and it's because of bully DM's
Eeeeyyy! I just pre-ordered the Tarokka deck! very excited.... 
I cast Water walk
Scribes wizard just bodysnatches a poor unsuspecting spellbook to replace it with their own q_q
I kinda wanna make my next character a Intellect Devourer
"I've done nothing but teleport brains for three days."
that would be an interesting first character death
Gonna take custom linage to grab the telepath feat
I just realized if the old int devour used devour int how were you suppose to get out of the stun?
Another session done and dusted
Calliope Copperheart almost fell to the power of an Arclight Phoenix in a battle on an airship
Cackling
Arclight's are Medium sized critters, yeah?
Idk why you'd size up a medium just get your reading like a normal person
I did 110 damage in a single round of combat to said phoenix 🤭
I scaled this beast up to huge for the fun of it
Ordinarily yes
His poor 209 hp ;-;
It was a worthy sacrifice for the amount of aura and fun I had that session ^~^
It was still a real threat
True!!
seeing people roleplay "pacifist" characters by being a supportive non-combatant but still enabling their allies to kill people feels weird and hypocritical
because you're still being complicit in killing people by being an enabler of violence. that doesn't seem very pacifist
that to me is what makes me feel weird about "pacifist" PCs
Yeah I tell folks that's not gonna work
In character, the pc probably understands the party doesn't have to follow their philosophy, out of game it's just more difficult to have everyone be a pacifist, then nothing would be done, at least permanently
Pacifist doesn't mean not enabling. It just means they themselves don't want to cause direct physical harm. It's not the dictionary definition it's the playstyle.
I don't see what's wrong with it, if it's not harming anyone or anything it's not an issue.
They want to play a mercy monk? good for them
In character you can confront them about their hypocrisy though. Would be a fun rp moment
i didn't say it was wrong per se, just that i find it hypocritical
You did say it felt weird, but weird can just mean different
Do you have a pacifist on your team? In game you can confront them! Might be a cool growing pains moment for your characters
no i'm just browsing through reddit
fair lol
I love that name!
It's one of my players' character, shes very cool
Hi
I mean... Is Discord much better?
no lol
We're all crabs in a bucket
and CritCrab is king
Character must go on adventure. One way or another, they've reconciled themselves to the fact their team may have different views regarding violence, and hopes that they can show a better way through their actions while also helping defeat the Dark Lord.
the bar is in hell, so yeah
Lies, the King Crab is king. Wait wrong franchise, there are no stompy mechas in dnd
-# King at catching LRMs, maybe...
I present, the humbe trashcan
Ventrilo died for our sins
By the way, if you know Ventrilo, I would recommend starting a family, old ahh
Or at least start composing a tome
Apparatus of kwalish (sorry spelling) is kinda a crab mech, tho pretty small
sup yall
Looks at the Mighty Servant of Leuk-o
Looks at Warforged Colossus
Looks at Spirit Warrior from older editions
There are indeed stompy Mechas in D&D
Arguably the actual colossus from 2024 too
Indeed, Indeed
Warforged Collosus doesn't really count. They're technically giant people.
They're not, actually.
Warforged Collosus are meant to be piloted.
Huh, neat.
Yeah, they've got a whole psychic helm system and everything
But yeah, unless it's Piloted, it's not really a Mecha.
Yeah an artificer got one in one of the games I was in
Mighty Servant of Leuk-o and Spirit Warriors from.. I forgot which edition are the defacto D&D mechas
Problem is that how tf are you supposed to haul that thing around? It’s a huge size I think so how do you get it through a dungeon
I guess the idea is that’s an intentional challenge
Interestingly
Spirit Warriors are actually raised from little tiny bugs to build bonds with their future pilots and eventually become giant undead beings when it's time to become a mech (transformation Shenanagins)
It ended up being a waste for us because we never could really use it in combat unless it was during travel
You don't. Is the thing.
It seems much more useful in full scale combats and honestly in campaigns built for it
This the apparatus of kwalsh?
DND certainly wasn't built with the expectation that someone could bring a Huge sized mech to an alleyway knife fight, or to a cramped cave dug out by Kobolds
The apparatus and other similar mechas
I love it, but only because I am biased due to it appearing in my favourite dnd podcast, dndads
Warforged Collosus, Mighty Servant of Leuk-o, Spirit warriors and Kwalsh
Ty both
D&D mecha topic lol
You don't, you use it to siege towns and villages and army regiments
I came at the best(?) time then? lol
Spirit Warriors are sadly stuck in older editions (as of now)
I learned about those from Dungeon Dad
He actually interviewed the guy who made them in that video
It was pretty cool
Oh dayum, cool!
Hell yeah, love me some Dungeon Dad
He's the only D&DTuber I'll watch
Helloooo! I have a question for you all! Did we ever get statblocks for the primordials (Aka the really big elementals)
Not really, but I’m sure you could tweak the elemental cataclysm as a basis
No, but check out Elemental Cataclysms. These are really cool. ✌️
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/mm-2024/monsters-e#ElementalCataclysm
We DO have the princes of Elemental Evil
They've got interesting statblocks
Yan-C-Bin, Imix, Ogremoch and Olhydra if I remember their names correctly
Whichhhh source?
I will guess princes of the apocalypse, I don’t have it but I’m researching it
Yep, theyre in PotA
I knew it 😎
Princes of the Apocalypse as they said lol
Sorry. I was typing that out but got distracted
With Primordial Warlock POTENTIALLY Being a thing in the future, I hope they get reprinted tbh
I'd love an updated Statblock for those 4
I'm almost POSITIVE they will, but I'll be disappointed if they don't
I want a Bigby's/Fizbans, but, well, for Elementals
They haven't gotten enough love in 5E
I'd like more love for Constructs, personally
Plants and Oozes for me
-# Arashem’s Archive of Elementals. Has a nice ring to it
oozes are fun
Laughs in Shadow of the Clockwork Isle
-# Another book in my setting, ignore me
I'm still stumped on mine
Guys, rank the elf subraces?
I’m fine with oozes not getting much attention, because I don’t like them >:( /lhj
-# I don’t like slime and goo irl
kagonesti on top, then silvanesti then drow
Eladrin though
Eladrin aren't a subrace for the elf.
They are lore-wise, but mechanically they're not a subrace for the player race
If all Elves were Eladrin I think they'd be considerably more interesting
they were in MtoF
MMM just made every subrace its own race
Yes, but that's outdated alas
this is like arguing Deep Gnomes aren't a subrace of Gnome because MMM makes them a different species option
Eladrin's are amazing
Well, I'm saying I wouldn't classify them as such if we're counting base subraces.
Guys thoughts on DMPC'S?
Or that Sea Elves aren't a kind of Elf
Don't likeem.
A good DMPC is just an NPC imo
Who keeps doing that? 😭
I think you'll be hard pressed to find people who like DMPCs
Who keeping pinging lol
Why thank you!
DMPC?
A DMPC that’s designed with the purpose of a DM just playing their own campaign the way they want is a no-go. But an NPC that’s designed to help the party with no risk of being “the main character” is common and not a big deal.
DMPC's are.. kinda cringe imo
The story is about the players, not the dm
I would rather just have a bunch of NPCs help the group than some DMPC with a character sheet. Yuck. My opinion anyway
i mean the dm is a player at the table too, but ya they don't need a pc, they are everything else in the world already
It's debatable
As a forever DM, I also think having a DMPC is a little silly for me personally, cuz like… I have enough stuff to do as a DM mid-session. Now I have to keep track of a character sheet too? Miss me with that
Just use a Statblock instead of a character sheet
I don't even like having a constant companion NPC cause most of the time they basically stand there doing nothing because I'm busy with literally everything else
...
I swear to god is this like a reminder that goes off every 2 minutes?
Woah, DDB is retrying a sort of a la carte. You can purchase "[Class] Starter Pack" which gives you the PHB subclasses, a handful of Species, some Feats, and Backgrounds.
Actually?
Its a manual command. Someone keeps typing "?noping" for whatever reason
My players dragged along the npc in their group. Was against my will 
My DM has abunch of self inserts of his old characters in a current game, I am actively trying to get with one of their sisters to messwith him 
I personally like DMPC'S if they are like guides to the players
Swag!
There's also Eberron Species Pack
👀
You can do that without making an entire DMPC tho
I'm a DMPC, I'm an eladrin, life domain cleric.
That’s one of the many things NPCs are made for
ah, the Eberron Species Pack is just the species, no Backgrounds or anything else
Ah.
Well at least it's something
This also happened to me, I just recently had her take her leave from the party to attend to other buisness
The closest I’d ever get to making a DMPC in one of my campaigns is using a Sidekick
Iv got enough going on lmao I don’t need to play another character
And we're saying that not everyone is going to like having a dmpc around because it feels like it can detract from player agency (imho) also, they can get annoying if given plot armor or act as the main character
I’m already every villain and ally
Otherwise it’s all too easy to let a DMPC be “the star of the show”, and historically that just leaves a bad taste in my players’ mouths
Why would I want to muddy that
Eberron my beloved
I get to do cool things anyways
I’ve got a Cleric DMPC because all my party are noobs who would TPK too easily; all she does is heal, blast some enemies out of range from the players, and make Religion checks
Exactly
Knome, make a guy with outlandish tech named Billy Joe and put him somewhere random
The goal of a DMPC/friendly NPC imo is for them to be supportive of the party, not necessarily one of them. So I don’t care for DMPCs myself.
Same. I play with Y8S at school, I coach them
Nah I'd tpk
At the end if the day if you do have a DMPC and your table likes/loves them then by all means. Keep em going. Most people here in this discord don't like the concept of them. Rightfully so.
I feel they go against the purpose of NPC's.
Just horrible experiences for some folks here, yeah
