#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 123 of 1
Depends on what you have going on with said weapon.
Even bows?
If i roll a nat20 will it somehow hit the c3 spine and the brainstem
all ranged weapons take ammunition. most DMs only make u keep track of special ammo (magical ammo and bullets)
Aimed shots aren’t a rule in 5e
You need a RAF DM
dnd doesnt take into account such granular details, so by RAW no.
Ah alr
Yes. Any weapon that has the ammunition properties means that you officially have to purchase and track ammunition. A lot of DMs hand wave that, but technically per the rules we’re supposed to keep track of ammo.
Can i give cancer to my enemies
Funny question... Can I bash my ranged weapon(like a bow or a rifle) as a melee if incase I have no ammo?
cancer is curable in dnd at higher levels
Dang it
Diseases don't exist in '24, so no.
Cancer is also useless it’s too slow term
Sure, that counts as an improvised weapon. It's not very effective, but it works.
Level 5 ain't that high.
Whats the best i can do as paladin support wise
for the long run
I wouldn’t call cancer a curse
Magical Contagions are what they became. Tbh I like the new systemitized "diseases"
Greater restoration bare minimum
Cancer isn't magical so ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Can we hurt teammates? 0=
Stage 4 cancer to bosses and run
Sure if you wanna be booted from the table
friendly fire is indeed on
Agreed. “Common diseases” are too easy to bypass as a PC so they’ve always been sort of inconsequential, but having magical contagions that require extra work to cure is still interesting.
Nat1 meteor and it hits your teammate cause accuracy sucks
try not to anger your teammates though
Think of D&D like lord of the rings. If Legolas shot an arrow at Gimli there would be problems
Guys my dm told me to prepare a spare character, is that bad ?
Tavern Brawler would do it for fun~ Better than a Disadvantage.
I didn't ask how big the room is I said I cast fireball
I really don't feel that Sewer Plague and Sight Rot are magical either. This is just the name for what they are
Hopefully it wasn't just told to you.
Well, better than no proficiency bonus anyway 😄
is there any way to get pre painted minis?
Whats a bonus action
Is grenade an option? And if so will it hurt allies?
It’s a side effect of rules being streamlined. Adamantine and Mythril armor don’t function in an animatic field for example despite being mundane features of the metal because they are categorized as magic items and not special materials
Yes and yes
Not inherently. I typically suggest my players to have backup characters just in case, but that doesn’t necessarily mean I’m out to get them.
A bad idea that they never should have put in 5e
Does a grenade hurt your Allies irl?
Nice
Okayyyyy thanks for the answer 🫶🏻
So when can i use my lay on hands thing
Why do you think this a bad idea ?
no no, they just want you to have a buddy that's all 🙂
When you or an ally takes damage
Oh okayyy
yes (again though, they're Modern items so you prolly wont come across them). and also yes. you will blow up your buddies if you get a grenade near them
So when my ally takes dmg i can instantly use lay on hands? Or do i need to wait on my turn
It's a very sloppy mechanic. The designers themselves have said so.
My mindset behind having my players create a backup is so the players can get excited about their new character if their first character dies. That way the transition from playing one character to playing another is hopefully a little smoother.
Tbh this is really great, I love your mindset
How long does 1 campaign go for? hours?
First character: Krogen Ralius
Backup character: Timmy
months or years
oh sweet summer child
Damn
1 campaign goes as long as it needs to. Same with 1 session.
As long as the dm wants to
It could go for hours, yes
but if you can't commit for that long, you COULD try oneshots
A campaign has session and the session can be like for 7 hours or less or more and a campaign is like months or years
Or rather, as long as it works for everybody at the table. It’s not just the DM who decides how long a campaign lasts.
they mean campaigns not sessions
It's a bonus action if I remember correctly
And whats a bonus action
Yes yes. Measurable in hours. Just a lot of hours
How many session does a single campaign have? 3?
Systems that employ things like action points where you have a pool of points per turn and different actions cost X amount of points are much better, in my opinion, than 5e's design of action economy.
As many
Could be 3. Could also be 50.
As many as they need to tell a story from beginning to end. In some cases, that’s a single session (called a one-shot), in others in can take years.
A part of combat i recommend going to #learn-to-play or looking at the core rules to learn about combat
p2e gives you 3, and some spells cost 1, 2, or 3 points 
There’s no fixed number for what qualifies as a campaign
As the dm wants, for exemple my campaign started in the end of November and we had 7 sessions, we want to go level 20 so we are going for a 2 years campaign. So maybe more than 50
I liked this in Divinity Sin.
1 session of play is usually 2+ hours long. I've never played a session longer than 6 hours, but I know people that play for 10+ hours.
A Campaign is usually composed of several Sessions. The shortest Campaign I have been in lasted 8 Sessions over 2 months. The longest Campaign I have been in lasted 60+ over the course of 8 years. They last as long as they last.
Damn that's way to long 🥀
somewhere between like 3~15 for hardcovers, but a campaign can be as long or short as the party/DM want it to be; can either run a custom world or chain campaign books with the same characters
In my experience it's more like 5-100 for hardcovers 
Get strong enough to summon the Sun like a jojo stand
When I ran the prewritten adventure Curse of Strahd, it lasted about 30 sessions over the course of 6 months
A campaign is at minimum more than 1 session, in my opinion.
depends how lost in the weeds the party gets 
The campaign I had been in went on for a couple months, and in game, only one night had pass.
One. Long. Rest.
Agreed. A campaign is a story. Sometimes it only needs one session, sometimes it needs a lot more.
bet those casters thought real long and hard about using those slots 
“Real-time Campaign”
I’m just saying there’s no real numerical range of number of sessions for it to be a “campaign”.
Where the characters have to rest every 12 hours of gameplay
Real. Whats that quote "There are years where weeks happen, and there are weeks where years happen"
Sometimes you burn through 4 days in 1 session, sometimes you gnaw on 1 day for 5 sessions
the last 5 years was a heck of a decade thats for sure
My ass would probably shoot everyone I see to progress the game fast as the one who carry the guns
Traditionally there are no firearms at the start, I think
also this would probably make the game a whole lot slower 😭
I mean if there no gun I can use bows right?
It was Cantrips and tons Social Encounters.
I opted for Observant over War Caster
(Likely modified CoS spoilers) ahh ||Vallaki|| multiple combats including like 2 boss fights and ||a mansion full of darkness and Shadows|| and ||our warlock's quasit burning the mayor's mansion down with everyone inside||
Wait really? Won't little conversation on npc make it fast?
well you have to think about the impact it creates in-game, you could be locked up by guards if you just kill anyone and everyone
Correct. They’re too expensive to be starting equipment
Even if you took starring gold instead of starting equipment, I’m pretty sure they’re too expensive for you to start with a gun.
Good point... I would accidentally kill a important character that would progress the game 🙂
correct, 250g for a pistol or 500 for a musket is far beyond starting equipment at level 1 RAW
You could do the same with Short or Longbows.
There's a good chance there'll be good roleplay ahead of you
Tell that to the people out here trying to start with full plate 
i do when i have to, im running 9 games with no homebrew
Does armour matter?
Of course it does. For characters with low dexterity, armour is almost mandatory
definitely matters unless you're a monk or barbarian
Ahh even for ranged?
Ranged characters will be targetted too. In fact, some enemies may consider them higher priority targets.
Yes, one of these sessions you will inevitably get hit
Even barbarians can benefit more from wearing armor at higher levels than going unarmored the whole way
Yeah but to no honest it’s so cool and when you have your character you just want to play with it as long as you can
yeah that's true, but anything heavy will deactivate some features
I mean if we're talking about 2024, if you choose Artificer, and you take the infusion to have a pistol or musket, you can technically start with a gun. But I believe that's a level 2 feature.
Unarmored Defense is great for early level barbarians, but once the party starts getting magic armor, they’re better off wearing it and losing the UD benefits
or certain kinds of Bard, or certain kinds of wizard, or certain kinds of Druid 
Even mundane armor beats in armored defense once you have half plate 9 times out of 10
Wizards not wearing armor?
But not with 2014 because you don't "create" the items from thin air back then, bar wonderous items.
Can we be unhinged as we like? Or dms limits it?
I thought wizards don’t wear armour
early on, bladesinger gets an AC boost that doesn't like armor
You can but please be mindful of the other players
Guys, is the ranger class good ? I play cleric more often but I feel that for my next character I want to play more for attack
Wizards aren’t proficient in armor, so unless they get that proficiency so other way, like a feat, they can’t cast spells if armored
T3+ play is about saving throws anyway
ranger is great fun
elven chain is a wizard's best friend
Please try to remember this is a team game and you are playing a real person with the world. A Deadpool style character doesn’t actually fit in most fantasy settings and can generally take away the fun and immersion for the rest of the table
also do NOT metagame
Unless you're a 2014 Bladesinger Wizard, or you dip one level at first level into something with armor proficiency, no armor.
there are no bad classes
Nope. Often times metagaming is the right thing to do.
I generally disagree with that
I mean it could be funny but ofc I'll behave 🙂
for me it ruins the immersion
Your really right for that, I really want to test a ranger one day ! Maybe I’m gonna draw one for a npc in my back story
Being funny and keeping the game fun are not always the same
This depends on the style of campaign the entire table agrees to. If you’re the only one playing an “unhinged” character, you’re more than likely gonna come across as disruptive at the table, and that’s not a good thing.
Whether or not metagaming is good or bad depends on what you mean by metagaming. The word is ill-defined
There's positive metagaming and negative metagaming. Only the negative is often the one described as metagaming.
I hate when a DM tells me something my character wouldn't know like yesterday he said "Oh it's a charm spell but they can get out of it when they take damage". And then I can't test anything without feeling like I'm metagaming. Drives me bonkers. XD
coordinating with the players above the table is a form of metagaming, for example
The idea that a strong smack upside the head to break mind control is a very common trope and not metagaming
I love dnd so much, I wish I could have session everyday
but something like looking up enemy stat blocks, or using your existing knowledge of an enemy to influence the actions of your character, who may not have said knowledge, is generally viewed as an example of bad metagaming
It is but then when I mention "Well hey my character has a lot of enchantment and charm spells, can I have an idea of how to break it?"
And he's like "Welllll that would be metagaming."
-_-
yep i remember hitting my other party members with one magic missile to break a charm
That’s your DM being bad at his job. But also most enchantment effects can break by damage it’s a reasonable assumption
Then I was absolutely frustrated that he said anything at all! Like leave me in the dark so my character can test things.
An enchantment or charm saying damage doesn’t break it is actually abnormal
Yeah more often than not, taking damage triggers at least an additional saving throw
For example, I had Tasha's Hideous Laughter... Which allows you to take a save at adv if you take damage.
So it's not like my character wouldn't know to try that!
And it often matters who the source of that damage is
Your DM is bad at his job like I said
Among other spells like Suggestion and stuff
this...isn't metagaming. i don't understand why your dm didn't just have you roll arcana or history to see if your character had any of this knowledge
Some DMs are like that…
Also, isn't it kind of obvious that you should slap someone when they're under mental influence?
Yeah a lot of times it’s “if you or an ally damage the target”
Seems like something that should be tried.
I asked if I could do something about it and after he was like shrug shrug the whole time, I said "Alright I'll roll a 1d2. If I roll a 1, I try attacking the party member. If I roll a 2, I try to attack the caster to 'break concentration'."
He agreed to that. And of course I rolled a 2.
There’s also certain things that are just….objectively common knowledge. It’s never metagaming to know vampires die in sunlight that’s a well known fact even by peasants
sometimes, but also people may be uncomfortable with the idea of harming their party members
Our party members wanted it. They didn't want to be charmed to heal the enemy and attack us. XD
maybe, maybe not. Depends on how prevalent vampires are in the overall setting. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
your party members were directly healing the enemy? that must've been a higher level charm then
do you know what specifically affected the party?
I treat ghosts when I posses a character. I only make ghosts do unarmed strikes. Cause ghosts dont know the skills that character has developed. But stuff like intellect devourers. Dominate person etc. Yeah they can use all those abilities. But a paranormal possession would not
It was a non-concentration charm that can only be a repeated save if they take damage, but all at disadvantage.
That's all I know. They were high level spellcaster monsters.
That's also a pretty modern vampire weakness. Most historical vampires don't have that weakness.
all of you rolled at disadvantage against the charm??
Only after you failed the initial save and take damage.
that still sounds awful im not going to lie
It was absolutely awful. He got our rogue and cleric.
Modern vampire weaknesss are standard weaknesses in D&D worlds without DM adjustment so that means nothing
I'm just mad he knew I was an enchanter/illusion specialist and was like "Nah you wouldn't know". XD
rolling at disadvantage would mean that you'd just have to keep damaging your own party members and if it's bad enough you'd be doing more damage to your own friends than the actual enemy 😭
Just because you have an opinion doesn't mean my point is meaningless.
Is banshee like the biggest (could be tpk or could be wayy too easy)
Telling a specialist they don’t know what would generally be considered common knowledge about their subject is just poor form
Luckily AOEs were a thing we could do. XD
That’s not an opinion. The rules themselves treat modern vampire weaknesses as the base standard which would be applicable for all of history in a setting by default unless the dm has decided otherwise
Which is your opinion.
That’s literally not an opinion .-.
The rules don't dictate you must use the given stat blocks. They do quite the opposite.
I also clearly said ‘unless the DM has decided otherwise’ which is what you are suggesting
to me this seems like the DM had a grudge against someone in the party or against the party in general and wanted to ruin your day.
Which is what I outright said. I didn't suggest a single thing.
@whole crescent we could ask in here about joining a game
I started my entire statement with 'it depends on the setting'
Visit #find-a-game for everything you need to start your search, including:
- Instructions for finding a game here on the server (including how to post in our #looking-for channels).
- Suggestions for finding a game outside of this server.
- Basic advice to help you in your hunt.
wrong channel mb
Do people know vampires are killed by sunlight? Do people even know vampires exist? Do they even have stories and legends about vampires?
It all depends too much on too many variables.
I'm preferential to comparing metagaming to characters in a work of fiction knowing the genre of fiction they are in, as that heavily influences their play. They ideally know the setting, but knowing they are in a horror survival game within that setting is entirely something beyond their capabilities, so their actions should be self-contained to their experiences and not the player's own observations. Sometimes this has a PC touching something that the player has a very very strong sensation is going to have a negative effect, but the PC would have no way of knowing they're in a meatgrinder dungeon-crawl so can't reasonably be assumed to avoid it until evidence has been given of the fact.
What even is "good" metagaming?
Now, trolls and fire? That one is obvious. Not because people know about trolls. But because when you see something is regenerating, trying to burn it is the obvious next step
Treating PCs differently than you treat NPCs.
or acid!
If you're playing a character who would turn a murderer in to the authorities, you don't do it to a fellow PC.
maybe necrotic 
COming up with reasons your party sticks together, or follows the plot, or doesn't spiral in to PvP.
Communicating out of character with each other about what you're wanting/trying to do and trying to make it work.
Doing stuff that makes sense ahead of time
This usually devolves into in-table conversation unless there's Telepathy involved
being able to separate the player and the character
Honestly- discussing combat stratergies mid combat. I know some folk don't like that, and debatable on if you consider it 'metagaming' but my group's take is 'Our PCs would know each other well enough/ be better at combat than us, so us talking out of character to best make a plan, even if they're not communicating, is just us bridging that gap'
Felix good
Separating the player and the character would be the opposite of metagaming
Yes and no- metaknowledge is knowing Tim is not trying to ruin your game, even when Valefore the Wizard is totally messing with your PC's mood.
One example: I wanted to let an enemy run away after a fight, on the tried and true principle that it's easier to track a wounded beast to its nest than to ask it where it's going.
Maybe its just me as a DM but memorizing the parties' Spells, Spell Slots, and Hit Points and damage taken would count as metagaming right?
I had this idea in the middle of the fight. How do I communicate that idea with other PCs without the enemy realizing?
So being like 'Okay, let's see where this is going, because I'm sure Tim has a plan and reason for this'
No. Not if it is the DM..
At one point I just gave up and said "Guys, you know my character well enough. He is pretending to mess up because he wants that guy to escape."
When it comes to stuff like that, it could be seen as it but not necessarily
I mean it still is in the sense it is literally 'Meta' knowledge. it's knowlege of what is happening above table and beyond what ever charcater you're controlling has.
im gald
As HP represents your state of ability to continue fighting
So while a monster acting on an HP amount would be metagaming
Metagaming is oft used to refer to the typically overuse of metagaming to abuse that knowledge, but the whole game really only works on the use of metaknowledge.
A monster attacking a dude groaning and breathing heavily cause he's nearly about to faint wouldn't be
i would settle the agro with the int//wid stat
if the creature have some of it, wont attack like some dumb animal
Well even animals can tell when people are screwed up.
There is no such thing as "attacking like some dumb animal". Animals know how to attack and attack well.
Like Dogs can tell when their owners are sick and unhappy
higher of that stat meaning more strategist enemies
and there can be some "leaders"
I mean, I still have the dilemma on knowing that a PC is so low on HP a hit would kill them and if I should take that hit or go for another PC. Even that dilemma is in itself a metagame issue. One of those 'I cannot ignore this knowledge and any choice I make will be affected by it'
Wolves are better hunters than humans. Being a good combat strategist does not require intelligence.
that is why i said widsom too, understand what is happening around you
Wolves may not be able to draw out a plan, but they'll do tactics that humans have towards each other
Counterpoint: What if you asked your players not to tell you their HP so that it doesn't colour your knowledge?
I feel better doing this with Zombies.
Like Wolves will do stuff similar to pincer maneuvers and stuff
And sometimes that knowledge is knowing 'Oh no, that player would feel real mad if they thought I was going easy on them' so I will murder their PC to make them happy.
Or 'I know that this player has had a real bad time this combat with sucky rolls, and I have another move that would totally make sense and give them another turn'
Purely based off instinct, thouhht and body language
Ah, one of the things from VTTs. I see all HP.
The question of how the enemies of the party should behave has more to do with what they seek to achieve.
yep, but again, Widsom, the wolves have 12. They will understand when they are in danger, when attack and other stuff
I go by the rule of "monsters want to win"
So why are the wolves attacking the party? Are they defending their young from a perceived intrusion? Are they rabid? Are they starving? Are they under magical influence? That informs how they behave. And that is the only thing that really informs how they behave
So as a DM I will still metagame to go with options that I think will be more 'fun' over what might be the most optimal choice/ 'in character' choice.
Just as 'It's what my character would do' can be abused by players, so can it be abused by DMs if what that character would do is just Very Not Fun.
playing unplugged is fun, casting power word kill and then asking for their hit points is a rush
an ogre have 5 int and 7 wid
so the idea of someone leading the ogre or the ogre just being a violent creature that attack everything around him, that if you mock him you can easily take his agro
I admit, I think the most fun option is the option that would be what the character would do.
Provided the character is an actual character that makes sense
It's halflings and they want a snack
It's often the most immersive. But I've also played through games were DMs have pulled such stunts as 'The enemy can scry you can cast spells through the scry focus/ teleport a bunch of enemies to you/ meteor your village/ know your every plan and make a counter plan perfectly to it'
Yeah I've had an ogre fight start cause the players kept mispronouncing his name
"its what my character would do" is one of those excuses that rings hollow when the players point out you can make a character that doesn't do those things
or its my way to give a "rule" for the enemies, a "sense" behind some behaviors and more
and it applies to the DM too
And like. Sure. Okay. A really powerful archmage should be scary.
But I also just want to play the game...
Then the wolves will be attacking what seems to be the weakest one. The one not wearing armour. The weaker they seem the better. They will jump this one. Then the next action will depend on how the party acts in response
If somethings mindless or doesn't care, I'll have it attack downed PCs
Yeah, most importantly that, having fun is important, giving a challenge too because without it there is no feeling of "overcoming"
For me the problem with that is the logistics. When did that archmage scry on the party? Which information did they gleam from that?
i execute a lot of PC's i actually cant remember the last time one died from failing the death saves
Like Stirges, why would they detach from something that still has blood in it.
Honestly, for me, everything attacks downed PCs.
you basically never hear "its what my character would do" to justify characters doing awesome and fun things ...
its like the meme of the barbarian screaming "FIREBALL!!" to the thief's, they dont know he can do it
With some exceptions that depend on the context of the fight
For me, for enemies that can communicate with people, sometimes they'll use them as hostages, as an opening to escape, ect.
That is indeed one of the exceptions.
Can anyone help me with an issue? My and my DM are trying to come up with a compromise:
I play a character that is a prepared caster, so I unlock all my spells at once.
He wants the spells I find to be found in the world itself before hand, like a wizard.
Im trying to find a middle ground.
But like if I ever run a Lich for example, he's just gonna finish off PCs and raise them for his own forces.
Animals that are hungry will focus on the downed PCs. Enemies that are fighting to kill the party will focus on the downed PCs. Enemies that seek to make an escape will focus on the downed PCs to create a distraction.
yeah, tell it to me, the DM added an insanity mechanic that add us flaws, i got one and i told him how i would make it work.
its "Achieving my goal is the only thing of interest to me, and I'll ignore everything else to pursue it."
So, i told him what was always my goal, maintain the party alive. So i will make it work like i worry too much about them, will sacrifice some missions objectives, people to reassure they are safe, even myself
he liked it and we are going to see how we do it work
Like I will sometimes say to my players 'I'm sorry, I love you but (BBEG) wants to see the light fade from your eyes'.
And then multiattack their dying PC. >.>
But also will avoid doing things that.. aren't fun. Spells that make PCs skip turns are powerful but.. not really fun for that player.
I'll paralyze/stun/charm players personally
So not saying to never be mean or to use metaknowledge to advantage (Heck I think it's suggested for enemies wo are meant to be master mind tacticians t use what you know about the party to plan spells and traps ahead)
But that metaknowledge can 100% be abused by DMs too, in a way that isn't fun to players.
I won't make it a point to always include said stuff
But an Archmage of Enchantment is definitely gonna cast dominate person on that barbarian and send them after the parties wizard.
Oh I mean, I have some players who find that really fun 
Would do that only in a key moment and left it completely to the luck
if there is a party of 4
Roll a d100 or a d8 and give an number to each member, depending of which number land you target that player.
If the party is smart and understand that is getting targeted, they are going to protect it
Thing is "fun" is such a... Nebulous thing. Is it unfun to have your turn skipped? It depends. I have fun when I feel like the DM is pulling no punches, so getting stunned is fun for me if I see it the optimal option
I want my enemies to take the optimal course of action to fight me except in situations where there is a narrative explanation for why they aren't.
In small doses and when it makes sense it can be okay, but still, things like 'You're paralysed for half the battle, just sit and watch' can be.. not fun.
fun is subjective, there's no one-size-fits-all approach, and its the DMs job to figure out the best way to bring the fun at their unique table
Two kinds of DMs
DM 1: "Alright I have control but I won't use any features, just attack"
DM 2: "Smite that wizard"
Can paralyze a caster and they can still use voice spells
Balancing for fun doesn't work
and sometimes its impossible for a given table group to all have fun together >_> (or at least, impossible given current gaming technology)
i like the idea of balancing in challenge and giving fun in some ways
Not RAW no.
chat, how can i make a funny character
I think it's impossible to always have fun when playing a random chance game
Damn....
Sometimes you just get screwed by the dice
I explain before every campaign that I will not pull punches and your characters will die if you make dumb decisions
oh yeah, i would recommend using some bad dice moments for funny moments
But you will always have the tools to come out on top
-cough- -cough- me in real life
Like I remember I spent the entire first combat of one campaign paralyzed
Example: Nat 1 doing a persuasion, you just stutter a lot, slip and fall or word it in the worst possible way
Actually a nat 1 on a skill is not supposed to be any different from any other kind of failure. It's not even supposed to be an auto failure
i got in one fight charmed and couldnt attack, it was okey, because the paladin got the lightspot for him and i wasnt needed at all
My favorite choice is that it triggers some obscure personality flaws in the listeners
I had a character roll a nat 1 trying to flirt with a bartender and he slipped and hit his face on the bar and laid on the ground crying for 5 minutes afterwards
I didn't enjoy it, but I never rolled higher than a 4 on the DC:11 save
you know how video games have had difficulty selectors at the start of a game for decades? D&D should just steal that idea
this one get it, but if the dm want it too, he can make some mistakes into opportunities
This. I also feel when ever conversations like this come up where it obviously is going to be a subjective thing, and the topic is 'I think it's best to try and consider X' people seem to think of the extreme examples of either end of where it wouldn't work. And.. yes?
"the king of the dwarven realm you're in hears you mention the ocean and immediately orders you to be silent"
Eh, video games are video games
It's called CR
A "difficulty slider" if poorly implemented could lead to some extreme issues with table finding
or adapt it like Resident evil did in some time before, you do good? enemies are smarter and harder
You arent doing it too good and have a hard time, enemies are more forbidding
Nope they have no actions
It does
How?
If a DM doesn't wanna be forced to play every enemy like a skyrim enemy they're "a bad dm who hates people that need it easier"
Course this is already an existing sentiment online, but it'd get a lot worse.
yep, had been told, still weird for me but i guess you got all glued instead of just arms and legs
yoo
Yo
Also last I checked you cannot speak while Paralyzed
Wait... You mean, like... All monsters get slightly stronger the higher the difficulty?
I mean, DMs will need to scale challenges not just to the party level, but to the player's preferences and skills yep.
yeah, you just said it and the elgate told me, Thanks. The "for me" was for a reason.
A spellcaster foe is gonna be a lot more annoying for a party without counterspell or a tank
its a complex topic to describe in just a paragraph .... or I could just say "how baldurs gate 3 did it" and leave it there
A melee horde is just gonna melt a caster-heavy party
Bg3s a video game
it is?
And its AI is a lot crueler than a lot of DMs.
nah just goad ur dm saying the fights too easy and he tpks you
BG3s AI will almost always attack downed PCs.
i told my DM his world is like disney and we got tpk'd yesterday
Yeah, it's the optimal play
And CC PCs
i think thats only on higher difficulties
It’s so easy to break BG3 with a stealth archer I learned
on the lower difficulties it doesn't attack downed PCs
One of my group is highly tactical and honestly just.. way smarter than me. I need to make real mean, juiced up combats to challenge them.
Another group is young and new to the game and really just wants to have fun being strong and powerful so I'm going to make cool enemies that aren;t actually that hard to kill >.>
the AI also goes right for casters if the number of times I have to cast sanctuary on gale is any indication
My dm ask us to fill a form like some way to give a comment about the session and improve, we told him that some fights were kinda easy and its okey if he want to give us a more hard challenge
Yeah still, I don't think a DM should be forced to play like a game AI
Stealth archer is the crab evolution for fantasy games
damn
a
Re: the first, I know that feel. Heck, it's one versus four in the brain game!
It's so easy to break [insert generic fantasy game here] with a stealth Archer 
..I think folk are taking the wrong takeway from 'difficulty scaling like from video games'
Part of what drew me to DnD is its not limited by game code, and development.
It doesn't mean 'play D&D like a video game'
archer really is a cheat code for fantasy games isnt it
i enjoy there being stakes and all
I do like taking level design from video games
where can i find epic dnd wallpapers
It means 'Adjust how combat focused and how challenging options are to your group's preferences'.
its okey, we enjoy his sessions and he like to us give him an honest opinion. Its learning for both sides
More because we try sometimes new stuff like, we have a "glory kill mechanic" that is for making combats more dynamic and its good
i.e. the players upfront tell you what kind of game they want, so as a DM you don't have to guess
thats sounds so cool how does it work
you also get full license to take the gloves off if the party is like "we would like meat grinder mode please"
ngl my games are becoming more like players vs dm
I'm of the opinion that the DM finds players they want
sometimes its all u got gang
like u wanna play but u only got this group so u might as well
you also can just advertise the difficulty you're running and players you want will self-select into your game
If you want enemies in a skyrim conga line where all they do is roll to attack and never do anything else, then I'm sure someone out there will do that.
like i dont feel i can enjoy dnd with people i dont know so i only play with my group of friends
if you really want to emulate skyrim have the enemies yell "you never should have come here"
I like medium difficulty personally
As a DM and as a PC
and another example, with a campaign im going to maybe start with a DM, he make us roll for stats 2 times and we can pick any of the rolls, if roll A or B.
I got 1 roll with giga op stats and anotehr with not so good ones and i told him.
"hey, depending of what my allies get, i will choose A or B so its easier for both sides"
Because i understand that if i am too op, i would make it hard for my allies and if we are all weak would be still funnier
Isn't this more or less already a thing?
Like how you wouldn't run the same type of game for a new, young player who wants a cool story as you would for the experienced, tactical minded player who wants those combats that make them think.
definitely not
i like hard combat and an interesting story
I am looking for a gestalt.
Wait how does being too op make it hard for allies?
makes me more invested in my kit and character knowing how far i can push him
same
aw I missed the talk about killing downed players 😔
Thats all nice and good, but the real rush comes from counterspelling revival spells
I see people bring up difficulty in their ads quite a bit.
Lettuce band together and find a DM
if u got one OP player and the rest arent they just feel like side characters
like all my friends and i like to minmax so it works out
im too strong, my allies arent, who you think is going to be balanced the things?
Me that i can cast a spell and obliterate the enemies or the low power allies that cant against 3 goblins?
but if only one guy is minmaxxing itd be boring for the rest
Honestly that's just not how I DM. I don't take party strength into account, just their level
Tbh I don't see them trying to enforce a difficulty slider ending well.
It's best if difficulty is just handled by the dm
a level 7 hexadin aint like a level 7 ranger man
yes and its all subjective, the players that join those games still bounce off of them when they misinterpret what the difficulty means
can i create a nuclear bomb (cientifically acurrate) in dnd?
we just havee a rule that minmaxxing is allowed to the max since the dms likes to improvice on combat as well
And that's how it is, being able to find the right DnD group in one try is luck
two people claiming to be optimizers doesn't mean they're on the same page when it comes to optimization
Anyone else looking for a gestalt?
delayed blast fireball with 1 day extended duration via circle casting
DnD should remain a free will sort of game.
two people claiming to be narrative focused doesn't mean they're on the same page when it comes to how much narrative control they want
ulala
yh sometimes it should be fine for it to be easy and sometimes hard
True, but I honestly do not care. I prepare my encounter taking only level into account.
that is good, but still having a wizard with the highest stat being 18 and lowest being 12. While my allies can get easily lower stats even to 12.
I want to everyone have fun in my party, even the dm and others players so each one can have his spotlight moment
I balance off of level
Oh shit.... should I uhhhh... let my players out of the basement then?
i mean as u wish im not a dm i cant do it
i tried dming once its not for me
like i feel u do soo much for too little in return or it might just be me idk
but again, that go for each one, each one can drive their car in any way they want
I think more tools to scale difficulty wouldn't be too bad, although tricky still. CR is part of it, but also tips for running a monster 'hard' or 'easy', or such in pre written modules.
I used to allow burden PCs but now I don't anymore
man i miss my hexadin he got murked
guys, it is normal that the town habitants hate me (in a camapign irl)
i mesn i just burned down a catedral
we are using a module, so we can do some sort of "speedrun" of it, 3 sessions per week
Think of it like this
If Matthew Minmaxer is playing the most broken Hexadin he found on Reddit and Adam Average is playing a Tiger Totem Barbarian and Nick Newbie is playing a 2014 Assassin Rogue, it’ll be hard for Dan DM to make combat hard enough for Matthew while keeping Adam and Nick alive
I don't balance. I build the world and players are free to explore. Sometimes they will find areas they are overleveled for, sometimes they mess around with shit that they have 0 chance against. Etc.
just me it seems 
i think itd make sense to level them up ahead of the hexadin
Stuff like guidance I could get behind, nothing that forces people into anything.
isnt CR alr guidance
But Dan DM should not be trying to make combat hard enough for Matthew or trying to keep Adam Average and Nick Newbie alive. Dan DM should be trying to make an adventuring day that takes the monster CR and the party level into account, that's it.
My players know Im not afraid to kill them and are understandably wary and smart when interacting with new areas.
That is a shame, lettuce go find a DM together and search far and wide for the group we want as adventurers.
that ends up with matthew being bored tho :\
make your games like a soul like (trust me)
(dont trust me)
all games i play are soul like its pretty fun
It works similarly already yeah.
this one is nice and kinda common sense, if they get into the "evil and devious cave of wendigos that eat babies" at level 2 or 3 and expect some easy thing, welp, that is on them.
What I mean is like
Hydra:
Easy: Make the party fight it in a swamp cave, so it has little maneuverability and water to hide in.
Hard: Make them fight it in a deep difficult terrain swampy lake where it can hide under the water.
Shouldn't be bored if he's trying to keep those casuals he hangs around with alive.
you prob going all strength build
ahh that makes sense
all in fighter big axe
ive never played a non-martial class i wonder how it is
Yeah literally.
my human fighter has stood alot
Can't the PCs try to lure the hydra in the cave? Or ambush it while it rests? The DM doesn't really control that fully
But nothing like
"Alright DM these players wanna play on easy mode so time to say "never should've come here" and queue up the skyrim general combat music as the enemies stand still and die"
hell nahhh
go guts route
two handed big damn sword
big thick armor
assuming they're putting themselves into situations where you can even put them at risk :X
and not hiding behind matthew
characters backstory is he was a farmer non trained nothing just a brute that could handle this large axe to cut down trees
Well a difficulty slider means the DM doesn't have full control
Yeah but the difficulty slider also means nothing
quite berserk reference
paladins fighters and monks are forsho the coolest classes in dnd
The hydra lives in the swamp, sure. But how and where and when the PCs fight it is in the PCs' hands.
Bard, Cleric, Warlock. You were close though.
two sugar daddy classes aint cutting it man
Nah this is skyrim difficulty, it's just sitting there and waiting until the PCs come to the POI
my half orc fighter too, next session he is fighting the demon bidden to the cursed sword that the paladin was using.
Im using my action surge, lucky points, strike of the giant and everything to kill him.
Im getting it dead, it harmed my paladin and i wont let it slide
imo i like
artificer with battle smith
i like having a robot made into a small little cutie pet
uhhhhhhhhhh excuse me
man ive been asking my dm for a cursed weapon for so long now
my dm gave me a +1 longsword that i could sell for like 1000 or 700gp, im liking using it with duelist
artificer banned in our games but id like to play it
why???
i mean hes not THAT op
he gave us a greatsword with ice damage too and im planing to try it with great weapon fighting style
You literally listed a sugar daddy class of your own.
we were all new to the game and my DMS first time dming so artificer was just a naunce
but after the demon thing will be, now the objective is making hte demon heart stop pumping
I arise!
RAAGHHHH
jokes on you my clerics god is a chick /j
paladins aint work the same oaths dont have to be from a god
i mean my first game did a artificer i heard after game the DM screams in his room cause before i burned a cathedral with a nat 20
Neither does warlock have to be from a sentient creature.
You know, most deities have Avatars of different Genders, I'd say Gender is pretty fluid for a Deity
Paladins don't have to actually serve anyone or anything anymore, they just have to vaguely follow whatever the idea behind a pinky promise is
corellon my goat
yep, their own personal oath
take my smites im still a warrior with a sword take the patron ur nothing
I'm personally a fan of Primus, they're my non-binary GOAT
paladins are one of the most goated classes in dnd fosho
They gain the power to kill gods because they swore vengeance on Taco Bell
If it even exists! What even is Moander's gender?
guys lets Do a poll
shall i do a bard?
✅ / ❌
wizards are also cool since they work for it
Decent combat wize but boring overall.
My gender is goofball.
I identify as silly.
I'm a creature.
with their high cha i feel they can have alot of RP if theyre not played 1D to their oath
I think they are very binary
Monks are super fun
like a paladin doesnt have to be a goody two shoes
@mortal oriole bro idk if shall i do a bard
bard would be cool ngl
Heheh... because they're a machine Deity!
Heheh
Yeah they can but paladin players are usually the worst.
ive gor some ideas, can DM?
very fun im thinking of going echo knight x shadow monk
i agree for the most i was a very bad paladin player
Monk is notoriously bad for multiclassing, just sayin
sure
No but oathbreaker HAS TO BE EVIL. Dumb subclass.
idk we just waive allat in our games
yeah very MAD but we roll for it my rolls pretty neat across the board
I've only encountered a few 'bad paladin players'.
Most of the paladin PCs I've played as or with have been fun to interact with.
I have yet to find a non disruptive paladin player.
im a bad paladin player tbh for the most time i focused too much on the oaths and was jsut one dimensional doing nothing but following the oath i was a oath of conquest i felt i had to play as a edge lord idk
Though to be fair I play evil PC's and typically monster races. So it's usually a bad mix..
i feel dms have to say if the party will be good or bad beforehand
a disruptive player is going to be disruptive no matter what build they play. its about behaviror and not whats writtien on a charicter sheet
I have an idea for a Death Cleric of Baphomet, an Elderly Minotaur fellow who seeks to die in combat, but cause an absolute bloodbath before he dies, his look would probably be based off of a Cape Buffalo since they're known as "Black Death" in their country lol
Oh 1000% I just usually find those people playing pally
like ofcourse if i play a oath of devoation paladin and my friend is a assasin rogue it wont go well
Some people will use what's on a sheet to justify their bad behavior, true, but it's not what's on the sheet
Ok question for you all that buy the DnD books, where are the discounted or second hand DnD books located?
2nd hand bookstores
Amazon
Meh, a party is a mix right. They gotta sort out their differences.
The pits of hell
I've met more disruptive wizard PCs than paladin PCs honestly.
most 5e dnd books have kept their value quite a bit
2nd hand shops and stuff put stuff up for sale on Amazon
Like any specific location I’m talking about online or not
There's also some used book websites
You gotta go through Dantes Inferno to get your books, sorry 😔
i feel it always ends up on somone having to justify it and compromise
Half Price Books
Nothing beats the feeling of removing a disruptive player from the game
I can think of a few things that beat that feeling.
Are they actually half priced, or at least less?
idk man a crit on my smites on a fiend feels better
Depends on the kinda game you run. I go full grimdark and horror. Party infighting and PVP is always an option.
Counterspelling revivify. Having a PC figure out the twist you were planning just before the actual reveal...
You know...
I wonder how many Tiefling PC's have been created that are named Dante lmao
yh we got grimdark atleast the dm does but i feel some members dont like it and take it serious
Definitely a lot
My Tiefling was named Karkas 🧐
we banned revivify and any means of reviving someone dead
death has to feel final imo its more fun
while PvP can work... I've never actually seen it work properly. There's always some derailing of the game, or some tense feelings out of character.
You remember Karlas, don't ya?
I only always bring him up when I talk about my favorite personal Cleric pcs 💀
Maybe in a shorter game, or such but.. hmm.
Hey
Yeah
yesterday i pvped my friend and won and he lowk off today it carries over
I've seen PvP work well
I guess you can see how my old Harpy Necromancer who crafts cursed objects and commits ritualistic murder, or my current Ghoul PC who feeds off the flesh of its undead sister to parasitize her memories to relive their childhood could have some clashes with paladin players.
Tho campaign died after it cause a player threw a tantrum over the party not being the same as when it started and another left cause of the consequences of their actions.
tbh my friends and i arent the best at rp or playing so we take it more personal
youd like my first paladin he was goated everytime something bad happened he closed his eyes and called it a day
That would be the day.
aint break my oath if i didnt see it
my dm doesnt really care abt oaths for paladins he just sees them as character arcs if they break it like theres no mechanics behind it even if i were to kill or whatever
I played one character that turned evil in a campaign and it was my favorite character still, but most of my characters gravitate towards neutrality or heroism.
My closest recent character to an evil character in a regular campaign is my rogue
well in this campaign my character is quite literally going to hell
I'm personally a fan of Character VS Self,
My Dragonborn Fighter, Orizontas, is currently at his lowest point in trust with himself, he feels like an idiot because he feels like some of his actions have nearly costed the party their lives, even if they really didn't, he knows his actions has costed the life of his horse and can't bare to call himself a Knight anymore at the moment
my first character went to hell
She used to be leaning towards evil, but she leans more towards good now.
to whoever said that, PLEASE don't disclose your age here
he was a paladin ..... he ended up in hell
Will, don't worry, as long as your storytelling is alright they won't mind
Alright thank u
Oh so you aren't even playing a paladin.
I didnt realise until now u couldnt say ur age
yh tbh im just a fighter who can smite more of
Please do read our #rules !
Fair lol
Honest mistake, but the internet is a dangerous place to be giving out personal information like candy
he doesnt like the confinements of classes so its pretty cool
Ohh alright
man i love smiting its the best thing in dnd
Kinda like how you never give a Fae your name.
I think People sometimes take Paladin Oaths a little too strictly, while, in fact, most Paladin Oaths are like "Hey, if it's within your control, do this, but if it causes too much harm, don't do it!"
Fae?
Reminds me, someone in my Monday game gave their name to someone they believe they shouldn't have.
Paladin Oaths can be something fun to wrestle with.
Damnit, Vakbo 😭
Once you know, you will know.
i just use it as character arcs, when i take it and when i break it
Silly little Kobld.
Giving his name to random people in the woods and causing his Dragonborn boyfriend to worry
hitting a crit and having the slots to smite is no.1 feeling
One of my favourite PCs was a Paladin in 3.5 (When Paladin was embodying Lawful Good) who had to wrestle with his country and religious order not being as 'good' as he'd was raised to believe. Questioning orders and falling in love with someone who was chaotic neutral at best.
Never got to finish his arc, but it was fun while it lasted.
Just a random lone too clean for the enviroment beautiful woman in the woods, what's the danger.
damn
id hate not finishing a character arc
tbh we dont have romance in our games i wonder how people play it with romance
i mean i play with my irl friends theyre all guys i just cant see their character as not them idk
what are the best 6 Artificer infusions for a level 8 battle smith?
Can't flirt with the homies?
in your guys' opinions, do tails or snouts count as extra limbs?
look man im not sitting across my bald friend and flirting with him
I've also played a LE Warlock in a game with a LG Paladin.
It did end with the Paladin smite critting the Warlock, after the warlock finaly got hold of the artifact his patron had quested him to get and the paladin was like 'Whoah hey, that things evil' and finally giving up on trying to redeem the warlock after 'lock refused to abandon it.
Paladin didn't kill him though- just took the artifact and left. Caused the Warlock's patron to reject him. Would be fun to have seen what would have happened next.
"You know, you shine brighter than the sun, and twice as radiant"
its not even about genderlike even if it was a girl i just dont think i can seperate them im not good at rp
Not sure on snouts. I can see an argument for tails.
headbutt deals radiant damage
Kobolds are humanoid and small, I can turn into kobolds
Tails yes, snouts no.
Tails very yes if they mechanically change anything.
Fair enough.
If prehensile, yeah. But game rules and features will say for certain.
Interesting message to reply to
I don't do romance in dnd either.
Re: snouts, think elephants.
Snouts as in Kobolds, Tails as in Kobolds
Trunks yes.
Yeah why roleplay romance when you can just do romance? /jk
I'm just saying, if my kobold friend can sit in a barrel of water while we're in hell, I'm gonna turn into a kobold and sit with him
In Soras Monday Game
My Dragonborn Fighter, Orizontas, is dating another characters Kobold Monk, Vakbo
Orizontas proves to be the more mentally matured person, but Vakbo is emotionally wise and has lived through a life of loss.
They both watch eachothers backs and are there for eachother, but they also understand that they need to be their own people sometimes
Oh, well in that case, no to both.
All my NPCs are either Ace, taken, or interested in someone else. And all my PCs are either in a committed relationship or Ace.
holy hell has this sentence been said before
My PCs are schrodinger's orientation until something happens that I think will be interesting.
Often they just end up in queerplatonic relationships with other PCs anyway.
I don't know what that is, so I can't roleplay it.
yk the chemistry between my friends and i in dnd is kind of bad but theyre the only group ik so might as well
Asexual until proven otherwise
like the dm should've written a book and the other one keeps on lying for aura moments and im pretty sure im not that good at rp either like its such a weird mix
Might be better to say shrodingers orientation for mine as well lol
Slane the rogue was kinda dating someone for a hot minute. They both knew it was over when Slane put a weapon on the table.
De Vor cleaves only unto her patron and that's a barrel of laughs for everyone, and Zola is an absolute stray cat.
Most of my characters aren't really romantic, but there's a few exceptions
My Drow Druid, Vaskhir, dated an Owlin fellow named Caspian.
Auronoth, my Goliath Elements Monk, fell in love with a demon (mutually) when they were fighting eachother
And Orizontas is in a gay relationship with a Kobold lmao
Cause if another player approached me and asked to do a romance and I trusted them, I'd probably try it.
All are gay, it's glorious
nah ion got it in me to even consider romance
I'm sorry, fell in love with a demon?
im scared to play dnd again what I do
I mean, not even ace. I have some characters who are 100% ace. But some are just '????' until some RP comes up that seems fun comes up.
And one or two PCs where I was knew from the very start. But usually 'as the narrative flows'.
Yes, a Lawful Good Demigod Monk..
Fell in love with a Chaotic Evil Demon.
They found a place in the hells relatively safe for them to live out their lives together
I never romance my players, so I make my own NPCs fall in love with each other
man people who can rp good must be having more fun in dnd
Mine just won’t hang with people who have a job with a super high mortality rate (adventuring)
My Rogue had a "husband"
For taxes purposes no doubt /jk
Auronoth is a descendant of a Fire Giant God, so he doesn't mind the heat of the hells... or his demonic husband 😎
"Get out of that circle of salt and talk to me!" "Not until you stop your blood rituals!"
only spouses my characters had are dead in their backstory for edge lordness thats it
For that free city healthcare
Your DM let you be the descendant of a god?!
Auronoth is helping him become "better" as a person, but he also understands that his husband was born in a plane of Evil, and he accepts him as a person
real
It was a oneshot, all the PCs were demigods
was that a percy jackson oneshot
Why not?
lowk my dm allowed my shadow to be a dragon demi god thats hiding in my shadow and for me to be born with the soul of hell
I've played a character whose grandfather was revealed to be the king of the gods.
then i died but it was fun while it lasted
THAT GIVES ME AN IDEA!!!
One-shot where every player is a demigod and rolls 4d6 no modifiers for their stats
Everyone ends up with god stats
I've had a PC that was a descendant of Selune which was fun
Nope,we were fighting a Giant Deity of death and decay.
My fella actually got the last hit off, it was fun 😎
Her family name was Fullmoon 
I think the most dramatic thing that came out of a romance in my game was the CG Cleric's ill advised fling with a Cambion he was trying to redeem.
The tragic thing was that the Cambion genuinely felt something back, but his morals and outlook on the world meant that his idea of 'helping' ended up with the Cleric having to swear to kill him on sight, after the Cambion decided to help by 'taking out political competition' and could have caused the Cleric and his whole village to be disgraced and attacked.
most of my characters are orphans with no last name
in my campaign we have to kill Baphomet the Demon Lord
One of my other characters, Xolba, is a "sort of" descendant of a 'Deity', he was created by the Elder Evil, Caiphon, the purple star.
He himself wasn't really evil though
like i find it so cool to have a human fighter having no advantage nothing standing shoulder to shoulder with demi gods wizards sorcerers etc
He wasn't an elder yet for the evil to kick in
Oh yeah my Wizard managed to skip the boss’ 2nd phase with spamming Disintegrate
You gotta be an elder before you can get the evil
Also I was stunned for 1 hour and 10 minutes. (In real time)
alright, if everything goes well, in two days will be my first drop of DnD in a year
Monday is mine but I might have to push it another Monday
i think i'm gonna need to learn the basics of how to run romance soon, gotta hunt down advice for how to do it soon
I think there's a 3rd party book for it
i wanna try playing with new people see if theres any difference
"How to rizz up your fellow players at the table"
The best way to do a romance is to let it form naturally, or, if it's pre-planned, make the relationships new, and don't be too insanely lovey dovey as it could get uncomfortable lol
Honestly the thing with romance is that you often overthink it, even if it's just roleplay
what's great with knowing a different language than my fellow party members is I get to use my native language so both in real life and in-game they wont understand what I'm saying
id ony romance if i was with the person irl as well tbh i find it too weird for me to work
Tbh that might be the situation where I'd be comfortable with it as well
What’s everyone’s favorite subclass
i have no instincts for what any of that means :X
Tho I don't really treat people I'm dating that much differently than friends.
Juggernaut barbarian.
Unnerfed and original.
Berserker?
Oh do you mean the CR one?
Juggernaut Barb is from the 3rd party Tal Dorei book iirc
way of the open hand or echo knight or oathbreaker tbh
In the gestalt I want to use juggernaut barbarian and echoknight.
i wanna go echo knight x cleric of trickery it might be fun
I am just waiting for a DM to look over the party and pick up the foreverplayers
Hey, if a player is in the corner of a room with wall on his back and there is a monster in front of him, does he have disadvantage like when he's between 2 monsters ?
Idk if its understable 😅
My favorite Subclass is tough, but I'll name a few
War Cleric, Mercy Monk, Bladesinger Wizard, Berserker Barbarian, Cavalier Fighter, Aberrant Mind Sorcerer and Thief Rogue
I dont think so, since the wall can't really move or attack him in a way he feels overwhelmed than when 2 monsters are sandwiching him
back to wall no space to dodge or hit comforable id lowk rule it as yes
Out of the ones I’ve played I’d say hexblade
Just force normal rolls with juggernaut barbarian.
Not unless it’s a ranged attack
also where are his fellow party members
Is the monster kabedon'ing the PC?
he tried to aura farm and it bit him
are they also in the other corners? all 4 of them are being sandwiched by corners? 😭
my paladin died due to trying to aura farm man i miss him
Juggernaut Barbarian wasn't an officially published subclass, alas, it was Unearthed Arcana, which is playtesting, which most dms don't allow lol
Unless you're talking about a homebrew or third party
tbh i feel most dms allow unearthed arcana atleast the ones i know
Your table may vary.
I can see why it is disallowed because that sweet sweet knockback could be used to force falldamage,
i had a cultivator class it was fun
Honestly, lots of Unearthed Arcana is just.. bad.. weak.. or stupid 😭
Looks over at Pyromancer Sorcerer
ill never forget my OP cultivator class
Unlike the rest of the knockback builds juggernaut barbarian is just that something special I can endorse and endure since it is only as balanced as the map hazzards can be.
man it was such BS i had to nerf myself but the flavor was fun
I just want Psion to come out so I can play a Metamorph Psion and do some more freaky Body Hortor shit lol
also why cant there be items to raise unarmed strikes damage? like why must it be 1d4 only and the only way to inc is go monk os special stuff
I flavor it halberd as a whip with polearm master and UA tunnel fighter, the balanced part of it is where it would be only one attack per creature per turn.
"think you can hurt me? go on, try it, right here"
Rolls a Nat 20
my paladin tried clearing a fiend nest while his friends call for help, fair to say im rolling a new character now
Never split the party 😭
the aura farming moment was there man
i had everything smite slots good items cant believe he died
the party wasn't even in any real danger, if you guys stuck together you probably wouldn't have died
i think the dm got mad i even tried it he just insta killed me
my DM is making it clear that the campaign will be hellish literally
I prepared Fireball then he reminded me "Fireball? you're quite literally going to hell"
like he just said this aint disney then disintegerated me
lowk more fun
we banned revivy and any ressuruction spells
"you should think of ways to not be cooked to death" he said
Again, Leomund's Hut but make it mobile 
that's what the Kobold is doing
and I'm gonna use Shapechanger to turn into a kobold as well and join him
And then someone will pull out an Antimagic Gem and passively fry you all 
I roll for persuasion to try and persuade them not to
Here’s a build question! How viable are Bardic Ranger builds?
I know Drizzt had an antimagic gem at one point, but it got turned to dust when it encountered a really strong magic, but for the life of me, I can't remember what did it in.
The Crystal Shard
It blasted it to dust when they came in contact.
Left the Shard very weakened tho.
Crystal Shard.... I remember there being a shard, that red mind crystal the hobbit had....
It wasn’t Drizzt who had it
Wasn't the Crystal Shard you're referring to sentient or something?
Yes
Problem with this build is stat split forcing you both into wisdom and charisma and Dex all at once
I know
It was the Balor who had it, when the Crystal tried forcing its way the Balor used the gem.
He got the gem from Lolth
The challenge comes from how overall practical it is, ignoring stats (there’s ways around that).
If you know than you just need to find a way to cope with self-imposed weaknesses most likely coming from weak con
OH RIGHT, it was Crenshinibon!
Yeah, the crystal that made towers and influenced wielders...
I love that Artemis Entreri was immune to the Shard’s mental influences because he was just that tired and mad at the Shard’s shenanigans
Entreri was always getting done dirty. Tbf though, he definitely deserved it.
What features do you see working well together?
The Sellswords trilogy really got me liking the dynamic of Jarlaxle and Artemis
Jarlaxle out here wanting to enjoy some Dungeons & Dragons while dragging Entreri across Faerun
“What if we anger 7 level 20 characters for the lolz?”
well i see, but i don't really see the need for any ranger features in this idea
I keep accidentally giving my DM ideas, bad ideas
you can just go pure bard and flavour it as nature based caster
Or, you know, keeping Entreri from getting stabbed by his girlfriend. Honestly, Enteri would probably have preferred to just die instead.
oh i keep sending my DM monsters that will perfectely counter our party line up
Why did my message get deleted?
oh because its not #character-discussion
Fair
i mean a druid is a bard for animals
I would guess the m word, personally. A travelling performer? You don't need a multiclass for that. My rogue is that!
The DM sent art of a dark, long hallway littered with skulls, I commented "I feel like one of them will lunge and grab my leg"
I return from...
The Shower Dimension!
I'm now a squeaky clean lord of silly
I take great offense!
Comparing Druid to.. BARDS?!
Bards... eugh.
STR saving throw doesn't sound all that scary
my character has 10 strength as a level 7
personally i would give you an NPC that would get pulled upwards at some point
My favorite strength saving throw effect is the Black Hole attack
surprise, the corridor is a home to Shadows
From Amethyst Dragons
not that bad considering we're in hell
Better than my warlocks.
Even then , Strength saves aren't typically that worrisome unless it's shadows lol
oh in this case Shadow Demons
did you just said Shadows are not too bad with 10 STR score?
do you want to die?
Shadows and Intellect Devourers are scary even for high level parties
You were right. Combining with the term “Ritualist”, and it gave the dev team the wrong impression.
I wasn’t thinking of that. I just thought of playing my Fairy Bardic ranger, in some way, in 5e
Idea, Valor Bard for the Ranger effect
oh my god, I am so sorry, I just checked and EVERY one of my skills and attacks do NOTHING against it
Okay
except Spirit Guardians
I was wondering why are you so brave against enemy that can and will kill you in 4 attacks if you are unlucky
I thought *it can't be that bad, I mean, we're already going against Demons"
I didn't know it was resistant and immune to nearly EVERYTHING
Enemies that are very good at Ambushes too
Not to mention, Shadows often come in groups
Could I use bardic inspiration on myself?
Nope
alright well half of the party are bards
Bards can't give themselves inspiration
i mean you can do that too if you Aasimar Wildheart Barbarian Bear Rage
With a ring of force resistance
But you don't resist psychic then
yea then your only weak to Psychic
how did my character go from a con artist to on a quest to kill the demon lord Baphomet
I hope he slaughters your party
Sorry, I'm a Baphomet glazer
You're lucky you get to bask in his glory!
to con the ultimate con artist of course, once you con a devil you are the Con Lord
Baphomet is a Demon, not a Devil
And Demons don't make deals
and a minotaur
oh, kill him for being too weak to con people then
I got an amusing head canon on Baphomet
REAL fiends be scammin
They certainly do!
They're just not legally and magically bound by them
There are more demons than anything else in the realms
ehh sometimes they do. depends on the demon
Answered the wrong message btw, meant to answer "demons don't make deals"
So since MotM there has been talking about if Baphomet or The Lady of Pain created the first Minotaurs.
I offer the theory of “What if Baphomet was the monster in the Lady of Pain’s mazes, and he got out?”
What if Baphomet is the Lady of Pain?
Graz'zt and the charismatic Demogorgon head are tge only ones that strike me as dealmakers
what if Baphomet and Lady of Pain made the minotaurs together?
Lady of Pain doesn't collaborate with anyone.
Nah, Baphomet just changed his worshippers into his image, like a Chad
It's a boon! A blessing. To be as beautiful as the beast king!
I think Tokii REALLY likes Baphomet
tokii is baphomet
oh its not their worst feature, damn near invisibility and ability drain combined with Atrophy instant kill ability is the real issue
Dagon. Pazuzu. Pale Night.
Also, hate gnolls.
Minotaur and Gnolls have a legendary beef because Yenoghu and Baphomet hate eachothers guts.
Also they share similarities
The Dabus work for her
could I detect magic or dispel magic their invisibility?
Honestly, most of the Demon Lord's hate eachother and that's one of the Demons biggest weaknesses.
They don't like working together
Nope!
its not magical, its also not a real invisibility, so long its dark they can hide at will
you can just cast light spells though
Fair, but they're former Demon Lords!
Casting a light spell is generally the first thing you do against shadows
They aren't Lord's anymore smh..
No, they're still lords
Pazuzu is still one of the most powerful demons in the Abyss. Dagon is still one of the most politically influencial ones
Demogorgon literally took Dagons place though, no? 😭
I have zero light spells.
No. Dagon still has his place and Demogorgon can't really rule where Dagon lives
If you have one, most people don't carry those for some reason
this "i have darkvision" makes them weak
hear me out. Could I charm a shadow
vulnerable
wierdly enough, yes
Aren't most Demons immune to charm...
Or wait, no, that's Devils, right?
do they travel in packs?
also yes
guess I'll have to charm every shadow then
They are undead so most charms don’t effect them due to creature type
or you can light a torch
Charms tend to be specific with creature types
Are they humanoid perhaps
well their statblock doesn't have charm immunity, if they find a spell that is universtal, hell why not
No
No. They're Undead lol
nope
They are Undead.
oh man I can't even turn into a shadow
Creatures don't typically have more than one creature type either
But yea, Shadows are straight up a nightmare
Yeah it’s just creature type and maybe specifies even further what type of creature
since even if you beat the encounter, your STR score is weakened until you rest
if the DM goes for Shadow followed by STR intensive encounter, you are boned
is Radiant really the ONLY thing that can harm them?
Like how you can get Fiend (Devil)
no, they are resistant not immune
You could do half damage with other types
yeah but half damage is like a tickle
Damage is still damage
If you're doing damage, you're still furthering the goals to kill something
They have 16 hp, it's not much.
their highest possible hp is 27 right?
In 2024 they do not resist BPS notably
That’s their average.
45 is how high they can get.
oh my god.
Spellcasters issues
The biggest thing with Shadows is just making it harder for them to get to you.
You mentioned you're level 7 and have Spirit Gaurdians, that pretty much solves your issue
I'M A BARD AND I CAN'T CHARM THEM, what do I do
Literally anything else
again your DM is not aware we had this conversation and i doubt he would put Shadows instead of Shadow Demons there
yeah I mean I GUESS sure I can cast that
Buff your allies
you're right
wait a moment, who is your DM, let me message them the statblock for Shadows
NO
I already gave him the idea of making a town full of mind flayers
well, probably towns, plural
How about the Cr8 Shadow Assassins? They are Shadows who have way more Hp, speed, AC, and a Lot more attacks and damage
town full of mind flayers is not too bad, at least you didn't send him the stablock for Ilithid Dragon
Then don't say things to give your dms ideas to bite you in the ass later lol
what if I like that
Illithid Dragon is the fun monster that can potentiatly end the entire world
what if I like a harder challenge
My players wrecked an Elder Brain dragon the other week
but apparently, this is supposed to go even harder because we're supposed to end the campaign at level 20
What if your party doesn't?
Also, you're a Bard, playing bard is enough of a challenge lmao
3/6 members are bards
That's a horrible team composition (pun intended)
Okay, but how about an Aberrant Tarrasqlich? 
I'd give up if half of my party was bards to be blunt lmao
Yeah no doubt they could
well problem with this monster isn't fighting it, it's whats going to happen if it gets away
how many cities will he convert until you can catch up to him and slay it?
Was that hard tbh, they have the damage to do so
tbf bards are quite versatile
The dragon tried planes shifting away
Bards are VERY diverse
But the party just plane shifted after it.
Although Elder Brain dragons are not actually that dangerous. In truth I always found their statblock less scary than the elder brain.
I'm a certified Bard hater.
I don't hate them as much as Rangers though.
And it's not because I think they're bad.
I just don't enjoy how either play..
And don't enjoy their players lots of the time /Half-Joke
We have a Swords Bard, Lore Bard, and a Glamour Bard
It lacks the elder brain's ability to just screw you completely, its legendary actions are lackluster, its breath weapon is a line, objectively the worst type.
it's a flying monster, it can just fly away instead of attacking you
Frankly if i would to use this monster i would do just that
Either party finds a way to ground and kill it, or they lose
Valor Bard would've been better than a stinky swords Bard smh.
The Swords bard is a multiclass of a Warlock
Yeah they flew after it
If you can't ground a dragon you do not deserve to win
We went from levels 1 to 20 they got the loot and features
Anti Airborne Weapon Mastery
Bard and Ranger are the only classes I don't like
we need a weapon that can punch holes in wings to ground opponents
Ilithid Dragon is a real issue, there are few monsters that are even close to as game changing as it
Eh
Looks at Celestials, Fiends, Fey and other extraplanar creatures
I dunno, some of these are strong enough to do whatever the hell they want if they aren't stopped
This is probably an unpopular opinion, but I'm glad the Illithid Dragon did not come back
I always found the concept to be cheap and clumsy.
It’s very easy to get around
Imagine with me, if you will.
A Chaotic Evil Emperyan (as it is possible) starting a new false religion and how fast it'd spread because it's a literal angle, how fast that could change everything
Like the breath attack seems scary until you see it’s easy to undo with decent healing, or just killing the infected
tbh i can't get into Bard, Druid, or Wizard. all the other classes i see some multiclass use of at the least but those three i can't really get into
You have 6d12 hours after all
What kind of angle? How many degrees?
The joy of playing a class isn't ALWAYS Multiclassing
Actually once the person is unconscious, the only way is to use wish
I've found that not multiclassing is Franky a very joyful experience for Druids, Wizards and.. even Bards.
i mean if we're talking multiclass excluding then i'm only that into Warlock, Rogue, and Fighter
Because they don't NEED it anyway
No class does
Also it’s not like resurrecting the dead person is impossible too
We weren't.
I was talking about classes I just don't like.. you said you didn't like certain classes because of lacking multiclass capabilities, not conversation changing, but just throwing it out there, I don't multiclass because I personally think it takes away from a Character..
Especially spellcasters
One powerful monster is not all that bad
One Powerful monster capable of turning other creatures into other powerful monsters...
Some of those creatures don't even have to do that to be a considerable or world ending threat.
mechanically? you're probably right. but i play DND with writing in mind
Bro seeing Cr7 and deciding “powerful”
That's a nonsensical argument, not to be rude.
You can write a character without multiclassing.
again, no monster in Monster Manual comes even close to the world ending threat, Elder Brain Dragon is as close as it gets
that's not an argument, i'm saying that me, bebe frog, as a person, does no such wanna
My Warlock doesn't need to be a Fighter, Barbarian, ect to be good at Melee combat or a competent fighter
Besides the Tarrasque which just spawns more Tarrasques on death
Or the Mummy Lord who can rewrite timelines
My Bard doesn't need to be a Druid to do nature things
My Cleric doesn't have to be a Bard to be friendly, outgoing or good at playing instruments
Or the Shadow Dragon which makes more Shadows
But inspiration is neat
But you do need to be a warlock to sell your tail to a GOO 
And casting with an instrument
Shadows are less likely to turn on their dragon like Mind Flayers after all
Not really no
You don't have to be a Warlock to make pacts.
Any class can have a pact tbh
I demand this option on DNDB
Its already on it
Also i demand dragon patrons 
Having a pact is pure lore
If you mean Dark Bargain, we need more 
You can already do it in dndb
Also even better for the Shadow Dragon, their shadows also make more Shadows too
My Bladesinger Wizard is currently in a pact with a Knowledge Deity to use her Artifact, for example, but he's not a warlock.
A barbarian could say that his rage comes from a patron
A cleric could say hes worshipping and a warlock of some or other being
A paladin too
wait, that one is actually in Monster Manual?
Fiend pact for Tiamat, celestial pact for Bahamut. You're welcome
Anyone can have a pact in lore
Now you are just pulling my leg
And what pact for dracolich?
Pacts, Worshipping a Diety, anything can come from just plain storytelling.
You don't have to be class-locked or multiclass or whatever.
That’s in the 2025 Monster Manual
Undead patron.
One of the plots for Mummy Lords is about going back in time
If you think Elder Brain Dragons are more dangerous than the MM you might have to reread the MM
is it on the statblock though?
Ugh. Undead and Undying made me sad to see, because I'm a big fan of the altered self of Undead Patron, but not a fan of its spirit aspect, whereas Undying has some things I'd rather have, and some I'd prefer mechanics from Undead patron instead
Flavor is free