#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 102 of 1
Odysseus expects to find hospitality among the cyclops and, from what he describes of them, he seems to have knowledge of them.
2014 war or 2024 war?
An eye for an eye
My pfp is actually my old Tabaxi Grave Cleric
2024
The worst said about them is that they "have no assemblies for council, nor appointed laws, but each one rules his children and his wives and they do not concern themselves with one another"
Cheers mate
Cheers, friend
CD: Path To The Grave is a terrifying line of text to be reading at Level 3 (or is it 4?) i can't lie
Sadly it only works on Attack Rolls, but it's still good
does it stack on Sneak Attack?
Since sneak attack is applied on an attack roll, yes
Always yes. I've found a lot of fun with Life and War but Light has been enticing me recently.
Knowledge Cleric is also fun if you like gathering information
Is there any race that goes well with it or would dwarf work fine?
It's BG3 but me and my friends are running an all cleric campaign called the Amen.
I can't find anything that states the other Cyclopes didn't eat people
Hello, lovely one :>
I don't think there's a wrong answer for species. Yeah.
Hiiii
Alright it’s settled I’ll play war cleric dwarf, but can I pick a fighting style if I pick fighting initiate as a feat?
You're falling for a classic fallacy, you're trying to prove a negative.
I'm pretty sure the story implied that because Polyphemus was confusing the other Cyclopes, they weren't able to stop Odysseus and the rest of the crew from escaping
Proving a negative is an impossibility. The burden of proof belongs to the positive claim
Yeah, at level 4, or you can 1 level dip into fighter.
My first Cleric was a Tabaxi
My Second was a Drow
My Third was a Shifter
And
My Fourth is a Tortle lol
It seemed deliberate that at the very least they would have killed them to help Polyphemus
But they were tricked
My current war cleric is a red dragonborn lady
I think you might need to re-read song 9
Miiight be getting off topic again folks. (As much I love discussing and learning about myths)
Interesting
My Knowledge Cleric is an old Tortle librarian named Artanza
okei sick, me and the cleric had a funny plan to Channel Divinity to make a target Vulnerable to Piercing damage, since that's the only damage type i can deal, we can set something up where the poor guy takes (2d4+3d6)2 damage in a single turn at Level 6, which is decently comical
My first was a homebrew species that did nothing for me. Still an amazing cleric. (Life)
Second is a beasthide shifter. She's my war cleric, lots of fun!
My Twilight Cleric was a Shifter, he was a priest of Dol Arrah, one of the sovereign hosts
Her domains were: Light, Twilight, Family, War and Revenge lol
My light cleric is a dusk half elf who became one to get away from his lovey dovey parents
Is it fine for my players to already know who my npc is. Example, they're at a certain place and an npc comes rushing towards them yelling them about something. And I tell my players about this npc and that they already know who he is and they have a shared friendship
He wanted to be a Soldier, but the prejudice against shifters in eberron made him a bit paranoid, so he often hid who he was.
He was only 10 years old when his home city, Cyre was destroyed
What origin feat should I pick
Spells, probably
That's super cool! My War Cleric is a Priestess of Morena, who is the Goddess of Protection, Home, and Hearth. And she's ironically normally a gentle, kindhearted cleric who fiercely and violently defends the innocent and her allies. None of the party knows she's a Shifter yet (it's an intense human-strong world). But when I eventually pop that can of worms, it will be a cool story thing.
He was also separated from his brother, but one star always shines brighter than the rest for him, so he takes it as a sign from Dol Arrah that his younger brother is still alive
Her and Saulia (my dragonborn war cleric) sound pretty similar.
2024 Healer feat for my cleric has actually been really useful. Amazing healing between combat and your 1's in any of your healing spells are rerolled.
He was a fun lad, absolutely decimated a vampire that murdered a little girl's father and mother.
Uh huh
But also it depends on what you're focusing on. Tough is great for tanking/extra hp. Savage Attacker is fun for extra damage output. Healer feat is great for healing and sustainability of you and your party. Extra spells are great.
Tabaxi Cleric was a Cleric of Kelemvor
War Cleric was a Cleric of Hoar, The Doombringer (another Deity of Revenge)
Knowledge Cleric loosely worships Oghma
Trickery Cleric was a Worshipper of Lolths son, Vhaeraun (who seeked to dethrone her)
And
My Twilight Cleric was a follower of Dol Arrah
Alert is great for the likelihood of going first and getting your prep before your party splits off in combat.
I've played 5 Clerics...
Hmm..
Bandaid buddy
I want to play a heavily armored Order Cleric of Helm one day
And a Life Cleric of the Weeping God, Ilmater
I've read it and can't find any evidence supporting that they weren't. It would seem odd that they just stumbled into the cave of the one man eating Cyclops. If there is a verse that shows the other Cyclopes acting different that changes this please let me know
I love how your first cleric is called 'Tabaxi Cleric' and the others have subclasses. Lol.
Clerics are cool, but they’re also quite strong
In order:
Tabaxi
Tiefling
Tortle
Drow
Shifter
Lol sorry
being a cat takes precedent over your occupation, i guess
I love kitties
Lol same.
Nah, he was just my favorite..
And is my pfp lol
Good ol Nokiin
He's an elderly fella
My tabaxi is a Ranger. Talked about her a lot in #character-discussion
I wanna try drawing her at some point. I'm not amazing at cats, more versed in dogs and reptiles. But the more you learn!
I've played 4 Tabaxi
Nokiin (talked about to death)
Gentle Waves, a Fighter
Lockpick, A Rogue
And
Sumatra, a Monk
I just realised playing a summoner might have been a mistake
I did play a minotaur barbarian named Steakass one time. That was fun lol
None of them acted like cats, they just were cholk fellows
at least im not a necromancer so i have only 3 character sheets of decent complexity instead of like 6 zombie statblocks
I played a tabaxi monk x blood Hunter and my tabaxi ranger. The blood Hunter was a mistake. I tried.
I have a Minotaur Giant Barbarian named Mavros, he kicked ass
Yeah my current tabaxi doesn't act much like a cat other than casting Jump on her because she's a Snow Leopard.
Yay snep time
And I thought it'd be cool, funny, and also useful for extra movement.
Majority of my characters are beast men
But there's a decent amount that aren't as well lol
I wonder why...
I have only ever played monsters/anthros for very self evident reasons
I'm a furry so most of my characters are furries too.
Yoo
I feel like this is a safe place given the profile pictures.
I also have a goo. Because... Who doesn't like Plasmoids?
I'm not really a furry, least I don't consider myself one, I just don't like playing human so I'll play literally anything else, but have a proclivity for beast people
Honestly totally valid
that's fair, humans are layered with an unappealing taste of genericism in fantasy settings
I had one human... And he was also a werewolf (subclass stuff)
I'm a furry degen. Made up worldbuilding projects and constructed languages for my own internal setting before learning about TTRPGs and realized I could actually roleplay the things I make.
I've never had a character who is "just a guy" or "just a gal".
i had a human once and even then her species was pretty ambiguous to the party because Gloomstalker gave her Darkvision and she kept her face and other features covered (very edgy character)
I have a Giff Pugilist sitting somewhere waiting to be played
I can't wait to play my bare-knuckle brawling, Gunslinging, space traveling, silly British Hippo man
His name is
Reginald Archibald Montigue Esquire
We love the edge
I've had a character who always kept his face and other features covered too!
My Shifter Cleric kept his features covered as well.
He was afraid of being mobbed because Eberron.
Had a goth styled albino dragonborn warlock named Ariathi Akerbeltzen. Oozed edge but I made sure she was stylish about it.
He was from a nomadic desert people. It was basically a tagelmust or keffiyeh. And in his culture it was normal to keep it wrapped around the head.
Holy edge
I don't make characters edgy typically lol
i've had two characters who do that, one is that ranger who was a fed, the other is a rogue who is on the run from the mob
And it was bright red. He always wore bright colours.
Black eyeliner, black lipstick, black hair, nose piercings galore.
Well... The original was red, when it got destroyed during an unfortunate fireball, he put on a blue one.
And he had a lot of piercings, but they were bright gold and decorated with indigo
My edgiest character was an orphan rogue harpy lady who sits in the rafters and steals things.
Funny enough, she pretended to be a bard before revealing she was a warlock by using eldritch blast
My most Edgy character is my soon to be Centaur Barbarian, he was raised by tge Zhentarim and psychologically conditioned to feel nothing but pride and joy when taking a life (he also hears the sound of cheering when he does so in his twisted lil mind lol)
tbh i just generally lean toward edgier themes because the easiest way to explain why someone would intentionally do something as dangerous as adventuring is traumatic events and/or the inability to hash out their violent urges with a therapist
Can't wait to do gladiatorial executions on Devils with him
When I play a published campaign I often try to make my characters a contrast to whatever I know about the main antagonist.
With curse of Strahd I played an elven monk from a noble family. Contrasted nicely with Strahd, he was young but unimpressed by Strahd's age, as multiple members of his family were older. He was also of noble lineage and took pride in it. And he disdained spellcasting while Strahd is a wizard
Goated player
And of course, everyone knows that Strahd killed his brother, so my character had an old fashioned sense of value that saw kinslaying as the second worst thing anyone could possibly do
My most evil character was my Dhampir Moon Druid, he was a follower of Malar (evil beast deity) and seeked to make civilization crumble so the beasts could rule Supreme
Didn't play him long because I ended up leaving the campaign.
But he had a few good kills, at least lol
So for Descent into Avernus... I know I'll be playing a wizard but I haven't decided anything else. I want the character to fit and contrast in that story
I'm playing that Barbarian I mentioned, but I might change things up a little.
I know we'll be fighting Devils, which are Lawful Evil, so why not be the Chaotic Good "Good at any costs" type?
I think that one is about temptation. Maybe a recovering alcoholic?
Could be a good start, yes!
Be the one who wants to disrupt the Devils and zealously wishes to destroy them idk lol
I know it'd be hard for you, as a fiend and all...
He’s the anti-villain fiend
I am still not a fiend
I have no idea, i’m just running with Tokii. But you seem human based on your profile pic.
Buuut... I see three possibilities. The first is the "lawyer", a character adept at navigating contracts and finding loopholes in them.
A character just as lawful as the devils, capable of keeping pace with them at their game
Interesting. Those would be interesting. You could also use archfey warlock for that.
The second is the anarchist, a character profundly chaotic and who looks at the nine hells as the worst thing in the multiverse and is profundly horrified by it.
Obviously. You're an internet voice. 
The third is the tempted, a character with a history of falling for temptations and addictions
Details?
That could also be fun
My character believes that hell is somewhat meant to be conquered, what with being a follower of Bane and all
Those are just personality archetypes, there are no details yet
Man, if so many Devils weren't immune to fear, I'd play a Conquest paladin for it
Nonsense, they're just immune to magical fear. You just need to break bones til the begging begins.
Yeah, but the fear effect is the whole main shtick of Conquest paladin
They are immune to the condition, not awareness of power gradients. So i guess. Also, lots of lost souls to cajole
No, the point of it is that I don't want my subclass to be mechanically useless 💀
Yes, but it won’t be just fear immune devils down there. You’ll get souls and npcs that can be affected
I am forever envious of people who can easily do accents, that expands your character so much
Yeahhhh, I'd rather my subclass always be somewhat effective lol
So which of the three ideas is most interesting? Lawyer, anarchist or tempted?
Anarchist in an orderly hell is more interesting imo
Obviously all three. In a single Cartman
Also, as a lawyer, definitely gotta be a disciple of Gargauth.
... OK the three together can indeed result in an Eric Cartman
So, making a faerie character, and Lorwyn/Shadowmoor have me a bit confused. Are they in another plane of existence?
How does an anarchist lawyer work? They don't obey the law but they defend others when they're accused of disobeying the law?
Gargauth is god of contracts and betrayal
Ah.
Now I do like to give my characters a further motivation... If it's an elf, could be that they're interested in the possibility of hunting down Malkizid, another fallen solar but who once served Corellon
The anarchist seems weak to me. You would have to develop a structure to make it work. I’m not sure you could get the character to work so well. At least not without a framework or another trait to scaffold off of.
That's why subclasses that focus on particular damages or effects is rather iffy for me lmao
Henceforth, you shall wear these clown shoes. I am ALTERING the deal. Pray I do not ALTER it further.
Yeah. That’s fair.
Gargauth, previously the Lord of the Ninth Hell until all the rest of the Hells exiled him for being TOO EVIL. An incarnation of evil most rotten, Gargauth embodied the inevitable moral decay that followed both the victories won by evil means, and the selfish, greedy, and ambitious entities (both leaders and groups) that achieved them.
Basically, Gargauth is like if the Sith had a god.
You could have an anarcho-lawyer who made a deal with devil, had it broken by the other party, and now needs to get to a high authority to get reparations
Let's give all three a bit more details, shall we?
The lawyer: This elf was once part of the elven court, a scribe and keeper of the traditions often called to assist on trials of criminals. After seeking further education in wizardry, they plan on making a bid to become coronal (a title relatively equivalent to king but with further emphasis on lawgiving, legislature and military protection). Ambitious, driven and with a mastery of law.
The anarchist: Once a slave to... Let's say the Zhentarim, this one has come to see all laws and structures as means of control of the many by the few. Wizardry is the great equalizer, something all can learn and that empowers everyone. Devoted to the worship of Mystra as a great liberator, this one sees the harpers as far too moderate but as a good start. In time his ultimate ambition is to see the sword coast plunged in rebellion and all the lords, whether they be the masked ones in Waterdeep or the disdainful pirate-lords of Luskan beheaded.
The tempted: This one always had a problem with vice. Alcohol, women, men... Most of his youth was spent drowning in all three. One day he woke up, noticed how degraded his body was from his overindulgence and sought in wizardry a means to get new sensations that would not ruin him. The ultimate high, the ultimate pleasure, is the weave. He is still controlled by his desires, but he has learned that his ultimate desire, immortality as a chosen and the power of the weave, requires sacrificing the lesser wants.
So a wizard?
Yeah no matter what I pick, I'm playing a wizard
Prepared spell slots are all the suck
So which of the three is most interesting?
I think the tempted. Lawyer traits might be nice tho
Do clerics get weapon masteries ?
I like the weapon mastery properties, but as someone who really liked scimitars and making martials... nick kinda makes me feel like I'm being wasteful if I don't take a nick weapon and two weapon fighting... I recently realized I was more interested in protection that I was before. I don't know how much it changed for 2024, but I'm definitely more interested in it now that when I would see it befoe, could be a taste thing. Making a character who'd take dueling feels harder to justify though when getting multiple masteries and skipping nick and two weapon makes you lose out on way more than what dueling gives
certain clerics do
War cleric?
I'll check, but I think protector Clerics get martial proficiency from what I've been looking at there's nothing in cleric that gives a mastery. I'll make sure though
Protector gets martial weapon proficiency and heavy armour proficiency
anyone can take the feat that gives a weapon mastery
ah yeah looks like none of them actually do. I could have sworn it was otherwise
I’ll probably take it at lvl 4
Then
Yeah, the feat can give anyone a mastery and there are decent multiclasses (just made a ranger cleric for that protection fighting style i was talking about and they get masteries) but cleric by itself would need that feat
nick + dual wielder is another path you can go without taking two weapon fighting style
You technically can do dueling AND nick through a thrown weapon build iirc
and that way you can take one nick weapon and another one handed weapon with a different mastery property
I wanna play a war cleric since most other half casters seem off balanced to me and don’t seem that fun, I wanna swing weapons and cast magic whilst also being supportive
That reminds me: what is the Nick property, anyway?
like vex with a longsword
It’s a weapon mastery that moves your bonus action attack from using a light weapon to your action, once per turn
Is it the general consensus that nick lets you make the light property attack as the first one of your turn?
all it does is move the light weapon property extra attack that's usually a bonus action to being part of the attack action that you made with the weapon that has the nick weapon mastery
I was under the impression the main weapon still had to be light to trigger two weapon
it frees up your bonus action for something else - in the case of dual wielder, that feat grants an additional bonus action you can then take that isn't the light weapon extra attack
so level 1, you can be doing 3 attacks in one turn
sorry, *level 4
because dual wielder is a level 4 feat
and level 5 you can have 4 attacks if you have the extra attack feature
I was under the impression it had to be after
Yeah, war cleric is real good for that stuff based on what I've built. I'm moreso suggesting a dip into something else to put fighting styles and masteries on top, but if you just care about a specific mastery then that feat is a good bet
order of operations, yeah, it kinda has to be
Light property specifies the light attack is done after the first primary attack iirc, so yeah
Yeah, that's the problem I was having with new Dual Wielder too, cause using two weapons now relies on the main one being a light weapon, which turns my spear and sword guys into sword and spear guys, and forces their swords to be shortswords
it'd be:
- attack action with light weapon with nick
- light weapon extra attack with light weapon that may or may not have nick
- bonus action dual wielder attack with one handed weapon that doesn't need the light property
Can't do rapier and dagger... other such sword nerd gripes
So the current build I’m thinking is war cleric dwarf, healer as origin feat, then at lvl 4 I pick the weapon master or fighting initiate feat. But I’m not sure if I should go in that direction or simply pick up the stat increase, main point is I wanna swing a mace around AND heal and do damage whilst supporting the team with spells.
Mace’s mastery is sap, so that wouldn’t improve your damage btw
Hello nugget
Sap is a decently cool mastery but it's not one I'm super excited about from my personal taste, and I prefer half plate to full, so if mace is the weapon I was building around i probably would dip at least for a fighter level to add dueling and sap and other such fighter things rather than going the feat route. But... 🤔
Greetings
Fugget ‘bout the mace point is I wanna swing something blunt around or even an axe
Finally found a one-shot for beginners in the looking-for-players, I need to get some experience before my first actual campaign🤞
Noiceee
I won't use the character I'm gonna use in my first campaign though, he's special to me
I'm just gonna make a different character
Alright, then yeah, at least with what I'd like to build I'd imagine you could be perfectly happy with a protector war cleric who takes that feat to get a maul/warhammer mastery and then just wails on people. I'd recommend a decent wisdom score, like 14 or 16 at least so you can get those bonus action attacks regularly
Also why half plate to full plate?
That's a personal thing with my taste and the specific way my brain is weird. In my head, adding dex to my AC is more important than the difference between a 16/17 AC and an 18 AC
I like even numbers, but plate is like... twice the price to add what registers in my brain as a helmet and thigh protection, and between that and the not adding my dex... I'd like half more
It's fully an arbitrary thing in my head though, I wouldn't say there's anything wrong with plate, especially if you like characters in helmets
I don’t get it, maximum of plate is 18 and of half plate it’s 17, ntm they both give disadvantage to stealth(which I assume doesn’t happen if you have proficiency in heavy armour which the war cleric does)
it's assumed you're not gonna have enough gold to start with it
Then tf does proficiency do
Stops it from reducing your movement speed
And at least 1 other thing I'm blanking on
nay armor proficiency lets you cast spells, movement speed thing is str requirements
Ah, alright
If you wear armor that you lack proficiency with, you have disadvantage on any ability check, saving throw, or Attack roll that involves Strength or Dexterity, and you can’t cast Spells.
I tend to not put armor on my peeps who can't use it so it's something I've only seen once or twice 🤷🏿♂️ 😅
Noted
So yeah, don’t wear armor you’re not proficient in lol
I did not know this
The medium armor master feat also lets you turn that max 17 into a max 18, and I'm pretty sure you can ignore the disadvantage with that feat too unless they changed it for '24... so in my mind it's easy to make hald better than full
Mithral armor ignores stealth disadvantage (and I think the strength requirement) point blank though.
I mean you can ask for magic items lol, not that you'd get them
So if you're able to get mithral plate then that's... ya know, all my points moot
Also you can theoretically get 17 ac with studded leather if you got high enough dex
You can get higher
Yeah, that's also a definite way to go, a different vibe from the big war cleric with a big blunt weapon though.
There are ways to get higher than 20 Dex
Namely barbarian capstone or magic items
Yea but that with things that push the 20 barrier beyond its maximum
Better to put those points in making your strength higher and armoring up
The Barbarian capstone bumps Str and Con, you might be thinking of the Monk capstone
Ope, mb
Yup! Though wearing armor with monk is extremely questionable
Also splint armour is way cheaper than both plate types and still gives 17 ac, but needs 15 strength to use
Whats the highest you can have in a stat at lvl 1?
20 theoretically speaking
so it's capped?
20, but it'd rely on rolling an 18 and putting a +2 on it
Yea but some things remove the cap, although they’re very situational
And also usually not available at level 1
well some of the origins let you add 3 to a stat.
Remember when AC capped at -20? THACO was so awful....
It’s capped at 20
sadge
I've been primarily looking at exclusively 2024 stuff since that version dropped, but yeah, using pre-24 rules there are different ways to work stuff since some races/species had ability bonuses built in.
You could also technically put all 3 of your bonuses on 1 stat with the 2024 backgrounds based on things D&D beyond physically allows you to do
I'm not sure how raw that is though
D&D beyond isn't always correct.
Heresy 
A shame, seems we'll have to put him down 😔
You aren't SUPPOSED to put all three ASI's in one stat because, if they intended that, it'd be an actual option.
If WotC didn't want us doing something, it wouldn't be possible on DDB
Clearly, this is an allowed course of action.
Feats aren't supposed to raise you past 20 in an ability either, but you can on D&D Beyond.
Yeah, that is why I qualified what I was saying as "technically" being "physically possible" as opposed to just saying it could be done
And let's not forget how you can only push a stat to 15 by point buy, but can manually roll an 18 
Technically it's not possible because it's not RAW
That is very not true, especially with how much of ddb was made before wotc even owned it
-# i believe that statement was sarcastic
Anything possible is permissible or WotC would've fixed it.
Who, me? Nonsense, I don't know what you're on about.
I haven’t a single clue
Having said that, though, I draw the line at adding free feats
We all know that WotC is a perfect company run by ACTUAL WIZARDS that go back in time with temporal spells to undo any mistakes they make in the first place. So obviously it's canonically impossible for anything on an officially owned WotC site to be incorrect
That's just science. Time science 😎
1 morbillion fireballs.
No wonder our present sucks, rule number 1 of chronomancy, never change the past
Honestly, I'm fine with pretty much anything DDB can do as long as it's: in their paid marketplace and not adding free feats / free gear. I'm also totally fine with raising the point buy to 48 since I've rolled point buy equivalents up to 55 before and 27 point buy is trash compared to manual rolls.
I pretty much interact with the game exclusively through DDB so if a thing is on there with the capacity to give WotC money for it I'm generally fine with it. Only stuff on the site I'd really be saying no to if I was running games would be homebrew since you gotta vet that stuff.
Point buy’s average isn’t that much less than rolled stat’s average
I like those "starting at higher levels" rules so I'd just want my players to make their gear fit within those confines
I hear what you're saying. Counterpoint, my water sorc manual rolled 15, 18, 17, 10, 12, 16 
Part of rolling is the chance of going higher than average
I spent a year or two rolling stats, would roll 3 groups, and reroll any group with a 7 or lower in it. Rolling stats is very fun but I wouldn't even think to consider averages when talking about it.
Could rangers use guns?
Been doing point buy lately... it's so much harder
Point buy seems like a mid-high average to rolling. It's the safe option.
Yes
If you have limited rolls.
I'm sorry, I asked the wrong question
How advanced could the guns be?
I want my one-shot character to be a cowboy
Hi Nugget, I'm sorry
And also hi Nugget, I'm The Echo
Okay let's not get sidetracked
You could allwaus cheat on dnd beyond
That’s why exactly rolling is risky. If you can just reroll when you get a bad array then there’s no reason not to use rolled stats
Integrity is important
Standard issue 2024 has flintlocks as the basic martial guns that any martial can use, revolvers and automatic things and such exist but are based on DM approval
You could also lie to your DM about what you roll on your die, but that sucks the fun out of it
I rolled 6 20's. Trust bro.
That's alright, the DM lies about dice rolls all the time, too 
Get a repeating pistol and flavor that sum such as a revolver. That's what ill be doing when I get the eberron book
“Yes DM, I rolled all 20s on my ability scores”
a very possible outcome
Not a big fan of fudged rolls
That'd be 0.05 to the sixth? if I'm not wrong, possible? Yes. Probable? No
4 d6 drop lowest so highest you could have is 18
It’s harder to cheat rolls on DDB (and many VTTs) since there’s often a roll tracker
Yep, I'm just saying, dnd beyond does not stop players from cheating
You're right
unless if you roll straght d20 which is very risky in its own right
I miscounted.
That sound like a fun way to roll stats, lol. Roll 1d20, no redo's
Who cheats at DnD, and I'm not sure there's much they can do against cheating players without making the system worse or more complicated
You can add a million gold to your sheet and a ring of wishes, it's just there to record things not run the game
People will cheat at anything for one reason or another.
For the power and glory.
Exactly, it's up to the dm to run their game properly , and not think digital tools can do it all properly
In the realm of D&D in my experience it’s most often out of a desire to control the narrative
Particularly to avoid failure and/or make themselves look cool (it doesn’t)
Cheaters in dnd primarily cheat themselves out of the dopamine rush of the dice rolls mattering for sucess and failure, life and death
Own the failures, failure is what makes us human, and overall makes the game more fun (Most of the time)
The totally-not-a-furry being
I knew you were a bot.
The entire Warlock class: give us tentacles or give us death
You’re three kobolds in a trenchcoat?
I am what is or was, but cannot be.
What gave you the impression it was a choice?
You and I play different kinds of warlocks 😅
Guys where the heck do i go to find people willing to just do a oneshot and not a full campaign? Im just wanna be my little cleric guy for a night. The one channel in channel guide that says "Find players ready to join a game." is unknown....
No. Don't do that.
I like me a pact weapon and a nice tall glass of eldritch blast
You’re the past?
With the occasional infinite alter self and dog who can bite
There’s many kinds of warlocks 
My based Drow Celestial Warlock using the humble Guiding Bolt:
If work didn't exist I could scramble something together but it's too late for that now
I miss genie warlock... 😔
My absolute favorite is the book of ancient secrets edgelord warlock who thinks they’re better than the nerdy wizards
I'm glad there's a genie paladin, but it's not the same! 
My Drow Warlock is a current mix between Tome and Bladelock and I love it
Any class that doesn't need to prepare spell slots is WAY better than wizards.
Exactlyyyyy
Thanks for the thought though man you a real one
We all prepare spells down here now 😬
A whole party of warlocks just cruising through any module as if they’re not gonna enjoy all the short rests
Note that in 5e, Wizards don't HAVE to prepare spellslots
Jokes on you, my spells are decided before I’ve even looked at the rest of the spell list
You have my attention. 
Don't you just auto prepare after a long rest
I just pick the spells i like and mark the extra special ones as prepared, but I also don't play this game. I just build funky lil action figures for me shelf
I thought you had to spend an hour after a long rest
I just hit 700 and would like to be praised for my hoarding problem 😏
Yeah, in 5e prepared casters don't have to prepare every single spellslot they have with a spell,
They just prepare spells they can use for the day as a spell list
Sure, your prize is an introduction to Goblin Slayer himself 
I'd call you something related to that many babies, but I feel like my point of warlocks has proven itself now.
My Harengon Bladesinger wizard has a magic scroll that allows him to cast ANY spell.
The conditions are:
It has 9 charges and you must spend charges equal to the spells level, and it comes back each dawn.
It's the same Artifact that gave him 30 int lol
Wish
So a Wizard only gets 4 spells to use per day?
And then you hit the 30% chance of never being able to cast Wish again 
He doesn't HAVE to use a 9th level spell slot to cast any spell though.
He can just do it through an Artifact he owns
That's only if you don't use wish to replicate a spell
I use wish to wish for upside-down castles to land on my enemies
What?
"....I wish for my controlling player to be isekai'd into our party in-game?" 
No, wizards get a number of spells to use per day as stated at the level they're at.
If you cast wish from something that isn’t like you personally, does the 33% thing still apply? What about for genies?
Yes and no.
Yes. But not for genies
It depends on the thing but it doesn't necessarily hit you. Genies can cast a wish and then not be able to do it again for a year if they roll something wrong
Genies seem to be the only entities besides deities that Don't suffer from wish sickness, but they can't grant their own wishes.
I think the luck sword's wish hits you though iirc
Also, I'd say that the chances of your wishes going wrong from genies really depends on the type of genie and how you've treated them over genies always just misinterpreting wishes.
Hi
Thanks for clearing that up for me!
A Djinni, for example, being probably the most good genie, probably wouldn't intentionally try to hurt you with your own wishes
Is there a malee druid build aside from the moon druid. I don't remember. I don't meant necessarily as guish but as a melee caster.
Spores is another good option
Like the death cleric
Any Druid can technically be a melee Druid if you use sheleighleigh (if I spelled that correctly)
Thank you!
Now.
Have a Meteor Swarm for correcting me!!! >:[
Fool...
I used wish to make all spells Intelligence saving throws!
Fool, I’m the DM
No you aren't
I AM NOW
You're no dm of mine!
Fool, I'm the player who chooses whether to play your campaign! Those are now int saves or I QUIT!
No.
I’m Nugget
Who’s no dm of mine?
Yeah but I meant as a death cleric they spam inflict wounds and vempiric touch.
Cya!
You're not supposed to do that....
Nugget with the 9th level Banishment
I would prefer a melee caster druid than a quasi martial one .
Well, Druids don't have a lot of spells like that tbh
They aren't very touch spell focused
Regular melee options aren't bad with druids though, as they're still good with crowd control
Just go 1 or 2 levels fighter and the rest druid, right? We talking 2014 or 2024?
How good is animate dead on other classes except necromancer wizard?
Hello, I am new to dnd. my character is a human bard. im just wondering is there anything i should know about in general or be aware of before starting my dnd journey? anyone please share knowledge i would really apreciate it!
Bardic inspiration didn't appeal to me early on as much as some other things bonus actions could be used for, but it's actually real neat, keep it in mind. 👍🏿
First rule is avoid Tekta, she's already spawned 93 green brats and doesn't need more.
hi, welcome to the hobby
I'm a boy goblin 😔 and such a nice one too...

I have been considering getting into biting lately though...
what is biting
Ow! Alright, chomping then 
oh biting in the literl sense
Imma bite you.
Yeah, on account of the goblin teeth. Nom nom nang nang and so on
lol
For being pretty and nice? This is cruel and unusual punishment. I have rights
im practicly a bard irl so i picked that
Yes, for those two crimes
Oh! 😲 Then I will be evadinv the law, thank you very much 🏃🏿♂️➡️
Pretty goblins get monched.
First off, goblins are neither pretty nor nice. Second, you're only half-right about goblins having rights. They have the singular right to DIE for my loot and xp. 
How difficult would it be to make yuan-ti necromancer not evil?
Anti-goblin propaganda still running rampant in big 25... 😔
Take a propa ganda at my alignment. It clearly says chaotic good
How are goblins not nice?
you mean pro-goblin propaganda
Have you seen those grubby, filthy little goobers? They're honestly even worse than chimpanzees.
Do they apreciate good music? then i can tolerate
It clearly got misspelled
Such vial language used to describe such innocent creatures! How ignorant
are they innocent bc their brains are so small?
My last 5 girlfriends had proficiency in musical instruments and performance checks. You can't ask them about it though, they all moved out of town. They were all super duper real though
Super doubt is an excessive use of force 😔
Lmao
They're innocent because they've never hurt a soul
How does one unlock super reactions?
Tekta specifically is a very kinda lil warlock who enjoys sweeping with his flying broom. What's more innocent than keeping a clean home? I should be exonerated of all those bandits i eldritch blasted during my last tavern visit. I assumed them cackling about their bandit activities meant they were robbing old grannies, not corrupt nobles
You don't.
Suffer in your powerlessness! Ahahahahaha! 
It's either something a server does or a perk for having nitro. I honestly can't remember. 🤔 🤔 🤔
Big sadness
you have to buy it
I'll have to ask the artificiest of intellectuals i guess
i aint paying for nitro
Give discord your money or so help me
I've had Nitro for half a decade
Comes with 5 super reacts per day.
Give me your money :3
Was it worth it?
Gonna go with 'yes' 
We can do that? Dang, I'll take money for sure. I accept gold coins, gems worth 50+ gold coins, or ya know... united states dollars
Glad to hear you don't regret your decision!
Honestly, it's just $10 a month and I use most of its Nitro features constantly, so it works out
5 per day and you burned 2 to call me a liar?! You're so reckless with your spell slots
Oh, and Nitro comes with 2 free server boosts
That's 3 now! You're almost out of ammo!!
Three in ten minutes
On an innocent, borderline unarmed goblin mind you.
a server boost? forgive me i only just got discord
A broom is plenty armed, tbf
Right, sorry, my deepest, severest apologies
I'd feel bad for that broom
😌 you're forgiven
Because Tekta is a kind, diplomatic goblin
Thank you, your heart is kind
Are they British?
The specific setting wasn't decided on but if I said something based on what's true about tekta, eberron is the most fitting published setting. So... if that's an answer
I see
If the eberron book gave me playable goblins back I'd have a 2024 eberron tekta by now... insert fairlyoddparents trophy meme
I should probably pick a more recent character to be my face... but now I feel like I gotta stay tekta for at least another month, and by then I'll forget to change out my profile, so thanks for trapping me in this goblin body soldiers 🫡
The forgotten realms and other such WotC licensed settings thank you for your service
Could be neat. You're wondering about viability or pitching me a new face? For the former there's technically a channel for getting build help. #character-discussion I'd say it's a cool idea as long as the scores all line up right, and i don't recall echo needing a specific score
Personally, I'd just go full echo knight fighter lol
Okay, so today's was definitely volatile
Tons of nat 20s where it could have been better, pretty bad rolls and occassionally forgetting things
Do kind of wish I had better options for ranged weapons, this longbow is really not cutting it
A gun? IDK the setting.
Since I've locked myself in the post-24 bunker I don't technically even have access to echo knight, and as much as I love arcane trickster, I'm realizing the magic and sneak attack don't blend in a way that I personally go crazy for. For a full rogue it's neat, but if I'm getting spells from somewhere else that isn't int based I wonder if what trickster adds is worth it
I thought so too, but dm is apparently saying that although they are possible, probably need an artificer for it
Setting is CoS
No Idea what CoS is. What do you need the artificer for?
Making it or using it?
Curse of Strahd. And probably to make the gun
I mean, magehand thing is pretty interesting, and disadvantage on spell saves to surprised enemies
Could find some gnomeish tinkerers to make it maybe.....
Heavy crossbow is arguably better but without crossbow expert the loading property potentially makes it worse
Pay someone to train you to use the gun so you have proficiency.
Or a repeating heavy crossbow if that sweet, sweet eberron book is on the table
Finding a magic bow might be easier then a gun though i feel
For all intents and purposes, I already have proficiency with them. It's coming across one that's the issue
Then if you don't want to dip into artificer, finding a NPC tinkerer is you're best bet probably.
Multiclassing artificer as a ranger would be MADness tbh
I'm thinking so too, but being a long range character just to be outclassed by a wizard cantrip is a little depressing
Are you still fighting enemies resistant to your damage types?
That's just how it goes lol
No, but it's just how strong Fire Bolt is vs a longbow that somehow has enough power to travel 400 feet only does 1d8 piercing
isnt your dex added?
1d8 + dex mod?
Nah that's not supposed to happen. 1d10 fire is pretty significantly worse then 1d8 piercing+dex
That's still only 1d8 +4
Which has consistently been below average damage
That's a guaranteed 5 damage, with a max 2 higher than firebolt.
It isn't just the cantrip itself. Just an example
And again, my damage has consistently been below average. 2s, 3s, and the uncommon 4 being the experience
Cantrips<weapon attacks<leveled spells most of the time
Leveled spells are going to do more, but there is a limit to how many they can cast. You can do you're thing infinitely, or for however many arrows you have.
So you're just unlucky. Even then it's aight damage when you add your +3/+4 dex mod
thats still 6 damage at a 2
Higher than the fire bolt average
Alse rangers get some very good spells too, though that's not for damage so much
@remote wadi your minimum damage is firebolts average.
Homebrew rule is a problem. The summary for it is that they have MP max and casting, which means that they can cast spells more freely
You still do more damage with your attacks than their cantrips. But homebrew being unbalanced is just the standard I think.
So they looked at casters who outmatch noncasters by a landslide and decided to buff them?
do other DMs just give bowtwingers infinite normal arrows so that isn't a bothersome thing to track? lol
hmmm how does Speech of Beast and Leaf work if your character is mute? I'm gonna play a mute firbolg and it just says "you can communicate in a limited manner with beasts, plants and vegetation"
Thats homebrew's fault, not the games or yours.
Also, you’re complaining about your damage again, Bloodline? Haven’t you done this for a month now?
I do not. I expect them to replenish arrows on a regular basis or roleplay collecting them after battle.
Btw hi Nugget!
LadyStickler strikes again. Sensible.
Could you not lable this under complaining, please? I'm just trying to explain the situation and try to see where it's at so far
It's kind of like rations.
Fair.
I track them early game and encourage them replenishing them, and if they go a really long time without replenishing I remind them
Hallo Cracker!
How are you doing at this fine time?
I understand. Not a big deal. I suppose I just like streamlining, and generally try to make combat tough. You have infinite arrows or projectiles? Doesn't matter. You still gotta survive dis sheet.
Bored, but alive
My next session likely will be next year
I just don't know a good course of action. Perhaps talking to the DM about possible weapons and planning. Considering their ungodly luck so far, this could be considered asking for help keeping up
Dam, only next year, that's a bummer
Make them wear a quiver. 30 Arrows max. Gotta refill it with an action from the parties supply spot. There is no god here.
Ikr
I have a question about a monk character
Oooo, always love me monks
What’s the question?
Ask the DM what buffs you can get to keep up with the stupid buff they gave casters.
Mind you, among all the nat 20s so far, a minimum of 7 for this session alone, the only nat 20 I got was as the higher roll in disadvantage. Luck is not on my side, so I have to make do with what I got
Except for the plethora of them in-game. To each their own. Quiver or no quiver, there are no "gimmes" in combat for me. If I'm behind an encounter, any encounter, you can be sure there's multiple ways for one or more of you to perish.
I love it when dms buff casters for no reason
I’d argue Perkins crit is a partial buff to martials
I want to make like a british gentleman type character that fights using his cane, hat and fists and wanted to know if this would translate well to a monk?
Buff Monks more, please ;]
Extraordinarily well
I'd argue that it's a horrible homebrew rule.
Nothing I love better than not handwaving rules
The god part was a joke, lol. That honestly sounds fun to me, for a serious and gritty plathrough. But I can see some people hating it.
Great to hear!
oh mb xD
You wanna make sure you always have ammo? Then make sure to keep buying some
Cane is a quarterstaff arguably, but at worst take the tavern brawler feat and get proficiency in the improvised weapons. Boom, d6 hat.
It's not all tombstones and "dang we gon survive today or not?" There's fun. There's downtime. It's just combat that isn't "life or death or wat now?" doesn't feel like combat to me. If the stakes are low to nonexistent, there aren't any really, and PCs in 5.5e need no handholding. Rather powerful now.
Heck, reflavour the hat as a light hammer so you can chuck it
today i found out that my dad, who plays as one of my fellow party members and as tim who is a paladin sorcerer class character, well he always told me that my sister, the dungeon master of the party i am in, has the final say when it comes to making homebrew, but he has secretly been using a homebrew weapon and a homebrew armor behind my sister's back. this is more shocking to me because my sister is "by the book" which means that all homebrew done by anyone but her and any homebrew that doesn't replicate what she has given out to any party member is automatically not allowed in her campaigns even if that homebrew thing is reasonable to have. and the homebrew weapon and armor tim has, is reasonable to have. so i think tim and my dad broke the paladin oath. i disagree with dungeon masters being "by the book" but i would not decieve my dungeon master in order to have a homebrew thing.
Yo that's actually sick as heck, I'll definitely ask my dm if i can do this
Ye. Exploration and RP is fun, combat is fighting for you life. Which can also be fun.
They're just going to buy 200 arrows
in otherwords, your Dad has been cheating.
With tavern brawler you can also use a cigar as a weapon!
Nice. Might be a bit worrying with that 8 strength of theirs
Alrighty, then my next martial character is settled, thanks a lot for the help!
Monk power!
Cheater, cheater, poopoo eater.
Hitting my enemies with a Sherlock Holmes style pipe
200 arrows is 20lb
Oh, yeah. Might as well bring this up about the Fire Bolt
Yes, I technically do higher damage on average, but we recently hit level 4. Next Wizard level, that upgrades to 2d10. I do get extra attack, but needing to use up more resources to maybe keep up may be a problem
Yeah 20lbs is a lot to an 8 strength pc
GUYS I NEED HEWLUP
What?
Time for your dad to get some chin music (baseball). Plot with your sister to get even without letting on that you know he is cheating.
Especially when you account for armor, the weapon, backup weapon, backpack and items inside
you get extra attack for free though?
should I buy eye of ruin or welcome to hellfire??
Alternatively, don't be a coward and fight at range /j
Bow on average does more damage so you'll outscale them and arrows are barely a scarce resource
And that money you got on you weighs something too
I almost always refuse to play ranged combatants unless most of the party is melee
I enjoy eldritch blast too much.
I like ranged if it's crossbow or gun
I love playing ranged
and you can potentially up your dex to add more damage to each shot.
if you want to find reasons to complain and feel bad, you always will - But if you feel that behind, talk to the DM about why martials are unbuffed
It's less than 20%. I don't think I've ever seen carry capacity be an issue for anyone, except a classic module where they get given 10,000 copper.
The smoking pipe sherlock holmes used
I see it happen quite a bit
I enjoy cracking skulls too much..
My last Barbarian kill was a punch to the jaw so hard it literally knocked the dudes head off 😭
GUYS SHOULD I GET EYE OF RUIN OR WELCOME TO HELLFIRE
Again, I am working on that. We're just closing out the session. Just finished with combat
please don't abuse CAPS.. people are not obligated to answer.
I have a Kobold in my Monday game that's on hiatus that was crushed under the weight of all the money he had
Whats a perkins crit?
Woah thats insane
both.
Ahhh I need to choose one 😞
Max damage instead of double dice
So a longbow crit will be 1d8 + modifiers + 8
You killed my horse, you bastard /playful
I only have enough money to get one 😢
do you like stranger things?
Plenty of other equine in the grass
Hellfire. i assume thats the strangers things one
Orizontas will never be the same, his best friend/horse is dead!
Yeah but I also wanna get eye of ruin because the adventure seemed sick
Ooooh that is awesome. one of my dms do that
Say it should also double your ability score bonus damage
He grew up with that horse!
Either they don't or we don't
My homebrew is Perkins crit but if youre a ranger (esp 2024), you auto max damage targets with hunters mark
The best part
Either way, only one ability modifer
They don't or we don't what
DAMN YOUUU
Apply the double ability modifer rule
I see
Well still no reason to complain. Also you chose to play a ranger, you weren't forced to
Buffing the best classes
My new encounter table now has a 50% chance that every encounters enemies only go for mounts
I. Was. Not. Complaining. I was explaining what the session was today and a few homebrew rules for context
I get I'm not sunshine and rainbows, but I'm working on it
My Monk Homebrew allows me to do Tekken Combos /joking
exactly. Ranger best class
Nah monk is superior
I see
Monks and rangers are both best
Nah there can only be one
One power of friendship
Monk is superior
Only room for one best Dex+wis class
ranger to me is ketchup to pikachu.
Thank you!
You act like I'm not a Monk player smh.
Cleric?
Cleradin?
~2d8+4+4 (add +3+3 if HWM) wih a longbow trumps 2d10 though?
Clerics don't need Dex lol
Dex+wis+str+char
There are plenty of them that dump Dex in favour for 15 strength and heavy armor
Ig
Not the way I play it. (Eyebrow wiggle)
Druids?
My Tortle Cleric who has built in heavy armor :
Don’t need Dex to multiclass out of or into
Shucks
Clerics and Druids don't need dex to function
Rangers can go Strength Build as well..
Therefore, Monks are best Wisdex!!!
It's just annoying when I'm try to explain something that isn't positive and I'm immediately accused of complaining
Moon druid can get away with focusing just mental stats for the most part
Well necromancer wizard is better then monk and ranger together at stalling combat!
Rangers are pretty.
i figured i was right that my dad is in the wrong.
but wisdom is interesting
Strangers are so underrated, they only need to dump dex/wis
Clerics have such good class features at lv1. I dont see the need to multiclass to improve cleric. Infact, I see folks multiclass a lv into cleric to improve OTHER classes.
Yeah. And that sucks. I mean, it's great that you have a dad you can play games with, but if they're going to cheat, that's pretty... crummy for both you and your sister.
Wisdom is the only mental stat I never completely dump
Cleric/druid/ranger
It wasn't immediately, you've been talking about essentially the same issues for a while already
Because Wisdom saves are scary.
And to answer this, it would mathematically. But the dice hate me
That consistently below average for the dice claim? This was also ironically despite also having Piercer
This is why you don't play stranger
id' take HWM over piercer if not going sharpshooter
I know i was, but I'm trying to turn that around. Not easy, but gotta start somewhere
HWM?
What? A Ranger never wants to dump Wisdom ever lmao
Even as a strength build.
Dump Charisma and Intelligence instead lol
Already have Sharpshooter
Heavy Weapon Master; Longbow is a heavy weapon
also still benefits you in case you get stuck in melee for some reason
I love Piercer for dex builds and HWM for str builds
If you're doing pointbuy, building str, con, wis and dex will be tough, even if you only go 13 dex
Yeah, this is a dex build
For multiclassing
Just don't worry about dex, then? Lol.
You don't need to multiclass.
Using a feat to grab heavy armour prof then?
Your AC can be solved by going with smt like Tortle too
"lemme roll 20 attack sequences"
Nah, just deal with it, Simple as
Famous last words
Or, alternatively, use Bark Skin.
I like to MC, but that's because I enjoy doing so and make sure not to fall terribly behind standard classes
Lvl 20? I need 300 d20
multiclassing is overrated
Yeah, if all your daily fights fit into one or two one hour long sequences that can actually solve it
in most scenarios, it's objectively worse than pure classing
Speed running violence
but my silly Druid 15 / Warlock 5 is fun for me so 
Also, Fighter is one of the most relaxed classes for multiclassing anyway if you really wanted to
You either need 13 Strength OR 13 Dexterity, not both.
Fighters are just the best
I hate fighters :>
Why?
Monks are quite poor multiclassers, sadly
Monks superior.
We don't need it!
Liking monks shouldn't make you hate fighters
Nope lol
monk, cleric, and rogue as the primary class really do not want to branch out
I wanna multiclass my monk with a fighter
I have my other reasons for hating fighter.
arcane archers >>>>
It's a boring class.
Multiclassing monk paladin
Fighters use weapons
We us fists
Fighters use armor
We hate armor
Fighters say they can attack a lot
We attack a lot too, arguably more efficiently
Fighters and Wizards are both equally as boring to me
Why play either of those when I can play any martial or any caster?
I love wizards
Martials should band together, not infight
Necromancer with actually good raising dead posibilities
Now, don't get me wrong
I like my Fighter and my Wizard that I'm playing, but I moreso like them for the people they are, not their classes.
... okay?
I don't see how that pushes an argument in any way lol.
i agree, and what is more surprising is that he is the paladin of the party i am in and he always tells me that my sister has the final say on hombrew made things that anyone creates. but my dad did not ask my sister if that homebrew weapon and armor was okay to have. he claims you have to be subtle and sneaky in order to add homebrew things to your character sheet while in a campaign run by my sister. and what's worse is my dad is a loyal member of the church of latter day saints and yet his religion would most likely frown upon learning that fact about his cheating. plus he holds a leader position in his religion but not the top boss or boss of the church he goes to.
Clerics are good at reviving people and raising dead too.
Probably better lol
There is stuff fighters and wizards can do that other classes can't, at least as effuciently
cleric supremacy
So that's the current event happening. Spell casting is pretty high, and while i can keep up somewhat, it really doesn't feel like it. Especially with how inherently risky my damaging spells are. Ensnaring Strike, for one, requires to be cast before landing a hit and on top of that, I am now 2 for 2 on enemies breaking out of Ensnaring Strike right after failing the initial save. And with my longbow being on it's last legs, that means that I'm really holding out for a NPC tinkerer because I need a much better firearm
Reviving people isn't making undead
Still doesn't change the fact that I don't like either lol
Clerics can still raise dead too.
Raise Dead resurrects people. It doesn’t make undead
They're not good at it though
That's not what I mean, Sam.
I mean that Clerics can also still make undead
Yeah, they have animate dead iirc
Clerics get animate dead
Okay?
What's the argument you're getting at, wizards are better at raising dead than Clerics? I don't see how that makes wizard any mire appealing than a Cleric.
You guys are fighting different battles
The argument they're making for why wizards are good doesn't make sense lol.
I never said wizards are bad anyway, I just don't like them
Tokii never said that Wizards and Fighters are bad, he made a statement about his opinion. And Cracker isn’t invalidating your opinion, he’s explaining why he thinks those classes are powerful.
I love all classes
This is the most net zero argument I’ve seen here in a while
If i want to play a character raising dead, wizards would be by far the best option. I meant it as just an example that there are things wizards and fighters can do that other classes can't as i thought that was your problem with them. Though if not, i apologise for the misunderstanding
Looks at Spores Druid, Death Cleric and new Oathbreaker
They can raise dead, but no undead thralls
The only thing a wizard can do better than any caster is that they can have access to all of their spells eventually. That's literally the only reason wizards are the strongest casters besides having a good spell list.
As for Fighters, they're the only Martial that can attack many times consistently, but even then, when monk gets extra attack, they
can still Bonus action attack and have more attacks more consistently than fighter until level 20
They're also the only intelligence fullcaster
Wrong
Not true, Psion is getting released soon.
Not out yet though
I wouldn’t count psion yet
Monks can attack a lot with unarmed strikes only though, fighters can do it with weapons
Incorrect
Kensei?
Only Flurry of Blows is restricted to unarmed strikes.
New Monks don't have to use unarmed strikes to activate flurry of blows either (as it it's not required to do so to use flurry and blows anymore)
I see
They didn’t in 2014 either
That being said, Kensei does use weapons fairly well
They just had to make some kind of attack.
How many attacks do monks make a turn without flurry of blows?
Only exception usually is astral self, but even then
3 with extra attack
2, but they can use a bonus action for an extra unarmed strike without spending ki.
I see, so still fighters do more weapon attacks, though it is only at level 20
Then get extra attack at 5th level. Then they get Flurry of Blows, which lets them make an unarmed strike as a BA. They can spend ki points to increase the amount of attacks they can make with Flurry of Blows
With flurry of blows, 4 or 5.
With a level in Ranger for weapon mastery (nick), 5 or 6
Monks are more consistent than fighters attack wise up until level 20.
They're on par attack wise around level 11.
Monks beat fighters for the first 5 levels too
Yarp.
Heck, arguably the first 10
Monks are the strongest tier 1 martial and maintain a good running throughout tier 2 and 3. Only in tier 4 do Fighters vastly outclass them
It's not that Monks are better than Fighter or anything of the sort, they're just easily more consistent if you're willing to use your bonus action to attack
Even then, I wouldn’t say vastly
So, what is the best plan for an upgrade? Searching for someone who can craft a firearm?
That is true
I will actually say that Fighters are probably the weakest tier 1 martial, but that’s more contentious
That or magical ammo
Monks get three strikes with flurry of blows at some point, but then they're no longer more consistent because they have to dig into resources to attack more than a Fighter
No, I agree
Thems fighting words!
Elemental arrows or explosive arrows should be fun
magic bow with more damage.. better armor.. you already have sharpshooter so thats +10 to any target you hit
Magical ammo is a possibility, but I think that raw damage numbers could also be a good fix. Staying at 1 d8 per attack doesn't feel like it'll scale well
It'll be fine
I can contest to this
I'm a Fighter in a campaign with a Monk at level 4 and he does more cleaning up than I do, but, I'm able to take hits and "tank" more consistently, so we both have our spots on the team
Paladins get smite and spells and lay on hands, rangers get spells and expertise, monks get more attacks, barbs get rage, rogues get sneak attack
Fighters get…action surge
Magic weapons. Monks with Unarmed Strikes have fewer "magic items"
That also means they require less from the party, and others can get the loot without conflict
Sharpshooter is 2014. So it's +8 without the active buff. Which also doesn't stack up so well when my damage is a bit reliant on it to keep up. I'll ask the other members of my party and the DM for details on their plans and what to look for in this next town
Fighters get self-healing too, so they're a bit more efficient in that department than the other pure martials.. and they also get more utility because of having more weapon masteries
Yeah fighters can still hold their own
Rage increases damage and survivability by a large margin and Reckless provides a rare consistent source of Advantage. Sneak Attack also does very impactful damage early on, though it’s weakened by its rarity in advantage.
In tier 1, it’s probably Monk, Barb, Rogue, then Fighter. In tier 2 and 3 Barb falls to the bottom and Fighter rises to compete with Monk for first. In tier 4 Fighter take its rightful place as the best martial for a final ranking of Fighter, Monk, Rogue, Barb
They’re quite the good class still
Also using second wind for d20 tests can be clutch
Fighter is well-designed, it's just not my favorite lol
By the way, I wonder when 6e will be released
Probably not for a bit
Give it another 10 years
They're probably not the best at any single thing but they can do most martial things
not for a decent amount of time probably
I’m guessing another decade
-# and maybe a bit
tbf it depends on the fighter build
I'm guessing it will require a subscription to access the books.
Mfw I have to pay for a subscription for the privelege to pay for another subscription :(
What about 2024 martials?
So you pay $5 for your Subscription Portal subscription, then you have to pay $10 for the WotC subscription. Then $15 for the D&D 6e subscription. And then another $30 to rent each book. All monthly.
Monks are also pretty good in a decent majority of situations because they don't really need equipment to function
Even without it a Monk is still consistently dangerous 🔥
2024 fighter with 2014 sharpshooter 😎
I feel like that’s a testament to sharpshooter more than fighter lol
All you need is a Monk with an Eldritch Claw tattoo
Cracks knuckles
Funnily enough the best way to make a monk useless while imprisoning them is to strap armor on them that they can’t get off
Real lmao
You lose all your meaningful features, you have a speed penalty likely if it’s heavy armor, and not having armor prof ruins you
Fighter also gets Spellcasting features
Lmao
Monks crumbling when armor touches their body in any form of way
Only Eldritch Knights do.
Unless you have Magic initiate or feats that give Spellcasting.
Imagine forcing enemy Monks to wear shield and armour
Spelldritch knight
Ik
Put them in a straight jacket and they're donezo.
Leather armor and they will melt
Monks don't need spells to be badass 🔥
lowkey crazy that monk is the onyl class that can benefit from combining 2 uncommon items for a +2
Ranger gets spellcasting features tho
Sumatra, my Elements Monk
Absolutely destroyed an Adult black dragon, with help, of course, but he was doing MASSIVE damage >:]
I will only agree in the case of Way of Open Hand (Cuz you get to be Kenshiro from Fist of the North Star)
Because Rangers are built different
My favorite monk subclass is mercy
My fav is elemental warrior
Let Open Hand monks do their vibrating palm strikes 24/7 at Tier 4 but the damage is delayed til they say "Omae wa mou shindeiru"
my fav new one is elemental warrior
What? Are bracers of archery chopped liver?
I'm a healer at heart 😔
Fly above the enemy, pull them towards you, they fall, repeat for all your attacks
thats only +2 damage
not nearly as good as +2 damage and +2 atk bonus
ONLY?
do you know how good a flat bonus is to damage?
I wanna play my tiger monk again
That's not a +2 in general but still really good for an uncommon.
pales in comparason to a +2 to hit bonus
Okay, gonna level with you.
Get a +2 Weapon and also get Bracers of Archery.
unfortunatly bars you from using old xbow master
rare and uncommon item challenge cancelled
That's true.
im just talking about eldritch claw and +1 wraps stacking
Take Archery in fighter as ur base fighting style then take fighting initiate: archery
That’s not how that works
you cant do that
That's just taking the same fighting style twice
Bonuses only stack if they're from different sources.
🤣
+14 from Tier 2 would be nuts
Grim Hollow advanced weapon proficiency can allow you to do that if you have the right stats.
Isn't that only for spells
But that's 3rd party
No, it's for everything
No, it’s for everything. Unless specified otherwise
imagine getting 3 attacks a level before fighter does
Could be me
The humble monk:
Monk gaminggg
nick weapon amstery is fake
monks are also fake unfortuantly
the only real martial is fighter
Oki
once again the human fighter reigns supreme
What'd you just say?!
NUGGET, HOLD ME BACK!!!
Them some fighting words
them some fighters words
I cast haste, go ham
Bet
anyways artificer best class
-# Breaks concentration
I cast Sleet Storm on Nugget
Noooooo! Poor chicken!
How could you?!
medium armor prof and just infinite access to +1/+2 weapons AND +1 armor at early levels is crazy
Counterspell
Counterspell (I no longer have any reactions after this)
Counterspell (my bard friend is very kind)
CounterPUNCH!
You can’t move, I broke concentration on haste
Noooo
counterspell (i paid 30 hirelings with counterspell to stand here)
NUGGET?! Whyyy
They took meta magic adept, it was subtle spelled
You told me to hold you back, and I did!
Imagine hasting your monk and just ending concentration
That's devious work
Well, haste specifies they gotta be willing
You can do this on a deadweight character btw, its hilarious
That's a red flag.
That it is
In 2014, no
In 2024, yes because they removed the combining game effects rule from the DMG
Yeah thats fair
I meant NPCs
they what
At that point haste an ally PC, and have the deadweight be cannon fodder
Do you guys ever ask ai for ideas?
Rules from older books still apply if they are not contradicted or rewritten in a newer book
I don’t
No no, it'll be for interrogation once they become willing
Dont do that
Oh u responded to me. I just realized that lol
No, because my players signed up to play in my game with my ideas. I’m perfectly capable of stealing ideas from other creatives without the help of a water-sucking technodemon
seems like bad design
forces new players to learn 2014 and 2024 rules
Ok, thanks for your input
Na, i am creative enough and honestly, sometimes picking up a "common" story and adapting it to your character is okey, if its well made
Hello! I’m a semi-new DM. I’ve ran some games but due to time restraints and kiddos I had to take a step back. I’m looking for a 4person group to possibly run a game with. I really enjoy the DM role. If anyone is interested HMU ☺️
Check out #find-a-game
Okay, I just want some remedies for writers block. I want to be creative but im not. My brain not built that way
Like, making a character that is simple can give you space to give your own creativity on it through the story.
"a wizard that want to understand better the world around him in a hunger of knowledge"
Something basic that can give you space to a lot of things
I was talking about dming not making a pc
There is no such thing as an amount of creativity a person has. The brain is a muscle, so when you do creative things, you get better at being creative, and likewise is true. In fact, this means that using AI to supplement your creative works will, in fact, make you worse at being creative.
So, consume and create creative media. That is the only way to get more creative.
Well, that does mean there is an amlunt. But, I get what you are saying.
I meant that there’s not an intrinsic amount. It’s a skill that fluctuates with use, not a static talent
Scroll through something, call it twitter, pinterest, etc. And use a mix of ideas you can get through all that.
If not, search something from some show//comic and use it like inspiration.
In this case for DM same thing
can be something basic like "There is bad guy that want to rule over the world" and the party must stop his evils plans.
Or can go for something deeper "The bad guy was betrayed by a kind and using that hatred he became a smart general that use his resources to slowly make a big plan and overtake//exterminate that kind in some sort of revenge".
Or again, inspirate from some shows//stuff.
Send teh party 500 years in the future (Samurai jack)
Make them became part of a group and then the leader betray them all (Berserk)
The party need money for living (konosuba)
If you want just tell me some points you want in that campaign and i might help you, i get some creative spikes sometimes 
I am going to be playing an illusionist wizard for a one shot. I will be level 10. What are some higher level non damaging spells I can cast illusions of? Been thinking of casting an illusion of a globe of invulnerability
Hey I got a question
It depends what you mean by ideas, honestly. The extremely small amounts of times I use it, it's when I need a single spark for creativity, and the only reason I use it for that spark is because I have about 500 other assumptions in the background that need to be considered and I need random ideas that challenge my slump.
I would agree it's not at all helpful for actually getting better at creative thinking, though.
go for it, what is your doubt?
So I’m making my third character, since I’m a bit new to D&D, and I’m wondering what everyone’s favorite class is? I’ve asked a good number of people and the class with the most votes is what I’m picking. Just from the basic lot
what are you thoughts on a player asking for something their class doesnt normally get?
EX a barbarian wanting a fighting style
For me would be wizard, it have some epic spells, the whole idea of learning how to do magic by yourself is nice for me.
Variety and is in most of the times, simple to understand
And ngl, Sunburst, Ravenous Void, Dark star, time stop. Being someone that just know how to do it. (it kinda tickle a neuron)
Thank you so much!
is fighter also good for newbies?
Wizard and Cleric
There isnt a feat that give you that? Fighting initiative?
Fighter is good for everyone!
Yes, is simple to understand. But its too simple too, so is understandable the lack of "appeal" from it
It's just so fun to have so many options at your disposal, figuring out what works and what doesn't and figuring out spell synergies
i'm building a psi warrior kobold for it
More if the Dm dont kinda, "balance" the things.
I appreciate you guys for answering my question
its ok
i mean more like a "hey DM could i start with unarmed fighting"
like is that a bad thing to ask for to start with
Yes, but being honest, is a small thing.
Yeah, the barbarian with rage will do more damage with his punches.
And? its for me a too lil thing
Isnt something strong like duelist, defense, etc.
If you want, you can give it but with a price on it. "Yes, i give you this but you must sacrifice X"
I dont feel its needed by such small thing, but might be wrong
Usually its a no, multiclassing is right there if someone wants it
But house rules are house rules so its w/e
house rules exist
Oh, and almost forgot to mention something
There were an unreal amount of nat 20s from my team
3 from initiative, 2 from ability checks, and 2 from combat crits
The funnier part about 2 of the initiative nat 20s was despite both of those in one combat, I still went first
Right so you gave all your luck to them
Imagine playing an Evoker in a political intrigue campaign.
It’s like bringing a bazooka to a knife fight.
alternatively a inquistor rogur in a meat grinder
Evokers would be nice in those situations, you can now freely use aoe spells without outright killing innocents
"Gave", probably not the right word (implies choice. I need my luck too :< )
Better everyone but you has good luck than you having good luck while everyone's stuck with nat 1s
True
At least they are pulling their weight in a twisted way
Thank you for your…is charity the right word?
I take it that the inquisitor is meant for intrigue campaigns?
ye pretty bad combatsubclass
Fair point. And hopefully, my build will start to loosely come together to make crits possible without being luck based
By the way, thoughts on investing in the various tool kits (3 main ones for now being thief, smith, and tinkerer)
(And on the note of luck, there's something funny about 2 nat 20s on initiative but still going first because 23 roll and modifer means going first)
Sometimes.... i had to roll for stats, i had for first time in my life a 4....
the dm was too nice and deleted that roll and let me reroll again
Its a hot take but in games where I have to roll for stats, if I get below a certain threshold and can't reroll I'm auto leaving
i talk it out with the dm, he have me patience and let me do it because we are both good with each other.
We enjoy each other gaming and that feel nice. Still he understand that with a 4 in any stat i will just suffer
And i have enough being in a settling of stone era.
Something like Far cry Primal lets say
Hey yall...i just started playing today 😔😔😔
Why so sad?
all got tpk?
Idkk im so nervous i practiced with my bf and it was so awkward
Atleast my ocs cute
It’s normal to feel nervous at first
Its so confusing
It isn't, but having Chunky Crits with Assassin is my best (and possibly only) access to good consistent damage. There are options available, but are often available to others (Spike Growth), reliant on later levels (Sneak attack + rogue levels for scaling), or a bit too reliant on good luck (Favored Foe and Hunter's Mark: even worse are the resources burnt because I'm already out of spells from needing to use the other 2 to save our druid from death saves and the other to restrain someone running off with an important NPC)
Crit fishing isn't as consistent as you think
Even all the magical items in the world would push you no further than needing a nat 10 minimum for a crit
Exactly 
how should i build my college of swords bard satyr
I also like it when they put a suction cup on my back so they can pull on it
lol
2014
Nat 14s is probably the level you'd get realistically late game, but that's like a 30% chance... Before that, you're most likely dealing with 10-15% chances for the majority of the game
Hardly an improvement, but its satisfying anyways
It isn't, but I'm looking into some options
Talking to my DM, firearms can exist in the campaign, but anything past a pistol or musket would need to be crafted via an artificer or with the help of an appropriate NPC
I'm not commenting on firearms cuz that's another feat dedicated to it in the first place
I'll still redirect you back to tabletop builds
Cuz their builds didn't involve crit fishing but it works out anyways
Which is possible, thanks to the sizable amount of gemstones we got from the loot the bandit-esque enemies had, but i may need to talk to my party about what we plan to buy. I get we have about 3k GP worth, but we are not spending it on getting plate armor for the Fighter >_>
I'm personally kind of crit fishing with my Gloom Stalker monoclass mostly cuz its funny to hit for like 70-80 damage on turn 1 if I even score a single crit with a nat 17
(As in 70-80 for 3 attacks)
Because either he's pulling on my leg or really doesn't know how expensive that is
Dunno, don't really wanna comment on your teammates either lest we talk about how they suck again
Anyways tabletop builds
Mmm, they're doing pretty good from hearing more about them. They could stand to disengage a bit more, but can't complain
Anyways, a plan i have atm is investing in the proper kits and possibly working my way towards improving my musket more
Outside of investments like health potions, smithing for better armor for the team, and other supplies
Tabletop builds.