#ug-maths-physics
1 messages · Page 8 of 1
Not at their level 
Elliptic curves etc?
These two peeps are just
I just pretend to be smart :D
As wht I have expected
Oh yea, I saved a link on that. Still working through it.........
Waw thank youu
Not taught at uni?
Got interest in DS /ML / AI?
Bots don’t go to uni
Tbh at uni I was getting scared of all the courses, and by 3rd year I was just trying to pick easy ones to survive 🙃
Shit loh cambridge dashen also like that
I sure drop out

Only a slight interest haha, like I got not much motivation to sit down and go through the details
My god.. Machine learning data science.. Artificial intelligence
Please share some nice STEP questions
MDragon must be a pure mathematician. No time for applied stuff.
Actually, maybe you all can be my motivation xD
Ohhh no please.. I m not into the field at least 😆
Ya ya, it's very important. If you want to have a bright career, go for it
Idk the name is cool but I know very little about it 
hmmm actually my course might cover a bit of data science 🤔
||like a subset of it I believe||
A fancy name for statistics 🤔
MDragon took pure or applied maths?
Sama Sama 😆 the name immediately portrays the toughness of that course
Change the name, get more students

Engineering 🤓
Not fully stats la
a bit of both. You can select the courses in 2nd and 3rd year
Oh nice, so which "easy courses" did you pick
Totally not coz I see myself struggling

Okok and wht is the difference between two of these hahaha pure and applied
Have some faith in urself dB
Decibel
autocorrect
This YouTube comment said
Pure maths is exploring the world of maths
Applied maths is exploring the world with maths :)
eh...... Special Relativity, Probability and Measure.........
rip.. This sounds a bit hard to understand hahaha
I think those were the "easier" courses I actually found "easier" lol
Almost surely
Relativity.. That isn't rly an easy subject hmm
General Relativity is not
Dunno I think like pure maths is maths that hasn't been applicable to irl ? (Maybe in the future it will) Applied maths mostly proven to be applicable irl
Special Relativity is not too bad
I was hiding from this one xD
Aight 🤣
Why ah
But they can turn coffee mugs into doughnuts 😄
🍩
Yeah I like combinatorics
Nice
Topology.. Alright wth is this even but I looked that up and erm
The study of doughnuts
Must have a lot of geometry which I despise a lot
Somehow I found the Analysis courses quite challenging, so I was hesitant to go more abstract into that area
Sameeee
Abstract as in what ah
Paiseh
Well, as in you are dealing with less structure
For example, the real numbers have a lot of structure
Gonna pergi tidur.. Bye bye good night 
But you can go into more abstract areas where there is less structure, for example the integers, then groups.....
Nighttt
Ya, actually I want to sleep also
Too dumb to get this 😔
But nvm hahaha
Thank youu
Nice meeting you, Sifu Alex :D
Looking forward to maths tutorials from you
See how la
Haha no no. you are the sifu 😄
Hope can duoduozijiao
Hahahaha, high expectations 🙃
Quiet day here
Db just woke up :D
how many hours of sleep maam
6-8 that range hahaha
🤣
okok that is reasonable
Still quiet
U may attempt initiating a conversation here then hahaha
And posts random math questions for mdragon
Haha he’s kinda quiet
Ok here’s one. From another server.
Projectile. Find v in terms of a, α, and β.
Shit I forgot all my mechanics
Since you mentioned this question, it should be remarkable. And the only way I see this being remarkable is if || the solution doesn't depend on β. Therefore I'm gonna guess that: ||
|| v = sqrt (ga / (sin α) ) ||

shouldve put the original paragraph of the question too haha
i think they would understand some parts of it
Hello Pierrot. Another brilliant mathematician.
Haha it’s remarkable because it’s quite an interesting variation of the classical projectile problem. Not something I’ve come across before. And also in the original multiple choice question all answer options are wrong! I pointed this out to the person who posted. So did another person.
What’s miring?
slant
Haha
If oxide is oksida then why is slope not slopa?
That is the correct answer if β = α. But if they are not equal then the answer does depend on β as well.
here it is!
Ah I see. In that case, it's just a tedious algebra exercise........ 😕
It's also the correct answer if β is a right angle
I was wondering if there might be a clever transform that gets you to the answer directly
There's almost surely no way to know if there isn't, so there probably is 😂
Anyway all of the answer options are wrong! This is easily proven by letting β = α in which case the denominator inside the square root becomes negative.
How about thinking about it from a point of "reversed time"? Starting at the right and then moving to the left
Failing which what is the neatest way to approach the algebra grind?
Please do try
Another thing I was thinking about was the following problem: Given the curve y=x^2, there's a point on it (k, k^2). Consider a line passing through (k, k^2) which is perpendicular to the parabola at that point. What is the y-intercept of the line?
As in, trying to fit a parabola onto the problem, and completely ignoring the speed (and time taken) at first
yes also possible
please solve
you can always find that line for any point on the parabola. it's just the normal.
Why so?
Soalan ni yg dlm bahasa melayu 😏 ya u understand right xD
Anyway my answer is
||v²=(2ga/sin α)(1/(2-cot β (cot α -cot β))||
Y'all are big bren
||so when β = α it reduces nicely to v² = ga/sin α which matches your answer || @floral sky
U and ur obsession with maths
Why is a bot seeking for attention hahahaa
Not seeking. Just commenting.
Well this is a maths and science channel
Bot is noticing change in patterns

Thanks. I'm just lazy to plow through it 🙃
im indonesian, and i can confirm it is indonesian haha
alright xD
Unless crysto know what miring means 😄
And it’s not Japanese seasoning 😂
Hmmm no one seems to want to solve this projectile problem
I tak tau
So the question can’t be from Malaysia :)
Have you attempted the projectile question?
Too dumb for that-db's quote
Not true at all.
Please do share some interesting questions
Damn the way Alex is trying to initiate math convos
that's what a bot is supposed to do
an exceptional bot you are xD with extraordinary math skills and maybe some sense of humour
Sorry for the slow reply. Here you go:
Interesting!
They should ask part (b) first!
$\frac 1{\sin a^\circ \sin (a+1)^\circ} \
= \frac 1{\sin 1^\circ}\cdot \frac {\sin ((a+1)-a)^\circ}{\sin a^\circ \sin (a+1)^\circ}\
=\frac 1{\sin 1^\circ}\cdot \frac {\sin (a+1)^\circ \cos a^\circ-\cos(a+1)^\circ\sin a^\circ}{\sin a^\circ \sin (a+1)^\circ}\
=\frac 1{\sin 1^\circ}\cdot (\cot a^\circ - \cot (a+1)^\circ)$
AlexV
summing from a=1 to 89 by telescoping gives the result in (b)
For part (a) consider the series formed by the "missing" terms, i.e. the terms in between (and last one beyond). This is also equal to the sum, S. Adding both and summing via telescoping (as above) gives 2S = 2/sin 1° hence n=1.
@floral sky
very nice questions!
Yes, they should definitely ask part (b) first hahahaha
@rancid schooner Your solutions for both parts are correct. Awesome! 😃
😊
That made my day! Thanks! 😊
Glad to know! ^^
Here's one:
$\lim_{n\to \infty} \frac 1{2n}\log \binom {2n}n$
AlexV
Hmmm let's see........

The answer is || log 2 ||
|| The log can be to any base, as long as the question's log is the same base as the answer's log ||
Working is below:
(click to reveal)
Now I know how fast log( 2nCn ) grows. Cool! :D
Yes! That's correct! 👏 👏
Nice solution! 😄
😊
Thanks 😊
nah it's actually a pen, but the ink doesn't flow smoothly haha
haha
but I just use whatever is convenient. If that were a pencil, I'd use it
you don't have a favourite writing instrument?
haha a few different ones
ah you have a collection
u and ur obsession with pens
well uniball and pilot pens are pretty good
and there are some nice fountain pens as well
some of the old mathematicians have nice handwriting
I have some pilot pens and I agree that they're pretty good
you can see newton's notebooks online
hmmm, I never knew how newton's handwriting looked like.........
nice. what type?
they are literally the best ones here in msia
hahahahaha
😲 lemme search that up
isit? Then I'm lucky xD
nice. check out the Pilot Hi-Tecpoint. and also Uniball Eye and Uniball Vision Needle.
Uniball Vision Needle used to be available here but not any more. probably still so available in the UK.
lemme guess where is this bot from
yeah yeah xD so far so good no issues at all
thanks for the recommendations!
sold at a reasonable price
trying to sound local :)
@floral sky I find the double factorial notation quite useful.
ah I see.......
yeah I probably should get into the habit of that
are you giving maths tuition or something?
bots have good handwriting! what an exceptional bot u r alex! impressive
nah, but I could if I wanted to
one of the most difficult things to write when writing fast is the equal sign
have to make sure they are aligned, and parallel, and of equal length
bots have hands to write as well xD damn i m way too impressed
??? it is just an equal sign brooo hahahhaa not worth the ocd
😲 u and ur bots joke haiyaaaaa
@floral sky can it be done without squeezing? maybe not as rigorous?
hmmm...........
The IQ in this chat just suddenly stonks ten fold
you can spike your IQ also!
any of you play wordle?
||I m third wheeling rn||
I know how it works, but I don't play 🙃
therefore you must start participating more actively xD
Fourth wheel here
Took me like 5 mins to get this
:D
I dunno, but definitely less than 140
Bruh 140 is high liao
IQ can be trained also
Maybe like 100-120 lmao
🤣
Or 0😩
No lah should be higher than that.. Mine is probably that range
impossible XD
Ya oh hahahahha
😎 😎 😎
Mission impossible
@rancid schooner OMG look at this!!
Dear lord
Very nice! 😄
ikr 😄
Stackexchange?
The other answers are quite nice too
Nite!
Nite!
😏
There’s a math version of Stack overflow?
Nice
I read a funny thing today, that any number, even 10^1000000000000000000000000000 is closer to 0 than infinity
There's every subject version of it
Dear lord +1
Yeah, like Mushu says, there is one for virtually every subject. The complete subject list is here: https://stackexchange.com/sites
@floral sky can we use Stirling’s approx as well?
Maybe it's possible.......
@rancid schooner Yes you can, as long as you use this form of it:
It follows very quickly from this form actually
Yes it’s possible, I’ve done it.
But would it be considered circular though? Maybe the result can be used to derive Stirling instead. 🤔
What do mathematicians do on Sundays?
I became curious about how to derive Stirling
It seems that you can derive Stirling without the result, according to this link: https://faculty.washington.edu/moishe/hanoiex/counting/Stirling.pdf
Nice. Yes I’ve seen a similar proof before. I suppose using an approx to prove another approx is not as pure as working from first principles.
Yeah I guess so
Please translate
which question?
What you just posted
there are three of them, do u want all of them or just a specific one?
Please choose the most interesting one :)
Suppose f(x) is defined in the interval (0,1] and satisfies (the x limit). Prove that (the n limit)
Suppose lambda >1, show that the equation (the eqn with lambda and z) has a root located in H. And show that the root is a real root (real number)
@rancid schooner
Looks difficult! I will leave it to the professional mathematicians 😄 @floral sky
I'm not a professional mathematician at all 😄
@rancid schooner 3) is quite straightforward using calculus:
Set f(x) = x + exp(-x)
Then show that f(0) = 1 and f is strictly increasing on [0, inf)
- looks really hard tho...........
this is also exactly what i did haha
but also gotta prove that there are no complex roots too in H
i.e. only can be real
ohh I see......... I misread
hmm...........
it's an interesting question
try finding out, i dont mind giving hints too if u want
though i can only do the method that u mentioned
there is another method that uses complex analysis, which i didnt get to know how
I'm not good at complex analysis anyway 🙃
thats finee
what do u major in if i may know?
I majored in math. I already graduated
pure???
well, a mix of pure and applied
thank you 😄
:D
you have my respect for confounding me with math questions!
woah
i only managed to solve the 3rd question
I see....
You have my respect too Sir :)
And you too :)
The respect is mutual, Sir Alex
😊
Alex is just a bot trying to entertain himself with some nice (and easily solvable) maths problems with elegant solutions 😄
Maybe someone can give us an easier question 😄
OK here's one:
¼ [1⋅10+2⋅9+3⋅8+⋯+10⋅1]=1²+2²+3²+4²+5²
Can this be generalized and proven without first resorting to the closed form?
Wdym closed form
The formula in the formula book
Ie cannot show that
LHS = formula book formula
and
RHS = formula book formula
so LHS = RHS
ie we want to keep it in summation form
Any thoughts @floral sky ?
No inspiration yet haha
I was thinking of overlapping regions of rectangles, like a 10 by 1 rectangle, a 9 by 2 rectangle and so on..........
And seeing if they can cover the same area as four times of a 1x1 square, a 2x2 square..........
I was thinking about manipulating the summand and summation limits
eventually it becomes this
(put the 4s and 5s where they belong 😛 )
now this thing, we can decompose as follows
now pair up the size 6 with the size 5, the size 4 with the size 3, and the size 2 with the size 1, like this:
join them together:
[in the last picture, the big square is 4(3^2), the medium square is 4(2^2), and the small square is 4(1^2) ]
err...... like this? Hahahaha
1(2n) + 2(2n-1) + ... + 2n(1)
= 1
+ 2 + 1
...
+ 2n + ... + 2 + 1
= (1
+ 2 + 1)
+ (3 + 2 + 1
+ 4 + 3 + 2 + 1)
+
...
+ ((2n-1) + ... + 2 + 1
+ 2n + (2n-1) + ... + 2 + 1)
= ( 0 + 1
+ 2 + 1)
+ ( 0 + 1 + 2 + 3
+ 4 + 3 + 2 + 1)
+
...
+ ( 0 + 1 + ... + (2n-2) + (2n-1)
+ 2n + (2n-1) + ... + 2 + 1 )
= (2(1))^2
+ (2(2))^2
+
...
+ (2n)^2
= 4(1^2 + 2^2 + ... + n^2)
V nice!
Can it be done with summation notation?
hmmm...........
oooh cool! Thanks!
😊
I have learned something from you, Sifu Alex
And vice versa!
😊
Anyway it’s quite fascinating that the sum of squares can be expressed as different combinations of composite sums
Yes, very fascinating
I regret taking a 2nd year math unit so hard rn
Linear and Abstract Algebra is killing me
I got 7/18 in my first graded quiz
Ah, thanks
Typo with pen hmm interesting
.... 😩
might be able to help with abstract alg
im also taking it now
ooo thanks
what book r u using?
I can help with linear algebra a bit, I did take it last year
Now whether I will be very useful is a different issue
linear algebra in my uni sucks ass man
i wanna learn LINEAR ALGEBRA
NOT BECOMING A CALCULATOR
We don't really use a textbook but I can send you some of the weekly tutorial questions
the matrices related stuff is easy af, but all the other stuff is hard
cycle permutations and whatnot
lets see wht is this even about xD
ohhhhh wtf i hate this one
dislikes matrices in general xD
oh you have them combined??
ive never seen such a thing
i see i see
this is actually interesting
ive never seen abstract alg and linalg to be combined like that
that would make the course heavier
this is a good resource for matrix calcs: http://matrixcalc.org/en
Matrix addition, multiplication, inversion, determinant and rank calculation, transposing, bringing to diagonal, triangular form, exponentiation, LU Decomposition, Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), solving of systems of linear equations with solution steps
i have a small question hahhaa my lecturer did not explain the squeeze theorem well enough..xD
You’ve started university?
it is a rly personal story hahhaa
Haha ok
Yesss
😊
Yepp
1st year units were solely linear algebra
2nd year unit is sort of transitioning you into the idea of abstract algebra
damn i cant imagine that pain mann
Random question
Why did you guys choose to major in math
Like, what makes you certain with that decision 🤔
And what do y'all plan to do with a math degree? 🤔
Is it maths or math?
Math and maths are equally acceptable abbreviations of mathematics. The only difference is that math is preferred in the U.S. and Canada, and maths is preferred in the U.K., Australia, and most other English-speaking areas of the world. Neither abbreviation is correct or incorrect.
So DB is American
What makes you like math so passionately? :)
Idk, like I see y'all so passionate about math here, if I'm not passionate as you guys idk if I should even take it man
Which subject are you passionate about then?
DB is smart!
Hmmm even tho I don't take maths as a degree but like I guess u just have to pick the course u enjoyed the most
Well based on a levels, furthermaths 🤣
But uni math is a whole different ball game so 😪
Danggg hahahhaa
I lost my interests in chemi hahahha while doing a levels
Don’t think too much. Just keep on enjoying further maths :)
And help solve or post more problems here!
My fav subject is Chemistry, it the root of 99% of my stress 😊
kinda occupied atm 😪
Go watch Tibees haha
She always review math papers from different countries :)
And always pretty
Watch full solutions to Q7 and Q10 by @Dr PK Math: https://youtu.be/hhWwDWwq8ZU
Subscribe to my channel to see more videos like this: https://www.youtube.com/user/tibees
HMMT past papers and solutions:
https://www.hmmt.org/www/archive/problems
2021 November: https://www.hmmt.org/www/archive/251
2021 February(March): https://www.hmmt.org/www/arc...
Her name sounds like cat food
I wanna do math
I have no idea
Because i was good at it ig
Brb
That’s a good enough reason
to do more math after that
Great answer!
Like what job
Wait I thought you're still in a levels?
Data Science
Hmm any plans after graduating with a math degree?
masters degree
I am but I got accepted for Data Science in uni
After that? XD
Yeah data science slightly different
Coz I was contemplating between math, engineering or data science
i just wanna see what happens first
it said joint major in Math Stats and CS
And all 3 of these involve maths to some extent
So how much maths is the right amount 😂
Tbh idk, pure mainly if according to further maths syllabus
I don't like stats, but a senior told me it's more useful than I think
So I try to keep an open mind ig?
further maths syllabus is morely oriented to applied maths from what i see, but there is no problem in trying pure too
Are you taking pure or applied?
right now, im taking applied
but i will move to pure
though i am taking a pure class
Hmm why so?
and self studying it
More interesting?
cuz im not into applied 😂
Or planning to take the academia route?
yeah most likely
unless i somehow change direction after bachelors
most likely data sci
but if not, then masters in math
I remember being in the mindset that stats and probability is dogshit and waste of time, but man Hypothesis testing is so cool
Why so?
Coz for further stats, the steps are like pretty standard
So after exam I forgot everything
But the pure stuff still sticks with me
S2 and FS ig
Im betting on it lol
I dint take s2😥
bruh
💯
Yesse
ah okay
Not a fan of the topology stuff
F Mech taught me never to take a major in physics 😎
Some topics are nice. Like projectiles.
Circular took me so long
Idk, I like fmech tbh, until I screwed up that one question
Projectiles took a day
A circular reference
There was a question which was a combination of projectile and circular motion
Very creative
I think I remember
Brave is a maths major?
Yeah like the object escapes the surface and becomes a projectile
A2 student...
I see
but taking Data Science in uni
Nice
thats a cool major
Yeah idk if I shd go for data sci if sg rejects me
u shud def take it
Nice rebranding of statistics :)
I'm afraid that the demand will decrease with time
statistics with programming
Lol
DB just relax
Coz now people are hopping onto that bandwagon
Post some questions and solutions here
That worries me too
You can’t really study to match market demand
but isnt it high demand at the same time?
Just study what you enjoy
So many people take a CS major just for money, I heard that programming interviewers give the simplest tasks and most people cant solve them
Depends on situation bah, you study performing arts in Malaysia sure die
🤣🤣🤣
im sure u can be the one that can solve the question
Not if you enjoy performing and are not good at other things
that way u would stand out right?
Yeah sg fresh grad from cs background starting salary sgd 6k
Anyway. Anyone posting any interesting questions here today?
probably lol, I was the only self taught programmer in my class and was the only one who got A in CS programming
yesterday's :)
thats good then
good headstart
That was too difficult 😄
Next time anyone post questions make a thread, easy to find in the future 😂
Give us an easier one
look at me, i can only use c++ lol
yes
If I go sg I'll make sure to spam alex with questions HAHAHA
You the one always asking for q wat 🤣
That’s what the server is for isn’t it
Yes but stupid humans like me need breaks 😔
But you come here voluntarily
Go watch tibee vids
Can do math questions from all over the world
Give us an interesting question from her
Here’s a nice and simple one.
Find the relationship between complex numbers a, b, c such that they form an equilateral triangle on the complex plane.
Reminds one of Hokkaido scallops
1/(2e^(-ax)+1) ?
yepp
😊
is anyone interested in the solution for the limit question?
are you? @rancid schooner
Yes. But let me try first :)
sure
A bit busy now so will try later when I have time.
Post the solution and spoiler it if you like :)
My solution to the last part.
yess
😊
So you’re giving STPM tuition?
😮
Please host live teaching season.
db x crysto.
i was actually talking about the essay question i posted 2 days ago haha
yeah cuz i realized u were doing the hokkaido question
i posted the wrong solution haha
i was actually referring to the limit of f(1/n^2) question
I see
No 😔
We dint learn this in fstats so I'm asking here 
Can still remember why max value?
yeah yeah hahhaa population var(x)
😊
Too many dragon duties to attend to 🙃
Like breathing fire? 😄
Is MDragon an anagram of DMorgan, short for De Morgan, the mathematician who came up with De Morgan’s Laws?
Indeed 😄
MDragon’s day job is a professional maths researcher or lecturer?
Neither. It's related to stocks and other financial instruments
Wow sounds sophisticated
alex is madly in love with his bro mdragon hahaha bromance
expertise in that field wow
Eh, idk how yet, still learning.....
A lot of maths and/or coding in your work?
Anyone solved πerrot’s last question?
but in this case z is complex 🤔
for Q2, let x=k/n^2, where k = 1, 2, ..., n. then limit (n →∞) of k ⋅ (n ²/k)⋅ f(k/n²) = k. Summing for k = 1 to n and dividing by n² gives the limit as limit (n→ ∞) (1/n²)(n(n+1)/2) = 1/2.
thats a nice method
but im not quite sure if that would be given full marks, but it is still valid
I did not solve it back then
But a full mark answer would require a formal proof of the limit
The epsilon delta one
So everything from first principles
ie y=x², dy/dx = 2x won’t get you full marks 😄
Haha that’s why it’s “essay”
Instead of “easy” 😄
so a more rigorous proof would increase the chances
Who organised this?
I see. They have a maths faculty?
of course
Nice
sadly not
Hopefully soon
Hopefully it’s not like the projectile question in the other competition where all answer options are wrong 😄
impossible haha
Have you tried to solve that one?
which one?
the projectile?
i dont think i can do projectiles anymore at this point haha
Just use the ratio test:
I got infinity but Symbolab said it converges
this is probably your mistake
@buoyant oasis
sure, we're dealing with the case where z is complex. But if we only consider it as a real-valued function, we will get one positive real root, so then once we extend this real-valued function to a function with complex domain and range, that positive real root solution we got earlier must still exist!
So proving the existence of the solution is easy
It is proving the fact that "all solutions with positive real part must have Im z = 0" which is difficult
new here- anyone willing to help me out with this emag problem? I'm not sure which resistors are to be included in the calculation of the time constant based on the conditions of the switch. I think i'm having a hard time visualizing the current's direction. would the time constant with the switch open just be R_1C?
welcome to the server! Unfortunately I am a noob with electrical circuits
Nice. Now we can apply that to the Riemann Hypothesis 😄
Apparently in the early 1900s the Cambridge Maths Tripos includes questions on electricity!
what youve said is exactly my strategy haha
proving its existence, then proving its uniqueness
and thank god
that is what made me able to get to the finals
Congratulations
How would you solve the middle part?
On a side note this is interesting. I saved the pic on my phone from another server and pasted it here but the spoiler status remains.
$\int$
TeXit is down again?
noob my ass la dragon ge
Good thing I'm born in modern times! 😄
Congrats!
really la, I am noob. I don't know head or tail about time constant, or impedance....
haha thank youuu
I can see the following steps immediately:
|| square first equation and subtract 2nd equation ||
|| cube first equation and subtract 3rd equation ||
but then it isn't immediately obvious
There’s a neat factorisation for the difference between cube of sum and sum of cubes :)
You could have been around then as well, you never know! 😄
Hmmmmmm
Makes sense la cuz u aren't an engineering graduate.. No one will expect u to know so much stuff hahaha
Isn’t that A-Level Physics?
I believe he knows a level physics stuff.. But not in detail
Engineering students tend to dive in more right xD more in depth
Yes yes it is
I’m sure he’s an A** student like you :)
he definitely is hahahaa me-maybe cuz of that grade inflation xD
ah, it's || 3 * the product of the pairwise sums ||
Lol, who knows
Oooh thanks!!
You could have been Hardy in a past life 😄
||Yes it is ||😊
I wish I had the opportunity to collaborate with Ramanujan :D
He revamped the Maths Tripos.
Made the course more rigorous. And probably removed the questions on electricity 😄
Oh, I didn't know that
It was mentioned somewhere online
And Littlewood :)
this is actually lit lmao
It’s very interesting. The pitches are calibrated according to the limits of the visible portion of the graph.
Try plotting y=floor(x) and then play the sound. Now zoom out and try again.
nicee
😊
Hey, a little random request but I'd really appreciate if someone could share a few math Olympiad level questions. I have the final selection test to finalize the participants who will represent out country in IMO tmrw
the question can be solved using rouche's theorem too if one intends to solve using complex analysis
Please share solution
for number 2 or 3?
Rouche
oh i have no idea how to do it with rouche yet haha
i just know thats the way to do it
the method i use to go to the finals doesnt use any cool theorems
hmm I see............
Why are so many of the important figures in pure mathematics in the 19th century from France and Germany and very few from the UK?
Story of Srinivasa Ramanujan, from his early self-study of math to the pivotal letter that opened up opportunities for writing important theorems and papers.
Interesting that the “L-angle” symbol was used for factorials at that time instead of “!”
Is that the reflection of the symbol for annuity?
Sometimes this makes me wonder about what u do for living xD do u spend all ur time on sophisticated maths research?
That’s what a bot does :)
Its from the Gamma function, the upside down L is I believe capital gamma
Hmmm that’s a creative way of thinking of it
I watched a whole play list on the gamma function and thats the only I remember 🤦🏽♂️
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7_F4P71E2E&list=PL2uXHjNuf12ZfzOl8JCJ7Uh9b9lpeAbVC
nvm I watched the first 2 vids only
In this video I introduce the Gamma Function.
For more videos on this topic, visit:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2uXHjNuf12ZfzOl8JCJ7Uh9b9lpeAbVC
You could have factorials without a gamma function though.
Uhhh help
Got this is the test today
Was only able to do problem 4
Could anyone help with the rest
@floral sky how would you approach these questions?
well, the first thing I would do is ask the examiner to check for a typo in Q1 😄
Why doesn't it just say x_1+...+x_n >= sqrt(n)
instead of x_1+...+x_n >= sqrt(k) for all k in [1,n] 🤔
then the first things I would do are:
try to apply Cauchy-Schwarz to Q1
draw a picture for Q2 (no idea what approach might work until I draw it....)
draw up a concrete example for Q3 (assigning all 7 students to some questions), trying to make the total number of questions as small as possible
Nice. Pigeonhole.
yeah Q3 almost certainly involves pigeonhole in some way...
For Q1 maybe it’s intentional. And then invoke AM-GM-HM.
hmm good point.........
😊
For the first one x_1+...+x_k ≥ sqrt(k) would probably make the most sense though
Q2 is actually pretty straightforward, just need to introduce one line and then it all comes together
Using QM≥AM I was able to get
$x_1²+...+x_n²≥1$ but it doesn't give much info
Acid
$\begin{aligned}
a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{k-1}&\ge \sqrt{k-1}\
a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{k-1}+a_k&\ge\sqrt{k}\
\therefore a_k&>\sqrt{k}-\sqrt{k-1}=\frac 1{\sqrt{k}+\sqrt{k-1}} > \frac 1{2\sqrt{k}}\
a_k^2&>\frac 1{4k}\
\sum_{k=1}^n a_k^2&>\frac 14 \left(1+\frac 12 +\frac 13+\cdots +\frac 1n\right)\end{aligned}$
AlexV
@main topaz @floral sky
👏 👏 👏
😊
aᵢ should read xᵢ
I think there is a typo ie x_n should read x_k.
For Q3 it appears that 7 questions should be sufficient
@main topaz @floral sky
There’s probably a more elegant solution using graph theory that can be used for the general case.
Interesting
😊
ah okay
you're on a roll! 😃
😊
Is it correct?
In this configuration, each question is answered by exactly 3 students, and each student answers exactly 3 questions.
hmmm interesting that the S-Q (Student-Question) matrix is symmetrical
yes, it's correct! Here's a proof that 7 is indeed the minimum number of questions:
@main topaz
Let n be the number of questions
Let r be the number of pairs (Q , P)
where Q is the question number
and P is the (unordered) pair of students who solved Q
For example, in your most recent picture,
r = 21
and the pairs (Q, P) are:
(1, (1,2)) , (1, (1,3)) , (1, (2,3)) ,
(2, (1,4)) , ... etc.
Each question is solved by at most 3 students,
so an upper bound on r is given by:
r <= (3C2) * n = 3n
However, the number of (unordered) pairs P is:
7C2 = 7*6/2 = 21
which acts as a lower bound for r, i.e.
r >= 21
But this means 3n >= 21
so n >= 7
intriguing....
😊
Very nice proof! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Yes it is indeed 😊
It's not my proof 😜
Whose proof is it?
It's given in the notes to a course by Yufei Zhao, so it is probably his/hers
I see. Nice.
An interesting follow-on question would be:
How many different ways are there to achieve this minimum?
@floral sky maybe you could host a tutorial session to go through the questions :)
eh, I don't really feel like it....... my energy is limited...........
Dragons have boundless energy :)
Bots have more, and they never get tired :D
👑👑
You guys should try the geometry q as well, it has a pretty neat solution
I drew this in the test 😂 that's all I got
How did you work it out?
Is that a trick question?
Because why not?
it's from real analysis
the proof is by contradiction
with the assumption that 1/2 > 0
But we know that 1 < -1/12 😄
robert g bartle
intro to real analysis
need some preceding theorems to show it
and definitions too
So you're trying to solve:
C_(k+1) - M*C_k = -R
for some constants M and R.
This is a linear first-order difference equation
The "standard" way to solve it is like this:
(It should remind you of the method of solving linear differential equations)
First we find the general solution for
C_(k+1) - M*C_k = 0
and then we find any particular solution for
C_(k+1) - M*C_k = -R
and then add them together.
So what is the solution for
C_(k+1) - M*C_k = 0 ?
Each successive term gets multiplied by M, so
C_k = M^k works. But wait, this first-order equation should have one arbitrary constant.... where is it....?
Ah, it's C_k = A * M^k for some arbitrary A
So now we just need a particular solution for
C_(k+1) - M*C_k = -R
C_k = {some constant} should work, and algebra gives:
C_k = R/(M-1)
Therefore the general solution of
C_(k+1) - M*C_k = -R
is
C_k = A * M^k + R/(M-1)
Now use your initial condition C_1 = C to find A. Then set C_(N+1)=0 and so on...
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Nice to see MDragon in professorial mode 😄
😄
For the general question, R is not a constant but a function of k.
Nice. You compiler that for your students?
Hahaha no, I found it randomly
@floral sky is a teacher?
No, I'm actually not. ~~ Just like Alex isn't actually a bot. ~~
Ah
So it’s similar to solving DEs
The method I used is the same as “unfolding” described in the paper.
Yeah. You might be interested in this: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/145523/links-between-difference-and-differential-equations
Nice to know that things are related 😊
Yeah 😊
Nice way to get an approximation for a loan repayment
Alternatively, for constant R case, the formula is just the reciprocal of the present value.
@floral sky
Unfolding :)
The cancellation is oddly satisfying 😄
Try it. It’s fun!
Here's a more direct approach.
Consider new loans Dₖ at end period k.
If no repayment up to period n+1, then
- the original loan compounds to C(1+𝛼)ⁿ
- each new loan compounds to Dₖ(1+𝛼)ⁿ⁻ᵏ.
Hence, total loan amount outstanding at start of period n+1 is:
Cₙ₊₁ = C(1+𝛼)ⁿ + ∑ₖ Dₖ(1+𝛼)ⁿ⁻ᵏ
However, if the new loans Dₖ are negative, i.e. they are repayments (Dₖ =-Rₖ ), then
Cₙ₊₁ = C(1+𝛼)ⁿ - ∑ₖ Rₖ(1+𝛼)ⁿ⁻ᵏ
which is the formula required. QED.
@floral sky
That's a neat explanation! 😃
😊
Thanks! Very kind of you to say so!
That made my day :)
@floral sky I wonder if they would accept that as an answer. It’s a STEP question 😄
I think they probably would. After all, they are looking for bright minds, and displaying original thinking would probably be a plus
😊😊😊
That made my week! :)
A bot displaying a set of emotions 🤔
Bots are very advanced now.
He gave it away many times.. That he isn't a bot ahhaa
Until this point ah Mr Alex
In order to pass the Turing test :)
is it generally acceptable to write $2^{1/4}$ as√√2 or $\sqrt{\sqrt{2}}$?
AlexV
I'm not sure about acceptable but I would write $2^{1/4}$ as $\sqrt{\sqrt{2}}$?
EminemSomething
Is anyone free enough to help me out with a math assignment
What sort of assignment?
university abstract algebra assignment
Sounds difficult
Awaiting @floral sky ‘s answer
Eh, I need to be up at 6:30am tomorrow and I really just want to have the rest of the evening to relax. But I'll point you in the right direction
It seems that your lecturer either hasn't explained the basic definitions of things, or (s)he hasn't given you basic examples of groups, fields etc. for you to see how they work.
For Q3, look at this pdf:
https://venhance.github.io/napkin/Napkin.pdf
and read the whole of Chapter 1, and also turn to chapter 5 just to check out the definition of "field" if you don't know it. (And I assume you are already familiar with the "determinant" of a matrix.) Then you should be able to understand what Q3 is asking, and if you understand it well, solving it should be easy
For Q4, here are some clarifications
T is a function that takes a coordinate (x,y) as an input and spits out another coordinate as an output
For example, if you give T the coordinate (1,2) as an input, then the output you get is (1-a,2-b)
i.e. T(1,2) = (1-a,2-b)
R is also a function that takes a coordinate (x,y) as an input and spits out another coordinate as an output
You are supposed to imagine all these coordinates as being plotted on the usual 2D plane with horizontal x-axis and vertical y-axis
For 4(a), T^(-1)RT is yet another such function. It is the function you get when you take (x,y), then apply T, then apply R, and then apply T-inverse. Your task in 4(a) is to describe the "rules" of this composite function T^(-1)RT. [It doesn't say whether you should describe it using an equation or using words, so you could probably get away with just doing it one way, but ideally you should be able to describe it both ways: equation or words.]
If you've understood everything up to here and you can solve 4(a), then you will understand what 4(b) and 4(c) are asking you to do (though solving (b) and (c) might take a while, because you need to work through the algebra)
Wow why so early?
eh, i'd rather not say publicly. Family stuff
I see. Ok.
Thought you need to get to work that early.
Interesting that venhance is an anagram of evanchen :)
THANK YOU SO MUCH
the thing about my lecturer is that although she's smart, she's not good at teaching and that makes it hard to pay attention to her. Also her work is messy and hard to follow, so her notes arent 100% useful
Q3 is a bit quick, show that the set is a subset, then show
- non empty
- closed
- has inverses
those questions are really interesting
@rancid schooner you should try them out
ah alright
i think ive got Q3
working on Q4 rn
A little off topic but why can't we integrate sin²x directly?
I'm still a bit stuck on 4a
I've understood how to upply R
But how would I apply T as a matrix
if one can, how?
||Using exponential form||
nvm i figured it out
but not using matrices, just by using equations in general
Nvm dumb question this was. Can just do it by breaking sin² using double angle, etc. I keep forgetting that there are no chain rules in integration
Double angle is the most common way that is taught to integrate sin^2
I see MDragon’s footprints around :)
I kinda get the formula but, by logic, for the probability that the car is behind door 1 when Monty reveals that the car is not behind door 2, isn't it 1/2 ? why 1/3? since there's no way that the car would be behind dr2 since he opened dr2 then it would just be either dr1 or 3
Anyone up?
Which book is this from?
Not a math book haha business analytics book 😂
Btw :)
Yes but what units do they use for gravity?
Haha why are you studying that? Which book? Anyway Monty Hall is pretty standard Bayesian probability.
You mean acceleration due to gravity?
Ya I dun get why not 1/2 :(
Yes
Inches per second per second 😂😂😂
32.17 ft/s*2
And why didn’t the SI people metricise time like what they did to everything else?
Wow you studied this?
Nah I just looked it up rn lol
I mean it is metricised to an extent, we have seconds and milliseconds
And everything smaller is metricised
But not kiloseconds or megaseconds
Fair
Why
Seconds in a day right
But wat so magical about ittt
Yes that’s why magical
HELP
Usually what kind of math interview questions will be asked
😭😭😭
Besides like "why do you choose this course"
Congratulations! Interview by which university?
Kinda private oops
But yeah any math related news lately 😭
I'm too occupied with other stuffs😭😭
Math sin π help 😭🙏
im gonna take a guess from here
i think they will give u a set of questions
and ask abt ur thought process as u try to solve it
this is based on cambridge interview btw
but i would also expect they ask u why u pick the major
omggggg
congrats db
That country hahaha
I dint apply to UK though, but since it's a zoom interview I doubt they will ask that
I saw Cambridge style is like sketch sinx/x hahaha
