#ug-maths-physics
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
Proof : a + b = b + a
If a + b = b + a
a+b = b + a
QED
@tawdry gull
looking at this makes the question sounds so easy
how did the hint help you?
Compute the first few values and find that they are the same as b_n.
same as in?
numerically equal
The πerrot
for n=1,2,3...
Oh I used a2 = 1 haha
a’n = bn 😄
haha
does that mean your proof is wrong or... it doesnt matter?
My proof should still be valid. Because in a proof you don't have to explain where you got your inspiration from.
haha i.e. you don't have to explain why you assumed b(n) = A b(n-1) + B b(n-2).
yes ofc haha
anyway from your earlier observation you can easily derive the same
how so?
$b_{n+2}\
=a_{n+1}-a_n\
= (4a_n-a_{n-1}) - (4a_{n-1}-a_{n-2})\
=4(a_n - a_{n-1}) - (a_{n-1}-a_{n-2})\
=4b_{n+1}-b_n$
AlexV
that couldve been much easier
😊
alright thanks a lot alex for the insights
credit transfer?
Exemptions
ah i see
What does φ : R -> R^2 mean
function that maps an input a real number to a vector with 2 components

Thanks
Gave +1 rep to The_Pierrot#7889
in a server we are usually not allowed to ping everyone but what if we ping @verbal nova ?
I get pinged lol
Shut ur normie ass
U havent done epsilon delta definition of limit
Go back to calc 1
🤓
I have Alex and Pierrot
@tawdry gull you should ask your lecturer this question: how can you tell if a recurrence relation can be expressed in linear form?
next time when i have the chance haha
I’ve already worked out the general case haha.
oh thats amazing
number theory is not my passion 😩
||b(n) = (c+2) b(n-1) - b(n-2)||
haha
😊
is this the solution or smth? haha
See above.
This is the solution haha.
Not difficult. Same method.
Have fun
Nice 👏🏻😄
||a(n) and b(n) are always of different parity||
||taking mod 2022 doesn’t alter parity||
I'm confused
||when one is odd the other is even||
Ah
Is this part of lectures on calculus or discrete maths?
Ok this makes a lot of sense
||Proper argument:
5x+1 changes the parity of x. And taking mod 2022 doesn’t change the parity. Since a1 and b1 are of different parity, and their parity changes for each increment, an and bn will always be of different parity and therefore cannot be equal.||
😊
Yeah this was the reasoning I was gonna go with after you explained the parity thing.
Thank you so much
😊
Wdym?
the subject for the question on recurrence
Not taught in lectures
But still have to do them
We were only taught abt sequences
But not solving recurrence in itself
So it’s all on us to study it
under which subject?
Honors calculus 1
Thats the only math class i have this semester
Others are just requirements
discrete maths in a future semester?
If i wanna take yes
recurrence relations is probably more discrete maths than calculus
It’s the convergence part that’s calculus
everything converges to calculus 😄
Do consider. Very interesting subject.
Will see
But maybe you’re more interested in continuous stuff haha.
Since you like difficult integrals.
difficult integrals... in discrete math? 😃
No.
Difficult integrals
In calculus
And maybe physics but physics is lazy as fuck with integrals
Will call everything trivial
i also prefer continuous to an extent
tho discrete math is sort of interesting
unlike abstract algebra 🤮
If you like both then you like concrete maths 😄
haha nice
there's a book with that title
@rancid schooner
what do you think?
the questions we did together are question 4 and optional question
Wow looks very professional! 👍🏻😄
Do they expect students to typeset homework beautifully in LaTeX like this?
0.2 points. Well every point counts :)
But it takes up a lot more time though
yeah
If it’s essay writing it’s understandable to require submission in typed up format in pdf rather than handwritten. But for maths homework it does take up a lot of time. TeX is primarily for writing papers, lecture notes, or maybe a special project.
Maybe you can find a software to convert handwriting to TeX :)
Anyway if I’m the lecturer I would use this as the sample solution for future students haha
hahaha i see
It wasnt in TeX?
?
So you use a clear square rather than a black square or halmos to indicate end of proof
Have used this for small equations, not sure how it'll hold for larger text
$\text {...end of proof.} \blacksquare$
AlexV
in the package
we are able to just simply write
\begin{proof}
...
\end{proof}
which will put the square automatically
Nice :)
That's quite convenient.
yes it is haha
What else does it do apart from adding the square?
it adds "Proof." when you do \begin{proof}
and ends with the square when you do \end{proof}
thats a comparison
nice
Uhhh I know this will be destroying the uni math tempo but a lil help with 8 and 10 would be appreciated
im particularly bad at this honestly
that's not typeset in TeX :)
not everything has to be in TeX :)
Me too :)
Where is this from?
Not sure a friend sent it to me
In q8, is it A?
Well tbh i just used a calculator 😅
...
Maybe pierrot or alex can check it out
For Q9, it's C, ie. 5.
Nice question.
Just find n where 12/(n+1) is an integer.
For Q8 the midpoint i.e. 108°, and deviations from it.
You mean 9?
Ye got that
Hmm will give this a go
Yes Q9 :)
You edited the wrong message lmao
It's correct now 😄
||It reduces to 2(cos 2𝜋/5 + cos 4𝜋/5)² = 2(-½)² = ½.||
I meant ur handwriting
Our sir is spending so much time explaining p -> q
He gave best example
If moon is made of green cheese, then I am richer than bill gates
We have an option to handwrite, type or use Latex here
I used to handwrite
But now I just solve it messily and then write it up in LaTeX
Because the LaTeX aesthetic is crazy good
So it's hard to go back to handwriting answers
What are the other questions?
Uhh dumb question but how did u get -½?
Because the sum of cos (2nπ/5) for n = 0 to 4 is zero. And cos θ = cos (-θ).
Consider the real part of the sum of the fifth roots of unity.
1 + cos(2π/5) + cos(4π/5) + cos(6π/5) + cos(8π/5) = 0.
But cos(8π/5) = cos(2π/5)
and cos(6π/5) = cos(4π/5).
So 1 + 2(cos(2π/5) + cos(4π/5) = 0
cos(2π/5) + cos(4π/5) = -1/2.
@swift zinc
i need some advice for c and d
a was fine i managed to get rref and set up free var
b i imagine was jus using the free variable to calculate values for f1 f2 f3
i hope so.
I'm ngl I haven't solved a question like this before lmao
Right
so for example: f1 + f2 = 20
cant tell what it wants with min and max flows
fuck sake
i wonder if a certain @tawdry gull would know
hes in uni tho
Let's start from A. If we assume all traffic flows along AB, the maximum value of f₁ would be 10 + 10 = 20. As a result, the minimum value of f₂ would be 0. This also means the minimum value of f₃ would be (20 + 5) - 20 = 5 and the maximum value of f₄ would be (15 + 15) - 5 = 25.
If we assume all traffic flows along AD instead, the maximum value of f₂ would be 10 + 10 = 20. As a result, the minimum value of f₁ would be 0. This also means the minimum value of f₄ would be (15 + 10) - 20 = 5 and the maximum value of f₃ would be (15 + 15) - 5 = 25.
Oh yeah forgot about that
Uh huh
Aight i think i get it
Interesting way of looking at it
Nah the first parts made sense
This textbook also mentioned those laws
It was jus getting the intuitive idea of c
@stuck rapids @swift zinc need to use matlab to confirm calculation that shows three vectors are in the span of R3
What would u do 
I could jus confirm what the rref is but not sure if thats acceptable
I haven't learnt MATLAB yet
There should be some tutorial online that'll give you an idea of how to do that question specifically
I could use it
But it comes down to whether my teacher will allow it
The hints they give for homeworks is horrid
Completely unhelpful
Are they even lecturers man
Idk doesn't sound like it
Or they're people getting 6 figures and couldn't be bothered helping students
Can you complain to higher up?
Lecturers earn so much?
Q7 can go fuck itself for the homework
@swift zinc i cba
@swift zinc got a q in vectors and matrices to balance a chemical equation
Bruv
I DIDNT TAKE CHEM IN IGCSE
What’s a question on chemistry doing in a maths course?
I'm so confused
I'm also confused how and why you would do that to yourself
everyone made it sound scary to naive hayzy back in the day
But what the fuck is chem doing here
It's IG, very little about it is not doable
Im doing the bonus problems to make up for it
Natural sciences shit no
Fuck the prof
Just make sure you have equal numbers of atoms on both sides
I also have to state what the each compound is
Google it
Na we make up for it with bonus problem 😎
Oxygen, carbon dioxide, iron oxide, sulfur dioxide, iron sulfide for a start
The organic I cbf
I wanted to do sth else with a saturday ngl…
C6H12O6 is glucose
Its only q 7 so
You've started very early for a Saturday man
I haven't moved out of my bed yet
Idk i cant sleep
But I'm 1h behind
Aww
Well I still woke up at 6 am like I would for work
The moment im outside
And then went back to sleep
Thats jus trauma
Ah fairs
Then I make it warmer and go sleep
Im lucky my roommate is sick
Noticed outside heaters werent working
Called maintenance 😎
So you changed your answer to yes after you thought about the gay
🥴
@stark wave btw do yk how to find the span of 3 vectors in matlab
Or somehow verify the calculations for it using matlab
Fuuuuuuck
I used to love these questions
They're so fun
MFER I HAVENT TAKEN CHEM
You don't need Chem💀
You just need to understand where the numbers go
Should make up for the last one 🙏
Might look this up later
Dk why its in lin algebra
It's just an application of augmented matrices, like here is another way to solve balancing equations that might be cool and useful for some of you
Can gib hint?
Send me the question and I'll be able to solve it I think
.
I need help with q2(d) and (e)
@swift zinc more chemistry for you.
@rancid schooner the new homework came out, it involves epsilon proofs
which im not sure if you like it or not haha
but its optional problem doesnt involve epsilon delta
Haha that’s quite dry
what can we do about it haha
i prefer doing analysis and algebra haha
heres the full course catalog for my uni @rancid schooner
u can freely take a look
my mom is telling me to go into computer science - data analysis since "it has lots of math" instead of majoring in math and cs
i need external opinions on this
what exactly is data analysis and what sort of math is involved?
i would say data science would involve more math, and its more in demand too
it involves lots of statistics surely
and some discrete math
but mostly statistics
especially when it comes to modelling data, finding general relationship etc
youll also learn to make algorithms, example is on data sorting
its almost a combination of cs + statistics
@long aurora
yep its basically this
thats almost exactly what im learning rn
i hope i describe it well 🙏
you did haha
theres also business domain knowledge that you learn with data science, coz businesses and industries are where you apply your data sci skills
i see
if youll do a double major in math and cs, youd probably learn math that wont be needed in cs
but ofc theres nothing wrong with it if u like it
yea but my parents are so against the idea
they think majoring in math would be useless and i would end up as a teacher
they want me to only study math that has practical applications
yea i try explaining
nope they didnt
they're deluding themselves into thinking im going to major in cs and get the bad
bag*
when i would rather choose math if i had to choose between it and cs
Just do what you enjoy
2343 looks interesting
You can easily get free credit for 3900. :)
I was planning to take that haha
But that is only for MATH students
Just fyi, first years do not get to pick their majors yet
So the earliest i could take it is when i have declared my major, which is next year
Just submit your ZNotes notes and videos. Instant credit 😄
Do the students use textbooks or just rely on lecture notes?
maths server be like
The last two look like y = sin(cos(eˣ)) and y = sin(sin(eˣ)). Very cool.
@tawdry gull is either Spivak or Apostol being used for Analysis?
for?
last time i used bartle's
What the fuck is the hkust disc serv lol
Prescribed text for analysis at university
??
Saadman sommow 💀
this is what they give for this course
and its just considered as additional reference
Nice
Interesting questions
The optional problem looks interesting
Looks like one of Ramanujan’s radical identities.
Thank Allah I took fmath
Looks difficult!
So am I 😄
hahaha
I luv my meth classes, but I hate hate discrete méthe
lol
It’s good to be discrete :)
Do u have weekly hws that are graded
@rancid schooner @tawdry gull would u guys proof by contra this one
Over to you @tawdry gull :)
FUCK
@swift zinc are my teachers braindead if they asked for matlab verification
For a fucking proof
They're really busting your ass huh
Yes
The => shud be easy, cuz each column adds up to 1
@rancid schooner can u try the optional problem in HW02?
looks difficult! will try when i have some time.
suree
∃x∃y(Love(x,y))
❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️
Have you done it? Quite interesting.
Haha yes
whats ur solution?
Haha will write it up neatly first
well i have done it using LaTeX haha
Haha I won’t look yet
How to solve part d?
Oh ma gawd
@rich wraith you were right!
I was confused why... v (¬p v q) opened to... v ¬p v q but realized its the assossicative law
@rich wraith thanks, idk why u deleted it tho
Gave +1 rep to Dysto#3930
I thought I made a mistake lol
@swift zinc day 50 of ranting about my shitty maths teachers
These fuckers left a note saying hint: (insert matlab func) and for some reason thats meant to mean USE THIS FUNC OR YOU LOSE A FUCKING MARK
what can be done
Whichever dumb cunt made this course should reconsider teaching maths and quit
Nothing i cry for a few mins then i try not to be dumb again
sometimes life is like that
Suck my dick
yeah that's quite obvious tbh
Nice. Continued fractions 😄
Try doing them if ure interested
what does the highlighted sentence mean?
discrete math
Fuck
Istg
If I have this
And I haven't studied it
I'm failing Discrete math this sem
nah its alright, mostly
bruh wtf have you done so far
"i am gay" becomes "i am not gay"
"not" precedes (is behind) the predicate
LOL
The meaning is not the same though
it's what they mean abt negation right?
It says transform so they want you to move the negation sign elsewhere but without changing the meaning. Or so that’s what it seems.
hmm i see
Maybe you could use De Morgan’s Laws for the first one.
Speaking my language now
So that just means that we have to negate the whole statement
Everyone is good
AxG(x)
~AxG(x)
Ex~G(x)
Some people are not good
I wonder how I could get the present value for this (problem revolves around annuity):
If money is worth 12% compounded quarterly, what is (a) the present value and (b) the amount of annuity of ₱4,332.50 payable at the end of each 3 months for 3 years and 6 months?
Go fuck yourself
You dumb piece of shit
How dare you integrate the summation symbol
What’s that currency symbol?
philippine peso
I love filipino rupee
It’s a geometric series with n = 42, R = 1/(1+r/4)
This is where the fun begins
Could you guys do this and show me your answer? Test is already over so no need to worry about me cheating
Well i) should jus be
Wait
Im gonna cry nvm i forgot all of this
(i) ||∀x(P(x)→Q(x))|| ? And for (ii) just put a ¬ in front of (i)?
I am having a hard time translating sentences into logical propositions
specifically if a proposition is (p -> q) or (p * q)
anyone got any tips or resources to understand this?
0.0 you're correct
my dumbass did (ii) and (iii) together in (ii) 
This is what I wrote on q3 hahhaa but I changed it last minute
I am probably fucked
I missed out the Ex at the left
I did this when there is 5 minutes left on the clock
😊
for any science nerds here (i assume this is a good place), there's a board game called search for planet X and it is absolutely fucking amazing, buy it if you see it!!
or find someone who has it
its probably the best game ive ever played
The option part is very interesting
Looks very theoretical 😄
Try out question 2
“Evil? :)” 😄
try it out haha
“Extended squeeze theorem”
u wanna tussle?
maybe πerrot can do a study session
@tawdry gull did you enjoy the one on continued fractions?
Interesting question with a neat answer. Let me know if the solution looks right.
😊
Thanks! Very kind of you. That made my day. 😊
Gave +1 rep to The_Pierrot#7889
🙏
Haha if you read carefully I said the answer (meaning the final value) is neat, not the solution (which refers to the how the answer is derived) :)
Fair fair
ya @little widget u dumbass
Go thirst over unattainable women
Burger flipper
hey at least i got women
So pro!
Help needed <@&597104882482413589>
hihihi can i ask does the inverse of this function exists?? cause if we combine 1/x and x into a single graph it doesn't exists however if we separate 1/x and x it exists
i need help plsss
this is calculus 1
this is what I got for f inv (x)
when x is greater than 2 any single input maps to 2 outputs so it cannot be a function
I think another way to do it is to state that f(x) is a many to one function in that domain so an inverse, which will be one to many, cannot exist (unless maybe the domain is restricted)
ohhhh! so my other assumption is correct
so when there’s a piecewise function , it needs to look at both f(x) function together right
Piecewise is when you eat a whole cake by yourself, one piece at a time
@rancid schooner curious to know what alternative approach u have for part b :)
This was the ans:
Wow a rare DQ appears after long absence
i seee
reads q “ this looks straightforward” reads sol
no alternative approach but perhaps solving it backwards would be clearer :)
hmm why did you move the (1+X) to the RHS?
Just to show what the inverse is
so the inverse can't be zero coz of the I term or?
oh nvm i think i kinda get it but also konfius :')
Yes
also is there way to prove that a matrix with its # of rows greater than # of columns multiplied with another matrix with its # of columns greater than # of rows doesn't give an identity matrix?
my lecturer pointed it out in class but idk how to prove it :(
as in the first one has to be a "tall" matrix multiplied with a second "long" matrix on the right
like [3x1 matrix][1x3] matrix etc
yes the dimension of the product can be determined easily by cancelling, e.g.
(axb)(bxc) = (axc)
what if it's mxn and nxm where n<m
how to prove that this doesn't give an identity matrix for all n and m
hmmm if AB=I, then I⁻¹ = (AB)⁻¹ = B⁻¹A⁻¹, which is not possible, so AB≠I. ?
nani
as in non-square matrices have no inverse?
Not a true inverse. ||But there’s the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse.||
yes because you can just let the last (n-m) columns of A be zero etc
is this a valid "proof"?
nice diagram
XD
B should be A transpose for the ones to be on the diagonal
idk other matrices which will produce the same effect
proof idea yes
wdym by perpendicular?
their dot products being 0
like relate it to dot product or something?
yeah exactly
hmm then what about the 1 ?
dotting each row with each column
the unit vector dotted with itself
i think this only works for if B = A transpose tho
ah i think it makes sense haha still tryna digest it :")
so each row must be the same vector as the column right for the dot product to be 1
can't visualize this T-T
then does the last n-m rows of B be zero as well
yeah so if u.u = 1 but u. (any other vector in our matrix) = 0
I don't even know if i'm right💀
makes sense to me hahaha
if they are zero the last elements on the diagonal will be 0 so no identity matrix
Consider the product of two square matrices S and T (pxp) which are inverses of each other, i.e. ST = I.
Stretch S to the right adding q new columns of zeros to create S' (px(p+k)).
Stretch T to downwards by adding q new rows (not necesarily zeros) to create T' ((p+k)xp).
Then S'T' gives I (pxp) because it is effectively ST.
not necessarily. the zero columns in the first matrix will take care of that.
can it be the other way around
like the first one doesn't have to be column of zeros but the second one has to be
I don't think so but i cant exactly get why
yes that's also possible
this method might be helpful in visualizing the other case as well.
start with two mxm matrices which are inverses of each other. then shrink insteadf of stretch.
so either row of zeros or column of zeros are fine?
I'll slowly think about this haha thanks :')
Gave +1 rep to AlexV#1811
I can't prove Cramer's Rule and I'm struggling like shit :')
yes. try it and see.
good luck! 😊
Bonjour
remember me?
cramer's rule is just instant gauss-jordan :)
Coz i dumb :(
i couldn't even visualize part a until i see the solution :')
haven't seen the solution for part b yet tho
yes you're Brave
got into uni?
got into but can't get out :')
the only way out is dropping out at this point😭
Part (c) is easy. Just divide both sides by det(A) and make xⱼthe subject :)
Linear algebra 😭
is there a formal proof to show this ?
even tho i like the intuitive explanation
I DYING SIS :')
@rancid schooner btw u can try this if u wanna haha i gave up :')
haha ok when i have some time.
try sketching the structure of the matrices - it might help visualization.
or use a small matrix as a numerical example.
sketched but still clueless af :')
Dude i fucking hate it
@rancid schooner in your opinion is it enough that i jus put the In and the identity matrix together in a matrix to show its inverse
or since thats just a method to compute an inverse it wont work?
cuz thats the easiest thing i can think of
one lined proof
Just multiply with itself?
plz help, how do I translate (a) into a logical statement?
Can the "No visitor from Canada is from Asia" be ∀x ~(C(x) -> A(x))
Nah the trick u use where u put it in matrix form side by side
And u do ERO on LHS until it becomes identity matrix
let C be the set of visitors from Canada
let A be people from Asia
for all c in C, then c is not in A
or simple
c in C => c not in A
Hi math senpais how to prove part (b)? Idk what method to use :(
Hint: The reciprocal of an irrational number is also an irrational number.
Shd we use direct or indirect proof?
Start with the “fact” provided in the question
i see, thanks
Gave +1 rep to The_Pierrot#7889
I hate discrete meth
discrete methametics
ye but there is no way to express an irrational number tho, so just use an arbitrary variable or something?
But isn't the fact something like the negation of the statement tho
I can't both :')
Please share your solution
Should I do like let the irrational number be t or something 😭
Can't solve that's why I'm asking 🥲
||Let a be a rational number and r an irrational number then:
a=a * r * 1/r
To prove a * r is irrational
a * r=c
r=c/a
Since a is rational c needs to be irrational for r to be irrational.
Therefore a * r is irrational
To prove 1/r is irrational
r=1/1/r
Since r is irrational and 1 is rational 1/r needs to be irrational.||
?
Can be any variable. As long as it’s a rational choice. 😄
So acid's solution works?
I spent whole day failing at doing math proofs and the exam is on Fri 😞😞
Start with the hint in the question. Then multiply both sides by the inverse of the irrational number that is multiplied with the rational number.
if x is rational, let x=p/q (assume p and q are coprime), then p/q = p/r * r/q where r is irrational
note that r wont ever be 0 in the first place since r is irrational (0 is rational)
Is there more to the proof? Looks like it's done right? 🥲
Then just say since product of non zero rational number with an irrational number is irrational, so quotient of an irrational number with a rational number is irrational, so r/q is irrational?
Like what the hint said ?
Then wb for p/r tho
also irrational la
integer divide by irrational is irrational
So from here say reciprocal of irrational is irrational?
If I write this in my proof it's ok right?
yeah u can write that just to be safe
but even without it is also oke 👍
cuz reader shud alrdy understand
Ok thanks 😭
Gave +1 rep to The_Pierrot#7889
okei
u dont have to use the hint is also okay u kno
Any alternatives tho :')
oh wait nvm
the one in the question is a fact that u can use without proof, but at the same time it serves as a hint
the rational*irrational thing
i like to imagine it as storytelling
when u do story telling, it has to be clear, make sense, and understandable
but this is maths, so add a few more
in proofs, u need to have those, but it also needs to be logically sound
So let qr = p,
q is rational,
the other 2 are irrational,
Then q = p/r = p × 1/r ?
every statement should be precisely defined or logically sound
Yea but quite hard to tell which method to use for which q :(
method to prove?
try to start by thinking of examples first
for example, ur question
try to think of two irrational numbers, that when u multiply become rational
Hmm so is this logically sound 😭
I rlly can't tell :(
Lol this one came out in finals :')
well what can u conclude from this?
Yes
huh, for all integers a,b?
I didn't translate wrong right :')
same paper :)
this one isnt so bad i think
since n is composite, let n=mp (all are positive integers)
let p be such that p<=m
then we have $\sqrt{n}=\sqrt{mp}=\sqrt{m}\sqrt{p}\geq\sqrt{m}\sqrt{m}=m$
Solution they gave was q long :')
Oh :(
let p be such that $p\geq m$
then we have $\sqrt{n}=\sqrt{mp}=\sqrt{m}\sqrt{p}\geq\sqrt{m}\sqrt{m}=m$
there u go
The πerrot
too many typo 😔
Oh wait just like that ah
bruh
Wanna see? 
sure HAHAHA
i mean... this makes sense too
Hmm but for this there is also the possibility that n=m² right
^Then this one is obvious
Basically either n=pm or n=m² right, no other cases?
thats why p>=m
p can be equal to m
also since n is composite, we can choose both p and m to be >1
(otherwise it would be prime since prime can only be divided by itself and 1)
Ye haha idk how to prove the sqrt n part :')
yes hahaha i meant idk how to prove that part before ur solution XD
@rancid schooner sorry i know this has been posted q awhile but could u explain the "equivalent when swapped" part? :')
Oh nvm I get it now 
😊
Can I ask if my solution is doable or nah? I got stuck :’)
Looks ok
How to proceed?
Can someone pls explain c to me 😔
I really can't understand what it's saying
Plug the answer into RHS and show that it equals LHS 😄
How to plug 😭
Just like the cube roots of unity
Substitute 😄
A^T = B
Well it doesn’t prove that it is the only answer. But it does prove that it is one of the answers. 😄
So, if 𝜔 is the m-th root of unity, then A =𝜔I could be a possible solution.
Shit I forgot my complex 😔
Got a more basic solution? Coz imma basic bish 
But this is the most convenient solution :)
I don't understand :(
So A is ω x identity where ω is a scalar?
oh wait. my solution gives A^m = I, not 0.
I don't even understand the question🥲
ok I think I've got the answer.
A is the mxm matrix with upper right triangular elements equal to 1 and other elements zero.
So, for example, for m=4, it would be
A = A² =
0 1 1 1 0 0 1 2
0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A³ = A⁴ =
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0``````
hint would be a matrix with det=0
both
well in the question it is power (question doesn't state dimension) but in your answer you should specify A as an mxm matrix
Oddly satisfying 😄
How to come up with this kind of intuition 😭
I would have never thought of that 😔
😊
It would be clearer to first show what the element c_ij is, where C = AA^T. Then sum c_ii for i = 1 to m.
Hmm as in before the summation?
For this one is true right, how to justify tho :')
Srry for spamming lmao my midterms r tmr
Separately
Use induction. And the fact that (AB)^T = B^T A^T
Ah shite
Ok thanks :')
Gave +1 rep to AlexV#1811
My last min saviour 😩🙏
😊
Since this is trace and we can do air ajr right, but if it's matrix multiplication instead of trace we can't do airajr, but have to do airarj coz the # of columns of the first matrix has to match the rows of the second one?
14 & 16🥺
14 is if C is invertible then C can be expressed as a product of elementary matrices?
it's the trace of the product, which is a square matrix, even though A is not square
Which corresponds to elementary row operations that brings A to RREF?
Idk abt 16a) tho :')
Is it bc it's square then we can switch to from rj to jr?
it's because of the transpose
a' is an element in A^T
Ye but I thought like the column of the first one has to always match the row of the second one :")
see the diagram
Same logic as this?
Not me violating my uni's intellectual property pls dun sue me 🥺
well it's more straightforward but similar
anyway gtg soon
good luck with your exam!
Thankiew😭
Stuck 😞
Omg step lecturer help im stuck
Man why the fuck is 14 even a proof
Fucking bullshit ITS OBVIOUS IF U TAKE A TRANSFORMATION THEN U TAKE ITS INVERSE YOU JUS GO BACK TO THE SAME PLACE AKA THE IDENTITY MATRIX WHICH IS IN RREF
Lecture: teaches row swap
Exam: asks to prove column swap
I can rot :')
4 marks GONE
@rancid schooner or any math gods? 🥺
Nice question though. It’s about divisibility by 11 and by 3
Adding both gives sum of digits of n which is divisible by 3 if n is divisible by 3, since 10^m = 1 mod 3.
Subtracting gives +/- alternating sign sum of digits which is divisible by 11 if n is divisible by 11, since 10^m = (-1)^m mod 11.
So if
a = sum of odd digits
b = sun of even digits
(counting from LSD)
then we want
a+b = 3s
a-b = 11r
where r and a are integers.
Solving gives
a = 1.5s + 5.5r
b = 1.5s - 5.5r.
Yea so how to make use of this to get some expression divisible by 33?
If it’s divisible by 3 and also divisible by 11, then it must be divisible by 33.
So how to proceed from here ah :(
See explanation above
Ye but so far my expression no 11 :(
I thought of this too but idk how to make use of the r
If n is divisible by 33, then it must be divisible by 3 as well as by 11.
For n to be divisible by 3, a+b = 3s
For n to be divisible by 11, a-b = 11r.
(see earlier posts for definitions and details).
Solving gives a = 1.5s + 5.5r, b = 1.5s - 5.5r.
Interesting! It’s the ham sandwich problem. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ham_sandwich_theorem
In mathematical measure theory, for every positive integer n the ham sandwich theorem states that given n measurable "objects" in n-dimensional Euclidean space, it is possible to divide each one of them in half (with respect to their measure, e.g. volume) with a single (n − 1)-dimensional hyperplane. This is even possible if the objects overlap....
Or is it called the char siu bao problem in HK? 😄
who knows 😂
Now I feel like having a ham sandwich and a char siu bao.
Sorry for the late reply but I asked my lect :')
And umm
I failed my discrete math test
If I can't do math proofs
Am I even well suited to study math
😭
It’s ok, you’ll do better next time
Was that the correct answer?
yeah something along those lines
this @anyone ?
Or maybe they didn’t teach it well
Idk everyone couldn't do like one q, some can't do 2 but at least they wrote something
I couldnt do 3
And 2 i left completely blank :') the other one my solution was shit :')
can someone use the most simple explanation to define span (in linear algebra)
perhaps with examples?
Help needed <@&597104882482413589>
i think ur well suited, but just not well adapted yet
i just cant understand that term.
the locations where u can reach using the given vectors
what locations?
points in the space
space as in real numbers?
space as in coordinates ofc
examples i have two vectors (1,0) and (0,1)
then i am able to touch (3,2)
cuz 3(1,0) + 2(0,1)=(3,2)
Gave +1 rep to The_Pierrot#7889
okii
Nice explanation
but i failed my proof mod :')
which is the ESSENCE of math :')
why y'all so sure hahah :')
mod = module?
The set of vectors you can represent as linear combinations of the span/basis vectors
Proofs can go suck my ass
ye
i always hated stats but i'm thinking to specialize in stats if stats has less proving :')
well it is ur first time too
yeah it has less proving, doesnt mean theres completely none tho
and i'm failing
on top of that we have uselsss mods like eThICs
and a connect4 python project
i'm dying
everyone i know i s
how's meth life in hkust hahaha
cuz they probably have a background in proofs
its just fine ofc
coz u pro :D
Sis u r well suited
All three of you can do a study session here. And anyone else.
i failed my math mod :')
how u so sure sis :")
U have passion for it + u have always been a smartieee
I think u haven't adapted to it yet la..
But this is just the first sem la... Usually it is the phase where u r getting used to the pace and all
the worst part is that mod is prerequisite for other future mods so my math is just gonna get worse and worse if i don't get my foundations right :")
how hard is the maths in ur uni? out of 10 in ur opinion
somewhere between 8 or 9
depends on the mod actually
tbh it would be more managable if we didnt have to take a bunch of shitty mods that has nothing to do w our major
like cs or the programming one right
something wrong haihhh wtf
python connect 4 :)
Do they have tutorials or small group study sessions?
yea for math but it's not vv helpful
i only like the calc one hahahaha coz he's malaysian :)
and he gives supplement notes :)
i like my calc lecturer the best also HAHAHA
then calc da best xD?
yeah more manageable relative to other mods
but shit mods are making me falling behind in everything
why tf would u want a math major to study uTiLiTaRiAnIsM
yeah idm if it's pass fail but it's graded
University graduates are supposed to have a world view.
sucks the joy in learning innit
That’s life
tf is this utilitbiqkqkq
yeah life sucks
It says just be happy
how did our genius bot survive uni
