#A little project im working on :3
152 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Those are just particles!
It’s just done with a single resource pack
ah thats very clever
The caustics are a single texture, and the rays are a single texture
are there no core shaders at all here?
Probably. I’m using a custom version of VFX+ for the polytone stuff
The textures are for this project though
And almost everything I show here is custom/has been updated since the screenshot has been taken
are the caustics animated?
Yes!
I have a video of it
I will try and find it
Reminds me a lot of Actions & Stuff
it...is
Oh damn!
I’ve been porting it privately to Java myself, but only the textures for now
oh nice
How does this work legally since Actions & Stuff is a paid product?
Hey if you want a video editor to make a trailer for the modpack I would be down (:
its a private project
hm
can you show me what youve done in the past
Sure I do have a 1 min preview of how far I can push my editing skills for a single video, give me a second to find it
if its compatible with flashback thats 50% of the road
if its not replay mod still exists
It’s not
compare before and afters too.
Wdym
like TNT explosions without the modpack and with the modpack etc
Why would a trailer be needed for something that isn’t releasing?
oh intresting
I never said it was needed Cade.
Let me rephrase sorry. What would the purpose of a trailer be for a project that wouldn’t be released?
Not trying to be rude or harsh, I’m genuinely curious
this ^ and taking your point cade, sapling {HMI mod maker} shouldnt have released his mod
…what?
Not following sorry
What does sapling have to do with anything
he is saying your project wouldnt be releasd for "legal" reasons no?
It won’t
Crimpy said it’s a private project, which is what I’m going off of
So I was curious what a trailer would be for its private
None of the assets are mine. I legally cannot release it
ah- now it makes sense.
It’s a port. Not a loose recreation
It honestly feels kinda misleading/bad to say “a port of something LOTS of people want” and then reveal that people wont ever be able to try it
Or just generally showcase it in this channel
Of something. That lots of people want
I never said “the port of actions and stuff THAT EVERYONE HERE CAN ENJOY AND USE RIGHT NOW”. THAT would be misleading
I know but showcasing something that “people REALLY want” and then learning it won’t ever be released is kind of mean, no? Like it’s teasing something that people want and won’t be able to get
Exactly
Misleading was the wrong word, sorry. Mean is a better descriptor
I’d be curious to ask a mod if it’s ok to promote illegal work being shared. Because I don’t know how else you’d interpret what you just said as “I’m not going to be posting a download publicly, but will still be sending it to others” which is still distributing something illegal
But it’s a community project. To get it, you have to contribute to the project (not with money. Idk why people jump to that conclusion. Contribute skills and knowledge). And must have already purchased actions and stuff. If you fit that criteria, you can get it. Otherwise, it’s private and you will not receive it. I’m not just giving out a paid product for free
I see, this is definitely a slippery slope to be posting in a showcase channel when the marketplace is usually extremely strict on enforcing using paid product assets
So is the project in affiliation with Oreville Studios or is it just something for yourself? I’m not understanding the mentions of “making a trailer” and “A port of something LOTS of people want” if it’s just for private use
there was a conversation right above your message about that haha. The art assets were illegally acquired, so it's not in affiliation
and yes I also feel like its very icky to say "lots of people want this" and showing it off when it will be for private use
i didnt bring up the trailer
"illegally aquired"
?
its a product I paid for
i paid for a file. who is stopping me from opening said file that i spent money on and doing whatever i want with the contents of said file
To my knowledge Microsoft/Bedrock encrypts addon assets so they cannot be modified or used outside of the game. You bought the product in the game and can use it in-game, but you don't own the rights to the assets which is why they're encrypted
I'm talking about legally 😅 like legally that is what you agreed to when buying the addon. Encryption is just backing up the fact that they don't want you to do this
as i said
i paid for a file
john microsoft isnt going to show up at my door because of a file i paid for and downloaded onto my pc, and opened it up
I agree they will most likely not care, I never said they'd hunt you down or anything lol. Just that with the terms and service you did not "pay for a file" and "can use that file because I paid for it". You paid for a product that can be used in the context of the game you bought it in. If they didn't care about you modifying or looking at the files they wouldn't have encrypted them
Obviously they do not care unless you're distributing it, which you've said it will be private, but that raises the same thought that me and the other person shared with the rest of their point that the way you showcased and phrased this for a "private project" is kinda icky
im going to buy a tshirt. and cut it up and resew it into 20 mini tshirts. then im going to give away the mini tshirts to people who already bought their own tshirts. will the clothing brand care that i did this?
I'm not following haha. Clothing and a something you agree to a terms and service stating what it can or can't be used for are completely different products
Like buying clothes and a product online (which has a TOS) are not really the same thing at all and comparable
or TOS might not be the correct word? License maybe?
how about instead of giving it out (to people who purchased this product) i will just go to those people and teach them how to do everything I did, 1:1, so that i dont distrubute anything :3. they would be doing it themselves wouldnt they?
I guess so? It feels like you're just moving the goal post with your points to make it "okay". In reality I don't really care what you do. I'm just stating along with the other person that how you showcased publicly and phrased this was icky if it was going to be a private project
I only bring up the distribution and illegalness of that in response to you giving examples of what is legal, and me correcting you that it is not. I more so just care about the subjective aspect that you showcasing this here was a bit weird, and it's not just me who feels that way as the other person also brought that up. Then the trailer guy also assumed it would be public with your phrasing (hence why he offered to make a trailer), further showing that it was phrased and showcased in a way that would make people assume this was public
you dont care what i do? because youve been talking here all day about how every step i take and every word i say is wrong. im allowed to show a project, no matter whos going to get it, no matter what the availability of it when its complete. Youre so caught up in the fact that its private, when, had i not shown pictures in the first place, no one would have gotten it anyways. nothing changed. no one is affected by this at all, except you apperently
yep! You're allowed to show it, I never said otherwise like I don't think it's against the rules or anything. In the same way I can still state I think subjectively that's icky to do 😝
I know this is silly to say, but the only times I say "every step and word you say is wrong" is when it is wrong XD. The amount of times I'm doing that isn't intentional or something I can control, if that makes sense. I admitted to the parts where I was wrong and have been trying to correct myself, as I'm definitely not always right nor know all of Microsoft's TOS lmao. Just each time I've noticed something was wrong I've pointed it out or asked further
no one is affected by this at all, except you apperently
Also once again, someone else pointed this out too so it wasn't just me
that its private, when, had i not shown pictures in the first place, no one would have gotten it anyways.
Yep! Exactly. I think if it's a private project you should make sure to state that clearly as no one else is getting it haha. That's exactly my line of thought, and once again this is completely subjective. You're free to do as you want in the same way I'm just voicing my thoughts here on it. Two other people and myself were confused by your initial phrasing making it sound like it would be public
you dont care what i do? because youve been talking here all day
I can back off if you'd prefer, I've been in and out of the house for most of the day and just responding when I have a bit of free time. I really like the addon on bedrock which is why I tuned into the thread in the first place, and have just been adding my thoughts as you respond and other people do too
License is the tricky part, since you don't actually own your copy; you're just allowed to use it in certain limited contexts.
if buying something isnt owning, then im not stealing
The problem is, it's more like renting than buying.
Most licenses, from what I understand, say that they still own it; you're just allowed to use it. It's a particularly fancy piece of hair-splitting that lets them maintain control over their product while making sure you can't distribute it or resell it. Oh, and they can charge you money for it too. I forgot to write that part down at first.
I agree it's not a nice strategy; I'm just saying what I understand the rules to be.
i do have a reason to be making this
a reason more in depth than "java good, bedrock bad"
ill talk about it tmrw tho its too late for this
yep you are right
ok cade
Maybe a better comparison is you can buy an iphone or a switch, but it's still illegal to brick/jailbreak them and look at/modify the files. As you agreed to not do that when buying them
Do people do it anyway? Yeah they do, and the vast majority of people don't get in trouble or anything. Just wanting to clarify what is considered legal or not legal like Startravel pointed out
Doesn’t really answer my question. You didn’t bring it up, but you were mentioning how you already had an idea in mind for creating a trailer
I honestly don’t care about it being a private project or not, but the allusions to a future release and/or distribution is weird to me.
I just wanted to say; I’ve appreciated watching a calm and civil discussion between people who don’t agree. It’s a rarity, so it’s nice to see here!
Actually jailbreaking an iPhone is perfectly legal (at least where I live, Australia, there was a court case on this)
you are buying the resource pack for your own use, you wouldn't expect buying a movie to mean that you can use clips from it in your own work, this is the same.
jailbreaking has been legal in the US since 2010. where people get in trouble with it is software piracy (which is a whole other can of worms)
Oh! I was wrong then and that was a bad analogy to give
you didn’t buy the file, you bought a license to use the file in certain restricted ways. you’re not stealing, you’re violating a license.
personally idgaf and while i always pay for software and never violate any EULAs, i think piracy is cool and i like people who pirate things
but like. don’t try to say that what you’re doing isn’t illegal because it’s clearly and plainly illegal. framing it like “i own the file and so i should be able to open the file and do whatever i want with it” is a little disingenuous. you already agreed to the terms of the license before you bought the license. if you were actually buying the file, it’d need to cost a lot more money to cover the development costs.
I'd disagree there; I think piracy is, honestly, violating the rights of the people who created it. They created it, they can choose what to charge for it (with the exception of things like GPL et al.). Even if I don't like them, I don't get the right to disregard their rights. If I did, how would I be justified in complaining if someone did the same to something of mine? Also, as you said, it's illegal.
What if you own a bedrock addon on the marketplace and you wanted to look at its files so you get it cracked?
this is such a contrived situation 😭
I concur; also, in this situation, wouldn't you be able to access its files legitimately, if you own it? After all, you'd be the one who created it!
No I meant what if you bought an addon on the marketplace
is this one of those situations in which the programmer doesn’t have to include the copyrighted assets, they can instead simply detect if the assets are installed on the user’s computer and work with them from there?
or would that too be distributing something that violates the marketplace EULA? I don’t know anything about it
it probably would still not be allowed under
Minecraft Usage Guidelines
The mod cannot be used to directly or indirectly verify whether a player owns or has access to out-of-game content, products, or services that affect in-game features and functions
Microsoft Services Agreement
(3.a.vi) This one probably doesn't directly affect this, included for thoroughness
Don’t circumvent any restrictions on access to, usage, or availability of the Services
(8.b.ii) Directly disallows current implementation in, probably applies to proposed solution (both parts dependent on copywrite law; this does not fall under fair use from my understanding)
disassemble, decompile, decrypt, hack, emulate, exploit, or reverse engineer any software or other aspect of the Services that is included in or accessible through the Services, except and only to the extent that the applicable copyright law expressly permits doing so```
I wasn't able to find any EULA specifically for the Minecraft DLC Marketplace that would change these
disclaimer: not a lawyer
it probably would still not be allowed under
Minecraft Usage Guidelines
The mod cannot be used to directly or indirectly verify whether a player owns or has access to out-of-game content, products, or services that affect in-game features and functions
they add this in the next paragraph:
For example, a mod that directly or indirectly checks a player owns an NFT to unlock skins, functions, or other in-game experiences is not ok with us.
so my personal opinion is that this clause is meant to disallow people from adding microtransactions to their mods (which a few modders already do). however, I still agree with your interpretation.
the next two clauses you mentioned are pretty clear 👍
Everyone’s so concerned about the legality of a project they’re not going to get
Lmao
I don't really care if you do it, I'm just not sure about posting publicly about blatantly breaking the services agreement
please don’t admit to breaking the law on the internet
Name every person that this effects.
*affects
affect: a noun that means emotional state, and a verb that means “influence”
effect: a noun that means a result or a consequence, and a verb that means “create as an effect”
you’re breaking the law, the morality of what you’re doing doesn’t really matter
do you think that we don’t allow discussion of cheats on this discord server because everyone has a moral objection to hacking the game?
🤷♂️
Whatever
I’ll take the post down then
You all would rather sit in a circle and talk about how bad I am but don’t actually do anything
-# I might argue that, by breaking the law here, you're affecting the rest of the server; if people break the law here too much, the server will end up getting disbanded by Discord. Thus, one would be causing negative consequences to all of us here. That's just something I could argue, though I wouldn't actually do so because I think it's a tenuous argument that could lead to trouble.
Okay Thomas