$20 (Deadline: Friday, June 7th) - Fix https://github.com/SniffVillage/Bren for multiplayer
#CLOSED - $20 (Deadline: Friday, June 7th) - Fix Bren's reload for multiplayer
leaden sonnet
sweet drum
would be better to put the link in your message instead of in the title
leaden sonnet
$20 (Deadline: Friday, June 7th) - Fix Bren's reload for multiplayer
gleaming rivet
This will be ran on a private server only, and not redistributed.
That is not a valid attempt to bypass a license
Especially since it's ARR
Unless SniffVillage has explicitly stated that this is okay
sweet drum
> This will be ran on a private server only, and not redistributed.
That is not ...
technically since it is public on GH you have the right to just fork it
but yeah redistribution is not allowed so then they'll need to build it
gleaming rivet
technically since it is public on GH you have the right to just fork it
but yeah...
From my understanding, not really?
You would fork it to contribute back to the project, not for your own needs
Feel free to correct that statement
sweet drum
From my understanding, not really?
You would fork it to contribute back to the p...
i mean you can easily open a PR with "support for 1.20.6", so what do you mean ?
(aka what you just said makes no sense ?)
sweet drum
From my understanding, not really?
You would fork it to contribute back to the p...
anyway this apply
no matter what the licenser say, if they put it on GitHub in a public repo, you have the rights to fork and the licenser can cope with it (from what i understand)
(this is part of the GitHub ToS that they accepted without reading)
gleaming rivet
Okay then
sweet drum
anyway
to go back to the point of the issue it sure needs some work to be ported to 1.20.6 due to the changes in networking
wait for what version do you want it ?
oh so you mean it just work in solo but it doesn't sync properly
yeah it's gonna be quite bad to try to debug and fix...
unless you really really want that mod, you can look into these
honestly you should just look into this then
https://modrinth.com/mods?q=gun&g=categories%3A'fabric'&v=1.20.1&s=downloads
echo quarry
I managed to get it working on a server. I just want to be sure I wouldn't break any rules or whatever giving the code/jar to someone else
sweet drum
the solution probably isn't to remove the line, but to separate client and server 1st and then to adjust them to sync
sweet drum
I managed to get it working on a server. I just want to be sure I wouldn't break...
fork the repo on GH and push the commits that change the code
echo quarry
yeah reloading works
echo quarry
fork the repo on GH and push the commits that change the code
alright will do thanks
I just moved a few lines of code from common to client to not crash servers
so it most likely isn't fixed
sweet drum
alright will do thanks
btw if you enable GH actions and add this file to the repo
https://github.com/FabricMC/fabric-example-mod/blob/1.20/.github/workflows/build.yml
and change these 2 values to 17 it'll auto-build
https://github.com/FabricMC/fabric-example-mod/blob/2930d654410f005963a3c695860a3f5ca93d60d7/.github/workflows/build.yml#L15
https://github.com/FabricMC/fabric-example-mod/blob/2930d654410f005963a3c695860a3f5ca93d60d7/.github/workflows/build.yml#L33
noble plume
anyway this apply
no matter what the licenser say, if they put it on GitHub in a...
Tell me you don't know what visible source vs open source is without telling me you don't know 🗿
Yes, you can fork it, but that doesn't give you the right to do.. anything with it. So the narrative of not tinkering with such mods (respecting their licenses) still stands.
And sure, you can always argue that you're only doing it "for private use", but that wouldn't make a difference regardless of whether the mod has a Github repo or not
sweet drum
Tell me you don't know what visible source vs open source is without telling me ...
You'd mean that by saying fork they mean pressing a F button ?
This would be pretty stupid...
noble plume
Usually content that is VSS is only there for educational purposes and the likes. You could fork it for "private use", but with how strict the guidelines for it are you're pretty much better off just looking through and doing your own thing IMO
You could, for example, create your own version of the mod that achieves the same goal, but in your own way. Recall the fact that you can't Copyright general ideas
And I don't mean to assume bad intentions
However, the Internet demands cautionary sense
So me personally, if I was asked to work on an ARR mod without explicit permission from the original author, I'd just create my own version instead
sacred topaz