#off-topic
1 messages · Page 467 of 1
You don’t have the regular role
Neither do I.
Proof of this channel existing? 
I think the roles description mentions it.
I personally will take your word for it because it is a well known fact that Unreal is incorrectly optimized, so what you are saying isn't exactly nonsensical.
Morning
Good morning!
there is no furry erp staff chat, this madman is lieing to you
we just get emoji benefits in off topic

Well, they had me for a while there.
Knew it lmao
Sorry for trolling cat walked across the keyboard
Simply because Unreal really IS badly optimized.
oh damn you're right
Claiming that Palworld is nearing the end due to engine limitations and claiming Pocketpair has no plans according to something Bucky said... only for it being a troll according to you ... is that really Regular role behavior? 
I will admit, that was actually quite clever. Though the whole "Palworld is nearing its end" part didn't really convince me because there are ways to circumvent limitations, like the one I described.
Yeah.
End of Palworld because of Unreal, what?
They deleted their messages, but it was more along the lines of some players would be unable to load the map if the add more content.
Something like that. I can't quite remember.
if anything with how unreal works things can only get better only limited by the coding capabilities of the dev team
Games stream content, Unreal is no different.
-# where are my robinquill mini games from the trailers pocketpair, let me shoot apples of lamballs heads
I didn't believe them anyway, but some people believed what they said in #palworld-general referencing the discussion here.
Lods can be used if map gets that detailed tbh
Lods are already used
which loads a shit quality model when viewed from a distance
I can’t keep up with General.
Palworld already dodges a bullet that hit Ark by not having all pals be persistent
And only spawning around the player
Huh, see a lot of “but bucky said” so maybe I should look there and see what’s most likely getting misconstrued.
Look where?
I'm tired. 
il remind you bucky said grillet and warsect terra were a myth and don't release, it did happen
i don't trust anything the frog man says anymore
That was datamined information
In the game files
dragostrophe,Boltmane,dark mutant
The post you linked showed a regular admitting to something so I just searched bucky posts.
Kinda wish Dark Mutant was a thing.
Sniper rifle, beer, poop
Also, I am scrambled yet again.
see channel exclusive to regular role holders
Do Beegardes rarely drop their spears or is that just datamining?
Rare drop
This message
Because TV Tropes insinuates they can, and I distinctly remember one doing that, but people tell me that's unused and I must have a Mandela Effect going on.
Oh wait
So my Beegarde + Elizabee culling is not in vain?
Not beegardes, only elizabee drops the staff
Ah, so it IS a datamine.
Yes
Alrighty! Thank you for clearing that up!
Like, a few Lifmunk effigies were found hidden in the map in inaccessible places. We only know about those by looking at the game data.
We wouldn't know about those normally.
Dammit Stpaddy! 
Yeah so I think what was actually being said is that Palworld still needs to launch according to plan and not turn into a Star Citizen forever project with ever expanding scope. Talk of technical limitations were tongue in cheek mostly.
Bucky would have to have said that though.
and a channel exclusive to Regular role holders would have to exist
and apparently neither of those exist
I see nothing that really implies an end.
Exactly
Not sure why Unreal Engine is a discussion
More messages are getting deleted
They were messages posted by Stpaddy.
I think they are deleting their own messages to clean up.
But they were basically saying that Bucky said blah blah blah
You get the idea
One that wasn't deleted yet
and one message below it saying it was a direct quote
Buch of nonsense anyway
@cyan acorn Don't worry about what was said in here
I will conclude that whole discussion seems to just be the result of a little trolling that blew up since it plain doesn’t make sense.
Yeah. It really didn't.
Maybe my initial analysis based the general link accepted plain fabrications to begin with… just my opinion is that I don’t see any reason why the engine or the game will just arbitrarily hit a hard coded wall. That’s just not how any of this really works.
Like, if the Palworld map really gets too big, why not have another map separated by a loading screen?
or maybe a million other solutions
Like I said (though this is probably quite expensive) would be to modify the engine itself to be optimized for Palworld.
I don’t imagine it loads the full map in full detail at once anyway or the amount of memory you’d need would already be as big as the game.
Consoles in general have very little memory so engines are designed to stream (but the level designer has to set that up)
-# this is a significant simplification
so yeah, it just doesn’t make sense
This would be optimal for consoles, as this is actually what many devs did.
Many games typically branch from the engine, it’s nothing unusual
True, though it is probably expensive because of licenses.
I think the biggest limitation rn is Pal AI and base sizes since there’s so much going on. I don’t know if Unreal’s Mass can help with that, but investing in an advanced solution for this might enable some cool things.
Or just programmer’s time
True that.
Also true.
to expand; there are 3 that could not be obtained without glitches, but 1 was fixed in the feybreak update so it currently stands at only 2 unobtainable right now
One is in the ocean
another two are inside terrain
another one was stuck behind an invisible wall, but that was fixed iirc
If anyone plays warframe, this is my new kubrow 😃
He's an omega
I forgot I can't send pics here
havent heard the ocean one?
the invisible wall one was fixed, and the two terrain ones still exist. one near the penking area, forget where the other is
ive been waiting for a new doom game that's all i want
Approaching its limits is a wild take lmfao
Consider how God of War did it. No loading screens. The "loading screens" in that game are done by putting the player in an enclosed area where they're moving slowly, and the actual loading of the next area is a background process.
Like an elevator going up or down. It was pretty clever
This was a common practice when loading from incredibly slow discs.
Every console manufacturer has had devs be like “please require an SSD in your next system! Please! We’re begging you! *God!!”
Hmmm?
Are you accusing the discord decoration here of being AI?
These are 2 different posts
The nine tailed kitsune is on sale
Quick question here: Does anybody know of any Unreal editors that would allow me to look into Palworld and (potentially) Deep Rock Galactic's inner workings?
I crave the "Use Remedy" sound, as it... how do I explain... sounds like I was back in 2014.
And I want the Cave Skull's "dying laughs".
I’m not sure if the question is appropriate for #palworld-modding but they’ll know.
The regular editor might work too, I haven’t bothered yet. 
You mean UEdit or whatever that was?
Bucky said dogs can't look up.
The one that comes with Unreal Engine. 
For the official tools, yeah.
Cloudy
☁️ -4°C°F
-canada i can't even leave my house 😭
don't you have a 2nd floor?
they never need to, no natural flying predators
think about all of the reindeer though.
imma be alright i still have shadow and jugjug
i hope some of thoes don't dissapear for 2 month
Pigs can't look up 
I do
😭
Animals are made to be eaten
If we didn't eat them, they would over populate, and suffer long and painful deaths, through having lack of space and food
I'm happy being a vegetarian thank you ^^
But feel free to eat all the meat you want
More animals end up dying by harvesting plants
Machines/trucks used to harvest plants and shit, don't stop when animals are in the way
On top of that, vegetarian food, is taking food away from the animals, making them starve, and the amount of bugs and insects(which they still count), is insane
7billion animals die, from machines, used to harvest plants
And that's not including bugs and insects
And that's just in the US
No idea why you're pinging me about this, no one is judging you for the food you eat so I don't understand why you're judging me. You eat what you want and I'll eat what I want.
End of discussion for me
I'm not judging
I'm just stating a fact
Because there is no such thing as vegetarians
if that's the person i think you're talking to, you can ignore 'em, they a lil hard headed don't pay em any mind
You eat what you wanna eat and respect what others eat as well, you're more than alright in my book 👍🏽

Nah it's fine ^^ no one was judging anyone. I threaten to punch shell over everything so we're all joking around having fun
What he says is true tho
But thank you
Because I don't go based on opinions
I go on only facts
ye
oinky tasty ngl
im sure it is, but there's no point in trying to bring it up if Inari isn't even trying to argue about it
Tho in the bible before sin happened every living thing had a green plant to eat after sin animals turned on eachother
No need for debate brain here, friend
The Bible also said to not wear clothes of mixed materials, but look how that turned out
-# oinky flavor gud tho...

-# like oinks you real hard
Yeee pork and bacon are good tho, but its okay for peeps to not like all dat

That's not true
Every creature was made in gods vision
Hints why, carnivores always had teeth made for eating meat
Wong! Pork is queen of meat
It's literally in the bible
lion shall be king when he tastes as good
Which Bible
Catholic or Christian
what does that make beef?
Didn't know there was a difference
And that's one thing I don't like about this server
A lot of members, are either liberals, or have liberal views/opinions
Very liberal yes but if you speak against it your muted or whatever
Which is funny, because that's the side that's supposed to be "loving and accepting"
But despite that I like this place and half of them are alright but I try not to force a issue
Wanna know something funny?
Sure
Check DMs, I don't wanna say it here, because I don't wanna start no argument
idk what the other person is on about but like... yeah this server is pretty chill if you can just let things go and let people be people, lmao
not everything needs to be a debate
life is just too short
Eat your veggies, kids

I know what he is on about and I fully agree with him but I'm not gonna deep dive into stuff
fair enough, i stand by my statement
this server is pretty chill, it helps to not go all debate brain
i mean after every we said i still respect you and appreciate your company, ya know?

Well thank you
whatta mean
what does it look like now?
Wha
sometimes discord messes up and shows my default PFP instead of my server specific pfp
Now it's depresso
^
But I meant that little yellow guy from the server pfp
aww very cute
fren
she ate a Sig Red Dot
what's there not to get
Yo dancing cow
But
Why
Oh I found context
Sig are recalling red dots because batteries in them don't have a warning about not eating them
dats dumb.
ur dumb.
No u
What :v
opens steam
New & Trending: Isekai Reincarnation Magic 🐓
🗿

steam has some interesting games on it for sure
That's steam for you, either you get the good stuff or you don't
I don't trust you gabe
Stop Killing Games has its own Discord server, now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5uumnNNPRU
The Stop Killing Games movement now has an official Discord open to the public! This will hopefully be for coordinating future action, but it's also up to where the users want to take it.
Link to the Discord here:
https://discord.gg/dC5wjw76
Lmao why don’t you trust gabe
I dont like any video game industry veterans: Phill, Gabe, I actively hate Todd.
One one hand gabe invented loot boxes, on the other he is probably the only reason steam/ is still a decent company
He also super pretentious
Yeahhhhh
Did you see he said the only reason they havent made half life 3 because the half life games are only tech demos
And he couldn't think of something innovative enough to make a 3rd game
At least there aren’t 40 half life games and they are all bad tho
Closest we got was vr
And maybe that weird Twitter post that happened end of last year
a bit early, next big sale is in 61 days. RTS sale is in 9 days
Morning
Camera production line
I just got done beating Balatro (all 20 challenges and 120 deck stakes completed). I wish there'd be a Palworld crossover with the game for some neat cardart.
?
That's not pretentious, that's just wanting to have a proper reason to make a game other than to just make one
There is always Lore. Several things are still left unanswered.
And they only added even more with Half Life: Alyx.
Though it also gives them some artistic freedom.
They can either continue from Half Life 2: Episode 2 or continue from Half Life: Alyx.
sucked
It didn't further the story
I do agree that doing an entire alternative universe/take was completely unnecessary, though I can see why they'd do it.
Given that Marc Laidlaw has left the Team, I guess they just retconned it to their liking. Doesn't mean I enjoy it, though.
Awww yeah egg timeee 🍳
Very pretentious
Bruh
I ain't ever seen someone dislike Gabe Newell but I suppose there's a first for everything
Literally no?
Gabe is a monopoly owner. I don't like monopolies
He just doesn't wanna make another half life just for the sake of making a third one
He wants it to have an impact and to change PC gaming once again
That's what HE wants for HIS game, he's not saying every game needs to innovate
Literally how
Are you seriously saying you don't see how steam is a monopoly?
Epic games store
GoG galaxy
Microsoft Store
Steam isn't a monopoly, it's just dominate because it's a Hella good client with sick ass features
-People only use epic for Fortnite.
-Gog us only used by those who legit can't use steam
-Hahahahahahahahahahaha
It's absolutely a monopoly but it gets away with it because people loves gabe so much
It's not a monopoly just because 90% of people prefer it
Lmao
It's a monopoly because it's basically the only usable option
And that's the fault of Valve... How? It's not like they're hitting epic with any patent law suits, Epic is just having a skill issue with creating a storefront and client
I don't like them either but comeptitors need to start actually putting time into making a good storefront that users will want to use over steam. Simple as
Just interesting to see someone not vibe with Gabe N, but fair enough
We'll have to agree to disagree

Ok be real Carby no one takes any of those seriously
EXACTLY
GOG is criminally underrated.

Gog is used by people that want to own their games
And dont give a damn if in a few years a game gets removed on steam
And based because of that
guys whats overdungeon
A game
Who cares if a game gets removed from steam
If it's in your library, you still have access to it
someone else answer i blocked them
Steam isn't the only option
There's multiple "online stores"
Steam, gog, epic games, battle net, Ubisoft connect, Microsoft store, "green man gaming" and more
Theres multiple, just because people prefer something over the other options, doesn't mean it's a monopoly
It takes like 3 seconds to search
"Steam alternatives"
arent steam currently being sued over their monopoly
Steam simp
just double checked; theyre currently being charged with violations of competition law after allegedly requiring developers to lock prices across steam alternatives
Wasn't Johny Depp tooken to court for abusing Amber? See how that turned out?
except this is a criminal matter
So is domestic violence
And so is false accusations of said domestic violence
Again, it takes 3 seconds to search "steam alternatives"
And? Innocent until proven guilty
takes the same time to look up the court case theyre currently involved in that shows those "steam alternatives" are being price locked by steam which is a crime if true
Personally I am deeply concerned by steam's monopoly
" just because people prefer something over the other options, doesn't mean it's a monopoly"
most countries, the UK for example is one of the countries charging valve, dont require complete control. they only require a dominant position, and unfair practices to maintain that.
like sure it's all fun and games now but when gabe kicks a bucket and some corpo shareholders get ahold of the company
we're all going to be sorry we celebrated their market dominance
I have similar feelings about Unreal Engine except there is no "when x retires" because the corpos already own Epic Games
Steam library sharing
GONE
Online play
SUBSCRIPTION
Steam workshop
COSTS MONEY (for you)
The user interface
RUINED
that's my prediction for the minute, the second Gabe stops owning Valve and/or Steam
i mean, Gabe is the guy who invented lootboxes so hes not exactly a saint =p
it's a shame that it's like this I would prefer there not be a competition or a market here because that would just be a headache
Imagine having to keep 6 separate programs on your computer just for launching, buying, and downloading content for video games
Ain't no way you unironically posted a reddit post as "evidence"
but the reality is that capability matters a whole lot more than intent and I am deeply bothered by Steam's capability at this juncture
And wheres your "evidence" that steam is price fixing?
I'm not the one who said it.
this does NOT help your argument; this is LITERALLY what they are in court for. you arent allowed to tell developers how much they can sell their game for on othr platforms.
I thought developers set the prices
Please read it
That's not what it said at all
yes it is
They do
Technically I think publishers do
it used the term "price fixing" but thats not what theyre being fined for. that post created a strawman, then attacked it
If a game is sold on steam for $40
And sold on epic for $20
Steam is ALLOWED to match that $20
That's not price fixing, that's called being competitive
theyre being charged with price manipulation and pricing restrictions. NOT "price fixing"
thats not it; steam is requiring the devs to offer that price.
if a dev says "im selling for $25 on steam, but $20 on epic, and steam lowers it to $20 to match, its anti-trust.
Ah so your making up shit up now
Originally you said price fixing, and now your saying they aren't price fixing
If you can't keep lies straight, then don't lie in the first place
This is why "innocent until proven guilty" is a thing and not "people on the Internet get to decide if someone is guilty based on feelings and opinions"
"gothic must"?
No it's not LOL
it layman's terms, "price fixing" isnt literally wrong. however, when it gets to court the actual legal distinction is price manipulation or price restricting.
It litterally is
when the conversation moves to the courtroom, its formal to use the legal terms
No it's not
Price matching is not illegal
Companies making a settlement to not go above or below, is what's illegal, which steam is not doing
meh overworld has limited 3d models and no open world and not live action, not my type of game
If price matching, is illegal, then literally every single store would be shut down instantly
here is why its illegal;
-a developer doesnt want to use steam anymore, so they move to, lets say, epic.
-they bring their games and offer them at 30% off to try and get a market set up on epic
-steam knock the price down to 30% to match it, removing the incentive to move to the other platform
-the dev is efectively restricted in where they can sell their wares
-the law protects the developer by allowing them to choose where they can give the best deals.
I wonder if people are leaving Steam because of price changes and moving to another launcher
You don't have to sell your games on steam LOL
Like you said, if a dev wants to move to a different store, they 100% can, there is no legal binding to stay on steam
You can remove your game from steam at any point
Price matching, is not illegal
you dont burn your posessions and then move house
Again, if price matching was illegal, literally every single company would be shut down
thats not whats happening; whats happening is steam is deciding what prices the dev can set and not the developer,.
Devs lose literally nothing if they remove their games from steam
And neither do the customers
If a game is removed from steam, you still have full access to that game, shit I have fable 3 on steam, and that shits been removed for a long ass time, and I can still download it
some people wont make the switch, and devs dont know if the switching weill pay off. so they sell their game on steam as a safety net, then offer it cheaper elsewhere to try and incentivise following them onto the new platform
because steam can just "nope" that, they are able to remove that incentive at will, and preserve a hold on the market
yes. the DEVELOPER company is free to set its own prices.
but steam is forcing them to sell at their prices
The company is steam
no, steam is the distributer
Man, it's crazy gabe made a discord account to argue on the palworld discord
Lol
So tell me
Who set the price for palworld
Pocket pair, or steam
pocket pair i believe
See they can't do it!
So you just proved yourself wrong
Steam isn't forcing prices on developers
Pocket pair is a indi company, which means it would be EXTREMELY easy to bully into selling at whatever price the bigger company wants
what is donnie on about
You claimed, steam forces the prices for games
If pocket pair decided their price
Then that means steam isn't forcing prices
I'm saying A person is Gabe in disguise
who is a person
using palworld as an example;
-pocketpair sells the game for $30 on steam
-it then sells it for $25 on epic
-valve says "you must sell it for $25 here too, or we remove the game"
this is what valve is being sued for.
Yes that's called being competitive
Welcome to marketing
Is it someone you have blocked
devs are supposed to pick the price, so tel a dev "you must sell at X price" is illegal
Gabe detected
thats not "competitive2 its anti-competitive as you arent allowing competition
i don't block people donnie
i block and ignore
it does wonders for my emotional health 
No, it would be illegal if
- The 2 different companies/distributors made a deal to do it
Or
- That distributor/company, is the only place the product is being sold at
I don't think you understand marketing or laws.....
theyre all illegal
Matching prices, is quite literally what every company does
Anti-compative, would be making deals with the comparators, to not be competitive
For example
That's say I own Walmart, and you own Walgreens
We both sell "lays sour cream and onion chips"
If you and me had a meeting, as owners, and I paid you to not undersell me, that would be illegal
However, if I see you selling your chips for $10, and I'm selling them for $20, I'm allowed to move the price down to $10(or even below), to be competitive WITHOUT making deals with you
not an accurate analogy.
this would be like opening a mcdonalds in a shopping mall and selling burgers for $5, then running a burger cart where you sell them for $4 outside, and then the shopping mall tells you "you must sell them for $4 inside too, or we throw you out"
They're allowed to do that, as it's private property LOL
That's like saying a store can't kick you out for being loud in the store
and thats why its anti competitive. it removes my ability to offer an alternative, resulting in the mall having a monopoly.
they are using a dominant position to control the market
... Wait, so you own the MCD and the burger cart?
Nope, because you can move your "cart" right outside the private property, and sell there
its a special mcd burger cart
Why would you purposely sell lower than your own store?
Same reason airports do. They sell higher for convenience
Like I said
He doesn't understand the law or fair marketing practices
an airport would have probably been a beter example, yeah =p
you are fixated on the idea that a company must own everything to be a monopoly, and thats not how legal monopolies works.
Wrong again, that's not even close to what I've said AT ALL
For what your claiming steam is doing, to be illegal:
- Steam would have to be the ONLY store, which they aren't
Or
- Steam would have to make deals/agreements with the other stores(such as epic games), which they quite literally haven't done
Airport works only because you're paying extra for the convenience of having the item there, at that time.
Same way with "one hour shipping", for example.
He's trying to argue that price matching, is illegal
(Which it isn't)
this is not the exhaustive list. here is the TFEU 102 for example;
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX%3A12008E102
its not price fixing, its anti trust violations of the TFEU competition laws
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX%3A12008E101%3AEN%3AHTML
"1.(a): directly or indirectly fix purchase or selling prices or any other trading conditions;"
PRICE FIXING IS ILLEGAL UNDER ATRICLE 101, 1.(a) OF THE TFEU
Price matching done without cooperation between the parties, is legal.
You sell something for 5$, guy down the street sells for 4$, then you drop to 4$, is legal.
You move to 4$, guy down the street calls up, says "hey, I'll sell at 5$ too if you put your price back to 5$.", is illegal.
Your mom comes over, sees you at 5$, the guy down the street selling for 4$, and bonks you going "sell for 4$, you're not gonna make any money for the family!", is legal.
this isnt whats happening;
-dev sells at store A for $5
-the same dev sells at a diferent store for $4
-store A forces the dev to sell at $4 at their store or they cant sell at that store anymore
That's legal.
"directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions", steam has the same prices then epic games(sometimes you even get better deals on epic games, shit I got a $70 game for free on epic)
" limiting production, markets or technical development to the prejudice of consumers" steam doesn't have any limits on who can/can't buy the products
"applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage" which again, steam isn't doing(this would be paying another party, such as epic games, to sell their version at a higher price then steam, which steam is not doing)
"making the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts" this would be steam paying or making deals with other companies, such as epic, to have the same pricing, which again steam isn't doing
"My service, an online platform for game selling, does not see a cut of the profit from your game, while providing advertisement and support, because you sell it elsewhere cheaper. Drop the price or I stop supporting it."
youre literally describing coercion
Exactly, like kitrat literally has no idea how the law works or how marketing works
By that definition, you're being coercive in trying to convince us of other ideas.
coercion requires a threat
Of some sort of injury. While usually physical, it can be psychological or monetary.
However, "sell it at the same price as your other places" does not cause injury if the same profit is had by the owner of the objects being sold.
Exactly
the issue is, this case is multifaceted; the threat would stifle competition as being able to sell your game lower elsewhere gives you market mobility.
If Steam was saying "you must sell at 1% less than everywhere else, or be kicked off", that would be coercive behavior.
They're saying "keep it a level buying field."
and the argument being put forward is that by forcing the market to be equal, they are exploiting a dominant position
Dominant, but not monopoly.
GOG provides "you actually own it" services for their games.
Epic... I mean, do they even have a "basket" function yet? All they have are "free" game giveaways.
Others, not sure.
for legal purposes, only dominant is required.
theyre known as "monopoly" laws, but in reality theyre referred to as "competition" laws
Then Walmart, Krogers, Walgreens, mjier, and sams, and all the other big companies are illegal
Because there's smaller unknown companies, that are over shadowed and become bankrupt, due to not making sales
dunno how you do it in america, but in europe we actually have rules and laws specficially for that; supermarkets for example have strict regulation on where they can build their locations
it is illegal to build a supermarket in certain locations such as villages
Again, what steam does, is price matching
You don't even know what your arguing, first you said steam was "price fixing" and then you said "steam isn't price fixing"
And there is competition.
GOG focuses on providing support for older games, and non-DRM stuff so you actually own your game.
Steam has solid forums and community.
Epic... 🤷
Then look at Google and Apple, selling games on their phones.
epic has lower cut for devs; they take less than steam
And? That's called competition
Please keep on point.
Moving to zoning laws is just distracting...
they "shrugged" at epic, so i was just telling them one thing epic has
Yea, they're providing a better offer for devs, which impacts where developers put their games.
Tell me
Where would you sell your product:
Walmart: you sell for $30 and only get $10 in return due to having to pay for shelf space and everything else
Or
A ma and pa shop: where you sell for $20, but get $15 in return
which ties back into how this case started; devs wanted to move to epic and because epic takes a small cut, they wanted to give that cut to the players, so reduced its price on epic.
steam said they must offer the same cut on steam, but that would eat into their profits as they'd still lose 30% to steam.
as such, steam was requiring the devs to give up profit or stay on steam
So why not stop using Steam?
Because kitrat thinks, people ONLY use steam

And thanks steam is the ONLY store
Like I told him, there is no legal binding contract to have your game on steam
You can easily use steam to grow your game, and then move to another store, such as epic, and bring your fan base with you
ill try to provide some maths for an example;
game sells for $50, steam takes $15 (makes $35)
game sells on epic for $50, epic takes $6 (makes $44)
dev reduces the price to $40, epic takes $4.80 (makes $35.20)
steam demand dev sells for $40, steam takes $12 (makes $28)
so basically, if they want to sell on epic and make the same money, saving the customer money in the end, steam punished them by cutting their income by 20% ($35>$28)
Devs are suing because it isnt fair that wanting to benefit the end-user is getting them punished by steam
the EU got involve because this harms the end-user (the market) and so because the consumer doesnt benefit from this practice, they declare it illegal
And what services does Steam provide?
Gothic games, hmm, what I'm thinking of is likely not what they actually mean.
im explaining why the suit is happening.
And I'm explaining why Steam is going to say "our cut being X is fine because we're providing a lot more service that they don't get elsewhere, and the developers need to make the decision if they want to use our extra features or not, it will come from their pockets".
effectively, devs are being fined 20% of their profits if they want to sell on a different market for the same profit
And why it'll be dismissed with nothing happening*
Think of it this way:
They can sell in store A for 5$, and spend 5$ on advertising, community support, more sales... or, they can sell in store B for 5$ and have none of that.
in this instance, they were happy to get the same profit; (35 versus 35.20) and the end result is the consumer gets a cheaper game.
Exactly
It costs valve way more to keep steam up and running, compared to epic
in order to meet steams demand, they would have to give up $7 on every steam sale
It's like saying Xbox live and PlayStation+ is illegal
Because they are forcing you to pay extra to use features that PC players get for free
math is hard?
Steam is providing more in turn for offering it on their store. That's their defense, and why this won't work.
Devs could sell it on their own webpage, and take 100% of the profit.
There, no game store should exist, because Devs are losing money, according to your math and logic.
"competitors must sell at our price because we offer a better service" doesnt sound like a very strong argument for them
Literally every market/store does that LOL
Do you think it's free to advertise? Do you think it's free to run a service?
"Competitors must sell at the same price as elsewhere, because a lower price elsewhere means they're unfairly taking advantage of our advertising and support system, while not reimbursing us for the costs."
they get 30% of the sales.
And in turn, have a mature sales program that offers community management, guides, social networking (kinda)...
but they want to sell on two storefronts
So, they can.
But the storefronts can also just say "we don't want to sell your stuff".
and then they get nothing
So?
And??? A store doesn't HAVE to sell your product
For example, if Walmart wanted to, they could stop selling lays chips
okay
People these days think they are entitled to whatever they want
like steam is entitled to choose the game's price?
You already admitted they don't
You said pocket pair chose their price
I would suggest reading up on Externalities.
and thats why theye getting sued
So that's not even an argument LOL
Your argument is "steam chooses the price"
But then said "pocket pair chose their price"
oh right, that was meant to be a sarcastic question to your statement, lemme add the ?
The devs can choose.
Either sell at the price Steam says is fair, or don't on their marketplace.
Steam itself is not forcing the price change without Dev notice.
Their getting sued, because devs are allowed to pick their prices?
And that steam is allowed to be competitive with other companies?
basically, in order to meet steams demand, the devs must give up 20% of their profits at steam
Rat, I bet you think Amber is innocent and dep is guilty 
to save 18% on epics cuts
Crazy it's as if
Steam costs more to run, then epic games
It's as if, one is bigger then the other so its more expensive to run
they make a loss unless they stay steam exclusive
the "equal" price isnt equal profits to the dev
Again, there is no legal binding agreement with steam
You can freely take your game off steam, and only use epic and other stores
theres more money on steam as they have the biggest platform
well, second but we cant name #1
So what your saying is:
Steam HAS to lose money, and eventually go bankrupt
While also providing free advertisement, better algorithms, better community support
All for free?
they get 30% of sales, thats not free
Quick math!
You sell a game for 100$.
Store A takes 50%, Store B takes 20%.
Store A will have 1,000 sales, Store B will have 600 sales.
Which store is best for your profits?
both
Avoiding the question
Because you know it'll show how dumb you are 
no, the correct answer is both. why would you only sell on one market
Now you sell it at Store B for 99$, and expect to make 50 more sales.
Store A says you either lower the price to 99$ in their store, and thus gain another 100 sales, or you can't sell there.
What do you do?
apparently, take them to court
Because it's not up to you
It's up to the market
Again, a store doesn't have to sell your product, they can fully decline to sell your product for any reason
refusing to sell a product because it was being sold cheaper elsewhere is exactly why theyre being taken to court now
How much money do you make in those situations?
Just Store A at 100$, and 99$
Just Store B at 100$, and 99$
Both Stores at the same price (100$, and 99$)
Ah so now
It's not price fixing
It's now "refusing to sell products"
If you think refusing to sell a product, is illegal, then you must be a child
i see why everyone just gave up talking here lmao youre literally circling around again
Then tell me what is steam being sued for
You said it's not price fixing
So what is the reason
It's seemed like you've been moving what you've said as points come up against you.
because lawsuits arent as simple as "in court for one thing". you are often charged for several things in one go and have to defend every point. this is why youll often hear at the end of a court session "on the charge of...." and they go through a list of guilty and not guiltys
steam are in court for a whole bunch of reasons tied to the same incident;
-they required prices to be set at their discretion (price fixing/manipulation)
-which led to loss of profits if agreed to (anti-trust practices)
-and incentivises remaining on steam exclsuive (anti competition)
-withholding the right of sale if not agreed with (abuse of dominant position)
thats why it keeps "changing"; because theyre not being hit with one charge, its a whole bunch of charges from one action
-
"They required prices to be set at their discretion" wrong, devs set their prices, and to stay financially stable, they have to be competitive with other stores
-
"Incentives remaining on steam exclusive", exclusivity is not illegal, if so PlayStation and Microsoft would of been shut down day 1
-
Price agreement with the seller and distributor, is not illegal, and is how EVERY company is ran
No it keeps changing, because you don't know the actual law
And have 0 proof to back anything up, just a bunch of hearsay
Infact, you sent a link to the law that steam "broke"
And I proved it wrong
and court docs
hi
You mean how the court docs for Nintendo vs palworld
How people listened to YouTubers that "read" the documents, and miss interpreted them, and started spreading miss information?
Hearing info, from a third party, and stating as fact
Is hear say
the above points i gave were from the second party, Milberg LLP
who were the same legal team who won against sony, securing a 5bn payout for breach of competition law
Which again, is still hear say
how is it hearsay if its literally the team responsible for the lawsuit
"we are suing and heres why"
"thats hearsay"
No what's hear say is
"I read this, from these people, and stating it as fact, because Im stuck in my feelings"
Is what's hearsay
Breach of competition law? What happened in that suit?
they are literally the people involved in the case dfirectly
literally whats happening here; they were forcing developers to charge extra to release on sony
That doesn't mean it's fact LOL
They are accusing valve of something, that doesn't mean that it's true
You are stating it as if it is true
What you are doing is hearsay, and misrepresenting information, and technically defamation
That doesn't mean they won the law suit LOL
It literally says in the link
"To proceed to trial" LOL
Just because something goes to trial doesn't mean it's true LOL
lawsuits take a long time
After the trial is when something becomes true or false
i am literally putting out the facts of why they are being sued
not "they have 100% done this" otherwise it wouldnt be in court
So that gives you the green light, to say they are guilty?
Thank God your not a judge or in any legal power
The entire world would be doomed if you were 🤣
The word you’re looking for here is allegations.
hes not reading anymore is he
i think the PW gifs are appropriate because it sounds like theyre on the breakdown segment
No, you are stating that steam IS doing those things
Instead of being ACCUSED
Being ACCUSED of something and ACTUALLY doing something is completely different
the implication is that it is an accusation. otherwise it wouldnt be in court
Being accused of something is an allegation.......y'all really have no idea what your talking about do you.....
yeah, theyre allegations, hence why theyre going to court
You stated it as a fact as if they are doing it
You literally said "Sony lost"
Which they literally haven't LOL it hasn't even gone to trial yet LOl
Gen z is doomed 
Going to trial = automatically guilty
Guess that's how the world works now
(It 100% doesn't work like that)
and?? you do realize that quite literly means nothing, right? 🤣 all that emans is that its going to court LOL
okay
thanks for reminding me im old
Okay but that's the fault of the other competitors for not doing enough to make a client that makes players want to move from steam
which, i'll admit, is hard to do since steam has had 20+ years of development
I mean not really
The digital age has caused a new and terrifying threat to the FTC's goals to rear its head
ANd that's a thing called a "Natural Monopoly"
Steam has alot of fail safes in it to stop corrupt share holders from fucking over the end users. Licensing and stuff
It is inevitable that social medias and digital storefronts will become a monopoly
all the money and all the expertise and all the marketing in the world cannot create a consistent competition because people simply do not want a competition, a competition is often to the detriment of end users, so they naturally conglomerate
i would like to think most users like competition because it forces positive change and better features being put forward
Epic games could make the best storefront you've ever seen but the only two possible outcomes are them failing anyway or them becoming the new monopoly
which is why people fuggin' HATE how dominant Nvidia is in the gfx card industry
including me, btw
i want AMD to swing back but holy shit they struggle doing so
Users don't want competition, they want a Good Deal (or, alternatively, a Better Deal)
And if everyone is offering their own Deals and those Deals all have exclusives, then none of them will ever be Good Enough
then wtf do you want? you complain about steam being too dominate but then say a competitor can ONLY either fail or become a new monopoly
you're not even trying to think optimistically here
I never said I want steam to change, just that I am worried about the possible futures
In fact I would be perfectly content if everything remained as it is now
well, as time moves on, steam is gonna keep adding on cool features (the replay feature they have is kinda sick ngl) and epic is also gonna keep adding stuff on to their client
Steam offers an excellent UX, unbeatable catalog, and is generally extremely consumer friendly
I haven't even been alive for over 100 years
i just disagree with the notion that steam already has a monopoly when there are plenty of other competitors on the market
but like that's just because they have extremely good leadership who sees all this power and says "let's use this to give people a Good Deal"
Even if the CEO dies of old age, someone will take over Steam anyway
and it's only a matter of time before someone comes into a position of power who says "I want MORE money, and I don't care what it takes to get it"
DUDE RIGHT?!
idk why so many mother fuckers here say "blocking is for pansies" bitch if someone annoys me that much, why just ignore them when i can block AND ignore them?
some call it overkill, i call it insurance
sorry just wanted to say that rq
idk what "unfair practices" valve is doing to keep their "monopoly" but if the UK or EU find issue with valve and some juicy info comes to light about it all, i'll gladly eat my words and admit i was wrong.
But im just explaining my opinion based on what i see atm
that's a fair fear, i'll admit, but im just talking about the now, because that's all i can deduce for
Steam already a good few failsafes in place
I wonder if the EU is interested in the gaming industry? Because I don't think so.
i mean its all buisness, if something shady is going on that's hurting consumers in the EU and it makes enough noise they're on it
but yes, what im trying to say is
@limpid vessel @teal iron you all are dumb, i am the only smart one here (of course), and wil put another notch on the wall on my "Discord arguments won" tally, good day.
also, Blocked.
(I'm joking :p)
I know exactly who you're parodying and I love it
Wut
wat
am i parodying someone? im just jokingly pretending to be a chronically online debate brain nerd lmao
I mean it >:)
GabeN has his moments, but no one alive can always be an angel.
So the his favorite role is the backstabber.....interesting
And in comparison to some, one has to agree he would be the Lesser Evil.
tbh steam is fine rn but I'm more worried about the growing market dominance of unreal engine
The fact that they say "f-ck you install 70GB engine to make mods" instead of giving developers seemingly any way to create better modding tools tells me all I need to know about what kind of company they are
A company that is concerned with profit, and nothing else
The last thing I want is for Unreal Engine to become a standard

They gonna pull a unity or worse
@tranquil obsidianhey can i test your legal knowledge real quick?
Unreal ain't even that good, not to mention it is incorrectly optimized.
I have an RTX 3060, and I have huge lag spikes while playing UE5.
Not to mention it is a serious pain just getting the game to launch normally.
I think the "optimization and performance!!!" arguments are just
Game devs these days are bad at optimization
There are various reasons for lags, even Windows updates ruin the optimization
"playing ue5" you mean using UE5?
or fo yuou mean playing a game made in UE5? because if its a game made in UE5, then that means nothing, because some games are optimized better then others
Satisfactory lets me do things that I am absolutely positive should be obliterating my framerate and it's like
Marginal loss at best
Well, true. I played the Silent Hill 2 Remake, which is supposed to be astoundingly badly optimized.
Unreal Engine makes it very easy to make a game that turns on and has graphics but it still takes a LOT of time, planning, skill, and money to make that game run good and most devs either lack those things or don't care
then your argument is instatnly invalid
Though I was told it is meant to be the peak of UE5.
Like I said, satisfactory, a UE5.4 game, runs incredibly well
I do get some performance issues but I play on Ultra settings on a laptop
Seems to be that last option, as the tech team behind the Silent Hill 2 Remake apparently wants to step back now.
and I build some incredibly disastrous factories
and who did yoiu hear that from?
I think the difference between palworld running like a slideshow when I stand in a base with 20 pals and Satisfactory running at 40fps on Ultra Everything in the middle of Nightmare Death Pain And Suffering Central Production (Easily a hundred times more visually and logistically complex) is that Satisfactory put an enormous amount of time and care into optimizing the game and Palworld is barely a year old
and I could actually get like 60FPS or more if I turned on DLSS or whatever in satisfactory
I forget why I turned it off
Gaming News Sites. Might've been Gamesradar or IGN, I cannot remember.
It was like 2 months ago.
........so......you believed game journalists?
are you new to gaming?
Not really. It was not just from "game journalists" either. Some Discord users also told me that, but they had no credentials.
btw there UE 5.5 already
Even so, there is no one to believe, because all the "non-journalists" have their own different opinions
And yes, I do know Game Journalists are generally untrustworthy.
"Some Discord users also told me that"....this just gets more and more worse the longer this goes.......
I do agree. I suppose it does boil down to how the development team handles it.
Yeah, sorry about that.
I ain't no developer either to know much about optimization.
Yea my favorite is Medic
Spies are a nightmare for Medics. For anyone really. I look at stealth classes like an arachnophobe looks at spiders
I cant tell you how many times I called for Spy to be nerfed
however I dont reccomend using it
it has numerous issues at the moment
I'd stick to UE5.4.4
… But Genki has nothing to worry about because they’ve never signed any papers with Nintendo, no confidentiality agreement, no NDA.”
It seems that Nintendo are already on the case!
https://thegamepost.com/nintendo-lawyers-genki-switch-2-mockup-ces-2025/
thats crazy
Can’t help but wonder what this accessory maker’s long term plan is. 😅
Free marketing
Striesand effect
I spelled that wrong
Anyway I beat Forgotten Land (again)
The game is still peak
Carby
whar
Blurbo

Kirby will never be vroomin
Nintendo turning this into a 2,500$ hat for your car.
Kirby tasting metal and rust 
mmm iron supplements
No pain no gain, and in this case the gain is vroom vroom
mmmmm car vore...
guys help me haha how i can unlock that XD? https://puu.sh/KmdH0.png
E
Unimplemented skin
wait its Unimplemented? i thought it was a custom one.
well its probbly going to be a twitch drop or something like that then
Morning
Maybe it is maybe it isn't 
What if it's dawsuk

Dawn - The last moment vampires have to find cover before death.
Dusk - warns people the vampires are waking and it is too late.

That’s certainly the short term plan.
is this the official?
I am at a loss for how I could counter an argument that Palworld is AI Generated.
I was asked for sketches, which I did (the ones from that magazine thing), and they refuted by saying they aren't hand-drawn...
I personally think it doesn't NEED to be hand-drawn anymore.
2021 development date
Plus, Valve's Steam Policy states that developers need to put up a warning if their game has AI Generated Content.
They correctly mentioned that Pocketpair could've just omitted that info, but something tells me Valve would be checking.
They would have verification systems in place.
Because Valve may not be the smartest game devs on the planet, but they aren't fools either.
So what's the proof that Palworld is AI generated
Because so far, I've only seen some 2 - 3 tweets of Takuro going "wow this is cool" some 4 years ago
Apparently the CEO's support of it, and the fact that apparently there is no hand-draw concept sketches.
I say there doesn't need to be. Digital Art is a thing.
Also, wouldn't the files' Metadata say if it is AI Generated or not?
That isn't proof of anything
We know Pocketpair has artists
I do agree, and if it was, Valve would almost certainly know of it.
Most of the designs are from 2021
And earlier
In 2021, no one had AI good enough to make a viable product
I do think they check the games before they are permitted to go onto sale in Steam.
People were making memes with dall-e
Is there like any time stamps on concept art or anything?
Because I do need more "direct" proof.
To refute their arguments anyway.
https://gematsu.com/tag/palworld
https://gematsu.com/gallery/palworld
Palworld
Platform: PC
Publisher: Pocket Pair
Developer: Pocket Pair
I personally don't think Palworld is AI-Generated because otherwise Valve would have forced them to put the warning.
The trailer already had a lot of finalized design that are still in use in the game
And those are already done 3D models
They would've had to be made in 2020 to be done in time.
Going through a standard design pipeline of drafts > internal voting > design changes > 3D design > 3D modelling/texturing
No one had an AI good enough in 2020 for that
Even to AI-Generate reference pictures, right?
At the time, I wasn't really paying attention to AI Art.
And by then, Pocketpair was too small and insignificant to have any special access to experimental models
There wasn't anything
People were using dall-e, chatGPT didn't exist
And Dall-e gave you some tiny 9 pics that barely made any sense
Oh, it was still around that time?
I did try out Crayon, or "Dall-E Lite" sometime in mid-2022. I assume that was the state of Dall-E in 2020.
It was worse lol
So the dates don't matchup for Ai-generated designs
And the "proof" is the CEO saying "oh wow thats cool" in some tweets that, if I remember correctly, were posted after the game had started development...
Maybe even posted after the first trailer
Yeah, if I remember correctly, they dated the posts to 2021.
Well now, I'll see if this is good enough evidence.
This has only convinced me further.
I don't think it'll convince them, but it doesn't matter
I'm pretty sure when TPC starts doing AI-generated designs they will all go praise them for it
Brand cultism is awful
Perhaps.
This is absolutely true though.
For instance, I used to love a company called FragLab due to their game combining my favorite aspects into one single playable experience, but when they made that one fatal decision, I (along with what I am told is roughly half of the development team) gave up, I went home.
Even today, it still makes me slightly bitter.
It is right to love, cherish and support a company, but wrong to followthem without checking what is in front of you.
Calling real artists AI is kind of the in thing to do rn
Case in point
Somebody makes an accusation and then it’s guilty even if proven innocent.
Not much can be done about the deranged, but they’re hurting a lot of people.
I do agree.
I will admit it is getting harder to distinguish the two.
But that doesn't mean an artist is automatically an AI Faker.
They call out things that aren’t even ai artifacts to begin with.
I did plan on using AI to illustrate one of my earlier novels. I didn't because they were... Lackluster.
Keep in mind, this was in 2022, and most of my characters tend to be fairly complex in text.
I used to have a decent eye for AI Generated things. Now I am starting to fall behind.
Does not mean I will frown upon it too much because AI Art is simply an inevitability at this point.
AI is now better at generating videos of Will Smith eating pasta
It’s hard to say. Some displacement os inevitable, it’s already happening even before we know how exactly the indiscriminate methods of training are going to be held accountable (as there are open cases over it), but they’re hurting immediate threat seems to be people defaming real artists for it as it’s happening everywhere.
People hell bent on Palworld designs being AI generated when many were shown before generative AI art was even demonstrated and yet weirdos aren’t having it. 😆
So it would seem.
I don't even think a company is required to state their inspirations out loud, or show off their conceptual sketches for that matter.
Plus, it doesn't have to be on paper. We are in the digital age currently, and Digital Art is a thing.
I’m sure many companies would like to. 
Welcome to the gen Z era, inorder to stay
You need to reduce your IQ to 1
Someone that hates AI art, just shows they aren't creative or unique
AI makes art based on existing art
Aka, can't create something completely brand spanking new
Actual artists, are able to create completely unique and new art
Such as "The Starry Night"
Or
"The Persistence of Memory"
oh shit is that a Nanuc
I cant talk in the Pal general, its stuck on 04 seconds and I cant type in there
I remember when it was first being public I asked someone with access to put in primarinabee as a joke and all but one image was of some Greek statues for some reason
The other was an actual bee
Try reloading Discord (ctrl+r on desktop, though don’t do that if you’re in a voice call anywhere).
thanks
No, it's an apchee 4800
It's one of the best cases on the market(IMO)
AI art by definition is real art, for anyone looking for a detailed breakdown as to how that is, LiquidZulu posted a video going over every argument against AI art and their faulty, underlying premises.
Came out of nowhere with that lol
Whoops, it looks like I forgot to hit reply before sending, my bad.
It was meant to be a comment on this discussion that was a short scroll up in the channel.
I say this genuinely, it's not a bait message. The arguments against AI art are fundamentally flawed and faulty.
In a place such as this with people that truly hates AI you will find no one gonna listen to you lol
I get that in the process of lowering the barrier to entry for new artists, a number of them will just be lazy with it, but that was true for each previous art tool in the past.
It's just more fearmongering and elitism.
Elaborate
I was relatively neutral about AI art in the beginning, but now I'm watching it become a symbol of laziness, buzzwords, and it discourages people from actually learning to make things with their thoughts and hands.
I know that it definitely has some uses, especially in making certain difficult aspects of art more convenient, but too many people are using it as a crutch imo
The main claim of "theft" operates on the premise that art can be stolen in the same way that physical property can. Theft is defined around the relationship between conflicting interests and uses over scarce goods, and when the rightful owner of that property is deprived of it by another party who is not the rightful owner of it. Downloading a publicly posted digital art to add to a training set for a neural network does not deprive the original artist of the image that was posted. Copying is not theft as it does not deprive scarce goods from another interested party.
So it boils down to the IP/copyright argument which fails ethical analysis in the framework of what constitutes property, as to enforce it, would impose on the property rights of others, telling A he cannot write with his own paper and his own ink, as the thinker has already made a similar arrangement. Even if ignore the fact that AI image models do not in fact collage training data, nor store the training data itself within the finished model, it would still not constitute "theft" as the fair use defense would apply as it would be a transformative use of the publicly posted work, especially since the neural networks learn in the same mechanism that humans do, just on a faster scale. Observation, and practice in re-creating the style.
That one will be decided in courts
The matter of an individual user breaking a model to somehow spit out something that's a near copy of an existing work and trying to impersonate that artist claiming to be that same artist is a matter of fraud, not the underlying tool itself.
It's currently in process
Considering the case precendent in other transformative works in the past, as well as the lack of ability to copyright plain results of algorythmic generation, I think it's fair say that simply typing "tree" and posting the result would only be as artistic as someone taking a decent camera and pointing it at a tree and posting a less-than-changed photo and calling it art. It's the creative input of the user, selection process, change in settings, manual correction, posing choice, color correction and other artistic inputs that make an AI generated image something artistic.
The "effort" someone puts into a work is different between person to person, and the labor theory of value doesn't work in regular markets, art less so. If you were to show me a piece of modern or post modern art and an image someone generated using an AI that had applied some sort of artistic vision or goal, I don't think you could blame me for thinking the latter should also be seen as art.
The walls you make are irrelevant. In the end, you're not doing what an artist does by using a generator.
I believe you are either deliberately conflating "tree" and what someone actually using the tool is or are unable to understand the difference.
EMP hits and your AI is gone, you cannot generate anything at all.
An artist can grab a pencil and a sheet of paper and still create with the same skill shown.
You had me until "effort doesn't matter lol" I do get your point with modern/contemporary art though, as I am quite unfond of a banana taped to the wall as the next guy
There's the difference between a generator and a tool.
The same argument you just made can be said about photoshop or Krita, but you wouldn't argue that those forms of digital art are invalid.
Nope, AI is a tool, not a final result printer.
Photoshop doesn't generate a picture for you
You learn it's tools, and use them
What are you talking about, it literally can
You can still do everything without it, even in paint.
Sure, now that Adobe filled it with dataminers
Not to mention that the artist's motions aren't translated 1:1 in photoshop either, thanks to tools like brush stabilizers, or random noise used to determine certain brush patterns.
Do you really think that digital artist write a promt and run it through photoshop?
Irrelevant, the program is not generating the picture. The artists skill and how they use the tools determines the outcome. And the artist still remains capable of creating without those tools.
Have you actually sat down and tried to get a result you wanted out of Stable Diffusion or SDXL? You are either going to spend hours trying to in-paint the corrections or take the image to Photoshop or a similar program and make manual corrections.
Have you actually sat down and tried to draw anything and get good at it?
Not irrelevant, the same elitist arguments were made against photography and photoshop respectively.
You have to spend years learning and developing
Calling it elitist is disregarding the massive time investment it involves
Honestly, it's gross and rude
And what about those with hand injuries who can't hold a pencil or paint brush but want to make art?
They develop their own methods
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1274000247835721779/1275653988175450214/image0.jpg?ex=67852d9b&is=6783dc1b&hm=16f2f9c970ab9dfe1bd5c8b8754eddec81d5ed424d353d91a6e68cc7d792d178&
i prompted the AI to draw me holding a coffee cup 
Sips ☕
Glad I am neutral in this topic lmfao
Apply the same mentality to any technological advancement that made anything recreational or work related easier over that rationale.
Accessibility has nothing to do with it. They can still create if they develop their own methods
AI is not a tool. It's a generator.
Now I know you would have done this regardless lol
You learnt nothing by using it. You're not capable of creating outside of it
Me too, but only because I have to be lol
stop boinging the cat
You learn nothing of painting by taking a photograph of a landscape, yet you wouldn't go so far as to say such a photograph can't count as art.
This is objectively wrong
I learnt a lot simply coloring my pictures
Just because the tool requires a different knowledgeset for how to use it effectively, does not make it invalid as a tool.
Shading, adding deepth with just color
Taking a photo, not a coloring book
Love handles
Taking a photo is even more complicated
How come when I stop inserting my loud and angry opinions into obvious bait, everyone who told me "prima stop" is like "don't mind if I do"
What is framed, the lightning, reflections
Is there some kind of sacred balance that I disrupted
You have less control over what happens on your canvas
It was easier for me to block the person than to argue
This counts as doing it again doesn't it ...
I didn't really give a damn till i bought a few artists works and started comparing, Ai fucking sucks man even at a "high quality" mode
Look into the history of photography, please. You'll see that early on, the existing painting market which was focused on realism rallied against the emerging tool. "You just point and push a button and now you captured that landscape, where's the art in that?"
It's weird to assume what a photographer does is easy because they press a button, while ignoring everything that goes into a photo, even the timing of it
Exactly, but that was the elitist mentality at the time it was an emerging technology and good enough to be useable by the masses.
Have you seen the great photos in history?
All the composition? Those are real stuff.
They captured real things in that precise moment
Your AI just generated a picture based on text.
It's not comparable in the slightest
"Waaaahhh waaahhhh i have to type words and wait for hours for the pictures to show up" it takes artists years to actually make things with their hands and you equate that with some computer-generated composite of their work you didn't even make?
And you act like artists using AI tools have no control over composition at all. Your assumption that it's all text is wrong as well, please look into image-to-image for how one can use his own immages or sketches to generate around the artist's desired poses or composition.
Crying "elitist" because people actually give a shit and work on their skills lmfao
Anyway continuing my previous thought I wonder if AI has gotten any better at responding to the prompt "Primarinabee"
I'm too lazy to find out
Ok time to go cause this topic will start to get heated again and someone will be put into time out soon
I'm not the one getting heated here.
I don't care, you're just generating a picture, you acquired no skill, you didn't learn anything, and you're not comparable to the work an actual artist put to even learn to do what they do
And further, I wonder if the original Dall-E would've handled "Primarina" correctly
Appeal to emotion while simultaneously trying to take emotion away from art is fucking comical lmao
What's your argument against "learn to draw"
As someone who is obsessive about taking good pictures (screenshots, but I think a lot of stuff carries over) I can assure you that there is A LOT of nuance, assuming that my pitiful knowledge is indeed pitiful
The fact that AI art can be used to convey an emotion that the artist desires in those who view it is proof enough that it meets the criteria for the baseline definition and purpose of artistic expression.
If the emotion is disgust, yes.
Only because you only look for slop to confirm your bias against the tool you refuse to learn or engage with in any honest fashion.
Also, this isn't a fact, it's a made up sentence
every time I post a palworld screenshot you guys need to understand that I spent like a good 2 minutes making sure the specific right things were in the frame, in the exact right poses, or at least as close as I could get
I almost died in a boss fight trying to get a perfect screenshot
Competitive Pokemon Snap player, really
I was willing to listen to your defense of AI but it all boils down to "I don't have to think about it and it takes my robot seconds to regurgitate what took you 17 years to master so ladeeda whos the artist now" like get a grip dude
A robot doesn't have feelings
It's isn't a tool. It's a generator
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/610964378552107010/1328097384701366433/image.png?ex=67857693&is=67842513&hm=157faa8a78f26a6b3eef063e26625b11bf7619cf88554cf95dc7315847be75f8&=&format=webp&quality=lossless&width=369&height=280 No clue what you were getting but,..The internet thinks is a furry apparently
Neither does Photoshop, or a camera, or a canvas and paints. Your point being? The person behind the tool provides the feelings.
-# i always make sure that my UI mods are in-frame, even though it would normally be something I would avoid entirely
are you arguing about ai images
yes
I mean...it's not WRONG
A little confused, but not wrong
guys its all fake anyway
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/610964378552107010/1328097807634137231/image.png?ex=678576f8&is=67842578&hm=2c6a47f87009ee76cb0546ac648dec2e655337bb15c4eb7de8dc3a4b17cf4f16&=&format=webp&quality=lossless&width=732&height=400 and this is what I get when I switch art style to "digital painting" using same prompt "Primarinabee"
i need to stress that the last time I did this experiment was when Dall-E was a new, cool, trendy program that only a select few nerds had access to and they had to like get on a waiting list or something
Not sure why Ai is removing your pants but it is what it is
Well maybe that's because I don't wear pants
anyway I have palworld mods to work on
Skirt moment
you. you get it.
cloak and robes moment
What model are you using, what are you settings, is your prompt just that one word without any art direction prompts, what's the noise strength or canvas size, are you using a control image for style, composition? I could ask alot more questions, as there's a number of ways a user can change or alter the appearance of an image, not to mention things like in-painting, masks or manual touch-ups.
You're not making it though. It's the robot making things for you. Photography is more than just taking pictures of something. Someone poses, puts things on top of each other, wears different kinds of clothes, waits for the perfect moment to snap a picture. Again, you're blowing off a practice that's actually more complicated than it looks
Did you try a cup of "shut the fuck up" with a dash of "eat a dick" inside
You seem to be misunderstaning the argument I was trying to make there. My parents were both professional photographers, I know what goes into it and how it's art, I wasn't denying that. I was telling you how the established means of creating art and that art community back then were biased against photography as an artform when it first came about.
I was making a comparison to the same mindset of "that's not real art, that's too easy" from people who haven't actually taken the time to learn what goes into it and how to make somthing that looks good and expresses the vision you are aiming to capture.
Simultaneously claiming "real art" takes great effort and downplaying the effort the new tool entering the market takes to get a good result. I never said people can't be lazy with the new tool, what I said was that doesn't discredit the effort that people who are genuinely trying to make art put into the tool and the human decisions that are made at each step along the way, including manually made edits in conjunction with other software.
"Cameras don't paint landscapes or capture human life in a still image like paintings do, you just push a button, it's a generator." -essentially the negative bias against cameras in the art community in the past, ignoring what all goes into taking a good picture.
guys, its all fake anyway, ai only uses previous training data to make fake stuff
photos and paintings require more effort and therefore can have more value (monetarily and otherwise) but its all a representation of something
The camera didn't generate the moment captured.
It captured it. Which is entirely different.
neither did ai
Now realize it's also happened again when "digital art isn't real art" was a thing against photoshop, and what's going on right now against AI.
I don't care what some dead person said 100 years ago
This isn't the same either.
It's the same elitism, and the point I was making is that people get over it in time and accept the new tool.
Digital art is not generating a picture.
Do you care to talk in good faith? It appears as though you don't.
You don't either
Sips ☕
The elitism is from "art takes more effort than that" while ignoring what it takes to use the new tool.
If you're not going to add anything to the conversation, maybe don't speak at all.
So you're saying that writting an AI prompt is the same effort as years of learning how to do something on paper
You ignore the entire process it took the artist to get where it is
Sips ☕
This wasn't saying anything I am sipping
Watching the convo fly past to a convo that will never done
I will leave soon don't worry your head
You brush it off and call it elitism, then say that your generator is the same valid """""skill"""""
Bare completely moment
Facts
Yet, you don't bother to try to learn what it involves, and make assumptions that boosts your points.
Using AI tools effectively is not just "writing a prompt", you need to have some understanding of fundamentals such as composition, color theory, in-painting, masking and manual corrections in order to make art. Even if it were as simple as that, prompting in whatever way the model you use or train would take in order to get a good starting image before manual corrections can feel like speaking another language at times because the software doesn't talk like you or I do.
I don't consider myself an artist, but damn, all the effort and hours it took me to learn how to even draw something remotely resembling a pal isn't comparable to your couple of hours writting a prompt
God, you people are annoying. Enjoy your fencesitting, your slop and your self-jorking. I'm gonna go finish cleaning my room.
Also, you're a real one Azrelus
And man, I learnt how to color and shade pictures while doing it
I figured it out, doing it, for the first time.
And even if my computer is off, I can do it on paper.
The people who hate on "AI art" I can guarantee, that they don't even know how it works
I got in a discussion/argument about AI art with someone before in this server, and I challenged them to go make an ACTUALLY good AI art, and they couldn't do it 

The classic, "If you think it's so easy, then you do it", only to see it wasn't as the other person dismissed.
Yup, ignore everything I just say and go along with the local troll.
Well, I had enough, I'm going to my game.
I've been replying to your messages for how long now?
Have a fun day typing
you ever thought about arguing less on discord and instead working on your skill issue?
good call, enjoy ur game, Az!
I wish I was diong the fun kind of modding
Are you saying that those with physical limitations shouldn't be able to make art?
what kinda physical limitations are we talking about
but i'm just banging my head against my keyboard to recreate what unpr3diT%#$ctable m@ -_; chine err0r>>> has destroyed
Man, using people with disabilities to push AI slop is probably the lowest of low I've seen
What's also funny is that people try to make the argument "it's taking jobs away from artists"
If someone is using AI to make art, chances are they were never gonna pay someone to make said art
On top of that
What about physically disabled people? They should be forced to pay someone else, because they are physically unable to do it?
Like for example, Steven Hawkins, if bro wanted art, should he be forced to pay an artist, or can he use AI to make his own art?
I could show you the post cards armless people here in my town draw for charity, they use feet and mouths
stupid unreal engine
"Uhhh I can't package this content because uhhhhh ummmmm skill issue!!!!"
And they still look better than any ai slop i've seen
Ah yes, I forgot, the only physical disability, is no arms
People like Steven Hawkins 100% don't exist
so now I have to copy content but because I move the files slightly to the left the engine is like "whar??? references???"
And also I have to watch out for how palworld does pal blink animations by grabbing material INDEX not ID
Blink issue
so if I have the materials ordered wrong then the character will blink using their entire body
i bet you AI wouldn't have this issue
if you try to drag me into the AI discussion again i'll drag you into the endless abyss of the infinite void for all eternity
Carby is already in a void
Gotta pay up for the new house
I doubt it can get worse
Another argument I love seeing people try to make it
"AI art is theft", like huh?? If AI art is theft, then so is every other single piece of art
"AI art" uses previously created art, to learn and make its own
Which is exactly what every other artist does, so by their logic, every single artist is a thief
soz
Way to dismiss people with disabilities who use AI tools who make the same point and how they felt better about themselves now being able to express themselves when they couldn't have done so before.
sorry, but I've decided that these cyclical arguments are cringe
I've decided to finish my cup of dry prune tea
unless someone is going to pay me to say "HAHAHA AI SLOPPPP" every time, I'm not gonna bother




