#pc-specs
1 messages · Page 99 of 1
Regarding this, it's something that has already been discussed and it brings more than what was mentioned we will literally see our performance and VRAM usage significantly reduced.
Closer to 10 since its shared as system memory
Ohhhh okay makes a lot more sense
Two years since neural texture compression was announced, we're talking about a theoretical 80% size reduction with no apparently significant loss.
For me to care a game would actually have to support it, and currently, not a single game supports it AFAIK
I linked a video where the guy says SM is "free performance" so im not sure what you meant by that or how it fits to that comment
Sad thing its going to need game developers to implement it
It's a new and quite effective compression method literally one of the few AI-based features we had been asking for that wasn't being done until now. But it's not free: it will require GPU processing to achieve the result. You always save VRAM, but you'll be using GPU power to get that benefit, which will hopefully be worth it given the reduced load. For now, it's only for new games — though, for example, if the devs of Stalker 2 wanted to implement it, I doubt it would be hard to add.
I think mods could add it for example, it would work with any RTX Remix creation.
I think you pinned the wrong message,again, but fair points
mb
It’s a technology that I view with some fear because, like DLSS or Frame Generation, although it’s an improvement, companies will take it as an excuse to stop caring about texture compression. I don’t know how it will affect the future, but once you give these companies an inch, they’ll take a mile (ehem, GSC).
Probably but you those games that are being remixed dont really struggle with vram
In words of the doc: " AFTER 5 YEARS OF THE PS5 WE STILL ONLY GOT 16GB ON A FCK 1000$ GPU"

Well, actually yes besides that, performance also improves thanks to the compression, even if they don’t use all your VRAM. Keep that in mind.
Reason: Bad word usage
🐺 ´d
60 class gpus at high 400$, next season 500$ if amd doesnt stop f'ing around
Less memory bus usage, less swapping or loading from storage, and better resource management doesn’t sound bad at all.
the problem is that these graphics cards barely improve, yet they still charge you about 30% more.
On top of that, adding 4GB of VRAM for me only cost 80 euros . and they cant do it😭
Losing 10 - 40% performance is not feature thats desirable for sake of smaller vram use
Who says that’s the actual consumption??? wtf
And thats just proof of concept testing and not practical use testing
100% we got more Vram and performance with 80TI with less cost after 5 years of the PS4. Now we get less performance same Vram and need to spend more money for it 2X for it. Just sad 🥀
Neat feature, going to need Nvidia to find new pet developers to push it
5% y 15% They were recently talking, about 40%?? Where?
It consumes additional computing power, but much less than if you had to load and handle full uncompressed textures.
Praying that Nvidia and AMD step up next gen. Nvidia seeing AMD doing something and AMD coming with UDNA
udna will either be the rdna3 we expected or a nothing burger
AMD specializes in messing things up just because, never count on them.
They’re even capable of canceling a conference because they freaked out.
Yup like ... always?
remember the leaked slides showing gamers buy <700$ so they wanted to price it at that
Eh show me it being used in actual game with benefits before that its just neat theoretical gimmick
they are absolutely clueless in their marketing team
I mean they learned this gen how to do it right the numbers speak for it.
Hope that those that did the right call stay at AMD 🙂
You said 40%, so you’re the same don’t ask from others what you don’t give.
From the old testing before last weeks coop vector test
they had a clear winner this gen, nvidia stagnated
They could've priced it at 500$ and just win, but they gotta follow what nvidia does
if they price up they have to price up further
Rather have a 150€ less costing same performing GPU than one that cost only 50dollar less
Pass it to me then
You must have seen it. It was from february or march
im just gonna wait for intel to shake up the market, ill keep my gpu until it dies
No, I haven’t seen it, I’m just looking at recent test results.
40% or so is without cooperative vectors
11%~ is with coop vectors AFAIK
i dont really have much faith TBH
when was the last time you saw a B850 at MSRP ?
they are behind in performance but so far all their generations are positive outcome
especially battlemage, smooth launch
6700 xt perf for 250$ with better RT
and its half the die of A770
So full BM could be like 30% more perf on top
Celestial Xe3 already showing signs in panther lake igpu that is 50% better than previous gen, so same uplift
its 280e here, not a bad card still
well, no matter what your veiw point is, they still have a long way to go
the B580's die is the same size as a 4070, yet it performs similarly to a 4060...
Guys i found the Final Problem. So its a Chrome issue that happens when using Chromium browsers with drivers starting from 25.5.1.
Angle backend to one like --use-angle=gl or --use-angle=vulkan fixes the issue.
Problably the Driver had it hidden. The same was on Nvidia GPUs. Not the driver was at fault it was Chrome.
So revert the AMD driver Bug 1 to a 0
Add Bug to Chrome from 10000000 to 10000001
Driver for sure
they have long way to go but they are the only one that can actually do something, unlike team red
Celestial top end if they release it is an 3090
i heavily doubt
i dont think gaining 65%~ performance (which is where the 4070 is) is something intel can do with drivers at this point
65%??
thats where the 4070 is
drivers have been pretty good, only flaw i would say is that if u pair it with not the best CPU ur perf is kinda mid
its already not the top end die they use for B580, so them getting 50% perf is good and plausible cus they have still a fresh built architecture and 30% on top of that if they go full out its a 5070/3090 perf level card
something tells me something like that wouldnt be as good value VS AMD/Nvidia as the B580 is
plus, by the time celestial comes out, UDNA and Ruby whatever (RTX 60) will be out soon too
and the B580 looked much more impressive before the 9060 XT/5060 came out 🤷♂️
true, they will have to give like 24GB memory and probably lose some $ on the card sold
pricing it aggressively
its still a net positive, without ARC they would be doomed in the laptop space
OEMs wouldnt even wanna touch their stuff, even if AMD is now ahead, they would be like 4x more ahead than they are if not for their battlemage
rumors about it being cancelled are bogus
i tend to not read into romurs too much
they usually lead you to an AMD RDNA 3 level disapointment
XD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrLC0GFpFsQ&t
9060 XT is kinda wonky sometimes
i follow intel gpus for the most part cus thats what excites me ;'D Amd and nvidia can go into an anomaly
cyberpunk RT ? better than 6800 XT
calisto protocol RT ? way worse than 6800 XT
You can see that we are in a Regression of performance.
GTA V EH RT with 2nd bounce ? way worse than 6800 XT, without 2nd bounce ? same as 6800 XT
6800 xt is goated
We need nother one
its the best gpu amd released from the RDNA lineup
Reason: Bad word usage
Do you guys thing the IPC of Zen6 gonna be really that high?
what a bieatch
I dont think that its gonna be that high. Also that the clocks are geting 7+ are crazy
clock speed could be 6,4ghz cus 2 nodes better
SH2 R 1% lows ? f"cked on SW lumen, HW lumen ? no.
6.4-6.2 is more in line but 7 + is too far.
i believe max will be 6.6ghz at 10950x if we get lucky
poll man
i gotta do my thing you know
Sounds stupit but for the last AM5 i dont think so
stupid is what they do with CPU naming
like changing laptop CPU naming scheme, TWICE FOR NO REASON
AMD HX AI 395x MEGA GIGA
You forgot XTX at the end
amd is doing what is xbox doing to themselves
xbox 360, xbox one x, series x
RADEON AI MAX RX 9875 XT AI XT
OFC they do. Every Gen they need to add something
RDNA naming has made sense so far TBF
well, except for STARTING AT 5000 FOR SOME STUPID REASON
hd radeon 7000, rx vega, rx radeon VII , rx 5700 xt, rx 6900 xt, rx 7900 xtx, rx 9070 xt
brother make up ur mind 😭
AND THEN SKIPPING 8000
okay well technically Strix halo is RX 8000 but who tha fuack cares
Nuh uh. 5000 than we got 7000 with Some letters added like XTX and GRE. And now we got the number moved to the right
6000 also happened BTW
Yes but nothing changed in that time
well it got GRE in 2023 but do you count that?
but RDNA naming isnt so bad
like, higher number = better still applies
the generation isnt hidden through some random obscure number
segmentation also isnt hidden like that
and the suffixxes are OK
only actuall problem was 9060 XT having to models, 8 and 16 otherwise nothing crazy
saddest part 5050 will outsell it ;'(
CUZ OF THOSE GODAMN PREBUILTSSSS ::: ((((((
Still nothing like the CPU department. They did nothing exept add numbers as they got higher end CPUs. But it stayed like that since 5000
rip intel in the cpu department
Reason: Bad word usage
ive seen 1 guy test from 7800x3d to 9800x3d on anomaly gamma, pretty good uplift for 1 generation
mostly what they are doing at radeon too....
i think they'll stagnate a bit still
stagnate SO MUCH that they cant get 30% more performance ??
something about bad bus and no vram and increased price
Adding numbers check BUT adding letters + changing name + Move numbers = no
why i said *mostly
unless they do a ryzen glue moment for UDNA, if its just an arch change i doubt it'll be as good as we expect
counter: GDDR 7 and i dont think AMD wants to screw up their low end again (for pricing)
Most is more than 50%
gddr7 offers no uplift in games almost, gddr6 is still better to use with the cost savings
i think the only one that was sensitive to gddr7 was hogwarts
but it helps with bandwith, and smaller busses
id say its like 65% consistent 
so more than 50%
sussy
one side of me is saying nvidia cant stagnate 2nd in a row (Refresh)
AMD on the other hand is always 50% either a hit gen or a dud
How many cores does the 5060 have ?
i thought it was 3560 but TPU says 3840, at it just doesnt seem right
my solution to that is just give us full dies with the bus that ur supposed to get ;') that simple AMD, and price it normally next time
you only named AMD while that also goes for NVIDIA [sus] /s

They deserve more of a bashing cus they are 8% market holders, publicly defending 8GB vram gpus
Nvidia does it cus AMD allows them
i disagree with the first one, 2nd thing was worded incorectly, and i think wouldve made a lot more sense if it wasnt, and 3rd, kinda agree
if they would be a threat nvidia would drop the prices, but AMD is doing minimal work so nvidia doesnt care in the end, we could see another increase next gen who knows
Looks like I get to email Sapphire Customer Support 😒
Huh?
Sapphire. AMD GPU AIB.
It’s 1920.
Okay, but why though ?
WUT
NVIDIA counts virtual cores, AMD doesn’t.
So generally, whatever it says you need to half it for NVIDIA and even that’s just a rough estimate. Unless that changes this generation.
ADA Lovelace suffered from this problem I do know.
I need the dimensions of the thermal pads for my GPU which they don’t provide on their website.
Ahh
You mean how Nvidia Started counting CUDAs double when they allowed INT side to do FP too in Ampere? or was it otherway around
But im comparing NVIDIA to NVIDIA
Ada Lovelace is NVIDIA.
But anyway, yes I need to replace the thermal paste on my GPU or rather I want to. Just in case I rip the pads I’d like to grab some backups…
Blackwell unified cuda cores so its 128 cores FP or INT per SM. Ampere and ADA had it split 64 FP and 64 FP/INT. So core count is true.
Turin was scrub and had 64 cores per SM so im guessing confusion came from that when ampere went back to 128 cores and had it split
So no such thing as virtual cores. Just Nvidia doing its dishonest thing and only counting FP for CUDA count.. But now it doesnt really matter since its unified
Makes one kinda wonder what was the whole point of this adventure only to go back way Pascal did it
@tropic bobcat Do enlighten me how is that wrong?
Only certain specific parts of it and I didn’t feel like having an in depth discussion about it because I don’t have the energy for it tbh.
Fair enough
Thanks for being cool about it lol. I just have no energy right now. Still trying to find the right thickness for these thermal pads, this is idiotic.
I might just have to wing it and hope I don’t rip any of them 😒
Which card?
7900xtx Sapphire Pulse, already located the PTM7950 that’s no big deal. Might throw some on my CPU also because you can use it for both. It’s the pads for the VRAM and such that’s an issue finding the right thickness and type.
guys i think here is a good place to ask? I have a 5700x3d with a 4070ti super and in places like Duga the fps is not really good no matter the resolution. An 9800x3d would be a good upgrade? Or not worth it? This is the only game i feel my cpu is not enough ...
What settings?
Epic but even on high actually looks like it does not matter
i've got a super ultrawide (32:9) monitor but this game runs quite bad with the full ultrawide screen. I've tried many times to mess around with the settings but no luck - how do i get black bars on the sides while going back to 1440p resolution so i can get some fps back?
i've tried messing around with aspect ratio and enabling the bar settings but nothing changes and no bars get introduced
@coarse linden found some, Thermalright Odyssey, $20 on Aliexprsss for a pack of 0.5mm, 1.5mm, 2mm and 2.5mm.
Eww ali
Wha?
They sell great PC components and stuff. I got my $30 Lian Li GPU bracket on there for $8.
Eh they have screwed me one time too many
Haven’t to me yet.
I decided to go with these.
Grabbed some PTM7950 also of course, and some extra tools I’ve been needing.
PTM is the good stuff
Too bad its kinda hard to come by since OG factory only sells to companies
Oh yeah, JOYJOM on Amazon sells the real stuff at decent prices, $16 for 40mm x 80mm sheet.
My only source is some polish online store lol
Might put some on my CPU also which I’ll freely admit I’ve never tried. MX-4 has been my stuff for years and years and years now lol.
MX4 is good. Not good for GPU since it pumps out
I’ve got probably a dozen tubes of the stuff lying around.
Kryonaut was my way to go for CPU for while but since latest incident been tad hesitant to use it again
Yeah, my sapphire uses standard paste. I spotted a 97c hotspot earlier. It’s summertime also, couldn’t hurt to throw in some PTM.
“Incident”?
It hardened real bad so cpu came off the socket with cooler
So? Will it be a good upgrade for STALKER2?
In theory 50% uplift. Practically in Stalker 2 something like 10ish to 15ish fps more
But other games will love it for sure
Twist.
It didnt twist at all
Ok, blow dryer
It was like cement glue
Dental floss.
That and isopropanol
3 year application and temps were fine so was kinda surprising
Did you also run the system for five minutes before removing it?
My system is on 24/7 lol
Whelp. They just sent you glue then.
Been doing this hobby for 30 years lol
AM4 was notorious for getting CPUs stuck to coolers it was…not so funny after a while lol.
Dental floss is crazy but goddamn does it work lol.
Had bit of a heart attack when it came off
If just twisting doesn’t work out comes the dental floss.
It’s a bit better than MX4 but it’s harder to work with since it’s not as viscous.
Wait I might of used that word wrong lmfao
Anyway, it’s thicker - you know what I mean anyway lol.
heh yeah
Costs more here also. Not sure about where you’re from.
7 month so far so good. Havent noticed the usual 1 month temp increase that kryonaut does
Grizzly is overrrated. I’m not sorry.
Kinda yeah
Sure they make good stuff but it’s not any better than anyone else and they charge out the ass for it.
And stupidly expensive
They’re the Corsair of paste, but their products aren’t shit
Corsair cuts corners. 🤨
Hey corsair isnt "that" bad
Well, I’m bias. I HATE their memory modules.
They did give us maglev fans and im kinda fond of the k70 keyboard
I’m using a SteelSeries keyboard and mouse at the moment. 💀💀💀
Build quality is top notch, but their software is straight doodoo.
But then again corsairs software ain’t much better lol
Tbh i have not downloaded any corsair software
It likes to just stop functioning
Nor did they have one for this keyboard when it came
Huh…
Been using this for like 11 years
Mine has this little screen on it so I wanted it at the time 🤣
To be fair the keyboard itself was also revolutionary at the time.
Damn i wanted it so bad but could not justify the cost to myself
It was the first keyboard to ever feature magnetic switches. I checked. They hold the patent for it still.
Magnetic adjustable switches, I guess would be a better phrase.
That sounds kinda neat
Oh yeah, you just adjust it in the software and it just…does it.
It was freaking revolutionary at the time. LTT did a great video on it when they weren’t shit
Not that i would see any actual need to have mag switches
It’s just a six minute video but it’s really neat tech, pretty commonplace now but at the time and when I bought it was the cutting edge lol. Still is to some extent.
MX Reds been serving me well all this time so cant even see reliability aspect to justify extra euros
The tech really hasn’t changed that much to be honest. Anyway that’s a good watch.
Nah I agree but his older content was MUCH better.
That video is straight to the point, also. He just gives you the facts and that’s that. These days he’d turn that into a twenty minute video with Alex bursting everything into flames.
Alex is like the only Person on LTT that I like because he’s unhinged lol.
Only tech tuber i even bother to watch is gamers nexus
Totally fair, usually same.
I watch some of LTT’s old content but if I need facts I go to GN.
LTT is just entertainment and always has been to a certain extent. Their newer content is just slop.
I’ve opted to just not use their software, besides it conflicting with software I actually do want to use, you don’t need to use it anyway
I’ve heard that quite a lot that it conflicts with other software and I’m sure it does but I’ve honesty never experienced it myself.
i had it for 1.5y pretty good but i switched to kryosheet thermal pad and i got same if not a bit better temps (1C)
Grizzly costs way too much imo.
20$ for permanent longevity seems like a good deal to me, hassle free
ptm7950 exists and costs less.
So far, for my country, I'm up to $32 on the kryosheet and its double the price of what I paid for ptm7950 and its half the size.
Unless its cheaper in your country, your paying for the brand and your getting screwed for it.
cant buy ptm here, ptm also has an expiration date, this doesnt
Okay fair enough, but also they both “expire”, and the latter doesn’t have a “date” even if Honeywell says otherwise.
Just keep it in the fridge. 🫡
will AMD update FSR 4 upscaling to 4.1 when redstone releases
4
5
1
yes
😎
Guys what 1% low you have?
I dunno, why?
Game is just bad with the 1% lows
I’ve never noticed tbh.
That’s odd.
Question for you. did you ever get mods regarding conflicts working.
Like getting mod merger working?
I don't use many mods, I don't know what that is. I just know it plays well lol
Celestial C770 = RTX 5070/3090?
2
3
1
Yes
598839725280722978
smile_strelok
w
Would make sense considering it would be a next generation card, E.G NVIDIA 60xx would be on the horizon by then and whatever AMD decides their next naming scheme is.
if they dont stagnate with vram intel has a chance
How do you mean?
8gb
I don't think the C770 is going to have that problem. 😄
i mean with nvidia and amd
Oh, AMD seems to be pretty fair with VRAM, historically speaking. NVDIA used to be. I'm not sure what was their idea with the 9060XT 8GB, you got me there.
RDNA2 was the their moment, they really had an advantage in the vram department, this gen? not so much
never said they had an advantage, just that it was fair.
5060 Ti 16GB/8GB 9060XT 8GB/16GB
5070 12GB vs 9070 16GB
5070 Ti 16GB vs 9070XT 16GB
Seems pretty fair to me to be honest.
a lot of it is all over the place with the regional pricing, in my country nvidia is cheaper which shouldnt happen
That is going to happen though.
As for vram
5070 12GB is enough for a lot of games if u dont crank useless RT setting to the max
You can't stop that. Regional pricing is a reality of...anything really.
NVIDIA, Intel and everyone else suffers from that same problem by the way. ☝️
its AMDs job to pressure retailers and AIBs
they did it with rebate at first
now its back to overpriced scalped
they got used to profits a lot
Since covid/crypto boom prices never went down ever, where its usually 2-3 months max after a new gen prices will start going msrp and under, but since RX 7000/RTX 4000 its always inflated
NVIDIA tried tactics like that with EVGA and it completely detonated in their faces.
It plays it amazingly, I love the game far better on Linux... just wish they would make it native
Stalker 2?
You know it'll be funny once intel starts providing competitive products , out of nowhere AMD and Nvidia start instantly cutting prices
RTX 5050 pcb is literally scraps, same with RX 9060
5050 matches the B580, by the way.
Yup... It's insanely good
Huh, you on NVIDIA or AMD?
nvidia
5050 will outsell everything amd has cus of oems
, and 50 is now 250$ priced class card cus of zero competition
AMD has massive performance gains on Linux. 7900xtx’s can surpass a 4090 on Linux pretty easily.
That is why I am gettign a 9070xt soon.... or wait a few months and see if the 9080xt is a thing
Something tells me 9080XT isn’t happening though I’d love to be wrong.
doubt it
Might not be a bad idea to wait anyway just in case I’m wrong.
well, the prices are a lil above MSRP anyway
Yeah, there's no reference model.
and are slowly dropping... so waiting wont be a bad thing
your region is quite unlucky then.
dunno , rdna4 is yet another ''hey guys we exist'' generation
also in US same story , they have more shipments so they can drop the prices
i disagree but whatever : )
in my region pretty much every GPU is below MSRP so, i dont care that much
Same here, it is a great gneration and shows that AMD, while being serious still has work to do but that they are comitted to doing so.
The efficiency by itself is just great.
effeciency is worse
60c at max load? My 7900xtx could never....
Of course not, but I am in no need to rush, so I can afford to wait and save $100, which I can spend on other things
The 9070xt nearly matches my 7900xtx with HALF of the power draw, bud?
u dont match that u match the competitors bud
also 9070 xt is downgrade cus of vram, eventually fsr 4 will come to 7000
Why? because you say so?
efficiency is not raster btw
I never said it was?
What are you talking about? Are you just saying random nonsense in order to confuse everyone?
Who is trying to justify nVidia? Shill.... I will never buy from tehm again... Just scamming gamers
why do i feel like you are secretely dennythefart ? 
24GB vram > 16GB
What does it have? RT only? Which is still mid tech so its a side grade at best
maybe he means power draw?
I don’t understand how someone can say the efficiency of 9000 series is worse than 7000 series. I love my 7900xtx but not only is it HOT, but it’s also an energy PIG.
Wouldn’t matter, as he’d still be wrong.
Some people cannot compare objectively and efficiency is power draw
the TI has 16Gb RAM, so what are you talking about, so the same as 9070xt
he compared it to his 7900 xtx which had 24
I’m sitting here on my 7900xtx drawing over 420w just sitting here. It IDLES at 100w. 9070xt comes nowhere close to that but can nearly match the performance.
I compared it in rasterization, not video memory.
why the hell are you comparing the XTX to the 9070 XT ?
because he did
yes, 50 series has better efficiency, no they still are bad and amd still wins 70 series cause of their power, not by power draw, but by fps/$
Because I didn’t*
Thank you : )
power draw wise ???, NOT VRAM
Yeah I never mentioned VRAM between the two I’m not sure where he pulled that from.
efficency is perf/watt, not just power consumption, wth
And?
the 9070XT runs a little fast/slower but for less power... that makes it more efficient
That’s very debatable.
i was comparing it with the competitor 5070 ti , he started comparing it to 7900 xtx then i said its a downgrade from that card because of less vram, RT is pretty much still useless toggle in games
I don’t think you are going to get anywhere with them. Just another Danny.
70xt is still cheaper then 7900xtx
i literally have an AMD GPU , but i objectively say AMD is not as good of a value as people say
he still downgraded is my point
And?
So what, compairing to previous gen is thing... nVidia, customers and reviewers have been doing it for years.
So what exactly is the issue?
it has better value then 50 series
Nobody downgraded? What’re you talking about now? This is just yap.
he was only moparing efficiency, not performance nor VRAM
not really when you incluse RT performance and FSR 4
They are majority of the market share amd are just 8%, if u expect they will win like this totally wrong
That is not what I was asking?
So WTF is this answer?
only regarding vram, in regards to power consumption its upgrade, in fps its about the same, so i think its an upgrade. even though its like a 7800xt, but next gen
FSR 4 can be used in RX 7000 modders have already figured it out , its not outside of amds possibility to implement it
*on linux
and it runs much worse on RDNA 3...
better that than vaseline FSR 3
There's also massive caveats to that bud.
why wouldn`t it run on windows? seems like its not a hardware issue
but it will be nowhere near as good, due to the AI chips required.
So a mute argument
Then why hasn't it?
Cus their software team is pepega
like, going from 60 to 50fps worse
You don’t think that at some point, one of these guys would have been like “hmmm, we’ve been doing this on Linux for a while…why don’t we try it on windows?”
But yet nothing has happened. It’s a valid point whether you like it or not.
idk, could be a promotion of 90 series, maybe they just dont want to do this cause it doesnt have much sense
I’m not talking about AMD. We know why they haven’t done it yet.
Really? That is funny... Linux better than windows 😄
linux is easier to mod than windows.
Agreed, the visual “uploft” for worse performance despite being upscaled? Yeah…I’ll stick to XESS thanks.
depends on what r u doing
Sure, but someone would have figured it out by now I’d imagine.
for me - as for just a casual windows user who mainly plays games on it - windows is better option
Gaming... and yes... Linux is really good. Darktide for me runs infinitely better on Linux
I am a casual gamer, runs like a dream
They figured out how to lift the power limit on my GPU without an EVC recently, that’s pretty huge. I figure they couldn’t figure out how to get some part of FSR4 working for these GPUs on windows.
good for you i guess, but for me windows is just easier to navigate and use it overall
taking the highest end 9070 XT card and comparing it to refrecne card ? lol
That’s why I still use it, Linux is great but still has its own list of issues just as Windows does.
AMD doesnt have a reference card
Well, technically not true.
show me it then
There is one, in China. It’s pretty not well known.
for a causal user linux is easier on many fronts... especially it's flatpak stuff...
looking at GN
the 9070 non XT has the same efficiency as the 4080
the XT (sapphire) is the same as a 5070 non TI FE, and leaves RDNA 3 in the dust being nearly twice as efficient (granted, thats the nitor model for the XT/XTX)
the 70 TI Asus prime is 11% more efficient
nuh uh. thats all, im gonna go make slavery a thing in minecraft
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/sapphire-radeon-rx-9070-xt-nitro/41.htm
also, here’s the rest of that image they sent, since they decided to only snip the part they wanted us to see.
for RDNA 3 they DO
same for 4 but its china exclusive
why did they made it so?
i sent a gaming benchmark power draw
That chart also isn’t even that accurate, what the hell TPU?
IDK, doesnt matter
It lists the 7900xtx Multi-Monitor at 14W which uhhhhhhh isn’t true?
Its not released
no it matters, i think its pretty good looking card
coping off the charts
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/sapphire-radeon-rx-9070-xt-nitro/41.html
Some china boys pocketing cards nothing new
GRE edition, first milk at china then release it for the rest of us
link* doesnt function : )
R.I.P.
Works just fine?
74w
rdna 3 drivers moment
yeah, its a known issue. I'm not sure where TPU is getting their figures for the 7900xtx but its WAY wrong.
not for me it didnt
18W on my 6600 lol
Get actual browser instead rusty chromium 
yeah, 7900xtx is beyond inefficient.
in using firefox brhu
9070xt is also WAY cooler. My hotspot can hit upwards of 97c.
hold up, i was looking at their RT chart : (
Repasting soon, anyway. Have penty of goodies on the way.
they tested DD2 with RT TOO ARRGHH
I mean they explain how they get their results
I even got a new caliper 🙂
"We conduct a physical measurement using professional lab equipment, the values are not software sensor readings, which are much less accurate."
They should stop doing that then, because its wrong on the xtx.
https://prnt.sc/fOcuwpFTiTIF
20ms transient spikes?
At least for multi-monitor.
ive never seen physiscall measuring give lower readings than software : )
That would be because it doesn't, they do that to lend credibility. Industry standard.
well, their starfield test doesnt..
https://imgur.com/a/heYpuX9
Eh they post what their measurements show them. You say they are wrong and in reality i dont even give a shit lol
Then why are you here?
Bored
So you do care.
Your back and forth is entertainment
9070 non XT as efficient as non TI
XT VS TI is differnet though thats 41% better for 5070TI here
who ze fuack cares ?
tf
I moved on tbh, let them continue.
Why you got 100W idle
someone said it was efficient, i am providing evidence
Because I run more then one monitor.
I do to
and the evidence is power consumption 0.000000000000000000001% of the time ? 
I only have 30w
It seems to be a widespread issue. Maybe only effects certain units?
What 100W?
High power consumption on multi-monitors, just do a quick google search.
Heh reminds me when both AMD and Nvidia had driver issues where multi monitor setup refused to downclock at all so card ran at full clocks constantly
You are also on 4k, I am not.
Thats not what is happening
The issue is 1440p monitors, 4k is unaffected.
Refresh rate also has an effect, could be another issue.
No you got some bad Monitor clock that is making your GPU clock higher
You can lower the hz to make it work
Really? becuase going from 180z to 144hz and the wattage is now half what it was.
Do I actually care? Not really.
I got 2 1440P monitors with one 144hz and other 165hz no problem on me
Few watts here or there
Some people mind the power consumption, I don't personally.
70w more is big
I don't mind.
Thats a hole CPU you got in there of extra usage
More like two.
Just change the sec monitor to a lower or similar hz
165hz also fixes that issue btw, its well documented.
I just don't care enough to want to address it.
It doesn't actually affect in-game performance at all, the thing draws over 420w at load, I think we are past "reasonable" anyway.
Bro why are you still on this? Go take ya meds.
Relax
that anyway with 450 on older highend GPUs and now 600w
Well 5090 is unsusal haha.
you DO realize that HUBs power testing is quite literally uselss cuz they test THE ENTIRE SYSTEM unlike GN
Some people to attached to material stuff, so they gotta defend their purchasing decisions, im just here fact spitting
Even the 4090 only draw 475w maximum, give or take a little for AIB's.
Starfield at 1440p is up now. This is without ray tracing. The 9070 XT pulled 310W again here, landing at 0.34 FPS/W and just ahead of the B570 and 7800 XT. The 5070 and 5070 Ti are both more efficient, with the 5070 Ti in particular keeping a massive improvement at 0.48 FPS/W. The performance is comparable on the 9070 XT and the 5070 Ti here, meaning that most of that efficiency benefit comes from the NVIDIA card pulling just 209W
GN's review
Ok, Danny.
You asked for GN i gave GN
Okay, Danny, we get it.
fair. but i already posted that, BTW 
Everyone else already moved on too.
2.2GB for this mod, come on man....
At 1080p but still in F1 24 with RT, the 9070 XT ran at 311W and scored 0.51 FPS/W. That puts it ahead of the RTX 4060, the Intel B580, and 42% improved on the prior 7900 XT. NVIDIA’s 5070 Ti maintains an advantage at 266W
(GN)
I dont really care anymore about Wattage in Gaming. Just the usage in Idle since sometimes i leave it on.
non XT is much more efficient though, which is a littly weird to me 🤔
Tbh i have not seen my 5070 ti pull over 300w in any game so far
Fair enough, I stopped caring about either. I like my 180Hz even if its diminshing returns.
XT is just the Trying to get the most out of it
if amd would release bios flash for non 9070 to flash to 9070 XT , you can do it now but needs some workaround
but the non XT has like 20% less cores i think
They're disabled.
They are present. Flashing the 9070xt vBIOS on a 9070 gives you the performance of a 9070xt.
true, but its not like you could simply enable them : )
I just remember myself that a beast PC with 2 CPUs and 2 SLI GPUs only took 600W. Today one GPU takes as much
Disabled or simply not working
Either or, my guess is disabled. Thats usually the case.
ye its crazy efficient
it gives a higher power budget
it also often changes the clocks.
Did you try using all the stuff that nvidia has?
Did you try to undervolt it @coarse linden by any chance
its not gonna activate the inactive cores
Since Nvidia has the extra cores for RT and AI you actually dont use all of the GPU.
?
PT, FG, RR, DLSS
Upscaling FG like use AI 100% and use RT at 100%
Like use the GPU as much as you can
Have not used FG tbf
I use it on cyberpunk and stalker
Even with all the AI stuff i dont think you will get the reall 100% usage of the Chip cuz the AI on nvidia is strong enough for basic DLSS
wonder if same goes for RDNA 4 🤔
Only experimented so far. Does run 875 with +300 on core and 1000 on memory with it but not sure if its stable. Been too lazy about it
what FG?
230w in games i assume?
Since AMD has no AI CORES and its more build in the CU i would think that the power usage stays same since all the cores are active all the time to get you most FPS
FSR 3.1 + XESS2 at the moment.
okay
Did not measure lol
Looks quite nice plus....a lot of mods....
2077 ?
Cyberpunk runs 60fps on path tracing at 1440p is good enough for me
yeah.
nice.... you got a flashlight mod? The custom one I am using is not working, the UI is not coming on.
hows their FG implementation for ya ?
I use many many many many visual mods.
cyberpunk botched the update with FSR4 , frame time all over the place
The best out of any game to date, the devs did a great job with FG implmentation.
Sounds like a personal problem perhaps.
just cuz this is the only footage i have of it, and here it looks like ass
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pNuhZRsEXI
AG showcased it
Thats because FSR 3.1 is ass. im talking about the framegen.
so am I : )
Looks fine for me and...everyone else on the modding discord at least.
Wow didint see that coming
How much?
That video he's also using FSR 3.1 Upscaling, I'm not.
https://youtu.be/kEnuTrZZ81g?si=wpGEPNvBr-yeEYwf
Epic frame time CDPR
These frametimes are off by like .3MS at most in all these frames im seeing?
What am I missing here?
as if upscaling method mattered to FG quality?
and BTW, thats before they added 3.1...
that its way worse than last update ?
You said it LOOKED bad, thats FSR 3.1 mostly there.
Thats just on the devs.
But i want to ask you how much?
moving camera causing stutters
Doesn't on my end.
have you even watched the video i linked ???
Yes...? Thats why Im commenting on them using FSR 3.1 Upscaling AND FrameGen.
fun fact, you cant* use 3.1 upscaling unless you have RDNA 4
(in cyberpunk anyway)
I mean not ideal but far from unplayable really
I don't.
I've not noticed it personally.
My stalker has worse 1% lows
stalker sht until they move to 5.6
i meant cant* BTW : )
Not cuz of that
Still better frametimes what unreal engine offers
I can.
I think i downloaded Mods and it kinda fck my game and now its stuttering on the newest Game i started
But the older saves are Fine
80fps - 70 1% lowss
maybe this will help clear up what i meant, the part in red didnt get interpolated only the part i circled with blue had FG applied to it
https://imgur.com/a/H1TFKMi
you sure your eyes arent deceiving you ?
send a screenshot of you having FSR 3.1 upscaling selected 
But how much?
doesnt matter, all that matters is FSR 3.1 uscaling
No how much is CDPR getting payed?
ohhhh
Do we gonna get this month even new driver?
answer: LOL
each month usually has a new driver
To fix the stutters? And Officially make FSR4 in CP77
AMD pushes monthly drivers? Since when?
the times when RDNA2 got 3 drivers per month
since adrenalin came out lol
I hate that they started to leave a month or make it Optional.
Past 2 years it was fine but no they had the blow it up. They and their pride and ego 
Reason: Bad word usage
Oh cmon.... This f bot. I aint writing that again
Hello guys, which settings in the game is cpu intense?
My cpu is hot when playing S2 and I would to know which settings is especially cpu task
LOD/culling stuff
set the game to off
Define “hot”?
LMAO
The game might do that for you if we’re being real.
I bought more thermal pads, so now I have a full set for no particular reason.
80-85C
My cpu is around 70C in other games like metro exodus enhanced 
I desperately need help with the stuttering in this game, its making the game bascially unplayable for me
Alright, CoochieMan.
I have a 9800x3d and a 9070xt and have downloaded both a stuttering fix pak and a engine.ini tweak but they haven't helped much
Most of those things are snake oil
works on nvidia
I got 9800x3d and 3090ti
brand really doesnt matter for these sort of things : )
Has to do with mods. Bricked my game with low 1%
If you have the steam version, the engine.ini tweaks must be in gameusersettings.ini or something like that.
I have a old i5 10400f with 6900xt and ddr4 ram. Playing at 4k high/epic with TSR 80% (yes, TSR) and FSR framegen ingame @60fps stable without any stuttering (while using reshade as well).
I also changed from TAA to FXAA in the ini.
If you want I can send you my tweaked ini
Engine.ini and GameUserSettings.ini are completely different things. If you start adding things meant to be apart of your Engine.ini there’s a good chance you may just break your game until you remove whatever it is that you added. Now, that being said the Steam version does not have an Engine.ini but you can just create one and the game will recognize it.
Anyway, my guess is his problem is mod related because there shouldn’t really be any reason why his game shouldn’t be running well on a 9800x3D and a 9070 XT., his install could also be borked. Whatever the cause is I seriously doubt it’s his hardware unless it’s faulty.
Which mod?
Don’t know yet but I think it’s the forests mod
The one that adds more forestry? That one?
If that’s the one in question, that’s exactly what the problem is.
The autor off the ini tweaks specifically stated that for the steam version the engine.ini wouldn't be recognized, and recommend to use the gameusersettings.ini which I did and it worked great for me (I added two full ini tweaks in that file plus the change to FXAA.
Non issues, I had only one crash in 70 houres, aand that was due to a corrupted save file, just load one older quicksave and it was working again.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3369280920
In the comments also a discussion about this (for me the engine.ini didnt work as well)
Interesting considering it works for me.
Author? You mean….GSC GameWorld? Epic Games?
Author of the guide 🙂
Unfortunately they’d be wrong.
EDIT: Nowhere in this guide does the author state that creating an Engine.ini file will not work for the Steam version of the game, not that I'm seeing. Not really sure where that was pulled from.
https://i.imgur.com/R3X2ous.png
here's mine and I know its working and I'll show you why.
No problem, at least it works for me this way 🙂
https://i.imgur.com/INX9k5g.png
That line at the very bottom disables the warmup and sure enough it does work, so the file is being recognized.
Yes
Have ya tried removing it yet?
Yes
Did it change anything...?
Glad it works for you 🙂 but for me it works this way as well. And an old saying for me is: never touch a running system. So I keep it this way, if it works it works. (And I have a backup of the file of course)
https://i.imgur.com/vhQp9kF.png
my favorite 
No
Why change to FXAA of you are already using TSR ?
TSR just overrites FXAA for AA
whý does amost every gun has a scope bolted in.
Its really strange how high end UE5 graphics require so much cpu (even when its a single player)
Is it time for zen 6 cpu
more fix engines and devs
In stalker 2 case its the AI really.. It being abysmally heavy from foundation does not help for what they are trying to do
A friend of mine was clearing out the house and had an old PC in it, I said, I will take that...
Turns out, he had a AMD Phenom II 955x4 black edition, with 8Gb of RAM, and HD6950 in it, all working... current installing linux, will install proton on it, MAME too, it's got a SSD in it... It's going to be a fun little thing to tinker with.
Infact, I am using it right now.
Think I will need to sort out the thermal paste in the GPU though, tis a bit old, and probably dryer than the sahar
Hi should i turn off motion blur? does it heavily affects gpu resource? how about post processing effect? should i turn it down to low? using 3070
Any self respecting PC gamer turns off motion blur as first thing after they start the game
it doesnt impact
i personally prefer a bit motion blur in S2 because it hides low details in the background
i keep getting memory leak in busy places like rostok whenever i opened my map and it stays stuck at 5-14 fps. is there any way to completely resolve this or should i keep quitting to main menu and reload the game?
try to DL a stalker 2 optimization mod to mitigate that
sadly it's already installed 😭
verify steam files, try to lower settings even further with the upscalers if needed
if u didnt compile shaders in a long time try to do it again
I've lowered the dlss to ultra performance, I'll get back later with the result
GPU?
will Helledivers 2 EVER get DLSS 2.0+ or FSR 2.0+ ?
2
2
1
NO.
598839725280722978
smile_strelok
lol
such high confidence
CPU Topseller Amazon US 🇺🇸
The first Intel CPU in the list moved 2K units last month, while the first 3 AMD CPUs alone did 27K units.
Almost didn’t see intel 
will UDNA's / RTX 60's 60 class card be as fast as a 3090/4070 Super
2
4
4
yes for both
These don’t work.
It’s a placebo effect. They do nothing to optimize the game itself. Most of the commands within these files aren’t even correct. I’d avoid using them.
S.2 Optimization Tweaks specifically actually makes performance worse in certain areas like Rostok.
I’d suggest remove it ASAP, this mod in particular makes performance in Rostok worse, for example. Remove this mod and run around in Rostok and get back to me with the results to see what changes.
Of course, it could all go away if GCs did their job properly, but nah 😄
Sure would, but UE5 certainly isn’t making things better. If UE5 at least didn’t make everything look like smeared ass that would be great to start.
This game is certainly not the best graphically for sure
Cool, but that isn’t what I said.
Sticking to ue4 would have been best call
That is mrope to with the devs, I have played plenty of UE5 games and most of them look great, becaue the devs put the time and effort in.
GCS are just lazy and useless, always taking the quick option, rather than putting the effort in.
Agreed, sure maybe it wouldn’t have looked as “realistic” but at least it wouldn’t be smeared ass and run like trash, kinda…
All my UE 4 games are unoptimized AF lol
Abosulty cluster F of a call that.
UE5 is notorious for smearing everything. It’s not unusual.
Run better than ue5
That’s not really fair. The developers expected an engine that wasn’t pure utter dogshit.
And look worse too...
The developers have their share of the blame for sure, but it isn’t 100% on them.
No really, it depents, its smeary because of the AA, old AA games look way sharper, becaue of the AA tech used, for some reason the new AA stuff, just looks dog shit.
Compare Unreal Engine 5.1 to Unreal Engine 5.7, the performance difference alone is night and damn day. The comparison is shocking,
They wasted 1-2 years on ue5
Also, UE 4 suffers from the same smear/ghost problem 5 does, especially if FSR/XeSS/DLSS aren't available
UE5 is dependent on AA, a lot of games aren’t.
and had to cut corners and take short cuts, one of which meant they couldn;t implement A-Life how they wanted due to the way the game was zoned.
Sure it does but it’s nowhere near as bad. Take a look at Days Gone, looks great without any AA whatsoever, but of course it looks even better with it.
Did you guys see the unfinished locations ? There are so many
It’s just incredible. And so many missions that modders find and reimplement
Ehh, ill counter that by saying that SCUM, BL3 (UE4) was more smeary to me than satisfactory and ASA
Like I said, depends on the AA...
And it's blight of modern gaming in general, because devs use all this stuff, to take short cuts and do a lazy ass job. That is not something that is unique to UE5...
Just modern game development in general, be as lazy as possible and do a slop job that just passes.
I don’t really care what ue is more smeary least it’s running
Days gone is the exception, not the rule...
And I have content
And it was all down to poor management, snd blowing 10's of millions of god knows what.
UE5 is a common denominator though not always.
Somehow they repeat the same mistakes even worse than legacy games
Least they had own engine
Their management does seem rather poor, doesn’t it?
Like a real upcoming team
So explain the rest of gaming industry that has the same problems, that don't use UE5...
“though not always”
💯 they are so disorganized
Poor 😄
Non-existent 😄
I haven't tried disabling TAA in BL3 but i have tried in scum and it made me want to throw up, it was so bad..
Call it whenever you want.
A steaming pile of donkey turd
Alright.
Hi mistor probably scammer
@pure ibex
hes owned
get owned bruh
Though it was cracker jack...
That's why i couldn't find him : (
It took me a while also…discord just kept having his name appear and then disappear, this app is trash sometimes.
Wonder how it’s going to go when discord goes public…
Well, it's owned by TenCents, all they want is your money and data, they give a single F about providing a good app.
Why would they, when so many mugs pay for the garbage they dish out.
Worst I feel is that this game could been much better if it had avoided switching
What is owned by TenCent?
Your cents..
The whole ten of them
Discord
Discord to be serious
Uhh? Discord is a Privately held company. Sony owns some of it too.
Sony can F off too... But the majority holder I think is TenCents IIRC.
Discord is going for an IPO. It can’t be “owned” by TenCent.
July 22nd, came and went... No GPU : (((((
ARRGHHH
Eh What?
Ordered a 9060 XT, still isn't here, and o have no updates on shipping so i gave up, refunded it
They bought a GPU and it hasnt shown up yet is my guess.
But my thermal pads, PTM7950 and other tools showed up for my GPU to be repasted 😉
Not sure when I’ll get around to doing that 😒
did you get it of a reputable site?
Where did you order
Probably got “scammed” on Amazon
Thought so...
IDK RN

Forgor
You do not know where you ordered it from?
I order pads and thermal past today.... I got a HD6950, from years ago. 2Gb of RAM 😄
Gonna turn it into a retro gaming machine with MAME and maybe windows XP or 7.
Long as it’s PTM7950 
Did you get your money when you cancelled
I knew, when i refunded it, 
It’s a phase changing material. You don’t actually need it for a GPU like that, it’s more for high performance GPUs.
I got some mx4 paste, if not, got some grizzly...
The pads are grizzly too
Anyway, i bought it from a diferent retailer, one that i actually trust, should be here tomorrow
Those grizzly pads are the same thing, PTM.
PTM7950 is just the “original” from Honeywell. They also cost less usually.
BENCHMARK
I will once i get it
Thanks for the heads up I will remember that
There’s a lot of fake PTM7950 specifically, I get mine from JOYJOM on Amazon, it’s a fan favorite of ours in the overclocking community.
Really, I generally hate Amazon, as it is mostly cheap chinese shyte... Are they American or British?
No ides what the company is, but they sell the legit stuff not clones.
Real PTM7950 is 0.25mm thick, the clones are often 0.20mm. 😒
This was the CPU cooler in teh PC I got... It was well looked after 😄
Cheers, I will check them out 😄
I know nvidia has advanced AI SLI technology that they use for AI gpus but they just seem to refuse to bring it to gaming gpus 
wow ngreedia seems to not care about common users, so unexpected
SLI and Crossfire weren't effective for gaming, which is why both were discontinued.
More to do with the fact it would make no sense to support it in this case.
Big issues with microstutters
That and GPU usage.
i guess its more like "if i have 2 1080ti - there is no point in buying 2080ti, cause its no more powerful then 2x 1080ti"
No, its more like it wasnt effective for gaming - at all.
if it really x2 fps, but it didn`t, unffrtunately
it was somewhat effective, from what i`ve heard
No, not really. It was trash.
It had no place in gaming which is why support was dropped. You'd see 50% usage for each GPU in gaming at best. You'd often find the same performance or even better performance with just one GPU.
input latency was also a major issue.
if it worked properly - world would`ve been a better place
It never would have.
unfortunately, a lot of thing doesnt work like they should have
SLI only worked WHEN developers implemented it also...
lets just hope that one day - it will come back, working properly
God I hope not...
It would be a cool flex. Especially with current gpu prices lol
Lesson learned only order ones shipped by amazon itself and not some bs garage store
3070
Did you try removing S.2 Optimization Tweaks? I’d seriously recommend ditching that mod immediately as it causes major issues with the game and performance.
Good morning, I just woke up and removed it now. sorry about that, it was 12 am earlier here at my country. Should I change the upscaler back to balance too? I lowered it to ultra performance last time and the game textures looked like an oil painting lol.
Hey no worries. Just wanted to make sure you ditch those mods, to reiterate they do NOT work, like at all. Now the ones that change the game VISUALLY often do.
Keep the upscaler at whatever it was before and give Rostok another try since removing S2.
wow currently at rostok and i am running, jumping, sprinting then openning the map and so far so good. no fps drop to 12
lol i take it back. i went in to the arena bar and quickly open pda map and the fps is now at 4 lol. It wont go back to 55+
I guess whenever the game load something when I enter a building in rostok and quickly opened the map that's the time the fps drops and stays. sad
well its a start at least.
what settings and res?
fps 4 gpu 99% lol
99%? In rostok...? really?
thats...unusually high, thats a good thing. even mine never gets that high cause this game is nasty on cpu optimization...
yup this happens when i open map quickly, fps will drop to 1 digit and gpu will go up to 99%
i mean 99% is good, uhhh can ou check vram, usage?
although my cpu is only at 20%
I'm looking at the task manager and the dedicated memory usage on gpu is almost high at 8gb on the graph
Yup until now it's still stuck at 4 fps and 99% gpu util.
Okay so I loaded back to my recent save at duga and the fps is still at 4. I can confirm that the only way to stop the fps being stuck to 1 digit is to quit to main meny and load the game from there. Quitting back to main menu gets the fps back to 60 and gpu util to lower than 50%
how high is that? 7.6gb? 7.8gb?
maybe 7.6gb the graph doesn't show the amount only that the line is near at the top 8gb..
yeah that could be why.
You think an AI model couldnt fix that
Nvlink is still used to this day for AI gpus
And it has improved compared to when gaming had it
I think they can do it right now
I really hope they make more optimizations 
DX12 was kinda final nail since instead of drivers handling SLI its developers responsibility to make it work and seemingly since developers hate dx12 still, thats never going to happen
Could even do that cursed mixed GPU with it but you know
Oh i see
Technically nothing stops you from installing 2 gpus and having it work with games if game developer have added support for it
Thought needs to be dx12 game
Are you playing on low ? And what resolution?
Not going to happen. Play 720p and all low so you don’t get it. Vram is already optimized. It would look very bad if they further optimized vram usage
1080
I've had the same issues with the game droping to 1 digit fps.It mosly happened when entering the Slag Heap building and looking towards the right,it would fix itself after a while.Since i've progressed from that area,i didn't encounter the problem anymore(hopefully)
You need to play low settings
No. Otherwise it would have.
Guys you don’t see the big picture. Sli FG times 16x
i had a 6600 and i didnt have to play all low 
blame Nvidia? Somehow he is getting Vram leak.
Could also be a mod.
9060 XT 16GB: INSTALLED 🥳
im gonna start with cyberpunk : D
I have a 4070super rn I could do some benchmarks too
as its one of the games that most needed an upgrade for me
so with FSR 4 AA + RT ultra im getting like 40 to 50fps so far
it looks a LOT better than it ever did on my 6600
though reflections are quite smeary
some RR would be nice
FSR Q gets me above 60
mostly
Or up the res
thatd make it run worse... and i dont think itd be able to run that
it was better than buying a 5060 TI lol
cuz its like 20% less than that
PT crashes... but it runs OK-ish overall...
path tracing?
only game to use RT that is worth is cyberpunk, metro and dying light 2 rest makes low diff
but using RT with 60 class card is still questionable
it actually doesnt run that bad...
1080p high preset FSR 4 AA RT lighting P + RTS + RTR
42 avg
35 1%
34 0.1%
😭
*THAT
i would throw that RT in the trash and just use 4k instead, better outcome
if i had a 4K monitor i migh even consider it : )
for me 50fps+ is very playable, and FSR 4 Q looks really good
FSR 4 P is like 3.1 AA in this game lol
try to use VRS
that always leaves me second guessing wether or not its placebo or it actually looks better 
it does i did use it for AC origins, only flaw is u have to use fullscreen instead of borderless
1080p high preset FSR 4 AA [CPU bottlenecked]
87 avg
55 1%
44 0.1%
1440p high preset FSR 4 AA
66 avg
53 1%
46 0.1%
think its a little sharper... but thats it... the thing s that annoy me at native 1080p are still there with VSR 1440p...
stalker/
dont hold your breath on my benching that 
i was asking if that was stalker cus i didnt play it for a bit
nah... thats cyberpunk...
stalker probably woulndt get me 60fps at 1440p native
i got 35 fps at prypiat c:
or at 540p either...
cuz CPU
most optimized GSC game
F-me
1440p was tested with XeAA not FSR 4 AA
optiscaler the ultimate troll...
even less of a difference with FSR 4
whats so funny ?
optiscaller le troll
i suppose DLSS input with DRS with FSR 4 through opti isnt the best combo
[game crashed]
though i'd think DRS through opti should work..
nope. opti doesnt even have a feature like that : (
oh well... i suppose i'll just stick to UQ or Q for now
that game is like 180GB lol
i dont even know what to guess : )
but first im gonna try satisfactory
so its much better for the most part than XeSS and 3.1/2.1 but its a little wonky with cliffs... which use nanite in that game
by wonky i mean: weirdly blurry ?
Though XeSS and 3.1 have that same issue so IDK
AMD's first (?) RT demo 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHTqrGwH95s
huh...
so i tried something in cyberpunk and FSR 4 and VSR
at 1080p i was using quality mode, it was good but not the greatest, then i went up to 1440p changed the FSR preset to performance.
and it actually looked better 😎 same ish performance too
fsr4 is great now
70 1080p Q to 65 1440p FSR P
another interesting thing is that at 1080p FSR 4 was very slightly faster than 3.1
but at 1440p FSR 4 is 0.6-4ms slower...
yea monitor upgrade looking more saucy after upscaler upgrades rn
4k using dlss 4 perf or fsr 4 perf
will be the angle
Low on 3070?neah.....i have an RX 6600 and i have a mix of medium/epic settings from Benchmark king.The game runs locked at 60 FPS,i would imagine the 3070 should perform at least a bit better than me.
decided to replace VSR with OS (optiscaler feature)
Uff that needs a fix
amd shouldve released 9090 XTX
it couldve been a close 5090 competitor, those cards sell for 3000$, so they could sell it for 1000$ easy
if they do not release it next year mid cycle , they are clueless 
will ARK smear ascended look good with FSR 4 ?
2
3
1
no, UE 5 game problems..
598839640476352525
smile_degtyarev
maybe bit more with 24gb on the box. cuz there are no gpus that are between 16 and 32gb
gddr6 is very cheap compared to ddr7 so they could do it
maybe this is why the 6800 XT was soo much faster than the 9060 XT in the calisto protocol at least with RT
🤔
its just stutters perf is fine
6800 xt is just goated
in RT ? 
Nah they would have priced it 2800
we already suffer from unoptimized games, rt on top of that is death
RT is nice
Work in progress last i heard
thankfully there arent so many UE 4 games with RT 
32GB XD
jensen; gpus getting too fast, lets invent a feature that eats 95% of ur fps
ft. RT
what is it with AMD and shader compilation stuttering ?
last year there were months where a bunch of games had constant shader compilation stutters
and now... its back !
You meanin the summer?
yeah pretty much
i think it was 24.7.1 or something
i think it was 24.6 to 24.9
Only remember Fortnite having such issue
no pretty sure it was just maybe 2 weeks before a update came
IDK
praying that its not one of the updateless months
u having some issues or
CP77 needs FSR4 support
no. just hopin' theyd fix the UE 4 +RT thing that update
its not official rn.
they said you need a Driver update
Oh in January Maxwell and Pascal will be dropped from driver support. RIP

Well its been more or less 10 years since launch
RX 580 came out in 2017,drivers stopped in 2024?
that would be 7 years
nah.. it got dumped to legacy in 2022 i think
and im talking about being dumped to legacy and not being discontinued..
Aha
weird enough RX 5000 was released in 2019 so..........we might see the driver updates for it slow down
exactly 6 years ago on July 7th
if it was 600$ since launch would be 500$ now if we were in a normal market
Isn't tech epiphany a german site ?
yes
Cuz in germany 600€ is WAAAAYYY below MSRP
i thought he was using
pc part picker but everything there looking at it is way overpriced
Its probably mind factory or whatever its called
You know the guys that share sale reports all the timw
yea nvm amd is doing an nvidia move by keeping everything over msrp everywhere beside germany 1 retailer
''look guys its msrp"
600$ 1 stock remaining
besides most of europe* : D
And remember in germany and most of Europe MSRP is NOT 600€
eager to see Q2 results in market share if 9070 xt outsold nvidia (prolly not) but maybe their best selling launch card yet? could be? cus nvidia doesnt provide any
But 726
german MSRP is 690€ keep it in mind
Prebuilts almost exclusively have NVIDIA so NVIDIA no doubt wont loose market share
Though it was 726, cuz VAT is 21% or is it ?
even diy market is 90% nvidia unfortunately
How could you possibly know that ?
19%
Ahh
AMD said its 689€ in germany
somehow i cant find a good number on Nvidia without doing your self
majority ppl that i know, are semi casual will still choose nvidia because it just works
, better for vr, ai, better dlss , people dont care about how much % is better
They just hear "it is better" and opt for it
Reason pre builts buy nvidia is because they know it will sell
If AMD had a competitive product, instead of slashed price -50$ , they would've gotten it instead
especially at the lower end
9060 xt 8 GB = 300$, 5060 8GB = 300$
https://x.com/TechEpiphanyYT/status/1901540251132162341/photo/1 they done it again
Neither of those should exist LMAO
They are both garbage.
Reason: Bad word usage

if amd decided to price 9060XT 16GB and price it at 300$
it wouldve maybe turned few heads
they even have the cheaper GDDR so they could but nah
It's already 80 less than the nvidia competitor..
I cant imagine someone that is building his own PC buying a 5060
I wouldn't complain cheaper is better of course
people that are not informed just go to =>filter newest => cheapest
and buy whats available