#pc-specs
1 messages · Page 72 of 1
Boards yes, gpus no... amd 5700xt strix had problems alot of problems
thats kinda galax now
you dont buy a radeon from asus
thats just dumb
the days of the asus ares are decades behind us
lol
if you want a radeon you buy it from power color
POWER COLOR PEAK
Well i wish i learned that when i had mine back in 2019-2020 :/
asus just makes radeons as a side hustle lol
uh.. 5700XT was the product that made me forsake AMD GPU's for good
Abysmal drivers
Yeah me too man, the drivers man... feels like a never ending fight with a Demon
Reason: Bad word usage
you can hate the radeon 7 but
Pfft I aint typing that again
Only reason i would go back to radeons is if they magically manage to match raytracing and make FSR not suck
I mean AMD drivers generally are "fine wine" type but holy fuck those drivers even few years after
But yeah i heard amd gpus are getting better thankfully
lol thanks
7900 xtx looks very fun id get a liquid devil if i got one though
Think i already bought 3080 so didnt look that way
if you mod them
which is very easy to do
you can fully unlock the power limit on them
and they can overclock A LOT
I just run mine with slight down volt
Undervolting a amd cpu is pretty interesting too its complicated but its worth it in the end
Keeps it nice in cool with losing like 1 fps lol
Got mine at MSRP and shop was selling these things in queue
For some folk it took over 1 year to get their order
i got insanely lucky
so i got my 3090 in like december 2020
i was in que right behind the guy who got the last strix 3090 i was trying to get
but he cancelled his order
so it then fell to me
I ordered in september and got it around january
Yeah thats what i heard too about the 3000s it sucks but msi allows me to oc it kinda but i dont really do it
had to drive like 200 miles to get it lol
for what ever reason
i ended up buying it all the way at the bottom of the state below me
how idk
but its what happened
Now that shop sells stuff with "buy order raffle"
To not repeat same hit they took with 30 series
its the samsung 8nm node
it kinda just blows
Some talks that Nvidia might go back to samsung node in future
I mean TSMC is getting stupidly expensive
They increased prices 10% this year already if i recall correctly
Slicon be very expensive in general
silicon its self is not expensive
its made in japan
it costs roughly 1000 dollars per
300mm wafer
for the disk its self
the expensive part is impanting it
the cost comes from the RND
process its self has not really changed in price to execute
only RND cost
Id imagine if Nvidia went up a node for this gen prices would have gone up more
blackwell is 2nm isnt it
Nvidia adopting "tick-tock"? lol
Oh oof thats not good
3nm is stupidly expensive
realistically amd should surpass nvidia at some point due to there manfucaturing tech costing way less
but idk when that will happen
nvidia will likely at some point hit a brick wall
with in the next 10 years
well
eventually there will be chiplets
Maybe
intels tech for it is also interesting
Considering how much Nvidia can throw into R&D
there usings amds silicon interposer
to build the entire cpu
piece by piece
intels another thing entirely though tbh
id bet good money there basically just completly fucked
Heh i abandoned Intel CPUs when they went stuck on skylake+++ and refused to look at their way until they abandon that big.LITTLE for desktops
i think intels best course of action
is to sell all of there fabs
its the only way to save the company
they are simply not capable of doing both anymore
pretty much
if they sell the fabs they might be able to dump enough money into rnd to refloat the rapidly sinking cpu ship
and make product that doesnt require own solar farm to run
other option is to spin off the cpu part as its own company
and just do only fabs
but issue with that is
no one wants to use there node
cus it fucken sucks
heh
there are better options for far less money
Intel is not really known for making those kind of good decisions
go ask GF or any number of the 10 thousand small Chinese fabs
they can make your chip for the same or less than what ever intels best offer is
or the french
them too
germans swiss etc etc etc
but anyways back to the topic of pc hardware
motherboards
i swear that naming scheme is so stupid now that they are so close lol
they are basically exacly the same spec wise
as what came before
only real difference is they now support cudimms
x870 boards are a scam
they are if you dont care about mem performance
people are very excited for the asus x870e apex
which is for cudimm oc
that whole grippled pci-e lanes just because of usb4
so you cant have over 2 m.2's without killing GPU PCI-e lane to x8
Give us more pcie lanes
Some boards if you added that 2nd m.2 it already killed GPU lanes
And they advertise some boards with 4 m.2 slots that you cant realistically even use because of that
back in the day they used pcie bridge chips
to boost the number of lanes you had
they should bring those back
like the nv2000 chip
Since if i fail to aquire RTX card i might as well just get the whole 9800x3d bs
im tempted but they seem to just hard cap out at like 5.7ghz
im hopping the 9950x3d can push higher
ccds will be a higher bin
OC was fun back in the days with little competition with forum folk. Not anymore
eh
its still fun
just gotta temper your expectations
unless your wielding a phase changer
in which case all bets are off lol
DIY watercooling shenanigans and all that
It was fun
But those fun people are gone, moved on with their lifes
considering how much quiter compressors are now
im surprised they have not made a come back
Im really getting old pffff
overclocking still has a massive community
people like buildzoid on youtube
have massive followings
goes super in depth on what is good and what is not
what to buy and not to buy
and what numbers work and what dont
and why
ok headphones, what do you guys use as headphones? i have some corsair headphones
i have Sennheiser hd 560s
beyerdynamic dt770
there fine
Once you abandon those 1337 gaming youghurt cans there is no going back
mine when i charge it says "CHARGING BATTERY" sometimes alot for some reason
then again im using an old cord for it, since the new one got destroyed by my dog lola
i stopped buying corsair headhpones when i realized they dont sell replacement parts
so when they break out of warranty thats it
my old pair
Roccat Kave was interesting
"real 5.1" in headphones lol
EXCEPT not because corsair did not sell replacements
Yeap because gamers just buy new pair instead of repairing
No need for that since they just buy new pair
mics cant just be fixed
but anways got a standalone mic now and a standalone pair of headphones
and both work great
Studio headphones and modmic good to go
have an elgato mic
from what i found online it was basically the best you could get for like 150 bux so
i went for that
i have a blue yeti as a mic still functinal after along time of use lol
modmic works for me just fine
i might invest in an actual audio set up for my headphones at some point
but for now i just plug em in the back of the motherboard and am happy with that
Heh i actually still use soundcard
last creative labs customer spotted in the wild
SoundBlaster Z bought it long time ago
yeah plug it in and good to go really
who wants my 7800x3d and 4090, need to upgrade to 9800x3d and 5090
yep free , free shipping too
can i have the 4090?
Jack got it first buddy
goes into pci-e x1 slot
Chumming the waters
oh im thinking of the audigy 2zs
Works surprisingly well still even when creative is arse with its software and drivers
Im currently (finally) watching the benchmarks from GN and HUB
real talk id buy your 4090 for like 1k but
im not sure how i can trust you wont run off with my money lol
dam it i really need a new GPU though :/
Kinda funny that i have never been interested in 90 cards lol
If you really wanted too we might be able to work something out, it's an ASUS Strix model
IM VERY INTERESTED
Can shoot me a DM and we can discuss
Tbh i would rather trust indian microsoft tech support lol
reminds me of that trade offer meme lol
strike when the iron is hot
my hardware colleciton has many rare pieces for this reason

Want GTX 1070 Strix to it too
Pfff but what if you would collect 1 of each strix cards
Get 20 and make epoxy table out of those
like the ares or mars
both of which only 1000 of each are made
mars is a super cracked gtx 295
ares is a super cracked radeon hd 5970
both have upgraded vram over stock
Tbh im not even sure what pc hardware i have
i had an ares
but it was dead
so i returned it to the seller
super sad about that
such a rare card
I have about 10 large boxes full of old hardware since somewhere from 1994 that i didnt manage to sell and just put in storage
Heh only car i ever paid over 3k was my work van
lol
Eh being poor is simple life
No need to worry about buying something stupidly expensive for sake of buying
and learn not to want unnecessary crap
Says pleb whos considering buying RTX 50 card
buying a 700$ card is alot different then buying a brand new car
well id never buy a new car
id pay far more than the price of a new car
for an old car
like my beloved
or just know someone who is loaded
i wish
blessing and a curse trust me
From my experience, people who are also into cars/motorcycles tend to have a very moderate setup in terms of pricing compared to their vehicles/maintenance
dunno idk the price yet
80s firebird supremacy
mff not even close to the mighty rotary
but
we can agree to disagree
80s firebird engine idc its mainly the body
but rotary engines sound dope. just like 80s firebird for a body and paint design
Pff 90's old arse BMW with 1.6L, busted heater and back windows are not air tight lol
Cost me 800€ when i bought it about 13 years ago
1k shitboxes winning
Only 64k driven so practically brand new really
Old gentlemens car that family wanted to get rid off when he died
240k mile honda still working
in 5 speed manual
i kinda wanted a 2006 acura RSX type s
but there super rare with less than 200k miles lol
lexus rx350 feel so nice to drive
ls300 is super cool
id have bought an older one
with a 1uz but
BUT
they do not come in manual so
hard pass from me
lexus sedans are so niceeee
Hah friend bought one of those. Older thought but it was real crap that broke down every 2 months and in the end cost him 20k in repairs total
the turbos ruin them
finally he got pissed enough and just ordered tow truck to make it into a cube
It was kinda funny to watch how he got these flashy and refined cars only to end up with 1L ford fiesta
meh i prefer old cars 40s-70s cars i love car shows too :p
there is a place in new hampshire
my mums friend owns
she repairs legendary rare cars
like the gt40 driven by ken miles at the 24 hours of le mans
we had one in our town last year it was awsome, seeing all the old cars from 50s 60s and 70s some even had the original receits with them and how they restored them
my heart lies with only one beauty
the mazda FD rx7

it is my lifes true and only ambition to own that car
i want to see an actual ford gran Torino 1976, my dad said they had one back then too but they sold it sadly
my grand dad
had a super rare truck
a 1974 mazda rotary pick up truck
only 11k were made in total
Dlss 4 is good
Much better imo
Even performance mode now looks like previous dlss version balanced. Quality is nearly indistinguishable from native it’s great. Less vram usage with Frame Gen also. Wish I could try that mfg. looks insane from what I saw on YouTube
Friday and no patch for the weekend meh
they hit profitability and did their bare minimum "we released at least a few months too early to be feature complete, have a "were sorry" few essential patches that barely fix anything" thing so, i guess we have to lump it
Bro is drinking the fantasy juice
RTX 5090 early benchmarks have finally come out and it looks like the RTX 5090 is about 30% faster than the previous 2+ year old RTX 4090 at a much higher TDP, this is very underwhelming considering that both of these architectures use the same manufacturing node. Jensen Huang claimed that The RTX 5090 is twice as fast as the RTX 4090 but nowher...
yeah the new transformer model is pretty insane, tested it out yesterday on cyberpunk. So much more detail
Typical nvidia haha 5090 is honestly a scam
I think the 5090 aib cards will overclock a fair bit so I’m excited to see that
All the current reviews are for the some what meh founders card
fair we need to see its OC potential and fair yeah FE card doesnt look appealing
Like if some 5090s clock to 3ghz that would be huge
tbh it's not like anyone is actually gonna be able to get their hands on one
I got my hands on 3090 in December of 2020 at a bestbuy so I think anyone can

They technically didn't lie, since it can do that much better than the 4090 with all their tech turned on
But with apples-to-apples settings, it's typically 20-30% faster for 20-30% more power and die area
It performs like a 4090 Ti would have
But there planning to add said tech to the 40 series

They're updating some of the stuff, but multi framegen (the fake frames that let them achieve such huge numbers) is 50-series exclusive
Multiple outlets said it was coming to 40 series
seriously? lmao absolutely no reason to upgrade if you're got a 40 series card already then
that's great news
I’m pretty sure I’ve seen Nvidia say that multi framegen is 50 series exclusive
I know that they’re improving the single framegen and upscaling parts of DLSS, are you sure you aren’t thinking of that
i'm finding some articles saying that it might come to 40 series eventually according to a DF interview
MFG is awful imo seeing more fake frames then real ones 
All comes down to how much the 5090 can oc
IDK i havent heard that at all
all i heard is that the 30 series might get regular FG
Call me when there’s an optimization patch
set a timer for one year
Pretty sure I heard it was gonna get it but maybe I’m wrong
Either way If 5090 hits 3ghz that would be pretty huge
"We are aiming to have fixes for Rostok memory leak and some performance improvements in the next patch"
I hope with "some perf improvs" we get quite a few actually :S
tbh i'm worried that performance will never really be great
then again i'm done with the game so it doesn't bother me too much, just concerned for others that keep asking
Check out the Asus X870 Range here: https://www.asus.com/microsite/motherboard/amd-am5-ryzen-9000-x3d-x870e-x870-b850-b840/
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hardwareunboxed
YT Membership: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCI8iQa1hv7oV_Z8D35vVuSg/join
Buy relevant products from Amazon, Newegg and others below:
GeForce RTX 5090 - ht...
First none founders review dropped
Watching now
Not really that impressive
But I get the impression it’s power limited
i saw it jump in video to 775ish watts on that little screen when the cord is rated for 600 watts
the preformance itself isnt all that good imo
Support us on Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/eTeknix
Reviews for the RTX 5090 are now live, and for our first look at card for someone that isn't NVIDIA themselves, we have the ROG ASTAL from ASUS, a monster of a card with a price tag to match, but does that monster price tag at least get justified with superior gaming performance and coolin...
Big kahoona
I am a bit scared of the 5090 not having a Hotspot temp and some user not seeing the heat problem and thus there GPU dies. Could be big problem
Yea next gen should be more exciting when its 2n. The power should be lower and GPUs faster. We got now cooler that are as big as the 4090TI prototype cooler.
I mean I think the 5090 really is wants to draw like 800 watts but
The single Tiny connector can’t safely provide that much
You would need active cooking for the fucken power connector lol
THe gpu does not go on the Motherboard, the motherboard goes on the GPU
It's actually crazy how big goes are getting lol
Dont get why AMD did go the Monolithic Die this time. They had something with the 7000
I'm interested in seeing how big the 6090 will be after the 50xx series is over
FE shrank, the AiB's might be bigger
5 slot gpu
Insert image of itx motherboard with 4090
XD
All this talk of 5090 but I’m only interested in 5070 
the bench's are nice but meh, i never go above RTX **80's i dont have a work station. and no money to throw away
i dont think it woulda been worth it
5070/70ti might be the real mvps
Are there die shots of the 9070 yet?
there are kinda
and those show it being monolithick
30% more performances for 30% more power
Coming out in march
AMD really said RNDA4 features not for 7900xtx and not gonna release a better or similar performance card
then got greedy, trying to price new cards higher because they thought Nvidia would raise their gpu prices again, and now stuck talking to AIBs and retailers regarding the money refunds and trying to match nvidia new features, pushing launch to March.
As that being said, Multiple retailers have 9070XT siting in stock
stupid dogs of a division lmao. I bet my balls it’s going to be another flop.
amd try to not shoot themselves in the foot challenge
Radeons are never gonna pull ahead till Nvidia drops monolithic die
OK. we will see about that lol
The frequency of silly people here has risen the past month, I hope that’s not a pattern I’m sensing
It’s never gonna pull a head anyway
Isn’t Blackwell architecture just chiplet? Or is that reserved for the much bigger llm data center chips?
Nothing nvidia makes is chiplets
Your think of hbm
But that’s not chiplets
That’s just vram
HBM is high bandwidth memory I know that
It looks like chiplets
GB202 is a monolithic design I’m well aware of that
Also it just takes one stumble for the competition to catch up
Yeah yeah, not when you have over 80% mkt shares. Largest goddam company in the world, cult like followers.
More like 10 consecutive stumbles
Hahaha Radeons have held 70 percent market share in the past
The balance of power has shifted many times
Nothing that’s gonna be miles better than what’s been out there
i have RTX 3070 TI, Intel i10-10850k (OC 5.2Ghz), 32Gb ddr5.
im running the game at 1440p high with dlss and fsr enabled
i get around 110 fps and 60-70fps in populated areas.
whenever i scope in with my weapon the game instantly drops to around 10fps.
is this a bug, a hardware issue or bad optimisation?
please let me know
How much % does the 5080 gonna have over the 4080Super? Raster
2
4
8
10%
after the 5090 reveiws : do you expect the 5080 to beat (or match) the 4090? (without MFG)
6
6
2
NO.
598839708474408971
smile_scar
benchmark leaks say 8%
Pitiful
hey can anyone help me get stalker 2 working properly? i have some good specs, but i notice that they are not being fully utilised and im dropping frames. frametime also spikes a ton. any help appreciated. rtx4070 i5 13500 32gb ram, ssd, only discord as my other open tab
no no, 5080 no, 4080 ti
I'm amazed by people who think frame generation will save them. Games like Stalker 2, which already have so many visual bugs caused by Lumen, will only make these issues more noticeable with this technology, creating even more artifacts than there already are.
What resolution?
2k
Where do you notice most spiking?
anywhere really its just random stutters no matter where i am
I have only tested cyberpunk so far. On my 4060 at 1080p dlss 4 performance with frame Gen is getting me 130-165 fps in dlc area ~7.3gb vram max settings aside from path tracing and performance looks a bit better than 3.8 balanced. It’s actually kinda insane
I’m impressed tbh. Can’t even really tell difference from dlss 4 quality vs native taa (dlss has less ghosting for sure). 4 Balanced looks like 3.8 quality. Frame Gen using less vram is nice. Latency went down from ~12ms to now ~8ms (both with nvidia reflex enabled)
Going to run stalker in a bit to test
If it got dlss 4 support that is. Idek. Haven’t kept up with stalker in weeks
Anyone have an RX-7600 XT and playing this game? I'm wanting to upgrade from my GTX1660 and I don't want to spend past $325. I was looking at the RTX-4060, but that only has 8gb of RAM, and with newer games coming out wanting 12-16, the RX 7600 XT seems like a better option to future proof with 16gb VRAM. Just curious how well or bad it performs with this game.
Only 1 game I have had vram issue with my 4060. Indiana jones
Sure more vram is better for future but it really isn’t a dealbreaker imo. 4060 is a very good card for the price imo
Well, Doom Dark Ages requires 12-16gb if you want to go above 1080p and low detail graphics to get 60 fps.
I’ve never heard of that game when did it release
May 2025. It's the next installment of Doom. 8gb cards can only do 1080p low settings at 60 fps.
Same with Indiana jones but that game is still beautiful on low textures
At the end of the day just go with whatever you feel like is the best for the budget you have
I would just hate to purchase that card and in a year or two, it can't handle other games except at very low settings. I'm a budget type of gamer, hence why my PC I built back in 2020 used a GTX-1660. I'm hung up between the RTX-4060 8gb or the RX 7600 XT 16gb.
I’ve never used amd gpu. Have you looked into Intel? Idk if they even have them in stock yet. Just make sure to explore as many options as you can
Intel has too many issues with my CPU, whereas the AMD and nVidia perform better with my CPU (Ryzen 5 3600).
I just upgraded from 1070 to 4060 couple months ago. But I got a crazy deal only reason
Intel only seems to perform better with non-budget CPUs which is wild. They might fix it later on with a driver update, but too many tests have shown you need a higher-end CPU to get better performance out of the Intel cards.
Is your gpu like done for? Or still going? Could always try to save a bit more to get a better card maybe
Plus, Intel B series is hard to get at the MSRP. Most are going for over $350 USD. That's too much for me. The 4060 and 7600 XT are much cheaper.
That's what I'm trying to do is save up. The GTX-1660 isn't dying, but I can't play most newer games that require hardware raytracing, like Indiana Jones, the upcoming Doom Dark Ages, and just so many Unreal Engine games, like this, play okay, but are a blurry mess.
Even Ninja Gaiden 2 Black, which states a GTX-1060 min, GTX-1080 max, looks like garbage. It's also on Unreal Engine 5, so my GPU just doesn't do well with that engine as far as looking nice. Just a blurry mess no matter what upscaling I use or not.
I know DLSS apparently looks the best, but that 8gb VRAM concerns me as more and more games are requiring more VRAM for higher settings. Sooner or later, 8gb I think will no longer be supported. 😦
Like 45 to 60 on medium without upscaling (1080p) prolly can get a better framerate with quality fsr but it also depends a lot on your cpu
UE5 games are just too much for current hardware imo unless you have a dang 4080/90 or something. What about 7700 xt
Settlements will still eat all your gpu and cpu power so dont expect a good framerate there
I would go for a 6700xt at least or a 7700xt
Dont be scared of buying an used one imo
That's why I hate how games are all using it now. They're not optimized well, etc. And I'm sorry, when I compare the latest Ninja Gaiden 2 Black with the previous Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2, Sigma 2 is so much sharper and clearer, while NG2 Black has so many blurry moments, especially when a lot of action is going on screen. It's just frustrating.
Imo 7700 xt Or try to wait and save for new amd cards releasing later this year
All this attempt to try to make the most "realistic" graphics have resulted in so many software algorithms to try and make things "look" better, but it just looks worse in many respects.
Or maybe used rtx card but would be more pricey I’m sure
Like I said, I'm a budget gamer. I don't want to spend way over $300. And I want new, which is why I was looking at the RTX 4060 or the RX 7600 XT. I'm probably still going to be at 1080p (not getting a new monitor any time soon), but I want to have some path to be able to play at 1440p in the future.
I know you said $350 but 7700 xt is $400 and I think ~15% faster than 7600 iirc
Nope. Not going over $325 to $350.
I don't need to play at the highest graphical settings, but as long as it looks pretty good, then I can get away with medium.
Well you just have limited options then. Like I said I never used amd cards but I will honestly say 4060 is well worth it for the price imo. For current gaming at least
The 7600xt is a bit better but you lose dlss (it also has more vram)
What I read about the 4060 is DLSS looks much better than FSR, but as I research, many are saying the 8gb RAM is getting to the point of being limiting with newer games coming out. I'll just have to wait and see. lol! Thanks for helping out though!
Imo go for the amd card
That's the thing I'm looking at most I think is the VRAM. More VRAM means hopefully less issues with buffering, etc. I won't get the BEST graphics, but I've read it doesn't look that bad. I'll figure it out one way or the other. I'm kind of leaning to the RTX-4060 because I've been nVidia since my GTX-560 back in 2010/2011. lol
Yeah I was about to say the same. I don’t think 8gb vram will be an issue for another few years at least tho
But that 16gb of VRAM in the 7600 XT seems really nice too.
Nah most games are choking with 8gb rn even with 10gbs
yeah, I agree. I think the new minimum, if it's not already there, will be 12GB.
Can you imagine the 5090 with 32gb???? Man.
Indiana jones I run low textures ultra everything else and I get 100+ fps no frame Gen
VRAM never maxed
I have a rx 6700 of 10gbs (just a tiny bit faster than a rx7600xt) and the 10gbs still isnt enough for some games
Medium should be good for 8gb isnt it
Well, that is on iD Tech engine, and iD has always been good at optimizing their games and their engines.
Medium textures is a big performance hit
Compared to low. And doesn’t look much different
yeah, id states for 8gb cards, it has to be at 1080p low settings to get 60 fps.
That's for their latest id tech engine which Indiana Jones and the upcoming Doom Dark Ages uses.
Indiana jones low looks like most games high lol
how does this game look? And how is the performance?
I’ve never experienced path tracing or anything like that so idk there. But with low textures max every other setting it looks good. Real good
I cap my fps at 90 on that game but I was getting 100+
This game on low looks decent but the framerate isnt that much better on low to medium end cards
I run 1080p tho
It might be awhile before I have enough money saved up. Hopefully, 4060s will still be around. lol. And I'll be at 1080p myself. Not getting a 1440p monitor any time soon. Plus it's capped at 60 hz. ugh.
Mine is 165hz but not too many games I can get that frame rate on the settings that look pretty lol
I would just get the 7600xt or if you can save more/wait go for a new budget amd card when they release. If they aren’t all sold out that is
I have already started saving. I think I might go amd next time around. I hear they are working on fsr to maybe compete with dlss. But dlss4 just blew them out of the water so idk
Has anyone tried the new dlss model on s2?
preset j
because your 0.1% and 1% lows are bad. Same thing here, 5800x3d, 4090
average framerate around 165 (capped) but with 1% recordings dropping as low as 30 fps
I am amazed that some think its gonna be 10% really Optimistic
first of all....when you poll you should (at) everyone.
the 50 series was built with MFG to be used. not to turn it off. 
Yeah I don't really get the purpose of buying a certain card with certain features just to turn them off, may as well not even buy it
I’m impressed even with updated frame Gen on 40 series. At least cyberpunk anyway. It looks soooo much smoother and cleaner. Feels more responsive as well. Less stutters
Saw zwormz test 5090 in cyberpunk and mfg with path tracing was insane. 200+ fps and looked fairly smooth. But as always with FG you can tell it’s not native if that makes sense. It is getting a lot better though
I agree its definitely getting better, looks much cleaner too
Much less ghosting is nice too see
less blur overall it seems
Im interested in that Reflex 2 tho
for input latency
Where does the fact change? Nobody gonna include FG in the Performance of the card. Most people want just more raw FPS. Without extra stuff. If you are after framegen and think thats something that is what will improve your games do it. But 4X FG is useless. You are using FG to smooth it. 4X is just for the numbers. U cant use 4X on 30FPS base game where it would be useful.
As is with all technologies/software, early days implementation leave a lot to be desired, but this is likely heading down a path where in 10-15 years, 4X FG might not come with a latency hit at all.
Hardware progression is slowing down, unless you add a ridiculous amount of power delivery into the mix and unfathomable cooling for the average user, as is Moore’s law.
Software however, is clearly making jumps
I wonder if 4x fg will help with 1% lows. No point in having 500fps if the game is going to stutter
Watch zwormz play cyberpunk on 5090 if you’re curious. Good video. I’m more interested in 5070 & ti tbh
Also interested in how dlss4 & reflex 2 will be implemented for 40 series and how all that will make games feel. Especially UE5 games
There are a lot of improvement or changes to Hardware that we can do without just shrinking the gate.
It just needs to be cheaper or reliable enough to be mass produced.
If just using Software would give a real rendered frame than it would be insane good and we all would use it.
Even if we are saying the FG is so good it will not get Artifacts it will not see whats coming around the corner what with a "Real" frame would show. When running at 30FPS it will still have problems. So software has its limitations.
There is still things that could massive improve the hardware like Glass, Graphene, 3D stacking(Is not the AMD X3D 3D staking that i am talking about), Using light as transporting data. And there are many more. Like its not the end how some say. It could be just the beginning of better hardware if you look that way.
While I agree with many of your points, I don’t see those options coming to us in the foreseeable future, especially not when the company that controls 80% of the gamer market share is so heavily invested in AI is running the race, and AMD is seemingly slacking off
AMD either needs to pull an X3D like move with their GPUs to get the advantage on Nvidia, or we’re treading down the same path we are currently on. Simply making equal/slightly worse performing cards compared to their competitor at equal/slightly cheaper pricing clearly isn’t cutting it for them
Amd needs to do too much to catch up with nvidia. im not the only one that doesnt care about raster performance.
Ai rendering just gonna keep getting better from here on out
All those stuff exist and are working but like i said either price wise good or and reliable is the reason why its still not on the marked. Its just what TSMC or Samsung or any other can announce next week that they will give customers the ability. AMD did the right step with the Chiplets but i have no idea why they abandon it this time. So its on them not using the tech. I could see that again in UDNA.
Sad that Nvidia will not do much on the hardware side, least on our side. It did improve the large Servers.
AMD did though? "Infinity Cache" on GPU's that Nvidia matched in RTX 40
Then do what you want. Putting AI in everything will not work. Some stuff genuinely helps and some are just useless. Never get that why some need to defend anything.
Well "matched" Nivida just increased L2 cache size quite alot
There was also X3D before X3D in the GPU side if you look the Fury X it had 3D stacked Memory but AMD never sticks to there stuff.
HBM? Still wildly used just not for consumers
Yea
And since its expensive it makes no sense to put it on gamer cards
I don’t get why folks are so worked up about this AI stuff from Nvidia
probably not much benefit either unless someone makes a game for hbm memory usage
People may disagree with me but Raw Raster performance is nearly at a dead end
Can't keep brute forcing graphics fidelity
https://imgur.com/a/Vol2hfx as stated in this interview
but everyone will keep screaming for raw raster anyway
If raw raster could be done, it would have, obviously these new techs are better and will only get better over time
So much so that it'll look better than Native
People can hate Nvidia all they want but they're in the position they're in for a reason and have the largest market share for a reason
Go big or go home
I do think we are never gonna get rid of the artifacts from ai upscaling tech. Closest we will get is between 95-99% of native. But I will take that to have frame rates 4x what native is.
It'll be to a point to where it's happening so fast and so small that only a trained eye would notice it or not even notice it at all
The next big improvement is going to be RT cores which will start to replace shader cores if we do make the jump from light maps to doing light calculation on the GPU
Indeed, Ray Tracing has some ways to go but it'll get there
We are pretty close to that already. Unless you are really actively looking it's not noticeable. Except for the oddball here and there
The question now is RT cores going to replace shader cores. For gaming yes but how will it affect other programs
Yeah and at that point it's like are you really gonna be that stubborn and play at 60 fps or 240fps
People say they don't wanna use AI but own a smart phone
I'm taking 240fps over 60. Idc. Ai is going the path of the calculator. People who used them before where called cheaters. Same with ai but you can already see how places are embracing it for programming and grammar
Someone will come in here and say its people like us that are ruining things 
Far frame gen is the worst example of frame gen. But even the worst case scenario you can get used to it. These systems are alot easier to understand than ai networking where AI will auto complete file data
Native might've stayed over ai if producing the chips also didn't get even more costly as well
I think the biggest thing for people with FG is the input latency, and it's also a hard subject to convey to people cause you can't feel it in a video, you have to experience it for yourself, but FG input latency is based on your base or native FPS so the lower your native FPS is, the worse FG is going to feel, but at higher native FPS like 60-80+, FG doesn't feel nearly as bad, but a lot of people will try to use FG at 20 native FPS and say it looks and feels like crap.
I'm hoping this new Reflex 2 can help with that
Also yeah the networks that guess the last half of files are a thing that are being implemented in some places which is insane
Reflex 2 is looking to drop latency lower than native. I think people are trying to use fg as a get outta jail card for low frame rates which isn't gonna work. Its like using a 4 cylinder car to tow a cow trailer and complain how it's struggling. These tools have situations where the perform the best and if you don't give it them they will cripple it worse than if you didn't use it
Yeah, that Reflex 2 is looking really good, and supposed to come to all RTX series cards in the future, hopefully it doesn't take to long
I did see how lossless scaling did x20 mode. Frame gen is gonna be the only way we are gonna use 500hz monitors or higher. But we can only rely on this tech for so long before we need hardware improvements or for game developers to take a turn from making hyper realistic games only and switching to different art styles like borderlands for an example. Graphics are just the big example but not the sole problem there is other issues under the hood. Easier to beat the dead horse
Huh 5080 is 6% faster in opengl but vulkan 22%. Interesting
and with how cleaned up DLSS 4 is looking, with less blur, ghosting, and better denoising, combined with Reflex 2 and FG, I'm thinking it's gonna be a pretty nice combo.
Its also impressive seeing the 5090 being CPU bottlenecked already
Yeah I've been seeing a few videos on Lossless Scaling, gotta respect those devs, while not as good as FSR FG or DLSS FG, it is neat
Part of me is also glad that 50 series wasn't a gigantic improvement because my 3080 to got resale value still then
yeah that card is made for 4k+
NEED a 9800x3d for that thing lol
at lower res anyway
Gonna be using a 7950x3d for it probably. If I bottleneck it a bit oh well. Need the cores and 5090 for image ai models
Gonna make those training so short
yeah it's only around 25%ish to 30%+ up to 40% in some cases, will likely increase as drivers come out and optimizations for games etc
biggest gains at 4k ofc
What res you playing it on?
4k but go down to 1440p for some of the big games like stalker 2
I will bring out my 720p TV show it a true bottleneck
Oh definitely. Had an option of local or cloud. Local will stay winning will never do compute on the cloud
4090 was a different beast
60% increase to performance and no price increase
That was thanks to the clock increase almost a doubling
Also I think 50 series will show it's true strength later after it's features get implemented
What
AI is already deeply integrated into many aspects of our daily lives, including our smartphones, social media, navigation apps, digital assistants like Siri and Alexa, smart home devices, online shopping recommendations, email spam filters, and even facial recognition technology, meaning we interact with AI on a regular basis without always realizing it; essentially, AI is present in many of the digital tools we use frequently.
It's not gonna kill you if it's used in a video game
Is that ripped from ChatGPT?
I think u are confusing 2 different things. There are algorithms and AI.
Only I can use AI for cooking I don’t use it.
And most people I know don’t use AI daily. Maybe most I know are now counting as Stone Age people 🤷.
I use AI but I don’t need it everywhere
Nothing AI about email spam filters
AI have become new buzzword crypto use to be
And drives people just as crazy
Didn't confuse anything but sure
Yeah sure "ai"
Recommend you guys watch The Social Dilemma documentary
Nothing i dont know. But aint that against AI?
Even worst when using AI that Imitates as a Person on social media. So you will have AI that imitates a User like commend and such. Crazy world.
has anyone tried dlss4 in s2? results?
Sure we destroyed the planet with GPU server farms running the algoryms but for one brief moment we allowed the ai bros to extract maximum value from the market before it popped. Halcion days
Big neural nets. Still falls under artificial intelligence.
i been sayin it and nvidia sayin it. Raster performance is not an (end all be all) anymore. nvidia's last Raster focused card was the 1080ti. then DLSS came along in the 20 series rtx cards.
Hey guys, any of you guys can recommend the best Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 9 series for Stalker 2 much appreciated thanks guys
The best is 9800X3D
fun fact....get more fps in stalker 2 than allan wake 2 ♿
any x3d chip will be best but 9800x3d is top
at least you can play 4k with 5090...60fps 
yeah ofcourse when you pair it with a 12100f
i5-2500k
I am gonna pair it with a xeon 2670 v3
I've got myself a RTX 4070 super lately, whats with the massive FPS drops every once in a while?
Drops from 50-60 to 10-20
So far i've noticed that happened at Pripyat and Sidorovich
game is poorly optimised, it's worse when near many npcs
Ye its clear that its poorly optimised, but im not even near many npcs. In fact, there aint any chaos at all, nothing is happening, im just standing in front of a single NPC and the Fps drops to like 20
does it fix when you restart?
if so thats just a bug, im on a 4080 s and still get the occational bug where it becomes a slideshow but a restart instantly fixes it
though i rarely get frame drops or anything
even on maxed out settings
Reason: Bad word usage
tbf though with a 4080s, 9700x and enough ram for a third of the game files i would not expect frame drops. though the memory leak in rostok has been a pain in the butt still, even with 64 gigs.
sometimes it does when i just press ESC, Sometimes it doesn't
I've got myself some mod from nexus thats supposed to help, we'll see how it'll be from now on
well tbh im just glad that i have the 4070 now and i can actually enjoy the game, not like before with the 1650. I've played about 100 hours with only 20fps
oof yeah, i had savings laying around and built this pc with this game in mind.
Yeah same, if it weren't for Stalkeh, i wouldn't upgrade my PC Anytime soon haha
i had a 2070s and thought that was too little tbh
cyberpunk ate that card for breakfast
tbf the 20 series was kinda terrible
Well, 1650 never failed me, but they weren't too high of settings either
yeah but the 16 series was pretty good, the 20 series was meh over all instantly surpassed by the 30 series basically which was a 70-80% increase in many ways
Well tbh i can't really say, im really green when it comes to PC components such as GPUs or CPUs, but if you say so
i can give you some advice! mind i open a dm?
I do not mind at all, sure go on
you will have to add me as you have unfriended messages off :p
On it
First RT generation. Is gonna suck ever 1st attempt is janky at best
Does this game run with RT always on? Like even on lowest settings? Then why AMD GPUs do so well in benchmarks, don't they suck at RT?
yes but its not using ray tracing cores afaik
that sounds extra silly
lumen is set to pure raster in this game
well from what I can tell, it runs better than hardware would
. maybe they'll add an option eventually
i would def like to try it since I have a 4070 Super
tho not super interested with how cpu demanding the game is rn anyway
regardless ill prob come back after sdk, all dlc is out and maybe just maybe it'll not get bottlenecked so badly just rendering the environment. empty ass wild territory absolutely slaughters my 5800x3d last i checked for example. goofy.
170 hours was def enough for now for me
Kinda Diff RT not working on HW so there is not problem with AMD
The game has software RT (SW lumen) which is why reflections look so poor when leaving the screenspace
Yeah man, I remember soon as loaded this game up and during that first cut scene every one of my 5700x3d cores was at like 70% I was like...uhhh ohh...ohhh no 😂
I don't know how long you've been on the AM4 platform but it's actually crazy as hell to think how long this platform has been around and technically EOL and AMD still gave us those X3Ds.. just one of the many reasons I support my boiz in Red, even if I do wanna take their GPU division and just shake the absolute**** outta them sometimes.
yeah my 5800x3d wasn't having a great time either
maybe in a year it'll have improved
Good avg fps, bad 1% lows
Scope look so blurry while using dlss
Tried DLSS4.. tbh i didnt see any difference. Ray recontruction looks awful to me
anyone noticed rendering problems when theyve manually changed their dlss version?
I have a 1600p screen (RTX4080 12GB Laptop, i9-14900HX) and tried the new DLSS4 forced with nVidia Profile Inspector. Game is upscaled to 4k with DLDSR and I used DLSS Balanced + FG -> around 10fps more and waaaaay better image quality
played around 150hours with DLSS Quality. Tried DLSS 4 and all i can say is I didn't see a difference. I'm on a 1440p Oled
Yeah not seeing anything incredible from 3.7 - 310.1.0.0 looks about the same and honestly I might like how 3.7 looks better, fps is near identical between the two. I’m sure when the S2 dev team releases their patch and dlss4 officially comes out we’ll see more from it.
dlss 4 is better on a fundamental level. model being better trained and the transformer style clearly does a better job. just hard to notice unless you are looking for it
it does do better with long distance objects. maybe i can finally see the glass anomaly before running straight through it
On paper maybe, i did side by side comparisons and didn't see that much of a difference.
Granted its not officially out, so I'm hoping between the S2 patch that's coming out and Nvidia's New driver/DLSS 4 release it'll look/preform alot better.
from what im seeing it does better with see through objects like cyberpunk huds and long distance objects. that was the main benefit
That might be true in cyberpunk, i was just talking about what im seeing in S2.
I mean as with most things, it’s subjective, we don’t all have the same eyes or look for the same things, or may not even know what to look for, so we’re all gonna have different opinions on DLSS4 and we all also have different PC setups and monitors. Lots of variables.
It’s the same thing with Frame Gen
i mean that's valid, i was more coming from with how hard Nvidia was selling DLSS 4 + the new 50 series i expected a night and day difference rather then what i was seeing.
the night and day difference is mainly frame rate dlss4 the transformer model might get updated again and better performance
Haven’t tried stalker 2 with dlss4 yet but cyberpunk there is a massive difference. Even at 1080p I can use performance mode and not really have any issues. Looks clean. Frame Gen also uses much less vram and latency was 3-5ms lower
Dlss4 performance looks like previous version dlss balanced in cyberpunk
Maybe little better actually since there is no ghosting or barely any artifacts. Some shimmer at long distances is all I noticed
glad they also made it 3 types not super performance,performance,balanded,quality and extreme quality. pretty dumb having 3 is what it should be
They have 3 only on stalker ?
Cyberpunk has DLAA, quality, balanced, performance & ultra performance
& DSR
yeah it used to be 5 different presets which wasn't needed
Like xess lol
Ultra quality - ultra performance
Xess actually looks good in cyberpunk (not like dlss but better than fsr) I wonder how good xess performs on Intel gpu or if it is same
it should perform and look better on intel GPUs BC on ARC cards it uses the XMX AI/ML pathway while everything else uses its DP4A pathway which both performs an looks worse
[in raster]
Has anyone tried dlss4 in s2?
Who are the guys that are saying like the 4070?? The XTX is even faster than 4070 in RT.
i have none of this
in some cases yes. but in things like PT no.
People have. Its an upgrade but not life-changing
I just hope they'll fix the stutters at some point
Its gonna happen just a matter of time really
game been out 2 months, they aint gonna be able to improve performance much more than this.
theres nothing they can do cuz : UE5
its UE5 afterall
they should have made the game in UE4. might not have looked as good but with everything people have to tone down for performance , would look the same anyway
There is. Just harder.
no really there is nothing they can do. need better hardware for UE5
they could, it'll just take far longer than 2 months for substantial changes
this version of ue5 is just ass
they could disable the world partition system🤷♂️
the cause off all UE5 stutters
You guys act like the ability to optimise on ue5 is the same as being able to go to a different galaxy this year. Also I don't think they are solely focused on performance as of now rather than bug fixes. Alot of the patch work was on bugs relating to quests etc.
patches 1.1.3 - 1.1.1 (crash fixes and save bugs)
and 1.1 patch according to patch notes as again focused on crashes and game breaking issues that wouldn't allow you to progress along with balancing
with a small part being on optimization. half of it relating to controllers
all ue5 games are hard to run. meh they can try. i dont see anything changing. just feel bad for lower end PC players needing to mod the hell out of it just to play it.
no cephus protocol is made on unreal engine 5 and it runs amazing on old hardware just wanting 2gb of vram. yeah the engine doesn't like old gpus but the gtx 10 series is 8 years old. now it is expected for a 8 year old gpu to be struggling or unable to run new games. happened to me when i got a 1060 my gpu was unable to run due to directx 12 incompatibility
im redownloading s2 to see if i get more than 125 fps in rostok Vanilla max settings w/ FG havent played it since december 19
what gpu?
4080s
i was able to get 120fps on 3080ti at 1440p med
i capped it tho to 60fps pre frame gen
im on 1440p...run the game on max. no ini file. no mods. just straight vanilla.
ill see if it changed...im curious
from what i hear is 60-80fps is what people tend to achieve
ya dlss and fg off thats what i get
dlaa i get 90-100 if i remember correctly
in rostok that is. i mention rostok because apparently at the time was a heavy place to be in
whats this i hear about hair detail hurts performance? or did i hear that from another game?
There’s plenty they can do, UE5 in itself isn’t that intensive to run, but the heavy utilization of Nanite and Lumen makes it so.
These tools run much better on UE5.4 compared to 5.1, and the best way to get the performance up would obviously be hand made LODs and baked light maps, but these would require a lot of time
yeah i looked into that...in order for them to migrate to UE5.5 would basically be a major overhaul
They would have to remake most of their assets, like Ready Or Not had to do with their switch from 5.1 to 5.4, but if it’s something they can do in the background over the next 6 months, it would be well worth the effort
RoN took about 2 months, considering the scale of S2, I wouldn’t expect to see that within the next 8-12 months however
shaders took 2 min 29 seconds. they improved that since
so yeah epic 1440p vanilla dlss+fg is 156 fps standing still in rostok and 115-130 running around. so basically nothing improved yet
i don't blame them for not cranking out optimization patches. makes sense game is in a state that it can be playable for a decent chunk of the player base. rather fix gameplay issues before optimizations.
Stalker 2 will have DLSS4 support on January 30th
so its not even in game yet. thought it was.
cyberpunk the only game running dlss 4 right now according to articles. other games getting it Jan 30.
it can be if you swap dll files
yeah no thanks lol... ima let the game update it properly
i just wanna test it out anyway . my days are in alan wake 2 these days
nvidia has a dll file in the game if you swap it then you get the updated version.
now im curious if the game itself has the nvidia model or is it stored seperatly and the dll just allows access
I'm sick of the visual bugs, they want us to use frame gen but it only causes the lighting load and visual bugs to last longer and be more annoying.
I hate UE5 it's unreal
UE5 looks great but it's very hard for it to be optimized. Even harder when a game on the scale of Stalker 2 is using it.
its jan 30th
if the future of gaming is entirely UE5 then I do not have high hopes
none of those performance mods on nexus work they're all placebo btw
Ninja Gaiden 2 Black is on Unreal Engine 5 and that runs a lot better than this game. But then again, it's a bit different from what Stalker 2 is. But even Robocop is one that I can play, but it does have the same issues as this game. I'd say NG2B is the one UE5 game I can actually run on my machine; AMD Ryzen 5 3600, GTX-1660 OC, 2x16 DDR4-3200.
not entirely UE5 but games are evolving for better graphics so. ya. UE5, Unity are 2 of the biggest players in the market
but all games should have a game menu to disable Ray Tracing for lower end rigs
I don't agree, the problem is not Unreal Engine 5 but how it was used. The engine is better than Unreal 4, but if you overuse technologies like Lumen and Nanite to save development time, these things happen.
Something about a craftsman and his tools
I'm not gonna pretend to know UE5 inside out, but from what I've been seeing the main issue seems to be developers not knowing how to best implement and optimise all the things the engine can offer, rather than the engine being inherently ass
got an 7900xtx + 7800x3d, been away for a month and just installed patch 1.1.3, game crashes without fail when compiling shaders, when I launch the game again, I get a message that the last shader warmup failed and a workaround is being used so I can play, game then launches but im getting input delays with this ''workaround'', anyone else?
at least unity games run at reasonable frames
I just think Stalker 2 is a good game held back by a horrible engine
the gameplay is great when the engine actually lets you play the game at more than 10 fps
thats just tarkov
but tbf the only unity engine games I play are scp secret lab and ravenfield
is there a known rostok memory leak?
pretty sure a memory leak is still active
Yes I believe there is a commonly experienced memory leak when you’re in Rostok that wasn’t patched last time I was there
MSI really need to make a meg GPU design black and gold design would be so sick
there's multiple, there's the rostok issue and then some people are still getting mem leaks after playing for an hour or less even outside rostok
I got 4800$ saved up and im ready to buy the new asus 5090 might be my last gpu with how good it looks
Out of about 30 hours I’ve played of stalker 2 I have had 3 times where my fps dropped to single digits and I had to restart to fix it. Other than that, the game runs okay enough. I’m easily pleased though. Long as I have 60+ fps and an alright looking game with a smooth experience I’m happy
Good luck getting your hands on one of those anytime soon. Unless you have some pull and/or are famous I guess. Anyway, hope you are able to get one
Well the msrp is only 2800$ so even if they get scalped ill be fine
I already have a 4090 and 3090 ti from asus in my pc
Lucky! lol I was stuck with a 1070 from 2016 to a couple months ago. I now have a 4060. Wish I could get at least a 4070. I really want a 5070. Been saving here and there when I can
Yea the 4090 was easy to get and didnt go out of stock as i thought it would
I guess ill have to take the 3090 out once i get the 5090 unless i can find a way to have 3 gpus
Sell it to make some of your money back 
I doubt many people are gonna buy the 3090 ti for much since the 5090 and 4090 are out
Try clearing your shader cache in the AMD driver
.
Idk who I was talking to before about my aio pump making crackling/trickling noises but it is doing it again. Seems like it happens sometimes after I get done with long gaming sessions. Not sure if it is something to be worried about or not since it is only 2 months old
need those patch notes
There was a patch?
no need that too
Jan 30th
sauce?
It might just include dlss4 but most likely it’s gonna be a big patch
But 100% gonna be a patch on Jan 30th
i am gonna be unresponsive if there isnt a patch on the 30th
Check #📜┃gsc-answers 
TODAY!? 
Hotfix, not a major patch. But still a hotfix.
holding my thumbs for the game to work a bit more stable, having issues with my inventory 😦
You can try leaning your tower forward and then backwards a bit, might simply be air bubbles trapped inside. As long as it’s cooling properly and you don’t hear the fans running loud you should be good
I can hear the trickling noise on mine on startup but it subsides after that
As long as it’s installed properly and you don’t hear the fans working harder than normal…you’re good.
well... Look at the jump the 4090 had over the 3090. Around ~60% in raster. 4090 to 5090 is like 30%
does anyone know what the deal is with devs not setting uplimits on shader caching? in this game and many others, my cpu overheats during it to the point my mobo is red lighting. but then gaming is completely normal temp
would love to know how to counteract that, still need some time before i get a new cooler
3090 to 4090 was almost with staying same price while the 5090 400$ Cost more.
I noticed it only happens for like 1-3 minutes after gaming for a few hours. Doesn’t do it other than that. And while under load my temps are fine like cpu rarely ever breaks 70 degrees. I think it is alright I just get worried easily 
Thanks for the advice
They repacked 4090s with new software installed and told us it is 5090 
Should called it 4090TIE
oh yeah. I forgot to mention that the 5090 is basically a 4090Ti. 30% more performance for 30% more money and 30% more power draw
its litetally only MFG that gives it some hype
I will never be able to afford an xx80 or xx90 gpu for a very long time anyway. The folks that got sent 5090 for testing and stuff seemed happy with it for the most part (I would be happy too if I got early access to thousands of dollars likely for free)
Dont get even that.
Nah most are saying Meh its a 4090TI
I like FG but the problem with these new games is that they stutter like a mf and FG won't help you when you drop to 20-30fps because of the lack of optimization
One guy put out a YouTube short saying the wholesale price for 100 5090s in bulk was $3,000 each…that’s $300,000
no way anyone other than large companies can afford that
I don't think so. There's plenty of people who can afford 300k. Especially in the US. The question is what connections they have to be able to hoard all that
Frame Gen is most useful when you have 60 maybe 50 base fps at least. Any lower and it isn’t ideal. Still playable I guess but not a good experience
Do you live in the US? You seem to be overestimating the average consumer/small time supplier here. No way anyone is shelling out $300k for just 100 gpu. They still have to buy all other parts to make prebuilts on top of that. They would be broke
And for $3000 each you aren’t selling them individually or you’ll be broke too. Either way you lose on that
Yea it sounds normal, Appreciate you!
FG is not bad. But its purpose is to make the game smooth. But 240FPS is overkill for Smoothing. And the Artefacts that come with it. Could get better but end it will never be "free" performance.
I will never get why to spend so much for Scalping
The artifacts and stuff really only happen when you have less than 60 base fps tbh
Do they even make a profit?
At least with the new updated dlss running
Idk a lot about scalpers but I can’t see them doing what they do if they didnt make any profit
Maybe they are the reason I had to pay nearly $1200 for my 1070 back in 2016
From nvidia themselves
1200 for GTX 1070??
Nah i saw videos from HUB and Vex and both where running 4X above 60FPS and had Artifacts. Ofc more FPS will help but then with that high FPS at some point just runn it native
😭
Where do you live? No way you pay as much as a Titan card
Yeah but it is Barely even noticeable unless you examine the image at least imo. Maybe it’s bc I play 1080p
This was when 1070 first launched or shortly after. I live in US
I was rich back then and didn’t know anything about pc parts
I have RTX 6969 to sell to you for only lowly price of 4000€
I got my 1070 for 330€ at launch day
I ordered directly from Nvidia website
There is absolutely no way
You mean with 4X? They where pretty obvious things. Well some times its not there, there are also scene that can really look off.
I still have to a box right here in my room it is nvidia GeForce model lol I swear I ordered directly from Nvidia site
They scammed you get your money back
Tad late for that lol
Yeah that was almost 9 years ago
So anyway the RTX 6969. The real deal straight from Nvidia themselfs
You where sure it was a Nvidia side not scam one? Like fake scalper side?
It was Nvidia site 100%
Gonna wait for the 6969 TIE SUper
Maybe I’m misremembering. May have been that price with the entire 960 prebuilt I had got shortly prior to installing 1070 into it lol
I mean type of person thats got too much money and i can help to make that wallet lighter
Bang for the buck with 20X FG only available for that only card
Moderate offense with that statement. 1200 for 1070 is just...
Shut up
Love you too 
I was Barely 18 years old and never had a computer before
Anyway, I’m broke and not so much of an idiot these days
Im 21 and have not even that much money 😦
Its even got the crappiest blower cooler
Paying 200 brand new for it was a bloody scam
It was a good card
Good card sure. Crap blower cooler
NGl but the 20 Series had the best Looking GPUs. Not good at cooling but looking ✅
Yeah 1070 always ran hot but still lasted almost a decade. Well it still works fine actually
Just dusty and I can’t take it apart to clean it
Did not run hot when you had proper AiB
I had 1 fan in my case in that pc. Plus 1 cpu fan and then the 1 gpu fan lol
Which is why those old reference cards were a bloody scam since only use for those was to get waterblock for it
Plus multiple ppl smoking multiple things in the houses I lived so it got gunked up I’m sure. I never had tools to open gpu to clean it properly. Only could clean fan part
I really like how simple the lower end palit cards look
Watercooling is insane cool. It looks good and sleek as long you are doing it right.
Gets expensive quite fast tbh
The Cp77 version of the card is also a good one. Man the 20 series was shit but it was least best in looks
- if you are lazy the maintenance is going to be pain
I just noticed there was patch just a little bit ago
Yea but i am not lazy luckly but broke when comes to buying that thing.
Mostly just blocks and pump that cost ye pretty penny
And if you really insist making stuff unsellable and pain you use pastel color dyes
Isn’t the 2080ti one of the better cards still
And was a beast back in its day
Yeah its a tiny hotfix for the shader compilation error and rostok's crashes
The 2080ti is hard to find now anyways
You mean the 1080TI the 2080TI was good but cost much more than the gen before and RT was not a thing back then. Now you cant even use that for RT.
Maybe it was 2070 super idk one of the 20 series I always hear about and it is still good to this day
Early adopters getting shafted yet again lol
I saw some 2080tis really cheap last year
There is a refurbished 2080ti on Amazon for $350 still right now
Overpriced
2080TI but cost is in the used marked to high.
like all old card that where high end back then
Was 280$ on marketplace last time i checked
Marketplace? Like Facebook?
On my place i found really good deal for 250
Yeah, i check there every couple of months
Screw that if I get ripped off by someone on Facebook I’ll hunt them down 😂
300-250 range really good now. Guess all the usere are selling that thing now
2080ti around 250 here used
There were also a lot ofs rx 5700xts for 200 bucks each one
Aint the 3080 Same performance as the 2080TIß
3080 performs better
Put one in one of my build for 120 was good deal
Yea the 2080TI is more a 4060TI
I saw 16gb 4060ti for $550 at Best Buy..isn’t that like same price as 4070 super or 4070
What the hell
40 series price is bloated now that they quit making those 6 months ago
Same price as 4070 MSRP
How much was 4060ti 16gb at launch? $550?
lol I just bought a 3080Ti like 3 weeks ago for $300 CAD ($200 USD)
The 60TI was even before bloated with +400$ cost
Think its MSRP was 500
There is 8gb and 16gb 4060ti tho
Lots of deals right now on used 20 & 30 series cards right now if you know where to look or can do a GPU swap
8gb 400 and 16Gb 500 so bad deal either way
Dont buy a 8gb 4060ti
Even the 16Gb 4060 doesn’t perform like a 16GB card fwiw
I already have 8gb 4060 no way I’m buying anything less than xx70. But I doubt I’ll even be able to afford that for awhile anyway
I legit looked for 3 years consistently looking for a good deal on a card, you can afford them, but you just have to be patient
60 tier are the new bait
50 used the be the bait
Yeah, I agree, anything less than a 70 series you are wasting your time
Maybe i am gonna make new PC flip? Could be good now.
Too bad retailers here rarely even sell GPU's on discount. At best its like 20€ off lol
New GPU’s don’t go on sale
Use to
PC flipping is the new economy now
Yeah not anymore, GPU’s in too high demand these days
Nah not really demand more like margins are too low and retailers dont want to take the hit
That too, but it is demand. The problem is that chip manufactures are allocating most of their dies for enterprise these days
That launch mania calms down soon enough
👍🏼 Yea with Nvidia having this gen even less at the start.
The margin on 30-40 series are quite high for both the manufacturer and the AIB’s, the new 50 series not so much. Retailers don’t need to drop price because they know people will buy them, but they also need to be approved by the manufacturer (retailer receives rebate)
So EVGA dropped GPU's for fun?
EVGA is not even there now 😦 Kingpin also gone
If margins were there EVGA would still do GPU's
And would not have been complaining since GTX 10 series about it
Evga is only one manufacture
I mean that’s like thinking that your going to get a 5070 for $549
It will be $749 after the AIB markup, and all Nvidia really does is send a BOM, there isn’t much cost for AIB’s
And Nvidia is still going to be selling that for $549 at profit (thought again this Gen due to GDRR7 will be smaller)
I would rather play lottery then hope to get it for 550$
Correct
Thats gonna be for a hole year so and till then i bet Nvidia get the "Super" series out.
Is there even going to be 5060?
5060 was on the leaks
This is the whole reason why retailers can’t sell 9000 cards, AMD was selling their cards to retailers for like $700-800, and now all the retailers are pissed and won’t sell them until they receive rebates from AMD
Cause they literally cannot sell their cards at those costs (Nvidia actually being competitive on pricing for once)
Leaks say there is one but i could be also that they abandon that low end with AMDs APUs Supposed to be as good as a 4070.
apparently stock is at stores is software problems.
if they did it would'a been a broken mess
How big was the update for people on Steam? I didn't realize it had already patched (I was away). Some are saying 13gb? Is that true? So far, shader compile freeze seems to have been fixed (at least for me). This was a hotfix, so that's why I was surprised in Steam discussion of the patch that some were saying 13gb!
yeah. this is just how they launch. 90 and 80 class first then 70 class and closer to march for 60 and lower
Yep 13 gb
My Microcenter is telling us already not to get too excited. Stock will not be good.
margins aren't good from what they are saying "its like charity" this is probably due to tsmc having insane costs for producing chips
Though DLSS Transformer has all but quelled any excitement for I had for 5090.
That came out wrong. What I meant was I'm not even thinking about it anymore.
If I can move to DLSS Performance in all titles where I used to run Quality and not be able to tell (LIke is the case with Cyberpunk in my testing), I'll be a happy camper and keep my $2000+.
going to the 50series isn't worth it to 40 series owners but it is a good upgrade for 30 series or older
next patch when! lol
....
I dont feel it's worth it if you have a 40 series, 30 series...sure
Nivida banks off of FOMO
Me going from 3080ti it's around double the performance.
I live knowing some of you boys here has higher 1440p fps average on a 7800xt and 9800x3d than I do with my 7900xtx and Ryzen 7900
I think this new generation is the least worth upgrading to in all of history.
How much are you getting?
80 fps in 1440p
Native?
I should have gone with 4k 240hz oled instead of the 1440p 360hz oled.
Biggest blunder of my life

That's because the FPS rate is situational. Many people claim they get 120 FPS because they're in an open field. It's hard to calculate the average frame rate in Stalker 2.
Lmao
I went with a 144 VA panel for a multitude of reasons, but I got between 70-90 native at 3440x1440, the lower end being in Rostok on a 13700K, now between 85-105 native on a 9800X3D
I think it's the same as with 2K to 4K—there isn't that much of a difference. It's the same with FPS
Okay, let’s talk a common point, in Rostok I get 70 fps
That’s true most game doesn’t scale higher than 100 fps I think.
Same for helldivers 2
i have 77 whit a 4080
I think we might be more cpu limited in situations like rostok
I’m surprised the game doesn’t offer much hyper threading like Cyberpunk2077 does
Your graphics aren’t the problem, just don’t worry too much
Well, visual fidelity is… 2k doesn’t serve me particularly well
A VA panel? What are you? A devil?
My performance improved by changing the processor, but not by much, it's CPU demanding. But until they optimize the LODs, the fact that it loads things that are underground, and how terribly Lumen works, we’ll have to wait.
Flight simmer and occasional editor, so I like true colors
And the panel is a solid 3/4 years old now
I just needed that "push" to make it seem worthwhile to not cash in while I can get the most back. Problem with buying the highest end thing is only the next highest end thing will be faster. So either you just trade up every two years or you skip a generation or two. DLSS Transformer's performance in... Performance mode at 4K was that kick I needed.
That’s a nice jump and you can keep that 3080 as a backup or build a 2nd pc if you stream
Going from 20 series to 40 series is on the biggest jumps we had in that little of time. It's gonna get smaller and smaller of bumps
Gonna sell it to fund a epyc server
My next upgrade won’t be until the 60 series and then I’ll jump to AM5
I would wait for Zen 6 which would be a good deal or make prior gens really cheap. Gonna be high core count
Two years from today, we'll be heavily talking about AM6 and Zen7.
Right now, if I upgrade from a 4080 to a 5080, it would be like buying the Ti version. Like 8 % maybe
Nah zen 6 no am6 yet. 2026-2027 for zen 6 launch
They are selling us a 8 cores cpu for 480 United States Dollars
what
9800X3D
Zen6 on AM5 but we'll know a lot more about AM6 in two years from now.
Zen 6 is planning to be 12 core CCDs so a Ryzen 7 will be at 12 and top of the line 24
